Rather Expose Them Christian News Blog

Trump Parts with Future Pence Vice-Presidency: ‘I Don’t Think the People Would Accept It’

CATHOLIC, POPE'S PUPPET, Ex-VP Mike Pence hits back at Donald Trump over election

VP Pence And Pope Francis Discuss US Pro-Life Movement During Vatican Meeting – Eurasia Review

ONE MONTH AGO, THEY'RE STILL AT IT: 

Exclusive: Vice President Pence tells EWTN News about meeting with Pope Francis

CATHOLICS IN AMERICAN POLITICS ARE THE ONES TRYING TO DESTROY AMERICA & ITS CONSTITUTION, GETTING THEIR INSTRUCTIONS FROM THE POPE

JANUARY 24, 2020: 

US Vice President Pence to Pope Francis: you made me a hero

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/trump-parts-with-future-pence-vice-presidency-i-dont-think-the-people-would-accept-it/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

As Trump and former VP part ways, Pence eyes POTUS.

QUICK FACTS:
  • President Donald Trump is effectively ruling out asking former Vice President Mike Pence to be his running mate should he run for a third White House bid in 2024 and win the Republican nomination, The Washington Examiner reports.
  • “I don’t think the people would accept it,” Trump told The Examiner Tuesday evening during a telephone interview from Mar-a-Lago, his private club and political headquarters in Palm Beach, Florida.
  • Trump pointed to disagreement between himself and Pence rising in the aftermath of the 2020 election, suggesting their differences are too stark to overcome, The Examiner notes.
  • Trump claims the election was stolen and wanted Pence to overturn the results during the congressional certification of Joe Biden’s Electoral College win.
  • But Trump did characterize Pence as a “really fine person,” even though he signaled their relationship might be irrevocably broken.
  • “Mike and I had a great relationship except for the very important factor that took place at the end. We had a very good relationship,” Trump said. “I haven’t spoken to him in a long time.”
PENCE FOR PRESIDENT?:
  • Pence is considering a 2024 bid, The Examiner reports.
  • He’s also signaled he wouldn’t automatically stand aside if Trump were to run, accelerating efforts to establish his independence from President Trump.
  • Pence recently told a gathering of conservative lawyers Trump is flat “wrong” to claim the vice president is constitutionally empowered to throw out the results of a presidential election.
  • He also took aim at Trump’s remarks toward Russian President Vladimir Putin during remarks to party financiers gathered for a Republican National Committee donor retreat, saying, “There is no room in this party for apologists for Putin.” Trump had previously referred to Putin as “smart,” “savvy,” and “a genius” in certain contexts while insisting that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine never would have happened on his watch.
  • “We cannot win by fighting yesterday’s battles or by relitigating the past,” said Pence.
  • Trump was recently the overwhelming favorite for the GOP nomination in the 2024 presidential election, garnering 59% of the vote in a straw poll conducted at a Conservative Political Action Conference‘s meeting in Orlando, Florida, even beating Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis by 31 points.
  • Pence was among the 1 percenters, along with Sens. Rand Paul of Kentucky, Tim Scott of South Carolina and Ted Cruz of Texas, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, former UN ambassador Nikki Haley, and Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin.
BACKGROUND:
  • Pence argues the Constitution granted him no authority to overturn the Electoral College results.
  • “Mike thought he was going to be a human conveyor belt, that no matter how fraudulent the votes, you have to send them up to the Old Crow,” Trump said, using his nickname for Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, The Examiner notes.
  • “But that turned out to be wrong. Because now, as you know, they are feverishly working to try and get it so that the vice president cannot do what Mike said he couldn’t do,” Trump said, referring to proposals to overhaul the Electoral Count Act. “Obviously, they were either lying, misrepresenting, or they didn’t know.”
  • “I was disappointed in Mike,” Trump said.

Questioning U.S. Elections, COVID, Jan 6 Narratives Designated ‘Violent Extremism Threat’ by U.S. Department of Homeland Security

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/questioning-u-s-elections-covid-jan-6-narratives-designated-violent-extremism-threat-by-u-s-department-of-homeland-security/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Gov’t assessment points to “sociopolitical developments such as narratives of fraud in the recent general election, the emboldening impact of the violent breach of the U.S. Capitol” and “conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic.”

