Rand Paul Slams ‘Dangerous, Obscene Authoritarians’ Pushing No-Fly Lists For The Unvaccinated

"All of these people, are the same people who hooted and hollered and said ‘Trump is leading us to authoritarianism.’"

BY STEVE WATSON

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-rand-paul-slams-dangerous-obscene-authoritarians-pushing-no-fly-lists-for-the-unvaccinated/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Appearing on Fox News Thursday, Senator Rand Paul warned that the very same people who for four years screeched about president Trump leading the country into authoritarianism have seized power and instituted the most draconian crackdown ever seen in U.S. history.

The Senator responded to an op ed by Juliette Kayyem, a former assistant secretary for homeland security under Obama who seriously argued that unvaccinated people should be banned from flying.

“The CDC says you’re not supposed to get vaccinated if you’ve been infected within three months. So what are we going to do? Tell people that they can’t fly for three months, even according to the CDC?” Paul questioned.

Describing the idea of no-fly lists for the unvaccinated as “obscene,” Paul added “You know that if we now disagree in our personal medical decisions with the left, they’re going to declare that we’re a terrorist and that we can’t fly.”

“This idiot would have us not flying for three months,” Paul urged, referring to Kayyem.

Paul continued, “It makes no sense. It’s complete collectivism, and all of these people, are the same people who hooted and hollered and said ‘Trump is leading us to authoritarianism.’ What could be more authoritarian than a no-fly list for people who disagree with you?”

During the interview, Paul again picked up on his quest to expose Anthony Fauci.

“Dr. Fauci needs to be away from government, away from advice, because almost all of his advice had been wrongheaded. But some of it’s actually very dangerous,” the Senator declared.

“I, and other doctors, actually think that your immunity from being infected is going to last a lot longer,” he noted referring to the indiscriminate pushing of vaccines.

In a short piece Wednesday, Paul further highlighted Fauci’s lies on the funding of gain of function research in Wuhan, stating “Dr. Fauci is obfuscating the truth and trying to cover up for the fact that he lied and got caught. I won’t let him get away with this and will continue to shine a light on this issue.”

Paul also released an epic video detailing all of his past confrontations with Fauci:

In a further op-ed this week Paul urged Americans to ‘resist anti-science’ lockdowns and mask mandates, noting “They can’t arrest us all. They can’t keep all your kids home from school. They can’t keep every government building closed – although I’ve got a long list of ones they should.”

“We don’t have to accept the mandates, lockdowns, and harmful policies of the feckless bureaucrats. We can simply say no, not again,” Paul urged, labelling Nancy Pelosi “drunk with power” and a “petty tyrant.”

———————————————————————————————————————

‘Fault Lines’: New Bestseller Exposes Critical Race Theory’s Danger~Things are scary now, but Dr. Voddie Baucham offers hope.

BY DANUSHA GOSKA

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/08/fault-lines-new-bestseller-exposes-critical-race-danusha-goska/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Fault Lines: The Social Justice Movement and Evangelicalism's Looming Catastrophe by Dr. Voddie T. Baucham, Jr., is the number one bestseller in its category in Amazon as of this writing in early August, 2021. The book was released in April, and yet it already has five thousand customer reviews, 94% of which award the book five-stars. Given that Fault Lines is not receiving the kind of major-media, saturation coverage that a bestseller might expect, many of those thousands of reviews are fueled by enthusiastic word-of-mouth.

Fault Lines deserves its phenomenal success. Don't let its "Evangelical" subtitle fool you. I'm no Evangelical, but I will happily join my five-star review to the thousands of others. Baucham's presentation of the history and current profile of critical theory is accessible to all readers. Even non-Christians can benefit from understanding how the majority faith of Americans is being corrupted. Finally, as a Christian, Baucham offers hope for the future. Even non-Christians can apply some of Baucham's recommendations.

Fault Lines is one of many recent books struggling to take readers by the hand and guide them through our current cultural moment, of pupils suddenly being asked to inform their teachers of their "preferred pronouns," of toppling statues, burning cities, and careers ruined by one suspect utterance. Fault Lines belongs on the same bookshelf as James Lindsay and Helen Pluckrose's Cynical Theories: How Activist Scholarship Made Everything about Race, Gender, and Identity – And Why This Harms Everybody, as well as Douglas Murray's The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race, and IdentityCynical Theories goes into greater detail on the roots of today's hysteria, and its authors are Christophobic atheists who hold up a vague and unhistorical notion of "The Enlightenment" as our salvation. Douglas Murray, a former Christian and current atheist, appears to despair of any hope; rather, he's given to dire prognostications: "The US is on the brink of Civil War;" Murray has said; the Western world is "standing on the precipice" of cultural annihilation.

Voddie T. Baucham has one up on Lindsey, Pluckrose, and Murray. Yes, Baucham recognizes how bad things are. "The United States is on the verge of a race war, if not a complete cultural meltdown," Baucham predicts. But Baucham offers hope, and he offers healing. He finds both in Christian faith. Again, though, you don't have to be a Christian to benefit from reading Fault Lines.

Fault Lines is very reader-friendly. Lindsey and Pluckrose offer much more detailed and academic surveys of how Marxism's twisted evolution lead to the concept of "microaggressions" and social media videos in which obese women insist that if you aren't sexually attracted to them you are a bigot. Like those authors, Baucham also introduces his reader to influential progenitors of Woke like Antonio Gramsci, Derrick Bell, Kimberle Crenshaw, and Peggy McIntosh, but more briefly. Clearly, Baucham exhibits the Evangelical's zeal to reach the maximum audience with the deepest truths, while never allowing academic jargon to get in the way. This is a book you could understand even if you were reading it in a noisy and crowded subway car. Its ease of reading in no way diminishes its profundity.

Helen Pluckrose, a plump woman, has the courage and integrity to take on the excesses of extremist feminists and fat activists. Murray is a gay man who critiques extreme LGBT activists. Baucham is a black man, and a descendant of slaves. He grew up in the hood and he currently serves as dean of theology at the African Christian University in Zambia. He tackles Black Lives Matter and critical race theory.

Yes, Baucham has a Ph.D. and is a preacher and professor. But our Woke overlords judge qualifications not on training or intelligence but on identity, and on the grounds of identity, Baucham is qualified to stand head-to-head with Ibram X. Kendi and Robin DiAngelo. Baucham devotes 31 pages of his 251-page book to his own biography. Baucham has traced his maternal ancestry back to slaves in Alabama, Virginia, and Texas. He traced his paternal ancestry to a slave in North Carolina. He was born to a teenaged mother who married his teenaged father in a "shotgun wedding." The marriage didn't last and Baucham has no memories of being in an intact family. For decades, that lack of a father and a family life "haunted" him. His cousin Jamal was shot to death by a fellow drug dealer while he was selling crack. His absent father freebased cocaine in Baucham's presence, was shot five times in a crack-related incident, and eventually succumbed to the damage cocaine did to his heart.

"I grew up poor, without a father, and surrounded by drugs, gangs, violence, and disfunction in one of the toughest urban environments imaginable … I didn't just survive, I thrived! Not because of government programs or white people 'doing the work of anti-racism'" but because of his mother. Baucham credits his single mother with keeping him on the straight and narrow. She did this by impressing upon him a sense of agency and accountability. He was always certain of two things: "My mother loved me, and if I got out of line, she'd kill me." To conform to peer pressure from his black "homeboys," Baucham purposely underperformed in school. Baucham's mother visited his school and got him back on track. Young Voddie once wore a t-shirt featuring images of Malcolm X and Elijah Mohammad. At the time, "I was more black than Christian." In fact, his mother was a Buddhist and he was raised as a Buddhist. He converted to Christianity after contact with a Campus Crusade for Christ staffer.

Moving to Africa affected Baucham deeply. "Most Africans would give all they had to get to America." He realized he didn't have to, because he was American. He also realized that his ancestors were enslaved by fellow Africans. Those sold west were relatively lucky. "Thank God they were not sold to the Arabs! The Arab slave trade lasted more than thirteen centuries and ... few Africans sold to the Arabs even survived." Life in Africa taught Baucham that "culture does matter … not all cultures are equal … Christian culture has produced the highest levels of freedom and prosperity … in the world … transforming culture is a laudable and worthwhile goal."

These are remarkable statements that defy Woke at every turn. Baucham rejects cultural relativism that says that, say, a culture where girls undergo FGM is no worse than cultures that do not practice such mutilation. He refuses to join in Woke demonization of the West. And he says that "transforming culture is a laudable and worthwhile goal." Many on the left condemn calls for conforming to Western civilization, capitalism, or middle-class values as "imperialism." Rather, the larger culture must change to accommodate minority culture. If black kids are not doing well in school, that is because of racism, and the racist culture must be dismantled. Objective truth and the scientific method are denounced as white supremacist. Black children are presumed to possess superiority at music, sports, and storytelling about their own life experience. These "Afrocentric" skills must become the new standard, in place of "white" excellence at math, science, or literature.

"Our pursuit of justice must be characterized by a pursuit of truth," Baucham says, citing Leviticus 19:15. With that and other Bible verses in mind, Baucham interrogates the many lies of Black Lives Matter, a movement founded on lies. Baucham is fearless; his sentences advance like a warrior marching into battle. His weaponry consists of facts. Never does he quiver or hesitate or apologize, as some white critics might do, for fear of appearing "racist." Baucham recognizes that there is in fact nothing racist about truth. Baucham cites the research on police shootings published by Roland G. Fryer, Jr, the National Academy of Sciences, David J. Johnson, and the Washington Post. There is no epidemic of racist white police officers killing unarmed black men. In fact "it is white people who are actually shot at disproportionately high rates when the number of interactions with police is tallied up."

BLM counters that numbers alone do not tell the full story, because, they say, white cops murder black people under circumstances that would never result in the killing of a white suspect. On June 11, 2020, John McWhorter published "Racist Police Violence Reconsidered" in QuilletteQuillette is a fine publication, but this important piece should have appeared in McWhorter's home publication, The Atlantic, which has a larger circulation. Perhaps it was too controversial – that is, too truthful – for The Atlantic. McWhorter cites case after case in which whites died in police custody in circumstances that parallel the death of blacks in police custody, starting with a comparison between the deaths of George Floyd and Tony Timpa. Baucham makes the same sort of comparisons. Baucham cites numerous whites, adults and children, who died after brandishing fake guns, as did the African American child, Tamir Rice. Baucham similarly walks through misperceptions around the police shootings of Philando Castile, Michael Brown, and Breonna Taylor.

Baucham says that antiracism is a new cult, in competition with, and infecting, Christianity. Like Christianity, antiracism has its own versions of sin, law, gospel, martyrs, priests, means of atonement, new birth, liturgy, canon, theologians, and catechism. Baucham offers examples of each of these. Antiracism is unlike Christianity in that "antiracism offers no salvation;" only "perpetual penance" and "incurable disease." One thing antiracism does not have, does not value, and indeed condemns, is objective fact arrived at through traditional scholarly routes like the scientific method. "The quest for objectivity is tantamount to a quest for white supremacy." Baucham mentions one influential Woke classic, Peggy McIntosh's 1989 essay on "white privilege." Baucham points out that McIntosh's exercise "is a classic example of grievance studies in that it was based entirely on assumptions, anecdotes, and personal observations, and completely devoid of scholarly research."

The religion of antiracism directly contradicts Christianity in multiple ways, and yet Evangelicals are abandoning Christianity and embracing Woke. Except for passing mentions, Fault Lines does not mention Catholicism, but Catholics, too, are abandoning central Christian teachings in favor of critical race theory. America, the Jesuit magazine, is leading the way, for example hereSojourners is a prominent Christian magazine. It was founded by Jim Wallis, a self-described Evangelical Christian. Unless they confess to "the sin of white privilege," Wallis wrote, "white Christians will never be free." Baucham contrasts Wallis' fiat with Christian scripture, which declares that Jesus Christ frees those who believe in him and repent of their sins.

Baucham points out that antiracism concocts a Kafka trap, that is a rhetorical prison where no matter what any white person says or does, his speech and action will be interpreted to "prove" that he is a white supremacist. Concepts like "white fragility" and "white equilibrium" are tools in this trap. Anyone who disagrees with any aspect of antiracism is met with "That's your white fragility speaking" if they are white, or "That is your internalized racism," if they are not white.

Black people's "lived experience," recounted in anecdotes, is sacrosanct and must be honored, and never examined. Baucham calls this "Ethnic Gnosticism," that is, the belief that being a member of a certain ethnic group endows that group member with knowledge that no one outside the group can ever lay claim to. Ethnic Gnosticism insists that there is a "black perspective" that all black people share. If a black person disagrees with Woke, he is "broken." Baucham, because he criticizes antiracism, is "broken." He is not an authentic black person. The people declaring that he is not an authentic black person are themselves often white. The Woke similarly condemn, Baucham reports, black conservatives like John McWhorter and Thomas Sowell.

Be the Bridge is a self-described "non-profit organization." Non-profit or not, its founder Latasha Morrison has done quite well. She is represented by the same talent agency that represents Olympian Simone Biles, singer Alanis Morissette, and award-winning journalist Bob Woodward. Be the Bridge hosts an online store where one can purchase a $299, eight-course "Whiteness Intensive" indoctrination "taught by a diverse group of Be the Bridge educators;" a $40 "anti-racist hoodie;" and a free webinar entitled "A Discussion on [sic] Self-Care, Lament, & Trauma for People of Color." On its Facebook page, Be the Bridge offers a self-description. "We inspire and equip ambassadors of racial reconciliation to build a community of people who share a common goal of creating healthy dialogue about race."

According to one Amazon review of her bestselling book, Morrison, in a directly un-Biblical manner (see Ezekiel 18:1-4), holds all whites guilty for sins committed by other, long dead white people. Conversely, she does not hold blacks guilty even for contemporary crimes against non-black people, or against their own kin. "She holds Whites' skin color against them and calls them privileged … plenty of white people have not been born into privileged homes and have been labeled derogatory terms such as 'white trash.' Where is her call for Blacks to grieve black gang violence, violent crimes done against non-black people, or the cost of the abandonment of black children by their fathers that leads to societal evil affecting all people? Did I miss where she called for the Blacks whose ancestors were slave owners to lament over their part in slavery? Or for all the African-Americans whose ancestors played a part in selling/trading their countrymen?"

Baucham says that Be the Bridge it is a "go-to resource" for Evangelicals. Baucham, like the above-quoted Amazon reviewer, faults Be the Bridge for an unbiblical view of guilt. "Morrison's work … is replete with references to generational guilt." Baucham quotes the "rules" for white Be the Bridge members. Whites must never speak to non-whites as if they, the white people, are equal. They must always speak and act as inferior, submissive, guilty, and tainted. They must not share their understanding, they must assume themselves guilty no matter what their intentions are, they must never refer to objective facts, and they must remain silent and passive when being publicly cursed, insulted and accused of racism. Truth in advertising demands that Latasha Morrison retitle her work, "Be the Punching Bag." Indeed, Be the Bridge commandments for how white people are allowed to behave are reminiscent of requirements for the accused at Maoist struggle sessions.

Baucham mentions Southern Baptist Theological Seminary professor and author Jarvis J. Williams. In a shocking YouTube video, Williams claims or insinuates that white people have never been lynched, that white people invented slavery, that white people were never enslaved, and that the Confederate flag can mean only one thing to those who brandish it: white terror against black and brown people. Williams said he was so afraid when he saw a Confederate flag in Tennessee that he had to leave the area. In fact if Williams were open to actual facts, I could show him archival photographs of lynched whites, I could show him numbers proving that these lynchings of white Italian and other immigrants, including German immigrant Robert Prager were no one-offs, that white people have in fact been enslaved, in their millions, by Muslims, that there were white slaves in the US, see, for example, here, that the indenture system of whites was slightly better than, but in many respects comparable to, slavery, and that there are abundant images of African Americans wearing, flying, or otherwise embracing the Confederate flag, which suggests that not all black people interpret it as he does. One response to Williams' comments on YouTube reads, "I’m Hispanic  and brown when I see a confederate flag I think Dixie, a war that was won for freedom, the dukes of hazard and gone with the wind! Im not offended never have never will ! I recognize history and learn from it! I don’t dwell in it !" Finally, it is very disturbing to hear a Christian preacher insist that no whites were ever lynched, given the notorious history of the lynching of the Jewish man Leo Frank.

