MARXIST TERRORIST SUSPECTED OF WOUNDING SIX U.S. SOLDIERS LEADS MIGRANT MARCH, DEMANDS ENTRY INTO U.S. OR $50,000 PER PERSON

 
MARXIST TERRORIST SUSPECTED OF WOUNDING SIX U.S. SOLDIERS LEADS MIGRANT MARCH
BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
Quick question, isn’t this what we have drones for? We’ve taken out Al Qaeda terrorists for less.

A suspect in a 1987 bombing that wounded six American soldiers in
Honduras is leading a group of migrants demanding entry into the United
States.

Alfonso Guerrero Ulloa organized a march of
approximately 100 migrants to the U.S. Consulate in Tijuana, Mexico, on
Tuesday, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported. Ulloa delivered a letter
to the consulate on behalf of the migrants, asking for either entry into
the U.S. or a payment of $50,000 per person.

And so we have a suspect in a bomb attack that wounded 6 American soldiers delivering a letter to our consulate.

Ulloa has lived in Mexico since 1987 after fleeing Honduras in the
wake of a bombing that wounded six soldiers. Ulloa was suspected of
planting a bomb in a Chinese restaurant, but received asylum from
Mexico, whose government described the suspected terrorist as a “freedom
fighter.”
Ulloa posted a lengthy diatribe about the 1987 bombing to Facebook in June 2017.

In the post, Ulloa again denied any role in the bombing, though he
admitted to being a member of Popular Revolutionary Forces-Lorenzo
Zelaya — a now-defunct left-wing group whose members claimed
responsibility in 1982 for hijacking a plane and taking hostages,
including eight Americans.

The Marxist-Leninist terror group was a spinoff of the Honduras Communist party and had been trained by the Cubans.

Since American soldiers obviously don’t matter to the Left, a New York
Times story of the period also mentions that it injured Honduran
civilians.

“A bomb exploded at a restaurant in a
town north of Tegucigalpa Saturday evening, seriously injuring six
American soldiers and six Honduran civilians, officials said today.

The bomb, made from about 12 sticks of dynamite, exploded about 7:30
P.M. Saturday in the town of Comayagua at a restaurant popular among the
1,200 United States soldiers stationed at Palmerola Air Base, about 12
miles to the south.”

The Left would call those Honduran civilians, collateral damage.

EIGHT YEAR OLD NOT PERMITTED TO TELL CLASSMATES ABOUT BIBLICAL ACCOUNT OF DANIEL IN SHOW & TELL

EIGHT YEAR OLD NOT PERMITTED TO TELL CLASSMATES ABOUT BIBLICAL ACCOUNT OF DANIEL IN SHOW & TELL
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

ARLINGTON, Va. — A father in Virginia says that his
son was stopped from speaking last week as he took his Bible to school
for show-and-tell to share with his classmates about what he had been
reading in the book of Daniel.


In the article, “Preferred Gender Pronouns Required in Virginia’s Public Schools. The Bible? Not Allowed,”
published by PJ Media on Tuesday, commentator John Ellis outlined that
his eight-year-old took his Bible to school last week for the
show-and-tell segment, unbenounced to him. He learned of the situation
later.


“The teacher stopped me from speaking, and went on to the next
person. I didn’t get to tell them about Daniel,” his son advised. Ellis
said that his son was both disappointed and confused as to why he wasn’t
allowed to proceed.


“You see, my son had been reading the book of Daniel and wanted to
tell his friends about it. It was important to him,” he explained. “What
he didn’t realize is that the Bible, no matter how important to his
identity, is verboten in the brave new world of progressive tolerance.”

Ellis said that his son learned the hard way that “[t]he Bible and
those who take God’s Word seriously are not allowed a platform in
leftist America.” He contrasted the situation with the recent firing of West Point High School teacher Peter Vlaming,
who was terminated last week by a unanimous vote of the school board
after he refused repeated requests that he refer to a female student who
identifies as a boy with masculine pronouns.

Vlaming had said that the request violated his Christian convictions,
and felt like “a specific worldview is being imposed upon me.”

“If my son had been allowed to proceed, no other kid in that
classroom would have been under any obligation to listen to or care
about what was being said about the Bible. They most definitely wouldn’t
have been under any compulsion to agree with the Bible or convert,”
Ellis wrote.

“On the other hand, if a girl believes that she is a boy, it’s not
enough to allow her to believe what she wants; others are required to
accept and promote her belief, even if it violates their own faith
identity,” he lamented.

Ellis said that he believes the way his son was treated, versus the
way that the “transgender” student was treated, is “a harbinger of
things to come.”

“Make no mistake: the left has zero interest in allowing people to
express themselves. Protecting important aspects of a person’s identity
is not universal. That protection only extends to the ideology that the
left wants to promote. Anyone who gets in their way will be silenced,
like my son, or have their livelihood ripped away, like Peter Vlaming,”
he wrote.

Read the article in full here.

As previously reported, Dr. Benjamin Rush, a signer of the
Declaration of Independence and vice-president of the Bible Society of
Philadelphia, once said, “The only means of establishing and
perpetuating our republican forms of government is the universal
education of our youth in the principles of Christianity by means of the
Bible.”

He also wrote in a letter to John Adams in 1807, “By renouncing the
Bible, philosophers swing from their moorings upon all moral subjects.
Our Saviour in speaking of it calls it ‘Truth,’ in the abstract. It is
the only correct map of the human heart that ever has been published. It
contains a faithful representation of all its follies, vices &
crimes. All systems of religion, morals, and government not founded upon
it, must perish, and how consoling the thought!—It will not only
survive the wreck of those systems, but the world itself. ‘The gates of
Hell shall not prevail against it.’”

(Read here from the National Archives.)

ANTI-CHRIST POPE FRANCIS ON FEAST DAY OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE: MARY “UNTIES ONE KNOT AFTER ANOTHER” OF MEN’S “MANY WRONGS”

 https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/images/Pope_Francis_celebrates_Mass_on_the_feast_of_Our_Lady_of_Guadalupe_in_St_Peters_Basilica_Dec_12_2016_Credit_Daniel_Ibanez_1_CNA.jpg
 https://aleteiaen.files.wordpress.com/2016/12/web-our-lady-of-guadalupe-pope-francis-000_7x3eh-osservatore-romano-via-afp.jpg?quality=100&strip=all
ANTI-CHRIST POPE FRANCIS ON FEAST DAY OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE: MARY “UNTIES ONE KNOT AFTER ANOTHER” OF MEN’S “MANY WRONGS”
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

ROME — The leader of Roman Catholicism, Jorge
Bergoglio, also known as “Pope Francis,” delivered a homily on Wednesday
in recognition of the Feast Day of Our Lady of Guadalupe, a day
surrounding the claim that Mary appeared to an Aztec Indian in the
1500’s and left her image imprinted on his cloak. The observance is said
by Christians to be unbiblical and that such practices should be
examined in the light of the Scriptures.

“She walked to Tepeyac to accompany Juan Diego and she continues
walking the continent when, by means of an image or holy card, of a
candle or a medal, of a rosary or a Hail Mary, she enters a house, a
prison cell, a hospital room, an old age home, a school, a
rehabilitation clinic, to say: ‘Am I not here, who am your mother?’”
Bergoglio stated during evening mass at St. Peter’s Basilica.

“She more than anyone knows how to draw near. She is a woman who
walks with the delicateness and tenderness of a mother; she feels at
home in family life; she unties one knot after another of the many
wrongs we manage to generate; and she teaches us to remain on our feet
in the midst of the storm,” he said, according to a translation from the Catholic News Service.

As previously reported, Roman Catholic legend teaches that in 1531,
Mary appeared to a peasant farmer named Juan Diego on Mexico’s Tepeyac
Hill and requested that he petition the bishop for a church to be built
that “your people may experience my compassion.”

“All those who sincerely ask my help in their work and in their
sorrows will know my mother’s heart in this place. Here I will see their
tears; I will console them and they will be at peace,” she is reported
as stating.

As the bishop did not believe Diego’s story and asked for a sign, he
returned to the spot where he saw Mary and was told to pick the flowers
on top of the hill. The tale states that Diego found Castilian roses in
bloom when he reached the destination, even though it was December. He
gathered the flowers in his tilma, or cloak, and took them to the
bishop.

Roman Catholic legend then states that when Diego opened his cloak to
present the roses to the bishop, an image of Mary was imprinted upon
it. Mary also purportedly appeared to Diego’s uncle, Juan Bernardino,
who was sick, and his illness left him.

“Call me and call my image Santa Maria de Guadalupe,” she instructed.

The cloak stated to belong to Diego is on display at The Basilica of
Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico City, a location where Roman Catholics
make pilgrimages every year. In 1945, Pope Pius XII declared the Lady of
Guadalupe the “Patroness of all the Americas,” and a feast day was set
on the liturgical calendar for Dec. 12.

“The night before, millions of Catholics across … Mexico, Latin
America, the United States, and the globe, will pray to her and for her;
they’ll sing to her; they’ll walk on their knees toward her at her
Mexico City shrine; they will petition her for her intercession; they
will thank her for the blessings that they attribute to her; or they
simply will stand or sit in her presence basking in the warmth of their
faith during the midnight vigils at churches and homes,” reports Ernesto Portillo, Jr. of the Arizona Daily Star.

On Wednesday, Bergoglio posted a tweet
urging Catholics, “Let us beg the Virgin Mary, Our Lady of Guadalupe,
to continue accompanying and protecting the peoples of the American
continent. #VirgendeGuadalupe”

He also delivered a homily that evening, in which he stated that many
life lessons about attitude and conduct can be learned from “Mary’s
school.”

“In Mary, the Lord silenced the temptation to give protagonism the
strength of intimidation and power, to those who scream the loudest or
who assert themselves on the basis of lies or manipulation,” Bergoglio
said. “With Mary, the Lord watches over believers so that their hearts
do not harden and that they might constantly know the renewed and
renewing power of solidarity, capable of hearing God’s pulse in the
hearts of the men and women of our peoples.”

IS IT BIBLICAL?

Gendron“Many
Catholic feast days and traditions stand opposed to the supreme
authority of God’s Word and this one is no different,” Mike Gendron of
Proclaiming the Gospel Ministries told Christian News Network.


“God’s Word warns us not to believe every spirit, but to test the
spirits to see whether they are from God (1 John 4:1). Testing the
spirits is of utmost importance because apparitions either have a divine
origin or a demonic origin. Satan can disguise himself as an angel of
light (2 Cor. 11:14),” he said.


Gendron stated that the story behind the feast day rather directs
attention away from Christ to Mary, and such is the aim of the enemy of
souls.


“One of his goals is to lead people away from a pure devotion to the
Lord Jesus Christ (2 Cor. 11:2). He does this very effectively with
‘another Mary,’ who appears to deceive the world and steal the glory
that only God deserves,” he outlined. “Since the Mary of the Bible
exalted God her Savior, she would not direct Juan Diego to build a
shrine for her. We also know that the end times lyings signs and wonders
will be used by Satan to deceive the world (Matt. 24:24).”

When asked about the devotion that is given to Mary during the feast
day, such as described in the Arizona Daily Star, Gendron said that it
is unbiblical for men to seek intercession from Mary as there is only
One who serves as mediator between God and men.

