Category: Internet
Lt. General Thomas McInerney: Special Forces Took Nancy Pelosi Laptop Wednesday, Says She’s Frantic
Lt. General Thomas McInerney speaking at the White House says that special forces were mixed in on Wednesday when the capitol was stormed, and that they’re the ones who stole Nancy Pelosi’s laptop.
Parler executive speaks out following Google app store ban, threats from Apple
INTERVIEW WITH PARLER CEO JOHN MATZE ON SUSPENSIONS FROM BIG TECH; GOOGLE, APPLE, AMAZON REMOVE SERVERS; ABANDONMENT BY THEIR LAWYERS
Parler Chief Policy Officer Amy Peikoff discusses a potential ban for Parler following President Trump's Twitter ban on 'Tucker Carlson Tonight'
Tech Expert Shocks GA Election Fraud Hearing With News He ‘Got Into’ Voting System With WiFi
More Hacks Where The Ballots Are Being Cast! #JovanHuttonPulitzer
WIFI CONNECTING TO CHINESE AT POLLING PLACES
BY VICTORIA TAFT
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The man who invented and patented the technology that lets you scan items at the grocery store, create an airport boarding pass, and generate authentication codes just blew the doors off the Georgia State Senate subcommittee hearing on elections.
Tech expert Jovan Hutton Pulitzer claimed that to the extent there were election issues in Georgia, they could be explained by simply looking at the paper ballots. And he claimed to prove in real time that the system was susceptible to manipulation via WiFi because his team had broken in and were in it at the time of the hearing.
Pulitzer basically threw down, telling a Georgia Senate subcommittee looking into voter fraud to show him the ballots, give him two hours, and he’d show them if there was election fraud in Fulton County.
I only care what that piece of paper tells us. The paper, the paper. Verify the vote, verify the vote.
[…] I can determine where ink comes from, where paper comes from, whether it was mailed, whether it was folded, the difference of a duplicated press” and a mass copier.
Pulitzer wants to see the paper ballot because what he’s seen so far looks entirely janky.
He told the lawmakers that it’s not about the code in the machines that caused 93% of them to be set aside to be “adjudicated” by humans; all he needs to do is get a look the “Holy Grail” – the physical paper ballots.
In the nearly hour-long presentation at a special hearing with the subcommittee (see it below), Pulitzer demonstrated the differences between the paper ballots in two different areas of Fulton County that he claims clearly differentiated between Democrat and Republican Party ballots.
A bar code was put on Republican ballots while none was put on Democrat ballots, he claimed. Furthermore, he said, the alignment cues used by a scanner to read the ballot were out of alignment on the Republican ballots but not on the Democrat ones.
If the machine worked according to programming none of us would be standing here. We’re standing here because something broke. I don’t care about the machine. I don’t even care about the code that was written into the machine. What I care about is that physical artifact. That physical artifact has material differences from district to district that should not be there. Why are they there? I’m not talking about code. That’s how this gets derailed.
He said he could tell immediately if a ballot was real or counterfeit.
You could look at every section of the ballot count even the spike and tell if that was a real or counterfeit ballot.
We will tell you instantly what came out of a mass copier versus what came out of a printer. Did a human fill this out? Did a machine fill this out? Was it mailed or was it not mailed? It can be compared against spoilage or adjudicated by number or, last but not least, we will tell you have we seen this number before. Did we see it keep popping back up?
You will see what gets run over and over and over and over again. That is the problem of why we must see – the physical ballot is the Holy Grail, the second one is the digital scan.
I’ve spent the last 24 years studying the way paper and machines and internet react. I’ve spent the last six years studying the paper reading details at the nano level. I can tell you what paper came from China. I can tell you the person who handled it was a smoker. All of it is detectable with the physical ballot.
But the most shocking moment of the hours-long hearing came later when the issue of whether others could break into the voting system and modify the data (the votes) in the voting system came up.
Pulitzer said he was assured there was no way the system could give or send signals but that wasn’t true because, he claimed, his team had penetrated the system using WiFi.
“Look,” he told them, “this is simple.”
