A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) In the months after Joe Biden became our nominal commander-in-chief, military observers began to notice a change in the attitude of top commanders.
The men and women who are charged with protecting our country know that the United States can never afford to lose a major war because our most dangerous enemies — Russia, China, Iran, North Korea — would never be as benevolent in victory as America would be.
Now, it appears that the regime is specifically targeting the base service member: White, America-first, evangelical Christian conservatives for reduction and elimination from all branches, via the highly controversial COVID-19 vaccine mandate, which the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday struck down for private businesses.
According to the Truth for Health Foundation, the regime, as well as the top military commanders for each branch, are using these illegal vaccine mandates in ways that are compromising U.S. national security: Purging military members who refuse to take the experimental jabs; refusing any and all waiver requests whether for religious or medical reasons; physically punishing non-compliant members; allowing for the hazing and shaming of unvaccinated members; denying treatment to members who contract the virus, and burying serious reactions and deaths to the vaccines — all of which are “egregious violations of soldiers’ religious and civil rights guaranteed under the US Constitution,” the organization said this week.
“What the Biden administration and the Department of Defense are doing to our honorable sons and daughters in the military is unconscionable,” Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, president, and CEO of Truth for Health Foundation, a non-profit that seeks to defend medical truth and individual medical freedom to choose, said.
“Our service members are being illegally ordered to take a EUA product while being told it is ‘FDA-approved.’ Comirnaty, the only FDA-approved COVID shot is not available on any U.S. military installationin the U.S. or overseas, according to military sources,” Vliet, a past Director of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and a currently practicing physician, added.
“If service members request a religious or medical exemption, they face extra duty, public humiliation, and threats of dishonorable discharge. If they talk about it, they risk career-ending discipline. Some have been arrested for requesting a religious exemption, a constitutional right all of our military take an oath to defend,” she continued.
Earlier this month, Fox News quoted several currently serving Marines who also are of the opinion that the regime is targeting military members for their political beliefs under cover of the vaccine mandate.
“There’s something fundamentally wrong at this point with our nation’s leadership,” a major with more than 17 years of active service told the network. “We are facing an unconstitutional edict that I think is very targeted as a political purge, taking out some of the best and brightest soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and guardians from the Space Force.”
During a recent “Purging Patriots from the Military” press conference, the foundation provided “indisputable proof” from military whistleblowers and their attorneys regarding how military brass are using the mandate to violate fundamental constitutional protections regarding medical and religious rights.
The organization also documented violations of Universal Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) regulations and how the service has conducted medical experimentation on members without their informed consent.
“Catastrophic damage from the experimental vaccines and COVID policies has damaged military readiness and poses a serious threat to America’s national security,” the group notes.
The organization adds: “Our military members defend us. They deserve our support to defend them now against medical tyranny by their own Command.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) chief Alejandro Mayorkas announced to Congress Wednesday that DHS has established a “disinformation governance board” to ensure election security and prevent misinformation from being used ahead of the upcoming midterm elections. The board will use the weight of DHS to fight “misinformation” but promises to protect “free speech, privacy, and civil rights.”
The announcement came as Mayorkas was answering questions from lawmakers. Invoking the bogeyman of previous “Russian interference” in the 2020 elections, Representative Jim Langevin (D-R.I.) asked the DHS chief what the department was doing to prevent misinformation from skewing the 2022 midterms. Mayorkas said, “We have just established a disinformation governance board in the Department of Homeland Security to more effectively combat this threat, not only to election security but to our homeland security.” He added that the board will also work to stop the spread of misinformation in “minority communities.”
The board will be under the executive direction of Nina Jankowicz — a “Russian disinformation” expert who served as a Disinformation Fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center for International Scholars in Washington, D.C. It is noteworthy that Jankowicz ticks off several of the Left’s important boxes.
She is not only a woman, but she appears to be a woman who hates men. She is the author of How to Be A Woman Online: Surviving Abuse and Harassment, and How to Fight Back. If the title alone is not enough, she recently tweeted this excerpt:
Men “burst violently into your mentions and your life like the Kool-aid man, demanding your attention, hawking opinions that they believe are unarguably, manifestly correct and indispensable.”
Men "burst violently into your mentions and your life like the Kool-aid man, demanding your attention, hawking opinions that they believe are unarguably, manifestly correct and indispensable."
She also blindly regurgitated the now-debunked idea that the “laptop from Hell” — with data showing Biden connections to Ukrainian corruption and a “pay for play” scheme featuring then-Vice President Biden — was (say it with me) “Russian Disinformation.”
During the final presidential debate between Trump and Biden, she tweeted:
Back on the “laptop from hell,” apparently- Biden notes 50 former natsec officials and 5 former CIA heads that believe the laptop is a Russian influence op.
Trump says “Russia, Russia, Russia.”
Back on the "laptop from hell," apparently- Biden notes 50 former natsec officials and 5 former CIA heads that believe the laptop is a Russian influence op.
Now that she has been elevated to her new position as “Arbiter of All Truth,” Jankowicz is feeding that tweet through the spin machine on a double-rinse cycle. Immediately after her appointment was announced, she tweeted:
For those who believe this tweet is a key to all my views, it is simply a direct quote from both candidates during the final presidential debate. If you look at my timeline, you will see I was livetweeting that evening.
For those who believe this tweet is a key to all my views, it is simply a direct quote from both candidates during the final presidential debate. If you look at my timeline, you will see I was livetweeting that evening. https://t.co/nI7ZgBtTLChttps://t.co/4DjBl9bzt0
And while she can point to the fact that she was “live-tweeting” during the debate, that point does nothing to change the fact that the “laptop from Hell” tweet was a tacit endorsement of Biden’s claim. As evidence of that, the next morning — after time to reflect and not while “live-tweeting” — Jankowicz tweeted her analysis of the “election security section of the debate,” writing:
I was thinking of pitching a quick piece about the election security section of the debate, but I realized it can be summed up in a tweet:
One candidate cogently discussed actual policies for keeping our democracy safe.
To be fair, in retrospect, what Jankowicz tweeted is true — she just had the roles reversed. And lest there be any confusion on that point, her time spent “live-tweeting” the night before was spent spewing snarky comments about almost anything Trump said and gushing about almost anything Biden said.
Also, her “live-tweeting” excuse falls apart as soon as one realizes that she sent a total of six tweets during the debate, so it is not as if she were transcribing the debate for people who have access to the Internet but for some inexplicable reason, couldn’t watch the debate for themselves.
Jankowicz is also an enemy of free speech, which should go a long way in a job where she will have the authority to silence those with whom she finds fault. On April 25 — while waiting in the wings for the announcement of her appointment as Arbiter of All Truth — she tweeted about “free speech absolutists” making her “shudder,” writing:
Last week I told @NPRMichel: I shudder to think about if free speech absolutists were taking over more platforms, what that would look like for the marginalized communities…which are already shouldering…disproportionate amounts of this abuse.” https://t.co/GLqMwC3iYH
And by couching her disdain for free speech in terms of support for women and other “marginalized communities,” Jankowicz muddies the water of logic and reason while ticking off another box beloved by the Left. She is a rabid pro-fill-in-the-blank-of-victimhood, bleeding-heart liberal.
Aside from being a woman who appears to hate men, someone who regurgitates Party Line lies, an enemy of free speech, and a bleeding-heart liberal, Jankowicz also goes wherever the political wind blows her. In September of 2017, she wrote an almost coherent op/ed piece for the New York Times under the headline, “The Only Way to Defend Against Russia’s Information War.”
Before reading on, remind yourself that this topic is her area of “expertise.”
Spewing affirmations of Russian interference in the presidential election (after all, how else to explain the election of Donald Trump?), Jankowicz laments the sad state of people falling for “Russian disinformation,” writing:
On Sept. 14, Molly McKew, a writer and consultant who describes herself as an “information warfare expert,” testified before Congress that these “media outlets” and others “deep within the shadow space” have infected America. In response, Ms. McKew would have us “develop a rapid response capability for irregular information warfare” to “secure our information space.” She also recommended more regulation for social media.
And:
What no one seems to care to discuss is the people who are targets of Russian disinformation, why its narratives find fertile ground among them and what can be done to change that.
According to the Pew Research Center, only 20 percent of Americans trust their government. The same low percentage has “a lot” of trust in the national news media. It’s impossible to say definitively what causes this mistrust, but its growth has coincided with the rise of both the adrenaline-driven internet news cycle and the dying of local journalism over the past two decades. Without news that connects people to their town councils or county fair, or stories that analyze how federal policies affect local businesses, people are left with news about big banks in New York and dirty politics in Washington.
Readers compare this coverage with their dwindling bank balances and crumbling infrastructure and feel disconnected and disenfranchised, and latch onto something — anything — that speaks to them. That might be President Trump’s tweets. Or dubious “news” from an extreme right- or left-wing site might ring true. Or they might turn to Russian disinformation, which exploits this trust gap.
Jankowicz blames the spread of “Russian disinformation” (which has been shown to be nearly nonexistent, by the way) on “the rise of both the adrenaline-driven internet news cycle and the dying of local journalism over the past two decades” as if a lack of reporting on “news that connects people to their town councils or county fair” leave people vulnerable to a conspiracy between Trump and Putin to skew the election.
Wow.
But as bad as all that is (and it is bad), her solution in 2017 is simply amazing, mind-numbingly worse:
The fight starts in people’s minds, and the molding of them. In K-12 curriculums, states should encourage a widespread refocusing on critical reading and analysis skills for the digital age. Introductory seminars at universities should include a crash course in sourcing and emotional manipulation in the media. Similar courses could be created as professional development for adults, beginning with state employees. Large corporations could be offered government incentives to participate, too.
She cites a program by IREX, a nongovernmental organization operating in Ukraine (which at the time was just breaking free from Biden’s financial manipulation) and a similar program in Finland as evidence that what Americans lack is basic critical thinking and reading comprehension skills.
And while that may be true, her solution is insane:
The American government should also work to level the information playing field, increasing its investment in public broadcasters and demanding a hefty financial commitment from companies like Facebook and Twitter — the unwitting agents of Russia’s information war — to support the proliferation of local, citizen-focused journalism. If social networks are unwilling to be the arbiters of truth (despite 45 percent of American adults’ getting news from Facebook), they should at the very least provide grants to reporters who cover the local issues that most immediately affect people’s lives and donate advertising to small outlets that cannot compete with national media giants.
And — evidencing the fact that in 2017, Jankowicz could have no idea that in 2022 she would be leading a “disinformation governance board” under the authority of the Department of Homeland Security — she wrote:
All is not lost. Disinformation can be defeated without the establishment of a shiny new initiative cased in the language of Cold War 2.0. Instead of “rapid information operations,” the United States should work to systematically rebuild analytical skills across the American population and invest in the media to ensure that it is driven by truth, not clicks.
So, in 2017, with Trump in the White House, she eschewed “regulation for social media” and other heavy-handed government measures. But that was then, this is now.