“When millions of Catholics across the globe pray to Mary, we see how
effective Satan’s strategy has become. Throughout the Bible we do not
see any God fearing man or woman praying to anyone other than God. We
also know that May cannot intercede for anyone because they is only one
mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus (1 Tim. 2:5),” he
explained.

“I am grieved when I see so many Catholics zealous for their
religious traditions and feast days,” Gendron continued. “As a former
Catholic, I was never exhorted to test every spirit and to test every
man’s teaching with the supreme authority of God’s Word. This is why so
many Catholics are easily deceived. The nature of deception is that
people do not know they are deceived unless they have an infallible
source for truth. God has given us His inspired, authoritative Word to
be just that.”

Gendron, who identified as a Roman Catholic for over 30 years, now
leads a ministry to help point Roman Catholics to the Word of God and to
teach others how to do so.

“It is my prayer that every born again Christian will realize the
huge mission field the Roman Catholic Church represents,” he said. “Let
us sow the imperishable seed of God’s Word in the hearts of every
Catholic we know.”

STRASBOURG JIHADIST CHERIF CHEKATT IS DEAD, KILLED BY POLICE

STRASBOURG JIHADIST IS DEAD, KILLED BY POLICE 
 Published on Dec 13, 2018

On
December 11, 2018, a young Muslim named Chérif Chekatt shouted “Allahu
Akbar” as he opened fire at a Christmas market in Strasbourg, France,
killing three, leaving one brain-dead, and wounding many more. On the
evening of December 13, Chekatt was killed by French police. David Wood
discusses the issue.

 

LEGAL GUIDANCE: WHAT TO DO AS NEW JERSEY POLICE COME FOR YOUR GUN MAGAZINES

 GESTAPO POLICE STATE
LEGAL GUIDANCE: WHAT TO DO AS NEW JERSEY POLICE COME FOR YOUR GUN MAGAZINES
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 
Editors
Note: New Jersey readers if you had not turned in all your standard gun
magazines, that hold more than ten (10) rounds, by December 10, 2018,
the state of New Jersey has made you a felon. You are now a criminal
under the law.


Standard Capacity Magazines BanNew Jersey’s Standard Capacity Magazine BanNew Jersey – -(AmmoLand.com)-
Gun rights attorney and Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol
Clubs board member Evan Nappen, Esq. has issued legal guidance on how to
handle potential efforts by police to enforce the Murphy magazine ban.
Entitled
“Knock! Knock! Show Us Your Glock,” the insightful guide by Nappen
covers what to expect and how to protect yourself if the unthinkable
happens. Click here to view the guide online. Please share this link far
and wide among gun owners.
In the meanwhile, Association of New
Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs is gearing up for further appeal of the
legal challenge against the Murphy mag ban. Please watch for upcoming
alerts on the litigation as it continues.

Knock! Knock! – Show Us Your Glock

What to Expect & How to Protect Yourself from the Murphy Magazine Ban
By Evan F. Nappen, Attorney at Law
The Murphy Magazine Ban WILL be enforced. It is only a question of what degree it will be enforced against honest gun owners.

“The
New Jersey State Police corresponded with Breitbart News on December 11
and refused to rule out house-to-house enforcement of the state’s “high
capacity” magazine ban.”

Possession of any magazine
holding over 10 rounds that works in a semi-automatic firearm is now a
felony-level offense with a penalty of up to 18 months in prison. There
is no “grandfather clause.” If you are convicted, you lose your gun
rights for the entire United States. These standard capacity magazines,
which have been turned into contraband, are commonly being called
“Murphy Mags.”
There are four basic levels of potential
enforcement. The question is how aggressive the anti-gun-rights Murphy
administration is going to be in enforcing the Murphy Mag ban. Here are
the four possibilities:

  • Police Raids: House-to-house searches of suspected possessors.
  • Police Investigations: Interrogation of suspected possessors.
  • Demand Letters: Intimidating official letters sent to suspected possessors.
  • Random Prosecutions: Randomly prosecuting anyone caught possessing.

Police Raids
Many
gun owners are very concerned that the police will be coming door to
door and searching homes. It is unlikely to happen. The State Police
claim to have “no plans” at this time to do this. However, it is not an
unreasonable fear, considering the extremist left’s fanatical hatred of
gun owners. Ultimately New Jersey’s zealous anti-gun-rights Attorney
General could order the State Police to act. To say it will never happen
would be foolish. Although a search warrant is normally necessary,
house-to-house searches have happened without warrants if there are
“exigent circumstances.”
Approximately five years ago, this was done in
Boston when the police were looking for a terrorist suspect. Here are
some reasons/scenarios why it might happen in New Jersey:

  • Some
    highly publicized mass shooting occurs, and the knee-jerk, politically
    expedient reaction is to go after Murphy Mag possessors.
    Murphy’s
    failure to aggressively enforce his ban gives his political challengers
    the opportunity to call him out on it. There is already pressure on
    Murphy to explain how he intends to enforce the ban. Breitbart News also
    reached out to Murphy’s press secretary, Daniel Bryan, about
    enforcement of the ban. He confirmed that the Governor “…had not ruled
    out house-to-house enforcement of the ban either.”
  • New Jersey
    has a computerized database of registered gun owners & their
    registered handguns which includes make and model. Many of these
    handguns came with Murphy Mags. For example, 15 round magazines came
    standard with the Glock Model 19, Beretta Model
  • 92 and SIG Model P226, just to name three commonly possessed handguns.
  • New
    Jersey has a long history of abusing gun owners
    , creating “gun law
    victims” (destroying people’s lives with arbitrary gun laws) and
    undermining Second Amendment rights.
  • New Jersey has a liberal news media which actively acts as the propaganda arm for the anti-gun-rights movement.
  • New Jersey law enforcement will obey orders and enforce the law, rather than lose their jobs & pensions.

In
1990, the Florio Administration explored going after “Assault Firearm”
owners under the newly enacted “Assault Firearm” law, which included a
“large capacity ammunition magazine” ban. They tried to quietly sneak
through an Administrative Code provision requiring the filing of the
Certificate of Eligibility with the police on private sales of long
arms. This would have cured the break-in establishing the chain of
possession. I helped to kill it by successfully challenging the code
modification as being outside the statutory law. The Florio
Administration abandoned their scheme. Since then, the Murphy
Administration has eliminated private sales via newly passed
legislation.
There are other important differences between the Florio Ban of 1990 & the current Murphy Mag Ban:

  • There
    are substantially more, commonly possessed, standard capacity magazines
    that hold over 10 rounds, than over 15, that fit readily identifiable,
    registered handguns.
  • There was no reliable pre-existing computer database in 1990.
  • In 1990, there was not the intense fanatical hatred gun owners that exists today.
  • There was no windfall of Bloomberg money for anti-gun extremist candidates in 1990.

What to Do If the Police Raid Your Home?
A
right given up is a right lost. Do not consent to a search without a
warrant. Never physically resist. Do not sign any documents or
statements without an attorney’s advice. All citizens have a Fourth
Amendment right to a warrant being issued before their person or
premises are searched. Exceptions exist regarding the necessity for a
warrant, and a large body of law exists as to when a law enforcement
officer has probable cause for a warrantless search. However, whether
probable cause for the warrantless search exists or not, one should
never consent to a warrantless search. The key here is never consent.
 

Warning: Even if you are not home, the police can search your home based
on the consent of your spouse, roommate or a guest. If a law
enforcement officer insists on searching your home, do not resist the
search. Just make it clear that you are not consenting to this search.
Additionally, do not sign any consent form or for that matter any
document without the advice of your attorney. Law enforcement officers
cannot get a warrant simply based on your refusal, nor can they punish
you for not giving consent to search.

If a search is done in
violation of your Fourth Amendment rights, the court will suppress the
evidence obtained, and the State will not be able to use it against you
in a criminal prosecution. When you consent to a search, anything found
may be used as evidence — evidence against you — whether there was
probable cause or not! Although you may feel that you have nothing to
hide, consider that you may inadvertently possess contraband which you
believe to be legal, or that a friend may have left contraband in your
car, house, or borrowed clothing.
Police Investigations
There
is much more of a chance that the police will investigate based on
information gleaned from the computerized database of registered gun
owners and their registered handguns.
It is a relatively simple task for
state or local police to look at their database of registered gun
owners with their registered handguns and start knocking on doors to
talk to suspected possessors of handguns with standard issue Murphy Mags
(such as Glock 19, SIG P226, Beretta 92, etc.). No warrant is necessary
to investigate. Talking to suspected possessors at their homes will
possibly lead to more information justifying a search, seizure, and
arrest.
What if the police want to talk to you?
If
police knock on your door, do not open the door, ask them through the
closed door if they have a warrant. If they don’t have a warrant, do not
allow them into your home. Do not answer any questions. Simply say “I
do not want to talk to you” and do not talk to the police. The Fifth
Amendment right to remain silent and against self-incrimination is one
of the most important Constitutional rights. By remaining silent, a
person is not assisting the State in its case against him or her. This
is the purest form of self-protection. It is something everyone should
do, whether the person believes him/herself innocent or not. You cannot
be punished for a refusal to answer questions. Basically, only a court
can order you to answer questions. Remember, anything you say can be
used against you. For instance, merely affirming that you still have the
registered handgun, could lead to being searched and arrested. Lying to
the police is a crime, but remaining silent is not. So, stay silent!

Not
giving consent is not probable cause for a search.
Some people feel
that if they do not consent to the search, then the officer will think
they are guilty of hiding something. Some people are afraid of the
improper question: “What do you have to hide?” The proper question you
should ask yourself is: “Why does this law enforcement officer feel it
is necessary to invade my privacy and conduct a search without a
warrant?” This mindset properly shifts the burden to the police.
Remember, the Fourth Amendment is there to protect our privacy.
Always
remain polite when asserting your rights, but the key is to assert
them. Do not be embarrassed or intimidated into giving up your rights.
If you give up your rights (apart from making defending you that much
harder), you will have substantially increased your chance of becoming
another victim of New Jersey gun law.
Intimidation Letters
Law
Enforcement agencies might choose to send intimidating letters
demanding information based on the computerized database of registered
gun owners and their registered handguns. The letters would go to
suspected possessors of handguns with standard issue Murphy Mags. It is a
simple matter today to send letters via a database. This type of
intimidation letter is often used to collect taxes. Any information
gleaned could then be followed up with further enforcement actions.
What if you receive an intimidation letter?
Generally,
you have no obligation to respond to questions in a such letter.
Contact an attorney as soon as possible for specific advice regarding
such a letter.
Random Prosecutions
There is
no doubt that enforcement will occur by way of random prosecutions.
Police will find Murphy Mags due to Red Flag Laws, Domestic Violence
Laws, Duty to Warn Laws, safekeeping seizures, house fires, home
inspections and the endless other ways that contraband items find their
way to the authorities. You can be sure to see criminal charges on these
Murphy Mags. This is the default setting for minimum enforcement.
What if you are the subject of a random prosecution?
If
you are charged with Murphy Mag possession or any other criminal
offense, contact an attorney as soon as possible for specific advice and
representation.
Action Items:

  • Make sure that your friends and family are aware of this potential threat.
  • Make sure that your friends and family are aware of the implications of talking with the police and consenting to searches.
  • Make sure that you do not have in your possession any Murphy Mags or other prohibited items.
  • Make sure that you, your family and your friends have the mindset to stand on your rights

SUPPORT THE LAWSUIT CLICK HERE TO DONATE!

