Gov. Gavin Newsom sues Trump admin over federalization of California National Guard

CERES, CALIFORNIA - APRIL 16: California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference at Gemperle Orchard on April 16, 2025 in Ceres, California. Governor Gavin Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta have filed a lawsuit in federal court challenging the Trump administration's use of emergency powers to enact sweeping tariffs that hurt states, consumers, and businesses. The tariffs have disrupted supply chains, increased costs for the state and Californians, and inflicted billions in damages on California’s economy, the fifth largest in the world. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a news conference at Gemperle Orchard on April 16, 2025 in Ceres, California. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

OAN Staff Blake Wolf
6:04 PM – Monday, June 9, 2025

California Governor Gavin Newsom announced that the state is suing the Trump administration due to President Donald Trump federalizing the state’s National Guard — in response to the violent riots taking place in Los Angeles.

Riots broke out across Los Angeles to protest local raids conducted by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), overwhelming LAPD — prompting a strong response from President Donald Trump.

Rioters were caught on camera torching cars and throwing rocks at police vehicles, leading to numerous arrests as the federal guard worked to stamp out the chaotic gathering.

“Donald Trump is putting fuel on this fire. Commandeering a state’s National Guard without consulting the Governor of that state is illegal and immoral,” Newsom wrote in an X post on Sunday. “California will be taking him to court.”

Newsom issued an update on Monday, writing: “This is a manufactured crisis. [Trump] is creating fear and terror to take over a state militia and violate the U.S. constitution. The illegal order he signed could allow him to send the military into ANY STATE HE WISHES. Every governor – red or blue – should reject this outrageous overreach. There’s a lot of hyperbole out there. This isn’t that. This is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism that threatens the foundation of our republic. We cannot let it stand.”

The spat between Newsom and Trump continued after Newsom dared Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, to arrest him.

“Come after me. Arrest me. Let’s just get it over with, tough guy,” Newsom stated on Sunday.

Newsom’s comment seemingly meant to amplify the narrative that the Trump administration was overstepping its authority, despite Homan clarifying his message that "nobody is above the law regardless of their authority.

“Look I’m not biting on that,” Homan responded when directly asked about Newsom’s comments during a segment on MSNBC. “The NBC reporter that interviewed me is very dishonest. We did a 20 minute interview and he cuts out a little clip and takes my words out of context.”

“Here’s what I said – they have a right to protest, they have a first amendment right, but they can’t cross that line. They can’t cross that line of impediment, they can’t cross that line of putting their hands on officers, they can’t cross that line of knowing and concealing an illegal alien because those are all federal crimes,” he continued.

“That includes Mayor [Karen] Bass and Governor Newsom – and I was clear, they haven’t crossed the line but they’re not above the law either. If they commit a crime, they certainly would ask for prosecution. That’s what was happening. I never threatened to arrest Governor Newsom, so I’m not biting off on that,” he added.

Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta stated that he plans on requesting a court order declaring that Trump’s deployment of the National Guard was unlawful, while acquiring a restraining order against its deployment.

“Federalizing the California National Guard is an abuse of the President’s authority under the law and is not one we take lightly. We’re asking a court to put a stop to this unlawful, unprecedented order,” he wrote in an announcement.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts


'VERY SERIOUS': Gavin Newsom challenges Trump's federal authority

California gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton discusses Gov. Gavin Newsom's response to the Los Angeles riots on 'Varney & Co.'

Newsom tears into Trump as he prepares lawsuit: 'Fuel on this fire'

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley joins 'Fox & Friends' to discuss the legality surrounding President Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard to the LA riots, how Dems are responding to the move and the latest on Abrego Garcia's return.

 

DOJ sues Newark, other N.J. cities over sanctuary policies

WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 29: The Justice Department seal is seen on the lectern during a Hate Crimes Subcommittee summit on June 29, 2017 in Washington, DC. The meeting gave stakeholders the opportunity to offer imput to the committee before it makes its recommendations to the attorney general on what the Department of Justice can do to improve reporting, investigation and prosecution of hate crimes. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
The Justice Department seal is seen on the lectern during a Hate Crimes Subcommittee summit on June 29, 2017 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

OAN Staff Angelica Russell
1:10 PM – Saturday, May 24, 2025

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has sued Newark and three other New Jersey cities, accusing them of violating federal law by refusing to cooperate with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The suit, filed on Friday, targeted policies which block federal agents from getting information on someone’s immigration status.