“I’m the guy that told the world that that little bar code can talk to the internet. Making the physical world talk to the internet world. This is as simple as scanning a loaf of bread at a grocery store. That’s your vote. You’re handing it to the checker or scanning it yourself that’s basically the polling machine.
“What is sad about this is we’re not even performing at standards expected at grocery stores. … if you complained, [the store] would have to audit it and make it right. But we don’t do this in elections?
But they’re playing hide and seek with the ballots? Why?
Somebody was listening because at the conclusion of the hearing the subcommittee agreed to have a look at some of the ballots from Fulton County that were questionable.
Stay tuned.
Victoria Taft is the host of “The Adult in the Room Podcast With Victoria Taft” where you can hear her series on “Antifa Versus Mike Strickland.” Find it here.Follow her on Facebook, Twitter, Parler, MeWe, Minds @VictoriaTaft
DOJ Adviser Says 368,000 Fraudulent ‘Excess Votes’ Tipped Election to Joe Biden
Major Court Victory Boosts Election Integrity in Georgia Runoffs
The Censored Hunter Biden Laptop Story Is Coming Back to Bite Twitter Big Time
Michigan fraud witness debunks Dominion CEO testimony, says Poulos falsely denied internet connection & ballot dumps
ABOVE: Melissa Carone, who was working for Dominion Voting Services, speaks in front of the Michigan House Oversight Committee in Lansing, Michigan on December 2, 2020. – The president’s attorneys, led by Rudy Giuliani, have made numerous allegations of election fraud. (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY / AFP) (Photo by JEFF KOWALSKY/AFP via Getty Images)
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:01 PM PT – Wednesday, December 16, 2020
Michigan’s top witness of election fraud debunked recent claims that Dominion CEO John Poulos made while under oath to a State Senate Committee.
“He stated none of the machines were connected to the Internet,” election fraud witness Melissa Carone said. “[There is a] 53-minute audio recording of the Dominion training session, in which they admit that all of their hardware is connected to the internet.”
Melissa Carone said the Dominion CEO also lied by saying that election workers had ballots locked in steel boxes. In reality, she said, they had access to the ballots and even ran them through machines several times.
Additionally, Carone added Poulos falsely denied ballot dumps at Detroit’s TCF Center. She noted there is documented evidence of the ballot dumps.
“These pictures are crazy,” Carone said. “They are from outside the Department of Elections on the third and the fourth and there are Penske moving trucks. The back of them are open.”
She noted that trucks belonging to the city of Detroit were allegedly parked behind the moving trucks to guard them.
MORE NEWS: Dominion CEO Poulos Denies Vote Manipulation Despite Evidence
____________________________________________________________________
'Sassy' Dominion IT Whistleblower Melissa Carone Has Secret Video Evidence!
MILLIE WEAVER INTERVIEWS CARONE
DHS and FBI say hackers from Islamic Republic of Iran are targeting state election websites, pushing disinformation
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The mullahs had it so good from 2009 to 2017, they’re working hard to restore the status quo ante.
“DHS and FBI warn Iranian hackers are targeting state election websites and pushing disinformation,” by Jerry Dunleavy, Washington Examiner, October 31, 2020:
An Iranian cyber group was responsible for the targeting of U.S. election websites, the voter intimidation emails sent to potential voters, and the dissemination of election-related disinformation on voter fraud through a propaganda video this month, according to the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI.
DHS’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the bureau issued a joint cybersecurity advisory related to an Iranian “advanced persistent threat” hacker organization just a few days before Tuesday’s presidential election, saying the U.S. analysis indicated that the Iranians had also “scanned state websites, to include state election websites” in late September and that it was also observed “attempting to exploit websites to obtain copies of voter registration data” in September and October. CISA and the FBI confirmed that the Iranian hackers “successfully obtained voter registration data in at least one state” and that “a review of the records that were copied and obtained reveals the information was used in the propaganda video.”
