Fauci lied, millions died: The conspiracy behind hydroxychloroquine’s suppression

June 7, 2021 John

Image: Fauci lied, millions died: The conspiracy behind hydroxychloroquine’s suppression

BY ETHAN HUFF

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-06-fauci-lied-millions-died-conspiracy-hydroxychloroquine-suppression.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Another email bombshell from the Anthony Fauci archives has been dropped, this one showing that “America’s doctor” knew full well that hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was an effective remedy against the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), and yet chose to lie to the public by claiming otherwise.

Not only that, but Fauci colluded with other deep state entities to ban HCQ from even being allowed as an “approved” treatment for the Chinese Virus, even though numerous studies prove it to be an effective remedy against all sorts of coronaviruses.

Fifteen years ago, Fauci himself was a strong proponent of HCQ, having indicated before it was politically incorrect to do so that HCQ works against SARS, a cousin of the Wuhan Flu.

Chloroquine, Fauci admitted back in 2005, “completely abolished SARS-CoV infection.” For whatever reason, the story changed in 2020 when SARS-CoV-2 (covid) emerged when Fauci suddenly decided that HCQ and its derivatives could not be used in the treatment of Chinese Disease.

In response to a Feb. 24, 2020, inquiry, Fauci was dismissive about the potential benefits of HCQ in the early treatment of the Wuhan Flu.

“Is there any indication/data to substantiate this claim from China (attached publication) that chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine can decrease COVID-19 infections and lung disease?” wrote Maryland pharmacologist Philip Gatti in an email to Fauci.

“There are no data in this brief report and so I have no way of evaluating their claim,” Fauci responded. “There are a lot of these types of claims going around. I would love to see their data.”

Fauci doubled down with deception by claiming that hydroxychloroquine is “dangerous”

After being presented with the data, Fauci proceeded to double down on his claim that HCQ was ineffective against the Chinese Virus, even going so far as to claim that the use of it was “dangerous.”

During an appearance on CNN last spring, Fauci warned the network’s handful of viewers that using HCQ prophylactically like then-President Donald Trump had done was dangerous, despite the fact that the drug has been used for decades without issue.

It would seem as though Fauci only wanted to contradict Trump rather than inform Americans as to a safe and effective remedy for the Chinese Flu. Because Trump was for HCQ, Fauci stood against it, proving his loyalty to politics rather than medicine.

Millions of people are now dead, thanks to Fauci’s bad advice. Big Tech followed suit by further censoring all information about HCQ from social media, and much of the world was plunged into lockdowns, mask mandates, and business closures – all because of Fauci’s lies.

Keep in mind that back in 2013, Fauci promoted the use of HCQ in the treatment of MERS, another type of coronavirus similar to SARS and the Wuhan Flu. What changed since that time? Trump became president, is the simplest answer.

“When the history books are written Dr. Tony Fauci will go down as one of the greatest mass murderers of our day,” writes Jim Hoft for The Gateway Pundit.

“He funded the research on coronavirus in the U.S. Then he funded it in China after it was banned here. Then he downplayed the severity of the disease. Then he lied about a successful treatment for the dangerous man-made pathogen. Fauci is a killer. Arrest Fauci.”

One wonders where Fauci is hiding these days as the lid is blown on this whole scandal. Fauci is quickly becoming the most hated figure on the planet, even more so, perhaps, than billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates. The good news is that justice is coming for all of them eventually.

More of the latest news about Fauci’s emails can be found at Conspiracy.news.

Sources for this article include:

TheGatewayPundit.com

NaturalNews.com

Gain of Function Research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology—Dr. Nicole Saphier on Lab Leak Theory

June 7, 2021 John

Rumble — 🔵 SUBSCRIBE to #EpochTV: http://epochtv.com/ATL
🔴 Watch the full episode: https://ept.ms/3uUwZrW

At the Wuhan Institute of Virology, “they have published data that they were actually introducing furin cleavage sites,” says Dr. Nicole Saphier, Director of Breast Imaging at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. That mutation would make a virus much more dangerous, she said.

In this episode, we sit down with Dr. Nicole Saphier to discuss the Wuhan lab leak theory, Dr. Fauci’s newly released email trove, and her new book, “Panic Attack: Playing Politics With Science in the Fight Against COVID-19.”

“When you have the CDC coming out saying young children still need to be wearing masks outdoors, even when they're physically distancing, until they're vaccinated—this makes no sense,” Dr. Saphier said.

#nicolesaphier #lableak #fauci

Spike proteins administered intravenously are engineered to cross the blood-brain barrier, can cause cerebral hemorrhage

June 5, 2021 John

Image: Spike proteins administered intravenously are engineered to cross the blood-brain barrier, can cause cerebral hemorrhage

BY LANCE D. JOHNSON

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-03-spike-proteins-engineered-to-cross-blood-brain-barrier.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) A study from Nature Neuroscience finds the S1 spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood–brain barrier in mice and can cause damage to the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. The spike protein is readily cleared from the blood and taken up by peripheral tissues. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was recovered from cerebrospinal fluid, proving it can cross the blood–brain barrier.

The study shows that these new spike proteins have been engineered to exploit angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), allowing for increased intake of spike proteins into the lungs and specifically to the brain. This is why a real case of SARS-CoV-2 can cause symptoms in the central nervous system, including changes to taste and smell, headaches, twitching, seizures, confusion, vision impairment, nerve pain, dizziness, impaired consciousness, nausea, hemiplegia, ataxia, stroke and cerebral hemorrhage.

So why are people going along with these new “vaccines” — if they turn their own cells into spike protein factories?

Intravenous administration of spike proteins concentrates in the brain TEN times greater than nasal exposure

The engineered SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to human cells using its S1 sub-unit. The researchers reveal that the S1 sub-unit was readily taken up in the parenchymal brain space, the hippocampus, the olfactory bulb, and was measured in eleven regions of the brain. When the spike proteins were administered intravenously, they concentrated in the brain TEN TIMES greater than when administered intranasally!

These are the same spike proteins that human cells are forced to translate, synthesize and replicate using the genetic instructions provided by new mRNA vaccines and adenovirus-vectored vaccines. The lab-engineered spike protein that is being mass-produced in human cells is not only subverting the natural genetic template of protein synthesis, but it is also inundating the brain with foreign TOXINS.

The research finds that spike proteins readily cross the blood-brain barrier through a process called adsorptive transcytosis. Transcytosis is a type of trans-cellular transport in which various macro-molecules are transported across the interior of a cell. Adsorptive-mediated transcytosis provides a means for brain delivery of medicines across the blood-brain barrier.

Why are the spike proteins designed to readily adsorb across the blood-brain barrier? Could this mode of action be intended to deliver other medicines and chemicals, genetic instructions or autoimmune attacks to the brain cells? Is this the real reason for encephalitis and brain hemorrhage following both infection and vaccination? What are the ramifications of spike proteins accumulating in the brain? Will recently vaccinated persons suffer acute or permanent brain damage from these experimental injections?

The research also showed that inflammation increases spike protein uptake in the brain and lungs. When the animals were induced with inflammation, the intravenously administered spike proteins entered the brain more readily. People who eat a plant-based, anti-inflammatory diet are more equipped to survive spike protein attacks to the brain.

Engineering coronavirus spike proteins for human experimentation and vaccine development

Naturally-occurring coronaviruses were first identified in the mid-1960s. They are named after the crown-like spikes on their surface. These viruses are prevalent in animals; however, four coronaviruses are known to infect humans, including 229E, NL63, OC43, HKU1. All of these strains cause mild, cold-like symptoms in humans.

In the twenty-first century, scientists have been studying and engineering the coronavirus spike protein. Scientists can splice genes into the coronavirus spike protein, allowing natural selection to rapidly mutate the spike protein in the lab, one gene at a time. This serial passage technique hides any trace of human interference, but the advanced attachment properties of the resulting virus are a dead give-way that the virus was manipulated in a lab. This controversial gain-of-function research was banned in the US in 2004, but continued to take place in the US and abroad — as long as the research was conducted to invent new vaccines. Today, new experimental vaccines are being unleashed, as the outbreaks occur in real-time.

Since coronavirus gain-of-function research began, three new coronaviruses have emerged, causing severe illness in humans. SARS-CoV-1 was first identified in China in 2003; MERS-CoV was first identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012; and today’s SARS-CoV-2, was first identified in Wuhan, nearby the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China.

Beijing researchers affiliated with the Academy of Military Medical Science published a study in June 2020, explaining the methods they used to modify coronavirus spike proteins to exploit human lung cells. The researchers equipped mice with the ACE2 receptor from human lung cells. By exploiting the ACE2 receptor, the spike protein is engineered to attack the brain and lungs of humans. The damage of this laboratory-leak vaccine experiment will only continue as new vaccine experiments go live on the population, translating spike proteins in human cells and attacking human brains into the unforeseeable future.

Sources include:

“It’s terrifying”: Connecticut mom speaks out after teen son develops heart condition post COVID-19 vaccination

June 5, 2021 John

BY VIRGILIO MARIN

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-04-connecticut-mom-son-heart-condition-post-vaccination.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Connecticut resident Rachel Hatton’s son was diagnosed with a serious heart condition days after taking the COVID-19 vaccine. In a recent interview with NBC Connecticut, Hatton recounted what his 17-year-old son Gregory went through post-vaccination.

She said that Gregory started complaining of severe chest pain three days after getting the second dose. He felt worse on the fourth day and started to experience back pain as well.

He then went to a walk-in clinic and found that he has pericarditis, or the inflammation of the lining outside the heart. He was then sent to two different hospitals as healthcare workers scrambled to identify the cause of his condition.

“They hooked him up to a heart monitor, did more EKGs (electrocardiograms), echocardiograms,” Hatton said.

Infectious disease experts also came to determine if he had an infection that could have caused his disease. They tested him for various conditions but each of the tests came back negative.

Experts still couldn’t tell if the COVID-19 vaccine caused his condition, but they called him back in for an MRI after two more patients displayed similar symptoms. In total, 18 teens and young adults in the state developed heart problems shortly after taking the vaccine, the Connecticut Department of Public Health said in a news conference last Monday, May 24.

Hatton bared that she hasn’t been able to sleep well lately because she is constantly worrying about her son, who is now out of work, on medication and hooked up to a heart monitor.

“If I hear my son sneeze or if he sounds like he’s out of breath when I call him on my break at work, I get nervous because I just don’t know what else could happen,” she shared. “He basically has a heart condition now and it’s terrifying.”

Hatton said she is sharing her son’s story to raise awareness. She noted that though physicians said the condition is rare, it doesn’t feel rare to parents whose own child is suffering from the condition.

“I just want people to be aware and be more informed because now they want to give this vaccine to younger and younger children and it’s terrifying,” she said. “I wouldn’t want any other parent to go through what we’ve been through.”

Other parents of teens who got vaccinated also expressed concern, noting that children are far too young to be inoculated with what are essentially experimental vaccines.

“With that age group, we did have a little bit of concern because they are still growing,” Karn Collard told NBC Connecticut.

“It’s one thing for me to get the vaccine, but for my child to get the vaccine, it’s kind of scary not knowing what’s going to happen and not having a lot of research having been done on it,” Siobhan Cefarelli said. (Related: Pfizer betting big on steady stream of adults and children getting yearly COVID-19 vaccines… it’s all about REPEAT PROFITS.)

