PASTORS WILL ASK FOR GOD’S BLESSING ON PLANNED PARENTHOOD ABORTION CLINIC


PASTORS WILL ASK FOR GOD’S BLESSING 
ON PLANNED PARENTHOOD ABORTION CLINIC 
BY STEVEN ERTELT
SEE: https://www.lifenews.com/2018/10/22/pastors-will-ask-for-gods-blessing-on-planned-parenthood-abortion-clinic/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

It’s one of the most sacrilegious acts a religious leader could perform, but it’s happening again — this time in Columbus, Ohio.  There, on the evening of November 9, the so-called Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice is planning a “blessing” of the Planned Parenthood abortion center.
This appears to be a response to the closing ceremony of the 40 Days for Life campaign. The event is called Holy Ground: Blessing the Sacred Space of Decision, and an event description reads:
During this clinic blessing, participants will gather with local faith leaders and guests to ask for God’s blessing upon Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio’s East Columbus Surgical facility, the abortion providers and staff, and all those who pass through the center.
In celebration of conscience and moral decision making, this event will include interfaith blessings, prayers, and testimonies about receiving and providing abortion care. This clinic blessing will create space for progressive voices of faith to speak boldly in support of comprehensive reproductive health care, especially abortion.
Mark Harrington, President of the pro-life group Created Equal informed LifeNews of the event. He said Planned Parenthood abortion practitioners kill babies at the abortion clinic in dismemberment abortions whey they are nearly 5 months old.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! Help us stand for life, please help LifeNews.com with a donation!
He said: “To suggest that God advocates for the shedding of innocent blood is blasphemous. In scripture, Satan “masquerades as an angel of light” and “is a liar and the father of lies.’ Abortion is a frontal attack on those made in His image – human beings. Authentic ministers of God oppose the killing of the preborn, they don’t promote it.”
“If you never believed abortion was child sacrifice, think again. These priests of child-killing may not be offering children as a human sacrifice to Molech, a Canaanite deity associated with the practice of child sacrifice, but instead are offering them to a modern false idol called ‘reproductive choice,” he added.


800 INFLUENTIAL ISLAMIC SCHOLARS FROM 120 COUNTRIES TO MEET IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THAT ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE

800 INFLUENTIAL ISLAMIC SCHOLARS FROM 120 COUNTRIES TO MEET IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THAT ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/800-influential-islamic-scholars-from-120-countries-to-meet-in-order-to-establish-that-islam-is-a-religion-of-peace; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

If it really were a religion of peace, they wouldn’t have to hold big conferences to prove it; it would be obvious to everyone. But there is an unfortunate reality that the Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies is likely to ignore: there has never been a period since the beginning of Islam that was characterized by large-scale peaceful coexistence between Muslims and non-Muslims. There was no time when mainstream and dominant Islamic authorities taught the equality of non-Muslims with Muslims, or the obsolescence of jihad warfare. There was no Era of Good Feeling, no Golden Age of Tolerance, no Paradise of Proto-Multiculturalism. There has always been, with virtually no interruption, jihad, everywhere Muslims and non-Muslims have lived in close proximity with one another. Everywhere Muslims and non-Muslims have lived together, some of those Muslims have been violent toward the non-Muslims. Everywhere. Without exception.
I prove this abundantly, relying primarily on Islamic sources, in my book The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS. Dr Mohammad Mattar Al Kaabi will likely never see this post, and that’s a shame. If he did see it, I invite him to prove me wrong. He can reach me at director@jihadwatch.org. If he provides me with an address, I will send him a copy of The History of Jihad, and if he finds a historical error in it, I will make a $5,000 contribution to the Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies.
But neither he nor any other Muslim will take up that challenge, because they would not be able to prove that Islam has ever been a religion of peace, anywhere, at any point in its history. The public policy implications of that are massive, which is why there are such strenuous efforts, such as this conference, to cover it up.
“Peace forum to set up ‘alliance of virtues’ on Islam,” by Samir Salama, Gulf News, October 24, 2018:

Abu Dhabi: The 5th edition of the Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies, to be held in Abu Dhabi on December 5, will establish that Islam is a religion of peace and justice, said Dr Mohammad Mattar Al Kaabi, secretary general of the forum, an Abu Dhabi-based international organisation.
The forum will bring together more than 800 of the world’s most influential Islamic scholars and thinkers from 120 countries, including ministers of religious affairs, muftis, representatives of the Muslim communities and delegates from the United Nations and rights organisations across the world….
“The idea came following the resounding success of the peace caravan, where an intimate and diverse group of US Muslim, Christian and Jewish clerics convened in Abu Dhabi last year to understand and appreciate theological differences while focusing on the synergism of religious commonalities essential to building healthy ad peaceful communities,” Dr Al Kaabi said.
“These endeavours culminated in an international conference in Washington D.C. in February this year under the theme ‘An Alliance of Virtues for the Common Good’. The event drew participation from hundreds of Christian pastors, Jewish rabbis and Muslim imams, alongside academics and researchers concerned with the culture of peace, as well as representatives of major international organisations and the US civil society. This landmark event was the first time the Abrahamic family of religions convened in all its diversity, to agree on new foundations for a religious dialogue, one that transcends disputation and proselytisation to achieve a discourse of mutual acquaintance and cooperation based upon common values.”…
The forum will tackle five main topics: a contemporary outlook of early Islam’s Alliance of Virtues, treaties and covenants in Islam, contemporary crises of religions and mankind, religion and the ethics of universal solidarity, and a new alliance of virtues — an opportunity for global peace.


INFLUENTIAL EVANGELICAL LEADER NOW EMBRACES POLYAMORY, SAYS IT’S “HOLY, WELCOME, & CELEBRATED”

INFLUENTIAL EVANGELICAL LEADER 
NOW EMBRACES POLYAMORY, SAYS IT’S 
“HOLY, WELCOME, & CELEBRATED”

SEE ROBERTSON’S YOUTUBE CHANNEL HERE:

SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2018/10/26/influential-evangelical-leader-now-embraces-polyamory-says-its-holy-welcome-and-celebrated/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Robertson is a rising star among the evangelical left. 
He identifies as bisexual.
This is is Brandan Robertson. He is an emerging personality on the religious left. Robertson pastors Missiongathering Christian Church, a San Diego church affiliated with the Disciples of Christ. Robertson graduated from  Moody Bible Institute. He has written in  The Washington Post, Tim Magazine, and The Huffington Post. He also speaks at the Wild Goose Festival, a liberal religious gathering referred to as a “Gay Christian Woodstock,” which we have previously written about here. Most recently, Robertson claimed that polyamorous relationships (having intimate sexual relationships with multiple people, such as in an “open marriage”) is “holy, welcome and celebrated.”
Robertson tweeted this out last week…
In honor and support of @QTheology recent webinar on non-monogamous relationships, I want to share this word that I spoke to our congregation on the topic this summer:
#FaithfullyLGBT pic.twitter.com/ygiud05lED
— Brandan Robertson (@BrandanJR) October 18, 2018
Robertson then posted a video (now deleted) in which he says the following (as transcribed by Juicy Ecumenism, here)…
“For those who are in an open or polyamorous relationship here this morning who might be squirming, because this is an uncomfortable question to hear in church sometimes. I want you to hear me loud and clear as a minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Your relationships are holy. They are beautiful and they are welcomed and celebrated in this space.”
And:
“We call all of us together to the same set of standards that we call everyone to: to seek to follow Jesus in all of our relationships. To seek to be honest and respectful and self-sacrificial and consensual and loving with your partners. When any of us live into these standards we can be sure we are on the path to wholeness and holiness.”
Robertson is – according to Vice Magazine – one of the “Woke Young Evangelicals Trying to Make Christianity Cool Again.” We compared him and others highlighted by Vice to Russell Moore here.
If that’s what “cool” is, no thanks.
[HT Juicy Ecumenism]

TRANSEXUAL LADY PASTORS SAY TRUMP ISN’T BEING VERY CHRISTIAN

TRANSEXUAL LADY PASTORS SAY TRUMP 
ISN’T BEING VERY CHRISTIAN 
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2018/10/26/transexual-lady-pastors-say-trump-isnt-being-very-christian/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
From left: Rev. M Barclay, director of enfleshed; Myles Markham, programs and organizing coordinator for the Reformation Project; and Rev. Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza, founder of the Activist Theology Project, photo credit to HuffPo
[Huffington Post] Transgender Christian leaders have a message for President Donald Trump’s administration, following reports that it plans to drastically narrow the legal definition of gender.
Even though the administration is moving to stop recognizing the existence of transgender and nonbinary people, there’s nothing it could do that would erase trans people’s inherent worth, the faith leaders told HuffPost.
“No government entity or leader can take or excise or erase the depth of worth that Transgender people are and embody,” the Rev. Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza, a queer Latinx activist and founder of the Activist Theology Project, told HuffPost in an email. “My religious tradition teaches that I am made in the image of God and of sacred worth.”
Progressive activists have responded with anger and protests to news that the Department of Health and Human Services is seeking to establish a legal definition of gender that would roll back advances made by the Obama administration. The proposed definition, first reported by The New York Times, would treat gender as a biological and unchangeable condition assigned at birth.
In effect, the definition would exclude America’s estimated 1.4 million transgender or nonbinary citizens from federal civil rights protections. Disputes over a person’s gender would have to be clarified with genetic testing, the Times reported.
The government’s proposed definition would realign its understanding of gender with the theology of conservative evangelical Christians, who have long been some of Trump’s staunchest supporters.

