Rather Expose Them Christian News Blog

Category: Legal

List of 80 Republicans Who Passed $400 Million Vax-Tracking Bill Advancing a ‘Computerized Database that Records Immunization Doses’: ‘Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2021’

BY JON FLEETWOOD

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/list-of-80-republicans-who-passed-400-million-vax-tracking-bill-advancing-a-computerized-database-that-records-immunization-doses-immunization-infrastructure-modernization-act-of-2021/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

80 House Republicans—including Reps. Dan Crenshaw (TX), Adam Kinzinger (IL), Kevin McCarthy (CA), Young Kim (CA)—voted in favor of a Democrat-sponsored bill that will upgrade an “Orwellian” federal vaccine database used to “track” unvaccinated Americans.

  • Eighty Republicans voted (see list below) with Democrats on Tuesday to pass H.R. 550, the ‘Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act,’ which seeks to “improve immunization information data quality” of “all personal data elements recommended by the National Vaccine Advisory Committee (NVAC),” according to the bill.
  • H.R. 550 is sponsored by Rep. Ann M. Kuster (D-NH) and cosponsored by 10 other Democrats and four Republicans.
  • The bill seeks to improve “incomplete patient records” by creating a “computerized database that records immunization doses administered by any health care provider to persons within the geographic area covered by that database.”
  • This information will be accessible via “cloud storage.”
  • Financial grants authorized by the bill “will be used to assist public health departments in improving data quality” by “supporting activities to improve the scheduling and administration of vaccinations.”
  • H.R. 550 will promote vaccine record data collection by “developing and disseminating information related to the use and importance of immunization record data” to “health care providers and other relevant entities.”
  • H.R. 550 will also “authorize $400 million for the Secretary of Health and Human Services to improve and expand immunization information systems (IIS).”
  • This money will support “real-time immunization record data exchange and reporting to support rapid identification of immunization coverage gaps.”
  • Such a monumental task will require the “Secretary to develop and utilize contracts and cooperative agreements for technical assistance, training, and related implementation support.”
  • The bill still needs Senate approval before it can be signed into law.
  • Rep. Mary Miller (R-IL), one of the 130 Republicans to vote ‘no,’ told Breitbart that the legislation would enable the federal government to “track” unvaccinated Americans who “will be targeted and forced to comply with Biden’s crazy ‘global vaccination’ vision.”
  • “These systems are designed to allow for the sharing of crucial information and maintenance of records. Do we really trust the government to protect our medical records?” Miller asked. “The bill’s author even bragged in her press release that these systems will help the government remind patients when they are due for a recommended vaccine and identify areas with low vaccination rates to ensure equitable distribution of vaccines. This was clearly a legislative tool to enforce vaccine mandates and force their Orwellian rules onto those who do not comply.”
  • Rep. Dan Crenshaw, who voted ‘yes’ on the bill, posted a video on Instagram alleging legislators “crafted this bill to put safeguards in place, ensure ALL the data is anonymous and non-trackable.” But no section of the bill explains how this will be done. While part of one sentence in its more than 1,700-word text briefly mentions supporting the “maintenance” of “security standards to protect individually identifiable health information,” no section of the bill elaborates on any new “safeguards” for improving or ensuring “anonymity” for American citizens’ private vaccination status. The terms “safeguard,” “anonymous,” and “non-trackable” do not appear in the bill.

READ THE FULL BILL HERE.

9 Reasons Rep. Dan Crenshaw Is a Globalist Shill: A Warning to American Patriots

PURPOSE & SUMMARY OF H.R. 550:

The Bill reads: “H.R. 550, the ‘Immunization Infrastructure Modernization Act of 2021,’ authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the Secretary) to conduct activities, including designating data and technology standards, developing public-private partnerships, and awarding grants or cooperative agreements to health departments, in order to expand, enhance, and improve immunization information systems (IIS).”

REPUBLICANS WHO VOTED TO PASS H.R. 550 (CLICK NAME FOR CONTACT INFORMATION):
Bacon Republican Nebraska YEA
Baird Republican Indiana YEA
Banks Republican Indiana YEA
Barr Republican Kentucky YEA
Bilirakis Republican Florida YEA
Bucshon Republican Indiana YEA
Burgess Republican Texas YEA
Carl Republican Alabama YEA
Carter (GA) Republican Georgia YEA
Carter (TX) Republican Texas YEA
Cheney Republican Wyoming YEA
Cole Republican Oklahoma YEA
Comer Republican Kentucky YEA
Crenshaw Republican Texas YEA
Curtis Republican Utah YEA
Davis, Rodney Republican Illinois YEA
Diaz-Balart Republican Florida YEA
Dunn Republican Florida YEA
Fitzpatrick Republican Pennsylvania YEA
Fleischmann Republican Tennessee YEA
Fortenberry Republican Nebraska YEA
Gimenez Republican Florida YEA
Gonzales, Tony Republican Texas YEA
Gonzalez (OH) Republican Ohio YEA
Graves (MO) Republican Missouri YEA
Guthrie Republican Kentucky YEA
Herrera Beutler Republican Washington YEA
Hill Republican Arkansas YEA
Hinson Republican Iowa YEA
Hudson Republican North Carolina YEA
Huizenga Republican Michigan YEA
Jacobs (NY) Republican New York YEA
Johnson (OH) Republican Ohio YEA
Joyce (OH) Republican Ohio YEA
Joyce (PA) Republican Pennsylvania YEA
Katko Republican New York YEA
Keller Republican Pennsylvania YEA
Kim (CA) Republican California YEA
Kinzinger Republican Illinois YEA
Kustoff Republican Tennessee YEA
LaHood Republican Illinois YEA
Lesko Republican Arizona YEA
Letlow Republican Louisiana YEA
Long Republican Missouri YEA
Lucas Republican Oklahoma YEA
Luetkemeyer Republican Missouri YEA
McCarthy Republican California YEA
McCaul Republican Texas YEA
McClain Republican Michigan YEA
McHenry Republican North Carolina YEA
McKinley Republican West Virginia YEA
Meijer Republican Michigan YEA
Miller-Meeks Republican Iowa YEA
Moore (UT) Republican Utah YEA
Murphy (NC) Republican North Carolina YEA
Newhouse Republican Washington YEA
Owens Republican Utah YEA
Palazzo Republican Mississippi YEA
Palmer Republican Alabama YEA
Pence Republican Indiana YEA
Reed Republican New York YEA
Reschenthaler Republican Pennsylvania YEA
Rodgers (WA) Republican Washington YEA
Rogers (AL) Republican Alabama YEA
Rogers (KY) Republican Kentucky YEA
Salazar Republican Florida YEA
Schweikert Republican Arizona YEA
Smith (NJ) Republican New Jersey YEA
Smucker Republican Pennsylvania YEA
Stauber Republican Minnesota YEA
Stewart Republican Utah YEA
Thompson (PA) Republican Pennsylvania YEA
Turner Republican Ohio YEA
Upton Republican Michigan YEA
Wagner Republican Missouri YEA
Wenstrup Republican Ohio YEA
Westerman Republican Arkansas YEA
Wilson (SC) Republican South Carolina YEA
Womack Republican Arkansas YEA
Young Republican Alaska YEA
BREITBART REPORTS:

Rep. Byron Donalds (R-FL) also voted “no” on the bill, citing “Democrats’ habitual pattern of reckless and wasteful spending” in an exclusive statement to Breitbart News. The congressman said the legislation only serves to expand the power of the federal government and trample individual rights.

“This legislation would unnecessarily appropriate millions of taxpayer funds intended to expand bureaucracy in Washington. A database solely created to record and collect confidential vaccination information of Americans explicitly encroaches upon individuals’ fundamental right to medical privacy,” Donalds said. “As a fiscal conservative, I cannot in good faith support legislation that contributes to the Democrats’ habitual pattern of reckless and wasteful spending and the intrusive heavy hand of government.”

Miller noted that the legislation paves the way for the government to give blue states millions in taxpayers funds to enforce vaccine mandates. According to the bill’s text, the government could award grants and cooperative agreements to health departments or other local governmental entities for agreeing to adopt the new data collection guidelines set by the CDC. Any agencies hoping to receive a grant must agree to comply with security standards to protect personal health information.

The government may also develop “public-private partnerships” to help with “technical assistance, training, and related implementation support.” When Breitbart News asked Miller if public-private partnerships could potentially obscure data collection activities from the public, she said the government cannot be trusted to be transparent.

“…The government has become so large, you cannot expect them to keep anything private anymore. There is hardly any congressional oversight into studies these agencies conduct,” she added.

…Miller contended that the government has “no reason” to collect more vaccination data on Americans.

“As I’ve said many times before, the government is not your doctor. The federal government has no business inserting itself into private healthcare matters of Americans. There is no reason for them to collect this data, it is an affront to our liberties and health freedoms,” she said. “This kind of legislation is always passed because the government has its hands in everything nowadays, often at the expense of the freedoms and privacy of Americans. This bill would allow the government to collect, study, and share your private health data. There are endless ways the government could potentially use that information against you – purposefully and accidentally.”

Jon Fleetwood is Managing Editor for American Faith and author of “An American Revival: Why American Christianity Is Failing & How to Fix It.“

‘This May Be A First!’: Ted Cruz Confronts ‘Radical’ Biden Nominee With His Own Past Statements

At today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) confronted Dale Ho, nominee to be United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York over his past statements.

'I Think You're An Angry Man': John Kennedy Directly Confronts Judicial Nominee Over Past Statements

'We Both Know That And You're Under Oath': Mike Lee Rips Judicial Nominee Over His Answer

'According To Your Syllabus, You Teach Critical Race Theory': Grassley Grills Judicial Nominee

American Faith: Christianity on trial in Finland as Bible is deemed ‘hate speech’

PUNISHED For His Faith: Bishop Juhana Pohjola on Federalist Radio Hour

Paul Coleman Relays Legal Cases of Hate Speech Charges for Teaching Biblical Sexuality

Paul Coleman, Executive Director of ADF International, joins Tony Perkins to discuss the cases of Päivi Räsänen, Finland's former Interior Minister and leader of the Christian Democrats, and Rev Dr. Juhana Pohjola, Bishop-Elect of the Evangelical Lutheran Mission Diocese of Finland. They have both been criminally charged under a Finnish hate speech law for sharing what the Bible teaches about human sexuality.

