THE GLAZOV GANG: IRANIAN SHARIA SURVIVOR’S BONE CHILLING WARNING TO AMERICA~AL-QUDS DAY RAMADAN FOMENTS HATE FOR JEWS~RAPE IS IN THE KORAN

THE GLAZOV GANG: IRANIAN SHARIA SURVIVOR’S BONE CHILLING WARNING TO AMERICA
 Published on Jul 11, 2017

Aynaz Anni Cyrus at United America First Rally, CA — July 8, 2017

 Sharia: The Threat to America-Part 1 
 Published on Jun 18, 2017
An
ATP Report Production – On this episode Barry interviews Aynaz Anni
Cyrus, National Director of American Truth Project, and discusses what
Sharia law is and how it relates to American policy, law, society and
the pervasive spread of violence on America’s homeland.
 Sharia: The Threat to America-Part 2
 Published on Jun 25, 2017
An
ATP Report Production – On this episode Barry interviews Aynaz Anni
Cyrus, National Director of American Truth Project, and discusses what
Sharia is and how it relates to American policy, law, society and the
pervasive spread of violence on America’s homeland as well as the agenda
of Linda Sarsour, leading the Islamism movement in America.
 Islam’s “Kill-All-Jews” Day and the Left’s 
Hateful Silence
 https://rehmat1.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/alqudsdayposterwebsite1.jpg
ISLAMIC AL-QUDS DAY FOMENTS HATE FOR JEWS
 Anni Cyrus Video: Leftist Feminists’ 
S&M Islamic Odyssey

 The Unknown: Islam’s Rape Game in Europe

HUGH FITZGERALD: NO ROOM AT THE INN FOR AN IFTAR DINNER~THE INN THIS TIME BEING TRUMP’S WHITE HOUSE

 http://www.trumparmy.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/jefferson-ramadan-01.jpg
 http://www.usatwentyfour.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/f-100-820x486.jpg
HUGH FITZGERALD: NO ROOM AT THE INN FOR AN IFTAR DINNER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 The Washington Post has reported--drop a ready tear — that there will be no 
Iftar Dinner this year in the White House:

For the first time in nearly two decades, Ramadan has
come and gone without the White House recognizing it with an iftar or
Eid celebration, as had taken place each year under the Clinton, Bush
and Obama administrations.

And the article by Amy Wang attempts to suggest that the “tradition”
of the Iftar Dinner goes all the way back to Thomas Jefferson who, as is
well known, was asked by a visiting Muslim envoy of the Bey of Tunis,
one Sidi Soliman Mellimelli,  to postpone the dinner to which Jefferson
had invited him, along with others, until after sundown, which
Jefferson, as a matter of courtesy, did.
The Post continues:

Jefferson’s decision to change the time of the meal to
accommodate Mellimelli’s [the envoy from the Bey of Tunis] observance of
Ramadan has been seized on by both sides in the 21st-century debate
over Islam more than 200 years later. Historians have cited the meal as
the first time an iftar took place in the White House — and it has been
referenced in recent White House celebrations of Ramadan as an
embodiment of the Founding Father’s respect for religious freedom.
Meanwhile, critics on the far right have taken issue with the
characterization of Jefferson’s Dec. 9, 1805, dinner as an iftar.

Notice how in the Post article it is “historians” (disinterested,
authoritative, not to be doubted) who cite that 1805 meal as the first
Iftar dinner in the White House,  while those who deny that the meal was
an “Iftar dinner” are described as being on the “far right,” apparently
for no other reason than that very denial.
What actually happened is clear for those without an insensate need
to make Islam, as Barack Obama has repeatedly  claimed it was, “always
part of America’s story.” And you can be as left-wing as all get out,
and still recognize that Jefferson was not putting on an Iftar dinner. A
little history will help:  Mellimelli came to Washington as the envoy
of the Bey of Tunis. The Americans had blockaded the port of Tunis, in
order to force the Bey to halt his attacks on American shipping.
Mellimelli was sent to make an agreement that would end the blockade.
Invited by Jefferson to a dinner at the White House set for 3:30
(dinners were earlier in those pre-Edison days of our existence), he
requested that it be held after sundown, in accordance with his Muslim
practice, and Jefferson, a courteous man, obliged him. There is no hint
that the dinner had changed in any way; no one then called it, or
thought of it, as an “Iftar dinner.” Mellimelli himself did not describe
it as an “Iftar dinner.” There is no record of it being anything other
than the exact same dinner, the same menu, with wine (no removal of
alcohol as would be necessary were it a real Iftar dinner), the only
change being that of the three-hour delay until sunset. Nothing
Jefferson said or did at the time, or in his later writings,  indicates
that he thought of that delayed dinner as an “Iftar dinner”; nor did he
think he was in any way honoring Islam.
In fact, Jefferson had a very dim view of Islam, which came out of
his experience in dealing with the Barbary Pirates, that is, the North
African Muslims (in Morocco, Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli), who attacked
Christian shipping and seized ships and Christian sailors, and then
demanded ransom. The sums were not trivial; the American Republic found
itself spending 20% of its national budget on such payments. These
continued until Jefferson became President, stopped the practice of
paying such tribute, and instead made war on the Barbary Pirates. And
that worked.
In 1786, years before he became president, Jefferson, along with John
Adams, met with the Tripolitanian envoy Sidi Haji Abdrahaman in London.
 Perhaps by then Jefferson had read the Qur’an he had purchased in 1765
out of curiosity (no one knows how much of that Qur’an Jefferson  may
have read, or when, though some Muslim apologists have baselessly
claimed he must have bought his Qur’an out of sympathetic interest in
Islam.) If he did read it,  it would have helped him to understand the
motivations of the North African Muslims. Certainly by the time he
became President in 1801, he was determined not to negotiate with the
Barbary Pirates, but to implacably oppose with force these Muslims whom,
he knew from his encounter with Abdrahaman in London, were permanently
hostile to all non-Muslims.
In London, Jefferson and Adams had queried the Tripolitanian
ambassador “concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon
nations who had done them no injury” for the Americans had done nothing
to deserve being attacked, and the ambassador replied, as Jefferson
reported:

“It was written in their Koran, that all nations which
had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and
duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman
who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise.”

And later, Jefferson reported to Secretary of State John Jay and to
Congress at greater length, with a nearly identical quote from the
ambassador:

“The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded
on the Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that
it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could
be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and
that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to
Paradise.”

These reports do not sound as if they came from someone who thought
well of Islam. The more dealings Jefferson had with the representatives
of the Barbary states, and the more he learned from them directly of the
tenets of the faith, the more he began to understand the aggressive
nature of Islam, the centrality of Jihad, the inculcation of permanent
hostility toward non-Muslims, and the heavenly reward for Jihadis slain
in battle.
The Iftar dinner “tradition” begins not with Jefferson in 1805, and
that three-hour delay in a meal that was otherwise unchanged, but with
our latter-day interfaith outreach presidents — Clinton, Bush, Obama —
each of whom, in his own way, has managed to ignore or misinterpret the
texts and teachings of Islam.
That “tradition” of Iftar dinners in the White House is less than 20
years old, as compared with the other “tradition,” ten times as long,
that is, the 200 years of Iftar-less presidencies. That short-lived
“tradition”  has been ended, for now, by an administration that, for all
of its self-inflicted wounds and woes in other areas, continues to
exhibit a better sense of what Islam, foreign and domestic, is all
about, than its predecessors, and has no desire to obliquely honor it.
The interfaith outreach farce that the Iftar Dinner at the White
house embodies, honoring Islam — while, all over the world, every day
brings fresh news of Muslim atrocities against non-Muslims, more than
30,000 such attacks since 9/11/2001 alone, not to mention attacks as
well  against other Muslims deemed either of the wrong sect, or
insufficient in the fervor of their faith — now comes to an end, if only
for four years. That is certainly what Jefferson (and John Adams, and
that most profound presidential student of Islam, John Quincy Adams), if
not The Washington Post, would have wanted.
And since John Quincy Adams has been mentioned, why doesn’t The Washington Post
take it upon itself to share with its readers what that most scholarly
of our presidents wrote about Islam. It does not date. And it might
prove most instructive.
_________________________________________________________

 IFTAR DINNER AT TRUMP TOWER, NEW YORK CITY ON THE STREET, WITH LINDA SARSOUR MAKING PROTEST STATEMENT ABOUT PERCEIVED, ALLEGED “HATRED & ISLAMOPHOBIA” 

  

 

TRUMP ON DEMOCRATS: OBSTRUCTIONISTS, BUT COMMUNIST THUGS TOO!~PAMELA GELLER ON THE SPLC INCITING TERROR AGAINST PATRIOTS, CHRISTIANS

Trump Make America Great Again

They are only OBSTRUCTIONISTS


Democrats have absolutely NOTHING to offer our country.

After
their BILLION-DOLLAR election loss, all Democrats have done is OBSTRUCT
President Trump and maniacally scream the word “RUSSIA” until they’re
blue in the face.

They’ve sparked protests in the streets, refused to approve White House
nominees, destroyed our health care system, and used the media to spew
vicious rhetoric against the President.
 

ENOUGH!

Tell Democrats: It’s time to stop obstructing the AMERICAN PEOPLE’S MANDATE.
 

Add your name to our official petition now. >>

By
refusing to work with President Trump, Democrats are choosing to IGNORE
the millions of Americans who voted for our America First platform last
November.

Democrats had no problem rigging their primary against Bernie Sanders
and his supporters — and now they’re choosing to strip the Silent
Majority of their new-found voice in our country.

 You will NEVER hear the media report this. But this is the truth that America needs to hear.

Please sign our official petition telling Democrats to stop obstructing our America First agenda.

Thank you,

Team TRUMP

 

ADD YOUR NAME

Or go to: https://action.donaldjtrump.com/stop-obstructing-american-peoples-mandate/?utm_medium=Email&utm_source=ET_105&utm_campaign=20170616_713_Obstructionism-Petition_DonaldJTrumpCom_JFC&utm_content=WHE_agenda_Button-Add-Name-1

____________________________________________________

 Pamela Geller: J’accuse the Left of Treason, 
Murder and Warmongering
BY PAMELA GELLER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Yesterday’s shooting by an SPLC (Southern Poverty Law Center) supporting, Bernie Sanders devotee
is the obvious and logical consequence of the left’s treasonous war on
America. This is but another assassination attempt by a left-lauded
Southern Poverty Law center supporter. SPLC, a vicious hate and smear
machine, is  held up as some kind of authority by elite media and
academic institutions. SPLC enthusiast Floyd Corkins 
shot up the Family Research Council with the hope of killing as many
employees as possible in August 2012. But this is just the tip of the
iceberg.


SPLC Hit List:

For years, the left and its media lapdogs have created narratives out
of whole cloth about the impending violence from the right. President
Obama, inciter-in-chief, regularly used violent rhetoric to gin up the
Democrats: “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun.” He has supported the most violent, seditious movements of 21st-century
America (Black Lives Matter, Occupy Wall Street, Muslim Brotherhood
groups, etc.) while directing the Department of Homeland Security to
track “right wing extremists” — in other words, Americans like you and
me.


Here are some choice and sparsely reported quotes from Barack Obama:

“My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks.” Obama to CEOs.
“Get in Their Faces!” Obama to his doorknockers.
“I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!” Obama to ACORN crowd.
“Punch back twice as hard!” Obama to his Obomunists.
“We talk to these folks…so I know whose ass to kick.” Obama to the Left on the private sector.
“A Republican victory would mean hand to hand combat.” Obama to supporters.
“It’s time to Fight for it.” Obama in a speech to his supporters.
“Punish your enemies.” Obama to Latino supporters.
“I’m itching for a fight.” Obama to Democrats in a speech.


For years, the street thugs have been agitating, and for years the
elites in the Democrat Party have egged them on, giving the violence
their imprimatur, legitimacy and sanction. All the while, they blamed
the right for unrelated violence. While there was no connection between
what a Norway mass-murdering madman did and we what said, what we
recommended for countering jihad terrorism and the brutal sharia, the
left blew up and blood-libeled us almost to the point of extinction.
When it came out in court that this Norwegian madman was inspired to violence by al Qaeda and Hamas,
that was never widely reported. The left always blames us for violence,
no matter how non-existent the ties. Even when I was the target of an
assassination plot in Garland, Texas, for example, the left blamed me
because I would not adhere to the blasphemy laws under the sharia.


Bernie Sanders fundraised by blaming Sarah Palin and conservatives in general for the 2011 shooting of Rep. Gabby Giffords (D-AZ). The Daily Caller reported
that “there was never any actual evidence presented that Jared
Loughner, a diagnosed schizophrenic who pleaded guilty to the
shooting, was a Palin fan, a Tea Party supporter, or that he had ever
seen Palin’s ‘crosshairs’ map” that was widely blamed for the shooting.
In fact, according to the Caller, “one friend tweeted that ‘he was left wing, quite liberal.’”


Last week’s shooter in Portland was also a Bernie supporter;
he ranted against Christians, Jews and Muslims, but the enemedia
reported his shooting of two people as an “Islamophobic” “hate crime.”


I have been covering leftist and Islamic protests for years, and they
are rife with hate and violence that never get reported in the
mainstream media. My colleague, Pamela Hall, has been indefatigable in covering the rise of the left-wing totalitarians. Followers of my website, the Geller Report, know her work and what it proves: a systematic, organized movement to overthrow American freedoms and install an enemy regime.


At every pro-America, pro-Trump, anti-sharia, counter terrorism
protest, leftists show up full of bloodlust and primed for battle. These
primitives agitate, incite and attack our people whenever we peacefully
assemble. And their stooges in the media, like clockwork, then report
what happened as follows: “Violence breaks out at far-right rally…”
“Far-right” the media’s term for anyone who doesn’t submit to these
goose-stepping, jackbooted thugs. At my rally against CUNY’s invitation
to terror-inciter Linda Sarsour to give its commencement address, New
York City Mayor “Red Bill” de Blasio directed the NYPD to put the violent leftists not three feet from our people. It was not pretty.


Conservative and pro-Israel speakers are attacked and silenced on the
rare occasions they are even invited to speak. Trump supporters have
been beaten at
rallies and demos in support of the President. From Berkeley to
Brooklyn, college campuses have become nothing short of war zones.


As the Daily Wire noted:
“In recent years, under the tender tutelage of the Obama Department of
Justice, mass violent action by leftists has become commonplace across
the country, from the Occupy Wall Street movement to Black Lives
Matter-inspired mob violence in Ferguson and Baltimore, from campus
chaos at California State University of Los Angeles to this sort of
violence at Trump rallies.”


This is not static. This situation on the ground is fluid.  Do the
leftists think freedom-lovers will continue to stand down? Does the left
want war? They are gong to get it. Because we know where this road
leads. We saw this same kind of violent thuggery in the 1930s in
Germany. And we have seen what happens when good people do nothing.


As for the “good people” in the Democrat Party, where are they? Where
are the mass protests where Democrats proclaim, “Not My Party!” Why
aren’t we seeing that the way we are seeing “Not My President!”


If you are a Democrat Party member, you are part of the problem.

