ABORTIONISTS SUE TO STOP TEXAS FROM REQUIRING BURIAL, CREMATION OF ABORTED BABIES

ABORTIONISTS SUE TO STOP TEXAS FROM REQUIRING BURIAL, CREMATION OF ABORTED BABIES
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 AUSTIN — A coalition of abortion providers have 
filed suit in an effort to stop Texas officials from requiring that they
 bury or cremate the bodies of the unborn children they kill instead of 
having them incinerated with medical waste and dumped in landfills.

“The regulation enshrines into law an exceedingly narrow set of
beliefs regarding embryonic and fetal personhood, and what is
appropriate for the disposition of embryonic and fetal tissue,” the lawsuit,
filed on Monday, asserts. “These views do not reflect the diversity of
views people hold about when human life begins and about the proper
disposition of bodies.”

As previously reported, the rule, requested by Gov. Greg Abbott, is set to take effect on Dec. 19.

“Governor Abbott believes human and fetal remains should not be
treated like medical waste, and the proposed rule changes affirms the
value and dignity of all life,” spokesperson Ciara Matthews said in a
statement in July when the proposal was first announced. “For the
unborn, the mothers and the hospital and clinic staff, the governor
believes it is imperative to establish higher standards that reflect our
respect for the sanctity of life.”

Abortion facilities customarily contract with third party medical
waste companies to dispose of the aborted babies, which are usually
classified as “pathological waste.” The containers of aborted babies,
mixed in with boxes of bodily fluids, tissues and other items that are
not permitted to be thrown in the trash, are then transported to an
incineration plant where they are burned into ash and then dumped into
landfills.

However, current Texas law also allows for other types of disposal,
including “grinding and discharging to a sanitary sewer system,”
“chlorine disinfection/maceration followed by deposition in a sanitary
landfill” or other “approved alternate treatment process, provided that
the process renders the item as unrecognizable, followed by deposition
in a sanitary landfill.”

The new law will now mandate that abortionists utilize services provided by funeral homes rather than medical waste companies.

Therefore, several abortion facilities are seeking to put a stop to
the requirement, with Whole Woman’s Health, Brookside Women’s Medical
Center, Austin Women’s Health Center, Alamo Women’s Reproductive
Services, and others filing suit. As previously reported, the medical waste company Stericycle was fined $42,000 in 2011 for dumping fetal remains from Whole Woman’s Health with household and commercial trash.

“It imposes a funeral ritual on women who have a miscarriage
management procedure, ectopic pregnancy surgery, or an abortion,” the
legal challenge, filed in part by the New York-based Center for
Reproductive Rights, reads. “It also forces healthcare providers to work
with an extremely limited number of third-party vendors for burial or
scattering ashes, threatening abortion clinics’ provision of care and
their long-term ability to remain open, as well as cost increases for
women seeking pregnancy-related medical care.”

It also asserts that the plaintiffs aren’t aware of any burial or
cremation service that isn’t more expensive than using a medical waste
disposal service, and that the rule will make women feel shame and guilt
over ending the life of their unborn child.

“By depriving women of the moral agency to act in accordance with
their own views about personhood, the regulation deprives women of
dignity,” the suit states. “The regulation’s imposition onto women’s
autonomy and invasion of their privacy will also harm women spiritually
and emotionally, causing trauma, guilt, shame, anger, and
feelings of exploitation and violation.”

The abortion providers are therefore seeking an injunction, as well as a declaration that the rule is unconstitutional.

“Governor Abbott believes human and fetal remains should not be
treated like medical waste, and the proposed rule changes affirms the
value and dignity of all life,” Matthews said on Monday in response to
the suit. “For the unborn, the mothers and the hospital and clinic
staff, the governor believes it is imperative to establish higher
standards that reflect our respect for the sanctity of life.”

Abortion is Murder from I’ll Be Honest on Vimeo.

“PALESTINIAN” & LEFTIST “ACTIVISTS” ATTEMPT TO INDOCTRINATE ITHACA, NEW YORK THIRD GRADERS INTO HATING ISRAEL

“PALESTINIAN” & LEFTIST “ACTIVISTS” ATTEMPT TO INDOCTRINATE ITHACA, NEW YORK THIRD GRADERS INTO HATING ISRAEL
BY PAMELA GELLER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Palestinian Lies and Myths: Jihad and Jew Hatred
 

The ghouls of the Obama-era Left leave no stone unturned in
demonizing the Jews and indoctrinating children into the hating of the
good for being the good.

This is analogous to the “Palestinian” indoctrination of children:
they teach them at the youngest ages to hate Israel and want to kill
Jews. And now the same thing has come to Ithaca, New York.

“VIDEO: Activists manipulate third-graders into hating Israel,” by William A. Jacobson, Legal Insurrection, December 11, 2016 (thanks to Armaros):

Ithaca (NY) third grade event shows how anti-Israel indoctrination has moved into elementary schools.

Anti-Israel activism by faculty at colleges and universities receives
a lot of media attention in part because campuses generally are open to
the public and college students are able to report on what happens.

Faculty-inspired anti-Israel activism, however, is not limited to
colleges and universities. I hear many parents and students complain
that by the time many students reach college, they already have been
turned against Israel.

Far under the radar, the attempt to demonize Israel is moving down
the educational chain even into elementary schools, pushed by activists
who accept no boundaries even for young children. Yet because such
activities take place in schools to which access is limited, and the
young students are not developmentally able to report on what happens,
it’s rare to obtain hard visual proof.

We have such proof.

On Friday morning, September 18, 2015, the third grade classes at the
Beverly J. Martin School in Ithaca, NY, heard a presentation on “human
rights” by Palestinian activist Bassem Tamimi and local anti-Israel activists, led by Ariel Gold. We broke the story a couple of days later, Anti-Israel activism hits elementary school in Ithaca, NY.

Based on documents produced pursuant to a NY Freedom of Information
Law (FOIL) request and court rulings, previously we were able to
document that the Tamimi event was an anti-Israel propaganda event. At
least one third-grade student suffered nightmares and a Letter of Reprimand was issued to the school principal for attempting to cover-up the nature of the event.

Previously, though, we didn’t have any video of the Tamimi Event,
just the paper and electronic record of communications. While that paper
and electronic record was shocking, only video could fully convey what
happened.

After over a year of investigation and litigation, including a court order
under the NY Freedom of Information Law, Legal Insurrection has
obtained a partial video of the Tamimi Event. That partial video shows
how, after the main portion of the presentation was over (for which
there is almost no video), the third-grade students expressed strong
hostility to Israel and were encouraged to do so.

That video, which has been blurred and bleeped to protect student
identities, is embedded in its entirety below. As bad as I expected it
to be, it was worse. I was shaken as I watched the manipulation of these
8 and 9 year olds in a public school.

This video, and the Tamimi event, should serve as a clarion call.

The Attempt to Portray the Tamimi Event as Loving

On Sunday night, September 20, 2015, Legal Insurrection broke the story, Anti-Israel activism hits elementary school in Ithaca, NY.

Because of Tamimi’s notoriety for exploiting children
in videotaped confrontations with Israeli soldiers, Tamimi’s mere
appearance in a third grade class raised suspicions about the event. The
Tamimis are best known for the 2012 video
of daughter Ahed confronting Israeli soldiers for the cameras, for
which she received an award from then Turkish Prime Minister (and
current President) Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

Subsequent to the Ithaca third-grade event, Tamimi was barred from entry to the U.S.

Gold is an Ithaca-based anti-Israel activist who now works for Code Pink. She is best known for generating publicity through disrupting speeches and events, and even prayers at the Western Wall. Gold uses her own children in her anti-Israel activism.

Gold, who was Tamimi’s national tour coordinator, arranged the Tamimi
event at the elementary school. The discussion was guided by teacher
Brooke Burnett, a friend of Gold, and partially filmed by Mary Anne
Grady Flores, another Ithaca activist who is friends with Gold and
Burnett.

[Bassem Tamimi and Mary Anne Grady Flores at Beverly J. Martin Elementary School][Image via Ariel Gold Facebook]

[Bassem Tamimi and Mary Anne Grady Flores at Beverly J. Martin Elementary School][Image via Ariel Gold Facebook]

Gold has attempted to describe the Tamimi event as loving and
promoting peace, even the call for the school children to become
“freedom fighters for Palestine”:

Tamimi also defended the event:

Initially, the principal of the elementary school, Susan Eschbach,
also attempted to downplay the significance of the Tamimi event. In a
September 22, 2015, statement to the school community Eschbach denied
there was anything improper. The statement provided, in pertinent part (full text here):

Responding to the concerns about Tamimi’s arrival at BJM….

There were many adults present in the class and at no time was there
an anti-Israel, anti-Palestine, anti-Jewish, or anti-Muslim stance. The
children took away from this experience several messages .”I can be an
ambassador for peace.” “ You can make friends across borders and that is
a good thing.” “Children want the option to live peacefully and to go
to school. Children can help stand for these desires.” “Everyone should
work things out to live together.” And “love will make peace, not hate.”
The children had meaningful, relevant, and appropriate conversations.

Superintendent: Politically Skewed, Inflammatory, and Not “Developmentally Appropriate”

The statement from Eschbach to the community was rebutted, in
substance, when Superintendent of the Ithaca City School District
(ICSD), Dr. Luvelle Brown, later released a statement denouncing the
event, Superintendent: Third Grade event “politically skewed, inflammatory” against Israel.

The Superintendent’s statement provided, in part (emphasis added):

… The assumed purpose of the talk was to focus on human rights and peace. Upon further investigation, we have learned that the speakers went beyond the original intent of the talk. Additionally, school administration was not informed beforehand of the invitation to include one of the speakers.

The following statements are some of the most egregious examples from the presentation:

● At the beginning of the session, the speakers showed a brief video
of a young Palestinian girl who references Israelis killing
Palestinians;

●There was an indication by the speakers that Israel has broken many
United Nations’ laws and that Israel controls all of the resources of
the geographic area;

● In a closing statement of how students could help, a speaker spoke
of solidarity and being freedom fighters for Palestine; to bring peace
and protect the future of their children.

The Ithaca City School District’s position is that such statements are not
developmentally appropriate for third graders, nor aligned with the New
York State standards. The statements were politically skewed,
inflammatory, and not endorsed by the Ithaca City School District
.

… We recognize that the Israeli Palestinian conflict is very
sensitive to many members of our community. We also recognize that this
delicate topic was not presented in a manner consistent with its
importance. We sincerely regret that this has occurred.

Jewish Voice for Peace,
in which Gold is active, started a petition drive asserting that
criticism of the Tamimi event was an attempt to stifle Palestinian
voices, and 31 parents at the Beverly J. Martin school (it’s unclear if
any had children in the class), led by Ithaca College Park School of
Communications employee Nicole Koschmann, submitted a letter to the
editor of the Ithaca Journal, Teachers know best about school speakers, defending the Tamimi event:

We, 31 Beverly J. Martin Elementary School parents, are
writing in regards to recent news regarding the Palestinian human-rights
activist visit at BJM on Sept. 18….

We parents believe teachers are the professionals in their field
regarding the developmental stages of their students, what is
appropriate, and what relates to the standards that need to be taught.
They are trained in this. Law professors at Cornell University do not
have this expertise. Political activists do not have this expertise.
This knowledge lies with teachers and their principal….

The reactionary swell created outside of BJM as a result of this
event is especially shameful when one considers the amount of resources
the teachers and administrators have had to divert from their job of
educating our children.

Our children were not preyed or imposed upon by the visitors that
day. Instead, they were exposed to a perspective and a situation.

The conversation will continue at school and at home. We are not
afraid of differing opinions. In fact, teaching students to disagree
respectfully, and with patience and compassion, is one of the key
elements of teaching human rights. Unfortunately, this is not a lesson
many adults have learned.

IRAN’S DEFENSE MINISTER: TRUMP COULD TRIGGER “WORLD WAR” AND “DESTRUCTION” OF ISRAEL IF HE PROVOKES IRAN

 
IRAN’S DEFENSE MINISTER: TRUMP COULD TRIGGER “WORLD WAR” AND “DESTRUCTION” OF ISRAEL 
IF HE PROVOKES IRAN
BY ROBERT SPENCER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
And what is on the horizon if Trump doesn’t tear up the deal and lets the Islamic Republic 
of Iran proceed on course? World war and the destruction of Israel.
 

“Trump’s Iran stance could threaten a WORLD WAR and the destruction
of Israel, warns Tehran as it cautions the Donald against ‘provoking’
them in the Middle East,” by Thomas Burrows, MailOnline, December 11, 2016:

The Iranian defense minister has warned that Donald Trump
could trigger a world war and the ‘destruction’ of Israel and small
Gulf Arab states if he provokes the Middle Eastern power.

Trump’s election victory has raised the prospect the US will pull out of the nuclear pact signed by Barack Obama last year.

During his campaign, Trump was strongly critical of the agreement
that saw Iran agree to limits on its nuclear program in exchange for the
lifting of international sanctions on its oil industry and finances.

In September 2015, the billionaire told a crowd: ‘Any
commander-in-chief worthy of defending this nation should be prepared to
stand up on 20 January 2017 [inauguration day] and rip to shreds this
catastrophic deal.’

He also called the deal a ‘disaster’ and ‘the worst deal ever negotiated’.

This has led to panic among US allies in the Gulf, Iranian Defense Minister Hossein Dehghan has claimed.

‘Even though a businessman, the assistants that … (Trump) has chosen
may map a different path for him, and this has led to unease,
particularly among Persian Gulf countries,’ Dehghan told a security
conference in Tehran, according to Iran’s Mehr news agency.

‘Considering Trump’s character and that he measures the cost of
everything in dollars, it does not seem likely that he would take strong
action against our country,’ he said.

‘Enemies may want to impose a war on us based on false calculations
and only taking into consideration their material capabilities…

‘Such a war would mean the destruction of the Zionist regime (Israel)
… and will engulf the whole region and could lead to a world war,’ Mehr
quoted Dehghan as saying.

‘Among other consequences of the war, would be the destruction of the
city-states on the southern shore of the Persian Gulf, because they
lack popular support,’ Dehghan said, referring to small Western-allied
Gulf states such as the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Qatar.

However Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been a
fierce critic of the agreement, hoped he could work with Trump to
dismantle the deal.

He said: ‘I know Donald Trump. And I think his attitude, his support
for Israel is clear. He feels very warmly about the Jewish state, about
the Jewish people.’

Pressed on what those options might be, Netanyahu said he had ‘about five things in my mind’, but did not elaborate….

 
 

BUNDY: A TRUE STORY MADE FROM PRISON!

BUNDY: A TRUE STORY MADE FROM PRISON! 
BY GAVIN SEIM
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

This is a true story about one of Americas most courageous families.

Controversy is state I’ve learned to live with, a badge of honor that
often stings. It’s a badge the Bundy family possesses in abundance,
because you stand up, you will always be attacked. My brother and I
stood with the Bundy’s in 2014; we saw the truth and we felt the danger.
When Oregon happened there was no question in our minds that these men
and woman deserved the support of all who love liberty. Their message
was pure. But much of America did not feel the same. Why?

Like many activists and prisoners, from patriots to the natives. The
hate for the Bundy’s comes from lies who’s intent is to make the story
of a warrior misunderstood.  Our “justice” system goes to great lengths
to ensure the real story does not reach the masses. This works because
we don’t really want to know how bad it is. That’s why it’s important to
share a story no matter how you feel about a person. Watch it and make
sure others do the same, sending it to those who know and to those who
do not.

People often say, there’s nothing we can do. But I do something every
day and if you will set aside differences and do something with me, we
will set this nation free.

Many don’t know that these men are still in
prison. That they are abused and even tortured by prison staff,
disregarded by judges and lied about in media propaganda. This is not a
story of privileged white ranchers. This is a story about every falsely
imprisoned man and woman, black or white, Christian or Muslim, liberal
or conservative. A story about the way they suffer every day.

This is HD version that includes all 3 parts. I’ll want to share a
little of how it happened, but more importantly I want you do to
something. Any of you can make a video, show up somewhere, call a
prison, support the suffering or interrupt a meeting of entitled
politicians to speak the truth. It’s what America was built on.

When Ammon Bundy asked me to record this story for the world, I knew
it was important. Ammon had been working for some time on articulating
the real story of his family and those who stood with them. It needed to
be open, honest and brief. As always, Ammon had the words, we just
needed to do something with them. I figured I would add some stills and
video and we’ll push it out. Once I realized what Ammon had poured into
this message, I saw a real documentary of Americas darkest times. What
resulted took the last three months to finish.

Sound comes first so I setup the call in over my computer versus
cellular because quality is a problem. Even at that it took a lot of
post production to get the final sound, which still sounds like a phone,
but not like a the bad jail phone that it is. We had to work to try and
restore some of the richness to his voice, but you still know that it’s
coming coming a cement prison.

At times Ammon was frustrated, distracted by jail noise, reading on
scribbles notes on top of notes. I have been on the inside trying to get
a messages out from a jail; it is utterly exhausting in way that you
can only know by being there. But Ammon just kept calling back until we
had it all.

Next came video. We needed the story and we needed footage to match
the story. The Bundy’s and others had clips of critical moments, but
there had to be more, so my family and I went to Nevada and camped out
for days trying to capture the essence of the ranch. The crowning moment
of that was the last evening, the one where you see the Bundy cowboys
riding off into the Sunset  and the birds flying over the Virgin river.
It my 20 years of filming I have never had a shot like those birds. I
was glad Carol pushed the boys to saddle up and me to break out the
cameras again that final night.

Then came the hard part. As I reviewed the project I realized how
much was required and we started collecting more photos, more footage
and more of the key bits that took this from a phone call to a full
documentary that we had to mix around with work at my Studio that pays the bills.

Fine tuning a project of this scale and then laying in a good
soundtrack takes time. Sometimes people complain about the music in a
video, but it’s essential to the emotion of a story because it coneys in
part what you lack in the story by not being there. I was at Bundy
ranch, I know what it felt like, but many do not and that has to be told
not only with words but with sound in order to even partially convey
the truth of it.

This is not just a story about the Bundy’s. It’s the story of the
struggle every man woman and child in America must face. Freedom, or
slavery. I think the finished result is beautiful. I’m always amazed by
how well Ammon speaks and even though he could not be here in person,
together we managed to defy the evil of our court system in a small way
and make a story for the world that is brief, compelling and most of
all, the truth.

Thanks for for spreading this message.You can share or embed the
video and if you need to you can download and re-post it so long as it’s
not being sold or used for profit.

If you want to contribute my my work and expenses visit my donation page. To donate to the Bundy family go here.
___________________________________________________

Cliven Bundy And The Truth About 

The Bundy Family History.

CLIVEN BUNDY’S DAUGHTER: MY FAMILY IS BEING TREATED LIKE RAPISTS/MURDERERS.


BLASPHEMOUS NOVEL “THE SHACK” TO BE RELEASED AS FILM FEATURING GOD AS WOMAN; MUSIC FROM HILLSONG UNITED

 
BLASPHEMOUS NOVEL “THE SHACK” TO BE RELEASED AS FILM FEATURING GOD AS WOMAN; 
MUSIC FROM HILLSONG UNITED 
BY HEATHER CLARK
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Concerns are being raised as the popular and blasphemous novel “The 
Shack” will be released as a film in 2017—a book that portrays God the 
Father as a woman, and that some say unbiblically teaches universalism.

