BANK OF AMERICA FREEZES PASTOR STEVEN ANDERSON’S ASSETS, BANK ACCOUNTS FOR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS

PASTOR: “GO TO HELL, BANK OF AMERICA” 
(FOR THEIR SUPPORT OF SODOMITES)
BANK OF AMERICA FREEZES PASTOR STEVEN ANDERSON’S ASSETS, BANK ACCOUNTS 
FOR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

pulpitandpen.org



Steven Anderson is a fiery and controversial preacher from Tempe, Arizona, where he pastors Faithful Word Baptist Church. Anderson has been a public figure for some time, making the news for praying imprecatory prayers against President Obama, seeming pleased by the shooting at the Orlando gay night club, and perhaps most famously, getting tased by Border Patrol for resisting an unconstitutional traffic stop (a jury found Anderson not guilty).



Anderson is an Independent Fundamental Baptist, a title that varies widely in regard to its meaning and definition. Anderson has also been banned from numerous countries (ostensibly for ‘hate speech’ or its equivalent thought-crime equivalent) and has had as many as eight online financial platforms cancel his accounts due to pressure from online activists, usually associated with the LGBTQXYZLMNOP lobby.



Pulpit & Pen reached out to Anderson regarding the news that Bank of America has frozen his church’s assets and made his church’s money inaccessible.



Anderson told P&P, “First thing yesterday morning, I went to pay someone online and I went to transfer funds and neither transaction would go through. So, I figure the bank just put on a hold because I have been traveling…so I called the bank and [I was transferred to] a new department, and while I’m on hold it tells you that your account has been terminated and the representative will not be able to tell you why, will not change our decision, and will not give you any more information.”



Anderson continued, “They said, ‘Your account is frozen. You can’t remove any funds from your account. On the 23rd we’re going to issue you a cashier’s check and mail it to you.’ So they’re going to sit on our money for weeks.”



When asked if it was in relation to Southern Poverty Law Center or other activist groups that have flagged Anderson’s church for hate speech, Anderson relayed, “We’ve already been shut off by eight different online giving platforms. Paypal shut me off years ago. Paypal, then Easy Tithe, these other platforms and they’ve all been shut down. None of them will tell you why because they don’t want to get sued or be held accountable.



Anderson blamed the account closure on homosexual activism.







Anderson said, “It usually has something to do about the Sodomites. Typically this happens when we’re going viral in an article about the Sodomites. Right now we’ve been big in the media over the last week because I’m going to go preach in Ireland and Sweden and the Netherlands and because of that a whole bunch of people have done articles about that.”



Anderson credited Providence with his church’s financial solvency during the time period between the sudden freezing of his assets and when his church will receive their money from Bank of America. He explained that as rarely [as it] happens, the church treasurer had yet to make a deposit from the week prior, and they had an offering from the day before, which left two weeks of capital to start an account and get by until they could receive their funds.



Anderson said, “If we had already deposited our offerings, we would have been in a really hard place. It would’ve been a really bad thing. But thank God, even though it wasted a full day, it will work out. By the end of the day we fixed everything, and we have enough money to coast until we get our money in this cashier’s check.”



Anderson continued, “I mean, it’s a lot of money. It’s tens of thousands of dollars. We have like five full-time employees, we have three different locations where we’re paying rent. It could have been a disaster. The fact that they freeze your account for a few weeks, that can really wreak havoc when there’s no warning and you have obligations.”



One must question whether or not it is appropriate for financial institutions – which are backed by the United States Congress-appointed FDIC and governed by state and federal regulatory agencies – to discriminate based upon the religious or political views of customers when doing business with United States Citizens.

HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ASSIGNED TO TABULATE “PRIVILEGE” BASED ON RACE, GENDER, SEXUALITY, RELIGION~ADD 25 POINTS FOR BEING WHITE OR MALE, DEDUCT 100 POINTS FOR BEING BLACK, 500 FOR IDENTIFYING AS TRANSGENDER

HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS ASSIGNED TO TABULATE “PRIVILEGE” BASED ON RACE, GENDER, SEXUALITY, RELIGION~ADD 25 POINTS FOR BEING WHITE OR MALE, DEDUCT 100 POINTS FOR BEING BLACK, 500 FOR IDENTIFYING AS TRANSGENDER
BY SARA DOGAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Parents in the community of Saratoga Springs, New York are up in arms after a 
shocking assignment that asked students to tabulate their “privilege” by adding 
or subtracting points for their race, gender, religion, appearance, disability status, 
and other factors was given to students at a public high school.
The “Privilege Reflection Forms” were given to students in a business class at Saratoga Springs High School, apparently with the approval of school administrators who considered it a useful tool to enlighten students on their relative status in society. According to the worksheet provided, students were told to calculate how privileged they are by adding or subtracting sums for possessing different attributes.

For instance, Caucasian students completing the form are directed to add 25 points for being white, whereas African-American students are told to subtract 100 points for being black. Males are told to add 25 points whereas females are told to subtract 50 points. Nor does the lesson stop there. Straight students are told to add 20 points for the privilege they derive from that status, while gay students are told to subtract 150 points. And if a student identifies as transgender, they are supposed to deduct a whopping 500 points.

The offensiveness of the scoresheet only increases from there. Under a section on religion, Jewish students are instructed to add 25 points (apparently Jews are the most privileged religious group), and Christian students to add 5 points, but Muslim students are told to deduct 50 points—that is unless a student is both black and Jewish, in which case they should deduct 25 points, as a note on the assignment specifies. Students are also asked to rank their own appearance and add 10 points for having an attractive face, but to subtract 10 points if they are overweight and subtract 40 points if they are “disfigured.” 

And then it gets even worse. A section of the form on “Disability” uses horrifically offensive and outdated language, asking students to add 25 points to their total for being “able-bodied” but to subtract 20 points for “social autism,” deduct another 30 points for being “immobile” and a full 50 points for being “retarded.”

A diagram at the bottom of the form explains that students who score from 50-100 should consider themselves “privileged” while those scoring in excess of 100 are “very privileged” and should “check it [their privileged status] daily.” By contrast, those scoring -100 or less are “very disprivileged”—if that’s even a word.

Parent Michelle King whose daughter received the scorecard in class called it “Absolutely offensive and appalling.”

“I cannot comprehend as a parent whose child, whose daughter, was handed this, how anyone can say this was acceptable,” King told a local news program.

Astoundingly, when questioned about the assignment, administrators at Saratoga Springs High School acknowledged that the offensive terminology should have been retracted, but refused to admit that the exercise as a whole was inappropriate.

School district spokeswoman Maura Manny said that the privilege scorecard had been discussed at a recent faculty meeting, along with other potential activities for students. Manny also released a prepared statement about the lesson which said “our school district continues to champion efforts fostering and facilitating growth in becoming a culturally competent school community.” It also highlighted the district’s belief in “equity of opportunity.”

A statement released by the school district claimed: “An unmodified version of the privilege reflection form was distributed to students without the removal of insensitive words. The district does not condone the use of the document with these insensitive words.” The school district’s statement notably did not condemn the exercise as a whole.

But parent Michelle King still has questions. “How did it get into the school, and how did the principal say it was acceptable?” she asks.  For now, she is receiving no answers.

To learn more about the Freedom Center's campaign to halt indoctrination in K-12 schools, please visit  www.stopk12indoctrination.org.  To read the K-12 Code of Ethics CLICK HERE. To order the Freedom Center’s new pamphlet, “Leftist Indoctrination in Our K-12 Public Schools,” CLICK HERE. To donate to the Stop K-12 Indoctrination campaign, CLICK HERE.

CHINA: JIANGXI OFFICIALS CRACK DOWN ON CHRISTIANITY

CHINA: JIANGXI OFFICIALS CRACK DOWN ON CHRISTIANITY
BY CHINA AID
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes from:
https://www.chinaaid.org/2019/04/jiangxi-officials-crack-down-on.html
(Shangrao, Jiangxi—April 15, 2019) Since September, authorities in an area of China’s eastern Jiangxi province have carried out a sweeping crackdown on Christianity, destroying the crosses of 25 churches and imposing various measures in order to keep a tight rein on religious activities.

Religious affairs and United Front Work Department officials started collecting information on Christians and churches in Poyang County, Shangrao, Jiangxi, and urged the local government to prioritize the management of religious venues, emphasize patriotic education, promote core socialism values, and guide religious people to love their country.

On Sept. 30, Poyang County in Shangrao, Jiangxi, organized a flag raising ceremony at religious venues, with all personnel from the United Front Work Department and the local ethnic and religious affairs bureau, as well as leaders from the government-run branches of Buddhism, Daoism, Protestantism, Catholicism, etc., were present. Now, all churches must display China’s national flag, and authorities have installed surveillance cameras and systems within church buildings and posted various propaganda materials on the walls.
People who receive government financial aid have also been forbidden from believing in Christianity. Otherwise, their state-supplied income will be terminated.

In addition, the local ethnic and religious bureau banned Christians from worshipping at church if they take children and removed the crosses of 25 churches.

Moreover, village cadres have occupied six churches, which were forcibly sold to the Communist Party. If the churches would not have been sold, the government would have blown them up.

Poyang County authorities also held a training session about the cultivation of religious policy legislation, which more than 1,000 people attended. During the session, the Secretary of the County Committee, Zhang Zhenxiang, was present and spoke, stressing the difficulty of implementing projects regarding governing religions and the tremendous responsibility and profound significance the Communist Party places on it.

The conference also featured officials from Jiangxi’s Provincial Ethnic and Religious Affairs Bureau.

ChinaAid exposes abuses in order to stand in solidarity with the persecuted and promote religious freedom, human rights, and rule of law. If you wish to partner with us in helping those persecuted by the Chinese government, please click the button below to make a charitable donation.


ChinaAid Media Team
Cell: +1 (432) 553-1080 | Office: +1 (432) 689-6985 | Other: +1 (888) 889-7757
Email: media@chinaaid.org 
For more information, click here

COLORADO GOVERNOR SIGNS DEADLY RED FLAG BILL INTO LAW

COLORADO GOVERNOR SIGNS DEADLY 
RED FLAG BILL INTO LAW 
BY JARED J. YANIS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Colorado – -(AmmoLand.com)- Colorado is now the fifteenth state to sign a red flag bill into law. Twenty-nine other states are also considering such legislation. Colorado’s Democratic Governor, Jared Polis, signed HB 1177, the state’s red flag bill, into law. The legislation will take effect in 2020.



This new red flag law presents an interesting scenario because of it 2/3 of Colorado’s counties have become Second Amendment sanctuary counties. If somebody were to put a red flag on you, and the judge finds that you're a risk to yourself or others, you have 14 days for a hearing to prove your innocence. It used to be up to the government to prove you guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.



The two biggest police departments in Colorado, both Denver and Aurora, have come out against the red flag law. Douglas County Sheriff Tony Spurlock has been a big proponent for this bill backing it intensely, and as a result, he is now facing a recall effort to bounce him out of office. On the flip side, Weld County Sheriff Steve Reams disagrees with red flag laws and he even said he's willing to go to jail instead of enforcing it. This unconstitutional and illegal bill is riding on the coattails of the momentum that the red flag law movement has seen since the Parkland Shooting.



You might recall that Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) and Senator Lindsey Graham have both recently submitted National Extreme Risk Protection Order Bills. Also, do not forget President Donald Trump, via his Federal Commission on School Safety, urged states to adopt “extreme risk protection orders” that would remove firearms from individuals who are a danger to themselves and others.



READ the Report of the Federal Commission on School Safety: www2.ed.gov/documents/school-safety/school-safety-report.pdf  It is imperative that gun owners and lovers of the Constitution make an effort to be heard. No longer can we be the “Silent Majority.”



These unjust laws are spreading like wildfire and they will be the biggest threat to the future of the 2nd Amendment as we know it! There are now 15 states that have passed these laws that have only one intended goal: to circumvent the 2nd Amendment and confiscate guns from people who are then considered guilty until proven innocent. It is an outright attack on the law-abiding gun owners around the country.



These ERPO or RED FLAG bills do absolutely nothing to target criminals, illegally owned guns, mental health nor will they do anything to save lives! What red flag bills do, however, is to violate a person’s 1st Amendment Right to Free Speech, as a comment or even your social media, can be used against you. All one needs is to have someone say they fear what a gun owner MIGHT do, and they can seek an ERPO from a judge.