An FBI FLASH Alert also noted that Iranian cyber actors “are likely intent on influencing and interfering with the U.S. elections to sow discord among voters and undermine public confidence in the US electoral process” and “are creating fictitious media sites and spoofing legitimate media sites to spread anti-American propaganda and misinformation about voter suppression.” The FBI said that the Iranians “had taken specific actions to influence public opinion relating to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election” and advised that the Iranian-backed propaganda video that has circulated online “is almost certainly intended to make U.S. voter information and the voting process appear insecure and susceptible to fraud.”
There is no indication that the Iranian hackers have changed any votes or that they have the ability to interfere with any tallies….
Giuliani: Hunter Biden’s Hard Drive Contains Pics of Underage Girls, Text to Father That Says He’s “Very Unsafe” for Kids
BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Such were the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop hard drive that Trump adviser Rudy Giuliani didn’t want the thing in his possession.
The hard drive contains photographs of underage girls, the former mayor of New York told NewsMax’s Greg Kelly. And in a text message from Hunter Biden to his father, Giuliani said, the younger Biden confessed that he was accused of being “sexually inappropriate” with a 14-year-old girl.
And so Giuliani turned the incriminating evidence over to authorites in Delaware, who immediately gave it to the FBI.
When news of the laptop appeared in the New York Post, the dirty pics were somewhat secondary to the main story: An e-mail proved that Hunter Biden introduced his father to a top official from Burisma Holdings, the Ukrainian energy company at the center of the Biden-Burisma influence-peddling scandal.
But Giuliani’s allegations suggest something far worse than routine political corruption. If the text is authentic, the Democrat candidate for president knew his son was accused of sex crimes against underage girls.
“Sexually Inappropriate”
Giuliani received the hard drive of the MacBook Pro from the owner of a computer repair store, John Paul Mac Isaac, a Trump supporter who says Hunter Biden dropped the machine at his store and never returned. Mac Issac gave the hard drive to the FBI and a copy to Giuliani.
Giuliani, in turn, provided a copy to the New York Post, which published a major story about the incriminating e-mail. It was a thank-you note from a Burisma executive to Hunter Biden for arranging a meeting with then-Vice President Joe Biden in 2015.
Biden famously bragged that he forced Ukraine to fire the Ukrainian prosecutor who was investigating Burisma Holdings for corruption. Burisma paid Hunter Biden an exorbitant salary to sit on its board. With his record as a drug addict and no experience in the energy business, Hunter Biden’s lucrative position is inexplicable — except for his connection to Biden senior.
But now Joe Biden’s activities when he was point man for the Obama administration in Ukraine might be secondary, if what Giuliani said is true.
Speaking with Kelly, Giuliani divulged the text message Hunter wrote to his father.
“This is really a very, very sensitive one,” Giuliani began. “There’s a text message to his father, in which he says the following, and he’s discussing his sister-in-law, who for quite some time was his lover.”
Giuliani then read the message:
She told my therapist that I was sexually inappropriate [Giuliani: This would be with an unnamed 14-year-old girl].
When she says that I Facetime naked with [the unnamed 14-year-old girl] and the reason I can’t have her out to see me is because I walk around naked smoking crack talking [to] girls on face time. When she was pressed she said that [the unnamed 14-year-old girl] never said anything like that but the bottom line is that I created and caused a very unsafe environment for the kids.
The message “is supported by numerous pictures of underage girls,” Giuliani continued.
“Bernie Kerik and I turned it over to the Delaware State Police because I’m very uncomfortable with this,” he told Kelly. “And I’m very uncomfortable with the fact that these underage girls were not protected.”
“This was sent to the vice president,” Giuliani said. “What did he do about it?”
Delaware Online reported that Giuliani “visited a New Castle County police station Monday to share files from what he said was Hunter Biden’s laptop,” and that the local cops gave the information to the state’s attorney general, Kathy Jennings.
Jennings handed it to the FBI.
No Russian Disinformation
Unsurprisingly, the Democrats and their information ministry, the hard-left social and mainstream media, are terrified the revelations will derail Joe Biden’s third and final bid for the White House. They say the e-mails on the laptop are Russian disinformation.