William P. Young’s 2007 novel is stated to have sold approximately 20
million copies and has been translated into 39 languages. In 2013,
Lionsgate Entertainment obtained the rights to turn the book into a
film, which is now scheduled to be released in March 2017 and is
currently being promoted nationwide.
“The Shack” tells the story of a man named Mackenzie “Mack” Phillips
who faces a crisis while on a family vacation as his youngest daughter
Missy is abducted and presumably killed in an abandoned shack. Years
later, the grieving father receives a note from “Papa,” who
tells Phillips that it has “been a while” and to meet up at the shack
the following weekend.
Reluctantly, Phillips returns to the site, where he meets the
Godhead, portrayed as what Young called a “fat black woman,” another
young woman named Sarayu, and a carpenter named Jesus, who seek to help
him deal with his faltering faith and to learn to forgive.

The film features Octavia Spencer as “Papa,” who is asked blatantly
by Phillips, played by Sam Worthington, “Where were you when I needed
you?”
“I never left you. I never left Missy,” she replies with tears.
Sumire Matsubara, a young Asian woman, plays the Holy Spirit, portrayed in the book as Sarayu.

Spencer told reporters prior to the film’s production, “[P]eople have
to remember it’s a manifestation of God—how [the film subject] sees
God—not necessarily how or who or what God is.”
In addition to music from country stars Tim McGraw and Faith Hill,
Lady Antebellum, Brett Eldredge and Dierk Bentley, the film also
features songs from Christian-identified groups Hillsong United and
NeedtoBreathe.
But some have expressed concern not only over the portrayals in “The
Shack,” but also the numerous messages that they state are
unbiblical. James De Young, a professor of New Testament Language and
Literature at Western Seminary in Oregon, wrote a book entitled “Burning
Down the Shack: How the ‘Christian’ Bestseller is Deceiving Millions.”
“A relationship with God comes only by personal trust or faith placed
in Jesus Christ,” he told WND. “For the book to ignore this core of
faith is to propound another and different gospel to that of Jesus and
the Apostles. It is the heart of the gospel, but it is ignored in the
heresy of universal salvation.”
De Young said that in “The Shack,” “ultimately there’s no divine
Savior and Lord, because if people including the devil and his angels
get into Heaven, there’s no cross left to preach.”
“If we cast off the uniqueness of the gospel message, then God is
relegated to an understanding of a deity of our own creation,” he
stated.
Others have also noted that “The Shack” suggests that God is all love
and no justice, and will never judge men for their sins, nor will any
be tormented eternally in Hell.
“I can already imagine ‘The Shack’ Bible studies, sermon series, and
of course the social media hype, not to mention busloads of small groups
fellowshipping and praising ‘Papa’ for another opportunity to share
Jesus. But which Jesus?” asked Amy Spreeman of Berean Research.

 ________________________________________________________
 OCTAVIA SPENCER PLAYS GOD (BUT NOT THE GOD OF THE BIBLE):
 The Shack: Its Dangerous Theology and Error 
(Full Documentary Film)

THE SHACK: Exposing Its Dangerous Heresies (Iron Sharpens Iron Radio Interview)

________________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT THE SHACK & THOSE PROMOTING IT AND OTHER SOURCES; THESE ARE JUST TWO:

SEE ALSO: https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/2017/02/18/christians
-falling-for-the-shack-must-get-back-to-the-word-of-god/

MACY’S NO LONGER DONATING TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD THROUGH EMPLOYEE MATCHING GIFT PROGRAM

 
MACY’S NO LONGER DONATING TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD THROUGH EMPLOYEE 
MATCHING GIFT PROGRAM
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

A watchdog group that monitors the social stances of major
corporations, as well as those who donate to the abortion and
contraceptive giant Planned Parenthood, has announced that the retail
store Macy’s has discontinued donations to the organization through its
matching program.

“Macy’s confirmed with 2ndVote … that the company no longer gives and
no longer matches donations to Planned Parenthood,” 2ndVote said in a
post on Wednesday.

Representatives with the retailer had explained to the Daily Signal
last year that Macy’s hadn’t been giving to the organization directly,
but matched employee donations in a few instances.

“Our company makes no direct donations to Planned Parenthood,” it
said. “In our Matching Gift program, we will match our employees’
donations to any 501c3 organization. We are a company of 160,000 people,
and we do match a small handful of gifts each year to Planned
Parenthood organizations given that they are 501c3.”

Macy’s has not released an official statement declaring its
discontinuance, and is not commenting to the media, but 2ndVote
states that they were able to obtain confirmation.

“Macy’s has listened to its customers and this shows that informed
consumers are able to effectively engage companies for taking positions
on the issues,” said 2ndVote Director of Communications Robert
Kuykendall. “Ultimately, people don’t want to support organizations like
Planned Parenthood that don’t match their values and they would rather
do business with a more neutral company, especially on the life issue.”

Kuykendall’s organization maintains a list of companies that give to
Planned Parenthood in one form or another. It currently has 36 major
corporations on its direct donation list, including Avon, Clorox, ExxonMobil, Microsoft, PepsiCo, Starbucks and Verizon.

2ndVote says that 25 percent of Planned Parenthood’s annual revenue comes from private donations. Planned Parenthood’s annual report released last December outlined that it received $353 million in private contributions and bequests from June 2014-June 2015.

The organization also received $553 million in government grants
during the period, up from $528 million the year prior, which equated to
43 percent of its total income. And despite its expenditures, Planned
Parenthood still garnered a $61 million dollar profit.

It performed 323,999 abortions, or approximately one-third of all abortions nationwide when compared to data released by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

As previously reported, Planned Parenthood, originally known as the
American Birth Control League, was founded by Margaret Sanger, a
feminist who decried what she characterized as women serving as
“incubators.”

“Woman’s role has been that of an incubator and little more. She has
given birth to an incubated race,” she wrote in “Woman and the New
Race.” “In the mass, she has brought forth quantity, not quality. The
requirement of a male dominated civilization has been numbers. She has
met that requirement.”

“This is the dawn. Womanhood shakes off its bondage. It asserts its
right to be free. In its freedom, its thoughts turn to the race. Like
begets like. We gather perfect fruit from perfect trees,” Sanger said.
“The relentless efforts of reactionary authority to suppress the message
of birth control and of voluntary motherhood are futile. The powers of
reaction cannot now prevent the feminine spirit from breaking its bonds.

Sanger, who was a staunch advocate of eugenics, also made a
correlation between birth control and the purification of the races,
referring to those with disabilities as being “morons,” “idiots” and
“imbeciles.”

“Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law,
is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding
out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who
will become defectives,” she wrote in the aforementioned publication.
“If we are to make racial progress, this development of womanhood must
precede motherhood in every individual woman.”

 

SWEDEN: MUSLIM MIGRANTS DEFECATE, MASTURBATE, SCREAM ISLAMIC CHANTS IN CHURCH PEWS

SWEDEN: MUSLIM MIGRANTS DEFECATE, MASTURBATE, SCREAM ISLAMIC CHANTS IN CHURCH PEWS  
BY CHRISTINE WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Christians have become frightened to visit the Holy
Trinity church as newcomers are reported to yell loudly and smash liquor
bottles during services, masturbate in the pews and urinate and
defecate both inside and in the church grounds.

The “newcomers” are Muslim migrants that the Christians tried to open their hearts to and welcome.

These Muslim migrants event went a little further:

Aside from leaving their offensive bodily fluids
everywhere, the migrants scream Islamic chants and smash liquor bottles
on the floor in an attempt to silence Christian worshipers from praying
to God.

Can one imagine the same being done by Christians in a mosque? It’s
shocking and disgusting what the West puts up with in the name of
political correctness and diversity. It’s even an insult to Muslims
themselves: the most “racist” or ethnocentric gesture is to treat human
beings as if they were animals who cannot be expected to behave in a
civilized manner.

 
 

“Security Guards at Church Services As ‘New Clientele’ Defecate, Masturbate in Pews,” by Virginia Hale, Breitbart, December 9, 2016:

A church in Kristianstad has been forced to hire guards
to keep the peace at services after the disruptive behavior of “new
clientele” has become increasingly serious in recent years.

Christians have become frightened to visit the Holy Trinity church as
newcomers are reported to yell loudly and smash liquor bottles during
services, masturbate in the pews and urinate and defecate both inside
and in the church grounds.

Concerned locals have even reported concern over attempts to kidnap children during baptism.

Police yesterday gave the go-ahead to the church to have Security
guards at all future services, weddings and christenings. Staff have
also received training on how to deal with threats and violence and
sessions on conflict management are in the works, the Kristianstadsbladet reported.

Holy Trinity administrative manager Bengt Alvland told the newspaper
that people have repeatedly tried to steal silver, and staff are having
to keep the organ locked to prevent them from climbing on top of it to
disturb worshipers.

He also recounted how, during baptism, people have tried to take
children away from the priest and parents as the ceremony was ongoing.
In addition, people have sat masturbating in the pews.

 “[A man] was pulling on his penis. He did not stop, even when a
female police officer told him to”, Alvland said, adding: “There are no
limits or inhibitions for these people. It makes the staff feel very
concerned”.

He revealed that the people whose behavior is proving so disruptive
are not the town’s “old homeless”, but are instead a “new clientele”.

“The fact that there are more security guards at the Town Hall and
the railway station means there are fewer places for these people to go.
Therefore, the church has become the weakest link”, Alvland explained.

Speaking on Holy Trinity’s request for security presence during
services, he said: “We want a peaceful and safe environment for our
staff and visitors”. The security industry is booming
in Sweden, with sales for market leader Securitas reaching 80 billion
Swedish krona in 2015, twice the amount the nation spends on defense.

After numerous comments on the story were posted on
Kristianstadsbladet’s Facebook page, many of which connected the
disturbances with mass migration to the city, the Swedish church issued a statement insisting that it’s “Swedish men aged 35-45 with drug problems” who are causing the trouble.


Stein Flom Jacobsen questioned this, writing
on Facebook: “I see that these persons will be described as ‘Swedish
men……’ what does that mean that they’re Swedish citizens, or that they
are so-called ‘ethnic Swedes’? I know several addicts and have met a lot
of them but never understood them to be menacing, or heard of this form
of vandalism in churches, temples or mosques”.

BOSTON ISLAMIC CENTER WITH TIES TO MULTIPLE JIHAD TERRORISTS HOSTS INTERFAITH CALL FOR PEACE

BOSTON ISLAMIC CENTER WITH TIES 
TO MULTIPLE JIHAD TERRORISTS 
HOSTS INTERFAITH CALL FOR PEACE
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The cynicism of this is breathtaking, but the easy marks among Jewish and Christian leaders are lining up to participate.

“It’s ironic that they would hold a rally against hate in one of the
most hateful houses of worship in New England where imam after imam has
been found to preach anti-Semitism, homophobia, and hate for the United
States, its people and its government.”

Yes, but there is never any shortage of useful idiots among Jewish
and Christian leaders. And this article goes easy: not only was the
Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center frequented by the Tsarnaev
brothers, Siddiqui, and Mehanna, but also Ahmad Abousamra, the Islamic State’s “social media guru.”
And Alamoudi wasn’t just “sentenced in 2004 to 23 years in prison for
taking part in a plot to kill Saudi royal officials”; that operation was
an al-Qaeda plot.

“Controversial Islamic center hosts interfaith call for peace, despite terror ties,” by Brooke Singman, Fox News, December 9, 2016:

A Boston Islamic center that has been linked to convicted
terrorists is hosting an interfaith event on Sunday to promote peace,
but some critics say such “hateful houses of worship” are a dubious
venue for a message of solidarity and hope.

The event, at Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center, is entitled
“Out of Many, One,” and has Boston Mayor Marty Walsh and Sen. Elizabeth
Warren, D-Mass., slated to speak. It is sponsored by the Greater Boston
Interfaith Organization, and aimed at bringing religious communities
together under common beliefs.

This Cambridge mosque has been at the center of controversy for years.

“My hope is that we can provide a place for members of the community,
who are so fearful and concerned about our values being challenged, to
speak up,” Interfaith Organization Board Member Nahma Nadich told
FoxNews.com. “We need to affirm our values and be in solidarity with
each other to protect all members of our community against hateful,
divisive rhetoric.”

But the location of the event has raised concerns, as the Islamic
Society of Boston Cultural Center operates two mosques –one in Boston,
where the event will be held, and one in Cambridge where several
convicted terrorists reportedly worshiped. They include Boston
Marathon bombers Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev; Aafia Siddiqui, who
plotted a chemical attack on New York City and Tarek Mehanna, who was
sentenced in 2012 to 17 years in prison for conspiring to aid Al Qaeda.

In addition, a founder of ISBCC, Abduraham Alamoudi, was sentenced in
2004 to 23 years in prison for taking part in a plot to kill Saudi
royal officials, has allegedly worshiped at the mosque.

Neither the mosque nor top officials have been implicated in criminal
activity. But critics say several speakers at the mosque have delivered
fiery and hateful sermons, and that its connections to terror make it
an unlikely host of an event calling for peace.

“It’s ironic that they would hold a rally against hate in one of the
most hateful houses of worship in New England where imam after imam has
been found to preach anti-Semitism, homophobia, and hate for the United
States, its people and its government,” Director of Research at
Americans for Peace and Tolerance Ilya Feoktistov told FoxNews.com.

U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts Carmen Ortiz has
dismissed Americans for Peace and Tolerance’s claims as “incredibly
racist and unfair.”

But Feoktistov referred to a 2010 video of Abdullah Faaruuq, a guest
preacher, exhorting worshipers to “grab onto the rope, grab onto the
typewriter, grab onto the shovel, grab onto the gun and the sword.”
Faaruuq told FoxNews.com last year that ISIS was not created by Islamic
teachings, but rather by America.

“It was created by the United States’ encouragement into other
people’s countries seeking weapons of mass destruction that don’t
exist,” Faaruuq said. “Destroying their societies and leaving the bitter
taste in young people’s mouths.”

In August, ISBCC appointed an associate imam, Abdul-Malik Merchant,
who, according to APT shared anti-Semitic posts on social media.
Merchant issued an apology to the Jewish community.

Local Jewish leaders said neither the ISBCC nor the mosques it operates should be judged by the actions of a few….

Feoktistov said faith leaders and elected officials are turning a blind eye to what has taken place in the mosque.

“I think lawmakers discount the hatred for political reasons because
the hatred is being spouted by what they consider to be a valuable
minority,” Feoktistov told Fox News. “They are holding this event at an
extremely hateful place, and that doesn’t bother them at all.”…

The “Interfaith call for Dignity & Diligence” event will take place at ISBCC in Roxbury, on Sunday, Dec. 11 at 6 p.m.

ISBCC Executive Director Yusuf Vali said in a statement that the work
at the ISBCC embodies a community that “builds bridges” and “brings
people together.”…

MITT ROMNEY IS OUT, REX TILLERSON IS IN

 MITT ROMNEY IS OUT, REX TILLERSON IS IN

Exxon Mobil CEO reportedly Trump’s top pick for secretary of state

 Alex Jones breaks down the reason that Donald Trump has
reportedly picked Exxon Mobil CEO Rex Tillerson as secretary of state,
passing over both Mitt Romney and Jon Huntsman, who had been on the
short list to be America’s top diplomat.

 

BERLIN SENATE’S NEW MUSLIM SECRETARY OF STATE CLAIMS SHARIA “ABSOLUTELY COMPATIBLE” WITH GERMAN LAW

MERKEL COULDN’T FIND A GERMAN, SO SHE APPOINTS A PALESTINIAN WITH MIDDLE EAST MULTICULTURAL SYMPATHIES LIKE HERS
 http://www.infiniteunknown.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Sawsan-Chebli.png
BERLIN SENATE’S NEW MUSLIM SECRETARY OF STATE CLAIMS SHARIA “ABSOLUTELY COMPATIBLE” 
WITH GERMAN LAW 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Stonings, amputations, warfare against non-Muslims, institutionalized 
subjugation of women and non-Muslims, denial of the freedom of speech — 
what do you mean, incompatible with German law? This is the new, Merkelian, 
multicultural Germany.
 

“Berlin’s New Secretary of State is Pro-Sharia Law Conservative Muslim,” by Oliver JJ Lane, Breitbart, December 11, 2016 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

The daughter of Palestinian immigrants is to be the
Berlin senate’s secretary of state for coordinating federal and state
affairs, but attention has focused on her recent remarks in support of
Sharia law.

Berlin state senate member, former deputy speaker for foreign affairs
and Muslim rising star of German politics Sawsan Chebli is to get a new
cabinet post. The appointment by the Red-Red-Green coalition government
has caused concern after a recent interview in which she expressed her
view that Sharia law was perfectly compatible with secular German
society.

Speaking back in August alongside Berlin Social Democrat party Mayor
Michael Muller, she not only defended Sharia law against suspicion by
many Germans who she accused of not understanding what it meant, but she
also went on the attack too. Criticising members of anti-mass migration
party Alternative for German (AfD), she said their views towards
foreigners made them fundamentally un-German.

Speaking to the Franzfurter Allgeimeine Zeitung,
she said: “My father is a pious Muslim, hardly speaks German, can
neither read nor write, but he is more integrated than many
functionaries of the AfD who question our constitution”.

Germany’s newspaper of record and the nation’s most widely-read broadsheet Welt reported Sunday
that while the politician attempted to portray the image of the perfect
“successful migrant” who despite being born to illiterate, stateless
parents was able to succeed in education and enter politics, there are
“cracks” displayed by her support of Sharia.

In August she complained that in political discourse, German national
law and Sharia law are always presented as contradictory to each other,
and said “Everyone talks about Shariah, but hardly anyone knows what
Sharia means”. Remarking that Sharia exists “largely to govern the
relationship between God and man”, Chebli said Sharia law was
“absolutely compatible” with Germany….

______________________________________________________

Germany: Steinmeier sending diplomat to Turkey to improve relations – FM spokesperson 

 Published on Aug 8, 2016

Spokesperson
of the Foreign Ministry Sawsan Chebli announced today that Foreign
Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier has sent State secretary Markus Ederer
to Turkey in order to have direct talks with the Turkish authorities,
during a press conference in Berlin on Monday.

SOT, Sawsan
Chebli, spokesperson for Foreign Ministry (German): “We must ask
ourselves the question: ‘what do we actually want?’ Turkey is an
important partner. Turkey is an important neighbour and with each set of
the refugee agreements there are important things we have to discuss
with and work with them on: political, economic, and, based on the 3.5
million Turkish-Germans living here, we have a closer relationship. And
when we take a look at Turkey we must ask ourselves the question: ‘how
do we get out of this very difficult, very [..] confrontational
situation?’ It is important for us to have another conversation which is
why Foreign Minister [Frank-Walter] Steinmeier sent the Secretary of
State to Turkey to have a direct conversation with the Turkish [and]
also to search for different levels and to strengthen and bring closer
the conversation, instead of, like I said, speaking over the mega phone
and microphone.”

SOT, Sawsan Chebli, spokesperson for Foreign
Ministry (German): “In our view it is good that, following the downing
of a Russian warplane through Turkey in the past years, that there is an
approach. We can only welcome that, because the more that is spoken to
each other – also with the conflict background in the region in which
Turkey is part of – the better.”

SOT, Sawsan Chebli, spokesperson
for Foreign Ministry (German): “Turkey is and will stay an important
partner in NATO and we don’t presume therefore at the present moment
that [NATO] cooperation, through the relationship between Russia and
Turkey, could somehow have an impact [on NATO relations].”