Officials say these policies undermine national security and protect criminals from deportation.

Newark Mayor Ras Baraka, who was arrested earlier this month during a high-profile clash with immigration officers, called the lawsuit “absurd” and vowed to fight it.

“No one is blocking them from doing anything. The courts have already said that it’s not the obligation of…you know…to enforce federal laws to allow these people to do what they are doing,” Baraka said. “They can do what they want to do outside of us.”

Other New Jersey cities named in the suit are Jersey City, Paterson, and Elizabeth.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner Sues Elon Musk Over Swing-State Voter Lottery

Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner speaks to a reporter. (Photo by Scott Heins/Getty Images)

OAN Staff Brooke Mallory
11:35 AM – Monday, October 28, 2024

SEE: https://www.oann.com/newsroom/philadelphia-da-larry-krasner-sues-elon-musk-over-swing-state-voter-lottery/; republished below in full, unedited, for informational, educational, & research purposes:

On Monday, Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner filed a lawsuit against Elon Musk and his PAC in order to prevent them from disbursing $1 million daily to a registered voter in a swing state who signs their petition.

The petition simply asks people to sign if they desire secure borders, safe cities, free speech, sensible spending, self-protection, and a fair justice system in the U.S.

Additionally, the First and Second Amendments, which address American constitutional rights related to speech, religion, and firearms, are endorsed by petition signatories.

“America PAC and Musk are luring Philadelphia citizens – and others in the Commonwealth (and other swing states in the upcoming election) – to give up their personal identifying information and make a political pledge in exchange for the chance to win $1 million,” according to the legal complaint.

“America PAC’s and Musk’s lottery is plainly not a lawful lottery,” the lawsuit notes.

The complaint claims that the lottery is in violation of Pennsylvania law, which mandates that all lotteries in the state be subject to government regulation. Additionally, the DA argued that Musk and his American PAC “have not published a complete set of lottery rules or shown how they are protecting the privacy of participants’ personal information,” which he highlighted is a violation of Pennsylvania consumer protection laws.

Musk is accused in the case of “falsely claiming” that the winner was chosen at random, with the liberal DA asserting that “multiple winners that have been selected are individuals who have shown up at Trump rallies in Pennsylvania.”

However, after the story first broke, social media users noted that it is not abnormal for Trump supporters to sign a petition touting the same ideals that the Republican Party and Trump have openly expressed as guiding principles for how the U.S. should operate.

Musk has publicly expressed support for the GOP nominee, former President Donald Trump, appearing at a number of Trump rallies alongside the former president and large crowds of supporters.

According to the lawsuit, Musk and the PAC purportedly promised to give $100 to registered voters who signed a pro-First and Second Amendment petition, but the district attorney’s office stated that they don’t believe that any of those payments have been made.

CNN reported that the PAC has already received a warning letter from the U.S. Justice Department claiming that the gift may be in violation of federal election law.

Last Thursday, Musk seemed unfazed by the warning. The PAC declared two victors on Thursday but did not declare a winner on Wednesday.

The Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas is being asked by Krasner to issue an order that would forbid Musk and his political action committee from carrying out “any unfair or deceptive acts or practices in connection with their lottery.”

Meanwhile, the New York Times reported last week that Bill Gates “disclosed in private” that he donated around $50 million to a nonprofit assisting Vice President Kamala Harris in her bid for president, according to individuals familiar with the matter who spoke with the outlet.

At the start of October, the makers of the “raunchy” card game Cards Against Humanity offered to pay blue-leaning non-voters in battleground states $100 as long as they made voting plans and posted on social media that “Donald Trump is a human toilet.”

In addition, the Tufts University Career Center has similarly offered a pro-Harris initiative, “compensating people up to $400 to talk with their friends and family about voting.” Specifically, the program is “about supporting Kamala Harris for President, as well as candidates who are fighting for climate change, reproductive freedom, democracy, healthcare, marijuana legalization, and more. It’s a chance to help shape the future while making a tangible difference,” according to its website.

(Photo via: FEC)

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts