CONFIRMED: TREASURY SAYS OBAMA STOLE FROM FANNIE & FREDDIE INVESTORS TO FUND OBAMACARE

 Confirmed: Treasury Says Obama Stole From Fannie, Freddie Investors to Fund Obamacare
 
Obama Stole $200+ Billion In Secret Bail In
 
Treasury Department Confirmed 
Obama Robbed Investors

CONFIRMED: TREASURY SAYS OBAMA STOLE FROM FANNIE & FREDDIE INVESTORS TO FUND OBAMACARE

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
 Docs reveal Obama defrauding mortgage investors
BY JEROME CORSI
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – A careful analysis of the Treasury Department’s “Agency Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2013” provides evidence the Obama administration stole from Fannie and Freddie investors to fund Obamacare.
Guided
by a CPA, who worked for two years for a major U.S. accounting firm as
an outside auditor for Freddie Mac, Infowars.com has documented in the
Treasury Department’s 2013 financial reports how the Obama
administration diverted into Obamacare billions of dollars that Treasury
confiscated from Freddie and Fannie earnings.
On Aug. 17, 2012,
the Obama administration finalized the amendment of the Treasury
Department’s Senior Preferred Stock Agreements with Fannie and Freddie
that deprived private and institutional investors of their legally due
dividend payments.

This enabled the Obama Treasury Department to confiscate billions of
dollars in Fannie and Freddie earnings, in what is known as the “Net
Worth Sweep,” or NWS.
The analysis begins with a table entitled
“Summary Financial Information,” presented on page 26 of the Treasury
Department’s “Agency Financial Report for Fiscal Year 2013.”

Note
the line item “GSEs Non-Entity Costs (Revenue)” that records the flow
into Treasury of the funds confiscated by the Obama administration in
the NWS: recorded in 2012 as a cost to the treasury of $5.3 billion.
This
line item dramatically reverses in 2013 to reflect the NWS revenue
inflow from the two Government Sponsored Entities, GSEs, amounting in
2013 to $126 billion.
Treasury also revised their 2013 internal
estimate of GSE liabilities from a liability of $288.7 billion in 2012,
to a much-reduced liability of $9 billion in 2013 — a difference
explained entirely by the Net Worth Sweep.
The second paragraph of the “Financial Overview” below the chart leaves no doubt, reading as follows:
“Additionally,
the Department amended its Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements
(SPSPAs) with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac – two Government-Sponsored
Enterprises (GSEs) – in 2012, which changed, among other things, the
basis for determining quarterly dividends that are paid by the GSEs to
the U.S. government commencing with the quarter ending March 31, 2013.
As a result of the amended SPSPAs, coupled with the GSEs’ long-term
financial forecasts within a specific time horizon, the Department
reduced its contingent liability associated with the GSE program by $9.0
billion and $288.7 billion at the end of fiscal year 2013 and 2012,
respectively, via a reduction in expense.”
The $126.6 billion that
Treasury received from the Fannie and Freddie NWS is also noted in the
“Consolidated Statements of Net Cost for the Fiscal Years Ended Sept.
30, 2013 and 2012” that the report publishes on page 50.
The
explanation of the $126.6 billion in Treasury revenue received from the
GSEs is further elaborated in the following paragraph that appears on
page 29 of the report:
“GSE Non-Entity Revenue totaled
$126.6 billion for 2013 compared to net cost of $5.3 billion for 2012.
The revenue in 2013 was primarily driven by a $77.3 billion increase in
preferred stock dividends, coupled with a $30.9 billion valuation gain
on GSE investments in 2013 compared to a $42.3 billion loss in 2012.
These increases primarily stemmed from federal income tax benefits and
other improvements in the GSEs’ financial performance in 2013.”
On
page 94, the report provides a chart detailing that the $126.6 billion
in GSE revenue came from preferred stock dividends and from the market
fair value gain on the preferred stock Treasury held in Fannie and
Freddie, as seen here:

A
table presented on page 113, entitled “Transfers to the General Fund
and Other” makes clear Treasury transferred the NWS revenue from Fannie
and Freddie to the Treasury “General Fund,” where the revenue was
accounted as available for Treasury reallocation.

The
analysis of how the Treasury Department spent the NWS receipts
deposited into the General Fund derives from an analysis of the
month-by-month analysis of “Table 9: Summary of Receipts by Source, and
Outlays by Function of the U.S. Government,” found in the Monthly Treasury Statement of Receipts and Outlays of the U.S. Government.
With
the assistance of the accounting expert mentioned above, Infowars.com
constructed a spreadsheet to summarize findings from an analysis of the
Table 9 entries for calendar year 2013.

As
seen in the above excel spreadsheet, analysis of the line items in
Table 9 for the months of calendar year 2013 revealed that the amounts
Treasury received in GSE revenue corresponded to decreases in the
“Commerce and Housing” line item, and to increases in the line items
“Health” and “Medicare.”
This strongly suggests Treasury used the
“Commerce and Housing” line item to record receipts in GSE revenue that
were reallocated in subsequent months as debits out of “Commerce and
Housing” that corresponded to increases in “Health” and increases in
“Medicare.”
Note the first NWS payment was received by Treasury at the end of March 2013.
During
that month, the Treasury accounting debited “Commerce and Housing” by
$23.770 billion, establishing a pattern where the amounts credited to
“Health” and to “Medicare” increased for each of the next two months.

This pattern was repeated with the NWS of $65.2 billion received by
Treasury in June, the NWS of $14.6 billion in September, and the $39
billion in December.
With the exception of September, the amount
debited out of “Commerce” corresponded closely (but not exactly) with
the NWS received, and the amounts added to “Health” and “Medicare”
increased for the two months following Treasury’s receipt of NWS funds
from Fannie and Freddie.
The $133 billion in NWS Treasury receipts
for 2013 correspond interestingly to a comment made by Joshua Rosner,
managing director of the independent research firm Graham Fisher &
Co.
Rosner is a widely-recognized authority on Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, known for co-authoring with Pulitzer Prize-winning business
reporter Gretchen Morgenson the 2011 best-selling book entitled Reckless Endangerment: How Outsized Ambition, Greed and Corruption Led to Economic Armageddon – an analysis of Fannie Mae’s role in the sub-prime mortgage crisis that led to the economic crisis of 2008/2009.
“In
2013 alone, Treasury swept over $130 billion dollars in GSE profits in
the form of dividends via the Net Worth Sweep,” he wrote in a paper entitled “Former White House Officials Involved in GSE Scandal,” published May 23, 2016.
“To
highlight the scale of these dollars, these are the same amounts
recently at issue in a lawsuit over the cost of 10-years of ‘Obamacare’
reimbursements to insurers.”
That the Obama Treasury Department
was diverting funds to pay the Section 4012 insurance subsidies under
the Affordable Clear Act has been uncontested since May 12, 2016.
This
is the day when U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer ruled against
Health and Human Services Secretary Sylvia Matthews Burwell, in the case
U.S. House of Representatives v. Burwell, (130 F. Supp. 3d 53, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia).
In
this case, Judge Collyer decided HHS Secretary Burwell had no
constitutional authority to divert funds Congress appropriated to one
section of the ACA, to fund Obamacare subsidy payments to insurers under
another section of the ACA.
The section of the ACA that HHS was desperate to fund was Section 1402 – the clause defining the insurer subsidies.

The problem was that Congress specifically declined to appropriate
any funds to Section 1402 to pay for the insurance subsidy the ACA
required for low-income individuals and families to afford the insurance
the ACA provided.
“Paying out Section 1402 reimbursements without
an appropriation thus violates the Constitution,” Judge Collyer
concluded. “Congress authorized reduced cost sharing but did not
appropriate monies for it, in the Fiscal Year 2014 budget or since.
Congress is the only source for such an appropriation, and no public
money can be spent without one.”
The U.S. District court in this
ruling entered judgment in favor of the House of Representatives,
enjoining HHS from using unappropriated money to pay insurers under
Section 1402.
What was at issue in Section 1402 was the Obamacare
provision that capped the amount low-income families would be required
to pay for insurance purchased on state insurance exchanges.
The law provided that federal insurance subsidies under Section 1402 would pay the difference between the capped maximum a low-income family was required to pay and the amount the insurance cost.
On
July 8, 2016, Thomas Miller, J.D., a resident fellow in health policy
studies at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, submitted a statement before the House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
In
this statement, Miller added support for the conclusion that the Obama
administration was desperate in its effort to identify funds that could
be diverted to keep Obama care from collapsing.
“For the last six
years, the Obama administration has been frustrated by its inability to
get Congress to support more funding for a number of its less-popular
objectives under the ACA,” Miller commented. “It keeps trying to stretch
appropriations law and administrative guidance to spend money without
necessary consent or authority.”
In a report issued in March 2016, the Congressional Budget Office estimated the cost
for providing Section 1402 subsidies over the next ten years
(2016-2026) was estimated to be $130 billion – the amount referenced by
Rosner in the quotation above.
Judge Collyer’s decision
specifically prohibited HHS to pay Section 1402 subsidies by diverting
money Congress had appropriated for other ACA provisions.
Given
this, the Obama administration faced the prospect the government could
not pay the insurance subsidies required for low-income persons and
families to buy insurance under Obamacare.
The only other
alternative was to force insurance companies to absorb as a loss the
amount the government had intended to pay as an insurance subsidy under
the ACA.
In other words, Obamacare risked bankrupting
participating insurance companies if the Obama administration could not
find a way to circumvent the District Court’s decision U.S. House of Representatives v. Burwell to find a way to fund Section 1402 despite the fact Congress had refused to do so.
In
July 2016, the Republican majority staff of the House Committee on
Energy and Commerce together with the Republican majority staff of the
House Committee on Ways and Means issued a “Joint Congressional Investigation into the Source of Funding for the ACA’s Cost Sharing Reduction Program.”