Let’s see how long it takes for her to forget her words from 2017 and begin “a shiny new initiative cased in the language of Cold War 2.0” that features “rapid information operations” to quash what she and her fellow arbiters of truth deem false. And remember, that designation will not be based on truth but on partisan political expediency.
Aside from the fact that this “disinformation governance board” sounds eerily like it could be the backstory for the “Ministry of Truth” from Orwell’s 1984, the immediate concern is such a heavy-handed government board — with the weight of DHS behind it — deciding for us what differentiates information from disinformation. After all, the Deep State is unconcerned with what is true; the only concern is finding what can be used to manipulate people and elections.
To put DHS — a department so deeply Deep State that it nearly defines the term — in charge of ensuring election integrity and preventing misinformation from being used to sway elections is a farce of epic proportions. To compare it to putting the fox in charge of the henhouse is an affront to foxes everywhere.
After all, these are the same types of folks (and, in some cases the very folks) who called Hunter Biden’s laptop “Russian disinformation” and who rapidly changed the meaning of “disinformation” as soon as the facts of their Covid mandates came under such scrutiny that they could no longer stand.
Make no mistake, the American Ministry of Truth is being operated by the very people who skewed the 2020 election by blocking — as “disinformation” — real news stories that would have likely cost Biden the election.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
The use of “newspeak” is a military-grade methodology of “hacking” our instincts and tricking us into acting against our best interests
In the natural world, the method of “disguising as a friend” exists strictly as a hunting technique — but today, it is applied by the power holders to the entire population
For centuries, invaders and reformers have been using upside-down language to confuse the enemy and recruit loyal supporters
Since 2020, we have seen many definitions changed, from medical terms to things like “compassion” and “freedom”
World Economic Forum’s Global Shapers Community is a recruitment effort designed to eventually misplace those who want to live in the “old normal”
This story is about a particular genre of lying, namely the genre of covertly changing definitions in order to convince us to accept horrible things and be "happy" about it. The creation of upside-down language, in military terms, is "hacking" of our instincts designed to trick us into acting against our best interests.
This practice is abundantly illustrated by the COVID "biosecurity" propaganda — as well as by the tradition of grooming loyal supporters through the World Economic Forum's "Global Shapers."
Upside-down language is treacherous because in the natural world, the method of "disguising as a friend in order to catch prey" is strictly a hunting technique — but today, the power holders apply it across the board, to the entire population. Which then, if we think about it honestly, makes it clear what kind of relationship we've been having with the Machine.
It is not a relationship of benevolence but a relationship between a hunter and prey! (And perhaps, from the standpoint of existential clarity, the Great Reset showed up in such an ugly way to help us realize that we've been in an abusive relationship with the Machine for a while?)
Upside-Down Language: Funny Examples to Highlight the Absurdity of It
I think we all know this beast very well but to make the absurdity stand out even more, here are two funny metaphors.
Straightforward lying: pointing at a brick and saying, "It's a bird." Or pointing at a defective brick and saying that it's an excellent, high-quality brick that surely works great in construction! (See traditional advertising.)
Upside-down language: secretly changing the definition of "bird" to include bricks, then announcing that there is a new revolutionary technology of building homes from birds — and when somebody says, "But those are clearly bricks," raising one's voice and saying, "No, those are BIRDS. Look it up." The king is not naked, and newspeak is the old speak. Don't you know?!
The Feeling of Disappointment Follows Inevitably
Another exaggerated metaphor: Imagine that someone tells you, "I promise to marry you next year!" And then they go ahead and change the definition of "marriage" to "sending a birthday text." And because they do send you a birthday text, they then say that they have surely kept their promise!
But you somehow, strangely, feel cheated — and so, to curb your complaints, someone then tells you that there is great honor and dignity in the new (and only) definition of marriage because it allows you to say "free" and not "depend" on the other person while being honorably "married"! And those other people telling you that you are not really married are clearly idiots who don't love you.
And perhaps, because your mind wants you to feel dignified, it tricks you into going into denial and pretending you are really married. And this is how you find yourself in the world of upside-down language, as a gaslit victim in denial!
And something still doesn't feel quite right — but you no longer remember what it is and why you feel this way! You forgot the original meaning because remembering it makes you feel like a loser. (For some reason, our evolving relationship with a certain medical product comes to mind).
This certainly is an outrageous and funny example but this is exactly how abusive relationships work. The victim's mind has to constantly accept "updated" definitions of love, care, and truth in order to save one's face. And this is how abusers can get away with a lot — up until the point in time when the pain of the victim becomes so unbearable that forces change.
Examples of "Updated" Definitions From the COVID Era
But as importantly, our aspiring "masters" have been constantly "updating" definitions that refer to our fundamental instincts and conditions, such as "health," "compassion," "freedom," and so on. I find it particularly treacherous because it allows any non-benevolent actor to turn our innate qualities into weapons against ourselves!
For example, early on, has been a fascinating series of United Nations "pandemic" images that tell a story of cruel propaganda. Here's how, according to that series, you love your grandma:
[Photo by United Nations COVID-19 Response via Unsplash]
And here is the importance of stopping "misinformation":
[Photo by United Nations COVID-19 Response via Unsplash]
According to newspeak, "compassion" means not touching your children or your parents. Not socializing. Not visiting your loved one in the hospital. Their version of compassion sounds horribly self-eliminating and sociopathic!
And responsible behavior? According to newspeak, "responsible behavior" means inhaling your exhaust and enthusiastically accepting an experimental medical product with unknown long-term effects. No questions asked. All based on another hijacked definition, the so called "community values," as per by our aspiring "masters" who wouldn't know "community" if it stared them in the face — and who are certainly not morally qualified to lead anyone anywhere.
Historical Examples of Newspeak
It reminds me of how back in my old homeland of Russia before the Soviet Union fell apart, the official marketing brochure said that we were "the freest country in the world."
There was even a very popular radio song about it, called "My country is so spacious" (it really sounds much less awkward in Russian). The song contained a line that went, "I don't know any other country where a man can breathe so freely." Well no wonder, no one knew any other country because barely anyone could travel abroad!
My point here is not picking on isms, as the Soviet Union never had an exclusive patent on newspeak, it just happens to be the newspeak that I grew up on. America has long practiced its own version of newspeak where a resource grab has never been a resource grab but a noble act to establish "progress" or "democracy," with the initial "democracy march" requiring a genocide of "hostile Indians" who outrageously dared defend their land.)
Sadly, history is full of newspeak! Upside-down language has been an important weaponry item for "disrupters" and robbers for thousands of years! But it feels to me as a Soviet ex-pat that today's version of upside-down language is really close to the one from my old homeland, and I don't like it. It didn't lead to anything good in my old homeland, and it is likely to be a disaster again if repeated.
Upside-Down Language and the Global Shapers
With all this in mind, let's look at the military-grade World Economic Forum project called "Global Shapers." Here is how it defines itself:
"Born out of the World Economic Forum, the Global Shapers Community is a network of inspiring young people under the age of 30 working together to address local, regional, and global challenges. With more than 14,000 members, the Global Shapers Community spans 456 city-based hubs in 150 countries."
"In 2011, Professor Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum, founded the Global Shapers Community to empower young people to play an active role in shaping local, regional and global agendas."
"The Global Shapers Community is a non-profit organization registered in Geneva, Switzerland and housed at the World Economic Forum. The Forum's contribution to the Shapers organization includes significant financial and in-kind contributions for operational support including staff time, technology tools and opportunities to interact and collaborate with its membership network."
Among its partners are Salesforce, Accenture, The Climate Reality Project, and other noble entities. And here is Mr. Schwab himself, doing a sweet talk on how he decided to "give young people a voice":
An "Upgrade" in WEF Language
By the way, it looks like the World Economic Forum is learning to speak more subtly and thus, even more treacherously. There is no more "you'll own nothing and you'll be happy." "Owning nothing" is now the quiet part. In fact, if I were to look at their marketing through the eyes of a post-Soviet kid who wants to be "Western cool," I would see all this as an exciting career opportunity!
(It really is a global military operation, so it has to be innocent-sounding, convincing, and elegant — and by the way, the corporate recruitment of the early post-Soviet times wasn't too much different and probably benefitted the same "stakeholders," in a time-appropriate manner. Just a side thought, based on my memory of the post-Soviet corporate recruitment, that came with "newspeak" of its own.)
The language on the Global Shapers website is really lofty, and really "positive" sounding (except for an occasional slip about "rethinking what it means to be human." Come progress! Come the roads, the internet, and gender equality! Come the bright young cultists leaders shaping the world's future's vision! Hooray! Hooray!
Of course, "framing" is an art, and one can frame anything — including murder — in a positive thing. Burning a woman at stake could be framed as "saving her soul." Destroying indigenous people can be framed as "bringing them culture," etc., etc.
All of it has been done to real, breathing people who merely minded their business — and it's really heartbreaking. I am writing about newspeak today with such passion because newspeak has an ugly history throughout the centuries, and it's time to spit it out.
A Military Operation
This entire thing with Global Shapers is of course like recruiting an army. Aspiring masters cannot do anything by themselves, so they always seek to recruit, indoctrinate, and bribe the most malleable to support their "vision."
The Bolsheviks, for example, put a lot of energy into "raising" a new generation of "communist" leaders and into glorifying those who supported their version of "new normal" most enthusiastically. They invested in creating a psychological gap between the children and the parents.
The Bolshevik elites didn't care about their supporters — who mostly lived in abject poverty unless they were in the upper echelon — but they surely paid them lip service, and gave them "dignity" by allowing them to take the dignity away from some of their fellows …
Similarly, European elites who were seeking to benefit from the riches of the Western hemisphere, not yet colonized at the time, could not do it without "manpower," and so they lured a bunch of impoverished Europeans to travel across the ocean in search of a better life.
And since a better life was sorely needed by a lot of common Europeans at the time, the masters of those days cynically used that fact to recruit the impoverished Europeans as their "manpower" to fight the "hostile Indians."
The early American "branding" was very different from the Bolshevik "branding" but the essence of the conquest was not dissimilar: "You are the good, righteous people. Those guys over there are the evil people. They own stuff that righteously belongs to you. Go take it from them, and we'll let you keep some of it." History is ugly.
And since today's events seem to run on the same emotional fuel of conquest, it seems like that army of young Global Shapers is being recruited mostly as "manpower" to drive away from the people with "old normal" habits. As I said, it's a military operation.
Newspeak, or the "upside-down" language, is the weapon of indoctrination. The adults may remember the original meanings of words, they may feel resentful. But the kids simply imbibe the meanings they are given. This is why the World Economic Forum is investing in grooming youth. Disgusting!
What Now?
We seem to be in a historically important moment. I believe that the predators' existential function is to make sure that we are fully alive and awake. Predators use weaponized language to make us act against our own interests. They create an atmosphere in which self-betrayal sounds tempting — but it's a trick!
Realistically, it is rare for human beings to choose the right thing on the first attempt in the absence of great pressure — so it's unknown what the near future of the world will look like — but no matter whether our road to victory is fast or dragged out, in the end, the victory is ours. On my end, I pray with passion that our road is the kindest one.