“We know that this whole smear on Joe Biden comes from the Kremlin,” leftist Representative Adam Schiff of California told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer. “That’s been clear for well over a year now that they’ve been pushing this false narrative about the vice president and his son.”
John Ratcliffe, the director of U.S. intelligence, says Schiff is trying to conscript the intelligence community to serve the Democrats.
“It’s funny that some of the people who complain the most about intelligence being politicized are the ones politicizing the intelligence,” Ratcliffe told Maria Bariromo of Fox News on Monday.
“Unfortunately, in this case, it is Adam Schiff, the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who as you pointed out on Friday, said that the intelligence community believes the Hunter Biden’s laptop and emails on it are part of a Russian disinformation campaign.”
Continued Ratcliffe:
Let me be clear: the intelligence community doesn’t believe that because there is no intelligence that supports that. And we have shared no intelligence with Chairman Schiff, or any member of Congress, that Hunter Biden’s laptop is part of some Russian disinformation campaign.
It’s simply not true.
Ratcliffe said Schiff is using the intelligence community to support a “political narrative” that will protect his “preferred political candidate,” Joe Biden.
“Hunter Biden’s laptop is not part of some Russian disinformation campaign,” he said.
Ratcliffe said the FBI’s probe of the laptop has nothing to do with Russian disinformation.
A senior intelligence official backed Ratcliffe, Fox reported: “Ratcliffe is 100% correct. There is no intelligence at this time to support Chairman Schiff’s statement that recent stories on Biden’s foreign business dealings are part of a smart campaign that ‘comes from the Kremlin.’”
________________________________________________________________________
Was Child Pornography Found on Hunter Biden's Laptop?
This Tiny Detail Buried in Federal Subpoena May Bolster Giuliani's Claim That Hunter's Laptop Contained Pics of Underage Girls
EXCERPT:
On Tuesday, Rudy Giuliani dropped the bombshell on Newsmax TV, alleging that “numerous pictures” of underage girls were found on Hunter Biden’s laptop. Text messages also suggest that Hunter Biden may have been “sexually inappropriate” with a 14-year-old girl, and had told Joe Biden about ---.
__________________________________________________________________________
NY Post Publishes pic of Biden With Hunter's Kazak Partner
EXCERPT:
Trump DOJ Takes Google to Court Over Search Near-Monopoly
BY TYLER O'NEIL
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The Department of Justice (DOJ) under President Donald Trump will file an antitrust lawsuit against Google on Tuesday. Both Republicans and Democrats have accused Google of engaging in anticompetitive conduct to preserve monopolies in search and search advertising. Psychologist Robert Epstein has long warned about the potential political impact of Google Search, claiming that Google bias may have been responsible for Hillary Clinton’s lead in the popular vote in 2016.
The DOJ will allege that Google, a unit of Alphabet Inc., is maintaining its status as a gatekeeper to the internet “through an unlawful web of exclusionary and interlocking business agreements that shut out competitors,” DOJ officials told The Wall Street Journal in an exclusive.
“The government will allege that Google uses billions of dollars collected from advertisements on its platform to pay mobile-phone manufacturers, carriers and browsers, like Apple Inc.’s Safari, to maintain Google as their preset, default search engine,” WSJ reported.
As a result of such practices, Google dominates search on hundreds of millions of American devices “with little opportunity for any competitor to make inroads, the government will allege.”
The lawsuit will also fault Google for arrangements in which Google’s Search application is preloaded and cannot be deleted from mobile phones running the Android operating system. The DOJ will claim that such arrangements unlawfully edge out competing search engines.
Google owns or controls search distribution channels for about 80 percent of search queries in the U.S. According to the lawsuit, that means Google’s competitors cannot get a meaningful number of search queries to build the scale needed to compete, leaving consumers with less choice and less innovation and advertisers with less competitive prices.
The company has defended its prime position, arguing that its competitive edge comes from offering a product that billions of people freely choose to use each day. Google has argued that it faces vigorous competition across its different operations and that its products and platforms help both small and large businesses to reach new customers.
Google offers its services at little or no cost, undercutting the traditional antitrust argument around potential price controls.
