Pence Believes He Does Not Have Power to Reject Electoral Votes

BREAKING! Pence REFUSES to REJECT ELECTORS as Protestors STORM Capitol Building!!!

Report: Pence Believes He Does Not Have Power to Reject Electoral Votes

BY LUIS MIGUEL

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/report-pence-believes-he-does-not-have-power-to-reject-electoral-votes/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Is the president’s window narrowing?

Although many of President Trump’s supporters hope Vice President Mike Pence will deliver the commander-in-chief a hail mary win by rejecting electoral results from states where major voter fraud occurred, a report claims that Pence told the president he doesn’t believe he has the power to do so.

A source told The New York Times (which has earned a reputation as an anti-Trump publication) that Pence said in a conversation with President Trump that he “did not believe he had the power to block congressional certification of Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s victory in the presidential election.”

The comment was reportedly made on Tuesday, just one day before Congress is set to certify the 50 states’ slates of electors — slates that would hand the White House over to Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

The Times reported that the vice president is trying to play a delicate balancing act between his views on the matter and President Trump’s expectation that he will reject the electors:

Even as he sought to make clear that he does not have the power Mr. Trump seems to think he has, Mr. Pence also indicated to the president that he would keep studying the issue up until the final hours before the joint session of Congress begins at 1 p.m. Wednesday, according to the people briefed on their conversation.

One option being considered, according to a person close to Mr. Trump, was having Mr. Pence acknowledge the president’s claims about election fraud in some form during one or more of the Senate debates about the results from particular states before the certification. Mr. Pence will preside over those debates.

The conversation between president and vice president reportedly came after President Trump tweeted on Tuesday morning that Pence can reject electors.

Yet in a statement published later on Tuesday, President Trump denied that such a conversation took place, calling reports about the exchange “fake news.”

“He never said that,” the statement read. “The Vice President and I are in total agreement that the Vice President has the power to act.”

If Pence were unable to carry out his duties during the counting of the electoral votes on Wednesday, that responsibility would fall on Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) as President Pro Tempore of the Senate.

Some confusion took place Tuesday morning when Senator Grassley was quoted saying that he would be the one presiding over the certification, and not Vice President Pence, because “we don’t expect him to be there.”

Aides for Senator Grassley later said he was suggesting a hypothetical, should Pence step out for a break sometime during the session.

Jay Sekulow, one of the president’s personal lawyers, appeared to shoot down the possibility of Pence reversing the present election outcome as he spoke on a radio program Tuesday.

“Some have speculated that the vice president could simply say, ‘I’m not going to accept these electors,’ that he has the authority to do that under the Constitution. I actually don’t think that’s what the Constitution has in mind,” Sekulow said.

“If that’s the case, any vice president could refuse any election,” he added. “It’s more of a ministerial procedural function.”

It’s expected that there will be debate regarding the electors. It only takes one member of each chamber of Congress to initiate a debate, and Representative Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) signaled that he will do so in the lower chamber; Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) will join him in the Senate. 

On Wednesday morning, Representative Brooks spoke to a large crowd of Trump supporters near the White House.

“We’re going to stop them,” Brooks said. “We have definitely had some setbacks with what happened in November. We had some setbacks with what happened last night in Georgia [a reference to the projected losses of both Republicans in the Senate runoff, which will give Democrats control of the chamber].

“But we are not going to let the socialists rip the heart out of our country. We are not going to let them continue to corrupt our elections and steal from us our God-given right to control our nation’s destiny.”

Millions of Americans are behind President Trump and allies such as Mo Brooks. But with a Democrat majority in the House of Representatives and most Republicans in the Senate signaling they will not object to the electoral count, the president’s chances appear slim.

No matter what happens, the battle for our Republic is far from over. There are many ways in which we can, and must, continue to fight back.

 

Jan Morgan Exposes ‘Bilderberg’ Tom Cotton, Solidifies Arkansas Behind Trump And America

Snakes in the Republican party exposed by Jan Morgan, former Arkansas governor candidate

Former Arkansas Governor Candidate Sears ‘Bilderberg’ Tom Cotton for Siding With Biden on January 6

BY TOM PAPPERT

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/posts/bombshell-jan-morgan-exposes-bilderberg-tom-cotton-solidifies-arkansas-behind-trump-and-america/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Tom Pappert is joined by Jan Morgan live via Skype to break down how Senator Tom Cotton attended the elites’ Bilderberg meeting in 2017, and how he- coincidentally- doesn’t seem interested in stopping Joe Biden’s 2020 Presidential nomination steal from Donald Trump.

 

Massive Dem Election Fraud Operation From Italy Revealed~President Trump Briefed On Proof

Election Hacking by Italian Operatives, CIA with funding setup by Obama, Renzi

Recording of a Conference Call from members of Nations in Action plus others. http://nationsinaction.org

Sophisticated election theft funded by Obama, executed by Italian military contractor, says top former CIA chief

The theft of the election was orchestrated in the Rome embassy by an employee Stefano Serafini, a foreign service officer of over 20 years. He retired the day before the election to ensure he would not lose his pension unlike what happened to some of the FBI agents who betrayed our country in 2016 and did lose their pension just days before their retirement. Stefan Serafini coordinated with general Claudio Graziano, who is on the board of Leonardo SPA (an Italian aerospace defense contractor). Leonardo used their military satellite uplink to load the software and transfer it over to change the votes from Trump to Biden. The plan was orchestrated by Barack Obama with the help of Matteo Renzi, the former prime minister of Italy. The Italian intelligence service supplied intercepts, photos, phone calls, and (shockingly) pictures of the CIA agents who have been involved in orchestrating this. Italy did it. Senior IT Expert at Global Defense Contractor Testifies in Italian Federal Court that He and Others Switched Votes throughout America in the U.S. Presidential Race https://nationsinaction.org/2021/01/p... Italygate Article https://lacrunadellago.net/2020/12/29... Where the story broke on Twitter https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/s... #ItalyGate #ItalyDidIt #LeonardoSPA

BY JAMIE WHITE

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/posts/bombshell-report-massive-dem-election-fraud-operation-from-italy-revealed-president-trump-briefed-on-proof/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The basic questions about exactly what caused the major voting irregularities in the six battleground states on Election Day have been answered, according to a government watchdog nonprofit and a former CIA officer.

Not only that, but President Trump has been personally briefed on the smoking-gun proof, according to Maria Zack, chairman of Nations in Action, a government watchdog nonprofit.

In a phone call with volunteers and contributors on Tuesday, Nations in Action chairman Maria Zack explained how she came upon irrefutable proof that the 2020 election fraud originated in Italy, involving a veteran foreign services officer and Italian defense contractor Leonardo.

“The theft of the election was orchestrated in the Rome embassy…by an employee Stephan Serafini, a foreign service officer of over 20 years,” Zack said.

“Stephan Serafini coordinated with a General Claudio Graziano, and Gen. Graziano is on the board of Leonardo SpA, the defense contractor. Leonardo used their military satellite uplink to load the software and transfer it over to change the votes from Trump to Biden.”

“The proof that was missing, the very basic ‘who did it, where did they do it, and how did they do it’, had been missing from all the documents sent into the courts. There was nothing that was helping us win in the courts,” she added.