The Rev.&nbsp;M Barclay&nbsp;was the <a href="https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/united-methodist-church-transgender-deacon

REV. M BARCLAY

The Rev. M Barclay was the first openly nonbinary person to become a deacon in the United Methodist Church.

The Rev. M Barclay, director of the Christian ministry enfleshed, said they are deeply troubled about the proposal ― but not especially surprised, given the administration’s previous discriminatory actions toward the trans community.
Not only does the proposed definition threaten to snatch away trans Americans’ access to crucial resources and rights, these political moves against the community also leave deep emotional wounds, Barclay, who is based in Iowa and uses gender-neutral pronouns, told HuffPost.
“The spiritual trauma of being perpetually told who we are isn’t real, that others shouldn’t believe us or support us, and that our well-being isn’t of collective significance is doing so much damage,” they said.

“PALESTINIAN” SCHOOLS STILL TEACHING JEW HATRED TO KIDS

Students in a school in Gaza of the UNRWA 
at the beginning of the new academic year.
“PALESTINIAN” SCHOOLS STILL TEACHING 
JEW HATRED TO KIDS
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/palestinian-schools-still-teaching-jew-hatred-kids/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
”Fatah, the largest faction of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, has announced the publication of four new booklets for children in which notorious terrorists and their actions are glorified, according to a recent news report by the Middle East Media Research Institute,” reports WashExaminer.
“One of the booklets is dedicated to Abu Jihad, Yasser Arafat’s deputy and PLO co-founder, who helped plan and execute the murder of 125 Israelis, and another to Dalal Al-Mughrabi, the female Fatah terrorist who led the deadliest terrorist attack in Israel’s history, in which more than three dozen Israeli civilians, one-third of them children, were killed on a hijacked bus in 1978…
“This initiative, the first of its kind, uses stories to document the history of the Palestinian people and of the Fatah movement, the largest faction in the PLO,” said a spokesman.
“The new textbooks examined in this report indoctrinate for death and martyrdom. Jews and Israelis are portrayed as quintessentially evil, amid calls for jihad and martyrdom by Palestinian children. …
“The image of a girl with a long dagger is a disturbing reminder of the 2015-16 Knife Intifada, when children were encouraged to use knives and scissors to attack Israelis. … Anti-Semitism is more prevalent than before [in the new textbooks]. … Israel and the Jews are referred to as ‘enemies of Islam,’ and are blamed for poisoning the Prophet Muhammad. … Encouraging girls and boys to sacrifice their lives in the name of religion appears to be a central goal of this curriculum. ”
[Dr. Chaps’ comment:  This is why President Trump reportedly wants to defund UNWRA, the UN agency funding Palestinian schools, whose textbooks teach terrorism with US taxpayer dollars.  We have got to stand up for Israel and insist on peace in Palestine.]
Trump stops funding Anti-Jewish U.N. Muslim Schools
” The Trump administration has moved to stop all funding for UNRWA, the UN agency that provides aid [and anti-Israel propaganda] for Palestinian refugees. The decision goes to the core of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” reports CBN News.
“The decision to cut off all US funding to the agency has set off a chain reaction in the region.  Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat announced a plan to remove UNRWA from the city.
” Protests popped up in Jordan and the Gaza Strip. Palestinian Authority leaders condemned the action, calling it a ‘path to destruction.’
“What is the American administration doing? They are preempting, prejudging issues reserved for permanent status. They are undermining the moderate forces in Palestine and Israel,” said PLO executive committee secretary general Saeb Erekat. “Those elements that want to achieve peace peacefully, based on a two-state solution, are being destroyed.”
“Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu applauded the decision.
“The United States has made a very important thing, stopping the funds for the agency perpetuating refugees, called UNRWA. The US is finally beginning to solve the problem.”
“So, I think President Trump is touching on the core issue,” Schwartz said. “The core issue is not how large Israel will be or how much territory it will cede. But the question is if Israel will stay. Israel obviously wants to stay, but the Palestinians unfortunately do not accept us yet.”
[Dr. Chaps’ comment:   We must oppose UNWRA funding of anti-Jewish propaganda in Muslim schools, and we oppose dividing Jerusalem or seizing other Israeli land for Muslims, period.]
“I will enter into judgment with them there on behalf of My people and My inheritance, Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations; and they have divided up My land.” Joel 3:2
God Bless you, in Jesus’ name,

Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD
P.S. Thank you for standing with Israel and with with me. I appreciate your love for God and God’s chosen people, who are under attack from all sides in these last days .

DELAWARE: THE LATE TERM ABORTION STATE?

DELAWARE: THE LATE TERM ABORTION STATE?

Your vote on NOV 6th says “I am NOT ok being represented by someone who condones or justifies the barbaric practice of fetal dismemberment up to and including the 9th month of pregnancy.”
Delaware’s abortion law, as of June 2017, re-defines “viability” to make the legal status of abortion virtually open-ended until late in the third trimester. 

During the committee hearing on this legislation (SS1 to SB5), the leading abortionist for Delaware said that a “fetus” could be 9 months and still not be “viable.”

Exactly! That’s the problem! 

This law allows abortion of an infant who is considered not “viable” by the abortion doctor. “Viable” is defined as unable to live outside the womb without the application of “extraordinary medical measures.” That phrase “extraordinary medical measures” is undefined in the law. 

A baby who needs help breathing in the last stages of pregnancy could be considered “not viable” due to needing “extraordinary medical measures” and therefore aborted.  

Thus, this law, passed in 2017, would allow abortions in Delaware well into the late-term stages, creating a legal climate in which very late abortion is protected and inviting to late-term abortionists to set up shop here.” (Steven Aden, Constitutional Law Attorney)

Good Legislators offered reasonable amendments when this law was being debated; such as, amendments to reinstate informed consent requirements for abortion patients that have been upheld by the Supreme Court in cases like Planned Parenthood v. Casey, an amendment to anesthetize babies after 22 weeks before a violent death by dismemberment abortion, and amendments to urge the state to define a gestational age of viability. 

All clarifying amendments were rejected by Democrats Legislators.
To Be Clear, This Is The Kind Of Abortion Allowed In Delaware: 
If you are not ok with this, VOTE ON NOV. 6TH!  We have an excellent opportunity put men and women in our state legislature who will vote for life, religious liberty, and family first! 

If you are not ok with our state being a late term abortion destination… VOTE on NOV. 6th. 

Stopping this radical agenda depends on you and me and people like us getting to the polls. VOTE ON NOV. 6TH 
Additional Resources:
DFPC Action is the Political Action Committee partner of Delaware Family Policy Council. DFPC Action is funded by citizens in Delaware who care deeply about principles that are foundational to human flourishing, such as: thriving families, the sanctity and dignity of human life, religious liberty, and the right of conscience. 

Delaware. The Late Term Abortion State? 

“HATE SPEECH” IS SNEAKY LEFTIST CENSORSHIP, NOT LAW

“HATE SPEECH” IS SNEAKY LEFTIST CENSORSHIP, 
NOT LAW 
By Cheryl K. Chumley – The Washington Times – Friday, August 10, 2018
SEE: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/10/hate-speech-clever-leftist-censorship-not-law/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

ANALYSIS/OPINION:
Leftists have been particularly crafty about clamping down and chilling conservative thought lately, boldly going where milder-mannered censors have previously feared to tread and managing to make several righteous-sounding cases, at least among their circles of progressive types, for the booting of deemed hate speakers from social media.
But their censorship argument dangles precariously on the meaningless claim that in America there’s no room for hate speech.
And I say meaningless because first off, nobody can define what constitutes hate speech and second off, even if they could, there are no criminal laws against speaking one’s mind in this country — except in cases of inciting riots or falsely yelling “fire” in a crowded theater, the latter of which is not really speech at all.
Yet the shrill accusations of hate speech continue.
There are political strategies behind all this screeching.