Page 10 of the joint committee’s final report noted the following:
“Between April 10, 2013 and July 11, 2013, in an unusual move, the
Administration informally withdrew its request for an annual
appropriation for the cost sharing reduction program by calling the
Senate Committee on Appropriations.”
The timing would suggest the
Obama administration realized in March 2013 the $130 billion the
Treasury expected to receive in 2013 as revenue from the Fannie and
Freddie NWS could be reallocated to pay for a decade the anticipated
shortfall in low-income insurance subsidies.
Having found this
solution may explain why the Obama administration stopped trying to
divert other funds Congress had appropriated to keep insurers solvent
under ACA requirements to subsidize health insurance for low-income
persons and families.

 

PROOF: FACEBOOK IS BLOCKING LINKS TO INFOWARS.COM~HARVARD’S “BLACK LISTS” OF CONSERVATIVE NEWS

 Proof: Facebook Is Blocking Links to Infowars.com
PROOF: FACEBOOK IS BLOCKING LINKS 
TO INFOWARS.COM
 Censorship under the justification of preventing 
“fake news” and “spam” accelerates
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Facebook is blocking links
from Infowars.com being posted by users by declaring them “spam” in a
chilling example of how the social media giant is using the excuse of
combating “fake news” to censor anti-establishment content.
As the video below illustrates, Facebook is preventing users from posting a link to this Infowars article having previously labeled it as “spam”.
The
article contains a commentary video about how feminists are offended
over the viral video of a man doing a BBC interview before being
interrupted by his children. The article constitutes completely
legitimate news commentary and cannot be considered “spam” or “fake
news” by any stretch of the imagination.
The
social networking giant recently launched a new feature in which users
could flag content as “spam” or “fake news” – a system that allows huge
numbers of organized users to flag content simply because they disagree
with it or it offends them. One suspects that CNN and other mainstream
news outlets won’t be impacted by the new feature.
Back
on March 6, Facebook also blocked another completely legitimate
Infowars story about a left-wing anti-Trump journalist who was arrested
for making bomb threats against Jewish community centers by declaring it
as “spam”.
In
the video below, Alex Jones documents how Facebook censored another
Infowars story about a former CIA analyst asserting that Trump was
wiretapped by declaring it “spam”.
With web founder Tim Berners-Lee demanding that Facebook do more to combat so-called “fake news” – despite the fact that a Stanford University study found it had virtually no impact on the presidential election – the social media giant has teamed up with biased left-wing outfits to target conservative news sources.
A list of “fake” and misleading websites released by Harvard also includes virtually every major conservative website on the blacklist.
It’s
completely evident that Facebook, Twitter and others are exploiting the
contrived panic and hysteria about “fake news” as an excuse to censor
content or opinions that contradict left-wing narratives.
Here
is the offending video that Facebook doesn’t want people to see. They
would be very unhappy if you shared it like there’s no tomorrow.
_______________________________________________________

Robert Spencer: Fake University Harvard Uses Fake Professor’s List to Smear Real News Sites

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/03/robert-spencer-fake-university-harvard-uses-fake-professors-list-to-smear-real-news-sites 

 

THE PROGRESSIVE DISEASE OF SPIRITUAL DECEPTION IN OUR TIME

THE PROGRESSIVE DISEASE OF SPIRITUAL DECEPTION IN OUR TIME
BY GREGORY REID
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

lightThere
was a time when ideas like yoga or eastern meditation in the church
were only associated with Christ Science churches, Universalist
Churches, and a few spurious non-biblical fringe places. In a few scant
decades, the walls have been so completely torn down that we not only
see no harm in these things, we promote them. This is exactly what
Theosophist (Luciferian) leader Alice Bailey predicted would be part of
the new age infiltration into the church: ““The three main channels
through which the preparation for the new age is going on might be
regarded as the Church (emphasis mine) the Masonic Fraternity and the educational field.” (The Externalization of the Hierarchy, Page 511.)

So, in fact, this has been underway for some time. It probably began
to get a real foothold in our present time with Norman Vincent Peale’s
“Power of Positive Thinking” theology, quickly adapted by Rev. Robert
Schuller who was really the first modern “megachurch” and “Seeker
Friendly” church pastor. Their ideas were once considered a bit of an
aberration from mainstream Christian doctrine. But here we are decades
later, and seeker friendly and power of positive thinking is normal and
unchallenged. The crack into Bible-based evangelical churches had begun
to open just a little…

Fast forward: In the last three decades we have opened our doors to
things like the laughter movement, barking like dogs and oinking like
pigs and calling it the “anoinking of the Spirit,” and worse. A number
of leaders challenged these things, but its promoters did not repent of
it.

A few years later, spiritual formation, “be still” meditation,
breathing techniques, “Christian” yoga, “the sacred feminine,”
labyrinths, circle making – all an extension of exotic religions,
eastern mysticism, and Buddhist/Hindu tools to reach “the divine within”
– all began to creep into church media, books, music and movies. Even
Father Thomas Merton came to be revered by many evangelicals – a man who
said at the end of his life that he wished to ““to become as good a
Buddhist as I can,” as well as Henri Nouwen, who influenced millions of
evangelicals but at the end of his life denied that Jesus was the only
way to the Father.

The door opened a little wider…where were the watchmen? Where were
the Shepherds? One at a time, I began to see even pastors welcome these
things. And as these things crept in, the Word of God began to become an
addendum to our lives, a devotional nicety but not central in our walk
with Jesus, and no longer our final determination of truth.

Slowly, the poison seeped into our ranks…one book, one DVD, one movie
at a time. Everyone ignored the subtle twisting of the Word of God in
Rob Bell’s “Velvet Elvis,” hailing it as “groundbreaking.” And indeed,
it was, but not in a good way. His next book, “The Sex God” raised a few
eyebrows, but youth pastors everywhere still adored him and emulated
him and bought glasses and cool clothes just to look just like him in an
attempt to “relate to youth.” Millennial youth pastors began diluting
the Word of God and preparing little mini-messages to justify their
increasingly party-like youth group atmosphere which was strong on
entertainment and weak on the Word of God.

Then Rob Bell wrote “Love Wins,” denying hell and proclaiming
universalism – the idea that everyone gets saved. And now, he is
speaking at conferences alongside New Age guru Deepak Chopra at
conferences titled things like, “The Seduction of Spirit.” [1]

When he was exposed as being truly a non-evangelical false teacher, I
heard nothing but crickets from all those who formerly sang his
praises. But by then, everyone was off chasing the next big thing
anyway, the next bestseller, the next circle-making, ear-tickling,
scripture-diluting thing. We had begun forming a pattern of going after
the latest “it,” or hot speaker, or bestselling book, and then when it
turned out the thing or person was fraudulent, in error or full of
deception, almost no one took responsibility for originally supporting
or promoting them – least of all the Christian media and those who
peddled their products – even when these false teachers  were fully
exposed. Very few took responsibility for an evangelist’s crazy, ungodly
antics in Florida that hundreds of thousands of believers flocked to
see, while behind the scenes he was conducting an affair that shredded
his wife and kids. (For the record, I deeply believe in restoring fallen
servants of the Lord.) They gave him a short time-out (“restoration
process”) and bam! He was back on the circuit – new wife, new life. And
few took responsibility for calling him – no, for laying hands on and anointing him – as the “world apostle” in front of an international audience.[2]

Very few called a well-known “prophet” to account for his 1998
prophecy that Obama would be a mighty man of God – a Christian – who
would set everything right. They just said, “Oh well, nobody’s perfect”
and kept supporting and following his ministry anyway.

Rarely do people say, “we were wrong.” Rarely do leaders say, “We
were in error.” And because of that, unrepentant error in discernment
has led to greater and greater error, because deception is a PROGRESSIVE
DISEASE.

The more error we receive, the more the ability to discern goes numb
and then dies in us. It applies to us as individuals. It applies to
churches.

Nobody was alarmed that Roma Downey was still attending a new age
college at the same time she was working on their television series “The
Bible” or that she never renounced her new age beliefs, despite the
fact that these concerns were brought to some of the highest levels of
leadership in the church and corporate Christian world possible. They
gave her a pass on those issues because, as I was told, the benefits of
how it would reach people outweighed the theological problems. And
nothing kept several bits of clear gnostic teaching from being inserted
into their movies, including giving a prominent role to Mary Magdalene,
whom new agers consider the “thirteenth apostle.” And to be honest, by
the time these concerns were raised, even certain denominations had
invested far too much money in promoting the movies to retract, recall
product and repent at that point. In the end, I believe financial
concerns were more important than truth.

By the time The Shack came around, we had already been
prepped through years of “felt need” theology, experiential-based faith
and cherry-picking scriptures we liked while ignoring the ones we
didn’t.

As the internet grew, I began to understand the power of the appeal
to our emotions. More than once, I had seen almost an entire five to
ten-minute video on some issue and found myself in tears before I found
out at the end that not only was it not a Christian video and did not
have a Christian message, but it was produced by people and represented a
view that was unbiblical, new age and worse. I got emotionally hooked
before I learned the truth. Those without a biblical foundation of truth
just get hooked.

People loved The Shack because it replaced the God of the Bible
(which deep down they possibly didn’t feel comfortable with, because His
ways are beyond our understanding and bad things happen, and it upsets
our sunshine version of Christianity) and gave them a God who made them feel good, who took the God of the Bible and said, “That’s not really God, this
is what God is like…” and gave them a diluted, false version of Father,
Son, Holy Spirit, and a dose of Sophia, Greek goddess of wisdom.

I was sure that anyone with even a modicum of discernment would throw
the book in the trash. I had underestimated how wide the door of
deception had opened. I lost friends who were pastors who were furious
at me for questioning the book. One pastor railed at me, “I haven’t had a
relationship with God for years, but now I have my ‘Papa’ back! You
can’t take that from me!”