CDC probing link between serious heart condition and coronavirus vaccine

Hatton’s account came after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said that it was investigating cases of myocarditis, or the inflammation of the heart muscle, in young vaccine recipients.

Myocarditis is usually caused by a virus but could also result from an adverse reaction to a drug, according to Mayo Clinic. Symptoms include chest pain, fatigue, shortness of breath and irregular or rapid heart rhythm. Severe myocarditis could permanently damage the heart muscle and lead to heart failure, heart attack, stroke or sudden cardiac death.

In a safety advisory last week, the CDC said there were cases of myocarditis occurring in recipients of either the Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine. These cases typically began within four days after the second dose and predominantly affected male teens and young adults, the CDC said as per its vaccine safety committee.

Follow VaccineInjuryNews.com for more about the dangers of the experimental COVID-19 vaccines.

Sources include:

Employers Plan to Mandate Vaccines

June 5, 2021 John

Rumble — The Covid-19 vaccine is not your typical vaccine. Not only does it work differently than vaccines we're accustomed to taking, such as for the measels or mumps, but there hasn't been enough time for long-term studies to be conducted.

Many employers have announced that they are going to mandate Covid vaccinations as a condition of employment. Are these mandates legal? Find out from Robert Owens on this episode of Constitution Corner!

The Five Biggest Bombshells (So Far) From Fauci’s Emails

June 4, 2021 John

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/06/03/the-five-biggest-bombshells-so-far-from-faucis-emails-n1451869;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The release of thousands of Dr. Fauci’s emails as the result of a Freedom of Information Act request has given us a trove of information about Fauci’s behind-the-scenes actions during the pandemic. And there are quite a few bombshells. Below are five key bombshells I’ve identified, though I’m sure more will be coming to light soon.

5. Fauci ignored advice to prevent shutdowns and widespread panic

In mid-March, Fauci received excellent advice on the proper messaging that should have been done on COVID-19, which Fauci promptly ignored. “The problem right now is that the media has created a panic,” wrote someone named Mike Betts, who has not yet been identified. “Last night my wife and I went to the local whole foods and many of the shelves were empty and healthy younger people were wearing masks. The message is not getting out that the virus is almost solely dangerous to the elderly and immunosuppressed. [Why aren’t the demographics being released? That in itself could calm many people.] With my suggestions, exposures to them would be diminished, significantly reducing the number of deaths, as well as potential impact on hospitals.”

Betts urged isolating the vulnerable population and understanding that “the mortality rate for people outside of that group is likely lower than the flu.”

“Of course, while this occurs we are working on finding treatments and vaccines. Bud sending home workers who have next to no likelihood of being significantly impacted by this virus is ridiculous.”

Betts added, “The virus hits hardest the old and infirm, two groups that are most likely NOT to even be in the workforce.”

Why did Fauci ignore this advice? Had Fauci listened, damage to the economy would have been limited.

4. Fauci knew of the NIH’s ties to gain-of-function research abroad

On February 1, 2020, Fauci sent an email to NIH Principal Deputy Director Hugh Auchincloss with the subject line “IMPORTANT” and an attachment labeled “Baric, Shi et al – Nature medicine – SARS Gain of function.pdf.” The undeniably urgent-sounding message informed Auchincloss that it was “essential” for them to speak soon. “Hugh: It is essential that we speak this AM. Keep your cell phone on. I have a conference call at 7:45 AM with [HHS Secretary Alex] Azar. It likely will be over at 8:45 AM. Read this paper as well as the e-mail that I will forward to you now. You will have tasks today that must be done. Thanks, Tony.”

Auchincloss replied and told him, “The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what that means since Emily is sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. Ste will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.”

Fauci had publicly denied the NIH was funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

3. Fauci was told COVID-19 may have been engineered

We were all aware of Fauci’s recent flip-flop on the origins of COVID-19, but what was made more clear from the release of the emails was that Fauci had been told in the early days of the pandemic that COVID-19 had “unusual features” that “potentially look engineered.”

“On a phylogenetic tree the virus looks totally normal and the close clustering with bats suggest that bats serve as the reservoir. The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered,” NIH scientist Kristian Andersen told him on February 1, 2020. Not long after, Anderson was one of the authors of a study that totally discounted the lab-leak theory.

Yet, Fauci publicly and others publicly dismissed this idea publicly, suggesting they were, in fact, part of a cover-up.

2. Fauci said face masks don’t keep out the virus

“Masks are really for infected people to protect them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection,” Fauci wrote on February 5, 2020. “The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through the material.”

Fauci went from saying masks weren’t necessary, to recommending them, to recommending goggles, and even double-masking. Clearly, science wasn’t a key factor in his recommendations.

1. Fauci said COVID would “decline on its own” without a vaccine

What really gets me about this one is that Trump was (and still is) mocked for once suggesting that COVID-19 would eventually disappear. But this is essentially what Fauci said himself. “Social distancing is not really geared to wait for a vaccine,” he said on March 2, 2020. “The major point is to prevent easy spread of infections in schools (closing them), crowded events such as theaters, stadiums (cancel events), workplaces (do teleworking where possible). States and localities make these decisions, not the Federal Government. The goal of social distancing is to prevent a single person who is infected to readily spread to several others, which is facilitated by close contact in crowds.”

“Close proximity of people will keep the R0 higher than 1 and even as high as 2 to 3,” he continued. “If we can get the R0 to less than 1, the epidemic will gradually decline on its own without a vaccine.”

Well, luckily, President Trump made it possible for three vaccines to be developed in less than a year.

___________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:

The Fauci Fraud Is Now Plain for All to See:

https://pjmedia.com/columns/stephen-kruiser/2021/06/03/the-morning-briefing-the-fauci-fraud-is-now-plain-for-all-to-see-n1451625

Real America - Dan W/ Jack Posobiec on Fauci Emails:

State Department Tried to Block Investigation of Lab Leak

June 4, 2021 John

BY RICK MORAN

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2021/06/03/bombshell-u-s-state-department-tried-to-block-investigation-of-lab-leak-at-wuhan-n1451851;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A report in Vanity Fair details actions by some members of the U.S. State Department to block efforts to investigate the origins of the coronavirus because the inquiry could open “a can of worms.” An internal memo sent to department heads by Thomas DiNanno, former acting assistant secretary of the State Department’s Bureau of Arms Control, Verification, and Compliance, warned: “not to pursue an investigation into the origin of COVID-19.”

The “can of worms” in question was the extensive funding by the U.S. government into the Wuhan Virology Lab’s “gain-of-function” virus research. It’s unclear whether DiNanno was concerned that an investigation would uncover evidence of a lab leak or the extent to which the U.S. was funding dangerous research.

Indeed, there’s a lot more going on with this gain-of-function research than has ever been revealed. There appears to be a powerful lobby within the U.S. government that is heavily invested in the dangerous research and is serious about keeping it quiet. Former CDC chairman Robert Redfield received death threats from fellow scientists after telling CNN that he believed COVID-19 had originated in a lab.

“I was threatened and ostracized because I proposed another hypothesis,” Redfield told Vanity Fair. “I expected it from politicians. I didn’t expect it from science.”

Going back to the beginning of the pandemic, ostracizing and ridiculing those who mentioned the lab-leak theory became common. It stems from a letter published in the medical journal Lancet, as the VF article points out.

On February 19, 2020, The Lancet, among the most respected and influential medical journals in the world, published a statement that roundly rejected the lab-leak hypothesis, effectively casting it as a xenophobic cousin to climate change denialism and anti-vaxxism. Signed by 27 scientists, the statement expressed “solidarity with all scientists and health professionals in China” and asserted: “We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.”

That was enough for the American media, which was in no mood to give Donald Trump a break in reporting on the virus. But why dismiss a hypothesis when no one had gathered any evidence of how the virus originated?

Then came the revelation that the Lancet statement was not only signed but organized by a zoologist named Peter Daszak, who has repackaged U.S. government grants and allocated them to facilities conducting gain-of-function research—among them the WIV itself. David Asher, now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, ran the State Department’s day-to-day COVID-19 origins inquiry. He said it soon became clear that “there is a huge gain-of-function bureaucracy” inside the federal government.

Daszak, you may recall, is the founder and president of EcoHealth Alliance and was one of the primary investigators hired by the WHO to go to China and discover the origins of the coronavirus, even though he had a conflict of interest in investigating the Wuhan lab due to his arranging U.S. government funding for the lab’s gain-of-function research.

The “gain-of-function bureaucracy” inside the U.S. government was very busy in 2020.

As officials at the meeting discussed what they could share with the public, they were advised by Christopher Park, the director of the State Department’s Biological Policy Staff in the Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation, not to say anything that would point to the U.S. government’s own role in gain-of-function research, according to documentation of the meeting obtained by Vanity Fair.

Some of the attendees were “absolutely floored,” said an official familiar with the proceedings. That someone in the U.S. government could “make an argument that is so nakedly against transparency, in light of the unfolding catastrophe, was…shocking and disturbing.”

More disturbing was the role that Park played in lifting the moratorium on funding gain-of-function research.

Park, who in 2017 had been involved in lifting a U.S. government moratorium on funding for gain-of-function research, was not the only official to warn the State Department investigators against digging in sensitive places. As the group probed the lab-leak scenario, among other possibilities, its members were repeatedly advised not to open a “Pandora’s box,” said four former State Department officials interviewed by Vanity Fair. The admonitions “smelled like a cover-up,” said Thomas DiNanno, “and I wasn’t going to be part of it.”

Eventually, efforts to cover up the mystery of the origin of the virus failed, and U.S. intelligence as well as the state department and national security agency are going full bore trying to uncover the truth. They won’t be able to succeed without the full cooperation of the Chinese Communists, which is why there will always be a question of whether the virus occurred naturally and was transmitted to humans as viruses have done for tens of thousands of years, or it was a careless leak in a lab.

CEO of COVID-19 vaccine maker Moderna worked with Big Pharma billionaire pal of China’s Xi while promoting lab where virus escaped

June 3, 2021 John

BY J.D. HEYES

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-02-ceo-moderna-big-pharma-billionaire-pals-china-xi.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) The longer the COVID-19 pandemic lasts, the more we learn about its diabolical origins and the key players involved in ensuring that it was not only financed and developed but released on the world by a Chinese Communist regime hell-bent on global domination.

As the walls close in on ‘lead American immunologist’ Dr. Anthony Fauci regarding what he knew about the virus and when he knew it, other devious connections have been made in recent days that are equally alarming.

For instance, a report published earlier this week has tied the CEO of Moderna, one of the first pharmaceutical companies to develop a COVID-19 vaccine (coincidentally), to a big pharma billionaire who is also an associate of ChiCom Dear Leader Xi Jinping and who actually stumped for the Level 4 lab in Wuhan where the virus is believed to have been created and released.

Big League Politics notes:

Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel, who is pushing experimental COVID-19 vaccines designed to alter the RNA of recipients, previously worked as CEO of BioMerieux, a firm owned by a billionaire who was instrumental in the development of the infamous virology lab in Wuhan, China.

French pharma billionaire Alain Merieux, creator of BioMerieux, once served as the Co-President of the Franco-Chinese Committee on Emerging Infectious Diseases. Through this role, Merieux was instrumental in the development of the P4 Laboratory in Wuhan where the COVID-19 virus may have been synthesized and released to devastate society.