Baucham details behind-the-scenes politicking around critical theory and the 2019 Southern Baptist Convention. Concerned Baptists put forward a resolution on critical race theory and intersectionality. The original document boldly asserted that "critical race theory and intersectionality are founded upon unbiblical presuppositions descended from Marxist theories and categories, and therefore are inherently opposed to the Scriptures as the true center of Christian union." The rest of the document was equally forceful and clear. Politicking watered the document down and that watered down document was all the public saw. Baucham fearlessly names the names of those who promoted Woke at the expense of the Bible, and engaged in what he calls a "deliberate act of duplicity." It is never more clear than in this account why Baucham titled his book Fault Lines. Clearly, his own life will be quite challenging because of this book's forthrightness. As in the wider society, congregants at Christian churches are being separated by an ideological divide as difficult to mend as the fault line ripped into the earth after a large quake.

Baucham speaks to black people as his own mother spoke to him. Baucham's mother emphasized personal responsibility. Baucham, too, emphasizes personal responsibility. Like so many other conservatives, he cites the importance of fathers. He also emphasizes the importance of education and he is not afraid to talk about the statistics that indicate that African Americans commit a disproportionate number of violent crimes, and that most of those crimes are committed against fellow African Americans. Baucham points out the folly of many voices, like that of Lebron James, who insist that African Americans are afraid to leave their homes because white people might hunt and kill them. Rather, African Americans are much more likely to commit a violent crime against a white or Asian person than vice versa. "Black people are overwhelmingly more likely to victimize white people than the other way around … a police officer is 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black assailant than an unarmed black man is to be killed by a cop." Black people themselves support the presence of police in their communities, and black voters and black politicians participated in tough-on-crime measures during the crack epidemic that devastated black communities.

Baucham believes that the deadliest destroyer of black lives in the US is abortion. "Though black women make up less than 13 percent of the population, they account for 35 percent of all abortions. In major cities like New York, Philadelphia, and Los Angeles, more black babies are aborted than born … nearly 80 percent of Planned Parenthood's abortion clinics are in minority neighborhoods."

Again, Baucham does offer hope. His hope is distinctively Christian, and it entails features that used to be part of everyday life in the West: repentance, forgiveness, starting anew, a belief in progress, a belief that all of us were created by one loving, creator God, and that we are all connected by that shared creation. Tom Holland, author of Dominion, and Douglas Murray are both atheists, and they are both astute observers who recognize that society needs routes out of resentment, recrimination, and the lust for revenge, and Christianity provided those routes. Baucham, a Calvinist, does not expect his every reader to become Christian. We must, therefore, find some way to respect these Christians traditions in a post-Christian society. Otherwise, the Pagan tribalism that Baucham labels "ethnic Gnosticism" and the no-exit, permanent struggle session mandated by critical race theory will destroy the bonds that hold Americans together.

"There can be no reconciliation without justice," Black Lives Matter claims. Baucham replies, and the all caps are in his original reply, "YES! AND THE DEATH OF CHRIST IS THAT JUSTICE! … Antiracism offers endless penance, judgment, and fear … I am not an African. I am not an African American. I am an American, and I wouldn't want to be anything else. America doesn't owe me anything. America has blessed me beyond measure. If anything I owe America. More importantly, I owe my Savior, and, by extension, I owe my brothers and sisters in Christ." What can one say except "Amen"?

Danusha Goska is the author of God through Binoculars: A Hitchhiker at a Monastery

 

‘We Are Silent No More’: Brave Leaders Join Forces to Halt the Covid Vaccine (Video)

BY RENEE NAL

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/we-are-silent-no-more-brave-leaders-join-forces-to-halt-the-covid-vaccine-video/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

“We are men and women created in the image of God, not guinea pigs or lab rats.”

LifeSite News sponsored an online conference with the Truth for Health Foundation featuring brave “scientists, religious leaders, attorneys and physicians” and others who are standing together fight the “dark cloud of censorship,” as explained by Texas Internist and Cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough.

Some of the highlights during the presentation:

  • Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet kicked off the program, saying that “We are silent no more”.
  • Dr. Peter McCullough emphasized that Americans have not yet been given a safety briefing on the Covid vaccines. Dr. McCullough highlighted this fact as well during an interview with RAIR Foundation USA earlier this week.
  • Pastor Stephen Broden stated that churches will be teaming with the Truth for Health Foundation to get the truth to congregants with their initiative “Medicine and Ministry United“.
  • Former Pfizer VP Dr. Michael Yeadon made powerful statements about the potential effects of the mRNA vaccine on fertility in women. “The authorities are not giving us full information about the risks of these products.”
  • Attorney Thomas Renz, who works with America’s Frontline Doctors, claims that so-called “breakthrough cases” (those diagnosed with Covid after receiving the vaccine) account for “40 percent or more of the [hospital] admissions.”
  • Sister Deidre Byrne, who is also board-certified in family medicine and general surgery, is exasperated that citizens are being coerced to to take a vaccine meant to address a treatable virus with “a mortality rate near zero in children and healthy adults.”
  • German immunologist Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi said that the coronavirus is “less dangerous than seasonal flu.”
  • Dr. Jose Trasancos, CEO of Children of God for Life, stressed that the vaccine coercion elitists have disregarded safe, effective coronavirus treatments. Dr. Trasancos expressed sadness that many so-called religious organizations have joined to push the vaccine.
  • Pamela Popper of Wellness Forum Health reaffirmed that this period has been one of medical tyranny. Ms. Popper invited citizens to join her activist organization, Make America Free Again.
  • Reverend Bill Cook, Founder of America’s Black Robe Regiment criticized the pandemic for being based on false data. Reverend Bill Cook powerfully called for the mRNA vaccines to be pulled immediately.
  • Renowned Pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson expressed his outrage in no uncertain terms over the politicized pandemic which he referred to as “pure propaganda.” The 2019 coronavirus is “nothing more than a bad seasonal flu” and “nothing was needed except “good old common sense and early treatment.” RAIR Foundation USA was privileged to have interviewed Dr. Roger Hodkinson on several recent occasions (see herehere and here).

Watch the full program:

Rumble — This video is part of an article at RAIR Foundation USA: https://rairfoundation.com/we-are-silent-no-more-brave-leaders-join-forces-to-halt-the-covid-vaccine-video/

Lifesite News Sponsored this event.

Source: https://www.lifesitenews.com/conference-stop-the-shot/

"LifeSite hosted a townhall conference with The Truth For Health Foundation, “Stop the Shot… The Rest of the Story.” This online meeting will feature Dr. Peter McCullough, Attorney Thomas Renz, Dr. Michael Yeadon, Sister Deidre Byrne, Dr. Elizabeth Lee Vliet, Dr. Jose Trasancos, and other prominent physicians, scientists, attorneys, and religious leaders who will be discussing vital information related to the COVID jab, clinical trials, and more.

Here’s a brief look at what was shared at this online meeting:

Breaking information will be shared by the lead attorney in U.S. suit against the Biden regime’s HHS regarding VAERS, adverse events, under-reporting deaths, and injuries. This presentation will also include an update on the CDC Whistleblower affidavit, which indicates more than 45,000 actual deaths have taken place following the COVID shot, versus the VAERS reports of only 11,000.
Previously undisclosed data from both Pharma-clinical trials and subsequent additional studies on the COVID jab related to specific, serious, immediate, and long-term impacts on fertility in both men and women.
Updates on international medical studies regarding actual vaccine immunity versus what has been reported to the public by the media.
Breaking information regarding international lawsuits and theological implications related to the latest COVID news around the world.

NATURAL NEWS: YOUR KIND aren’t welcome here~Unvaccinated people now treated worse than Blacks in the Jim Crow era as vaccine pushers turn to bigotry and segregation

BY MIKE ADAMS

SEE: https://naturalnews.com/2021-08-05-your-kind-arent-welcome-here-unvaccinated-people-now-treated-worse-than-blacks-bigotry-racism.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) It is morally wrong to dehumanize and disrespect people because of the color of their skin, or for being gay, or for being physically disabled, and so on. In America, we build access ramps so that people in wheelchairs can have access to restaurants and public buildings. But now, thanks to the bigoted, racist, anti-freedom vaccine zealots, Black people who refuse to take part in the government’s vaccine medical experiment will be told, “You people aren’t welcome here.”

The appropriate question is: What do you mean, YOU PEOPLE?

In New York City, Mayor de Blasio has just announced that restaurants, gymnasiums, and soon grocery stores and public buildings will discriminate against the unvaccinated like a scene ripped right out of the Jim Crow era of racism and bigotry. The pharma-funded media is openly calling for unvaccinated people to be “shamed” and “shunned,” actually encouraging vaccinated people to dehumanize others who refuse to take the deadly jabs that are now linked to at least 20,595 deaths and 1.9 million injuries across the USA and the EU.

To see how insane this government-sanctioned discrimination really is, just take the recent announcement by de Blasio and replace “vaccinated” with “White” and “unvaccinated” with “Black,” and it turns out like this:

Bill de Blasio: If you’re White, you’ll have the key, you can open the door. But if you’re Black, unfortunately, you won’t be able to participate in most things. That’s the point we’re trying to get across, it’s time people see Whiteness as literally necessary to living a good, and full and healthy life. It will require Whiteness for workers and customers in indoor dining, in indoor fitness facilities, and indoor entertainment facilities. The ONLY way to patronize these establishments indoors will be if they’re White. The same in terms of work.

Can you imagine the outcry if de Blasio declared that Blacks could not have jobs, or visit restaurants, or go to the gym because of who they were? It would be immediately decried as a policy rooted in hate and racism, and those attempting to carry out such policies would be criminally investigated by the DOJ.

But announce the same discrimination against unvaccinated people, and suddenly all the hate and bigotry is celebrated by the media, the government and Big Tech. Because hatred is endorsed by all those groups when it helps compel people to take Big Pharma’s depopulation shots. Never make the mistake of believing that this vaccine push is rooted in love or even a desire for public health. It’s all rooted in hatred, racism and raw bigotry.

In a nation where it would be abhorrent to deny someone access to a restaurant because they’re gay, trans, Black, female or physically disabled, we now see mayors literally encouraging discrimination based on vaccine status. This makes those government leaders bigots and racist since Black Americans have the least percentage of vaccinated people (about 26%) versus other races. So the war against the unvaccinated is, not surprisingly, actually a war on Blacks, now being waged by the very same lunatics (like Dr. Leana Wen) who have been running the Planned Parenthood genocidal attack on Black babies for generations.

Many people refusing the vaccines have been previously vaccine-injured, meaning they have a medical disability… so why is it okay to discriminate against the medically disabled?

What’s even more disturbing in all this is the fact that many people have made a conscious choice to avoid vaccines because of previous vaccine injuries or allergic reactions. This means they have a medical disability that prohibits them from taking additional vaccines without risking serious adverse reactions or death. Yet in a society where it’s illegal to discriminate against people with physical disabilities, it’s now being openly encouraged to discriminate against those with medical disabilities.

It’s the equivalent of a restaurant owner in New York City tearing down the wheelchair ramps and posting a sign, “Handicapped not welcome here” … which would be abhorrent (and illegal).

Or imagine if a fitness gym set up shop in New York City and posted a sign, “No lesbians allowed.” They would be burned down by angry lesbians wielding Molotov cocktails, pitchforks and torches.

Yet Mayor de Blasio essentially just told every NYC business to post a sign that says, “Unvaccinated aren’t welcome here,” thereby discriminating against people for who they are.

In a world where the left-wing media repeatedly tells us, “love wins,” when it comes to vaccine obedience, hatred is the real policy of those who currently hold power.

In America’s left-wing culture, you can be a pedophile and still be excused by the media.

Or you can be a trans female felon who’s actually a biological man raping women in the women’s prison, and you will be celebrated by the media. You can literally murder your own newborn child in New York, right after it’s born alive, and be applauded by the media. You can be almost any insane thing you want, but you’re not allowed to be unvaccinated because on that issue alone, you must comply or be destroyed.

Since all vaccines have expiration dates in vaccine passport apps, any person’s privileged status will end if they don’t continue to comply

Vaccine passports used in New York assign expiration dates to vaccine injections. Your “freedom” expires in one year, based on current vaccines, and with Moderna and Pfizer now pushing “booster” shots, those will likely expire in just a few months. Big Pharma is pushing for monthly spike protein injections, which means vaccine passport apps will have people on a short leash: Keep complying with the monthly bioweapons injections, or you’ll lose your freedom and plunge into the “unvaccinated” status, even if you’ve taken all the vaccines so far.

This means, incredibly, that even those who have taken all the hyped vaccines can very quickly find themselves categorized as “unvaccinated” and watch their “key to the city” privileges vanish.

The lesson in all this? Complying with medical tyranny will never bring you freedom. The only freedom comes from saying NO to tyranny in the first place.

Learn more in today’s critically important podcast about medical rights, human rights and civil rights in the context of health freedom. For if we don’t protect the freedoms of all people to function in society, then none of us are living in a free society at all.

Brighteon.com/00295300-b3d6-46dd-b363-069ac8e618cc

Discover a new podcast each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

CDC Discusses Confinement, Internment Camps for Those at High Risk of China Virus

BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/cdc-discusses-confinement-internment-camps-for-those-at-high-risk-of-china-virus/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Centers for Disease Control is openly discussing internment camps for individuals with a high risk of contracting the China Virus.

Although a document at the CDC website appears to refer to settings outside the United States, the suggestion that governments should erect safe zones to quarantine healthy but at-risk people should alarm Americans already faced with mask and vaccine mandates.

In New York City, for instance, hard-left Mayor Bill de Blasio has closed some public venues to those who aren’t vaccinated, and the state legislature has passed a bill to indefinitely arrest and contain those who don’t have the contagious disease. 

It’s a short step from those measures to mandated confinement of the type CDC contemplates.

Green Zones

Dated July 26, the CDC document listed under “Global COVID-19” discusses “green zones” in which those at “high risk” of contracting the virus will be housed. CDC’s euphemism for the internment is “shielding.” The goal is to “protect high-risk populations from disease and death.”