This whole anti-hate speech call has been a tremendous boon for the left’s successes in shuttering conservative rhetoric, whether online, on college campuses or in the media world.
The best lies and deceptions, after all, are the ones that ring of truth.
The truth: In America, morally speaking, philosophically speaking, sensibly speaking — of course there’s no room in America for hate speech. Only a radical nut would see or say otherwise. But speaking of morality is not the same as speaking of legality. Morally speaking, no citizen should spew vicious, racist, misogynistic, ugly, hateful words. Legally? For the most part, have at it. 
Also the truth: The First Amendment was penned in part to protect primarily political speech — to preserve as a God-given right the ability of citizens to say as they will, to petition as they want, to seek redress for grievances as they ought. Some of these pursuits can get pretty rancorous.
Sometimes, people get offended.
The Founders knew that. That’s the beauty of the First Amendment — to protect those who would offend.
But the left, unable to withstand fact-based scrutiny of its ridiculously anti-American progressive policies, and unable to legislatively advance anti-American progressive policies without the wings of emotionally charged discourse, has been trying to circumvent the spirit of free speech for some time. Why? To shut down the fact-finders and truth-tellers.
The left would like nothing more than to see hate speech etched into law as a punishable offense because that would make the job of censoring conservative thought and statements so much the easier.
The First Amendment and America’s long and cherished history of allowing for the lively exchange of ideas gets in the way of this goal, however. So the desperate left has advanced a public relations campaign that sees hate speech being talked about with rising frequency — as if it’s a thing.
As if it’s an American concept.
As if it’s a real crime, like stealing somebody’s car or punching somebody in the face in a bar.
The left’s hope is to talk it up enough so it doesn’t sound odd or out of place — so people stop wondering every time they hear it, “what? What is that?”
Then come the actual hate speech laws.
Then go the conservatives, too chilled to speak.
It’s like this: The Ku Klux Klan, the Black Panther Party, Louis Farrakhan, David Duke and a long list of others may all speak in ways that strike a large portion of the public as offensive. But fact is, they pretty much have the legal and natural right to speak as they will. The discomfort of either the few or the many does not justify the stripping of their God-given rights — or of anyone’s God-given right to speak freely. It’s a pretty good system of governance that allows both Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, haters and do-gooders alike, equality of expression.
Here in America, let’s keep it that way. All discussions of hate speech should include mention of the fact no such laws in this country exist.

EX-DEMOCRATS “WALK AWAY” FROM PARTY TOWARDS TRUMP & GOP, STAGING MARCH IN WASHINGTON, D.C. IN RAIN

EX-DEMOCRATS “WALK AWAY” FROM PARTY TOWARDS TRUMP & GOP, STAGING MARCH IN WASHINGTON, D.C.

#Walkaway March Full Coverage

JOE HAGMANN REPORTS

“I #WalkAway to save my country.”

Published on Oct 26, 2018

“Finally sharing my #WalkAway story in hopes that someone will watch and walk away. I don’t recognize these Democrats. I’ve never been afraid of a political party getting control again like I am now with these Democrats. The Democrats are encouraging violence and obstruct with zero good ideas on how to help Americans. #LatinosLoveTrump #WalkAway #DemExit” Terry.

#WalkAway March Owen Shroyer of Infowars

#WalkAway March – Will Witt

#WalkAway March – DeAnna Lorraine


PRESIDENT TRUMP’S STATEMENT ABOUT PITTSBURGH SYNAGOGUE SHOOTINGS, PRAYERS WITH RABBI & PASTOR~SUSPECT ARRESTED IS ROBERT BOWERS

PRESIDENT TRUMP’S STATEMENT 
ABOUT PITTSBURGH SYNAGOGUE SHOOTINGS, 
PRAYERS WITH RABBI & PASTOR
President Trump delivers IMPORTANT Remarks at Future Farmers of America Convention in Indiana ahead of MAGA Rally in Illinois.
Pittsburgh synagogue suspect identified as Robert Bowers
Eleven people gathered for a baby naming service were shot to death and four police officers wounded after a gunman opened fire inside the Tree of Life synagogue; Garrett Tenney reports from Pittsburgh.

Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooter Is Robert Bowers…Nazi…Hates Donald Trump…Says Trump Controlled By Jews


EUROPEAN COURT: CALLING THE SATANIC PERVERT MUHAMMAD A PEDOPHILE, DOES NOT FALL UNDER PURVIEW OF FREE SPEECH & CAN BE CRIMINALIZED

EUROPEAN COURT: CALLING THE SATANIC PERVERT MUHAMMAD A PEDOPHILE, DOES NOT FALL UNDER PURVIEW OF FREE SPEECH & CAN BE CRIMINALIZED 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

The freedom of speech does not extend to include defaming the prophet of Islam, the European Court of Human rights ruled Thursday.



The Strasbourg-based ECHR ruled that insulting Islamic prophet Muhammad “goes beyond the permissible limits of an objective debate” and “could stir up prejudice and put at risk religious peace.”



The court’s decision comes after it rejected an Austrian woman’s claim that her previous conviction for calling Muhammad a pedophile, due to his marriage to a 6-year-old girl, violated her freedom of speech.



The ECHR ruled Austrian courts had “carefully balanced her right to freedom of expression with the right of others to have their religious feelings protected.”



The woman, in her late 40s and identified only as E.S., claimed during two public seminars in 2009 that Muhammad’s marriage to a young girl was akin to “pedophilia.”



According to Islamic tradition, the marriage between Muhammad and a 6-year-old girl was consummated when she was 9 years old and he was about 50.



The Austrian woman stated in her seminars that Muhammad “liked to do it with children” and “… A 56-year-old and a 6-year-old? … What do we call it, if it is not pedophilia?”



A Vienna court convicted her in 2011 of disparaging religious doctrines, ordering her to pay a $547 fine, plus legal costs. The ruling was later upheld by an Austrian appeals court.



The woman argued her comments fell within her right of freedom of expression and that religious groups must tolerate criticism. She also argued her comments were intended to contribute to public debate and not designed to defame Muhammad.



The ECHR said the Austrian court’s decision “served the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace.”



The court also said the woman’s comments were not objective, failed to provide historical background and had no intention of promoting public debate.



_____________________________________________________________



SEE ALSO:



http://bigfaithministries.com/was-muhammad-a-pedophile/

https://gatesofvienna.net/2018/10/the-echr-rules-against-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolff/

https://gatesofvienna.net/repression/elisabeths-voice/ (TIMELINE OF "HATE SPEECH" CASE)

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/271763/now-its-official-europeans-cant-criticize-islam-bruce-bawer

EXCERPT: "The bottom line here is grimly clear. The ECHR has totally capitulated to Islam. It has dealt a major blow to freedom of speech in Europe. At this point, indeed, the ECHR might as well be a sharia court. When it comes to voicing unpleasant truths about Islam, it can no longer be claimed with any legitimacy that Europeans under the jurisdiction of the ECHR – which is to say, every European except for the thousand-odd residents of the Vatican and the nine million inhabitants of Belarus – still enjoy freedom of expression. In one fell swoop, the ECHR has put an end to that. And some Americans wonder why Donald Trump is so determined to keep the United States out of the jurisdiction of international courts."



_____________________________________________________________





Sharia in Europe: Human Rights Court Adopts 



Islamic Blasphemy Laws



The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) recently ruled that freedom of speech must be balanced with "protecting the religious feelings" of others. Hence, Europeans are no longer allowed to call Muhammad offensive names like "pedophile," even though he had sex with a prepubescent nine-year-old girl named Aisha. David Wood discusses the issue.












NATIONALIST-POPULIST-COUNTER JIHAD ACTIVIST







Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff at OSCE: "Hate Speech" is a Freedom Problem



Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff at OSCE of Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa speaks at the OSCE conference. Topic: "Hate Speech" is a Freedom Problem







Christian Reporter News Interview in San Angelo, Texas:



"Freedom of Speech" is Lost in Europe







Her Speech: 







Clare Lopez and Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff explain the mission at the OSCE







At a Pro Trump Rally in Denver, Colorado 



on March 4, 2017

























Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff with Geert Wilders of Netherlands











Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, and State Representative Peggy Mast (gatesofvienna.net)



Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff responds to EU court’s ruling that speech insulting Muhammad is prohibited



BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS





republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



Yesterday, Jihad Watch covered the troubling ruling of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that “an Austrian woman’s criminal conviction and fine for her statements accusing the Prophet Muhammad of pedophilia did not breach her right to free speech.”



Insulting Muhammad is now forbidden, according to the ECHR, which has conceded to Sharia imperatives. This ruling is important not only for the “Austrian woman” who was not even named in the Daily Sabah article, but for all who support free speech. According to the ruling, Austrian courts had “carefully balanced her right to freedom of expression with the right of others to have their religious feelings protected.”



Consider the impact of this ruling when weighed with what Pakistan’s President Imran Khan said: that he was “taking the matter [of blasphemy] to the United Nations, saying that few in the West understand the pain caused to Muslims by such activities.” Pakistan is well known for its cruel blasphemy laws.



The next step for the expansion of Sharia provisions in Europe will be the prohibition of all speech that is considered to be broadly offensive to Muhammad’s established religion — Islam — and offensive to the feelings of Muslims.




This is clearly the case of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, who was fined and given a jail sentence for calling Muhammad a pedophile. He married a six-year-old and consummated the marriage when she was nine, but “the Austrian courts had held that ES was making value judgments partly based on untrue facts and without regard to the historical context.



I had the privilege to meet Elisabeth in Warsaw last month at the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s (OSCE) Human Dimension Implementation Meetings. The Center for Security Policy states:



For the last decade, a civil society delegation led by Austrian patriot and freedom fighter Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff has attended ODIHR [OSCE Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights] meetings to express concerns that especially European countries were potentially unwittingly facilitating these Sharia-compliant practices, to their great and increasingly obvious detriment.



Elisabeth is a powerful advocate for freedom. The ECHR ruling on her case bears grave implications for everyone worldwide who supports freedom and genuine human rights. Elisabeth sent me her statement on the ECHR ruling this morning. We owe her much gratitude and support for her fight for the freedom of speech, the hallmark of democracy:



On Thursday, 25 October the ECHR ruled that my conviction by an Austrian court for discussing the marriage between Prophet Mohammed and a six year old girl, Aisha, did not infringe my rights of freedom of speech.