Jared J YanisJared J. Yanis

About Jared J. Yanis & Guns & Gadgets



With over 20 years of experience in the law enforcement field, I have learned the numerous channels used by those who would love to see our 2nd Amendment rights stripped. Because of this, I am often able to bring you the news on new bills submitted at the local, state and federal levels that look to carry out those attacks. If you are new to the channel or want to stay up to date with the constant infringements on our Constitutional Right to Bear Arms, please subscribe to my YouTube Channel at www.youtube.com/GunsGadgets



GunsAndGadgets@charter.net
Guns & Gadgets
P. O. Box 940
Douglas, Massachusetts 01516


    

  • https://www.facebook.com/GunsGadgets
    • 

  • https://www.instagram.com/guns_and_gadgets
    • 

  • https://twitter.com/jyanis
    • 

  • https://gunstreamer.com/@Guns_and_Gadgets
    • 

  • https://videos.utahgunexchange.com/@Guns%20and%20Gadgets
    •

MUSLIM REP. RASHIDA TLAIB HOSTS ANOTHER SUPPORTER OF “PALESTINIAN” JIHAD TERROR ON CAPITOL HILL

VIDEO:

Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib met with another extreme anti-Israel activist and terrorist-supporter in her Capitol Hill congressional office during American Muslims for Palestine Advocacy Day in mid-April. American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) hosted the annual advocacy and training event, which was open to all adults who “seek justice in Palestine.” Additional criteria for participation includes supporting the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to punish Israel by economically depriving the country for its alleged mistreatment of Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip and West Bank. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) describes the BDS movement as “the most prominent effort to undermine Israel’s existence” and has further criticized AMP for promoting anti-Semitism under the guise of educating Americans. AMP hailed the ADL’s anti-Israel description of its organization. Tlaib spoke to AMP on April 8 where she told the group that she feels “more Palestinian” when she is in Congress than she does elsewhere, according to The Investigative Project On Terrorism, who first reported on the meeting. AMP’s New Jersey chapter posted a photograph of Tlaib outside of her office with some of its members during the event, including Joe Catron, an avowed supporter of multiple Palestinian terrorist organizations. “A tip of my hat to Rashida Tlaib, who really goes above and beyond the call of duty in welcoming every supporter of Palestine to her office, listening to what we have to say, answering our questions, and posing for endless pictures,” Catron wrote on Facebook following the meeting. Catron is a long-time extreme anti-Israel activist and has openly supported terrorist organizations. He serves as the U.S. coordinator of Samidoun, the Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network. Samidoun is an affiliate arm of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a Palestinian Marxist–Leninist and revolutionary socialist organization.


MUSLIM REP. RASHIDA TLAIB HOSTS ANOTHER SUPPORTER OF “PALESTINIAN” JIHAD TERROR 

ON CAPITOL HILL
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

There will be many others. Those who think Tlaib is going to stop doing this kind of thing are naive. The plan here is to normalize and mainstream support for the bloodiest, most avowedly genocidal “Palestinian” jihad terror groups. The Democrat leadership, which has already betrayed Israel, will fall in line with alacrity.







“SCOOP: Rashida Tlaib Hosts Another Extreme Anti-Israel, Terror-Affiliated Activist On Capitol Hill,” by Molly Prince, Daily Caller, April 17, 2019 (thanks to the Geller Report):





Democratic Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib met with another extreme anti-Israel activist and terrorist-supporter in her Capitol Hill congressional office during American Muslims for Palestine Advocacy Day in mid-April.



American Muslims for Palestine (AMP) hosted the annual advocacy and training event, which was open to all adults who “seek justice in Palestine.” Additional criteria for participation includes supporting the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to punish Israel by economically depriving the country for its alleged mistreatment of Palestinians living in the Gaza Strip and West Bank.



The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) describes the BDS movement as “the most prominent effort to undermine Israel’s existence” and has further criticized AMP for promoting anti-Semitism under the guise of educating Americans. AMP hailed the ADL’s anti-Israel description of its organization.



Tlaib spoke to AMP on April 8 where she told the group that she feels “more Palestinian” when she is in Congress than she does elsewhere, according to The Investigative Project On Terrorism, who first reported on the meeting.



AMP’s New Jersey chapter posted a photograph of Tlaib outside of her office with some of its members during the event, including Joe Catron, an avowed supporter of multiple Palestinian terrorist organizations.





Far Left: Joe Catron [Facebook/screen shot]



Far Left: Joe Catron
[Facebook/screen shot]





“A tip of my hat to Rashida Tlaib, who really goes above and beyond the call of duty in welcoming every supporter of Palestine to her office, listening to what we have to say, answering our questions, and posing for endless pictures,” Catron wrote on Facebook following the meeting.



[Facebook/screen shot]



[Facebook/screen shot]



Catron is a long-time extreme anti-Israel activist and has openly supported terrorist organizations. He serves as the U.S. coordinator of Samidoun, the Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network. Samidoun is an affiliate arm of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a Palestinian Marxist–Leninist and revolutionary socialist organization. The United States designated PFLP a terrorist organization in 1997, and Australia, Japan, Canada and the European Union shortly followed suit. Catron’s cover photo on both of his personal Twitter and Facebook accounts is a montage of a PFLP fighter donned in the organization’s official logo, as well as rockets and soldiers pointed towards a target over the state of Israel. It also displays the Arabic phrase “If you do [more attacks on Gaza] we will do [as well], hell is waiting for you.” The phrase is attributed to Mohammad Deif, the supreme military commander of Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas’s military wing.





Cover photo for @jncatron [Twitter/screen shot]



Cover photo for @jncatron [Twitter/screen shot]





Moreover, the feature image on his social media accounts are of himself posed alongside Leila Khaled, a member of PFLP who is a known Palestinian terrorist most notable for hijacking airplanes. After PFLP murdered an Israeli policewoman in 2017 during a terrorist attack in Jerusalem, Catron posted PFLP’s official statement on his social media and referred to the event as “heroic.” The attack was described by the PFLP as a “blood oath” to Palestinians, and the organization echoed the Hamas war cry to eradicate Israel.



_______________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:





Palestinian Resistance to Apartheid, Israeli Occupation







Remarks by Sara Flounders, co director International Action Center and Joe Catron, of Samidoun, Prisoner Support Network on heroic resistance of Palestinians. Call for demonstration in support world wide on April 18th, Day of Nakba



_______________________________________________________







Muslim Rep. Rashida Tlaib: “Honestly, I never felt more Palestinian than I ever felt in Congress”



BY ROBERT SPENCER






republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



Remember: this is the same person who accused pro-Israel Americans of dual loyalty. Tlaib doesn’t have to worry about similar accusations being made against her: she knows that the Democrat leadership and the establishment media will cover for her.







“Dem Rep: I’ve Never Felt More Palestinian Than I Do in Congress,” NTK Network, April 17, 2019 (thanks to Ken):





Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) said that she never felt more Palestinian than she does in the halls Congress while addressing the Michigan Coalition for Human Rights on Sunday.



“You know myself, Ilhan [Omar], and all of us, we watch that people are policing what we say,” Tlaib said. “‘What do you mean by that Rashida? Do you condemn this?’ I was like, ‘I don’t know, did you condemn that?”



“Honestly, I never felt more Palestinian than I ever felt in Congress…..



A video of Tlaib’s speech was posted to YouTube on Monday.

NBC CONDEMNS QUESTIONS ABOUT NOTRE DAME FIRE BEING JIHAD ARSON AS “ISLAMOPHOBIC CONSPIRACY THEORIES”~FORMER CHIEF ARCHITECT SAYS ANCIENT OAK DOESN’T BURN LIKE THAT

NBC CONDEMNS QUESTIONS ABOUT NOTRE DAME FIRE BEING JIHAD ARSON AS 
“ISLAMOPHOBIC CONSPIRACY THEORIES”  
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Some in the mainstream media have been quick to accuse anyone of spreading “Islamophobic conspiracy theories” if they question whether the Notre Dame blaze may be a jihad attack. An NBC article states: “Images and videos of the flaming cathedral spread quickly across social media and were quickly seized upon to push Islamophobic narratives that have flourished in far-right politics.” The Huffington Post shouted “racial hatred.”



No one knows whether jihadists ignited the blaze or not, and there is ample reason to ask questions. Many in the media, however, have lost an ability which was once a job requirement of journalists: to ask probing questions.



One should not jump to conclusions about Nortre Dame, but there are a few occurrences that likely prompted questions.


    

  • Despite the unusually quick response to blame renovations for the fire, “the chief architect of historical monuments responsible for the restoration of the spire of Notre Dame, Philippe Villeneuve, states: ‘the work had not started yet, only the scaffolding was being assembled.’ From his point of view, ‘the hot spot hypothesis is therefore not the right one.” So there were no workers in the cathedral and no heat sources near the timber frame.
    • 

  • In September 2016, a Muslim was arrested after his car is found packed with explosive gas cylinders outside Notre Dame cathedral.
    • 

  • A couple days later, three more Muslims were arrested over a Notre Dame Cathedral jihad bomb plot.
    • 

  • In France, three churches a day are vandalized on average and last month “over 800-year-old Basilica of Saint-Denis in the now heavily migrant-populated suburbs of Paris was also vandalised, with the basilica’s organ being heavily damaged and stained glass windows were broken.” Across Europe, churches are routinely being desecrated.
    • 

  • A Catholic priest was beheaded by jihadists in front of horrified onlookers during mass in 2016. Father Jacques Hamel was first forced to his knees before he was murdered, while the jihadists “filmed themselves preaching in Arabic by the altar.”
    • 

  • And consider the words of Muslim political candidate Eve Torres in Montreal: she stated that the Notre Dame fire was divine retribution and that “firefighters should sleep in the church on Notre-Dame Street in Montreal.”
    • 

  • “The Australian Jewish Association cited alleged social media post by Muslims and people with Arab names that delighted in the church’s destruction.”
    • 




Prudent people ask questions in the face of suspicious occurrences, and it is not spreading conspiracy theories to do so. Nor is it “far right,” “racist,” or “Islamophobic.”







“Notre Dame Cathedral fire spurs Islamophobic conspiracy theories on social media,” by Ben Collins, NBC News, April 16, 2019:





As firefighters worked to contain the fire that ravaged the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris on Monday, Twitter and YouTube struggled to take down conspiracy theories being pushed by both anonymous accounts and verified white nationalists who spread Islamophobic theories about the disaster.



French officials investigating the fire have ruled out arson and terrorism, saying the fire that led to a roof collapse may have been tied to ongoing repairs at the cathedral.



Images and videos of the flaming cathedral spread quickly across social media and were quickly seized upon to push Islamophobic narratives that have flourished in far-right politics around the world in recent years. Those sentiments then made their way to more mainstream conservative pundits, who questioned whether the fire had been set on purpose.



Some anonymous users used editing software to push conspiracy theories on YouTube and Twitter, and their accounts remained active on the platforms — despite repeated debunkings and reports on the platform. One video on YouTube, viewed 40,000 times, superimposes audio of a man yelling “Allahu Akbar” (Arabic for “God is great”) over a video of the Notre Dame fire. The audio comes from a years-old video, which is the first result when a user searches for “Allahu Akbar Scream” in Google. The video has not been removed from YouTube….



______________________________________________________________







12 MINUTE INTERVIEW IN FRENCH WITH ENGLISH SUBTITLES:











Fmr. Notre Dame Chief Architect: Ancient Oak Doesn’t Burn Like That



Expert casts doubt on official narrative



BY DAN LYMAN




republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



A former chief architect and general inspector of French historical monuments has cast doubts on the official narrative that the Notre Dame fire was likely an electrical short that set the iconic cathedral ablaze.



Benjamin Mouton, who served as Chief Architect of Historic Monuments in France and oversaw restoration work of Notre Dame until 2013, says that it is highly unlikely an electrical short circuit took place, and that it would take an extraordinary effort to ignite the ancient oak of the cathedral.







“So, you’re telling us that this type of timber doesn’t burn like that?” Mouton was asked by an LCI host.







“Oak that is 800-years-old is very hard – try to burn it,” Mouton said. “Old oak, it is not easy at all. You would need a lot of kindling to succeed… It stupefies me.”



Asked to present an explanation for how the blaze spread so quickly and with such strength, Mouton asserted that there were no additional precautions that could have been taken to ensure such a “quick” incineration could be prevented.



“In the Nineties, we updated all the electrical wiring of Notre Dame,” Mouton said. “So there is no possibility of a short circuit. We updated to conform with the contemporary norms, even going very far – all the detection and protection systems against fire in the cathedral.”