BY WORLD NET DAILY

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/christianity-on-trial-in-finland-as-bible-is-deemed-hate-speech/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Religious liberties are in danger.

Religious liberties are in danger in Finland, and Christianity has a giant target on its back.

In a court case with monumental implications, a pastor and a member of the Finnish Parliament are on trial for their faith. Juhana Pohjola, 49, faces criminal charges for teaching the Christian word that has been established for thousands of years.

Pohjola has ministered to small delegations of only dozens and has worked a lifetime building a tight-knit network of churches across Finland. Many of the humble churches started as a handful of people gathering for Bible study, singing hymns, prayer, and communion.

Many of the humble churches started as a handful of people gathering for Bible study, singing hymns, prayer, and communion.

But Pohjola’s life work faces a harrowing test of persecution when he and Finnish MP Päivi Räsänen go to trial on January 24th.

What’s the accusation against Pohjola and Räsänen?

Hate speech!

The Federalist wrote:

Rasanen’s alleged crimes in a country that claims to guarantee freedom of speech and religion include tweeting a picture of a Bible verse. Potential penalties if they are convicted include fines and up to two years in prison.

Finnish Authorities: The Bible Is Hate Speech

Rasanen and Pohjola are being charged with “hate speech” for respectively writing and publishing a 24-page 2004 booklet that explains basic Christian theology about sex and marriage, which reserves sex exclusively for within marriage, which can only consist of one man and one woman, for life. The Finnish prosecutor claims centuries-old Christian teachings about sex “incite hatred” and violate legal preferences for government-privileged identity groups.

For a country that supposedly believes in free speech and religion, this prosecution is nothing more than a witch hunt.

The American Conservative noted:

Päivi Räsänen is a member of the Finnish Parliament from the Christian Democratic Party, and a practicing Lutheran. She is also facing hate speech investigations for having questioned publicly her own church leaders’ decision to affirm LGBT pride. Now, the Finnish police have expanded the investigation to consider charges against her over a 2004 pamphlet she wrote defending the Lutheran Church’s traditional teaching about marriage (which entails denying that same-sex marriage is a real marriage). It’s worth noting that Räsänen wrote that pamphlet seven years before LGBT was added to the national hate-speech law as a protected class. She was investigated once before for the pamphlet, and cleared — but now she’s going to undergo another interrogation.

Below is a screenshot of the tweet that started the persecution:

Pohjola and Räsänen have faced relentless interrogation from police about their theology, and Finnish authorities admit their interpretation of Finland’s law makes publishing the Bible a hate crime.

The case is expected to have major international implications for freedom of speech and religious liberty in Western society.

The Federalist explained:

“Although all European countries have these hate speech laws, and these hate speech laws are increasingly being used against citizens for things that they say, this is the first time we’ve really seen Christians face criminal prosecution for explaining their biblical views,” Coleman said. “…It’s unprecedented. We’ve not seen attacks on free speech on this level in Europe, and that’s why they are extremely important cases, not just for the people of Finland and Paivi Rasanen and the bishop themselves, but for all of Europe. If this is upheld in one jurisdiction, we will no doubt see it in other jurisdictions as well.”

Such “hate speech” laws exist in every European country and Western countries such as Canada and Australia, and descend from Soviet influence. Coleman called them “sleeper laws,” saying that in other countries “they could be used any time just like they are in Finland. People need to mobilize against these laws and overturn them.”

ADF International is providing legal support for the cases and noted the grave dangers to freedom of speech:

“Freedom of speech is one of the cornerstones of democracy. The Finnish Prosecutor General’s decision to bring these charges against Dr. Räsänen creates a culture of fear and censorship. If committed civil servants like Päivi Räsänen are criminally charged for voicing their deeply held beliefs, it creates a chilling effect for everyone’s right to speak freely, ”said Paul Coleman, Executive Director of ADF International and author of “Censored“.

Learn more about the case in the video below:

Parents suing schools over trans agendas

BY THE DAILY CALLER

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/parents-suing-schools-over-trans-agendas/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

  • A Nov. 17 lawsuit filed by two public-interest law firms is just the latest in a series of cases where schools are accused of initiating social gender transitions of children behind the backs of their parents.
  • An attorney involved in the litigation told the Daily Caller News Foundation that the policies are in place in school districts across the country.
  • ‘[T]his sort of thing is metastasizing like a cancer underneath the surface around the country,’ Vernadette Broyles, president and general counsel of the Child and Parent Rights Campaign (CPRC) told the DCNF.

The lawsuit filed Nov. 17 by two public-interest law firms against the Kettle Moraine School District in Wisconsin over the clandestine social transition of a 12-year-old girl marks the latest in a series of cases where school officials allegedly initiated social gender transitions without parental consent.

The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL), one of the public-interest firms suing the Waukesha-area school district, is also involved in litigation against the Madison Metropolitan School District (MMSD). But one attorney involved in the litigation tells the Daily Caller News Foundation that policies and guidelines that are prompting schools to carry out clandestine transitions are in place across the country.

“[T]his sort of thing is metastasizing like a cancer underneath the surface around the country,” Vernadette Broyles, president and general counsel of the Child and Parent Rights Campaign (CPRC), told the Daily Caller News Foundation.

‘Mom, I Had A Meeting Today’

Broyles represents Jeff and January Littlejohn in a suit which alleges that Leon County Schools began helping their daughter transition without their consent after their daughter experienced gender dysphoria during the spring and summer of 2020. Mrs. Littlejohn told the DCNF she emailed her daughter’s math teacher, explaining that they “weren’t affirming at home” but that they “didn’t feel like we could stop our daughter from using a nickname.”

However, weeks later, Mrs. Littlejohn told the DCNF that her daughter made a shocking revelation while being picked up from school, saying, “Mom. I had a meeting today about my name and they asked me which restroom I wanted to use.”

“I immediately was very upset, I was confused. I asked her to elaborate. What are you talking about, I don’t know anything about a meeting. And so I immediately emailed the guidance counselor and I was called back with the assistant principal, which I thought, that’s also odd,” Mrs. Littlejohn told the DCNF. “And they then told me my daughter was now protected by law under a non-discrimination law, and they could not give me any information, because my daughter, who was 13 at the time, had to be the one to authorize my notification or attendance at the meeting,” she went on to say, adding that when she initially called the school, they would not even confirm such a meeting had taken place.

A guide for employees of Leon County Schools in addressing LGBTQ students shared with the DCNF by CPRC includes the question, “A student has exhibited behavior in school leading administrators or teachers to believe the student is LGBTQ+. Should the parents or legal guardians be notified?”

“No. Outing a student, especially to parents, can be very dangerous to the students' health and well-being. Some students are not able to be out at home because their parents are unaccepting of LGBTQ+ people out,” the “LCS Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Gender Nonconforming and Questioning Support Guide” states. “As many as 40% of homeless youth are LGBTQ+, many of whom have been rejected by their families for being LGBTQ+. Outing students to their parents can literally make them homeless.”

After weeks of communications that failed to resolve the situation, the Littlejohns, backed by CPRC, filed suit in federal court on Oct 18. Leon County Schools did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

Screenshot from the “LCS Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Gender Nonconforming and Questioning Support Guide” provided to the DCNF

‘Even Over Her Parents’ Objection’

In Wisconsin, parents faced a similar situation in the Kettle Moraine School District, located near Milwaukee. After the parents told a guidance counselor and the principal at Kettle Moraine Middle School of their daughter’s struggle with gender dysphoria, the principal’s response on Jan. 20 left no room for doubt that their wishes would not be respected, according to legal documents.

The principal told them “when their daughter returned to school, school staff would refer to her using whatever name and pronouns she wanted while at school, even over her parents’ objection,” according to a complaint filed by WILL and the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).

“[Her parents] had no choice but to withdraw her from school, which they did immediately and kept her out of school for a few weeks. And during that time, she changed her mind. She realized her parents were right to take that cautious approach, and that she’d actually been confused,” WILL’s Luke Berg told the DCNF in an interview. The daughter now attends another school district.

The Kettle Moraine School District did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

Screenshot of the complaint in B.F. v. Kettle Moraine School District

‘Not Adopted In A Transparent Manner’

WILL is also involved in a lawsuit against the MMSD over a similar policy, which it filed in February 2020, representing eight families, two of which involve single mothers.

“The District’s Policy was not adopted in a transparent manner with a full opportunity for all parents to provide feedback and with a public vote by the School Board,” the complaint said. “Instead, the Policy was developed internally within the Madison School District staff working with preferred groups that agreed with the direction being pursued by the staff.”

Berg told the DCNF that one of the preliminary motions, in this case, has already reached the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which is being asked to decide if the plaintiffs can remain anonymous. It is also being asked to rule on a preliminary injunction against the Madison Municipal School District.

“The trial court said the policy is enjoined to the extent that it requires staff or allows staff to deceive parents or to lie to parents if they ask about what’s happening at school,” Berg explained to the DCNF. “So that injunction is still in place, so parents can affirmatively ask their school district, ‘Hey what name and pronouns are you calling my child at school?’ and the staff has to answer truthfully.”

Tim LeMonds, the executive director for communications and public affairs for MMSD, told the DCNF he was “not able to provide comment on pending litigation.”

Screenshot from complaint in Doe v. Madison Metropolitan School District

‘Allowed To Keep Parents Out Of The Loop’

Cases alleging clandestine transitions are cropping up elsewhere across the country. In Montgomery County, Maryland, parents are suing their school district over a policy like those in Florida and Wisconsin.