Please forward this article to every gun owner you know, and if you don’t already receive alerts from ANJRPC, please subscribe to our free email alerts for the latest Second Amendment breaking news and action alerts.
Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol ClubsAbout ANJRPC:
The
Association of New Jersey Rifle & Pistol Clubs is the official New
Jersey affiliate of the NRA and is New Jersey’s oldest, largest, and
most effective Second Amendment advocacy organization. www.anjrpc.org

  • EUROPEAN UNION ARMY USING ARMORED VEHICLES IN PARIS TO CONFRONT YELLOW VEST PROTESTORS BECAUSE FRENCH POLICE WON’T

     https://images.gulfnews.com/201812/Paris%20armoured%20cars_resources1.jpg
     Armoured vehicles bearing EU flag STORM Paris in sign European Army ALREADY created
    EUROPEAN UNION ARMY USING ARMORED VEHICLES IN PARIS TO CONFRONT YELLOW VEST PROTESTORS BECAUSE FRENCH POLICE WON’T
     Armoured vehicles bearing EU flag STORM Paris in sign European Army ALREADY created

    ARMOURED vehicles bearing the European Union flag have stormed into Paris as protesters bring the city to a standstill

     Published on Dec 11, 2018
    The
    EU is unashamed to flex their “authority” over sovereign countries that
    are members. Now the EU military is assisting with protecting the
    streets of France. Alex breaks down the decades long plan by the
    globalists to conquer nation states.

    BURN OUT AMONG PHYSICIANS IS A CRISIS IN MEDICINE THAT CAN LEAD TO MEDICAL ERRORS

    BURN OUT AMONG PHYSICIANS IS A CRISIS IN MEDICINE THAT CAN LEAD TO MEDICAL ERRORS
    BY NBC NIGHTLY NEWS
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     Up before dawn making breakfast for her two sons and daughter, who has 
    special needs… And that’s all before doctor […] starts her shift in the 
    Stanford emergency department. The busiest time in the ER, afternoon? 
    Yeah, evening. Yep. Today, Dr. […] is teaching medical students. 
    On buy days, she’ll see 15 to 20 patients and do hours of paperwork. If
     I work an eight-hour shift, I might spend two hours or three hours in 
     front of a computer, rather than at the bedside talking to my patients. 
     I imagine you did not get into the medical field to look at a computer? 
    No. At night, she’s still catching up on patient charts.

    NEW YORK GIVES ADOPTION AGENCY ULTIMATUM: CHANGE POLICY EXCLUDING UNWED OR SAME SEX HOMES, OR SHUT DOWN

      OCFS participated in kicking off Albany County’s public awareness campaign. Deputy Commissioner Laura Velez spoke at the press conference and OCFS provided an information table with safe sleep materials.
     ABOVE: LAURA VELEZ, DEPUTY COMMISSONER
    SYRACUSE REGIONAL OFFICE
     Office of Children and Family Services

    The Atrium, 100 S. Salina Street, Suite 350, Syracuse, NY 13202
    Sara Simon, Director, 315-423-1200
    Suzanne Colligan, Permanency Specialist, Adoption, 315-423-3943
    NEW YORK GIVES ADOPTION AGENCY ULTIMATUM: CHANGE POLICY EXCLUDING UNWED OR SAME SEX HOMES, OR SHUT DOWN 
    BY HEATHER CLARK
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     SYRACUSE, N.Y. — A Christian adoption agency has
    filed a federal lawsuit after the New York State Office of Children and
    Family Services (OCFS) gave the entity an ultimatum to either change its
    policies in regard to only placing children in homes with both a mother
    and father or discontinue its foster and adoption program.

    New Hope Family Services of Syracuse, which was founded in 1965 by a
    pastor and seeks “to be Christ’s hands extended to offer hope and help
    to people with pregnancy, parenting, adoption, or post-abortion
    needs,” 
    says in its complaint that it was visited in September by a
    representative of the New York OCFS for an official review that included
    meeting with staff and perusing sample records.

    Syracuse regional office Director Sara Simon later sent New Hope
    Interim Director Judy Geyer a letter that, while requesting a few policy
    adjustments, praised the organization for its work.

    “Our office found that your program has a number of strengths in
    providing adoption services within the community. One of which is the
    strong emphasis on assisting the birth parents in making an informed
    decision for their newborn, providing them time to make the decision,
    along with a supportive and detailed adoptive family selection process,”
    the correspondence read.

    However, just days later, Geyer received a phone call from Suzanne
    Colligan, who had conducted the review, to advise that a problem had
    been found with the faith-based organization’s placement policies.
    Colligan reportedly told Geyer that New Hope must allow placement with
    unmarried couples and homosexuals, or the adoption agency would be
    “choosing to close.”

    Geyer said that New Hope could in no way violate its religious
    convictions and that the organization would “never choose to close. You
    will be forcing us to close.” According to the legal challenge, Colligan
    advised during the call that “[s]ome Christian ministries have decided
    to compromise and stay open.”

    Geyer soon after received a formal letter from Laura Velez, the
    deputy commissioner of OCFS division of child welfare and community
    services.

    “It was found that the agency’s policy pertaining to not placing
    ‘children with those who are living together without the benefit of marriage’ or ‘same sex couples’ violates Title 18 NYCRR § 421.3, and is discriminatory and impermissible,” Velez wrote.

    She requested a formal response in regard to revising the policy to
    eliminate the exclusion, and warned that “should the agency fail to
    bring the policy into compliance with the regulation, OFCS will be
    unable to approve continuation of NHFS’ current adoption program and
    NHFS will be required to submit a close-out plan for the adoption
    program.”


    New Hope Family Services has consequently decided to take the matter
    to court in order to continue serving children in the state without
    having to violate their Christian convictions in the process.

    Its formal complaint states that several other faith-based agencies
    have lost their authorization because of the State’s requirements, and
    points to a quote from OCFS spokesperson Monica Mahaffey in the Buffalo
    News, in which she declared, “Discrimination of any kind is illegal and
    in this case OCFS will vigorously enforce the laws designed to
    protect the rights of children and same sex couples. … There is no place
    for providers that choose not to follow the law.”

    New Hope also outlined that it has had to turn away four prospective
    adoptive families because of OCFS’ threats, and rather refer them
    elsewhere, as well as four expectant birth mothers who wanted help
    placing their children up for adoption.

    The organization also operates its own pregnancy resource center, and
    says that its work to help mothers with unplanned pregnancies will
    likewise be negatively impacted if it is unable to place children in
    foster care or with adoptive families.

    “OCFS has conditioned New Hope’s perpetual authorization to
    perform adoption services on New Hope’s willingness to renounce or
    violate its religious beliefs pertaining to marriage and family,” the
    legal challenge states.

    “Defendant has violated the unconstitutional conditions doctrine
    by conditioning New Hope’s perpetual authorization to provide adoption
    services on its willingness to relinquish its First Amendment rights,”
    it contends.

    New Hope says that there are numerous secular adoption agencies in
    the state that work with unmarried or same-sex households, and that the
    government does not need to force a Christian organization to violate
    its mission or give up its right to the free exercise of religion to
    accomplish its purposes.

    It is seeking an injunction against OCFS enforcement, as well as a
    declaration that the government’s actions violate the adoption agency’s
    First and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

    Read the legal challenge in full here.

    APOSTATIZED CHURCH OF ENGLAND RELEASES GUIDANCE FOR ANGLICAN LEADERS TO MARK “TRANSITION” OF “TRANSGENDERS”

    APOSTATIZED CHURCH OF ENGLAND RELEASES GUIDANCE FOR ANGLICAN LEADERS TO MARK “TRANSITION” OF “TRANSGENDERS”
    BY HEATHER CLARK
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

    LONDON — The apostatized Church of England has
    released new guidance for “parishes planning services to help
    transgender people mark their transition,” a move that has raised
    concerns among those who were already worried about the direction of the denomination.


    The Church of England
    welcomes and encourages the unconditional affirmation of trans people,
    equally with all people, within the body of Christ, and rejoices in the
    diversity of that body into which all Christians have been baptized by
    one Spirit,” it reads.

    The document,
    which was written following consultation with three male priests who
    identify as women—who go by the names Tina Beardsley, Sarah Jones and
    Rachel Mann
    —was released on Tuesday after being approved by the House of
    Bishops.

    It states that if a person who identifies as the opposite sex has not
    yet been baptized, “then baptism itself would be the natural liturgical
    context for recognizing and celebrating their identity in Christ and
    God’s love for them.” If the individual was baptized in the past, then
    the rite of Affirmation of Baptismal Faith would be employed to
    “recognize liturgically a person’s gender transition.”

    “The affirmation therefore gives priority to the original
    and authentic baptism of the individual as the sacramental beginning of
    the Christian life, allowing someone who has undergone a serious and
    lasting change to re-dedicate their life and identity to Christ,” the
    directives claim.
    The document further advises leaders to avoid stereotyping and to use
    the preferred pronouns and chosen name of the church member during the
    service.
    It also provides suggestions in regard to Scripture readings for the
    service, such as Genesis 17, where God changes Sarai’s name of Sarah;
    Genesis 32, where Jacob is named Israel after wrestling with an angel;
    and Galatians 3:27-28, which says that for those baptized into Christ
    “there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there
    is neither male nor female, for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”

    The guidance also states that the person may be anointed with oil,
    presented with gifts such as a Bible with their chosen name, and invited
    to provide their “testimony,” so as to “provide both the candidate and
    congregation with an opportunity both to understand the person’s
    Christian journey and to affirm them in their identity.”
    However, some have expressed deep concern over the development,
    including Andrea Williams of Christian Concern, who serves as a lay
    member of the General Synod. Her statement was also published by the Global Anglican Future Conference (GAFCON),
    which released an open letter earlier this year urging Christians to
    “defend the gospel against threats from without and within.”
    “Today’s guidance continues the Church of England’s devastating
    trajectory towards an outright denial of God and His word, by
    undermining what it means to be baptized and to identify with Him
    through baptism,” Williams lamented.


    “The point of baptism is to identify a person with Jesus as they
    begin a life of following Him,” she noted. “Using an affirmation of
    baptism to celebrate a gender transition turns this upside down by
    encouraging people to follow their own feelings and live in identities
    contrary to how God created them.”

    Williams said that the Church of England thinks that it is being
    “loving” in releasing the guidance, but it is actually doing the
    opposite.
    “There is no need for Christians to sacrifice truth in a misguided
    attempt to be loving. It is not loving to mislead people—and wider
    society—into the falsehoods and myths of transgender ideology,” she
    remarked.
    “The Bible, God’s revealed and perfect word, does not recognize
    postmodern gender theory. Neither does the official doctrine of the
    Church of England. It is time for bishops to teach faithfully on this
    issue and for the clergy to speak with love, compassion and truth.”
    As previously reported, in July 2017, Gavin Ashenden wrote for Anglican Ink that
    the Church of England has presented a false Jesus to the world in
    matters of both homosexuality and transgenderism—which is especially
    dangerous and damning to those who are perishing.

    “Where the real Jesus saves us from our sins and offers us renewal in
    the image and furthers the likeness of God, the fake Jesus offers to
    make us comfortable in our skins, cozy with our sexual appetites and
    untroubled by having the central areas of who we are off limits to the
    interference of God,” he outlined.