I was not extended the courtesy of being told of this ruling. Like many others, I had to read it in the media.



The ECHR found there had been no violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights and that right to expression needed to be balanced with the rights of others to have their religious feelings protected, and served the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace in Austria.





In other words, my right to speak freely is less important than protecting the religious feelings of others.



This should ring warning bells for my fellow citizens across the continent. We should all be extremely concerned that the rights of Muslims in Europe NOT to be offended are greater than my own rights, as a native European Christian woman, to speak freely.



I am proud to be the woman who has raised this alarm. 







I am also optimistic. Since giving my seminars in Austria in 2009, we have come a very long way. Ten years ago the press labeled me a “confused doom-monger” and I was compared to Osama Bin Laden. Now, Islam is being discussed in every sphere of life and people are waking up to the reality of a culture so opposed to our own. The cultural and political threat posed by Islam to Western societies is now widely recognized and discussed. It is fair to say European society, as well as the political realm, is undergoing an enlightenment, as it is more awake than ever to the need to defend our own Judeo-Christian culture. I believe my seminars in 2009, and subsequent work have contributed to strong push back against an Islamic culture which is so at odds with our own. And note with interest that only one sentence out of 12 hours of seminars on Islam was a prosecutable offense. I assume the remaining content is now officially sanctioned by our Establishment masters. It is obvious to me that public education and discourse on the subject of Islam can have a fundamental and far-reaching impact, even if our state or supra-national authorities try to stifle or silence it, in order to appease a culture so foreign to our own. This fight continues. My voice will not and cannot be silenced.







Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

POPE FRANCIS COMPARES “POPULISTS” TO HITLER; CALLS FOR OPEN DOORS TO ALL MIGRANTS~PEDOPHILE PRIESTS DEFENDED BY POPE COMPARING ACCUSERS TO THE “GREAT ACCUSER” SATAN

BLOOD ON HIS HANDS
PAPAL ANTI-CHRIST WARNS ABOUT ANOTHER HITLER TYPE IF NATIONALISM/POPULISM GROWS,
WHILE SILENT ON CHRISTIAN & JEWISH PERSECUTION FROM ISLAMIC JIHAD TERRORISTS
CITES FALSE “BIBLICAL MANDATE” 
FOR OPEN DOORS TO ILLEGAL MIGRANTS
POPE FRANCIS COMPARES “POPULISTS” TO HITLER; CALLS FOR OPEN DOORS TO ALL MIGRANTS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/pope-francis-compares-populists-to-hitler-calls-for-open-doors-to-all-migrants; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
So-called “populist” groups have arisen in response to the hijrah and the subsequent descent of Europe into chaos. In comments that would suggest the Pope has taken leave of his sanity:
Pope Francis adopted his toughest stance ever against populism…comparing populists to Adolf Hitler and suggesting that populism caused the Second World War.
It is abhorrent that Pope Francis would compare those who are trying to save Judeo-Christian civilization in the face of the hijrah to Hitler. Another point to ponder is the rise of Islamic anti-Semitism in Europe. It is now so bad in France that Ricard Abitbol, President of the Confederation of Jews in France and Friends of Israel, stated:
Every day we have people who are hurt, every day we have people who are insulted,” told RT. “We can be hurt by words, but we don’t mind, but when we are hurt by a knife, a gun, you can’t say I don’t mind.
He went on:
In a few decades, there will be no Jews in France.
Even the globalist, open-door supporting Angela Merkel commented about Germany:
We now have another phenomenon, as we have refugees or people of Arab origin who bring another form of anti-Semitism into the country
The Pope needs a memory juggle. Europe welcomed migrants with open arms, ie. until it was struck with a range of imported problems, from lawlessness and abuse to an infiltration of jihadists. In response, “populist” groups arose to warn about such dangers and advocate for a defense of borders and national security.
The Pope continued that all “must be welcomed with an open heart and open doors. Closure is the path to suicide.”
On the contrary, open doors is a path to suicide. The Pope has yet to open his doors at the Vatican to everyone. Pope Francis has now risen up against the “populist” Italian government, spreading deceit and stirring up tensions, all while demonstrating his lack compassion and sensitivity for the victims of jihad terror and Sharia abuses, not to mention Islamic anti-Semitism and the vast Muslim persecution of Christians. It is a dark time indeed for the Catholic Church under such leadership, which (on a separate issue) has also been covering up abuses against children in the Church.
“Pope Francis Compares Populists to Hitler, Born of ‘Hate’”, by Thomas D. Williams, Breitbart , October 25, 2018:
Pope Francis adopted his toughest stance ever against populism Tuesday, comparing populists to Adolf Hitler and suggesting that populism caused the Second World War.
“It is important for young people to know how populism is born,” the pope said Tuesday at a book launch in Rome. “I think of Hitler in the last century, who had promised development for Germany. They should know how populisms begin: by sowing hate. You can’t live sowing hate.”
The pontiff’s words struck hard in a country living under its first elected populist government in decades, formed by a coalition between the progressive, Eurosceptic 5-Star Movement and the pro-sovereignty Lega party.
“Study your history, this is the way the Führer started, with racial purity,” he said. We are now in full World War III fought piecemeal and even religion is deformed to be able to hate better.”
“Making hatred grow, creating violence and division represents a path to destruction and suicide,” the 81-year-old pontiff added.
Increased efforts are needed to teach the young about the history of the First and Second World Wars “so they do not fall into the same error and so they know how populism spreads,” he said.
The Pope’s comments came in response to 83-year-old Fiorella Bacherini, an Italian teacher who works with immigrants, who told him that she was concerned about a rise in anti-immigrant sentiment.
Migrants, the pope said, “must be welcomed with an open heart and open doors. Closure is the path to suicide. It is true that migrants must be welcomed, but they must also be accompanied and above all they must be integrated.”
“A government must have an open heart to receive and good structures to assist integration, and also the prudence to say: I can do it up to this point, but no further,” he said.
Accepting migrants, Francis added, “is a biblical mandate. We think of Europe that has been made by migrants, by cultures mixing together.”
Tuesday’s comments represent the pope’s strongest condemnation of populism to date, although his anti-populist message had already been growing more radical…

______________________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://pulpitandpen.org/2018/10/29/pope-claims-sex-abuse-scandal-is-persecution-of-the-church/ 
AND:

POPE CALLS TO DEFEND AGAINST “THE GREAT ACCUSER”

Meanwhile, Vatican fails to punish sexual predator priests

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/pope-calls-to-defend-against-the-great-accuser/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Earlier this year, after it was revealed that over 300 priests had molested over one thousand children in the Pennsylvania area, a demand to oust predatory Catholic priests reached a fever pitch.
However, the process to bring these priests to justice has been stonewalled at every turn.

PITTSBURGH CITY COUNCIL & PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT WANT “HATEFUL” CHICK-FIL-A DROPPED AS SPONSOR OF CHILDREN’S MARATHON

PITTSBURGH CITY COUNCIL & PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT WANT “HATEFUL” CHICK-FIL-A DROPPED 
AS SPONSOR OF CHILDREN’S MARATHON
BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: https://christiannews.net/2018/10/26/pittsburgh-city-council-wants-hateful-chick-fil-a-dropped-as-sponsor-of-childrens-marathon/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
PITTSBURGH, Pa. — All nine members of Pittsburgh City Council have signed an opposing letter to the leaders of the Pittsburgh Three Rivers Marathon after learning that the fast food chain Chick-fil-A will be the title sponsor for next year’s children’s marathon.
The letter argues that “[t]he leadership of Chick-fil-A has openly and passionately promulgated hateful beliefs against the LGBTQIA+ community,” and that it has financed organizations that oppose same-sex “marriage” and homosexual behavior in general.
“Chick-fil-A’s sponsorship of an event designed to encourage healthy living represents a significant setback for Pittsburgh as we continue our work to build a more progressive and welcoming city for all people regardless of who they are or who they love,” the letter, dated October 17, reads.
“Most importantly, its sponsorship sends the wrong message to LBGTQIA+ children and families who face psychological abuse and experience the effects of bullying at disproportionate rates,” it outlines.
The “Kids Marathon” event, to be held next May, is a one mile run that is held in conjunction with the Kids of STEEL effort, which according to the marathon website, is “a physical activity and nutrition program designed to motivate children to pursue quality nutrition and an active lifestyle by incorporating exercise and healthy eating habits into their daily routine.”
Area schools and youth programs can participate in the Kids of STEEL offerings free of charge.
However, in addition to the Pittsburgh City Council’s opposition to Chick-fil-A’s sponsorship of the marathon, the local school district also unanimously voted on Wednesday to approve a resolution against the sponsorship.
According to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, the resolution prohibits any district employee from participating in the event on an official basis (yet not a personal basis), as well as promoting the marathon in school.
“The family-owned, privately held restaurant company has expressed views contrary to and in conflict with the district’s non-discrimination policies,” it also states.
The Three Rivers Marathon told the outlet in a statement that it welcomes any organization that wants to partner with the group’s goal of helping children lead healthy lives.
“Every year through our Kids’ Marathon, P3R commits itself to encouraging kids to live healthy lives. This is a cause we’re always going to support, and we’ll always welcome anyone or any organization willing to join us in helping the kids of Pittsburgh discover the joy of running,” it said.
Chick-fil-A has signed on to be the title sponsor of both the marathon and the Kids of STEEL program for the next three years.

