FLORIDA: REPUBLICAN PARTY HEADQUARTERS SHOT UP; MEDIA CALLS IT “VANDALISM”

Republican Party Headquarters Shot Up; Media Calls it "Vandalism"
FLORIDA: REPUBLICAN PARTY HEADQUARTERS SHOT UP; MEDIA CALLS IT “VANDALISM”

By that logic, the mail bomber was also “vandalism”

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/republican-party-headquarters-shot-up-media-calls-it-vandalism/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
After a Republican Party headquarters in Volusia County, Florida was shot up, the media reported the incident as an act of “vandalism”.
The windows of the HQ were shot out Monday morning and four bullet holes were found inside the office. The attack was almost certainly politically motivated because no other business on the strip was targeted.
“At this point we can confirm that at least four rounds were fired into the building,” said South Daytona police Capt. Mark Cheatham. “We are working to see if we can get video from nearby businesses but so far we have no witnesses.”
The incident occurred hot on the heels of a South Florida man being arrested for sending dud pipe bombs in the mail to top Democrats, but what little media attention it has received downplayed the shooting as an act of vandalism.
The Daytona Beach News-Journal reported the shocking incident as a mere act of “vandalism,” equating it with graffiti.
The Florida Times-Union also reported that the office had been “vandalized by gunfire”.
Numerous other outlets reported the shooting as an act of vandalism.
By this logic, the mail bombs were just “vandalism”. No, that was terrorism and so is this.
If a right-wing Trump supporter had shot up a Democratic party headquarters, would the media call it vandalism or terrorism?
As of right now, CNN hasn’t even reported on this attempted terror attack at all.

But there’s no media bias against conservatives, honest!

JUDICIAL WATCH DOCS PROVE MIGRANT CARAVAN FUNDED BY SOROS & OTHER INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

JUDICIAL WATCH DOCS PROVE MIGRANT CARAVAN FUNDED BY SOROS & OTHER INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS

Globalists restricting Lou Dobbs for accurately reporting caravan origins — funding must be cut off now!

BY JAMIE WHITE
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/judicial-watch-docs-prove-migrant-caravan-funded-by-soros-other-international-organizations/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Billionaire globalist George Soros used State Department resources and taxpayer funds to advance his leftist political activities, including influencing migration policy, according to documents obtained by Judicial Watch earlier this year.
The 32 pages of records show the Obama administration sent U.S. taxpayer money to Soros-backed groups in Albania to fund his subversive political activity, and that he assisted the State Department in deciding how to allocate taxpayer funds for certain grants.

The documents obtained through Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit reveal the mechanism by which Soros-backed groups are able to organize efforts like the migrant caravans through groups like Pueblos Sin Fronteras, and the leftist coalition known as CARA.
Additionally, leaked 2016 documents from Soros’ Open Society Foundation, titled “Migration Governance and Enforcement Portfolio Review,” show close ties between his NGO and the United Nations’ migration representative Peter Sutherland related to facilitating mass migration, including shaping international migration policy.
“IMI’s [Open Society International Migration Initiative] access to the Sutherland team’s discussions has allowed us to keep civil society partners up-to-date on the latest developments, in order to inform advocacy and campaigning strategies prior to the events and to plan follow up actions,” the leaked document states.
The Soros document goes on to claim the cozy relationship with Sutherland has “set the stage for institutional reforms to global migration governance, and to break new ground on protections for migrants outside the asylum system,” meaning unfettered protection for migrants regardless of asylum criteria.
Together, these documents paint a picture of how Soros-backed NGOs and the UN are quarterbacking the migrant caravans funneling their way to the U.S. southern border, such as logistics-planning, food and water distribution, and media outreach.
This is why the globalists pulled the “Lou Dobbs Tonight” episode featuring Judicial Watch Director Chris Farrell, resulting in his permanent ban from Fox News and an apology from the network, absurdly claiming his rhetoric was antisemitic.
Farrell clearly outlined how Soros, evidenced by the above documents, allocates taxpayer funds from the State Department to his NGOs to push his far-left political agenda of creating a borderless utopia.
And that’s why he had to be silenced.
Twitter: 

TRUMP TO ACT ON BORDER TUESDAY; RADICAL LEFT READIES LAWSUITS~GLOBALIST PLAN COLLAPSING AS SOROS PUSHES FOR MIGRANT ENTRANCE

TRUMP TO ACT ON BORDER TUESDAY; 
RADICAL LEFT READIES LAWSUITS
BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/immigration/item/30480-trump-acts-on-border-tomorrow-radical-left-readies-lawsuits?vsmaid=1727&vcid=3987; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Tuesday is the day President Trump will announce his plan to stop the migrant invasion force heading north through Mexico toward the U.S. border.
According to the Washington Post, the officials are still nailing down the details.
But others are working on plans, too. Leftists are gearing up, as The New American reported last week, to file border-busting lawsuits that will stop the president from deporting the illegal aliens.
Rather than claim the president doesn’t have the authority to declare some immigrants ineligible, the anti-American legal front will claim the migrants are seeking asylum and have a right to apply for it. That would tie up their deportation in the court system.

Of course, the “migrants,” many of whom have openly said they’re coming to work, know this, and will, if necessary, act accordingly by lying to border authorities.
Tuesday Order, Leftist Legal Challenge
The anti-Trump, leftist media reported last week that the president will close the border with his authority under the Immigration and Nationality Ac and as laid out in the U.S. Code:
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
Trump will divulge the plan Tuesday in a major speech, the Post reported:
President Trump is preparing to announce a sweeping border crackdown in a speech Tuesday, a week before the midterm elections, in which he is expected to invoke emergency powers to stop migrants from entering the United States and depict them as a grave national security threat, administration officials said Friday.
Trump is considering steps that would bar migrants from crossing the border and deny them a chance to apply for asylum in the United States, measures that legal scholars and immigrant rights groups say would contravene U.S. laws and international treaties, likely triggering challenges in federal court.
The question is whether the order can stand up in court.
According to a former U.S. federal prosecutor, as TNA reported, Trump has the authority to close the border. And the U.S. Supreme Court upheld that authority in ruling Trump did indeed have the authority to impose the misnamed “Muslim ban,” which blocked travel to the United States from suspected enemy countries.
But that, the Post reported, isn’t the legal challenge Trump faces. Rather, the open-borders legal phalanx will sue for asylum claims because Trump’s move “would likely violate the 1980 Refugee Act and a 1967 international refugee treaty that the United States signed, said Philip G. Schrag, a Georgetown University law professor and author of several books on asylum and immigration law.”
Federal law says that any immigrant “who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States” — whether at a legal checkpoint or after sneaking across the border — can apply for asylum, he said.
“It’s very unlikely that the courts would hold that the president has the power … to prevent people from applying for asylum,” Schrag said. “My prediction is that it would be subject to a temporary injunction of a court within days.”
Already, the Post hinted, the Left is preparing sue with bogus and baseless asylum claims.
“They are coming to the United States in search of protection,” one activist told the Post. “It’s ridiculous to argue that the babies in the caravan are a national security threat.”
Unsurprisingly, the American Civil Liberties Union will put its two red cents in. Omar Jadwat, director of its Immigrants’ Rights Project, told the Post that the Supreme Court’s ruling that backed Trump’s travel restrictions doesn’t apply in this case. “That’s the law,” he told the newspaper. “You get a chance to explain why you think you are going to be persecuted if you return home.”
Coming for Jobs
But the migrants aren’t “coming … in search of protection,” as the Post itself and The Associated Press revealed.
The migrants are coming for jobs. “We are workers,” an illegal alien told the Post. “What are we supposed to do in Honduras if there’s no work?” And “most of the migrants,” the Post reported, “were not planning to apply for asylum.”
As one migrant told AP, “We only want to work.”
_____________________________________________________________

Real News: Globalist Plan Collapsing As Soros Pushes For Migrant Entrance

REAL NEWS: GLOBALIST PLAN COLLAPSING AS SOROS PUSHES FOR MIGRANT ENTRANCE

The migrant caravans approaching America’s southern border are totally manufactured

GLOBALISTS FREAK AS “TROPICAL TRUMP” BOLSONARO WINS IN BRAZIL~WILL CLOSE “PALESTINIAN” EMBASSY & MOVE BRAZILIAN EMBASSY TO JERUSALEM