    “This comes under the historic categories of both blasphemy and
    heresy,” Ashendon continued. “It interferes with peoples’ salvation. It
    replaces faith in the Living Christ with pseudo-therapy. It is an
    abandonment of the heart of the gospel; and this is done by people who
    when they use the words ‘Jesus, holy, love and acceptance,’ have twisted
    the words to mean very different things from what the Church has always
    intended.”

    ISLAMIC JIHAD: THE STRASBOURG, FRANCE CHRISTMAS MARKET MASSACRE (& THE COWARDICE OF THE MEDIA)~PRESS BENDS TO COMPLAINTS FROM MUSLIM COUNCIL

     MUSLIMS COMPLAIN ABOUT GRAPHIC NEWS HEADLINES, SO THEY ARE CHANGED TO ASSUAGE THEM
     https://www.toulouse7.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Strasbourg-Cherif-Chekatt-ennemi-public-num%C3%A9ro-1.jpeg
     http://congresoestudiantesacodres.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/au-bureau-strasbourg-inspirant-le-bureau-strasbourg-unique-christmas-markets-might-be-the-best-image-of-au-bureau-strasbourg.jpg
    ISLAMIC JIHAD: THE STRASBOURG, FRANCE CHRISTMAS MARKET MASSACRE 
    (& THE COWARDICE OF THE MEDIA)

    Published on Dec 12, 2018
     Muhammad said, “I have been made victorious with terror.” Nearly 1400
    years later, jihadis continue to strike terror into the hearts of
    infidels. On December 11, 2018, a young Muslim named Chérif Chekatt
    opened fire at a Christmas market in Strasbourg, France, killing and
    wounding many. Meanwhile, Western media sites such as the BBC and Sky
    News take orders from the Muslim Council of Britain on how to word their
    headlines. David Wood discusses the issue.

     Chérif Chekatt: Everything you need to know about Strasbourg terror suspect
     

    Published on Dec 12, 2018

    Chérif Chekatt: Everything you need to know about Strasbourg terror suspect:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/….

    Thanks for watching, subscribe for more videos:
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC9Sa…
     

    The gunman suspected of killing three people and injuring 13 near
    Strasbourg’s Christmas Market served several terms in prison for armed
    robbery and is believed to have been radicalised in prison.  29-year-old
    Chérif Chekatt has been on France’s “S” file terrorist watch list since
    2015, and his profile matches that of self-styled “jihadists” who have
    carried out other attacks in France.   Born in Strasbourg, he is a
    French citizen and has some 27 convictions in France, Germany and
    Switzerland to his name, according to Strasbourg’s public prosecutor
    Rémy Heitz. In 2016, he was released from prison in Germany and, before
    the attack on Tuesday night, was wanted in connection with an attempted
    murder and an armed robbery, according to a source close to the
    investigation.  On Tuesday morning, police raided Mr Chekatt’s home and
    found grenades, a .22 firearm and two hunting knives, but failed to
    capture him. Five associates were, however, detained. Strasbourg
    shooting map  “He fell into crime when he was still in his teens,” the
    source said.  In 2011 he was jailed for six months for assaulting a
    teenager with a broken bottle, and completed his last prison sentence in
    France in at the end of 2015, around the same time as the November 13
    Paris attacks that left 130 dead.  He went on to serve a further jail
    term in Germany for robbing a dental practice and a pharmacy, and was
    deported to France last year after completing his sentence.   The
    suspected motive for the shootings on Tuesday night is terrorism.
    “Terrorism has again struck our soil,” said Mr Heitz at a press
    conference on Wednesday, noting that witnesses heard the gunman shout
    “Allahu Akbar” during the attack.   Laurent Nunez, the junior interior
    minister, said: “The individual appears to have been radicalised in his
    religious practices during his prison terms.” Specialised anti-terrorist
    prosecutors are in charge of the investigation.  In prison, the
    suspect became known for violence and  repeated attempts to convert
    fellow-inmates to a radical form of Islam.   Before the Strasbourg
    attack, he was considered to be an extremely high-risk suspect,
    intelligence sources said.  France’s DGSI, the domestic intelligence
    service, placed him under “active” surveillance following his release
    from a French prison in 2015, Mr Nunez said.  As a child in Strasbourg,
    he grew up alongside six brothers and sisters. Although he worked for
    local authorities after leaving school, he had not been employed since
    2011.  Investigators are trying to establish whether Mr Chekatt
    travelled to Syria or Iraq to join an Islamist group, or whether he was
    radicalised entirely in France, according to sources close to the case.
    _____________________________________________________________

     France Islamic Terrorist Had 27 Previous Convictions
    BY DANIEL GREENFIELD
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     
    These “lone wolf” Muslim terrorists invariably have a track record.

    Before they actually carry out an attack, they’ve usually spent years
    enriching the European countries they settled in with a long record of
    petty crime, violent attacks and drug dealing.
    Cherif Chekkat, who opened fire at the Strasbourg Christmas market, has the expected record.

    Chekkat was born in Strasbourg in February 1989, into a family with
    Moroccan roots, and appears to have fallen first into petty crime then
    gangster circles. The final stage, his apparent move into Islamic
    extremism, was reportedly sparked – or at least strengthened – during a
    spell in prison between 2013 and 2015.

    This is typical enough. As I noted in a previous article on the gang rape in Freiburg, these guys usually have a track record.

    29.

    That’s how many crimes one single Syrian migrant had allegedly
    committed since entering Germany four years ago. He had already
    been wanted for drug trafficking and had been investigated for a rape
    last year. And then he struck again, this time in a case that has once
    again torn apart a sleepy college town.
    Majid and another of
    the suspects had already been suspected of the rape of another
    20-year-old woman in her home. And Majid had also been suspected of
    committing yet another sexual assault. He was also due to be arrested
    shortly for drug trafficking, but before the police could take him in,
    he struck again and destroyed a young woman’s life.

    This is what’s Europe’s criminals and terrorists look like.

    TWITTER WARNS FOES OF JIHAD TERROR & SHARIA OPPRESSION THAT THEIR TWEETS VIOLATE PAKISTANI BLASPHEMY LAWS

    TWITTER WARNS FOES OF JIHAD TERROR & SHARIA OPPRESSION THAT THEIR TWEETS VIOLATE PAKISTANI BLASPHEMY LAWS 
    BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

    People have long debated the question of how a free society can lose
    its freedom without a fight. It doesn’t happen overnight. It happens in
    full view as people help usher in authoritarianism, such as modern-day
    Leftists who ally with Islamic supremacists and those who continue to
    deny the reality that it is indeed happening. The actions of Twitter
    should raise serious concern for everyone who supports free societies.

    Twitter has become a Sharia police. 
    Last month, as Jihad Watch noted,
    Ensaf Haidar, the wife of Raif Badawi, “who has been languishing for
    years in a Saudi prison for ‘insulting Islam,’” posted an anti-niqab
    tweet on twitter. She received a notice from Twitter that she was in
    violation of Pakistani law.

    Canadian columnist Anthony Furey also received an email from Twitter
    warning him about violating Pakistan’s blasphemy laws for his posting of
    cartoons of Muhammad years ago.
    Imam Mohammad Tawhidi from Australia is
    a third person to receive the same such warning.

    Add to this the fact that Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan vowed to go to the UN to stop all Muhammad cartoons and criticism of Islam.

    Pakistan is a state sponsor of jihad terror that is actively
    exporting jihad beyond its borders. Aside from spreading Sharia
    blasphemy laws, its spy agency, Inter Service Intelligence,
    is now manipulating the general elections in Bangladesh that are coming
    up this month in order to help the jihadist Bangladesh Nationalist
    Party (BNP) and Jamaat e Islami Bangladesh (JIB) to be part of the next
    government.


    “Twitter warns global users their tweets violate Pakistani law,” Channel News Asia, December 11, 2018:

    WASHINGTON: When Canadian columnist Anthony Furey
    received an email said to be from Twitter’s legal team telling him he
    may have broken a slew of Pakistani laws, his first instinct was to
    dismiss it as spam.


    But after Googling the relevant sections of Pakistan’s penal code,
    the Toronto Sun op-ed editor was startled to learn he stood accused of
    insulting the Prophet Mohammad – a crime punishable by death in the
    Islamic republic – and Twitter later confirmed the correspondence was
    genuine.

    His perceived offense was to post cartoons of the prophet several years ago.

    Furey and two prominent critics of extremism in Islam say they are
    “shocked” to have received notices by the social media giant this past
    week over alleged violations of Islamabad’s laws, despite having no
    apparent connection to the South Asian country.

    They say the notices amount to an effort to stifle their voices – a
    charge Twitter denies, arguing the notices came about as a result of
    “valid requests from an authorized entity,” understood to mean Pakistan,
    helped users “to take measures to protect their interests,” and the
    process is not unique to any one country.

    But Furey is the third prominent user in the space of days to publicly complain about receiving a message linked to Pakistan.

    The other two are Saudi-Canadian activist Ensaf Haidar and Imam
    Mohammad Tawhidi, a progressive Muslim scholar from Australia who was
    born in Iran.

    Both are outspoken critics of religious extremism and have accused
    the social media giant of helping to silence progressive ideas within
    Islam.

    ‘VALIDATES BLASPHEMY LAWS’

    Furey, who detailed his experience in a column for his newspaper on
    Saturday (Dec 8), told AFP: “I’m somewhat alarmed that Twitter would
    even allow a country to make a complaint like this, as it almost
    validates their absurd blasphemy laws.”

    The tweet in question was a collage of cartoons of Mohammad that he posted four years ago.

    “Looking back, I remember I did it right after there had been an
    ISIS-inspired attack in retaliation over the cartoons,” Furey wrote in
    his column, adding he had not posted similar material before or since….

    GESTAPO TYRANNY: NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE REFUSE TO RULE OUT DOOR TO DOOR DISARMAMENT

     
     THE GESTAPO ARE COMING!
     https://media.breitbart.com/media/2018/12/new-jersey-state-police-troopers-salute-getty-18-getty-640x480.jpg
    POLICE STATE NEW JERSEY’S SEARCH & SEIZURE MENTALITY EXPANDS
    NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE REFUSE TO RULE OUT DOOR TO DOOR DISARMAMENT 
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     

    Breitbart News reports that the New Jersey State Police have “refused
    to rule out house-to-house enforcement of the state’s ‘high capacity’
    magazine ban,” in correspondence from the Garden State’s law-enforcement
    agency to the news organization.

    As of December 11, it is a fourth-degree felony in New Jersey to
    possess a “large capacity ammunition magazine,” which is defined as “a
    box, drum, tube or other container which is capable of holding more than
    10 rounds of ammunition to be fed continuously and directly therefrom
    into a semi-automatic firearm.”

    Governor Phil Murphy signed a slate of gun-control measures into law
    in June, including the so-called large capacity ammunition magazine ban.
    A story in Freebeacon reported that the new statute “gave
    New Jersey gun owners who currently possess the magazines in question
    180 days to either surrender them, permanently modify them to only
    accept up to 10 rounds, or transfer them to somebody who is allowed to
    legally own them.” The grace period expired yesterday, December 10.
    In what can only be interpreted as an omen of impending and expanding
    infringement of the right to keep and bear arms, the Third Circuit
    Court of Appeals handed down an opinion last week declaring the New
    Jersey ban to be “constitutional.”
    In the majority opinion, Judge Patty Shwartz wrote: “New Jersey’s law
    reasonably fits the State’s interest in public safety and does not
    unconstitutionally burden the Second Amendment’s right to self-defense
    in the home.”