Though “this approach has never been documented,” the agency says, “considerations are based on current evidence known about the transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes available.”8/5/2021

Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings | CDC
https://www
.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the
Shielding Approach
to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in
Humanitarian Settings
Updated July 26, 2020
Print
This document presents considerations from the perspective of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) for
implementing the shielding approach in humanitarian settings as outlined in guidance documents focused on camps,
displaced populations and low-resource settings.
This approach has never been documented and has raised questions and
concerns among humanitarian partners who support response activities in these settings. The purpose of this document is to
highlight potential implementation challenges of the shielding approach from CDC’s perspective and guide thinking around
implementation in the absence of empirical data. Considerations are based on current evidence known about the
transmission and severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and may need to be revised as more information becomes
available. Please check the
CDC website
periodically for updates.
What is the Shielding Approach?
The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at
higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be
temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level
depending on the context and setting.
They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.
Current evidence indicates that older adults and people of any age who have serious underlying medical conditions are at
higher risk for severe illness from COVID-19.
In most humanitarian settings, older population groups make up a small
percentage of the total population.
 For this reason, the shielding approach suggests physically separating high-risk
individuals from the general population to prioritize the use of the limited available resources and avoid implementing long-
term containment measures among the general population.
In theory, shielding may serve its objective to protect high-risk populations from disease and death. However, implementation
of the approach necessitates strict adherence
, to protocol. Inadvertent introduction of the virus into a green zone may
result in rapid transmission among the most vulnerable populations the approach is trying to protect.
A summary of the shielding approach described by Favas is shown in Table 1. See
Guidance for the prevention of COVID-19
infections among high-risk individuals in low-resource displaced and camp and camp-like settings
 for full details.
Table 1: Summary of the Shielding Approach
Level
Movement/ Interactions
Household (HH) Level:
A specic room/area designated for high-risk individuals
who are physically isolated from other HH members.
Low-risk HH members should not enter the green zone. If
entry is necessary, it should be done only by healthy
individuals after washing hands and using face coverings.
Interactions should be at a safe distance (approx. 2
meters). Minimum movement of high-risk individuals
outside the green zone. Low-risk HH members continue to
follow social distancing and hygiene practices outside the
house.8/5/2021
Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings | CDC
https://www
.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
Neighborhood Level:
A designated shelter/group of shelters (max 5-10
households), within a small camp or area where high-risk
members are grouped together. Neighbors “swap”
households to accommodate high-risk individuals.
Same as above
Camp/Sector Level:
A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings
within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per
single green zone) where high-risk individuals are
physically isolated together.
One entry point is used for the exchange of food, supplies,
etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to
interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No
movement into or outside the green zone.
Operational Considerations
The shielding approach requires several prerequisites for effective implementation. Several are addressed, including access
to healthcare and the provision of food. However, there are several prerequisites which require additional considerations. Table 2
presents the prerequisites or suggestions as stated in the shielding guidance document (column 1) and CDC presents
additional questions and considerations alongside these prerequisites (column 2).
Table 2: Suggested Prerequisites per the shielding documents and CDC’s Operational Considerations for Implementation
Suggested Prerequisites
*As stated in the shielding document*
Considerations as suggested by CDC
Each green zone has a dedicated latrine/bathing
facility for high-risk individuals
The shielding approach advises against any new
facility construction to establish green zones;
however, few settings will have existing shelters or
communal facilities with designated latrines/bathing
facilities to accommodate high-risk individuals. In
these settings, most latrines used by HHs are located
outside the home and often shared by multiple HHs.
If dedicated facilities are available, ensure safety
measures such as proper lighting,
handwashing/hygiene infrastructure, maintenance
and disinfection of latrines.
Ensure facilities can accommodate high-risk
individuals with disabilities, children and separate
genders at the neighborhood/camp level.
To minimize external contact, each green zone
should include able-bodied high-risk individuals
capable of caring for residents who have disabilities
or are less mobile.  Otherwise, designate low-risk
individuals for these tasks, preferably who have
recovered from confirmed COVID-19 and are
assumed to be immune.
This may be difficult to sustain, especially if the
caregivers are also high risk. As caregivers may often
will be family members, ensure that this strategy is
socially or culturally acceptable.
Currently, we do not know if prior infection confers
immunity.
The green zone and living areas for high-risk
residents should be aligned with minimum
humanitarian (SPHERE) standards.
The shielding approach requires strict adherence to
infection, prevention and control (IPC) measures.
They require, uninterrupted availability of soap,
water, hygiene/cleaning supplies, masks or cloth face
coverings etc for all individuals
in green zones
8/5/2021
Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings | CDC
https://www
.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
coverings, etc. for all individuals in green zones.
Thus, it is necessary to ensure minimum public
health standards
are maintained and possibly
supplemented to decrease the risk of other
outbreaks outside of COVID-19. Attaining and
maintaining minimum SPHERE
standards is difficult
in these settings for the general
population.
 Users should consider that provision
of services and supplies to high-risk individuals could
be at the expense of low-risk residents, putting them
at increased risk for other outbreaks.
Monitor and evaluate the implementation of the
shielding approach.
Monitoring protocols will need to be developed for
each type of green zone.
Dedicated staff need to be identified to monitor each
green zone. Monitoring includes both adherence to
protocols and potential adverse effects or outcomes
due to isolation and stigma. It may be necessary to
assign someone within the green zone, if feasible, to
minimize movement in/out of green zones.
Men and women, and individuals with tuberculosis
(TB), severe immunodeficiencies, or dementia should
be isolated separately
Multiple green zones would be needed to achieve
this level of separation, each requiring additional
inputs/resources. Further considerations include
challenges of accommodating dierent ethnicities,
socio-cultural groups, or religions within one setting.
Community acceptance and involvement in the
design and implementation
Even with community involvement, there may be a
risk of stigmatization.
 Isolation/separation from
family members, loss of freedom and personal
interactions may require additional psychosocial
support structures/systems. See section on
additional considerations below.
High-risk minors should be accompanied into
isolation by a single caregiver who will also be
considered a green zone resident in terms of
movements and contacts with those outside the
green zone.
Protection measures are critical to implementation.
Ensure there is appropriate, adequate, and
acceptable care of other minors or individuals with
disabilities or mental health conditions who remain
in the HH if separated from their primary caregiver.
Green zone shelters should always be kept clean.
Residents should be provided with the necessary
cleaning products and materials to clean their living
spaces.
High-risk individuals will be responsible for cleaning
and maintaining their own living space and facilities.
This may not be feasible for persons with disabilities
or decreased mobility.
 Maintaining hygiene
conditions in communal facilities is difficult during
non-outbreak settings.
 consequently it may be
necessary to provide additional human resource
support.
Green zones should be more spacious in terms of
shelter area per capita than the surrounding
camp/sector, even at the cost of greater crowding of
low-risk people.
Ensure that targeting high-risk individuals does not
negate mitigation measures among low-risk
individuals (physical distancing in markets or water
points, where feasible, etc.). Differences in space
based on risk status may increase the potential risk
of exposure among the rest of the low-risk residents
and maybe unacceptable or impracticable,
8/5/2021
Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings | CDC
https://www
.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/global-covid-19/shielding-approach-humanitarian.html
considering space limitations and overcrowding in
many settings.
Additional Considerations
The shielding approach outlines the general “logistics” of implementation –who, what, where, how. However, there may be
additional logistical challenges to implementing these strategies as a result of unavailable commodities, transport restrictions,
limited sta capacity and availability to meet the increased needs. The approach does not address the potential emotional,
social/cultural, psychological impact for separated individuals nor for the households with separated members. Additional
considerations to address these challenges are presented below.
Population characteristics and demographics
Consideration: The number of green zones required may be greater than anticipated, as they are based on the total number
of high-risk individuals, disease categories, and the socio-demographics of the area and not just the proportion of elderly
population.
Explanation: Older adults represent a small percentage of the population in many camps in humanitarian settings
(approximately 3-5%
), however in some humanitarian settings more than one-quarter of the population may fall under high
risk categories
based on underlying medical conditions which may increase a person’s risk for severe COVID-19 illness
which include chronic kidney disease, obesity, serious heart conditions, sickle cell disease, and type 2 diabetes. Additionally,
many camps and settlements host multiple nationalities which may require additional separation, for example, Kakuma
Refugee Camp in Kenya accommodates refugees from 19 countries.
Timeline considerations
Consideration: Plan for an extended duration of implementation time, at least 6 months.
Explanation: The shielding approach proposes that green zones be maintained until one of the following circumstances
arises: (i) sufficient hospitalization capacity is established; (ii) effective vaccine or therapeutic options become widely available;
or (iii) the COVID-19 epidemic affecting the population subsides.
Given the limited resources and healthcare available to populations in humanitarian settings prior to the pandemic, it is
unlikely sufficient hospitalization capacity (beds, personal protective equipment, ventilators, and sta) will be achievable
during widespread transmission. The national capacity in many of the countries where these settings are located (e.g., Chad,
Myanmar, and Syria) are limited. Resources may become quickly overwhelmed during the peak of transmission and may not be
accessible to the emergency affected populations.
Vaccine trials are underway, but with no definite timeline. Reaching the suppression phase where the epidemic subsides can
take several months and cases may resurge in a second or even third wave. Herd immunity (the depletion of susceptible
people) for COVID-19 has not been demonstrated to date. It is also unclear if an infected person develops immunity and the
duration of potential immunity is unknown. Thus, contingency plans to account for a possibly extended operational timeline
are critical.
Other logistical considerations
Consideration: Plan to identify additional resources and outline supply chain mechanisms to support green zones.
Explanation: The implementation and operation of green zones requires strong coordination among several sectors which
may require substantial additional resources:  supplies and sta to maintain these spaces – shelters, IPC, water, sanitation,
and hygiene (WASH), non-food items (NFIs) (beds, linens, dishes/utensils, water containers), psychosocial support,
monitors/supervisors, caretakers/attendants, risk communication and community engagement, security, etc. Considering
global reductions in commodity shortages,
 movement restrictions, border closures, and decreased trucking and ights, it is
important to outline what additional resources will be needed and how they will be procured.
17

Page 1 / 7

Zoom 100%

What sounds like a blueprint for a future action describes three levels of confinement. The targeted will be “temporarily relocated to safe or ‘green zones’ at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level.” Each involves isolation. 

The lucky high-risk people will be at home, but “physically isolated from other [household] members,” CDC says:

Low-risk HH members should not enter the green zone. If entry is necessary, it should be done only by healthy individuals after washing hands and using face coverings. Interactions should be at a safe distance (approx. 2 meters). Minimum movement of high-risk individuals outside the green zone. Low-risk HH members continue to follow social distancing and hygiene practices outside the house.

The same rules will apply for the “neighborhood” level, and the “Camp/Sector Level” is next:

A group of shelters such as schools, community buildings within a camp/sector (max 50 high-risk individuals per single green zone) where high-risk individuals are physically isolated together.

Rules in the camp “green zone” will be tight. No one in, no one out:

One entry point is used for exchange of food, supplies, etc. A meeting area is used for residents and visitors to interact while practicing physical distancing (2 meters). No movement into or outside the green zone.

High-risk kids are not exempt from the “operational considerations.” They will be “be accompanied into isolation by a single caregiver who will also be considered a green zone resident in terms of movements and contacts with those outside the green zone.”

“Dedicated staff” will monitor the “green zones,” meaning they code and track the movements of the “green-zone” inmates.

New York has already moved to quarantine the healthy. A newly enacted law that awaits disgraced Governor Andrew Cuomo’s signature will give him the power to lock up anyone he deems a threat, including those only “suspected” of infection with a contagious disease.

The governor or one of his underlings “may order the removal and/or detention of such a person or of a group of such persons by issuing a single order, identifying such persons either by name or by a reasonably specific description of the individuals or group being detained,” the law says:

Such person or group of persons shall be detained in a medical facility or other appropriate facility or premises.

The state has considered the idea for at least six years.

It goes without saying that certain “high-risk individuals” will not be trapped in “green zones” should the Biden Regime implement the confinement/internment plan. They include President Joe Biden and family, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her bunch, Senators Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell and their relatives, tycoons such as Bill Gates and Warren Buffett, and anyone else with money and power. They will remain free to do as they please.

Border Invasion

One reason Americans might be subject to confinement is the illegal alien invasion at the southwest frontier with Mexico. As The New American reported last month, official data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection show that agents have caught more than one million illegals since October 1, the beginning of fiscal 2021.

Unofficial data reported by the Associated Press put the latest monthly total for August at 210,000, not counting 37,000 who slipped into the country.

The Biden Regime is dumping those illegals, many infected with the China virus, into American communities. In some cases, they are flown into the heartland; in others, they board buses. In either case, they scatter where they wish.

On August 2, Bill Melugin of Fox News tweeted footage of buses arriving at processing centers from the border.

Biden has dumped 7,000 infected migrants in McAllen, Texas, including 1,500 in the last week.

In late July, police in La Joya, Texas, learned that illegals with the virus were freely running about town, and in one case were caught sneezing and coughing in a Whataburger.

RHODE ISLAND: Gigantic Teachers’ Union Sues Mom for Asking What the Local Public School Is Teaching Her Daughter

BY BRYAN PRESTON

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/bryan-preston/2021/08/05/gigantic-teachers-union-sues-mom-for-asking-what-the-local-public-school-is-teaching-her-daughter-n1467245;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

There was a time when parental involvement in our kids’ education was seen as a good thing that all parents should do. We were invited to meet our kids’ teachers and even participated in class once or twice a week. This was all part of making sure our kids obtained the education our tax dollars paid for.

The COVID pandemic and the moral panic following George Floyd’s death destroyed all of that. Unionized teachers advocated for closing schools and keeping them closed and started sneaking in critical race theory teachings at every level during online classes. When parents noticed and asked, they tended to get a run-around or worse. In Loudon County, Virginia, public school administrators and teachers formed a cabal to hunt down and smear parents who questioned them.

Rhode Island mom Nicole Solas wanted to know what her daughter was being taught in kindergarten. So she asked the school for copies of the curriculum. She is entitled to that, as a parent and as a taxpayer. Public school curricula are public documents.

Instead of accommodating her, the school fought her. That naturally raised her suspicions, so she asked for more and more, about 200 public information requests, and got more and more of a runaround from the school. The school even tried to stick her with a bill for $74,000 as a way of making her go away.

Now the all-powerful National Education Association-Rhode Island has sued Solas. She was served with the lawsuit this week. The NEA is the largest teachers’ union in the United States, and it backs using public schools to teach critical race theory. It proudly states that its president, Becky Pringle, is a “fierce social justice warrior and defender of educator rights.” NEA’s bio of Pringle doesn’t mention parents at all.

Related: Critical Race Theory Backers Get Predatory

The NEA’s complaint is available here. The Goldwater Institute is representing Solas.

Boiled down, the gigantic union is begging the court to silence the mom, Nicole Solas, from asking questions about her child’s education. They want the court to enable public school administrators to hide documents that may be subject to FOIA laws (called APRA in Rhode Island, for the Access to Public Records Act). For instance:

NEA

I’ve dealt with public records from both sides, as a vigilante journalist and as a state agency employee, though not under Rhode Island’s APRA. Why is someone writing a “private” email or document to a public body? Why would a member of the NEA, in particular, do this? Its members are almost all public employees, making their electronic communications largely public information when a public body such as a school is also involved. Those communications may not be private at all. It can depend on the content and purpose of the communication or document. Typically a state’s attorney general is asked to weigh in on questions regarding documents such as these. NEA-RI seems to have chosen to use an intimidating lawsuit instead. Rhode Island’s attorney general is a Democrat, Peter Neronha. Depending on how APRA works, appealing to him rather than filing a lawsuit may have been the NEA’s smarter play.

Legal Insurrection has followed Solas’ case from the beginning. Law professor William Jacobsen says:

My initial take is that this smells collusive. South Kingstown doesn’t want to produce records and the union is helping them out. The lawsuit purports to prevent disclosure of “private” information, but the public records laws and Solas’ requests pursuant to those laws only require the district to produce public records. The district has been very aggressive in asserting exemptions and redacting documents, so the union’s concern and rush to court seems peculiar, at best.

It’s worth noting that the South Kingstown NEA previously targeted Solas, as we reported, by holding a special membership meeting singling her out as a danger.

Solas has been on the union’s radar very much as a target. She seems to have caught public employees violating the state’s open meetings law.

Now the monstrous teachers’ union is suing her.

NYC Business Owner Calls on Businesses to Defy COVID Rules

NYC Business Owner Calls on Businesses to Defy COVID Rules

BY VERONIKA KYRYLENKO

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/nyc-business-owner-calls-on-businesses-to-defy-covid-rules/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A popular YouTuber and New York City business owner has vowed to defy a rule introduced by New York Mayor Bill de Blasio that will make vaccination mandatory for certain indoor activities and a condition of employment, arguing that the policy is authoritarian.

Louis Rossmann, whose biting commentaries on “right-to-repair” and a wide range of other issues have earned him a large social media following, is the owner and operator of Rossmann Repair Group located in Manhattan. Arguably, he’s by far the most famous independent Mac and iPhone repair person in the United States and became famous for championing legislation that would allow people to repair their devices without having to rely on services offered exclusively by the Silicon Valley giant.

Following Mayor de Blasio’s announcement of the program dubbed “Key to NYC Pass” — which will require patrons of indoor dining, fitness, and entertainment venues to show proof of vaccination against COVID-19 before entering, as well as require all staff to be vaccinated — Rossmann published a video in which he stated that his computer repair shop would not be turning away customers based on their vaccination status. The program is set to take effect on August 16, while inspections and enforcement are said to begin in mid-September.

Rossmann started his emotional video by stressing that he was fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and believes that the benefits of inoculation far outweigh the risks. “I’m not anti-vaccine,” he said, “I’m not even anti-vaccine for vaccines that have not had a full FDA approval.” The problem, Rossmann said, is that New York City’s leaders are “getting out of control” and “don’t understand the concept of consent.”

Showing a compilation of shuttered storefronts, Rossmann said that due to the economic devastation caused by more than a year of lockdowns and other restrictions, most businesses in the city don’t have the “luxury” of selecting paying customers based on their personal health decisions. 

Rossmann expressed his outrage over de Blasio essentially forcing people to get vaccinated, and the degree to which the mayor had no respect for people’s personal choices, as he played footage of de Blasio complaining about corporate media how the city “tried voluntarily” and how they “could not be more kind and compassionate,” but the “voluntary phase is over.”  