The Chinese-French partnership was key to the lab’s development. According to a report from GNews, the government of then-French President Nicolas Sarcozy worked over many years to ensure the construction of the lab, as Merieux was constantly advising Sarkozy to continue working with the ChiCom regime on that and other projects.

The former French leader traveled to China in November 2007 to put ink to an agreement that would “ensure that all necessary measures are taken as soon as possible to implement all projects including the Wuhan P4 laboratory.” And from that point, a course of events was put in place that has culminated in forced changes to lifestyles, losses of life, and trillions in wealth vanquished.

“P4 laboratory construction in Wuhan is very important for Chinese public health and a good symbol of the France China Collaboration in public health,“ Xi would say years later as the lab was set to open.

According to the reports, BioMérieux helped with the propaganda end, selling the concept of the controversial infectious disease lab to the Chinese people in and beyond Wuhan. That included disinformation campaign drives with Xi, who portrayed the lab as a breakthrough for public health.

An online profile of Merieux, which has been translated from French, details his deep ties to China; his father-in-law was also a Western collaborator with the brutal dictatorship of Mao Zedong.

“At the very beginning of the 1960s, Alain Mérieux’s father-in-law, Paul Berliet, discovered this country. If he was part of the trip of General de Gaulle, the first Western head of state to go to Beijing in 1965, the heir to the Berliet transport group already knows the highest dignitaries of the Maoist regime, Zhou Enlai and Deng Xiaoping in particular,” the profile notes.

Meanwhile Bancel “was leading Mérieux’s organization in the same role as they were working to create the Wuhan virology lab,” Big League Politics adds.

These revelations come as it appears that a) the virus indeed was manufactured in the Wuhan lab; b) it was allowed to escape on purpose, and c) Fauci was both aware of the research and aware that the infectious diseases agency he has run since the early 1980s helped fund it as well.

A reckoning, indeed.

Sources include:

Pandemic.news

BigLeaguePolitics.com

Absolutely NOT safe and NOT effective: FDA and CDC lied about vaccine efficacy to obtain ’emergency authorized use’ (EAU) for highly-suspect human medical experiment using mRNA

June 3, 2021 John

BY S.D. WELLS

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-01-fda-cdc-lied-about-vaccine-efficacy.html#;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) As they say, the proof is in the pudding. COVID-19 shots have been the deadliest inoculations ever documented, by far, and that’s according to the CDC’s very own data. More people have died from Covid vaccines (approaching 5,000 now) than all vaccine deaths totaled since the 1950s. No wonder why. They couldn’t even reach the EAU (emergency authorized use) 50 percent efficacy threshold for approval, and that is pretty sad, but worst of all, these ‘treatments’ are super dangerous and haphazard.

Safety thresholds have been thrown out the window with all of these Covid jabs from all three manufacturers. They always assume that none of us can remember what happened last month or last year, but some of us can (the unvaccinated) and do, and we review the data and the findings too. Investigative journalists who support clean living and healthy living must expose the truth to the masses, or the “fence riders” (those not sure whether to vax-up or not) have no chance at all.

Scamdemic Alert: Gene-tampering Covid jabs offer ZERO safety or effectiveness proof while causing blood clots around the world

In the summer of 2020, the FDA’s commissioner stated that in order for the vaccine manufacturers to even get just emergency authorized use, they had to cross the minimum threshold of 50 percent efficacy, that’s according to their own documented standard, and even if they did, that would only be considered a medical experiment, not some mass campaign to inoculate more than 70 percent of the world’s populace in less than 6 months. So how did they even get 50 percent efficacy, when the shots haven’t proven that ANYBODY at all is yet immune to Covid? Easy. Fake the research. Fake the results. Fake everything.

All Covid vaccines are actually a crime right now because none of them even meet the EAU threshold. FDA testing reveals more than half of the test-subject participants came down with Covid-19 within 7 days post-vaccination, but the symptoms were labeled “reactogenicity” to alter the results in order to gain emergency approval. In other words, the FDA/CDC created a gray area where they say symptoms of Covid overlap with symptoms and adverse reactions or “side effects” of the inoculations.

So what did the vaccine manufacturers do to solve this little dilemma, and in their favor? They never bothered to verify whether those test subjects (human guinea pigs) even had Covid, they just chalked up all the symptoms they had as common reactogenicity.

They simply never checked to see if the vaccinated sheeple really caught Covid, because they didn’t want those results (and records), as they would demolish their chances of reaching the 50 percent EAU acceptable medical experiment threshold. And when will the worldwide “test” of vaccine “efficacy” cross the blood clot threshold of 50 percent?

Reactogenicity is the inflammatory response to vaccination, now used as a cover story for “safety and efficacy” of dangerous, deadly Covid vaccines

Chronic inflammation is the root of nearly all ill-health problems. The CDC tries their best to convince the worried, “hesitant” populace that all the horror stories are fake and that the only side effects from inoculations are slight pain at the injection site, fatigue and a low-grade fever. That’s only the tip of the iceberg, and they know it, but most Americans never look any deeper than that.

Forget about “hesitancy.” It’s gone way beyond that. The skeptics of vaccines have much more to worry about than a slight fever or some numb pain called reactogenicity. If the CDC and the FDA were honest, or even if someone somehow was keeping them honest, they would have to disclose right now that the jabs are causing blood clots around the world.

Now, the CDC is targeting young teens. Pfizer wants 12-year-olds to get the vaccine, even though there’s nary a case of death on Earth for anyone that young, and if there is, it’s probably faked too (they probably died in a car wreck or drowned, and then tested positive for Covid proteins – and those are fake tests too).

Meanwhile, the vaccine industry is busy collaborating with the CDC and the tech giants, shutting down all talk (and literature) about natural remedies and indigenous cures that have worked against these viruses for millennia. The scamdemic also reveals that the PCR tests are fundamentally invalid and fraudulent.

The vaccines don’t prevent infection, but rather cause blood clots and hyper-inflammatory responses that are very dangerous to the immune system and can even cause mad cow disease in humans through the uncontrollable creation of prions thanks to mRNA “technology.”

Tune your internet frequency to Pandemic.news for updates on how to prepare for the upcoming VACCINE PANDEMIC and communist apocalypse.

Sources for this article include:

Pandemic.news

NaturalNews.com

TheLibertyLoft.com

Bombshell Emails Reveal That Fauci Wasn’t Being Straight With the American People

June 3, 2021 John

SEE:

https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-tucker-carlson-eviscerates-fauci-after-email-release/

BY MEGAN FOX

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/columns/megan-fox/2021/06/02/emails-reveal-that-fauci-wasnt-being-straight-with-the-american-people-n1451475;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Dr. Anthony Fauci is getting roasted all over social media after the Washington Post and BuzzFeed released scores of his emails, obtained through FOIA requests. The ones that aren’t heavily redacted tell quite a story. It should come as no surprise to readers of PJ Media that Dr. Fauci didn’t believe the line of crap he sold us about wearing “the typical mask you buy in the drugstore” to protect us from the virus—at least he didn’t in Feb. 2020.

“Masks are really for infected people to protect them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection,” Fauci wrote in an email to Sylvia Burwell, presumably President Barack Obama’s former HHS secretary. “The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through the material.”

Recall that in March 2020 Fauci was telling people to stop buying masks. We later learned that he made the recommendation because he was “concerned that it was at a time when personal protective equipment, including the N95 masks and the surgical masks, were in very short supply.”

We’ve been telling you for a year that it’s written on the boxes that drug-store masks are not sufficient to protect from viruses. Dr. Fauci knew it then and he knows it now. Yet, STILL, our children are forced into these things and made to wear them all day in order to participate in school. He should be arrested and charged with the mass child abuse of America’s children.

Somehow, advice for sick people to wear masks to avoid infecting others morphed into “even healthy people have to wear masks,” including people who are vaccinated, even after “asymptomatic spread” panic never panned out. The level of convoluted nonsense here is off the scale.

PJ Media has written extensively about how Facebook decimated our traffic and hurt our business over false fact-checks for raising questions about the response to the virus. When our sister sites Townhall and RedState reported that some scientists were questioning whether COVID-19 was engineered or leaked from a lab, they got choked by the Big-Tech bullies and told that we were spreading “fake news.” (Sign up for VIP today to help us stay independent from the censors.)

An email Fauci received in Feb. 2020, obtained by BuzzFeed, says that the COVID-19 virus showed signs of “potentially” being engineered. Kristian Anderson, professor of immunology and microbiology at Scripps Research, emailed Fauci saying, “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered.”

Why was this point of view silenced? Who knows if that’s true or not? Anderson’s email coincides with and echos a report suggesting the possibility of an engineered virus, which was pulled a few days later for factual errors.

To be clear: I strongly object to media outlets being silenced and censored for reporting what one or more scientists think they’ve found. Whatever it is, the public should hear it. If it is withdrawn later, as was a report that made some scientists believe that COVID-19 might be engineered, then the press should report that. Scientific integrity is preserved and the public is treated to a real-time look at how science is never settled and is always changing and advancing or being clarified. Most importantly, the public is treated like adults and not small children who are incapable of understanding science and evolving studies.

Why are we being controlled like Chinese press outlets? It doesn’t even matter if the virus was engineered or not. The fact that one or more scientists have reason to believe it might be (even if they change their minds at a later date) is newsworthy. It is not okay for the Big-Tech powers that be to shut down any story they want and punish and silence media for trying to tell it.

Back in February of 2020, anyone who reported that the virus might be engineered or may have come from the Wuhan lab was censored and defamed. In May of last year, Fauci declared: “If you look at the evolution of the virus in bats and what’s out there now, [the scientific evidence] is very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated … Everything about the stepwise evolution over time strongly indicates that [this virus] evolved in nature and then jumped species.” Facebook censored any news outlet reporting that the virus may have escaped from a Chinese facility. Recently, the establishment has admitted that the virus could have leaked from the Wuhan lab, after dismissing that theory as a cooked-up “racist” Trump provocation for the better part of a year. How dare they?

It’s true that our knowledge of the virus changed over the months, but I don’t think there is any excuse for Fauci making half of America believe that a cloth mask is some kind of magic solution against a virus he knew to be far smaller than the holes in the masks. Nor is it appropriate to have hidden ongoing studies and findings about the virus from the public. It’s negligent and dishonest. This is the kind of thing that dictatorships do. I am looking forward to Rand Paul’s next session with Dr. Fauci at a Senate hearing.

If you want to scroll through Fauci’s emails yourself, here they are:

_________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:

Fauci's Emails and the Covid Cover-Up

If you like your pandemic, you can keep your pandemic

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/06/new-emails-cast-light-faucis-coronavirus-cover-daniel-greenfield/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Last May, Dr. Fauci offered National Geographic magazine an “exclusive” interview. It was one of the millions of exclusive interviews that he seemed to be doing for every media outlet in the country and on the planet. But there was a special twist to this particular exclusive interview.

President Trump revealed a week earlier that he had seen evidence that the coronavirus pandemic had come out of a Chinese lab. The media and its pet experts rushed to shut down what they called a “conspiracy theory” even though it was backed by secret intelligence.

And the media’s biggest pet expert was Fauci who was more than happy to oblige.

Fauci told the magazine owned by Disney, China’s big corporate partner, the evidence is “very, very strongly leaning toward this could not have been artificially or deliberately manipulated” but he turned curiously evasive when asked if it could have leaked from Wuhan's Level 4 lab and dismissed the relevance of the question since the virus "was in the wild to begin with".