Pamela Geller is the President of the American Freedom Defense Initiative (AFDI), publisher of PamelaGeller.com and author of The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America and Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance. Follow her on Twitter here. Like her on Facebook here.
_______________________________________________________

 Mark Steyn on Tucker Carlson: “The Left wants to prevent debate from taking place”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Last night, Mark Steyn discusses a frequent preoccupation of this site, 
the growing authoritarianism and thuggishness of the Left (and Leftists’
 Islamic supremacist allies). They don’t want to debate, and probably 
know in their heart of hearts that they would lose any debate, and so 
instead they are increasingly moving to crush all dissent.
___________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.ammoland.com/2017/06/long-history-leftist-hatred/
#axzz4kASvu9d8 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Video: Mark Steyn on the Leftist/Islamic 
preference for violently shutting down opponents
 

VIDEO FROM VIRGINIA: IMAM AT MOSQUE WITH MULTIPLE TERROR TIES ENDORSES FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION

 http://i.ytimg.com/vi/cMdk2cMXWO4/maxresdefault.jpg
VIDEO FROM VIRGINIA: IMAM AT MOSQUE WITH MULTIPLE TERROR TIES ENDORSES 
FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION
BY ROBERT SPENCER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

“Circumcision is obligatory (for every male and female) (by cutting
off the piece of skin on the glans of the penis of the male, but
circumcision of the female is by cutting out the bazr ‘clitoris’ [this
is called khufaadh ‘female circumcision’]).” — ‘Umdat al-Salik e4.3, translated by Mark Durie, The Third Choice, p. 64

Why is it obligatory? Because Muhammad is held to have said so: “Abu
al- Malih ibn Usama’s father relates that the Prophet said:
‘Circumcision is a law for men and a preservation of honour for women.’”
— Ahmad Ibn Hanbal 5:75

“Narrated Umm Atiyyah al-Ansariyyah: A woman used to perform
circumcision in Medina. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said to her: ‘Do
not cut severely as that is better for a woman and more desirable for a
husband.’” — Abu Dawud 41:5251

“Do not cut severely,” but not “Do not cut.”

That’s why it is so common around the world, and why it is certain to
become increasingly common in the United States, particularly with help
from the ACLU, which doubtless wants to avoid appearing to be
“Islamophobic.”

Note that Shaker Elsayed is quite clear in his remarks that FGM is to be practiced in order to control female sexuality.

Meanwhile , even lawmakers who fatuously praised
Dar Al-Hijrah noted that “the Dar Al-Hijrah Islamic Center is
affiliated with the Muslim American Society.” The Muslim American
Society is the chief arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S.,
according to Ikhwanweb,
the Muslim Brotherhood’s English website. Shaker Elsayed, the mosque’s
imam from 2005 to the present, was Secretary General of the Muslim
American Society. According to a captured internal Brotherhood document,
the Muslim Brotherhood in the U.S. is engaged in a “grand Jihad in
eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and
‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the
believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made
victorious over all other religions.”

There is more. The late jihad leader Anwar al-Awlaki was the imam at Dar al-Hijrah.
He is said to have been a “spiritual adviser” to three of the hijackers
who attacked America on September 11, 2001. Al-Awlaki was also in
regular contact with Umar Farouk Abdulmuttalab, the Christmas underwear
bomber who tried to blow up a passenger jet over Detroit on Christmas
Day 2009.

Former Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan, who murdered thirteen Americans in a jihad massacre at Fort Hood in Texas, worshiped at Dar al-Hijrah when he lived in the area and was in touch with al-Awlaki shortly before he carried out his attack.

The Saudi-backed North American Islamic Trust (NAIT), an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, bought the mosque’s grounds in 1983. Mohammed al-Hanooti, the mosque’s imam from 1995 to 1999, was named an unindicted co-conspirator
in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Ahmed Omar Abu Ali taught
Islamic studies and was a camp counselor at the mosque; he is now in
prison for plotting to assassinate President George W. Bush. Abdelhaleem Hasan Abdelraziq Ashqar, a member of the mosque’s Executive Committee, was convicted
in November 2007 of contempt and obstruction of justice for refusing to
testify regarding Hamas and received an eleven-year prison sentence.

“Dar al-Hijrah Imam Endorses (Partial) Female Genital Mutilation,” by John Rossomando, IPT News, June 2, 2017 (thanks to the Geller Report):

Female genital mutilation (FGM) can be an effective tool
to prevent promiscuity among girls, the imam at a prominent northern
Virginia mosque claimed in a recent lecture flagged by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).


Without it, “hyper-sexuality takes over the entire society and a woman is not satisfied with one person or two or three,” said
Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center Imam Shaker Elsayed in a May 19 talk,
“Foundation of a Happy Family.” Only tip of a girl’s clitoris should be
cut, he said, otherwise it creates “serious harm in the sexual life of
the child when she grows up. And this is why the West thinks of alkhikah as sexual mutilation…”

The video remains posted on the Falls Church, Va. mosque’s YouTube channel.

Muslim societies which prohibit FGM are making a mistake “to prohibit
the tradition and they end up causing a lot of damage on the other
extreme side of the sexual life of a woman,” Elsayed said.

He isn’t the only prominent voice in the U.S. Muslim community
endorsing female genital mutilation. The Assembly of Muslim Jurists in
America (AMJA) endorses the practice
in two fatwas posted on its website, using justifications similar to
Elsayed’s. While not required, one fatwa says, “it is considered an
honorable thing for females.”

Islamist advocates argue that FGM has nothing to do with Islam.

After several Detroit area doctors were charged with violating Michigan’s ban on female genital mutilation in April, activist Linda Sarsour denounced denouncing the practice as contrary to Islam.

“FGM has no place in Detroit or anywhere else in the world. FGM is barbaric & not an Islamic practice,” Sarsour wrote.

She should target that message to its proponents. Sarsour spoke at a fundraiser
at Elsayed’s mosque six days before his talk on female anatomy and
promiscuity. FGM did not come up, but Sarsour described Islam’s prophet
Mohammed as “a feminist in his own right.”

TRUMP GLORIES WITH MUSLIMS; TRIES TO SELL TOLERANT, PEACEFUL WORLD VIEW; BUT THE HATE, RAPE, MUTILATIONS, SLAVERY & DECAPITATIONS CONTINUE JUSTIFIED BY MOHAMMED’S SHARIA, JIHAD UNDER KORAN

 THE ULTIMATE DECEITFUL 
ROYAL CHARADE OF HOSPITALITY 
COVERS BARBARISM
TRUMP GLORIES WITH MUSLIMS; TRIES TO SELL TOLERANT, PEACEFUL WORLD VIEW ALONG WITH DEALS; BUT THE HATE, RAPE, MUTILATIONS, SLAVERY & DECAPITATIONS CONTINUE JUSTIFIED BY MOHAMMED’S SHARIA & JIHAD UNDER KORAN
BAY RIDGE, BROOKLYN, NEW YORK CITY ACTIVIST
 “Victim”Linda Sarsour’s Complete Lies: 
“Muhammad was human rights activist, feminist, 
first victim of ‘Islamophobia'”;
Would Rather Die a Martyr for Allah, Taking All 
the Insults & Abuse “Racist Islamophobes” Dish Out
SARSOUR’S REVISIONIST ISLAMIC HISTORY
  MRCTV Profile: Who Is Linda Sarsour, Really?
Published on Feb 17, 2017

Linda
Sarsour is one of the women who organized the Women’s March on
Washington back in January. She is being championed as a beacon of light
for women’s rights and a new leader of the modern feminist movement.

Sarsour
has been endorsed by the likes of Amnesty International, the Southern
Poverty Law Center (SPLC), Black Lives Matter (BLM), Sen. Bernie
Sanders, Rep. Keith Ellison, Van Jones, Sally Kohn, Susan Sarandon, Mark
Ruffalo, Shaun King and Russell Simmons.

But who is Linda Sarsour, really? Some interesting facts and statements from and about her can be unearthed with some digging.

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/05/linda-sarsour-muhammad-was-human-rights-activist-feminist-first-victim-of-islamophobia;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

“War is deceit,” said Muhammad, and the anti-Semitic, pro-Sharia Muslim “feminist” Linda Sarsour was listening.
1. Muhammad was a feminist? In reality, the Qur’an taught that men
are superior to women and should beat those from whom they “fear
disobedience”
: “Men have authority over women because Allah has made the
one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to
maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts
because Allah has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear
disobedience, admonish them and send them to beds apart and beat them.” —
Qur’an 4:34
Muhammad’s child bride, Aisha, says in a hadith that Muhammad “struck
me on the chest which caused me pain, and then said: ‘Did you think
that Allah and His Apostle would deal unjustly with you?’” — Sahih
Muslim 2127
The Qur’an likens a woman to a field (tilth), to be used by a man as
he wills: “Your women are a tilth for you, so go to your tilth as you
will” — Qur’an 2:223
It declares that a woman’s testimony is worth half that of a man:
“Get two witnesses, out of your own men, and if there are not two men,
then a man and two women, such as you choose, for witnesses, so that if
one of them errs, the other can remind her” — Qur’an 2:282
It allows men to marry up to four wives, and have sex with slave
girls also: “If you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with
the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; but if
you fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly, then only one, or one
that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent
you from doing injustice” — Qur’an 4:3
It rules that a son’s inheritance should be twice the size of that of
a daughter: “Allah directs you as regards your children’s inheritance:
to the male, a portion equal to that of two females” — Qur’an 4:11
It allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls, stipulating that
Islamic divorce procedures “shall apply to those who have not yet
menstruated” — Qur’an 65:4
Islamic law stipulates that a man’s prayer is annulled if a dog or a
woman passes in front of him as he is praying. “Narrated ‘Aisha: The
things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said,
“Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in
front of the praying people).” I said, ‘You have made us (i.e. women)
dogs.’ I saw the Prophet praying while I used to lie in my bed between
him and the Qibla. Whenever I was in need of something, I would slip
away. for I disliked to face him.” — Sahih Bukhari 1.9.490
Another hadith depicts Muhammad saying that the majority of the inhabitants of hell are women:
“I looked into Paradise and I saw that the majority of its people
were the poor. And I looked into Hell and I saw that the majority of its
people are women.” — Sahih Bukhari 3241; Sahih Muslim 2737
When asked about this, he explained:

“I was shown Hell and I have never seen anything more
terrifying than it. And I saw that the majority of its people are
women.” They said, “Why, O Messenger of Allah?” He said, “Because of
their ingratitude (kufr).” It was said, “Are they ungrateful to Allah?”
He said, “They are ungrateful to their companions (husbands) and
ungrateful for good treatment. If you are kind to one of them for a
lifetime then she sees one (undesirable) thing in you, she will say, ‘I
have never had anything good from you.’” — Sahih Bukhari 1052

And in another hadith:

The Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be
upon him) went out to the musalla (prayer place) on the day of Eid
al-Adha or Eid al-Fitr. He passed by the women and said, ‘O women! Give
charity, for I have seen that you form the majority of the people of
Hell.’ They asked, ‘Why is that, O Messenger of Allah?’ He replied, ‘You
curse frequently and are ungrateful to your husbands. I have not seen
anyone more deficient in intelligence and religious commitment than you.
A cautious sensible man could be led astray by some of you.’ The women
asked, ‘O Messenger of Allah, what is deficient in our intelligence and
religious commitment?’ He said, ‘Is not the testimony of two women equal
to the testimony of one man?’ They said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This is the
deficiency in her intelligence. Is it not true that a woman can neither
pray nor fast during her menses?’ The women said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘This
is the deficiency in her religious commitment.’” — Sahih Bukhari 304

Another statement attributed to Muhammad: “If a husband calls his
wife to his bed [i.e. to have sexual relation] and she refuses and
causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning.” —
Sahih Bukhari 4.54.460
2. Muhammad was an animal rights activist? Do dogs count as animals?
Islam hates dogs:
“Once Gabriel promised the Prophet (that he would
visit him, but Gabriel did not come) and later on he said, ‘We, angels,
do not enter a house which contains a picture or a dog.’” — Sahih
Bukhari 4.54.50
“Abdullah (b. Umar) (Allah be pleased with them) reported: Allah’s
Messenger (may peace be upon him) ordered the killing of dogs and we
would send (men) in Medina and its corners and we did not spare any dog
that we did not kill, so much so that we killed the dog that accompanied
the wet she-camel belonging to the people of the desert.” — Sahih
Muslim 3811
“Ibn Mughaffal reported: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon
him) ordered killing of the dogs, and then said: What about them, i. e.
about other dogs? and then granted concession (to keep) the dog for
hunting and the dog for (the security) of the herd, and said: When the
dog licks the utensil, wash it seven times, and rub it with earth the
eighth time.” — Sahih Muslim 551
3. Muhammad was a human rights activist? Do Jews count as humans? The
Qur’an depicts the Jews as fabricating things and falsely ascribing
them to Allah (2:79; 3:75, 3:181, 5:64); loving to listen to lies
(5:41); disobeying Allah and never observing his commands (5:13);
disputing and quarreling (2:247); hiding the truth and misleading people
(3:78); staging rebellion against the prophets and rejecting their
guidance (2:55); being hypocritical (2:14, 2:44); giving preference to
their own interests over the teachings of Muhammad (2:87); wishing evil
for people and trying to mislead them (2:109); feeling pain when others
are happy or fortunate (3:120); being arrogant about their being Allah’s
beloved people (5:18); devouring people’s wealth by subterfuge (4:161);
slandering the true religion and being cursed by Allah (4:46); killing
the prophets (2:61); being merciless and heartless (2:74); never keeping
their promises or fulfilling their words (2:100); being unrestrained in
committing sins (5:79); being cowardly (59:13-14); being miserly
(4:53); and more. It tells Muslims that Jews will be their worst enemies
(5:82) and that they’re under Allah’s curse (9:30), and that Muslims
must wage war against and subjugate them under the hegemony of Sharia,
denying them basic rights (9:29).
4. Muhammad was the first victim of “Islamophobia”? Isn’t that
putting the cart before the horse? Why would anyone have disliked
Muhammad other than because of what he said and did? Might statements of
his such as these, attributed to him in canonical ahadith, have
contributed to this climate of “Islamophobia”?
“I have been made victorious through terror.” — Sahih Bukhari 4:52.220

“Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war…When
you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses
of action. If they respond to any one of these you also accept it and
withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept)
Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from
fighting against them…. If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them
the Jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your
hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight
them.” — Sahih Muslim 4294
“I have been commanded to fight against people so long as they do not
declare that there is no god but Allah, and he who professed it was
guaranteed the protection of his property and life on my behalf except
for the right affairs rest with Allah.” — Sahih Muslim 30
“May Allah curse the Jews and Christians for they built the places of
worship at the graves of their Prophets.” — Sahih Bukhari 1.8.427

__________________________________________________

  https://cdn.jihadwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Trump-Saudi-tolerance.png
Trump views exhibit on religious tolerance in Saudi Arabia, which allows only Islam
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

What a comic opera absurdity. Did President Trump ask King Salman
where the churches and synagogues and Hindu temples were in Saudi
Arabia? Did he ask the sinister little king how his exhibition of
tolerance and coexistence among different faiths squared with the Saudi Grand Mufti’s calling for the demolition of churches?
Did he ask Salman about Muhammad’s order as recorded in a hadith: “I
will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will
not leave any but Muslim.” (Sahih Muslim 19.4366)? Did he request, as a
foreign head of state, the honor of being given a tour of Mecca,
including a look inside the Ka’aba, and then ask how the fact that he is
not allowed to enter Mecca since he is not a Muslim squared with this
claim of “tolerance and coexistence among different faiths”?