This unprecedented foreign cyberattack was funded by none other than former U.S. President Barack Obama, Zack said.

“They thought they were very shrewd in how they did it. They had a really brilliant plan that was orchestrated by Barack Obama with the help of Renzi, the former prime minister of Italy,” she said.

Zack claims she obtained a sworn affidavit from a whistleblower within Leonardo, the 8th largest defense contractor, outlining how the election crime of the century was committed and passed it along to President Trump and his lawyers on Christmas Eve at Mar-a-Lago.

“And I informed him that he is getting the best Christmas present he could ever ask for, the affidavits of the people who did it, and their confession and assistance in letting everybody know what happened,” she said.

“I said ‘Merry Christmas sir, we’re about to give you the best Christmas present ever, you’re going to have the evidence you need from the Italian whistleblower who actually committed the crime of uploading the software.'”

She implored the pro-Trump movement to rally around this information because even though the perpetrators “lost and don’t know it yet,” they’re desperate and hope to silence the whistleblowers.

“We need the grassroots support like never before and the reason is, aside from the fact that we’ve just awakened the sleeping giant in people who thought that they escaped with the greatest theft in the history of the world, they actually have lost and they don’t know it yet,” Zack said.

Zack then explained that when the proof comes out, the states must act swiftly and punish harshly those who tried to interfere in our election.

“States must prosecute all illegal voting activities and provide immediate legislative remedies. There can only be zero tolerance for criminal interference in American elections. This international conspiracy must be met with swift action by the President and be fully supported by elected officials for the protection of voting integrity and the prosperity of our great nation.”

Former CIA operations officer Brad Johnson claimed in December that the U.S. government had discovered the Italian election fraud operation used Leonardo’s satellite network to upload fraudulent votes into the main swing states’ systems via the internet.

“I think we’re finally tracking this down as to where the actual problems took place. All this broke in Italy,” Johnson said.

“The way it’s shaping up now, that the U.S. elections were changed, the results were changed in 5 or 6 key states, all those voting machines were hooked up to the internet. The internet was then used to download the information to those famous servers in Germany.”

If these claims are true, Biden will never set foot in the White House again, and the world will soon learn the truth about the biggest theft in American history.



Data Scientists Show More Than 432,000 Trump Votes Removed in Pennsylvania

Data Scientists Show More Than 432,000 Trump Votes Removed in Pennsylvania

BY C. MITCHELL SHAW

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/data-scientists-show-more-than-432000-trump-votes-removed-in-pennsylvania/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

As allegations of voter fraud continue to come forward — only to be dismissed out of hand by Democrats — a group of data scientists with the Data Integrity Group say they have uncovered evidence that more than 432,000 Trump votes were nixed in Pennsylvania. Those vote removals happened during the vote tabulation process, and this happened in at least 15 counties across Pennsylvania, according to a report by The Epoch Times.

That report includes a video presentation from those data scientists that shows the breakdown of the removed votes. The report states that vote removals included both Election Day (in-person) votes and absentee votes:

The group said that Election Day vote removals happened during the vote tabulation process in at least 15 counties, including Lehigh County, Chester County, Allegheny County, Armstrong County, Westmoreland County, Northampton County, Delaware County, Montgomery County, Lackawanna County, Dauphin County, Pike County, Carbon County, Washington County, Erie County, and Luzerne County.

Meanwhile, absentee vote removals happened in Allegheny County, Chester County, and Lehigh County.

At least 432,116 votes — 213,707 election day votes and 218,409 absentee votes — were removed in total.

It goes on to say that though there were “vote movements across all candidates,” there was one major difference. “We did not see the same type of negative decrements to any of the [other] candidates that we saw with President Trump’s tallies, and they happened repeatedly with no explanation,” Lynda McLaughlin, a member of the group, told The Epoch Times.

And while — as stated above — Democrats have dismissed claims of election fraud without so much as a passing glance at the evidence, it should be noted that the Data Integrity Group is not a consortium of tinfoil-hat-wearing fringe lunatics. On the contrary, their bona fides are impressive. As The Epoch Times reported:

The Data Integrity Group is a group of scientists, engineers, and machine learning experts who have been working together to check whether or not there was manipulation of data in the 2020 general election.

The group’s lineup of data scientists includes Justin Mealey and Dave Lobue.

Mealey is a nine-year veteran of the U.S. Navy, where he worked as an electronic warfare technician, cryptologic technician, and Arabic linguist. He worked at the NSA as a mission manager for Levant/North Africa and later worked as a CIA contractor at the National Counter-Terrorism Center.

Lobue has 12 years of experience in data science and machine learning across financial services, telecommunications, and research consulting industries. He currently specializes in artificial intelligence applications.

This is a far cry from the wild, unsubstantiated claims Democrats and their mainstream media accomplices made about election fraud during the 2016 election. Only then, those claims led the news cycles as “facts” — though no evidence was ever offered to prove their claims.

And the Data Integrity Group is careful to stick to verifiable facts and demonstrable data. Not making claims about blame or jumping to any conclusions about what may have caused the removal of the votes, the group told The Epoch Times, “The bottom line is the errors were made. Data confirms these errors and it shouldn’t matter if they were machine or human, they’re still errors and deserve a second review and thorough analysis with forensic audits to find the answers.”

Indeed. But Democrats and other establishment types do not appear to want answers. They already have the only “answer” they want: Biden won according to the count, and that is that. Nothing else to see here, folks.

As such, the report from The Epoch Times states:

Pennsylvania’s electors cast their votes for Biden and Kamala Harris as president-elect and vice president-elect on Dec. 14, 2020.

State-certified results show Biden won the Keystone State by 80,555 votes.

But, if 432,000 Trump votes were removed, that 80,555 gap closes considerably. And — here, this writer will speculate, though given what is known, the speculation is not wild — if any sizable number of those votes were counted for Biden, that gap may disappear altogether, meaning that Trump actually won Pennsylvania.

To show that such a possibility is not a stretch, consider that — as The Epoch Times reported — a widely-circulated video clip of CNN’s live election night broadcast shows 19,958 votes being switched from Trump to Biden in 30 seconds.

That “oops” moment was brought to you by Edison Research and was corrected. But then that error was broadcast nation-wide on CNN. How many such errors were not seen on your television and computer screens and therefore not corrected?

None of this is about partisan politics and which candidate won. Instead, it is about the integrity of the entire election process. If the establishment can simply slap its imprimatur on a victory that has so many unaddressed problems stemming from what appears to any honest person to be fraud, then moving forward, the United States has an election system that makes banana republics look honest by comparison.

 

More Evidence of Voter Fraud as Congress Gears Up for Electoral College Vote Certification

More Evidence of Voter Fraud as Congress Gears Up for Electoral College Vote Certification

BY LUIS MIGUEL

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/more-evidence-of-voter-fraud-as-congress-gears-up-for-electoral-college-vote-certification/

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Mere days before Congress is set to certify the results of the 2020 presidential election on Wednesday, information about the voter fraud that handed Joe Biden a victory continues to arise, despite insistence by the mainstream media that there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Patrick Byrne, founder of OverStock.com and a member of the Trump team who has been working to expose fraud in the election, tweeted on Saturday that footage and photographs were captured of fake ballots in Georgia’s Fulton County that were eventually picked up by moving trucks and shredded.