Even so, the company’s massive search footprint has attracted legal challenges from both sides of the aisle. Democrats on a House antitrust subcommittee released a report this month, claiming that Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google wield monopoly power and recommending congressional action.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) investigated Google for more than a year but decided against bringing an antitrust case in 2013. That case focused on claims that Google engaged in “search bias” by favoring its own services and demoting rivals like Yelp and Tripadvisor, which have long complained about Google’s search power. The FTC ultimately concluded that such a case would be hard to win because while the company desires to hobble rivals, it also pursues its policies to advance quality products and services for consumers.
The DOJ’s case will not focus on a search-bias theory, officials told WSJ.
The DOJ has investigated Google for more than a year. Nearly all state attorneys general are separately investigating the search company, while Amazon, Apple, and Facebook also face antitrust scrutiny. More than ten state attorneys general are expected to join the DOJ’s case.
The case will likely take years to resolve. If Google loses, a court may mandate changes to its business operations in order to create new openings for rival companies. The DOJ lawsuit will not specify particular remedies yet — this kind of recommendation will be addressed later in the case. If Google wins, a court ruling could hobble the government’s attempts to rein in Big Tech. However, a Google victory may spur Congress to take legislative action.
Former Google Engineer Says Google Will Try to Prevent Trump’s Reelection
The impact of Google’s near-monopoly
Google’s search engine has achieved such a near-monopoly that Americans will use the verb “to google” rather than “to search.” This seems innocent enough — after all, Google does provide an excellent search engine. Yet critics have long raised concerns that Google’s near-monopoly on internet search could have hidden impacts on Americans.
Ph.D. psychologist Robert Epstein, who supported Hillary Clinton in 2016, has long warned about Google’s power to manipulate elections. In 2017, he wrote a white paper arguing that Clinton’s popular vote margin was almost entirely attributable to pro-Clinton bias at Google.
“Extrapolating from the mathematics introduced in this report … the lead author of the PNAS study [Epstein himself] predicted that a pro-Clinton bias in Google’s search results would, over time, shift at least 2.6 million votes to Clinton. She won the popular vote in the November election by 2,864,974 votes,” Epstein wrote with his co-author Ronald E. Robertson.
“Without the pro-Clinton bias in Google’s search results, her win margin in the popular vote would have been negligible,” Epstein wrote.
A 2018 survey found that conservative employees in Silicon Valley tech companies live in fear that their political beliefs will be found out. James Damore said conservatives at Google are “in the closet” and that Google executives are digging through a secret email list in order to out them.
Last month, a Google whistleblower told Project Veritas that Google News results are intentionally biased against Trump. This seemed to confirm the results of an unscientific test on Google News bias run by PJ Media editor Paula Bolyard last year (tweeted out by Trump himself), and a more scientific study also suggesting bias. The Google News slant is not a conspiracy theory, though Google of course denies manipulating results. After all, Google employees heavily favor Democrats in their political donations.
More than 90 percent of political contributions from employees of Alphabet, Google’s parent company, have gone to Democrats since 2004. In 2018, 96 percent went to Democrats.
Yet Google bias may not always be liberal. All Americans should be concerned about Google’s ability to interfere in elections, and a former Google engineer said the company will try to prevent Trump’s reelection. This should worry all Americans, no matter what they think about Trump.
Google’s near-monopoly should worry Americans, and this lawsuit may be a step in the right direction. Even so, Americans should also worry about a government take-over of Big Tech. Antitrust actions against Google may be necessary, but if politicians and regulators get their hands on the kind of power Google possesses, the prospects might be far worse than the threat Google currently poses.
Tyler O’Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.
Trump: Google ‘Should Be Sued’ for Manipulating ‘from 2.6 Million to 16 Million Votes for Hillary’
New Movie Claims Google Handed the Popular Vote to Hillary Clinton in 2016
RNC Files FEC Complaint: Twitter Gave ‘In-Kind Contribution’ to Biden Campaign
Election Interference? Big Tech Censored Trump More Than 60 Times, Left Biden Unscathed