About the Author
To find more of Tessa Lena's work, be sure to check out her bio, Tessa Fights Robots.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Psychological obedience training is being used to control the global population, from cradle to grave. The technocratic elite are after our children, and they’re using a variety of psychological tools to shape and mold them. The more we know about their strategies, the better we can protect ourselves and our children from these predators
The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (HR 3684) grants control over what and when you drive to the transportation system. It will control the type of vehicle you can use and when you can drive. It will control the vehicle-to-grid 5G technology and its kill switches (which will be built in). The bill also includes an integrated payment system and a per-mile driving fee
The effort to control you starts from birth. Social emotional learning (SEL) is a programming effort that uses the relabeling and changing of words to alter perception of reality and mold children’s beliefs and behaviors
Companies are collecting and analyzing your child’s personal data to build their social credit score. In addition to demographics and grades, the data collection also includes behavioral information, such as scientific, financial, cultural and civic literacy, and competencies such as critical thinking skills, problem solving, creativity, communication and collaboration, plus character qualities such as curiosity, initiative, persistence, grit, adaptability, leadership, social and cultural awareness
Unless we refuse to comply or participate, our social credit scores and climate scores will soon dictate everything we can and cannot do in life
In the video below, finance expert Catherine Austin Fitts, Polly Tommey and Carolyn Betts interview investigative journalist Corey Lynn, who runs a blog called “Corey’s Digs.” She’s also the author of “Global Landscape on Vaccine ID Passports,” available from her website.1
In this interview, Lynn discusses how psychological obedience training is being used to control the global population from cradle to grave. She reviews programs that mine your personal data and indoctrinate users to become reliant on digital currency, and offers practical advice for those who recognize the dangers and want to break free.
As noted by Tommey, the technocratic elite are after our children, and they’re using a variety of psychological tools to shape and mold them into obedient and clueless serfs. The more we know about their strategies, the better we can protect our children from these predators.
What the Infrastructure Bill Is Actually Funding
Lynn starts off with a potent example of how the U.S. government is using our own money to build the prison walls around us. The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (HR 3684) was passed by Congress and signed by President Biden in November 2021.
This $1.2 trillion spending bill includes a number of questionable and outright nefarious allocations. Importantly, this bill grants control over what and when you drive to the transportation system. It will control the type of vehicle you can use and when you can drive, Lynn explains.
It will control the vehicle-to-grid 5G technology and its kill switches (which will be built in). The bill also includes an integrated payment system and a per-mile driving fee. Twenty-seven pilot programs are also listed that will given them even more control over your transportation in the future.
As noted by Lynn, “Our taxpayer dollars are going to build our control grid.” For more information, see her article, “A Clearer Breakdown of What This Infrastructure Bill Is Really Funding.”2
Social Emotional Learning Is Programming
The effort to control you starts from birth. Lynn reviews the use of social emotional learning (SEL), which uses the relabeling and changing of words to alter our perception of reality and mold children’s beliefs and behaviors.
“The Department of Education was created in 1979, and ever since then, they've been building up to Common Core, building in all these Marxist agendas and pulling in critical race theory (CRT),” Lynn says.
“It's a psychological agenda. It's not a single curriculum. This is [about] ideologies and behaviors and thought processes, it's obedience training and conditioning that starts in preschool, and it's embedded throughout the day. So, it's a whole mind control system.
They're creating what the World Economic Forum (WEF) likes to refer to as digital citizens, for the future workforce, and so they're bringing in all this ed-tech and doing massive data mining. We have statewide longitudinal data systems that are tracking behavior ...
In 2016, they started kicking billions of dollars into this ... and then they started pulling in legislation. And while COVID is going on, they say, ‘Well, we really need to step this up, we need to pour more money into this because of the mental health and well being of children.’
And so, they are molding the children, they're building their social scores ... and then they're bringing it into parents. They're saying we need to teach the parents too, so the parents can help train the kids. And they're bringing it into businesses ... This is a major psychological obedience training to lead to AI.
This is an excerpt from ‘Dreaming the Future of Health for the Next 100 Years,’ a 2013 white paper from the Global Health Summit that was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation:3
‘We will interact more with artificial intelligence. The use of robotics [and] bioengineering to augment human functioning is already well underway and will advance. Reengineering of humans into potentially separate and unequal forms through genetic engineering or mixed human robots raises debates on ethics and equality.
A new demography is projected to emerge after 2030 of technologies, robotics, genetic engineering, nanotechnology, producing robots, engineered organisms, nanobots and artificial intelligence that can self replicate. Debates will grow on the implications of an impending reality of human-designed life.’
So, this, this is where this is all heading ... It’s in 110 countries, it's all over the US. It's in most schools, and they're starting in preschool. This is what you're dealing with. So, when you're considering homeschooling, I just want people to understand what they're up against, and what they need to weed out. It's more than just the school board. There are a lot of parts going on here.”
Already, there are several companies that collect and analyze your child’s personal data to build their social credit score. In the beginning, the data collection was fairly generic, such as age, demographics and grades, but now they’ve started to collect behavioral information as well, such as scientific literacy, ICT literacy, financial literacy, cultural and civic literacy.
They also collect data on competencies such as critical thinking skills, problem solving, creativity, communication and collaboration, plus character qualities such as curiosity, initiative, persistence, grit, adaptability, leadership, social and cultural awareness. You can learn more about all of this in Lynn’s nine-part series, the “2030 Psychological Agenda.”4
They’re Teaching Children To Be Nice but Stupid
Another important point made by Austin Fitts is that many of the “improvements” in education have been designed to make children less knowledgeable. For example, Common Core “is designed to make you phenomenally ignorant of math, and very obedient and easy to control,” she says, adding:
“I used to have a dental surgeon who, all he wanted to talk about was how furious he was at the schools. He said his kids had been taught that if they were going to get together and design a bridge, it was more important that they get along than they use the right number for Pi. As long as they got along, it was okay if the bridge fell down.”
Financial apps aimed at children are another form of programming. For example, the FinTech app “Greenlight,” advertised as a debit card for kids and teens, is financed by players such as Wells Fargo, JP Morgan, Chase and Amazon. Lynn explains:
“On the surface, this may look great. Parents can help their children understand investing, how to save money and whatnot. But when you start looking at the investors ... and where this is really going, what they're doing is programming. They say this is created by families, for families, even though there are 29 big investors in this ...
They're saying this is to help for parents to raise financially smart kids. So, what they do is, the [parents] pay them their allowance, or they pay them for chores. It goes through a little MasterCard Greenlight card that then goes into the bank ... and then they can control their spending. So, it's teaching them about getting involved in the banking system digitally.”
Of course, we now know that the globalist elite are planning to roll out a programmable central bank digital currency (CBDC), with which they’ll be able to control how, where and when you spend your own money. So, “Greenlight” is basically teaching children to see this system as completely normal. As noted by Austin Fitts, “They're getting groomed to plug into a system which will be centrally controlled.”
How to Break the Indoctrination Schedule
Parents who are waking up to the nightmare planned for their children by the WEF and its allies are now starting to fight back. Here are a few key things parents need to do to protect their young children from the indoctrination currently trying to swallow their children:
Homeschool your children. Some parents are starting their own schools, educating five or six children
Get your children out in nature as much as possible
Eliminate mindless TV watching and cell phone use
Be a role model for your children. That means modeling appropriate use of television and technologies such as computers, cell phones and social media
Minimizing your cell phone use, to whatever extent possible, is one thing everyone can do. Lynn says:
“I truly believe that if we ditch [our cell phones], if 50% of the population ditched them, that would put a major crushing to their agenda, on most of what they're rolling out. There’s geofencing on phones. Everywhere you go, you're being tracked ... You don't even have to be on the phone. It could just be in your pocket, it can be in your car.
They're constantly aggregating data from us so they can then use it against us, and ... they have the ability to target us on an individual basis. They track everything we do on the internet as well. When I go on walks with my dog, I don't bring my phone with me ... Anywhere I go, I leave the phone at home, or I leave it in the car.”
If we do nothing to change our technology-addicted lifestyles, what will happen to us in 10 years’ time? Where will we be? Austin Fitts is convinced we’ll all be slaves — literally enslaved by the technology that is tracking and analyzing us every moment. Decisions will be made for us by AI, based on our social credit scores.
Children may even be taken from their families at a young age and brought up in facilities where their upbringing and behavior can be controlled. “Parents will have no authority over their children and the children ... their bodies and their minds, will be used to prototype all sorts of transhumanism,” Austin Fitts says.
Understand the End Game and Do Not Comply
There’s really only one way to prevent the transhumanist, centrally controlled authoritarian regime from getting a foothold: Do not comply. We have to say no to all of their schemes. If you do comply, understand that you are erecting your own prison walls, and that of your children, with every data point you let them have.
“It's all under the guise of convenience,” Lynn says. “Going back to cell phones, and technology in general ... People need to start seeing these things for what they are. And instead of looking at it and immediately going, ‘Oh, this is great, oh, this is so convenient, oh, this is going to save me time,’ they need to stop and take a look at who the company is.
Who's behind it? Dig around in their website, see who the leadership is, see who the investors are ... and just understand their ultimate end game. So when they're throwing these things out there, with all their fluff and pizzazz, you don't take the bait. They're trapping you into more and more control over you.”
The Planned Takeover of Your Bank Account
Also, consider using cash as much as possible, and move your money out of the big banks, as they too are part of the control system. Lynn explains:
“I got out of mine about a year ago, and I wasn't even in one of the biggest, worst ones. But I started noticing that they were categorizing my spending. I'm like, ‘What is this?’ All of a sudden, it's showing my grocery shopping and restaurant and health care?
I tell people go into your bank right now, look at the categorizing that's happening. They're already getting the infrastructure set up to control spending by categorizing it all. It's not for your convenience, so you can better budget and see how you're spending your money.”
For more information about this, see Lynn’s article, “Financial Takeover and Your Bank Account — BlackRock, Envestnet/Yodlee, and The Federal Reserve.”5,6 The short video above also summarizes the most important points of that article.
One important point highlighted by Austin Fitts is that banks can store their data on the bank server or the provider server. Austin Fitts says, “You want to call them and make sure the bank is keeping the data on their server, because you did not give permission for all of that data to be shared with the provider.” Having the data stored on the bank server helps protect against this malicious data harvesting.
In closing, I urge you to listen to the featured interview, as I’ve only summarized some of the key points here. In it, they review and discuss several signs, things that are happening now, that clearly illustrate where we’re headed.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Turkey has long been heralded by the international media as a “secular” and “modern” country. But in reality, it is the absolute opposite. Non-Muslim communities – Christians, Jews, Alevis, Yazidis, agnostics, deists, atheists, and all others – are systematically victimized by discriminatory acts, including violations of their human rights, their convictions, their faith, and their freedom of speech.
A 2022 report by the Norwegian Helsinki Committee’s Freedom of Belief Initiative, entitled “An Appeal to Move Forward from Aspirations to Actions: Monitoring Report on the Right to Freedom of Religion or Belief in Turkey,” reveals Turkey’s decades-long abuses against non-Muslim communities across the country.