“It’s time for these politicians to learn the meaning of the word ‘no,’” Rossmann continued, “When they say that you need to shut down your business, and we’re not gonna tell you when we’ll allow you to reopen your business, and we’re not gonna tell you or help you to pay a rent on that business, or the employees of that business, but you need to shut down — for all of these things, the answer should be ‘NO.’”

The businessman also expressed his disgust with de Blasio asking people to snitch on venues that allow their customers to violate social-distancing rules by taking pictures and sending them to the mayor’s office.

“When they say that we need to be the police that enforce whether or not people have injected something into their arm before they are allowed to do business with us, it’s about time that we say ‘NO,’” Rossmann stressed, adding, “these people are never going to learn unless we force them to.”

Rossmann went on to advise business owners to start using de Blasio’s own language against him, arguing they tried being “nice” and comply with all the lockdown rules and regulations, but now it’s time for a more forceful response: “If you’re saying that after a year of destroying all those businesses that used to be my customer base, I now need to reduce my customer base even more … based on people’s medical status?… NO!”

He added that while he’s “done” with de Blasio’s lockdowns and restrictions, if the city dares to go after his business, Rossmann said he would find a better place to move it to instead of staying in “this garbage dystopia that we’re starting to live in.” Rossmann called on people to push back on authoritarians and send them a strong message that they’ve crossed the last red line.

New York has seen a tremendous exodus of both businesses and people in the last year. In 2020, a net of 70,000 people left the metropolitan region, resulting in roughly $34 billion in lost income.

According to a Forbes report, the trend of businesses fleeing the Big Apple preceded the pandemic, as Wall Street executives relocated thousands of jobs to states outside of New York in an effort to cut costs. Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Barclays, UBS, Citigroup, Alliance Bernstein, and an array of other financial institutions have established and aggressively staffed hubs in Florida, North Carolina, Salt Lake City, Dallas, Nashville and other less-expensive locations compared to New York. But, the report continues, a combination of high taxes, poor governance on the part of Mayor de Blasio, ever-increasing crime, business and school shutdowns, and a resurgence in COVID-19 cases has led to even more businesses to relocate.

Small businesses have been struggling, as nearly a third of them have been permanently closed due to COVID-related shutdowns imposed by the city. Eater New York reports that as of July 30, the restaurant business is far from recovered: “More than one year after New York’s first indoor dining shutdown, restaurants and bars continue to close their doors,” and estimated that lockdowns left the city at least 1,000 restaurants short, while admitting the number may be actually much higher. The Patch adds, “the hospitality industry likely deserves its own category [among business closures], due to the near-total evaporation of all revenue during the pandemic lockdowns. In Midtown, the Omni Hotel, the Times Square Hilton, the storied Roosevelt Hotel, and the Marriott Marquis all announced temporary or permanent closures this year, laying off thousands of workers in the process.”

_____________________________________________________________

Mayor De Blasio missing in action following NYC shootings

Rumble — An urgent search begins for suspects involved in a mass shooting that occurred in New York City over the weekend. One America’s Caitlin Sinclair has more.

Woke Corporate America lining up to force their own employees to get vaccinated, placing them in imminent danger of vaccine injury or death

Image: Woke Corporate America lining up to force their own employees to get vaccinated, placing them in imminent danger of vaccine injury or death

BY J.D. HEYES

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-08-04-woke-corporate-america-force-employees-get-vaccinated.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Not long ago when patriotism was proudly displayed by a vast majority of citizens and our cultural and societal influencers weren’t Marxist haters, U.S. corporations grew large and wealthy on “Buy American” pledges.

Walmart essentially grew its brand on such a pledge and ran commercials during the 1980s and 1990s touting, “Bring It Home To The USA.”

How times have changed.

Today, U.S. Olympians protest about “injustice” and being oppressed. Professional sports athletes take a knee or turn their back on the flag during the playing of the National Anthem. Hollywood is a cesspool of anti-American hate. Every white conservative who praises our country and loves freedom and liberty is branded by a thoroughly corrupt media as “nationalists” or “supremacists.”

And American corporations are now run by hypocritical Marxist shills who stump for tyranny while simultaneously making bank in a capitalist economy they claim to hate.

After the Biden regime announced in recent days that it would require all federal workers and contractors to get an increasingly ineffective and dangerous COVID-19 vaccine, U.S. corporations anxious to please their Democrat masters in Washington to avoid being regulated into oblivion are rushing to follow suit, requiring their workers to either get a vaccine or be endlessly hassled with weekly COVID tests and other mandates.

The Epoch Times reports:

The Walt Disney Co. and Walmart announced new policies late last week that will require nearly every employee working for the companies in the United States to be vaccinated against the CCP virus.

Disney’s new measure will give both salaried and non-union hourly employees across the nation 60 days to be compliant, the company said in a July 30 statement. Newly hired employees will also be required to be fully vaccinated before beginning employment.

“Employees who aren’t already vaccinated and are working on-site will have 60 days from today to complete their protocols and any employees still working from home will need to provide verification of vaccination prior to their return, with certain limited exceptions,” said a Disney statement, adding that negotiations are already underway with various union leaders that represent employees regarding a vaccine mandate.

“Vaccines are the best tool we all have to help control this global pandemic and protect our employees,” Disney claimed, which, of course, is complete nonsense.

Nevertheless, the livelihood of some 203,000 employees throughout Disney’s theme parks and media companies are going to be affected.

“Disney’s policy was announced as several big-tech companies, including Google and Facebook, said in July that every American employee must get a shot before stepping back into offices,” The Epoch Times added.

“We’re hoping that will influence even more of our frontline associates to become vaccinated,” said Scott Pope, a Walmart spokesman.

CNN reported on the trend as well, noting, “Corporate America is getting serious about vaccines.”

But others are going further, including famous restauranteur Danny Meyer; he will require customers to show proof they’ve been vaccinated or they won’t be allowed inside his New York City and Washington, D.C., establishments.

In addition to these companies, other American corporations that have hopped on the COVID vaccine bandwagon include Netflix, BlackRock, Morgan Stanley, Saks Fifth Avenue, The Washington Post, Lyft, Twitter, Uber and Goldman Sachs.

No doubt more will follow because that’s what tyrannical CEOs do.

“This is an American tragedy. People are dying – and will die – who don’t have to die. If you’re out there unvaccinated, you don’t have to die,” Biden said during remarks at the White House last month. He continued the propaganda push with, “Read the news. You’ll see stories of unvaccinated patients in hospitals, as they’re lying in bed dying from Covid-19, they’re asking, ‘Doc, can I get the vaccine?’ The doctors have to say, ‘Sorry, it’s too late.’”

He added: “You present a problem to yourself, to your family and to those with whom you work.”

Remember when America used to be the “land of the free?” Marxist revolutionaries are using the COVID outbreak to steal our liberties and never give them back.

Sources include:

CNN.com

TheEpochTimes.com

NaturalNews.com

Public Schools: Masks, Vaccines, and Usurpation of Parental Authority

Public Schools: Masks, Vaccines, and Usurpation of Parental Authority

BY C. MITCHELL SHAW

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/public-schools-masks-vaccines-and-usurpation-of-parental-authority/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

With COVID leading the news and dominating so much political discourse just weeks before the start of the school year, parents will have some tough decisions to make about the safety and well-being of their children. But in some parts of the nation, parents whose children are in public schools will have many of those decisions — such as whether their children should wear masks for hours on end or receive experimental vaccines with questionable efficacy — made for them. And the people making those decisions answer only to themselves.

It is, by now, an indisputable fact known to anyone who has been paying attention that schools assert authority over the lives and decisions of students. Parents who try to push back and assert their God-given authority and responsibility are quickly informed that school policy is the final rule. This has been demonstrated in “sex education” classes pushing everything from masturbation to abortion and from pornographic reading and viewing assignments to accepting and celebrating the full range of LGBTQ+ ideology. It has also been demonstrated in instance after instance of schools indoctrinating kids in radical, anti-American ideologies — the most recent and prominent example of which is Critical Race Theory.

In school districts across the nation, parents who have tried to address these concerns are told that what happens in school is none of their business. The public-school system views the role of parents as subsidiary at best. Parents are expected to pay taxes, place their kids in the care of the school system, and butt out.

With the dreaded Delta Variant leading in headlines and political debates, the CDC, the White House, states, and local municipalities are all making decisions — either in the form of recommendations or regulations. But even many of the “recommendations” come dangerously close to carrying the weight of law. The oft-repeated mantra of “follow the science” doesn’t really act as a guide, by the way, since whatever the Church of CDC said last week (as interpreted by High Priest Fauci) does not necessarily apply this week. And as this writer noted in a previous article, if what Fauci and the CDC say does not line up with the political agenda of the Ruling Party, liberal mainstream media are instructed by the Biden administration as to what to report and how to report it.

So, as the new school year approaches, parents across the nation will find themselves stripped of their authority to make medical decisions for their children. The landscape is difficult to navigate since there are so many states involved and each has its own laws and guidelines. To make matters even worse, those laws and guidelines are subject to change without notice. The following is the best available information as of this writing, but it is up to the reader to verify whether it has changed.

While it would be reasonable to expect that medical decisions for minors would fall to their parents, it is demonstrable that we are not living in reasonable times. As of this writing, 41 states do require parental consent for minors to receive vaccinations. But in one of those states — Arizona — the parents' refusal for their minor child to get the COVID vaccine can be overridden by a court if a doctor requests such. And in two cities — San Francisco and Philadelphia — it is possible for a minor as young as 12 to get the COVID shot without parental consent.

And four states — Alabama, Oregon, Rhode Island, and South Carolina — allow minors to “self consent” with certain age requirements that range from 14 to 16, depending on the state. Washington, D.C., also allows minors to “self consent” and amazingly sets the age for doing so at 11.

The remaining five states — Arkansas, Idaho, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Washington — apply the “mature minor doctrine.” This means that — as a matter of law — there is no minimum age for a child to make this medical decision for himself. In those states, providers have the discretion to decide if a minor possesses the maturity to consent to a vaccine.

Before going any further, let’s spend a moment on the “mature minor doctrine.” Since this doctrine assumes no minimum age, it needs to be asked what exactly is meant by the word “mature” in this term. This writer would — perhaps — grant the use of that word to a small handful of 16 or 17-year-olds I have known in my half-century sojourn on this planet. But no one who has spent any real time here at all would use that word to describe the ability of most children to make informed medical decisions that could have life-changing consequences.

And yet, states that apply that doctrine (as well as states that set insanely low ages for children to “consent” to an experimental vaccine they cannot really understand) will be using school policy and pressure tactics to press kids into “consenting” without parental involvement.

The parents may not even know that their child is getting the vaccine until it has already been done.

An example of a “mature minor doctrine” state is North Carolina. So how is the Old North State applying that doctrine where COVID vaccines are concerned? Well, for now, the minimum age is 14. But — and this is important — nothing in the law prohibits schools from arbitrarily lowering that age restriction. If a child wants to receive the experimental vaccine (either because he has bought into the hype that he is at risk or because he wants to do what many of his friends have done), a lack of parental consent will not stand in the way. The state — and its schools — set that standard. Parents can sit down and shut up; it’s none of their business.

Of course, vaccines and their possible side effects are not the only COVID-related issues that deal with parental consent. As the CDC and White House continue to point to the specter of the dreaded Delta Variant (which has not been shown to be very dangerous, even if it is shown to be highly contagious), masks even for the vaccinated are back on the agenda. This, despite a year and a half’s worth of data on the lack of efficacy of masks and the detrimental effects of wearing them for long durations — especially for children.

As of this writing, states are all over the map on mandating masks for schools. Forbes reported in mid-July that Arizona, Arkansas, Iowa, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and Vermont had banned schools from requiring masks. But that has already changed. As of August 3, the Phoenix Union High School District in Arizona said everyone must wear masks indoors. And Arkansas followed suit, with Governor Asa Hutchinson asking the state legislature to provide an exemption to the law and require masks for schools. Utah passed a mask mandate, but whether it will apply to schools remains to be seen. Probably, though.

And mask mandates at the state or local level — including and sometimes specifically mentioning schools — have been reenacted all over the country. This means that a parent who is concerned about his child being masked for hours on end — with the incumbent problems related to physical, mental, and emotional health, social development, and learning — has no say in the matter in those places. The state — and its schools — will decide what is “best” for the child.

And while vaccines and masks are the immediate concern for many parents, they are really just symptoms of a larger, deeper, more systemic problem: The parent has no say in what does or does not happen at school. There is a basic principle that states “You can delegate authority, but you cannot delegate responsibility.” When we as parents stand — at the end of our lives — before the Great Judge, we will answer for the ways in which we raised our children. We will answer for the formation of their moral consciences. We will answer. And saying, “But the school said…” will not fly. Our Lord said to render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to render unto God the things that are God’s. How will we answer in that dreadful day if we have rendered unto Caesar those things that we were to render to God, namely our children?

Over the last few decades — and considerably before experimental vaccines, masks, LGBTQ+ gender-fluid “sex education,” CRT, and the whole cornucopia of dangers schools push today — concerned parents who have taken seriously the formation of their children have elected to homeschool their kids. By taking to heart the responsibility to exercise their parental authority, these parents have removed their children from a godless system that lacks both the moral jurisdiction and a mandate to educate those children.

Homeschooling is much simpler now than it ever has been. Gone are the days when it meant thousands of dollars in textbooks, rigid schedules, and reinventing the wheel. Today, there are homeschool groups all over the country that are headed by veteran homeschoolers who helped pioneer the movement. They can help almost anyone find a version of homeschooling that works for them. And there are hybrid systems such as Freedom Project Academy that use live and recorded video lessons with qualified teachers who answer to the parents, not to a godless system.

The real question, then, is this: If a parent loves his children and wants to raise them with his values, morals, and religious ideals, what is keeping him from removing his child from Caesar’s schools and rendering that child unto God?

What is keeping you?

For a list of educational resources for parents and their children, visit Save Our Children. And be sure to check out Freedom Project Academy for information on a fully accredited, Common Core-free, classical education for kindergarten through high school right in your own home.

Sen. Cramer: Make States Mandating Vaccine Passports Mandate Voter ID

Sen. Cramer: Make States Mandating Vaccine Passports  Mandate Voter ID

BY VERONIKA KYRYLENKO

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/sen-cramer-make-states-mandating-vaccine-passports-mandate-voter-id/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Senator Kevin Cramer (R-S.D.) has introduced legislation to require states that are mandating COVID-19 vaccine passports to also enact voter identification laws.

Senator Cramer issued a following statement on Tuesday:

If states that take federal money for elections feel the need to make residents verify a piece of information as private as their vaccination status just to return to normalcy, then they should have no problem requiring people to prove they are who they say they are when they go to vote. My legislation would ensure those states are being consistent about their identification requirements and shine a light on those who hypocritically oppose Voter ID laws but support vaccine passports.

The senator added that he plans to introduce the legislation as both a standalone bill and as an amendment to the Democrats’ $3.5 trillion spending plan.

Cramer’s proposed legislation comes as New York City announced it was mandating proof of vaccination to enter certain indoor dining, fitness, and entertainment establishments.

Even though no states have made proof of vaccines mandatory, New York, California, and Hawaii have all created optional vaccine digital passports for residents. As the “purely voluntary phase” of vaccinations has reached it limits, as New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio put it, the states switched their approach from cajoling to coercing, and started introducing various COVID-19 vaccination mandates, arguably in a bid to stop the spread of the “highly contagious” Delta Variant. There is also Oregon, which is requiring retail stores, restaurants, grocery stores, and other establishments to review vaccination status cards of those consumers who refuse to wear facemasks.

Some observers pointed out that the same people that readily embrace the COVID IDs are adamantly opposed to voter IDs. The latter are considered “racist” and “discriminatory” against ethnic minorities, since, the argument goes, they are “disadvantaged” and have difficulty obtaining voter IDs. Yet, the statistic shows that many of the black residents in New York City have not rushed to get their COVID-19 shots, and thus will soon be unable to enjoy certain services. Independent journalist Michael Tracey pointed out that only 42 percent of black residents in New York City have received at least one dose of the jab — a threshold set by de Blasio to enter certain venues. “Looking at these figures, it seems impossible to dispute that NYC’s upcoming ‘vaccine mandate’ policy will have a racially disparate impact. Is that still the primary standard by which a policy must be judged, or not?” Tracey tweeted. Yet, he added, the city’s liberals were cheering the policy, despite it violating the only standard they normally seem to care about.

Similarly, in California, about 44 percent of the black population has been partially vaccinated. Neither state has voter ID requirements.  

As some states work on COVID-19 vaccine electronic verification systems, there are 20 states, including Cramer’s North Dakota, that have already decided not to introduce a statewide vaccine-proof requirement.

When asked about the comparatively low proportion of black New Yorkers being vaccinated — as compared to the national level recorded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) — White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki responded that the objective of the Biden administration was to “close that equity gap” by working closely with local governments to make vaccines available and accessible for all. Psaki added that given the Delta Variant of COVID-19 is “spreading like wildfire” across the country, cities and local communities “should be able to take steps to incentivize more people getting vaccinated,” implicitly endorsing de Blasio’s mandate.

But since the vaccines, according to de Blasio, have long been available to be delivered directly to any New Yorker’s door, it’s unclear what Psaki meant by stating the vaccines should be more accessible.

Joe Biden has repeatedly decried voter-integrity laws such as those passed in Georgia, calling them “Jim Crow on steroids,” implying modern-day Republicans are actually worse than segregationists. The Department of Justice has even been ordered to sue the state of Georgia over its voter-ID law on the grounds that it was “racially motivated.”

At the same time, the administration sees no problem with requiring people to share their personal medical information to attend certain public venues, and, accordingly, sees no problem that access would be denied to those who refuse to do that. In addition to that, while the White House has repeatedly denied it would we be supporting a system that requires Americans to carry any form of COVID-19 vaccination credential, it was reported back in May that the Biden administration has actually partnered with private companies to develop a standard way of handling credentials that would “allow Americans to prove they have been vaccinated against COVID-19.”

On July 30, CDC director Rochelle Walensky indicated the Biden administration is considering a federal vaccine mandate: “That’s something that I think the administration is looking into. It’s something that I think we are looking to see approval of from the vaccine.” She backtracked the next day. “To clarify: There will be no nationwide mandate. I was referring to mandates by private institutions and portions of the federal government. There will be no federal mandate,” Walensky tweeted.

Wearing Masks at Home

"There is no science to defend putting your kids in masks or parents wearing masks—no science whatsoever."

BY STEVE WATSON

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-rand-paul-calls-nih-director-stupid-after-call-to-wear-masks-at-home/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Senator Rand Paul denounced “stupid” comments made on CNN by National Institutes of Health director Dr. Francis Collins, after the direct underling of Anthony Fauci declared that parents with children under the age of 12 should wear face masks INSIDE their own homes.

Appearing on Fox News, an exasperated Paul urged “How can people who are so smart say such stupid things?”

Watch:

“There is no science to defend putting your kids in masks or parents wearing masks—no science whatsoever,” Paul emphasised, adding “If there were, we would be wearing masks for years and years because for kids, the death rate is about the same as the seasonal flu. It may be less than the seasonal flu.”

The Senator continued, “So, is Francis Collins proposing that because the flu is with us forever that parents should be wearing masks around their kids that have the flu? It is absolutely and utterly without scientific evidence!”

Going on to speak regarding the government fear mongering over the Delta (or Indian) variant of the virus, Paul said “Now, they’re all freaking out right now about the Delta variant. One thing is—in all likelihood true—it is more transmissible, significantly more transmissible, but guess what? Every bit of evidence shows that it’s less deadly—significantly less deadly.”

“Public Health England looked at 92,000 people. If you were vaccinated and under 50, there were no deaths. If you were unvaccinated and under 50, .08%—still very, very small. So, it’s not an argument for not getting vaccinated. It’s an argument for not getting hysterical over the Delta variant,” Paul further urged.

He continued “We shouldn’t be changing any mandates and really, in all likelihood, the masks didn’t affect the trajectory of the virus at all.”

Paul, a qualified physician, further explained “The only thing that’s slowing the virus down is the vaccine and natural immunity and they continue to ignore natural immunity because they think we are too far behind.”

“We got to vaccinate the children but, in reality I think it’s 90% of people over 65 have been vaccinated. That’s extraordinary. We should be celebrating,” Paul concluded.

Following the interview, Paul tweeted out a report noting that the FDA has approved the use of COVID-19 antibody therapy, meaning Monoclonal antibodies can be given to elderly spouses or family members who live with someone who has COVID 19.

Hooray for REAL Science!

Paul also reacted to being censored by YouTube after an interview he did with Newsmax on the lack of efficacy of cloth face masks was removed purely because it contradicts what the government says about masks.

———————————————————————————

SEE ALSO: https://thenewamerican.com/public-schools-masks-vaccines-and-usurpation-of-parental-authority/

CNN: We Can’t Trust the Unvaccinated

"Everybody should still be wearing masks."

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/posts/cnn-medical-analyst-we-cant-trust-the-unvaccinated/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

CNN medical analyst Leana Wen further entrenched the two tier society when she blamed people who hadn’t taken the jab for a COVID-19 “surge” while asserting “we can’t trust the unvaccinated.”

Wen made the comments during an appearance on Democracy Now.

“When vaccinated and unvaccinated people are mixing, unless there is proof of vaccination, everybody should still be wearing masks,” said Wen.

“So I actually support what the CDC is now doing, which is going back to this indoor mask requirement because frankly we know that we can’t trust the unvaccinated, that they have been walking around without masks and in fact that’s what led to the surge that we’re seeing,” she added.

Given that it’s now well established that vaccinated people can still spread the virus, there is no evidence to wholly blame the “surge” of the delta variant on unvaccinated people.

But Wen is merely continuing her narrative of attempting to frame the unvaccinated as second class citizens who should face discrimination.

During a previous appearance on CNN, Wen asserted that, “It needs to be hard for people to remain unvaccinated,” calling on workplaces and schools to start making life difficult for those who refuse to take the shot.

However, Wen didn’t seem as concerned about the spread of the virus when she basically gave Black Lives Matter protesters a pass despite them gathering in their thousands in major cities during the height of the pandemic.

Wen’s total disregard for bodily autonomy is somewhat ironic given her former position as head of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

As we have exhaustively highlighted, masks are completely useless and merely serve as a symbol of mass conformity.

A peer reviewed study involving 6,000 participants in Denmark revealed that “there was no statistically significant difference between those who wore masks and those who did not when it came to being infected by Covid-19,” the Spectator reported.

Dr Colin Axon, a SAGE advisor for the UK government, dismissed face masks as “comfort blankets” that do virtually nothing, noting that the COVID-19 virus particle is up to 5,000 times smaller than the holes in the mask.

“The small sizes are not easily understood but an imperfect analogy would be to imagine marbles fired at builders’ scaffolding, some might hit a pole and rebound, but obviously most will fly through,” Axon said.

Even Dr. Anthony Fauci admitted that masks were pointless at the start of the pandemic, when he wrote that a typical store-bought face mask “is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material.”

The coming Delta lockdown is DESIGNED to invoke nationwide protests so they can be exploited as a backdrop for false flag event to blame “anti-vaxxers”

BY MIKE ADAMS

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-08-03-the-coming-delta-lockdown-is-designed-to-invoke-nationwide-protests-false-flag-event.html

EXCERPTS: 

The swamp criminals who ran this entire covid plandemic are getting desperate, you see, and they need to create a new crisis to try to seize even more power. Here’s how this plan will work, according to multiple sources:

Step 1) Biden announces a nationwide, overreaching lockdown.

Step 2) Americans react against the medical tyranny and take to the streets in peaceful protests.

Step 3) The criminal Biden regime exploits the chaos of the protests to stage a violent false flag attack against a medical facility so that blame can be placed on gun owners who are also “anti-vaxxers.”

Step 4) CNN runs with the staged footage, claiming anti-vaxxers are terrorists. The entire media jumps on the engineered narrative to whip up mass hysteria and hatred against the unvaccinated. This further divides America while the media whips up the emotions to insane levels.

Step 5) Biden uses the emotional hysteria to issue an executive order outlawing all gun ownership by civilians. Yes, it’s illegal and unconstitutional, but he will try it. Many red states will denounce the effort, and this will accelerate the splintering of the United States of America as red states realize they can no longer maintain any allegiance to a criminal swamp cabal that recognizes no limits of government power.

Step 6) Biden launches door-to-door “strike force” teams, now heavily armed up after the false flag theater, to forcibly vaccinate people at gunpoint and confiscate their firearms.

As I explain in my podcast below, here’s what I suggest you keep in mind when joining the peaceful protests against medical tyranny:

  1. NEVER bring weapons to any protest. Not even pepper spray. If you bring weapons, you may wind up ensnared in another FBI false-flag terror plot.
  2. DO NOT trespass into any building, including a hospital or clinic. This is how they arrested innocent, peaceful protesters on January 6th.
  3. FILM EVERYTHING and be ready to quickly hide your micro SD card so that the corrupt FBI can’t confiscate it after they pull off their false flag event. This means preparing in advance to hide micro SD cards in your bra, shoes, underwear, hair or even other body orifices, should you dare. Since America is now becoming North Korea, honest Americans must now resort to the same freedom techniques used by dissenting North Korean citizens who have to smuggle videos that show the corruption and criminality of the regime.
  4. WATCH OUT for efforts by individuals or any group to whip you into aggressive action of any kind. The FBI will obviously run agent provocateurs who try to convince people to do outrageous things, and CNN’s cameras will be waiting to capture you on film and destroy your life.
  5. IF IN DOUBT, stay the f##k out. Don’t get dragged into some situation that seems fishy or out of control. Don’t enter buildings or private property. Even be careful what you say verbally because there are audio recording devices all around you. By merely stating out loud something like, “We should barge in there!” you can be charged with terrorism under the new Biden regime and its corrupt DOJ.

Chip Roy: Biden Should Be Impeached Over Immigration Crisis

Chip Roy: Biden Should Be Impeached Over Immigration Crisis

BY BOB ADELMANN

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/chip-roy-biden-should-be-impeached-over-immigration-crisis/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Representative Chip Roy (R-Texas) essentially gave 200,000 reasons why he believes President Joe Biden should be impeached and removed from office. After noting that more than 200,000 illegals were taken into custody in July, Roy told the Daily Wire:

Over the past several months President Biden and [DHS Secretary] Mayorkas have blatantly and consistently refused to do their constitutional duty to take care that the immigration laws be faithfully executed, as required by Article II [of the U.S. Constitution], endangering countless American and foreign lives in the process.

An average of 6,779 illegals crossing the southern border of the United States every day in July. That’s more than 200,000 for the month and, if left unchecked, would approach two and a half million for the year.

Chip Roy’s reasons for impeachment add to those outlined by Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) in her impeachment filing the day after Joe Biden entered the Oval Office:

President Joe Biden is unfit to hold the office of the presidency. His pattern of abuse of power as President Obama’s Vice President is lengthy and disturbing.

President Biden has demonstrated that he will do whatever it takes to bail out his son, Hunter, and line his family’s pockets with cash from corrupt foreign energy companies.

President Biden is even on tape admitting to a quid pro quo with the Ukrainian government threatening to withhold $1,000,000,000 in foreign aid if they did not do his bidding. President Biden residing in the White House is a threat to national security and he must be immediately impeached….

Joe Biden abused the power of the Office of the Vice President, enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors, by allowing his son to influence the domestic policy of a foreign nation and accept various benefits — including financial compensation — from foreign nationals in exchange for certain favors.

After detailing Hunter’s efforts to sell his father’s influence to officials of foreign governments, Greene concluded in her articles of impeachment:

President Biden gravely endangered the security of the United States and its institutions of government. Through blatant nepotism, he enabled his son to influence foreign policy and financially benefit as a result of his role as Vice President.

He supported his son engaging in collusion with Chinese Communist party-linked officials. He allowed his son to trade appointments with his father and other high-ranking administration officials in exchange for financial compensation. He permitted his son to take money from Russian oligarchs, including Elena Baturina, the wife of the former mayor of Moscow.

By enabling the flow of illegals to become a flood, some say Biden and his DHS secretary are threatening the very foundations of the Republic. This is the same Republic that Biden swore to uphold and defend against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Instead, he is allowing those enemies, both foreign and domestic, including his son Hunter, to run wild, without restraint.

The 200,000 who just entered the U.S. illegally last month merely add to the lengthening list of reasons why many say Biden should be impeached. Of course, since there is a Democrat majority in both houses of Congress, the possibility of this happening are basically zero. 

Related article:

Freshman House Member Files Articles of Impeachment Against Joe Biden

________________________________________________________

No, Border Patrol Wasn't "Whipping" Haitian Migrants~Guest: Rep. Chip Roy 

ALLIE BETH STUCKEY INTERVIEW:

White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator Says It’s ‘Time To Impose Vaccine Requirements’

“It’s simple, if you want to work with the federal government, get your workers vaccinated”

BY STEVE WATSON

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-white-house-coronavirus-response-coordinator-says-its-time-to-impose-vaccine-requirements/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In a briefing Monday, the Biden Coronavirus Response Coordinator Jeffrey Zients announced that “it’s time to impose some requirements” where COVID vaccines are concerned.

Zients referenced Biden’s comments from last week where the latter talked about giving people cash in exchange for being vaccinated, but added that this doesn’t go far enough.

“Last week the president called on states and local governments to use funding they have received, including from the American Rescue Plan, to give $100 to anyone who gets fully vaccinated,” Zientz said, adding “If financial incentives like these help us get more shots in arms, we should use them.”

“But in addition to incentives, it’s time to impose some requirements based on the realities of different risks unvaccinated individuals pose versus those who have been vaccinated,” Zients proclaimed.

He then went on to confirm that any federal worker or contractor who remains unvaccinated will be forced to wear a mask and get COVID tests twice a week.

“It’s simple, if you want to work with the federal government, get your workers vaccinated,” Zients decreed.

Watch:

As we reported last week, Biden himself indicated that he is seeking confirmation on whether the entire country can be mandated to get the vaccines.

While talking about the likes of Google and Facebook announcing vaccine mandates for their employees, Biden said “I would like to see them continue to move in that direction,” and added that “it’s still a question whether the Federal government can mandate the whole country.”

“I don’t know that yet,” Biden added, indicating it is something he is actively seeking to clarify.

Watch:

When asked for clarification on exactly what COVID rules could be implemented going forward, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said Monday that nothing is off the table.

While suggesting that total lockdown will not be brought back, Psaki responded that Biden “has said from the beginning that we are going to be guided by the science, guided by our public health experts, and we’re not going to take options off the table of what they may recommend.”

Again, basically Americans will be ordered to do whatever the “experts” say.

Ludlow Superintendent resigns after months of pressure. School Board members join him in vicious public attacks on parents.

SEE: https://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen4/21b/Ludlow-MA-middle-school/Supt-and-Board-attack-parents/index.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

An unbelievable display: Using all the leftist talking points to demean and demonize parents during consecutive School Board meetings - after complaints about radical agenda in middle school.

See two video clips below.

Part 10 in a series. (See entire series here.)

August 1, 2021
ALT TEXT 
The ringleaders against parents (left to right): Superintendent Todd Gazda, Board Chairman Michael Kelliher, "Chip" Harrington.
ALT TEXT 
Board members Jeffrey Lang, Charles Mullin, Sarah Bowler.

The vitriol that school officials unleash against parents who hold traditional values is truly chilling. But it is extremely common, though rarely displayed in public.

At the May 25, 2021 Ludlow, Mass. School Board meeting, Superintendent Todd Gazda announced his resignation. This followed more than a year of pressure and outrage from parents and members of the local community over a toxic agenda in the middle school. The resignation came less than a week after the Superintendent and Principal fired Bonnie, an outspoken teacher who supported the parents.

At both that School Board meeting and the following meeting two weeks later, Gazda and Board members publicly attacked, demeaned, and demonized the parents, community members, and even a student who had spoken out. Normal meeting procedures were blatantly set aside, allowing for these shocking attacks.

Background: Pushing a toxic agenda on middle school children

The outrages started in late 2019 when lurid pornographic books for teenagers appeared in the school library and classrooms of Baird Middle School in Ludlow, Mass. The books had been brought in by the school librarian, a strange cross-dressing woman.

In late 2020, the situation got much worse. Teachers and guidance counselors at Baird took advantage of the COVID disruption to introduce radical “transgender” ideas to children. They persuaded children as young as 11 that they were “transgender” – and the school staff purposely kept this from the children’s parents.