“The judge is busy working on his opinion, I suppose, for six months or more now,” Rick Claybrook, an attorney working with the National Legal Foundation on the case, told the DCNF.

Claybrook told the DCNF that the suit, while filed in a Maryland state court, has been moved to a federal court over some of the issues raised.

“We’re not challenging the entire policy, but we’re challenging those parts of the policy that say you are allowed to keep parents out of the loop,” he explained.

A spokesman for Montgomery County Public Schools asked the DCNF for additional details about the litigation but did not provide comment as of this writing.

Screenshot of the complaint filed in Parents v. Montgomery County Board of Education

Fired For Telling Parents

A situation in Ludlow, Massachusetts shows just how serious some school districts are about keeping information from parents, according to a fired teacher’s lawyer.

Bonnie Manchester, a social studies teacher at Paul R. Baird Middle School, informed the parents of two students who had begun to socially transition at school. Manchester had done so at the request of one of the students, and the parents had been grateful for being told, according to her attorney, Frank McNamara.

However, in an April 16 letter, Principal Stacy Monette informed Manchester of her intent to terminate her employment.

“You shared sensitive confidential information about a student’s expressed gender identity,” Monette wrote, adding, “If you believed that it was necessary to inform the parents, the appropriate means to express your belief would have been through the so-called Mariners team and/or Guidance Counselor.”

“Thanks to the actions of Ms. Manchester, a child’s life may have been saved,” McNamara wrote in a May 17 letter to the district.

Two days later, Monette wrote to Manchester, announcing the decision to fire her.

“I have decided to terminate your employment with the Ludlow Public Schools due to conduct unbecoming of a teacher,” the May 19 termination letter said, going on to claim that by telling the parents, Manchester showed “a complete lack of concern for the student’s well-being.”

“You violated state law and regulations regard student records/privacy as well as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) by releasing student information to individuals who did not have the right to view the information,” Monette added.

McNamara told the DCNF he intends to file a civil complaint regarding the termination of Manchester. A Lowell Public Schools respond to the DCNF’s request for comment with a terse “No comment.”

The lawyers who filed the lawsuits against the school districts told the DCNF more legal action could be forthcoming.

“We’re speaking for parents around the country,” Broyles told the DCNF. “We’re actively working with parents in another state and considering yet another.”

Breaking: U.S. District Judge STRIKES DOWN Biden’s vax mandate for federal contractors

BY LANCE D. JOHNSON

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-12-02-us-district-judge-strikes-down-bidens-vax-mandate-federal-contractors.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) U.S. District Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove struck down Biden’s intrusive covid-19 vaccine mandate that threatened the body autonomy rights of individuals who work as federal contractors. On September 9, 2021, Joe Biden signed an executive order forcing all federal contractors to ensure that their workers are “fully vaccinated” with experimental covid-19 jabs. If a contractor did not comply with the vaccine order by December 8, 2021, the Biden regime threatened to cut them off, discontinuing all business relations with the contractor and severing any future opportunities with them. Workers were scheduled to be terminated en masse, but now they are standing on legal high ground, as Biden’s vaccine mandates crumble all around him.

Judge restores equal opportunity, body autonomy rights for all federal contractors and their employees

Judge Tatenhove ruled that the Biden administration lacks the legal authority to force people to get vaccinated in order to contract with the federal government and freely engage in commerce. Biden’s vaccine mandate violates the medical privacy rights of all individuals involved while ignoring all evidence of natural immunity in the population and the growing evidence of vaccine failure. (There is no scientific evidence that covid vaccines have saved a single life.)

For now, the preliminary injunction applies to three states — Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee. If the Constitution is enforced, then the ruling will soon be made permanent, restoring equal opportunity for all federal contractors across the United States. A preliminary injunction has already been filed against the Biden regime’s vaccine mandate targeting private businesses and health care workers. Every person who is currently being pressured to take the jabs must continue to stand firm in their faith and bodily integrity because these communists will continue to lose in the courts.

“The question presented here is narrow. Can the president use congressionally delegated authority to manage the federal procurement of goods and services to impose vaccines on the employees of federal contractors and subcontractors? In all likelihood, the answer to that question is no,” Judge Tatenhove affirmed in a 29-page order. It should be noted that Judge Tatenhove pandered to the defendants and argued that the vaccines “are effective” and that governments “in some circumstances, can require citizens to obtain vaccines.”

It doesn’t take a law professor to understand that vaccine mandates are unconstitutional and violate natural law

Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost stated, “This is not about vaccines, it’s about the mandates. The judge’s opinion clearly states that and it has been our position all along that the president cannot impose these mandates on the people.”

Biden’s lawyers argued that the federal government does have authority to control the private medical decisions of everyone who does businesses with the government because the President can pursue “efficient and economic” procurement under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act.

Judge Tatenhove ruled in favor of the states and the people, citing the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution. He also ruled against Biden’s legal justification, saying that Biden failed to produce a single instance where the Services Act was used “to promulgate such a wide and sweeping public health regulation as mandatory vaccination for all federal contractors and subcontractors.”

The states that fought the vaccine mandate found it to be not only illegal and unconstitutional but also very burdensome to the labor force and the supply chain, with negative economic impacts to States and private citizens. The attorneys general argued that there are people with natural immunity, too, and the current risks of COVID-19 are not being considered with the biased, discriminatory vaccine mandate.

With the definition of “fully vaccinated” changing every six months — contractors, healthcare workers, and private companies across the United States would become permanently enslaved to a fascist medical dictatorship if the mandate is allowed to stand. Not only would they be subjugated into forever compliance, but they would also have to become a forever medical police force, threatening people to do things to their body under duress, against their own will. A vaccine mandate uses discrimination, segregation, and bribery to violate an individual’s privacy, faith, conscientious beliefs, health, and body autonomy. If a vaccine mandate is allowed to persist through any form of legal precedent, a dangerous threshold will have been breached, and it will take determined, righteous acts of courage to restore the Constitutional order and the respect for natural law. But for now, the rule of law is prevailing, and the communists are taking serious blows from the patriots who are fighting to protect the country.

Sources include:

TheEpochTimes.com

NaturalNews.com

DocumentCloud.org

RT USA News: New BLM fundraiser asks for $5 million FOR DARRELL BROOKS’ BAIL, after previous one is taken down

New BLM fundraiser asks for $5 million after previous one is taken down

SEE: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/exclusive-louisville-riot-u-haul-driver-arrested-according-leaked-internal-documents/

SEE: https://www.rt.com/usa/541567-gofundme-darrell-brooks-bail/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

28 Nov, 2021 16:43 / Updated 3 days ago
Get short URL
New BLM fundraiser asks for $5 million after previous one is taken down
Darrell Brooks appears in Waukesha County Court in Waukesha, Wisconsin ©  Mark Hoffman/Pool via REUTERS
A Milwaukee Black Lives Matter GoFundMe page claims to be raising $5 million for a nonprofit bail organization. It comes days after GoFundMe shut down a BLM fundraiser for Darrell Brooks, the suspect in a Waukesha car attack.
READ MORE

BLM’s Christmas message? ‘Boycott white businesses’BLM’s Christmas message? ‘Boycott white businesses’

A previous GoFundMe page that was raising funds specifically for Brooks’ bail was taken down for violating the platform’s terms of service. The new fundraising page, set up two days ago, is trying to raise the exact same amount, but is much more generic in its language and does not mention Brooks.

The page, started by Holly Zoller, says it’s raising money for the Bail Project, a nonprofit organization that works to raise funds for people’s bails. The group bailed out numerous people arrested last year during Black Lives Matter protests.

Zoller says she is raising money to “help make an impact,” though she does not say where the money will go after it is given to the Bail Project.

Brooks is accused of driving a vehicle into a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin, injuring dozens and killing six. At the time, he was out on bail of just $1,000. The organizer of the previous GoFundMe page described Brooks, a convicted sex offender, as “our dear friend” and insinuated that Brooks’ arrest was a result of systematic racism.

While the new project doesn’t specify that it will help Brooks, many have accused the page of using a loophole in the system to continue violating the platform’s terms of service, which prevent fundraising for someone accused of violent crimes.

Zoller is listed on the Bail Project’s website as a ‘bail disrupter’ in Louisville, Kentucky. A ‘bail disrupter’ is described by the group as “community members” dedicated to “racial and economic justice.” Her activism in the past included a viral video showing a U-Haul truck, reportedly rented by her, that handed out supplies, such as shields.

Update. RT has received an email signed by The Bail Project press manager Joseph Pate, who said his charity has no connection to the fundraiser campaign and was not raising funds for Darrell Brooks. The GoFundMe page has since been deleted.

_____________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO: https://trutelli.com/2020/09/24/like-clock-work-a-u-haul-filled-with-signs-shields-and-weapons-are-passed-out-to-louisville-rioters/

Kamala Stopped FBI From Monitoring Black Supremacists Like Waukesha Killer

The Waukesha killer’s allies are sitting in the White House.

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/kamala-stopped-fbi-monitoring-black-supremacists-daniel-greenfield/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Daniel Greenfield is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center specializing in investigative reporting on the Left and Islamic terrorism.

Two years ago, Senator Kamala Harris, along with Senator Cory Booker and six other Democrat Senate members, attacked the Justice Department for monitoring black supremacists. The politicians signed a letter falsely claiming that black identity extremists was “a fabricated term based on a faulty assessment of a small number of isolated incidents”.

And they argued that monitoring black racists was racist.

When Kamala Harris was running for president, the privileged daughter of wealthy foreign students falsely claimed that she faced segregation in Berkeley, California.

“That little girl was me,” she famously declared.

In Waukesha, Jackson Sparks, an 8-year-old boy, was killed by the black supremacist terrorist whom Kamala Harris had protected.

That little boy’s blood is on her hands.

Kamala had joined a crusade by Senator Cory Booker to pressure the FBI to eliminate the black identity extremists category and stop tracking terror attacks by black supremacists.

Later that same year, two devotees of the Black Hebrew Israelite hate group, a racist and antisemitic cult, opened fire at a Kosher market in Jersey City. The black supremacist terror attack killed the store owner, an employee, and a customer.