Cathy

As previously reported, the controversy over Chick-fil-A began in 2012 when owner Dan Cathy told Baptist Press that he is “very much supporting of the family—the biblical definition of the family unit.”
“We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives,” he said. “We give God thanks for that.”
According to the Washington Post, Cathy had also stated on a radio broadcast that he believed that the promotion of homosexual “marriage” was evoking the wrath of God upon America.
Following initial uproar about the matter, including assertions that the company donates to organizations that oppose same-sex “marriage,” Chick-fil-A issued a statement outlining that it had never sought to donate to groups that speak against homosexuality, and that “[g]oing forward, our intent is to leave the policy debate over same-sex marriage to the government and political arena.”
In a document entitled “Who We Are,” the company also noted that “[t]here are many diverse viewpoints and opinions among those associated with Chick-fil-A,” and that “[i]f someone in Chick-fil-A offers a personal viewpoint, they do not presume to speak for everyone.”
The company also outlined its donor practices, noting that its charitable outreaches are focused in three areas: “Creating educational opportunities for our team members and youth across America,” “Food donations for those serving or those in need,” and “Developing youth and family/marriage enrichment programs and supporting our communities.”
“For many months now, Chick-fil-A’s corporate giving has been mischaracterized,” it stated, referring to the hostility it has received from pro-homosexual groups that have rejected the fast food restaurant by claiming that it gives donations to organizations that oppose same-sex “marriage.”
“Chick-fil-A’s giving heritage is focused on programs that educate youth, strengthen families and enrich marriages, and support communities. We will continue to focus our giving in those areas. … Our intent is not to support political or social agendas,” Chick-fil-A further clarified, noting that the company’s giving has always been focused on positive charities and outreaches, but not necessarily any particular social issue, such as homosexuality.
_____________________________________________________________

Pittsburgh Kids Marathon Organizers Pressured 

To Cut Ties With Chick-Fil-A

SCHOOL BOARD ALSO CANCELS SPONSORSHIP

FAKE BOMB PATSY IDENTIFIED CESAR ALTIERI SAYOC SUSPECT WAS KNOWN TO LAW ENFORCEMENT

FAKE BOMB PATSY IDENTIFIED CESAR ALTIERI SAYOC~ SUSPECT WAS KNOWN TO LAW ENFORCEMENT

Learn more about the hoax bomber here and spread this link to fight internet censorship

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/fake-bomb-patsy-identified-cesar-altieri-sayoc-suspect-was-known-to-law-enforcement/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Sources say Sayoc made bomb threats in the past and was known by police.
Watch Alex Jones’ live coverage below:
Pipe Bomb Hoax Is A Test, Bigger Event Coming

FALSE FLAG BOMBINGS ARE DISTRACTION FROM SOUTHERN INVASION

False Flag Bombings Are Distraction From Southern Invasion
FALSE FLAG BOMBINGS ARE DISTRACTION 
FROM SOUTHERN INVASION

Legacy media uses bomb hoax to distract public from migrant caravan

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/false-flag-bombings-are-distraction-from-southern-invasion/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
MSM is working overtime to use the “bomb” scare to win sympathy votes for the Democrats. Alex breaks down how this tactic is being used to distract the American people from the actual invasion force heading to America from Mexico.
Also:

WYOMING GOVERNOR’S CANDIDATE MARY THRONE IS LYING TO GUN OWNERS

Wyoming Governor's Candidate Mary Throne is Lying to Gun Owners
WYOMING GOVERNOR’S CANDIDATE MARY THRONE 
IS LYING TO GUN OWNERS 
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/10/wyoming-candidate-mary-throne-is-lying-to-gun-owners/#axzz5V95mongH; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Wyoming –(AmmoLand.com)- Mary Throne is desperate.
It’s no surprise; after all, she is a hardened anti-gun politician who is trying to become the Governor of Wyoming — one of the most pro-gun states in the country.
To do that, Mary Throne is going all out in her effort to twist the facts about her record as a former state lawmaker.
Recently, in an interview with KODI and KZMQ, Throne did her best to totally reinvent herself as a stalwart supporter of the Second Amendment.
Like every gun grabber in the country, Throne began by professing her support of hunting — just like former Vice President Biden used to do — as if the Second Amendment was written to ensure our right to hunt.
Of course, you and I know that it was about the right of the people to remain armed to deal with criminals and tyrants.
But sensing that that wasn’t enough for gun owners, Throne dispensed with the truth and began to flat out lie by claiming, “I’ve never supported any kind of gun control.” Technically, you see, Throne is correct. There have not been gun control bills on the floor of the legislature for her to vote for.

But Mary Throne voted AGAINST YOUR GUN RIGHTS every chance she had during her years in Cheyenne, making her a long-time opponent of the right to keep and bear arms.

  • Mary Throne voted against silencer legislation on February 13, 2013.
  • Mary Throne voted against Constitutional Carry on February 25, 2011.
  • Mary Throne voted against the Firearms Freedom Act on March 3, 2010.
  • Mary Throne voted against the bill to allow employees to secure their firearms in their car while at work, on February 9, 2011.
I can go on and on, as Mary Throne’s war against gun owners spans almost a decade.
For Mary Throne to now claim that she’s never supported any kind of gun control is a flat out lie, and it’s insulting to every gun owner — and every voter — in Wyoming.

On the other hand, Mark Gordon has been very upfront about his support of the Second Amendment, when he signed the Wyoming Gun Owners candidate survey.

Mark Gordon for Wyoming GovernorMark Gordon for Wyoming Governor

To be clear, Mark Gordon has publicly stated that he would oppose legislation like:
  • Red Flag Gun Seizures; which would allow you to lose your gun rights based on secret court proceedings and without even being charged with a crime.
  • Universal Background Checks; which would make it a crime to transfer any firearms (even amongst family members) without going through a government check first!
  • Veterans Disarmament Act; which would disarm every American citizen under the age of 21, including those who have served in the military with distinction!
But more than what he would oppose, is the legislation that Mark Gordon has promised to sign.
As you all know, WYGO is determined to end deadly ‘Gun Free Zones’ in Wyoming, an effort that was stalled in 2017 when Governor Mead vetoed our bill.
But Mark Gordon has promised, in writing, to sign this bill into law.
Now that you have the facts, please help Wyoming Gun Owners get this message out to as many gun owners as possible between now and November 6th, 2018..
Wyoming was a bright spot in 2018 in the fight for gun rights, passing Stand-Your-Ground law while many ‘red states’ were advancing gun control. But we can’t let up now!
And with virtually everyone talking about a blue wave coming on election day, we can’t take anything for granted, either. Whatever you do, please make sure that you forward this article to more gun owners, so that they are not confused by Throne’s lies!
For Freedom,
Aaron Dorr
Policy Advisor
Wyoming Gun Owners

Wyoming Gun OwnersWyoming Gun Owners

About Wyoming Gun Owners
Wyoming Gun Owners has been a hard-hitting, no compromise, boots-on-the-ground gun rights organization here in Wyoming since 2010!
We’re dedicated to one thing: defending and advancing the 2nd Amendment rights of all law-abiding citizens in the state of Wyoming — and exposing legislators who refuse to do the same thing! www.wyominggunowners.org

ELITE U.S. UNIVERSITIES HAVE TAKEN OVER $614 MILLION FROM SAUDI ARABIA SINCE 2011

ELITE U.S. UNIVERSITIES HAVE TAKEN OVER 
$614 MILLION FROM SAUDI ARABIA SINCE 2011 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/elite-us-universities-have-taken-over-614000000-from-saudi-arabia-since-2011; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This explains a great deal, for it is not only true that “these gifts and contracts, in some instances, are intended to influence students’ and faculty experts’ views on the kingdom”; it is also true that these gifts and contracts are intended to influence students’ and faculty experts’ views on Islam, jihad and Sharia. Georgetown University isn’t even on the lists below, but Saudi money funds its Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, and its Bridge Initiative, both of which are dedicated to giving the fictions that Islam is a religion of peace and Sharia is benign and compatible with democracy an intellectual veneer, while smearing and defaming all those who speak the truth about Islam and Sharia as “Islamophobes.” Georgetown’s faculty is full of Wahhabis, Salafis, and apologists for Islam, including Islamic convert and pro-slavery spokesman Jonathan A. C. Brown. And that’s just Georgetown. Imagine what it must be like at MIT, George Washington U, and the rest.
“Before Killing Of Journalist, Elite US Universities Took $600 Million From Saudi Arabia And Affiliates,” by Luke Rosiak, Daily Caller, October 23, 2018:
Before the death of a Washington Post contributor in a Saudi Arabian embassy, elite U.S. universities took more than half a billion dollars from the country and its affiliates between 2011 and 2017.
These gifts and contracts, in some instances, are intended to influence students’ and faculty experts’ views on the kingdom.
Saudi Arabian interests paid $614 million to U.S. universities over a six-year period, more than every country but Qatar and the United Kingdom, Department of Education data analyzed by The Daily Caller News Foundation shows. That includes $120 million from the Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission to the U.S., whose website says it “disseminate[s] information that reflects Saudi culture, tradition, and heritage through our active participation in academic, cultural, and social activities.”
About $200 million came in the form of gifts, while the rest were contracts. U.S. law requires universities to disclose “information about gifts received from any foreign source, contracts with a foreign entity, and any ownership interests in or control over the institution by a foreign entity.”…
Saudi-Affiliated Funding to U.S. Universities
Source: Department of Education