Nothing jarred me more than seeing grown men of God just abandoning
clear truth because something tugged their heart, justifying the
scriptural butchering by saying, “It’s just fiction, it’s not the
Bible!” I confronted someone on this the other night. “What about the
satanic Necronomicon. Can I read it? It’s just fiction. Can I read
pornography? It’s just fiction.” They thought that a bit extreme. Of
course it was. My point was, where what was their criteria, where was
their own event horizon they were not willing to cross because it was
just too obviously wrong? How much scripture bending or ignoring would
they accept and justify as ok because it was “just fiction” before they
had enough and said no more? The demonic genius of The Shack is
how cleverly it has clothed itself in a loose and nebulous garment of
scriptures – just enough to justify the complete butchering of the true
nature of God and morphing Him into a Trinitarian hybrid god that
represents whatever will make you feel better about your horrible
tragedies and “great sadness.” The fact is, though, God will not appear
as whatever we want. One person said, “God appeared as a fiery bush, but
I know he’s not a bush!” But He appeared in the bush. He wasn’t a bush. God will not appear as Shiva, Buddha, or Sarayu,  because He is “I AM WHAT I AM.” We can say God is like a rock, but we cannot say God is like Baal. It’s not about imagery, it is about the nature and character of God. And The Shack gives a false representation of both of those.

Look, I get it. I’ve suffered innumerable losses my entire life, and
every one of us at some point cries out, “WHY, GOD?” And in those
moments, people either reject Him as uncaring, or He brings us into His
Kingdom, and we learn to trust Him in the midst of, sometimes in spite
of tragedies that seem to have no reason. And we may find ourselves once
again crying out in pain, “WHY, GOD?” And His response is, “You don’t
need to know all the answers. Trust Me, trust My Word. Trust in My
love.” It’s called FAITH. But The Shack is a shortcut to
feeling better, a panacea, a spiritual drug that allows you to embrace a
conception of God that may temporarily take away the pain but leaves
you with an open door to deception because it is not the God of the
Word. IT IS NOT THE REAL JESUS.

Is The Shack the God portrayed in scripture? Is God a woman?
Is Jesus a clumsy Jewish kid with a hook nose? Is the Holy Spirit a
Japanese girl named after a Hindu river? Is the judge of our lives
Sophia? Is everyone saved? Is Jesus just the best way to the Father, as
the book suggests, or is He what the Bible says – the only way?

“But they’re just parables! Stories! It’s not the Bible!” some argue.
So is it acceptable to distort the truth in the guise of fiction just
to make a point? How is that ever acceptable? Someone said, “CS Lewis
did The Chronicles of Narnia, they were spiritual allegories! It wasn’t scripture!” True, that; but unlike The Shack, when Lewis did
touch on the nature of God or Jesus, he kept it fairly consistently in
line with scripture and the biblical character and nature of God. The Shack
has a radically different version of God: One who does not judge, one
who can change, one who suggests Jesus is simply a better way to God,
not the only way. But feeling trumped truth, and the book has become a
multimillion bestseller. To simplify the responses I have heard, “Don’t
confuse me with biblical facts. It made me feel good!”

It did not bother leaders and publishers that Young’s second book,
Eve – a “reimagining” of the Adam and Eve story – was laced with
kabbalistic themes and occultic, gnostic fairy tales. “It’s just a
story.” The door opened wider….

You see, Satan keeps pushing the goalpost deeper and deeper into the
center of the church, and every time he sees no resistance, he is
emboldened and takes it to “the next level.”

Now, the movie is out. The arguments as to why it’s such an amazing
life-changing story despite the clear unscriptural aspects that were
brought up when the book came out are the same. The difference seems to
be that those who support it are much angrier at those of us who pose
the crucial questions. “You’re so judgmental! Who do you think you are?
You must be looking for a book deal or something. You’ll never lead
anyone to Christ, and I doubt if you ever did before.” I’ve had it all
thrown at me the last few weeks as I tried to reason it out with folks
on Facebook. And I realize that the level of deception had gone so deep
that not only were people willing to embrace a lie and ignore the error,
but worse – they saw themselves as fully biblical believers who were
completely loyal to the Word of God, while at the same time promoting a
story by a man who claims that everyone is “in Christ” already. And you
cannot reason with that level of delusion. It seems to bother devoted
Shack followers not at all that the author is a universalist.

Universalism, the “all paths lead to God” religion, is exactly what
is needed to turn the Christian church into part of the one-world
antichrist mystery religion that Alice Bailey wrote about and all
Luciferian world leaders are counting on.

We did not accept Rob Bell’s universalism. But now we are
willing to ignore William Paul Young’s. That is the malignancy of
deception unchecked.

This movie comes at a time when the next level of eastern meditation
techniques under the guise of “mindfulness” are being pushed into the
educational system,[3]
and now are coming into the church. (Mindfulness is a Buddhist
technique of detachment, leading to realizing the “divine within,” which
eventually leads to Nirvana – nonexistence. There are several new
“Christian” books promoting meditation and mindfulness practices with
devotional books and coloring books, and a new book on spiritual
formation and meditation called The Wired Soul: Finding Spiritual Balance in a Hyperconnected Age by
Tricia McCary Rhodes which “reintroduces us to the classic disciplines
of Scripture reading, meditation, prayer, and contemplation.” In other
words, it’s just more repackaged eastern religious teaching and
techniques for the church which will further it on the road to the new
age goal of “east meets west,” where we all become one under a false one
world religion and we all recognize the “Christ spirit” or godhood in
each other (Namaste – the divine in me bows to the divine in you.)

Add to that, a new book is being used in Christian youth groups called, God in My Everything: How an Ancient Rhythm Helps Busy People Enjoy God
by Ken Shigematsu, who “draws on both eastern and western perspectives
in writing and speaking.” Those are buzzwords for introducing a mixing
of eastern religion thought processes with Christianity and bringing it
into the church.

All of this is producing Christian minds that are malleable, soft,
undiscerning, half-drugged, feeling good, and completely open to the
power of suggestion from…whoever, and whatever. That is what eastern
meditation techniques do. You empty your mind and accept that whatever
comes must be good and right and from God.

The church has become an entity seeking to have their ears tickled.
Seeking to feel better about their painful lives. Seeking to be
successful, happy and prosperous. What is it you seek? Step right up
folks…we’ve got it all now.

Everything except the whole truth of the Word of God, the
way of the cross, the power of the blood to save and heal and forgive,
the altar of God where we come to be broken and changed, healed and set
free. Everything which made the Gospel powerful has and is being
systematically removed by the enemy of our souls – not because it is not
powerful, but because we no longer wish to bow to its demands, its holiness or its truth.

We are seeing the fruit of nearly thirty years of dumbing-down and
de-prioritizing the Word of God, giving it a mini-place in our lives
while shiny things and baubles and the newest “move” catch our attention
and send us off on a fruitless quest for the next experience. The seed
of the Word of God has corporately fallen on stony ground, without depth, where it grows up quick, shrivels and dies.

I know I am very passionate about this, reluctant to even use the
word passionate, so overused it is. I have a right to be. I grew up in
the occult, a world of delusions, lies, and darkness. Even when I tried
to turn to new age thought to dispel the darkness, turning to Hinduism,
Buddhism, and becoming an avid follower of Paramahansa Yogananda in my
little bedroom devouring his every word as “truth,” I ended up deceived,
wrecked and in utter darkness, even though some of it temporarily
numbed my pain and made me “feel good.”

I understand many of these Christians who are so emotionally bound to The Shack
that they have thrown caution to the wind and ignored the dangerous
reality that it in fact promotes unbiblical lies and is being promoted
by someone who has rejected Biblical truth about hell and salvation. I was one of those Christians after I was saved. I was totally brainwashed. I was
a universalist. Then came this “mean man,” this “judgmental Christian”
Bible study leader named Dave Malkin, who dared to get out the Word of
God and without holding back challenged me about my beliefs. This “judgmental, mean man” saved my spiritual life. (I thank God for Dave, may his memory be blessed!) I needed a hard word to break through the lies.

In all my dealings with everything from Rob Bell to The Shack,
I understand that simple logic and reason isn’t working with people who
are emotionally invested in the teachers or the stories. People need a
wake-up call, and that may not feel good or seem loving. But I cannot
apologize for my approach because I see that in the end, The Shack
is not just a book or a movie but a game-changer that is extinguishing
some of the last lights of discernment out of the hearts of thousands of
believers. I know how they feel. I have been there. And I thank God
that someone cared enough to hurt me with the truth. When a house is
burning down and people are asleep inside, one cannot afford to meekly
whisper, hoping the people hear. You have to shout at the top of your
lungs, “Get out, quickly!” In dealing with these new delusions, it may
be necessary to jar people awake.

Jesus said in Matthew 24 that all of this would happen. Paul said,
“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall
depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of
devils”. (1 Tim. 4:1) The great falling away is at hand. But a remnant
will remain faithful. I can only pray humbly not to be one who falls for
the lies in a moment of vulnerability, or weakness, or pain or giving
up, for we are all vulnerable. That is where I understand the motto of
the French foreign legion that a friend shared with me. “If I falter,
straighten me out. If I stumble, pick me up. If I retreat, shoot me.”
Blunt, but as a spiritual warrior it resonates in my heart. None of us
are exempt from having to diligently guard against the lies of this age,
outside and inside the church.

I believe all these progressive deceptions over the last few decades
have been just the build-up to the next great delusion, which could be
the final one. God help us to turn away from the slow poisoning
of the church through breath-prayers, eastern meditation, mindfulness,
yoga, etc. God help us to surrender our soulish ways of perceiving God
based on a book that was written by a wounded man, William Paul Young –
unhealed from abuse and bitter church hurts – whom those seeking to make
a profit have promoted regardless of his spiritual fragility and
woundedness – who rejected the God of the Bible for a god who would
somehow ease his pain – one that eases your pain as it kills your soul. The Shack is the spiritual Jack Kavorkian of our age.