An unexploded bomb in their van could have killed people a distance of five football fields away.

Even though the terrorist attack happened in Senator Booker’s state, he refused to acknowledge that the black supremacist hate he had protected was responsible.

Booker had previously berated FBI Director Christopher Wray for monitoring black racists.

“That language you said, both ends of the spectrum, the murders at synagogues, the murders we've seen motivated,” he ranted. “You said both ends of the spectrum as if there actually is a movement of black identity extremism: it's almost creating this reality.”

Another Black Hebrew Israelite terrorist attacker went on to attack a Monsey synagogue during Chanukah, slashing worshipers with a machete, wounding 4, and killing one.

A 72-year-old Chassidic Jew who had been born in Hungary after the Holocaust tried to fight him off with his cane. The black supremacist killer smashed in his skull with a machete.

A Green Party candidate and "respected civil rights attorney" fought for the racist killer who got off, despite having googled "Why did Hitler hate the Jews" and "New York City Increases Police Presence in Jewish Neighborhoods After Possible Anti-Semitic Attacks. Here's What To Know."

The Black Hebrew Israelite cult’s "Why did Hitler hate the Jews" meme reappeared again in the internet history of another black supremacist killer.

Darrell Brooks, who drove his car into the Waukesha Christmas Parade, killing 6 people, including an 8-year-old boy, had previously posted a variation of the same Black Hebrew Israelite meme claiming that Hitler was killing Jews to support the black supremacists.

While Kamala and Booker intimidated the Justice Department and law enforcement officials, the media had celebrated the vile racists. The New York Times described the Black Hebrew Israelites as “sidewalk ministers” who practice “tough love” while dismissing their racist rants as “blunt and sometimes offensive language.”

Typical of this “tough love” and “blunt” language was declaring, "The Holocaust is a damn joke! Heil Hitler!" and  “The Messiah, who is a black man, is going to kill you”.

The media’s laborious whitewashing of the Black Hebrew Israelite hate cult began when it falsely accused Covington Catholic students in D.C. for a pro-life rally of racism when they were assailed by racial slurs from members of the BHI hate group. The Washington Post, which would end up settling a lawsuit over its false reporting, claimed that "Israelite street preaching in parts of D.C., Philadelphia and New York is commonplace, a familiar if odd accent to city life."

According to the Bezos paper, “Heil Hitler” adds a ”familiar if odd accent to city life”.

Rep. Ilhan Omar, who could never resist antisemites and racists, falsely claimed that the slandered students were “taunting 5 Black men”.

There is a direct line from the New York Times and the Washington Post’s lies about the Black Hebrew Israelites, the suppression of FBI efforts to track black supremacist terrorists, to the rising tide of BHI violence including a machete attack on a random white family last year.

Tragedy was averted in North Carolina when the Black Hebrew Israelite attacker, who had been lying in wait behind the house, grappled with the husband while the wife returned to the house, got a gun, and opened fire, forcing the would-be killer to run for his life.

What began with the media’s lies about Covington escalated to growing acts of terrorism until it reached its pinnacle with the Waukesha Christmas Parade massacre by a racist killer who had cited the hateful teachings of the black supremacist Black Hebrew Israelite movement.

Where was the FBI?

Senate Democrats had forbidden the FBI from monitoring black supremacist terror groups. And the FBI had put political correctness over public safety by bowing to their racial dictates.

Booker had grilled FBI Director Christopher Wray over efforts to prevent black supremacist terror. “So, you no longer use the term Black Identity Extremism,” he had gloated. “That's great news.”

Great news for Booker’s black nationalism meant mass death for Jews and Christians.

“So nobody is being investigated or surveilled under black identity extremism?” Booker had demanded.

No one was. And that’s why the Jersey City Kosher supermarket massacre and the Waukesha Christmas massacre happened with no interference from the FBI. After the hearing, Booker issued a press release urging, “Director Wray to issue updated guidance notifying law enforcement agencies about the elimination of this misleading designation.”

Black supremacism, this “misleading designation” which Democrats claim doesn’t exist, keeps killing people, police officers in Dallas, Jews in New Jersey, and Christians in Waukesha.

When Kamala Harris joined Booker’s crusade to protect black supremacists from the FBI, she helped pave the way for the brutal killings carried out by these racist killers and terrorists.

Democrats frequently accused President Trump of protecting white supremacists. Despite these false claims, the DOJ and FBI never stopped tracking or investigating white racist terrorists.

That was not true of black supremacist terrorists.

Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, and other Democrats are on record as suppressing FBI investigations of the kinds of black supremacist hate that led to the Waukesha massacre.

Even now the same media that began by lying about Black Hebrew Israelite hate when smearing the Covington Catholic students is back to lying about the killer in Waukesha.

The lies must end.

Republicans must have the guts to name the hateful black supremacist ideology behind the racist terrorist killings across the country and to denounce Kamala Harris and Democrats for protecting their racist allies. Like Islamic terrorism, black nationalist terrorism happens because law enforcement is prevented from doing its job by the Democrat political allies of the terrorists.

Waukesha was not an “incident”. It was a massacre. It was not committed by an “SUV”, but by a racist black supremacist terrorist. Its accomplices are sitting in the White House right now.

Biden and Kamala issued statements on the Arbery verdict. Biden had previously issued a statement condemning the Rittenhouse verdict. Neither of them has issued statements about the massacre of six Americans by a racist terrorist. Democrats have adopted the critical race theory ideology which, like the racist killer, causes them to believe white people aren’t human.

That’s what Black Lives Matter means. Black lives matter. No one else’s lives matter.

Judge Halts Vax Mandate for Healthcare Workers in 10 States

BY VERONIKA KYRYLENKO

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/judge-halts-vax-mandate-for-healthcare-workers-in-10-states/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A federal judge in Missouri has halted President Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate for healthcare workers at the Medicare- and Medicaid-affiliated facilities in 10 states, saying that it would require approval from the U.S. Congress, which was never received. In addition to that, the government violated the legal procedure when issuing the rule that would likely cause the states “irreparable harm.”

U.S. District Court Judge Matthew Schelp issued a preliminary injunction on Monday, blocking the Interim Final Rule issued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) stating that nearly all workers employed by healthcare facilities must have received at least a first dose of the COVID vaccine by December 6 or face losing their jobs.

Judge Schelp argued that the plaintiffs, namely, the states of Missouri, Nebraska, Arkansas, Kansas, Iowa, Wyoming, Alaska, South Dakota, North Dakota, and New Hampshire are “likely to succeed in their argument that Congress has not provided CMS the authority to enact the regulation at issue here.” He wrote,

“[A]n agency literally has no power to act, let alone pre-empt the validly enacted legislation of a sovereign State, unless and until Congress confers power upon it.”… While the Court agrees Congress has authorized the Secretary of Health and Human Services general authority to enact regulations for the “administration” of Medicare and Medicaid and the “health and safety” of recipients, the nature and breadth of the CMS mandate requires clear authorization from Congress — and Congress has provided none.

The judge further argued that the CMS violated so-called notice and comment requirements, which also serves as grounds for invalidating the rule.

On that matter, the court documents say that CMS’s own delay undermines its “emergency” justification for bypassing notice and comment requirements:

The CMS mandate was announced nearly two months before the agency released it, and the mandate itself prominently features yet another one-month delay…. [S]ince the onset of COVID, CMS has issued five IFC mandates, such as the one here…. One could query how an “emergency” could prompt such a slow response; such delay hardly suggests a situation so dire that CMS may dispense with notice and comment requirements.

Second, CMS failed to meet its “good cause” burden, which is a serious violation of legal procedure, “especially in light of the unprecedented, controversial, and health-related nature of the mandate.”

Further, the judge concluded the plaintiffs are likely to succeed in establishing that the mandate is “arbitrary or capricious” for several reasons:
  • CMS lacks evidence showing that vaccination status has a direct impact on spreading COVID in the mandate’s covered healthcare facilities — the fact which the agency confirmed itself.
  • CMS improperly rejected alternatives to the mandate, such as regular testing, nor did it exclude workers with the natural immunity from the rule.
  • The mandate is way too broad in its scope, which renders it arbitrary.
  • CMS failed to adequately explain its contradiction to its long-standing practice of encouraging rather than forcing vaccination of healthcare workers. When an agency departs from its regular policy, it must show “good reasons for the new policy,” which CMS failed to do. The agency confirmed that the vaccines’ effectiveness to prevent disease transmission by those vaccinated is not currently known.
  • CMS failed to consider or properly weigh the necessary reliance interests of the medical facilities, healthcare workers, and patients. If it did, it would see the “evidence showing that the mandate threatens devastating consequences to healthcare providers, staff, and patients throughout the nation,” per the ruling.

If the mandate is not halted, the judge said the plaintiffs will likely suffer irreparable harm: Plaintiffs would be harmed because they could not enforce their duly enacted laws and because the likely harm of the mandate “would be harm in the colloquial sense — pain, suffering, distress,” Schelp wrote.

Schelp agreed with the states that the mandate would lead to staffing shortages in the industry, which, in turn, would have devastating consequences for public health, especially in rural areas. In some cases, “the loss of staffing in many instances will result in no care at all, as some facilities will be forced to close altogether.”

Per the order,

No one questions that protecting patients and health care workers from contracting COVID is a laudable objective. But the court cannot, in good faith, allow CMS to enact an unprecedented mandate that lacks a “rational connection between the facts found and the choice made.”

Halting the CMS mandate is in the public interest, concluded Schelp, saying that

the mandate will have a crippling effect on a significant number of healthcare facilities in Plaintiffs’ states, especially in rural areas, create a critical shortage of services … and jeopardize the lives of numerous vulnerable citizens.

The 10 states, including one led by a Democratic governor, filed a lawsuit against President Joe Biden and key administration officials on November 11, which was covered by The New American here.