Byrne contended that video footage in his possession shows vans pulling up at 10 o’clock at night after a state Senate subcommittee panel, upon which the ballots were loaded up.

“On Wednesday afternoon in the Georgia Senate Judiciary voted to have these ballots inspected. What happened next?,” Byrne wrote in a tweet,

Byrne also claimed that his people obtained samples of the fake ballots.

The statistical case against Joe Biden also keeping mounting.

For example, a new analysis posted to Rumble by BasedMedia and DonaldWon.com noted that Joe Biden was given a five-percent advantage over President Trump in counties using Dominion voting machines.

The analysis reads:

Analysis conducted by DataScience and released through BASEDmedia constructed a statistical model to predict relative performance for either candidate based upon U.S. Census county data to 90% accuracy.

This analysis revealed that counties that used Dominion and Hart InterCivic ballot counting devices and software consistently gave a 5% vote advantage to candidate Joe Biden over President Trump. This advantage was observed regardless of the county’s majority political party affiliation nor urban, suburban, or rural area demographics.

Congress will vote to certify the 50 states’ Electoral College votes on Wednesday, January 6, but some Republican lawmakers are planning efforts to reject these results due to the lingering shadow of fraud.

One effort, led by Representative Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) in the House and joined by Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) in the Senate, seeks to force a debate regarding electoral tallies.

“We have no congressional investigation of the fraud,” Hawley said of his participation in the effort. “We need it. We’ve had no congressional action. We need that to protect our elections going forward. I will make all these points and try to force a debate about all of these points.”

Firing back at critics who say he is attempting to subvert the electoral system, Hawley pointed out that Democrats have taken such action before.

In 2005, for example, then-Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) objected to Ohio electors during the 2005 certification of President George W. Bush’s reelection and defeat of John Kerry.

“First of all, I don’t hear the Democrats making such outrageous claims when they were the ones who were objecting during the electoral college certification in 2004 and 2016. Democrats have done this for years to raise concerns about election integrity,” Hawley said on Fox News. “Now when Republicans and 74 million Americans have concerns about election integrity, we are supposed to sit down and shut up? Somebody has to stand up here.”

A separate effort led by Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) involves a number of Republican senators who say they will block certification of the electoral results unless there is an emergency 10-day audit by an electoral commission.

“Voter fraud has posed a persistent challenge in our elections, although its breadth and scope are disputed,” Cruz and the other senators maintained in a Saturday statement. “By any measure, the allegations of fraud and irregularities in the 2020 election exceed any in our lifetimes.”

On Saturday, Vice President Mike Pence’s chief of staff, Marc Short, said his boss shared “the concerns of millions of Americans about voter fraud and irregularities.”

The vice president “welcomes the efforts of members of the House and Senate to use the authority they have under the law to raise objections and bring forward evidence before the Congress and the American people.”

As president of the senate, Pence will have the responsibility of overseeing the January 6 session, which has caused some of the president’s proponents to argue that the vice president should use this opportunity to reject electoral votes from fraud-ridden states.

 

Trump Acted Properly, The Media is Lying About His Georgia Call

Trump's call with Raffensperger reveals U.S. President is a great negotiator & never gives up

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2021/01/04/the-media-is-lying-about-trumps-call-with-georgia-secretary-of-state-n1304209;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Over the past couple of days, media headlines have tried to convey the impression that a leaked phone call between President Trump and top Georgia officials shows Trump pressuring Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to fraudulently “find” enough votes for him to win the state.

“Trump pressures Georgia’s Raffensperger to overturn his defeat in extraordinary call” read the headline from the Washington Post.

CNN called the leaked audio “astonishing new evidence of a desperate President Donald Trump” trying to “steal the election,” claiming Trump “tried to bully” Raffensperger “into finding votes” for him.

But a review of the transcript of the call shows no such thing. The Washington Post claimed that Trump “repeatedly urged [Raffensperger] to alter the outcome of the presidential vote in the state,” but that isn’t what happened.

Throughout the conversation, Trump lays out the evidence that there was voter fraud in the state, and demands an honest accounting of the ballots, which he believes would give him more than 11,000 votes needed to win the state. “I just want to find 11,780 votes,” is the key quote cited by the media, but there’s more to the quote.

“So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state,” is what Trump said, in context. He also insisted that “there’s no way I lost Georgia. There’s no way. We won by hundreds of thousands of votes.”

During the conversation, Trump laid out the evidence, explaining how there “4,502 voters who voted but who weren’t on the voter registration list,” and “18,325 vacant address voters” whose votes should not have been counted. He even mentioned 904 votes linked to post office boxes, which is also not allowed. Trump also mentioned the State Farm videotape that corresponds to a late-night vote dump of at least 18,000 votes which were counted after Republican poll watchers were told to leave. Trump brought up nearly 5,000 out-of-state votes, 2,326 absentee ballots sent to vacant addresses, and roughly 5,000 votes from dead people. Then there are the suspicious military ballots that went all for Biden.

“So there were many infractions, and the bottom line is, many, many times the 11,779 margin that they said we lost by — we had vast, I mean the state is in turmoil over this,” Trump said on the call.

Raffensperger disputed Trump’s claims, saying that only two dead people voted, that the State Farm video didn’t actually show fraud. Raffensperger also claimed that an audit showed that there weren’t any ballots that were scanned three times.

While it’s true that not all of these allegations by Trump’s team may pan out or be proven, the allegations are linked to many thousands of votes and should be investigated properly. Yes, Trump did acknowledge that he’d only need roughly 12,000 votes to change the result, but that margin is smaller than the number of disputed ballots. “Look, Brad. I got to get . . . I have to find 12,000 votes, and I have them times a lot. And therefore, I won the state. That’s before we go to the next step, which is in the process of right now. You know, and I watched you this morning, and you said, well, there was no criminality.”

Trump very clearly believes that he legitimately won Georgia, and wasn’t asking Raffensperger to fraudulently “find” enough ballots to make up that margin. Trump discussed at length the examples of fraud, which are backed up by video evidence, affidavits, and statistical analyses.

Like the transcript with Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky that Democrats impeached him over, this phone call is yet another nothing burger that has the media and the left crying foul. There’s already a Wikipedia page for the “Trump-Raffensperger scandal.” Democrats are reportedly looking to censure Trump and have asked FBI Director Wray to open a criminal probe. But Trump quite clearly presented evidence that there was fraud, and made the case that the number of disputed ballots is larger than his deficit in the certified results. A proper investigation would resolve these outstanding questions about these disputed ballots.

Matt Margolis is the author of Airborne: How The Liberal Media Weaponized The Coronavirus Against Donald Trumpand the bestselling book The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama. You can follow Matt on Twitter @MattMargolis

 

ALERT: LEFT-WING ‘SHUT DOWN DC’ SENDS MOB TO CONFRONT ELECTION ATTORNEYS

ALERT: Left-wing ‘Shut Down DC’ Sends Mob to Confront Election Attorneys

BY RENEE NAL

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/alert-left-wing-shut-down-dc-sends-mob-to-confront-election-attorneys/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

“We have divided up the list of lawyers who work at the firm so that together we can contact a huge number of people – and this is your assigned person.” – Shut Down DC Mailing, November 13, 2020

The militant left-wing group Shut Down DC is doxxing specific attorneys in a mass email sent on November 13, 2020. In the email, Shut Down DC provides supporters with a unique “assigned” attorney to harass with form letters and pre-scripted phone calls.