The Committee lists some of the violations of the rights of non-Muslims:
Atheists, deists, and agnostics encounter daily infringement on their right to freedom of thought and belief in the workplace, family, and the education system. Atheist, deist, and agnostic parents and students do not have the right to exemption from the compulsory religious instruction in the Religious Culture and Ethics lessons.
Those who express criticism of religion or belief in general, or of specific interpretations, especially those of Islam, face complaints and risk being prosecuted under the Turkish Penal Code.
No religious or belief community in Turkey has a legal personality as such. Religious or belief groups and their representative institutions, such as Patriarchates of the Chief Rabbinate, lack legal entity status and as such, cannot access the court system, open bank accounts, buy property or officially employ their own religious officials and provide social security for them. Individuals belonging to religious, or belief groups organize themselves as associations or establish foundations with religious intent, though these are also subject to limitations.
Important restrictions continue to hamper the associative capacity of the non-Muslim community foundations. The foundations’ board elections have been obstructed since 2013. As a result, the functioning of the community foundations and the beneficiary communities continue to be paralyzed and weak.
Acquiring place of worship status remains an ongoing challenge for several religious communities. This is particularly true for the Alevi, Jehovah’s Witnesses, and Protestant communities. The kingdom halls of Jehovah’s Witnesses, the churches of the Protestant community, and the cemevis of the Alevi community are in particularly precarious positions due to this lack of an official place of worship status. The public authorities have systematically denied a place of worship status to these sites, in disregard of relevant ECtHR [European Court of Human Rights] judgments.
Many religious buildings are on the verge of ruin and at risk of being lost even though they are officially registered as cultural heritage sites by the Cultural Heritage Preservation Regional Boards under the umbrella of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism.
Furthermore, the impact of past loss of properties and associated foundations belonging to a wide range of religious or belief groups continues to be a scar in need of attention. For non-Muslim communities, the process of returning community foundation property that was unjustly taken has not been completed; the damage has yet to be fully remedied.
The report gives as examples the Hagia Sophia former Church and the Chora former Church in Constantinople that were converted into mosques in 2020.
“Both Hagia Sophia and Chora were originally built as churches, converted into mosques during the Ottoman period, and then converted into museums during the Republican Period,” the report adds.
In 2005, the Association of Permanent Foundations and Service to Historical Artifacts and Environment filed a lawsuit to challenge the status of the Chora Church as a museum. In November 2019, the Council of State, Turkey’s highest administrative court, ordered that it was to be reconverted to a mosque. A Presidential Decree opening the Chora (Kariye) Mosque to worship was published in the Official Gazette on 21 August 2020. In October 2020 the images of Jesus Christ, frescoes and icons in the museum were covered by white curtains.
In July 2020, the Turkish Council of State Tenth Chamber annulled the 1934 Cabinet Decree making it a museum. The Council of State ruled unanimously to nullify the 1934 Cabinet Decree as contrary to the law. Almost immediately after the ruling, President [Recep Tayyip] Erdoğan signed a presidential decree on 10 July 2020 turning the site back into a mosque. The decree transferred the administration of the Hagia Sophia (Ayasofya-i Kebir) Mosque to the Presidency of Religious Affairs (Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı, DİB or Diyanet), a public body under the Presidency responsible for the administration of all mosques in Turkey.”
No measures have been taken to eliminate interference [of the government] in the internal affairs of the Armenian Orthodox, Jewish, and Greek Orthodox communities in the appointment of religious leaders. This is despite the finding of the Turkish Constitutional Court that the interference in the latest election of the Armenian Patriarch was not prescribed by law.
Glaring inequalities in the legal restrictions facing training religious personnel other than Sunni Muslim religious personnel and in public resources allocated to the training of Sunni Muslim religious personnel versus the denial of resources to the training of other religious personnel have not been remedied.
Religious communities, such as the Alevi community, Greek Orthodox Patriarchate, Armenian Patriarchate, and Protestant community, have been unable to train religious staff within Turkey.
Turkish authorities have continued to issue travel restrictions targeting Christian foreigners. These restrictions interfere with several human rights including freedom of religion or belief, the right to a fair trial, freedom of movement, and protection of aliens against unlawful expulsion. This practice also impacts the Protestant community since, not being permitted to train their own teachers, they rely on foreign religious workers.
Public funding of religious services is provided solely for the Sunni Islamic community. This is in contradiction with the prohibition of discrimination and with the state’s obligation to observe the principle of equality.
As a result of the denial of public religious services, requested by the Alevi applicants, and the non-recognition of the Alevi faith by the state, Alevis are unable to fully exercise their right to freedom of religion or belief.
The child’s right to freedom of thought, conscience, and religion, their right to participation, as well as parents’ rights to raise their children in line with their own philosophical or religious views, are subject to systematic interference in Turkey’s public education system. The mandatory Religious Culture and Ethics (RCE) lessons, including the exemption mechanism, the optional religion courses, Islamic religious practices in schools, and high school placement exams constitute substantial interference in the protection of, among others, the child’s right to freedom of religion or belief.
Women across different religious or belief communities face significant obstructions to free will in the exercise of their human rights, including freedom of religion or belief. Some of the central findings of this report demonstrate that women continue to be especially vulnerable in their homes, women are prone to pressures from secular and religious segments of society, and women often feel compelled to live double lives. Furthermore, men continue to exercise a monopoly over the interpretation of religious dogma and religious offices. Decision-making processes in religious or belief communities also remain dominated by men.
All these rights violations are rooted in or inspired by Islamic teachings.
Islam does not allow freedom of religion and threatens the death penalty for apostasy. As the website “The Religion of Peace” (ROP) puts it, “The only freedom of belief in Islam is the freedom to become Muslim.” The ROP website also notes:
Muslims are told to fight unbelievers until they are either dead, converted to Islam, or in a permanent state of subjugation under Muslim domination. Allowing people of other faiths to live and worship independently of Islamic rule is not an option.
And in the Islamic teachings and traditions, there is no room for a secular political system in which all people are treated as equals.
While the believers of all other religions and non-religious citizens are oppressed and deprived of their human rights, one of the most important institutions of the country is the Presidency of Religious Affairs, a Sunni Islamic institution, referred to in Turkish simply as the Diyanet. It was established in 1924. The President of Turkey appoints the President of the Diyanet. Provincial muftis and imams working in Sunni mosques are appointed by the Diyanet. With an enormous budget, a plentiful staff, broad activities, and a great sphere of influence, the Diyanet is a bigger institution than many ministries of Turkey.
The institutions and associations belonging to non-Muslims, however, are subject to organized discrimination. The demographic collapse of Christians and Jews has made the problem even worse. Today only 0.1% of Turkey’s whole population is Christian or Jewish, because of decades of persecution culminating in the genocide at the beginning of the twentieth century.
Massacres swept across the Christian population of Anatolia from 1894 to 1924. During the three decades, around 2.5 million Armenians, Assyrians, and Greeks were murdered by Turks. The historians Benny Morris and Dror Ze’evi detail the crimes committed during this period in their book The Thirty-Year Genocide.
Also, in 1934, Jews in eastern Thrace were exposed to a pogrom. From 1941 to 1942, Turkey enlisted all Christian and Jewish males in the military, including the elderly and mentally ill. They were forced to work under horrendous conditions in labor battalions. In 1942, a wealth tax was imposed to eliminate Christians and Jews from the economy. In 1955, Greeks, Armenians, and Jews were targeted by a pogrom in Istanbul. And in 1964, the remaining Greeks were forcefully expelled from Turkey. All of the above contributed to the ethnic cleansing of Christians and Jews in Turkey.
Even after those crimes, Turkey arbitrarily continues to violate the rights of the non-Muslims who are still living in the country, as the most recent report by the Norwegian Helsinki Committee’s Freedom of Belief Initiative has once more revealed.
It is the Islamic government of Turkey and much of its Islamic society that are responsible for this continual prejudice and abuse of human rights. Dissidents living under such Islamic dictatorships, however, are not allowed to have public debates about these issues, because of the ideological refusal to recognize their freedom of speech if they are “kafirs” or “infidels” and ever dared to question historic facts, and above all, Islam.
Uzay Bulut is a Turkish journalist and political analyst formerly based in Ankara.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
In a move signifying a limit to Biden’s tendency to run America like a dictatorship, Federal Court Judge “Robert R. Summerhays granted a temporary restraining order that is likely to prevent Biden from ending Title 42 while the case makes its way through federal court.”
The American Southwest border has already been seeing a whopping 6000-8000 illegals a day enter, and that number was projected to double after the announcement of the end of the CDC Emergency Title 42 expulsion authority.
But Biden’s destroy-America plan is somewhat slowed down for the time being, as due process takes a lead.
“Trump-appointed Judge Announces He Will Block Biden from Ending Title 42 at Border,” by John Binder, Breitbart, April 25, 2022:
A federal judge in Louisiana, appointed by former President Donald Trump, is expected to block President Joe Biden’s plans to end the Title 42 public health authority at the United States-Mexico border.
Weeks ago, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced that on May 23 the Biden administration would end Title 42. The authority was first issued by Trump in 2020 and has allowed federal immigration officials to quickly return illegal aliens to their native countries after having crossed the southern border.
Soon after the announcement, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, and Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt filed a lawsuit arguing that ending Title 42 will place an undue burden on their states and that the administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in doing so.
On Monday, Judge Robert R. Summerhays granted a temporary restraining order that is likely to prevent Biden from ending Title 42 while the case makes its way through federal court.
“Today, the court announced its intention to grant a temporary restraining order in Missouri, Louisiana, and Arizona’s lawsuit against the Biden administration over their planned suspension of Title 42,” Schmitt said in a statement.
“This temporary restraining order is expected to keep Title 42 in place until further court proceedings, a critical win for border security and the rule of law,” he continued.
Landry celebrated the decision, writing on Twitter that “Biden’s reckless decision to rescind Title 42 would have flooded our already stressed southern border with illegal immigrants.”….
Teacher Says He's Bringing 'Transition Closet' To High School Classroom
Secret Transition Closets, the Bypassing of Parents & Parental Authority Around the country, some public school-approved gender transition closets are being provided so students can wear other-gender clothes without their parents' knowledge or consent. There is an increasing wave of school boards and governments bypassing parents to influence children toward ideologies most parents don’t agree with. Just who has more authority over the child? Parents or the state or the school? God gives a clear picture of the answer to that question, especially for the Christian parent. Dr. Walt Swaim presents a brief summary of the truth of God concerning this and advice in putting it into action in the home and society.
I Read to You: "Trans Closets" of Tik Tok Showing up in MIDDLE SCHOOLS???
DUKE PESTA: School Creates ‘Transition Closet’ So Students Can Lie To Parents
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The San Francisco Gay Men’s Chorus boasted “We’ll convert your children….We’re coming for your children.” They said they were going to convert them to tolerance and knowledge, they said. Yeah, sure, that was it. That was it all along.