QUICK FACTS:
  • Under the direction of Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released a “Report on Internal Review of Domestic Violent Extremism” conducted by “a cross-Departmental working group of senior officials.”
  • The report incorporated a “comprehensive review of how to best prevent, detect, and respond to potential threats related to domestic violent extremism within the Department of Homeland Security,” according to the DHS website.
  • The assessment is defined as “domestic violent extremists” those “who are motivated by a range of ideologies and galvanized by recent political and societal events in the United States.”
  • These extremists “pose an elevated threat to the Homeland in 2021,” the report goes on to say.
  • The report emphasized “sociopolitical developments such as narratives of fraud in the recent general election, the emboldening impact of the violent breach of the U.S. Capitol, conditions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and conspiracy theories promoting violence,” arguing that such developments “will almost certainly spur some [domestic violent extremists] [sic] to try to engage in violence this year.”
READ THE FULL REPORT:
WHAT ELSE MAYORKAS SAID:
  • “Every day, the more than 250,000 dedicated public servants at DHS work to ensure the safety and security of communities across our country. To ensure we are able to continue executing our critical mission with honor and integrity, we will not tolerate hateful acts or violent extremist activity within our Department,” said Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas.
  • “The findings of this internal review highlight key steps that our Department will continue to take with urgency to better prevent, detect, and respond to potential internal threats related to domestic violent extremism, and protect the integrity of our mission.”
BACKGROUND:
  • DHS has promised over the coming months to “focus on implementing the report’s recommendations” and to “include establishing baseline policies and guidance, promoting employee awareness, and enhancing methods to identify and address violent extremist activity while continuing to protect privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties.”
  • The department says it “has already begun addressing many of the gaps identified in the report, including by updating related employee training modules and developing guides for leaders to reference when discussing violent extremist activity.”

A Bill Banning FACEBOOK’S ‘Zuckbucks’ Foundation Funding in Virginia Elections Is Headed to Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s Desk

The Era of ‘Zuckbucks’ in Florida Election Administration Ends - The Thinking Conservative

BY THE FEDERALIST

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/a-bill-banning-zuckbucks-foundation-funding-in-virginia-elections-is-headed-to-gov-glenn-youngkins-desk/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Virginia’s assembly passed legislation to prohibit state and local election officials from accepting certain funding from private groups.

The General Assembly of Virginia successfully passed a series of bills this week that would prohibit state and local election officials from accepting certain gifts and funding from private individuals or non-governmental entities that would impact how elections are conducted within the Commonwealth.

Passed by both the state’s House of Delegates and Senate, HB 205 (and its companion SB 80) would mandate that “The State Board, the Department, each local electoral board, and all offices of the general registrar shall not solicit, accept, use, or dispose of any money, grants, property, or services given by a private individual or nongovernmental entity for the purpose of funding voter education and outreach programs, voter registration programs, or any other expense incurred in the conduct of elections.”

The operation of polling places and voter satellite offices in facilities supplied by private individuals or non-governmental entities are exempt under the law, however.

Del. Otto Wachsmann Jr., who introduced the measure in the House, told The Federalist he was “pleased” the legislation has successfully passed both chambers of the General Assembly while emphasizing how “outside entities” will no longer be able “to influence how elections are run by the state.”

“While nongovernmental groups are allowed to conduct events like voter registration drives outside of our governmental agencies, this bill clarifies that they have no business directly influencing the way that our registrars and electoral boards conduct their business,” Wachsmann said. “That is the sole role of our governmental agencies. I am pleased that the General Assembly has agreed with this concept.”

In explaining the need for the legislation, Wachsmann cited a press release from U.S. Rep. Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y., which details how Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg gave $350 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), a left-wing advocacy group. CTCL spent millions on “financing the infiltration of election offices at the city and county level by left-wing activists and using those offices as a platform to implement preferred administrative practices, voting methods, and data-sharing agreements, as well as to launch intensive outreach campaigns in areas heavy with Democratic voters” leading up to the 2020 election.

Wachsmann also noted figures from the Capital Research Center, which show CTCL spending nearly $4 million “Zuckbucks” in Virginia during the 2020 election cycle. While the report notes that CTCL distributed funds to more counties won by Trump (22 of 87) than Biden (14 of 46), over 90 percent ($3.4 million) of the organization’s funding was given to the 14 Biden-won counties, with less than 10 percent ($358,910) going towards the 22 Trump-won counties.

“This is the second-most lopsided bias in favor of Democratic-leaning counties we’ve identified (after Texas),” the report concludes.