Pray for William Paul Young, that God would pull him out of this most
dangerous and deadly strange fire. Pray for the multitudes who are
believing lies. And may God deal with those mercenaries and
money changers who care more about what sells and profits them then about
the care and protection of the flock of God.

Alice Bailey’s plans are about to come to full fruition. The greatest lie is just around the corner.

Stay strong, saints. “And when these things begin to come to pass,
then look up, and lift up your heads; for your redemption draweth nigh.
(Luke 21:28) He is coming soon!

[1] http://www.carlsbadlifestylepubs.com/am_event/seduction-of-spirit-i-am-wholeness
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkrtac7IgXs

[3] https://www.facebook.com/BBCLondon/videos/1361390013924062/

UPDATED TESTIMONY OF EX CATHOLIC PRIEST, RICHARD BENNETT

UPDATED TESTIMONY OF EX CATHOLIC PRIEST, RICHARD BENNETT
 Published on Oct 26, 2016
Hear
the trials and tribulations of a Roman Catholic Priest in his struggle
to truly know he was going to heaven when he died and have a
relationship with Jesus Christ. This 13 year struggle of Richard to
know God in a real biblical way crosses 2 oceans, 2 continents and even 2
hemispheres. Watch what powerful and wonderful things God did to save
him from his sins and give him real peace and love instead of his own
empty works.

This update includes the latest news of the
miracles God has performed in his life since the last time he shared his
testimony with us. It is a heartwarming and powerful account of what
God can do for you if you will only listen to God. If you are seeking
answers from God or seeking to know God and have the confidence that the
moment you die you can be with Christ and not in some hell or
punishment area, this is must see video for you. Let Richard share his
story and the Words of God with you. From Lourdes to China, from the
Vatican in Rome to Washington state, Richard’s journey has been long but
the gift is great.

 

THE CUNNING EVIL GENIUS OF THE VATICAN PAPAL SYSTEM REGARDING “GLOBAL WARMING”, “SUSTAINABILITY” & MARXIST ECONOMICS

THE CUNNING EVIL GENIUS OF THE VATICAN PAPAL SYSTEM REGARDING “GLOBAL WARMING” & “SUSTAINABILITY”
BY EX-PRIEST RICHARD BENNETT 
 Published on Jul 27, 2015
As
the history of the structure of the Catholic Church is alarming, an
exposure of its system is essential. Richard Bennett of
www.bereanbeacon.org breaks down the latest move by Pope Francis and how
it fits into the history of the Papal system. Biblical and historical
analysis of the Papal system is required so that its influence can be
prevented. This we have done this video. In dealing with Papal Rome, it
is utterly important to remember that “those who do not learn from
history are doomed to repeat it.” Many Christian people, and indeed
Evangelical churches, have been harmed because of their ignorance of the
genius of Vatican procedures. This video in explaining the facts
exposes these procedures. Please like, rate, and share this video with
your fellow church members and your family and friends and subscribe.
Thank you.
 Worse than Karl Marx – The Pope Francis’ 
Dogma on Economics

CROATIAN GIRL ESCAPES CATHOLICISM BY THE GRACE OF GOD

CROATIAN GIRL ESCAPES CATHOLICISM 
BY THE GRACE OF GOD 

 Doctor Lucija Tomljenovic has a wonderful story of being born and raised
in a Catholic family in Croatia. Her love for biology and science led
her across many continents in a quest for truth in both Science and
Religion. In this gripping tale you will discover how Lucija came to
understand that she was Chosen by God to inherit eternal life. It was
not by any merits of her own but truly by Grace alone through Faith
alone and in Christ Alone.

ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ENDEAVORS TO OVERTURN THE REFORMATION

ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH ENDEAVORS 
TO OVERTURN THE REFORMATION 
 Published on May 19, 2016
 http://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server5100/7hqkmn/product_images/uploaded_images/RevRichardBennett.jpg
Richard
Bennett, ex-Catholic priest, of www.bereanbeacon.org, exposes Pope Francis’s meeting with the
Lutherans on the 500 year anniversary of the Reformation.
Just as
the primary response of the Roman Catholic Church to the Biblical faith
of the Reformers was the Counter-Reformation through the Jesuits, now
Pope Francis a Jesuit leads the Roman Church’s endeavors to overturn the
Reformation. Thus it is of vital importance that we understand want is
involved in these endeavors so as not only to impede them but to advance
Reformation faith. It is also very important that you like and share
this video with your church members, and of course your family and
friends. Please, share on your social media and post this video on your
websites all over the Internet. Thank you
 

THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT HAS TRUMP IN ITS CROSS HAIRS

THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT HAS TRUMP 
IN ITS CROSS HAIRS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By: Devvy Kidd
March 13, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
Things
are moving in hyper speed since President Trump was inaugurated. The
attacks on him, his family, his cabinet picks, what he’s trying to accomplish
for us – you name it – the shadow government has him in its cross hairs.
The lying ‘mainstream’ media from print to cable have been exposed.
The Democratic/Communist Party USA has been exposed as the party of
racism and exploitation. They’re all in a panic as are those who control
them and Washington, DC. To confirm the shadow’s government’s intent,
see Sean Hannity interview Monica Crowley a victim herself of the shadow
government below. 
Tens
of millions of we the people are fully aware America dodged the final
nail in our coffin with the defeat of die-hard Marxist, Hildebeast Clinton.
It wasn’t just a blow to her Highness who firmly believed it was “her”
time, it was a blow to the evil forces in this country working feverishly
to destroy our sovereign nation and transition us into world government.
I
firmly believe as probably millions of others do that without the Internet
we would have been toast long ago.
The
Internet is an amazing tool. It has some of the darkest places you can
imagine that promote child pornography, snuff films and debauchery beyond
most decent people’s imagination.
It
is a major revenue tool for retailers and service oriented businesses
alike as well as helping people receive an education, fund-raising for
worthy causes and so much more.
Have
a question about cooking, gardening – you name it, the Internet is the
place to go for a speedy answer.
It’s
also full of lies, distortion and propaganda in the realm of what’s
called politics whether it be in this country or countries around the
globe. The amount of all three is dished out daily on thousands of web
sites is enough to drown anyone. Web sites that print nothing but theories
without a single fact to back them up seem to attract far too many people
who quite frankly, don’t do any research themselves.
While
I’ve been in the trenches going on 27 years full time, it wasn’t until
July 1998 that I put up my own web site. Prior to that it was faxes,
newsletters and very expensive long distance phone bills (long before
unlimited calling by phone providers) trying to get the world out about
things like stopping NAFTA, trying to explain the problem with the unconstitutional,
privately owned “Federal” Reserve, fiat currency and more.
And, yes, the push towards a ‘one world order’ even though people laughed
in my face.
I’ve
spent an enormous amount of time on the Internet doing research, verifying,
reading and of course, writing this weekly column. As I wrote back in
January, my experience tells me which web sites I can and cannot trust
and which ones provide not just commentary but in-depth exposure of
the sinister individuals behind the curtain. NWVs writers are very careful
about which web sites we link to verify and back up what’s in our columns.
NWVs
is just about ready to launch it’s new web site – something computer
folks know about called ‘content based’. You
can see it here — not all the links are working yet as there were
more than 19,000 files to get transferred over. It should be finished
sometime in early April. All of this has cost a lot of money and as
I say so often, a web site like NWVs has to be treated as a business
or it won’t survive. In the competitive world of commentary/news web
sites one must stay up with technology or sink. The only exception here
is that Paul Walter and his lovely wife do not get paid a salary or
any other compensation. Only outside computer expertise.
I
KNOW the commentaries and columns on this web site have made a big difference
over the years. I wrote my first column here in 2002 and have watched
things grow exponentially since then. The quality of writers is superb
and they all donate their precious time to bring you the best in research,
keeping all of us updated on the avalanche of ‘stuff’ going on as well
as Sunday’s featured clergy. Can’t be beat.
NWVs
writers give up their precious time while working (lawyers, bakers,
educators, clergy, business owners) to make a difference by writing
columns for NWVs. I know you appreciate them.
 Yes,
this is a request for donations. OUR beloved America, is at a very dangerous
cross roads right now. The resistance by misguided Americans spoon-fed
daily lies can only be countered by truth. By continuing to get facts
out there instead of propaganda. By educating as many Americans as we
can so that their blinders will be lifted.
President
Trump is under siege. I mean can you imagine, even being the tough NY
‘street fighter’ he is what this has been like for him day after day?
He is working to keep this republic sovereign while evil scum like George
Sores and the GOP establishment as well as they Democratic/Communist
Party USA are working to destroy us. Yes, I said the GOP establishment
and I pointedly mean Rat Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell and others with
their forked tongues.
We
can and must defeat them and they only way we can do that is through
knowledge because knowledge is power. We won’t get another chance at
saving our country before it turns very ugly.
Please
show your support for NWVs today. Take the time to sign up as a monthly
sponsor for $10.00 or $25.00 – less than the cost of a pizza. If enough
readers of this web site did that NWVs would have a good idea of their
monthly operating capital they can count on. Or, if you can’t do that,
please be generous and make a donation right now. It’s very easy. Please
click here to donate.
Don’t
forget to join me on my radio show Monday, Wednesday and Friday evenings,
5:00 pm PST, 7:00 pm CST and 8:00 pm EST, to hear my guests, get up
to date accurate information and call in with your thoughts and/or suggestions
on the issues. And, every show for the next couple weeks for a lucky
caller: A free signed copy of my book, Taking Politics Out of Solutions.
To listen, click
here.
[Devvy’s
hot new book, Taking
Politics Out of Solutions is now available. The most important issues
destroying America are presented along with constitutional solutions
neither the Republicans or Democrats will pursue. Get your copy now.
Excellent discounts for 2 or more books, or on bulk orders.]