    Since when was the Second Amendment’s protection confined to “self-defense in the home?”

    Never!

    For evidence that this limitation never entered the mind of the Founding Generation, let’s look at the Militia Act of 1792.
    Prior to the enactment of that law, President George Washington spoke
    to the House of Representatives, saying that “a free people ought not
    only to be armed, but disciplined.” In response to this exhortation and
    as an indication of their own legislative will, Congress adopted the
    Militia Act of 1792, which required every “free able bodied white male
    citizen” between the ages of 18 and 45 “to provide himself with a good
    musket of firelock,” and the “requisite type and amount of ammunition.”
    Henry Knox, Washington’s secretary of war, was the sponsor of this
    bill, and during deliberation on the matter he echoed his boss’s point
    of view, saying that “all men of legal military age should be armed,”
    claiming that such a force of citizen soldiers is the “capital security
    of a free Republic.”
    And to put a cap on the concept, during congressional consideration
    of the proposal, Thomas Fitzsimmons of Pennsylvania said, “As far as the
    whole body of the people are necessary to the general defense, they
    ought to be armed.”
    So much for Judge Schwartz’s opinion that the Second Amendment was written to scare off burglars.
    Anyone convicted of violating the magazine ban faces 18 months in prison, a $10,000 fine, or both.
    Breitbart News reached out to New Jersey state law-enforcement
    officials “to ask how they planned to enforce the newly enacted ban. We
    asked whether they would enforce it on a traffic-stop basis — checking
    magazines in firearms when they pulled over drivers for speeding,
    reckless driving, etc. — or whether they would enforce it by going to
    house-to-house to check magazine capacity in the firearms New Jersey
    residents kept in their homes.”
    The reply is, sadly, not surprising and not at all direct.
    “We do not discuss enforcement strategies,” was all the New Jersey State Police would say.

    While that’s not a “yes,” it’s not a “no” either.
    Breitbart explained that they enquired about the enforcement plan
    because “Americans always fear Second Amendment prohibitions will lead
    to knocks on their doors.”
    As well they should.
    Americans have had to suffer attempts by law enforcement to seize
    their ammunition and firearms for a couple of centuries. In fact, it was
    the British plan to disarm Bostonians that flamed the fire of
    separation that the king and Parliament had kindled years earlier.
    Our Founding Fathers knew, and Americans should remember, that the
    “shot heard ‘round the world” on Lexington Green on April 19, 1775 was
    fired because King George sent British troops to seize the patriots’
    ammunition stockpile stored outside of that small Massachusetts
    village.
    They knew that in the days following that battle, British general
    Thomas Gage ordered soldiers to go house to house in Boston,
    confiscating all weapons from civilians.
    Beyond and before their personal experience with disarmament as a
    tool of tyranny, our Founding Fathers learned the history of Rome and
    Greece, and from their childhood they were well aware of this tactic
    popular with those who sought to rule over the formerly free people of
    the past.
    Our Founding Fathers very well intended that every American be armed,
    believing that such was the only way to avoid being enslaved by
    tyrants. They knew from their study of history that a tyrant’s first
    move was always to disarm the people, and generally to claim it was for
    the people’s safety, and to establish a standing army so as to convince
    the people that they didn’t need arms to protect themselves, for the
    tyrant and his professional soldiers would do it for them.
    In ancient Greece, Aristotle reported that the tyrant Pisistratus,
    after winning the battle of Pallenis, “seized the government and
    disarmed the people.” Then, when the people were finally fed up with the
    taxes and the tyranny, they had to turn to Sparta for relief, for their
    own weapons were long ago surrendered to a despot promising to be
    “kindly and mild.”
    The record is clear. Our Founding Fathers knew from sad experience
    and from their study of history that one of the telltale signs of a
    tyrant is the disarmament of anybody who might oppose him. It was true
    in Athens circa 490 B.C., and it is true in New Jersey in 2018.
    ______________________________________________________________

     Blue Cities Announce Plans To Confiscate Guns 
    In Red Rural Areas

    ROBERTS, KAVANAUGH JOIN LIBERAL SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN REJECTION OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD DEFUNDING CASES

     MURDER OF UNBORN BABIES IS NOT “HEALTH CARE”, EXCEPT IF YOU COME FROM COMMUNIST CHINA’S BRAINWASHING
     http://i.yomyomf.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/12164024/Dm64IpoW4AE5SwT-1024x1024.jpg
    ROBERTS, KAVANAUGH JOIN LIBERAL SUPREME COURT JUSTICES IN REJECTION OF 
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD DEFUNDING CASES 
    BY HEATHER CLARK
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

    WASHINGTON — U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John
    Roberts and newly-appointed Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the liberal
    judges on the nation’s highest court on Monday to turn down appeals from
    two states challenging lower court rulings striking down efforts to
    defund Planned Parenthood’s participation in state Medicaid programs.


    Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch were the only
    three of the nine judges who dissented with the decision not to hear
    the cases of Gee v. Planned Parenthood (out of Louisiana) and Anderson v. Planned Parenthood (out of Kansas). Four votes are needed to hear a case.

    13 states had joined Louisiana and Kansas in amicus briefs, urging
    the Supreme Court to hear the appeals. Supportive states included
    Georgia, Idaho, Missouri, Michigan, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, West
    Virginia, Wyoming, Utah and Wisconsin.
    “The circuits are divided over whether Medicaid beneficiaries have a
    private right of action to challenge a state’s disqualification of a
    provider under the Medicaid Act. Five circuits have decided that
    the Medicaid provider-choice provision may be privately enforced under
    Section 1983, while one has held that it may not,” the Gee brief
    outlines.

    It asked the court clear up the matter since “[u]ntil this split is
    resolved, patients in the Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Tenth
    Circuits have the right to bring suit in federal court if their
    preferred provider’s agreement is terminated, while patients in the
    Eighth Circuit do not.”
    Read the briefs here and here.
    Chief Justice Clarence Thomas wrote an explanation of his dissent
    from the majority, noting that the cases before the court wouldn’t have
    even dealt with the legality of abortion, and that he fears his
    colleagues rejected the appeals simply because the name Planned
    Parenthood was involved.
    “So what explains the court’s refusal to do its job here? I suspect
    it has something to do with the fact that some respondents in these
    cases are named ‘Planned Parenthood,’” Thomas lamented. “That makes the
    court’s decision particularly troubling, as the question presented has
    nothing to do with abortion.”
    “It is true that these particular cases arose after several States
    alleged that Planned Parenthood affiliates had, among other things,
    engaged in ‘the illegal sale of fetal organs’ and ‘fraudulent billing
    practices,’ and thus removed Planned Parenthood as a state
    Medicaid provider,” he continued. “But these cases are not about
    abortion rights. They are about private rights of action under the
    Medicaid Act.”
    Thomas added, “Resolving the question presented here would not even
    affect Planned Parenthood’s ability to challenge the States’ decisions;
    it concerns only the rights of individual Medicaid patients to bring
    their own suits.”
    Read the dissent in full here.
    Planned Parenthood applauded the appeal rejection, with new president
    Leana Wen referring to the abortion and contraceptive giant’s
    sexually-centered business as one of providing “health care.”


    “We are pleased that lower court rulings protecting patients remain
    in place,” she said. “Every person has a fundamental right to health
    care, no matter who they are, where they live, or how much they earn. As
    a doctor, I have seen what’s at stake when people cannot access the
    care they need, and when politics gets in the way of people making their
    own health care choices.”

    Psalm 119:136 says, “Rivers of waters run down mine eyes because they keep not Thy law.”

     ____________________________________
    The Healthcare Fallacy of Planned Parenthood 
    and Dr. Leana Wen
     Dr. Leana Wen is Planned Parenthood’s new director and the organization
    has turned up the rhetoric: Planned Parenthood is all about legit, good
    old fashioned women’s healthcare. I know, right? Who knew. I address the
    fallacy underlying their claims.

    SEE ALSO:
    https://christiannews.net/2018/12/26/new-planned-parenthood-president-birth-control-abortion-are-standard-medical-care/ 
    EXCERPTS:
     “In a recent social media post, new Planned Parenthood President Leana
    Wen asserted that the organization’s services, which include the
    provision of contraceptives and abortions, are “standard medical care,”
    and healthcare is a “basic human right.”

    “From here on out, we want to be clear: Planned Parenthood services,
    from birth control to cancer screenings and abortion, are standard
    medical care,” she wrote
    on Dec. 16. “Reproductive healthcare is healthcare. Women’s healthcare
    is healthcare. And healthcare is a basic human right. #ThisIsHealthcare”

    The following day, Wen tweeted,
    “Denying people healthcare perpetuates inequality. Keeping people
    unhealthy is a tool of oppression. The American people want more
    healthcare, not less. We want healthcare protected, expanded, and
    treated as a fundamental human right. #ThisIsHealthcare””

    RUSSIAN TU-160 BOMBERS IN VENEZUELA

     https://cdn.airplane-pictures.net/images/uploaded-images/2013/5/19/290417.jpg
     https://www.cgstudio.com/imgd/l/96/59e49dd8a7024874178b4567/strategic_bomber_tupolev_tu_160_blackjack_03.jpg
    RUSSIAN TU-160 BOMBERS IN VENEZUELA 
     US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has slammed Russia for sending
    long-range bombers to Venezuela for a joint military operation. Moscow
    retaliated saying Pompeo’s statement was ‘absolutely inappropriate’…

    RT’s Maria Finoshina witnessed the arrivals of the bombers earlier on
    Monday.

      Russia Deploys Two Strategic Bombers To Poor Venezuela, U.S. Outraged

     The United States is blasting Russia for deploying two strategic bombers
    to Venezuela.

    “The Russian and Venezuelan people should see this for what it is: two
    corrupt governments squandering public funds and squelching liberty and
    freedom while their people suffer,” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo
    tweeted Tuesday.

    The Kremlin responded to Pompeo’s comments, calling them “unacceptable”
    and “highly undiplomatic for a secretary of state.”

    Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the U.S. has no business criticizing the
    money being spent on the drills, saying just half of the U.S. defense
    budget could feed all of Africa.

    Two Russian planes capable of carrying nuclear bombs landed in Venezuela
    Monday for what Venezuelan officials call air force drills designed to
    bolster its defense capabilities.

    Russia also sent about 100 pilots and other military personnel.

    The commander of Russia’s strategic aircraft, General Sergei Kobylash,
    said the drills “will help us understand better how Venezuela’s pilots
    are organized and trained.”

    Russia sent the planes after Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro held
    talks in Moscow last week with Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has
    expressed support for the socialist government.

    The United States has been fiercely critical of Maduro and what it calls
    his rigged elections and corrupt policies that suppress human rights
    and free speech.

    The collapse in world energy prices has also left oil-rich Venezuela’s
    economy in tatters. Many basic foods and medicine are in severely short
    supply and thousands of Venezuelans flee the country every day.

    Maduro blames his country’s problems on the United States and what he
    says is its support for the opposition.

    Putin Watches Debut of New Tu-160 
    Blackjack Supersonic Jet

    CHINA DEMANDS CHRISTIANS RENOUNCE THEIR FAITH AS PERSECUTION INCREASES~COMMUNISTS HELPED BY GOOGLE TO CENSOR, SPY & TRACK THEIR ACTIVITIES

     

    The Apostle Peter says, “Beloved, do not be surprised at the fiery trial
    when it comes upon you to test you, as though something strange were
    happening to you. But rejoice insofar as you share Christ’s sufferings,
    that you may also rejoice and be glad when his glory is revealed. If you
    are insulted for the name of Christ, you are blessed, because the
    Spirit of glory and of God rests upon you.”  