Having officially cleared the General Assembly, the bills now head to the desk of Gov. Glenn Youngkin, who previously said during Virginia’s Republican gubernatorial primary last year that he would make election integrity a “top priority.” According to Youngkin press secretary Macaulay Porter, the governor “will review the legislation when it comes to his desk.”

In addition to Virginia, numerous battleground states across the country saw Zuckbucks infiltrate their election systems during the 2020 election cycle. As detailed by Federalist Editor in Chief Mollie Hemingway in her New York Times bestselling book, “Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections,” Zuckerberg “didn’t just help Democrats by censoring their political opponents,” his financing of “liberal groups running partisan get-out-the-vote operations” was ultimately “the means by which [Democrat] activists achieved their ‘revolution’ and changed the course of the 2020 election.”

“It was a genius plan,” writes Hemingway. “And because no one ever imagined that a coordinated operation could pull off the privatization of the election system, laws were not built to combat it.”

As of March 2022, 16 states have either banned or severely restricted the use and acceptance of private funds for state and local elections.

‘Afghan Adjustment Act’ Would Legalize 36,000 Unvetted Afghans

Don’t ask questions, just give them their citizenship

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/03/afghan-adjustment-act-would-legalize-36000-daniel-greenfield/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

Biden’s evacuation brought tens of thousands of Afghans to America.

The majority of them were not interpreters, had no visas, and had no basis for entering the country. Despite that, they were rapidly brought here with virtually no vetting, dropped off at military bases, and then put through the resettlement process across the United States.

There’s no one problem.

At last count around 36,000 Afghans or 40% of the “refugees” had no legal basis for being evacuated even after the Biden administration and its congressional allies, both Democrat and Republican, watered-down standards for applying for SIV visas so much so that virtually any Afghan employed in any capacity by any contractors, charities, or even the media qualified.

The vast majority of Afghans in the evacuation were not visa recipients, but the evacuees got past Taliban checkpoints even while Americans and visa holders were being turned back.

Many of them have no paperwork and no legitimate basis for even claiming political asylum.

The same coalition of administration officials, congressional staffers, and refugee resettlement profiteers who perpetrated this mess have a shortcut in mind for legalizing all of them anyway.

A proposed Afghan Adjustment Act would grant the Afghan migrants, at least 36,000 of them, permanent legal residency and put them on a pathway to demanding citizenship.

Tens of thousands of Afghans have been turned loose on “humanitarian parole” for two years, which gives the refugee resettlement organizations handling their cases plenty of time to figure out some basis for applying for a more permanent asylum, but they don’t want to follow the law.

Why not?

Despite the virtual lack of vetting, hundreds of Afghan migrants are being flagged as security risks. 50 believed to be security risks were already released in this country and the majority of them are in the wind. Four have already been involved in sexual assault cases. Considering how much the Afghans have misbehaved in so little time, the refugee resettlement contractors are understandably worried that much more damaging information will come out after two years.

The new rush to lobby for an Afghan Adjustment Act, still in draft form, exploits the outrage and sentiment over the botched Afghanistan evacuation to rapidly legalize all of the Afghans here.

We were rushed into this disaster and we’re still being rushed into more disastrous decisions.

Biden told us that we had to urgently evacuate Afghanistan, but he was the one who chose to turn over Kabul to the Taliban and to create the conditions that allowed the terrorists to quickly seize the country. Once the Afghans were evacuated, there should have been plenty of time to hold them at overseas bases in Qatar and elsewhere, then thoroughly screen and vet them.

Instead, the Biden administration pushed to cut refugee resettlement and vetting times from years to days. What exactly was the rush to evacuate the Afghans, not from Kabul, but from Qatar? Now, with two years to go, there’s a new rush to give the Afghans instant legal status.

What’s the rush? They’re no longer fleeing the Taliban. They’re safely in America. What’s the excuse for not properly screening and vetting them through the normal asylum process?

Bringing tens of thousands of Afghans to America and rapidly resettling them, even though they had no long-term legal status, was meant to make the invasion irreversible. Now that the Afghans are scattered from Omaha to Philly to the Bay Area, the odds of deporting them after two years are slim, but the Afghan Adjustment Act would lock in their status, and make it very difficult to deport them even if they turn out to be terrorists, rapists, and other kinds of criminals.

It also speeds up the process of demographic change by which they will import family members, and alleged family members, to this country in order to transform cities, states, and the nation.