“More Secret Gender Transition Closets Discovered in Public Schools,” by Alice Giordano, Epoch Times, April 22, 2022:
They started in colleges, but trans closets—rooms stocked with transgender clothes and accessories for students to change into after arriving to school and back out of before going home—are being discovered in public schools with some indication they are being kept a secret from parents.
In a recent TikTok video, a California teacher implies that the trans closet he started at the high school where he works is meant to be kept from parents.
“The goal of the transition closet is for our students to wear the clothes that their parents approve of, come to school and then swap out into the clothes that fit who they truly are,” the teacher said.
The California Family Council and others eventually confirmed the identity of the teacher as Oakland Unified School District Spanish teacher Thomas Martin-Edwards, who is also the founder of “Queer Teacher Fellowship.”
Martin-Edwards, the teacher who runs the trans closet, is also transgender. He has posted videos of himself in the classroom showing off the stilettos he wears to school….
Amare Roush (https://www.tiktok.com/discover/Amare-Roush) founder of The Transition Closet, told The Epoch Times that her organization does support keeping the existence of trans closets at schools secret from parents, because of the abuse she says children often face at home if they disclose to their parents they are transgender.
“We do provide a safe space for kids whose parents are not accepting, because it’s known to help lower the suicide rate,” said Roush who is also a certified advocate for domestic violence victims.
“These kids are going to do it anyway, we just want a way to provide them with a way to do it safely to where they’re not wearing clothes that are too small for them, or doing so in a way that’s going to get them hurt by their parents.”…
“This is grooming,” tweeted one Colorado man, “Police should come to the classroom and arrest whoever the teacher is in this classroom.”…
Marshall University, the University of Arkansas, Penn State, and the University of California are among colleges that have been operating trans closets for years.
Taliban fighters hold their weapons as they stand atop a building at the Kart-e-Sakhi shrine in Kabul, Afghanistan. (AP Photo/Ahmad Halabisaz):
Why Are Second Amendment Cases Stalled in the Supreme Court?
In this video, Dudley Brown of the National Association For Gun Rights joins Eric to discuss possible reasons why the Supreme Court has heard a plethora of 1A cases but has turned most 2A cases away in recent years.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
“In recent years,” Barack Obama tweeted Tuesday, “we’ve seen how quickly disinformation spreads, especially on social media. This has created real challenges for our democracy.” As Hunter Biden can attest, all too often yesterday’s “disinformation” has become today’s hot news, and that’s the strongest possible case for not banning it. But for Obama and his fellow Leftists, “our democracy” means “Leftist hegemony,” and Leftists have never hesitated to resort to decidedly undemocratic means to protect that hegemony. Their latest target is Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia), whom they’re trying to prevent from running for reelection not by defeating her in a primary, but by banning her from running because she supported their fictional January 6 “insurrection.” And now it’s clear why they keep insisting it was an “insurrection” in the teeth of all the evidence to the contrary.
A group of Leftists in Georgia have filed suit to bar Greene from running again, based on a clause in the Fourteenth Amendment that prohibits those who have participated in an insurrection from holding office. The Fourteenth Amendment, Section 3 says: “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.”
This remedy was designed to keep unrepentant Confederates out of public office after the Civil War (although many did hold office, as more often than not Congress voted to waive the prohibition). It has been dormant since then. But if January 6 were an insurrection — which hasn’t been proven or even established with a shred of credible evidence in impeachment proceedings of Donald Trump or in the trials of the alleged “insurrectionists” that have taken place so far — and if Greene supported it — which also is not the case, since there wasn’t any insurrection to support — then she can’t run for reelection. Only good Democrats and Romneyite Republicans will be left on the ballot. How very convenient.
On Monday, Tucker Carlson asked Greene, “So they’re trying to prevent voters from voting for you. How is that democracy?” Green answered, “Well it’s not, Tucker, that’s the thing. These people hate the people in my district so much, they look down on them because they voted for me and sent me to Washington to fight for the things that most Americans care about, like secure borders, stopping abortion, protecting our Second Amendment, stopping the out of control spending in Washington, and stop funding never-ending foreign wars and the insanity that takes place in Washington.” Yeah, can’t have that. Our elected representatives are supposed to fight for their own self-interest, and for the interests of those who line their pockets. Just ask The Big Guy.
Greene continued, “Well, I went there and I have been fighting it, and now the progressives, the people who donate money to dark money groups — you know, the 501(c)(3)s and the foundations — they’ve hired up some attorneys from New York who hate the people in my district and don’t believe they should have the right to elect who they want to send to Washington, which is me. I have overwhelming support in my district and I’m so thankful for all of them. Well, now [Leftists have] filed a lawsuit because they’re trying to rip my name off of the ballot and steal my district’s ability to reelect me and send me back to Congress.”
Greene is right: if Greene can be reelected, and there is every reason to think that she can, then these “insurrection”-mongers are trying to take that vote away from the people in her district. All in the interests of protecting “our democracy,” of course.
Tucker Carlson indicated that he knew what the game was all about, saying, “So if you can prevent voters from being allowed to vote for the candidate of their choice, which is their constitutional right, then the system’s over.”
Yes, it is. And the end of the system is close. But that end can be pushed back as more and more free citizens wake up to what these sanctimonious liars and hypocrites are doing, and fight against their schemes. Greene has significant support. Every American who values our actual republic has a stake in seeing her prevail in this fight.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The 2022 “year in review” specials should feature the angry moms of school board meetings. The army of moms standing up against the sexualization of their children by groomer teachers is a defining moment in the culture wars this year. It is happening again in Glendale, Calif. at the Glendale Unified School District, and the board there got an earful at their last meeting after a third-grade teacher, Tammy Tiber, was caught teaching LGBTQ sexuality to 8-year-olds three days a week.
The teacher played several videos for her 8-year-old students that addressed “queer kid stuff,” “pride parades,” “love is love,” and a lesson on Stonewall. One of the videos (below), called Talking to Kids About Pride Month, was pretty disturbing.
The most alarming video that we would like to discuss is “Talking To Kids About Pride Month” with Jessi Cruickshank. In this video, we see the normalization of an adult speaking to children about sexual desires. It desensitizes children to the act of adults talking to them about sexual topics. In the video, the host says, “Jodie Foster is a woman, and she made me question my sexuality when I was a child because I liked her so much. And she was nude in the film ‘Nell.’ Not that I remember watching it several times as a child.”
This video is intended to instruct children about appropriate interpersonal relationships – and what did the child learn? The child learned that it is okay for an adult to talk to a child about watching nude people in movies, and having it affect their sexual desires and sexual arousal. This is normalizing behavior – a known tactic of sexual groomers – that should be a warning sign to parents and children. The behavior observed here is adults talking to children about sexual desires and sexual attraction.
When parents tried to bring the issue up to the teacher, she went behind their backs and plotted to continue teaching the material in spite of the objections. The administration colluded to help her do it.
— Adult Human Female Megan Fox (@MeganFoxWriter) April 25, 2022
Parents confronted the school board about the leaked emails and the LGBTQ lessons. Those videos were removed by Twitter when the account that shared them was suspended for unknown reasons. I was able to locate the original videos and have uploaded them to YouTube below.
PJ Media reached out to the Glendale Unified School District but did not receive a response by the time of publishing.
(WARNING: there’s language in the following video from me. I edited out some of it, but this issue makes me very angry and sweary. Don’t watch in front of kids.)
PROJECT VERITAS: LEAKED RAW AUDIO-Full Twitter All-Hands Call 04-25-22
The woke left is in absolute shock after losing their favorite woke platform! They’re in shock and they are actually canceling themselves! In this video, we’re going to have some fun by looking at some highlights of the collective woke meltdown over Elon Musk taking over Twitter, we’re going to see some massive and utterly hilarious hypocrisy along the way, and stick with me to the very end of this video when I’ll reveal why Elon Musk has done more than anyone else to expose the odious sentiments of the woke left for all the world to see; you are NOT going to want to miss this!
Reports are that Twitter is indeed being sold to Elon Musk, thus ushering in the beginning of the end of the horrific nightmare of woke cancel culture in social media! In this video, we’re going take a look at the deal that appears to be finalized, we’re going to see how leftists have gone utterly hysterical over it all, and stick with me to the very end of this video when I’ll reveal precisely why this represents nothing less than the beginning of the final and definitive end to wokeism once and for all; you are NOT going to want to miss this!
Elon Musk Buys Twitter: Will He Save It or Ruin It?
Today, Elon Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion. Some say that Elon is going to fix the biased moderation problems on the platform; others think he's going to ruin the platform by allowing endless hate speech. What do you think? Whatever else happens, let's just hope we see the speedy return of the Babylon Bee!
Elon Musk Buys Twitter: Here’s How The Platform Could Change
Violent riots in Copenhagen after Rasmus Paludan burns the Quran. Cars on fire. Buses on fire
DAVID WOOD REPORTS: Ramadan Quran Riots in Sweden? Seriously???
Violent riots erupted in the Swedish city of Orebro during Ramadan, in response to a Quran-burning demonstration by Rasmus Paludan, leader of the Danish far-right political party Stram Kurs (Hard Line). How can Muslims in Sweden move forward when the Quran is burned? David Wood is here to help!
Head Of Danish Political Party Rasmus Paludan Savagely Attacked By Muslims Yet Arrested For 'Racism'
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) A pattern of fires striking food facilities across the United States suggests that arson teams are targeting food facilities for destruction. This theory, if confirmed, is consistent with other engineered tactics now being deployed to destroy food abundance in America:
The mass culling of chickens and turkeys, using fraudulent PCR testing to claim there’s another “bird flu epidemic” that requires the mass destruction of egg-producing chickens (and other birds used for meat).
The government paying farmers to plow their crops under, effectively incentivizing the destruction of the food supply.
Joe Biden’s dismantling of America’s energy infrastructure (pipelines, drilling, etc.) directly impacts agriculture, creating vastly increased prices for farming inputs such as fuel and fertilizer.
In a recent broadcast, Black Conservative Patriot (BCP) asked his audience to crowdsource reports of fires affecting food facilities in the last few months. His audience produced the following list. It hasn’t been fully vetted, but several recent fires such as the Azure Standard fire and the Taylor Farms food processing facility fire in Salinas, California, are both widely covered in recent news stories.
– Dried milk plant – Idaho fire 10-21 – Food processing plant fire San Antonio 12-21 – JBS beef plant fire 12-21 – Mississippi poultry feed mill boiler explosion 12–21 – Hamilton Mountain poultry processing plant fire 1-22 – LeCompte Feed mill fire, Louisiana 1-22 – Bonanza meat company fire El Paso, Texas 2-22 – Shearer’s Food Plant Fire, Oregon 2-22 – Mauston Wisconsin River Meats fire 2-22 – Foodbank in Maricopa county Arizona- food pantry 50,000 pounds of food destroyed by fire 3–22 – Nestle fire Arkansas. 3-22 – Walmart distribution center fire 3–22 – Potato processing plant Penobscot, Maine 3-22 – Sherbrooke, Canada food processing fire 4-22 – Fire grain elevator plant fire, Kansas 4-22 – Fertilizer plant fire 4-22 – Azure Standard fire 4-22 – Food processing plant fire, Salinas California 4-22
Granted, there exists a certain background frequency of fires even in normal times, but this pattern of so many fires striking so many food facilities in such as short period of time is raising eyebrows.