INSTITUTION AMOUNT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology $77,675,000
George Washington University $76,017,693
George Mason University $63,136,496
Tufts University $46,065,215
Johns Hopkins University $40,295,468
University of Kansas $30,066,721
Harvard University $28,167,613
Stanford University $27,759,040
University of Southern California $22,670,154
Northwestern University $14,408,243
Georgia Institute of Technology $13,433,882
University of California, Berkeley $13,385,510
Eastern Washington University $13,079,062
New York Institute of Technology $12,260,853
University of California, Los Angeles $12,032,553
Ball State University $10,386,082
University of Washington – Seattle $10,150,738
Much of the international affairs literature that informs the U.S. posture toward foreign nations is developed at elite institutions like George Mason University and George Washington University in the D.C. area, whose experts are widely cited. Those universities are among the top recipients of Saudi government funds.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology ranks first in Saudi-affiliated funding, thanks to a $73 million gift from Saudi business magnate Mohammed A. Jameel.
A spokesman for George Washington University did not respond to questions about the $76 million it has received….
Largest Payments
Source: Department of Education

INSTITUTION GIFT TYPE PAYER AMOUNT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Monetary Gift Jameel. Mohammed, Abdul $73,000,000
George Mason University Contract Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia $56,675,210
George Washington University Contract Government of Saudi Arabia $55,378,271
Johns Hopkins University Monetary Gift $40,295,468
Tufts University Contract Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission $38,940,121
Stanford University Monetary Gift $27,759,040
Harvard University Contract $24,917,563
University of Kansas Contract Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission $24,888,384
George Washington University Contract Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia $18,293,212
Northwestern University Contract King Abdulaziz City for Sci/Tech

14,000 STRONG CARAVAN INVASION HEADED TO AMERICA~”NO ONE WILL STOP US, ONLY GOD”

DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen Holds Press Conference at Border Wall Near California 10/26/18

14,000 STRONG CARAVAN INVASION HEADED TO AMERICA~”NO ONE WILL STOP US, ONLY GOD” 

BY PEDRO GONZALEZ
SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/271741/14000-strong-caravan-invasion-headed-america-pedro-gonzalez; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Reprinted from American Greatness.    
Among the signs carried by the northbound invasion, one in particular stands out: “Pueblos Sin Fronteras.” This is the name of a group that organizes the so-called migrant caravans, but it also doubles as the raison d’être of the mob itself. They are not marching north to become good little capitalist “Americans,” much less citizens of the United States. In fact, they hate capitalism, bellowing socialist chants of: “We are international workers!”
They do not march because they look fondly upon our country, its institutions, its values, or its culture. And, no, they are not “fleeing” the violence and poverty of the pueblo. Rather, what they want is to bring the pueblo to us. They are convinced that it is their manifest destiny to do so.
Americans tend to think only we put stock in our destiny, and we don’t like to think of ourselves as conquerable—and certainly not already conquered. But if we cannot control our borders, let alone have a say in who may live among us, what might we call that condition?
Who Are the 14,000 and Counting?
As it has done in so many other Western nations, neo-Marxist education has stripped us of our ability even to conceive of anyone other than ourselves as conquerors (which, ironically, is rather condescending and paternalistic!). We learn to see only the evil in ourselves, and the “good” in everyone else—even those who would destroy our civilization. No people but us hateful and sinful Americans has the capacity to carry out something so incorrigible as “manifest destiny” anyway.
It is beyond the comprehension of our moral betters in the media, academia, entertainment, and government, that Third Worlders are even capable of doing harm—perennially “oppressed,” as we are assured they are, by white men in the midwest who have never even so much as seen the blood soaked streets of Guatemala on TV.
Yet here they come. As of Monday, they were 14,000-strong and screaming: “No one will stop us, only God.” And those Mexicans who we think only wish us well? They’re helping the invasion along, even joining it. Why wouldn’t they? Their president-elect told them that they have a “right” to violate our sovereignty. Moreover, “It’s solidarity,” Maria Teresa Orellana tells a journalist. Orellana handed out free sandals to the swarm as it passed through her neighborhood. “They’re our brothers,” she said.
Orellana wasn’t alone. As the mob marched through Ciudad Hidalgo, “they drew applause, cheers and donations of food and clothing from Mexicans,” the Washington Times reports.
The majority of Mexicans showed Americans what they thought of them, when they carried the expressly anti-American Andrés Manuel Obrador to Los Pinos by a landslide. “The mass support for the immigrant caravan across Latin America testifies to growing consciousness of the international character of the working class,” writes one socialist reporter. I would add that there is a growing ethno-racial consciousness, too—and it is explicitly anti-gringo. But there are other reasons to fear the swarm surging toward us.
Recently, Prensa Libre, the biggest newspaper in Guatemala, reported that 100 Islamic State terrorists were apprehended by federal agents. Guatemala is a global human smuggling capital through which individuals from Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, Nepal and Bangladesh, and other Middle Eastern and Asian countries, enter the United States illegally.
That said, there is one group of people in the Middle East that we might learn from.
When Palestinians cry, “Death to the Jews,” the Israelis do not muse over what could be the esoteric and defanged meaning of “Death to the Jews.” They do not turn to hierophants to interpret for them the “true” meanings of explicit of death threats. The Israelis do not ask, “but how will we get on without cheap Palestinian labor?” Rather, they built a wall. They reinforce the wall with men. They defend their land and their people. We have we not yet learned this lesson, even as the United States is teetering on the edge of civilizational suicide.
Looking Past the Media Narrative
Looking at pictures not handpicked by the managers of public opinion in the press, one cannot help but notice that these “migrants” are mostly young, military-aged males. Many of them appear angry, shouting, and scowling.
“We are going to stay together, we won’t be broken,” said one Honduran. In other words, the members of the mob intend to break us, like they broke through a steel barrier at the Guatemala-Mexico border. Something about these howling savages ripping through metal with their bare hands doesn’t quite fit with the narrative of them as harmless travelers.
Then there is, of course, the media’s favorite: migrants with children. There are two kinds of people who would subject little children to this ordeal: those who have abducted them to try pose as “family units” at our border (there have been 400 such attempts this year), and failed parents who should be considered hideously immoral. Who else would imperil the lives of their children by reducing them to mere sympathy tokens with which they hope to purchase access to our country—a legal and moral discount, compliments of the progressives among us.
These “parents” have literally lined up for paychecks from unknown benefactors along with their children in order to participate in this march—just in time for midterms, just when the Left needs a boost. But who paid them is not so important as the fact that they accepted the payment. Mercenaries, then, not “migrants” come our way. Are these the “family values” we want to import?
The northbound invaders will test our societal will to live, without which we may as well consider the Reconquista settled. Of course, some would celebrate such a defeat, and they write for the New York Times, claiming that their ancestors were here long before the “white man” set foot on the continent. A scene from “The Year of the Dragon,” a 1985 film directed by the patriotic Italian-American, Michael Cimino, comes to mind.
Playing a Polish-American cop and Vietnam vet, Mickey Rourke returns home from the war to find that America has imported the “diverse” culture he encountered in Asia. Faced with violence and a narcoculture dealt by ethnic gangs, who justify it under the banner of their “thousands of years”-old culture, Rourke responds:
You people think gambling and extortion are kosher because it’s a thousand years old. All this thousand year old stuff is shit to me. This is America you’re living in, and it’s 200 years old, so you better get your clocks fixed.
How we face down the coming mob is the question before us now. Will we be cowed into letting our destroyers among us to “atone” for the historical grievances spread before our feet by the Left? Or will we insist that not a single one set foot on American soil? And that includes children if we care about the fact that one in four MS-13 gang members arrested or charged with crimes since 2012 entered the United States as an unaccompanied minor. If we cannot ensure that these children do not end up in violent gangs, where their victims, ironically, are typically other minorities and immigrants, then we have no business taking them in—yet the Left insists that we do this in the name of compassion.
What kind of cheap compassion is that?
The “Saints” Go Marching In
The motives of the Left, however well known, are less important than the consequences of their actions. Ultimately, this swarm should serve as a telegram to us of what awaits if we do not change course on immigration.
According to a recent Gallup poll, 13 percent of the world’s adults—or more than 640 million people—say they would like to leave their country permanently, with 150 million responding that they would like to move to America—and that does not account for the relatives who would invariably accompany them. Whether the United States could comfortably accommodate all those people, is a matter of how one defines “comfortably.” Yet there is more at stake than amber waves of grain.
In 1973, Jean Raspail published the prophetic Le Camp des Saints after one day sitting on a beach in the South of France near Saint-Raphaël, in Vallauris. Raspail recalled looking out across the Mediterranean in 1971 and being struck by the terrible thought: “What if they were to come? I did not know who ‘they’ were, but it seemed inevitable to me that the numberless disinherited people of the South would, like a tidal wave, set sail one day for this opulent shore, our fortunate country’s wide-gaping frontier.”
Raspail’s migrants have no intention of assimilating into French culture, and the French government is unwilling to repel their advance out of “compassion.” The migrants flood France, aided and abetted by the Left, and yet demand First World living conditions even as they reduce it to the Third, victimizing Europeans and non-Europeans who have assimilated into French culture out of patriotism.
The novel has been condemned by some as “racist” and “xenophobic.” Then in 2001, a boatload of Kurdish refugees came ashore in Boulouris, near Saint-Raphaël, just a few yards from the office where Raspail wrote Le Camp des Saints. The present migrant crisis, said Raspail in a 2015 interview, “puts an end to 30 years of insults and slander against me.” It’s worth noting that Saints ends with Westerners, European and non-European alike, as refugees themselves.
Raspail believes that the collapse of the West is inevitable, unless we can put aside our misguided and uninformed sense of “compassion.” Certainly, this premise seems heartless, unless we consider what exactly it is that we are asked to have “compassion” for.
If as in California, for example, Latinos outnumber whites and yet Latino children constitute the greatest number of poor children in the state, can it be said that we are compassionate toward children? If nonwhite immigrants are most likely to victimize other minorities in impoverished communities, can it be said that we are compassionate toward minorities? If immigrants take jobs from unskilled American laborers (blacks, and those who are the children of immigrants included), can it be said that we are compassionate toward our own poor? If every American citizen murdered by an illegal alien, is a murder that could have been avoided simply by enforcing existing laws, can it be said that we are compassionate toward our own citizens?
Our “compassion,” then, is akin to purchasing drugs for an addict as we watch him waste away. Our momentary feeling of pride for our supposed righteousness is the cause of untold suffering for people who have a higher claim to our sympathies.
The mob has made its perception of us clear: “Donald Trump is the antichrist.” But their holy war is not against Trump per se, for they would certainly celebrate him if he held our borders open to them. Rather, Trump is their “antichrist” because he stands for what they and the Left have rejected: sovereignty, the rule of law, nationhood, order itself.
And yes, you, are their adversary, too, if you stand for these things.
As the invading army marches north and the Left, with their Democratic and Republican allies, eggs them on, can Americans put aside their petty differences and unite under a common interest to fight for their right to live, to exist as a civilization? Or will we consign ourselves to quietly acquiescing a Raspailian fate? Immigration is not an issue in our time, it is the issue of our time.