The House version of the Afghan Adjustment Act is being drafted by Rep. Earl Blumenauer, one of the most notorious shills for Islamists, and the Democrats are trying to enlist Republicans into foolishly backing the rushed effort to rapidly legalize a population of unvetted Afghan migrants.

Refugee resettlers like the Church World Service and HIAS, as well as umbrella groups like the Refugee Council, which also includes Islamic Relief USA, Amnesty International, the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, OXFAM, and other players in the same racket, are pressuring Congress to legalize all the Afghans now while asking questions later. Or never.

And the first question is who are the Afghan migrants and why can’t we wait to find that out?

The pressure campaign around the Afghan Adjustment Act is aimed at protecting Afghan migrants from having to apply for asylum. The advocates for instant legalization claim that the backlog of asylum requests is too long, but that’s the doing of their own organizations which have done everything possible to Cloward-Piven the refugee system by pushing open borders.

If the refugee asylum process were reserved for people fleeing political and religious persecution, as they should be, instead of Latin Americans fleeing high crime rates, we wouldn’t be overwhelmed with a massive backlog of frivolous asylum requests by illegal border invaders.

And two years is plenty of time in which to process the current requests if that were the issue.

Instead, the refugee resettlement lobby wants a free pass for 36,000 Afghans. And it wants to rush Americans into once again going along without asking any of the important questions..

Americans have been lied to about the Afghan evacuation at every turn. Politicians, the media, and the resettlers kept telling us that they were providing visas to interpreters. But the vast majority of Afghans need their own interpreters and most of them never worked with the military.

If they had, they would qualify for SIV visas.

40% of the Afghans, those tens of thousands, not only didn’t work for our military but never worked with any American organization in any capacity or they would qualify for a visa.

After lying to us about saving “interpreters”, and lying about the Afghans being carefully “vetted”, they’re trying to pull off the biggest scam yet by retroactively legalizing their illegal evacuation under the umbrella of an Afghan Adjustment Act which will shut down any further scrutiny.

Why don’t they want the Afghans to apply for asylum? The answer is painfully obvious. Just as it was obvious why they dismantled the visa standards for Afghans every single step of the way.

The Biden administration never vetted the tens of thousands of Afghans it imported into America. It and its refugee resettlement allies want to make sure that they never are.

Discovering the real truth about the Afghanistan withdrawal will require close scrutiny of what happened in the White House, in the Pentagon, and in the State Department. The tens of thousands of Afghans who got on the planes, when Americans and visa holders could not, the Taliban checkpoints, and the suicide bombing at the airport are all part of a larger puzzle.

The Afghan Adjustment Act isn’t a humanitarian gesture to persecuted people: it’s a cover-up.

Bombshell study finds more than 200,000 ballots from 2020 election with “mismatched signatures” indicating widespread fraud

Image: Bombshell study finds more than 200,000 ballots from 2020 election with “mismatched signatures” indicating widespread fraud

BY J.D. HEYES

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-02-25-more-than-200000-ballots-from-2020-election-mismatched-signatures.html#;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) A newly published study reveals additional evidence that the 2020 presidential election in Arizona was stolen from President Donald Trump just like he and his campaign surrogates and attorneys have insisted now for more than a year.

The study, by Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai of MIT, found more than 200,000 ballots from the election contained “mismatched signatures” and they were all counted in Maricopa County without being “cured” — that is, reviewed for accuracy and summarily fixed or rejected, as the law requires.

Liz Harrington, who handles communications for the former president, tweeted the results of the study.

“HUGE! In Arizona there were AT LEAST 229,430 early ballots with CLEARLY mismatched signatures In an election decided by 10,457 votes,” she wrote in a tweet that contained a short video of Ayyadurai explaining his findings.

She followed that tweet up with screenshots of the examples Ayyadurai found.

This “vote” was counted in Maricopa County pic.twitter.com/eCnq18KWgJ

— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) February 23, 2022

So was this pic.twitter.com/GIgEj01dQg

— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) February 23, 2022

And this pic.twitter.com/3wFNIIJ4VA

— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) February 23, 2022

The most secure election in history! pic.twitter.com/XAFbbC9Rrk

— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) February 23, 2022

“This analysis by Dr. Shiva is unimpeachable,” she continued with more examples, adding, “6 people — 3 forensic document examiners and 3 novices all agreed that 12 PERCENT of early mail-in ballots had mismatched signatures. Maricopa County only sent 1.3% for curing.