Bonnie, a Social Studies teacher, was upset at what she saw and raised the alarm in February 2021. Parents and even some teachers were shocked and demanded the books be removed. But the school officials refused to take any action. Then, as the word got out in the community, the pressure led to the librarian’s resignation in early 2021.

MassResistance helped parents inform the larger community through a flyer, and people in Ludlow were livid at the school officials. In May, the Superintendent and Principal retaliated against Bonnie by firing her. They had to concoct phony charges, since she had a spotless 20-year record as a teacher.

School Board disallows direct public comment at meetings

During the COVID shutdowns, most School Boards and other government bodies around the world held their meetings online via Zoom. Members of the public would still be able to speak directly to the school officials during the public comments part of online meetings.

But the Ludlow School Board did not want to hear from angry parents. So instead of using Zoom, they held their Board meetings in their regular meeting room (wearing their masks). But they did not allow the public into the meetings; the Board met before an empty room! As before, the meetings were broadcast on cable-TV and the videos were posted later.

If Ludlow citizens wanted to register comments, they had to email them beforehand. The Superintendent would decide which emails would be read aloud during the meeting. This outrageous restriction – not being able to address their officials in person – only added to the anger of the parents.

Changing meeting procedures to lash out at parents

With the news that the librarian had quit and the Superintendent was about to announce his resignation, the School Board was extremely angry at the parents and wanted to lash back publicly.

So, for their May 25 and June 8 meetings, the School Board decided to deviate even further from normal meeting procedures. Usually, School Boards just listen to the public comments without replying. But now, if there were emailed comments from critics of the middle school situation, the Superintendent and/or Board members would prepare a “rebuttal” beforehand (attacking that person’s remarks) and read it out loud. We have never seen that done before anywhere. It was shameful, childish, and simply vindictive.

At the May 25, 2021 School Board meeting: Superintendent’s resignation and angry attack

VIDEO: Clip from 5/25/21 Ludlow School Board meeting (6 min 12 sec)

Superintendent Todd Gazda started off by formally announcing his resignation, adding that he had accepted a job with a local non-profit organization. (Usually, Superintendents leave to take a job with a bigger school system – and a higher salary. We’ve never seen one leave to work for a non-profit.) With accumulated vacation, his last day would be June 17, he said.

Then, during “citizen participation,” the Board read aloud one email. It was from Alex, a 10th-grade student at Ludlow High School, who (like many parents) was outraged at the abuses of children at the middle school and particularly Bonnie’s firing for exposing it. He pointed out that parental rights were being disregarded.

Alex said that staff members were pushing extreme ideas to children 11-14 years old. “This agenda has been trying to convince them to change who they are, change their sexuality and gender at an age that many kids don’t fully understand either,” he wrote. “The school committee ignores the concerns of the parents. You ignore us. You won’t talk to us.”

He ended: “So I ask, who will finally listen to the parents of this district? When will this be fixed? When can we have a discussion about this? Or will you just continue to ignore the people in this town who should matter the most to this committee?”

Right after Alex’s email was read, the School Board Chairman, Michael Kelleher, blurted out, “Most of that’s just baloney.”

Then Superintendent Gazda read aloud his prepared “rebuttal” to Alex’s letter. It was a shrill, angry rant that largely repeated the LGBT movement’s talking points.

Gazda stated that the issues Alex was complaining about – sexual books, pushing transgenderism on children without telling parents, etc. – are really about “inclusion” and “making schools safe.” These help children to “be free to be themselves.” Rather than stop these programs, he said, “we do not do enough … and we need to do more.”

He made the disingenuous claim that this is “in compliance with the laws and regulations of our state and the guidance of the Department of Education (DOE).” (MassResistance is not aware of any Mass. state law or regulation that requires this, and he grossly misrepresented the DOE “guidance.”)

He stated that such complaints amounted to “intolerance of LGBTQ individuals” and were in fact “thinly veiled behind a camouflage of parental rights” and half-truths, misrepresentations, and false accusations. (In other words, the parents were lying.)

He claimed that the schools are the true “safe place” for students – not their homes with their parents. He said this controversy is about supporting children’s true “identity” (i.e., homosexual or transgender) and that the school supplies “caring adults” where students can discuss “problems they might have.” He said, “For many students school is their only safe place, and that safety evaporates when they leave the confines of our buildings.”

Gazda said that the middle school will absolutely continue to help the children “express who they are” despite parents’ wishes to the contrary.

With that, the Chairman adjourned the meeting. But there was much more to come at the next meeting.

The June 8 School Board meeting: more vile attacks on parents

VIDEO: Clip from 6/8/21 Ludlow School Board meeting (10 min 13 sec)

On June 8, 2021, the Superintendent attended his last School Board meeting.

In the “public comments” section, the Board again read aloud just one email. It was sent by a Ludlow father and mother of middle school children, and was signed by several other Ludlow parents.

The letter stated seven demands that the parents have regarding the middle school:

  1. Stop promotion of transgender and homosexual ideas to middle school children.
  2. Remove all destructive transgender and homosexual materials from the middle school library and classrooms.
  3. Establish a book review committee with parents, which would include library books, school websites. and textbooks.
  4. Stop retribution against teachers who expose these abuses to parents.
  5. Stop the hostility, intimidation, and harassment of parents who complain about these abuses.
  6. Instruct the Superintendent and school staff not to attack, shame, or demean parents and residents in the community because they criticize decisions by the School Board or school staff.
  7. Establish a policy that requires use of students’ given names and actual pronouns. We want all students treated with proper respect and dignity, with no attempt at coercion or manipulation.

These “demands” express normal and obvious sentiments parents hold for their middle school children. But they prompted a nearly hysterical reaction against these parents from the Superintendent and Board members.

School Board Chairman Michael Kelliher started by reading aloud his prepared reply - a nasty hate-filled rant, using numerous time-worn LGBT talking points. First, he repeated the claim that what the school did is supported by “state and federal law,” but he didn’t identify which laws.

He then said that it was just a “small group of vocal parents” who were attacking books in the library and were now opposing “the inclusive policies of the Ludlow Public Schools.”  He said that “the staff are simply doing their jobs” being “welcoming and supporting” to the children.

Kelliher said the Ludlow parents are actually under the spell of “outside groups” including MassResistance and which are “recruiting members” in Ludlow. (Of course, he ignores the fact that the entire LGBT agenda in Ludlow is fueled by outside groups, and earlier this year the American Library Association became very active pushing the sexual agenda in the town’s schools.)

Whenever liberals have no substantive argument, they call the other side “bigots” or “haters.” So it was no surprise that Kelliher called MassResistance a “hate group,” mentioning our opposition to the LGBT agenda and what he called “marriage equality.” His name-calling only reveals his own childish anger.

Kelliher ended by making the ridiculous charge that it is “MassResistance [that] is trying to change people’s identities, not the school staff.” He said that our efforts to protect children constitute “hateful rhetoric” and that we are creating “divisive battles” in Ludlow.

Then the Superintendent read his prepared rebuttal to the parents’ letter. It was mostly a repeat of the absurd points he’d made at the previous meeting. But he added:

Myself [sic] and other members of our Ludlow staff have been called evil, sick, twisted, and deviant. We have been accused of grooming students, implying we are pedophiles – for supporting an inclusive environment in our schools where all students can feel safe and supported.

Harassing phone calls have been made to our personal home phones and cell phones all in a pathetic attempt to intimidate and harass.

Actually, the phone calls were attempts by parents to set up meetings. The school officials had ignored the emails and calls to their offices. However, the terms “evil, sick, twisted, and deviant” seem appropriate in this perverse situation.

Gazda ended by characterizing the parents’ complaints as “prejudice and bigotry.”

Then Board Member James “Chip” Harrington spoke up. While the previous officials made remarks that were hateful and offensive, Harrington’s were just plain stupid:

I am all in favor of giving parents the right to decide how they’re going to raise their children. But if they’re going to reach in and tell other parents how to raise their children because it’s not in line with how they feel, then shame on them. You raise your kid how you want. But don’t start dictating to other parents how they should raise their kids.

This is exactly the opposite of what’s really going on. The parents have no interest in how others raise their kids. They simply want their own children left alone by school personnel. It’s a little frightening that Ludlow trusts someone as dense as Harrington to decide on school policies.

And he didn’t stop there. Harrington ended by saying that the parents’ letter is “inaccurate” because “there already is a process in place” to decide these issues. Yes, that’s technically true. But it’s a phony process where a bogus “committee” of left-wing faculty members is created to make a decision, and it always rules against the parents.

This is what the parents are up against!

Final reflection

You need to watch the two videos above (especially the second one) to appreciate how unbelievably offensive and repulsive these officials are. The three who did not comment were silent because they had nothing to add – not because they disagreed in any way.

Regular people – especially conservatives – make the same mistake across the country. They assume that these kinds of school officials and School Board members are basically like the rest of us, but simply “misguided” and can be reasoned with. Without exception, our experience has been the opposite.

These people are not normal. Normal people do not do repugnant and immoral things that can cause immeasurable emotional and psychological harm to other people’s children. Normal people do not lash out with this kind of unhinged hostility, hate, lies, and anger when challenged on it by constituents. The education system attracts some very, very bad people. We need to understand that and act accordingly.

More to come!

Please help us continue to do our uncompromising work!

Our successes depend on people like you.

Donate to MassResistance

Your support will make the difference!

 

The Social Media Giants Find A Violent Extremist: Me~So since I watch terrorists, I’ve been watching myself.

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/08/social-media-giants-find-violent-extremist-me-robert-spencer/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

As the director of Jihad Watch, I have an ongoing interest in the activities of violent extremists, and have been tracking those activities daily for eighteen years now. But now, in their benevolence, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, and YouTube have made it easier than ever with their Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT): all I have to do is look in the mirror.

The GIFCT means to wipe out the groups it targets. Tyler O’Neil explains at PJ Media that GIFCT “shares terrorism data among Big Tech companies, enabling them to flag and remove terrorist content,” and is stepping up these operations: “On Monday, GIFCT announced that it significantly expanded the types of extremist content in its database, aiming to crack down on material from white supremacists and far-right militias.”

It’s about time, right? Those white supremacists and far-right militias have been rioting with impunity in Portland, and Seattle, and – oh, wait, that was the noble ideological heirs of the heroes of World War II. But we don’t have to guess who they have in mind: the GIFCT offers a helpful list of the dangerous groups from which it is going to save us.

At the highest level, Level 3, are the groups GIFCT classifies as actual bloodthirsty, grade-A certified dangerous terrorists: Boogaloo Boys, Ku Klux Klan, the National Socialist Network, Al-Qaeda, the Islamic State, even the Irish Republican Army. But that’s not all that the intrepid warriors of the GIFCT are going after. Once you’ve reached Level 3, the problem has advanced way too far, anyway. The GIFCT aims to nip terrorism in the bud by also targeting Level 2, “Violent Extremism,” which includes groups that are just below terrorist group status, but moving up the charts with a bullet: Blood & Honour, Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, and…Jihad Watch.

Perhaps even more surprising than the inclusion of Jihad Watch on this list is the fact that Antifa is also listed at Level 2. The likelihood of the social media giants moving in on Antifa is about as likely as Nancy Pelosi being Trump’s running mate in 2024, but it does help put things in perspective. Antifa has been openly calling for and applauding violence in cities all over the country, and as far as the counter-terror “experts” at the GIFCT are concerned, they’re on par with an organization that is dedicated to tracking jihad terror activity and elucidating its motivating ideology. Unlike Antifa, neither I nor Jihad Watch has ever called for or approved of any violence or illegal activity of any kind. But another way we differ from Antifa is that establishment media stooges aren’t falling all over themselves likening us to the men (you may remember what those were) who stormed the Normandy beaches on June 6, 1944. The likelihood that Jihad Watch will be targeted for being on the GIFCT’s list, and Antifa given another pass, is about 100%.

On the morning I found out that I was a violent extremist, I discovered that violent extremists sometimes enjoy a bit of yogurt for breakfast, try to fit in a good long walk, and spend a lot of the day typing. It was a bit more sedentary, and definitely filled with less death-defying adventure, than I expected for an official “violent extremist.” With all the time I sit here facing this infernal machine, the GIFCT may think I’m at work on my “manifesto,” for they say they’re going to make sure that “Manifestos from terrorist and violent extremist attackers” are removed from the Internet, but that doesn’t mean that they won’t be intensely scrutinized, for “a wide range of experts on expanding the reach and impact of our hash-sharing database’s taxonomy in order to respond to terrorist content online across the ideological spectrum.”

Hey, great. Let me start you folks off on the right foot. Here’s my Manifesto, GIFCT, straight from one of your designated “violent extremists.” Get your experts on this, and make sure they study it carefully. Ready? Here it is:

You. People. Are. Nuts.

That’s it. You like it? It took me months to get the precise formulation of my “violent extremist” ideas. And just because I have so much respect for your violent extremist-hunting prowess, GIFCT wonks, here’s a bonus. Here’s what I want for America and the world: the freedom of speech. The freedom of conscience. The equality of rights of all people before the law.

Yeah, I know that messes with you Communists’ sugar-plum visions of racial strife, civil war, and the dissolution of America as a unitary nation-state. And that may be the clue to all of this madness. Violent extremists and their enablers want to make sure they have a free hand, and one strategy to get it was delineated in the Marxists’ tested-and-true playbook: accuse your enemy of that which you’re guilty of doing. Could it be that my organization been designated a violent extremist group because some people have a bit of violent extremism planned and want to make sure that anyone who might speak out against them is silenced and cleared away?

Stranger things have happened. Meanwhile, if I disappear from the net, and from the streets, someday soon, you’ll know that the good folks at the GIFCT have done their job. One less violent extremist will be menacing the rest of us. And we will all be able to breathe a sigh of relief over that. Won’t we?

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is author of 23 books including many bestsellers, such as The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)The Truth About Muhammad and The History of Jihad. His latest book is Did Muhammad Exist?: An Inquiry into Islam’s Obscure Origins―Revised and Expanded Edition. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.

 

55% of Republicans ‘Back Potential Use of Force to Preserve American Way of Life’

BY: DAVE WORKMAN

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/07/55-of-republicans-back-potential-use-of-force-to-preserve-american-way-of-life/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A new George Washington University survey reveals divided sentiments about using force to preserve America’s way of life.

U.S.A. –-(AmmoLand.com)- A stunning George Washington University poll conducted in June revealed that “Over half of Republicans (55%) supported the possible use of force to preserve the ‘traditional American way of life,’” while also finding that 47 percent of Republicans think there may be a time when “patriotic Americans have to take the law into their own hands.”

Another finding listed in the survey is that Republicans are far less likely (21%) than Democrats (83%) to say that “changing the nation’s gun laws is very or somewhat important.”

As reported by The Hill, “support for principles like free and fair elections, free speech and peaceful protest was nearly unanimous among Democratic and Republican voters.”

However, The Hill also noted, “Republicans were significantly less likely to have a strong amount of faith in local and state elections. Eighty-five percent of Democrats expressed trust in local election officials, with 76 percent saying the same of state officials, compared to 63 percent and 44 percent, respectively, for GOP voters.”

What this survey actually accomplished was to show the continuing, and perhaps widening divide between Democrats and Republicans on gun rights, and how political partisans disagree in their understanding of what the Second Amendment is really about. As grassroots gun rights activists repeatedly remind one another on social media, it’s “not about duck hunting.”

Considering the reductions to police departments in some major cities over the past year—a result of the “defund police” movement and an apparent decline in morale among police officers due to what they see as a lack of support from elected officials—it probably should not be surprising to see an increasing number of citizens concerned about having to act as their own first responders in life-threatening emergencies.

Amid the turmoil of 2020 and continuing into this year, gun sales have continued briskly in many parts of the country. Some estimates have put the number at 8 million new, first-time gun owners have joined the firearms community.

Back in April, The Hill reported on another survey, this one a Morning Consult-Politico tracking poll, that found 64 percent of registered voters support stricter U.S. gun laws, while 28 percent do not.

Alarming to gun rights activists, that survey also found 46 percent of respondents “said that limiting gun ownership was more important than protecting the Second Amendment, while 44 percent said that gun ownership rights were a higher priority.”

In May, Pew Research released a report citing eight “key facts about Americans and guns.” This poll also illustrates the divide between party philosophies on the Second Amendment.