The mandate was developed by the CMS and HHS in lieu of President Biden’s order issued September 9. The interim rule was released nearly two months later, on November 5. 

“We’re going to protect vaccinated workers from unvaccinated coworkers,” Biden said when announcing his plans of sweeping mandates for the federal workers and contractors, large employers, and medical workers at the Medicare- and Medicaid-affiliated facilities.

Countering Overreach Banner728

Tomi Lahren blasts students who want Rittenhouse banned from college

The Fox Nation host reacts to student protests against Kyle Rittenhouse at Arizona State University, rumors that Kamala Harris and Pete Buttigieg may run for president and a new migrant caravan heading to the U.S.

Ohio jury finds Walmart, Walgreens and CVS all guilty of fueling opioid epidemic

Image: Ohio jury finds Walmart, Walgreens and CVS all guilty of fueling opioid epidemic

The counties blamed pharmacies operated by CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart for not stopping the flood of pills that caused hundreds of overdose deaths and cost each of the two counties about $1 billion, their attorney said.

BY ETHAN HUFF

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-11-29-jury-walmart-walgreens-cvs-guilty-opioid-epidemic.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) A federal jury in Cleveland has found CVS, Walgreens, and Walmart all guilty of contributing to the opioid epidemic, which hit particularly hard in some areas of Ohio.

Attorneys for Lake and Trumbull counties in northeastern Ohio claimed that the three pharmacy chains failed to stop the deadly pain pills from flooding into the two counties. They also alleged that the three chains failed to stop false opioid prescriptions from being filled.

“The counties argued that by enabling the opioid crisis the pharmacy companies had created a public nuisance costing them each about $1 billion in law-enforcement, social-services, and court expenses,” reported The Wall Street Journal.

In their rebuttals, the three companies claim that they tried to stop the pills from being illegally flooded, as well as followed all procedures required by both state and federal regulators.

They further claim that others are to blame for the opioid crisis and that Lake and Trumbull counties failed to show that pharmacies played a “major role” in the epidemic.

“The verdict, delivered after a six-week trial, came in a so-called bellwether case that attorneys elsewhere have watched closely,” the Journal further reported. (RELATED: Johnson & Johnson stopped manufacturing opioids entirely following a $230 million settlement.)

“Similar cases across the country continue to play out against pharmaceutical manufacturers and distributors, but Tuesday’s verdict was the first against deep-pocketed pharmacy chains.”

Injured Americans need to keep suing the legal drug cartels for destroying the health of the country

While bellwether cases typically do not carry precedential weight, lawyers do tend to rely on them when handling similar cases. They are said to be “guideposts for settlement talks.”

The Ohio ruling follows several others in both Oklahoma and California, which recently issued judgments against plaintiffs for public nuisance claims.

“The public-nuisance theory, in general, is pretty novel and untested as it applies to the sale of controlled substances,” said Elizabeth Burch, a University of Georgia law professor.

“We’re so early in the overall distribution that we don’t know whether these are outliers or trendsetters.”

In a joint statement, lawyers for the plaintiffs said that this is a major victory in holding the pharmaceutical industry, including pharmacy distributors of pharmaceuticals, responsible for their corrupt behavior.

“For decades, pharmacy chains have watched as the pills flowing out of their doors cause harm and failed to take action as required by law,” that statement reads.

“Instead, these companies responded by opening up more locations, flooding communities with pills, and facilitating the flow of opioids into an illegal, secondary market.”

All three companies say they are planning to appeal the verdict, arguing that Ohio’s public-nuisance laws were incorrectly applied in this case.

A spokesman for CVS Health Corp. indicated that the company is very unhappy with the verdict, as it is not used to being held accountable for much of anything as a participator in the legal drug cartel racket.

“Pharmacists fill legal prescriptions written by DEA-licensed doctors who prescribe legal, FDA-approved substances to treat actual patients in need,” this person said in a statement.

Walmart issued a statement alleging that plaintiffs are simply trying to pull money out of “deep pockets” while ignoring what the company claims are the real causes of the opioid crisis: pill mill doctors, regulators “asleep at the switch,” and “illegal drugs.”

U.S. District Judge Dan Polster, who oversaw the trial, will now have to determine how much the three companies must pay to deal with the public nuisance that was created in Lake and Trumbull counties.

Plaintiffs say they are seeking damages of $1.1 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively, for the two counties.

More of the latest news about Big Pharma and the opioid epidemic can be found at Corruption.news.

Sources for this article include:

Archive.fo

NaturalNews.com

Right To Dissent & The Right To Bear Arms: Bulwarks Against Tyranny

BY ROGER KATZ

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/11/right-to-dissent-the-right-to-bear-arms-bulwarks-against-tyranny/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

New York – -(AmmoLand.com)- Americans remain at the moment privileged to celebrate Thanksgiving, Christmas, Independence Day, Labor Day, and other Holidays. But, for how much longer.

A year ago July, Independence day we wrote of the dire threats to our Nation, coming from within.

“With Independence Day only days away, this Country can hardly be in a celebratory spirit, as the very words, ‘nationalism’ and ‘patriotism’ are treated like obscenities.

We witness two-legged predators laying waste the Land, destroying property, intimidating innocent Americans, causing bedlam and mayhem. The police, under fire, are ordered to stand down. Government cowers. Law and Order breaks down everywhere. The seditious Press and Radical Left members of Congress, along with Radical Left State Governors and City Mayors give their blessing to the perpetrators of this violence.”

See also our sister article, posted a few days earlier.

Has anything changed, almost seventeen months later? Yes, the threat to our Nation has only grown direr.

The Trotting Horse of American Marxism and Neoliberal Globalism is now running at full gallop. It is charging directly toward a formidable defense to be sure—the Bill of Rights. But it is determined to break through, destroying the Constitution of the United States, annihilating a free Republic, subjugating a free and sovereign people.

Evidence for this is everywhere, including, inter alia:

  • Government acquiescence to violent rioting, and looting in the Nation’s cities.
  • A systematic plan to indoctrinate the Nation’s youth with “Critical Race Theory”.
  • Constraints on the exercise of Free Speech/Intolerance toward Dissent.
  • Violations of Due Process and Equal Protection Guarantees.
  • Violations of the Right Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures. [Red Flag Laws]
  • Unlawful Government orders and mandates, such as mandatory COVID Vaccinations.
  • Failure of Government to Enforce the Nation’s Immigration Laws.
  • Debilitation of the Military: Purging of the Ranks, Politicization of Upper Echelons, Creating Dissension, and Destroying morale.
  • Consolidation of Governmental power in a single Branch.
  • Expanding Federal Government power over the people and the States.
  • Emasculation of State and Community Police Forces.
  • Politicization and Corruption of Executive Branch Departments.
  • Deliberate Destruction of the Nation’s Economy.
  • Collusion between the Government and the Press to Distort News and to indoctrinate the public. [Fake News Media]
  • The defacing, destroying, and removing of national monuments.
  • Denigration of the American Flag and other national emblems.
  • Belittlement of the notion of “Citizen of the United States”.
  • Ennoblement of Marxist Lawbreakers and Illegal Aliens.

And most ominously,

  • Concerted Attacks on Civilian Possession of firearms and of the inherent, natural Right of Armed Self-defense.

The Era Of “Hybrid Warfare”

The Marxist & Neoliberal Globalist [deep state] forces that dare to crush both the institutions of our Nation and the spirit of our people are engaging in a new, sophisticated multilayered stratagem. It has a name. It is called, “Hybrid Warfare.” This is an expression that entered the political and military lexicon in 2008.

“In the twenty-first century, wars are not declared or waged conventionally; instead, conflicts are instigated by clandestine agents using military, non-military, media, cyber tools, information operations, NGOs, nonstate actors, intelligence agencies, economic tools, propaganda, ambiguity, terrorism, and insurgency or rebel movements. In hybrid warfare, the lines between peacetime and wartime and between combatants and civilians are blurred. Further, systemic aggression is imposed on the targeted state using gray zones, nonlinear warfare, unrestricted warfare, unconventional warfare, and color revolutions to avoid attribution and possible retribution against the aggressor.

The threat posed by hybrid warfare is real. hybrid warfare employs a wide array of power tools, including: political, economic, military, asymmetric, civil. Additionally, it includes informational tools such as: diplomacy, terrorism, proxies, and economic attacks to persuade populations or to divide societies. hybrid warfare targets the vulnerabilities of a society and system while deliberately exploiting ambiguity to avoid detection. It is usually detected only when it is fully functional and capable of inflicting harm. Some researchers believe that lawfare (in which law is used as a tool of aggression) is also a branch of hybrid warfare.”

John J. McCuen, in his 2008 paper ‘Hybrid Wars,’ describes hybrid warfare as ‘spectrum wars with both physical and conceptual dimensions: the former, a struggle against an armed enemy and the latter, a wider struggle for control and support of the combat zone’s indigenous population, the support of the home fronts of the intervening nations, and the support of the international community.’

McCuen sees hybrid warfare as using a variety of tools to persuade the domestic population of a targeted state.” ~The Rise Of Hybrid Warfare, 10 Notre Dame J. Int’l & Comp. L. 173 (2020), by Waseem Ahmad Qureshi, Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan.

Marxists and Neoliberal Globalists, are using hybrid warfare against Americans.

Be cognizant of it: what it is; how and where it is employed against our Nation and its people; and its impact on the Nation and on the people. Its effects are both subtle and lucid.

The application of hybrid warfare is subtle where it attacks the mind, psyche, and spirit of the American people. It is lucid where it attacks the tangible infrastructure of our towns and cities along with the intangible fundamental institutions of the Country, the very fabric of our society. These fundamental institutions include education; health; law; business and finance; and family and religion.

It is all under attack.

But the most insidious attack against the American citizen is the subtle—the attack on the psyche of the American people.

The Marxists and Neoliberal Globalists have attacked the very core of the American psyche in its assault on natural law rights: The most fundamental Natural Law Right—the Right of Self-defense—includes the Reciprocal Natural Law Responsibility of Self-defense.