Of course he didn’t. He went along with the charade, as Bush and
Obama would have done. Who knows, he may yet praise Islam’s glorious
tradition of tolerance while he is still in the Kingdom of the Two Holy
Places. It looks as if he has fallen headlong into the swamp, and the
hungry gators have gathered around for a good meal.
_______________________________________________________

 While Haters are Busy Hating, Trump is Busy Making $380 Billion in Business Deals in Saudi Arabia
  Trump jumps into the swamp, extends 
“worst deal ever,” renews sanctions relief 
for Islamic Republic of Iran
BY ROBERT SPENCER

Here’s an idea: let’s elect a President who is really a Washington
outsider. Not just a politician who says he is, but a real outsider, but
one with experience in making deals and real business acumen, combined
with fierce patriotism, street smarts, and the right instincts on what
must be done to make America great again. Someone who will promise to
repair some of the immense damage that has been done domestically and
internationally over the last few decades by the political elites.
Someone who would, say, cancel the disastrous Iran deal and stop making
concessions to the Islamic Republic of Iran, and refusing all further
negotiations or concessions until they stop their genocidal rhetoric.
Someone who would, in short, drain the swamp.
I know, I know, it’s a pipe dream. But you never know. Maybe it could happen in 2020.
“Iran nuclear: Trump extends Obama’s ‘worst deal ever,’” BBC, May 17, 2017:

Donald Trump’s White House has renewed sanctions relief for Iran, despite the US president’s past criticism.

The easing of sanctions is part of a crucial nuclear deal brokered in
2015 under then-President Barack Obama with five other world powers.


Mr Trump has described the landmark agreement as the “worst deal ever”.
However, the US Treasury issued fresh sanctions against specific
officials and a Chinese business with links to Iran’s missile programme.
The move means that sanctions preventing any US companies selling to
or dealing with Iran will remain suspended for the time being.
In return, Iran has pledged to restrict its nuclear activities,
reducing its uranium enrichment, plutonium production plans, and
allowing inspectors access to facilities.
The new sanctions from the Treasury are much more specific in scope,
targeting two senior Iranian defence officials and suppliers of missile
equipment, in apparent retaliation for a recent missile test, and for
Iran’s support of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria.
US citizens and entities are now banned from dealing with the officials and companies involved.
However, the White House stopped short of failing to renew the
waivers on more widespread sanctions, which are not permanent and were
due to expire this week.
This is the first time Mr Trump has been faced with the issue, after
former President Obama renewed the agreement shortly before he left
office.
Mr Trump has consistently warned Iran over its missile activity, and
has criticised the terms of the deal made by Mr Obama – at one point
claiming his “number one priority” if elected would be “to dismantle the
disastrous deal”.
But the other nations involved in the agreement – including China,
Russia, and the UK – believe it is the best way to prevent Iran getting a
nuclear weapon.
Since Mr Trump’s inauguration, his administration has also continued
to certify to Congress that Iran is upholding its part of the deal,
which it must do every 90 days….

_______________________________________________________

 TRUMP TOURS SAUDI ARABIA LIKE A KING
 Video: Did Trump Bow To The Saudi King?
 SAUDIS GIVE U.S. $40 BILLION FOR “INFRASTRUCTURE”
NOTHING COMPARED TO OBAMA’S SPENDING TRILLIONS OF TAXPAYERS’ MONEY
 DEAL WITH DEVILS:
President Trump Participates in the Signing Ceremony
 President Trump Attends Opening of Global Center for Combating Extremism
 Published on May 21, 2017

President
Trump, along with Egypt’s Abdel Fatah al-Sissi and Saudi Arabia’s King
Salman, opened the new Global Center for Combating Extremist Ideology on
May 21 in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

 President Trump Participates in the Arab Islamic American Summit Riyadh
VIDEO & TEXT OF SPEECH:
 EXCERPT:
“A better future is only possible if your nations drive out the terrorists and extremists. Drive. Them. Out.

DRIVE THEM OUT of your places of worship.
DRIVE THEM OUT of your communities.
DRIVE THEM OUT of your holy land, and
DRIVE THEM OUT OF THIS EARTH.”

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 This is certainly a much more honest speech about the jihad threat than 
any speech Barack Obama ever delivered, and Trump delivered it well to a
 tough audience. How he follows up on it is all-important: will he 
actually scrap Obama’s fantasy-based counterterror program and allow for
 study of the motivating ideology of jihad terrorists, without which 
there can be no effective response to the global jihad threat? We shall 
see.
 

“Read full text of Trump’s Riyadh address to the Muslim world,” Jerusalem Post, May 21, 2017:

I want to thank King Salman for his extraordinary words,
and the magnificent Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for hosting today’s summit. I
am honored to be received by such gracious hosts. I have always heard
about the splendor of your country and the kindness of your citizens,
but words do not do justice to the grandeur of this remarkable place and
the incredible hospitality you have shown us from the moment we
arrived.
You also hosted me in the treasured home of King Abdulaziz, the
founder of the Kingdom who united your great people. Working alongside
another beloved leader – American President Franklin Roosevelt – King
Abdulaziz began the enduring partnership between our two countries. King
Salman: your father would be so proud to see that you are continuing
his legacy – and just as he opened the first chapter in our partnership,
today we begin a new chapter that will bring lasting benefits to our
citizens.
Let me now also extend my deep and heartfelt gratitude to each and
every one of the distinguished heads of state who made this journey here
today. You greatly honor us with your presence, and I send the warmest
regards from my country to yours. I know that our time together will
bring many blessings to both your people and mine.
I stand before you as a representative of the American People, to
deliver a message of friendship and hope. That is why I chose to make my
first foreign visit a trip to the heart of the Muslim world, to the
nation that serves as custodian of the two holiest sites in the Islamic
Faith.
In my inaugural address to the American People, I pledged to
strengthen America’s oldest friendships, and to build new partnerships
in pursuit of peace. I also promised that America will not seek to
impose our way of life on others, but to outstretch our hands in the
spirit of cooperation and trust.
Our vision is one of peace, security, and prosperity—in this region, and in the world.
Our goal is a coalition of nations who share the aim of stamping out
extremism and providing our children a hopeful future that does honor to
God.
And so this historic and unprecedented gathering of leaders—unique in
the history of nations—is a symbol to the world of our shared resolve
and our mutual respect. To the leaders and citizens of every country
assembled here today, I want you to know that the United States is eager
to form closer bonds of friendship, security, culture and commerce.
For Americans, this is an exciting time. A new spirit of optimism is
sweeping our country: in just a few months, we have created almost a
million new jobs, added over 3 trillion dollars of new value, lifted the
burdens on American industry, and made record investments in our
military that will protect the safety of our people and enhance the
security of our wonderful friends and allies – many of whom are here
today.
Now, there is even more blessed news I am pleased to share with you.
My meetings with King Salman, the Crown Prince, and the Deputy Crown
Prince, have been filled with great warmth, good will, and tremendous
cooperation. Yesterday, we signed historic agreements with the Kingdom
that will invest almost $400 billion in our two countries and create
many thousands of jobs in America and Saudi Arabia.
This landmark agreement includes the announcement of a $110 billion
Saudi-funded defense purchase – and we will be sure to help our Saudi
friends to get a good deal from our great American defense companies.
This agreement will help the Saudi military to take a greater role in
security operations.
We have also started discussions with many of the countries present
today on strengthening partnerships, and forming new ones, to advance
security and stability across the Middle East and beyond.
Later today, we will make history again with the opening of a new
Global Center for Combating Extremist Ideology – located right here, in
this central part of the Islamic World.
This groundbreaking new center represents a clear declaration that
Muslim-majority countries must take the lead in combatting
radicalization, and I want to express our gratitude to King Salman for
this strong demonstration of leadership.
I have had the pleasure of welcoming several of the leaders present
today to the White House, and I look forward to working with all of you.
America is a sovereign nation and our first priority is always the
safety and security of our citizens. We are not here to lecture—we are
not here to tell other people how to live, what to do, who to be, or how
to worship. Instead, we are here to offer partnership – based on shared
interests and values – to pursue a better future for us all.
Here at this summit we will discuss many interests we share together.
But above all we must be united in pursuing the one goal that
transcends every other consideration. That goal is to meet history’s
great test—to conquer extremism and vanquish the forces of terrorism.
Young Muslim boys and girls should be able to grow up free from fear,
safe from violence, and innocent of hatred. And young Muslim men and
women should have the chance to build a new era of prosperity for
themselves and their peoples.
With God’s help, this summit will mark the beginning of the end for
those who practice terror and spread its vile creed. At the same time,
we pray this special gathering may someday be remembered as the
beginning of peace in the Middle East – and maybe, even all over the
world.
But this future can only be achieved through defeating terrorism and the ideology that drives it.
Few nations have been spared its violent reach.
America has suffered repeated barbaric attacks – from the atrocities
of September 11th to the devastation of the Boston Bombing, to the
horrible killings in San Bernardino and Orlando.
The nations of Europe have also endured unspeakable horror. So too
have the nations of Africa and even South America. India, Russia, China
and Australia have been victims.
But, in sheer numbers, the deadliest toll has been exacted on the
innocent people of Arab, Muslim and Middle Eastern nations. They have
borne the brunt of the killings and the worst of the destruction in this
wave of fanatical violence.
Some estimates hold that more than 95 percent of the victims of terrorism are themselves Muslim.
We now face a humanitarian and security disaster in this region that
is spreading across the planet. It is a tragedy of epic proportions. No
description of the suffering and depravity can begin to capture its full
measure.
The true toll of ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, and so many
others, must be counted not only in the number of dead. It must also be
counted in generations of vanished dreams.
The Middle East is rich with natural beauty, vibrant cultures, and
massive amounts of historic treasures. It should increasingly become one
of the great global centers of commerce and opportunity.
This region should not be a place from which refugees flee, but to which newcomers flock.
Saudi Arabia is home to the holiest sites in one of the world’s great
faiths. Each year millions of Muslims come from around the world to
Saudi Arabia to take part in the Hajj. In addition to ancient wonders,
this country is also home to modern ones — including soaring
achievements in architecture.
Egypt was a thriving center of learning and achievement thousands of
years before other parts of the world. The wonders of Giza, Luxor and
Alexandria are proud monuments to that ancient heritage.
All over the world, people dream of walking through the ruins of
Petra in Jordan. Iraq was the cradle of civilization and is a land of
natural beauty. And the United Arab Emirates has reached incredible
heights with glass and steel, and turned earth and water into
spectacular works of art.
The entire region is at the center of the key shipping lanes of the
Suez Canal, the Red Sea, and the Straits of Hormuz. The potential of
this region has never been greater. 65 percent of its population is
under the age of 30. Like all young men and women, they seek great
futures to build, great national projects to join, and a place for their
families to call home.
But this untapped potential, this tremendous cause for optimism, is
held at bay by bloodshed and terror. There can be no coexistence with
this violence. There can be no tolerating it, no accepting it, no
excusing it, and no ignoring it.
Every time a terrorist murders an innocent person, and falsely
invokes the name of God, it should be an insult to every person of
faith.
Terrorists do not worship God, they worship death.
If we do not act against this organized terror, then we know what
will happen. Terrorism’s devastation of life will continue to spread.
Peaceful societies will become engulfed by violence. And the futures of
many generations will be sadly squandered.
If we do not stand in uniform condemnation of this killing—then not
only will we be judged by our people, not only will we be judged by
history, but we will be judged by God.
This is not a battle between different faiths, different sects, or different civilizations.
This is a battle between barbaric criminals who seek to obliterate
human life, and decent people of all religions who seek to protect it.
This is a battle between Good and Evil.
When we see the scenes of destruction in the wake of terror, we see
no signs that those murdered were Jewish or Christian, Shia or Sunni.
When we look upon the streams of innocent blood soaked into the ancient
ground, we cannot see the faith or sect or tribe of the victims – we see
only that they were Children of God whose deaths are an insult to all
that is holy.
But we can only overcome this evil if the forces of good are united
and strong – and if everyone in this room does their fair share and
fulfills their part of the burden.
Terrorism has spread across the world. But the path to peace begins right here, on this ancient soil, in this sacred land.
America is prepared to stand with you – in pursuit of shared interests and common security.
But the nations of the Middle East cannot wait for American power to
crush this enemy for them. The nations of the Middle East will have to
decide what kind of future they want for themselves, for their
countries, and for their children.
It is a choice between two futures – and it is a choice America CANNOT make for you.
A better future is only possible if your nations drive out the terrorists and extremists. Drive. Them. Out.

DRIVE THEM OUT of your places of worship.
DRIVE THEM OUT of your communities.
DRIVE THEM OUT of your holy land, and
DRIVE THEM OUT OF THIS EARTH.