According to Pew, the eight points are:

  • Around half of Americans (48%) see gun violence as a very big problem in the country today.
  • Attitudes about gun violence differ widely by race, ethnicity, party and community type.
  • Roughly half of Americans (53%) favor stricter gun laws, a decline since 2019.
  • Americans are divided over whether restricting legal gun ownership would lead to fewer mass shootings.
  • There is broad partisan agreement on some gun policy proposals, but most are politically divisive.
  • Americans in rural areas typically favor more expansive gun access, while Americans in urban places prefer more restrictive policies.
  • More than four-in-ten U.S. adults (44%) say they live in a household with a gun, including about a third (32%) who say they personally own one.*
  • Personal protection tops the list of reasons why gun owners say they own a firearm.

(*There is an interesting aspect to this question on gun ownership, and it came up recently in an Elway poll conducted in Washington State. When survey participants were asked whether anyone in their household owned a firearm, 42 percent said “yes,” 44 percent said “no,” but a sizeable number (14%) declined to answer. It is becoming more frequent that gun owners refuse to answer such a question because they do not believe it is anyone’s business whether they own a gun. Washington, incidentally, is a state with about 7.3 million residents, and there are currently more than 625,000 active concealed pistol licenses in circulation. That translates roughly to about one in nine or ten adults in the state who are licensed to carry, and roughly 20 percent of them are women.)

Among the prickliest of issues may be that 80 percent (or more) of Democrats “favor creating a federal database to track all gun sales and banning both assault-style weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, majorities of Republicans oppose the proposals,” Pew said.

Gun owners have long opposed a federal gun registry, a sentiment that could be more

However, 72 percent of Republicans “support allowing people to carry concealed guns in more places and allowing teachers and school officials to carry guns in K-12 schools (66%)” Pew added. Democrats, on the other hand, are largely opposed. Only 20 percent support broader concealed carry and 24 percent supported the idea of armed teachers.

The George Washington University poll revelations about the differences between Republican and Democrat responses underscores the concern American gun owners have about the push to change the nation’s gun laws and make them more restrictive under Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and the Pelosi-Schumer Democrat majority on Capitol Hill.

The political landscape could change dramatically in November 2022, largely driven by those concerns. Between now and then, however, activists will have their hands full blocking the gun control schemes that have already been introduced, and those yet to be revealed.


About Dave Workman

Dave Workman is a senior editor at TheGunMag.com and Liberty Park Press, author of multiple books on the Right to Keep & Bear Arms, and formerly an NRA-certified firearms instructor.

Dave Workman

Florida Governor DeSantis Tells the Feds Where to Stick Their School Mask Mandates

BY PAULA BOLYARD

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/paula-bolyard/2021/07/30/watch-gov-desantis-tells-the-feds-where-to-stick-their-school-mask-mandates-n1465815;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Friday announced that he would issue an executive order defying the federal government’s new masking recommendations for school children. The order will direct the Florida Department of Education and the Florida Department of Health to promulgate emergency rules giving parents the authority to decide whether their children will wear masks when they return to school next month.

“I want to empower parents to make the best decisions they can for the well-being of their children,” DeSantis told a crowd during a press conference at a Cape Coral restaurant.

Now there’s a novel idea: letting parents, rather than the government, decide what’s best for their own personal children.

In case there was any doubt where Gov. DeSantis stands on further COVID mandates, he declared: “There will be no lockdowns, there will be no school closures, there will be no restrictions and no mandates in the state of Florida.” The crowd roared its approval.

 

On Tuesday, the CDC updated its COVID-19 guidance to advise masking in indoor settings for the unvaccinated, which includes children under the age of 12 who are not yet eligible for the shot, and, remarkably, for those who have been vaccinated if they live in areas with high infection rates.

CDC recommends all unvaccinated persons wear masks in public indoor settings. Based on emerging evidence on the Delta variant (2), CDC also recommends that fully vaccinated persons wear masks in public indoor settings in areas of substantial or high transmission. Fully vaccinated persons might consider wearing a mask in public indoor settings, regardless of transmission level, if they or someone in their household is immunocompromised or is at increased risk for severe disease, or if someone in their household is unvaccinated (including children aged <12 years who are currently ineligible for vaccination).

We’ve been saying here at PJ Media for months that Dr. Fauci, the Democrats, and the media have been the most prolific vaccine deniers in the country. Recommending that vaccinated individuals continue to mask flies in the face of everything they’ve been saying about the efficacy of the vaccines and ignores the science on the vaccines’ efficacy. Either they work or they don’t. If they don’t, and we must continue to mask, why are they urging—and in some cases forcing—people to take the jab? Is it any wonder that so many Americans don’t trust these people with their health?

“Floridians have been, are, and will remain free to choose what’s best for themselves and their families and we will protect their right to work, will protect the right of businesses to operate, and we will protect the right of our kids to attend school in person,” the governor continued.

Related: Gov. DeSantis Skillfully Dismantles Arguments for Masking Children in 30 Seconds

He noted that Florida was the only large state that had widespread in-person schooling for the entire last school year, but lamented that a majority of school districts required masks. He cited a Brown University study comparing outcomes in Florida, Massachusetts, and New York, which concluded that there was “no correlation” between case rates and mask mandates in K-12 schools.

“We can say, in Florida, for the 2020-21 school year, that the districts that did not require masks did not perform statistically different from those that did,” he explained. Private and charter schools that didn’t require masks had similar outcomes.

“CDC’s position is that every single student, every single staff member, every single teacher must be masked at all time,” despite the fact that many of the students have already recovered from COVID-19 and the vaccine has been available to staff for months. DeSantis explained that much of the current wave of the virus moving through the state is driven by young people who are not getting very sick and are developing immunity. He said it’s “frustrating” that the government is pushing vaccinations while at the same time continuing to require masking. “What message does that send?”

DeSantis said he’s also frustrated that there seems to be no end in sight for the mandates. “There’s no off-ramp. We were told that the off-ramp was vaccination. Now we’re told that that’s not going to be the case and now you’re going to have to do masking, you may have to do restrictions and other severe forms of mitigation that will have a devastating impact on so many people’s lives and livelihoods and freedoms. So CDC’s policies, by doing this so hamhandedly by not looking things like this Brown study, it really shows a callous disregard for the physical, emotional, and academic well-being of our children,” he said. “They need to be put first. We had this whole year and a half where so many people in society wanted to put kids last. They wanted to impose most of the extreme mitigation on the kids that were the least likely to face any negative harm from this and, obviously, who were in very developmental stages where this could do a lot of potential damage. The forced masking, it has harmed students.”

Related: Why Democrats Fear Ron DeSantis

“Last month I signed HB 241, the Parents’ Bill of Rights. The bill prevents any institution from infringing on the ‘fundamental rights of a parent to direct the upbringing, education, health care, and mental health of his or her minor child.’ I think this decision about whether parents want their kids to have to wear masks all day in school, I think that’s a decision that falls squarely within the contours of this Parents’ Bill of Rights that I signed, and so, accordingly, very soon, I will be signing an executive order which directs the Florida Department of Education and Florida Department of Health to issue emergency rules protecting the rights of parents to make this decision about wearing masks for their children. We think that that’s the fairest way to do it. ”

“You know, I have young kids,” he said. “My wife and I are not going to do the masks with the kids, we never have. I want to see my kids smiling. I want them having fun.”

“And the question is, shouldn’t this be something the parent is best to evaluate the effect that this has on their children? Why would we have government force masks on our kids when many of these kids are already immune from prior infection, there is virtually zero risk of serious illness, and when virtually every school personnel, they’ve had access to vaccines for months and months,” DeSantis argued.  “I want to empower parents to be able to make the best decisions they can for the well-being of their children… we need to make sure that the parents’ rights are protected. The parents have to come first.”

Is it any wonder Americans from blue states are flocking en masse to Florida? The state has beautiful weather, stunning beaches, and the scent of freedom in the air—thanks to Gov. DeSantis, who has been one of only a handful of governors with the courage to stand up to the fearmongering and anti-science mandates.

COVID Killing the Classroom: The Virus Is Making Homeschooling Go Viral

COVID Killing the Classroom: The Virus Is Making Homeschooling Go Viral

BY SELWYN DUKE

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/covid-killing-the-classroom-the-virus-is-making-homeschooling-go-viral/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

What happens when you’ve long been reliant upon a sub-par service, but then find out you can perform it better yourself? If you answer that you ditch the service, now you know the reason for one often welcome, COVID-19-inspired societal change: a surge in homeschooling.

Homeschooling has long been gaining in popularity. Numbering only about 850,000 in 1999, there were approximately two million homeschooled children in America five years ago and an estimated 2.5 million in the spring of 2019, with a growth rate of two to eight percent per year, according to recruitment service Mark in Style.

That is, until the virus made it go viral. In fact, the U.S. Census Bureau told us in March that the rate of households homeschooling their children more than doubled during the six-month period from March to September 2020, rising from 5.4 percent to 11 percent.  

More striking still, black American households led the way, with their homeschooling rate rising during this period from 3.3 percent to 16.1 percent.

Moreover, now that the ice has been broken and these parents have shed the mass-schooling illusion, most might have said goodbye to the education cartel forever.

The Associated Press reported on this issue Monday, admitting that “some parents are grateful” for the coronavirus-inspired homeschooling transition. The outlet mentions how the parents it spoke to cited religious or “special needs” reasons as inspiring their educational endeavor — and that some mentioned how schools were “flawed,” a description trivializing what studies have shown is the main homeschooling motivation: academic indoctrination.

Relating one mother’s testimonial, the AP writes, “‘That’s one of the silver linings of the pandemic — I don’t think we would have chosen to home-school otherwise,’ said Danielle King of Randolph, Vermont, whose 7-year-old daughter Zoë thrived with the flexible, one-on-one instruction. Her curriculum has included literature, anatomy, even archaeology, enlivened by outdoor excursions to search for fossils.”

As another example, “Arlena and Robert Brown of Austin, Texas, had three children in elementary school when the pandemic took hold,” relates the AP, citing one of the new homeschooling black families. “After experimenting with virtual learning, the couple opted to try home-schooling with a Catholic-oriented curriculum provided by Seton Home Study School, which serves about 16,000 students nationwide.”

“‘I didn’t want my kids to become a statistic and not meet their full potential,’ said Robert Brown, a former teacher who now does consulting,” the AP further wrote. “And we wanted them to have a very solid understanding of their faith.”

Unfortunately, the Browns don’t reflect every black American homeschooling family. That is to say, the AP also cites those using something called the National Black Home Educators (NBHE) curriculum, which, the outlet informs, “provides content for each academic subject pertaining to African American history and culture.” This does, of course, sound highly racialized.

Nonetheless, the phenomenon does again illustrate the China virus-fired homeschooling boom — with the AP telling us that the NBHE had “about 5,000 members before the pandemic and now has more than 35,000” — and the children thus educated are still likely receiving better instruction than the government schools provide.

What the AP doesn’t present are examples of indoctrination-wary parents who’ve opted to homeschool; this is perhaps because Big Media and Big Education are ideological fellow travelers, and substantive criticism of the schools would equate to criticism of the AP itself.

More straightforward about its anti-homeschooling antipathy is British paper the Independent; it wrote Tuesday that the “number of children being homeschooled could soon become a serious problem,” citing “religious zealotry” as an issue. But there has been no recent Western rise in “religious” zealotry (save the Islamic variety); on the contrary, we’ve been losing our faith. But there has been a rise in opposition to “secular” zealotry. Parents aren’t suddenly having a Road to Damascus moment; they’re reacting to a pseudo-elite culture that’s becoming overtly hostile to the Christian faith — and, put differently, to the Truth itself.

And the truth is that even many “secular” parents are recoiling at today’s schools’ full-throated leftism. As the Daily Caller reported in 2019, “Classroom Indoctrination Is Causing a Rise in Homeschooling.” Arlena echoed this last year, pointing out that “educators” don’t represent the people they serve.

“Among English teachers, there are 97 Democrats for every three Republicans,” the site related, “with the proportion being even more one-sided among health teachers, with 99 Democrats for every one Republican.… Among high school teachers overall, there are 87 Democrats for every 13 Republicans.”

This is reflected in the “teaching” (twisting?), with students encouraged to go out and protest “climate change” and support neo-Marxist group Black Lives Matter, and being accosted with mental monstrosities such as sexual devolutionary perversion and Critical Race Theory (along with masking and the rest of COVID Ritual). In fact, 2020 could be called the year when Big Education jumped the shark of schooling surreality.

This brings us to a common but laughable anti-homeschooling claim: that many children thus taught will receive a sub-par education. But while no education is highly preferable to soul-killing miseducation (“First, do no harm…”), this is hardly the homeschooling reality. As Mark in Style relates:

  • Homeschoolers score 15% to 30% higher on tests than public-school students. 
  • Homeschooling erases racial disparities in academic achievement.
  • Homeschooled students perform four grade levels above average.
  • Homeschooled children engage in 5.2 activities outside the home.

(I am curious as to what two-tenths of an activity is.)

One activity they don’t usually engage in, however, is immersion in things such as Hate America First 101, Introduction to Soul Destruction, Sexual Perversion 2.0, and How to Become a Dummy for Dummies.

If the education cartel is upset about losing “customers,” or, as some would say, captives, they’ve no one but themselves to blame.

CDC Director Walensky Lies About Kids, Contradicting CDC’s OWN DATA

CDC Director Rochelle Walensky

CDC Director Walensky Lies, Contradicting CDC’s OWN DATA

BY SELWYN DUKE

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/cdc-director-walensky-lies-contradicting-cdcs-own-data-to-encourage-child-abuse/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Rochelle Walensky lied about how kids died — and more children will suffer as a result.

Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), perhaps trying to justify the administration's position that children will probably have to wear masks at school in the fall, recently stated that COVID-19 is notably deadlier to kids than is the flu. The problem is that the CDC bigwig’s claim was contradicted by an interesting source: the CDC.

Fox News host Tucker Carlson reported on this last night, stating that

Walensky is an actual doctor.… She went to Harvard. She’s never been elected to anything, but in a pandemic like this, her word is law. It’s more powerful than anything Congress produces. She’s her own federal agency. In fact, on a continuum, she sits somewhere between king and God. So read carefully as Rochelle Walensky tells you that COVID is killing twice as many children as influenza. 

“I think it’s really important for people to understand that this is not a benign disease compared to other diseases our kids see,” Walensky could be heard stating in a clip Carlson played (video below; relevant portion begins at 10:05). “If you look at the mortality rate of COVID, just this past year for children, it’s more than twice the mortality rate that we see in influenza in a given year.”

The problem is that unless Walensky is profoundly ignorant of her own CDC’s data and what attentive laymen have known for more than a year, her claim is a lie.

The Truth: “From 2019 to 2020, according to the CDC, a total of 124 children died of COVID. From 2020 to 2021, 213 children died of COVID. By comparison, influenza killed more than 400 children just last year,” Carlson related. “In fact, that was not an aberration. Influenza has killed far more children than COVID has in each of the past five years. It’s not even close.”

This isn’t some esoteric fact. I’ve long cited a study out of Newcastle University in London showing what data the world over reflect: that the flu is at least twice as dangerous to children under 10 as is the China virus. A good example is the Spanish Influenza epidemic of 1918-19, which claimed 675,000 American lives — many of them young. This is more than two million when adjusted for today’s population.

In fact, insofar as diseases go and according to BusinessTech, influenza is history’s fifth-greatest killer (50 million deaths), behind malaria, tuberculosis, smallpox, and plague.  

On July 12, New York’s Intelligencer further illustrated the irrationality of fearing the threat SARS-CoV-2 poses to children. “Over the course of the pandemic, 49,000 Americans under the age of 18 have died of all causes, according to the CDC,” the site wrote. “Only 331 of those deaths have been from COVID — less than half as many as have died of pneumonia. In 2019, more than 2,000 American kids and teenagers died in car crashes; each year, according to some estimates, about a thousand die from drowning.”

So if you’re going to mask and/or vaccinate kids for fear of The Virus™, then you’d surely better keep them far away from water and autos.

What’s more, “In a recent report, the CDC itself acknowledges it could be vastly over-reporting the number of children who are dying from COVID,” Carlson also related last evening. “The CDC report states that, when considering everyone who died of COVID, roughly 2.5% of those who died had a co-existing medical condition unrelated to their deaths. But for children under the age of 18, that number is dramatic — over 35% of children who died from COVID had what the CDC calls an ‘unrelated medical condition.’”