NEWT GINGRICH: PLANNING FOR THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT INVASION~SHOULD WE BE DOCILE, COMPLIANT, OBEDIENT TO GOVERNMENT?~WHAT IF GOVERNMENT CAN’T OR WON’T PROTECT US?

NEWT GINGRICH: PLANNING FOR THE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT INVASION
SHOULD WE BE DOCILE, COMPLIANT, OBEDIENT TO GOVERNMENT?~WHAT IF GOVERNMENT CAN’T OR WON’T PROTECT US?
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/10/planning-for-illegal-immigrant-invasion/#axzz5UnCdNUKK; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

USA – -(AmmoLand.com)- As of Tuesday, the caravan of now more than 7,000 Central American invaders trekking through Mexico toward the United States was roughly 1,000 miles from the nearest point of entry. A second group of roughly 1,000 is also seeking to join them.
They may still be weeks away from our border, but this leaves little time for President Trump, Congress, and all Americans who care about our national sovereignty and the rule of law to solve three incredibly pressing challenges. I discussed these on Monday on Facebook.
First, we must determine – and do – what we can right now to end this invasion before it reaches our doorstep. Second, we must develop and execute a cohesive, efficient, effective plan for preventing these invaders from illegally crossing our border and swiftly deporting those who are successful. Finally, we must fix the debilitatingly stupid amalgam of immigration laws, policies, and court rulings that enable and encourage migrants to band together and stage these types of illegal invasions.
Newt Live: The Caravan Invasion
Should we fail to solve any of these problems, our already dysfunctional immigration system will be further crippled, our relationships with Mexico and our Central American neighbors could be severely damaged, our border will be overwhelmed by droves of new migrants, and America will become significantly less safe.
If this caravan is allowed to get through, the next caravan will be even bigger – and the one following that will be enormous. According to the Gallup World Poll, 29 percent of people who want to migrate from Latin America and the Caribbean want to make the United States their permanent homes. That is 37 million people who want to come here. We must demand and ensure that they do so legally.
The clearest answer to alleviating this issue while the caravan is still in Mexico, is for Mexico to stop it. President Trump has already made clear that securing the border is more important than our recent trade agreement with our southern neighbor, and Mexico should take him seriously. Many of the members of this caravan forced their way through the Guatemala-Mexico border. They are already in violation of Mexican law, and Mexican law enforcement should take action.
Furthermore, we should not underestimate the degree to which human traffickers and transnational criminal gangs, such as MS-13 and other cartels, are involved with this invasion force. Mexican authorities should also be seeking to weed these elements out of this migrant army – and dealing with those who may have legitimate asylum claims through the Mexican system.

Our neighbors must understand that while they did not assertively deal with this problem at their southern border, they will own the problem if it gets to their northern border.

This relates to what we must do if or when the caravan is allowed to arrive at the U.S. border.
President Trump should instruct the Attorney General to issue a clarification to define the qualifications for asylum. Asylum is meant to provide protection for people who are fleeing real persecution and human rights abuses, such as genocide. Simply being from a poor country that lacks opportunities does not qualify someone for asylum.
We already have approximately 750,000 backlogged asylum cases, and some of those cases date back to 2014. These invaders should be screened (preferably in Mexico) so they never enter the U.S. system.
The federal government should also immediately begin coordinating with local and state governments along the border to develop an organized, completely nonviolent system that can deter these migrants from crossing into the United States and process and return those who do within a matter of days – not weeks, months, or years. I know Texas already works with federal officials to prepare for mass migration events. Other border states should follow suit (if they don’t already) and begin preparing now for this caravan’s potential arrival.
If we are serious about preventing this caravan invasion from being imitated, we must overwhelm them, stop them in their tracks, and quickly return them to their home countries. By my estimate, we should have four to five U.S. forces for every member of the caravan. If we want to protect our country, our border, and our rule of law, we must mobilize so much force that we don’t have to use it.
The news media should be allowed to cover the preparation and the overwhelming response to the caravan, so the members of the caravan – and every potential caravanner across Central and South America – will see that their plan will not work.

These first two problems are urgent and difficult. The third problem is just as urgent – but it is an order of magnitude more challenging. That is figuring out how we must fix our failing immigration system so that this type of situation doesn’t arise again.

Our immigration system has been completely broken by Democrat-backed laws that make it easier for immigrants to flood our system and stay in our country while their cases take years to process. It has been further hobbled by activist judicial rulings that have tied the hands of border enforcement officials and prevented them from keeping track of those who cross the border illegally.
Once we deal with the immediate problem of this invasion caravan, Republicans and the White House must work to fix our broken immigration system once and for all.
Your Friend,
Newt

Newt GingrichNewt Gingrich

P.S. My new book, Trump’s America: The Truth About Our Nation’s Great Comeback is out and available for order.
About Newt Gingrich
Newt Gingrich is well-known as the architect of the “Contract with America” that led the Republican Party to victory in 1994 by capturing the majority in the U.S. House of Representatives for the first time in forty years. After he was elected Speaker, he disrupted the status quo by moving power out of Washington and back to the American people.
Gingrich Productions is a performance and production company featuring the work of Newt Gingrich and Callista Gingrich. Visit : www.gingrichproductions.com

MICHELLE MALKIN: 2018 MIDTERM ELECTIONS-ALL ABOUT NARCISSIST OBAMA~REFERRED TO HIMSELF 92 TIMES IN 38 MINUTES!

REFERRED TO HIMSELF 92 TIMES IN 38 MINUTES!

President Obama

2018 MIDTERMS: ALL ABOUT OBAMA 

BY MICHELLE MALKIN
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/10/2018-midterms-all-about-obama/#axzz5UnCdNUKK; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

U.S.A. ––(Ammoland.com)- Former President Selfie Stick is back in action, firing up Democrats before the midterms with his signature rallying cries:

I, I, I, I! Me, me, me! My, my, my!