For our part, America is committed to adjusting our strategies to
meet evolving threats and new facts. We will discard those strategies
that have not worked—and will apply new approaches informed by
experience and judgment. We are adopting a Principled Realism, rooted in
common values and shared interests.
Our friends will never question our support, and our enemies will
never doubt our determination. Our partnerships will advance security
through stability, not through radical disruption. We will make
decisions based on real-world outcomes – not inflexible ideology. We
will be guided by the lessons of experience, not the confines of rigid
thinking. And, wherever possible, we will seek gradual reforms – not
sudden intervention.
We must seek partners, not perfection—and to make allies of all who share our goals.
Above all, America seeks peace – not war.
Muslim nations must be willing to take on the burden, if we are going
to defeat terrorism and send its wicked ideology into oblivion.
The first task in this joint effort is for your nations to deny all
territory to the foot soldiers of evil. Every country in the region has
an absolute duty to ensure that terrorists find no sanctuary on their
soil.
Many are already making significant contributions to regional
security: Jordanian pilots are crucial partners against ISIS in Syria
and Iraq. Saudi Arabia and a regional coalition have taken strong action
against Houthi militants in Yemen. The Lebanese Army is hunting ISIS
operatives who try to infiltrate their territory. Emirati troops are
supporting our Afghan partners. In Mosul, American troops are supporting
Kurds, Sunnis and Shias fighting together for their homeland. Qatar,
which hosts the U.S. Central Command, is a crucial strategic partner.
Our longstanding partnership with Kuwait and Bahrain continue to enhance
security in the region. And courageous Afghan soldiers are making
tremendous sacrifices in the fight against the Taliban, and others, in
the fight for their country.
As we deny terrorist organizations control of territory and
populations, we must also strip them of their access to funds. We must
cut off the financial channels that let ISIS sell oil, let extremists
pay their fighters, and help terrorists smuggle their reinforcements.
I am proud to announce that the nations here today will be signing an
agreement to prevent the financing of terrorism, called the Terrorist
Financing Targeting Center – co-chaired by the United States and Saudi
Arabia, and joined by every member of the Gulf Cooperation Council. It
is another historic step in a day that will be long remembered.
I also applaud the Gulf Cooperation Council for blocking funders from
using their countries as a financial base for terror, and designating
Hezbollah as a terrorist organization last year. Saudi Arabia also
joined us this week in placing sanctions on one of the most senior
leaders of Hezbollah.
Of course, there is still much work to do.
That means honestly confronting the crisis of Islamist extremism and
the Islamist terror groups it inspires. And it means standing together
against the murder of innocent Muslims, the oppression of women, the
persecution of Jews, and the slaughter of Christians.
Religious leaders must make this absolutely clear: Barbarism will
deliver you no glory – piety to evil will bring you no dignity. If you
choose the path of terror, your life will be empty, your life will be
brief, and YOUR SOUL WILL BE CONDEMNED.
And political leaders must speak out to affirm the same idea: heroes
don’t kill innocents; they save them. Many nations here today have taken
important steps to raise up that message. Saudi Arabia’s Vision for
2030 is an important and encouraging statement of tolerance, respect,
empowering women, and economic development.
The United Arab Emirates has also engaged in the battle for hearts
and souls—and with the U.S., launched a center to counter the online
spread of hate. Bahrain too is working to undermine recruitment and
radicalism.
I also applaud Jordan, Turkey and Lebanon for their role in hosting
refugees. The surge of migrants and refugees leaving the Middle East
depletes the human capital needed to build stable societies and
economies. Instead of depriving this region of so much human potential,
Middle Eastern countries can give young people hope for a brighter
future in their home nations and regions.
That means promoting the aspirations and dreams of all citizens who
seek a better life – including women, children, and followers of all
faiths. Numerous Arab and Islamic scholars have eloquently argued that
protecting equality strengthens Arab and Muslim communities.
For many centuries the Middle East has been home to Christians,
Muslims and Jews living side-by-side. We must practice tolerance and
respect for each other once again—and make this region a place where
every man and woman, no matter their faith or ethnicity, can enjoy a
life of dignity and hope.
In that spirit, after concluding my visit in Riyadh, I will travel to
Jerusalem and Bethlehem, and then to the Vatican – visiting many of the
holiest places in the three Abrahamic Faiths. If these three faiths can
join together in cooperation, then peace in this world is possible –
including peace between Israelis and Palestinians. I will be meeting
with both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Palestinian
President Mahmoud Abbas.
Starving terrorists of their territory, their funding, and the false
allure of their craven ideology, will be the basis for defeating them.
But no discussion of stamping out this threat would be complete without
mentioning the government that gives terrorists all three—safe harbor,
financial backing, and the social standing needed for recruitment. It is
a regime that is responsible for so much instability in the region. I
am speaking of course of Iran.
From Lebanon to Iraq to Yemen, Iran funds, arms, and trains
terrorists, militias, and other extremist groups that spread destruction
and chaos across the region. For decades, Iran has fueled the fires of
sectarian conflict and terror.
It is a government that speaks openly of mass murder, vowing the
destruction of Israel, death to America, and ruin for many leaders and
nations in this room.
Among Iran’s most tragic and destabilizing interventions have been in
Syria. Bolstered by Iran, Assad has committed unspeakable crimes, and
the United States has taken firm action in response to the use of banned
chemical weapons by the Assad Regime – launching 59 tomahawk missiles
at the Syrian air base from where that murderous attack originated.
Responsible nations must work together to end the humanitarian crisis
in Syria, eradicate ISIS, and restore stability to the region. The
Iranian regime’s longest-suffering victims are its own people. Iran has a
rich history and culture, but the people of Iran have endured hardship
and despair under their leaders’ reckless pursuit of conflict and
terror.
Until the Iranian regime is willing to be a partner for peace, all
nations of conscience must work together to isolate Iran, deny it
funding for terrorism, and pray for the day when the Iranian people have
the just and righteous government they deserve.
The decisions we make will affect countless lives.
King Salman, I thank you for the creation of this great moment in
history, and for your massive investment in America, its industry and
its jobs. I also thank you for investing in the future of this part of
the world.
This fertile region has all the ingredients for extraordinary success
– a rich history and culture, a young and vibrant people, a thriving
spirit of enterprise. But you can only unlock this future if the
citizens of the Middle East are freed from extremism, terror and
violence.
We in this room are the leaders of our peoples. They look to us for
answers, and for action. And when we look back at their faces, behind
every pair of eyes is a soul that yearns for justice.
Today, billions of faces are now looking at us, waiting for us to act on the great question of our time.
Will we be indifferent in the presence of evil? Will we protect our
citizens from its violent ideology? Will we let its venom spread through
our societies? Will we let it destroy the most holy sites on earth? If
we do not confront this deadly terror, we know what the future will
bring—more suffering and despair. But if we act—if we leave this
magnificent room unified and determined to do what it takes to destroy
the terror that threatens the world—then there is no limit to the great
future our citizens will have.
The birthplace of civilization is waiting to begin a new renaissance. Just imagine what tomorrow could bring.
Glorious wonders of science, art, medicine and commerce to inspire
humankind. Great cities built on the ruins of shattered towns. New jobs
and industries that will lift up millions of people. Parents who no
longer worry for their children, families who no longer mourn for their
loved ones, and the faithful who finally worship without fear.
These are the blessings of prosperity and peace. These are the
desires that burn with a righteous flame in every human heart. And these
are the just demands of our beloved peoples.
I ask you to join me, to join together, to work together, and to FIGHT together— BECAUSE UNITED, WE WILL NOT FAIL.
Thank you. God Bless You. God Bless Your Countries. And God Bless the United States of America.

________________________________________________________

RECENT BARBARISM, A CONSTANT REPLAY OF MOHAMMED’S LIFE, WITNESS & KORAN’S 
JIHAD & SHARIA
 Islamic State beheads and dismembers dozens of women and children in jihad attack on Shia villages
BY CHRISTINE WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The series of deadly attacks in the central Hama province
targeted villages where most residents belong to the Ismaili branch of
Shia Islam.

The Islamic State considers Ismailis apostates, and the Sharia
punishment for apostasy is death. But you won’t hear much about
Muslim-on-Muslim violence committed in the name of Islam from the
mainstream media. The media wants to give the impression that it about
us versus them (i.e., Westerners unfairly picking on Muslims).
A leading Muslim group (and many Muslims), meanwhile, were reportedly angered by a British documentary that dared to ask the question, “how Islamic is Islamic State?” A Newsweek report
offers some insight: “When It Comes to Beheadings, ISIS Has Nothing
Over Saudi Arabia”: the world’s most self-consciously Islamic state
behaves in a manner very much like that of…the Islamic State. Saudi
Arabia is a massive exporter of Wahhabi ideology and a major funder of
mosques worldwide, in which imams are frequently preaching death to
apostates, gays and blasphemers; the beating of wives; the
permissibility of raping infidel women, etc.

“ISIS behead and dismember dozens of women and children in horrific
attack on Syrian villages”, by Bassem Mroue & Lucy Clarke-Billings, Mirror, May 18, 2017:

Islamic State militants have beheaded and dismembered
dozens of women and children in horrific attacks on Syrian villages
which have left 52 people dead.
The series of deadly attacks in the central Hama province targeted
villages where most residents belong to the Ismaili branch of Shia
Islam.
The villages are located near the town of Salamiyeh and the highway
that links the capital, Damascus, to the northern city of Aleppo.
State news agency SANA said militants stormed homes in the southern part of the Aqareb al-Safi village.
Government forces eventually managed to “repel them”, pushing them back toward the desert.
The head of the National Hospital in Salamiyeh, Dr Noufal Safar, said
the hospital received 52 bodies, including 11 women and 17 children.
He said some of them had been beheaded, while others had their limbs removed…..

________________________________________________________

 Report: Never Found British Teen Sex Slaves 
Fed Into Meat Grinders By Muslims to Make Kebabs
Published on May 19, 2017

The
latest news about the Muslim rape gangs in England is that to cover
their crimes they fed a teenage sex slave into a meat grinder.

 Muslims Attack Journalist In England 
For Investigating Sex Slavery
Published on May 19, 2017

Alex
Jones talks with Tommy Robinson about the continual attacks he suffers
during his efforts to make the Muslim rape gangs in England known.



THE NEXT WOMEN’S MARCH IS CO-ORGANIZED BY AN ISLAMIC TERRORIST

THE NEXT
WOMEN’S MARCH IS CO-ORGANIZED 
BY AN ISLAMIC TERRORIST
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By
Kelleigh Nelson


March 4, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
Peaceful
dissent and protest is a hallmark of American freedom. Rioting, destroying
business, and attacking people who disagree with you are hallmarks of
Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Communist China, North Korea… If you
are either too stupid to understand that or you actually embrace this
approach, then you are not American. Not even close.
—J. D.
Pendry
J.D.
Pendry is absolutely spot on, and the filthy tirades by the so-called
Hollywood
elite in the first women’s march, demanding more dead babies, was
enough to show grassroots Americans that those women are demonically possessed.
And yes, the initial women’s march was co-organized by a pro-Palestinian
Islamic woman named Linda Sarsour.
The photo of her picture on a van, is from the first march.
The
foolish women attending these marches cannot see that it behooves Islamics
to promote American women to kill their unborn babies. Why? Because the
typical Islamic family produces 6.2 children and this is how they take
over nation states, by sheer numbers. American women have two children
per family, sometimes less, sometimes none, and barely replace themselves.
The American women involved in this are being played by Islamists for
the takeover of the western world, and they’re too stupid to even
see it.
The
Truth from Oriana Fallaci
Italian
journalist, Oriana
Fallaci
, had the chutzpah to tell the truth about Islam. She did it
quite well in her little book, The
Rage and the Pride
. To read it is to understand the destruction of
Europe. Oriana warned America that the same would happen to us. She had
death threats from Islamists, over and over again, but she stood for the
truth and never gave up.
To paraphrase
this wonderful brave woman, she said of Islam,
First,
they immigrate, then they breed like rats, then they use the laws of
the country they’re infiltrating to gain special accommodations for
their religious views. Then, when there are enough of them, they disrupt
the normal lives of the country’s people, and then the so-called ‘moderates’
join in. And pretty soon, the country is lost.
No,
not all Islamists are like this, but a large majority are, and they want
to dominate the world. Islam is not a religion, nor is it peaceful, and
they do not worship the same God as Judeo-Christians. Islam is found in
the Koran, Sira, and Hadith, and it is involved in these Women’s
Marches, both the first one, and now the second one.
Convicted
Terrorist Organizes March
Notice
the garbage left by the first march, unlike when pro-lifers march on D.C.,
and there is nothing to empty except garbage cans. These women are destructive,
and this is shown explicitly by those who are organizing these militant
marches. Like J.D. Pendry said, “they are not Americans.”
A manifesto published in The
Guardian
on 6 February 17, states this very fact…a “new
wave of militant feminist struggle.” Struggle to kill their unborn
babies, the very children who have different DNA and who are growing inside
the mother’s body? Is that their struggle? That baby is not part
of her body, it is a totally different human being, but they would rather
kill the child than allow it life, because their lives center around their
own self-identity and nothing else.
“Militant”
feminist struggle somehow seems appropriate, considering one of these
so-called feminists is Rasmea
Yousef Odeh
, a former “Popular
Front for the Liberation of Palestine
” (PFLP) terrorist who
was sentenced to life in prison in Israel in 1970 for her involvement
in two terrorist bombings in Jerusalem in 1969. One of the bombings killed
two students while they were shopping for groceries (both males) –
but Odeh only spent 10 years in prison before being released in a prisoner
exchange with the PFLP in 1980.
How
Odeh managed to become a US citizen in 2004 without proper vetting is
beyond most Americans, and this is what our President wants to stop. Apparently,
the INS never bothered to check even google, or they’d have found
she was a convicted terrorist.
In 2014,
she was convicted of immigration fraud for the lies she told to enter
this country, mainly for concealing her arrest, conviction, and imprisonment
for the 1969 bombings. However, she won the right to a new trial this
coming spring, by claiming she had been suffering from PTSD at the time
she lied on her application. Oh, and in her time as a citizen, she worked
for a while as an Obamacare navigator. She also served as associate director
at the Arab
American Action Network
in Chicago, Illinois. Odeh’s history
is a perfect reason she never should have been allowed in our country.
Americans
need to understand that our own government has worked against the citizens
to implement the new world order and globalism. This is why the hatred
of Donald Trump is so vitriolic. He is not a globalist. He has promised
to keep these barbaric savages from infiltrating and destroying our beloved
country.
This
is why we need our President’s Executive Order stopping potential
Islamic terrorists from coming into the United States. The danger to American
citizens has been exposed time and again, and the rotten leftist appointed
judiciary is fighting the man who wants to protect us!
Odeh’s
Manifesto Document
Rasmea
Yousef Odeh, actually co-authored this Manifesto document with Communist
Angela Davis, and Maoist Tithi Bhattacharya. The left believes this Islamist
woman is a hero, despite her murdering past and imprisonment. 
Angela
Davis and Communism
Angela
Davis
is a Stalinist
professor
and longtime supporter of the Black Panthers who blocked
voting districts
in 2008 in order to elect Obama. My cousin lived
in Philadelphia at the time and actually emailed me about what was happening.
And Obama’s Attorney General, Eric
Holder, actually dropped the case against them
.
Davis
is best known for being acquitted in a 1972 trial after three guns she
bought were used in a courtroom shootout that resulted in the death of
a judge. She celebrated by going to Cuba. In the 70s, when my family and
I lived in Moline, Illinois, we attended a church, the denomination of
which I was raised in…and they had a meeting after the service on
Sunday morning. After this meeting, I never stepped foot in this church
again, because I found that monies we donated to this church, which were
going to the Synod, were funding Communist Angela Davis.
Maoisist
Tithi Bhattacharya
A third
co-author, Tithi
Bhattacharya
, praised Maoism
in an essay for the International
Socialist Review
, noting that Maoists are “on the terrorist
list of the US State Department, Canada, and the European Union.”
Maoism is a political philosophy which builds upon both Marxism and Leninism.
Just lovely, and totally anathema to the founding of our beloved country
based on freedom and liberty.
These
women think this is an international grass-roots affair, and they are
promising more information on how to participate in protests throughout
our country, all of which are financed and promoted by George Soros and
Barack Hussein Obama’s
Indivisible movement
. They are actually urging women to walk off their
jobs and join a demonstration near them to promote the murder of unborn
babies, and hatred of our new President.
This
group of Islamic and communist leftists wants women to spend their day
blocking roads, bridges, and squares and abstaining from any domestic
care and sexual relations with their spouses, and boycotting any pro-Trump
businesses. They also want everyone to wear red in solidarity.
Violence,
Not Peaceful Demonstrations
The
hostility and belligerence of the manifesto and its call for a “militant”
uprising is yet another indicator that liberals are increasingly willing
to justify violence in the name of opposing Trump. After the Berkeley
campus erupted in flames
and violence to protest the planned appearance
of Milo Yiannopoulos, many socialist activists took to Twitter to cheer
them on. Hollywood stars Debra Messing and Sarah Silverman both tweeted
their support, with Messing saying, “Resistance works,” and
Silverman ranting, “Wake up and join the resistance. Once the military
is with us, fascists get overthrown. Mad king and his handlers go bye-bye.”
The
insanity is that they don’t realize they are the fascists…not
our new President.
The
organizers of this second march believe that it is okay to punch people
in the face if you hate them. And now, Trump supporters are not the only
targets, these protestors are even angry at liberal democrats, allegedly
because they too are “linked to the corporate capitalist structure,”
according to Angela Davis.
Conclusion
In our
President’s first message to the joint session of Congress, he said,
“Our obligation is to serve, protect, and defend the citizens of
the United States. We are also taking strong measures to protect our nation
from radical Islamic terrorism.” Rasmea Yousef
Odeh is a radical Islamic terrorist, and she is one of the organizers
of this latest women’s march.
 The
rage at losing their globalist socialist new world order candidate has
made them vicious, sadistic and cold blooded, and their fanatical pro-abortion
stances are seen as demonic in nature. The filth they spewed at the last
march was repulsive and abhorrent. They lacked the female refinement of
good manners and good taste, and dove headfirst into the sewers of vulgar
and offensive obscenities. Please pray for them.
Trump
supporters want to keep our sovereign nation, our faith in God, our freedoms
and liberties. We want borders that protect our citizens, jobs that pay
enough to raise our families, free market healthcare, and lower taxes,
and those are just a few reasons why we elected Donald J. Trump as our
President.
Pray
for him, hold his feet to the fire, and tweet to him how you feel. He
is a man chosen by God, and it is our prayers that will give him the wisdom
to lead our country.
P.S.
Every day NewsWithViews brings amazingly researched articles and opinions
on the state of our country into your mailbox. It is not a cheap endeavor
to run this amazing website. The journalists donate their time and articles,
and the editor of NWVs works tirelessly without pay to bring you the best
information on the web. It is your donations that keep this website alive.
Please go
here to help with any amount you can
.