    (1 Peter 4:12-14)

     Letter Collage.jpg

    How China uses intimidation, negotiation to bringChristians under its control

     CHINA DEMANDS CHRISTIANS RENOUNCE 

    THEIR FAITH, AS PERSECUTION INCREASES
     Why is it that the United States is consistently involving itself in
    religious and cultural wars in other countries, but says nothing as
    China rounds up Christians and demands they renounce their faith in
    Christ?

    WHAT’S THE AGENDA CAUSING U.S. TO OVERLOOK THESE CHRISTIANS? 

    SEE: https://christiannews.net/2018/12/10/more-than-100-sichuan-house-church-members-arrested/
    AND: 
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6478413/Time-come-Chinese-police-detain-prominent-house-church-leaders.html
    http://the-trumpet-online.com/chinese-christians-stand-strong-face-persecution/ 
    https://christiannews.net/2018/12/16/early-rain-covenant-church-worships-in-park-after-building-blocked-by-police-those-leading-gathering-taken-away/ 
    https://christiannews.net/2018/12/18/chinese-officials-force-third-prominent-house-church-to-close/ 
    https://christiannews.net/2018/12/25/man-with-chinas-early-rain-church-testifies-of-time-in-detention-everyone-eagerly-wanted-to-hear-the-gospel/ 
     CHINESE GOVERNMENT VIOLENTLY SHUTS DOWN LARGE CHURCHES
    (Friday Church News Notes, December 28, 2018, www.wayoflife.org
    fbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) – The following is excerpted from
    “Hong Kong Christians Protest Brutal China Crackdown,” Breitbart, Dec.
    23, 2018: “On December 9, Chinese security forces carried out a series
    of coordinated raids on the Early Rain Covenant Church, one of the most
    prominent house churches in China, arresting as many as a hundred
    members, including Pastor Wang Yi and his wife. According to Gina Goh,
    Southeast Asia regional manager for International Christian Concern,
    officials beat, tortured, and denied food and restroom accommodations to
    the Christian detainees. Some of the Christians were dragged along the
    ground, stepped on, bound to chairs, and had handfuls of hair pulled
    from their scalp, Goh said. Six days later, authorities repeated
    the exercise on the Rongguili Church in Guangzhou, the largest
    unregistered church in south China. Local officials shut down the
    church, interrupting a children’s Bible class, and confiscated some
    4,000 religious books. The pre-Christmas raids are part of an escalating
    crackdown on house churches and unsanctioned Christians, as part of an
    effort by the Xi regime to secure absolute control over all religious
    activities in the country. So far this year, there have been more than
    10,000 cases of Christians being detained in China, compared with just
    over 3,000 cases for the whole of last year, according to Bob Fu of
    China Aid, a U.S.-based Christian non-profit organization.”

     Members of the Early Rain Church have been unable to contact pastor Wang Yi, the church's founder, or his wife (both pictured) after the incident on Sunday
    ABOVE: 
    Members of the Early Rain Church have been unable to contact pastor Wang
    Yi, the church’s founder, or his wife (both pictured) after the
    incident on Sunday

     Elder of Chinese Church Pens Letter in Hiding 

    as Over 100 Members Detained: 
    ‘We Are in the Hands of the Lord’

    SEE: https://christiannews.net/2018/12/12/elder-of-chinese-church-pens-letter-in-hiding-as-over-100-members-arrested-we-are-in-the-hands-of-the-lord/;
    EXCERPTS:
     CHENGDU — An elder of Early Rain Covenant Church
    penned a handwritten letter providing spiritual exhortation and guidance
    on how the church should proceed in the middle of persecution as over
    100 members, including pastors, elders and deacons, were detained on
    Sunday by Chinese police.

    “Beloved brothers and sisters, do you have joy?” asked Li Yingqiang.
    “Are you rejoicing in the fact that you are suffering with Christ
    because of this church? Do you know that we are blessed?”


    “The Lord is bestowing on us poor people today treasures of glory
    from Heaven!” he wrote. “The Lord himself is bestowing on us weak people
    comfort from Heaven! The Lord Jesus is shining on us blind people his
    great light. Those of us brothers and sisters standing on the front
    lines of the gospel war will earn great spiritual riches!”

     Reports state that the church was shut down because it was
    “unauthorized.” Members of the church posted images to the Early Rain
    Facebook page of bruises and torn clothing that they allegedly suffered
    at the hands of the Chinese police.

    SEE FULL LETTER FROM ELDER HERE:

     http://www.chinapartnership.org/blog/2018/12/how-the-church-should-face-persecution-a-handwritten-letter-from-early-rains-last-elder

    AND VIDEOS OF CHURCH ARRESTS & ELDER HERE, INCLUDING PHOTOS OF INJURIES BY POLICE:  
     https://lidblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2ow1l2-1200x630.jpg
     http://media3.mic.com/YmE5YTM4YmIwOCMvZmJ1RGl2emx4ZkhDTVBSTldEWl81YUhPWEJBPS8xNXg1NToxMDY1eDcyNy85MDB4NTc2L2ZpbHRlcnM6cXVhbGl0eSg3MCkvaHR0cDovL3MzLmFtYXpvbmF3cy5jb20vcG9saWN5bWljLWltYWdlcy9ybDl1eW4zajlueHM5cWxiOTR1cnp3bmR6NXpkaWhndnF4dG1hZG95aDdwenNwcnNyeXd5bGFtcmhneXY1dWd6LmpwZw==.jpg
    California Democrat Congressman: 
    “I’d Love To Be Able To Regulate ‘Free Speech'”

     End Freedom of Speech Says 
    Democrat Congressman Ted Lieu

     

    TRUMP FRUSTRATED ON BORDER WALL AS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION CONTINUES~THREATENS SHUT DOWN OF GOVERNMENT IF DEMOCRATS REMAIN INTRANSIGENT

     President Trump Vs Pelosi, Schumer 
    at EXPLOSIVE Press Briefing 
    on Border Wall Budget
     Trump speaks to press after threatening 
    government shutdown
     TRUMP FRUSTRATED ON BORDER WALL 
    AS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION CONTINUES
    BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     

    Time is running out for President Trump to lock down the money for
    what he calls his “Great Wall” on the border, news that coincides with a
    rise in illegal immigration apart from the migrant horde that threatens
    invasion from the border city of Tijuana.
    If Congress doesn’t fund Trump’s No. 1 priority before this session
    ends, he’ll have to deal with leftist, open-borders Democrats who have
    said they won’t fund a wall, since this would stop the importation of
    more future Democratic voters. That they will not allow to happen.
    So as the wall remains unbuilt, the illegal-alien invasion threat is building.
    Trump Tweets: The Military Can Build It
    Trump hammered the Democrats again this morning on Twitter.
    “Ice, Border Patrol and our Military have done a FANTASTIC job of securing our Southern Border,” he tweeted.
    “A Great Wall would be, however, a far easier & less expensive
    solution. We have already built large new sections & fully renovated
    others, making them like new.
    But “for strictly political reasons and because they have been pulled
    so far left,” the Democrats “do NOT want Border Security,” he continued.
    “They want Open Borders for anyone to come in. This brings large scale
    crime and disease. Our Southern Border is now Secure and will remain
    that way.”

    Then The Donald warned that if Democrats won’t help him build his
    Great Wall, he will do it himself on this own authority by conscripting
    the military. “People do not yet realize how much of the Wall, including
    really effective renovation, has already been built,” he tweeted.
    “If the Democrats do not give us the votes to secure our Country, the
    Military will build the remaining sections of the Wall. They know how
    important it is!”
    That move, undoubtedly, would inspire political and perhaps legal hurricane.
    Trump wants
    $5 billion for the wall and has said he’ll let the some of the
    government shut down next week — once, again, Congress is at an impasse
    on the budget — if Congress doesn’t give him what he wants.
    But he does look forward to meeting with Democrat chieftains Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer. Pelosi has said the wall is merely a sign that Trump is insecure about his masculinity.
    Illegal Immigration Continues
    While Trump battles
    Congress over funding for his border wall, illegal immigration remains a
    growing problem, highlighting the need for better control of our
    southern border.
    U.S. Border Patrol agents collared
    a whopping 51,856 people, including 25,172 “family units” and 5,283
    unaccompanied minors, trying to sneak into the country in November, the
    second month of fiscal 2019.
    In October, the number of illegals who jumped the border was 51,001,
    including 23,115 “family units” and 4,982 unaccompanied minors.
    So thus far this year, the Border Patrol has cuffed more than 100,000 illegal aliens.
    That is nearly double the number of illegals the Border Patrol caught in fiscal 2018: 25,488 in October and 29,085 in November, or 54,573.
    For all of last year, border police caught 396,579, not counting the
    124,511 migrants who presented themselves at ports of entry but were
    deemed inadmissible.
    But Democrats don’t want to build a wall.
    Migrant Horde Adding To Illegal-Alien Threat
    The so-called migrant caravan isn’t helping matters.
    Members of the 6,000-strong horde, who carry communicable diseases as Trump noted, are sneaking into the country with alarming regularity.
    Migrants are digging under the border fence, as The New American reported yesterday, as well as squeezing through gaps and even hopping over when pregnant.
    A pregnant Honduran traveled with the caravan, she admitted, just so
    she could give birth on U.S. territory because the new infant would be a
    U.S. citizen.
    Last week, reporters witnessed more than two dozen of the
    law-flouting illegals using ropes made of blankets to breach the fence
    near Tijuana.
    Once in, they falsely claim asylum, knowing, undoubtedly, that U.S.
    officials cannot remove them before the lengthy rigmarole involved in
    such an application is complete. That permits them time to deliver
    children, or if they wish, simply disappear.
    They also know that sympathetic leftists in the U.S. government will not help immigration authorities catch them.
    Just last week, New Jersey’s Democratic attorney, whose parents were born in India, published an order forbidding state law-enforcement authorities from helping immigration officials collar illegal aliens.
    While building an effective barrier on our southern border is
    certainly one solution to the problem of illegal immigration, perhaps a
    better solution would be to stop incentivizing the illegal immigration
    in the first place. Ending birthright citizenship, actually enforcing
    laws against hiring illegal immigrants, and refusing to offer
    non-citizens any form of government benefits would go a long way toward
    stopping the problem. If you don’t make entering the country illegally
    worth their while, people usually won’t do it. 

    ______________________________________________________

     Chuck Schumer Slams President Trump 
    For Wanting Shutdown
     

    LATEST VIDEOS OF MACRON’S UNLEASHING REPRESSION OF YELLOW VEST PROTESTORS~ARRESTS & INJURIES MULTIPLY, BUT GLOBALISTS SUFFER MORE

    LATEST VIDEOS OF MACRON’S UNLEASHING REPRESSION OF YELLOW VEST PROTESTORS~
    ARRESTS & INJURIES MULTIPLY

    MARINE LEPEN NOW MORE POPULAR THAN MACRON
    12 FRENCH GENERALS SIGN LETTER WARNING MACRON OF TREASON IF HE SIGNS MIGRANT PACT

    Published on Dec 11, 2018

    TWITTER: @99freemind
    I look at the French Generals shocking open letter to the French President and combine that with a recent Q drop. Both seem to indicate that there is no time left for ‘passionate political debate.’ We are in a war.