GLOBALISTS FREAK AS “TROPICAL TRUMP” 
BOLSONARO WINS IN BRAZIL 
BY ALEX NEWMAN
Brazilian Congressman Jair Bolsonaro’s platform was everything the establishment despises, all wrapped up in one campaign: pro-God, pro-free market, anti-globalist, pro-family, anti-corruption, pro-gun rights, anti-establishment, pro-life, anti-communist, pro-Western Christian civilization, anti-cultural Marxism, and pro-Brazil. And now, thanks to evangelicals and conservative Catholics uniting in an election that shocked the globalist political class worldwide, the so-called Tropical Trump, or Trump of the Tropics, is Brazil’s next president. It is likely that U.S. President Donald Trump and Brazilian President-elect Jair Bolsonaro (shown) will have a lot in common. And assuming Bolsonaro keeps his campaign pledges — a likely prospect considering his decades of walking the talk — Brazil is set to see a counter-revolution that could set the powerful communist and globalist movements in Latin America back by decades or more.
What happened in Brazil over the weekend represents a political earthquake of immense proportions. After two back-to-back communist-controlled administrations nearly drove Brazil into the abyss of totalitarianism over a period of about a dozen years, a fierce anti-communist opposed to globalism has come to “rescue Brazil,” as Bolsonaro put it. Former President Luiz Inacio “Lula” da Silva — a close ally of the Castro regime, Marxist narco-terror movements, and other murderers and criminals — is behind bars for flagrant corruption in the “Operation Car Wash” (Lava Jato) scandal. His handpicked successor, Dilma Rousseff, was impeached and removed from office by Congress amid massive anti-communist demonstrations. Lula’s next minion, Fernando Haddad, meanwhile, went down in flames in Sunday’s election, with Bolsonaro winning by a margin of around 12 percentage points. Haddad’s campaign slogan was simple yet obviously ineffective: “Haddad is Lula.”
Instead of electing another Marxist masquerading as a “moderate,” conservative Catholics and increasingly influential evangelical Christians teamed up in the world’s largest Catholic country to not only stop the march of communism, but to root it out completely. Ranchers and the agricultural community played a large role, too. And so did everyday Brazilians sick and tired of corruption, oppression, high taxes, out-of-control crime, massive unemployment, and other hallmarks of socialist and communist nations everywhere. Some analysts are calling the historic Bolsonaro election a “revolution” in Brazilian politics. However, much more accurate would be to describe it as a peaceful counter-revolution, with the Lula-backed revolution in Brazil and across the region now shattered. Indeed, the Foro de São Paulo, a communist network founded by Lula, Castro, the Sandinistas, the communist terror group known as the FARC, and other forces, was on the cusp of conquering all of Latin America. Now, they are on the run practically everywhere, with many of the top leaders dead or in prison.  
    Brazilian Congressman Jair Bolsonaro’s platform was everything the establishment despises, all wrapped up in one campaign: pro-God, pro-free market, anti-globalist, pro-family, anti-corruption, pro-gun rights, anti-establishment, pro-life, anti-communist, pro-Western Christian civilization, anti-cultural Marxism, and pro-Brazil. And now, thanks to evangelicals and conservative Catholics uniting in an election that shocked the globalist political class worldwide, the so-called Tropical Trump, or Trump of the Tropics, is Brazil’s next president. It is likely that U.S. President Donald Trump and Brazilian President-elect Jair Bolsonaro (shown) will have a lot in common. And assuming Bolsonaro keeps his campaign pledges — a likely prospect considering his decades of walking the talk — Brazil is set to see a counter-revolution that could set the powerful communist and globalist movements in Latin America back by decades or more.

What happened in Brazil over the weekend represents a political earthquake of immense proportions. After two back-to-back communist-controlled administrations nearly drove Brazil into the abyss of totalitarianism over a period of about a dozen years, a fierce anti-communist opposed to globalism has come to “rescue Brazil,” as Bolsonaro put it. Former President Luiz Inacio “Lula” da Silva — a close ally of the Castro regime, Marxist narco-terror movements, and other murderers and criminals — is behind bars for flagrant corruption in the “Operation Car Wash” (Lava Jato) scandal. His handpicked successor, Dilma Rousseff, was impeached and removed from office by Congress amid massive anti-communist demonstrations. Lula’s next minion, Fernando Haddad, meanwhile, went down in flames in Sunday’s election, with Bolsonaro winning by a margin of around 12 percentage points. Haddad’s campaign slogan was simple yet obviously ineffective: “Haddad is Lula.”
Instead of electing another Marxist masquerading as a “moderate,” conservative Catholics and increasingly influential evangelical Christians teamed up in the world’s largest Catholic country to not only stop the march of communism, but to root it out completely. Ranchers and the agricultural community played a large role, too. And so did everyday Brazilians sick and tired of corruption, oppression, high taxes, out-of-control crime, massive unemployment, and other hallmarks of socialist and communist nations everywhere. Some analysts are calling the historic Bolsonaro election a “revolution” in Brazilian politics. However, much more accurate would be to describe it as a peaceful counter-revolution, with the Lula-backed revolution in Brazil and across the region now shattered. Indeed, the Foro de São Paulo, a communist network founded by Lula, Castro, the Sandinistas, the communist terror group known as the FARC, and other forces, was on the cusp of conquering all of Latin America. Now, they are on the run practically everywhere, with many of the top leaders dead or in prison.      
Brazilian Congressman Jair Bolsonaro’s platform was everything the establishment despises, all wrapped up in one campaign: pro-God, pro-free market, anti-globalist, pro-family, anti-corruption, pro-gun rights, anti-establishment, pro-life, anti-communist, pro-Western Christian civilization, anti-cultural Marxism, and pro-Brazil. And now, thanks to evangelicals and conservative Catholics uniting in an election that shocked the globalist political class worldwide, the so-called Tropical Trump, or Trump of the Tropics, is Brazil’s next president. It is likely that U.S. President Donald Trump and Brazilian President-elect Jair Bolsonaro (shown) will have a lot in common. And assuming Bolsonaro keeps his campaign pledges — a likely prospect considering his decades of walking the talk — Brazil is set to see a counter-revolution that could set the powerful communist and globalist movements in Latin America back by decades or more.
What happened in Brazil over the weekend represents a political earthquake of immense proportions. After two back-to-back communist-controlled administrations nearly drove Brazil into the abyss of totalitarianism over a period of about a dozen years, a fierce anti-communist opposed to globalism has come to “rescue Brazil,” as Bolsonaro put it. Former President Luiz Inacio “Lula” da Silva — a close ally of the Castro regime, Marxist narco-terror movements, and other murderers and criminals — is behind bars for flagrant corruption in the “Operation Car Wash” (Lava Jato) scandal. His handpicked successor, Dilma Rousseff, was impeached and removed from office by Congress amid massive anti-communist demonstrations. Lula’s next minion, Fernando Haddad, meanwhile, went down in flames in Sunday’s election, with Bolsonaro winning by a margin of around 12 percentage points. Haddad’s campaign slogan was simple yet obviously ineffective: “Haddad is Lula.”
Instead of electing another Marxist masquerading as a “moderate,” conservative Catholics and increasingly influential evangelical Christians teamed up in the world’s largest Catholic country to not only stop the march of communism, but to root it out completely. Ranchers and the agricultural community played a large role, too. And so did everyday Brazilians sick and tired of corruption, oppression, high taxes, out-of-control crime, massive unemployment, and other hallmarks of socialist and communist nations everywhere. Some analysts are calling the historic Bolsonaro election a “revolution” in Brazilian politics. However, much more accurate would be to describe it as a peaceful counter-revolution, with the Lula-backed revolution in Brazil and across the region now shattered. Indeed, the Foro de São Paulo, a communist network founded by Lula, Castro, the Sandinistas, the communist terror group known as the FARC, and other forces, was on the cusp of conquering all of Latin America. Now, they are on the run practically everywhere, with many of the top leaders dead or in prison.      
In typical fashion, though, the establishment media around the world was not interested in the real story. Instead, they chose to reveal just how far to the left they have gone, blasting the obviously mainstream candidate as a “far-right” extremist. The media continuously lied about Bolsonaro in other ways, too, seeking to portray him as some sort of monster on the verge of killing everyone. Like Trump, Bolsonaro occasionally speaks before thinking through his comments. And so, as with Trump, the press has endlessly recycled the same three or four quotes to paint him as some sort of dictator-admiring racist, sexist, and bigot. Obviously, the Brazilian people did not fall for it. Ironically, many of the same establishment mouthpieces who portrayed actual communist terrorist Rousseff as a “moderate” claimed Bolsonaro was “extreme” and “radical.”  
Indeed, one of the key lines of attack is the claim that Bolsonaro is a supporter of dictatorship who would jail, torture, and execute his political opponents. In reality, the former Army captain has simply expressed support for the (admittedly sometimes overzealous) efforts of Brazil’s pre-1985 military government to keep communist terrorists and murderous revolutionaries in check. Of course, what the media fail to mention is that, had it not been for the anti-communist efforts of Brazilian authorities and others in the region such as Chilean General Augusto Pinochet, the entire South American continent could and likely would look today like Communist Cuba — a giant open-air prison and slave state ruled by communist criminals in which dissent is not tolerated, critics are tortured and executed, Christians are persecuted, poverty reigns supreme, and everyone except the ruling elite is equally miserable. However, Bolsonaro was able to bypass the media’s dishonest reporting and reach out directly to the people using the Internet, social media, and direct communications spread by his supporters.  
But while the establishment media in Brazil and worldwide, which Bolsonaro ridicules as “fake news,” was almost unanimously against him, the people were clearly behind him. “I was never alone,” Bolsonaro told supporters outside his Rio de Janeiro home after his victory. “I always felt the presence of God and the force of the Brazilian people.” A failed assassination attempt on the campaign trail nearly claimed his life, but Bolsonaro pulled through. And now, he is vowing to make Brazil great. “We have everything we need to become a great nation,” Bolsonaro said in a Facebook video after the vote was called for him. “Together we will change the destiny of Brazil.” Despite “fake news” reports claiming he would institute a dictatorship, Bolsonaro vowed to respect liberty, the rule of law, self-government, and the Brazilian Constitution. “I will be the president of everyone,” he said, adding that ideological indoctrination pushed under the previous regimes would be removed from schools. “It should not be us against them, them against us. We need politics that serve the interests of everyone…. We will unite everyone and be one people, one nation.” He concluded by asking God for strength to do the right thing for Brazil.  
President Trump called Bolsonaro after the victory was announced and wished him “good luck” in what Bolsonaro described as “obviously a very friendly contact.” And on foreign policy, Bolsonaro is expected to follow Trump in defending Western Christian civilization against the twin threats of cultural Marxism and global Islamist jihad. In fact, Bolsonaro’s top candidate for foreign minister, Ernesto Henrique Fraga Araújo, last year wrote a fantastically insightful piece in a foreign-policy journal headlined “Trump and the West.” In it, Fraga Araújo, a senior Brazilian diplomat, compares the Trump presidency to a “Hail Mary pass” in a football game. With the Christian West on the verge of destruction — and many Westerners not even realizing that a “game” threatening their civilization was underway — along came Trump with a series of almost impossible wins to potentially rescue his nation and civilization from forces bent on its annihilation. 
God, Christianity, and faith, Fraga Araújo wrote, are crucial to the Western world’s identity — far more so than economic vitality, military might, or any of the other ideas and values that have increasingly supplanted them in the globalist-backed worldview. And among top leaders of the West, only Trump and a handful of others understand that the Brazilian diplomat explained, quoting extensively from some of Trump’s international speeches. The prominent diplomat, who may go on to lead the Brazilian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the Bolsonaro administration, called for Brazil to recover its own Western roots and extricate itself from the globalist multilateral web that has been imposed on it. In a subsequent blog post headlined “Against Globalism,” Fraga Araújo called for Brazilians to unite behind Bolsonaro to rescue Brazil. Many, obviously, decided to do exactly that.   
Some Bolsonaro supporters in Brazil and beyond expressed concerns about the then-candidate’s meeting with Shannon O’Neill, the “Nelson and David Rockefeller Senior Fellow for Latin America Studies” at the global government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations. The Deep State organization’s members, including O’Neill’s radical predecessor Julia Sweig, a Castro apparatchik, have been known for promoting globalism and socialism around the world. In fact, defectors and whistleblowers, such as U.S. Admiral Chester Ward, have said publicly that the CFR’s membership is virtually united in a quest to surrender national sovereignty and self-government and impose a global government on humanity in their place. “The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence, and submergence into an all-powerful one-world government,” warned the widely respected U.S. admiral.
Sweig, the previous “Nelson and David Rockefeller Senior Fellow for Latin America Studies,” was so extreme that she was accused by a U.S. counterintelligence official of being an “agent of influence” for the mass-murdering regime enslaving Cuba — a regime put in power with crucial assistance from a large roster of CFR members in media and government. But despite the one-time meeting with CFR globalists, several individuals close to the Bolsonaro campaign told The New American that Bolsonaro is the real deal and firmly rejects globalism. In fact, at the meeting, Bolsonaro touted bilateralism and bilateral agreements between governments, rather than the CFR-backed vision of regional and global governance schemes that now encircles the globe. Bolsonaro was also briefed by advisors on the true nature of the CFR, sources told The New American. And after the meeting, CFR mouthpiece Foreign Affairs continued to pump out anti-Bolsonaro propaganda, suggesting the globalists were less than impressed with him. That is all good news for Brazil, liberty, and humanity.   
What happened in Brazil this weekend is truly historic. For supporters of liberty and Christian civilization, and for opponents of communism and tyranny, this should be a time for celebration. Like Trump, Bolsonaro is merely human, and so, he is obviously not perfect. Without question, he will sometimes be wrong. But that is not the important issue here. In short, the progress of the most murderous “ideology” in human history across a major region of the world has been halted and reversed in an unprecedented, peaceful counter-revolution. The establishment seeking a globalist “world order” has been dealt a stunning blow by the Brazilian people. Trump, Bolsonaro, and the growing roster of national leaders united in defense of their nations and their peoples can and should cooperate in defeating globalism and socialism for good. It is an incredible time to be alive.
Related articles:
___________________________________________________________