Union Pacific railroad is shutting down the transportation of grains and fertilizer, even as demand for such agricultural inputs is skyrocketing
The recent Union Pacific announcement that they would start de-platforming rail cars carrying fertilizer to US farmers only adds to the speculation that all this is somehow coordinated to create food scarcity in America. It also begs the question: As the world is running straight into a global food crisis, why would the US rail infrastructure companies decide to drop fertilizer and grain shipments?
“If we do not see reductions to the operating inventory through their voluntary efforts, then we will begin metering traffic after April 18th,” announced a Union Pacific press release that targeted at least 30 companies that ship fertilizer, grain, and other goods by rail. The term “metering” means forced de-platforming, of course. Companies like CF Industries were warned that if they did not voluntarily reduce the number of rail cars they were using, they would be banished from the entire rail system.
CF Industries, in its own announcement, warned that “Not only will fertilizer be delayed by these shipping restrictions, but additional fertilizer needed to complete spring applications may be unable to reach farmers at all. By placing this arbitrary restriction on just a handful of shippers, Union Pacific is jeopardizing farmers’ harvests and increasing the cost of food for consumers.”
That same announcement revealed that 30 companies are facing similar restrictions. Union Pacific claims it is overloaded with demand and can’t handle it, so they’re buying more locomotives… a process that will likely take years to complete, if ever.
Engineered food shortages will lead to food riots and civil unrest around the world
The United Nations’ FAO is already warning that food prices are spiking at the astonishing rate of 12.6% per month, according to the FAO’s latest data (March 2022).
Protests have already erupted in Peru due to unrelenting inflation, and this is probably only a taste of what is to come as the problem spreads.
Sky-high food prices, especially in poorer countries, will make it unaffordable for many families to make ends meet. This will lead to protests and riots – and as the dominoes continue to fall throughout the rest of the world, hell on earth will ensue.
“This crisis unfolds even as the global economy has not yet fully recovered from the pandemic,” says Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, the IMF’s research development director.
When even the globalist institutions are warning about widespread food riots, civil unrest, and the potential for political revolutions around the world, you know things are looking rather dim.
Analysis: The engineered collapse of the US food supply is part of the collapse / reset plan to destroy America
In our analysis, these data points are not merely coincidences. They indicate a well-planned, well-funded scheme to create food scarcity across the USA in the second half of 2022 and extending well into 2023.
Whoever is running this plan wants Americans to panic from hunger.
That panic will of course lead to uprisings and food riots, almost certainly followed by food rationing and, eventually, government-mandated price controls.
I have also predicted that the corrupt Biden regime will direct limited food supplies to “blue” areas while starving “red” areas as a run-up to civil war in America. Biden has already indicated he will use similar powers to weaponize supplies by denying the supply of monoclonal antibodies to red states. That action is a kind of medical sanction and an act of war against the red states.
To survive the engineered starvation that’s coming, we strongly urge all readers to learn how to grow food. ICanGrowFood.com is a Brighteon sponsor and features a free webinar video that shows you how to grow a huge amount of food in a very small space (about the same space of 2-3 parking lot spaces for cars).
You can also search Brighteon.com for the term “Kratky” to find all sorts of videos about the Kratky non-circulating hydroponic grow method, which is also the one that I use to produce massive amounts of vegetables with minimal effort.
Watch my hydroponics how-to videos at PrepWithMike.com to see how I use this simple, low-tech technology to grow food.
Finally, pre-register now at ResilientPrepping.com to be alerted when my new audiobook, “Resilient Prepping,” is available for download for free.
Hear more about the apparent food supply destruction in today’s Situation Update podcast:
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
There are times when many of us would really love to say, “We told you so.” Despite the mocking and scorn over the years, it turns out there actually is a “gay” agenda directed toward children-- depraved and aggressive-- and it’s now more obvious than ever.
The Florida Parental Rights Bill (HB 1557) reveals the crass, exploitative underbelly of “gay” activism and is a threat to the prize target of many wayward adults—vulnerable children.
This important bill recently signed by Governor Ron DeSantis protects children in kindergarten through third grade from homosexual and gender deviance indoctrination in lessons, books, and so on. It also prohibits schools from withholding physical/mental health information from a parent.
The law makes perfect sense and my hope is that we can pass many such bills in other states. I wish lawmakers had extended it to all grade levels, but perhaps that seemed an unreachable goal. Yet the measure is a good start. It also helpfully elicited a furious reaction from the “LGBTQ” community.
The sexual anarchy lobby named the measure the “Don’t Say Gay” bill and even organized walkouts of mostly high school students, showing a limited understanding of what the bill does.
Human Rights Campaign, for instance, is already selling “Ok to Say Gay” T-shirts—but ironically, none in sizes for small children. Doesn’t HRC believe these “youth” should have the “right” to identify as “LGBTQ”? Or is that just for backroom discussions?
Once again, it’s all about the adults and their preferences/depravities, and child human shields are mostly unimportant, except for perhaps the hard-to-locate gender-confused 6-year-old, who will be sadly paraded as a literal poster child in upcoming court cases in the hope of overturning this bill.
Does the sustained outrage mean that Big Gay will now openly push small grade-schoolers to identify as LGBTQ? There’s a term for that: grooming.
And we know the answer is yes, when and where they can get away with it. Radical educators have already been doing this, hence the need for the bill. Lately, grooming techniques have gotten much more overt in schools nationwide. But to see such honesty from these advocates about their goals is a teachable if tragic, moment.
“Get out of our way while we recruit/convert/corrupt your children! You have no right to stop us.”
These extremists would do well to remember that this bill has overwhelming support from both Republican and Democrat voters in Florida.
The vitriol from opponents is over the top: “Our goal as a company is for this law to be repealed by the legislature or struck down in the courts, and we remain committed to supporting the national and state organizations working to achieve that. We are dedicated to standing up for the rights and safety of LGBTQ+ members of the Disney family, as well as the LGBTQ+ community in Florida and across the country.” ( Disney)
DeSantis told the media that this statement by Disney “crossed the line.”
Disney has already pledged, in apparent retaliation for the bill, the addition of more “queerness” (many more sexually deviant characters) to its programming.
Human Rights Campaign believes “...these dangerous anti-equality proposals that harm LGBTQ+ families and kids have no place in Florida. Every student deserves to be seen, and every student deserves an education that prepares them for health and success — regardless of who they are.”
This bill in no way prevents any child from being “seen” and will allow a greater chance for academic success. Does HRC really take the position that K – 3rd-grade children deserve to identify as homosexual or “trans,” regardless of parental consent? That would be jaw-dropping advocacy of essentially criminal conduct.
GLSEN decries the “...continuing pattern of openly targeting LGBTQ+ youth from Governor DeSantis...” No child is being “targeted” but instead, protected.
And right on cue, the National Education Association is screaming “discrimination,” even the horrifying prospect that a homosexual teacher may not be able to reveal his/her chosen identity to young children. If only! How refreshing such schools would be!
NEA may want to inform “LGBTQ” teachers about the option to overcome these attractions/identities and become an ex-“gay” or ex-lesbian.
Why do these adult activists so desperately want little children to learn all about homosexuality and gender deviance? Without parents present? That fits the definition of grooming. And in the not-too-distant past, such actions would qualify as a crime of child corruption, subject to criminal penalties.
And inclusivity? What hypocrisy. Some anonymous Disney employees revealed in a Christian Post article the increasingly uncomfortable work climate for conservatives because of Disney’s left-wing political activity. Inclusivity does not extend to them and they believe Disney should stay out of these political debates.
Let’s make it clear what’s at stake: children who will be led into sin, violating the word of God, engaging in unnecessary, not born-that-way conduct, and all the accompanying health, social and spiritual risks. Or the opposite: children who may retain their innocence, remain open to the Lord, and have a better chance to mature on a natural timetable.
So big thanks to brave Governor DeSantis. Let’s keep this good work rolling out and get bills like this introduced in states throughout the country. And let’s extend the ban to all school grades.
It’s time to stand up for our children and kick sexual/gender perversion and its advocates out of America’s schools for good.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Much like the Pope, Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby uses Christianity to justify open borders — ie. breaking the law and illegally entering sovereign countries.Yet also like the globalist Pope, Welby is surrounded by personal security, and whoever enters his own personal domain is carefully vetted. He is also financially well cared for, unlike so many Britons, who are now saddled with the price tag of accommodating illegals— from feeding them and housing them to providing medical services, and when needed, heightened security services to protect citizens, given the disproportionately high incidents of crime committed by illegals.
A couple of years ago, a sensible cardinal opposed the woke leadership of the Catholic Church. Cardinal Robert Sarah — prefect of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments — compared “the modern influx of Muslim migrants to the invasions of barbarian tribes that ultimately brought down the Roman Empire in a.d. 475.” Sarah also issued a warning which contradicted Pope Francis. He cautioned that “it is a false exegesis [interpretation of scriptural text] to use the Word of God to promote migration. God never wanted these rifts.” But this is precisely what Pope Francis has been doing, along with the Anglican Welby: abusing their positions and acting as blind guides in preaching that it is un-Christian to oppose illegal, mass Muslim migration into Europe.
“Woke Anglican Archbishop Uses Easter Message to Attack Border Controls,” by Jack Montgomery, Breitbart, April 17, 2022:
Archbishop Justin Welby, the de facto head of the Church of England, has used his Easter message to attack British government plans to transfer some male boat migrants to Rwanda while their asylum claims are processed, claiming the policy “is the opposite of the nature of God”.
In a highly political “sermon” preached at the service of Holy Communion at Canterbury Cathedral and broadcast on BBC Radio 4 on Sunday morning, the woke archbishop loosely linked the resurrection of Jesus Christ to a number of contemporary political issues he is interested in, including the conflict in Ukraine, “the rising cost of power, fuel, and basic food”, and, of course, immigration.
“[T]his season is also why there are such serious ethical questions about sending asylum seekers overseas,” the Archbishop of Canterbury claimed, referring to the Boris Johnson administration’s plans to finally do something about the ever-worsening boat migrant crisis by striking a deal with Rwanda, a safe third country, to host some male asylum seekers while their asylum claims — often bogus — are processed.
“The details are for politics and politicians. The principle must stand the judgement of God and it cannot,” declared Welby, who himself has a direct role in lawmaking as a member of the House of Lords.
“It cannot carry the weight of resurrection justice, of life conquering death. It cannot carry the weight of the resurrection that was first to the least valued, for it privileges the rich and strong,” he went on, without offering a clear explanation as to how paying Rwanda to host people who illegally enter British territory from France — a safe European Union member-state — is an exercise of “privilege”….