    The Globalists call us Populists and Nationalists as if those are bad things! They use that excuse to keep us out of debates, out of the public square, and will not tolerate criticism. They are building their New World Order and they will not tolerate debate. In short, they have declared war.

    Would you like to support my work? You can do so here:
    https://paypal.me/PollyStGeorge


    GOOGLE’S SUNDAR PICHAI LIES TO CONGRESS ABOUT TRACKING LOCATION OF USERS, CREATING “DRAGONFLY” CENSORED SEARCH ENGINE

     Human Rights Groups Fire Broadside at Google
     Google’s congressional hearing highlights

     GOOGLE’S SUNDAR PICHAI LIES TO CONGRESS ABOUT TRACKING LOCATION OF USERS 

     Falsely claims users can opt out
    BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     

    Google CEO Sundar Pichai lied to Congress during testimony
    today when he claimed that users could opt out of Google’s location
    tracking services, a claim that the Associated Press previously found to
    be false.

    During his appearance in front of the the
    House Judiciary committee for a hearing entitled: Transparency &
    Accountability: Examining Google and its Data Collection, Use and
    Filtering Practices, Pichai claimed that users had control of what
    information Google stored about them.
    “For Google services, you
    have a choice of what information is collected, and we make it
    transparent,” Pichai said, adding, “We give clear toggles, by category,
    where they can decide whether that information is collected, stored, or –
    more importantly – if they decide to stop using it.”
    However, this is categorically untrue.
    As
    an investigation by the Associated Press back in August confirmed,
    Google is tracking the location of its users even when the location
    tracking option is turned off.
    “An Associated Press investigation
    found that many Google services on Android devices and iPhones store
    your location data even if you’ve used a privacy setting that says it
    will prevent Google from doing so,” the news agency reported.
    Even
    with the option to pause location history turned off, “Some Google apps
    automatically store time-stamped location data without asking,” states
    the report.
    Google’s maps app stores a snapshot of your location
    whenever you open it, daily weather updates on Android also record your
    rough location and Google searches also pinpoint and store your precise
    latitude and longitude down to a single square foot.
    Before Pichai gave his testimony, he was confronted by Alex Jones and Roger Stone.
    Anti-censorship
    activists who accuse Google of working with the Chinese government to
    out political dissidents have also made their presence felt at the
    hearing.
    ______________________________________________________________

    Human Rights Groups Fire 
    Broadside at Google

    Over 60 groups accuse Google of facilitating repressive state censorship

    SEE: https://www.infowars.com/human-rights-groups-fire-broadside-at-google/ republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

    More than 60 human rights groups are now taking aim at Google
    over its development of a censored search engine custom made for China.

    The
    groups say that Google has downplayed concerns over Dragonfly, the
    search engine project designed to restrict information on human rights
    and other subjects forbidden by the Chinese government.
    According to The Intercept:

    A prototype for the censored search engine was designed to
    blacklist broad categories of information about human rights, democracy,
    and peaceful protest. It would link Chinese users’ searches to their
    personal cellphone number and store people’s search records inside the
    data centers of a Chinese company in Beijing or Shanghai, which would be
    accessible to China’s authoritarian Communist Party government.


    If the plan proceeds, “there is a real risk that Google would
    directly assist the Chinese government in arresting or imprisoning
    people simply for expressing their views online, making the company
    complicit in human rights violations,” the human rights groups wrote in a letter that will be sent to Google’s leadership on Tuesday.


    The letter, written by groups from all over the world, doesn’t mince words:

    New details leaked to the media strongly suggest that if
    Google launches such a product it would facilitate repressive state
    censorship, surveillance, and other violations affecting nearly a
    billion people in China. Media reports state that Google has built a
    prototype that censors “blacklisted” search terms including “human
    rights,” “student protest” and “Nobel Prize,” including in journalistic
    concerns, and links users’ search queries to personal phone numbers. The
    app would also force users to sign in to use the service, track and
    store location information and search histories, and provide “unilateral
    access” to such data to an unnamed Chinese joint venture company, in
    line with China’s data localization law – allowing the government
    virtually unfettered access to this information.


    China represents over 18% of the world population.

    Also, keep in mind that numerous tech sites already demand phone numbers from users worldwide
    in exchange for setting up accounts under the guise of “fighting spam,”
    which is fueling concerns that, in the future, certain aspects of
    Dragonfly won’t be limited to just China.

    Alex Jones, who has also raised the alarm on Project Dragonfly,
    is at Tuesday’s Google hearing in Washington, DC, to protest this mass
    censorship.
    _____________________________________________________________

     Google CEO Giggles When Confronted About Aiding Chinese Genocide

    Alex Jones storms DC to confront Sundar Pichai on working with the ChiComs

    SEE: https://www.infowars.com/google-ceo-giggles-when-confronted-about-aiding-chinese-genocide/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
    Google CEO Giggles When Confronted About Aiding Chinese Genocide

     Alex Jones confronted Google CEO Sundar Pichai Tuesday, calling
    out the genocide in China his company’s helped orchestrate. Jones was
    promptly threatened with arrest after confronting him.

    Alex Jones & Millie Weaver of Infowars 
    Confront Google CEO Sundar Pichai
    Kaitlin Bennett & Millie Weaver Crash Google Hearing
     Googles CEO Sundar Pichai testifies before the House Judiciary Committee
    regarding censorship. Millie Weaver and Kaitlin Bennett discuss the
    extent of Googles censorship and privacy violations against Americans
    and the Chinese DragonFly Project.

     
    OAN speaks to Alex Jones on Google CEO hearing

     Infowars founder Alex Jones is calling out alleged collusion between
    Google and Democrats as the CEO for the tech giant appeared before
    lawmakers on Capitol Hill. One America’s Jack Posobiec has more from
    Washington.

     

     

     

    “GIVE US ANOTHER CHANCE”: MACRON EMERGES TO ADDRESS FRENCH PEOPLE

     THE “SAVIOR” BOY OF GLOBALISM,”CHARLEMAGNE/NAPOLEON”  REINCARNATION
    PULLS HIS HEAD OUT OF THE SAND
    FULL SPEECH WITH ENGLISH TRANSLATION:
     'Give Us Another Chance': Macron Emerges To Address French People
     The Yellow Vest movement has largely rejected French
    President Emmanuel Macron’s concession speech, claiming it was an
    insincere “charade.”
    “He is trying to do a pirouette to
    land back on his feet but we can see that he isn’t sincere, that it’s
    all smoke and mirrors,” Jean-Marc, a car mechanic told the AFP Monday.
    According to local media, other French citizens described the speech as “window dressing,” “a bluff,” a “drop in the ocean,” “nonsense,” and a “charade.”

    “GIVE US ANOTHER CHANCE”: 

    MACRON EMERGES TO ADDRESS FRENCH PEOPLE
     Embattled French president criticized for hiding away while riots engulfed nation
    BY JAMIE WHITE
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     

    After days of silence amid riots by the Yellow Vests over his
    unpopular policies, French President Macron took a scolding tone when
    he finally addressed his people in a statement Monday.

    “There
    was legitimate claims, however, there was a chain of inadmissible
    violence, and I’m here to talk about it,” Macron said from the Élysée
    Palace. “I won’t forget that there’s anger, there’s worry, there’s
    indignation – all of us, or most of us in France feel it. However, I
    cannot accept the unacceptable behavior that took place.”

    “The anger was about the gas tax and the Prime Minister responded to
    that by cancelling the gas tax. However, I feel the anger. Give us
    another chance. Give a chance to the couple that needs to wake up in the
    morning to travel for a couple of hours to work far away from their
    home. Give the single mother a chance to make ends meet. We have to take
    into account the retired who have worked all their lives and cannot
    make ends meet.”
    Macron then tried to reconcile with his people by
    offering all workers end-of-year bonuses tax-free, presumably by
    driving up France’s debt.

    “Maybe in the beginning I gave you the impression that I didn’t care,
    but that’s not true. Maybe I hurt some of you. That was not my
    intention. I want to find a way to get out of this together.”

    “This is why I’m ordering an end-of-year bonus for all employees
    without any tax. How we treat you is a very important part of our
    nation. In 2019, you’re going to see this.”

    But Macron also rejected the measure to increase taxes for the rich, saying it would drive rich companies out of France.

    “Some of you want me to come back and revisit the fortune tax.
    However, this has caused the richer companies to depart our country and
    we have suffered from this measure tremendously. Going backward will
    make us weaker and we will lose jobs in every sector.”

    Colleagues from across the political spectrum criticized
    Macron over the weekend for hiding away in the Élysée Palace while
    Paris was burning, including political rival Marine Le Pen and socialist
    leader Jean-Luc Melenchon.

    President Trump also criticized the Paris Climate Accord, noting
    the French people weren’t responding positively to its dictates.

    “The Paris Agreement isn’t working out so well for Paris.
    Protests and riots all over France. People do not want to pay large sums
    of money, much to third world countries (that are questionably run), in
    order to maybe protect the environment. Chanting ‘We Want Trump!’ Love
    France,” he tweeted Saturday.

    The Paris Agreement isn’t working out so well for Paris. Protests and riots all over France. People do not want to pay large sums of money, much to third world countries (that are questionably run), in order to maybe protect the environment. Chanting “We Want Trump!” Love France.
    ___________________________________________________________
    Macron Concedes Anger Over Mass Immigration Must Be Acknowledged
     Macron Concedes Anger Over Mass Immigration 
    Must Be Acknowledged
    French President capitulates to demands of yellow vest movement 
    BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
    SEE: https://www.infowars.com/macron-concedes-anger-over-mass-immigration-must-be-acknowledged/; 

    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     

    During a speech to the nation this evening, French President
    Emmanuel Macron acknowledged that yellow vest demonstrators were angry
    about mass immigration and that the issue needs to be debated at the
    national level.

    Almost 2000 people were arrested on
    Saturday in France while 264 people were injured during protests that
    boiled over into riots and looting, the fourth round of such
    demonstrations in recent weeks.
    During a primetime address on live
    television, Macron said that despite acts of violence, the protesters’
    indignation was “deep and in many ways legitimate,” adding, “I take my
    share of responsibility. I know I have hurt some of you with my words.”
    Despite
    the outside perception being that the protests were solely about
    economic woes, Macron acknowledged that mass immigration was also a
    major concern, conceding, “We must tackle the question of immigration.”
    One
    yellow vest leader responded to the address by telling the French
    President, “If you still have respect for your people, resign.”
     Embedded video

    WATCH: A yellow vest protester to French President Emmanuel Macron moments after televised statement: “If you still have respect for your people, resign”

    Macron also announced a number of economic relief measures, including
    raising the monthly minimum wage by 100 euros and making overtime pay
    and end of year bonuses tax exempt. Retired citizens who earn less than
    2000 euros a month will not be taxed.
    The snap policy changes are being seen by some as a total capitulation by Macron’s government to the will of protesters.
    As
    we document in the video below, aside from looters and mindless
    rioters, the core of the yellow vest movement is very much a reaction
    against globalism by an increasingly impoverished lower middle and
    working class who are seeing floods of migrants enter the France and
    receive welfare while their own cost of living continues to rise.

    Macron’s Lame Attempt to BUY OFF Yellow Vest Protesters!!!