“As you can see, it’s called irreconcilable differences,”  Ayyadurai says in his presentation.

“Over 200,000, mail ballots, with mismatched signatures counted without being reviewed, which means cured, and you’re going to understand what that terminology means in Maricopa, and this is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, to calculate signature matching rates, to provide a quantitative framework for assessing signature verification of mail ballots, the whole area of mail-in ballots obviously has become a very controversial area, it’s split up the country, there’s a lot of division,” he continued.

“You’re going to learn about signature verification, we’re going to go over the results that took place in the 2020 election in Maricopa with, how they verified signatures, what results they had, then we’re going to share with you two important experiments that we did, where we got novices, to do the same exercise of having side by side signatures, and then telling us whether the signatures matched or not from the same person,” the researcher said, adding that the purpose of the study was to “educate” election officials both in Arizona and around the country.

He also said that the results were being provided to the Arizona Senate as well as GOP Attorney General Mark Brnovich.

Ayyadurai explained that ballot curing is done by election workers who don’t have a lot of training and do not spend more than a few seconds attempting to match signatures, which is a problem in a large area when millions of ballot signatures have to be matched.

In the case of Arizona, as Harrington pointed out, some 12 percent of early mail-in ballots contained mismatched signatures, but in Maricopa County, the state’s largest population center, just 1.3 percent of ballots were sent to be cured.

That resulted in hundreds of thousands fewer ballots being sent for further review than should have been, and as the research demonstrates, there were plenty of very obviously mismatched signatures — way more than enough to overturn Arizona’s ‘election of Joe Biden’ for president.

Trump is right, again: What happened in 2020 was flat-out election theft.

Sources include:

VAShiva.com

CitizenFreePress.com

D.C. City Council Bill to Allow Voting by Phones, Other Mobile Devices

BY VERONIKA KYRYLENKO

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/d-c-city-council-bill-to-allow-voting-by-phones-other-mobile-devices/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Forget about voting by mail, it is so yesterday. A Washington, D.C., City Council bill would allow people to cast their votes using their smartphones and tablets.

Brooke Pinto, a Democrat, introduced the bill dubbed “Mobile Voting Options for Turnout Equity Amendment Act of 2022,” or Mobile VOTE Act, Friday along with seven colleagues. She believes the initiative would simplify the voting process and enable individuals in “underserved communities” who would likely otherwise sit out the election to participate. 

According to Pinto’s press release,

“Our city and nation have well established values that voting rights are civil rights; enfranchising District residents by making voting easy and accessible for all is fundamentally important in advancing those values,” said Councilmember Pinto. “Despite District efforts to increase voting access, many residents continue to face voting barriers.”

Pinto further lamented that “hundreds of thousands” of eligible District voters don’t vote. While the capital residents showed up at the polls in previously unseen numbers to cast their ballots in the “historic 2020 elections,” they remain unengaged when it comes to the local races, per Pinto. This situation is, not surprisingly, blamed on racism and sexism. According to the councilmember,

Older adults, people with limited English proficiency, and people with disabilities, visual impairment, or limited transit access may have difficulty voting in person. Additionally, caregivers in the District, many of whom are women of color, and individuals who are hospitalized or have other emergencies, may also face barriers to voting.

These categories of voters, Pinto says, have been “historically underserved or excluded from the election process.” Pinto did not specify what are the modern “barriers” that are preventing older people or people of color from casting their ballots in the nation’s capital.

Nonetheless, she insists that “Mobile voting is one essential way to reduce barriers to voting and move the District to the forefront of modernizing elections.”

If passed, the bill would allow any eligible voter to cast an absentee ballot from a smartphone, tablet, or a computer “without having to travel to a polling site or mailbox or to stand in line to vote.” Pinto likened the process to submitting tax forms electronically. After voters submit their votes via mobile devices, the elections board would print and count the ballots. 

Likely foreseeing concerns over the proposed system’s security and privacy, Pinto claimed that it would “build on rapid advancements in cryptography in recent years that would allow voters to verify the system works correctly from end to end by verifying their own ballot and allow the Board of Elections to protect privacy, anonymity, and integrity of digital ballots.”

The bill would also establish an auditing system to report security threats and require the District’s Board of Elections (BOA) to create a system that protects voter data. It would also require personally identifiable information to be kept confidential and permanently deleted after a vote is cast.