RASMEA YOUSEF ODEH: WOMEN’S MARCH ORGANIZER IS A CONVICTED TERRORIST

 http://truthfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Rasmea-Yousef-Odeh-01-800x416.jpg
 http://9502-presscdn-0-95.pagely.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Rasmea-Yousef-Odeh.jpg
RASMEA YOUSEF ODEH: WOMEN’S MARCH ORGANIZER IS A CONVICTED TERRORIST 
BY RAVEN CLABOUGH
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
One of the organizers for the next women’s anti-Trump march is an
illegal immigrant who was convicted of terrorism. According to the Daily Mail,
Rasmea Yousef Odeh (shown), 69, is a former member of the
Marxist-Leninist group the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
(PFLP) who was convicted of killing two men in a bombing at an Israeli
supermarket and is facing deportation for lying about her involvement in
it in her citizenship application.
Odeh and her fellow organizers are
calling on women to take part in an anti-capitalist, feminist march next
month to oppose President Trump and his “aggressively misogynistic,
homophobic, transphobic and racist policies.”

In an open letter to the British newspaper The Guardian,
Odeh, along with eight other women, claim that the women’s marches on
January 21 marked the beginning of a new age of feminism. The letter’s
co-authors encourage women to take part in an “international strike
against male violence and in defense of reproductive rights” on March 8.
The letter calls upon women to “mobilize” and oppose capitalism and
usher in a new and more “militant’ feminism, stating:

The kind of feminism we seek is already
emerging internationally, in struggles across the globe: from the
women’s strike in Poland against the abortion ban to the women’s strikes
and marches in Latin America against male violence; from the vast
women’s demonstration of last November in Italy to the protests and the
women’s strike in defense of reproductive rights in South Korea and
Ireland.
What is striking about these
mobilizations is that several of them combined struggles against male
violence with opposition to the casualization of labor and wage
inequality, while also opposing homophobia, transphobia and xenophobic
immigration policies. Together, they herald a new international feminist
movement with an expanded agenda: at once anti-racist,
anti-imperialist, anti-heterosexist and anti-neoliberal.

The letter states that the organizers are taking their inspiration
from the Argentinian coalition Ni Una Menos, which defines violence
against women as physical, such as domestic violence, but also
metaphysical, as in “violence of the market, of debt, of capitalist
property relations, and of the state; the violence of discriminatory
policies against lesbian, trans and queer women; the violence of state
criminalization of migratory movements; the violence of mass
incarceration; and the institutional violence against women’s bodies
through abortion bans and lack of access to free healthcare and free
abortion.”

The solution to this, according to the authors, is to do away with
what they dub “lean-in feminism” and create in its stead a feminism that
is militantly anti-capitalist and pro-abortion.

It makes sense that these organizers are asking women to shirk the
old feminism since the original feminists were vehemently pro-life and
therefore unwelcome in today’s Marxist feminist ideology. CNS News
writes, “The suffragettes — Susan B. Anthony in particular — were
fiercely pro-life, calling abortion a ‘crime against humanity,’
‘feticide,’ and ‘child murder.’” But today’s feminist movement is so
adamantly pro-abortion that Women’s March co-chairwoman Linda Sarsour
told the New York Times that any group that wished to participate in the Women’s March had to be pro-choice.

Though the letter credits Trump’s election as the catalyst that
mobilized this new feminist movement, it claims that capitalism has
forged the need for such a movement, as women’s conditions of life have
deteriorated in the last 30 years as a result of corporate globalization
and financialization.

Yet the letter makes no such claims regarding women’s conditions in
Muslim-majority nations. The writers purport to oppose “institutional,
political, cultural and economic attacks on Muslim and migrant women,”
but take no issue with the misogyny that is at the center of the Muslim
culture and sharia law. Even the left-leaning Salon wrote a
piece last October in which it noted that liberals have been largely
silent on the misogyny in the Muslim world, in which women are subject
to genital mutilation, arranged marriages, acid attacks, and many more
horrors.

Meanwhile, while the letter claims to oppose violence, Odeh’s
terroristic actions show otherwise, as she was convicted in 1970 of
planting four bombs in Israel, two of which detonated. One of the bombs
killed two men at an Israeli supermarket and another detonated at the
British Consulate in Israel, though no one was injured.

She served 10 years in prison before being freed in an exchange
program for Israeli prisoners. She came to the United States in 1995,
and received her American citizenship in 2004; however, in 2013 she was
indicted on immigration fraud charges for failing to disclose her
criminal record on her citizenship application.

“An individual convicted of a terrorist bombing would not be admitted
to the United States if that information was known at the time of
arrival,” the Michigan attorney general told ABC at the time.

She has won the right to a new trial, which is set for this spring, according to the New York Post.

As noted by the Daily Mail, Odeh has become “leftist cause
célèbre.” In 2013, for example, Odeh was given the Outstanding Community
Leader Award by the Chicago Cultural Alliance. And protesters have
pleaded for justice on her behalf throughout her immigration trial.  

The New York Post also notes that two other signees on the
letter are heroes of the far Left. Angela Davis is a former leader of
the Communist Party USA and a long-time supporter of the Black Panthers,
who was acquitted in 1972 after three guns she bought were used by a
17-year-old to shoot up a courtroom, killing a judge. And Tithi
Bhattacharya defended Maoism in the Global South as offering “real
protection to the oppressed” in an article for the International Socialist Review.

Clearly, not one of these women is opposed to violence as long as it
is in the name of their pet causes. And yet they somehow feel they have a
right to speak out against violence. The letter itself calls for
disruptive behavior, encouraging women to block roads, bridges, and
squares, and, true to the feminist belief system, asks women to abstain
“from domestic care and sex work.”

It makes one wonder whether the feminist movement is about women’s
rights at all, or if the true intent of the movement is to push a
radical, anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-male agenda. No better
proof is needed than that someone such as Odeh is the movement’s leader.
______________________________________________________

 Who are the People Leading these Women’s Marches?
 Published on Feb 27, 2017
In addition to not being an American citizen, Rasmea Yousef Odeh is a convicted Palestinian terrorist murderer.
 TERRORIST Leading New Women’s March-
Rasmea Yousef Odeh | Feminism | Anti-Trump
 Published on Feb 27, 2017

Just
when you thought Liberals couldn’t get any dumber, now they have a
CONVICTED TERRORIST organizing the next women’s march. Rasmea Yousef
Odeh is a Palestinian terrorist guilty of killing two students with a
bomb. Now she’s the face of feminism.

Guardian article – https://www.theguardian.com/commentis…

 Rasmea Odeh Sentencing for Immigration Fraud
Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome,”PTSS”, 
Caused Her to Lie
 Spinning a Terrorist Into a Victim-5 Part Video Series
Who Is Rasmieh Odeh 
Published on Oct 27, 2014
Starting
Nov. 4, federal prosecutors in Detroit present their case against a
Palestinian woman who slipped through the cracks. Rasmieh Odeh, 67, has
been in the United States since at least 1995.

To her advocates, she’s a peaceful community activist living in Chicago and an asset to her community.

Yet, she has a bloody, dark side that she has kept hidden all these years.

Odeh
is a convicted terrorist who spent 10 years in an Israeli prison. She
led a 1969 bombing that killed two college students in a Jerusalem
supermarket. Odeh confessed. She says that confession only came after
she was tortured. She was sentenced to life in prison, but was released
unexpectedly as part of a prisoner exchange in 1979.

Her torture
claim has never been substantiated—even by the United Nations, to which
she reported the alleged torture after her release—and she has yet to
deny her involvement in the murders or even her ultimate imprisonment.

Odeh
could have discussed the particulars of her situation when she applied
for her visa and citizenship—how her sentence was even commuted—if she
felt her alleged torture merited special consideration. Instead, she
simply told U.S. authorities she had a spotless record.

Prosecutors
say that constitutes immigration fraud. A terrorist conviction for an
attack causing two deaths is something immigration officials would want
to consider before granting an immigrant a visa or welcoming her into
American citizenship.

Still, her supporters have launched an
aggressive campaign aimed at getting the fraud charges dropped. Odeh,
they say, is the real victim here. They claim this case is really about a
government conspiracy to attack Palestinian advocates in America.

The
campaign is led by Odeh’s colleagues from the Arab American Action
Network (AAAN), but has attracted support from the Council on
American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), American Muslims for Palestine (AMP),
the Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee, and even a group of
124 feminist academics.

In the video above, the first installment
of a five-part Investigative Project on Terrorism video series on
Odeh’s case and the campaign to thwart it, we provide an overview of the
case and a look at Rasmieh Odeh and those supporting her.

New
installments will be released each day this week. Tomorrow we examine
the 1969 Jerusalem bombing Odeh helped orchestrate and learn more about
her victims.

 
 
 
 

VIRGINIA CHURCH HOSTS LECTURE ON ” ISLAMOPHOBIA”; PROFESSOR CLAIMS IT’S DRIVEN BY “IMPERIALISM”

 Todd Green
 Todd Green is serving as a Franklin Fellow and advisor on Islamophobia in Europe.
 Todd Green visiting with Representative Keith Ellison (MN) in Washington, DC.
ABOVE: GREEN WITH ELLISON 
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT ELLISON:
VIRGINIA CHURCH HOSTS LECTURE ON 
” ISLAMOPHOBIA”; PROFESSOR CLAIMS IT’S DRIVEN BY “IMPERIALISM” 
BY ANDREW HARROD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

“I have lots of relationships with Muslims. They have taught me compassion and peace,” stated Luther College Professor Todd Green during a January 22 presentation at McLean, Virginia’s Lewinsville Presbyterian Church (LPC). Here this self-proclaimed “scholar of Islamophobia” and “anti-Islamophobia activist
reiterated his fantasy that interpersonal relationships with Muslims
can refute supposed “Islamophobic” prejudices arising from Western sins
like imperialism.

Green, author of the 2015 book The Fear of Islam:  An Introduction to Islamophobia in the West, is currently a Franklin Fellow
at the United States Department of State, where Green “assesses and
analyzes Islamophobia in Europe.” He has had ample opportunity to
expound the book’s themes in various appearances in radio (see here, here, and here) and online, as well as public presentations such as at the 2016 Peacestock conference of the leftwing Veterans for Peace. He also writes for left-leaning publications such as the Huffington Post and Sojourners.

Without specific definitions, Green has concluded that “Islamophobia
is an irrational fear, hostility, or hatred of Muslims and Islam” and is
“one of the most acceptable prejudices in the United States today.”
This presents a “cultural racism” in which “Muslims are essentialized;
they are treated as a race,” he elaborated at LPC. Nonetheless, he has
previously vaguely qualified that critical study of any such posited
bigotry “is not an attempt to cut off critical conversations about
Islam.”

Green has assessed that “imperialism is one of the main factors
driving Islamophobia in the past and in the present,” resulting from
historical “imperial tension and imperial competition” between
Christians and Muslims. “In the seventh century when Islam came on the
scene, it spread very quickly and Islamic empires developed quite
quickly,” he has stated, while leaving unmentioned the Islamic
supremacist jihad doctrine
that propelled such conquests. With shifting power balances between
Western and Islamic civilization across the centuries, Islamic empires
gave way to the European colonialism that subjugated many Islamic lands.

Westerners colonizing Muslims, Green has argued, realized that “with
imperial projects there must be some ‘other’, and this ‘other’ must be
demonized and dehumanized in order for the imperial nation to galvanize
popular support.” The “neo-imperialism” of rival Cold War superpowers
followed European colonialism. Even post-Cold War, “much of U.S. foreign
policy is incomprehensible apart from understanding that we are still
engaged in the imperial project.”

Casting Muslims as passive victims of Western aggression, Green
believes that such stereotypes influence Americans today who “have seen
and continue to see Muslims in many parts of the world as obstacles to
our imperial ambitions.” In the Huffington Post, he emphasizes
the “history of Western interventionism in Muslim-majority contexts,
the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the U.S. exploitation of energy
resources in the Middle East, the legacy of European colonialism.” The
oft-debated question “Is ISIS [the Islamic State in Iraq and (Greater)
Syria] Islamic?” is merely a “thinly veiled form of Islamophobia
intended to heighten our fears of Islam while absolving the U.S. of its
own responsibility in contributing to the rise to ISIS.”

“Religion is rarely the driving force behind terrorism,” Green’s article claims, befitting his oft-disproved analysis
that socioeconomic disadvantage, not Islamic doctrine, lies behind
jihadist violence. At LPC, he described Muslims joining ISIS because of
factors like discrimination in Europe or oppression from Middle Eastern
dictatorships, just as socioeconomic factors might influence Westerners
to join rightwing movements. “White Christians have an empire to hide
behind.  Many of these young men joining ISIS don’t.  When you are
politically disenfranchised you will sometimes find other ways to find
power.”

In identifying “Islamophobia’s” past and present purveyors, Green resorts to well-worn, hackneyed tropes. He embraces the fraudulent Edward Said’s Orientalism
thesis that “knowledge about Islam coming from Orientalism was being
distorted by the imperial project.” Past Western Islamic studies served
not intellectual inquiry, but rather “knowledge for the sake of control”
over Muslims.

Green today castigates “professional Islamophobes” supposedly motivated by pure malice, such as Pamela Geller, Daniel Pipes, Jihad Watch’s Robert Spencer, and Geert Wilders.
“From the time they wake up in the morning to the time they go to bed
at night, their job is to figure out ‘how can I better demonize Muslims
today.’” While “Islamophobia” often appears among conservatives, it is
“more dangerous in the way it manifests itself among those who claim to
be liberal,” such as talk show host Bill Maher, Green noted at LPC. He meanwhile makes the common yet baseless claim
that “Islamophobia” forms a well-funded “powerful industry,” while the
“anti-Islamophobia side does not pay quite as well” for individuals like
him.

Contrastingly, in Green’s estimation Islamic belief seemingly can
cause no harm, as he rejects “misconceptions” that “sharia law is
somehow incompatible with democracy or with the West.” “The overwhelming
majority of Muslims” globally “really are trying to practice their
religion that helps them and their fellow human beings flourish,” he has
argued. At LPC he added that “I hate the language of ‘radical Islamic
terrorism’” and its “simplistic understanding that Islam programs people
to be violent.”

Islamic rule past and present thus raises few concerns for Green
while he condemns the United States for having supported dictators like
Iran’s shah. Like many academics, he whitewashes Islam’s often brutal, subjugated
“status of dhimmis or protected minorities” for non-Muslims, stating
that “for much of the history of Islam Christians and Jews were
protected and lived in peace with Muslims.” Today Americans in the
Middle East should “be very consistent when it comes to supporting
democratic movements, even if that means risking losing an alliance with
an autocratic government,” irrespective of such “democratic” results in
1979 Iran and 2011 Egypt.