While Fauci pretended to be disinterested in the question of the pandemic’s origins, emails released through Freedom of Information Act requests showed he knew what was at stake.

In April, before Fauci’s interview or President Trump’s comments, Peter Daszak, whose EcoHealth Alliance had moved millions in grants from the National Institutes of Health to study bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, thanked Fauci for protecting the lab.

Daszak offered Fauci a “personal thank you on behalf of our staff and collaborators” for backing "a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology." The entire middle part of the email was curiously redacted. It’s unclear if the collaborators would have included the Chinese scientists laboring away in Wuhan.

The EcoHealth Alliance had been working with Wuhan's top man, Shi Zhengli, and Fauci wasn’t a disinterested party. The Wuhan grant had come through NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases which Fauci has headed since 1984. The lab release theory wasn’t just bad news for the EcoHealth Alliance, whose grant would be suspended by the Trump administration, but for Fauci, who wasn’t just helping the media slam Trump, but was also helping himself.

“We’ll all know the shoddy truth of how a conspiracy theory pushed by this administration led @NIHDirector to block the only US research group still working in China to analyze COVID origins,” Daszak later angrily tweeted.

“Why was it canceled? It was canceled because the NIH was told to cancel it," Fauci glibly told Congress that summer. "I don’t know the reason, but we were told to cancel it.”

Not even Fauci’s biggest media fans could pretend that he didn’t know why it was canceled.

But even while Fauci was pretending that he didn’t understand why the issue kept coming up when he was in front of the cameras, his emails show that he was well aware of the issue.

Emails show that Fauci was urgently conferring with NIAID's Principal Deputy Director Hugh Auchincloss over gain of function experiments. “She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad,” Auchincloss wrote in one email. Fauci likely already knew the answer.

Fauci closed another email to Auchincloss with a curt, "You will have tasks today that must be done." It was a curious response to the sort of thing that he would breezily dismiss as an irrelevant distraction that he was baffled to be even asked about while in public forums.

But Fauci was actually a longstanding fan of gain-of-function research despite its deadly risks.

In 2012, he pondered the possibility that “an important gain-of-function experiment involving a virus with serious pandemic potential is performed” and then badly replicated so that a “scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?”

What was Fauci’s response to a pandemic caused by dangerous gain-of-function research?

“Scientists working in this field might say – as indeed I have said – that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks."

It’s entirely possible that we might all be living in that no longer hypothetical world right now.

A year later, Fauci lifted a gain-of-function moratorium on influenza viruses. In 2017, NIH lifted a pause on gain-of- function research on influenza, SARS, and MERS. The pause had been implemented by the Obama administration which offered guidance for lifting it in its final days.

Nature Magazine succinctly described the move in a headline, "The National Institutes of Health will again fund research that makes viruses more dangerous."

This year, Fauci dismissed the funding for the Wuhan Institute of Virology as a “a modest collaboration with very respectable Chinese scientists who were world experts on coronavirus.”

But the very respectable lab and its scientists were, as former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said, “engaged in efforts connected to the People's Liberation Army” with “military activity being performed alongside what they claimed was just good old civilian research.”

Fauci insisted that the NIH was not directly backing gain-of-function research that could have produced a pandemic, but the NIH could not deny that the Chinese Military could have done so.

He admitted in a Senate hearing, “You never know” when asked about possible gain of function research being carried out anyway, but kept insisting that he trusted Chinese researchers.

Some of the researchers had to be hospitalized with an unusual illness before the pandemic. The revelation of that and other research has helped demolish Fauci’s attempt to stonewall the theory that the pandemic had come out of the very same lab funded by his National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Fauci has signaled a greater openness to the theory he once fought, but it’s much too late to salvage his reputation. The latest release of Fauci emails, heavily censored in places, once again shows that he was the man who knew too much.

As the National Geographic interview went live, a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases employee gushingly emailed him, “I am grateful to say my Director is Dr. Anthony Fauci and share with my family, friends, and church that if you said it, it’s gospel.”

But the faith in Fauci is falling into expert heresy as new revelations arrive every day. The prayer candles and t-shirts, the tide of Fauci fantasies and fan mail, are beginning to recede. Even his biggest fans are turning from the gospel of Fauci to ask some very hard questions.

The experts and the media made it a priority to suppress the China lab leak theory under President Trump. Without Trump, the media no longer has any real need to cover for Fauci and China. What was once falsely described by the media as a “conspiracy theory” is now science.

And if those Fauci emails set off alarm bells, the ones he’s sending now must be deafening.

Texas Healthcare Workers Refuse to be “Human Guinea Pigs,” Sue Hospital Over COVID Vaccine Mandate

June 3, 2021 John

BY Veronika Kyrylenko

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/texas-healthcare-workers-refuse-to-be-human-guinea-pigs-sue-hospital-over-covid-vaccine-mandate/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A Houston hospital was hit with litigation on May 29 for allegedly making its employees and doctors get the COVID-19 vaccine to keep their jobs.

The Houston Methodist Health System network became the first hospital in America to require all employees to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Currently, it oversees eight hospitals and has more than 26,000 employees. Houston Methodist gave workers a deadline of June 7 to get the vaccine — if not, staffers risk suspension and termination.

As a result, 117 employees have joined a lawsuit in Montgomery County that alleges the hospital is “illegally requiring its employees to be injected with an experimental COVID-19 mRNA gene modification injection or be fired.” “Methodist Hospital is forcing its employees to be human ‘guinea pigs’ as a condition for continued employment,” the lawsuit states.

Hospital CEO Dr. Marc Boom sent out a letter in April to staffers announcing that employees have to be vaccinated by June 7. “Please see the HR policy that outlines the consequences of not being compliant by June 7, which include suspension and eventually termination,” the letter, which was included in the lawsuit, stated.

The employees who are challenging the hospital believe they should have freedom of choice to take the vaccine without “force, deceit, fraud, threat, solicitation, or any type of binding or coercion,” and that the mandate is a violation of the Nuremberg Code, a medical ethics code that bans forced medical experiments and mandates voluntary consent.

The lawsuit cited that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued its first emergency use authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 in December 2020, but the vaccines are awaiting full FDA approval and licensing, which will likely take months for the agency to review additional data.

Jennifer Bridges, a nurse who has worked at the Texas hospital for six years, is the lead plaintiff in the case. She said she wants more time for the FDA to gather more research on the vaccine before she gets it.

“People trying to force you to put something into your body that you’re not comfortable with, in order to keep your job, is just insane,” Bridges told KHOU-11, Houston’s CBS News affiliate.

Dr. Boom responded to the lawsuit, saying that 99 percent of Houston Methodist employees have already met the requirements for the vaccination mandate against the “deadly virus,” and added, “As health care workers, it is our sacred obligation to do whatever we can to protect our patients, who are the most vulnerable in our community. It is our duty and our privilege.”

He went on to state that “It is unfortunate that the few remaining employees who refuse to get vaccinated and put our patients first are responding in this way. It is legal for health care institutions to mandate vaccines, as we have done with the flu vaccine since 2009. The COVID-19 vaccines have proven through rigorous trials to be very safe and very effective and are not experimental.”

“Fact-checkers” back Dr. Boom’s claim that “COVID vaccines are not experimental,” arguing the shots have not skipped any trial stages. But the formal stages that the COVID jabs went through are far from enough to consider them “not experimental.” This type of reasoning seems to be purely sophistic since the FDA grants EUA for “investigational” drugs. All three injections that got EUA — Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna and J&J — were defined as “investigational” by the FDA.

According to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), an investigational product refers to a preventative (vaccine), a therapeutic (drug or biologic), device, diagnostic, or palliative used in a clinical trial. An investigational product may be an unlicensed product or a licensed product when used or assembled (formulated or packaged) differently from the approved form, when used for an unapproved indication, or when used to gain further information about an approved use.

The FDA guidance on “Emergency Use Authorization of Medical Products and Related Authorities” explicitly states that people “have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product.” Until the drug gets full approval, an informed consent of the recipient to use it is necessary.

However, according to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), state and local mandates are subject to state and local laws.

“The federal government does not mandate (require) vaccination for people. Whether a state or local government or employer, for example, can require or mandate COVID-19 vaccination is a matter of state or other applicable law.”

Also, the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission (EOEC), a federal government agency that protects workers from discrimination, issued a new guidance on May 28, that, ironically, promotes discrimination against workers who refuse to get an experimental gene injection. The guidance allows employers to legally require COVID-19 shots to re-enter a physical workplace as long as they follow requirements to find alternative arrangements for employees unable to get vaccinated for medical reasons or religious beliefs.

Some of those accommodations include allowing an unvaccinated employee to wear a face mask and social distance while at work, to work a modified shift, get periodic tests for COVID-19, or be given the opportunity to telework or accept a reassignment, according to the guidance.

Hence, the outcome of the lawsuit filed by the Texas healthcare workers is hard to predict.

Are feds discussing ‘VAX passport’ to resuscitate REAL ID?

June 3, 2021 John

REAL ID image

BY CHRIS WOODWARD

SEE: https://onenewsnow.com/medical-health/2021/06/01/are-feds-discussing-vax-passport-to-resuscitate-real-id;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Department of Homeland Security says there are no plans for anything like a vaccine passport – but some think it's still on the minds of people within the department.

DHS made the announcement Friday seeking to clarify what Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said earlier in response to a question in a television interview. Mayorkas had said the agency was "taking a very close look" at the possibility of vaccine passports as the coronavirus pandemic eases and Americans begin to travel overseas.

Twila Brase of Citizens' Council for Health Freedom suggests Mayorkas "may be talking from what he knows inside his own agency or some thought that they have had and forgetting that President Biden has said, 'No, they're not going to be doing that.'

She adds: "Some of Biden's other staff have also said that they're not going to be doing it as well. However, the Department of Homeland Security is heading up the REAL ID program … and that makes me think that there is perhaps some discussion within the department that they would use the vaccination passport as a way to advance REAL ID, which has been delayed now for another two years."

The REAL ID Act, passed by Congress in 2005, enacted the 9/11 Commission's recommendation that the federal government "set standards for the issuance of sources of identification, such as driver's licenses."

The Act established minimum security standards for license issuance and production and prohibits federal agencies from accepting (for certain purposes) driver's licenses and ID cards from states not meeting the Act's minimum standards.

The ability to board a flight is one area where people might see or hear the need for REAL ID, but Brase is concerned that people might one day be told they need it for health care services.

Related articles from One News Now:

Real problems exposed with REAL ID (May 20, 2016)
Brase takes on DHS and its rumor-squashing claims (May 27, 2016)
Brase: Delay of REAL ID a good problem for all (March 25, 2020)

______________________________________________________

Dr. Zelenko: Covid vaccine mandates for children are “coercive human experimentation, crimes against humanity”

June 2, 2021 John

Image: Dr. Zelenko: Covid vaccine mandates for children are “coercive human experimentation, crimes against humanity”

BY ETHAN HUFF

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-06-01-zelenko-covid-vaccine-mandates-children-human-experimentation.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Administering Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” to children under duress is a form of “coercive human experimentation,” and those pushing for such are guilty of “crimes against humanity,” says Dr. Vladimir Zev Zelenko, M.D., the discoverer of the famous Zelenko protocol.