Mouton also revealed that there are two watchmen on duty around the clock who monitor for any chance of fire, adding that the technical and security measures taken to protect monuments like Notre Dame are unprecedented.



More than a billion euros have been pledged to restore Notre Dame, which President Emmanuel Macron claims will be executed within five years.












Alex Jones presents video of Fox host Lou Dobbs warning his viewers of a “political” cover-up of the cause of the Notre Dame cathedral fire.

VACCINE REFUSAL: WHITE, COLLEGE-EDUCATED, “WHOLE FOODS MOMS” DEEMED THE ENEMY~VACCINES MARKETED BY STOKING FEAR OF DISEASE~HPV VACCINES ASSOCIATED WITH DEATH, DISABILITY

Package explodes in Center City kitchen; man injured
VACCINE REFUSAL: WHITE, COLLEGE-EDUCATED, “WHOLE FOODS MOMS” DEEMED THE ENEMY
BY MARCO CACERES
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

If you are someone who has questions about the safety of vaccines or the wisdom of giving so many vaccines at one time and over the course of a lifetime, or if you question the ethics of forced vaccination laws that deny the right to informed consent to vaccine risk taking, or if you just simply want to exercise the human right to bodily autonomy for yourself and your children when it comes to medical interventions in general, the chances are you’re a “college-educated white woman making decent money.”1



This is what reporter Alfred Lubrano suggested in a recent article in The Philadelphia Inquirer.



According to Lubrano, “The rebel forces in America’s latest culture war—the so-called anti-vaxxers—are often described as middle- and upper-class women who breast-feed their children, shop at Whole Foods, endlessly scour the web for vaccine-related conversation, and believe that their thinking supersedes that of doctors. Typically their families earn more than $75,000 a year.”1



This characterization of the very broad and derogatory label “anti-vaxxers” is based on “various studies,” wrote Lubrano, including the National Immunization Surveys by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases.1



In a 2017 referenced public commentary titled “Class and Race Profiling in the Vaccine Culture War,”Barbara Loe Fisher of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) cited one of these studies published by the CDC in the Journal of Pediatrics.2 The authors of the 2004 CDC study wrote:





Unvaccinated children tended to be white, to have a mother who was married and had a college degree, to live in a household with an annual income exceeding $75,000 and to have parents who expressed concerns regarding the safety of vaccines and indicated that medical doctors have little influence over vaccination decisions for their children.3





These women, then, are intelligent, caring mothers who spend time doing their own research when it comes to health care issues, shop for healthy and nutritious food and come from families that are relatively stable and financially secure. The only negative trait Lubrano was able to discern about these women is that they are so confident in their research skills and ability to make rational decisions about risk taking that they prefer to think for themselves and not always take the word of doctors at face value, notably as it pertains to weighing the benefits and risks of using pharmaceutical products like vaccines.



It is worth noting that this is not an unreasonable preference, given the limited amount of training and education about vaccination that doctors receive in medical school and the fact that, after getting a license to practice medicine, doctors get much of their information from the Internet like everyone else.4 5 6 7



Lubrano quoted pediatrician Paul Offit, MD who pushed back on the idea that well-educated mothers (and fathers) have the required intellect to make informed health care decisions for their families. “Frankly, these Caucasian, suburban, educated parents believe they can Google the word vaccine and get as much information as anybody,” said Dr. Offit.1



Epidemiologist Neal Goldstein, PhD agreed with Offit that “affluent” college educated parents are incapable of making rational decisions about vaccination. Goldstein stated:









The affluent classes tend to be more hesitant about vaccinating. [But that’s based] on wrong information that leads them down a rabbit hole of falsehoods. I can spot credible data online, but the general public doesn’t have my training.1





Lubrano also cited professor of sociology Jennifer Reich, PhD, who said, “Vaccine resistance has become a ‘form of privilege’ and that educated mothers develop a “sense of entitlement” that helps them decide which vaccines are unnecessary, and that their efforts to promote healthy practices at home enables them to think they know more than doctors “who don’t know their children.”1



The implication is that higher education leads to a “sense of entitlement” that gives college educated mothers the mistaken impression they should be allowed to engage in independent thought. The suggestion is that education and economic stability can lead to misguided and perhaps even dangerous thinking about health and medical care, and that the better way is for parents to trust doctors and do what they tell them to do.



Lubrano quoted professor of nursing Alison Buttenheim, PhD, who unfavorably compared educated independent thinking middle- and upper-class mothers to “minority mothers who ‘never hesitate’ to get shots for their kids.”1



“They (minority mothers) say, ‘A good mom does what the doctor tells me to do,’” said Dr. Buttenheim.1



That appears to be the crux of the message Lubrano intended to convey in his article. It is the same message many mainstream media sources and medical trade publications are marketing—Moms, don’t think and don’t ask any questions, just shut up and obey.



References:





1 Lubrano A. Anti-vaccine parents are often white, college-educated, ‘Whole Foods moms’. The Philadelphia Inquirer Apr. 10, 2019.
2 Fisher BL. Class and Race Profiling in the Vaccine Culture War. NVIC Newsletter July 17, 2017.
3 Smith PJ, Chu SY, Barker LE. Children Who Have Received No Vaccines: Who Are They and Where Do They Live? Pediatrics 2004; 114(1): 187-195.
4 Cáceres M. What Doctors Learn in Medical School About Vaccines. The Vaccine Reaction July 27, 2018.
5 Cáceres M. Doctors Are No Experts on Vaccines. The Vaccine Reaction Nov. 28, 2015.
6 Cáceres M. “Consult Your Doctor” on Vaccines? The Vaccine Reaction May 15, 2016.
7 Cáceres M. Doctors Consult Dr. Google Too. The Vaccine Reaction Apr. 3, 2019.



____________________________________________________________



Vaccines Marketed by Stoking Fear of Disease



BY RISHMA PARPIA



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:











STORY HIGHLIGHTS




    

  • The marketing of vaccines is one of the most aggressive public health policies today.
    • 

  • The most common marketing strategy used by stakeholders to promote vaccines is to create a culture that fears disease.
    • 

  • Fear-based marketing generates vaccine demand and calls into question ethical standards in journalism.
    • 






One of the most visible and aggressive public health policies in the United States is the marketing of vaccines. A common strategy adopted by many media sources, medical trade associations, government health officials and pharmaceutical companies to market vaccines is to help create and fuel public fear of disease.1



Creating a Culture Fearful of Disease



Headlines such as the following have become all too common in the media:


    

  • “First Pediatric Flu Death in Three Years Raises New Concerns in Maine”2
    • 

  • “Opting Out of Measles Vaccine Could Be A Death Sentence for Others”3
    • 

  • “Why Intentionally Exposing Your Children to Chickenpox Is a Terrible Idea”4
    • 

  • “Unvaccinated Boy Almost Dies of Tetanus, CDC Says”5
    • 




If you carefully examine such articles, the content, words and tone used are presented in a manner that creates fears and elicit anxieties about infectious diseases that were once not considered as dangerous as they are portrayed today.



In order to sell a vaccine, you first have to sell people on the disease itself. The most effective way to generate vaccine demand is to market the disease as a threat of great proportion. The most common underlying theme in such news articles is that everyone is at risk of contracting these diseases and that everyone is at risk of serious complications regardless whether an adult or child is considered healthy.1



This theme is often paired with the claim that “vaccines save lives.” The theme of “threat” and the “solution” provided insinuates to the reader that the disease threatens their very existence and their child’s existence; therefore, triggering a sense of fear and driving the reader to consider vaccination.1  



Understanding Fear-based Marketing



There are two main goals of fear-based news programming. The first goal is to grab the viewer/reader’s attention. This is usually done through selecting strategic attention-grabbing words in a headline. Words such as deaths, outbreak, hospitalization, children, etc. are usually used in association with the particular disease. The second goal is to present the viewer/reader with a solution for eliminating the identified fear. In many of these articles, vaccines are always presented as the solution for eliminating the fear of disease.1 6



According to an article in Psychology Today, “The success of fear-based news relies on presenting dramatic anecdotes in place of scientific evidence, promoting isolated events as trends, depicting categories of people as dangerous and replacing optimism with fatalistic thinking.”6



This is reflective of fear-based media articles on infectious diseases. They typically lack context and scientific evidence and include selective reporting which often results in misleading information that triggers anxiety within the viewer/reader, thus driving the demand for vaccines.



Questioning Journalism Today



Historically, the mission of journalists has been to straightforwardly and with professionalism report news that contains accurate facts, fair balance and does not reveal the journalist’s bias or forward a perspective or narrative with a specific political, ideological or business agenda.



Peter Doshi, PhD, an associate editor for the British Medical Journal and assistant professor of pharmaceutical health services research at the University of Maryland School of Pharmacy wrote a feature article in the BMJ explaining the importance of good journalism on the issue of vaccines. He writes:





Good journalism on this topic will require abandoning current practices of avoiding interviewing, understanding, and presenting critical voices out of fear that expressing any criticism amounts to presenting a “false balance” that will result in health scares.7





Dr. Doshi adds…





… And among those uncertainties are the known and unknown side effects that each vaccine carries. Contrary to the suggestion—generally implicit—that vaccines are risk free (and therefore why would anyone ever resist official recommendations), the reality is that officially sanctioned written medical information on vaccines is—just like drugs—filled with information about common, uncommon, and unconfirmed but possible harms.”7





Doshi ends by writing that, “Medical journalists have an obligation to the truth. But journalists must also ensure that patients come first, which means a fresh approach to covering vaccines. It’s time to listen—seriously and respectfully—to patients’ concerns, not demonize them.”7



References:





1 Doshi P. Influenza: Marketing Vaccine by Marketing Disease. British Medical Journal 2013; 346.
2 WGME. First Pediatric Flu Death in Three Years Raises New Concerns in Maine. WGME Apr. 10, 2019.3 Gupta R. Opting Out of Measles Vaccine Could Be A Death Sentence for Others. The Hill Apr. 10, 2019.4 Curley C. Why Intentionally Exposing Your Children to Chickenpox Is a Terrible Idea. Healthline Mar. 26, 2019.
5 CBS/AP. Unvaccinated Boy Almost Dies of Tetanus, CDC Says. CBS News Mar. 8, 2019.6 Serani D. If It Bleeds, It Leads: Understanding Fear-Based Media. Psychology Today June 7, 2011.
7 Doshi P. Medical response to Trump requires truth seeking and respect for patients. British Medical Journal 2017; 356.

__________________________________________________________



Cause or Coincidence HPV Vaccines Associated 



with Deaths and Disability







The vaccination to help prevent cervical cancer has been on offer here since 2008 and more than 200,000 New Zealand girls have had it. The scientists say it’s safe. But in tonight’s 3D Investigates, Paula Penfold hears from girls and their families who have serious doubts and want to know whether Gardasil is to blame for what’s happened to them. In two cases, that was sudden and unexplained deaths and others crippling illness. Are these families right to be concerned or is science on the vaccine side?

DOUGLAS M. DUCOTE, SR. REPORTING FROM THE AMERICAN-MEXICAN BORDER

DOUGLAS M. DUCOTE, SR. REPORTING FROM THE AMERICAN-MEXICAN BORDER

This Will Shock You! What I Witnessed On The Border



SSG. Douglas M. Ducote Sr.
United States Army (Ret.)
CEO Veterans United For Justice
Veteran Law Enforcement
Cohost Real World Witness

Follow me on Twitter @DouglasDucote

Facebook: American Patriot By The Grace Of God, and Veterans United For Justice

www.Realworldwitness1.com

CHASE BANK CLOSES ACCOUNTS OF CONSERVATIVE ACTIVISTS WITHOUT EXPLANATION~BANK OF AMERICA FREEZES PASTOR STEVEN ANDERSON’S ACCOUNTS

CHASE BANK CLOSES ACCOUNTS OF CONSERVATIVE ACTIVISTS WITHOUT EXPLANATION
BY WARREN MASS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Chase Bank has closed the accounts of several conservative activists in recent weeks, without providing any reason for doing so. Among the individuals whose accounts Chase arbitrarily closed were Martina Markota, a video host for the conservative news website Rebel Media; independent reporter, Army combat veteran, and purple heart recipient Joe Biggs; Enrique Tarrio, chairman of the Proud Boys activist group and owner of a website that sells provocative political merchandise; conservative activist Laura Loomer, who was unable to  access her Chase banking app, but she was uncertain as to whether this was politically motivated or a technical glitch.