More often than not, non-Muslims draw Green’s criticism. Writing in Sojourners, he approved of President Barack Obama’s regurgitation of the common canard
that the Crusades were unjustified aggression, not a just war defensive
response to jihadist conquests. “Obama did his best at the National Prayer Breakfast
in February [2015] to address the legacy of violence carried out in the
name of Christianity.” Green also has falsely relativized that the
“Bible has its fair share of violent texts” along with the Quran,
thereby ignoring fundamental differences between violent verses in these two scriptures.

Green’s Huffington Post writings betray a less than stirring defense of free speech against jihadist censorship. Geller and Spencer’s 2015 Muhammad cartoon contest in Garland, Texas, where security guards killed two Muslim assailants, merely exemplified “hate rallies that engage in Muslim-bashing under the pretense of defending freedom of speech.” Reviewing Iran’s 1989 blasphemy death sentence for British writer Salman Rushdie,
Green mused that “minorities rarely have possessed the same
opportunities to shape public opinion as those with political power or
cultural capital.” Therefore, “Rushdie and some of his more outspoken
supporters adopted a fairly uncritical approach to freedom of
expression, assuming at times that this freedom benefits all members of
Western societies equally.”

For Green, individual relationships between Muslims and non-Muslims
are the antidote to what he has called a “perfect storm of Islamophobia”
in a French television interview.
He laments supposedly skewed media representations emphasizing Islam’s
violence while “there simply are not enough strong relationships in the
West between Muslims who are in the minority and the non-Muslim
majority.” As one venue for interfaith outreach, he advocates the Muslim
Brotherhood (MB)-derived Muslim Students Association (MSA), which he addressed in 2010 at Minnesota’s St. Cloud State University.

One of Green’s book interviewees, Muslim congressman Keith Ellison, currently under fire for his anti-Israel statements and extremists Islamist affiliations,
presents for Green the kind of Muslim people should befriend. “If you
have a really jaded, negative view of politicians and think that they
are intellectually disengaged, you should have a conversation with Keith
Ellison, and you will change your mind,” Green has stated about the
Minnesota representative. Accordingly, Green’s wife and fellow leftist, Tabita, has written
about how he took Luther College students from their Iowa campus on a
field trip to Ellison’s Minneapolis mosque, where the radical imam Siraj Wahaj has been a featured speaker.
Tabita also noted that the field trip included a visit to the Minnesota
chapter of the Hamas-derived Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) “to learn about their civil rights work.”

Green’s tweets round out his Islamist sympathies. In one, he calls the radical, anti-Semitic Woman’s March on Washington organizer Linda Sarsour a “shining star in the battle against racism and bigotry” and therefore “#ImarchwithLinda.” In another,
his CAIR and MSA affiliations apparently make him worry that
“[d]esignating the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist org. will open the
door to witch hunts aimed @ Muslim civil liberties groups.”

Yet even Green recognizes that interfaith relations with Muslims are
not without their pitfalls. “You want to see a nonstarter happen,” he
has indicated in his various appearances, including at LPC, then
introduce the subject of “Palestine” between Jews and Muslims. Before
tackling such hot topics, he recommends that interfaith groups undertake
noncontroversial community projects like Habitat for Humanity homebuilding; “I tend to prefer more organic relationships to evolve,” he has stated. Apparently then, Jewish legal legend Alan Dershowitz should build a house with Ellison before deciding to leave the Democratic Party if he becomes the Democratic National Committee chairman.

Reality belies Green’s “getting to know you
thesis in which individual relationships with Muslims dispel
reservations towards Islam that actually come from the faith’s hard
facts, not imagined prejudice. Numerous Christians from Muslim-majority
countries have impressed upon this author Islam’s oppressive nature
towards non-Muslims, even though these individuals lack no opportunity
to meet Muslims as Green bemoans in the United States. Likewise Europe’s
significantly larger Muslim populations, recently increased by an
influx of “refugees,” have done little to improve Islam’s popularity.

The arguments of Green, who by self-admission is by training a
student of American and European religious history, not Islamic studies,
might impress his fellow leftists as indicated by his largely positive
reception at LPC. Paralleling the Obama Administration’s State
Department, LPC has made an appeal to “Actively Support the Boycott of Products Made in Israeli Settlements” and is pro-LGBT. Yet individuals like James Lafferty,
head of Christians Against Radical Islam (CARI), indicated during
audience questions why skepticism is warranted. He recalled a local
presentation 25 years ago by Anwar al-Awlaki, an imam once feted as a Muslim “moderate”
and later killed in Yemen as an Al Qaeda supporter by a 2011 American
drone strike. “He said many times exactly the same words I have heard
tonight,” Lafferty noted.
______________________________________________________

 THE FEAR OF ISLAM BY TODD GREEN:
 
 

EXPOSED! THE POWER BEHIND THE WOMEN’S MARCH

 EXPOSED! THE POWER BEHIND THE WOMEN’S MARCH
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
By Kelleigh Nelson


January 23, 2017
NewsWithViews.com
The
most persecuted group in the world today is Christians. Christians in
Nigeria, Egypt, Syria and other nations are murdered, raped, kidnapped,
enslaved and persecuted on a daily basis. The reason for the vast majority
of all of this violence is that they are Christian among Muslims.
But
their abuse does not stop with the violence. The perpetrators of violence
are measured in the thousands, but the greatest abuse is at the hands
of those who should demand that the violence stop. The silence in the
face of this persecution is denial and justification. The persecutors
are few, but the deniers are in the billions.
—Professor Bill
Warner
Pro-Palestinian
Islamic Heads the Women’s March
Linda
Sarsour is a National Co-Chair of the Women’s March on Washington, which
took place on January 21, 2017, one day after the inauguration of Donald
Trump as President of the United States of America.
Sarsour
is a Palestinian-American
activist who is the executive director of the Arab
American Association of New York
. This group will receive $10 million
over the next five years, awarded to them by the Mayor of New York City.
[Link]
Sarsour is very vocal about her support for Palestine and her
utter hatred for Israel
. She was recently spotted at a large Muslim
convention in Chicago posing for pictures with an accused financier for
Hamas, the terrorist group.
In 2016,
Sarsour endorsed Socialist Senator Bernie
Sanders
for President of the United States, and attended the Democratic
Convention as a delegate from the State of New York.
The
women in this march celebrate abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy.
No pro-life feminists were allowed. Yet, the Islamic National Co-Chair,
Sarsour, and her Muslim brethren have an average of 6.2 children per family.
Their goal is to outnumber Jews and Christians via population growth.
An Obama
White House “Champion of Change,” Sarsour spoke at the 15th
annual convention of the Muslim
American Society
and Islamic
Circle of North America
. While there, she posed for a picture with
Salah
Sarsour
, a member of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee and former Hamas
operative who was jailed in Israel in the 1990s because of his alleged
work for the terrorist group.
Linda
Sarsour is very active on Twitter. She is pro Sharia law, and a couple
of her tweets even have a seditious tone to them where she romanticizes
Sharia law and hints at it taking over America whereby we would have interest
free loans. (Islamists do not pay interest on loans).
She
tweeted this picture of American women tying on hijabs in solidarity with
Islam.
So,
women of America, how do you like the fact that the organizer of your
march advocates for Shariah Law, has ties to the terrorist group, Hamas,
is considered a second class citizen because she’s a Muslim woman,
and is leading your pro-rights Women’s March?
Here
is a list
of the so-called celebrities attending the Women’s
March, which includes Planned Parenthood President, Cecile Richards, daughter
of former Democratic Governor of Texas, Ann “Ma” Richards.
And
of course, once again, this march
is being funded by the Soros groups
.
Truly,
have these women lost their minds?
Seditionists
at Women’s March

A photograph was taken by an observer of the Women’s March in Washington
D.C. that shows a participant holding a sign that calls for the assassination
of President Donald Trump. The sign reads, “Someone should chop
Trump’s head off & burn it in the ashes of everything he loved.
666”
This is sedition, calling for the assassination of our duly elected President,
but even worse, signing it with the number of the anti-Christ is telling.
And he’s smiling!

Heather
Lowrey
Heather
Lowrey, who described herself as a Louisville vixen and aspiring wrestling
diva on her Twitter profile, before going into electronic hiding, tweeted
the message on January 17, “If someone was cruel enough to assassinate
MLK, maybe someone will be kind enough to assassinate Trump. #bekind #trump
#lovetrumpshate.”
Her
employers soon after fired Lowrey and issued public statements distancing
themselves from her threatening tweet.
Madonna
The
Secret
Service has reportedly said it will open an investigation into Madonna

after the singer told the Women’s March on Washington that she had thought
about “blowing up the White House.”
Donning
a black p***y hat, the music icon dropped the F-bomb four times, sparking
a slew of apologies from broadcasters airing the protest live.
She
went on to speak of her rage at the election result, telling the crowd
she had thought a lot about “blowing up the White House, but knew
that it wouldn’t change anything.”
Ashley
Judd
Actress
Ashley Judd proudly took to the stage to proclaim the fact that she was
glad she was able to abort her baby conceived in rape. Judd proudly repeated
the phrase “I’m a nasty woman,” as the crowd of thousands
continued to cheer. “And our p***ies ain’t for grabbing, they’re
for reminding you that our walls are stronger than America’s ever
will be,” she concluded.
“Our
pu**ies are for our pleasure, for birthing new generations of filthy,
vulgar, nasty, proud, Christian, Buddhist, Muslim, Sikh, generations of
nasty women.” [Link]
She
went on to rant
and rave
about her monthly periods and why Tampax is taxed whereas
Viagra and other men’s erectile dysfunction prescriptions are not.
I guess she doesn’t realize that one is a physician’s prescription
and the other is an over-the-counter convenience for women.
Patriotism
vs. Classless Morons
Samuel
Adams said, “He therefore is the truest friend to the liberty of
this country who tries most to promote its virtue, and who, so far as
his power and influence extend, will not suffer a man to be chosen into
any office of power and trust who is not a wise and virtuous man…The
sum of all is, if we would most truly enjoy this gift of Heaven, let us
become a virtuous people.” Virtue was absent at the Women’s
March.
And
Thomas Paine stated, “Those who expect to reap the blessings of
freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it.”
President Trump has given up a life of ease to take on the huge task of
righting our beloved nation, not just for his own descendants, but for
all of the Americans he loves and cares about.
And
like President Trump, singer Lee Greenwood is the epitome of true patriotism.
Back in 2015, when Lee Greenwood crossed paths with the U.S. Army Chorus,
they shared a profoundly patriotic moment in the tunnels of Nationals
Park, Washington, D.C. In honor of Lee and the amazing patriotic impact
his music has had on our nation, here is the video. And may God Bless
you, Sir, and God Bless the USA!
There’s
a New Sheriff in Town
Former
Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy said, “The reason why we find
ourselves in a position of impotency is not because the enemy has sent
men to invade our shores, but rather because of the traitorous actions
of those who have had all the benefits that the wealthiest
nation on earth has had to offer – the finest homes, the finest college
educations, and the finest jobs in Government we can give.”
 Those
days have now come to an end, and the liberal Socialists are rebelling.
Journalist
Daniel Greenfield
said it far better than I ever could, “There
were those who celebrated and those who mourned the fall of the USSR.
So too there are those who celebrate and those who mourn the end of Obama.
The tears of leftist hipsters crying over Obama are no different than
those of the old women holding up Stalin’s portrait on May Day in
the Red Square.”
______________________________________________________

 Women’s March organizer Linda Sarsour 
makes Islamic State signal
 

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT LINDA SARSOUR:
https://ratherexposethem.org/2017/01/southwest-airlines-flight-turns-on-pink.html 
_________________________________________________

 

Women’s March organizer Linda Sarsour has family ties to Hamas, recently met former Hamas financier

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/01/womens-march-organizer-linda-sarsour-has-family-ties-to-hamas-recently-met-former-hamas-financier;

  republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

 “Though she avoids discussing it now, Sarsour has acknowledged
in past interviews that she has cousins serving prison time in Israel
because of their work for Hamas.Sarsour has denied having any contact
with the terror group. She told The New York Times in 2012 that she
would not have been appointed an Obama ‘Champion of Change’ if she had.”

In reality, it’s highly doubtful that Obama, who stopped the
prosecutions of and legitimized Hamas-linked Islamic groups in the U.S.,
would have cared.
Related question: how do you think all these silly, narcissistic,
self-pitying women wearing “pussy hats” and marching against Trump would
fare in Hamas-controlled Gaza?

“Women’s March Organizer Recently Met Ex-Hamas Operative, Has Family Ties To Terror Group,” by Chuck Ross, Daily Caller, January 21, 2017:

Linda Sarsour, one of the organizers behind Saturday’s
Women’s March, being held in Washington, D.C., was recently spotted at a
large Muslim convention in Chicago posing for pictures with an accused
financier for Hamas, the terrorist group.

Sarsour, the head of the Arab American Association of New York and an
Obama White House “Champion of Change,” was speaking at last month’s
15th annual convention of the Muslim American Society and Islamic Circle
of North America.
While there, she posed for a picture with Salah Sarsour, a member of
the Islamic Society of Milwaukee and former Hamas operative who was
jailed in Israel in the 1990s because of his alleged work for the
terrorist group.
Salah Sarsour, who is also a board member of American Muslims for
Palestine, served as a bodyguard of sorts at the convention for Sumeyye
Erdogan Bayraktar, the daughter of Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip
Erdogan.
While it is unclear if Salah and Linda are related (though they share
the same surname, she has suggested in the past on social media that
they are not and did not respond to requests for comment), she has other
family ties to alleged Hamas operatives. Though she avoids discussing
it now, Sarsour has acknowledged
in past interviews that she has cousins serving prison time in Israel
because of their work for Hamas.Sarsour has denied having any contact
with the terror group. She told The New York Times in 2012 that she
would not have been appointed an Obama “Champion of Change” if she had.

The activist has risen to national attention recently. She served as a
delegate to the Democratic National Convention, and she is one of four
lead organizers for the Women’s March.
The event is expected to attract 500,000 people and will feature
several high-profile progressive speakers. But it has been heavily
criticized for excluding pro-life women’s groups. Meanwhile, the Council
on American-Islamic Relations, a Muslim civil rights group which
opposes abortions past 20 weeks, was asked to take part in the event.

HLF was found to have funneled money to Hamas, which was designated a terrorist group in the 1990s.
Salah Sarsour has ties to that group.

Sarsour was implicated in Hamas activity in the West Bank in the 1990s, according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).
ADL cited a Nov. 2001 FBI memo detailing information provided by Sarsour’s brother, Jamil, to Israeli investigators in 1998.
“According to statements given to Israeli investigators by his
brother Jamil, Sarsour was personally involved in fundraising for Hamas.
According to a November 2001 FBI memorandum, Jamil Sarsour was arrested
in 1998 for funding Hamas and told Israeli investigators that Salah
Sarsour was involved in funding Hamas through his fundraising for the
Holy Land Foundation (HLF),” ADL reported….