The Washington Post reported how the initiative was supported by the representatives of various D.C. communities. Those included the senior pastor at Mount Lebanon Baptist Church, who said that mobile voting would “make voting more accessible for all D.C. residents.”

Tajuan Farmer, legislative chair for the National Federation of the Blind of D.C. Residents said he liked the initiative because he would not have to worry that “a voting location will be accessible or if the screen-reading features on the voting machines will work.”

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) claimed that people of color often encounter difficulty finding time to vote because of their busy work schedule, and praised Pinto’s initiative.

The bill will most likely face opposition over the system’s high susceptibility to hacking, according to DCist. Per the outlet,

“There is currently no internet technology available that allows for the secure transmission of voted ballots while also maintaining voter privacy and ballot verifiability,” wrote Mark Lindeman, an expert on voting security and audits with Verified Voting, a nonpartisan group that focuses on elections and technology, in a recent letter to legislators in Rhode Island considering a bill to allow ballots to be returned over the internet.

Four federal agencies concluded in a May 2020 assessment,

Securing the return of voted ballots via the internet while ensuring ballot integrity and maintaining voter privacy is difficult, if not impossible, at this time.

D.C. has already tried and failed to enhance its voting system with modern-day technology. For example, in August 2020, the elections board suspended use of its “notoriously buggy” and “unreliable” app that allowed voters to register to vote or change their registration.

The outlet points out that Pinto’s initiative follows a push launched last year by venture capitalist and former political operative Bradley Tusk “to make D.C. the first place in the country to formally adopt mobile voting.” Tusk is said to be passionate about mobile voting and heavily invested in at least 20 mobile voting projects. Among other initiatives, Tusk funded mobile-voting pilot programs across seven states — including WashingtonWest Virginia, and Oregon — mostly to support overseas and military voters, per DCist. “But his effort in D.C. would represent the first push to make mobile voting a permanent part of elections for all voters,” stressed the outlet.

The D.C. Council is already at work on a number of voting reforms, including one that would enshrine sending all district voters ballots by mail, and another that would introduce ranked-choice voting. 

Watch “Durham Is About To END The FBI and CLINTON for Good!!!”

★★★ YOUR PATRIOT PROFESSOR! ★★★

DR. STEVE TURLEY REPORTS: 

The Durham investigation appears poised to end the FBI and Hillary Clinton for good! In this video we’re going to look at the latest fallout from the bombshell spying revelations, we’re going to see the calls growing to reform or eliminate the FBI, and stick with me to the end of this video when we’ll see a brand new Trump ad that promises: “Justice is Coming for Hillary”; you are NOT going to want to miss this!

Hogan Gidley: Clinton Having Access To President Trump’s Servers ‘Completely Destructive’ To Country

Rumble — The latest revelations from John Durham establish bipartisan recognition for Hillary Clinton's' role in the Russia hoax. One America's Camryn Kinsey has more.

Watch "Hillary Clinton IMPLODES! Majority of DEMS Want Her Investigated!!!"

Image: Trump blasts Hillary Clinton for committing TREASON following bombshell Durham court filing

Trump blasts Hillary Clinton for committing TREASON following bombshell Durham court filing

BY J.D. HEYES

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-02-17-trump-blasts-hillary-clinton-for-committing-treason.html; republished below in full unedited for educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) There is already a myriad of reasons why Hillary Clinton should not be breathing free air at this very moment, having been locked up long ago for the rest of her natural life, but special counsel John Durham has found another one.

Durham, who is investigating the origins of the Obama-era “Trump-Russia collusion” lie, noted in a bombshell court filing late last week that Clinton directed an operation by her 2016 presidential campaign that involved the hiring of a technology company that “infiltrate” internet servers first at Trump Tower and then at the Trump White House in a vain attempt to find an illicit connection between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin’s government.

There was never any link found because the entire operation was premised on a lie. Trump and Putin never joined forces to “steal the election” from Clinton.

But the gist of Durham’s filing — that Clinton’s 2016 campaign may have broken laws to spy on Trump electronically — is a whole other level of corruption.

“Lawyers for the Clinton campaign paid a technology company to ‘infiltrate’ servers belonging to Trump Tower, and later the White House, in order to establish an ‘inference’ and ‘narrative’ to bring to government agencies linking Donald Trump to Russia, a filing from Special Counsel John Durham found,” Fox News reported.