Armed Self-defense provides the best means available to protect one’s physical being and that of one’s family.

The idea of “Self-defense,” generally, and “Armed Self-defense, especially, embody the concept of the sanctity and inviolability of Self.

The Right of Free Speech also goes to the sanctity of one’s Selfhood. The Right of Dissent is intrinsic to Selfhood.

The unalienable, immutable, illimitable right of the individual to be individual means Government cannot lawfully impinge upon or encroach on one’s Selfhood.

The sanctity and inviolability of Self are at the core of what it means to be an American. The framework of our Constitution is grounded on that sacred, inviolate, Truth. It is the single source of our Nation’s power and success.

The Marxists and Neoliberal Globalists know this to be so, and they are chiseling away at all of it. They intend to destroy the Soul of the American citizen. To effectuate this it is necessary to destroy the exercise of armed self-defense and exercise of free expression.

If the Marxists and Neoliberal Globalists defeat the exercise of armed self-defense and the exercise of free expression, they have succeeded to defeat the two salient avenues of resistance to their iron will.

For, if one is prevented from exercising one’s freedom of speech—the freedom to dissent, the freedom to exercise independence of thought—one’s mind, spirit, and soul is damaged.

And, if one is prevented from exercising his freedom to bear arms—one’s right of defense against a predatory beast, predatory man, or predatory government—then the safety and well-being of one’s physical Self are imperiled.

The two most basic rights—the right of self-protection and independence of thought—go together.

To lose the one is to lose the other.

Autonomy of Selfhood is impossible where the individual is helpless—physically, psychically, mentally, intellectually, spiritually.

The Marxists and Neoliberal Globalists intend to cripple mind, spirit, and soul, and they are doing this through the propagation of disinformation, misinformation, and psychological conditioning.

Control of government and the Press and social media provide them with powerful mechanisms to accomplish this.

Americans must do what is necessary to see that these ruthless, jealous, rapacious forces do not succeed.

About The Arbalest Quarrel:

Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel’ website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.

For more information, visit: www.arbalestquarrel.com.

Arbalest Quarrel

Waukesha Massacre, Courtesy of Your Friendly Neighborhood Democrats

Waukesha Massacre, Courtesy of Your Friendly Neighborhood Democrats

ABOVE: John Chisholm

BY SELWYN DUKE

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/waukesha-massacre-courtesy-of-your-friendly-neighborhood-democrats/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

What do you do with someone who has a rap sheet going back more than a generation, listing crimes such as drug possession, sex offenses, strangulation and suffocation, illegal firearm possession, resisting arrest, battery, and beating up and then running over the mother of one of his children?

If you say, release the person on a $1,000 bond to continue his predation, congratulations — you qualify to be Milwaukee County district attorney.

For this is precisely what the actual Milwaukee County district attorney, John Chisholm, did via his policies with respect to Darrell Brooks. Brooks is the man who drove his SUV into Waukesha, Wisconsin’s Christmas parade on Sunday, killing six people and injuring more than 60.

It was just last week that Brooks was arrested for using a vehicle to run down his baby momma “and charged with five counts — one of which was bail jumping,” writes commentator Andrea Widburg. “With his record, one would think his bail would be high — or maybe, like those January 6 protesters rotting in jail without bail on charges of trespassing and ‘parading,’ Brooks would be denied bail entirely.” But not with Chisholm in charge, a man whose office was at least partially bought with left-wing billionaire George Soros’s money.

After all, aside “from inflammatory tweets about January 6 in which he calls for fire and brimstone to rain down on the protesters — statements he was not obligated to make sitting in his little corner of Wisconsin — Chisholm has repeatedly made clear that he believes that his obligation as the prosecutor isn’t to enforce the law but is, instead, to protect wrongdoers from law enforcement, all in the name of equity and social justice,” Widburg also informs. She then presents a couple of relevant tweets (below):

Speaking of “objective data” is odd given that leftists have of late written off “objectivity” as reflecting white supremacy. But truly notable about Chisholm’s comments is the hang-up with race and ethnicity and the notion of “proportional outcomes.”

It’s not clear what he means by the latter. But if it’s that different perpetrators shouldn’t be punished differently for the “same crimes,” note that different perpetrators are called different perpetrators because they’re different. In other words, they may not always share the sameness of circumstances and background. But Chisholm could also by “proportional outcomes” be referring to ensuring that blacks and Hispanics aren’t subject to greater incarceration than whites are.

This is, frankly, a major driver behind the larger prison-abolition movement, epitomized by the endorsement last year by Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) of a bill that would eliminate federal prisons over the course of 10 years. (In a recent interview, Tlaib didn’t appear to have any grasp of the details and of how freeing child sex traffickers and other miscreants wouldn’t be dangerous for society. But, hey, who needs details? Après moi, le deluge!)

But those who care about details, and know history, understand that this has been tried before. In the 1960s and ‘70s there also was a movement to reduce incarceration — i.e., punishment — in favor of “rehabilitation.” The justification back then wasn’t explicitly racial, but rather tended to be class-oriented: “‘Underprivileged’ [poor] people may be more criminally inclined, but they’re victims of their environment” was the thinking.

But the result was the same as we’re experiencing now with leftist prosecutors’ freeing of criminals: Crime exploded.

That is until we started exploding the prison population by locking people up in the ‘90s. (What a shock: Fewer criminals on the street=less crime!)

Of course, though, to the more childish, “History started with me!” leftists supporting the current slap-on-the-wrist movement, it seems like some novel idea. And thus did G.K. Chesterton once observe, “Nine out of ten of what we call new ideas are simply old mistakes.”

But if Chisholm is trying to achieve equal racial outcomes (“equity”) in punishment, this idea, too, is no longer new. Among other things, Barack Obama pressured schools more than a decade ago to punish students based on racial quota. Yet as Professor Thomas Sowell pointed out regarding such unless you believe that a black boy couldn’t possibly be more likely to misbehave in school than an Asian-descent girl, what’s the point?

And, actually, this brings us to the next point: Those trumpeting racial proportionality in criminal justice aren’t at all sincere. Consider: Do these “reformers” ever complain about whites having a far greater incarceration rate than Asian-descent Americans? On the contrary, they often hide this fact.

The National Institute of Justice, for example, provides its “Figure 2. U.S. Incarceration Rates by Race and Sex,” but doesn’t present Asian-descent Americans at all. It does provide Hispanics’ rate, however, even though “Hispanic” isn’t even a race (it’s an ethnicity). The same is true for this Sentencing Project page.

Why the obfuscation? Well, it’s hard blaming racial incarceration disparities on “systemic racism” and “white privilege” if people know that Asians have more “white privilege” than whites do.

Not hidden because no one even thinks to mention it, is that females apparently have more “male privilege” than males do. After all, men have a far higher incarceration rate.

Such inconvenient facts point to the reality: Generally speaking, cops and judges aren’t just randomly yanking people off the street and locking them up based on prejudice (except, oh, when at issue are innocent white teens who shoot rioting miscreants in self-defense). Some groups really do commit more crimes than other groups. Go figure.

As for Chisholm, whatever the method to his madness, he knew his woke schemes would get people killed — he admitted as much in a 2007 interview. “Is there going to be an individual I divert, or I put into a treatment program, who’s going to go out and kill somebody?” he asked rhetorically. “You bet — guaranteed.”

So, perhaps, the Waukesha massacre has made him an honest man. For, unlike most leftist politicians, his next campaign slogan can now be, “Predictions vindicated — promises kept.”

Some States Making JPMorgan Chase Pay for Anti-Gun Discrimination

BY DAVID CODREA

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/11/some-states-making-jpmorgan-chase-pay-for-anti-gun-discrimination/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Despite the Biden administration’s statements to the contrary, Americans are still buying more guns than ever. IMG iStock-1189937492

U.S.A. – -(Ammoland.com)- “JPMorgan Chase & Co. was removed on Thursday from a $700 million Louisiana municipal-bond deal after the bank’s stance on guns drew criticism from state Republican officials,” Bloomberg News reports. “The decision came after state Treasurer John Schroder, a Republican, said his team was scrutinizing JPMorgan’s gun policies following Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon’s comments to a Congressional committee earlier this year that his firm won’t finance companies that make military-style weapons for consumers.”

“Louisiana isn’t alone in standing up to discriminatory policies,” the National Shooting Sports Foundation reported in October. “Texas’s legislature passed and Republican Gov. Gregg Abbott signed into law the Firearm Industry Nondiscrimination Act (FIND Act). The law prohibits ‘woke’ corporations from profiting from Texas tax dollars and using those profits to fund efforts to deny those same taxpayers their Second Amendment rights. The law already cost JPMorgan Chase the $3.3 billion it underwrote in bonds in 2020 now that it is denied from doing so this year.”

Similar measures are being pursued in other states, including Ohio, where Rep. Scott Wiggam has introduced legislation that “would deny corporations the ability to benefit from taxpayer-funded state or municipal contracts while at the same time holding policies that discriminate against firearm-related businesses.”

From my 2018 GUNS Magazine “Banking on Disarmament” column:

Unsurprisingly, banks are also beneficiaries of collectivism. Citigroup and B of A both got “government bailouts” courtesy of the taxpayers. Gun owners had no say in prohibiting money taken from them being used to guarantee assets of corporate ingrates. And JPMorgan Chase, ATF’s credit card provider, offered a position to get a double-dipping Fast and Furious manager out of the country, was a top Obama and Hillary campaign contributor, and the bank that terminated the account of “3D printed gun” pioneer Defense Distributed.

With an estimated net worth of around $2B, Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimond is above it all. Naturally, an “Executive Protection Specialist” bodyguard is one of the perks he enjoys, so what the little people who have credit cards, checking, and savings accounts are to do is of no concern to him. There are so many customers, a handful lost here or there will not even register on the bottom line.

As for the argument that the super-rich like Dimond and celebrities need such services more than the average person because they’re such potentially lucrative targets, tell that to the most at-risk low-wage workers among us, like convenience store clerks, or taxi drivers, or the pizza delivery guy.