The Epoch Times stated in a report that Markota, a principle of Magnum Opus Productions, was the first individual they know of to have an account closed by Chase. As if to add insult to injury, the letter that Chase sent to Magnum Opus Productions noted: “Even though we are closing your banking and/or investment accounts, any Chase Auto, Mortgage and/or student loan or lease accounts you may have with us will remain open. Please continue to make regular payments.”







An article in the conservative entertainment paper Society Reviews last September 4, said of Makota:



From Artist to News Personality to the star of her very own graphic novel, it has been a very interesting road for Martina Markota in the last couple of years. Blacklisted in the art community of NYC after coming out as a Trump Supporter during the 2016 election, Markota has been the target many harassment campaigns due to her affiliation with controversial right-wing figures Milo Yiannopoulos and Gavin McInnes. 



The Epoch Times also reported on Joe Biggs’ experience with Chase Bank. Biggs runs an online shop selling merchandise such as T-shirts imprinted with conservative slogans such as “Register communists, not firearms,” and “Deportation saves lives.”



“Chase bank just closed out my account!” Biggs said in a February 16 tweet.



His Twitter post came to Chase’s attention after is was circulated in hundreds of retweets, after which Biggs’phone started ringing with calls from Chase’s executive office.



“After about hour and a half on the phone, I wasn’t able to talk to anybody and get a clear reason as to why they closed my account,” he later said in an interview with the OAN news network.



Chase told Biggs that they had received a lot of backlash from veterans, and they offered to reinstate his account, but he declined and decided to take his business elsewhere.



The Epoch Times reported that it spent nearly two months in regular correspondence with Chase spokespeople, but could never get an explanation regarding the account terminations.



“We can’t share information about customers for privacy reasons, but we would never close an account due to political affiliation,” Chase spokesman Tom Kelly said in an e-mail.



In addition to being unable to access her Chase account, Loomer has also had her Twitter account suspended, and she’s also been banned by PayPal and from ride-sharing services Lyft and Uber, reported Breitbart.



Related article:

FOIA REQUEST CONFIRMS ZERO STANDARD CAPACITY MAGAZINES TURNED IN TO NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE

FOIA REQUEST CONFIRMS ZERO STANDARD CAPACITY MAGAZINES TURNED IN TO NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE 
BY JOHN CRUMP
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

New Jersey –-(Ammoland.com)-There are an estimated one million-gun owners with standard capacity magazines (10+ rounds) in the State of New Jersey, bringing an estimated number of magazines holding more than ten rounds to around ten million. Some estimates even have this number being higher.



When New Jersey passed a law making these magazines illegal in 2018, there was a debate on whether the gun owners of the state would hand in their magazines. When the law went into effect at the end of last year, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy and Attorney General Gurbir Grewal celebrated it as a victory against gun rights advocates.



AmmoLand news reached out to departments across the Garden State and the New Jersey State Police to see how many magazines were turned in for destruction. Local departments were quick to confirm that they did not receive any magazines turned in by the citizens of New Jersey. The State Police would not comment on the record on the number of magazines turned in by residents.





Off the record, State Police sources told AmmoLand no magazines were turned in. We filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to get the official answer from State Police officials. Our first request went unanswered, so we sent another, then another, and so on until we finally received a response from the State Police.





SGT Kristina Pados of the New Jersey State Police responded to our FOIA request. She confirmed what our sources inside the New Jersey Police told us. The gun owners of New Jersey have surrendered no magazines.





However, she did state that local departments might have them.





AmmoLand reached out to local police departments across New Jersey and have not been able to find a single magazine turned over to the authorities. It would seem like the gun owners of New Jersey have decided to ignore the law most likely because it is unenforceable.



As previously reported New Jersey residents have been openly mocking Democrat Governor Phil Murphy on message boards and Facebook groups. This revelation feeds into the narrative that the new law was just a ploy to please the Governor's anti-gun base.



According to sources inside the New Jersey law enforcement communities, they still have not received any guidance on how to enforce the magazine ban. New Jersey Attorney General Gurbir Grewal's office still gives the evasive response of “not discussing law enforcement tactics” when pressed on why no guidance has been given to the State Police.



No law enforcement agency spoken to has charged anyone with having a standard capacity magazine. Short of going door to door there is no way of pro-actively enforcing the law. Law enforcement has not and are not planning on using this tactic.



When the law was going into effect, some agencies considered enforcing the ban as a secondary charge. Police would add on the charge of having an illegal magazine if a crime was committed with the magazine, but we have been unable to find anyone charged even under this circumstance.



Gov. Murphy has not commented on the failure of the new law. Last December the Governor's office referred us to the New Jersey Attorney General’s office. This time we shared the FOIA response from the State Police with them, but they did not return our request for comment at the time of publication.



FOIA-NJSP Gun Magazine Ban








About John CrumpJohn Crump



John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. He is the former CEO of Veritas Firearms, LLC and is the co-host of The Patriot-News Podcast which can be found at www.blogtalkradio.com/patriotnews. John has written extensively on the patriot movement including 3%'ers, Oath Keepers, and Militias. In addition to the Patriot movement, John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and is currently working on a book on leftist deplatforming methods and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, on Facebook at realjohncrump, or at www.crumpy.com.

ISLAMIC STATE JIHADIS CHEER DESTRUCTION OF NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL AS “RETRIBUTION & PUNISHMENT”

NOTRE DAME DESTRUCTION AFTERMATH – FIRE ENGULFS 850-YEAR-OLD CATHEDRAL

Photos: Notre Dame Destruction Aftermath - Fire Engulfs 850-year-old Cathedral

ALLAH’S “DIVINE INTERVENTION”?
ISLAMIC STATE JIHADIS CHEER DESTRUCTION OF NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL AS “RETRIBUTION & PUNISHMENT”
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Notably, they didn’t claim responsibility. Contrary to media myth, the Islamic State does not have a record of claiming responsibility for jihad attacks in which it was not involved. But they’re cheering nonetheless: “It’s time to say goodbye to your oratory polytheism.”



The bemused pursuers of “Muslim-Christian dialogue” may find this puzzling, thinking that Muslims recognize Christians as fellow monotheists, and will dismiss it as “extremism.” However, the Qur’an itself, which any Christian involved in “interfaith dialogue” should read and study, but which none will, is quite clear that Christians are polytheists:



Those who believe in the divinity of Christ are unbelievers: “They have certainly disbelieved who say that Allah is Christ, the son of Mary.” — Qur’an 5:17 (cf. 5:72)



Jesus is not the Son of God and belief in the Trinity is “excess”: “O People of the Book! Do not exaggerate in your religion nor utter anything concerning Allah save the truth. The Messiah, Jesus son of Mary, was only a messenger of Allah, and his word which he conveyed to Mary, and a spirit from him. So believe in Allah and His messengers, and do not say ‘Three.’ Cease! It is better for you! Allah is only One Allah. It is far removed from his transcendent majesty that he should have a son. His is all that is in the heavens and all that is in the earth. And Allah is sufficient as Defender.” — Qur’an 4:171



And: “It is not befitting to Allah that he should beget a son. Glory be to him! When He determines a matter, he only says to it, ‘Be,’ and it is.” — Qur’an 19:35







“Notre Dame FIRE: ISIS fanatics praise blaze and call it ‘RETRIBUTION,'” by Rebecca Perring, Express, April 16, 2019:





ISIS fanatics have posted a chilling message bidding “au revoir” to Notre Dame after the historic cathedral was ravaged by a devastating fire.



A poster created by an ISIS affiliated propaganda wing shows the cathedral engulfed by flames with the words “have a good day” and describes the inferno as “retribution and punishment”. According to the Terrorism Research & Analysis Consortium, the Al-Muntasir group created the poster, which reads: “Its construction began in the year 1163 and ended in 1345. It’s time to say goodbye to your oratory polytheism.”



This is not the first time the Al-Munatsir media organisation has revelled in terror attacks that have rocked France over the years.



The Paris prosecutor’s office have ruled out terror-related motives for now and say they are treating the fire as an accident….



_____________________________________________________________

Surge in Muslim migration sees spike in attacks on Christians in France



Investigators are still sifting through the debris at Notre Dame Cathedral, while reports have indicated the fire appears to be an accident. However, as One America's Pearson Sharp explains, the fire comes after a surge in violence against Christians and Catholic churches over the last few years.





“Allah est grand”: Muslims laugh, celebrate as blaze destroys Notre Dame cathedral during Holy Week

BY ROBERT SPENCER


SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/04/allah-est-grand-muslims-laugh-


celebrate-as-blaze-destroys-notre-dame-cathedral-during-holy-week;


republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



Jihadists may not have set the fire, but they’re certainly celebrating it. Many Muslims believe that the ruins and destruction of non-Muslim structures testifies to the truth of Islam, as the Qur’an suggests that the destroyed remnants of ancient non-Muslim civilizations are a sign of Allah’s punishment of those who rejected his truth: “Many were the Ways of Life that have passed away before you: travel through the earth, and see what was the end of those who rejected Truth.” (3:137)







“‘ALLAH EST GRAND’: Muslims laugh as blaze destroys Notre Dame cathedral during Holy Week,” by Kyle Olson, American Mirror, April 15, 2019 (thanks to the Geller Report):





A whole lot of people with Arab names are finding the historic Notre Dame ablaze very funny.



Twitter user Damien Rieu posted a video showing the amount of people responding to a video of the Paris church with a “laughing” face emoji.



Watch:








A sampling of the Facebook users taking delight in the tragedy…see if you notice anything in common:


    

  • Wahid Hadji
    • 

  • Oubbad Jsk
    • 

  • Yusuf Mohammedzai
    • 

  • Hessam Massa
    • 

  • Mohamed Hiadi
    • 

  • Mohamed Bensalem
    • 

  • Alaa Atfeh
    • 

  • Raidh Khaled
    • 

  • Ammar Sofiane
    • 

  • Abdelhakim Noui Oua
    • 

  • Mohamed Amin
    • 




You get the picture.



Witnesses say the fire broke out at the 850-year-old cathedral earlier today.



The roof and spire have collapsed and officials believe “nothing will remain”.



Rieu posted other examples of Muslims cheering the demise of the Christian relic during Holy Week.



“Allah est grand,” Mohamed Mouara commented at the sight…



______________________________________________________________ 



POLICE: 875 FRENCH CATHOLIC CHURCHES DESECRATED IN 2018 ALONE



Despite this trend, MSM refuses to entertain possibility of Notre Dame blaze being intentional



BY KELEN MC BREEN




republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



Feces smeared on walls, intentional fires and theft plague churches across France as police figures show 875 of the country’s 42,258 churches were vandalized in 2018.



As Infowars’ Paul Joseph Watson reported just hours before the Notre Dame Cathedral caught fire, “The number of anti-religious attacks against Jews and Christians in France continues to rise, while attacks against Muslims are at their lowest for 9 years.”



The church attacks have some politicians saying France’s Christian heritage being threatened by “militant secularists.”



“Every day, at least two churches are profaned,” Republican MP MP Valerie Boyer stated.



Meanwhile, according to Newsweek, some French officials say they “don’t know why” the churches have been targeted.



While the cause of the Notre Dame inferno is still unknown, one hypothesis is Islamic arson, but MSM is stopping anyone who dares mention this from speaking out.



For example, Fox News’ Shepard Smith and Neil Cavuto both cut off guests who alluded to the possibility of the fire being intentional.



A TIME Magazine columnist, Christopher J. Hale, claimed a worker at the cathedral told him the blaze was purposely started.







The media is also covering up the celebration of the cathedral’s destruction on social media, claiming Infowars lied about people reacting with smiley face emojis despite video evidence.













Although Islamic terrorism and threats against Christians are on the rise in Europe, the MSM appears ready to censor any opinions that the fire at Notre Dame may have been a terror attack.



Alex breaks down how even french officials are now questioning the true motives of this tragedy.





______________________________________________________________



Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris on Fire, Worker Claims it Was"Deliberately" Started



BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON




EXCERPTS:







However, TIME columnist Christopher J. Hale tweeted, “A Jesuit friend in Paris who works in #NotreDame told me cathedral staff said the fire was intentionally set.”

null

Hale deleted the tweet within minutes after it attracted attention.



The Saint Sulpice church in Paris was deliberately set on fire earlier this year, although media reports downplayed the story.