Shut Down DC, along with their many allies in big tech, the mainstream media and the democrat-funded Lincoln Project, have launched a full-on attack on law firms and individual attorneys for daring to take on cases that may possibly bring wrong-doing to light, as reported at RAIR Foundation USA.

Shut Down DC asks supporters to join them in “visiting [law firm] King & Spalding” and to assist in their “virtual campaign” where they provide supporters with their “assigned” attorney’s name, phone number and email address. The left-wing group also reminds supporters that they can participate in shaming attorneys on social media.

“I am very concerned that King & Spalding is pursuing frivolous lawsuits for the Trump campaign that are undermining our democracy and attempting to silence the voices of Black and brown voters,” the juvenile and amateur form letter reads in part. “You are complicit in Trump’s effort to bully and cheat his way through this election and impede a stable and safe transfer of presidential power,” the letter continues.

Here is a screenshot of the mass mailing, sent through the Action Network, which describes itself as “a mission-driven organization dedicated to building power for the progressive movement…”

Screenshot from email

The mainstream media has thrown away all semblance of objectivity and journalistic integrity, with some even threatening attorneys that if they work with the Trump Administration, they may not have a job in the future, like this menacing message from The Atlantic:

Image
Threatening Message to Attorneys: If you work with Trump, you might not keep your job

The authors of the Atlantic piece, Bradley P. Moss and Joanne Molinaro, are rabidly against the President and have been from the beginning. Moss, who obsessively tweets about the President, referred to claims of voter fraud as “baseless and pathetic” and Molinaro even wrote a poorly-written open letter to President Trump bashing him for making her mad at her boyfriend and having white voters, or something.

While the complicit left is counting on the ignorance of their base, there is a constitutional process that must be completed. The mainstream media is not constitutionally authorized to call elections.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo explains:

“We’re gonna count all the votes. When the process is complete, there’ll be electors selected. There’s a process. The Constitution lays it out pretty clearly.”

Watch attorney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani discuss the compelling evidence of potential voter fraud that is being scrutinized in Pennsylvania and Michigan:

Support our work at RAIR Foundation USA! We are a grassroots activist team and we need your help! Please consider making a donation here: https://rairfoundation.com/donate/

 

A Group of 400 Former U.S. Intelligence Officials Are Investigating ‘Blatant’ Election Fraud

BY VICTORIA TAFT

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2021/01/03/report-a-group-of-400-former-u-s-intelligence-officials-are-investigating-blatant-election-fraud-n1300963;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A loose “network” of about 400 former investigators and intelligence operatives from the FBI, CIA, NSA, and several other agencies are investigating the 2020 election to determine if there was any election fraud, according to an exclusive story in The Epoch Times.

A former CIA intelligence officer-turned private agent for a “strategic planning, technologies and foreign and domestic” group under President George H.W. Bush says he’s been a part of a network of such investigators since 2014 but the group is increasing in size because of the shady antics surrounding the 2020 presidential election results.

Robert Caron told The Epoch Times that the election fraud was so in-your-face that he was impelled to activate the group to investigate it.

“After numerous reports of irregularities in the 2020 election, the investigation network expanded. Many have focused on investigating the election, according to Caron, who said most are volunteering, while some are getting paid for the inquiry. He said that as far as he knows, the size of the network is “way over 400” and that each member of the network sees obvious election fraud based on their own observations.

“The fraud was so massive and so blatant, despite what the mainstream media said, that we need to get this information out to the public,” said Caron. “That’s why more and more people from the intelligence community and law enforcement are coming out, which is unheard of.”

[…] Caron said that the network includes former intelligence officers, analysts, operatives, military, law enforcement, and judiciary from the FBI, CIA, Military Intelligence, DIA, and National Security Agency (NSA), among others, as well as many former intelligence officers in other countries.”

It’s unclear what the group can chase down at this point. The deadline to approve the presidential contest is set for January 6.

A growing number of U.S. senators are calling for a ten-day extension of the Electoral College count in a joint session of Congress to complete an “audit” of the election. The Washington Post reports that Republican Senators Ted Cruz (Texas), Ron Johnson (Wisc.), James Lankford (Okla.), Josh Hawley (Mo.), and Senators-elect Cynthia Lummis (Wyo.), Roger Marshall (Kan.), Tommy Tuberville (Kan.), and Bill Hagerty (Tenn.) will contest the Electoral College vote certification.

The group issued a joint statement on Saturday calling for the creation of a commission to investigate the election results.

[A]n Electoral Commission, with full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states. Once completed, individual states would evaluate the Commission’s findings and could convene a special legislative session to certify a change in their vote, if needed.

“Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.

The group further states that such an audit is not unprecedented.

[T]here is long precedent of Democratic Members of Congress raising objections to presidential election results, as they did in 1969, 2001, 2005, and 2017. And, in both 1969 and 2005, a Democratic Senator joined with a Democratic House Member in forcing votes in both houses on whether to accept the presidential electors being challenged.

“The most direct precedent on this question arose in 1877, following serious allegations of fraud and illegal conduct in the Hayes-Tilden presidential race. Specifically, the elections in three states-Florida, Louisiana, and South Carolina-were alleged to have been conducted illegally.

“In 1877, Congress did not ignore those allegations, nor did the media simply dismiss those raising them as radicals trying to undermine democracy. Instead, Congress appointed an Electoral Commission-consisting of five Senators, five House Members, and five Supreme Court Justices-to consider and resolve the disputed returns.

Vice President Mike Pence, who presides over the joint session, seemed willing to entertain the group’s request. He issued a statement saying that he “welcomed the efforts of members of the House and Senate to use the authority they have under the law to raise objections and bring forward evidence before the Congress and the American people on January 6th.”

Caron says the group of 400-plus intelligence officials began investigating the results of elections when the intelligence community was shocked when President Obama did not act “properly on intelligence” after the 2016 election, according to then-Defense Intelligence Agency chief General Michael Flynn, who was later fired after criticizing his boss. Flynn was later spied on by Obama administration officials in order to get the three-star general thrown out from his job as President Donald Trump’s National Security Adviser. It worked. The Crossfire Hurricane investigation, otherwise known as the Russia hoax, ended in infamy.

Since then, the group has also seen other instances where intelligence wasn’t properly acted upon.

“President Obama was not acting properly on intelligence that he received concerning Benghazi,” Caron said, referring to an attack of U.S. government facilities in Benghazi, Libya, that resulted in the deaths of several U.S. officials. He said he believes it was then that a lot of people from the intelligence community got together and started recruiting people to join the network.

The mainstream media continues to pretend that there’s nothing hinky with the election results or myriad reports of voter fraud. It will be interesting to see if they pick up this story about the 400-plus intel pros looking into the election. If you’ll recall, a pre-election letter signed by 50 Obama-era intelligence community folks was issued in response to the Hunter Biden laptop, Ukraine, and The Big Guy story. The same people who said that Donald Trump was a Russian secret agent alleged that the laptop story could possiblyperhapsmaybe be Russian disinformation. The media hung their hats on that gauzy characterization to boycott the explosive story about Joe Biden’s son and Biden’s high-stakes role as the family rainmaker. And only after the election did we find out that the younger Biden was indeed under investigation.