It’s past time for the government to investigate past “sweetheart deals” such as JPMorgan enjoyed with ATF. If the Republicans can succeed in not blowing a return to majority power, gun owners should demand they hold banks to the same non-discrimination policies as the above-cited states are enacting.

Starting with no more bailing the ungrateful loan sharks out when they run things into the gutter…

About David Codrea:

David Codrea is the winner of multiple journalist awards for investigating/defending the RKBA and a long-time gun owner rights advocate who defiantly challenges the folly of citizen disarmament. He blogs at “The War on Guns: Notes from the Resistance,” is a regularly featured contributor to Firearms News, and posts on Twitter: @dcodrea and Facebook.

David Codrea

FACT: ‘The Unvaccinated Are the New Jews’~Don’t Let the Left Tell You Otherwise (Video)

BY AMY MEK

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/fact-the-unvaccinated-are-the-new-jews-dont-let-the-left-tell-you-otherwise-video/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Holocaust didn’t start with death camps. It began with propaganda, scaremongering, scapegoating, and segregation.

Thierry Baudet, leader of the Netherlands’ populist party, Forum-for-Democracy (FFD), caused outrage among the establishment when he compared his government’s discriminatory policies towards the unvaccinated to those of Jews during the Second World War.

In a social media post to Twitter on Sunday, Baudet stated, “The current situation can be compared with the 1930s and 1940s. The unvaccinated are the new Jews; the ignorant exclusions are the new Nazis and NSB [National Socialist Movement in the Netherlands] members. There, I said it.”

Baudet’s statements are in response to a newsletter from opinion pollster Maurice de Hond, in which he expressed concerns about the Cabinet’s proposal to ban all unvaccinated people from specific locations. 

De Hond, who is Jewish, recognizes the same pattern of slow, systematic exclusion of people that mimics “the experiences of my parents from a period that is the blackest page of our history.”

Predictably, the left immediately launched attacks against the popular leader. Outgoing Deputy Prime Minister of the Netherlands and Minister of Health Hugo de Jonge called Baudet’s statements “disgusting, totally inappropriate and very hurtful to many people.” Additionally, Sigrid Kaag, leader of the left-wing Democrats 66 party, commented on Twitter, “he seriously damages the authority and dignity of the Chamber. I feel shame about that.”

To further exemplify the staggering truth in Baudet’s statements, many called for his imprisonment. 

Dehumanizing the Unvaccinated

It is dangerous to qualify people (the unvaccinated) as scapegoats, sources of disease, or profiteers, explains the FvD party. Historically, there have been (and are) vast and conclusive examples of the genocidal playbook that all begin with the political and social dehumanization of the “offending” population. 

Baudet’s party detailed that leading up to and during WW2, ordinary Germans were so blinded by propaganda that they actually cheered the hunt for the Jews. They were so severely brainwashed they felt morally obligated to help facilitate the slow and miserable demise of innocent people and families. The parallels to today’s policies are shocking.

According to Hugo de Jonge, only vaccinated people have taken social responsibility. Unvaccinated people are “antisocial” and therefore deserve to be expelled from society. Further, anyone who allows themselves to be pricked does so selflessly “for another person.” Those who do not let themselves be pricked “only live for themselves.”

According to state propaganda, unvaccinated people kill the vaccinated by taking up hospital beds, preventing good vaccinated people from undergoing surgery.

Shocking Parallels

Six million Jews did not agree to die in gas chambers. It started with small, measured steps.

Baudet compared the systematic exclusion of the unvaccinated with the exclusion of Jews in the 1930s and 1940s. Shockingly, there is much similarity in how the Jews were treated during the years leading up to War. There is also this similarity in the “measures” taken. As early as April 1, 1933, the German state organized a boycott of Jewish entrepreneurs and professionals. In September 1935, the state passed comprehensive and restrictive legislation on nationality and citizenship. Jews were placed outside the “German people’s community” with these laws.

In the Netherlands, it began when Jews were prohibited from working in the air protection service on July 1, 1940. This was followed by banning Jews from government service. Then Jews were no longer welcome at Amsterdam markets. In November, it was announced that Jewish civil servants would be suspended; they would later be fired on February 21, 1941. On January 7, Jews were forbidden to visit cinemas. A few days later, all Jews must register. Signs reading “Jews not wanted” appear in various public places.

Lockdown For Jews

Austria and the Netherlands have recently implemented lockdowns for only the unvaccinated. Similarly, in the past, the Netherlands only had lockdowns for Jews. Baudet’s FvD party detailed the measures that were taken against the Jews before WW2:

January 10, 1941: Compulsory registration in the Netherlands of all persons “wholly or largely of Jewish blood.”

March 12, 1941: Jewish students were no longer allowed to study at the university.  Jews were no longer allowed to have their own company. 

May 1: Jewish doctors were banned from treating non-Jews

April 1: Jews in Haarlem were no longer allowed to enter cafes, restaurants, cinemas, theatres, libraries, and swimming pools. 

May 31: Jews were forbidden to visit swimming pools and beaches. They were also no longer allowed to rent rooms in some seaside resorts or visit public places in those areas.

September 1: Jewish students were prohibited from attending regular schools and educational institutions.

September 15: Jews were forbidden to visit parks, zoos, cafes, restaurants, libraries, hotels, theatres, cinemas, and museums. Also, Jews were no longer allowed to travel or relocate without a permit. From this moment on, ‘Forbidden for Jews’ signs appeared in the streets.

October 20: The Jewish Council was obliged to register all Jews in the Netherlands. There was also a new regulation that restricted Jews from exercising certain professions.

On October 22: Jews were required to t leave non-Jewish associations and foundations. 

December 5: all non-Dutch Jews were required to report for ‘voluntary emigration.’ 

January 9: public education for Jews was banned on January

January 23, 1942: identification cards of Jews were marked with the letter ‘J.’ 

May 3: Introduction of the Jewish Star, effectively sealing the fate of Jews in the
The Netherlands.

June 5: there was a complete travel ban for Jews. 

June 12:  Jews were prohibited from shopping outside during certain times and were only allowed to enter a limited number of shops. They were also no longer allowed to practice sports. 

June 30: Curfew imposed. Jews were required to be home between 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. 

July 6: Jews were no longer allowed to visit non-Jews.

The similarities to today’s unvaccinated people in the Netherlands and many countries worldwide are shocking. Laws are being changed solely to implement vaccine policies, putting unvaccinated people in the same terrifying position as Jews in 1930s Europe. The unvaccinated are already being fired in many countries, which the Netherlands Prime Minister, Mark Rutte, is also trying to implement as law. People without a vaccine pass, or “Green Passport” (as it is called in much of Europe), are no longer allowed to travel by public transport. In Canada, the unvaccinated are not even allowed to leave their country anymore. 

Austria tried imposing lockdown measures on about two million unvaccinated people. Now the state is mandating vaccinations for the entire population. Watch the following clips of Austrian Police officers monitoring compliance with the lockdown for the unvaccinated:

Auschwitz Did Not Fall From The Sky

Early last year, 94-year-old Auschwitz survivor Marian Turski gave a speech during the commemoration of the 75th anniversary of the camp’s liberation. The Pole, who was imprisoned in the camp in 1944, had a warning: Recognize the signs. “Auschwitz didn’t appear from nowhere. So one could say, as we say in Polish: was not an implicit matter of course.”

The Nazi camp didn’t drop from the sky, he reminded his audience, but was the endpoint of a process that began with exclusion: from park benches, food stores, chorus’, swimming pools, and social clubs. Once they established a new reality of stigmatism, segregation, and exclusion, it was an easy next step to strip further rights, dehumanize, and brutally extinguish that minority.

But be careful, be careful, we are already beginning to become accustomed to thinking, that you can exclude someone, stigmatize someone, alienate someone. And slowly, step by step, day by day, that’s how people gradually become familiar with these things. Both the victims and the perpetrators and the witnesses, those we call bystanders, begin to become accustomed to the thoughts and ideas, that this minority that produced Einstein, Nelly Sachs, Heinrich Heine and the Mendelssohns is different, that they can be expelled from society, that they are foreign people, that they are people who spread germs, diseases and epidemics. That is terrible, and dangerous. That is the beginning of what can rapidly develop.

Turski, along with his family, was forced into the Lodz ghetto and later deported to Auschwitz, calling on people not to remain indifferent when people are discriminated against and “whenever any government violates already existing, common social contracts.”

The survivor implored people to remain faithful to his Eleventh Commandment: Never be a bystander. He then addressed his daughters and grandchildren, warning them to “defend the constitution, defend your rights, defend your democratic order, defend the rights of minorities” and above all, “thou shalt not be indifferent.” Turski explained, “if you become complacent, before you know it, some kind of Auschwitz will suddenly appear from nowhere and befall you and your descendants.”

Watch Marian Tursk’s powerful speech:

The Holocaust didn’t start with death camps. It began with propaganda, scaremongering, scapegoating, and segregation. Unfortunately, the comparisons to 1930s and 1940s Nazi Germany are valid. Do not let anyone tell you otherwise.

Waukesha Massacre Suspect Tied to Radical Islamic Group. Leftist D.A. Laments Bail That Let Suspect Out of Jail

$5 MILLION DOLLAR BAIL SET

Darrell E. Brooks, Jr. Has Ties To Radical Islamic Group

Darrell Brooks Belongs to Black Supremacist Sect of Islam Called ‘The Five Percent Nation’; He Committed Vehicular Jihad

BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/waukesha-massacre-suspect-tied-to-radical-islamic-group-leftist-d-a-laments-bail-that-let-suspect-out-of-jail/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The suspect in Sunday’s Waukesha Christmas Parade Massacre, who will be charged with five counts of intentional homicide today, is a Muslim black supremacist and dangerous felon wrongly released from jail.

Conservative writer Laura Loomer reported that career criminal Darrell E. Brooks, Jr. is a member of the unhinged Five Percent Nation, a group of dangerous Islamic crackpots.