According to a tally by The American Mirror’s Kyle Olson, Barack Obama’s campaign speech Monday for Nevada Senate Democratic candidate Jacky Rosen referred to himself 92 times in 38 minutes — or an average self-allusion every 24.7 seconds.
When he wasn’t “I”-ing, the former narcissist-in-chief was lying.
“Unlike some, I actually try to state facts,” Obama snarked passive-aggressively in a swipe at President Donald Trump. “I don’t believe in just making stuff up. I think you should actually say to people what’s true.”
Sit down, Mister “If you like your plan, you can keep your plan.”
Thanks to you, my husband, children and I lost not one, not two, not three but four private individual market health plans killed directly by Obamacare. Reminder: When the health insurance cancellation notice tsunami hit in 2013, liberal Mother Jones magazine sneered that the phenomenon was “phony.” But after 4 million American families received cancellation letters at the end of 2013, Obama’s health care prevarication was finally deemed the “Lie of the Year” by left-leaning PolitiFact.
And five years after promising Americans they could “keep their doctor” along with their health plan “no matter what,” Obama belatedly ‘fessed up that “the average person” would be forced “to have to make some choices, and they might end up having to switch doctors.”
Facts, schmacts.
Moving on, Obama tried to galvanize voters this week by trashing Trump’s jobs boom: “When you hear all this talk about economic miracles right now, remember who started it.”
Hold up, Mister “Jobs are not coming back.” I remember you taunting Trump for needing a “magic wand” to achieve what you claimed was an unachievable manufacturing industry renaissance — for which you are now claiming unadulterated credit!
I remember you, Mister Multitrillion-Dollar-Stimulus, promising the sun, moon and stars with the “most sweeping economic recovery package in our history” that was supposed to lift two million people out of poverty.
I recall sky-high unemployment rates for black Americans, nearly double the national rate, and 90 million-plus able-bodied citizens of all colors simply giving up looking for work while wasted billions went to fund crony green energy boondoggles, bridges to nowhere, renovations to Joe Biden’s favorite Amtrak train station in Delaware, General Services Administrations junkets in Las Vegas and Hawaii, ghost congressional districts and stimulus propaganda road signs planted nationwide and stamped with the shovel-ready logo.
Speaking of which, I won’t forget you smirking while you admitted at one of your phony Jobs and Competitiveness Council meetings that “Shovel-ready was not as, uh, shovel-ready as we expected.” Yukkity-yuk-yuk.
Nor will it go down the memory hole how the Obama administration’s wreckovery lies were enabled by slavering “journalists” like New York Times columnist David Brooks. He giggled on Jim Lehrer’s PBS show that Obama had told him off the record that the shovel-ready promise was a crock, yet he sat on the truth until his Times’ colleague Peter Baker reported the admission more than a year later.
Wait, we’re not done yet. Astonishingly, Obama is now on the campaign trail comparing the Trump White House to a “tin-pot dictatorship” and calling for a return to “decency” and “lawfulness.”
Yes, this is the same man who sicced the IRS on tea party conservatives, evangelicals and pro-life citizens, amnestied millions of illegal immigrants through executive fiat, appointed dozens of unaccountable and unvetted policy czars, used his Justice Department to spy on journalists, deceived the country over the Benghazi massacre and the Iran deal, demonized his political opponents, and mastered the very social justice agitation techniques now wielded by left-wing mobs targeting Republicans in every corner of the public square.
Thanks, Obama, for reminding America of your miserable legacy of deceit, division, persecution and redistribution as voters head to the polls. You wanna make the 2018 midterms all about you? It’s on.
About Michelle MalkinMichelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin is host of “Michelle Malkin Investigates” on CRTV.com. As well as the author of “Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies” & “Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild“. Her email address is writemalkin@gmail.com.
















___________________________________________________________

OBAMA TO MILLENNIALS: DON’T LET YOURGRANDPARENTS CHOOSE YOUR SENATOR



“PALESTINIAN” AUTHORITY TV SERMON: “HITLER WAS SENT BY ALLAH TO PUNISH THE JEWS”

NAZI SALUTE ADOPTED BY PALESTINIAN TERRORISTS & LEBANESE HEZBOLLAH
“PALESTINIAN” AUTHORITY TV SERMON: 
“HITLER WAS SENT BY ALLAH TO PUNISH THE JEWS” 
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/palestinian-authority-tv-sermon-hitler-was-sent-by-allah-to-punish-the-jews; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
As the world continues to fight for the “Palestinian cause” and wrongly slam Israel (which is targeted for obliteration by the PA, Hamas and Fatah):
A preacher on official PA TV taught that Hitler was one of a series of people sent by Allah throughout history to punish the Jews because of their evil behavior, and to teach them a lesson. However, the preacher taught in Friday’s sermon, in spite of all these punishments the Jews “have not learned from the events of history,” and continue their evil ways.
Such teachings are not out of place for PA TV, which teaches kids “the way to Jihad Street,” while Hamas TV also teaches children to kill Jews. And:
In a PLO children’s magazine. Hitler was presented as one who performed a positive service to humanity by killing the Jews because they “spread destruction all over the world.” In the essay by a young girl published in the PLO youth magazine Zayzafuna funded by the PA, the girl wrote about a meeting and conversation with Hitler in a dream. Hitler, who was presented along with three Muslim role models, was depicted as someone to be admired because he murdered the Jews.
“PA TV sermon: Hitler was sent by Allah to punish the Jews,” by Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik, Palestinian Media Watch, October 22, 2018:
A preacher on official PA TV taught that Hitler was one of a series of people sent by Allah throughout history to punish the Jews because of their evil behavior, and to teach them a lesson. However, the preacher taught in Friday’s sermon, in spite of all these punishments the Jews “have not learned from the events of history,” and continue their evil ways.
The Jews deserve their punishment, he assured his listeners. Their mentality is one of “arrogance… superiority over other people… seclusion.” Jews are “planning and systematically working to incite wars and strife in the entire world.” Because of this behavior the Jews have been punished. First Allah sent the Babylonian Nebuchadnezzar to destroy the First Temple, then he sent the Roman Titus to destroy the Second Temple, and then Hitler and the kings of Europe, and still the Jews did not learn their lesson:
Seven times in this short excerpt (see below) the unidentified preacher repeated and emphasized his antisemitic message that Jews refuse to learn from Allah’s punishments:
“They didn’t learn. They have continued to behave the same way… Those [Jews] have not learned from the events of history.”
The preacher opened his condemnation of the Jews citing a verse from the Quran to prove his point that the Jews’ suffering is not coincidental but is a punishment from Allah because of their bad behavior. He quoted a verse saying that Allah’s punishment can be seen “throughout the earth”:
“Proceed throughout the earth and observe how was the end of those who denied.” [Quran 3:137, Sahih International]
The sermon was preached at Khan Al-Ahmar, a site where Palestinian Bedouins have illegally erected dwellings and a school and which is slated for destruction. The preacher was filmed from behind and his face was not visible.
Palestinian Media Watch reported on a similar message in a PLO children’s magazine. Hitler was presented as one who performed a positive service to humanity by killing the Jews because they “spread destruction all over the world.” In the essay by a young girl published in the PLO youth magazine Zayzafuna funded by the PA, the girl wrote about a meeting and conversation with Hitler in a dream. Hitler, who was presented along with three Muslim role models, was depicted as someone to be admired because he murdered the Jews:
In her dream, the girl asks Hitler: “You’re the one who killed the Jews?” Hitler responds: “Yes. I killed them so you would all know that they are a nation which spreads destruction all over the world.”  [Zayzafuna, February 2011]….

UK: LEGITIMIZING “TERRIBLE ABUSE”: NEARLY 2000 CHILD BRIDES IN FIVE YEARS~MUHAMMAD “MARRIED” A CHILD, SO MUSLIMS THINK IT’S OK

UK: LEGITIMIZING “TERRIBLE ABUSE”: 
NEARLY 2000 CHILD BRIDES IN FIVE YEARS
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/uk-legitimizing-terrible-abuse-nearly-2000-child-brides-in-five-years; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Here is another indication of why this decision by the European Court of Human Rights was so misguided. The UK has gradually ushered in Sharia law, severe abuses included:
Nearly 2,000 young people in Britain, the vast majority of them girls, were wed before the age of 18 between 2010 and 2015
The UK also has 100 Sharia courts, which are running outside the reach of British law. These courts have already seen a sentence handed down approving of honor killing, and another ordered a traumatized woman to return to her abusive rapist husband.
Sharia abuses also include the rape of infidel girls and their use as sex slaves, a sickening phenomenon manifested in the UK Muslim rape gang crisis.
“Child marriage survivors say UK law legitimizes ‘terrible’ abuse,” by Emma Batha, Reuters, October 23, 2018:
LONDON, Oct 23 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) – When Zee was 13, she returned from school one day to find an engagement party under way at her home in northern England, but her excitement at the celebrations quickly turned to shock.
“I asked my mum who’s getting married. She said, ‘It’s you’,” Zee told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.
Her betrothed was represented by a photo – an older cousin she had never met who lived in Afghanistan, her parents’ country of birth.
“One day I’m not even allowed to talk to boys and the next I’m told I’m getting married,” Zee said.
“I was dressed up to look like a Christmas tree – very sparkly, very bling. Everyone was happy. The only person who was miserable was me.”
Child marriage – defined internationally as marriage under 18 – remains legal in Britain. In England, Wales and Northern Ireland, teenagers can wed at 16 with parental consent. In Scotland, they do not need consent.
Zee, who did not want to give her full name, escaped by running away from home, but she says many girls are still being pushed into marriage.
Campaigners say it is time that Britain – which has been vocal about ending child marriage in developing countries – got its own laws in order.
They were particularly dismayed when Bangladesh changed its law recently to allow marriage at 16 – and cited British law as a justification.
“The UK should practice what it preaches,” said Mabel van Oranje, chairwoman of global advocacy group Girls Not Brides.
“Britain’s delay in reforming its own marriage laws is increasingly counterproductive.”…
1 … 511 512 513 514 515 … 792