_______________________________________________



Shep Smith Cuts Off French Official For Alluding To Islamic Arson Of Notre Dame Cathedral



SHEP SMITH CUTS OFF FRENCH OFFICIAL FOR ALLUDING TO ISLAMIC ARSON OF NOTRE DAME CATHEDRAL



‘No sir. We’re not doing that here. Not now, not on my watch,’ snaps Smith





BY JAMIE WHITE






republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



Fox News host Shepard Smith abruptly cut off a French government official describing the burning of the Notre Dame cathedral after he suggested that the blaze may not have been accidental.



“I would tell you something, even if nobody died, it’s like a 9/11, the French 9/11,” French official Philippe Karsenty said of the historic cathedral’s burning on Monday.




“And it’s a big shock. I mean, this church was there for more than 850 years, even the Nazis didn’t dare to destroy it.”











Karsenty then explained the routine Islamic attacks against churches throughout France, and alluded that the media is spreading the “politically correct” narrative that the cathedral’s burning is accidental before being suddenly cut off by Smith.



“And you need to know that for the past year we’ve had churches desecrated each and every week in France. All over France. Of course you will hear the stories about the political correctness which will tell you that it’s probably an accident — ”



“Sir? Sir. Sir. We’re not going to speculate here of the cause of something which we don’t know,” Smith said.



“I’m just telling you something, we need to be ready — ” Karsenty began.



“No sir. We’re not doing that here. Not now, not on my watch,” Smith snapped.



Coincidentally, Fox host Neil Cavuto reportedly also abruptly cut off the Catholic League president Bill Donahue for insinuating the fire was intentionally caused.

____________________________________________________________

RELATED:

https://www.infowars.com/lou-dobbs-it-was-a-political-decision-to-rule-out-arson-in-notre-dame-blaze/














SEE ALSO:



As Notre Dame Cathedral Burns, Political Correctness Runs Amuck



Phillipe Karsenty Censored When He Tried to Suggest Islamic Jihad as Possible Reason











https://europe.infowars.com/france-attacks-against-jews-christians-







https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/04/international-union-of-muslim-


scholars-urges-imams-to-preach-violent-jihad-against-israel-quotes-genocidal-


hadith







https://europe.infowars.com/french-journalist-two-churches-in-france-are-


vandalized-every-day-and-no-one-gives-a-f-ck/










https://www.infowars.com/muslim-politician-in-canada-says-notre-dame-fire-


was-divine-intervention/








https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/04/notre-dame-fire-no-workers-were-in-the-


cathedral-no-heat-sources-were-near-the-timber-frame








https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273515/jihad-against-churches-joseph


-klein









			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
MUSLIM LIES & DECEPTION: TURKEY’S FOREIGN MINISTER- “WE ARE PROUD BECAUSE OUR HISTORY HAS NEVER HAD ANY GENOCIDES & NO COLONIALISM”
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

MUSLIM LIES & DECEPTION:



TURKEY’S FOREIGN MINISTER: “WE ARE PROUD BECAUSE OUR HISTORY HAS NEVER HAD ANY GENOCIDES & NO COLONIALISM” 



BY ROBERT SPENCER







republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:





Let’s see. A million and a half Armenians killed. Not genocide, insists Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu. A million Greeks killed. Not genocide, insists Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu. The jihad conquests of the Byzantine Empire, Eastern Europe, and more. Not colonialism, insists Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu. And indeed, the Ottoman Empire didn’t create colonies out of the conquered territories; the Ottomans just created colonial subjects within the empire: the dhimmis, the Jews and Christians who were subjugated under Islamic law, and who had to pay a special tax and suffer institutionalized discrimination and harassment. The Ottoman’s Empire’s bloody record is abundantly documented from primary sources in The History of Jihad From Muhammad to ISIS, but Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu is counting on his hearers not knowing this history, and he is largely correct.









“No genocide, colonialism in Turkey’s history: FM Çavuşoğlu,” Hürriyet Daily News, April 15, 2019:





Turks are proud of their history because they have not committed any genocide or partaken in colonialism, Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşoğlu has said, vowing the Turkish government will not stay silent against “some countries trying to lecture Turkey on history,” in reference to France and Italy’s recognition of the 1915 killings of Armenians as genocide.



“We are proud of our history because our history has never had any genocides. And no colonialism exists in our history,” Minister Çavuşoğlu addressed an event at Selçuk University in the Central Anatolian province of Konya on April 15.



Turkey will never take history lessons from those who have forgotten the history of their own countries and will not hesitate to give a lesson to those who dare question Turkey’s history, Çavuşoğlu said, indirectly recalling a quarrel he had with a French parliamentarian last week in the southern province of Antalya on the sidelines of a NATO parliamentary meeting.



“France is the last country which can lecture Turkey on genocide and history,” Çavuşoğlu had said, in response to a statement by French deputy Sonia Krimi. “France should mind its own dark history in Rwanda and Algeria,” he added….





			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
LDS CHURCH SAYS LGBT MORMONS ARE NO LONGER “APOSTATE”
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

A CHANGING UNDERSTANDING OF REVELATION FROM GOD?







LDS CHURCH SAYS LGBT MORMONS 



ARE NO LONGER “APOSTATE” 



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



The Mormon Church is full of self-correction. Although the Christian religion, which is by nature intrinsically anchored to Sacred Writing, the Mormon faith is tethered to a human hierarchy consisting of a President and Prophet, First Counselor, Second Counselor, and Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. All Scriptural interpretation, doctrinal belief, and theological interpretation is therefore subjected to changing human interpretation.



Mormon Church history is full of policy reversals, supposedly by the will of God, handed down by their presidents and prophets. Last year, the LDS officially scuttled their name Mormon, scrubbing it from all official literature and advertising as a part of a decades-long plan to merge their faith into the perceived mainstream of Christianity (they’ve even changed the name of their famous Mormon Tabernacle Choir to accommodate the re-branding. Until 1978, black men were prohibited from the priesthood and both black men and women were forbidden from receiving the ordinances. In 2012, the LDS Church un-banned caffeinated soda products (caffeine is still banned in hot drinks like tea or coffee). And most famously, the LDS church conveniently abandoned polygamy in 1890, which happened to coincide with Utah’s entrance into the Union, which required their abandonment of polygamy (God seems to speak through his prophets when it’s politically expedient).







The traditionally super-conservative Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is rapidly changing their policies on LGBTQXYZLMNOP issues.



In a major change that came a week ago, the LDS headquarters announced that God again had changed his mind on an important social issue. Although the Mormons had banned people in ‘gay marriages’ as “apostates,” they reversed that decision on April 4.



Most drastically, dropping the ‘apostate’ label on gay Mormons will allow their children to be baptized and ‘blessed’ prior to their adulthood. The church will now put their seal of approval on children adopted, artificially conceived, or trafficked into gay marriages. 

President Dallin Oaks said that the decision of the LDS church was to “reduce the hate and contention so common today.”







In reality, the decision is probably due to nearly 1 thousand gay or gay-supporting Mormons who recently showed up in Salt Lake City to resign their membership in the church out of protest of the church’s stance against LGBTQXYZLMNOP marriages.



As good Continuationists (those who believe the Apostolic Sign Gifts like prophecy have continued into the church age, such as charismatics, Pentecostals, the Assemblies of God and lots of confused Baptists), the LDS press release announced that the changes to policy were due to a changing understanding of revelation from God.





“These policy changes come after an extended period of counseling with our brethren in the Quorum the Twelve Apostles after fervent, united prayer to understand the will of the Lord,”





In other words, the revelation from God has not changed, but it has been misunderstood and only now is being rightfully interpreted by the church.















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
VIDEO: HOW TO SURVIVE A CHURCH SHOOTING
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

VIDEO: HOW TO SURVIVE A CHURCH SHOOTING 



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:


Are you packing to church? If you’re trained, you should be.

A movie trailer for Emanuel, the film about the 2015 shooting at Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, was released several days ago. The mass shooter [name purposefully withheld] walked into the church’s Bible study and open fired, killing 9 church members. The film which is produced by NBA star, Stephen Curry, highlights the tragedy and interviews the families of those affected.



Along with the graphic and awful footage released from the New Zealand Mosque shooting several weeks ago, we are reminded that places of worship are often targets of devilish people who are looking for easy targets.







The best thing you can do, in case of such an event, is to have pre-planned the response scenario and have engaged in active shooter training.



This video from the United States Concealed Carry Association (of which I am a card-carrying member) gives some valuable advice to church-goers in relation to active shooter situations.







Try these tips:


    

  1. Your church needs a security team.
    2. 

  2. Conceal carry a firearm when you go to church (“no metal detectors, no problem,” as they say).
    3. 

  3. Talk to your family about an active-shooter situation. It’s important to tell everyone in the church that if they’re not intending to stop the shooter, to get down. This way, if everyone else is down, those who are armed can more easily acquire the target that needs to be eliminated (as shooters typically stand).
    4. 

  4. Be thinking ahead of time about target-acquisition and line-of-sight issues from where you’re sitting and entrances where gunmen may approach.
    5. 






And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one…Luke 22:36





To join the USCAA and receive more updates about protecting your houses of worship, click here.



			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
THE GOSPEL COALITION TURNS AGAINST PROTESTANTS, SIDES WITH CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHER AGAINST THE REFORMATION
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

THE GOSPEL COALITION TURNS AGAINST PROTESTANTS, SIDES WITH CATHOLIC PHILOSOPHER 



AGAINST THE REFORMATION




republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:




Tim Keller, at the TGC19 Panel, Lauding a Romanist Who Blames the Reformation for ‘Secularization’ that stands in the way fo their Jesuit-Marxist Social Justice Worldview

The Gospel Coalition’s annual conference was held earlier this month and produced many sessions and panels, one of which especially stood out in promoting one of the primary influences in the ideology and ministry philosophy of TGC co-founder and Vice President Dr. Tim Keller, who was one of the four panelists.



TGC Senior Editor, Collin Hansen moderated, with fellow TGC Senior Editor, Brett McCracken and author, Jen Pollack Michel rounding out the panel. The discussion centered around the survival of Christianity in this secular age based on the book titled “Our Secular Age: Ten Years of Reading and Applying Charles Taylor,” produced by TGC and contributed to by Hanson, Alastair Roberts, Carl Trueman, Michael Horton, Alan Noble, and more ‘woke’ Social Justice advocates.







Because the panel discussion focused on the book regarding Charles Taylor, it benefits those of us in the proletariat cheap-seats to ask the question as to who exactly this character is, who draws so much attention and appreciation from the Evangelical Intelligentsia.



You can watch the panel discussion below, but it might be wise to skip to the summary below for the sake of time. You won’t want to miss it.











Dr. Charles Margrave Taylor was a Roman Catholic and communitarian philosopher, and his biographers list the greatest influences on Taylor’s thinking as Aristotle, Plato, Hegel, and Karl Marx. 



Com-mu-ni-tar-i-an  adjective kə-ˌmyü-nə-ˈter-ē-ən  : of or relating to social organization in small cooperative partially collectivist communities



Col·lec·tiv·ism   noun  the practice or principle of giving a group priority over each individual in it.



Synonyms for communitarianism (which is what Russell Moore is according to sources) includes collectivism, socialism, Sovietism, Bolshevism, Marxism, Leninism, Trotskyism, and Maoism.



Taylor’s magnum opus, A Secular Age, is a massive 896 pages that best demonstrates his religious philosophy, as summarized below:





Taylor believes that a movement of Reform in Christianity, aiming to raise everyone up to the highest levels of religious devotion and practice, caused the move to secularization. The disciplined Reformed-self replaced the porous-self, vulnerable to external forces, spirits and demons, with a new buffered-self, or a disciplined and free agent living in a progressively disenchanted world of expressive individualism.”





According to Taylor, the success of Reform and the propagation of successful disciplined individuals leads to a disciplinary society that starts to take action against rowdiness and indiscipline.



Calvinists and Puritans were by nature industrious and disciplined. With such men a safe, well-ordered society can be built (p. 106), so Taylor argued, but the success of the project encouraged an anthropocentrism (human-centeredness) that opened the gates for a godless humanism (p. 130). Humans, therefore the arguing goes, are individuals no longer embedded in society, God is no longer embedded in the cosmos, and the notion of human flourishing becomes transformed into “salvation which takes us beyond what we usually understand as human flourishing” (p. 152).







Taylor argues that the Reformation was essentially a bad thing because its congruent entanglement with the Enlightenment caused “people started using reason and science instead of religion and superstition” (p. 273) to explain the world.



To argue for his theistic (but still terribly flawed outlook) unbelief, Taylor presents a selection of recent spiritual conversions or “epiphanic” experiences among Romanist artists and writers.