New Brazil President to close “Palestinian” embassy: “You do not negotiate with terrorists”

BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/new-brazil-president-to-close-palestinian-embassy-you-do-not-negotiate-with-terrorists; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

A refreshing dose of reality from a country that has supported the “Palestinian” jihad for a considerable period.
“Brazilians elect first ardently pro-Israel president,” by Marcus M. Gilban, JTA, October 29, 2018:
RIO DE JANEIRO (JTA) — Brazilians elected a president who is a far-right, ardently pro-Israel veteran pol who once declared “My heart is green, yellow, blue and white,” in a reference to the colors of the Israeli and Brazilian flags.
“Far-right”: i.e., hated by the political and media establishment.
Jair Bolsonaro, a 63-year-old seven-term congressman who built his campaign around pledges to crush corruption and crime, secured over 55 percent of the vote, an 11 percent lead over his far-left rival Fernando Haddad.
“We cannot continue flirting with socialism, communism, populism and leftist extremism … We are going to change the destiny of Brazil,” said Bolsonaro in his late Sunday night acceptance speech broadcast from his home in Rio, which showed a Jewish menorah in the background of the video.
Highly divisive among Jewish voters, the Conservative lawmaker — whose middle name, Messias, literally means “messiah” — won the ballot after a drama-filled election that looks set to radically reforge the future of the world’s fourth biggest democracy, leaving nearly 15 years of far-left governments behind….
For many Jewish voters, Bolsonaro has always been a dream president. He has declared he will move the Brazilian embassy to Jerusalem from Tel Aviv. His first international trip as president, he said, will be to Israel, with which he will seek to broaden the dialogue. And he promised to close the Palestinian embassy in Brasilia.
“Is Palestine a country? Palestine is not a country, so there should be no embassy here,” Bolsonaro said weeks ago. “You do not negotiate with terrorists.”…
“Bolsonaro stood out among the many candidates for including the State of Israel in the major speeches he made during the campaign,” Israel’s honorary consul in Rio, Osias Wurman, told JTA last week. “He is a lover of the people and the State of Israel.”…

RON PAUL: TRUMP IS RIGHT, THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS CRAZY

Image result for ron paul
RON PAUL: TRUMP IS RIGHT, 
THE FEDERAL RESERVE IS CRAZY 
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/trump-right-fed-crazy/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
By 
Ron Paul Institute
President Trump recently called the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes crazy. Leaving aside President Trump’s specific complaint, which is likely motivated by the belief that low rates will help him win reelection, he is right that “crazy” is a good way to describe the Federal Reserve.
When not forced to use a government-created currency, individuals have historically chosen to use a precious metal such as gold or silver as money. The reasons include that precious metals are durable and their value tends to remain relatively stable over time. A stable currency ensures that prices accurately convey the true value of goods and services.
A main value of a precious metal is it accurately conveys the true price of money, which is the Interest rate. If the interest rate reflects the manipulation of central bankers and not true market conditions, individuals will be unable to properly allocate resources between savings and current consumption.
In contrast to market money, government-created fiat currency is anything but stable. Central banks constantly increase and decrease the money supply in an attempt to control the economy by controlling the interest rates. This causes individuals to misread market conditions, leading to a misallocation of resources. This can create an illusion of prosperity. But eventually reality catches up to the Federal Reserve-created fantasies. When that happens, there is a recession or worse, leading the Fed to start the whole boom-and-bust cycle over again.
When central banks create money, those who first get the new money enjoy an increase in purchasing power before the new money causes a real increase in prices. Those who receive the money first are members of the banking and financial elite. By the time the new money reaches the middle class and working class, inflation has set in, so any gain in purchasing power is more than offset by the increase in inflation. Thus, central banking causes income inequality.
Since the Federal Reserve’s creation in 1913, the dollar has lost most of its value. The steady erosion of the dollar’s value punishes savers and rewards those who seek instant gratification even if it requires piling up massive debts. So the Federal Reserve is at least partially to blame for the rise of a culture that devalues thrift.
The very act of creating money and manipulating interest rates distorts the market. Therefore, the Federal Reserve System cannot be fixed with a “rules-based” monetary policy or even with “tying” the Fed-created money supply to the price of gold. It is amazing how many economists who oppose price controls on all other goods support allowing a secretive central bank to control the price of money.
Trusting the Federal Reserve to produce permanent prosperity instead of a boom-and-bust cycle is a textbook example of a popular definition of insanity being repeating the same action in hope of getting different results. The Federal Reserve System is as unworkable and doomed to failure as every other form of central planning.
It is likely that the next Fed-created recession will come sooner rather than later. This could be the major catastrophe that leads to the end of fiat currency. The only way to avoid crisis is to force Congress to end our monetary madness. The first steps are passing the Audit the Fed bill, allowing people to use alternative currencies, and exempting all transactions in precious metals and cryptocurrencies from capital gains taxes and other taxes.

BENNY HINN SUED FOR NEARLY $3 MILLION IN DEFAULTED LOANS

Pyromaniacs: Cessationism again
BENNY HINN & PAULA WHITE IN ROME:
BENNY HINN SUED FOR NEARLY $3 MILLION 
IN DEFAULTED LOANS 
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2018/10/22/benny-hinn-sued-for-nearly-3-million-in-defaulted-loans/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Benny Hinn, the false prophet and fake healer of World Healing Center Church, Inc. (aka Benny Hinn Ministries) has been sued by Mail America Communications, Inc. for the amount of $2,993,221.74 in unpaid loans, interest, and late fees which it borrowed in the original amount of over 5.6 million.
According to the lawsuit, Hinn began defaulting on his loan obligations in June of 2012 leading to a series of forbearance agreements:
Between June of 2012 and August of 2016, MAC and WHCC entered into series of formal and informal forbearance agreements and memoranda of understanding regarding the payment defaults under the Note and with respect to temporary reduced payments that MAC would be willing to accept from time to time on account of WHCC’s obligations under the Note without waiving or altering the terms of the Note.
In July of 2018, Hinn defaulted once again on the forbearance agreement with Mail America Communications, Inc. Hinn then promised to make a lump sum payment of $260 thousand, which he also failed to pay, causing Mail America Communications to file a lawsuit for damages due to “Breach of Contract” in the amount of $2,993,221.74.
Benny Hinn could not be reached for comment.