For the past nine years, the Donaldsons have dedicated their lives to creating the best possible outcome for the health and well-being of their little boy Tanner. Jenn Donaldson his mother, quit her job to care for Tanner so she can meet the frequency of his medical needs. Their little boy suffers from Posterior Urethral Valves (PUV) which are obstructive membranes that develop in the urethra, which functions by draining urine from the bladder. These valves can obstruct or block the outflow of urine, which leads the ureters and kidneys to become progressively dilated, resulting in damage. PUV cannot be prevented. It begins in the early stages of fetal development and abnormally affects male infants. Reports of the incidence of PUV vary as widely as 1 in 2,000 to as much as 1 in 25,000. Article Link | https://trialsitenews.com/cleveland-c...
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
As of October 2021, the Cleveland Clinic will not permit patients who have not gotten COVID-19 vaccine to undergo lifesaving organ transplants, either as a recipient or as living donors. The clinic’s reasoning is that the recipient, who receives immunosuppressant drugs post-transplant, could be at high risk of contracting SARS-Cov-2. The unvaccinated will not be accepted as living organ donors due to the possibility that the virus could be transmitted to the transplant recipient during the operation.1
According to the clinic:
Living donation for organ transplantation has been a life-saving treatment, but it is not without risks to the donor. For the living donor, preventing COVID-19 infection around the time of their surgery and recovery is crucial.2
Cleveland Clinic officials point to a John Hopkins University study that found that kidney transplant patients who received a COVID vaccine after the transplant procedure did not mount a sufficient immune response to vaccination. The study showed that less than one out of every five kidney transplant patients amounted a strong response to the vaccine. However, a subsequent Johns Hopkins study showed that transplant recipients who received a COVID booster did amount to a sufficient antibody response.3
Cleveland Clinic Denies Transplant to Unvaccinated Nine-Year-Old with Only One Failing Kidney
Nine-year-old Tanner Donaldson is being denied a kidney transplant because of Cleveland Clinic’s rigid COVID vaccine restrictions on organ transplant procedures. Tanner, who was born with only one kidney currently functioning at between 18-20 percent, will need a transplant soon. Fortunately, his father, Dane Donaldson, is a perfect match and a willing donor. Although Tanner has been under the care of the Clinic since his birth, he is unable to receive an organ transplant due to recent changes to the clinic’s transplant policy.4
Dane Donaldson was found to be a kidney transplant match for his son in 2018. The family decided to wait a few years for Tanner to have the surgery as a kidney from a live donor is only expected to last about 20 years and Tanner is so young. However, because the Donaldsons are not vaccinated due to their personal and religious beliefs, the Cleveland Clinic refuses to perform the life-saving operation it had previously agreed to perform.5
Both of Tanner's parents along with Tanner and his older sibling survived a bout with COVID and have natural immunity from the virus but the clinic has not changed its policy and has not responded to the family’s lawyer’s requests for a religious exemption.67
Kidneys from Unvaccinated Dead Donors are Used But Unvaccinated Live Kidney Donors are Turned Away
In an article in The Epoch Times, the Donaldsons pointed out that the hospital’s policy allows the kidneys of unvaccinated deceased donors to be used for kidney transplants but turns away unvaccinated live kidney donors.
Commenting on the contradiction, Dane Donaldson said:
A live donor is the best donor for kidneys, but they’ll take a kidney from a deceased person not vaccinated, it makes no sense.8
Despite the Donaldson’s offer to sign a liability waiver protecting the clinic should he or Tanner come down with COVID post-transplant, the clinic continues to refuse to perform the procedure for Tanner, maintaining that:
We continually strive to minimize risk to our living donors, and vaccination is an important component to ensure the safest approach and optimal outcomes for donors.9
The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sent a letter to the Cleveland Clinic listing a number of studies showing that it is rare for a person to be reinfected with COVID after recovering from the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which included a study published by the clinic itself. In that study looking at 52,238 vaccinated and unvaccinated healthcare workers, not one of the previously infected unvaccinated healthcare workers were reinfected with the virus over a five-month period.10
In an ABC-TV report, Dane Donaldson said about the Cleveland Clinic and his young son…
I don’t know what we do today. You know, I gotta think somewhere out there, that cooler heads would prevail and we could, you know, I’d love it still to be at the Clinic and us come around and have some type of dialogue and say, ‘Okay, you know, let’s look at your case,’” said Donaldson. “We’re trying to put plan B in place. The number one thing I can do is keep him as healthy as possible and I can remain and keep my health the best I can. But it’s stressful. There’s no doubt about it. You know, it just is.11
The Donaldsons are trying to find another facility that will perform the kidney transplant for Tanner.
In this episode, Dinesh discusses how Twitter's board is using a "poison pill" strategy to stop Elon Musk and continue its censorship policies. Dinesh asks who's going to blink first in the Ukraine war, the Russians, or the US? Dinesh discusses the future of the pro-life movement in a post-Roe America. Dinesh examines the implications of China becoming the global defender of traditional values. Dinesh explores the remarkable meeting between Dante the pilgrim and a Roman poet named Statius.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The Florida Department of Education has determined that a large number of math textbooks attempted to “indoctrinate” students through the inclusion of critical race theory and other prohibited subjects and have been rejected for the 2022 school year.
The department did not list specific textbooks that were rejected nor did it give any examples of why a textbook was rejected.
Fifty-four of the 132 textbooks that publishers submitted for the state’s review were “impermissible with either Florida’s new standards or contained prohibited topics.” The ax fell heaviest on textbooks designed for grades K-5 — 71% of materials were rejected.
“Reasons for rejecting textbooks included references to Critical Race Theory (CRT), inclusions of Common Core, and the unsolicited addition of Social Emotional Learning (SEL) in mathematics,” the press release said.
The decision comes as efforts to challenge books surge in local school board meetings across the nation. In Florida, Republican lawmakers approved a new law that offers more transparency in the book selection process, casting the issue as one about parental rights.
If it were just an issue of “parental rights,” the state would take much greater pains to explain exactly why certain books were rejected and what was objectionable about them.
“We’re going to ensure that Florida has the highest-quality instructional materials aligned to our nationally-recognized standards,” said Commissioner of Education Richard Corcoran. “Florida has become a national leader in education under the vision and leadership of Governor DeSantis. When it comes to education, other states continue to follow Florida’s lead as we continue to reinforce parents’ rights by focusing on providing their children with a world-class education without the fear of indoctrination or exposure to dangerous and divisive concepts in our classrooms.”
There’s nothing wrong with a little divisiveness in classrooms. Socrates encouraged it. It makes for a far more enriching learning experience if students challenge what’s being taught rather than sit there like a bump on a log and listen to a teacher drone on.
The state has a textbook adoption cycle that rotates through subjects every six years. When buying books for their schools, districts turn to the state’s approved list to make sure they align with state standards.
Next up is social studies, and many educators have predicted the effort will be more confrontational than in past years — particularly after the approval of a new law that will require schools to open to the public committee meetings where books are reviewed for purchase, and to make all materials available for public review before it is approved.
We should applaud these efforts to give parents more say in their child’s education, and all attempts at left-wing indoctrination should be resisted.
But what’s extremely worrying is the slap-dash approach to determining what books are in violation of these standards. Critical Race Theory is a philosophy — a specific, defined set of ideas and principles. But what we’re seeing is that many issues having to do with the teaching of slavery, of discrimination, of segregation — issues that need to be taught and discussed — are being carelessly lumped in with the concepts of CRT.
This is worse than left-wing indoctrination. It denies our children a true picture of their heritage and history. The fact that it’s not a pretty picture is irrelevant. It happened, and each of us has to deal with that history in our own way as Americans.
There is no “collective guilt.” But there won’t be an understanding of why unless there’s a clear-eyed view of the past that includes the glorious with the horrible, the sublime with the shameful.
Is Florida giving that complete picture to its students?
UB Police investigating reports of harassment following politician's visit
Former Texas GOP Chair Lt. Col. Allen West slammed the "radical mob" that interrupted his speech on American exceptionalism at the University of Buffalo. West told "The Brian Kilmeade Show" Tuesday that he was appearing last week on behalf of the Young Americas Foundation to speak about race and make the argument that America is not a racist country. "Who better that they think could do that than someone such as myself who was born in a Blacks-only hospital in Atlanta, Georgia, 61 years ago?" said West. The author and former Florida congressman said that despite being born in an era of segregation, he has still become successful. He also noted that his wife came to the United States legally as an immigrant from Jamaica. His wife now holds an MBA and a Ph.D. However, many students did not want to hear his story. Video "As a matter of fact, they were very disruptive, and I think people have seen now that it was a mob, it was radical, it was militant, and I had to be escorted off of the campus by police officers. And then after that, they turned their angst against many of those conservative students that were there who had invited me to come and speak," he explained. West was not the only person targeted by the mob. Young Americans for Freedom President Therese Purcell joined "Fox & Friends First" Monday to discuss the incident and how the meeting spiraled out of control. "I was really afraid for my life since they physically assaulted my friend, and like I said, they were screaming, no peace," Purcell told co-host Todd Piro. "I don't think they were going to do anything remotely peaceful. They were a very angry mob, and they were clearly saying that they were trying to chase me, that they wanted to capture me." Video West noted how America was once a place where Black students needed to be escorted onto college campuses to protect them from White students. "Here I am having to be escorted off a university campus and being screamed at by Black students who still want to talk about how they're oppressed. How does their behavior solve anything?" he asked, saying the students were "triggered" because he does not share their perspective. "They had to end the event early and then outside they were banging, kicking doors, and screaming, ‘We want West.’ I got to tell you, I don't know what they wanted, but if anyone had tried to, you know, physically assault me, it would have been a not good day for them."
Allen West on 'woke mob' swarming his speech | These kids wanna be victims
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The president of the conservative Young Americans for Freedom club on the campus of the University of Buffalo was forced to run for her life and hide in a bathroom after a woke mob targeted her and began to chase her from a lecture given by conservative activist Allen West.
“They were a very angry mob, and they were clearly saying that they were trying to chase me, that they wanted to capture me,” Therese Purcell said in an appearance on Fox News Monday. “I’m afraid of what would have happened if I wasn’t able to hide from them.”
“This despicable attack on conservative students prove exactly why YAF’s campus lectures are needed––to pop the liberal bubble and expose the hideous reality of the intolerant Left,” YAF spokeswoman Kara Zupkus wrote in a post on the organization’s website.
That may very well be true. But first, she has to survive the infantile tantrum-throwing by the woke mob that uses stormtrooper tactics to silence dissent.
Purcell claimed the threats escalated as protesters started screaming “no peace,” and “banging on the walls,” prompting Lt. Col. West to be escorted out by police.
Purcell said she followed him out alongside officials, but the mob quickly began to target her personally urging one another to “capture” her. She escaped into a bathroom to just barely evade the angry crowd.
“It was a really crazy event that we were trying to bring a Black voice to campus to talk about these issues of racism and American exceptionalism, and while they were screaming that we were trying to silence Black voices, we were actually trying to bring this conversation to campus,” Purcell stated.
Given the psychology of the mob, the “capture” of Purcell could very well have resulted in her being beaten to death. She was absolutely right to flee for her life.
Purcell seems genuinely perplexed that West’s “black voice” was not met with a receptive audience. She’s very young and will learn very quickly.