PRESIDENT TRUMP, HERITAGE FOUNDATION IS THE CONTROLLED OPPOSITION

PRESIDENT TRUMP, HERITAGE FOUNDATION IS THE CONTROLLED OPPOSITION
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By Kelleigh Nelson


December 12, 2016
NewsWithViews.com
Don’t
fear the enemy who attacks you, but the fake friend who hugs you.
The
government is best which governs the least, because its people discipline
themselves.
—Thomas Jefferson
In my
last article
, I documented Heritage Foundation’s drafting and
promotion of job destroying NAFTA, but Heritage is also responsible for
many other ills that American citizens face today, including healthcare
and education.
Who
Funds Heritage
Heritage
is not required to disclose its donors, but according to a Media Transparency
report in 2006, donors have included the John
M. Olin Foundation
, the Castle
Rock Foundation
, the Richard
and Helen DeVos Foundation
(founders of Amway and father-in-law to
newly appointed Education Secretary, Betsy DeVos), Bradley
Foundation
(board members include Federal Reserve and CFR members),
the Koch Brothers and Claude
Lambe Foundation
, and Richard
Mellon Scaife
, who gave over $30 million to Heritage.
Scaife
supported abortion, and paid for a full-page ad in the WSJ in 2011, “From
the Desk of Richard M. Scaife – An Open Letter to Fellow Conservatives:
Why Conservatives Should Oppose Efforts to Defund Planned Parenthood.”
His mother was a good friend of Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger,
and had her in for tea every Sunday afternoon.
The
list of President Trump’s Supreme Court justices was culled with
the aid of the Heritage Foundation and Federalist Society. Only two justices
on the list are truly pro-life. There are now 38 signees on the Coalition
Letter on the Pledge for a Pro-Life Nomination for Justice Scalia’s Seat
on the Supreme Court
.
Over
the past 25 years, Heritage has also been funded by private foundations
such as Pew
Charitable Trust
which also funded many GOALS 2000 initiatives. Bill
Clinton signed the Goals
2000
law on March 31, 1994, creating new education bureaucracies and
facilitating federal control of local education institutions.
William Greider’s bestseller, Who
Will Tell the People: The Betrayal of American Democracy
reveals other
benefactors: “Heritage received grants from Amoco, General Motors,
Chase Manhattan Bank (David Rockefeller) and right-wing foundations like
Olin and Bradley.”
Heritage
and National Healthcare
As John
Adams said, “Facts are stubborn things.” Heritage has promoted
much that is anathema to our Constitution. Let’s look at the facts.
Assuring
Affordable Health Care for All Americans
is the Heritage Foundation
plan, written by Republicans and endorsed by the so-called conservative
right. You will notice that Stuart
M. Butler
wrote this Heritage monograph. Butler is a Brit who is a
senior fellow at the liberal Brookings Institute, the same Institute that
is promoting the privatization of education. Please pay particular attention
to Item #2 on page 6 of this document wherein it states, “Mandate
all households to obtain adequate insurance.”
James
Taranto, who writes the Wall Street Journal’s “Best
of the Web” column, put forth a lengthy and informative discussion
on the conservative origins of the individual mandate, whose inclusion
in Obamacare is today its most controversial feature on the Right.
Taranto
writes that he was there when the Heritage Foundation was promoting the
mandate:
Heritage
did put forward the idea of an individual mandate, though it predated
Hillary Care by several years. We know this because we were there: In
1988-90, we were employed at Heritage as a public relations associate
(a junior writer and editor), and we wrote at least one press release
for a publication touting Heritage’s plan for comprehensive legislation
to provide universal “quality, affordable health care.”
As
a junior publicist, we weren’t being paid for our personal opinions.
But we are now, so you will be the first to know that when we worked
at Heritage, we hated the Heritage plan, especially the individual mandate.
“Universal health care” was neither already established
nor inevitable, and we thought the foundation had made a serious philosophical
and strategic error in accepting rather than disputing the left-liberal
notion that the provision of “quality, affordable health care”
to everyone was a proper role of government. As to the mandate, we remember
reading about it and thinking: “I thought we were supposed to
be for freedom.”
The
plan was introduced in a 1989 book, “A National Health System
for America” by Stuart Butler and Heritage Senior Researcher,
Edmund Haislmaier. We seem to have mislaid our copy, and we couldn’t
find it online, but we did track down a 1990
Backgrounder
and a 1991
lecture
by Butler that outlined the plan. One of its two major planks,
the equalization of tax treatment for individually purchased and employer-provided
health insurance, seemed sensible and unobjectionable, at least in principle.
But
the other was the mandate, described as a “Health Care Social
Contract” and fleshed out in the lecture. [Link]
Now,
Stuart Butler claims
we shouldn’t blame Heritage
for the Obamacare mandate. He links to
the Amicus brief filed in the 11th
circuit court of appeals
, dated May 11, 2011. If you read the Amicus
brief, notice Edwin Meese’s name as well as Randy
Barnett
, of Georgetown University who has long been promoting a Constitutional
Convention with Michael
Patrick Leahy
of Tennessee.
I find
it interesting that the Affordable Health Care Act was signed into law
by Barack Hussein Obama on March 23, 2010, but Heritage Foundation didn’t
file their Amicus brief until over a year later. Ahem!
Heritage’s
Mandate for Leadership
In 1980,
Heritage published their Mandate
for Leadership
to guide the incoming Reagan Administration and its
transition team. Working the high-level inside track on these personnel
hiring’s was Reagan’s “Kitchen Cabinet,” of which Council
for National Policy member, Joe Coors, was probably the best-known member.
A Reagan
loyalist since the 1968 GOP convention, Coors began spending a lot of
time in Washington, D.C. and at the White House. The attempt at governance
by the Kitchen Cabinet became so elaborate that they actually established
an office in the Executive Office Building across from the White House.
Embarrassed
by the image of a covey of millionaires seeming to run parallel and sometimes
conflicting personnel recruitment operations, senior White House staff
produced legal opinions saying that it was illegal for a private group
to occupy government property, in this case a White House office.
Although
Coors produced a legal opinion arguing there was no violation of law,
Coors and friends were evicted. Heritage could hardly claim diminished
relations with the Reagan Administration, however, as an estimated two-thirds
of its Mandate recommendations were adopted in the first year of the Administration.
Further,
Heritage was using a letter of endorsement from White House Chief of Staff,
Ed Meese, CNP charter member, in a December 1981 fundraising effort. In
his letter of endorsement, Meese promised Heritage’s president, Edwin
Feulner
, that “this Administration will cooperate fully with
your efforts.” The newly elected Ronald Reagan passed out copies
of the Mandate at his first Cabinet meeting, and it quickly became his
administration’s blueprint. By the end of Reagan’s first year
in office, 60 percent of the Mandate’s 2,000 ideas were
being implemented. After leaving the Reagan Administration, Meese joined
the staff of the Heritage Foundation and is still there today.
Meese
and his cronies were also involved in the theft of the Inslaw/Promis software
that enabled the Justice Department to track criminal prosecutions. [Link]
Meese had his intelligence buddies put a trap door in the software so
the Bushes could monitor everyone. The Justice Department started sharing
the illegally obtained PROMIS software with other agencies, including
agencies where PROMIS was modified for intelligence purposes and sold
to foreign intelligence operations in Israel, Jordan, and other places.
Michael
Risconsciuto
of the Wackenhut security firm (former FBI and CIA) had
testified that he was contracted to install a “trap door” in
the software to allow the CIA to tap into PROMIS software worldwide. It
appears that the original petty crimes of the Justice Department led to
the exposure of a sensitive national security operation. [Link]
It also
monitors all of us, and today there’s an even greater software program
out there…but that’s another story.
Edwin
J. Feulner
, formerly the president of Heritage Foundation, had a yearly
income including deferred compensation of $1,098,612. Former Attorney
General, Edwin Meese, takes home half a million a year from Heritage.
This is where your $25 monthly donations go…to enrich the lives
of these top dogs. Feulner is also a charter member of the Council
for National Policy
(CNP).
The
Rockefeller/Heritage Connection
Education
researcher Chey Simonton states in her article
on the Rockefeller/Heritage Connection
,
“The
top men of the Heritage Foundation, first Weyrich, then Ed Feulner,
and now Jim DeMint, with the trust and cooperation of masses of sincerely
committed conservatives, have been in a position to further elitist
Rockefeller goals. (These are the Rockefeller Republicans Phyllis Schlafly
called the Kingmakers, in her book, “A
Choice Not an Echo
.”) Along with radical World Government
advocate, Walter Hoffman of the World Federalist Association, they participated
on the 16 member U.S.
Commission on Improving the Effectiveness of the United Nations
.
Working with the US Information Agency, Feulner also participated in
facilitating the infamous 1985
US-Soviet Education Technology and Cultural Exchange Agreement
.
Soviet pedagogy, based on behavioral
conditioning
for a compliant collective labor force, is a dream
come true for the dozens of multinational corporations funding all the
think tanks promoting
American education reform. The humanist Carnegie Foundation,
a century-long collaborator with Rockefeller philanthropy, facilitated
the Soviet side of this Exchange Agreement.”
Remember,
in 1934, the Carnegie Corporation called for a shift from free enterprise
to collectivism. They wanted the Soviet planned economy. [Link]
Thus,
Heritage’s communist connections, were established rapidly after the historic
meeting between Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev at the Geneva Summit
.
Feulner
was appointed by Reagan as chairman of the U.S.
Advisory Commission on Public Diplomacy
. The commission was responsible
for expediting a signed Soviet-American
Educational Exchange Agreement
. The National American Legion was one
of hundreds of conservative groups refusing to do anything about the US/Soviet
Education Agreements.
In
1995, education researcher, Charlotte
Iserbyt
, identified conservative “Wolves
in Sheep’s Clothing
,” who not only gave the Soviets access
to American education, but whose act of treason “virtually
merged the two educational systems.”
Leading the pack for
an educational exchange initiative was none other than:
“Edwin
Feulner, former President of Heritage Foundation, who strongly supported
the U.S.-Soviet
education agreements
, and who had an office in Moscow, supported Soviet-style
magnet schools (i.e., tax supported choice/charter
schools), and had state affiliate organizations across the nation writing
charter school legislation that reads like it has been written by the
U.S.
Department of Education
, the Carnegie
Corporation
and the National
Education Association
.”
“Paul
Weyrich’s constitutional-convention promoting American
Legislative Exchange Council
(ALEC)
gave an award to Oregon’s Department of Education for its education
reform, especially the work force training component and its certificate
of initial mastery (CIM) necessary to get a job
. Same old Common
Core folks! See the June, 2011, WSJ article, “Industry
Puts Heat on Schools to Teach Skills Employees Need
.”
 We must
remember, the 1955 UNESCO
(United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)
book, MENTAL HEALTH IN EDUCATION, is the earliest reference
to the need for “choice” in education. The Charter Schools concept,
strongly marketed around the country by Heritage affiliates, with the
help of many CNP members in every state, attempts to link patriotic free
enterprise themes to a blatantly unconstitutional system of corporate
fascism to business/government partnerships in the education of our children.
At the
same time, note that Heritage founder, Paul Weyrich, once served as advisor
to former Russian President, Boris Yeltsin of Chechnyan genocide fame.
He wrote about it in an article in the Heritage
affiliate, Townhall Magazine
. In 1987, Weyrich also wrote an article
in The Washington Post, A
Conservative’s Lament
, which virtually recommended a new Constitution
and parliamentary form of government for the U.S.
Both
Feulner and Weyrich were also involved with other powerful players and
shadowy figures, some from the right and some from the left. They have
been included in groups formed to reinvent the UN, supposedly to face
the 21st century. It is becoming more and more evident that Weyrich and
Feulner were in fact organizing a tight group that represented the merger
of right and left, which we have seen over the past 65 years, and which
was quite obvious in our recent election.

“BASIC BIOLOGICAL TRUTHS”: ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT OVERTURNS RULING ALLOWING LESBIANS TO BE LISTED ON BIRTH CERTIFICATES

“BASIC BIOLOGICAL TRUTHS”: ARKANSAS SUPREME COURT OVERTURNS RULING ALLOWING LESBIANS TO BE LISTED ON BIRTH CERTIFICATES
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — The Supreme Court of 
Arkansas has overturned a lower court ruling that allowed lesbian 
partners to be recognized on birth certificates even though they are not
 the biological parent, stating that it is not unconstitutional to 
“acknowledge basic biological truths.”
“What is before this court is a narrow issue of whether the
birth-certificate statutes as written deny the appellees due process,”
Justice Josephine Linker Hart wrote
on behalf of the majority. “In the situation involving the female
spouse of a biological mother, the female spouse does not have the same
biological nexus to the child that the biological mother or the
biological father has. It does not violate equal protection to
acknowledge basic biological truths.”
As previously reported,
six lesbians had filed suit last year against the Arkansas Health
Department’s Vital Statistics Bureau after it declined to recognize both
women as the parents on the birth certificates, which they sought to do
in order to obtain insurance coverage for the children.
The bureau stated that the women needed to obtain a court order in the matter.

In their lawsuit, the women alleged that the refusal
violated the U.S. Constitution because they could not both be listed
just like heterosexual parents. But the state argued that the
requirement to obtain a court order is the same for heterosexual couples
who have children out of wedlock and marry after the birth.

Last November, Pulaski County Circuit Judge Tim Fox sided
with the lesbian women, stating that the birth certificates should be
amended to include both of their names.

He drew a distinction between the various plaintiffs,
however, as some had “married” before the birth and some after. Fox said
that the latter scenario was not as clear in his mind in siding with
the women, but decided to likewise allow their names to be listed.

But on Thursday, the state Supreme Court overturned Fox’s
ruling, stating that there is an “important governmental objective” in
requesting that biological parents be listed on the birth certificate,
such as having genetic information available for medical purposes.

“The purpose of the statutes is to truthfully record the
nexus of the biological mother and the biological father to the child,”
it outlined. “On the record presented, we cannot say that naming the
nonbiological spouse on the birth certificate of the child is an
interest of the person so fundamental that the State must accord the
interest its respect under either statute.”

“[T]he challenged classification serves an important
governmental objective—tracing public-health trends and providing
critical assistance to an individual’s identification of personal health
issues and genetic conditions—and that the means employed—requiring the
mother and father on the birth certificate to be biologically related
to the child—are substantially related to the achievement of those objectives,” the court declared.

Cheryl Maples, the attorney for the women, decried the
ruling, stating, “There’s no requirement that DNA be given or that there
be a biological relationship to a child to get on a birth certificate
for a father, for the non-birth parent. All you have to do is legitimize
the child, and you’re entitled, if you’re heterosexual. This is wrong.”

But Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge’s office said that they are satisfied with the outcome.

“If any changes are appropriate, it is the job of
legislators to do so, not the circuit court,” spokesman Judd Deere told
reporters.

MARKETING PSYCHOLOGY & AMERICAN CULTS: EXAMINING THE RETENTION PRACTICES OF SCIENTOLOGY, MORMONISM, & THE WATCHTOWER

MARKETING PSYCHOLOGY & AMERICAN CULTS: EXAMINING THE RETENTION PRACTICES OF SCIENTOLOGY, MORMONISM, & THE WATCHTOWER 
BY SETH DUNN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Religious Marketing in a Land of Opportunity

Before British journalist Christopher Hitchens would ever become known as one of the “Four Horseman”[1] of the New Atheism movement, he was an award-winning, widely-read, globe-trotting journalist.  In a 1997 interview with The Progressive,
the well-traveled Hitchens was asked why he chose to make his home in
the United States.  He answered, “The first thing I can remember I ever
wanted was to go to the United States. And for reasons that are as
conventional as you can imagine: I wanted to know if it was really true
that it was the land of opportunity, of democracy, and individual
liberty. My conclusion was that, at least as compared to the ancien
regime under which I had been brought up, it was.”[2] 
Hitchens eventually became an American citizen and exercised the
individual liberty afforded to him by his new country (along with its
free market) to author and promote his best-selling[3] book God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything.  Hitchens,
a vociferous and virulent critic of religion, promoted his book by
touring the United States from coast to coast seeking to debate
religious leaders about the soundness of his atheistic argument that
religion “poisons everything”.  He did not lack willing debate opponents
anywhere he went.[sg_popup id=”1″ event=”onload”][/sg_popup]

Nearly 80% of Americans identify as adherents of a certain religion.[4]  
Almost all of these religions were imported from the Old World. 
However, some of them are uniquely American.  The free exercise of
religion guaranteed by the United States Constitution has, since 1789,
allowed ample opportunity for not only the practice of religion but the
invention and promotion of it as well.  The Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints (commonly known as the Mormon sect) was founded in the
United States in 1830 by New York native Joseph Smith.[5] 
The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania (commonly known
as the Jehovah’s Witness sect) was founded in 1870 by Charles Taze
Russell.[6]  US Navy veteran L. Ron Hubbard founded the Church of Scientology in 1953.[7] 
 In totalitarian societies, such as those from which the very first
non-native settlers of the American continent fled, these three sects
would have likely been banned by law and quashed shortly after their
founding.  However, in the land of opportunity, they have been allowed
to thrive.

The convergence of the free market with freedom of religion has made
it easy for religious organizations to grow on the American continent. 
As religious organizations seek growth, they take part in what
sociologist George Ritzer has termed “The McDonaldization of Society”
which he defined as “the process by which the principles of the
fast-food restaurant are coming home to dominate more and more sectors
of American society and the rest of the world.”[8]
“Churches unintentionally pick up on the ideas of McDonaldization
through leadership magazines, conferences, and books that teach how
churches can engage more of the American culture through certain
structural, communications, and ministry models.”[9] 
One of these models is brand marketing and, often times, it is picked
up on quite purposefully.  Marketing strategy has come to be taught in
seminary courses.  One seminary course text[10], Pastor’s Handbook, advises church leaders to emulate the practices of McDonald’s, Starbucks, and Disney World.[11] 
The successful execution of church marketing is perhaps why religious
activity has turned into one of the largest sectors of the American
economy.

According to the authors of a study entitled “The Socio-economic
Contribution of Religion to American Society: An Empirical Analysis” and
published in the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research, their
most conservative estimate of the revenue of faith based-organizations
is “$378 billion annually – or more than a third of a trillion
dollars…more than the global annual revenues of tech giants Apple and
Microsoft combined.”[12] 
Their least conservative estimate places “the value of faith to U.S.
society at $4.8 trillion annually, or the equivalent of nearly a third
of America’s gross domestic product.”[13]  These figures are staggering, especially when it is considered that religious activity is an unregulated sector
of the economy.  The American economy, though fairly considered “free,”
is not without regulation.  Massive corporations such as Apple and
Microsoft as well as smaller, less influential businesses are regulated
by powerful federal, state, and local government agencies which are
tasked with protecting American consumers and investors.  Examples of
such agencies, which regulate diverse sectors of the American economy,
include the Federal Trade Commission, the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the Food and Drug Administration, The Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board, and the United States Department of
Agriculture.  Additionally various medical licensing boards protect
patients from being taken advantage of by abusive or incompetent doctors
and therapists. The missions of these various organizations fall in
line with a biblical understanding of civil government.[14]  They are “avengers who bring wrath on the one who practices evil.”[15]

The Mission of the Federal Trade Commission and similar agencies can
be summed up very simply: they exist to prevent and eliminate “unfair or
deceptive acts or practices” [16]
committed by nefarious and unscrupulous actors looking to turn a profit
in the marketplace.  If a business becomes monopolistic or colludes
with major competitors to corner the market, it is broken up by
government “trust-busters”.[17] 
If a business engages in an unfair marketing practice, such as a
“bait-and-switch”, it subject to reprisal from a government authority. 
However, if a religious organization becomes monopolistic[18]
or engages in such a psychological marketing trick (as long as it’s not
selling a guaranteed material good), it is insulated from prosecution. 
Religious organizations can, quite frankly, lie to and psychologically
manipulate their patrons in order perpetuate themselves numerically and
financially.  Ironically, the very same religious and personal liberty
that allowed Christopher Hitches to publish and promote a book about how
religion “poisons everything” allows certain religious organizations to
poison everything.

Of course, Hitchens and the rest of his New Atheist cohorts are
incorrect to assert that “religion” poisons everything.  As atheists,
they are committed to the idea that all religions are false.  If it is
the case that all religions are false then the leaders and adherents of
religions are either under delusion or, even worse, knowingly
manipulating people to into believing lifestyle-effecting lies, often in
the course of supporting themselves financially or procuring for
themselves some degree of cultural influence.  However, it is not the
case that all religions are false.  God exists and, furthermore, He has
revealed how religious activities should be carried out in the pages of
the Bible, which He inspired.[19]
 According to God’s word, true and acceptable religion is “to visit
orphans and widows in their distress, and to keep oneself unstained by
the world.”[20] 
The antithesis of true religion is, in the course of seeking after the
things of the world, taking advantage of the poor and ignorant,
especially while making a tidy profit.[21] 
Thus, in the absence of government regulation of religious practice
(which historically, has been shown to be ill-advised and disastrous),
it is up to God’s true church to expose the unfruitful deeds of darkness[22] perpetrated by the proprietors of false religion.

American society is full of religious organizations that defy God’s
definition of true religion and blaspheme Him by disseminating
unbiblical teachings about His natureHisJhhh hgg.  In an economy where
taking unfair advantage of people is strictly prohibited in every sector
but one, nefarious and unscrupulous actors looking to turn a profit are
most likely to drift to that particular sector.  In America, that
sector is religion.  While it may be true that the leaders of
seeker-sensitive, market-driven Christian churches are in some way
motivated by profit, the orthodox Trinitarian Christian theology which
they hold to and promote may insulate their parishioners from eternal
damnation.  In other words, someone (though he may be sorely lacking in
discipleship) might actually come to saving faith through the gospel as
presented by a McDonaldized Willow Creek, Purpose-Driven, or Andy
Stanley church. Though neither is regulated in the American society,
there is a difference between a huckster with the biblical gospel and a
huckster with a false one.[23] 
Examples of the latter type of huckster arguably include Joseph Smith,
Charles Taze Russell, and L. Ron Hubbard.  Though they died long ago,
these men founded cults that are today still operating successfully and
drawing new converts.  Using psychological manipulation techniques and
marketing tactics that profited-motivated businesses are prevented from
unfairly implementing, these cults and other like them, control the
minds and lives of millions of Americans.

By properly applying scripture, Christians can expose and critique
the unbiblical and eternally damnable beliefs perpetrated by these
cults.  Since men inherently lack the divine ability to see into the
hearts and minds of others, there is no guaranteed way to determine
which cult leaders and members are hucksters who know they are
perpetrating a lie and which cult leaders are genuinely deceived (or
even demon-possessed).  The Bible provides revelation from God which can
be trusted to expose the false teachings of cults, regardless of the
unknown internal motivations and mindsets of cultic false teachers. 
Unfortunately, cult-members are often so brainwashed and conditioned by
their cults that they are unable to see the way that their religious
leaders have twisted and misapplied religious texts, especially the
Bible, to gain control over their lives.  They may refuse to listen to
biblical correction altogether.  Thus, another method of exposing
damaging cult practices to deceived cult members may be useful: exposing
the psychological tactics of cults.  No one likes to be ripped off or
manipulated to their own disadvantage, even a cult member.  Mormons,
Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Scientologists can appreciate the type of work
done by the Federal Trade Commission and consumer watchdog groups as
much as atheists and Christians can.  Thus, Christians have the
opportunity to identify the psychological tricks used by cults and
inform cult members of the various ways of which they are being taken
advantage.  Cult members, especially those who are savvy businessmen,
having their eyes opened to the manipulative nature of their cults, will
be empowered to abandon them.  The religious vacuum created in their
lives can then be filled by a biblical Christian witness.  There are
many examples of psychological manipulation being implemented by
American cults.  By examining some of these examples, Christians can be
prepared to engage in the practice of cult-busting as a part of the
overall process of proclaiming the biblical gospel.

Escalation of Commitment – The Sunk Costs of Life in a Cult

Scientologists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Mormons, because of the way
their cults operate, are prone to engage in the practice of Escalation
of Commitment.  Escalation of Commitment is defined as the “’persistence
in a losing course of action by a decision-maker’.  It is marked by the
continuing investment of resources (e.g. time, money) despite negative
feedback about a previous decision.”[24] 
For a decision to be considered Escalation of Commitment it must
involve “(1) a previous loss; (2) the option to either continue or
withdraw from the decision situation; and (3) uncertain consequences of
making the decision to continue or withdraw.”[25] 
Perhaps the simplest and most relatable example of Escalation of
Commitment is a moviegoer who buys a ticket to a really bad two-hour
movie.  After one hour of not enjoying the movie, rather than walking
out, the moviegoer stays in his seat and finishes watching the film. 
Leaving at the halfway point would force the moviegoer to admit that he
wasted his ticket money.  Instead of leaving and preserving for
alternate use the remaining hour of his day, he holds out hope that the
movie might get better.  It doesn’t and he wastes another hour watching
the movie until its end.  With each passing second of the bad movie, the
commitment of the moviegoer to a doomed endeavor (watching a bad movie when his intention was to enjoy a good movie)
escalates.  Wasted time and money on a movie ticket does not amount to
much in the course of one’s life.  However, the cost of a single movie
ticket pales in comparison to much larger losses than can be incurred by
the same flawed thinking.  Consider the case of an investor who
purchases a block of stock for $10,000.  After a period of months the
value of his investment plummets to $5,000.  Market analysis indicates
that the company in which he owns stock is likely to go out of
business.  Rather than admit his error, sell the stock, and recoup
$5,000 of his investment for alternative use, the investor keeps his
stock until it is worthless.  Such irrational behavior is not limited to
individuals.  Large organizations and their managers also engage in
Escalation of Commitment when they refuse to abandon large-scale
multi-million dollar projects that show little indication of future
success.  According a 1987 article in Harvard Business Review
entitled “Knowing When to Pull the Plug”, “…all managers will make some
mistakes and stick with some decisions longer than they ought to. Recent
research has shown, however, that the tendency to pursue a failing
course of action is not a random thing. Indeed, at times some managers,
and even entire organizations, seem almost programmed to follow a dying
cause.” [26] 
No one makes the choice to enter into a course of action, whether it is
a relatively unimportant or life-changing one, unless he thinks he is
making the right decision.  Yet even highly-compensated business
executives are hesitant to admit failure when it becomes apparent. 
“Research has also shown…that executives fail to recognize when a
project is beyond hope. People have an almost uncanny ability to see
only what accords with their beliefs. Much like sports fans who
concentrate on their own team’s great plays and the other team’s fouls,
managers tend to see only what confirms their preferences. For example,
an executive who is convinced that a project will be profitable will
probably slant estimates of sales and costs to support the view. If the
facts challenge this opinion, the manager may work hard to find reasons
to discredit the source of information or the quality of the data. And
if the data are ambiguous, the manager may seize on just those facts
that support the opinion. Thus information biasing can be a major
roadblock to sensible withdrawal from losing courses of action…In
addition to the effects of rewards and biased information, (an
additional)  psychological mechanism may be at work. Sometimes even when
managers recognize that they have suffered losses, they may choose to
invest further resources in a project rather than accept failure. What
may be fostering escalation in these cases is a need for
self-justification.”[27] 
In the process of commitment escalation, decision makers demonstrate
undue attachment to “sunk costs,” which are defined as “costs that have
already been incurred and thus cannot be recovered.”[28] 
Because of their desire for self-justification they do not wish to
admit that the sunk costs which they have occurred have been wasted. 
The type of thinking present in Escalation of Commitment, which causes
individuals to continue with bad consumer choices and businesses to
continue with doomed investments projects, is the same type of thinking
that helps cults retain members.  Where cult members begin to doubt
their religious choices, Escalation of Commitment keeps them from
leaving their cult.

The religious practice of The Church of Scientology provides what is
perhaps the best example of Escalation of Commitment in religious life. 
According to the doctrine of scientology, “every person has two minds –
the analytical mind and the reactive mind.”[29]  The reactive mind is the “single source of human aberrations and psychosomatic ills.”[30] 
The purpose of practicing Scientology is to rid one’s self of the
reactive mind, thus entering in to a superior state of consciousness,
known in Scientology as “going clear”.  The reactive mind is removed
though the process of auditing.  Auditing sessions are offered by the
Church of Scientology for a fee.  As a Scientologist progresses in his
religious practice, paying for auditing session after auditing session,
he learns more and more about the very secretive religious beliefs of
Scientology.  A practitioner of scientology begins with the status of
“preclear.”  After a Scientologist has “gone clear” through the auditing
process he can receive the status of “Operating Thetan”.  However, his
potential for progression does not end at that point; there are
different levels of Operating Thetan status which can be achieved, up to
level eight.  To achieve these various levels one must continue paying
for auditing sessions.  At Operating Thetan Level Three, the
Scientologist is entrusted with the secretive story of how the reactive
mind came to wreak havoc on the human psyche.  According to the doctrine
of scientology, millions of years ago an intergalactic overlord named
Xenu was dealing with overpopulation in his empire.  To solve his
problem, he transported a multitude of frozen people to earth in space
planes. Once there, the frozen people were dumped into volcanoes and
obliterated by atomic bombs.  As their souls floated up into the
atmosphere, they were caught by soul-catching devices that Xenu had
placed there in anticipation.  These souls were then brainwashed by Xenu
and trapped on earth.  As humankind evolved from early primates, these
souls or “thetans” inhabited their minds.  Even today, when a child is
born, one or more thetans leap into his body, essentially becoming his
soul.  The reactive mind is a result of the bad experiences of these
thetans in their past lives.  Once a human “goes clear” as a
sufficiently leveled Operating Thetan, he can control matter, energy
space, and time. [31]  The cost of the auditing sessions necessary to obtain this plainly ludicrous explanation of humanity’s problems[32] is estimated to be between $200,000 and $400,000.[33] 
The amount of money and time spent to obtain Operating Thetan Level
Three is perhaps the ultimate religious sunk cost.  Admitting the
colossal mistake that one has progressively wasted hundreds of thousands
of dollars and worked thousands of man-hours to obtain a “clear state”
in a religion that is plainly as made up as a bad science fiction novel
takes a Herculean psychological effort.  Furthermore, the discrediting
of critical sources is a key tactic of Scientology’s leadership. 
Critics of Scientology deemed “suppressive persons” by the church are
essentially shunned by church members.  Furthermore, suppressive persons
can be maligned under Scientology’s “fair game” doctrine.[34] 
The maligning of the character of former Scientologists is easily
enabled by the auditing practice, as church members often admit
embarrassing facts about themselves in order to facilitate the process
of going clear.  The Scientologist who considers leaving his religion
faces losing friends, family, reputation, and any perceived progress in
attaining a higher state of consciousness.[35]

The structure of the Jehovah’s Witness religion also leaves its
members susceptible to Escalation of Commitment.  Unlike Scientology,
this religion is not a “pay to play” faith where adherents are expected
to pay their church for spiritual services.  However, like Scientology,
this religion teaches a form of works righteousness (or
self-justification), requires a significant investment of personal time,
and exhorts enormous influence over personal, professional, home, and
family life.  Jehovah’s Witnesses are well-known for their
house-to-house proselytizing.  Each Jehovah’s Witnesses is considered a
“publisher” [36]  by the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.[37]
Publishers are required to turn in a periodic “time report” to the
elders of their local congregation which detail their witnessing
activities.  “This report is put on their file. There are secret files
kept on all Jehovah’s Witnesses which are only viewed by the elders. If a
Jehovah’s Witness refuses to turn in a time report, they are
disciplined and put on list called ‘irregular publisher.’ The individual
will be on this black list until they again turn in regular reports.”[38] 
A convert to the Jehovah’s Witness faith “eagerly attends five meetings
a week and spends at least ten hours a month knocking on doors and
witnessing to people….if the JW is male and has not dropped out (of
publishing) he has the opportunity to progress through the ranks
publisher, servant, and perhaps even elder (a member of the
congregation’s governing board).”[39] 
If a Jehovah’s Witness spends seventy hours a month in preaching work,
he attains the level of “Pioneer”.  One can become a “Special Pioneer”
by devoting one hundred thirty hours or more to ministry each month. [40]
 In a way similar to how Scientology confers “Operating Thetan” levels
to practitioners who have earned them, the Watch Tower confers
prestigious levels of achievement on its dedicated members.  Any member
who begins to doubt the teaching of the Watch Tower or consider the
troubling the nature of its well-documented doctrinal flip flops, is
faced with Escalation of Commitment; admitting that the Jehovah’s
Witness faith is a false one also means admitting that he has wasted
countless hours pounding the pavement sharing the faith, all his kingdom
work has been for naught, and his earned status in the organization is
meaningless.  Further complicating matters is that Jehovah’s Witnesses
are discouraged from reading “apostate” literature (i.e. literature that
is critical of the Watch Tower).  So a Jehovah’s Witness is already
conditioned to trust the Watch Tower and doubt its detractors.  Former
Jehovah’s Witnesses are considered apostates.  “Apostates are the most
despicable people on the face of the earth, Jehovah’s Witnesses are
taught, with the result that a Witness would much rather encounter
someone expelled from the sect for theft or adultery than find himself
face-to-face with an apostate. The Watchtower tells them that they ‘must
hate’ apostates and that they must not be ‘curious about apostate
ideas.’ Therefore, any information that may come from an apostate source
can be dismissed without even listening to it.”[41] 
The Watch Tower, though Escalation of Commitment, sets its members up
for failure.  They are conditioned to doubt negative information about
the Watch Tower, trust their own biased information, and fear losing
their personal investment in self-justification.

The Mormon faith is also set up to capitalize on Escalation of
Commitment.  “Mormonism’s leaders believe that their organization, which
was founded by Joseph Smith in 1830, has God’s complete authority,
unlike any other institution on the face of the earth.”[42] 
“This authority comes through the LDS priesthood. There are two
divisions of the priesthood: the Aaronic and Melchizedek priesthoods,
both of which are held only by males. The Aaronic priesthood is known as
the ‘lesser’ priesthood and is made up of deacons (12 years old),
teachers (14 years old), priests (16 years old), and bishops (the leader
of local bodies of LDS believers). Meanwhile, the Melchizedek
priesthood is named after the priest mentioned in Genesis 14…The offices in this (priesthood) branch are elders, high priests, patriarchs, seventies, and apostles.”[43]  Faithful Mormon males between the ages of 18 and 25 are expected to participate in a two-year long mission trip[44] as a part of their priesthood duty.[45] 
Upon entering the Mormon mission field, the title of “elder” is
conferred upon a young man.  As is the case with Scientology and the
Watch Tower, the Mormon Church confers exclusive and prestigious titles
upon its members.  In the case of Mormonism, these titles are conferred
upon men who are still in their formative years. Mormons must earn the
right to enter their religious temples through clean living.  Only those
Mormons who support church leadership, are morally clean, pay a full
tithe, live in harmony with the church, and do not sympathize with
apostate groups earn a temple recommendation.[46] 
Inside of the temple is where Mormon marriage ceremonies are performed;
only those church members with a temple recommendation can attend these
ceremonies.  Husbands and wives who are sealed in a Mormon temple
marriage are taught that they have the opportunity to become gods and
goddesses of their own planet.  Without a celestial marriage, a Mormon
cannot become a god and continue his family into eternity.[47]  Furthermore, if a Mormon’s spouse leaves the Mormon faith, he cannot stay married to her and still become a god.[48]  As is the case with the priesthood, Mormon marriage commitments are typically foisted upon relatively young people.[49] 
As Mormons mature and learn more about their religion, there is good
reason that they should doubt what they have been taught.  The Mormon
creation myth is every bit as fantastical and intergalactic as that of
Scientology.  The Book or Mormon is not supported by any extant
archaeological evidence.  The character of Joseph Smith was dubious at
best.  As with L. Ron Hubbard, the historical record outside of his own
cult paints him as a cad.  Maturing Mormons who are tempted to leave
their faith face admitting that their priesthood titles and celestial
marriage commitments are fanciful fabrications and that the work they
performed for the salvation of themselves and others will not pay off. 
Adults who decide to leave the faith must admit that they wasted two
years of their life on a Mormon mission.  As it the case with the
Jehovah’s Witness and Scientology cults, members of the LDS church are
conditioned to look at their own biases with rose-colored glasses while
dismissing detractors as apostates.  Escalation of Commitment exerts
heavy pressure on Mormons to remain Mormon in the face of ample evidence
that their religion and its founding prophet are counterfeit; their
sunk costs are heavy.

The Consistency Trap – Mandated Testimony of Falsehoods

From small American beginnings, the Mormon and Jehovah’s Witness
religions have spread all over the world.  The Mormon Church estimates
its worldwide membership at 15,634,199.[50]  Jehovah’s Witnesses estimate their worldwide number to be 8,220,105.[51] 
These numbers are impressive, considering that neither religion is yet
two hundred years old and that both began with only a handful of
adherents.  However, these numbers are not surprising.  Mormons and
Jehovah’s Witnesses are known as the some of the most prolific
proselytizers of any faith.  Every Jehovah’s Witness is expected to be a
“publisher” who turns in witnessing reports.  The mandate of the Mormon
Church is “every member is a missionary.”[52] 
Because proselytizing is formally required by these cults (not just
expected as in other religions), its members are susceptible to falling
into what is known as a “consistency trap”.  (Ironically, they may try
to use such a trap themselves in order to make converts).  G. Richard
Sell, a professor of Business Ethics at the University of Pennsylvania’s
Wharton College of Business, explains the use of consistency traps as
follows: “Skilled negotiators know about the human need to appear
consistent and try to use it as often as they can.  Truly manipulative
people go beyond identifying their counterparts’ standard for
positioning purposes and try to trick their opponents by using what I
call consistency traps.  The goal of a consistency trap is to precommit
you to a seemingly innocent standard and then confront you with the
logical implications of the standard in a particular case – implications
that actually turn out to run against your interests.  This is a form
of intellectual coercion.”[53]  The consistency trap can be a marketer’s best friend.  They can also be useful for cults.

Testimonial write-in contests, which are typical of consumer product
marketers, provide an excellent example of a constancy trap in action.  A
typical contest resembles the following: The producers of Parkay Butter
offer $5,000 to the consumer who writes in the best testimonial
explaining why she “only uses Parkay Butter on her table.”  Not only
will the winner receive the cash prize; her testimonial will be printed
on Parkay’s butter packages.  Thousands of submissions are sent to
Parkay.  For the cost of $5,000 to one winner, Parkay gains the business
of every contest participant (to whom they paid nothing).  Each losing
contestant submitted a testimony saying that she would “only use Parkay
Butter on her table.”  Her own words, even though no one outside of
Parkay will ever see them, will convict her in her own mind every time
she is on the dairy aisle of the grocery store and thinks of reaching
for a different brand of butter.  At the same time, almost no one is
expected to begin buying Parkay butter because of the testimony of some
stranger that is written on the package.  The purpose of the contest all
along was to seal the participants in a consistency trap, not reach new
customers.[54] 
The proselytizing of Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses provides the same
benefit to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the Watch
Tower Bible and Tract Society, respectively.

Mormon Missionaries and Jehovah’s Witness publishers fail to gain a
new convert much more often than they successfully win one.  Each time a
Mormon Missionary or Jehovah’s Witness intentionally shares the
teaching of his cult, he reaffirms that teaching and his dedication to
his church in his own mind.  It is the practice of Mormons to share
their testimonies[55]
before their church.  Without doing so, a Mormon cannot participate in
temple ceremonies.  “A Mormon testimony consists of being able to say,
unequivocally, ‘I know the LDS Church is true and that Joseph Smith is a true prophet of God.’”[56] 
In order to reject Mormonism, a Mormon must admit that he dedicated two
years of his life on a mission trying to convince other people that a
lie was the truth.  A generational Mormon must admit that he passed this
lie on to his own children and encouraged them to go on missions of
their own.  He must admit that every time he said “The Holy Spirit
revealed to me that the Book of Mormon is true,” that he was deceived.[57] 
He must admit that he gave a false testimony to his church about what
he said he “knew”.  Similarly, in order to reject the Watch Tower, a
Jehovah’s Witnesses must admit that he spent countless hours going to
countless houses, knocking on countless doors, and trying to convince
countless people to believe a false gospel.[58] 
The Mormon and Watchtower cults, like marketers selling butter with a
testimonial contest, condition their members to stay consistent with
their doctrine through mandated and repeated personal testimonies.  In
order to admit that Joseph Smith was a liar, the Mormon has to admit
that he is a liar himself.  In order to admit that the Watch Tower is a
false prophet, the Jehovah’s Witness must admit that he is a false
prophet himself.  These cults have set up a systematic consistency
trap.  Their leaders arguably understand the old axiom of business: “It
is usually far cheaper to retain existing customers than it is to find
new ones.”[59]

Bait and Switch – What the Cultist at the Door Doesn’t Share

Without any documentation from cult leadership to confirm, it’s
impossible to definitively claim that the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints, and the Watchtower Bible or Tract Society
intentionally use consistency traps to retain members.  However, there
is a psychological manipulation tactic that Mormons and Jehovah’s
Witnesses certainly use to gain converts; the bait-and-switch.  “The
term bait-and-switch is most commonly used to refer to an
advertising practice that is both unethical and illegal…It typically
involves an advertiser luring customers into the store by advertising a
product at an unrealistically low price (the bait).  The customer is
then told that the advertised goods are (1) not available or (2) of
inferior quality and/or not suitable for the customer’s needs.  The goal
is to “switch” the customer to another, more expensive product or one
that has a higher profit margin.  What sets bait-and-switch apart from
other advertising practices is that the store does not intend to sell
the advertised product – the advertised product is intended to attract
customers, who are then persuaded to buy another product.”[60]

When Jehovah’s Witnesses knock on a door, they are often not entirely
honest about the full requirements of their religion to the person who
answers it.  “Dangerous cults don’t reveal all of their strange
doctrines when they try to recruit new members.  For a Jehovah’s Witness
to start his recruitment effort by saying, ‘Join us; if your child ever
needs a blood transfusion you have to let him die’ or ‘Join us; our
kids will have to give up sports and Christmas’ would be a
deal-breaker.  Usually the Jehovah’s Witnesses approach people with more
orthodox teachings – beliefs that are shared with other religious
groups….As the prospect becomes more interested and more committed to
the cult, the leaders gradually introduce the more bizarre doctrines. 
The initiate is not allowed to know the inner secrets until he is fully
indoctrinated.”[61] 
Jehovah’s Witnesses (themselves a sub-Christian cult) typically operate
within culturally Christian communities; they “bait” prospects with
generically orthodox Christian teachings as they initiate regular
Bible-study with them.  Then, once the commitment of a prospect has
escalated, Jehovah’s Witnesses “switch” to teaching the heretical,
controversial tenets of their cult.  Mormons do this as well.  Like
Jehovah’s Witnesses, they are a sub-Christian cult that typically
operates in culturally Christian areas.  Mormon missionaries approach
prospects with generic Christian language.  They refer to Jesus as
“savior” and to “the Godhead”.  However, the Jesus to which they refer
is not the Jesus of orthodox Christianity but a created spirit-being
from Kolob.  The Godhead to which they refer is not the Triune God of
orthodox Christianity but “Three gods— God the Father, Jesus Christ, and
the Holy Ghost— who, while distinct in being, are one in purpose.”[62] 
Like Jehovah’s Witnesses, Mormons hide the heretical, controversial
tenets of their cult.  Mormon missionaries are not supposed to tell
prospects and new converts about “deep doctrine” because it often scares
off new members.  Such “deep doctrine” includes the notions that there
is a heavenly mother, that Mormons can become gods, and that those
Mormons who don’t pay their tithes could die in by falling fire.[63] 
Deep doctrines come later, after commitment has escalated. 
Scientologists arguably participate in bait-and-switch tactics as well. 
Prospective scientologists are enticed with the idea that L. Ron
Hubbard’s “Dianetics” methodology can improve their psychological
state.  It is only at Operating Thetan Level Thee that they are informed
of Scientology’s space opera creation myth.

Christians and Consumer Advocacy

At the most basic level, lost is lost.  Whether someone is an
atheist, a non-religious theist, or a cult member, his biggest problem
is that he doesn’t know Jesus and his biggest need is the gospel.  The
gospel, that Christ died for humanity’s sins and was raised on the third
day in accordance with the scriptures,[64]
is the same for every person no matter his background.  Still special
care can be taken to approach non-Christians in accordance with their
backgrounds and personal situations.  Cultists, like all nonbelievers,
are separated from God by their sin.  However, they are additionally
insulated from and prejudiced toward biblical truth by the doctrinal
perversion and mind control perpetrated by their cult.  This is a wall
that needs to be broken down.  If a Christian attempts to break that
wall by showing the cultist that he has been, as it were, sold a bill of
goods, the Christian needs to ensure that the cultist knows that he
isn’t just trying to sell him Christianity as a replacement product.

The Christian needs to present himself as someone who is there to
help the cultist in the same way consumer advocates and government
agencies are there to help consumers who have been ripped off.  In
today’s Christian culture, this can be a difficult thing to do.  Perry
Noble, the former pastor the largest Southern Baptist Church in the
World[65]
was removed from his office in July of 2016 for the abuse of alcohol. 
His ministry comeback endeavor is church growth consulting.  In
advertising his services, Noble stated, “Some may argue the church is
not a business – I would disagree.  After all, at one point in serving
as the Senior Pastor of NewSpring Church I was responsible for 425
employees and a $63,000,000 budget – which takes way more than a prayer
meeting to manage!”[66] 
Christianity is not a transactional religion and Christ’s church is not
a storefront.  Methodological success and millions of dollars in
revenue do not make a religious organization successful before the
Lord.  Cultists who have spent their lives in works-based,
self-justifying religions must be able to see that Christian salvation
comes by God’s grace alone.  Cultists who have been trying to work their
way to God need to be told, “It’s not by doing good deeds. You can’t
work your way in. You do not have the ability to produce the things that
only God can do in your life…. You can’t, and God never said you could.
But He can, and He always said He would.”[67] 
The Christian life is not for sale; salvation is free a gift of God. 
Success in the Christian life comes by the sanctification of the Holy
Spirit.  No gimmicks and manipulations are needed.

The Christian should be wary when exposing the psychological tactics
cults use to cult members.  His audience might not be a deceived,
ignorant, and innocent victim but a willing perpetrator of psychological
manipulation and business-like marketing.  An iconic 1997 edition of
Time Magazine featured the phrase “Mormons Inc” superimposed over a
picture of the Salt Lake City Mormon Temple.  An article inside of the
magazine revealed that the Latter Day Saints were some of the world’s
savviest businesspeople.  Its writer reported, “…the Latter-day Saints
employ vast amounts of money in investments that TIME estimates to be at
least $6 billion strong. Even more unusual, most of this money is not
in bonds or stock in other peoples’ companies but is invested directly
in church-owned, for-profit concerns, the largest of which are in
agribusiness, media, insurance, travel and real estate. Deseret
Management Corp., the company through which the church holds almost all
its commercial assets, is one of the largest owners of farm and
ranchland in the country, including 49 for-profit parcels in addition to
the Deseret Ranch. Besides the Bonneville International chain and
Beneficial Life, the church owns a 52% holding in ZCMI, Utah’s largest
department-store chain.  All told, TIME estimates that the Latter-day
Saints farmland and financial investments total some $11 billion, and
that the church’s nontithe income from its investments exceeds $600
million.”[68] 
The Mormons are not novices when it comes to growing businesses or
religions.  Neither or Scientologists; their religion counts among its
adherents some of the film industry’s most influential power brokers. 
Their mindsets should be juxtaposed against that of Jesus.  L. Ron
Hubbard, a writer of pulp fiction before he founded his religion, is
famously credited with saying, “You don’t get rich writing science
fiction. If you want to get rich, you start a religion.”[69]  Jesus Christ, who died the death or a poor man and didn’t so much as have a place to lay his head[70] said, “I will build my church.”[71]  He did just that, without marketing, manipulation, or mind control.  The same cannot be said of the American cults.

*Please note that the preceding is my personal opinion. It is not
necessarily the opinion of any entity by which I am employed, any
church at which I am a member, any church which I attend, or the
educational institution at which I am enrolled. Any copyrighted material
displayed or referenced is done under the doctrine of fair use.

Bibliography

Abramsky, Sasha. “Christopher Hitchens Interview.” The Progressive.
December 16, 1997.
http://www.progressive.org/christopher_hitchens_1997_progressive_interview.html
(accessed November 13, 2016).

Barber, Wayne. “Ephesians 1:18-20 by Wayne Barber.” PreceptAustin.Org. August 01, 2016. http://www.preceptaustin.org/ephesians_118-20_by_wayne_barber (accessed November 28, 2016).

Barker, Jason. “Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.” Watchman Fellowship. 2011. http://www.watchman.org/profiles/pdf/watchtowerprofile.pdf (accessed November 16, 2016).

Bisagno, John. Pastor’s Handbook. B&H Publishing Group, 2011.

Branch, Craig. “Church of Scientology: A Religious Mafia?” Watchman Fellowship. http://www.watchman.org/articles/scientology/church-of-scientology-a-religious-mafia/ (accessed November 27, 2016).

Branch, Rich. “Church of Scientolgy .” Watchman Fellowship. 1994. http://www.watchman.org/profiles/pdf/scientologyprofile.pdf (accessed November 16, 2106).

Dunn, Seth. “A Doctrinal Overview of the Watch Tower.” Seth Dunn – A Chrisitan Worldview.
November 09, 2016.
A DOCTRINAL OVERVIEW OF THE WATCH TOWER
(accessed November 28, 2016).

—. “An Interview with a Former Mormon.” Seth Dunn – A Christian Worldview. November 25, 2016. https://gsethdunn.wordpress.com/2016/11/25/an-interview-with-a-former-mormon/ (accessed November 28, 2016).

Evangelical Philosophical Society. “Interview with Paul Copan: Is Yahweh a Moral Monster?” Evangelical Philosophical Society. April 7, 2008. http://blog.epsociety.org/2008/04/interview-with-paul-copan-is-yahweh.asp (accessed November 13, 2016).

Federal Trade Commission . “The Antitrust Laws.” Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws (accessed November 19, 2016).

Fisher, Josie. Bait-And-Switch Practices. Vol. 1, in Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society, edited by Robert W. Kolb. Sage Publications, 2008.

Grim, Brian J and Melissa E. Grim. “The Socio-economic Contribution of Religion to American Society: An Empirical Analysis.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 2016.

Hayes, Jenny and Frances Dredge. Managing Customer Service. Gower Publishing Limited, 1998.

Hewitt, Joe B. Rescuing Slaves of the Watchtower. Garland, TX: Hannibal Books, 2011.

Hitchens, Christopher. “God Bless Me, It’s a Best-Seller!” Vanity Fair. September 2007. http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2007/09/hitchens200709 (accessed November 16, 2016).

Horn, Marianna L. “The downside of persistence: The effects of mood
on an escalation of commitment paradigm.” A thesis submitted to the
Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, 2012.

http://www.watchthetower.net/. “Tools of the Trade.” http://www.watchthetower.net/. http://www.watchthetower.net/tools1 (accessed November 28, 2016).

Intellectual Reserve, Inc. “Facts and Statistics.” Newsroom. September 01, 2016. http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/facts-and-statistics (accessed September 18, 2016).

—. “Preparing to Serve.” www.lds.org. March 18, 2016. https://www.lds.org/callings/missionary/faqs?lang=eng#4 (accessed November 28, 2016).

Intellectual Reserve, Inc. “Missionary Program.” Newsroom. 2016. https://www.lds.org/callings/missionary/faqs?lang=eng#4 (accessed November 28, 2016).

Investopedia. “Sunk Cost.” Investopedia. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sunkcost.asp?lgl=no-infinite (accessed November 27, 2016).

LifeWay Christian Resources. “SBC 500.” ThomRainer.com. 2016. http://thomrainer.com/sbc500/ (accessed November 28, 2016).

McKeever, Bill and Eric Johnson. Mormonism 101: Examining the Religion of the Latter-day Saints. Revised and Expanded ed. Baker Books, 2015.

Naylor, Carma. A Mormon’s Unexpected Journey: Finding the Grace I Never Knew. Vol. 1. Enumclaw, MA: Winpress Publishing, 2006.

Noble, Perry. “My Next Step.” PerryNoble.com. November 28, 2016. https://perrynoble.com/blog/my-next-step (accessed November 28, 2016).

Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief. Directed by Alex Gibney. Produced by HBO Documentary Films. Performed by Jason Beghe, Spanky Taylor Paul Haggis. 2015.

Pew Research Center. “Religious Landscape Study.” Pew Research Center. 2016. http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/ (accessed November 11, 2016).

Reed, David. Answering Jehovah’s Witnesses: Subject by Subject. Kindle Edition. Baker Books, 2011.

Shell, G. Richard. Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. Penguin Books, 2006.

Stack, Peggy Fletcher. “Mormon guys delay marriage in paralyzing hunt for perfect wife.” USA Today. April 21, 2011. http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/2011-04-22-mormon_dating_21_ST_N.htm (accessed November 28, 2016).

Staw, Barry M and Jerry Ross. “Knowing When to Pull the Plug.” Harvard Business Review, 1987.

Trapped in the Closet. Directed by Trey Parker. Produced by Braniff. Performed by Matt Stone, John ‘Nancy’ Hansen Trey Parker. 2005.

Van Biema, David. “Kingdom Come – Salt Lake City Was Just for
Starters – The Mormons’ True Great Trek Has Been to Social Acceptance
And a $30 Billion Church Empire.” Time Magazine, August 4, 1997.

Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. “How Many of Jehovah’s Witnesses Are There Worldwide?” JW.ORG. 2016. https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/how-many-jw-members/ (accessed November 2016, 2016).

—. “What Is a Pioneer?” JW.ORG. 2016. https://www.jw.org/en/publications/books/jehovahs-will/jw-pioneer/ (accessed November 28, 2016).

White, Thomas and John Yeats. Franchising McChurch: Feeding American’s Obsession with Easy Christianity. David C Cook, 2009.

Wikiquote contributors. “L. Ron Hubbard.” Wikiquote. March 16, 2016. https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=L._Ron_Hubbard&oldid=2100019 (accessed March 28, 2016).

[1] Evangelical Philosophical Society. “Interview with Paul Copan: Is Yahweh a Moral Monster?” Evangelical Philosophical Society. April 7, 2008. http://blog.epsociety.org/2008/04/interview-with-paul-copan-is-yahweh.asp (accessed November 13, 2016).

[2] Abramsky, Sasha. “Christopher Hitchens Interview.” The Progressive.
December 16, 1997.
http://www.progressive.org/christopher_hitchens_1997_progressive_interview.html
(accessed November 13, 2016).

[3] Hitchens, Christopher. “God Bless Me, It’s a Best-Seller!” Vanity Fair. September 2007. http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2007/09/hitchens200709 (accessed November 16, 2016).

[4] Pew Research Center. “Religious Landscape Study.” Pew Research Center. 2016. http://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/ (accessed November 11, 2016).

[5] McKeever, Bill and Eric Johnson. Mormonism 101: Examining the Religion of the Latter-day Saints. Revised and Expanded ed. Baker Books, 2015. p 20.

[6] Barker, Jason. “Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society.” Watchman Fellowship. 2011. http://www.watchman.org/profiles/pdf/watchtowerprofile.pdf (accessed November 16, 2016).

[7] Branch, Rich. “Church of Scientolgy .” Watchman Fellowship. 1994. http://www.watchman.org/profiles/pdf/scientologyprofile.pdf (accessed November 16, 2106).

[8] White, Thomas and John Yeats. Franchising McChurch: Feeding American’s Obsession with Easy Christianity. David C Cook, 2009. p 13

[9] ibid

[10] This text has been used in the course Church Leadership and Administration at the New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary and is published by a Southern Baptist publishing company.

[11] On pages 318, 384, and 386 of Pastor’s Handbook,
Pastor John Bisagno encourages readers to adopt some of the business
practices of these secular hospitality companies in order to attract and
retain church attendees.

[12] Grim, Brian J and Melissa E. Grim. “The Socio-economic Contribution of Religion to American Society: An Empirical Analysis.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, 2016. p 2

[13] ibid

[14]
Their size, scope, competence, and compliance with a Christian view of
justice are debatable.  However, that debate is outside of the scope of
this paper.

[15]Romans 13:1-7

[16] Federal Trade Commission . “The Antitrust Laws.” Federal Trade Commission. https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/antitrust-laws (accessed November 19, 2016).

[17]
“Trust-busting” is a term that referred to President Theodore
Roosevelt’s policy of prosecuting monopolies, or “trusts,” that violated
federal antitrust law.  See http://www.encyclopedia.com/history/dictionaries-thesauruses-pictures-and-press-releases/trust-busting for further explanation.

[18]
It may seem strange to refer to religious organizations as
“monopolistic,” however, one of the marks of a cult is that, like a
monopoly, it corners the market on something desirable.  In the case of a
cult, it purports to have the market cornered on truth.  According to
the Christian Apologetics Research Ministry, one of the tendencies of a
cult is that it “often considers traditional religious systems to be
apostate and it alone possesses the complete truth.”  For more
information see https://carm.org/cults-outline-analysis.

[19] 2 Timothy 3:16, 2 Peter 1:21

[20] James 1:12

[21] Luke 20:47, Ezekiel 16:49, Amos 5:12, Titus 1:11, 1 Peter 5:2

[22] Ephesians 5:11

[23] Philippians 1:15

[24]
Horn, Marianna L. “The downside of persistence: The effects of mood on
an escalation of commitment paradigm.” A thesis submitted to the
Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the Degree of Master of Science, 2012.

[25] ibid

[26] Staw, Barry M and Jerry Ross. “Knowing When to Pull the Plug.” Harvard Business Review, 1987.

[27] ibid

[28] Investopedia. “Sunk Cost.” Investopedia. http://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sunkcost.asp?lgl=no-infinite (accessed November 27, 2016).

[29] Branch, Rich. “Church of Scientolgy .” Watchman Fellowship. 1994. http://www.watchman.org/profiles/pdf/scientologyprofile.pdf (accessed November 16, 2106).

[30] ibid

[31]
This information was a closely guarded secret for decades.  In recent
years, media producers and former scientologists have begun to
disseminate this information on the internet, in books, in documentary
film, and even in an episode of South Park.

[32] It must be noted here that L. Ron Hubbard was a writer of science fiction stories before he founded Scientology.