“In other words, more than a third of children … listed on the official records as dying from COVID had comorbidity that the CDC assures us cannot possibly be connected to COVID,” Carlson continued. “But it appears, upon closer examination, the comorbidities might in fact be related to the deaths of those children.”

It may be obvious why Walensky and others tell this bold China virus/influenza lie and why Big Media aid and abet them: You can’t justify masking and vaccinating children if people know that COVID is considerably less dangerous to them than a disease most of us sneeze at.

And some cities have actually reinstituted school mask mandates; the Biden administration, as mentioned earlier, has recommended such; and authorities have even pushed to get youths vaccinated. Below is a video of Walensky doing so just last month.

(Moreover, it was just announced that vaccines will be “available” for children under 12 late this year.)

This is child abuse. Studies have shown that masks offer little to no benefit when prescribed for the general population. Yet the costs appear great, with strong indications that masks can become as pathogen-laden Petri dishes on people’s faces and that wearers may be inhaling unhealthful plastic microparticles from them; furthermore, a study found that after just three minutes of wearing-time, children were inhaling carbon dioxide at up to six times the acceptable adult level.

As for vaccines, youths have suffered medical complications and even death after taking them; for example, 13-year-old Jacob Clynick passed away just three days after receiving his second China virus injection. Does taking such risk over a disease that imperils kids less than does the flu make any sense?

No, and this explains all the lies. But what should be the consequence for a person who thus deceives? We can already say that the health authorities lied and children died. They, not the January 6 defendants, should be brought up on serious charges.

______________________________________________________

CDC confesses: Vaccines are failing, the vaxxed can be super-spreaders, demands return to mask mandates for everyone, including the vaxxed 

BY MIKE ADAMS

SEE: https://naturalnews.com/2021-07-29-cdc-confesses-vaccines-are-failing-the-vaxxed-can-be-super-spreaders.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Via the words of the CDC’s own director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the official narrative on vaccines and covid has just self-destructed. While in March of this year, Walenksy had publicly promised that vaccinated people could not spread the virus and infect others, this week she publicly stated that vaccines are failing, and that vaccinated people may now carry higher viral loads than unvaccinated people, contributing to the spread of covid.

Even Yahoo News, which typically shills for Big Pharma, could not sugarcoat the devastating narrative shift, reporting:

The CDC updated its guidelines on Tuesday to recommend masks indoors, even for vaccinated people.
The Delta variant makes it easier for vaccinated people to transmit the virus, the CDC said.
Vaccinated and unvaccinated people infected with Delta may have similar viral loads.

USA Today was so alarmed by the CDC confession that they tried to memory hole their own reporting which cited NBC News. In a panic, USA Today scrubbed this sentence from their story:

NBC News, citing unnamed officials aware of the decision, reported it comes after new data suggests vaccinated individuals could have higher levels of virus and infect others amid the surge of cases driven by the delta variant of the coronavirus.

The CDC is currently hiding these data from the public, by the way, most likely because they know that once the data are revealed, any remaining shred of their pro-vaccine narrative will spontaneously collapse.

CDC “confession” just obliterated all the promises made to the vaccinated… now they are slowly realizing they’re the doomed super-spreaders

In making these public statements, the CDC just admitted that the entire promise that vaccinated people were immune to covid and couldn’t spread it to others just unraveled. Immediately, the CDC demanded that the entire nation revert to neanderthal mask mandates, even for those who have been “fully vaccinated.”

It begs the question: If the answer isn’t vaccines but rather just wearing masks, then why does America need the CDC in the first place? And since masks actually don’t work to block viral particles that are orders of magnitude smaller than the gaps in the mask threads, then how can masks stop them?

And if vaccines aren’t working, then what’s the use of vaccine passports?

This is all an open admission that the CDC has no tools against covid and that the last 18 months of pro-vaccine promises were nothing but lies and propaganda. Even worse, the entire medical establishment has suppressed the only legitimate solution to this pandemic, which is natural immunity, which can only function effectively when combined with good nutrition and proper supplementation. Yet the one-size-fits-all medical cult system that dominates society today can only see pharmaceuticals and vaccines as possible answers, never nutrition or natural immunity. Therefore, the CDC has nothing left to offer America other than blind obedience to their quack science lies.

But it’s even worse: CDC director just admitted the vaccines will soon be obsolete

If you can imagine it, the situation is actually far worse than what’s been covered here so far. In her public confessions this week, CDC director Walensky also admitted that covid is “just a few mutations away” from rendering all existing vaccines completely obsolete. She added:

The largest concern that I think we in public health and science are worried about is the virus and the potential mutations. We have a very transmissible virus, which has the potential to evade our vaccines in terms of how it protects us from severe disease and death…

So then, as any rational person might ask, what is the point of taking vaccines in the first place? This is even more alarming when you realize that vaccine-induced “immunity” is now documented to start fading after six weeks. And once the vaccine fades, people become more vulnerable to infections, compared to the unvaccinated or those with natural immunity. That’s why in California right now, the highest count of new covid-19 cases are being recorded in counties with the highest vaccination rates.

Similarly, in pushing for another moneymaking racket of “booster shots,” vaccine companies are now openly stating that their own vaccines stop working after a few months, hence people will need booster shots to keep the vaccine profits flowing.

Actually, it’s worse still: The vaccinated people are the “super-breeders” of covid variants, too

Not only are vaccinated people now the super-spreaders, it also turns out they’re the “super-breeders” of vaccine variants. As vaccine scientist Geert vanden Bossche explains: (emphasis ours)

…[M]ass vaccination promotes natural selection of increasingly vaccine immunity (VI)-escaping variants in the vaccinated part of the population. Taken together, mass vaccination conducted on a background of high infectivity rates enables more infectious, increasingly VI-escaping variants to expand in prevalence. This evolution inevitably results in inclining morbidity rates in both, the non-vaccinated and vaccinated population and precipitates the emergence of circulating viral variants that will eventually fully resist vaccine-mediated immunity (VMI). This is why mass vaccination campaigns should not be conducted during a pandemic of a highly mutable virus, let alone during a pandemic of more infectious variants (unless transmission-blocking vaccines are used!). It is critical to understand that a rapid decline in viral infectivity rates that is not achieved by natural infection but merely results from expedited mass vaccination campaigns will only delay abrupt propagation of emerging, fully vaccine-resistant viral variants and hence, only delay the occurrence of a high wave of morbidity and mortality.

The “high wave of morbidity and mortality,” it seems, has only just begun.

Dr. Robert Malone warns of “worst-case scenario” and cites first evidence showing Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE) now emerging

Over the next 12 months or so, we are likely going to see a wave of post-vaccine deaths that mirrors the wave of people obtaining vaccines earlier this year. Even Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology, warns that the CDC’s admission is essentially a confirmation that Antibody-Dependent Enhancement effects have begun.

In a recent interview with Steve Bannon on War Room Pandemic, Dr. Malone (who is fully pro-vaccine, by the way), stated:

This is exactly what you would see if antibody-dependent enhancement were happening… Pfizer protection is waning at six months. Those who received Pfizer, that are now in the waning phase, seem to be getting infected. This exactly what you would anticipate is the window of greatest susceptibility to antibody-dependent enhancement, in this long tapering phase as the vaccine response declines.

The government is obfuscating what’s happening here. What seems to be rolling out the worst-case scenario where the vaccine in the waning phase is causing the virus to replicate more efficiently than it would otherwise, which is what we call ADE.

When one of the world’s leading pro-vaccine scientists — the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology — steps forward and says the covid vaccines now represent a “worst-case scenario,” it’s probably worth paying attention.

I cover all this in much more detail in today’s eye-opening Situation Update podcast via Brighteon.com:

Brighteon.com/6657f4c5-a077-4136-b922-242c0236bb83

Find a new podcast (plus amazing interviews with experts) each weekday at:

https://www.brighteon.com/channels/hrreport

___________________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO: 

Tipping Point - Vaccine Mandates and Medical Privacy

Rumble — Part 1 of Chris Boyle's interview with Rep. Chip Roy on vaccine privacy

 COVID Killing the Classroom: The Virus Is Making Homeschooling Go Viral

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/covid-killing-the-classroom-the-virus-is-making-homeschooling-go-viral/

 

Social media giants’ Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism classifies Jihad Watch as ‘violent extremism’

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/07/social-media-giants-global-internet-forum-to-counter-terrorism-classifies-jihad-watch-as-violent-extremism;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

This is pure libel. We have never advocated or approved of any violence or any illegal activity of any kind. And if we are “extremist,” so is the U.S. Constitution, for we are trying to defend the freedom of speech, the freedom of conscience, and the equality of rights of all people before the law. But with these groups, there is no discussion, no appeal, no opportunity offered to defend oneself or argue one’s case. They will be shutting us down soon, and I may go to prison or worse, but remember: if that happens, it will be for no crime. It will be wholly and solely for enunciating truths that the elites prefer to hide. Not only can they not truthfully charge me with any criminal activity; they can’t even show that anything I say is inaccurate. But they have all the power, and they mean to shut down dissent, and that means our days here are numbered.

“Terrifying: The Big Tech Overlords Target Right-Wing ‘Terrorism,'” by Tyler O’Neil, PJ Media, July 28, 2021:

Back in 2017, Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, and YouTube founded the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT). GIFCT shares terrorism data among Big Tech companies, enabling them to flag and remove terrorist content. On Monday, GIFCT announced that it significantly expanded the types of extremist content in its database, aiming to crack down on material from white supremacists and far-right militias. However, the research behind the database cites the far-left smear factory the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and brands one of the SPLC’s conservative targets a “violent extremist” group.

GIFCT’s database has focused on videos and images from terrorist groups on a United Nations list, largely focused on content from radical Islamist groups like the Islamic State, al-Qaeda, and the Taliban, Reuters reported. Yet on Monday, the forum announced that it would add white supremacist attacker manifestos and other publications and links flagged by the U.N. initiative Tech Against Terrorism. GIFCT will use URLs and PDFs from more groups, including the Proud Boys, the Three Percenters, and neo-Nazis.

Using GIFCT, the Big Tech companies share “perceptual hashes,” unique numerical representations of original pieces of content that have been removed from their services.

On Monday, GIFCT announced that it would include three new hashed categories:

  1. Manifestos from terrorist and violent extremist attackers in PDF form;
  2. Terrorist publications that use specific branding and logos for the organization in PDF form; and
  3. URLs identified by Tech Against Terrorism as where specific terrorist content exists that are often shared and amplified on other platforms

This expansion came after GIFCT spent six months engaging “a wide range of experts on expanding the reach and impact of our hash-sharing database’s taxonomy in order to respond to terrorist content online across the ideological spectrum.”

“We believe that our work must be complementary and mutually-reinforced with human rights and fundamental freedoms, starting with the material we recognize as terrorist content online,” the Big Tech organization declared. “This six-month project resulted in a compilation report from international experts that will help shape and inform our strategy for thoughtful, deliberate, and practical broadening of our taxonomy framework over time.”

Yet it appears GIFCT’s team of “experts” included the scandal-plagued Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which smears mainstream conservative and Christian organizations as “hate groups,” putting them on a “hate map” with the Ku Klux Klan. Former employees have described the “hate map” as a con to bilk donors by exaggerating hate. An attempted terrorist opened fire at the Family Research Council (FRC) headquarters in Washington, D.C., attempting to kill everyone in the building and smear a Chick-fil-A chicken sandwich into the faces of his victims. He told the FBI he used the SPLC’s “hate map” to target FRC.

Despite this history, the GIFCT report justifying the new policy references the SPLC’s reporting on the Oath Keepers and notes the SPLC’s “hate group” list as an option for a list of terrorist organizations. The report notes the difficulty of “maintaining a list of terrorist and violent extremist actors that is objective, global in scope, and updated in real time,” and notes that “no such expanded designation list is currently available, although there are a number of non-governmental lists, such as those compiled by… civil society actors like the Southern Poverty Law Center.”

Considering the Oath Keepers’ involvement in the Capitol riot — and the involvement of other organizations the SPLC targets, such as the Proud Boys — it may make sense for GIFCT to target this group. However, the GIFCT list of organizations promoting “violent extremism” includes another organization on the SPLC’s “hate group” list that has no connection with the Capitol riot.

Among examples of “violent extremism,” alongside Oath Keepers, Proud Boys, and antifa, the GIFCT report lists JihadWatch, a non-profit dedicated to combatting radical Islam. JihadWatch, run by PJ Media’s Robert Spencer, does not advocate violence in any way. Rather, it highlights the disturbing history of Islam and the connections between that history and the terrorist motivations of groups like the Islamic State.

The presence of the SPLC in GIFCT’s report, and the suggestion that JihadWatch is a kind of “violent extremist” group do not bode well for conservatives on the internet….

UK Muslim publication says Christian stabbed at Speakers’ Corner ‘is known for insulting the Prophet’

Christian evangelist Hatun Tash was stabbed today at Speakers' Corner in London. Hatun is a vocal critic of Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran, as well as a prominent defender of freedom of speech and freedom of religion, and she was wearing a Charlie Hebdo shirt when she was attacked.

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/07/uk-muslim-publication-says-christian-stabbed-at-speakers-corner-is-known-for-insulting-the-prophet;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

This is just painting a large target on Hatun Tash’s back.

Islam mandates death for non-Muslim subjects of the Islamic state who mention “something impermissible about Allah, the Prophet (Allah bless him and give him peace), or Islam” (‘Umdat al-Salik, o11.10), and such laws are based upon passages in the Hadith and Sira in which Muhammad orders the murders of people who have insulted him.

These include Abu Afak, who was over one hundred years old, and the poetess Asma bint Marwan. Abu Afak was killed in his sleep, in response to Muhammad’s question, “Who will avenge me on this scoundrel?” Similarly, Muhammad on another occasion cried out, “Will no one rid me of this daughter of Marwan?” One of his followers, Umayr ibn Adi, went to her house that night, where he found her sleeping next to her children. The youngest, a nursing babe, was in her arms. But that didn’t stop Umayr from murdering her and the baby as well. Muhammad commended him: “You have done a great service to Allah and His Messenger, Umayr!” (Ibn Ishaq, 674-676)

Then there was Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf. Muhammad asked: “Who is willing to kill Ka’b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and His Apostle?” One of the Muslims, Muhammad
bin Maslama answered, “O Allah’s Apostle! Would you like that I kill him?” When Muhammad said that he would, Muhammad bin Maslama said, “Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).” Muhammad responded: “You may say it.” Muhammad bin Maslama duly lied to Ka’b, luring him into his trap, and murdered him. (Sahih Bukhari, volume 5, book 59, number 369)

Likewise, the popular website Islam QA called for death for blasphemers, using both Qur’an and Hadith to make its argument. “The scholars are unanimously agreed,” the site explains, “that a Muslim who insults the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) becomes a kaafir [unbeliever] and an apostate who is to be executed. This consensus was narrated by more than one of the scholars, such as Imaam Ishaaq ibn Raahawayh, Ibn al-Mundhir, al-Qaadi ‘Iyaad, al-Khattaabi and others.”

“Police searching for assailant who stabbed ex-Muslim Hatun Tash,” 5Pillars, July 28, 2021 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):

Police are still searching for an assailant who stabbed the ex-Muslim Islamophobe Hatun Tash at Speakers’ Corner in London on Sunday.

Tash, 39, was stabbed several times while she was wearing a Charlie Hebdo T-Shirt and was “preaching the Gospel” to Muslims, but is said to be fine after receiving medical attention.

The assailant fled the scene as some of the other 30 people there confronted him/her. The knife used in the attack was recovered.

Tash, who is of Turkish origin, is known for insulting the Prophet (pbuh) and desecrating the Quran. She often goes down to Speakers’ Corner to debate and confront Muslims from her evangelical Christian perspective.

Hatun Tash leads DCCI ministries, which says it exists to defend Christ, critique Islam and preach the Gospel to Muslims using apologetics and polemics….

Detective Superintendent Alex Bingley, from the Central West Command Unit, which covers policing in Westminster, said: “This was clearly a very distressing incident for the woman involved and officers have spent time with her, whilst she was being treated for her injury, to get an account of what happened.

“We know that this assault was witnessed by a number of people, many of whom captured it on their phones. I would ask them, if they have not already done so, to contact police.

“We remain in the early stages of our investigation and are working hard to trace the person responsible. I would ask people not to speculate on the motive for the attack until we have established the full facts.”…

1 51 52 53 54 55 100