SEDITION, ESPIONAGE AND WIRETAPPING OF PRESIDENT TRUMP

SEDITION, ESPIONAGE AND WIRETAPPING 
OF PRESIDENT TRUMP
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By
Kelleigh Nelson


March 13, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
Obama
and Hillary surrogates put forth a false narrative of Russian collusion,
but had no evidence to support the allegation. It appears that on a second
attempt, the Obama Administration got a FISA court order to monitor communications
of the Trump campaign, treasure hunting for evidence to support the false
narrative and apparently, there is none. Now a backfire has put the Obama
gang and their media lapdogs on the defensive. —J.D.
Pendry
Wouldn’t
it be nice to see the lying
Socialist-loving media actually on the defensive and in a meltdown?
What’s funny is they’ve actually put a bit of truth out in
the past, and now they’re having to eat their own words. The NYTs
asked Sean Spicer if there was proof of Obama’s wiretapping, and
Sean said, “No,” but the NYTs itself printed
the story on January 19, 2017.
Hopefully,
our new AG go full bore after the former administration and their alleged
illegal wiretapping!
Attorney
General Sessions has not recused himself from an investigation into the
latest wiretapping allegation and that just thrills me. Trump has turned
the tables on the left and their phony Russian election collusion stories.
The
Gateway
Pundit supplied an entire list of those the Obama administration had
wiretapped. However, Obama
is denying he ever spied on Trump or his administration. Yet, he has
his handler, communist-bred
Valerie Jarrett, in his rented townhouse, only blocks from the White
House, to lead the charge to topple the peoples’ choice for President.
Jarrett, from within the White House may have launched
a Watergate style attack on Trump during the election, and is now
continuing her attack.
Levin
Calls for Congressional Investigation
Even
former NeverTrumper and pro-Constitutional Convention talk show host,
Mark Levin, has said, “The evidence is overwhelming. This is not
about President Trump’s tweet, it is about the Obama administration’s
spying. The question isn’t whether it spied, we know they went to
the FISA court twice. The question is, who did they spy on, and the extent
of the spying. That is, the Trump campaign, the Trump transition, Trump
surrogates, and the American people.”

Levin called Obama’s efforts, “police state” tactics,
and suggested that Obama’s actions should be the target of a congressional
investigation. He also stated that the theories about Russian interference
in the presidential election were nothing more than conspiracy theories.
Here’s the
entire interview.

The
Timeline
The
first Obama FISA request came in June of 2016. In July, Trump made a joke
about Hillary’s missing emails saying that maybe Russia can find
them. This was the catalyst for the Socialist media to glom onto the fabrication
that Russia hacked the election for Trump’s win.
In October,
the Podesta emails kept flowing out from WikiLeaks,
and new scandals were in the news daily. Of course, the Clinton campaign
blamed Trump and the Russians, spewing the allegation that the Russians
hacked the Democrat emails. The truth of the matter is Podesta’s
emails were obtained because he fell for a phishing
scam.
When
Julian
Assange was interviewed in London by Sean Hannity, he clearly stated
that Russia was not responsible for the hacking of the DNC. He has no
reason to lie. We have just seen that the CIA department has possession
of Russia hacking malware that can be used to make
it appear that Russia’s fingerprints were on the DNC hacks.
The CIA was possibly the source of the “hacks” during the
election cycle. They didn’t give information to WikiLeaks, because
Assange said that the source came from within the DNC, but these hacks
were essentially made for no reason other than to provide a cover story
that Russian hacking helped Trump win the election.
In October,
the second
FISA request was made by Obama, focusing on a computer server in Trump
Tower suspected of links to Russian banks. Again, no evidence whatsoever
is found, but they continued their spying, ostensibly for national security
reasons.
These
are police state tactics where the standing administration is actually
monitoring an opposing presidential campaign with surveillance by the
federal government. There should be media outrage, but the media is part
of the problem.
In January
of 2017, John McCain got into the act and turned over to the FBI the phony
Buzzfeed intel “dossier”
compiled by a foreign spy. All of this was false, and nothing could be
verified; the info had been floating around DC for months and ignored.
In early
January, Obama decided to expand the NSA sharing and to share globally
intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other
intel agencies before applying privacy protections. Totally unheard of
and dangerous, these reduced protections made it easier for intel on private
citizens to be leaked or circulated.
Even
worse is the NYT’s
report on the eve of Inauguration Day, that several agencies, FBI,
CIA, NSA, and the Treasury Department are all monitoring several associates
of the Trump campaign suspected of Russian ties. Yes, multi-agencies were
working on this false story to destroy the peoples’ new president
and his administration.
In February,
the irreplaceable, NSA Chief, General Michael Flynn, fell prey to the
lies of the FBI transcripts. Obama’s Sally Yates, acting AG, is
fired for insubordination. The General, the finest appointee besides Sessions
in Trump’s administration, ends up resigning over allegedly misleading
VP Pence, most likely inadvertently, about the content of this normal
conversation with the Russian Ambassador.
My
own belief is that globalist
VP Pence wanted to be rid of the General. While in Germany days after
Flynn’s resignation, Pence mentioned needlessly that Flynn was gone
because of a “lack of trust.” Spicer had uttered the same
words. I believe Pence is the core of why the General, who was a loyalist
from the beginning, is gone.

Jeff
Kredo is reporting that, “The CIA and Departments of Justice
and Treasury are being sued
by Judicial Watch for their role in leaking highly classified material
as part of an effort to undermine the credibility of former Trump administration
NSA Chief Michael Flynn, according to a recent announcement.”

Back
to the timeline…later in February, the NYTs
cited four current and former American officials in the Trump campaign
who had “repeated contacts with Russian intel officials. Of course,
it’s been denied by the Trump administration, and then the NYTs
admitted there was no evidence of any collusion between the campaign and
the Russians. Finally, the administration is raising questions about illegal
intel leaks.
In March,
the Bezos owned Washington Post reported that AG Sessions had contact
twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign, once at the Heritage
Foundation, and once at a meeting in Sessions’ Senate office.
My previous
article exposed just how many times the top Democratic Socialists
have also met with the Russian ambassador as well as President Putin.
The
Back Story
NSA
Admiral Mike Rogers visited Trump Tower just 10 days after the election,
and right after another Mike Rogers – the former House intelligence
Chairman who retired after lying about the Benghazi fiasco – was
kicked off the Trump transition team on intelligence. No one could figure
out why he was kicked out. However, if you’ve read the
Benghazi Brief you know how damaged, corrupted and untrustworthy Chairman
Mike Rogers was – and he previously sat on the oversight gang of
eight.
It appears
that NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers didn’t want to participate
in the spying scheme (Clapper, Brennan, etc.), of President Obama’s
post presidency efforts to undermine Donald Trump. It could be that NSA
Rogers didn’t want to visit Trump Tower until Chairman Rogers was
gone.
Andrew
McCarthy Sums It Up
Former
prosecutor, Andrew
McCarthy summarized the story in William F. Buckley’s NeverTrump
National Review.
McCarthy
tells that Obama and his minions wanted criminal investigations of Trump’s
top people, yet there was nothing criminal to find. Surprise, Surprise!
So what they did next was convert
the investigation into an intel probe under FISA (The
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act). Parts of this story have been
confirmed by the BBC, NYTs, and the McClatchy
papers.
Normally
a FISA surveillance is allowed by the court whenever the feds ask to spy
on certain people, but not this time. The court refused permission to
spy on Trump’s people according
to the BBC. McCarthy commented that this is notable because, “the
FISA court is notoriously solicitous of government requests to conduct
national security surveillance.”
Not
liking the refusals, the Obama administration came back during the final
weeks of the campaign with a third request that didn’t specifically
mention Trump. Then the request was granted by the court, BUT…reports
from the Guardian and BBC don’t mention tapping of phones.
Of course,
there have been denials by the Obama administration, which McCarthy calls
“disingenuous on several levels.” Others have characterized
them as a “non-denial
denial.”
The
Deep-Police-State
Newt
Gingrich made
the observation, “To think this happened to be done by some
bureaucrats with no supervision, when you know, for example, that Attorney
General, Loretta Lynch, spent an hour in secret with Bill Clinton just
before they dropped charges against his wife. I mean all of this stuff
smells to high heaven despite the best efforts of the elite media to cover
it up.” He said, “These Obama wiretaps of our President are
very serious, and very dangerous to our liberties.”
The
very first FISA request on Trump Tower came after Bill Clinton, and Obama’s
AG Loretta Lynch, had their private meeting on the plane. [Link]

Gingrich made it clear that Schumer
is trying to derail this presidency by keeping Obama appointees in power.
Schumer knows that Jeff Sessions is a man of integrity and character above
reproach, but he attacks the finest in Trump’s administration.