PASTORS WILL ASK FOR GOD’S BLESSING ON PLANNED PARENTHOOD ABORTION CLINIC


PASTORS WILL ASK FOR GOD’S BLESSING 
ON PLANNED PARENTHOOD ABORTION CLINIC 
BY STEVEN ERTELT
SEE: https://www.lifenews.com/2018/10/22/pastors-will-ask-for-gods-blessing-on-planned-parenthood-abortion-clinic/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

It’s one of the most sacrilegious acts a religious leader could perform, but it’s happening again — this time in Columbus, Ohio.  There, on the evening of November 9, the so-called Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice is planning a “blessing” of the Planned Parenthood abortion center.
This appears to be a response to the closing ceremony of the 40 Days for Life campaign. The event is called Holy Ground: Blessing the Sacred Space of Decision, and an event description reads:
During this clinic blessing, participants will gather with local faith leaders and guests to ask for God’s blessing upon Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio’s East Columbus Surgical facility, the abortion providers and staff, and all those who pass through the center.
In celebration of conscience and moral decision making, this event will include interfaith blessings, prayers, and testimonies about receiving and providing abortion care. This clinic blessing will create space for progressive voices of faith to speak boldly in support of comprehensive reproductive health care, especially abortion.
Mark Harrington, President of the pro-life group Created Equal informed LifeNews of the event. He said Planned Parenthood abortion practitioners kill babies at the abortion clinic in dismemberment abortions whey they are nearly 5 months old.
SUPPORT LIFENEWS! Help us stand for life, please help LifeNews.com with a donation!
He said: “To suggest that God advocates for the shedding of innocent blood is blasphemous. In scripture, Satan “masquerades as an angel of light” and “is a liar and the father of lies.’ Abortion is a frontal attack on those made in His image – human beings. Authentic ministers of God oppose the killing of the preborn, they don’t promote it.”
“If you never believed abortion was child sacrifice, think again. These priests of child-killing may not be offering children as a human sacrifice to Molech, a Canaanite deity associated with the practice of child sacrifice, but instead are offering them to a modern false idol called ‘reproductive choice,” he added.


800 INFLUENTIAL ISLAMIC SCHOLARS FROM 120 COUNTRIES TO MEET IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THAT ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE

800 INFLUENTIAL ISLAMIC SCHOLARS FROM 120 COUNTRIES TO MEET IN ORDER TO ESTABLISH THAT ISLAM IS A RELIGION OF PEACE
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/800-influential-islamic-scholars-from-120-countries-to-meet-in-order-to-establish-that-islam-is-a-religion-of-peace; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

If it really were a religion of peace, they wouldn’t have to hold big conferences to prove it; it would be obvious to everyone. But there is an unfortunate reality that the Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies is likely to ignore: there has never been a period since the beginning of Islam that was characterized by large-scale peaceful coexistence between Muslims and non-Muslims. There was no time when mainstream and dominant Islamic authorities taught the equality of non-Muslims with Muslims, or the obsolescence of jihad warfare. There was no Era of Good Feeling, no Golden Age of Tolerance, no Paradise of Proto-Multiculturalism. There has always been, with virtually no interruption, jihad, everywhere Muslims and non-Muslims have lived in close proximity with one another. Everywhere Muslims and non-Muslims have lived together, some of those Muslims have been violent toward the non-Muslims. Everywhere. Without exception.
I prove this abundantly, relying primarily on Islamic sources, in my book The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS. Dr Mohammad Mattar Al Kaabi will likely never see this post, and that’s a shame. If he did see it, I invite him to prove me wrong. He can reach me at director@jihadwatch.org. If he provides me with an address, I will send him a copy of The History of Jihad, and if he finds a historical error in it, I will make a $5,000 contribution to the Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies.
But neither he nor any other Muslim will take up that challenge, because they would not be able to prove that Islam has ever been a religion of peace, anywhere, at any point in its history. The public policy implications of that are massive, which is why there are such strenuous efforts, such as this conference, to cover it up.
“Peace forum to set up ‘alliance of virtues’ on Islam,” by Samir Salama, Gulf News, October 24, 2018:

Abu Dhabi: The 5th edition of the Forum for Promoting Peace in Muslim Societies, to be held in Abu Dhabi on December 5, will establish that Islam is a religion of peace and justice, said Dr Mohammad Mattar Al Kaabi, secretary general of the forum, an Abu Dhabi-based international organisation.
The forum will bring together more than 800 of the world’s most influential Islamic scholars and thinkers from 120 countries, including ministers of religious affairs, muftis, representatives of the Muslim communities and delegates from the United Nations and rights organisations across the world….
“The idea came following the resounding success of the peace caravan, where an intimate and diverse group of US Muslim, Christian and Jewish clerics convened in Abu Dhabi last year to understand and appreciate theological differences while focusing on the synergism of religious commonalities essential to building healthy ad peaceful communities,” Dr Al Kaabi said.
“These endeavours culminated in an international conference in Washington D.C. in February this year under the theme ‘An Alliance of Virtues for the Common Good’. The event drew participation from hundreds of Christian pastors, Jewish rabbis and Muslim imams, alongside academics and researchers concerned with the culture of peace, as well as representatives of major international organisations and the US civil society. This landmark event was the first time the Abrahamic family of religions convened in all its diversity, to agree on new foundations for a religious dialogue, one that transcends disputation and proselytisation to achieve a discourse of mutual acquaintance and cooperation based upon common values.”…
The forum will tackle five main topics: a contemporary outlook of early Islam’s Alliance of Virtues, treaties and covenants in Islam, contemporary crises of religions and mankind, religion and the ethics of universal solidarity, and a new alliance of virtues — an opportunity for global peace.


INFLUENTIAL EVANGELICAL LEADER NOW EMBRACES POLYAMORY, SAYS IT’S “HOLY, WELCOME, & CELEBRATED”

INFLUENTIAL EVANGELICAL LEADER 
NOW EMBRACES POLYAMORY, SAYS IT’S 
“HOLY, WELCOME, & CELEBRATED”

SEE ROBERTSON’S YOUTUBE CHANNEL HERE:

SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2018/10/26/influential-evangelical-leader-now-embraces-polyamory-says-its-holy-welcome-and-celebrated/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Robertson is a rising star among the evangelical left. 
He identifies as bisexual.
This is is Brandan Robertson. He is an emerging personality on the religious left. Robertson pastors Missiongathering Christian Church, a San Diego church affiliated with the Disciples of Christ. Robertson graduated from  Moody Bible Institute. He has written in  The Washington Post, Tim Magazine, and The Huffington Post. He also speaks at the Wild Goose Festival, a liberal religious gathering referred to as a “Gay Christian Woodstock,” which we have previously written about here. Most recently, Robertson claimed that polyamorous relationships (having intimate sexual relationships with multiple people, such as in an “open marriage”) is “holy, welcome and celebrated.”
Robertson tweeted this out last week…
In honor and support of @QTheology recent webinar on non-monogamous relationships, I want to share this word that I spoke to our congregation on the topic this summer:
#FaithfullyLGBT pic.twitter.com/ygiud05lED
— Brandan Robertson (@BrandanJR) October 18, 2018
Robertson then posted a video (now deleted) in which he says the following (as transcribed by Juicy Ecumenism, here)…
“For those who are in an open or polyamorous relationship here this morning who might be squirming, because this is an uncomfortable question to hear in church sometimes. I want you to hear me loud and clear as a minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Your relationships are holy. They are beautiful and they are welcomed and celebrated in this space.”
And:
“We call all of us together to the same set of standards that we call everyone to: to seek to follow Jesus in all of our relationships. To seek to be honest and respectful and self-sacrificial and consensual and loving with your partners. When any of us live into these standards we can be sure we are on the path to wholeness and holiness.”
Robertson is – according to Vice Magazine – one of the “Woke Young Evangelicals Trying to Make Christianity Cool Again.” We compared him and others highlighted by Vice to Russell Moore here.
If that’s what “cool” is, no thanks.
[HT Juicy Ecumenism]

TRANSEXUAL LADY PASTORS SAY TRUMP ISN’T BEING VERY CHRISTIAN

TRANSEXUAL LADY PASTORS SAY TRUMP 
ISN’T BEING VERY CHRISTIAN 
SEE: https://pulpitandpen.org/2018/10/26/transexual-lady-pastors-say-trump-isnt-being-very-christian/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
From left: Rev. M Barclay, director of enfleshed; Myles Markham, programs and organizing coordinator for the Reformation Project; and Rev. Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza, founder of the Activist Theology Project, photo credit to HuffPo
[Huffington Post] Transgender Christian leaders have a message for President Donald Trump’s administration, following reports that it plans to drastically narrow the legal definition of gender.
Even though the administration is moving to stop recognizing the existence of transgender and nonbinary people, there’s nothing it could do that would erase trans people’s inherent worth, the faith leaders told HuffPost.
“No government entity or leader can take or excise or erase the depth of worth that Transgender people are and embody,” the Rev. Dr. Robyn Henderson-Espinoza, a queer Latinx activist and founder of the Activist Theology Project, told HuffPost in an email. “My religious tradition teaches that I am made in the image of God and of sacred worth.”
Progressive activists have responded with anger and protests to news that the Department of Health and Human Services is seeking to establish a legal definition of gender that would roll back advances made by the Obama administration. The proposed definition, first reported by The New York Times, would treat gender as a biological and unchangeable condition assigned at birth.
In effect, the definition would exclude America’s estimated 1.4 million transgender or nonbinary citizens from federal civil rights protections. Disputes over a person’s gender would have to be clarified with genetic testing, the Times reported.
The government’s proposed definition would realign its understanding of gender with the theology of conservative evangelical Christians, who have long been some of Trump’s staunchest supporters.

The Rev.&nbsp;M Barclay&nbsp;was the <a href="https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/united-methodist-church-transgender-deacon

REV. M BARCLAY

The Rev. M Barclay was the first openly nonbinary person to become a deacon in the United Methodist Church.