[33] Branch, Craig. “Church of Scientology: A Religious Mafia?” Watchman Fellowship. http://www.watchman.org/articles/scientology/church-of-scientology-a-religious-mafia/ (accessed November 27, 2016).

[34]
Breaking critics through litigation is a key strategy in fair game
doctrine.  Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard once remarked, “The
purpose of the suit is to harass and discourage rather than to win. The
law can be used very easily to harass, and enough harassment on somebody
who is simply on the thin edge anyway, well knowing that he is not
authorized, will generally be sufficient to cause his professional
decease. If possible, of course, ruin him utterly.”  For more
information see https://gsethdunn.wordpress.com/2014/02/01/fair-game-scientology-ergun-caner-lawsuits-and-the-georgia-baptist-convention/.

[35]
It is worth noting that the United States government (specifically the
IRS) did challenge the religious status of the Church of Scientology. 
The church was the subject of a massive FBI investigation that included
raids on church property.  A number of church operatives went to jail as
a result of these investigations.  Eventually, through the use of
litigation, The Church of Scientology obtained recognition as a
“religion” by the IRS.  For more information see Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief.

[36] Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. “What Is a Pioneer?” JW.ORG. 2016. https://www.jw.org/en/publications/books/jehovahs-will/jw-pioneer/ (accessed November 28, 2016).

[37]
“The Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania is a nonprofit
corporation formed in 1884 under the laws of the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania, U.S.A.  It is under the structure of this corporation, as
well as a number of affiliated legal entities, that the religious group
known as “Jehovah’s Witnesses” carries out its worldwide work.  For more
information see https://gsethdunn.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/a-doctrinal-overview-of-the-watch-tower/.

[38] http://www.watchthetower.net/. “Tools of the Trade.” http://www.watchthetower.net/.
http://www.watchthetower.net/tools1 (accessed November 28, 2016).  The
proprietors of Watchthetower.net are Paul and Pat Blizzard.  The
Blizzards are former high-level Jehovah’s Witnesses who are well-known
detractors of the Watch Tower.  For more information on the Blizzards
see http://www.watchthetower.net/bio.html.

[39] Hewitt, Joe B. Rescuing Slaves of the Watchtower. Garland, TX: Hannibal Books, 2011. p 11

[40] Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. “What Is a Pioneer?” JW.ORG. 2016. https://www.jw.org/en/publications/books/jehovahs-will/jw-pioneer/ (accessed November 28, 2016).

[41] Reed, David. Answering Jehovah’s Witnesses: Subject by Subject. Kindle Edition. Baker Books, 2011. p 18

[42] McKeever, Bill and Eric Johnson. Mormonism 101: Examining the Religion of the Latter-day Saints. Revised and Expanded ed. Baker Books, 2015. p 303

[43] ibid p 12-13

[44] Intellectual Reserve, Inc. “Missionary Program.” Newsroom. 2016. https://www.lds.org/callings/missionary/faqs?lang=eng#4 (accessed November 28, 2016).

[45] Intellectual Reserve, Inc. “Preparing to Serve.” www.lds.org. March 18, 2016. https://www.lds.org/callings/missionary/faqs?lang=eng#4 (accessed November 28, 2016).

[46] McKeever, Bill and Eric Johnson. Mormonism 101: Examining the Religion of the Latter-day Saints. Revised and Expanded ed. Baker Books, 2015. p 244

[47] ibid p 143

[48] Naylor, Carma. A Mormon’s Unexpected Journey: Finding the Grace I Never Knew. Vol. 1. Enumclaw, MA: Winpress Publishing, 2006. p 214

[49]
The median age for a first marriage in the U.S. has climbed to 25.8 for
women and 27.4 for men. In heavily Mormon Utah, the median age for
first-time brides has jumped from 20 in 1970 to 22 in 2008, and from 22
to 24 for men. For more information see http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/religion/2011-04-22-mormon_dating_21_ST_N.htm.

[50] Intellectual Reserve, Inc. “Facts and Statistics.” Newsroom. September 01, 2016. http://www.mormonnewsroom.org/facts-and-statistics (accessed September 18, 2016).

[51] Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania. “How Many of Jehovah’s Witnesses Are There Worldwide?” JW.ORG. 2016. https://www.jw.org/en/jehovahs-witnesses/faq/how-many-jw-members/ (accessed November 2016, 2016).

[52] Naylor, Carma. A Mormon’s Unexpected Journey: Finding the Grace I Never Knew. Vol. 1. Enumclaw, MA: Winpress Publishing, 2006. p 158

[53] Shell, G. Richard. Bargaining for Advantage: Negotiation Strategies for Reasonable People. Penguin Books, 2006. p 46

[54]
This contest scenario is not of my own invention.  It was presented by
the professor to my Psychology 101 class at Georgia Southern University
in the year 2000.  It’s been sixteen years since I took that course. 
His Parkay butter example sticks with me but I do not recall the
professor’s name.  He was a Buddhist who proscribed spanking children so
I didn’t put a lot of stock into some of the other things he said.

[55]
A Mormon testimony includes affirming the knowledge that one preexisted
with God on Kolob before being born on planet Earth.  Mormons believe
that they preexisted as God’s spirit children on another planet before
coming to Earth as humans.  Similarly, Scientologists believe that their
thetan souls preexisted as extraterrestrials before their human hosts
were born on Earth.

[56] Naylor, Carma. A Mormon’s Unexpected Journey: Finding the Grace I Never Knew. Vol. 1. Enumclaw, MA: Winpress Publishing, 2006. p 7

[57]
Mormon testimony almost typically includes the claim that the Mormon
received a “burning in the bosom” from the Holy Spirit that testified to
the truth of the Book of Mormon.

[58]
I use the term “countless” hyperbolically here since Jehovah’s
Witnesses literally keep count of their witnessing encounters and turn
in reports documenting their counts to their church’s leadership.

[59] Hayes, Jenny and Frances Dredge. Managing Customer Service. Gower Publishing Limited, 1998. p 4

[60] Fisher, Josie. Bait-And-Switch Practices. Vol. 1, in Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society, edited by Robert W. Kolb. Sage Publications, 2008. p 139

[61] Hewitt, Joe B. Rescuing Slaves of the Watchtower. Garland, TX: Hannibal Books, 2011. p 43-44.

[62] McKeever, Bill and Eric Johnson. Mormonism 101: Examining the Religion of the Latter-day Saints. Revised and Expanded ed. Baker Books, 2015. p 31

[63] Dunn, Seth. “An Interview with a Former Mormon.” Seth Dunn – A Christian Worldview. November 25, 2016. https://gsethdunn.wordpress.com/2016/11/25/an-interview-with-a-former-mormon/ (accessed November 28, 2016).

[64] 1 Corinthians 15:3-8

[65] That church is NewSpring Community Church in Anderson, SC.  For more information see http://thomrainer.com/sbc500/.

[66] Noble, Perry. “My Next Step.” PerryNoble.com. November 28, 2016. https://perrynoble.com/blog/my-next-step (accessed November 28, 2016)

[67] Barber, Wayne. “Ephesians 1:18-20 by Wayne Barber.” PreceptAustin.Org. August 01, 2016. http://www.preceptaustin.org/ephesians_118-20_by_wayne_barber (accessed November 28, 2016).

[68]
Van Biema, David. “Kingdom Come – Salt Lake City Was Just for Starters –
The Mormons’ True Great Trek Has Been to Social Acceptance And a $30
Billion Church Empire.” Time Magazine, August 4, 1997.

[69] Wikiquote contributors. “L. Ron Hubbard.” Wikiquote. March 16, 2016. https://en.wikiquote.org/w/index.php?title=L._Ron_Hubbard&oldid=2100019 (accessed March 28, 2016).

[70] Matthew 8:20

[71] Matthew 16:18

ROGUE CIA WORKING TO OVERTHROW TRUMP ELECTION~CLAIMS RUSSIA INTERFERED IN ELECTION TO BENEFIT TRUMP

ROGUE CIA WORKING TO OVERTHROW 
TRUMP ELECTION 
 CIA report claims Russia interfered in election 
to benefit Trump
 

When the CIA – a group of admitted liars and domestic propagandists – come out with a report, you can bet it’s fake news.
Also, check out Alex’s other report, “MSM Takes Fake News To The Next Level”:


STINCHFIELD & LOESCH TELL MILWAUKEE POLICE CHIEF ED FLYNN TO DEFEND HIS CONCEALED CARRY LIES ON NRATV, BUT HE REFUSES ALL INVITATIONS

STINCHFIELD & LOESCH TELL MILWAUKEE POLICE CHIEF ED FLYNN TO DEFEND HIS CONCEALED CARRY LIES ON NRATV 
Refuses Three Invitations
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 USA – -(Ammoland.com)-
 NRATV’s Grant Stinchfield and Dana Loesch are challenging Milwaukee 
Police Chief Ed Flynn to come on the network and answer for his baseless
 claim that “concealed-carry permit holders—many of whom have extensive 
criminal records,” are responsible for the city’s increased crime rate. 
“Put up or shut up. Show me the evidence,” Loesch said Thursday.
“He needs to answer publically for the damage he creates by
claiming—with no proof mind you—that concealed carry holders are
responsible for an increase in crime in Milwaukee. He attacks all
freedom loving Americans,” Stinchfield said.
On Friday, Loesch
noted she had invited Flynn on her radio show, but that “coward
chicken-crap chief” didn’t want to do it. “Guess what Dana? We invited
him here three times and about 15 minutes ago we got an email from him
saying he doesn’t want to come on,” Stinchfield said. “Milwaukee Police
Chief Ed Flynn is running from NRATV.”

Dana Loesch appears on “NRATV Live” with Host Grant Stinchfield weekdays
at 11 CT/12 ET. NRATV is a revolutionary network, broadcast in
streaming HD 24 hours a day, featuring live news updates and interviews
at the top of each hour, as well as 23 original series with episodes you
can watch on demand 24/7. NRATV offers the most comprehensive video
coverage of news, lifestyle shows, historic speeches, commentary and
live broadcasts on the issues of freedom that matter most and is
available on Apple TV, Roku, Google Chrome Cast, Amazon Fire TV and at NRATV.com.

WHITE HOUSE “CHAMPION” BLASTS MUSLIMS WHO TALK TO ANY PRO ISRAEL JEWS

 https://www.jihadwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/lindasarsour.jpg
WHITE HOUSE “CHAMPION” BLASTS MUSLIMS WHO TALK TO ANY PRO ISRAEL JEWS 
BY CHERYL CHUMLEY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

A Palestinian activist who decried “bitter people” on Twitter forgot
her own words and failed to walk what she talked when – three days later
– she delivered a hate-filled speech at the American Muslims for
Palestine conference that took broad sideswipes at Jews.
Here’s the story, from the Investigative Project:

“Linda Sarsour took to Twitter Nov. 22 with a quick, venting post: ‘You know what I can’t stand? Bitter people. That’s all.’
“Sarsour spoke at the annual American Muslims for Palestine (AMP)
conference three days later. Evidently, she can’t stand herself.
“Sarsour, who describes herself as a ‘racial justice and civil rights
activist,’ lashed out at Jews who extended a hand of friendship and
solidarity over concerns that increasing hostility toward Muslims in
America might lead to draconian government action. And she lashed out at
fellow Muslims who accepted the gesture and joined in a new inter-faith
dialogue.”

Umm, a bit bitter, wouldn’t you say, Sarsour?

Linda Sarsour is regarded as a moderate voice for Islam, but nonetheless criticizes Jewish people and those who believe Israel ought to exist as a nation.Linda
Sarsour is regarded as a moderate voice for Islam, but nonetheless
criticizes Jewish people and those who believe Israel ought to exist as a
nation.Again, from the Investigative Project, a clue to her angst:

“The Jews at issue support the state of Israel, support its existence and its vitality. Sarsour wants none of that.”

Got it. So bitterness, bad – except when it comes from outrage over Jewish people who support the state of Israel.
She said, the news outlet reported:

“‘We have limits to the type of friendships that we’re
looking for right now,” Sarsour told the AMP conference, ‘and I want to
be friends with those whom I know have been steadfast, courageous, have
been standing up and protecting their own communities, those who have
taken the risk to stand up and say – we are with the Palestinian people,
we unequivocally support BDS [boycott, divestment and sanctioning
Israel] when it comes to Palestinian human rights and have been attacked
viciously by the very people who are telling you that they’re about to
stand on the front line of the Muslim registry program. No thank you,
sisters and brothers.’”

Sarsour’s remarks no doubt went over well with the other conference attendees.
As Investigative Project wrote:

“AMP claims its ‘sole purpose is to educate the American
public and media about issues related to Palestine and its rich cultural
and historical heritage.’ But in practice, the group has defended Hamas
and its leaders admit they seek ‘to challenge the legitimacy of the
State of Israel.’”

Sarsour isn’t just any voice in the wilderness. She was honored by
the Obama administration as a “Champion of Change” and also served with
Sen. Bernie Sanders on his failed presidential campaign.
Once again, from the Investigative Project:

“She acknowledges there’s a rift among Islamists about
how hard a line to draw in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, yet she was
intent on pouring gasoline on the fire.
“The ‘cracks in our community’ are so wide, she said, they’re visible
to ‘right-wing Zionists, Islamophobes, white supremacists.’
“‘They know where we’re divided. They know that we’re segregated,’
she said. ‘So they, we could easily be targeted when we’re a fragmented
community. But if we were a strong, united, steadfast community that
stood up for each other first and foremost, you’d better believe that no
opposition would ever be trying to take us down, because we’d be too
big, too strong and too united.’
“Some of her comments likely were directed at Anti-Defamation League
chief Jonathan Greenblatt. Should a Trump administration create a
registry for Muslims, an idea that does not seem to be on the table,
Greenblatt recently pledged that ‘this proud Jew will register as
Muslim.’”
“Sarsour not only rebuked the gesture, she cast Muslims who might
respond more positively as sellouts of the Palestinian cause.
Cooperation and solidarity gestures should only be reserved for those
who share the depth of her hatred toward Israel, she said.”

______________________________________________________

 SARSOUR RAILS AGAINST “WHITE SUPREMACY”:
 COMBATING ISLAMOPHOBIA

ISLAM IN EUROPE: FREEDOM PARTY’S DUTCH MP GEERT WILDERS CONVICTED OF HERESY~WILDERS PUBLIC STATEMENT

 http://cdn-lejdd.ladmedia.fr/var/lejdd/storage/images/media/images/pamelawilders/11463910-1-fre-FR/pamelawilders.jpg
ISLAM IN EUROPE: 
FREEDOM PARTY’S DUTCH MP GEERT WILDERS CONVICTED OF HERESY~
WILDERS PUBLIC STATEMENT 
BY PAMELA GELLER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Freedom party leader Geert Wilders has been convicted of hate speech today in the Netherlands.

I have long known, admired and worked with Geert Wilders. I brought him to CPAC back in 2009. He spoke at our Ground Zero Mosque protests
in 2010. He is one of the world’s foremost fighters in defense of
liberty, a modern-day Churchill. He is a towering figure, iconic of the
fight in defense of freedom of speech and freedom of conscience. We
oppose jihad and sharia.

The unending persecution of Wilders is the byproduct of Islam in
Europe. Today he was found guilty of discrimination — hate speech — in
other words, violating the speech laws under the sharia (Islamic law).

I predict this will backfire and Geert Wilders will go on to be elected Prime Minister in the next election.

el_marco_lookingattheleft_0210

Revealed on the day Geert Wilders convicted – jihadi found in Rotterdam, Holland with loaded AK47.

Here is Geert Wilders’ response to his conviction:

Dear friends, I still cannot believe it, but I have just been
convicted. Because I asked a question about Moroccans. While the day
before yesterday, scores of Moroccan asylum-seekers terrorized buses in
Emmen and did not even had to pay a fine, a politician who asks a
question about fewer Moroccans is sentenced.

The Netherlands have become a sick country. And I have a message for
the judges who convicted me: You have restricted the freedom of speech
of millions of Dutch and hence convicted everyone. No one trusts you
anymore. But fortunately, truth and liberty are stronger than you. And
so am I.

I will never be silent. You will not be able to stop me. And you are
wrong, too. Moroccans are not a race, and people who criticize Moroccans
are not racists. I am not a racist and neither are my voters. This
sentence proves that you judges are completely out of touch.

And I have also a message for Prime Minister Rutte and the rest of
the multicultural elite: You will not succeed in silencing me and
defeating the PVV. Support for the Party for Freedom is stronger than
ever, and keeps growing every day. The Dutch want their country back and
cherish their freedom. It will not be possible to put the genie of
positive change back in the bottle.

And to people at home I say: Freedom of speech is our pride. And this
will remain so. For centuries, we Dutch have been speaking the
unvarnished truth. Free speech is our most important possession. We will
never let them take away our freedom of speech. Because the flame of
freedom burns within us and cannot be extinguished.

Millions of Dutch are sick and tired of political correctness. Sick
and tired of the elite which only cares about itself and ignores the
ordinary Dutchman. And sells out our country. People no longer feel
represented by all these disconnected politicians, judges and
journalists, who have been harming our people for so long, and make our
country weaker instead of stronger.

But I will keep fighting for you, and I tell all of you: thank you so
much. Thank you so much for all your support. It is really
overwhelming; I am immensely grateful to you. Thanks to your massive and
heartfelt support, I know that I am not alone. That you back me, and
are with me, and unwaveringly stand for freedom of expression.

Today, I was convicted in a political trial, which, shortly before
the elections, attempts to neutralize the leader of the largest and most
popular opposition party. But they will not succeed. Not even with this
verdict. Because I speak on behalf of millions of Dutch. And the
Netherlands are entitled to politicians who speak the truth, and
honestly address the problems with Moroccans. Politicians who will not
let themselves be silenced. Not even by the judges. And you can count on
it: I will never be silent.

And this conviction only makes me stronger. This is a shameful
sentence, which, of course, I will appeal. But I can tell you, I am now
more vigorous than ever. And I know: together, we aim for victory.

Standing shoulder-to-shoulder, we are strong enough to change the Netherlands.

To allow our children to grow up in a country they can be proud of.
In a Netherlands where we are allowed to say again what we think.
Where everybody can safely walk the streets again.
Where we are in charge of our own country again.

And that is what we stand for. For freedom and for our beautiful Netherlands.

Anti-Islam Dutch MP Geert Wilders guilty of discrimination

By i24news, December 9, 2016

Geert Wilders avait fait l’objet d’une relaxe dans un précédent procès en 2011

Wilders to appeal verdict, lawyer for Dutch populist says

Populist anti-Islam Dutch MP Geert Wilders was found guilty on Friday
of discrimination against Moroccans, but acquitted of hate speech in a
closely-watched trial ahead of next year’s key election.

In their verdict, the judges said “the inflammatory character of the
way in which the statements were made have incited others to
discriminate people of Moroccan origin.”

But they added that there was “insufficient evidence” that his words
at an election rally in 2014 amounted to incitement to hatred.

The judges also dismissed the prosecution’s request to impose a 5,000
euro fine on the far-right MP, whose Freedom Party (PVV) is eying an
upset victory in the March 2017 polls.

“In this case, the most important question is whether Wilders has
crossed a line. This judgement has answered that question,” the judges
said in their verdict.

“Therewith, the chamber finds that justice has been done. Consequently, no punishment is imposed.”

Wilders, 53, immediately gave notice that he intended to appeal his
conviction, as he believed it was “a big loss for freedom of speech.”

The most recent opinion polls predict the PVV will top the vote,
saying it could seize 34 seats in the 150-seat lower house of Dutch
parliament, some 10 seats ahead of his nearest rival, Prime Minister
Mark Rutte’s Liberals.