Meanwhile, Milwaukee’s leftist District Attorney John Chisholm confessed that Brooks never should have been allowed to post a $1,000 bail given the crimes with which he was charged when he was freed from jail last week.

In other words, had Brooks been in jail where he belongs, he wouldn’t have been able to mow down 53 people as he fled the scene of yet another crime. Five of those people are dead thanks to the leftists who run the Milwaukee district attorney’s office.

Loomer Report

The Loomered report links Brooks to the Five Percent Nation through his social media name, MathBoi Fly.

The Five Percenters, Loomer wrote, believe the world is divided into three categories:

85% of the world’s population, which includes White people, are described as “uncivilized people, poison animal eaters, slaves from mental death and power, people who do not know the Living God or their origin in this world, and they worship that which they do not know. They are easily led in the wrong direction, but hard to lead into the right direction.”

The other 10% of the world’s population is described as, “the rich, slave makers of the poor-who teach the poor lies, to believe that the Almighty, True and Living God is a spook and cannot be seen by the physical eye. Otherwise known as the Blood Suckers of the poor.”

The last five percent, known as the “Five Percent Nation” are described as, “the poor, righteous Teachers, who do not believe in the teachings of the 10%, and are all wise and know who the living God is, and teach that the Living God is the Sun of man, the Supreme being (the Black Man) of Asia, and Teach freedom, Justice, and Equality to all of the human family on planet Earth.”

Brooks’s social-media moniker, she wrote, is the link to this bizarre outfit. He bills himself as MathBoi Fly because the Five Percent Nation says “Supreme Mathematics and Supreme Alphabet are the keys to understanding humans’ relationship with the universe.”

Loomer’s report includes a raft of Brooks’s anti-white, anti-Trump, anti-Semitic, and black supremacist social-media posts, including quotes from Malcolm X.

He also posted a meme featuring Adolf Hitler with a long quote about Jews. Brooks thinks that “religion is white supremacy.”

DA Chisholm

For his part, Chisholm is running for cover. He explained in detail how Brooks wound up in a position to plow into the Christmas parade.

In July, Chisholm wrote, his office charged Brooks with second-degree recklessly endangering safety and felon in possession of a firearm. Bail was set for $10,000, then reduced to $7,500. 

In February, still in jail, Brooks demanded a speedy jury trial. The state could not comply, and so reduced his bond to $500. 

Two weeks ago, as The New American reported yesterday, prosecutors charged him with five crimes:

  • second degree recklessly endangering safety;
  • felony bail bumping;
  • battery, obstructing an officer, and disorderly conduct

Those were the charges that invited the $1,000 bond requested by Chisholm’s office. In that case, as Milwaukee’s Journal Sentinel reported, the victim told cops that “Brooks purposefully ran her ‘over with his vehicle’ while she was walking through a gas station parking lot after he had followed her there after a fight, according to the criminal complaint.”

So Brooks had already tried to run over one person, which prosecutors didn’t think was a good enough reason to keep him in jail.

That bail “was inappropriately low in light of the nature of the recent charges and the pending charges against Mr. Brooks,” Chisholm said:

The bail recommendation in this case is not consistent with the approach of the Milwaukee County District Attorney’s Office toward matters involving violent crime, nor was it consistent with the risk assessment of the defendant prior to setting of bail.

Now he tells us, the victims and their families must be saying. 

In 2018, Chisholm bragged about springing criminals such as Brooks from jail:

Brooks is scheduled for court today at 4 p.m., the Journal Sentinel reported.

________________________________________________________________

Darrell Brooks Belongs to Black Supremacist Sect of Islam Called ‘The Five Percent Nation’, He Committed Vehicular Jihad

BY LAURA LOOMER

SEE: https://loomered.com/2021/11/22/exclusive-darrell-brooks-belongs-to-black-supremacist-sect-of-islam-called-the-five-percent-nation-he-committed-vehicular-jihad/

EXCERPTS:

LOOMERED was first to exclusively report the identity of the Waukesha, WI attacker, Darrell Brooks. Our investigative reporting confirmed that he was the attacker and owner of the RED SUV used in Sunday’s Christmas Parade attack that left at least 5 people dead, and dozens more injured.

We were also first to report that his social media was littered with anti-white and anti-Jewish posts that encouraged the killing of White people and posts that celebrated Hitler for being “right about the real Jews”.

This publication was early to note and report Darrell’s ties to Black Lives Matter, and the fact that he used a vehicle to murder people in an act of vehicular jihad. Laura Loomer posted that the suspect was likely a black Muslim, and now we can exclusively confirm that Darrell Brooks is a supporter of The Five Percent Nation, otherwise known as the Nation of Gods and Earths (NGE or NOGE), a sub-sect of the Nation of Islam (NOI).

The Five Percent Nation is a black nationalist movement influenced by Islam. Members of the group call themselves “Allah’s Five Percenters”. The Fiver Percent Nation preaches black supremacy and teaches that black people are the original inhabitants of planet earth and that the white man is an evil devil.

The term “Five Percenter” comes from the “five percent” who are described in Nation of Islam in their “Lost-Found Muslim Leason No.2”.

Darrell Brooks’s social media posts, particularly one of his Twitter posts from October 2015, prove that he was a black supremacist and a supporter of Malcolm X, who was also a Muslim, and a spokesman for the Nation of Islam. 

His social media posts show that he also had hatred for Jews. In one Facebook post from November 2015, he said “Hitler knew who the real Jews were.”

The Five Percent Nation doesn’t believe in a God, but they instead believe that the “Asiatic Blackman” is God and that his name is “Allah”, the Arabic word for God.

LOOMERED was first to boldly report that Darrell Brooks was a black Muslim and that his weapon of choice was a vehicle, making his terrorist attack on White people an act of vehicular jihad.

On his SoundCloud, he raps about his love for Malcolm X, hate for White people, and carrying his AK 47.

 

 

Brighteon: Alex Jones joins Mike Adams in studio, warning of where America is headed in 2022

NaturalNews videos would not be possible without you, as always we remain passionately dedicated to our mission of educating people all over the world on the subject of natural healing remedies and personal liberty (food freedom, medical freedom, the freedom of speech, etc.). Together, we’re helping create a better world, with more honest food labeling, reduced chemical contamination, the avoidance of toxic heavy metals and vastly increased scientific transparency.

PATRIOT NURSE: What The Rittenhouse Trial and Public Response REALLY Tells Us

In this video, Patriot Nurse discusses the nature of compliance and human servitude. When you're looking around and everyone else seems to be complying, don't feel bad for being the lone man standing. Kyle Rittenhouse's trial and verdict pulls the mask back from the Left and what their vision is for the future.

EXPLOSIVE CLAIMS: Kyle Rittenhouse Says Lawyers Left Him in Jail While Financially Benefiting Off Him

BY MEGAN FOX

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/megan-fox/2021/11/23/kyle-rittenhouse-claims-lawyers-lin-wood-and-john-pierce-left-him-in-jail-while-financially-benefiting-off-him-n1535719;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Kyle Rittenhouse sat down with Tucker Carlson on Fox Nation on Monday and opened up about a disturbing part of the case no one has known about until now. Rittenhouse says his first attorneys, Lin Wood and John Pierce, took advantage of him, lied about him, gave him injurious advice, and left him rotting in jail without a shower for 87 days.

“I was in jail for 87 days,” said Rittenhouse. “Lin Wood was raising money on my behalf, and he held me in jail for 87 days, disrespecting my wishes, put me on media interviews, which I should never have done, which he said, oh, you’re going to go talk to The Washington Post … which was not a good idea.”

Rittenhouse continued, “They said I was safer in jail instead of at home with my family.” But while in jail, Rittenhouse didn’t feel very safe. “It was — it was scary in jail like you had to watch over yourself, and not a lot of people liked me in jail.” Rittenhouse said he managed to make friends over card games after some of the inmates listened to what happened to him. He also suffered from no running water in his cell and was unable to take a shower for the entire time he was there.

Related: Kenosha Crowd Reacts to Rittenhouse Verdict…and It’s Not What the Lying Media Told You Would Happen

“It was very long. I lost a lot of weight in there,” he said.

Rittenhouse continued saying he felt that his attorneys were profiting at his expense. “But 87 days of not being with my family for defending myself and being taken advantage [of and being] used for a cause by these — by John Pierce and Lin Wood, trying to raise money so they can take it for their own benefit, not trying to set me free.”

John Pierce was hired to handle the extradition portion of Rittenhouse’s case, but that doesn’t seem like something that was done in a timely manner. “They could have had me sign the waiver for extradition and had me back in Wisconsin and I could have been bailed out by mid-September, but they wanted to keep me in jail until November 20th,” Rittenhouse charged.

Worse, while Rittenhouse was in jail, he says Pierce lied about him on television and created the false narrative that he was in an unorganized militia. “John Pierce said that, and it’s blatantly false. I don’t — I didn’t know what a militia was until after the fact, until November, like, 25th, after I was watching some of the interviews he did. I was like, ‘I am not in a militia. I don’t know what that is.'”

This misstep by Pierce could have been unintentional but it angered Rittenhouse nonetheless. According to Pierce’s Twitter history, he tweeted out the definition of an unorganized militia and likened Rittenhouse to the legal definition. “Under 1- US Code 246, the unorganized ‘militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and … under 45 years of age.’ Kyle was a Minuteman protecting his community when the government would not. More American men should fulfill their duty.” While technically correct, this was the excuse the media needed to begin saying Rittenhouse was a “white supremacist” militia member which conjures an entirely different mental picture than civic-minded men protecting their town.

Under 10 US Code 246, the unorganized "militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and…under 45 years of age." Kyle was a Minuteman protecting his community when the government would not. More American men should fulfill their duty.

— John Pierce (@CaliKidJMP) August 29, 2020

You can see that part of the interview below.

 

 

 

1 … 25 26 27 28 29 … 72