FBI
Director Comey
According
to the NYTs, “The FBI director reportedly
made the verbal request, to the Justice Department to publicly
reject President Trump’s assertion that Obama ordered the tapping
of Trump’s phones, senior American officials said on Sunday. They
said Mr. Comey argued that the highly-charged claim is false and must
be corrected, but the department has not released any such statement.”
Director
Comey allegedly said, and it’s only supported by anonymous sources,
for the DOJ to refute the President’s allegations, because, “it
falsely insinuates that the FBI broke the law.”
So,
it’s okay with the FBI to falsely insinuate that the President broke
the law, but nobody had better make that same claim about them. Fake news?
Maybe. We’re still wondering why Comey was retained.
Obama’s
Community Organizers
Donald
Trump’s latest tweets sent arrows into the MSM and Obama’s
Organizing for America (OFA).
Paul
Sperry, writing for the New York Post, says OFA is an army of
agitators 30,000 strong who will fight President Donald Trump at every
turn of his presidency, and the ex-president “will command them from
a bunker less than two miles from the White House.” Sperry writes
that the ex-president is setting up a shadow government to sabotage the
incoming administration through a network of leftist nonprofits led by
OFA, which is growing its war chest (currently more than $40 million)
and has some 250 offices nationwide. OFA’s IRS filings, according
to Sperry, indicate OFA has 32,525 volunteers nationwide. The ex-president
and his wife will oversee the operation from their foundation office near
the White House.
Obama
has moved some of his top players into the OFA. He has even moved
his co-president and handler, Valerie Jarrett, into his rented home.
Conclusion
Here’s
the meat of this whole filthy deep-state spying sedition…the story
is not the Trump campaign. The story is not the Russians hacked the election.
The story is not the Trump campaign was working with the Russians. The
story is the effort by Barack Hussein Obama — and the Democrat Party,
and the New York Times, and Washington Post, and Politico — to sabotage
and destroy the Trump presidency, and Monica Crowley knows this all too
personally.
Crowley
was set to be the senior director of communications at the National Security
Council before a hit
job by CNN destroyed her. She was recently
interviewed by Sean Hannity (see the vidio below) and said the following:
Look,
what happened to me was a despicable
straight up political hit job. There is a very toxic and increasingly
poisonous atmosphere of personal destruction in DC and the media. It’s
always been there, but now it’s on a whole different level.
The
attack on me was a test. What happened to me, what happened to General
Flynn, what is happening to AG Sessions and others, is all of a piece.
There is a very dangerous and very effective destabilization campaign
under way against this President, his administration, and his agenda.
What I hope the President and his senior aides understand is that these
forces are not just looking to delegitimize him, they want to personally
destroy him, destroy his presidency, and they would like to see the
man in prison.

 They
are out for blood, and the reason they must destroy him is because Donald
Trump is an alien organism that has been injected into the body politic
by the American people to reform it. He must not be allowed to succeed.
They want him and his people rejected from the system, just like any
alien organism. He must not be allowed to succeed, and I hope everyone
around him understands that this is a war, and they will not end until
they destroy the President of the United States. 

David
Brock and other organizations have already raised tens of millions of
dollars for an impeachment process. They want “jail to the chief.”
We are so far beyond normal politics. We are in a very dangerous moment.
While President Trump is a very strong leader and a man of strong constitution,
and he was able to survive all of this during the campaign and get elected
president, I hope to God he is strong enough to withstand the monolithic
opposition, a federal bureaucracy that is completely out to undermine
him every day, and the intelligence community that is engaged in this
as well.
If
Trump succeeds, the country changes for the good, and the globalists
do not want that to happen.
Please
pray continually for our President, his administration, and our country.

EMERGING TRUTH: OBAMA AND AG LYNCH AUTHORIZED SPYING ON PRESIDENT TRUMP

EMERGING TRUTH: OBAMA AND AG LYNCH AUTHORIZED SPYING ON PRESIDENT TRUMP
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 By 
        NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri
As
this week’s spy drama continues to unfold, a former military intelligence
officer and police detective told NewsWithViews.com that last
year President Barack Obama’s Attorney General, Loretta Lynch, signed
off on — and expedited — two FISA (Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act) Court requests to wiretap the Trump
campaign.
Former
homicide detective Barry Thomas Neallon, a retired intelligence operative
with the U.S. Marines (*Force Recon), claims, “If Attorney General
Lynch was processing applications for electronic eavesdropping warrants,
then both her boss, Barack Obama, and her FBI chief, James Comey, had
to know about the spying and the justification to invade the privacy of
a presidential candidate from the opposition party.”
Besides
Neallon’s statement to NewsWithViews.com, ABC
News reported on Thursday that all of the applications to the FISA
Court were authorized by Lynch.
“[Which]
means that she chose not to investigate the Clinton Foundation for illegal
activities but rather signed an application to wiretap President Trump,”
stated Jim Hoft, the editor-in-chief for the Gateway
Pundit website.
Just
about every news story on the subject of the Trump wiretaps mentions that
the FISA Court turned down the first request to wiretap Trump even though
it was requested by Lynch herself. The fact the FISA judge nixed the warrant
is evidence that the Justice Department did not even come close to satisfying
the usually minimal standards for obtaining such warrants.
Out
of close to 11,000 warrant applications during the Obama administration
only two were rejected by the FISA Court. “It’s almost like getting
an indictment from a grand jury. A decent prosecutor could get a ham sandwich
indicted. Likewise, judges aren’t tough on warrants unless they believe
the requester is on a ‘fishing expedition’ or the request is totally without
merit,” said former police officer and corporate security director
Iris Aquino.
When
on Saturday morning President Trump’s tweeted that President Barack
Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower in October 2016, the usual cabal of Democrats
and news media outlets began their routine of casting doubts on Trump’s
accusation. “It was as if they were saying ‘how dare you make outrageous
allegations against Saint Barack,'” Aquino noted in a tongue-in-cheek
quip.
Meanwhile,
Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security adviser for Obama, told the news
media over and over again that presidents can’t order a wiretap. He also
cast doubts on the honesty of the new president.
Lynch
made statements this week on a video and she’s heard encouraging protests
and marches, blood in the streets and even death in order to stop and
topple the Trump administration.
 During
the last presidential election cycle, a man named Julian
Assange single-handedly alerted a large number of American voters
about the secretive, devious and hypocritical goings-on at the Democratic
National Committee headquarters and their connections to the Hillary Clinton
for President campaign and members of the so-called mainstream news media.
The damage done to the Democratic Party as a result of the leaked information
may never be fully gauged.
Instead
of looking at cyber security considerations at the DNC — a political
party that’s not part of the U.S. government — Democrats in
both houses of Congress prefer to make wildly absurd accusations about
President Donald Trump, Russian President Vladimir Putin, and anyone else
they can drudge up in order to portray themselves as victims. Also, instead
of asking the appropriate committees in the House and Senate to probe
the nation’s vulnerability to foreign espionage — especially
cyber espionage — the Democrats wish to create an ad hoc or select
committee to investigate the alleged cyber crimes perpetrated against
their opposition.
*Force
Recon is one of the United States Marine Corps’ special
operations capable forces (SOC) that provide essential elements of military
intelligence to the command element of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force
(MAGTF), by supporting their task force commanders.

CHINA WARNS/THREATENS NUCLEAR FIRST STRIKE IN RESPONSE TO “THAAD” MISSILE DEFENSE DEPLOYMENT IN KOREA

 China Warns of Nuclear First Strike in Response to THAAD Deployment
 Published on Mar 10, 2017

China is positioning itself for war and trying to bring the globalist plan for world domination into reality.

CHINA WARNS OF NUCLEAR FIRST STRIKE IN RESPONSE TO “THAAD” MISSILE DEFENSE DEPLOYMENT IN KOREA 
 “US must pay the price”
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
China warns that it is
reconsidering its policy not to use nuclear weapons against South Korea
in response to the U.S. deploying the THAAD missile system and sending
B-52 bombers to protect its ally.
THAAD
is being deployed to shield South Korea from North Korean ballistic
missiles after several tests by the Stalinist state in recent months.
Beijing is furious because the system will also be capable of detecting
and tracking missiles launched from China.
It was also reported yesterday that the U.S. will send B-1 and B-52 nuclear bombers to South Korea in order to display a stern show of strength.
300,000 South Korean troops and 15,000
US personnel have also started their annual Foal Eagle military
exercise. The USS Carl Vinson nuke-powered aircraft carrier will join
the drill – carrying dozens of fighter jets.
An article in the Global Times,
which is widely regarded as the voice of the Chinese government, says
that Beijing will respond to America’s “strategic provocations” by
actioning a “rapid increase in the number and quality of China’s
strategic nuclear weapons” and that China isn’t worried about starting a
limited “arms race”.
Asserting
that “the US must pay the price for the THAAD deployment,” the piece
goes on to warn that, “If the US further intensifies its anti-missile
attempts and strategic containment, China may reconsider its pledge of
not being the first to use nuclear weapons.”
In
other words, Beijing is signaling that it would be prepared to use
nuclear weapons against South Korea in the event of a conflict.
In a related development,
China’s second aircraft carrier is moving closer to completion while
China vows to use its “first class navy” to intercept any “intruding
aircraft” within its region of control.
Last month, Beijing warned
the Trump administration that the People’s Liberation Army is “making
preparations” for war after the deployment of the nuclear-powered USS
Carl Vinson to patrol the South China Sea.
Meanwhile, columnist Pat Buchanan warns that a new “Korean missile crisis” could be on the horizon.
“New
tests by North Korea of missiles or atom bombs for an ICBM could bring
U.S. strikes on its nuclear facilities and missile sites, igniting an
attack on the South,” he writes, adding that China would then be forced to defend its ally.

SPECIAL REPORT: WHY ARE SO MANY PEOPLE ACTING LIKE ZOMBIES?~JUST THE DRUGGED LIBERALS, COMMUNISTS, FASCISTS, SOCIALISTS, GLOBALISTS, THAT IS!

SPECIAL REPORT: WHY ARE SO MANY PEOPLE 
ACTING LIKE ZOMBIES?
 Leftists infected with post-Trump derangement syndrome
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Alex Jones discusses how leftists are devolving into zombies as their minds 
are infected with identity and victimhood politics.
 Best Of Social Justice Warrior FAIL Compilation
 SJWs: Dumbed Down By Design Via Vaccines 
& Public School Brainwashing/Indoctrination
 PROOF! SJW’s Are The Bad Guys
 Are SJWs Mind Control Victims?
 RELATED: Zombiefied Anti-Trump Protester 
Goes NUTS!
 

HOW THE LEFT WANTS YOU TO JOIN THEIR MEDICAL SLAVE CAMPS

HOW THE LEFT WANTS YOU TO JOIN THEIR 
MEDICAL SLAVE CAMPS 
 Published on Mar 9, 2017

Jon Rappoport hosts the fourth hour of the Alex Jones show and breaks down the medial tyranny of the left.

 Major Media Censorship In Medical News Exposed 
 Published on Mar 9, 2017

Jon
Rappoport hosts the fourth hour of the Alex Jones show and breaks down
how the media is used to censor all kinds of information from the
public.