The woke mob is not interested in debate. They don’t want dialogue. They are ignorant of the forms and procedures of democratic dissent. They don’t care about other human beings at all.
They’re too stupid to realize they’re destroying the country. Or if they do realize it, they believe that to be a good thing.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Raymond Ibrahim is a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center.
Pope Francis, a leading advocate of Doormat Christianity, is at it again, trying to reverse nearly two millennia of Christian doctrine, by preaching total passivity—even against violent aggression.
On March 18, 2022, Francis declared before an audience that “A war is always—always!—the defeat of humanity, always. We, the educated, who work in education, are defeated by this war because on another side we are responsible.”
So far, all well and good, if only because such lofty but impotent words are expected.
But then Francis went so far as to say, “There is no such thing as a just war: they do not exist!”
That is a remarkably dangerous claim, one that, if embraced—as no doubt it is by millions of similar naïve thinkers—can easily lead to their annihilation.
There is, indeed, such a thing as a just war—the only rational way of responding to unjust wars—and it is firmly grounded in Christian, especially Catholic, teaching, even if the head of the Catholic world argues otherwise.
In fact, from the very start, Christian theologians had concluded that “the so-called charity texts of the New Testament that preached passivism and forgiveness, not retaliation, were firmly defined as applying to the beliefs and behavior of the private person [and not the state],” to quote historian Christopher Tyerman.
Christ himself—who called on his followers to render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s and unto God what is God’s (Matt. 22:21)—differentiated between the social and spiritual realms. In the only recorded instance of Jesus being slapped, he did not “turn the other cheek,” but rather challenged his slapper to explain himself (John 18:22–23). The Nazarene further praised a Roman centurion without calling on him to “repent” by resigning from one of the most brutal militaries in world history (Matt. 8: 5–13). Similarly, when a group of soldiers asked John the Baptist how they should repent, he advised them always to be content with their army wages (Luke 3:14)—and said nothing about their quitting the Roman army.
This is because there is “no intrinsic contradiction,” continues Tyerman, “in a doctrine of personal, individual forgiveness condoning certain forms of necessary public violence to ensure the security in which, in St. Paul’s phrase, Christians ‘may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty’ (1 Tim. 2:2).”
Or in the words of that chief articulator of Just War theory, Saint Augustine (354–430), “It is the injustice of the opposing side that lays on the wise man the duty to wage war.” Crusades historian Jonathan Riley-Smith elaborates:
What was evil in war itself? Augustine had asked. The real evils were not the deaths of those who would have died anyway, but the love of violence, cruelty, and enmity; it was generally to punish such that good men undertook wars in obedience to God or some lawful authority…. Expeditions to the Levant, North Africa, or the Iberian Peninsula could be justified as responses to present Muslim aggression or as rightful attempts to recover Christian territory which had been injuriously seized in the past. [For more on the intricacies of just war theory, especially as compared and contrasted with unjust wars, which do merit condemnation, read “Just War vs. Just Plain Old Jihad.”]
Make no mistake: without just wars and the brave men who undertook them, the world today would be a very different place. Europe, for instance, would have been Islamic—and not by willingly capitulating, as it is now, but by force: countless jihads were waged against it and other Christian nations, and they were repulsed only by the force of arms—by war, just war.
Indeed, even the Vatican itself, whence Pope Francis issues his lofty words of peace and love, has long been targeted and even attacked (for example in 846) by Muslims, and was saved only thanks to men acting in accordance with just war theory.
There is nothing wrong with Pope Francis’s generic condemnation of war and its horrors. It is his usual lack of distinction—in this case, conflating just with unjust wars—that is problematic, if not suicidal.
'Life, Liberty & Levin' host Mark Levin joined 'Fox & Friends Weekend' to discuss the fallout over Biden's border crisis and the Hunter Biden investigation.
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA BIDEN CENTER, WASHINGTON, D.C.
"Strengthening American Global Leadership for the Future"
QUOTE: "As Campus Reformpreviously reported, the Ivy League school has been the subject of criticism for refusing to disclose the source of more than $22 million in anonymous donations from China. According to the National Legal and Policy Center — a nonprofit watchdog group — federal law “requires the disclosure of the source of all donations over $250,000.”"
BIDEN'S UNAPOLOGETIC RELATIONSHIP WITH COMMUNIST CHINA IS REVEALED IN DETAIL, IN AN INTERVIEW AT PENN BIDEN CENTER, APRIL 7, 2017:
University of Pennsylvania President, Dr. Amy Gutmann and the "Honorable" Joe Biden at the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement.
$54M in Chinese gifts donated to UPenn, home of Biden Center
A government watchdog is demanding the US Attorney probing Hunter Biden in Delaware investigate tens of millions in anonymous donations from China to the University of Pennsylvania, where an academic center is named for his father, President Biden. The Ivy League college raked in a total of $54.6 million from 2014 through June 2019 in donations from China, including $23.1 million in anonymous gifts starting in 2016, according to public records.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Take the jab or the boy gets it. That’s essentially the message the Cleveland Clinic is sending to the parents of 9-year-old Tanner Donaldson, who will soon need a kidney transplant. He was born with a rare birth defect, posterior urethral valves (PUV), a condition that caused irreversible kidney damage in utero and resulted in stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Dane Donaldson, Tanner’s father, told PJ Media that his son’s kidney function is currently between 15% and 20%, but his numbers have been ticking up lately, so they feel he is nearing the time when a transplant will be necessary. They’ve known since birth that Tanner would eventually need the transplant and doctors have told the parents that they’ll continue monitoring Tanner’s health and, when the time comes, “they’ll be preemptive.” Donaldson told PJ Media that they won’t let his condition proceed to the point where he needs dialysis.
Donaldson is a perfect match, but the Cleveland Clinic is refusing to do the transplant because Dane has not received the COVID-19 vaccination. The hospital requires that all living donors be fully vaccinated before they go under the knife for a transplant.
Both parents are actually matches, but it was ultimately decided that Dane would be the one to donate a kidney to his son. He’s in good health, an avid CrossFitter, and is ready to have the surgery the moment it’s needed.
In November, the family was blindsided by a letter from the Cleveland Clinic informing them that Dane would not qualify to be the kidney donor unless he agrees to take the COVID-19 vaccination.
“To help keep you safe from COVID-19 disease before and after transplant, we are now requiring COVID-19 vaccinations for all eligible transplant candidates and living donors,” the Cleveland Clinic Kidney and Pancreas Center explained in the letter. “This was a decision made by the leadership of all Cleveland Clinic transplant programs based on currently available medical evidence and is intended to make transplantation as successful as possible. After our meeting with Mr. and Mrs. Donaldson, they have maintained the decision for Mr. Donaldson not to be vaccinated, therefore at this time he is not a candidate to donate to Tanner. Tanner Donaldson remains a candidate for a kidney transplant and is currently still listed for transplant at our center.”
According to Donaldson, the family was told that organs are hard to come by and they want to make sure that the donors have all the antibodies necessary.
“They did not remove Tanner from the transplant list,” Donaldson said, “but they removed his best possible outcome: myself, the living donor, his dad.”
They tried explaining to the clinic that Dane Donaldson had recovered from COVID-19 and therefore has natural immunity—even presenting results from a T Detect test, which measures the T cell immune response to SARS-CoV-2—but their rationale fell on deaf ears. The parents’ lawyers contacted the Clinic to request a religious exemption for Donaldson, but the hospital never responded. The attorneys wrote in a letter to the Cleveland Clinic’s Center for Bioethics in January:
The Donaldsons have continued to request that the Hospital provide the data to support their policy and have been refused this information. Moreover, the Donaldsons are open to any and all suggestions on mitigating risk. If the Hospital’s concerns regarding Dane’s vaccination status are due to the potential to transmit the SARS-CoV-2 virus to Tanner, all could be alleviated by simply testing Tanner for various markers of natural immunity to the disease in addition to continuing to test them both for COVID-19 up until the point of transplant. Lastly, if the Hospital fears litigation, the Donaldsons could waive their right to sue the hospital for any COVID-19- related complications. There are plenty of reasonable options in play to both mitigate the risk of COVID-19 and achieve a successful surgery for Tanner, but the Hospital refuses to come to the table. It is entirely unethical to refuse treatment to Tanner because the Hospital believes it is more of a risk to Tanner’s health that he might contract COVID-19 from the transplant rather than the real, actual impending danger of renal failure due to Stage 5 kidney disease.
Tanner has been approved for a pre-emptive kidney transplant for about 2-3 years now with my husband being approved to be his living donor. Recently my son’s numbers have been creeping up and we have been in talks with his Nephrologist about potentially scheduling his transplant. In conversation with my son’s Nephrologist and the Infectious Disease doctor they questioned us on the Covid-19 injections. I politely indicated that my family and I have done many months of research and we are not going to take part in getting the injection–not now while it’s experimental (EUA) and not even if and when it is approved by FDA. These specialists became offensive, argumentative and told me this could pose a problem for Tanner and his continued transplant approval. I asked them to expand on this but they deferred since at this time the injection is not even EUA approved for children of his age–but they mentioned it will be soon. I am greatly concerned that this injection will be forced upon us in order to transplant my child and save his life. [Emphasis added]
Tanner Donaldson, a lively and sweet 9-year-old boy, has spent years of his life bearing the burden of chronic illness that has kept him from living a “normal” childhood. Unlike many in need of organ transplants, who are forced to pray and hope that an organ becomes available for them in time, Tanner was blessed with a miracle. His father, Dane, is a perfect match to donate one of his kidneys to Tanner. In any other year, Tanner would already be on the road to recovery post-operation, but thanks to the Hospital’s COVID-19 vaccine policy, Tanner is being refused the surgery on the grounds that his donor has not been vaccinated.
The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) has taken up Tanner’s cause. “Unfortunately, despite the Donaldsons’ pleas for the Hospital to make an exception, the Hospital has refused to budge – this despite the fact that Dane has natural immunity to COVID-19 which, as ICAN has repeatedly pointed out, is far superior to vaccine-induced immunity,” the organization said in a statement. “The Hospital appears to be operating under a psychosis of flawed morality in choosing to sacrifice the health and wellness of a 9-year-old patient in exchange for what it perceives to be the ‘greater good.’ The magnitude of the injustice of this situation for Tanner is hard to capture in words. After a grueling 4-year journey, Tanner, who is now entering stage 5 kidney disease, is having what may be his only chance at living a full life put at risk by an arbitrary and incredibly unethical new Hospital policy.”
The decision has left the family scrambling for other options, including seeking out another hospital that will perform the transplant or perhaps even another state like Florida or Texas.
“I don’t know what we do today. You know, I gotta think somewhere out there, that cooler heads would prevail and we could, you know, I’d love it still to be at the Clinic and us come around and have some type of dialogue and say, ‘Okay, you know, let’s look at your case,’” Donaldson told News 5 Cleveland. “We’re trying to put plan B in place. The number one thing I can do is keep him as healthy as possible and I can remain and keep my health the best I can. But it’s stressful. There’s no doubt about it. You know, it just is.”
(@MeganFoxWriter) 