If these intelligence community spooks have any intel they’d better get the news out fast. Time’s a-wasting.

Victoria Taft is the host of “The Adult in the Room Podcast With Victoria Taft” where you can hear her series on “Antifa Versus Mike Strickland.” Find it  here.  Follow her on Facebook,  TwitterParlerMeWeMinds @VictoriaTaft 

Democrats Have Objected to Electoral Vote Certification for the Last Three GOP Presidents
5 Reasons Why You’re Not Crazy to Question the Election Results
Tech Expert Shocks GA Election Fraud Hearing With News He ‘Got Into’ Voting System With WiFi
 

AS PER DATA SCIENTISTS: Georgia data reveals 30,000+ Trump votes removed, another 12,173 switched to Biden

Georgia election data indicates at least 30,000 votes were removed from President Donald Trump and another 12,173 votes were switched to Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, data scientists testified on Dec. 30 during a state Senate hearing.

The Georgia Senate Subcommittee held a hearing on December 30th and called Rudy Giuliani to testify based on his investigation. Rudy then gives one of the best, if not the best, summation of the facts as he sees them in about 15 minutes. Testimony provided here, in full, unedited as a public service. Nothing but straight testimony of what was said. Each person can judge the validity on their own.

January 6, 2021: The Day of the Electoral Epiphany

BY DAVID SOLWAY

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/columns/david-solway-2/2021/01/02/january-6-2021-the-day-of-the-electoral-epiphany-n1300844;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

January 6 marks the festival of the Christian Epiphany commemorating the visit of the Magi—the three “wise men” of popular parlance—bringing gifts to the Christ child. It is also the day on which the presidency of the United States will be determined as the “wise men” of Congress meet to certify or decertify the vote of the Electoral College. The question is whether the current legitimate president will be recognized or whether a pretender to the throne, a false messiah, or, to put it bluntly, a corrupt grifter benefitting from the largest electoral fraud in American history will be confirmed in his stead.

Three facts should be obvious.

The first is that the list of Donald Trump’s accomplishments as president is a long one: the Middle East peace treaties, wage gains for low wage earners, elimination of the ISIS Caliphate, low unemployment (pre-COVID), Operation Warp Speed, energy independence, rapid economic recovery, reduction of economy-strangling regulations, pushback against Chinese Communist subversive tactics (including his recent release of Chinese bounty intel), returning manufacturing and industry to the homeland, immigration sanity, forcing NATO allies to pay their fair share of military expenses, the renegotiating of trade deals in America’s favor, in short, the policy of America First—to mention only a few of his extraordinary achievements.

Second, he has been routinely and viscerally misrepresented and traduced by a hostile and corrupt media consortium that has suppressed or sullied a record any responsible president would be proud of. Clearly, we no longer have a fair and trustworthy press but a Soviet-style propaganda machine trading on lies, unceasing vitriol and relentless ad hominem attacks on a sitting president.

Third, the evidence of massive and unprecedented electoral fraud that may well cost Trump the election is undeniable: preventing inspectors from observing the vote count, accepting illegal mail-in ballots and invalid (without dates) absentee ballots, random assignment of ballots, vote dumping, ballot box stuffing, votes exceeding the number of estimated voters, registering 120-year-old voters, transference of votes from Trump to Biden in battleground states, suitcases filled with ballots dragged out from beneath a covered table after mandated poll observers were told to leave, thousands of affidavits attesting to illegitimate activities, election rules drastically changed, hackable and manipulated voting machines and practices, and so on. The documentation is everywhere. Pennsylvania election numbers don’t add upoutcome-determinative fraud occurred in GeorgiaRepublican ballots were misprinted in several swing states. The fraud, which is, in effect, an integral part of a premeditated coup d’état and “the biggest political scandal in U.S. history,” cannot be doubted or dismissed except by committed partisans of the Democratic Party, #NeverTrumpers, insurrectionary cadres like Antifa and BLM, useful idiots, and data-censoring corporate magnates frustrated by an honest broker in the Oval Office.

Trump has been faulted for his brusque rhetorical style, for his lack of polish, for his incessant Twittering, for his thin-skinned reaction to criticism, for his hands, for his hair, for his past—indeed, for anything his adversaries can think of. Certainly, he is not flawless, but I suspect his only significant fault is possibly his misjudging the vast extent of the “swamp,” and not acting early enough to counter its malignance. 

For the swamp is everywhere: in Congress, in the intelligence agencies, in the education establishment K-12 to post-graduate (including the professoriate and academic administration), in state legislatures, in the judiciary, in many of the churches, in the media gutters and high-tech platforms, in communal organizations and in a considerable portion of the nation. Perhaps Trump should have invoked the Insurrection Act. Perhaps he should have challenged Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act earlier in his term. Perhaps he should have fired the problematic elements and Obama holdovers in the military leadership and replaced them with reliable personnel. Perhaps he should have relied on executive privilege to ensure that the plotters who spied on his campaign and who used extraconstitutional means to remove a duly elected president be charged in criminal court or according to the Articles of the Constitution (Article II, Section 1). He should definitely have investigated the electoral apparatus and adopted preventive measures years before the current election. Then again, he is one man against a veritable world.

In this respect, I recall a lecture given by the celebrated education author and psycholinguist Frank Smith, which I attended when guesting at Brigham Young University. Smith was lamenting the state of the culture, which he felt had grown so decadent, divisive, and mendacious that it could no longer be salvaged. “We’re on the Titanic,” he said, “and we’re going down. Save yourself if you can. Jump ship.” The problem, so far as I could see, was that there was nowhere to jump. Everything is the Titanic: the sea, the land, the lifeboats, even the iceberg. The only solution, within the terms of the metaphor, was to keep bailing in order to maintain the ship afloat, in the hope that a competent crew could be dispatched to repair the damage before the foundering.

Similarly, as noted, the swamp is everywhere, giving off its fetid neo-Marxist/Globalist stench. Another four years of a Trump presidency will serve to drain it further, and perhaps make political life somewhat more bearable, but the swamp will continue to pollute the constitutional order of the nation. The battle is endless against the abominations who inhabit the swamp, the Shambling Mounds, the Green Hags, the Bullywugs, the Stirges, and especially the Mud Mephits and Yuan-tis. But this is more than a Dungeons & Dragons gaming session; it is a war for survival. Should Trump be re-elected, he will need all the help he can get when, as Adventurer-in-Chief, he enters the swamp to confront its foul denizens.

As Lee Smith writes in his recent The Permanent Coup, detailing the “desperate measures” of America’s domestic enemies, “The coup aimed at toppling Donald Trump will not end in November 2020, whether he is reelected or not…because it is aimed mainly at Americans…it’s weaponized to destroy anyone the left perceives as its enemy.” Trump and a few loyal allies are all America has as a bulwark against the advancing fen, in an effort to keep it at bay and reduce its lethality. Should a spurious and criminal election fail to be overturned, the swamp will inundate the land and there will be no Ark to ride it out, no Titanic to keep afloat.