 

PRESSURE BUILDS ON OBAMA OVER TRUMP WIRETAPPING ALLEGATIONS

PRESSURE BUILDS ON OBAMA OVER TRUMP WIRETAPPING ALLEGATIONS
 Obamagate draws similarities to Watergate
BY JEROME R. CORSI 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 WASHINGTON, D.C. – Pressure in Washington is building to get 
full disclosure from the Obama administration’s Department of Justice, 
NSA and CIA regarding the electronic surveillance conducted on the 
Russians that may have monitored Donald Trump and his close campaign 
aides during the 2016 election.

Yesterday, Judicial Watch
announced the filing of a FOIA lawsuit against the CIA seeking an
unclassified report assessing Russia’s interference in European
elections.
The Judicial Watch FOIA request to obtain the CIA’s
unclassified report regarding Russian meddling in the U.S. presidential
election was based on a Wall Street Journal report
commenting that since 2015, Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio), a member of the
House Intelligence Committee, has demanded to see the unclassified
version of the classified CIA report that was presented to the White
House.

“The fact that the administration is picking and choosing the
information it releases and who they release it to ought to give
everybody concern that the administration is manipulating this,” Turner
said.
This follows a separate Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed last week
against the CIA, the Department of Justice and the Department of the
Treasury, seeking to obtain records related to the investigation of
retired U.S. Army Lt. General Michael Flynn’s communications with
Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.
While President Trump has
consistently denied any involvement with Russia to interfere with the
2016 election, last weekend he asked the congressional intelligence
committees to investigate Obama administration electronic surveillance
before the November election that may have intercepted his
communications, as well as the communications of his close campaign
associates.
Underlying the inquires being made since last weekend,
when President Trump tweeted several messages accusing President Obama
of “wiretapping” Trump Tower, is the suspicion President Obama may have
encouraged Attorney Lynch to conduct FISA-authorized electronic
surveillance of the Russians during the presidential campaign because
the White House suspected the electronic surveillance would pick up
incidentally Donald Trump and his closest campaign associates.
The
suspicion in Washington is that President Obama ultimately will fail,
just as President Nixon failed, invoking the Watergate defense that he
did not directly give the order to “wiretap Trump,” but was
knowledgeable in encouraging the electronic surveillance of the Russians
because he and other top Obama administration officials had reason to
believe the effort would gain intelligence on Trump’s electoral plans.
The
key questions remain: (1.) Did Russia intervene in the U.S. 2016
presidential election?  (2) If Russia did intervene, did Russia do so in
collusion with Donald Trump?  (3) What did President Obama know about
the U.S. government electronic surveillance of Russia and when did he
know it?
The answers to the last question – the question made
famous by Sen. Howard Baker during the Watergate Hearings in 1974 –
could end up creating serious legal difficulties – potentially even
criminal legal difficulties – for President Obama, for his top aides,
for former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, for former CIA Director John
Brennan, and for Hillary Clinton – especially if it turns out the Obama
administration shared with Hillary or her campaign intelligence gained
about Trump and his 2016 presidential campaign.
On Tuesday, former
Clinton campaign manager Robby, in an appearance on Fox News “Fox &
Friends,” admitted the Clinton campaign had intelligence from the Obama
administration that came from the electronic surveillance the
administration was conducting on Russian agents during the campaign.
“Trump
aides were caught talking to Russian agents, and those conversations
were captured because the intelligence community regularly taps the
phone lines of those Russian agents,” Mook explained.
Fox News interpreted Mook’s comments
as the Obama administration was actively involved in conducting
electronic surveillance against Russian agents, and that the Obama
administration shared that information with the Clinton campaign.
“The
whole situation is very bizarre that American campaign operatives would
be going back and forth so much, not only with the Russian ambassador
but other Russian agents as well,” Mook said. “The whole reason we are
having this conversation is [because] the Trump campaign was talking to
the Russians a lot. That’s how this got picked up. We need to understand
why this was happening.”
John Brennan And The Trump Tower Wire Tactic

 

HILLARY CLINTON’S VP CANDIDATE & SENATOR TIM KAINE’S SON ARRESTED FOR “RAISING CAIN” AT TRUMP RALLY

 http://www.dbtechno.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Tim-Kaine-son-arrested.jpg
 “WOODY” THE ALLEGED ANARCHIST INSPIRED BY LAWYER FATHER? TIM INSISTS HIS THREE SONS WERE ADVISED TO PROTEST THE LEGAL WAY
 http://conservativefiringline.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/000000000-kaine.jpg
SENATOR TIM KAINE’S SON ARRESTED FOR 
“RAISING CAIN” AT TRUMP RALLY 
BY WARREN MASS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Linwood Kaine, the son of Virginia senator and former Democratic
vice-presidential candidate Tim Kaine, was arrested outside the capitol
grounds in St. Paul, Minnesota, on March 4, on suspicion of riot in the
second degree. Three police officers needed pepper spray to subdue
Kaine, who was among six protestors arrested after counter-protesters
set off fireworks, lit a smoke bomb, and sprayed a chemical irritant
into a crowd during the “March 4 Trump” rally at the Minnesota State
Capitol.
All of those arrested were released, but St. Paul City Attorney
Samuel Clark is reviewing the case to determine if possible additional
charges can be brought.
The Twin Cities Pioneer Press quoted a statement from Steve
Linders, a St. Paul police spokesman, who said that a police officer
ordered a man, later identified as Kaine, to get on the ground, but he
refused. “The officer was able to get ahold of Mr. Kaine, but he got up,
squared off with the officer and the officer tried to take him to the
ground again,” Linders said. Another officer arrived and sprayed a
chemical irritant toward Kaine to subdue him. “He then was taken to the
ground, but continued to resist, at which point another officer deployed
a knee strike to get him to cooperate with the officers and put his
hands behind his back,” Linders continued.

“After the strike, Mr. Kaine cooperated and was taken into custody without further incident.”
Kaine’s father, Senator Tim Kaine, released a statement through a spokesperson to the Pioneer Press, the Washington Post
and other news outlets saying: “We love that our three children have
their own views and concerns about current political issues. They fully
understand the responsibility to express those concerns peacefully.”
The Pioneer Press reported that on the afternoon of March 4,
several hundred Trump supporters showed up at the Capitol for a
permitted rally billed as the “March 4 Trump.” It was one of several
such held around the country.
The Minnesota State Patrol estimated that 400 Trump supporters were
present at the Capitol and that there were 50 counter-protestors.
Speeches had been going on for about a half-hour inside the Capitol
rotunda when a group of protestors tried to disrupt the event. Police
said that during the protests, someone set off a smoke bomb, which
apparently struck a woman in the head.
A March 6 Reuters article reported on a number of pro-Trump rallies
around the nation on the same day that Kaine was arrested, where
violence broke out. One of these took place in what Reuters described as
“the famously left-leaning city of Berkeley, California.” The report
noted:

At a park in Berkeley, across the bay
from San Francisco, protesters from both sides struck one another over
the head with wooden sticks and Trump supporters fired pepper spray as
police in riot gear stood at a distance.
Some in the pro-Trump crowd, holding
American flags, faced off against black-clad opponents. An elderly Trump
supporter was struck in the head and kicked on the ground.

Other pro-Trump rallies around the country went on without violent
incidents, though a few drew protests. Reuters noted that most of the
rallies appeared to take place without any disruption or violence, like
one outside the Michigan State Capitol in Lansing.
“How can anyone be disappointed with bringing back jobs? And he
promised he would secure our borders, and that’s exactly what he’s
doing,” said Meshawn Maddock, one of the organizers of the Lansing
rally, which drew about 200 people.
An article posted by The New American
on November 17 (after Trump was elected but before his inauguration)
sought to determine what was behind the often violent “protests” (which
were really riots) against president-elect Trump. The article noted:

Within a day of Donald Trump’s election,
protests and riots began in cities as far apart as New York and Los
Angeles and almost everywhere in between. In some of the protests,
participants can be seen carrying larger-than-life Donald Trump heads on
large sticks. In all of the protests, professionally-made signs bearing
the same images and slogans can be seen. Since the “spontaneous”
uprising began less than a day after the election results were known, it
seems odd that the protesters already had signs and Trump heads all
ready to go.

This is especially odd since Trump’s electoral victory surprised most people, even his supporters.
The writer of that article, C. Mitchell Shaw, posed the following
questions which cast doubt on any beliefs that these violent
demonstrations were spontaneous:

• Where did those signs and heads come from?
• Who paid for them?
• Who rallied the “troops” on such short notice?
• Does anyone really believe that all of this is spontaneous?

The article continued:

The answers — based on sheer logic alone —
would easily be that the protests and riots are likely not spontaneous
and that they are being funded and manned by the same deep-pocketed
leftists who spawned the earlier protests against Trump during his
candidacy and who also created other subversive movements and
organizations, such as Black Lives Matter (BLM). But sheer logic aside,
there is evidence that leftist elites are behind the protests and riots
across the nation.

The article offered as evidence, the text of ads appearing on
Craigslist in cities around the nations offering the generous amount of
$15-$18 an hour for anti-Trump protestors.
Which prompts immediate speculation about where the money to pay
these protesters comes from. The writer provides part of that answer by
observing:

The money — coming from Planned
Parenthood, George Soros’ MoveOn.org, Washington Community Action
Network, and other leftist organizations — has helped create a false
image that these protests are the spontaneous actions of angry, scared,
young voters who are pushing back against a system that they see as
targeting them. In reality, it is the very leftist organizations behind
these “protests” that are targeting the participants. Once arrested,
they will have criminal records. The organizations behind the
lawlessness will simply “move on” to the next event.

One wonders if Linwood Kaine’s act of protest was motivated by
misguided youthful idealism or if he also aspires to become a
professional agitator. It is impossible for us to know. But as the son
of a high-profile political figure, it might be expected that this angry
young man is not completely naïve when it comes to political activism.