Speaking to America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS), Dr. Zelenko revealed that there is absolutely no reason to inject children with experimental mRNA (messenger RNA) or viral vector Chinese Virus jabs because this age group has an almost zero risk of testing “positive” for the virus in the first place.

“According to the CDC, healthy kids 18 or younger have a 99.998 percent rate of recovery from Covid-19 without any treatment,” he is quoted as saying.

“There is no medical necessity for any vaccines – especially an experimental and unapproved mRNA injection that has been shown to have many dangerous side effects.”

Any government, business, or school district that attempts to mandate Wuhan Flu shots on children is acting in direct violation of the Geneva Convention’s prohibition against coercive human experimentation, he further warned.

“These are criminals of the highest order and must be brought to justice for crimes against humanity.”

The government of Israel, for example, is acting in such a manner by using “coercion against its own citizens to force them into human experimentation,” Dr. Zelenko says.

“The Israeli government uses coercion against its own citizens to force them into human experimentation,” he further contends. “Green passports are a tool of discrimination and exert an unconscionable amount of psychological pressure on innocent people.”

Why did we allow covid to destroy informed consent?

One of the Covidists’ biggest victories throughout this saga was abolishing informed consent, which is the right to accept or reject – your choice – a medical procedure based on your own decision, and not that of Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates or Donald Trump.

To demand that all Americans get injected with experimental DNA-modifying chemicals that will forever destroy the immune system amounts to crimes against humanity as Dr. Zelenko has indicated.

“Informed consent has been disregarded and medical necessity is not considered,” Dr. Zelenko further told AFLDS. “Therefore, young and healthy people and those who already have antibodies are still being forced into an experimental medical intervention that they do not need.”

Likening Israel’s forced vaccination program to the Israeli – Palestinian conflict, Dr. Zelenko went on to tell that country as well to stop forcibly injecting people, and especially children, with experimental gene therapy cocktails.

“Israeli government: Stop shooting microscopic missiles into the bodies of your innocent and non-consenting citizens,” he stated. “Proceed with caution, stop human experimentation, and gather more safety and efficacy data before using new and unapproved technology.”

Dr. Zelenko is among a group of doctors who have been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for their role in addressing the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) plandemic.

He achieved worldwide prominence for successfully treating Chinese Virus patients with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and zinc, which Trump also promoted early on in 2020 before switching to promoting the “Trump vaccine,” as he calls it.

According to Dr. Zelenko, early treatment with HCQ and zinc resulted in an eight-fold decrease in mortality among patients. Getting HCQ and zinc into patients within the first five days after they test “positive” also helps to decrease the death rate by 85 percent, he says.

Dr. Simone Gold, meanwhile, who heads up AFLDS, has been tweeting as of late about Big Tech’s continued censorship of these and other viable remedies for the Wuhan Flu.

“It’s not ‘research’ if they’re censoring opposing information,” she tweeted on May 28. “It’s not ‘science’ if you’re not allowed to question it.”

More related news about forced Chinese Virus injections can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

AmericasFrontlineDoctors.org

NaturalNews.com

Millions of Americans Decline Second Dose of Experimental mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines

June 2, 2021 John

BY RISHMA PARPIA

SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2021/05/millions-of-americans-decline-second-dose-of-experimental-mrna-covid-19-vaccines/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

By the end of April 2021, about eight percent of those who received the first dose of the experimental mRNA Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna/NIAID COVID-19 vaccines being distributed under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) granted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had not received the second dose of the vaccines. This represents more than five million people in the United States.¹ The percentage of people who had missed the second COVID vaccine dose was up by 3.4 percent since March 2021.²

The Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna/NIAID (National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases) COVID-19 vaccines are supposed to be given in two doses three to four weeks apart.³

“Obviously whenever you have a two-dose vaccine, you’re going to see people who for one reason or other—convenience, forgetting, a number of other things—just don’t show up for the second vaccine,” said Anthony Fauci, MD, director of NIAID.⁴

Public health officials predicted that two-dose vaccination campaign for adults would be challenging. Officials say that childhood vaccines, which usually have multiple doses, are easier to administer because children are scheduled to see their pediatricians frequently for “well-child” visits.⁵

Why Some Americans Are Skipping the Second Dose of the COVID-19 Vaccine

A U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) spokesperson said that the reasons behind why people are missing their second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine requires further analysis. However, it is speculated that there are a number of reasons for this, including a perception that one dose is enough to provide protection and, in other cases, concern that a more serious reaction will occur after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccine if a strong reaction was experienced following the first vaccination.⁶

Public health officials have suggested that some people may be choosing to miss the second dose of the vaccine because they believe that one dose is effective.⁷ Another reason is that they may have been advised by their healthcare provider not to get the second dose if they experienced an allergic reaction after their first dose. Angela Rasmussen, PhD, a virologist at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization (VIDO) in Canada said:

I think other people have been advised by their health care provider to not get a second shot, and that’s if they’ve had an allergic reaction or have a bad history with getting vaccine boosters—that’s probably a minority of cases but I think some people for medical reasons will have been advised not to get the second shot.⁸

The other reason why many people are reluctant to get the second dose of the vaccine is due to awareness about reports of moderate to severe adverse reactions that many people are experiencing following the second dose, reactions which are considered “normal” by health officials.⁹ The CDC lists fatigue, headaches, muscle pain, chills, fever and nausea as some of the common adverse effects for both Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna/NIAID COVID-19 vaccines and advises that those symptoms may be severe enough to interfere with daily activity for several days or more, depending upon the individual.¹⁰

Opting Out of the Second Dose Due to Concerns About Adverse Affects

Aaron Milstone, MD of Williamson County Medical Center in Franklin, Tennessee said that many of his patients do not want to get the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine because of the fear of a potentially severe adverse reaction. “I’ve had a fair number of patients come in and say I’m only going to get the one dose. I felt good with it, I didn’t have any side effects, why go ahead and tempt fate,” Dr. Milstone said.¹¹

Danielle Lee, an occupational therapist living in Southern California expressed hesitancy in getting a COVID-19 vaccine since she has had adverse reactions to vaccines in the past. She said she decided to get the first dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and had a mild reaction but she is unsure whether she will get the second dose. She said, “It’s almost like, I guess, maybe an emotional decision. I think it was a combination of, you know, maybe a little bit of peer pressure as well. Like you see other people doing it.”¹²

When asked if she was more concerned about the risks associated with the second dose of the vaccine than contracting the COVID-19 infection, Lee said, “To be honest, I’m more worried about a bad reaction to the second dose.”¹³

Marlene Ceballo of North Ogden, Utah said:

I am scheduled for my second dose on Wednesday. However, I have been debating on whether to go in and getting it or just skipping it overall. I’m afraid I might get another reaction to it. My in-laws received their second does on Friday and all were sick throughout the weekend. They are better now but it scares me to think of not making it, so I might just skip it.¹⁴

Click here to view References:

¹Pereira I. 2nd vaccine shot statistics show majority getting it, only 5 million missing it: CDC. ABC News Apr. 25, 2021.
²Maxouris C, Andone D, Fox M. CDC data shows more Americans are missing their second dose of Covid-19 vaccines. CNN Apr. 25, 2021.
³U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID-19 Vaccines That Require 2 Shots. May. 24, 2021.
⁴Maxouris C, Andone D, Fox M. CDC data shows more Americans are missing their second dose of Covid-19 vaccines. CNN Apr. 25, 2021.
⁵Weise E. About 92% of Americans who got the COVID-19 vaccine returned for their second shot. That’s good, but experts say the rest should do it now. USA Today Apr. 29, 2021.
⁶Waldrop T. Why so many Americans are skipping their second COVID-19 shot. CTV News May. 2, 2021.
⁷Cavanagh M, Mudge R. Fact check: COVID-19 vaccines — Why are people missing their second shot? DW May. 1, 2021.
⁸Ibid.
⁹Ibid.
¹⁰CDC. Different COVID-19 Vaccines. May. 13, 2021.
¹¹Ismail L. Doctors say some are opting out of second vaccine dose in fear of side effects. News Channel 5 Feb. 8, 2021.
¹²CBS News. Millions of Americans have missed their second Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine dose appointments. Apr. 28, 2021.
¹³Ibid.
¹⁴Alberty E. Why thousands of Utahns have missed their second COVID-19 vaccine dose and how it might affect the spread of the virus. Sltribe.com May. 11, 2021.

Natural News statement on vaccine refusal, freedom of choice, due process and human rights

June 2, 2021 John

BY MIKE ADAMS

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-05-30-natural-news-statement-on-vaccine-refusal-human-rights.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) From Mike Adams, the editor of Natural News:

We believe in the principles of human rights and freedom of choice when it comes to any medical intervention, regardless of their risks or benefits. This means we believe every human being has the right to independently decide whether they wish to consent to a vaccine intervention, even if those vaccines are “experimental” in nature and may pose the risk of serious harm, injury or death.

Because we believe in health freedom, we must respect the freedoms of others who choose medical interventions that we know to be dangerous. However, we may do our best to inform them of the risks that doctors, science journals and the media aren’t sharing with the public.

Acceptable methods of working to save someone from vaccine injury include sharing knowledge and information such as:

FDA data sheets that admit to a long list of covid-19 vaccine side effects, including neurological problems, anaphylactic shock and loss of consciousness. This FDA fact sheet admits that 86% of children who participated in a Pfizer covid vaccine trial experienced adverse reactions.
State-level information sheets such as this Connecticut document that admits covid-19 vaccines may cause permanent injury or harm.
Reports citing VAERS data from HHS.gov, showing that thousands of Americans have already died after taking covid-19 vaccines. (VAERS data is publicly available for anyone to view.) This story shows that VAERS data reveal covid vaccine injuries tripling in 12- to 17-year-olds last week.
Video interviews, articles or presentations from researchers who are presenting information about vaccine risks that are typically not covered by the pharma-controlled media.

… and so on. Despite all the censorship of “vaccine hesitancy” information by Facebook, YouTube, Google and Twitter, there still are many credible information resources where individuals who want to learn more about vaccines can find out about their ingredients, underlying technology (mRNA, for example), risks of side effects and blood clotting potential, among other things.

Despite the large-scale pro-vaccine propaganda that’s funded by the CDC’s $1 billion propaganda budget (passed as part of the recent covid stimulus bill), websites like Children’s Health Defense, Life Site News, Green Med Info and many other sites — including this one — offer fact-based knowledge that can help people learn simple facts about covid-19 vaccines they may take into account when making their own decisions regarding medical interventions.

It is NOT acceptable to threaten other people who are taking or administering the vaccine

Because we respect freedom of choice, we believe it is not acceptable to engage in coercive activities in order to interfere with other people’s medical choices, even if we are aware that their choices may be harmful or injurious to themselves and those around them. Specifically:

It is NOT okay to threaten anyone with violence in order to coerce them into avoiding taking a vaccine.
It is NOT okay to threaten the people administering vaccines to others, as they are merely NPCs following orders.
It is NOT okay to threaten doctors, nurses, pharmacists, vaccine researchers, Big Pharma executives or others who play a role in the vaccine pipeline. (It is okay to verbally condemn their actions, however.)
It is NOT okay to engage in vigilante justice of any kind against any person or group involved in vaccines.
We do NOT condone the use of violence to achieve a desired end, as we are OPPOSED to violence, including medical violence targeting children with experimental vaccines.