The Rev. M Barclay, director of the Christian ministry enfleshed, said they are deeply troubled about the proposal ― but not especially surprised, given the administration’s previous discriminatory actions toward the trans community.
Not only does the proposed definition threaten to snatch away trans Americans’ access to crucial resources and rights, these political moves against the community also leave deep emotional wounds, Barclay, who is based in Iowa and uses gender-neutral pronouns, told HuffPost.
“The spiritual trauma of being perpetually told who we are isn’t real, that others shouldn’t believe us or support us, and that our well-being isn’t of collective significance is doing so much damage,” they said.

“PALESTINIAN” SCHOOLS STILL TEACHING JEW HATRED TO KIDS

Students in a school in Gaza of the UNRWA 
at the beginning of the new academic year.
“PALESTINIAN” SCHOOLS STILL TEACHING 
JEW HATRED TO KIDS
SEE: http://the-trumpet-online.com/palestinian-schools-still-teaching-jew-hatred-kids/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
”Fatah, the largest faction of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, has announced the publication of four new booklets for children in which notorious terrorists and their actions are glorified, according to a recent news report by the Middle East Media Research Institute,” reports WashExaminer.
“One of the booklets is dedicated to Abu Jihad, Yasser Arafat’s deputy and PLO co-founder, who helped plan and execute the murder of 125 Israelis, and another to Dalal Al-Mughrabi, the female Fatah terrorist who led the deadliest terrorist attack in Israel’s history, in which more than three dozen Israeli civilians, one-third of them children, were killed on a hijacked bus in 1978…
“This initiative, the first of its kind, uses stories to document the history of the Palestinian people and of the Fatah movement, the largest faction in the PLO,” said a spokesman.
“The new textbooks examined in this report indoctrinate for death and martyrdom. Jews and Israelis are portrayed as quintessentially evil, amid calls for jihad and martyrdom by Palestinian children. …
“The image of a girl with a long dagger is a disturbing reminder of the 2015-16 Knife Intifada, when children were encouraged to use knives and scissors to attack Israelis. … Anti-Semitism is more prevalent than before [in the new textbooks]. … Israel and the Jews are referred to as ‘enemies of Islam,’ and are blamed for poisoning the Prophet Muhammad. … Encouraging girls and boys to sacrifice their lives in the name of religion appears to be a central goal of this curriculum. ”
[Dr. Chaps’ comment:  This is why President Trump reportedly wants to defund UNWRA, the UN agency funding Palestinian schools, whose textbooks teach terrorism with US taxpayer dollars.  We have got to stand up for Israel and insist on peace in Palestine.]
Trump stops funding Anti-Jewish U.N. Muslim Schools
” The Trump administration has moved to stop all funding for UNRWA, the UN agency that provides aid [and anti-Israel propaganda] for Palestinian refugees. The decision goes to the core of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” reports CBN News.
“The decision to cut off all US funding to the agency has set off a chain reaction in the region.  Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat announced a plan to remove UNRWA from the city.
” Protests popped up in Jordan and the Gaza Strip. Palestinian Authority leaders condemned the action, calling it a ‘path to destruction.’
“What is the American administration doing? They are preempting, prejudging issues reserved for permanent status. They are undermining the moderate forces in Palestine and Israel,” said PLO executive committee secretary general Saeb Erekat. “Those elements that want to achieve peace peacefully, based on a two-state solution, are being destroyed.”
“Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu applauded the decision.
“The United States has made a very important thing, stopping the funds for the agency perpetuating refugees, called UNRWA. The US is finally beginning to solve the problem.”
“So, I think President Trump is touching on the core issue,” Schwartz said. “The core issue is not how large Israel will be or how much territory it will cede. But the question is if Israel will stay. Israel obviously wants to stay, but the Palestinians unfortunately do not accept us yet.”
[Dr. Chaps’ comment:   We must oppose UNWRA funding of anti-Jewish propaganda in Muslim schools, and we oppose dividing Jerusalem or seizing other Israeli land for Muslims, period.]
“I will enter into judgment with them there on behalf of My people and My inheritance, Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations; and they have divided up My land.” Joel 3:2
God Bless you, in Jesus’ name,

Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt, PhD
P.S. Thank you for standing with Israel and with with me. I appreciate your love for God and God’s chosen people, who are under attack from all sides in these last days .

DELAWARE: THE LATE TERM ABORTION STATE?

DELAWARE: THE LATE TERM ABORTION STATE?

Your vote on NOV 6th says “I am NOT ok being represented by someone who condones or justifies the barbaric practice of fetal dismemberment up to and including the 9th month of pregnancy.”
Delaware’s abortion law, as of June 2017, re-defines “viability” to make the legal status of abortion virtually open-ended until late in the third trimester. 

During the committee hearing on this legislation (SS1 to SB5), the leading abortionist for Delaware said that a “fetus” could be 9 months and still not be “viable.”

Exactly! That’s the problem! 

This law allows abortion of an infant who is considered not “viable” by the abortion doctor. “Viable” is defined as unable to live outside the womb without the application of “extraordinary medical measures.” That phrase “extraordinary medical measures” is undefined in the law. 

A baby who needs help breathing in the last stages of pregnancy could be considered “not viable” due to needing “extraordinary medical measures” and therefore aborted.  

Thus, this law, passed in 2017, would allow abortions in Delaware well into the late-term stages, creating a legal climate in which very late abortion is protected and inviting to late-term abortionists to set up shop here.” (Steven Aden, Constitutional Law Attorney)

Good Legislators offered reasonable amendments when this law was being debated; such as, amendments to reinstate informed consent requirements for abortion patients that have been upheld by the Supreme Court in cases like Planned Parenthood v. Casey, an amendment to anesthetize babies after 22 weeks before a violent death by dismemberment abortion, and amendments to urge the state to define a gestational age of viability. 

All clarifying amendments were rejected by Democrats Legislators.
To Be Clear, This Is The Kind Of Abortion Allowed In Delaware: 
If you are not ok with this, VOTE ON NOV. 6TH!  We have an excellent opportunity put men and women in our state legislature who will vote for life, religious liberty, and family first! 

If you are not ok with our state being a late term abortion destination… VOTE on NOV. 6th. 

Stopping this radical agenda depends on you and me and people like us getting to the polls. VOTE ON NOV. 6TH 
Additional Resources:
DFPC Action is the Political Action Committee partner of Delaware Family Policy Council. DFPC Action is funded by citizens in Delaware who care deeply about principles that are foundational to human flourishing, such as: thriving families, the sanctity and dignity of human life, religious liberty, and the right of conscience. 

Delaware. The Late Term Abortion State? 

“HATE SPEECH” IS SNEAKY LEFTIST CENSORSHIP, NOT LAW

“HATE SPEECH” IS SNEAKY LEFTIST CENSORSHIP, 
NOT LAW 
By Cheryl K. Chumley – The Washington Times – Friday, August 10, 2018
SEE: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/aug/10/hate-speech-clever-leftist-censorship-not-law/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

ANALYSIS/OPINION:
Leftists have been particularly crafty about clamping down and chilling conservative thought lately, boldly going where milder-mannered censors have previously feared to tread and managing to make several righteous-sounding cases, at least among their circles of progressive types, for the booting of deemed hate speakers from social media.
But their censorship argument dangles precariously on the meaningless claim that in America there’s no room for hate speech.
And I say meaningless because first off, nobody can define what constitutes hate speech and second off, even if they could, there are no criminal laws against speaking one’s mind in this country — except in cases of inciting riots or falsely yelling “fire” in a crowded theater, the latter of which is not really speech at all.
Yet the shrill accusations of hate speech continue.
There are political strategies behind all this screeching.

This whole anti-hate speech call has been a tremendous boon for the left’s successes in shuttering conservative rhetoric, whether online, on college campuses or in the media world.
The best lies and deceptions, after all, are the ones that ring of truth.
The truth: In America, morally speaking, philosophically speaking, sensibly speaking — of course there’s no room in America for hate speech. Only a radical nut would see or say otherwise. But speaking of morality is not the same as speaking of legality. Morally speaking, no citizen should spew vicious, racist, misogynistic, ugly, hateful words. Legally? For the most part, have at it. 
Also the truth: The First Amendment was penned in part to protect primarily political speech — to preserve as a God-given right the ability of citizens to say as they will, to petition as they want, to seek redress for grievances as they ought. Some of these pursuits can get pretty rancorous.
Sometimes, people get offended.
The Founders knew that. That’s the beauty of the First Amendment — to protect those who would offend.
But the left, unable to withstand fact-based scrutiny of its ridiculously anti-American progressive policies, and unable to legislatively advance anti-American progressive policies without the wings of emotionally charged discourse, has been trying to circumvent the spirit of free speech for some time. Why? To shut down the fact-finders and truth-tellers.
The left would like nothing more than to see hate speech etched into law as a punishable offense because that would make the job of censoring conservative thought and statements so much the easier.
The First Amendment and America’s long and cherished history of allowing for the lively exchange of ideas gets in the way of this goal, however. So the desperate left has advanced a public relations campaign that sees hate speech being talked about with rising frequency — as if it’s a thing.
As if it’s an American concept.
As if it’s a real crime, like stealing somebody’s car or punching somebody in the face in a bar.
The left’s hope is to talk it up enough so it doesn’t sound odd or out of place — so people stop wondering every time they hear it, “what? What is that?”
Then come the actual hate speech laws.
Then go the conservatives, too chilled to speak.
It’s like this: The Ku Klux Klan, the Black Panther Party, Louis Farrakhan, David Duke and a long list of others may all speak in ways that strike a large portion of the public as offensive. But fact is, they pretty much have the legal and natural right to speak as they will. The discomfort of either the few or the many does not justify the stripping of their God-given rights — or of anyone’s God-given right to speak freely. It’s a pretty good system of governance that allows both Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, haters and do-gooders alike, equality of expression.
Here in America, let’s keep it that way. All discussions of hate speech should include mention of the fact no such laws in this country exist.