Related articles:
Trump “Protests” Manufactured by Leftist Elites and Manned by Professional Protesters
PRESIDENT TRUMP — Protests Fizzle, Fail to Stop Inauguration

 _______________________________________________________
INFOWARS REPORTS:
 
 Democrat Tim Kaine's Son Arrested for 
causing Disruptions at Pro-Trump Rally!!!
  
 LOSER TIM KAINE’S FAMILY JUST GOT 
HORRIBLE NEWS THAT WILL SHAME 
THEIR FAMILY FOREVER - THIS IS SICK!
  
 

ROBERT SPENCER: WHAT IF THE MEDIA HAD COVERED WORLD WAR II THE WAY IT COVERS JIHAD?

ROBERT SPENCER: WHAT IF THE MEDIA HAD COVERED WORLD WAR II THE WAY IT COVERS JIHAD?
 Published on Mar 9, 2017
Jihad
Watch director Robert Spencer sketches out how history might be very
different if the establishment media had reported on attempts to counter
Hitler and the Nazis the way it reports on the jihad threat.
 Robert Spencer: Opposition to Trump Immigration Ban is Based on False Pretenses

UNITED NATIONS PUSHES “HE-FOR-SHE” DOLLS FOR BOYS~FOLLOW UP TO FIRST TRANSGENDER & BOY DOLLS

 http://toybook.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/HeForSheBoyStory.jpg
 http://blabber.quickfix1.netdna-cdn.com/media/k2/items/cache/18125109805d4c009208c5be9950b1d6_M.jpg
 
VIDEO FROM FOUNDER:
“EXPANDING DIVERSITY IN CHILDREN’S PLAY” 
 “We ourselves are a small, woman-owned company. We have
encountered gender bias in the workplace. We know the harm it causes.
That’s one of the reasons we fight for our children to grow up in a
better world.”
“EQUALITY LINE ACTION DOLLS”
ONLY $102 EACH OR $185 PER PAIR
UNITED NATIONS PUSHES 
“HE-FOR-SHE” DOLLS FOR BOYS 
“UN WOMEN SOLIDARITY MOVEMENT 
FOR GENDER EQUALITY” 
 
BY SELWYN DUKE
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

There certainly have to be some intermediate steps between your son’s
birth and his ingestion of puberty-blocking drugs and subsequent
“gender-reassignment surgery,” and the United Nations is on the case. It
has joined forces with a new company to push dolls for boys so your child can get in touch with his “feminine side.”

Writes PR Newswire,
“HeForShe, UN Women’s global solidarity movement for gender equality
has teamed up with start-up company … Boy Story to launch two special
edition action dolls named Billy and Mason. The action dolls challenges
[sic] current prejudice surrounding boys playing with dolls, and
promotes the notion that both boys and girls should have the same
opportunity to bond with a special playmate, and that all children,
regardless of their gender, need to learn nurturing, emotional
intelligence, and empathy.”

Created by Boy Story founders Kristen Johnson and Katie Jarvis, Mason is a “Caucasian/Hispanic doll,” informs
Circa, while Billy is “African American” (meaning black, not a North
African Arab or white Afrikaner). It was not reported if they live in
San Francisco’s Haight-Ashbury district or NYC’s Greenwich Village, or
if they actually identify as boy dolls.

The company espouses the principles “How we play can change the
world” and “Harmful stereotypes start young,” which, presumably, would
include stereotyping humans as singular among creatures in (supposedly)
not having innately determined sex roles.

Boy Story writes,
“Girls should know that dolls are for everyone” and “Boys should know
they can have dolls that look like them. They can learn to nurture,
relate, and develop emotional intelligence.”

Interestingly, though, Mason and Billy represent children who can
walk and talk. Wouldn’t nurturing be better encouraged if they were
infants, requiring bottle feeding and diaper changes?

But that girly stuff just won’t do for this sex-stereotype-busting
company, which bills their creations as “Action Dolls.” Funny, when I
was a lad we had “action figures,” things such as G.I. Joe and Star Trek
characters. Yet at 18” tall, I imagine Billy or Mason could just kick
the G.I. out of Joe, an activity boys just might prefer to bottle
feeding.

Maybe that’s better than Mason taking a thumping, though, because the special-edition version will cost
you $102 — on sale. Note, it doesn’t appear the dolls are offered
low-cost or no-cost in hardship cases so that poor boys won’t be denied
feminization.

Each Boy Story doll comes with an associated storybook, which, I’m
guessing, doesn’t involve Mason hunting with his dad or Billy going out
for the football team. Then again, you never know. Explaining why the
dolls are made in China, the company states that it needed to make them “both unique and very durable to hold up to all the rumbling and tumbling that boys tend to do.”

My, that boys “tend” to do? That’s awfully stereotypical. Yet
if lads are innately more rumbly and tumbly, as is implied, isn’t it
possible other significant inborn differences between the sexes exist?

Of course, this is not only long-understood truth, but settled science. For example, the fine Norwegian documentary The Gender Equality Paradox (video below) presents studies showing that boys and girls exhibit different behaviors immediately after birth (e.g., boys are more likely to gaze at objects, as opposed to faces). Is that infernal intrauterine socialization to blame?

But all the usual modern misconceptions are in play here. Boy Story
writes, “Kids know and love diversity. When it comes to differences,
kids really don’t care much.” So children love “diversity,” which is
defined by differences, but also don’t care about differences? Whatever
happened to indifference being the opposite of love?

Also note that this 2014 study indicated that even babies “show racial bias,” preferring playmates from their own group.

Boy Story also embraces the supposition, “We all start out equal,” a
nonsensical idea as equality is not a thing of this world. Do we see it
in nature? Within and among species, there is variation in survivability
and in strength, speed, endurance, intelligence, and aggressiveness.
Animals also have hierarchies; one lion rules the pride, one silverback
gorilla leads his troop, and chickens really do have a pecking order.

So given that most of the equality dogmatists are also evolutionists
and believe man is just another animal, they should ask themselves: Are
humans really the one exception to the world’s rule of inequality? As
G.K. Chesterton put it, if people “were not created equal, they were
certainly evolved unequal.”

Yet the faithful have reason to reject equality dogma, too. Note that
the Bible only mentions “equality” in reference to weights and
measures, not man, and makes clear that we’re all gifted differently.
Why, it’s even said people have unequal glory in Heaven. (Thérèse of
Lisieux came to understand this
after being shown a tumbler and a thimble both filled with water and
then being asked: Which one is fuller?) Equality is our hang-up — not
God’s.

Like so many today, Boy Story essentially warns against putting
children in a “gender straitjacket” and not letting them find their own
way. Yet this is misguided because child-rearing is all about
structuring and limiting — and imposing values.

Consider: Would we likewise warn against placing kids in a species
straitjacket? Before answering, know that just as the psychobabblers
define “gender dysphoria” — the strong sense you were born in the body
of the wrong sex — they also speak of “species dysphoria,” the strong
sense you’re an animal stuck in a human body. For example, Texan Wolfie
Blackheart claimed she was a canine and a Norwegian woman calling herself Nano swore she was a cat.

Does this mean we shouldn’t put children in clothes, have them eat
with utensils, and teach them language, manners, and everything else
befitting a human because they may later identify as a ferret?

Of course, the sex-equality thesis holds that so-called sex
stereotyping hurts children by limiting and perhaps even stigmatizing
them. But what if this is a false assumption? What if, just as we raise a
boy in a species-specific way because he’s not an animal, we should
also raise him in a sex-specific way because he’s not a girl?

And why? Well, if we discern that a child has a gift for music, do we
treat him exactly the same as a kid gifted in golf? Are we constrained
by “equality” dogma? Or do we offer one music-specific training and the
other golf-specific training?

Likewise, is “sex stereotyping” really a negative force? In reality,
it’s just a matter of recognizing boys’ and girls’ characteristic gifts
and giving them sex-specific training allowing them to develop those
qualities fully.

Thus, the truth is the opposite of what the equality dogmatists say:
It’s sex-specific training that allows a child to be all he can be.
Withholding it is the same as denying musical training to the musically
gifted: You prevent the child from realizing his potential.

The kicker here is that virtually no one who has pondered the issue
deeply really believes in equality, anyway. For example, activists may
caterwaul about equal pay for women in sports, but when do they ever
propose eliminating separate athletic categories for the sexes? Or are
they separate because they’re not equal?

Perhaps we should remember that “how we play can change the world” —
and stop playing fast and loose with children’s lives based on the
latest psychobabble fad.  
________________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:

QUEERING INDOCTRINATION BY BLURRING GENDER LINES FOR BOYS AND GIRLS: FIRST TRANSGENDER & BOY DOLLS COME TO MARKET 

https://ratherexposethem.org/2017/02/queering-indoctrination-by-blurring.html 

AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ACT INTRODUCED IN CONGRESS TO REPLACE OBAMACARE~CONSERVATIVES BALKING

 https://evanjenkins.house.gov/sites/evanjenkins.house.gov/files/styles/congress_featured_image/public/home_page_feature/AmericanHealthCareAct.19069.jpg?itok=wAJEaPYo
 TRUMPCARE?
AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ACT INTRODUCED IN CONGRESS~CONSERVATIVES BALKING 
 Published on Mar 9, 2017

Brought to you by Desert Diamond: http://ddcaz.com
WASHINGTON (AP) — House Speaker Paul Ryan has used his weekly press
briefing to deliver a PowerPoint presentation about the Republican
health care bill that’s moving through the House. Using a laser pointer,
the speaker clicked through a series of slides to illustrate problems
with the existing law and explain the GOP’s solutions. Key committees
met through the night on the bill.

 HHS Secretary Tom Price Explains President Trump’s American Health Care Act After Repeal Of Obamacare
1 … 618 619 620 621 622 … 792