Acceptable approaches to countering vaccine violence must be rooted in peace, due process and human rights:

It is acceptable to peacefully protest outside vaccine clinics, hospitals or pharmaceutical operations, as long as such protests are lawful and pursued in the spirit of the First Amendment.
It is acceptable to demand investigations and prosecutions of those who are engaged in illegal activities surrounding vaccines, including those who are committing scientific fraud, withholding informed consent, carrying out plots to censor alternative treatments (such as ivermectin) or other illegal activities.
It is correct to demand law enforcement investigate and prosecute those carrying out crimes against children (or crimes against humanity), but we must defer to the justice system to pursue prosecutions and judgements.

The reason this approach is so important is because society as a whole must reject vaccine violence, not just a few individuals. Once this current batch of covid vaccines results in millions of deaths in the United States, it will become obvious that society must move against the vaccine cartels to protect innocent lives. That time has not yet arrived, but it will. Sadly, many of the very people who are going to be killed by these vaccines will never have a chance to speak out, since they will be dead. But survivors will sound the alarm.

Until that day comes, protect yourself and your loved ones from vaccine violence. Work to educate any who will listen. Adhere to the rule of law and respect due process. Do NOT take vigilante actions against vaccine proponents. Instead, record their actions and crimes for future legal action against them once law enforcement and the courts are ready to pursue criminal cases against those who carried out vaccine violence against innocent victims. It is perfectly acceptable to keep records of present-day events and to turn those records over to law enforcement when the political will to prosecute vaccine violence eventually surfaces. That day may be less than a year away…

The U.S. government has not yet moved vaccine compliance into the KINETIC phase… they are still pretending to be the “good guys”

As you ponder all this, remember that the US government has not yet taken this kinetic. There aren’t yet arresting people at gunpoint and forcing them to take vaccines against their will, in other words.

Understand that the kinetic coercion phase is coming, but for now, the government is using incentives (lottery tickets, free donuts, etc.) and punishments (no right to travel, no right to enter a church, etc.) to try to non-violently coerce as many people as possible into accepting vaccine injections.

This phase will likely continue for another 2-3 months, after which the government will then begin to ramp into coerced compliance with door-to-door “gunpoint medicine” demands that people get vaccinated or face criminal penalties (such as fines or jail time).

Once the government moves into this phase, they can no longer pretend to be the “good guys.” At that point, they are overtly following in the footsteps of totalitarian regimes engaged in crimes against humanity, and the vaccine drive begins to resemble a concentration camp mass arrest affair. Should the government shift into this phase, they expect heightened levels of resistance.

For this reason, as I have been told, the Biden regime is working with the vaccine deep state to stage a large-scale false flag event that can be blamed on anti-vaxxers and gun owners. They plan to shoot up some venue related to health care and blame it on anti-vaxxers while calling for immediate, nationwide gun confiscation.

Once the guns are confiscated — if that can even be pulled off — then the government will proceed with the kinetic phase without much resistance, since they will be armed and you won’t.

Once they (try to) take the guns, vaccine injections will be mandated at gunpoint

All Natural News readers should fully expect to witness the deep state pulling off a large-scale false flag event followed by demands for nationwide firearms confiscation. That will be followed by nationwide vaccine compliance via kinetic action on the part of the government.

If all goes according to the plans of the globalists, vaccines, economic collapse, regional warfare, engineered famine and the government’s war on America’s citizens can reduce the population of the United States by about 230 million between now and the end of 2025. We aren’t sure how many tens of millions of deaths are likely attributable to vaccines vs. starvation vs. widespread disease, etc. But the global plan is to reduce the U.S. population to under 100 million people, and we know that covid vaccines and additional bioweapons are key components of their nefarious depopulation plan.

We also know the vaccine deep state will release additional pathogens as required, likely including a new weaponized strain of Ebola. We also know that the NIH funded SARS-CoV-2 “gain-0f-function” research specifically to target human ACE2 receptor cells that exist in the respiratory tract, reproductive organs and other organs.

Finally, we know that the spike protein used in the vaccines is itself a biological weapon that even the Salk Institute confirms causes vascular disease. This is the particle that’s causing blood clots which lead to heart attacks, strokes and pulmonary embolism deaths. The spike protein is the weapon, and it’s intentionally formulated into the vaccines. (Or in the case of mRNA vaccines, your body’s cells are hijacked to generate spike protein bioweapons and release them into your own blood.)

The vaccine industry hopes to kill as many vaccine victims as possible so they can’t sue or protest

The truth about all this cannot be covered up for long. The coming wave of vaccine deaths will be irrefutable and horrifying. The vaccine industry knows this and they are trying to kill the vast majority of Americans before people realize they’re being culled. After all, the vaccine industry knows that dead people don’t protest, and dead people don’t file lawsuits. So the more quickly they can kill the largest number of people, the less backlash they will face when all this comes out.

Once the US government moves this into a kinetic compliance phase, the federal government will literally be at war with the American people, and all hell will break loose across the country on multiple fronts. So we will address that situation when and if it happens.

An upcoming podcast will delve into the full details of the five stages of vaccine coercion in America. (We are currently in stage 3.) Stage 5 is all-out government biological and kinetic warfare on the American people. If stage 5 is invoked, there will be no mistaking it because men with guns will show up at your door and demand you consent to being vaccinated at gunpoint.

Until that day comes, however, the vaccine death merchants are going to pretend to be the “good guys,” and the brainwashed American masses — who don’t know much at all about the real purpose behind these vaccines — remain convinced that vaccines equal freedom.

Soon, they will come to realize that covid vaccines equal death, but until that day comes, there’s not much the rest of us can do to stop them beyond trying to inform them. Sadly, we are all going to lose loved ones when the covid vaccine death wave is unleashed. Myself included, as I have relatives who have also taken the vaccine and may be gone in the next 1-3 years.

Save yourself, and save as many as you can through education, information and evidence. The truth will be readily apparent soon, and the vaccine industry has already set things in motion that will destroy the credibility of the entire industry for generations to come. Sadly, millions will die before the rest of society wakes up to the truth about vaccines and depopulation.

Stay safe and abide by the law. Respect due process. Warn others but do not threaten them. The truth will be revealed soon.

New CDC report admits over 10K fully vaccinated patients have contracted coronavirus

May 30, 2021 John

Rumble — A new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reveals over 10,000 fully vaccinated Americans have been infected with the coronavirus, as they admit they will no longer be tracking positive infections after vaccinations. One America's Pearson Sharp has more.

FDA document reveals 86% of children who participated in Pfizer covid vaccine trial experienced adverse reactions

May 29, 2021 John

BY MIKE ADAMS

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-05-27-fda-document-pfizer-covid-vaccine-trial-adverse-reactions.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) A publicly-available FDA “fact sheet” document reveals that 86% of children who participated in a Pfizer covid vaccine trial reported adverse reactions ranging from “mild” to “serious.”

As part of the vaccine experiments, children aged 12 to 15 are being injected with mRNA sequences that take control of their cells, causing them to churn our spike proteins in their blood. Spike proteins cause vascular disease and blood clots. Even the Jonas Salk Institute conclusively identifies spike proteins as the culprit behind vascular disease and blood clots.

This is all openly admitted by the FDA, which has published extremely disturbing reports of adverse reactions experienced by children in a Pfizer covid vaccine “fact sheet” labeled 144413. See the original FDA document here (PDF).

In case the FDA removes this sheet, we have archived it at Natural News servers here (PDF).

FDA admits mRNA vaccines cause adverse reactions in 86% of children, but calls it “safe” anyway

This Pfizer page at the FDA provides links to all the fact sheets and press releases where the FDA celebrates expanding its emergency use authorization to children aged 12 to 15.

That fact sheet contains the following table that details the alarming rate of side effects and damage experienced by 12 – 15-year-olds (i.e. children) who were given the mRNA injections:

Table 5: Study 2 – Frequency and Percentages of Adolescents With Solicited Local Reactions, by Maximum Severity, Within 7 Days After Each Dose – Adolescents 12 Through 15 Years of Age

As you can see from the table, 1127 children were given the first dose of the vaccine, and 1097 children received the second dose. What happened to the 30 children who didn’t show up for the second dose? Did they die? Why were they removed from the second dose?

Among those children injected with the mRNA vaccine medical experiment:

A shocking 86% experienced side effects.
Nearly 44% suffered “moderate” side effects defined as “interfering with activity.”
66% of the children experienced fever.
65% suffered headaches.
Other side effects experienced by these children as part of these medical experiments include chills, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, muscle pain and even joint pain.
Even after 86% of children experienced such side effects after being injected with the first dose, researchers continued to inject the children with a second dose.

The FDA claims this is all about “protecting” children while pushing more vaccine sales to generate billions of dollars in profits for Pfizer

The FDA claims in its celebratory press release that expanding Pfizer’s experimental vaccine to 12 to 15-year-olds is a kind of breakthrough, not a crime against children:

“The FDA’s expansion of the emergency use authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to include adolescents 12 through 15 years of age is a significant step in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic,” said Acting FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock, M.D. “Today’s action allows for a younger population to be protected from COVID-19, bringing us closer to returning to a sense of normalcy and to ending the pandemic. Parents and guardians can rest assured that the agency undertook a rigorous and thorough review of all available data, as we have with all of our COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorizations.”

In other words, the FDA is admitting they are fully aware of the 86% side effect rate when it comes to injecting children with experimental mRNA “vaccines.”

Vaccine medical experiments are harming children in the name of Big Pharma profits

When it comes to mRNA vaccine trials in the USA, when serious reactions such as facial paralysis are identified in the vaccinated group, the FDA (and presumably, the researchers) dismiss them as coincidence. From the FDA’s own document:

Bell’s palsy (facial paralysis) was reported by four participants in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine group. Onset of facial paralysis was Day 37 after Dose 1 (participant did not receive Dose 2) and Days 3, 9, and 48 after Dose 2. No cases of Bell’s palsy were reported in the placebo group. Currently available information is insufficient to determine a causal relationship with the vaccine.

Thus, no matter what horrific side effects are caused by the vaccine experiment, they are dismissed and ignored. After all, there are billions of dollars to be earned from authorizing vaccines for widespread use in children. (It’s a whole new demographic market to target.)

This FDA document even admits the vaccine is not approved and may cause serious injury or even death:

FDA has authorized the emergency use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, which is not an FDA-approved vaccine.

Adverse Reactions in Clinical Trials

Adverse reactions following the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine that have been reported in clinical trials include injection site pain, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, chills, joint pain, fever, injection site swelling, injection site redness, nausea, malaise, and lymphadenopathy (see Full EUA Prescribing Information).

Adverse Reactions in Post Authorization Experience

Severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, and other hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., rash, pruritus, urticaria, angioedema), diarrhea, vomiting, and pain in extremity (arm) have been reported following administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine outside of clinical trials. Additional adverse reactions, some of which may be serious, may become apparent with more widespread use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.

The FDA also admits that life-threatening anaphylactic shock may occur following the vaccine, or that vaccine recipients may lose consciousness:

Appropriate medical treatment used to manage immediate allergic reactions must be immediately available in the event an acute anaphylactic reaction occurs following the administration of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.

Syncope (fainting) may occur in association with the administration of injectable vaccines, in particular in adolescents. Procedures should be in place to avoid injury from fainting.

Any rational person, after reading this “fact sheet” from the FDA, would express serious concern over the continued recruitment and exploitation of children as human guinea pigs in vaccine medical experiments.