In summary and according to the Roman Catholic and communitarian philosopher, Charles Margrave Taylor, everything in the world was basically fine until the Reformers – led by Luther and Calvin – and the consequence of the Reformation was a rise in secularism. Taylor insists that the long road from the religious bliss of The Dark Ages to the secular doom of today started with The Protestant Reformation, and will only end when we go back to The Dark Ages.



No, seriously. That anti-Reformation theology is what’s being promoted at “The Gospel Coalition.”



Taylor recommends mystical, sensual experiences that provide a rich variety of paths to God, as well as a new approach to issues of sexuality, thereby promoting unity in the church. Not surprisingly, Taylor is a constant presence in Keller’s sermons, speeches, and books. This is a panel discussion on what they’ve learned from Taylor and the need to implement his philosophy in the church!



Unbelievable.



Charles Taylor is lauded by The Gospel Coalition for attacking the “secularism” of the Protestant Reformation (because The Gospel Coalition’s Jesuit-Marxist Liberation Theology stands opposed to Lockean concepts of personal liberty that came out of the Reformation and formed English Common Law and civil liberties). Another liberal organization, Huffington Post, had equally glowing things to say about Taylor if that tells you anything.



According to the HuffPo:





Taylor is of global influence as a Catholic thinker, a leader on the social democratic left and a spokesperson for combining rather than opposing liberalism and defense of community.





It should be apparent by now that The Gospel Coalition is an ideological change-agent for the political left in American evangelicalism.



[Contributed by Toni Brown]



			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
SOUTH KOREAN COURT FINDS ABORTION LAW UNCONSTITUTIONAL: UNBORN HAVE NO LEGAL RIGHT TO LIFE
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

SOUTH KOREAN COURT FINDS ABORTION LAW UNCONSTITUTIONAL: UNBORN HAVE NO LEGAL RIGHT TO LIFE 








republished below in full unedited for informational, educational 


and research purposes:




Pro-abortion activists gathered to celebrate the Constitutional 


Court’s overturning the current ban on abortion





Thursday South Korea’s constitutional court ruled the decades old ban on abortion is unconstitutional. The current law criminalizes abortion. Pro-abortion activists were elated and gathered near the courthouse in what they’re calling a victorious court ruling.





Although South Korea is one of the few remaining countries to criminalize infantacide (except for rape, incest, severe genetic anomalies or when the mother’s life is in jeopardy). As the current law stands, physicians who perform abortions can be imprisoned for up to two years and women who terminate their pregnancy (let us be straightforward, murder their unborn child) can receive a maximum of one-year sentence or can be fined up to 2m won (approximately $1,760).







This is seen as a historic court ruling as abortion has been illegal since 1953. The nine-member panel ruled 7-2 that the 66 year old abortion law is unconstitutional and new legislation must be written by South Korean legislators. 



In the decision the court stated:





The abortion ban limits women’s rights to pursue their own destinies, and violates their rights to health by limiting their access to safe and timely procedures.[…]
Embryos completely depend on the mother’s body for their survival and development, so it cannot be concluded that they are separate, independent living beings entitled to the right to life.





The debuty Asia director of Human Rights Watch, a human rights organization stated:





It’s about time South Korea heeded the voices of the majority of South Korean women who have today won the right to determine what happens with their bodies and their lives. Now the National Assembly needs to move without delay to revise the law in line with this far-reaching court verdict and ensure women’s rights are protected in law.









The current law is still in effect, however in the Constitutional Court ruling it stated that legislators must rewrite the law based on their ruling by the end of this year.



Anti-abortion activists that had also gather outside the courthouse are deeply saddened by the court’s decision. One of those protesters, Joon Il-kim, a mathematics professor at Yonsei University in Seoul, said:





I feel very sad. […] I do not agree with the decision. There’s a discrepancy between women’s rights and [an unborn] baby’s rights — it is a small human on its own.





Anti-abortion activists declared that they will continue to fight for the right to life for unborn children.



[Editor’s Note: HT Alex Reid]
















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
BOSCH FAWSTIN: “PEACEFUL DEATH THREATS” BY MUSLIMS
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						






BOSCH FAWSTIN: “PEACEFUL DEATH THREATS” 



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:





NOW AVAILABLE



UPDATE: Here’s a video preview of Peaceful Death Threats, along with some commentary by me on my proof copy of the book.




My Introduction to my new book, Peaceful Death Threats:



If I didn’t draw Mohammad cartoons, Muslims would be peaceful?



Some Muslims actually believe that, and they act as if my “terrorism”, (yes, they call my cartoons “terrorism”, as you’ll see in the pages ahead) must be responded to in kind, with terrorism, even though they’re “peaceful”.



If you want to maintain your illusions that “Islam means peace” and that “99.9% of Muslims are peace-loving”, then this book is not for you, as you’re either a Muslim or you might as well make it official and become one. If you can’t imagine threatening to murder cartoonists over cartoons, then this book is for you.



Islam wasn’t “hijacked” by jihadists, peace was hijacked by Muslims. In my acceptance speech after I won the Mohammad cartoon contest, I asked the audience, “Why do you think we have this kind of security?”, and as the audience started to applaud, and even laugh, as they had a good idea where I was going with it, I said that it was because Islam did not mean peace. The Only reason any of us are talking about Islam is because it doesn’t mean peace. Islam hasn’t given us any reason to talk about it outside of our concern over it.



When a lone evil scumbag goes on a shooting spree in America, the “national conversation” is that it has something to do with America, that it says something about us, and that we all have to answer for it in some way. Only self-loathing leftists would define America by a small minority of evil scumbags. Yet when daily atrocities are committed by Muslims across the world, the “national conversation” crowd tells us that it “has nothing to do with Islam”, while also saying that we had it coming. They live for a chance to condemn America for things it’s not responsible for, and to exonerate Islam for things it is responsible for. These “national conversationalists” don’t want a conversation about Islam, about jihad, or about the truth. And the “national conversation” that needs to take place is about Islam and its calls for violence against non-Muslims.



As for “nice Muslims”, especially those in the West, they embody Western values that they fancifully attribute to Islam, and it’s left to “mean” people like me to have to point that fact out. The reason why many of us choose to define Islam by the behavior of its least devout Muslims is because devout Muslims are monsters. But of course, in this increasingly truthless world we’re living in, merely pointing that fact out makes me a monster.



I got a wave of death threats a few months ago from Muslims the likes of which I’ve never experienced, and my life has not been the same. Thousands of Muslims from across the world, with many from Pakistan, threatened to murder me after I was announced as the judge for a new Mohammad cartoon contest that Geert Wilders announced in the summer of 2018. Many of the threats were monotonous and I couldn’t keep up with all of them, as they came from all corners of the internet, from social media, email, YouTube, my blog, and I even got audio death threats in Facebook messenger. So the threats in this book are the “best” 400 of them.



Since I’ve been called “the most dangerous man in comics”, this book has the potential to be my most “dangerous” one yet, as it will make it more difficult for some among us to maintain their illusions about Islam and its “peaceful” followers. My “co-writers” in this book are average, everyday Muslims who think it’s normal to threaten to rape and murder a cartoonist over Mohammad cartoons. They and their culture are not to be “understood”, but condemned. This book is a good document to show that Islamic culture, at large, is a problem, and that Muslims at large want cartoonists who draw Mohammad to be murdered, by their hand, or by the hands of their more devout co-religionists. All of the thousands of Muslims who wrote me death threats want me dead, and those who didn’t write me would likely celebrate if I were murdered, or at “best”, would “understand” why I had to die. “Not all Muslims”? Not One Muslim wrote me to say, “I may not like what you do, and I may even hate it, but you have the right to draw whatever you want, and you shouldn’t be threatened or killed over it.”



Not one.



When the Muslims who’ve threatened me hear of this book, what do you think their response would be that their threats were published, and that they inspired 60 new Mohammad cartoons by me? More threats.



The threats in this book are from Muslim students, doctors, engineers, musicians, etc., and I think that will be a revelation for some, for those who still cling to the idea that it’s only “extremists” who are the problem, because seeing is believing. Seeing death threats along with the names and pictures of average Muslims might open some eyes.



After years of getting death threats, they’ve become white noise to me, in a way. They’re meant to scare me into silence and inaction, but I’m more likely to laugh at them than be terrified. But I do pause at times, at the casual, decadent evil of it all, and the mass support that it gets from far more Muslims than many would like to believe. What did Muslims do after the massacre of Charlie Hebdo? They callously ran over the dead bodies of the murdered innocents to defend Mohammad, who murdered innocents. Islam didn’t teach them to live and let live, despite whatever criticism came their way, Islam taught them that the answer to criticism is murder. That the first, natural, Islamic response is murder.



Regarding my new Mohammad cartoons in this book: I think it’s important to show Mohammad, the murderous figure who inspires Muslims to murder, alongside screenshots of the death threats over my Mohammad cartoons, which inspired even more Mohammad cartoons by me.



And to those who’ve dismissed me when I say that Hitler is Islam’s favorite Infidel, there were endless Muslims who expressed their admiration for Hitler to me, and I have a page of the “best” ones in this book, where I draw Hitler as Mohammad.



I’m well aware that most of these threats are just talk, however obscene that talk is, but unlike members of other groups, Muslims are more prone to back up their threats with violent action, and so I take their threats more seriously than I do the threats of others. And some of them get very specific and personal.



It’s one thing for Muslims to have their prohibitions, but it’s quite another thing for them to try to force their prohibitions on us. Since 9/11, we’ve waged war the way Muslims wage peace, and we’re gong to have to learn how to wage war, in order to have peace.



Peace.



-Bosch Fawstin,
February 2019




Here’s where I will be signing the book, on the opening page, first page, title page.



You can order Peaceful Death Threats at TheBoschFawstinStore.blogspot.com



			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
ARIZONA: MUSLIM MURDERS HIS WIFE & TWO DAUGHTERS, SAYS ALLAH TOLD HIM TO DO IT
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

ARIZONA: MUSLIM MURDERS HIS WIFE & TWO DAUGHTERS, SAYS ALLAH TOLD HIM TO DO IT 



BY ROBERT SPENCER



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



“He said that the reason he shot these individuals is because in God’s eyes, it was all right for him to deal with someone in this manner who had been involved in adultery, extramarital affairs.” Apparently Smith was trying to cleanse his family’s honor, which is done by killing the offender. And there will be much, much more of this in America: Muslims commit 91 percent of honor killings worldwide. The Palestinian Authority gives pardons or suspended sentences for honor murders. Iraqi women have asked for tougher sentences for Islamic honor murderers, who get off lightly now. Syria in 2009 scrapped a law limiting the length of sentences for honor killings, but “the new law says a man can still benefit from extenuating circumstances in crimes of passion or honour ‘provided he serves a prison term of no less than two years in the case of killing.’” And in 2003 the Jordanian Parliament voted down on Islamic grounds a provision designed to stiffen penalties for honor killings. Al-Jazeera reported that “Islamists and conservatives said the laws violated religious traditions and would destroy families and values.”



Until the encouragement Islamic law gives to honor killing is acknowledged and confronted, more women will suffer.







“Suspect in west Phoenix shooting said ‘God told him to shoot his wife,'” by Brent Corrado, FOX 10, April 11, 2019 (thanks to Dane):





PHOENIX (FOX 10/AP) – Phoenix police say a man has been arrested on suspicion of killing his wife, his two young daughters and a man who the suspect thought was romantically involved with his wife.



According to police, the man, identified Friday afternoon as 30-year-old Austin Smith, killed his wife, 29-year-old Dasia Patterson. Smith is also accused of killing two young children, identified as five-year-old Nasha Smith and seven-year-old Mayan Smith, and fatally shooting 46-year-old Ron Freeman on Thursday night
Continue reading below



The couple’s three-year-old daughter was not hurt and was found hiding under a bed when police arrived at the scene. According to court documents released Friday evening, the youngest daughter was not killed because she reminded Smith of himself.



Police say the suspect killed his family at their home near 75th Avenue and Camelback before going to another location near 67th Avenue and Osborn and fatally shooting the man because he believed was having an affair with his wife.



Sgt. Thompson says the suspect was arrested while driving away from an apartment complex where the man had been shot dead and two others were shot and wounded. The suspect made an appearance in front of a judge Friday evening.



Neighbors say Smith was always very friendly, but the rest of the family kept to themselves.



“Helped the neighbors, ‘hey amigo, you need something’,” said Carmen Gallego. “He even gave my husband some jump started cables on Sunday for his truck.”



The suspect said his religion was a factor in committing the crimes.