In his Agony and Eloquence: John Adams, Thomas Jefferson and a World of Revolution, American historian Daniel Mallock reflects: “Every generation has its own times that try the souls of men and women. The present belongs to the living” who must honor the gift deeded to them by great and patriotic men like Adams and Jefferson, nation-builders like Washington and Lincoln. “Every generation writes its own history,” he continues, “Our interpretation will change but the truth of the matter will not; it is our responsibility to weigh the evidence and know the difference between the shadows of our prisms and the sometimes-dim light of historical truth.” The “dim light” also occludes our vision, not only of historical truth but of present reality, thanks to the efforts of an obscurantist media and the derelictions of our public institutions. Nevertheless, “it is our responsibility to weigh the evidence” of electoral malfeasance and institutional complicity to arrive at “the truth of the matter” and to act upon it

This January 6 is the critical moment in the modern history of the United States. The secular Epiphany will “show forth” whether there will be anything to celebrate or whether it will manifest as a terminal mockery of the will of the majority of the  American people and the virtual end of the American Republic.

If a Won Election Is Not Reported, Is It a Won Election?
 

Lin Wood Files EMERGENCY PETITION – ACCUSES John Roberts!

Lin Wood has filed an Emergency Petition to the Supreme Court to overturn the dismissals of his federal lawsuits and to pause the upcoming senate runoff election. He also tweeted some SPICY takes and accusations against Chief Justice John Roberts. Petition for Mandamus: https://www.dropbox.com/s/qs2n8cucvjx... Lin Wood Tweets: https://twitter.com/LLinWood/status/1...

Poll Observer Claims ‘Statistically Impossible’ Number of Military Ballots in Georgia County Went for Biden

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/12/31/poll-observer-claims-statistically-impossible-number-of-military-ballots-in-georgia-county-went-for-biden-n1296053;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A poll observer in Cobb County, Georgia said during a state Senate subcommittee meeting that she reviewed nearly 300 overseas military ballots and that as high as 90 percent of them went to Biden.

The poll observer, Debbie Fisher, says she reviewed ballots during the November 16 hand recount, and that “throughout the day, it made me sicker to see” that so many were going for Biden. According to Fisher, such a scenario was “statistically impossible” as that part of Cobb County is traditionally Republican.

But that’s not the only suspicious thing she witnessed.

“Of those ballots, as I walked through them piece by piece … I noticed something disturbing. They were inordinately perfect” in how they were filled out. “About 90 percent of them had no paper folds,” which means that they were not mailed in an envelope, as is required by law.

Fisher said she challenged the suspicious military ballots, requesting they be thrown out—but the election official in charge refused, and insisted the ballots were legitimate.

“People talk about obstruction, they talk about rudeness, they talk about whatever, but I can honestly tell you there was obstruction,” Fisher said of the behavior of the election workers.

But, a signature audit by the Georgia Bureau of Investigations and secretary of state investigators claim there were no widespread fraudulent absentee ballots.

According to a press release from Secretary of State Raffensperger’s office, “The absentee ballot envelopes for the audit were ‘pulled from 30 randomly selected boxes of the accepted ABM ballots and one box identified as accepted Electronic Ballot Delivery ABM ballots.’ Each of the boxes that held the ballots were previously ‘secured in boxes by the Cobb County Elections Department’ and were selected by a random number generator.”

Fisher doesn’t buy it. She says that election officials certified the signature audit “with no observers available to watch how they audited them.”

Matt Margolis is the author of Airborne: How The Liberal Media Weaponized The Coronavirus Against Donald Trumpand the bestselling book The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama. You can follow Matt on Twitter @MattMargolis

DOJ Adviser Says 368,000 Fraudulent ‘Excess Votes’ Tipped Election to Joe Biden
 

Melissa Carone Refuses To Cooperate With Potential Defamation Lawsuit From Dominion Voting Systems

BY CULLEN PARADIS

SEE: https://www.ibtimes.com/melissa-carone-refuses-cooperate-potential-defamation-lawsuit-dominion-voting-systems-3112650;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

KEY POINTS

  • Melissa Carone is saying she'll disregard a letter from Dominion Voting Systems asking that her emails with the Trump campaign be preserved
  • Dominion Voting has made a variety of legal threats against those pushing debunked claims of election fraud
  • Dominion also says Carone drastically overstated her position in election efforts

Melissa Carone, Rudy Giuliani’s star witness during Michigan’s surreal election hearings, may be facing a lawsuit for her debunked allegations against Dominion Voting Systems. She’s proven an uncooperative target, disregarding orders from Dominion lawyers not to tamper with evidence. 

"I don’t know who the [expletive] they think they are," Carone told Detroit's Fox affiliate. "Sorry, excuse my language, but they are not telling me what to do."

Carone is referring to a letter from Dominion’s lawyers informing her that a defamation suit is “imminent” and asking that she preserve any communications between her and the Donald Trump campaign.

"I’ll be saving them," Carone said in her Fox interview. "I’ll be saving them on my personal computer and if I feel like deleting them I’ll delete them, but they’re not going to see any of my private conversations - I’ll tell you that. Or any personal conversations I’ve had with the Trump campaign, anybody, they’re not seeing it."

Melissa CaroneMelissa Carone, who was working for Dominion Voting Services, speaks in front of the Michigan House Oversight Committee in Lansing, Michigan, on Dec. 2, 2020. Photo: Jeff Kowalsky/AFP via Getty Images

Dominion also said that Carone overstated her role in the voting process, saying she was a temp worker brought on to “clean glass on machines and complete other menial tasks.” Carone maintains she was part of the IT team overseeing the machines.

"My job description was in IT support," Carone said. "I don’t know what they mean when they say ‘cleaning glass’. I never cleaned glass… I guess it’s just to be degrading.” 

It’s the latest move in Dominion’s efforts to clamp down on the disproven accusations against the integrity of their election machines. A statement to Fox from its legal counsel says Carone won’t be the only one that might face lawsuits.

“Our immediate focus is on Sidney Powell, who has been one of the most egregious and prolific purveyors of defamatory falsehoods,” said the statement. “Moving forward, we will certainly be taking a close look at others who have participated directly in the defamatory campaign - as well as those who have recklessly provided a platform for these discredited allegations.”

 

Tech Expert Shocks GA Election Fraud Hearing With News He ‘Got Into’ Voting System With WiFi

More Hacks Where The Ballots Are Being Cast! #JovanHuttonPulitzer

WIFI CONNECTING TO CHINESE AT POLLING PLACES

BY VICTORIA TAFT

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/election/victoria-taft/2020/12/30/tech-expert-shocks-ga-election-fraud-hearing-with-news-he-got-into-voting-system-with-wifi-n1293439;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The man who invented and patented the technology that lets you scan items at the grocery store, create an airport boarding pass, and generate authentication codes just blew the doors off the Georgia State Senate subcommittee hearing on elections.

Tech expert Jovan Hutton Pulitzer claimed that to the extent there were election issues in Georgia, they could be explained by simply looking at the paper ballots. And he claimed to prove in real time that the system was susceptible to manipulation via WiFi because his team had broken in and were in it at the time of the hearing.

Pulitzer basically threw down, telling a Georgia Senate subcommittee looking into voter fraud to show him the ballots, give him two hours, and he’d show them if there was election fraud in Fulton County.