Rather than hurting the controversial lawmaker, observers say his
trial has boosted his popularity among Dutch voters, worried about the
influx of immigrants and driven by euro-sceptic sentiments.

Amid a string of populist victories in Europe and the November
election of Donald Trump as the next US president, the outcome of the
Dutch vote will be keenly watched.
– ‘Fewer Moroccans’ –

The three-week trial of Wilders had focused in particular on a
statement made at a 2014 local government election rally in The Hague,
when he asked supporters whether they wanted “fewer or more Moroccans in
your city and in the Netherlands”.

When the crowd shouted back “Fewer! Fewer!” a smiling Wilders answered: “We’re going to organise that.”

Prosecutors told a three-judge bench they had taken Wilders to court
because “racist remarks need to be stopped” after police received 6,400
complaints about his comments.

“Wilders singled out an entire group of citizens without making any distinction,” the judges ruled.

“This group has less rights to reside in the Netherlands. Therewith,
this statement can be regarded as affecting the dignity of this group as
a whole. It is insulting for the entire group.”

Throughout their case, prosecutors quoted numerous examples of
Dutch-Moroccans who said they felt like “third-rate citizens” and that
even “children are afraid” because of the politician’s statements.

Wilders boycotted most of the high-profile trial, and refused to appear in court for the verdict.

Just before the judgement was read, he said in a tweet: “Whatever the
verdict, I will continue to speak the truth about the Moroccan problem,
and no judge, politician or terrorist will stop me.”

If elected as the lowlands country’s new prime minister, Wilders has
vowed to confiscate Korans, close mosques and Islamic schools, shut
Dutch borders and ban migrants from Islamic countries among a raft of
other anti-Islamic moves.

His views have seen him receive death threats including from terror
groups such as the Islamic State group and Al-Qaeda. He is guarded at
all times and called the “best protected man in The Netherlands”.

Political observers say Wilders will benefit either way from the verdict due to the publicity the trial has generated.

The conviction however will mean he has a criminal record which could
for example impact travel plans to the United States, popular daily
tabloid Algemeen Dagblad said.

REDDIT SHADOW BANS INFOWARS AS “FAKE NEWS” WAR ACCELERATES

 http://i.alalam.ir/news/Image/original/2013/11/05/alalam_635192683804339585_25f_4x3.jpg
Reddit Shadow Bans Infowars As "Fake News" War Accelerates
 STEVE HUFFMAN, CEO OF REDDIT:
EXCERPTS: 
Shortly after being appointed CEO of Reddit in 2015, Huffman said that
some controversial communities shouldn’t be on Reddit, writing that
“neither Alexis nor I created reddit to be a bastion of free speech, but
rather as a place where open and honest discussion can happen.” Huffman later stated while Reddit had not been created as a “bastion of
free speech,” the concept “is important to us.” Huffman later created
new policies that would require users to opt-in to seeing some content,
and blocking material that encourages “Systematic and/or continued
actions to torment or demean someone.”
 On November 23, 2016 a member of a subreddit dedicated to Donald Trump, r/the_donald, posted evidence indicating that Reddit administrators had modified multiple user comments inside the subreddit.
Following this post Huffman took responsibility for the comment
modifications, writing that “Our community team is pretty pissed at me,
so I most assuredly won’t do this again.”
His administrative modifications involved changing one specific
insulting phrase, in several comments, to make them appear as if the
insults were directed toward the moderators of the subreddit instead of
him.
In a Reddit post Huffman wrote that he “messed with” some of the
comments but that he “restored the original comments after less than an
hour.”
On November 30, 2016, Huffman announced that sticky posts from
r/The_Donald would no longer show up on r/all, stating that the
community’s moderators were abusing the feature in order to “slingshot
posts into r/all, often in a manner that is antagonistic to the rest of
the community.”
 https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2016/11/spez-5.jpg?quality=65&strip=all&w=780
REDDIT SHADOW BANS INFOWARS AS 
“FAKE NEWS” WAR ACCELERATES
 Censorship purge of dissenting opinion 
knows no bounds
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Reddit has shadow banned
Infowars as the mass censorship of anti-establishment content
accelerates under the guise of stopping “fake news”.
As users of The Donald Reddit
have complained about numerous times, links to Infowars are being
deliberately prevented from appearing in Reddit’s popular /new/
category.
“Link posts to Infowars are shadow banned on Reddit,” wrote one user. “You can make the post, but it will NOT show up in /new/.”
“I’ve
noticed this too, I used to get loads of up votes from Infowars links
on the donald, but now they always stay as 1,” responded another user.
Note that all links from Infowars are being shadow banned, not just links relating to controversial topics like “PizzaGate”.
As we reported yesterday,
Facebook is already blocking entire subjects, not just links from
specific websites, related to whatever the establishment media (which
itself puts out fake news on a routine basis) declares to be “fake
news”.
By banning Infowars under
the claim that we are fake news, the likes of Reddit and Facebook are
censoring a news organization that secured an exclusive interview with
the next president of the United States. Let that sink in.
In
addition, despite innumerable attacks on Jones from the likes of the
New York Times, NPR, Stephen Colbert being fair game for Reddit, Jones’
rebuttal will be censored in every instance, effectively de-platforming
him.
The is happening despite the Washington Post having now been forced to admit that its vaunted “fake news” exposé was itself fake after massive blow back.
As Matt Drudge warned about last year,
the creation of social media ghettos has made the silencing of diverse
opinions far easier for tech giants like Reddit, Facebook and Twitter.
Despite the fact that these outlets are now the de facto public commons,
they are becoming increasingly authoritarian in their brazen move
towards censorship.
Last month, Reddit CEO Steve Huffman pledged to suppress pro-Trump groups and even began editing posts made by Trump supporters on The Donald sub-reddit, sparking outrage.
Click here to see the real fake news list. Click here to sign our petition to defend independent media from “fake news” attacks.
 

Under EU Orders Reddit Shadow Bans InfoWars.com / Redditors Fight Back!

Facebook And Reddit Delete Pages and Ban Users, Trying to Contoll Orlando Narrative

 

 

TANGLED WEBS: GOOGLE, MICROSOFT, FACEBOOK AND THE INTERNET GIVEAWAY

TANGLED WEBS: GOOGLE, MICROSOFT, FACEBOOK AND THE INTERNET GIVEAWAY
BY STEVEN NEILL
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 December 10, 2016

              NewsWithViews.com
            
The
use of lies and deception has been a standard tool of the trade
for over a century by the government and their willing and/or unwilling
stooges in the main
stream media
.[1] A few examples include Newspaper owners William
Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer, with the unspoken blessings
of US President, William McKinley, spreading lies to stir up the
masses enough to start a war
with Spain
.[2] This allowed McKinley to start an American empire
by taking over the Philippines, Guam, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico at
the close of the 19th century. In the following decades, the media
has obediently followed along covering up such things as the fraudulent
Gulf
of Tonkin
[3] incident, the governmental attack on the Branch
Davidians
, [4] 9/11,
[5] and the Obamacare
fiasco
. [6] In spite of the lies and distortions presented by
the government then spread by an obedient media, there were still
some journalists who were doing their job by reporting the truth.
In
1983, fifty companies controlled 90% of the American media, today
it is just six
multinational corporations
.[7] They are Viacom, Comcast, Time-Warner,
Disney, CBS, and News Corp and these companies are working very
hard to make sure that the news you hear is the news they and the
government want you to hear. From the anti-Muslim video that “caused”
the killing of four Americans at Benghazi,
[8] lying about the state of the economy before the 2008
meltdown
, [9] to the massive push to promote Obamacare,
[10] the main stream media is relentless in pushing the government/corporatist
agenda to its audience. This control is the dream of every tyrannical
state in history and the US government has almost achieved it.
Only,
they have, like the American Army in the WWII Battle
of Arnhem
, [11] pushed their power too far and too fast causing
the American people to no longer trust the main stream media. In
the spring of 2016, a major poll was conducted by the Media Insight
Project, a partnership of The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public
Affairs Research and the American Press Institute; they found that
just
6%
[12] of those polled have confidence in the main stream media
for news. The bias and outright lies have become so bad that even
a 30 year insider like Sharyl
Attkisson
[13] commented on it: “There is unprecedented,
I believe, influence on the media, not just the news, but the images
you see everywhere. By well-orchestrated and financed campaign of
special interests, political interests and corporations. I think
all of that comes into play.”
“ICANN
is arguably the single most powerful institution in the world”
Jeff
Baron
[14]
In
every format, the main stream media is losing patrons. From failing
newspapers to falling television ratings, the old model is dying
because of the internet. The Internet has become the primary source
for information for a huge percentage of Americans today. In fact,
in the last 25 years the internet has transformed the world. It
has completely revamped the way people do business, communicate,
purchase household goods, plan vacations, find friends, look up
information and just about every human activity imaginable. Since
it first became available for average Americans, the internet has
been a way to find information the elites did not want exposed and
they have been looking to shut down that freedom of information
for years. Subsequently with the support of numerous multinational
corporations like Microsoft, Google, Dell, Yahoo, Amazon, and Facebook
along with the blessing from globalist mouth pieces like the Council
on Foreign Relations, the LA Times, NBC, the International Chamber
of Commerce and Human Rights Watch, President Obama failed to renew
the contract with ICANN
[15] effectively giving the control over the internet to a private
company.
That
company is ICANN
[16] (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers) and it
is a CA based nonprofit corporation. In 1998, the Commerce Department
began contracting with ICANN, to take over management of IANA (The
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) and the internet’s domain
name system. The US Commerce Department has, for the most part,
let ICANN govern itself, but it maintained the authority to pull
the nonprofit’s contract. In essence ICANN records the numbers
(easier for computers to use) using words (easier for humans to
use) through DNS.
Domain
name system (DNS) is basically a directory for internet-connected
devices that helps translate domain names to numerical IP addresses.
Without DNS it is difficult for people to access websites as it
requires remembering large numbers of IP address, a series of numbers
such as “194.66.82.10”. So President Obama just ceded
power over the allocation of domain names from Google.com to your
church’s website without the consent of Congress
[17] and over the objections of millions of American citizens.
Those
supporting the transfer are quick to report that there is nothing
to fear from this transfer, after all ICANN is a “private”
company under a global multi-stakeholder group to oversee its Board
of Directors. What can possibly go wrong with the internet in the
hands of a “private
[18] company? Plenty.
[19]
ICANN
is first and foremost, a complete
monopoly
. [20] It has exclusive rights to allow
and renew
[21] domain names and that is a power it has not always
been used benevolently. It also has complete control over how much
to charge for a top level domain such as .com, .net, .biz and several
times in the past, it has abused
[22] those powers. For instance it allowed a top level domain named
.sucks to be purchased by the company Vox Populi which charges $2,500
to protect a company’s or individuals name from being purchased
and slandered with a sucks
[23] after it, then failed to rein the company in when it was running
an extortion operation. ICANN has also been accused numerous times
of siding with those who have the most to pay its fees and since
it costs over a million dollars to have ICANN officially look into
a complaint, not many decisions are overturned.
Another
troubling aspect of ICANN is that ICANN has made a fortune off of
its rapidly expanding list of Generic Top Level Domain Names (gTLDs).
Names like .lawyer; .google; .africa are going for at least $200,000
each and then annual fees. The .web domain brought $135,000,000
[24] into their coffers giving them not only a complete monopoly
on issuing domains but the means to create a very monopolistic self-supporting
group of elites.
Amazon,
[25] the giant online retailer, applied to register the gTLD .amazon.
ICANN has written limitations that govern the sale of a domain name
but since the name .amazon does not fall, into any of the categories
that are forbidden there should have no problems with Amazon’s
request. Only there was, the South American countries of Brazil
and Peru, through the interest group Government Advisory Committee
(GAC), declared this application to be illegal, based on the fact
that the Amazon River is a geographical area inhabited by some 30million
people. ICANN sided with the governments proving that the advantage
of being a monopoly is that you get to make up rules as you go along.
Amazon is now in the process of suing
[26] ICANN over the matter.
The
exact same thing happened to the sports company called Patagonia
[27] when it filed for the .patagonia domain. The governments of
Argentina and Chile objected and ICANN decided against selling the
name to the company. This trend shows that not only are rules made
to be broken but governments are meant to be appeased. This pattern
is more than disturbing considering that since 1998, nations that
routinely censor the internet of their citizens including Russia,
China, Iran and Saudi Arabia have pushed extremely hard to place
the functions of ICANN under the control of the U.N.’s Russian
dominated International Telecommunications Union (ITU)
[28] and President Obama may very well have just handed them their
chance.
For,
as stated above, ICANN holds a COMPLETE monopoly over the World
Wide Web root zone and complete monopolies in private hands are
illegal in most of the world. When operating under contract with
the Commerce Department, ICANN becomes a legal monopolist as it
becomes a “instrumentality” of government.
As
L. Gordon Crovitz points out in his article
[29] “U.S. Surrender: Internet Giveaway to the U.N.?,”
once ICANN became independent, they lost that umbrella of US Government
protection leaving them open to legal challenges from every despotic
government on earth looking to force them under the control of the
United Nations. Hence President Obama, in another case of “if
you want your doctor, you
can keep your doctor
,” [30] simply lied again when he
pledged that ICANN would not replace U.S. control for a “government-led
or an inter-governmental organization solution.” This fact
is verified on 10/14/16 When Obama gave a speech in Pittsburg,
[31] PA in which he glorified the days of the three major networks
delivering the news that most people trusted.
Obama
went on to say “We are going to have to rebuild within this
wild-wild-west-of-information
[32] flow some sort of curating function that people agree to. There
has to be, I think, some sort of way in which we can sort through
information that passes some basic truthiness tests and those that
we have to discard, because they just don’t have any basis
in anything that’s actually happening in the world,”
Obama added.
“That
is hard to do, but I think it’s going to be necessary, it’s
going to be possible. The answer is obviously not censorship, but
it’s creating places where people can say ‘this is reliable’
and I’m still able to argue safely about facts and what we
should do about it.” he added.
There
should be no longer any doubt as to why Obama went against Congress
and the people to give away the internet; we can no longer have
the “wild-wild-west-of-information flow” out there to
inform the people of what is really going on in the world.
German
Chancellor Merkel
, [33] speaking at a press conference with
out-going President Obama on 11-17-16, reinforced what ship we will
soon see coming to the internet port; censorship. She christened
the surge of populist or right wing politics as a “wave
that engulfs us that emanates from the United States
.”
[34]
“Look
at the European parliament. There are a lot of people who are looking
for simplistic solutions and are preaching simplistic solutions
which are very unfriendly policies. We have them here in Europe;
too, we have them in Germany too.”
“Digitization
is a disruptive technological force that brings about deep-seated
change and transformation in society. Look at the history of the
printing press, when this was invented what kind of consequences
it had, or industrialization, what consequences that had.”
“Very
often, it led to enormous transformational processes within individual
societies and it took a while until societies learned to find the
right kinds of policies to contain this, to manage and steer this.
We live in a period of profound transformation.”
Directing
her ire against the Germans who are angered with her flooding Germany
with Muslim invaders and massive job loss, she lashed out against
PEGIDA, the anti-mass migration and counter-Islamisation movement,
repeating their slogan: ‘Wir Sind Das Volk’ —
‘We Are The People’ — the chancellor said:
“The
most important and noble task of politicians these days is to see
that each and every person can find his place. But those who purportedly
belong to certain groups say ‘we are the people, and not others’.”
In
another of those frequent ironies so often dumped on the citizens,
Merkel, a former (?) East German communist, now says of PEGIDA:
“At
the time when we had [this saying] in the GDR [East Germany] when
the people stood in the streets and said ‘we are the people’
it filled me with great joy, but the fact these people have hijacked
it does not fill me with joy.”
How
long will it be before other world leaders join Ms. Merkel and president
Obama in demanding web censorship? Certainly foreign media is now
calling for it as Germany’s Zeit newspaper published a piece
calling for controls to prevent “a German Donald Trump”,
while Britain’s Independent former newspaper website published
a list of “fake” news sites which they claimed may have
“swayed votes towards Donald Trump”. Even the British
news outlet “The Guardian” is in on the fake news bandwagon.
That list is the same list being circulated by Google and Facebook.
Consequently,
now, the very instrument that has become the great equalizing force
against corporatism/globalism’s control over the main stream
media might now become just another weapon in their arsenal of global
censorship. Unfortunately, it is only one of several ways the internet
is being manipulated for corporatist/governmental advantage. One
only needs to look at the two most popular search engines and the
most popular social media site to see complete censorship
in action
. [35]
What
kind of drug does one have to take to believe Microsoft is a friend?
Dr.
Roy Schestowitz
[36]
Google,
Bing and Facebook have an unbroken record of suppressing sites,
postings and searches that don’t follow their world view.
Of the three, Bing is certainly the smallest but being part of Microsoft,
perhaps they try harder. Bing claims to be neutral and in fact,
the subscriber can set the search engine to their own preference
of conservative; liberal; Christian; etc. so how can they be biased?
Well the Bing [37] headline on August 16, 2016 for the conservative
bias setting in Bing featured three negative Trump articles:

Donald Trump plots strategy on ISIS — and campaign revival
(CNN)
Analysis: Making Sense of Donald Trump’s
Disjointed Foreign Policy Pitch (NBC News)
Early Voting Limits Donald Trump’s Time
to Turn Campaign Around (New York Times)
The
first headline implies Trump’s campaign had stalled and needs
revival. The second inferred Trump’s foreign policy was chaotic
and the third noted that the early vote will give Hillary such a
lead that discouraged Trump supporters won’t vote. Microsoft,
[38] donated $650,000 to the Hillary Clinton campaign and both Bill
and Melinda Gates
[39] were considered as possible Vice Presidential
running mates for her Presidential campaign.
This
is the Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, whose obsession with globalism
[40] and censorship
[41] is well known and on Sept. 20, 2016 at a conference in Vancouver,
B.C. he openly stated that opposition to globalism is “a
huge concern
,” [42)] and says the underlying issues of
resistance to it warrant a close examination. This is the same Bill
Gates that along with Steve Ballmer (Microsoft CEO) spoke at the
World Economic Forum in Davos,
Switzerland
[43] in early 2015 on the critical need for immigration
and more H-1B (44] visas because of a shortage of high tech workers,
and then laid off some 18,000
American high tech workers
. [45]
In
2010, China demanded that Google and Microsoft censor the results
of their search engines in China. Google resisted but Microsoft
was more than willing to go along. Bill Gates even criticized Google’s
decision to un-censor their search engine in China by saying “You’ve
got to decide: do you want to obey the laws of the countries you’re
in or not? If not, you may not end up doing business there.”
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer then said “If the Chinese government
gives us proper legal notice, we’ll take that piece of information
out of the Bing search engine.” Chinese
President Xi Jinping
[46] also stopped in for dinner at Bill
Gates house in September of 2015 before meeting with the heads of
Microsoft, Google and Facebook among other business leaders.
So
great is the Bing Censorship of China that the Chinese Web anti-censorship
monitoring service has gone to great lengths to show that Bing censors
content in China even more than the Chinese State owned search engine
Baidu
[47] does. But don’t worry; Microsoft’s support of the
ICANN was completely in the name of a “free” internet.
Privacy
is no longer a “social
norm
.”
[48] —Mark Zuckerberg
Facebook
is just as bad. In addition to being an outspoken advocate of globalism
and a liberal,
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is the controlling
force
behind the most powerful social media platform ever created.
Facebook controls the global dialogue used by over a billion people
with an invisible touch that is unprecedented. Almost two-thirds
of American adults get news
from social
media
, with 44% of them getting their news from Facebook alone.
This means Facebook’s algorithms dominate the information
of almost half the American public. As Gizmodo’s Michael Nuñez
puts it, “with Facebook, we don’t know what we’re
not seeing.” And he controls that platform with an iron grip.
Facebook
has conducted numerous studies to better understand how information
spreads in a social network. For instance, in 2010 Facebook conducted
a secret experiment on 61
million unknowing people
by tampering with their news feeds
to find out how successfully it could manipulate the real-world
voting habits of those people. Later, Facebook released the findings
and claimed that they increased voter turnout by more than 340,000
people. Facebook regularly skews the news it posts; in 2012 it manipulated
the feeds on 700,000 people without their consent to make them feel
sad
and then published the results in the respected (?) scientific
journal “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.”
The results showed fairly conclusively that Facebook had found the
key to intentionally influencing people’s emotions. That year
they did the same type of experiment on 1.9
million people
to influence the US election. In 2014 Facebook
used the rainbow flag as another experiment to get people to be
more accepting of same-sex
marriage
.
Facebook
has made an empire of selling information about every person they
can. It openly manipulates the feeds
and posts
they allow on Facebook and the posts people are allowed to place
for other members of Facebook. Facebook is now “reluctantly”
being “forced” to manipulate their algorithm to crack
down on “fake
news being posted on Facebook. Though this sounds like a noble goal,
the potential for censorship is unmistakable, especially when one
looks at the list of websites they plan on censoring. The sites
Facebook and Google are going to censor as “fake” was
created by a self-proclaimed feminist assistant professor at Merrimack
College who did not like the sites her students citing in their
research
papers
. Sites like Breitbart; Realfarmacy; Lew Rockwell; Zerohedge;
and World Net Daily. Though all have posted articles that have proven
to be false, Facebook has no problem with posting articles from
even less reliable news site like USA Today; MSNBC; CNN; BBC and
the New York Times. Google is now planning on using this same list
to censor content. It does not take a rocket scientist to see where
this censorship is headed.
“We
know where you are. We know where you’ve been. We can more or less
know what you’re thinking about.”
Eric
Schmidt
The
last of the big three masters of manipulation
is Google, and they are arguably the biggest of the bunch. Google
CEO Eric
Schmidt
is about as open with his liberal bias as one could
ever be. The Bilderberg attendee bankrolled a startup company called
The
Groundwork
” to provide technical experts Hillary
Clinton
needed to run her campaign. Schmidt was instrumental
in getting Barack Obama elected both times as he was the main supplier
of technical experts for all three campaigns.
Technology
is right up Schmidt’s alley as Google is the defacto gateway
to information. Google averages some 40,000 search queries every
second equaling over 3.5
billion searches
per day and 1.2 trillion searches per year
worldwide. Google conducts over 64%
of all internet searches
in the US and over 90% in some countries.
Google has indexed some 45 billion web pages while Bing, its closest
competitor has only 14 billion.
Of
course the 45 billion web pages are only part of the Schmidt plan
to control
everything on earth. Schmidt has stated that privacy
is an excuse to hide wrongdoing: “If you have something that
you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be
doing it in
the first place
.”
In
his plan to deprive you of your privacy, Schmidt has employed some
of the world’s top technocrats to find ever more powerful
ways to pry into every corner of your life since Google’s
business is, literally, mass
surveillance
, and they have become amazingly good at it.
They
are also a contractor to the US Government, including the NSA and
several military contractors as well. When Edward Snowden revealed
to the world the unimaginable world of government spying on US citizens,
he also revealed that the NSA
has direct access to the information stored on Google’s computers
as they do to Facebook, Twitter, Bing and every other company storing
online information on you.
In
a US News and World Report article published on 6/22/16, contributor
Robert
Epstein wrote
an extremely troubling article on just how powerful
Google is. According to Epstein “When Google’s employees or
algorithms decide to block our access to information about a news
item, political candidate or business, it causes opinions and votes
to shift, reputations to be ruined and businesses to crash and burn.
Because online censorship is entirely unregulated at the moment,
victims have little or no recourse when they have been harmed.”
Epstein
then exposes blacklists that Google wields like Jack the Ripper
did his knives with the first being the autocomplete blacklist.
This one is simple enough; it quietly guides the searcher to where
the company wants you to go. From directing away from negative articles
on Hillary Clinton to pointing to negative articles on Donald Trump,
there is little doubt that Google had a large impact on the recent
US election. In any search you make, the algorithm is your spiritual
guide.
Google
maps is a stalker’s dream showing just about every house and
area in the US and huge sections of the world. They did not ask
for permission to film your house, they just did it. Military installations
and a few other places are excluded but chances are, your house
is there.
Google’s
You Tube blacklist allows users to tag certain clips as inappropriate
and Google’s censors may or may not remove them. However,
You Tube is notorious for removing politically and morally conservative
videos on a regular basis while never doing the same to liberal
videos. They are also willing to work with foreign governments to
determine which videos will be allowed to be shown in the country.
The
Google account blacklist can cut people’s access to their
own email account as well as You Tube and other Google products
without any notice or recourse.
The
Google News blacklist is insidious in every way. They are the biggest
news aggregator on the planet, tracking tens of thousands of news
sources daily and converting them to numerous languages. They have
been accused on numerous occasions of excluding conservative news
feeds as well as certain writers and competing companies. This is
an incredibly powerful and nearly unnoticeable tool to promote political,
moral and/or religious agenda.
Google
Adwords blacklist is how Google gets the lion’s share of its
money (some $56 billion annually) by selling keywords to the highest
bidders. These keywords are how the website is found by searchers
so if your site does not have them, you are going to sink. On numerous
occasions, Google has simply deleted those keywords on sites effectively
making them invisible and financially crushing them.
The
search engine blacklist is a make or break situation for many web
pages. Google, for many unknown reasons will push web page down
the list of rankings effectively ruining many businesses in a very
short time.
The
power to “blacklist” a site is Google’s most dreaded
weapon however. Google claims this power is to keep the internet
free from malicious malware which, they claim is a public service.
The problems with this argument are many however. Google’s
crawlers often make mistakes, blacklisting websites that do not
contain malware.
Because
of how extensively Google crawls the web, all the other main search
engines use their “blacklist” which means that once
on the list, the site is effectively cut off from public access.
Google has used this power on numerous occasions on people they
do not like. Google even profits from this arrangement as they collect
information from every user that accesses Google’s results
and then sells it. Google has, for all intents and purposes, become
the internet police man and they use this power to further their
globalist agenda on a regular basis and it is now supporting the
same list of “fake” news sites that the British Independent
and Facebook are touting.
Google,
Microsoft and Facebook
have all three censored users on the
behest of world governments and all three; have consistently censored
users for no apparent reason. They, along with Twitter (another
social media monster) sided with Obama to give away America’s
right the control the internet.
“Those
who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.”

—Voltaire
Tragically,
the US now finds every purveyor of media has been compromised and
censored by those with globalist views. Once ICANN loses its independence
to the UN, the corporatist/governmental takeover will be complete. 
 Controlling
access to information is every
tyrant’s dream
and our government is no different. The
main stream media did a masterful job of concealing the 2008 economic
meltdown from the masses just like they have the corruption of Hillary
Clinton; the imploding Deutsche Bank; the growing threat of nuclear
war with Russia; the threat of an EMP from North Korea and now the
escalating violence of the Clinton supporters after the election
of Donald Trump. It was only the access of the people to alternative
news sites that alerted and continue to alert those willing to listen
to truth that news of these events get out at all. 
With
a growing population of closed minded bigots unwilling to even listen
to opposing opinions or facts, the US is slowly returning to the
Dark Ages with only a few sources controlling access to information.
Freedom loving people everywhere should all be asking themselves
why this particular time was chosen for Obama to open the door for
the UN takeover of an already censored internet. It is past time
to look into a ham radio and other forms of communication that cannot
be controlled by the elites. Here in the Pacific Northwest we have
an excellent source for information called the “Radio
Free Redoubt
.” Time is of the essence as the days of the
open internet are coming to a rapid close.
“Hell
is truth seen too late.”
—Thomas
Hobbes – Leviathan
Additional
Reading:

Cortana:
The spy in Windows 10

Google
Is Burying Negative Search Suggestions For Hillary Clinton, New
Study Shows

Google
to Bias Search Engine Based on ‘Facts’

Google
will soon ban fake news sites from using its ad network

Google
is Liberal and Biased

7,000
Sources or just a few favorites

Analyzing
the Google bias

Why
we should care about Facebook and Google’s political bias

How
Google Skewed Search Results

You
Think Google Wight be Biased?

Ban
on “Fake News:” What is Fake News?

ICANN’s
War on Whois Privacy

ICANN
Can Be Fixed

ICANN
faces first post-transmission test of U.N. power

Obama
Admin Wants To Surrender US Control Over Internet To Global Bureaucracy

FCC
Commissioner Hits Back at Internet Handover Proponents

Internet
giveaway day? US gov’t relinquishes control of web’s
‘address book’

U.S.
to relinquish remaining control over the Internet

Please
Stop Sharing These Sites:

Fake
news sites, deceptive memes, and the rise of post truth politics

Liberal
News, Conservative News and Fake News

False,
Misleading, Clickbait-y, and/or Satirical “News” Sources

List
of Fake News Websites

Two-thirds
of the world’s internet users live under government censorship:
report

Donuts
Inc.’s major play for new Web domain names raises eyebrows

Not
Obama’s to Give Away

Clinton’s
Russian roulette

*BREAKING* Anti-Trump
Globalist Zuckerberg Weaponizing Facebook to Influence 2016 Election

Facebook
admits human role in news operation but denies left wing bias
Footnotes:
1.
Why
the Media Lies So Much

2. Selling Empire: American Propaganda and War
in the Philippines
3. 5 Times When The Mainstream Media “Created Fake News”…
And People Died As A Result
4. Waco, Texas: Where A Part Of America’s Heart And Soul Died.
5. The Great 9/11 Cover-up
6. ABC, NBC Ignore All Obamacare Failures in 2016, CBS Barely Covers
7. Six Corporations Control 90% of American Media
8. Hillary’s Worst Crime Was Against the ‘Filmmaker’
9. The media and the financial crisis: Journalism failed
10. The Great ObamaCare Failure Our Corrupt Media Can’t Talk About
11. Animated Map: The Battle of Arnhem
12. Just 6% of the People
13. Former CBS Reporter: ‘I Was Called a Troublemaker for Pursuing
Benghazi’
14. Obama Admin Wants To Surrender US Control Over Internet To Global
Bureaucracy
15. Statements in Support of the IANA Stewardship Transition
16. What Does ICANN Do?
17. Critics fear censorship as Obama hands control of internet to
multi-national body
18. Here’s Why We Should Go through the IANA Transition
19. US to Hand Over Internet’s Naming System, But Is ICANN
Ready for Transition?
20. U.S. Surrender: Internet Giveaway to the U.N.?
21. Governing Cyberspace: ICANN, a Controversial Internet Standards
Body
22. In Congressional Hearing, Stakeholders Highlight ICANN’s Failures
and Need for Reform
23. ICANN reports .sucks to the FTC over “predatory”
pricing
24. ICANN Transition is Premature
25. ICANN’s Amazon Problem
26. Amazon files appeal on rejected .amazon domain
27. Governments kill off Patagonia’s dot-brand bid
28. US hands internet control over to ICANN
29. Stop Obama’s Internet Giveaway
30. Lie of the Year: ‘If you like your health care plan, you can
keep it’
31. Obama: We Have to Change ‘Wild West’ Media Landscape
32. Obama Says He Wants To Change The Free Flow Of Information
33. Merkel With Obama: Internet ‘Disruptive’ Force that
Has to Be ‘Contained, Managed, and Steered’ by Government
34. Obama Merkel – Internet Censorship Will Control Middle
Class Rebellion
35. Obama, Merkel Blame Social Media for Being Politically Disruptive
36. Microsoft is Still an Evil Company, Don’t Believe the
Reputation Laundering ‘Campaigners’
37. Liberal Media Bias
38. How Bing Search Engine Plays Politics in Election 2016
39. Tim Cook and Bill Gates Might Have Been on Hillary Clinton’s
Vice President List
40. Gates Foundation accused of ‘dangerously skewing’ aid priorities
by promoting ‘corporate globalization’
41. Web censorship in China? Not a problem, says Bill Gates
42. Bill Gates: Voter opposition to globalization is ‘a huge
concern’ — and a wake-up call
43. Bill Gates says in order to keep talent in America the country
must overhaul ‘perverse’ immigration laws
44. Soros & Fellow Billionaires for Open Borders Lobby GOP on
Amnesty
45. Microsoft Lays Off Thousands While Demanding More H1-B Visas
46. Xi Jinping in Seattle to meet with CEOs of Apple, Microsoft
and other tech giants
47. New research claims that Microsoft’s Bing censors heavily
within China, even more so than Baidu
48. Is Facebook Trying to Turn you Into a Globalist?
49. The end of Trump’: How Facebook deepens millennials’
confirmation bias
50. Zuckerberg proves he is Facebook’s editor by allowing
Trump’s hate speech.
51. Will Facebook Replace the News?
52. Facebook is a Media Company, Treat it as One
53. 61 million person experiment in social influence
54. Facebook Deliberately Experimented on Your Emotions
55. Facebook wants you to vote.
56. Did YOU change your Facebook picture to a rainbow?
57. Meet leftist prof who wrote ‘hit list’ of ‘fake’ news sites
58. Facebook Censorship
59. How Facebook Censors your posts
60. Facebook to crack down on spread of misinformation
61. The Top Ten Things We Can’t Believe Eric Schmidt Ever Said
62. Of Course Facebook Is Biased. That’s How Tech Works Today
63. Wikileaks: Google’s Eric Schmidt Planning Hillary’s
Campaign Since 2014
64. The Groundwork
65. Google defends its search engine against bias it favors Clinton
66. Eric Schmidt Dismisses Movie Driven Fear of AI
67. Google Search Statistics
68. Search Engine Ratings
69. Google’s power of censorship: who controls the controllers
of the internet?
70. Google controls what we buy, the news we read — and Obama’s
policies
71. The new mind control
72. The NSA’s Bulk Collection Is Over, but Google and Facebook Are
Still in the Data Business
73. The New Censorship
74. NSA Prism program taps in to user data of Apple, Google and
others
75. You’re a Criminal in a Mass Surveillance World –
How to Not Get Caught
76. Radio Free Redoubt
 
 

POPE (POOPUS) FRANCIS DISCUSSES PERVERSION OF EATING EXCREMENT AS A PARALLEL TO FOLLOWING “FAKE NEWS” FROM ALTERNATIVE MEDIA

 YES!: POPE (POOPUS) FRANCIS DISCUSSES PERVERSION OF EATING EXCREMENT AS A PARALLEL TO FOLLOWING “FAKE NEWS” FROM ALTERNATIVE MEDIA
WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT FROM A SOCIALIST-COMMUNIST-GLOBALIST? 
ANSWER: HATRED OF THE U.S. CONSTITUTION
SEE:  

‘Pope’ Prays in Observance of Catholic Belief Mary Was Conceived Sinless: 

‘You Free Us From Stain of Sin’ 

SEE: http://christiannews.net/2016/12/09/pope-francis-prays-in-observance-of-catholic-belief-mary-conceived-sinless-you-free-us-from-stain-of-sin/;

EXCERPTS: 

“Not only is Mary’s immaculate conception and her sinlessness not
revealed in God’s inspired, infallible Word, it goes directly against
the teaching of Scripture,” Mike Gendron of Proclaiming the Gospel
Ministries told Christian News Network. “The Bible clearly states that
the sin of Adam was spread to all his descendants, including Mary.”

He pointed to Romans 5:12, which reads, “[A]s by one man sin entered
into the world, and death by sin, and so death passed upon all men, for
that all have sinned,” as well as Romans 3:10 and 23, which teach that
“there is none righteous, no, not one,” and that “all have sinned and
fall short of the glory of God.”

Gendron also noted that Mary acknowledged her need of the Savior from
sin when she said in Luke 1:47, “My spirit rejoices in God, my Savior.”

He said that not only is the doctrine of immaculate conception
unbiblical, but Bergoglio’s assertion that Mary “frees us from the stain
of sin” is an affront to the gospel.

“He profanely attributed to Mary what Christ alone had accomplished
on Calvary’s cross,” Gendron said. “The pope’s prayer robbed Christ of
His glorious accomplishment of purifying for Himself a people for His
own possession (Titus 2:14). It was Jesus who ‘made purification of
sins’ and ‘sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high’ indicating
His redemptive work was finished (Heb. 1:3).”

“The pope needs to stop exalting Mary as a sinless mediator and give
all glory honor and praise to Jesus because it was His precious blood
that purifies His people from ALL sin (1 John 1:7),” he stated.
_______________________________________________________

PLEASE READ THIS BOOK FOR A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH: 
“A WOMAN RIDES THE BEAST”
BY DAVE HUNT 
 https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IY7Rp94Z5xE/hqdefault.jpg
 http://www.nowtheendbegins.com//wp-content/uploads/dave-hunt-woman-rides-the-beast-catholic-church-vatican.jpg
 

POPE FRANCIS PONTIFICATES ON “FAKE NEWS”, CALLS IT A SIN & LIKENS IT TO “SEXUAL AROUSAL FROM EXCREMENT”

 http://quotes.lifehack.org/media/quotes/quote-Pope-Francis-I-sometimes-negative-news-does-come-out-but-160016.png
 http://www.relatably.com/q/img/pope-francis-quotes/150209155614-07-pope-quote-redo-0209-super-169.jpg
 
 
 POPE FRANCIS PONTIFICATES ON “FAKE NEWS”, CALLS IT A SIN & LIKENS IT TO “SEXUAL AROUSAL FROM EXCREMENT” 
 The Pope also says that people who consume fake news are sick and tend toward coprophagia… eating poop
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

BREAKING: Real fake news list released! http://www.infowars.com/the-ultimate-fake-news-list/
In a recent interview with Tertio,
the Pope weighed in on the so-called “fake news” scandal by calling
disinformation a sin and saying that the media should not fall victim to
“coprophilia” — that’s right, being aroused by poop.

A
thing that can do great damage to the information media is
disinformation: that is, faced with any situation, saying only a part of
the truth, and not the rest. This is disinformation. Because you, to
the listener or the observer, give only half the truth, and therefore it
is not possible to make a serious judgement. Disinformation is probably
the greatest damage that the media can do, as opinion is guided in one
direction, neglecting the other part of the truth.

See,
all of that is true… but he’s not specifying where this disinformation
is coming from, leading the whole of the mainstream media to use the Pope’s statements to point fingers at the alternative media.
The Pope continued:

And
then, I believe that the media should be very clear, very transparent,
and not fall prey – without offense, please – to the sickness of
coprophilia, which is always wanting to communicate scandal, to
communicate ugly things, even though they may be true. And since people
have a tendency towards the sickness of coprophagia, it can do great
harm. Thus, I would say that there are these four temptations. But they
are builders of opinion and can construct, and do immense good, immense.

That’s right, the Pope also says that people who consume fake news are sick and tend toward coprophagia… eating poop.
He’s
not talking about governments who spend billions on war propaganda or
the mainstream media who parrots and tows the establishment line, even
when its a blatant lie…
He’s getting on board with the same censorship agenda as the rest of the system… in a really sick way.

POPE DEFECATES ON “FAKE NEWS”:
1 747 748 749 750 751 900