“He said that the reason he shot these individuals is because in God’s eyes, it was all right for him to deal with someone in this manner who had been involved in adultery, extramarital affairs,” said Phoenix Police Sergeant Tommy Thompson.



Smith also told police he killed his seven-year-old daughter because she was “weeping for the wicked”.



“Muslims don’t move like that either, so that’s an excuse,” said Patterson’s cousin, who did not want to be identified. “Muslims don’t move like that. They’re kids.”…





			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
TRUMP PROPOSES TO BUS ILLEGALS TO SANCTUARY CITIES~A POLITICAL MASTER STROKE
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						





TRUMP PROPOSES TO BUS ILLEGALS TO SANCTUARY CITIES~A POLITICAL MASTER STROKE 



BY MATTHEW VADUM



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



President Donald Trump’s proposal to ship immigration detainees to so-called sanctuary cities –which are Democrat strongholds— is a political masterstroke, if the Left’s wounded animal-like howling is any indication.



With this politically brilliant tactic, the likes of which would never have come from a President Jeb Bush or a President Mitt Romney, Trump continues to demonstrate that he is one of the few Republican presidents in modern American history who actually knows how to fight the Left. He is giving leftists a well-deserved taste of their own medicine.



And what better place to send illegal aliens than to sanctuary jurisdictions? They claim to welcome illegals and provide services for them. Their sanctuary policies, by which they harbor and shield illegals from U.S. Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE), are magnets for illegals, giving them incentives to sneak across the border or overstay visas.



The president’s plan only gives sanctuary cities more of what they claim to want.



“We’ll bring them to sanctuary city areas and let that particular area take care of it,” Trump said April 12 at the White House. “They say, ‘we have open arms,’ they’re always saying they have open arms, let’s see if they have open arms.”



The same day Trump tweeted: “Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigration laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerations to placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only....”



“Sanctuary cities that release known criminal aliens put all Americans at risk,” Trump told the National Association of Attorneys General on March 4.



“In the last two years, ICE officers made 266,000 arrests of aliens with criminal records, including those charged or convicted of approximately 100,000 assaults — and these are new numbers, hard to believe — 30,000 sex crimes, and 4,000 murders.”



California leftists loudly rejected Trump’s plan, which is not all that surprising because the Golden State gave birth to the sanctuary movement. Los Angeles became the first U.S. sanctuary city in 1979 when its police department issued Special Order 40, a document that forbids police officers from inquiring about the immigration status of individuals not suspected of crimes.



California’s new governor, Gavin Newsom (D), a former mayor of San Francisco, has pledged to make his home state “a sanctuary to all who seek it” in defiance of President Trump’s drive to secure the nation’s border with Mexico and enforce U.S. immigration laws. The state already has unprecedented sanctuary laws on its books that shelter its 2.4 million illegal aliens from ICE. Those dubious statutes are under attack in a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration.



Newsom was one step away from the funny farm Friday as he experienced an adjective-rich mental breakdown while describing his opposition to the plan to CBS News.



Newsom said Trump’s proposal was “unserious,” “illegal,” “immoral,” “asinine,” “sophomoric,” “ludicrous,” “petulant,” “un-American,” and “rather pathetic.”



“To use immigrants as pawns — to put them in difficult and trying circumstances as political theater shows how low a human being can go. And this human being happens to be sadly and tragically the president of the United States,” Newsom added.



Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, another California Democrat whose home town of San Francisco is a sanctuary city, attacked the Trump administration for its “cynicism and cruelty” in “using human beings … as pawns in their warped game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants.”



San Francisco’s current mayor, London Breed, said the plan “is just another in a long line of scare tactics and half-baked ideas.”



Oakland, California Mayor Libby Schaaf, called the plan “an outrageous abuse of power — using human beings to settle political scores.”



Schaaf has tipped off illegal aliens about approaching ICE raids to applause from the mainstream media. Schaaf piously insists her actions have not endangered ICE officers. “How can it be dangerous and illegal simply to tell people what the law is, what their rights are, what their resources are?” she said disingenuously. “That’s all I did.”



Except that Newsom, Pelosi, Breed, Schaaf, and their fellow Democrats have been using immigrants, or more precisely, illegal aliens, as pawns for decades in an effort to import an electorate more to their liking in what stubbornly remains a more or less right-of-center country.



Former President Obama even went further, sending busloads of migrants to law-and-order conservative cities that did not want them, to punish those jurisdictions for not being sanctuary cities, as Monica Showalter notes at American Thinker.



President Trump has tried to crack down on sanctuary cities.



An Obama-appointed San Francisco judge, U.S. District Judge William H. Orrick III, issued a permanent nationwide injunction against President Trump’s Executive Order 13768, which would have withheld federal funding from sanctuary jurisdictions that refuse to cooperate with ICE. That injunction remains in force.



Congressional Republicans have serially betrayed conservatives and handed Democrats victories over President Trump by refusing to cut off funding for sanctuary cities.



The sanctuary movement gave illegal aliens permission to rob, rape, and murder Americans by, among other things, stigmatizing immigration enforcement. Some left-wingers call sanctuary jurisdictions “civil liberties safe zones” to blur the distinction between citizens and non-citizens by implying illegal aliens somehow possess a civil right to be present in the U.S. Leftists also like to refer to all migrants, including illegal aliens, simply as “immigrants” in order to further muddy the waters. This helps the Left portray conservatives, who are generally not anti-immigrant –they’re anti-illegal immigration— as xenophobic bigots.



Sanctuary cities should be called traitor cities because they are in open rebellion against the United States just as much as the Confederate Army was when it opened fire on Fort Sumter.



President Trump, unlike Democrats and many in his own party, understands how dangerous sanctuary policies are.



And the Left’s extended freak-out over Trump’s new proposal suggests the president is on to something.







			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
REP. ILHAN OMAR CLAIMS VICTIMHOOD, COMPLAINS ABOUT THE OUTRAGE OVER HER 9/11 COMMENTS
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						





REP. ILHAN OMAR CLAIMS VICTIMHOOD, COMPLAINS ABOUT THE OUTRAGE OVER HER 9/11 COMMENTS 



BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



After insulting the memory of the thousands who lost their lives on 9/11, Ilhan Omar now plays the victim card. This is such a routine, overplayed tactic of Islamic supremacists that one wonders how it can be that many Westerners still haven’t caught on.



Omar says in response to the justified outrage over her remarks: “This is dangerous incitement, given the death threats I face. I hope leaders of both parties will join me in condemning it.”



This is Omar’s call for dhimmis to join her in accepting that Americans were wrong to be outraged over her abhorrent comments she made, and for the leaders of both parties to help her further undermine the security of the U.S. and the freedom of speech.



More on this story. “Ilhan Omar complains about outrage over her 9/11 comments,” by Mark Moore, New York Post, April 10, 2019:





Rep. Ilhan Omar went on Twitter Wednesday to complain that outrage over her comments describing the Sept. 11 attacks as “some people did something” was creating an unsafe situation for her.



“This is dangerous incitement, given the death threats I face. I hope leaders of both parties will join me in condemning it,” the Minnesota Democrat wrote on her account. “My love and commitment to our country and that of my colleagues should never be in question. We are ALL Americans!”



In her posting, she linked to comments made by Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw and Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade.



Crenshaw, a former Navy SEAL who lost an eye while fighting in Afghanistan, blasted Omar for her comments trivializing the terror attacks to a Muslim rights group.



“First Member of Congress to ever describe terrorists who killed thousands of Americans on 9/11 as ‘some people who did something,’” Crenshaw wrote Tuesday. “Unbelievable.”



During a segment of “Fox & Friends” about Omar’s speech, Kilmeade said: “Really? Some people did something? You have to wonder if she’s an American first.”



“As a Muslim American you should be more outraged because they sullied your religion,” Kilmeade continued. “In the name of religion they kill Americans and still do it on a daily basis.”….



______________________________________________________________



JAMIE GLAZOV TAKES ON REP. OMAR OVER 9/11





SEE ALSO:


https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/04/pelosi-orders-us-capitol-police-to-


ensure-omars-safety-omar-claims-criticism-of-her-is-endangering-lives


AND:


https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/04/nyc-yemeni-american-merchants-


association-boycotting-new-york-post-over-cover-criticizing-ilhan-omar








			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
SURVEY: HALF OF AMERICA’S PASTORS ARE AFRAID TO SPEAK ABOUT CONTROVERSIAL TOPICS
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

SURVEY: HALF OF AMERICA’S PASTORS ARE AFRAID 



TO SPEAK ABOUT CONTROVERSIAL TOPICS



BY DR. DIXON



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



Prophecy News Watch April 15, 2019



By Michael Snyder/Economic Collapse Blog



Most U.S. churches are shrinking, and more than 100 die every week.  In a day and age where pastors are judged by attendance numbers and budget levels, scaring people away is bad for business.



With all that in mind, the results from a recent Barna survey shouldn’t be surprising at all…



We wanted to know if pastors felt limited or pressured when it comes to speaking about controversial topics. Half of Christian pastors says they frequently (11%) or occasionally (39%) feel limited in their ability to speak out on moral and social issues because people will take offense. The other half of pastors say they only rarely (30%) or never (20%) feel limited in this way. 



When asked to identify the source of the concerns, pastors are much more likely to say that they feel limited by those inside the church than those outside. In other words, the reactions of those in the pews are most on the minds of today’s pastors.



And remember, these numbers just show the percentage of pastors that are willing to admit that they are afraid to speak out about controversial issues.



In reality, the percentage of U.S. pastors that actually hit the hard issues on a consistent basis is exceedingly low.



Not offending people is obviously a strategy that can work, because many of America’s largest churches today are pathetically shallow.  In fact, one of America’s most famous pastors absolutely refuses to ever use the word “sin” because it might offend someone.



But eventually people get tired of superficial religion that doesn’t have any substance, and nobody can deny that there has been a mass exodus from the Christian faith in this country.  In fact, the number of Americans with “no religion” has risen by 266 percent over the last three decades.



In particular, young people crave authenticity, and they can spot a fake a mile away.  They are leaving America’s churches faster than anyone else, and that is incredibly sad.



Some churches are attempting to reverse this trend, and many of them seem to think that being “hip” and “trendy” is the key to winning young people back.  For example, the following comes from a profile on C3 Church in New York City by Topic Magazine…



Have you ever been to a church where the Jesus music is so loud that some congregants–young, hip urbanites all–wear earplugs? Where the Christian pop-rock stirs people into such rapture that they jump up and down, both feet leaving earth, both hands raised ecstatically skyward, as if in a mild-mannered mosh pit? Where half the pastors, band members, and congregants have nose piercings and the other half have forearm tattoos, and a teeny-tiny beanie is the accessory du jour?



There is certainly nothing wrong with having good music and a modern presentation, but it must also be accompanied by truth if it is going to do any good.



In the profile, the reporter for Topic Magazine asked “Pastor Josh” about his stand on one of the most controversial issues of our day, and he did his very best to dance around it…



But Pastor Josh knows that some of his congregants are gay–or, in his words, “would say they’re gay”–and he’s happy to tell them where he feels “the truth lands on the issue.” He just doesn’t want “the conversation” to end the moment someone reads on C3’s website that gay marriage is an affront to God. 



“To me, that’s a shame,” he says. “I’m trying to show, ‘Hey, I’m not judging anyone. I’m not condemning anyone.’ We’ve all got our views and attractions and all those kinds of things.” He knows that young people, especially, inhabit a complicated, alienating world.



“I think every one of us is searching for love,” Pastor Josh says. “Even though we might disagree on where the best place to look for love is.”



I have read that quote several times, and I still don’t understand what he is trying to say.



Whether people agree with it or not, Pastor Josh owes it to all of us to tell us directly what he really believes.



Of course there are thousands upon thousands of other ministers just like “Pastor Josh” in America today.



The church business has become all about making people feel good, and in this type of spiritual environment even Kanye West can start a church…



Imagine stumbling into a church you’ve never seen on Sunday morning. As you approach you hear rapper DMX praying, “I have special privileges. I am God’s favored child.” In front of you sit Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom, who were both raised Christian but now consider themselves “spiritual.”



The prayer ends, and a gospel choir in matching Yeezy merchandise belts out rapper Kid Cudi’s “Reborn.” Presiding over it all is Pastor Kanye West.



It isn’t a dream. Kanye reportedly started his own church on the first Sunday of the year, and since then, he’s attracted celebrities to his entertaining, religion-laced gatherings.