I only care what that piece of paper tells us. The paper, the paper. Verify the vote, verify the vote.

[…] I can determine where ink comes from, where paper comes from, whether it was mailed, whether it was folded, the difference of a duplicated press” and a mass copier.

Pulitzer wants to see the paper ballot because what he’s seen so far looks entirely janky.

He told the lawmakers that it’s not about the code in the machines that caused 93% of them to be set aside to be “adjudicated” by humans; all he needs to do is get a look the “Holy Grail” – the physical paper ballots.

In the nearly hour-long presentation at a special hearing with the subcommittee (see it below), Pulitzer demonstrated the differences between the paper ballots in two different areas of Fulton County that he claims clearly differentiated between Democrat and Republican Party ballots.

A bar code was put on Republican ballots while none was put on Democrat ballots, he claimed. Furthermore, he said, the alignment cues used by a scanner to read the ballot were out of alignment on the Republican ballots but not on the Democrat ones.

If the machine worked according to programming none of us would be standing here. We’re standing here because something broke. I don’t care about the machine. I don’t even care about the code that was written into the machine. What I care about is that physical artifact. That physical artifact has material differences from district to district that should not be there. Why are they there? I’m not talking about code. That’s how this gets derailed.

He said he could tell immediately if a ballot was real or counterfeit.

You could look at every section of the ballot count even the spike and tell if that was a real or counterfeit ballot.

We will tell you instantly what came out of a mass copier versus what came out of a printer. Did a human fill this out? Did a machine fill this out? Was it mailed or was it not mailed? It can be compared against spoilage or adjudicated by number or, last but not least, we will tell you have we seen this number before. Did we see it keep popping back up?

You will see what gets run over and over and over and over again. That is the problem of why we must see – the physical ballot is the Holy Grail, the second one is the digital scan.

I’ve spent the last 24 years studying the way paper and machines and internet react. I’ve spent the last six years studying the paper reading details at the nano level. I can tell you what paper came from China. I can tell you the person who handled it was a smoker. All of it is detectable with the physical ballot.

But the most shocking moment of the hours-long hearing came later when the issue of whether others could break into the voting system and modify the data (the votes) in the voting system came up.

Pulitzer said he was assured there was no way the system could give or send signals but that wasn’t true because, he claimed, his team had penetrated the system using WiFi.

“Look,” he told them, “this is simple.”

“I’m the guy that told the world that that little bar code can talk to the internet. Making the physical world talk to the internet world. This is as simple as scanning a loaf of bread at a grocery store. That’s your vote. You’re handing it to the checker or scanning it yourself that’s basically the polling machine.

“What is sad about this is we’re not even performing at standards expected at grocery stores. … if you complained, [the store] would have to audit it and make it right. But we don’t do this in elections?

But they’re playing hide and seek with the ballots? Why?

Somebody was listening because at the conclusion of the hearing the subcommittee agreed to have a look at some of the ballots from Fulton County that were questionable.

Stay tuned.

Victoria Taft is the host of “The Adult in the Room Podcast With Victoria Taft” where you can hear her series on “Antifa Versus Mike Strickland.” Find it  here.Follow her on Facebook,  TwitterParlerMeWeMinds @VictoriaTaft 

DOJ Adviser Says 368,000 Fraudulent ‘Excess Votes’ Tipped Election to Joe Biden
Major Court Victory Boosts Election Integrity in Georgia Runoffs
The Censored Hunter Biden Laptop Story Is Coming Back to Bite Twitter Big Time
 

Walmart Goes After ‘#SoreLoser’ Sen Josh Hawley for Questioning Election Integrity and Immediately Regrets It

BY VICTORIA TAFT

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2020/12/31/walmart-goes-after-soreloser-sen-josh-hawley-for-questioning-election-integrity-and-immediately-regrets-it-n1295553;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Leftists working in America’s corporations and schools appear to have no compunction about using the power and prestige of their employer to amplify their personal politics. Now it’s Walmart’s turn.

Google employees openly lament over the 2016 election results and vow never to let it happen again. They manipulate searches and messages to do just that in 2020. Teachers think nothing of flipping off the president or the “teacher of the year” wishing death upon a Senate majority leader. They feel secure knowing that they’re surrounded by like-minded people and will suffer little-to-no consequences for their uncivil actions.

On Wednesday, it was Walmart’s turn. Someone in the company’s social media department decided it was no big deal to try to big-foot a US Senator for standing against ratifying the electoral college votes for the presidential election. They used the prestige of the company for which they work to mock Senator Josh Hawley and people who support President Trump.

It didn’t go well for the retail behemoth in the end. Hawley had the foresight to screenshot the tweet from Walmart in response to his message about election integrity.

Millions of voters concerned about election integrity deserve to be heard. I will object on January 6 on their behalf.

To which the official corporate Walmart Twitter account responded in a decidedly unprofessional, nay sophomoric, way.

Go ahead. Get your 2 hour debate. #Soreloser

And it was on.

Hawley responded:

Thanks @Walmart for your insulting condescension. Now that you’ve insulted 75 million Americans, will you at least apologize for using slave labor?

Hawley’s attack on Walmart’s dependence on cheaper products from China, which uses slave labor to make some products, wasn’t his coup de grâce. Yet.

The Missouri Senator went on.

Or maybe you’d like to apologize for the pathetic wages you pay your workers as you drive mom and pop stores out of business.

That’s got to smart a little.

Walmart has traditionally been a more Republican-leaning corporation but it’s now turned purple and obviously has turned its back on issues that are of import to all Americans, not just red-staters.

Walmart should take a page from NBA great, Michael Jordan, who once famously said, “Republicans buy sneakers, too.”

Though Jordan said it in jest, he wasn’t wrong.

There were 74 million people in the Trump camp on election day 2020. Most of them were Republicans, some were Democrats and others were independents. You can bet many of those people have shopped at a Walmart at one time or another.

Walmart just told them it doesn’t want their business. The message didn’t go over well. Twitter user Mindy Robinson weighed in.

You know what? F-Walmart and their slave labor produce cheap sh*tty products. We need American-made options for all manufactured goods starting RIGHT NOW.

Let’s phase out our dependence on China by taxing their products to oblivion! #CancelChina #BoycottWalmart

And a guy named Brian urged people to shop at small businesses – if you can find any that are allowed to be open during COVID.

Thank you @hawleymo! As for Walmart, time to shop at small businesses!

Some lashed back at Hawley for “insulting” 80 million voters who apparently think the election was totally on the up and up, even though their candidate barely actively campaigned.

During the COVID lockdowns, big box stores, of which Walmart is a part, have been deemed essential and allowed to stay open. CNBC reporter Rick Santelli pointed out the fundamental unfairness, not to mention lack of science, at keeping smaller stores closed while allowing big stores, with the same ratio of people to space, to stay open. Walmart has made billions during the lockdown because government has shut down what remains of its competition and the company has gobbled up market share. In August, Walmart announced its online sales were up by 97%.

Indeed, the unfairness has become the subject of memes.

I say for phase 3 we close down Walmart, Costco, & other big retail stores for 6 months & let have small businesses have a chance at making record profits.

Democrats and unions, but I repeat myself, over the years have unleashed a blitzkrieg of websites, movies and direct actions against the corporation for not using unionized employees. Walmart Watch/Change WalmartWalmart Sucks were part of the campaign by Democrat groups to hurt the company and force them to bend to the Left.