_______________________________________________________

 Bernie Sanders, Fashion Magazine “Elle” defend Hamas-linked pro-Sharia Women’s March organizer Linda Sarsour

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/01/bernie-sanders-elle-defend-hamas-linked-pro-sharia-womens-march-organizer-linda-sarsour;
EXCERPTS“The Daily Caller ran an exposé on Women’s March organizer Linda Sarsour’s ties to Hamas, and John Perazzo at FrontPage compiled an extensive report on her agitation in support of the “Palestinian” Jihad and Hamas in particular.
 Multiple links to Hamas? Openly in favor of a system that allows women
to be beaten, devalues their testimony and inheritance rights, and
treats them essentially like commodities owned by men? That sounds like
someone the contemporary Left would love! And they do. As this
information has come out about Sarsour, numerous prominent Leftists have
rushed to her defense, including Bernie Sanders.
 Sarsour’s defenders even include the fashion magazine Elle, which
apparently has not considered what the fashion industry would be like
were Sharia to prevail in the West. (Or maybe it has; top designers are
designing hijabs these days, so it could be that Elle is simply looking
at the way the wind is blowing.) Without taking even a nanosecond to
investigate whether or not the charges against Sarsour are true, Elle
dismisses them as “Islamophobic attacks.” (Could it be because she is
such a fashion plate?)”
________________________________________________________

AFDI Video at #WomensMarch: Violence, Profanity and Hate, Our Reporter Attacked 

Published on Jan 24, 2017
Subscribe: GellerReport.com
Like on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pamelageller/
Like AFDI on Fscebook: https://www.facebook.com/AFDInational/
AFDI.us

Last
week I warned on this site and various email newsblasts that it was
going to get ugly and we must get ready to fight for Trump. It’s worse
than that.

I was in DC for the Deploraball and the inauguration
and I can tell you, it was the best of times and it was the worst of
times. The best of America and the worst.

If anyone thought the
left would accept defeat and respect the democratic process, they have
not been paying attention for the past 40 years. The left’s army of
goons is fueled by incendiary rhetoric by the media, academia, Hollywood
airheads was on full display this past weekend at the sore losers
protests in leftwing cities across the country.

 

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT TURNS ON PINK CABIN LIGHTS FOR PRO ABORTION “WOMEN’S MARCH PARTICIPANTS

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES FLIGHT TURNS ON 
PINK CABIN LIGHTS FOR PRO ABORTION 
“WOMEN’S MARCH PARTICIPANTS 
BY HEATHER CLARK
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

WASHINGTON — A Southwest Airlines flight
transporting a number of men and women to the “Women’s March” on
Washington on Thursday reportedly turned the cabin lights pink to show
support for those attending the event, which was largely pro-abortion
and feminist.
“Southwest turns on the pink lights and a loud cheer erupts.
#WomensMarch” Jennifer Moran, who was aboard the flight, Tweeted,
sharing a photo of the illuminated cabin.
Passenger Krystal Parrish likewise posted a photo to Instagram
writing, “When your Southwest flight crew celebrate a plane full of
[expletive] women and men going to the Women’s March by lighting it
up!!”
Southwest Airlines has since released a statement outlining that the
move wasn’t a company effort, but that individual flights often change
the lighting as a statement of support for passengers.

“While we’re unaware of details surrounding a specific flight, our
flight crews celebrate, commemorate, acknowledge and share in special
moments with our customers all the time,” it said.
“Some of our aircraft are equipped with mood lighting and while this
was not a companywide initiative, at times, our flight crews will adjust
the lighting for a customer or group of customers traveling on their
flight,” the company explained. “For example, in October, one of our
flight crews changed the lighting to honor a breast cancer survivor
onboard their flight.”
According to reports, hundreds of thousands attended the march in
Washington, which included speeches and appearances from secular
celebrities such as Madonna, Cher, Alicia Keyes, Katy Perry, Miley
Cyrus, Jane Fonda, Gloria Steinem, Whoopie Goldberg, Scarlett Johannson,
Natalie Portman, Emma Watson, Drew Barrymore, Lena Dunham, Vanessa
Hudgens, and many others.

Some held signs such as, “We deserve to be sexual and serious, or
whatever we please,” “I stand with Planned Parenthood,” “Our bodies, our
minds, our power” and “I am woman, hear me roar.” Some were too
explicit or profane to repost—using profanity or vulgarity—and some
referred to President Trump as the “predator in chief.”
Cecile Richards, the president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, was one of the speakers at the event.
“For the majority of people in this country, Planned Parenthood is
not the problem, we’re the solution,” she claimed. “My pledge today is:
our doors stay open.”
Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton Tweeted in
support of the march, writing, “Thanks for standing, speaking &
marching for our values @womensmarch. Important as ever. I truly believe
we’re always stronger together.”
But a number of women who identify as “pro-life feminists” also took
to the streets of Washington to counter the abortion advocacy message,
holding banners and signs such as “Abortion betrays women” and “Real
feminists reject abortion.” The Huffington Post reports that some
attendees cussed at the pro-life women, while others thanked them for
their participation.
In addition to support for abortion, which was characterized as
“reproductive rights,” other platforms for marchers included immigration
rights, environmental justice and “LGBTQIA rights.”
“We firmly declare that LGBTQIA rights are human rights and that it
is our obligation to uplift, expand and protect the rights of our gay,
lesbian, bi, queer, trans or gender non-conforming brothers, sisters and
siblings. We must have the power to control our bodies and be free from
gender norms, expectations and stereotypes,” the website for the event
reads.

Similar marches were stated to have been held in cities across the nation, as well as internationally.
One of the event organizers, Linda Sarsour, is a Muslim and Planned
Parenthood supporter. Sarsour, who serves as the executive director of
the Arab American Association of New York, posted prior to the event,
“God be a fence around the #womensmarch tomorrow. May God protect our
marchers, may He envelope us in His love and mercy.”

 ______________________________________________________

WHITE HOUSE “CHAMPION” BLASTS MUSLIMS WHO TALK TO ANY PRO ISRAEL JEWS

 https://www.jihadwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/lindasarsour.jpg
WHITE HOUSE “CHAMPION” BLASTS MUSLIMS WHO TALK TO ANY PRO ISRAEL JEWS 
BY CHERYL CHUMLEY
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

A Palestinian activist who decried “bitter people” on Twitter forgot
her own words and failed to walk what she talked when – three days later
– she delivered a hate-filled speech at the American Muslims for
Palestine conference that took broad sideswipes at Jews.
Here’s the story, from the Investigative Project:

“Linda Sarsour took to Twitter Nov. 22 with a quick, venting post: ‘You know what I can’t stand? Bitter people. That’s all.’
“Sarsour spoke at the annual American Muslims for Palestine (AMP)
conference three days later. Evidently, she can’t stand herself.
“Sarsour, who describes herself as a ‘racial justice and civil rights
activist,’ lashed out at Jews who extended a hand of friendship and
solidarity over concerns that increasing hostility toward Muslims in
America might lead to draconian government action. And she lashed out at
fellow Muslims who accepted the gesture and joined in a new inter-faith
dialogue.”

Umm, a bit bitter, wouldn’t you say, Sarsour?

Linda Sarsour is regarded as a moderate voice for Islam, but nonetheless criticizes Jewish people and those who believe Israel ought to exist as a nation.Linda
Sarsour is regarded as a moderate voice for Islam, but nonetheless
criticizes Jewish people and those who believe Israel ought to exist as a
nation.Again, from the Investigative Project, a clue to her angst:

“The Jews at issue support the state of Israel, support its existence and its vitality. Sarsour wants none of that.”

Got it. So bitterness, bad – except when it comes from outrage over Jewish people who support the state of Israel.
She said, the news outlet reported:

“‘We have limits to the type of friendships that we’re
looking for right now,” Sarsour told the AMP conference, ‘and I want to
be friends with those whom I know have been steadfast, courageous, have
been standing up and protecting their own communities, those who have
taken the risk to stand up and say – we are with the Palestinian people,
we unequivocally support BDS [boycott, divestment and sanctioning
Israel] when it comes to Palestinian human rights and have been attacked
viciously by the very people who are telling you that they’re about to
stand on the front line of the Muslim registry program. No thank you,
sisters and brothers.’”

Sarsour’s remarks no doubt went over well with the other conference attendees.
As Investigative Project wrote:

“AMP claims its ‘sole purpose is to educate the American
public and media about issues related to Palestine and its rich cultural
and historical heritage.’ But in practice, the group has defended Hamas
and its leaders admit they seek ‘to challenge the legitimacy of the
State of Israel.’”

Sarsour isn’t just any voice in the wilderness. She was honored by
the Obama administration as a “Champion of Change” and also served with
Sen. Bernie Sanders on his failed presidential campaign.
Once again, from the Investigative Project:

“She acknowledges there’s a rift among Islamists about
how hard a line to draw in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, yet she was
intent on pouring gasoline on the fire.
“The ‘cracks in our community’ are so wide, she said, they’re visible
to ‘right-wing Zionists, Islamophobes, white supremacists.’
“‘They know where we’re divided. They know that we’re segregated,’
she said. ‘So they, we could easily be targeted when we’re a fragmented
community. But if we were a strong, united, steadfast community that
stood up for each other first and foremost, you’d better believe that no
opposition would ever be trying to take us down, because we’d be too
big, too strong and too united.’
“Some of her comments likely were directed at Anti-Defamation League
chief Jonathan Greenblatt. Should a Trump administration create a
registry for Muslims, an idea that does not seem to be on the table,
Greenblatt recently pledged that ‘this proud Jew will register as
Muslim.’”
“Sarsour not only rebuked the gesture, she cast Muslims who might
respond more positively as sellouts of the Palestinian cause.
Cooperation and solidarity gestures should only be reserved for those
who share the depth of her hatred toward Israel, she said.”

______________________________________________________

 SARSOUR RAILS AGAINST “WHITE SUPREMACY”:
 COMBATING ISLAMOPHOBIA

BERNIE SANDERS, JULIAN CASTRO SET TO SPEAK AT HAMAS LINKED ISLAMIC SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA CONFERENCE


BERNIE SANDERS, JULIAN CASTRO SET TO SPEAK 
AT HAMAS LINKED ISLAMIC SOCIETY 
OF NORTH AMERICA CONFERENCE
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
There is simply no concern on the Left for Islamic jihad and its enablers. Jihad does not exist; only “Islamophobia” does.
“The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) was established in July 1981 by U.S-based members of the Muslim Brotherhood with a background as leaders of the Muslim Students Association (MSA). As author and terrorism expert Steven Emerson puts it, ISNA “grew out of the Muslim Students Association, which also was founded by Brotherhood members.” Indeed, Muslim Brothers would dominate ISNA’s leadership throughout the Society’s early years. Striving “to advance the cause of Islam and serve Muslims in North America so as to enable them to adopt Islam as a complete way of life,” ISNA was highly dependent upon Saudi funding during its early years.” — from Discover the Networks
In its latest filing before the federal district court in Dallas on behalf of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and its affiliate organization, the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) in the Hamas-terrorism financing case, the ACLU has made a noteworthy admission.
Rather than deny that there is copious evidence tying ISNA and NAIT to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, the brief argues that such evidence is merely dated. In a curious footnote on page 7, the reply states:
Assuming the authenticity of documents’ dates, the most recent documents to mention either ISNA or NAIT are dated 1991, Gov. Exhs. 3-3 and 3-85, but the majority of the documents are older. Almost all of the numerous exhibits that purport to show financial transactions and that contain any mention of ISNA or NAIT are dated 1988 and 1989 (there are two dated 1990), almost a decade before the majority of the overt acts the government alleges in support of its conspiracy charges against the HLF defendants.
So ISNA and NAIT are not saying that the documents tying their organizations to Hamas are “inauthentic,” but that the problem with the evidence is just that it is old. Then, even more curiously, the reply goes on to argue something that the government has not even alleged:
Even if the “evidence” provided some basis for alleging criminality against petitioners, the government’s discussion of it shows the government utterly fails to grasp the singular weight and consequence that an official accusation of criminal conduct carries in our criminal justice system and in our society.
But, of course, the government has not charged ISNA or NAIT with criminal conduct, or the two groups would be indicted in their own right, rather than un-indicted co-conspirators who worked with the Holy Land for Relief and Development (HLF), the defendant and alleged Hamas-front. The reply brief then, as Shakespeare might write, “doth protest too much.”
“Bernie, Castro Set to Speak at Terror-Linked Radical Islam Conference,” by Tyler O’Neil, PJ Media, August 7, 2019:
At least two candidates for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former HUD Secretary Julián Castro, will speak at the annual convention for the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). ISNA was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case concerning funding the terror group Hamas.
ISNA may be the largest Muslim group in America, but it also has a bad history with terror and radical Islam. The Holy Land Foundation raised $12 million for Hamas, which the State Department designated a terrorist organization in 1997. The U.S., Israel, and the European Union have shut down organizations that funnel money to Hamas.
The Department of Justice lists ISNA as an “entity” of the Muslim Brotherhood, a radical group dedicated to establishing a global caliphate with all humanity living under sharia (Islamic law).
ISNA wasn’t just a co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case — the organization also shared an address with the Holy Land Foundation. One of its founders, Sami Al-Arian, would later be deported to Turkey thanks to his support for terrorist groups. Abdurahman Alamoudi, who would later be convicted on terror charges, led ISNA’s Political Awareness Committee.
ISNA’s bi-monthly publication, Islamic Horizons, has promoted terror-supporting radicals like Siraj Wahhaj, imam of Brooklyn’s al-Taqwa mosque. Wahhaj was an unindicted co-conspirator for a trial dealing with the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, an act that killed six Americans. He had been linked to the bombmaker. The publication has also fundraised for Islamic Relief, which Israel labeled as a front for Hamas.
Many forms of sharia condemn homosexuals. In July 2017, ISNA booted Muslims for Progressive Values, a pro-LGBT Muslim group, from its convention. Muzammil Siddiqi, ISNA’s president from 1997 to 2001, said he supported laws in countries where homosexuality is punishable by death.
Why do Sanders and Castro, who claim to support LGBT activism, openly associate with ISNA?…

ISLAM & FREEDOM DON’T MIX IN NEW CHARTER (PART ONE & TWO)

JIHADIST MUSLIMS SIGN DOCUMENT THEY’LL LIKELY NEVER ADHERE TO
 “American Charter of Freedom of Religion and Conscience”
 The American Charter of Freedom of Religion and Conscience is an initiative of the Religious Freedom Institute in partnership with Baylor University’s Institute for Studies of Religion with funding from the Templeton Religion Trust.
The American Charter of Freedom of Religion and Conscience is the result of a collaborative initiative to:

  • Restore civility to public discourse on religion and freedom of religion and conscience in American society.
  • Explore the meaning and value of freedom of religion and conscience as a foundation of American democracy and national and international prosperity.
  • Build a multi-faith, non-partisan coalition working to affirm freedom of religion and conscience as a vital safeguard for people of all faiths and none.
ISLAM & FREEDOM DON’T MIX IN NEW CHARTER (PART ONE) 
BY ANDREW HARROD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