Of course not all is lost.  There are some pastors out there that are doing a fantastic job, and all over the world God is raising up a Remnant.  But overall, the institutional church in America is failing to influence the culture because pastors are deathly afraid of scaring their customers away.



All that it takes for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.



And right now a whole lot of good men are doing precisely that.



(Publisher’s comments: This article misses another issue that some of us raised back in 1982 when we learned of the restrictions of the non-profit 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) contract that limits the stand that churches can take in the moral/political arena that has all but silenced most preachers for fear of losing their tax-exempt status. The church members have become so dependent on the tax-deductible gift that they actually believe it is embedded as a constitutional right. In my opinion there are two clear scriptures that describe these preachers. The first is found at 2Ti 4:3-4 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.



The next is found at Mt 7:21-23 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.



I personally don’t believe that the Lord means by these words that these ministers are not true believers, I believe he means the word “know” is in the conjugal sense. Paul said, That I may know him, and the power of his resurrection, and the fellowship of his sufferings, being made conformable unto his death; (Ph 3:10.) Few have known Him like this. Oh that we might have a longing to know Him in this manner.



			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
CANADA: MUSLIM PROFESSOR WHO CLAIMS SHE WAS ASSAULTED AT CONFERENCE HAS LONG RECORD OF “ISLAMOPHOBIA” PROPAGANDIZING
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						





CANADA: MUSLIM PROFESSOR WHO CLAIMS SHE WAS ASSAULTED AT CONFERENCE HAS LONG RECORD OF “ISLAMOPHOBIA” PROPAGANDIZING



BY ROBERT SPENCER



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



Yesterday we brought you the news that a Muslim professor who says she has expertise in “Islamophobia” claims she was assaulted at a conference of Canadians for the Rule of Law. According to “journalist” Ron Csillag of the Canadian Jewish News, Jasmin Zine, the professor making the assault claim, “said she did not plan on speaking” at the conference. Csillag quoted Zine saying: “I went really just to hear the viewpoints that were being expressed and the kind of arguments that were being made to support them.”



Really? Let’s examine the likelihood of that claim.



Jasmin Zine is part of the “Islamophobia Research and Documentation Project,” an initiative designed to buttress the spurious claim that Muslims are targets of wholesale discrimination and harassment in the West.



In April 2018, Jasmin Zine gave a keynote speech on “Islamophobia, Anti- Muslim Racism, and the Weaponizing of Free Speech” at “The Road Traveled: 9th Annual International Islamophobia Conference,” held at the University of California Berkeley.



Jasmin Zine testified in support of the Anti-Islamophobia Motion 103 before a Canadian Heritage Parliamentary subcommittee. That motion has been used to shut down criticism of jihad terror and Sharia oppression of women and others.



Zine defines “Islamophobia” as “fear and hatred of Islam and Muslims that translates into individual, ideological and systemic forms of oppression.” In reality, “Islamophobia” is an intentional conflation of two distinct and unrelated phenomena: vigilante attacks against innocent Muslims, which are never justified, and honest, accurate analysis of the motivating ideology behind the jihad threat. The purveyors of “Islamophobia” propaganda are trying to shut down the latter by equating it with the former. A former member of the International Institute of Islamic Thought, Abdur-Rahman Muhammad, has stated that “this loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliche conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” And it has been skillfully used to do just that.



Zine does want to restrict the freedom of speech. She has claimed: “As an academic, I support free speech as well as academic freedom. But these are not without limitations. Freedom of expression is limited by the consequences of that speech. Spreading hate is not free speech.” But who decides what is “spreading hate” and what is “enunciating unpopular truths”? She is essentially arguing for the extinguishing of the freedom of speech and the control of the public discourse by arbiters who would presumably stifle all criticism of Islam, jihad, and Sharia.



So Jasmin Zine went wanting to “hear the viewpoints that were being expressed”? Unlikely. What she did was ask Jihad Watch writer Christine Douglass-Williams a question and then talked over her answer, refusing to be silent until she was removed from the event. It is clear that she wanted to shut down the viewpoints that were being expressed and smear them with the false claims of “white supremacism” and “Islamophobia” that she makes in the Canadian Jewish News article.



That article also notes that the Canadians for the Rule of Law conference had “a large Jewish presence: sponsoring groups included B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Institute for Jewish Research, Hasbara Fellowships, Shurat HaDin and Canadians for Israel’s Legal Rights. Kashrut was observed at the event.”



What might Jasmin Zine have thought of that? Let’s see:



Jasmin Zine signed this petition accusing Israel of “apartheid” and calling on the University of Toronto and York University to divest from companies doing business with Israel.



Zine also signed this call for the Canadian government to impose sanctions upon Israel for alleged war crimes in Gaza in 2009. During that conflict, Hamas used human shields in order to get civilians killed, whereupon they would accuse Israel of targeting civilians and get the UN and others to condemn the Jewish State.



Zine endorsed sending a boat from Canada to Gaza to end the Israeli blockade. Remember that the people on the most notorious of these forays to Gaza to end the blockade, the Mavi Marmara flotilla from Turkey, were genocidal Jew-hating jihadis, as you can see in the second video below: they were chanting a jihad war cry recalling Muhammad’s massacre of the Jews of Arabia: “Khybar, Khybar, O Jews, the army of Muhammad will return.” If the same chant had begun on a Canadian boat bound for Gaza, would Jasmin Zine have objected?



















			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
MOTHER FACING MURDER CHARGE AFTER KILLING NEWBORN; BOYFRIEND CHARGED FOR DISPOSING OF SON IN DUMPSTER
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						





MOTHER FACING MURDER CHARGE AFTER KILLING NEWBORN; BOYFRIEND CHARGED FOR DISPOSING OF SON IN DUMPSTER



BY HEATHER CLARK



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



ASBURY PARK, N.J. — A New Jersey mother is facing a first-degree murder charge and her boyfriend a desecration of human remains charge after the woman allegedly killed the baby shortly after birth and then later decided with her boyfriend to dispose of the baby in a dumpster.



According to reports, Jada McLain, 18, hid her pregnancy from her parents for months. A friend who turned McLain into police last week said that McLain had attempted a self-abortion by drinking, smoking marijuana and taking pills, but her efforts were unsuccessful.



She considered going to an abortionist, but thought parental notification was required and didn’t want her mother to find out.



McClain and her boyfriend, Quaimere Mohammed, 19, consequently discussed what they would do after the baby was born, with an option being to kill the child.







In the early morning hours of March 29, McLain gave birth to a baby boy in the bathroom, took a shower to clean herself and the infant off, and laid the newborn, who was alive and crying, upon her bed. She then allegedly pushed down on her son’s chest until he turned blue and died.



McLain named the child Legend, and sent her friend photographs of the newborn from her bedroom.



According to NJ.com, McLain wrapped her deceased son in a blanket and drove to her boyfriend’s house. The two went to the beach to talk the matter over, and then returned to Mohammed’s house.



After crying and talking for approximately two hours, they decided to place the baby in a bag and dispose of him behind an apartment complex in Asbury Park.



KFSN-TV reports that McLain showed police the dumpster where the baby had been discarded. Surveillance video also captured the car driving up to the dumpster, with Mohammed getting out of the vehicle and placing a blue bag inside.



The teen’s friend reported the incident to the police on April 4, and both McLain and Mohammed were arrested.



NBC New York reports that McLain’s parents were in shock, both that they had lost a grandchild and in witnessing their daughter being arrested. Family members held each other and cried as they gathered in the courtroom.



NJ.com states that Mohammed’s attorney told the court on Friday that the two were remorseful, as text messages from McLain to Mohammed stated, “I was the one that took his last breath. … I’m the one who heard him struggling to breathe when I was killing him.”



She said that the baby looked like Mohammed and his face was etched in her mind.



“I’m always going to regret what I did till the day I die,” McLain texted.



Assistant Monmouth County Prosecutor Stephanie Dugan told the court on Friday during a detention hearing that Mohammed should remain in jail because of the severity of “throwing an hours-old dead baby in a dumpster in Asbury Park, which was put into a garbage truck, compacted in a garbage truck, dumped out on the floor of the dump, where the garbage is sorted and compacted again.”



A statement from McLain’s parents reads, “The family prays that authorities find the infant’s remains so they can properly bury their grandson. They also want to express their love and support for their daughter. They ask the public for privacy during these troubling times.”



New Jersey has a Safe Haven law that allows for mothers to safely surrender their newborns at a local hospital, police station or fire station without prosecution.

_____________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:

https://christiannews.net/2019/04/15/wisconsin-mother-to-face-murder-charge-after-strangling-newborn-son-beating-head-into-toilet/







			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
LIBERTY COUNSEL ACTION VIDEO: LGBTQ EQUALITY ACT (HR5) “ATTACKS RELIGIOUS LIBERTY HEAD ON”
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						

LIBERTY COUNSEL ACTION VIDEO: LGBTQ EQUALITY ACT (HR5) “ATTACKS RELIGIOUS LIBERTY HEAD ON”



BY PETER LA BARBERA



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:


The so-called LGBTQ “Equality Act” is the most dangerous piece of homosexual/transgender activist legislation every proposed. We thank Liberty CounselAction for producing this 3-minute video. Take Action: tell your Congressman (202-225-3121) to oppose HR5, the “Equality Act.”







SEE ALSO:



http://the-trumpet-online.com/stop-ill-named-equality-act-religious-freedom-stake/





			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	

		
	

		
		
PETE BUTTIGIEG’S FAKE CHRISTIANITY: DEMOCRAT BLAMES GOD FOR HIS HOMOSEXUALITY
		
		
 

	
		
		
					

			
		

						



PETE BUTTIGIEG’S FAKE CHRISTIANITY: 



DEMOCRAT BLAMES GOD FOR HIS HOMOSEXUALITY



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:



April 9, 2019



CONTACT: Peter LaBarbera: americansfortruth@gmail.com; 312-324-3787, or via Americans For Truth website HERE; Twitter: @PeterLaBarbera_





Blaming God for his sin: Democrat Pete Buttigieg claims God made him homosexual.



CHICAGO — Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans For Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH.org), issued the following statement today about potential Democratic presidential candidate and former South Bend Mayor Pete Buttigieg’s recent comments about God, homosexuality and Vice President Pence:



Mayor Pete Buttigieg is a living, walking and breathing example of the politicized sham that is religious-left “Christianity” today. He claims that God created him as a homosexual—a self-serving blasphemy as audacious as it is biblically nonsensical. (And science has refuted his “born gay” crutch.)

Buttigieg quotes Scripture even as he defies it with his very public, and very fake, “marriage” to another man (See in the Bible: Matthew 19:4-6; Romans 1: 24-27; Jude 7; 1 Timothy 1:8-10; Leviticus 18:22). (Redefining marriage to accommodate sexual perversion is beyond the Supreme Court’s pay grade.)

Predictably, “Mayor Pete” has quickly become the darling of a media who incessantly promote all things “gay” and “trans”—and who loathe socially conservative Christians who actually believe the Bible in humility, and fear God in reverence.

The simple truth is that homosexual behaviors are wrong, unnatural, and often unhealthy—yet can be overcome through the grace and power of Jesus Christ (1 Corinthians 6), as testified by countless ex-“gays” and former “transgenders.” No faithful Christian proudly identifies by his or her besetting sins, nor seeks to justify them before a holy God.

Vice President Mike Pence—a favorite target of Buttigieg and self-righteous LGBTQ political bullies—has been intimidated into silence, but he would do well to respond to the absurdities that flow out of Mayor Pete’s lips on a daily basis. Buttigieg claims that Pence has a “quarrel … with my Creator” because he opposes the aggressively anti-freedom, anti-Christian LGBTQ agenda. But it is Buttigieg himself who is defiantly living out his own quarrel with God every time he proudly celebrates his sexual sin and, worse, uses God to justify it—man’s ultimate folly.

Christians should pray that Pete Buttigieg repents of his proud homosexuality and dedicates himself to serving Christ in Truth—rather than mocking Him for political gain.


_____________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:











THE VIGILANTE FROM SOUTH BEND













Liar, character assassin, bigot – Pete Buttigieg is a natural leader for the Democrats.








https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/273468/vigilante-south-bend-david-horowitz 




SEE ALSO:

https://www.newswars.com/us-ambassador-slams-mayor-pete-for-pushing-hate-hoax-about-mike-pence/


https://www.ammoland.com/2019/04/mayor-pete-crackup-christianity/


http://the-trumpet-online.com/pete-buttigieg-wrong-homosexuality/

			

		

		
		

			
							

		


	


			  

					
1
…
479
480
481
482
483
…
795