    France’s “Yellow Vest” revolution exposes globalist puppet Macron

    The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris
    discuss the protests in Paris and how they represent more much more than
    a dissatisfaction with fuel price hikes, having much more to do with a
    general anger and disgust for Macron and his globalist government
    policies.

    POPE FRANCIS: CHRISTIANS MURDERED BY MUSLIMS IN ALGERIA ARE A TESTAMENT TO GOD’S PLAN FOR PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE OF CHRISTIANS & MUSLIMS

    POPE FRANCIS: CHRISTIANS MURDERED BY MUSLIMS ARE A TESTAMENT TO GOD’S PLAN FOR PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE OF CHRISTIANS & MUSLIMS 
    BY ROBERT SPENCER
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     

    “The lives of 19 religious men and women martyred during the Algerian
    civil war are a testament to God’s plan of love and peaceful
    coexistence between Christians and Muslims, Pope Francis said.”

    A more serious analyst would note that they were, after all,
    murdered, so they might not be that great a testimony to peaceful
    coexistence between Christians and Muslims. But this is the Pope who has said
    that “Muslim terrorism does not exist.” So he affirms that “by
    beatifying our 19 brothers and sisters, the church wishes to bear
    witness to her desire to continue to work for dialogue, harmony and
    friendship,” ignoring the fact that the murder of these people drowned
    their desire for “dialogue, harmony and friendship” in their own blood.
    There may be some room for dialogue, but only if it is informed and
    realistic, not based on wishful thinking and willful ignorance.

    “Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

    “Algerian martyrs bear witness to Christian-Muslim peace, Pope Francis says,” by Catholic News Service, December 10, 2018:

    VATICAN – The lives of 19 religious men and women
    martyred during the Algerian civil war are a testament to God’s plan of
    love and peaceful coexistence between Christians and Muslims, Pope
    Francis said….


    Both Christians and Muslims in Algeria “have been victims of the same
    violence for having lived, with faithfulness and respect for each
    other, their duties as believers and citizens in this blessed land. It
    is for them, too, that we pray and express our grateful tribute,” the
    Pope said.

    Among those who were beatified were Blessed Christian de Cherge and
    six of his fellow Trappists – Fathers Christophe Lebreton, Bruno
    Lemarchand and Celestin Ringeard as well as Brothers Luc Dochier, Michel
    Fleury and Paul Favre-Miville – who were murdered in 1996 by members of
    the Armed Islamic Group in Tibhirine, Algeria….

    Several months after their deaths, Blessed Pierre Claverie, bishop of
    Oran, was assassinated along with his driver by an explosive device.
    According to the website of the Dominican Order of Preachers, his death
    was mourned also by Muslims who considered him “their bishop.”

    Pope Francis said that all Algerians are heirs of the great message
    of love that began with St. Augustine of Hippo and continued with the
    martyred religious men and women “at a time when all people are seeking
    to advance their aspiration to live together in peace.”

    “By beatifying our 19 brothers and sisters, the church wishes to bear
    witness to her desire to continue to work for dialogue, harmony and
    friendship,” the Pope said. “We believe that this event, which is
    unprecedented in your country, will draw a great sign of brotherhood in
    the Algerian sky for the whole world.”

    BACKLASH ENSUES AFTER MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR TWEETS GOD “IMPREGNATED MARY WITHOUT “CONSENT”

     http://www.theamericanmirror.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/sprankle.png
     https://bigleaguepolitics.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Screen-Shot-2018-12-07-at-10.05.48-AM.png
     https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2018/12/07/15/7141022-6471593-image-a-19_1544195932179.jpg
    BACKLASH ENSUES AFTER MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY PROFESSOR TWEETS GOD “IMPREGNATED MARY WITHOUT “CONSENT” 
    BY HEATHER CLARK
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     MANKATO, Minn. — A professor at Minnesota State
    University tweeted this past week that the story of the virgin birth is
    about God impregnating a teenager without her consent, generating
    pushback from hundreds of commenters.

    “The virgin birth story is about an all-knowing, all-powerful deity
    impregnating a human teen. There is no definition of consent that would
    include that scenario,” wrote Eric Sprankle, an associate professor of psychology and sexuality studies at the university.

    The tweet has generated nearly 1,500 likes as of press time, but also much backlash.

    “Sorry. Luke 1:26-38 states clearly that the angel communicated God’s
    plan for Mary, and in verse 38, she agreed. Whether you believe or
    disbelieve, it helps if you actually read the text,” wrote commenter Tom
    Cleary.

    The Scriptures state that after the angel Gabriel told Mary that
    “thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call
    his name Jesus … and of His kingdom there shall be no end,” Mary asked,
    “How shall this be, seeing I know not a man?”

    “The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest
    shall overshadow thee. Therefore, also that holy thing which shall be
    born of thee shall be called the Son of God. And, behold, thy cousin
    Elisabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age, and this is the
    sixth month with her, who was called barren. For with God nothing shall
    be impossible,” Gabriel answered.

    “And Mary said, ‘Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word,’” verse 38 outlines.

    Sprankle, who, according to his website, “leads the Sexual Health
    Research Team at MSU examining sex work stigma” and is also a certified
    sex therapist, replied to Cleary that God would have punished Mary if
    she had not agreed, and that He consequently domineered over her in the
    matter.

    “The biblical God regularly punished disobedience. The power
    difference (deity vs. mortal) and the potential for violence for saying
    ‘no’ negates her ‘yes,’” Sprankle wrote. “To put someone in this
    position is an unethical abuse of power at best and grossly predatory at
    worst.”

    His remarks generated much controversy in the hours and days that
    followed, with some claiming that Mary was raped by God, and others
    proclaiming that such a notion is both blasphemous and incorrect.

    “This is blasphemy against Almighty God! You have zero business
    teaching young minds. Minnesota State clearly lacks integrity,” wrote
    Stacey Paige.

    “A psych degree does not equal biblical competency. First, Mary
    consented to becoming the mother of Jesus. Second, no early Christian
    believed the Holy Spirit had physical relations with Mary,” also
    stated commenter Benjamin Sanchez. “The emphasis is Jesus, the
    incarnation of the eternal Son of God…”

    “Hmmm, let’s see. If I create a clay pot, and decide after I made it
    that I wanted to add another smaller pot inside it, how does the 1st pot
    have any sayso?” asked Oze McCallum.

    Sprankle also shared tweets over the past week from The Satanic Temple, American Atheists and Planned Parenthood.

    1 Corinthians 2:14 states, “But the natural man receiveth not the
    things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness unto him, neither
    can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.”

    1 Corinthians 1:20-21 and 27-29 also declares, “Where is the wise?
    Where is the scribe? Where is the disputer of this world? Hath not God
    made foolish the wisdom of this world? For after that in the wisdom of
    God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness
    of preaching to save them that believe. … But God hath chosen the
    foolish things of the world to confound the wise, and God hath chosen
    the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty.
    And base things of the world, and things which are despised, hath God
    chosen, yea, and things which are not, to bring to nought things that
    are, that no flesh should glory in His presence.”

    DEDHAM, MASSACHUSETTS BLASPHEMY: CATHOLIC CHURCH PUTS BABY JESUS IN CAGE TO PROMOTE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION

     https://parismatch.be/app/uploads/2018/12/2018_family_deportation-1-1100x715.jpg
     BY ORDER OF POPE FRANCIS!
     https://1qxya61uvyue18mpsx3zc8om-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/12/47284424_10218242353112271_8448231328708558848_n.jpg
    BLASPHEMY: CATHOLIC CHURCH PUTS BABY JESUS IN CAGE TO PROMOTE ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION 
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     

    The Catholic Church globally is one of the world’s leading proponents
    of illegal immigration. Pope Francis himself has said many times that
    all nations should open their borders and let anyone and everyone come
    in. He says that how a christian is supposed to show compassion. What
    Francis forgot to tell you, of course, was how lucrative the illegal
    migrant business is, and how much money they are making in government
    grants by promoting and perpetuating it.

    “Therefore hell hath enlarged herself, and opened her mouth without
    measure: and their glory, and their multitude, and their pomp, and he
    that rejoiceth, shall descend into it.” Isaiah 5:14 (KJV)

    So a Catholic Church in Massachusetts decided to promote the illegal
    migrant caravan this year in a novel way. They took their nativity scene
    and placed the baby Jesus in a prison cage, next to a sign marked with
    ‘Deportation’. They are simply following Pope Francis’ mandate of open
    borders for all, which in reality is a satanically-inspired theme of how
    to overthrow sovereign nations.
    Germany allowed a million unchecked
    migrants in, and it almost destroyed their country. Sweden allowed
    unchecked migrants in, and now their women are raped on a daily basis.

    Let me just close with this thought. Heaven not only has a strict
    immigration policy, it also has multiple gates and a massive wall. Hell
    on the other hand has open borders, is wide open to everyone and is
    enlarging itself daily. Walls and borders are not only good, they are
    necessary if you want to have peace, security and order. But that is not
    what Pope Francis wants, he wants anarchy. And speaking of walls, how
    about taking down the massive wall that surrounds the Vatican?
    Hello?….anyone?? *crickets*

    Dedham Church’s Immigration-Themed Nativity Scene Features Baby Jesus In Cage
    FROM CBS BOSTON: The nativity scene at St. Susanna Parish is hoping to
    shine a light on the topic of immigration. The scene was set up over the
    weekend. It shows baby Jesus inside a black cage and the three wise men
    separated by a fence with a sign that reads “deportation.”

    To continue reading, click here

    [Editor’s Note: This article was written by Geoffrey Grider and published at NOW THE END BEGINS]
    ______________________________________________________

    THE BACKLASH & THE APPROVAL: 
    CONTROVERSIAL CRECHE
     

    OHIO RELIGIOUS LEADERS PROTEST PRO-LIFE BILL

    OHIO RELIGIOUS LEADERS PROTEST PRO-LIFE BILL
    republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
     

    A group of Ohio religious leaders criticized lawmakers’ efforts to
    pass protections for unborn babies Thursday during a pro-abortion
    protest at a church in downtown Columbus.


    The event at Trinity Episcopal Church, coordinated by the Ohio
    Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice, included Christian and
    Jewish leaders who oppose a bill to prohibit abortions after unborn
    babies have a detectable heartbeat, about six weeks of pregnancy.
    The state House passed the bill in November, and the Senate is
    considering it this week. It is expected to pass the
    Republican-controlled legislature.

    The Rev. Terry Williams, a United Church of Christ minister from
    Chillicothe who spoke at the protest, claimed to stand for women’s
    rights by opposing the pro-life bill.
    “I will not stand here idly and let them strip away the rights of women
    and others in our state to make the right decisions for them and their
    families,” Williams said.


    The Rev. Dr. Marian Stewart of the First Unitarian Universalist
    Church of Columbus also spoke, saying, “This bill, which does not
    protect the health of the woman or rape victims, is not pro-life.”


    The bill does protect life, though. An unborn baby’s heartbeat is
    detectable around six weeks of pregnancy, though new research suggests
    it may begin as early as 18 days after conception. In 2017, 20,893
    unborn babies were aborted in Ohio, according to the state Department of
    Health. Most of those babies would be protected if the legislation goes
    into effect.

    To continue reading, click here

    [Editor’s Note: The article was written by Micaiah Bilger and published at LifeNews.com]

    1 501 502 503 504 505 795