This is why we continue to sound the alarm on such practices.

_______________________________________________________

SEE ALSO:

Covid vaccine spike proteins attack male fertility, too

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-05-27-covid-vaccine-bioweapons-attack-male-fertility-too.html

PRO-VAX DOC: “I CAN NO LONGER RECOMMEND THE VACCINE TO ANY INDIVIDUAL”

Jim Meehan, MD, has a candid “doctor to doctor” discussion with Professor of Medicine, Peter McCullough, MD, about why he changed his mind on recommending the Covid vaccine to his patients, especially if they have already recovered from #Covid19.

BOMBSHELL: Fauci Pushed for ‘Gain-of-Function’ Research in 2012, Said It Was Worth the Risk of Pandemic

May 29, 2021 John

Paul Amendment bans funding for 'gain of function' research in China

Rumble — In an exclusive interview, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) told One America News about his amendment to ban gain of function research amid questions on the origins of coronavirus. One America's John Hines has more from Capitol Hill.

Sen. Rand Paul: Rejection of Trump Theory of Wuhan Virus is Standard Tactic of Left

Rumble — In an exclusive interview with One America News Senator Rand Paul discussed the evidence that the coronavirus may have originated in a lab in Wuhan, China. This is the same claim that President Trump made over a year ago. One America's John Hines has more on this report from Capitol Hill.

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/05/28/bombshell-fauci-pushed-for-gain-of-function-research-in-2012-said-it-was-worth-the-risk-of-pandemic-n1450565;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director and medical advisor to Joe Biden, defended controversial “gain-of-function” research in 2012, and said the research was worth the risk of a pandemic.

“In an unlikely but conceivable turn of events, what if that scientist becomes infected with the virus, which leads to an outbreak and ultimately triggers a pandemic?” Fauci wrote in an article in the American Society for Microbiology in October 2012—which was first reported by The Australian. “Scientists working in this field might say — as indeed I have said — that the benefits of such experiments and the resulting knowledge outweigh the risks.”

Gain-of-function research involves extracting natural virus samples from animals and engineering them to infect humans for the development of therapeutics and vaccines.

This stunning revelation comes on the heels of researchers raising new questions about the origins of the COVID-19 virus. It also comes after Dr. Fauci’s recent admission that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) sent $600,000 to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for research into the transmissibility of bat coronaviruses to humans, and his concession that COVID-19 may not have been naturally occurring after insisting for over a year that it was. Earlier this week, Facebook made an unusual reversal of its policy banning posts suggesting that COVID-19 may have originated in a Chinese laboratory. A House GOP report also found that “significant circumstantial evidence raises serious concerns that the COVID-19 outbreak may have been a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology,” and that Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID funded work there that “appeared to directly or indirectly involve controversial ‘gain of function’ research.”

Gain-of-function research is not only controversial, but two years after Fauci defended it, the U.S. government banned the practice on account of it being too dangerous. But it seems Fauci found a loophole and used NIH grant money to fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

Fauci may be trusted by Joe Biden and many other Americans, but he may have been directly involved in funding the research that ultimate caused the COVID-19 pandemic.

China Rejects “Lab Leak” Theory, Suggests America Developed COVID in Its Secret Labs

May 28, 2021 John

China Rejects “Lab Leak” Theory, Suggests America Developed COVID in Its Secret Labs

BY Veronika Kyrylenko

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/china-rejects-lab-leak-theory-suggests-america-developed-covid-in-its-secret-labs/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Beijing has responded to President Joe Biden’s Wednesday announcement of a probe into COVID-19 origins by denouncing the “lab leak” hypothesis as a conspiracy theory and urging an investigation into secret U.S. bio-labs around the world.

On Thursday, the Chinese Embassy in the U.S. released a statement on the origin tracing of COVID-19, saying:

“Lately, some people have played the old trick of political hype on the origin tracing of COVID-19 in the world. Smear campaign and blame shifting are making a comeback, and the conspiracy theory of ‘lab leak’ is resurfacing.”

Without naming names, the statement implies that “some political forces have been fixated on political manipulation and blame game, while ignoring their people’s urgent need to fight the pandemic and the international demand for cooperation on this front,” something that has “caused a tragic loss of many lives.”

China is calling for international cooperation to trace the origins of Covid-19 “on the basis of respecting facts and science, with a view of better coping with unexpected epidemics in the future,” the statement said. Politicizing the probe will make it “hard to find the origin of the virus” but also “seriously hamper international cooperation on the pandemic.”

“Out of a sense of responsibility towards the health of mankind,” Beijing supports “a comprehensive study of all early cases of [COVID]-19 found worldwide and a thorough investigation into some secretive bases and biological laboratories all over the world,” the embassy said, which will be “full, transparent and evidence-based, and shall get to the bottom to make everything clear.”

While it’s become conventional wisdom in the United States to believe that the novel coronavirus first appeared in the Chinese city of Wuhan in late 2019 — with the only mystery being whether it was transmitted from animals to humans via the city’s filthy wet market or escaped from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) lab — China has rejected both theories.

At a press conference in March 2020, Lijian Zhao, a spokesman for the Chinese Foreign Ministry instead voiced his suspicion that it actually was the U.S. scientists who developed the virus. He claimed that the covert research took place in one of America's bioweapon laboratories and then was sent to China during the Wuhan military games in October that year.

Pointing to a video of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) director Robert Redfield apparently admitting several deaths from COVID-19 before they were able to test for it, Zhao also tweeted that the United States “owes us explanation:”

“It might be US army who brought the epidemic to Wuhan,” Zhao suggested, calling for the CDC — and the Americans in general — to “be transparent” and share what they know about where and when “Patient Zero” was first diagnosed.

In the video, Redfield acknowledged that some cases of coronavirus were misclassified as influenza as the medics did not have an accurate test for the new epidemic at the time. He did not elaborate on when these misdiagnosed cases first appeared — saying only that “some cases have been diagnosed that way.”

Chinese officials repeatedly called the U.S. to follow China’s lead and invite the WHO experts to Fort Detrick, a U.S. Army Futures Command installation that is believed to conduct medical and biological experiments, along with the American “200-plus” overseas bio-labs, and disclose the detailed data and information on the outbreaks of respiratory disease in northern Virginia in July 2019 and the EVALI (E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use-Associated Lung Injury) outbreak in Wisconsin.

U.S. officials from both Trump and Biden administrations have condemned China’s effort to pin the blame for the pandemic on America as “false, baseless, and unscientific claims.” They assert that the Chinese government worked for more than a year to thwart an independent investigation into the origins of the deadly virus, and both administrations cast doubt on the manner in which a joint WHO-China report released was conducted in early 2021. The study states that transmission of the virus from bats to humans through another animal is the most likely scenario and that a lab leak is “extremely unlikely.” Later, the WHO added to the confusion and suspicions, saying the report “was not extensive enough,” and that further investigation of the Wuhan lab is needed.

Then-Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced in January that U.S. officials had “reason to believe” that Wuhan lab staff contracted a virus that produced “symptoms consistent with both COVID-19 and common seasonal illnesses.”

The “lab leak” theory is gaining credibility among U.S. top federal officials. Naturally, the question about holding the entities responsible for the outbreak accountable is hanging in the air. As of today, the White House won’t say if China will be punished if the Wuhan “lab leak” is proven correct.

TV Anchor Exposes How Covid-19 News was Censored~The MSM does NOT want you to hear this!

May 28, 2021 John

Professional journalist Kristi Leigh of KristiLeighTV.com joins The Alex Jones Show to expose how the MSM censored medical information at a time the public needed it the most.

SEE: https://www.youtube.com/c/KristiLeighTV/featured

Don’t miss:

Biden Admin. SHUT DOWN Investigation Into Wuhan Lab Leak Theory

May 26, 2021 John

The probe was initiated under President Trump to determine origin of the outbreak

BY STEVE WATSON

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/posts/report-biden-admin-shut-down-investigation-into-wuhan-lab-leak-theory/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

As the evidence piles up pointing toward a Wuhan lab leak being the origin of the coronavirus pandemic, and as it becoming accepted as a mainstream credible likelihood, it has emerged that Joe Biden’s administration SHUT DOWN an investigation into the theory that was initiated under President Trump.

The probe was opened by the State Department under former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who has long maintained that the lab leak needs to be looked at in more depth.

CNN (of all outlets) reports that the main thrust of the investigation was to examine China’s biological weapons program, and determine if it had a “greater role in the pandemic’s origin in Wuhan.”

The report notes that “Officials involved in the effort relied on scientific research as well as public and classified information to probe the lab leak theory, including looking into any possible connection between the virus and the Chinese government’s biological weapons program.”

It continues, “The US government has said that it believes China maintained an offensive biological weapons program even after joining the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention in 1984. China refutes this.”

However, before it properly got off the ground, the probe was shut down by Biden officials, who claimed that there were too many concerns about the quality of the evidence.

As we reported Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki declared that evidence pointing to a Chinese lab leak causing the coronavirus pandemic does not constitute “enough data and information to jump to a conclusion,” and indicated that the US will not conduct its own investigation.

Instead, the Biden administration has thrown its weight behind the World Health Organisation, despite the fact that the health body previously complained that it had ‘not been invited’ by China to investigate the outbreak, and has continually been criticized for propping up Communist Party talking points.

In addition, after spending months trying to negotiate a visit, WHO officials largely absolved China of blame for the outbreak after visiting the virus lab in Wuhan for just 3 hours.

Pompeo himself expressed his disgust this week at witnessing government scientists over the past year dismissing the possibility of COVID-19 originating from a lab “when they surely must have seen the same information that I had seen.”

“That includes, certainly, Dr. Fauci as well,” Pompeo noted:

President Trump also issued a statement Tuesday, noting that he was “right” about the lab leak theory:

This week a previously unseen US intelligence report revealed that at least three researchers working at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where coronavirus experiments were being conducted, were hospitalized in mid-November 2019 with symptoms matching those of COVID.

It adds to the mountains of evidence pointing to the lab leak that has been accumulating for over a year, with prominent scientists and intelligence figures lending their weight to the notion.

With numerous official entities now being forced to backtrack and acknowledge that the lab leak origin is a real possibility, media outlets and fact-checkers are scrambling to reverse previous statements on the issue.

STOP VAXXING KIDS ! MASSIVE LAWSUIT AGAINST DHHS FILED

May 26, 2021 John

Rumble — BREAKING: DHHS sued to halt the Covid-19 Vaccines to Children 15 years old and younger. This game-changing lawsuit was filed by Attorney Thomas Renz and America's Frontline Doctors against the Emergency Use Authorization of these experimental vaccines that have had no long term studies on the impact on adults, much less children.

Attorney Thomas Renz is the lead Attorney in several major cases brought in Ohio, New Mexico, Maine, and Nationally against the CDC and DHHS regarding the COVID-19 lockdowns, mask mandates, business closures, false PCR data, fraudulent death numbers and more. Attorney Thomas Renz works with and represents America's Frontline Doctors, Make Americans Free Again, and Ohio Stands Up.

Attorney Renz testified in front of the Ohio State Legislature regarding his findings on COVID-19 in Feb. 2021. Shockingly, Renz was immediately censored and slandered. His testimony was removed by YouTube, and the AP started calling. Despite the fact that Attorney Renz has CDC data and documentation backing up everything he testified to, YouTube and several news outlets have labeled him a "conspiracy theorist" presenting "baseless claims" as well as personally attacking him. Attorney Thomas Renz says " What they don't understand is I have no ego in this. I just want the people to know the truth and get their freedom back.This is a David vs Goliath fight. "

TOPIC: Breaking: DHHS sued to halt the Covid-19 Vaccines to Children 15 years old and younger. This game-changing lawsuit was filed by Attorney Thomas Renz and America's Frontline Doctors against the Emergency Use Authorization of these experimental vaccines that have had no long term studies on the impact on adults, much less children. The lawsuit also challenges the legality of "emergency use authorization" since that law states that children must be at risk, which the CDC says children are statistically at ZERO percent mortality rate by COVID-19. The "emergency use authorization" also states that it can only go into effect if there are no other viable treatments for the virus. Hydroxychloroquine, Ivermectin, Zinc, and Budesonide have all been proven as effective treatments by multiple doctors.

This lawsuit throws the kitchen sink at the unethical collusion and marketing campaign of this deadly vaccine through Big Media, Big Tech, Big Pharma, and Big Gov, all to financially benefit globalist billionaires. Attorney Thomas Renz also goes after Dr. Anthony Fauci for his numerous lies about gain of function , masks and more.

Suit and supporting documents are at www.Renz-Law.com

FROM AMERICAS FRONTLINE DOCTORS

America’s Frontline Doctors has filed a TRO to immediately halt the extension of the EUA that is permitting experimental biological agents to be given to America's 12-15 year olds.

TRO Papers have been submitted to the Court.

https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontline-news/americas-frontline-doctors-files-motion-for-temporary-restraining-order-against-use-of-covid-vaccine-in-children

This was a massive effort by dozens of incredibly talented, hardworking patriotic people.

I ask all journalists and influencers to please post widely and repeatedly. For the first time in our nation’s history, America’s children are being treated like guinea pigs with an experimental agent, claiming it is to protect them from a virus which has, by Defendant’s own admission, a zero percent chance of death for this age group.

“Kids are one third of our population and all of our future.
Kids are never the experiment. Protect the Children.”
America’s Frontline Doctors

#Protect the Children

James O’Keefe Joins Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for Signing of Historic Big Tech Censorship Bill~Facebook ‘demoting’ users based on ‘vaccine hesitancy’

May 26, 2021 John

James O'Keefe reveals bombshell docs showing Facebook 'demoting' users based on 'vaccine hesitancy'

Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine Being Tested on Babies

May 25, 2021 John

Experimental COVID-19 Vaccine Being Tested on Babies

BY KATE RAINES

SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2021/05/experimental-covid-19-vaccine-being-tested-on-babies/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

An eight-month-old baby is the youngest person in the world to have been fully vaccinated with two doses of Pfizer’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had previously granted Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the experimental COVID vaccines for use in adults and has recently expanded its authorization to include adolescents over 12 years old, but no data are available pertaining to the vaccine’s use in babies and small children.
Two “camps” have emerged: Parents who believe vaccination is safe, effective and the only way forward out of the pandemic and parents who are concerned about short- and long-term consequences of the experimental vaccinations and do not want their children used as “guinea pigs.”

An eight-month-old baby is the youngest person in the world to be given two doses of Pfizer/BioNTech’s experimental vaccine against COVID-19.¹ Little Vincenzo “Enzo” Mincolla,” of Baldwinsville in upstate New York, was injected with his first dose at just seven months of age and got his second dose last week on May 12, 2021. Baby Enzo’s parents are both doctors and expressed “no qualms about getting their baby vaccinated,” stating that, “We are helping science and evidence-based medicine.”²

Little Enzo is one of six infants included in Pfizer’s phase 1 clinical trial at the Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, NY, along with another 10 babies and young children being vaccinated and evaluated at three other research facilities across the U.S. The babies in the study were given two three-microgram doses of the vaccine, with a three-week interval between doses, equating to one-tenth of the dose adapted for older children and adults. No immediate short-term adverse reactions have been reported for any of the babies vaccinated so far, which has led to some concern among the researchers.

Researchers Concerned Dose Given to Infants May Be Too Low

Noting that the dosage might be too low for the age group,³ Joseph Domachowske, MD a pediatric infectious disease specialist at Upstate Medical University and chief investigator of the study, said that Pfizer has temporarily halted the study in order to evaluate the antibody response. If the babies do not develop antibodies to COVID-19, or the antibody response is lower than the targeted efficacy, Pfizer may recruit an additional 16 babies and treat them with a higher dose, which is projected to be 10 micrograms.⁴

Parents Split on Enrolling Children in Experimental Studies

Parents of other children participating in COVID-19 vaccine trials tend to agree with Enzo’s parents about the advantages of vaccination. Zinaida Good, PhD, a Stanford researcher whose young children are taking part in the vaccine trial at Stanford, said, ““I enrolled my kids, not because I want them to be part of a crazy experiment, but for them to have the best chance to stay healthy.”⁵

Other parents worry more about the potential side effects—both acute and long-term—of an experimental vaccine that has not been studied in larger, long-term clinical trials and a more substantial history of safety. One parent, who wanted to remain anonymous because she was concerned that she would be judged harshly for her decision, said, “I think for my children until we see a little bit more research and it’s proven that it’s something that is necessary, I think I’m going to wait.”

Krystal Shepard, another parent who agrees with that sentiment, said she does not want her kids being used “as guinea pigs.” She is quoted as saying, “What’s going to happen 10 to 15 years from now? I don’t want to find out with my kids…I’m not opposed to other people feeling that they want this for their family and for themselves. I think this is the right for every person to choose for themselves what they want to put in their body.”⁶

No Safety Data in Children Under 12 Years of Age

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had previously approved the experimental biologic under emergency use authorization for use in adults and has recently updated its recommendations to include adolescents over age 12.⁷ Addressing the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, David Kessler, MD, chief COVID-19 scientific officer for the current administration, projected that safety and efficacy data on the vaccines might be available on children under age 12 by late fall of 2021. Responding to that prediction, Anthony Fauci, MD indicated that, “steps to vaccinate younger children will probably occur in stages, progressing younger and younger, as study evidence accumulates.”⁸

Noting that he believes the COVID-19 vaccines have so far been shown to be safe and effective, pediatric infectious disease specialist James Campbell, who serves on the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP’s) Infectious Disease Committee, nevertheless acknowledges that, “Before COVID-19 vaccines become available for younger children, clinical trials need to be completed. This is to ensure they are safe and effective for these age groups. Children are not little adults; we can’t just assume a vaccine will have the same effect on a child as it does for someone older.”⁹

Doctors, Parents File Motion to Stop FDA Authorization of COVID Vaccines for Children

May 25, 2021 John

Doctors, Parents File Motion to Stop FDA Authorization of COVID Vaccines for Children

BY RAVEN CLABOUGH

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/doctors-parents-file-motion-to-stop-fda-authorization-of-covid-vaccines-for-children/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) has filed a motion in federal court seeking a temporary restraining order to “prevent the expansion of the FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for COVID-19 vaccines to include children under the age of 16,” the group announced in a statement this weekend.

Life Site News reports the motion was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama and is directed against Secretary Xavier Becerra and the Department of Health and Human Services.

“There is no public interest in subjecting children to an inoculation program, in order to protect them from a disease that simply does not threaten them,” stated attorney Lowell H. Becraft, Jr. “Children are inherently incapable of providing informed consent. Neither the children nor their parents can possibly give informed consent to these vaccines since the DHHS Secretary has failed to make even the minimum statutory disclosures regarding risks and alternative treatments.”

According to concerned doctors with the group, the risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine far outweigh any benefits of protecting children from a virus that causes minimal, if any, symptoms.

“We’ve never seen this level of side effects for any vaccine without the FDA taking action,” stated Dr. Angelina Farella, AFLDS Pediatric Medical Director. “The Rotavirus vaccine was pulled for 15 cases of non-lethal side effects and the Swine Flu vaccine was pulled for 25 deaths. But now, by the CDC’s own data, we are seeing a 12,000 percent increase in deaths with these vaccines and they’re still talking about giving this to our kids.”

The latest side effect of the COVID-19 vaccine, it seems, is myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, which has been reported in teens and young adults within days of receiving a second dose of the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines.

“Our children should never be the experiment,” she continued. “No additional authorizations or mandates should be granted. We want to preserve the previously established safety standards.”

In addition to AFLDS, plaintiffs on the motion include individual doctors and parents of minor children.

“I’ve done my research and know that there is essentially zero percent risk for young people dying of COVID-19 and fiercely oppose the use of an untested product that has not been fully approved for use in healthy children,” said plaintiff Matt Schweder, a parent of minor children.

Because of the minimal risks for children of dying of COVID-19, the plaintiffs contend the defendants will be unable to make “science-based” arguments that assert “preserving the status quo will create any hardship for them or for the public.” After all, the survivability rate for COVID-19 for individuals under the age of 20 is 99.997 percent, according to statistics cited by the plaintiffs.

The motion reads, “EUA requires that an intervention address a serious or life-threatening condition, and for known and potential benefits of the intervention to be balanced against the known and potential harms.” But, “[t]here is not even a pretense of a factual basis that COVID-19 represents a serious or life-threatening condition for children under 16, since the CDC acknowledges they face 0% risk of mortality from COVID-19 statistically.”

Meanwhile, the risks associated with the vaccine have been well-documented since their rollout. The plaintiffs note there have been more than 4,000 deaths tied to the COVID-19 vaccines in the last four months, far surpassing the 1,500 total in the previous 10 years for all vaccines.

Likewise, researchers have voiced concerns that spike proteins from the vaccines cross the blood-brain barrier and can potentially increase autoimmune disorders, which are far more harmful than COVID-19 for young people.

In addition to fighting against the use of vaccines for minor children, the plaintiffs also strongly discourage the vaccines for healthy populations between the ages of 20 and 69, the motion reads.

Sadly, the government’s COVID agenda has prompted decision-makers at all levels, as well as much of the medical community and average citizens, to look the other way when it comes to the dangers of the COVID vaccines. Typically, the plaintiffs note, experimental vaccine rollout is paused by the government when there are 25 unexplained deaths associated with the shot. Yet 4,000 deaths have failed to prompt any action.

The plaintiffs contend their motion includes arguments that will make clear to the court that the EUAs should never have been granted and should be immediately revoked, and that the injections are more dangerous than the virus itself. The motion also asserts that numerous laws have been broken in the process of granting the EUAs and the efforts to push the vaccines out. The motion includes assurances that the plaintiffs will be bringing suit “in the near future” against the EUAs.

“We all would like to put COVID-19 behind us, but we must be responsible about it as physicians, parents and as a nation. People are being misled here and we need to ensure that we don’t rob our children of their future because of a rush to administer a vaccine that has not been fully tested and approved,” stated Dr. Teryn Clarke, executive communications director for America’s Frontline Doctors.

The group contends the best approach to COVID-19 should protect both physicians and citizens from government overreach, preserve Constitutional freedoms, and remove threats of “medical ‘cancel culture’ and media censorship.” More successful ways to stop the virus, according to the motion, include expanding COVID-19 treatment options for all Americans and providing over-the-counter COVID preventative and early treatment options to all Americans who need them. The group rejects mandatory government lockdowns and restrictions unsupported by science, instead asserting the best care focuses on the nation’s “at-risk” population.

« 1 … 48 49 50 51 52 … 60 »