EX-DEMOCRATS “WALK AWAY” FROM PARTY TOWARDS TRUMP & GOP, STAGING MARCH IN WASHINGTON, D.C. IN RAIN

EX-DEMOCRATS “WALK AWAY” FROM PARTY TOWARDS TRUMP & GOP, STAGING MARCH IN WASHINGTON, D.C.

#Walkaway March Full Coverage

JOE HAGMANN REPORTS

“I #WalkAway to save my country.”

Published on Oct 26, 2018

“Finally sharing my #WalkAway story in hopes that someone will watch and walk away. I don’t recognize these Democrats. I’ve never been afraid of a political party getting control again like I am now with these Democrats. The Democrats are encouraging violence and obstruct with zero good ideas on how to help Americans. #LatinosLoveTrump #WalkAway #DemExit” Terry.

#WalkAway March Owen Shroyer of Infowars

#WalkAway March – Will Witt

#WalkAway March – DeAnna Lorraine


PRESIDENT TRUMP’S STATEMENT ABOUT PITTSBURGH SYNAGOGUE SHOOTINGS, PRAYERS WITH RABBI & PASTOR~SUSPECT ARRESTED IS ROBERT BOWERS

PRESIDENT TRUMP’S STATEMENT 
ABOUT PITTSBURGH SYNAGOGUE SHOOTINGS, 
PRAYERS WITH RABBI & PASTOR
President Trump delivers IMPORTANT Remarks at Future Farmers of America Convention in Indiana ahead of MAGA Rally in Illinois.
Pittsburgh synagogue suspect identified as Robert Bowers
Eleven people gathered for a baby naming service were shot to death and four police officers wounded after a gunman opened fire inside the Tree of Life synagogue; Garrett Tenney reports from Pittsburgh.

Pittsburgh Synagogue Shooter Is Robert Bowers…Nazi…Hates Donald Trump…Says Trump Controlled By Jews


EUROPEAN COURT: CALLING THE SATANIC PERVERT MUHAMMAD A PEDOPHILE, DOES NOT FALL UNDER PURVIEW OF FREE SPEECH & CAN BE CRIMINALIZED

EUROPEAN COURT: CALLING THE SATANIC PERVERT MUHAMMAD A PEDOPHILE, DOES NOT FALL UNDER PURVIEW OF FREE SPEECH & CAN BE CRIMINALIZED 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

The freedom of speech does not extend to include defaming the prophet of Islam, the European Court of Human rights ruled Thursday.



The Strasbourg-based ECHR ruled that insulting Islamic prophet Muhammad “goes beyond the permissible limits of an objective debate” and “could stir up prejudice and put at risk religious peace.”



The court’s decision comes after it rejected an Austrian woman’s claim that her previous conviction for calling Muhammad a pedophile, due to his marriage to a 6-year-old girl, violated her freedom of speech.



The ECHR ruled Austrian courts had “carefully balanced her right to freedom of expression with the right of others to have their religious feelings protected.”



The woman, in her late 40s and identified only as E.S., claimed during two public seminars in 2009 that Muhammad’s marriage to a young girl was akin to “pedophilia.”



According to Islamic tradition, the marriage between Muhammad and a 6-year-old girl was consummated when she was 9 years old and he was about 50.



The Austrian woman stated in her seminars that Muhammad “liked to do it with children” and “… A 56-year-old and a 6-year-old? … What do we call it, if it is not pedophilia?”



A Vienna court convicted her in 2011 of disparaging religious doctrines, ordering her to pay a $547 fine, plus legal costs. The ruling was later upheld by an Austrian appeals court.



The woman argued her comments fell within her right of freedom of expression and that religious groups must tolerate criticism. She also argued her comments were intended to contribute to public debate and not designed to defame Muhammad.



The ECHR said the Austrian court’s decision “served the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace.”



The court also said the woman’s comments were not objective, failed to provide historical background and had no intention of promoting public debate.



_____________________________________________________________



SEE ALSO:



http://bigfaithministries.com/was-muhammad-a-pedophile/

https://gatesofvienna.net/2018/10/the-echr-rules-against-elisabeth-sabaditsch-wolff/

https://gatesofvienna.net/repression/elisabeths-voice/ (TIMELINE OF "HATE SPEECH" CASE)

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/271763/now-its-official-europeans-cant-criticize-islam-bruce-bawer

EXCERPT: "The bottom line here is grimly clear. The ECHR has totally capitulated to Islam. It has dealt a major blow to freedom of speech in Europe. At this point, indeed, the ECHR might as well be a sharia court. When it comes to voicing unpleasant truths about Islam, it can no longer be claimed with any legitimacy that Europeans under the jurisdiction of the ECHR – which is to say, every European except for the thousand-odd residents of the Vatican and the nine million inhabitants of Belarus – still enjoy freedom of expression. In one fell swoop, the ECHR has put an end to that. And some Americans wonder why Donald Trump is so determined to keep the United States out of the jurisdiction of international courts."



_____________________________________________________________





Sharia in Europe: Human Rights Court Adopts 



Islamic Blasphemy Laws



The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) recently ruled that freedom of speech must be balanced with "protecting the religious feelings" of others. Hence, Europeans are no longer allowed to call Muhammad offensive names like "pedophile," even though he had sex with a prepubescent nine-year-old girl named Aisha. David Wood discusses the issue.












NATIONALIST-POPULIST-COUNTER JIHAD ACTIVIST







Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff at OSCE: "Hate Speech" is a Freedom Problem



Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff at OSCE of Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa speaks at the OSCE conference. Topic: "Hate Speech" is a Freedom Problem







Christian Reporter News Interview in San Angelo, Texas:



"Freedom of Speech" is Lost in Europe







Her Speech: 







Clare Lopez and Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff explain the mission at the OSCE







At a Pro Trump Rally in Denver, Colorado 



on March 4, 2017

























Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff with Geert Wilders of Netherlands











Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, and State Representative Peggy Mast (gatesofvienna.net)



Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff responds to EU court’s ruling that speech insulting Muhammad is prohibited



BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS





republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



Yesterday, Jihad Watch covered the troubling ruling of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) that “an Austrian woman’s criminal conviction and fine for her statements accusing the Prophet Muhammad of pedophilia did not breach her right to free speech.”



Insulting Muhammad is now forbidden, according to the ECHR, which has conceded to Sharia imperatives. This ruling is important not only for the “Austrian woman” who was not even named in the Daily Sabah article, but for all who support free speech. According to the ruling, Austrian courts had “carefully balanced her right to freedom of expression with the right of others to have their religious feelings protected.”



Consider the impact of this ruling when weighed with what Pakistan’s President Imran Khan said: that he was “taking the matter [of blasphemy] to the United Nations, saying that few in the West understand the pain caused to Muslims by such activities.” Pakistan is well known for its cruel blasphemy laws.



The next step for the expansion of Sharia provisions in Europe will be the prohibition of all speech that is considered to be broadly offensive to Muhammad’s established religion — Islam — and offensive to the feelings of Muslims.




This is clearly the case of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, who was fined and given a jail sentence for calling Muhammad a pedophile. He married a six-year-old and consummated the marriage when she was nine, but “the Austrian courts had held that ES was making value judgments partly based on untrue facts and without regard to the historical context.



I had the privilege to meet Elisabeth in Warsaw last month at the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe’s (OSCE) Human Dimension Implementation Meetings. The Center for Security Policy states:



For the last decade, a civil society delegation led by Austrian patriot and freedom fighter Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff has attended ODIHR [OSCE Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights] meetings to express concerns that especially European countries were potentially unwittingly facilitating these Sharia-compliant practices, to their great and increasingly obvious detriment.



Elisabeth is a powerful advocate for freedom. The ECHR ruling on her case bears grave implications for everyone worldwide who supports freedom and genuine human rights. Elisabeth sent me her statement on the ECHR ruling this morning. We owe her much gratitude and support for her fight for the freedom of speech, the hallmark of democracy:



On Thursday, 25 October the ECHR ruled that my conviction by an Austrian court for discussing the marriage between Prophet Mohammed and a six year old girl, Aisha, did not infringe my rights of freedom of speech.



I was not extended the courtesy of being told of this ruling. Like many others, I had to read it in the media.



The ECHR found there had been no violation of Article 10 (freedom of expression) of the European Convention on Human Rights and that right to expression needed to be balanced with the rights of others to have their religious feelings protected, and served the legitimate aim of preserving religious peace in Austria.





In other words, my right to speak freely is less important than protecting the religious feelings of others.



This should ring warning bells for my fellow citizens across the continent. We should all be extremely concerned that the rights of Muslims in Europe NOT to be offended are greater than my own rights, as a native European Christian woman, to speak freely.



I am proud to be the woman who has raised this alarm. 







I am also optimistic. Since giving my seminars in Austria in 2009, we have come a very long way. Ten years ago the press labeled me a “confused doom-monger” and I was compared to Osama Bin Laden. Now, Islam is being discussed in every sphere of life and people are waking up to the reality of a culture so opposed to our own. The cultural and political threat posed by Islam to Western societies is now widely recognized and discussed. It is fair to say European society, as well as the political realm, is undergoing an enlightenment, as it is more awake than ever to the need to defend our own Judeo-Christian culture. I believe my seminars in 2009, and subsequent work have contributed to strong push back against an Islamic culture which is so at odds with our own. And note with interest that only one sentence out of 12 hours of seminars on Islam was a prosecutable offense. I assume the remaining content is now officially sanctioned by our Establishment masters. It is obvious to me that public education and discourse on the subject of Islam can have a fundamental and far-reaching impact, even if our state or supra-national authorities try to stifle or silence it, in order to appease a culture so foreign to our own. This fight continues. My voice will not and cannot be silenced.







Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

POPE FRANCIS COMPARES “POPULISTS” TO HITLER; CALLS FOR OPEN DOORS TO ALL MIGRANTS~PEDOPHILE PRIESTS DEFENDED BY POPE COMPARING ACCUSERS TO THE “GREAT ACCUSER” SATAN

BLOOD ON HIS HANDS
PAPAL ANTI-CHRIST WARNS ABOUT ANOTHER HITLER TYPE IF NATIONALISM/POPULISM GROWS,
WHILE SILENT ON CHRISTIAN & JEWISH PERSECUTION FROM ISLAMIC JIHAD TERRORISTS
CITES FALSE “BIBLICAL MANDATE” 
FOR OPEN DOORS TO ILLEGAL MIGRANTS
POPE FRANCIS COMPARES “POPULISTS” TO HITLER; CALLS FOR OPEN DOORS TO ALL MIGRANTS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/pope-francis-compares-populists-to-hitler-calls-for-open-doors-to-all-migrants; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
So-called “populist” groups have arisen in response to the hijrah and the subsequent descent of Europe into chaos. In comments that would suggest the Pope has taken leave of his sanity:
Pope Francis adopted his toughest stance ever against populism…comparing populists to Adolf Hitler and suggesting that populism caused the Second World War.
It is abhorrent that Pope Francis would compare those who are trying to save Judeo-Christian civilization in the face of the hijrah to Hitler. Another point to ponder is the rise of Islamic anti-Semitism in Europe. It is now so bad in France that Ricard Abitbol, President of the Confederation of Jews in France and Friends of Israel, stated:
Every day we have people who are hurt, every day we have people who are insulted,” told RT. “We can be hurt by words, but we don’t mind, but when we are hurt by a knife, a gun, you can’t say I don’t mind.
He went on:
In a few decades, there will be no Jews in France.
Even the globalist, open-door supporting Angela Merkel commented about Germany:
We now have another phenomenon, as we have refugees or people of Arab origin who bring another form of anti-Semitism into the country
The Pope needs a memory juggle. Europe welcomed migrants with open arms, ie. until it was struck with a range of imported problems, from lawlessness and abuse to an infiltration of jihadists. In response, “populist” groups arose to warn about such dangers and advocate for a defense of borders and national security.
The Pope continued that all “must be welcomed with an open heart and open doors. Closure is the path to suicide.”
On the contrary, open doors is a path to suicide. The Pope has yet to open his doors at the Vatican to everyone. Pope Francis has now risen up against the “populist” Italian government, spreading deceit and stirring up tensions, all while demonstrating his lack compassion and sensitivity for the victims of jihad terror and Sharia abuses, not to mention Islamic anti-Semitism and the vast Muslim persecution of Christians. It is a dark time indeed for the Catholic Church under such leadership, which (on a separate issue) has also been covering up abuses against children in the Church.
“Pope Francis Compares Populists to Hitler, Born of ‘Hate’”, by Thomas D. Williams, Breitbart , October 25, 2018:
Pope Francis adopted his toughest stance ever against populism Tuesday, comparing populists to Adolf Hitler and suggesting that populism caused the Second World War.
“It is important for young people to know how populism is born,” the pope said Tuesday at a book launch in Rome. “I think of Hitler in the last century, who had promised development for Germany. They should know how populisms begin: by sowing hate. You can’t live sowing hate.”
The pontiff’s words struck hard in a country living under its first elected populist government in decades, formed by a coalition between the progressive, Eurosceptic 5-Star Movement and the pro-sovereignty Lega party.
“Study your history, this is the way the Führer started, with racial purity,” he said. We are now in full World War III fought piecemeal and even religion is deformed to be able to hate better.”
“Making hatred grow, creating violence and division represents a path to destruction and suicide,” the 81-year-old pontiff added.
Increased efforts are needed to teach the young about the history of the First and Second World Wars “so they do not fall into the same error and so they know how populism spreads,” he said.
The Pope’s comments came in response to 83-year-old Fiorella Bacherini, an Italian teacher who works with immigrants, who told him that she was concerned about a rise in anti-immigrant sentiment.
Migrants, the pope said, “must be welcomed with an open heart and open doors. Closure is the path to suicide. It is true that migrants must be welcomed, but they must also be accompanied and above all they must be integrated.”
“A government must have an open heart to receive and good structures to assist integration, and also the prudence to say: I can do it up to this point, but no further,” he said.
Accepting migrants, Francis added, “is a biblical mandate. We think of Europe that has been made by migrants, by cultures mixing together.”
Tuesday’s comments represent the pope’s strongest condemnation of populism to date, although his anti-populist message had already been growing more radical…

______________________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://pulpitandpen.org/2018/10/29/pope-claims-sex-abuse-scandal-is-persecution-of-the-church/ 
AND:

POPE CALLS TO DEFEND AGAINST “THE GREAT ACCUSER”

Meanwhile, Vatican fails to punish sexual predator priests

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/pope-calls-to-defend-against-the-great-accuser/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Earlier this year, after it was revealed that over 300 priests had molested over one thousand children in the Pennsylvania area, a demand to oust predatory Catholic priests reached a fever pitch.
However, the process to bring these priests to justice has been stonewalled at every turn.

PITTSBURGH CITY COUNCIL & PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT WANT “HATEFUL” CHICK-FIL-A DROPPED AS SPONSOR OF CHILDREN’S MARATHON

PITTSBURGH CITY COUNCIL & PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT WANT “HATEFUL” CHICK-FIL-A DROPPED 
AS SPONSOR OF CHILDREN’S MARATHON
BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: https://christiannews.net/2018/10/26/pittsburgh-city-council-wants-hateful-chick-fil-a-dropped-as-sponsor-of-childrens-marathon/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
PITTSBURGH, Pa. — All nine members of Pittsburgh City Council have signed an opposing letter to the leaders of the Pittsburgh Three Rivers Marathon after learning that the fast food chain Chick-fil-A will be the title sponsor for next year’s children’s marathon.
The letter argues that “[t]he leadership of Chick-fil-A has openly and passionately promulgated hateful beliefs against the LGBTQIA+ community,” and that it has financed organizations that oppose same-sex “marriage” and homosexual behavior in general.
“Chick-fil-A’s sponsorship of an event designed to encourage healthy living represents a significant setback for Pittsburgh as we continue our work to build a more progressive and welcoming city for all people regardless of who they are or who they love,” the letter, dated October 17, reads.
“Most importantly, its sponsorship sends the wrong message to LBGTQIA+ children and families who face psychological abuse and experience the effects of bullying at disproportionate rates,” it outlines.
The “Kids Marathon” event, to be held next May, is a one mile run that is held in conjunction with the Kids of STEEL effort, which according to the marathon website, is “a physical activity and nutrition program designed to motivate children to pursue quality nutrition and an active lifestyle by incorporating exercise and healthy eating habits into their daily routine.”
Area schools and youth programs can participate in the Kids of STEEL offerings free of charge.
However, in addition to the Pittsburgh City Council’s opposition to Chick-fil-A’s sponsorship of the marathon, the local school district also unanimously voted on Wednesday to approve a resolution against the sponsorship.
According to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, the resolution prohibits any district employee from participating in the event on an official basis (yet not a personal basis), as well as promoting the marathon in school.
“The family-owned, privately held restaurant company has expressed views contrary to and in conflict with the district’s non-discrimination policies,” it also states.
The Three Rivers Marathon told the outlet in a statement that it welcomes any organization that wants to partner with the group’s goal of helping children lead healthy lives.
“Every year through our Kids’ Marathon, P3R commits itself to encouraging kids to live healthy lives. This is a cause we’re always going to support, and we’ll always welcome anyone or any organization willing to join us in helping the kids of Pittsburgh discover the joy of running,” it said.
Chick-fil-A has signed on to be the title sponsor of both the marathon and the Kids of STEEL program for the next three years.

Cathy

As previously reported, the controversy over Chick-fil-A began in 2012 when owner Dan Cathy told Baptist Press that he is “very much supporting of the family—the biblical definition of the family unit.”
“We are a family-owned business, a family-led business, and we are married to our first wives,” he said. “We give God thanks for that.”
According to the Washington Post, Cathy had also stated on a radio broadcast that he believed that the promotion of homosexual “marriage” was evoking the wrath of God upon America.
Following initial uproar about the matter, including assertions that the company donates to organizations that oppose same-sex “marriage,” Chick-fil-A issued a statement outlining that it had never sought to donate to groups that speak against homosexuality, and that “[g]oing forward, our intent is to leave the policy debate over same-sex marriage to the government and political arena.”
In a document entitled “Who We Are,” the company also noted that “[t]here are many diverse viewpoints and opinions among those associated with Chick-fil-A,” and that “[i]f someone in Chick-fil-A offers a personal viewpoint, they do not presume to speak for everyone.”
The company also outlined its donor practices, noting that its charitable outreaches are focused in three areas: “Creating educational opportunities for our team members and youth across America,” “Food donations for those serving or those in need,” and “Developing youth and family/marriage enrichment programs and supporting our communities.”
“For many months now, Chick-fil-A’s corporate giving has been mischaracterized,” it stated, referring to the hostility it has received from pro-homosexual groups that have rejected the fast food restaurant by claiming that it gives donations to organizations that oppose same-sex “marriage.”
“Chick-fil-A’s giving heritage is focused on programs that educate youth, strengthen families and enrich marriages, and support communities. We will continue to focus our giving in those areas. … Our intent is not to support political or social agendas,” Chick-fil-A further clarified, noting that the company’s giving has always been focused on positive charities and outreaches, but not necessarily any particular social issue, such as homosexuality.
_____________________________________________________________