Award-winning religion reporter Richard Ostling recently noted a “neglected story” from 2018, namely the November 29 signing of the American Charter of Freedom of Religion and Conscience. This deeply flawed document, “at 5,000 words needlessly repetitive” in his description, includes several nefarious exponents of political Islam in an initiative that will ultimately do little to promote freedom.
The charter correctly emphasizes that religious freedom is a “fundamental right grounded in the dignity of the human person” and correspondingly notes the 1776 Declaration of Independence with its expression of natural law. America’s founding document is part of the “great tradition of freedom-loving peoples and their ringing declarations” such as the 1215 Magna Carta and the 1791 United States Constitution. This tradition evinces that “Americans’ political commitment to the Republic is rooted in deep pre-political conviction.”
The charter notes that religious freedom “has played an irreplaceable role in the story of our nation” and created “social capital…vital for human flourishing.” Correspondingly, the charter lauds the religious leadership in American reform movements, such as those against slavery and segregation. The charter thus announces its “distinctively American,” character while its authors universally “commend the vision, principles, and goals of the Charter to other nations.”
Yet the leadership of a prominent conservative Montana evangelical church (they believe in “young-Earth creationism” and that “Roman Catholicism is a counterfeit Christianity”) scorns the charter’s underlying ecumenical universalism. The church’s popular website Pulpit and Pen (PP) criticizes the fact that the charter “places oppressive religions like Islam in the same category as Christianity and credits them all with equal contributions to the American way of life.” While the American abolitionist and civil rights movements drew heavily upon Christian faith, the charter’s general terms are “gutting America of its theological underpinnings, minimizing its Christian heritage.”
The 19th-century French intellectual Alexis de Tocqueville provides compelling witness for PP’s valid observation that “America’s commitment to Christianity is responsible for its national exceptionalism.” American “pre-political” human rights values come from the “uniquely Christian doctrine” of mankind being made in the “Imago Dei.” By contrast, as the esteemed Catholic intellectual Robert Reilly has lucidly analyzed, Islamic orthodoxy’s denial that humanity shares a divine likeness has resulted in Islamic denigration of the human reason that underlies free societies.
Notwithstanding the charter’s prioritization of “pluralism” in America and abroad, observes the Christian commentator Cody Libolt, “some cultures are better than others.” The charter’s citation of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) among freedom’s “ringing declarations” ignores the fact that the UDHR resulted from centuries of human rights advocacy in which Christians were preeminent. All the other “ringing declarations” merely represent the “great tradition of freedom-loving peoples” in Anglo-American culture.
PP rightfully suspects that certain charter language would prevent policymakers from exercising precisely such necessary cultural awareness with respect to Islam. The charter vaguely opposes “any governmental policy that would discriminate against individuals or groups based on their religion.” The charter further condemns “rhetoric and actions by governmental leaders and others that demonize individuals or faith communities” or that “hold entire faith groups collectively responsible for the evil deeds of a few.” As PP observes, the charter apparently targets “policies like that threatened by President Trump” to “place a temporary moratorium on immigrants from primarily Islamic nations who want to destroy the United States.”
Review of the charter’s Muslim signatories only confirms PP’s wariness towards multiculturalism. Both Mohamed Magid and Sayyid Syeed, a man who wants to “to change the constitution of America” that is so praised by the charter, have not-so-“freedom-loving” pasts, as evidenced by both men’s leadership of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). This Muslim Brotherhood (MB)-derived organization and terrorism-financing unindicted co-conspirator demonstrated its continuing Islamic supremacism at ISNA’s 2018 annual conference with a rogue’s gallery of jihad terrorism apologists and Israel-haters.
Likewise Eftakhar Alam and Anwar Khan represent Islamic Relief USA, the American branch of another global MB organization known for antisemitism and terrorism support. Omar Suleiman’s apologetics for honor killings and sex slavery, along with his vicious antisemitism and Islamic myths that deny Jewish Temple Mount history, hardly befit the “dignity of the human person.” The Shiite Imam Hassan Al-Qazwini is similarly anti-Semitic, as indicated by his Dearborn, Michigan, Islamic Center of America hosting Louis Farrakhan as well as a 2010 memorial service for Hezbollah leader Mohammed Hussein Fadlallah.
“Free exercise of religion and conscience requires other fundamental rights also guaranteed by the First Amendment, including the freedoms of speech,” the charter proclaims, yet its Muslim signatories have consistently belied this sentiment. Al-Qazwini called in 2012 for censoring the internet film Innocence of Muslims as a form of incitement, while Suleiman has aided Google’s suppression of “Islamophobia.” Maha ElGenaidi wrote to Stanford University about her horrified opposition to a 2017 lecture by the “well-known national fomenter of Islamophobia,” Jihad Watch’s own Robert Spencer.
Similarly, Princeton University Muslim Life Coordinator and Chaplain Imam Sohaib Sultan tried to stop a 2009 address by the Egyptian-American Muslim convert to Christianity Nonie Darwish. His fellow signatory Asma Uddin once promoted the deranged leftist Israel-hater, academic fraud, and “Islamophobia” scam artist Nathan Lean at a Washington, DC, event by the Rumi Forum, part of the shadowy Islamic Fethullah Gülen network. She has correspondingly downplayed Islamic sharia law’s dangers and has wrongly argued that state law prohibitions on judicial application of foreign laws like sharia in violation of constitutional rights would ban private Islamic religious arbitration.
The Muslim charter signatory Usra Ghazi’s speech raises troubling questions of its own. She once responded to the internet sensation of a woman who wrote about concealing her Muslim identity to other Muslims, because she feared their condemnation for wearing traditionally non-Islamic female attire such as shorts. Ghazi argued that such “chastisement comes from a place of love” and is “taking really literally and personally the Koranic commandment [i.e. Quran 3:110] to enjoin good and forbid evil for the sake of the salvation of other Muslims.” While under the law in free societies such as America, she may debate such Islamic hijab dress codes for women, other women globally know from bitter personal experience how oppressive such Islamic enjoinment can be.
The charter proclaims with sacral invocations a religious freedom “commitment that is, at its heart, covenantal, based on a solemn and binding promise between citizens as embodied in the U.S. Constitution.” Yet the charter’s Muslim signatories inspire little confidence that they will embrace any such solemn commitment and its Western moral and theological underpinnings. By contrast, these dubious individuals will benefit from the legitimacy of associating with such a lofty-sounding charter and its implied opposition to “Islamophobia.” However, the charter will provide less benefit in protecting the religious freedom concerns of the charter’s often naïve non-Muslim signatories, as a forthcoming article will analyze.
______________________________________________________________

 Islam and Freedom Don’t Mix in New Charter (Part II)
BY ANDREW HARROD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
 

The November 29, 2018, American Charter of Freedom of Religion and Conscience claims as supporters a “multi-faith, non-partisan coalition” that includes several sharia supremacist charter signatories, as previously disclosed. Yet these and other dangers raise little alarm among the charter’s Christian signatories, who promote a flawed religious freedom defense.
The disturbing Muslim charter signatories receive no critical corrective from non-Muslim signatories such as Charles Haynes, Religious Freedom Center (RFC) founding director at the Washington, DC, Newseum Freedom Forum Institute. While Haynes has written about the “Islamophobia” concern he shares with his fellow signatory and RFC colleague Asma Uddin, the RFC has welcomed noted British Salafists. In a parallel situation, the evangelical Bob Roberts has suggested censoring Innocence of Muslims while praising the extremist Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi.
Roberts has a longstanding relationship with the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). His fellow evangelical signatory Chris Seiple has also had a similar lengthy relationship with Suhail Khan, an American Muslim with numerous close ISNA and other Muslim Brotherhood (MB) ties. The CATO Institute’s past laughable pronouncements on sharia law’s compatibility with libertarianism and dubious Muslim “libertarian” advisers meanwhile make suspect the credibility of signatory Ilya Shapiro, a CATO legal scholar.
The Catholic signatories such as conservative intellectual luminary Robert George always seem to show affection for all things Muslim, including his fellow charter signer and friend Hamza Yusuf, notwithstanding his radical affiliations. Similar outlooks are found among George’s fellow Catholics at Washington, DC’s Religious Freedom Institute (RFI), including its executive director Kent Hill, who over-optimistically advocates pro-life Christian-Muslim alliances. Georgetown University Professor Timothy Shah’s past policy prescriptions for Middle East Christians have likewise emphasized encouraging Muslim respect for religious freedom rather than Christian realpolitik defensive measures.
RFI’s Thomas Farr has carefully assessed strategies “to help Muslim reformers win the war of ideas” for religious liberty in Islamic societies, a key tool “to forestall religion-based violence and terrorism.” Yet he has concluded that, while Ground Zero Mosque initiative leader Faisal Abdul Rauf and his wife Daisy Khan “have said some highly inflammatory things, their lives of service and outreach belie the charge of extremism.” Farr would amaze National Review Online writers such as Andrew C. McCarthy and Ibn Warraq, who have amply demonstrated how “Rauf is a master of double talk and prevarication.”
Meanwhile, the Jewish leaders who signed the charter often profess leftist pieties about peace and multiculturalism, such as American Jewish Committee (AJC) general counsel Marc Stern. The AJC has drawn Jewish criticism for forming a Muslim-Jewish Advisory Council with ISNA while on the other hand not opposing affirmative action programs inimical to Jewish students. Rabbi Jack Moline has previously responded to jihadist violence not with criticism of Islamic doctrines, but rather with calls for gun control. Rabbi Michael G. Holzman is a member of the rabbinic cabinet for the George Soros-funded J Street, a leftist group with a fraudulent “pro-peace, pro-Israel” slogan.
Holzman and his fellow charter signer Usra Ghazi both supported statements opposing Israel’s 2014 campaign against Hamas terrorism in the Gaza strip. Ghazi signed a letter condemning “Israel’s illegal and immoral actions in the Occupied Territories” and calling for suspending military aid to Israel. Holzman issued a joint letter with the former ISNA president Mohamed Magid that presented Israel’s defense against Hamas’ jihadist aggression as a matter of “vengeance and blood-feud” and “tribal urges.”
Among all the charter signatories, the popular Baptist website Pulpit and Pen (PP) spotlighted Russell Moore, the leader of the Southern Baptist Convention’s (SBC) Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission (ERLC). PP noted his lifelong leftist tendencies at variance with the SBC’s Christian conservatives and his leading role in the Soros-funded Evangelical Immigration Table (EIT). EIT’s pro-immigration positions are fine with Moore, who has decried building a border wall as a “golden calf,” and with his “social justice warrior-companion,” the Hispanic evangelical and charter signatory Reverend Samuel Rodriguez.
While Moore and other Christian charter signers might seek good relations with leftists and Muslims, increasingly these groups are forming somewhat paradoxical red-green political alliances opposed to Christian conservatives. In particular, even Islamist groups such as ISNA have expressed support for Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) laws that would punish Christians and others for opposing homosexuality and “transgender” gender dysphoria.
In contrast, the charter makes the critical concession that “[l]ike all human rights, freedom of religion and conscience is not absolute.” As a press release states, the

American Charter frankly acknowledges today’s
controversies involving tensions involving freedom of religion and
conscience, including those involving the equal protection of the laws
and domestic security.

The press release expresses the pious hope amidst the pelvic Left’s take-no-prisoners assault upon Christians and other traditional sexual morality supporters that what “unites us as Americans is greater than what we disagree” on. Invoking the “civility” mantra particularly in vogue among America’s modern Left, the charter states the desire to “counter the incivility of the last half century of culture-warring.” As Haynes has written in conjunction with Oliver Thomas from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the charter responds to a “divided, dangerous moment in our history.”
Correspondingly, one charter signatory, National Association of Evangelicals President Leith Anderson, has accepted a so-called compromise on SOGI laws paired with religious exemptions. Yet Farr has previously accurately reported from America’s culture wars that today the “greatest threat to religious freedom” is same-sex “marriage” proponents like the ACLU, who have “such anger and vindictiveness that it’s frightening.” Thus Moore and Rodriguez, among others, have rejected Anderson’s belief that religious exemptions could ever defuse the inherent threats of SOGI laws.
However, in the charter, notes Christian commentator Cody Libolt, Moore “continues his pattern of speaking up for non-Christians while saying nothing about the massive and escalating infringements of the rights of Christians in this country.” While the charter proffers peace to secular LGBT agendas and makes previously noted nods against “Islamophobia,” he is “taking a stand for groups that are known to take advantage of tolerance until they come to power.” Notwithstanding commitments to human equality, Libolt concludes, “principled Christians should not lift even one finger to assist the agenda of groups explicitly hostile to Christianity or to the security of our nation.”
No wonder PP dismisses as “feckless, cowering, ecumenical claptrap” the charter and its broad church of signatories. Among them appear religious freedom stalwarts and jihad opponents such as former representative Frank Wolf as well as Suhag Shukla, whose Hindu American Foundation promotes supremacist Hindutva Hindu nationalism. It is doubtful how much the American Charter, with its carefully calibrated compromises, code phrases against “Islamophobia,” and motley crew coalitions with groups varying in their sincerity towards liberty, will protect religious freedom.
______________________________________________________________

 Freedom of religion and conscience: Restoring civility, protecting pluralism – Part 1
 
Brookings Institution

Published on Sep 14, 2017
 On September 13, 2017, Brookings hosted a discussion with the American Charter Project on the vital role that religious pluralism and freedom of religion and conscience play in fostering civility and unity in our democratic republic. https://www.brookings.edu/events/free… (transcript available)
 PART 2

NEW KATY PERRY SONG ENCOURAGES ANTI TRUMP RIOTS

 New Katy Perry Song Encourages Anti-Trump Riots
 NEW KATY PERRY SONG ENCOURAGES 
ANTI TRUMP RIOTS
 Pop culture re-brands civil unrest 
to cash in on divided America
BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
The lyrics to a new Katy Perry
song timed to coincide with her re-branding as an anti-Trump “activist”
includes a line that openly encourages her fans to riot.
Released earlier today, the pop star’s Chained to the Rhythm
track features lyrics by reggae singer Skip Marley that include the
lines, “We’re stumbling, we’re crumbling, and we’re about to riot / They
woke up, they woke up the lions.”
Elsewhere, the lyrics make reference to “liars” and the “empire,” clearly placing it in a political context.
“Even
though Skip is the one who seems to slyly diss the President, many drew
attention to how it’s still Katy’s song, and how her lyrics could also
be related to the current political climate,” reports Hollywood Life.
Perry, who now considers herself an “activist” according to her Twitter bio
(no doubt a genuine lifestyle choice and not just an avaricious form of
virtue signaling to make more money), endorsed Hillary Clinton multiple
times and headlined a concert in her honor back in November.
Following Donald Trump’s victory, she took to Twitter to call for a “revolution,” asking people to “rise up”.
As part of her new role as the Che Guevara of pop music, Perry also attended last month’s anti-Trump “women’s march” in DC.
After releasing her new song, Perry proclaimed the new era of “purposeful pop”.
Fans reacted to Perry’s new song by thanking her for taking on Trump.
“The anthem for our revolution!” wrote one.
“Katy Perry’s #ChainedToTheRhythm is the 1st major pop release that feels influenced by Trump era,” added another.
It is rumored that Perry will perform the new song during an appearance at the Grammys this Sunday.
Other anti-Trump pop stars have also jumped on the bandwagon in recent weeks. During the “women’s march,” which was organized by a supporter of sharia law, Madonna gave a speech in which she said she had “thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House”.
While it’s unlikely that Perry’s fans
are likely to organize a mass riot any time soon, her new song
highlights how popular culture is re-branding civil unrest as a trendy
form of virtue signaling in order to cash in on the deep political
divisions that plague America.
There
have been numerous riots since Trump won the presidency, including
immediately after the election, at the inauguration, more violent unrest
in response to his travel ban policy, as well as the shocking scenes at
Berkeley last week when attendees of a Milo Yiannopoulos event were
pepper sprayed and beaten by Antifa thugs.

While the dominant
culture desperately tries to portray itself as the anti-establishment
counter-culture, the only real counter-culture is the new brand of
conservatism that helped sweep Trump to victory in the first place.

“SOLD HER SOUL TO THE DEVIL” PERRY CALLS HER FANS “ZOMBIES” AND LOVES IT

“CHAINED TO THE RHYTHM” SONG

 
1 3 4 5