The memes about the “people of Walmart” started as one such effort and grew into its own franchise. The photos were a way of mocking hayseed Walmart shoppers – and by extension commenting on the lower social status of the store –  because on the ladder of victimhood, hating Walmart ranks higher than shaming people who shop at a cheaper, non-union store.

Who stood up for Walmart? People who support free enterprise. Not Democrats.

How soon they forget.

Walmart responded with an aw, shucks, that was just a mistake by some free radical pinging off the walls of our social media office.

The corporate headquarters, which originally sent out the initial attempted slap down of Senator Hawley, wrote that it never intended to involve itself in election politics and issued a non-apology-apology to the Missouri Republican.

The tweet published earlier was mistakenly posted by a member of our social media team. We deleted the post and have no intention of commenting on the subject of certifying the electoral college. We apologize to Senator Hawley for this error and any confusion about our position.

Maybe many Trump-voting “people of Walmart” haven’t noticed this tell by the retail behemoth, but seeing as how Hawley is the biggest name out there in Congress opposing codifying this flawed election, maybe they have.

 

Judge: Georgia Official Must Allow Republican Poll Watchers

Major Court Victory Boosts Election Integrity in Georgia Runoffs

JUDGE GEORGE KREEGER: 

Senior Judge George H Kreeger

Janine Eveler, elections director at the Cobb County Board of Elections & Registration:

BY TYLER O'NEIL

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/12/30/victory-georgia-elections-official-allows-republican-poll-watchers-after-lawsuit-n1293031;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In the vital lead-up to the Georgia Senate runoff elections on January 5, a pro-Trump PAC announced a key legal victory for election integrity. Janine Eveler, elections director at the Cobb County Board of Elections and Registration, had allegedly restricted Republican poll watchers. After the local Republican Party filed a lawsuit alongside the pro-Trump PAC Committee to Defend the President, Eveler signed a consent decree guaranteeing poll watchers’ access.

Ted Harvey, the PAC’s chairman, applauded Judge George Kreeger of the Cobb County Superior Court for “helping us bring accuracy, fairness, and transparency to Georgia. Because of this ruling, the county’s ballot observation process will no longer stink of secrecy and corruption.”

“However, the fight goes on: The Committee won’t rest until we hold each of these arrogant, abusive, and partisan election officials accountable and get to the bottom of unprecedented voting irregularities in the Peach State,” Harvey added.

The Committee to Defend the President joined the Cobb County GOP and Georgia elector Jason Shepherd in suing Eveler and the elections board for allegedly enforcing different rules when it comes to allowing or restricting poll watchers.

Eveler allegedly picked ballot monitors overnight and posted her selections early the next morning, while selecting only two people to monitor a 25,000-square-foot facility with three separate rooms.

Judge Kreeger’s ruling requires Eveler to interpret election laws as they were originally written, allowing Republican poll watchers to oversee the ballot counting process without the constraints of recent weeks.

According to the committee, “The ruling ensures that Eveler cannot abuse her power to undermine Republican Senators Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue.”

Kreeger’s order requires the elections board to allow Republican poll watchers throughout the ballot counting process, specifically allowing them to “observe the process of absentee ballot signature verification.”

In the aftermath of Joe Biden’s apparent narrow victory in Georgia in the November 3 presidential election, the Trump campaign had repeatedly alleged that election officials abused the signature verification on absentee ballots, verifying signatures that did not match the signature on file for the voter in question.

Since the ballot envelopes with the signatures were cast away after this verification process, it was likely impossible for the Trump campaign to separate votes illegally counted from those legally counted. However, if poll watchers have guaranteed access to observe the count, they can prevent or call out any such shenanigans in the January 5 runoff.

This legal victory only applies to Cobb County, but it does mark an important step in the right direction of restoring election integrity after the numerous irregularities that opened the November 3 election to potential fraud. Whatever Americans think of President Donald Trump’s attempts to challenge the election results, it is essential to address these irregularities and reform the system to bolster election integrity.

This ruling represents a crucial step in that direction, right before the runoffs.

Tyler O’Neil is the author of Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at @Tyler2ONeil.

Team Trump Demands Signature Audit as Dominion Server Crash Delays Georgia Recount
SPLC Funded Ballot Drop Boxes in Georgia, Now It’s Suing to Defend Them for the Runoff
Democrats Are Right to Worry About the Georgia Runoffs
5 Things to Know About the Georgia Runoff Debates
 

DOJ Adviser Says 368,000 Fraudulent ‘Excess Votes’ Tipped Election to Joe Biden

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2020/12/30/doj-adviser-says-368000-fraudulent-excess-votes-tipped-election-to-joe-biden-n1293011;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

John Lott, who was hired by the Justice Department in October as senior adviser for Research and Statistics at the Office of Justice Programs, has published a study concluding that as many as 368,000 “excess votes” tipped the election outcome to favor Joe Biden in two consequential battleground states.

“Increased fraud can take many forms: higher rates of filling out absentee ballots for people who hadn’t voted, dead people voting, ineligible people voting, or even payments to legally registered people for their votes,” reads the study’s summary. “The estimates here indicate that there were 70,000 to 79,000 ‘excess’ votes in Georgia and Pennsylvania.”

The best estimate shows an unusual 7.81% drop in Trump’s percentage of the absentee ballots for Fulton County alone of 11,350 votes, or over 80% of Biden’s vote lead in Georgia. The same approach is applied to Allegheny County in Pennsylvania for both absentee and provisional ballots. The estimated number of fraudulent votes from those two sources is about 55,270 votes.

The study aimed to quantify how large of a problem voter fraud and other election irregularities were in the 2020 election. “The process is applicable to other states where precinct-level data is available on voting by absentee and in-person voting,” explains the study’s introduction.

Lott concludes that the discrepancies in absentee voting are not likely to have been caused by a shift by Democrats to vote absentee because of the pandemic, as the study controlled for in-person voting.

“In layman’s terms, in precincts with alleged fraud, Trump’s proportion of absentee votes was depressed – even when such precincts had similar in-person Trump vote shares to their surrounding countries,” Lott explains. “The fact that the shift happens only in absentee ballots, and when a country line is crossed, is suspicious.”

“The precinct-level estimates for Georgia and Pennsylvania indicate that vote fraud may account for Biden’s win in both states,” Lott concludes.

Lott also looked at voter turnout rates in Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, and Wisconsin, comparing counties where there was alleged fraud and those where there wasn’t.  When those states are included, Lott estimates that as many 289,000 fraudulent votes in the 2020 election were counted.

The study, called “A Simple Test for the Extent of Vote Fraud with Absentee Ballots in the 2020 Presidential Election: Georgia and Pennsylvania Data” was published on Tuesday.

Lott is considered a controversial figure by the left-wing media. He is the founder of the Crime Prevention Research Center, a pro-Second Amendment nonprofit, which has published studies concluding that communities with higher rates of gun ownership have lower rates of crime. Lott left the organization to serve in the Trump administration. Andrew Pollack, the father of Meadow Pollack, who was killed during the Parkland shooting in 2018, has since taken over as president of the organization.

 
1 16 17 18 19 20 25