Pittsburgh Kids Marathon Organizers Pressured 

To Cut Ties With Chick-Fil-A

SCHOOL BOARD ALSO CANCELS SPONSORSHIP

FAKE BOMB PATSY IDENTIFIED CESAR ALTIERI SAYOC SUSPECT WAS KNOWN TO LAW ENFORCEMENT

FAKE BOMB PATSY IDENTIFIED CESAR ALTIERI SAYOC~ SUSPECT WAS KNOWN TO LAW ENFORCEMENT

Learn more about the hoax bomber here and spread this link to fight internet censorship

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/fake-bomb-patsy-identified-cesar-altieri-sayoc-suspect-was-known-to-law-enforcement/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Sources say Sayoc made bomb threats in the past and was known by police.
Watch Alex Jones’ live coverage below:
Pipe Bomb Hoax Is A Test, Bigger Event Coming

FALSE FLAG BOMBINGS ARE DISTRACTION FROM SOUTHERN INVASION

False Flag Bombings Are Distraction From Southern Invasion
FALSE FLAG BOMBINGS ARE DISTRACTION 
FROM SOUTHERN INVASION

Legacy media uses bomb hoax to distract public from migrant caravan

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/false-flag-bombings-are-distraction-from-southern-invasion/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
MSM is working overtime to use the “bomb” scare to win sympathy votes for the Democrats. Alex breaks down how this tactic is being used to distract the American people from the actual invasion force heading to America from Mexico.
Also:

WYOMING GOVERNOR’S CANDIDATE MARY THRONE IS LYING TO GUN OWNERS

Wyoming Governor's Candidate Mary Throne is Lying to Gun Owners
WYOMING GOVERNOR’S CANDIDATE MARY THRONE 
IS LYING TO GUN OWNERS 
SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2018/10/wyoming-candidate-mary-throne-is-lying-to-gun-owners/#axzz5V95mongH; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Wyoming –(AmmoLand.com)- Mary Throne is desperate.
It’s no surprise; after all, she is a hardened anti-gun politician who is trying to become the Governor of Wyoming — one of the most pro-gun states in the country.
To do that, Mary Throne is going all out in her effort to twist the facts about her record as a former state lawmaker.
Recently, in an interview with KODI and KZMQ, Throne did her best to totally reinvent herself as a stalwart supporter of the Second Amendment.
Like every gun grabber in the country, Throne began by professing her support of hunting — just like former Vice President Biden used to do — as if the Second Amendment was written to ensure our right to hunt.
Of course, you and I know that it was about the right of the people to remain armed to deal with criminals and tyrants.
But sensing that that wasn’t enough for gun owners, Throne dispensed with the truth and began to flat out lie by claiming, “I’ve never supported any kind of gun control.” Technically, you see, Throne is correct. There have not been gun control bills on the floor of the legislature for her to vote for.

But Mary Throne voted AGAINST YOUR GUN RIGHTS every chance she had during her years in Cheyenne, making her a long-time opponent of the right to keep and bear arms.

  • Mary Throne voted against silencer legislation on February 13, 2013.
  • Mary Throne voted against Constitutional Carry on February 25, 2011.
  • Mary Throne voted against the Firearms Freedom Act on March 3, 2010.
  • Mary Throne voted against the bill to allow employees to secure their firearms in their car while at work, on February 9, 2011.
I can go on and on, as Mary Throne’s war against gun owners spans almost a decade.
For Mary Throne to now claim that she’s never supported any kind of gun control is a flat out lie, and it’s insulting to every gun owner — and every voter — in Wyoming.

On the other hand, Mark Gordon has been very upfront about his support of the Second Amendment, when he signed the Wyoming Gun Owners candidate survey.

Mark Gordon for Wyoming GovernorMark Gordon for Wyoming Governor

To be clear, Mark Gordon has publicly stated that he would oppose legislation like:
  • Red Flag Gun Seizures; which would allow you to lose your gun rights based on secret court proceedings and without even being charged with a crime.
  • Universal Background Checks; which would make it a crime to transfer any firearms (even amongst family members) without going through a government check first!
  • Veterans Disarmament Act; which would disarm every American citizen under the age of 21, including those who have served in the military with distinction!
But more than what he would oppose, is the legislation that Mark Gordon has promised to sign.
As you all know, WYGO is determined to end deadly ‘Gun Free Zones’ in Wyoming, an effort that was stalled in 2017 when Governor Mead vetoed our bill.
But Mark Gordon has promised, in writing, to sign this bill into law.
Now that you have the facts, please help Wyoming Gun Owners get this message out to as many gun owners as possible between now and November 6th, 2018..
Wyoming was a bright spot in 2018 in the fight for gun rights, passing Stand-Your-Ground law while many ‘red states’ were advancing gun control. But we can’t let up now!
And with virtually everyone talking about a blue wave coming on election day, we can’t take anything for granted, either. Whatever you do, please make sure that you forward this article to more gun owners, so that they are not confused by Throne’s lies!
For Freedom,
Aaron Dorr
Policy Advisor
Wyoming Gun Owners

Wyoming Gun OwnersWyoming Gun Owners

About Wyoming Gun Owners
Wyoming Gun Owners has been a hard-hitting, no compromise, boots-on-the-ground gun rights organization here in Wyoming since 2010!
We’re dedicated to one thing: defending and advancing the 2nd Amendment rights of all law-abiding citizens in the state of Wyoming — and exposing legislators who refuse to do the same thing! www.wyominggunowners.org

ELITE U.S. UNIVERSITIES HAVE TAKEN OVER $614 MILLION FROM SAUDI ARABIA SINCE 2011

ELITE U.S. UNIVERSITIES HAVE TAKEN OVER 
$614 MILLION FROM SAUDI ARABIA SINCE 2011 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/10/elite-us-universities-have-taken-over-614000000-from-saudi-arabia-since-2011; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
This explains a great deal, for it is not only true that “these gifts and contracts, in some instances, are intended to influence students’ and faculty experts’ views on the kingdom”; it is also true that these gifts and contracts are intended to influence students’ and faculty experts’ views on Islam, jihad and Sharia. Georgetown University isn’t even on the lists below, but Saudi money funds its Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, and its Bridge Initiative, both of which are dedicated to giving the fictions that Islam is a religion of peace and Sharia is benign and compatible with democracy an intellectual veneer, while smearing and defaming all those who speak the truth about Islam and Sharia as “Islamophobes.” Georgetown’s faculty is full of Wahhabis, Salafis, and apologists for Islam, including Islamic convert and pro-slavery spokesman Jonathan A. C. Brown. And that’s just Georgetown. Imagine what it must be like at MIT, George Washington U, and the rest.
“Before Killing Of Journalist, Elite US Universities Took $600 Million From Saudi Arabia And Affiliates,” by Luke Rosiak, Daily Caller, October 23, 2018:
Before the death of a Washington Post contributor in a Saudi Arabian embassy, elite U.S. universities took more than half a billion dollars from the country and its affiliates between 2011 and 2017.
These gifts and contracts, in some instances, are intended to influence students’ and faculty experts’ views on the kingdom.
Saudi Arabian interests paid $614 million to U.S. universities over a six-year period, more than every country but Qatar and the United Kingdom, Department of Education data analyzed by The Daily Caller News Foundation shows. That includes $120 million from the Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission to the U.S., whose website says it “disseminate[s] information that reflects Saudi culture, tradition, and heritage through our active participation in academic, cultural, and social activities.”
About $200 million came in the form of gifts, while the rest were contracts. U.S. law requires universities to disclose “information about gifts received from any foreign source, contracts with a foreign entity, and any ownership interests in or control over the institution by a foreign entity.”…
Saudi-Affiliated Funding to U.S. Universities
Source: Department of Education

INSTITUTION AMOUNT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology $77,675,000
George Washington University $76,017,693
George Mason University $63,136,496
Tufts University $46,065,215
Johns Hopkins University $40,295,468
University of Kansas $30,066,721
Harvard University $28,167,613
Stanford University $27,759,040
University of Southern California $22,670,154
Northwestern University $14,408,243
Georgia Institute of Technology $13,433,882
University of California, Berkeley $13,385,510
Eastern Washington University $13,079,062
New York Institute of Technology $12,260,853
University of California, Los Angeles $12,032,553
Ball State University $10,386,082
University of Washington – Seattle $10,150,738
Much of the international affairs literature that informs the U.S. posture toward foreign nations is developed at elite institutions like George Mason University and George Washington University in the D.C. area, whose experts are widely cited. Those universities are among the top recipients of Saudi government funds.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology ranks first in Saudi-affiliated funding, thanks to a $73 million gift from Saudi business magnate Mohammed A. Jameel.
A spokesman for George Washington University did not respond to questions about the $76 million it has received….
Largest Payments
Source: Department of Education

INSTITUTION GIFT TYPE PAYER AMOUNT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Monetary Gift Jameel. Mohammed, Abdul $73,000,000
George Mason University Contract Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia $56,675,210
George Washington University Contract Government of Saudi Arabia $55,378,271
Johns Hopkins University Monetary Gift $40,295,468
Tufts University Contract Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission $38,940,121
Stanford University Monetary Gift $27,759,040
Harvard University Contract $24,917,563
University of Kansas Contract Saudi Arabian Cultural Mission $24,888,384
George Washington University Contract Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia $18,293,212
Northwestern University Contract King Abdulaziz City for Sci/Tech
1 … 510 511 512 513 514 … 792