“Durham filed a motion on Feb. 11 focused on potential conflicts of interest related to the representation of former Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who has been charged with making a false statement to a federal agent. Sussmann has pleaded not guilty.”

Fox News continued: “The filing revealed that Sussmann and the tech executive had met and communicated with another law partner, who was serving as General Counsel to the Clinton campaign. Sources told Fox News that lawyer is Marc Elias, who worked at the law firm Perkins Coie.”

According to Durham’s filing, in July 2016, the tech exec worked with and through Sussmann, a U.S. investigative firm hired by “Law Firm 1” on behalf of Clinton’s campaign, several cyber researchers and staffers at multiple internet companies to “assemble the purported data and white papers.”

“In connection with these efforts, Tech Executive-1 exploited his access to non-public and/or proprietary Internet data,” the filing stated. “Tech Executive-1 also enlisted the assistance of researchers at a U.S.-based university who were receiving and analyzing large amounts of Internet data in connection with a pending federal government cybersecurity research contract.”

Durham’s filing added: “Tech Executive-1 tasked these researchers to mine internet data to establish ‘an inference’ and ‘narrative’ tying then-candidate Trump to Russia. In doing so, Tech Executive-1 indicated that he was seeking to please certain ‘VIPs,’ referring to individuals at Law Firm-1 and the Clinton campaign.”

In addition, Durham noted that in Sussmann’s upcoming trial, the government will establish that among the internet data Tech Executive-1 and his associates improperly obtained was domain name system (DNS) internet traffic from “(i) a particular healthcare provider, (ii) Trump Tower, (iii) Donald Trump’s Central Park West apartment building and (iv) the Executive Office of the President of the United States (EOP).”

Translated, the actions taken by Clinton’s campaign are exactly what they have repeatedly falsely accused Trump of doing, and the former president has responded to Durham’s findings with fire and fury.

“The latest pleading from Special Counsel [John] Durham proves indisputable evidence that my campaign and presidency were spied on by operatives paid by the Hillary Clinton campaign in an effort to develop a completely fabricated connection to Russia,” he said in a statement, according to The Daily Mail.

“This is a scandal far greater in scope and magnitude than Watergate and those who were involved in and knew about this spying operation should be subject to criminal prosecution,” he continued. “In a stronger period of time in our country, this crime would have been punishable by death. In addition, reparations should be paid to those in our country who have been damaged by this.”

Hillary Clinton and everyone who assisted her in this overt act of treason needs to be behind bars for the rest of their lives.

Visit Treason.news for more related stories.

Sources include:

FoxNews.com

DailyMail.co.uk

Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) Says The Science Has it Changed —There’s an Election Coming Up

Rumble — "The science hasn't changed. What's changed is that there is an election coming, and Democrats have seen the polling on this question. Now they're running scared, and they want to pretend they didn't force your kid to wear a mask for two years."

DeSantis Aims to Fix Failure to Prosecute Florida Election Crimes

BY J. CHRISTIAN ADAMS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2022/01/26/desantis-aims-to-fix-failure-to-prosecute-election-crimes-in-florida-n1553081;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A crisis of government malfeasance has hurt the integrity of our elections for well over a decade, and things are only getting worse. Prosecutors, both at the county and federal level, are not prosecuting election crimes.

We now have hard data from Florida that shows serious potential election crimes have been ignored by both county and federal prosecutors in the Sunshine State.

This matters because vote fraud deniers will crow about how rare voter fraud is. If there are few convictions, they will say, then there must not be much fraud.

Whether or not prosecutors are pursuing possible election crimes they know about, however, is the weak link in that logical chain. And for the first time, we have a snapshot of data about failure to pursue election crimes.

This matters because Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has proposed the creation of state authority to investigate and prosecute election crimes.

Let’s examine the data.

In just the 2018 and 2020 federal elections, election officials in just nine large Florida counties made over 150 election crime referrals to county prosecutors. County election officials are probably the best possible origin for an election crime referral. After all, this is their business and they have the experience and know the signs. You can read the full report, “Safe Harbor,” containing all the data here.

These election crime referrals were for acts such as voting twice, voting from illegal addresses, and foreigners voting.

Were all of the referrals lead pipe lock crimes? Maybe, maybe not. But you can bet some were.

Of those 156 referrals, guess how many resulted in actual criminal prosecutions?

If you guessed zero, you’d be right. Not one single county prosecutor did anything. No charges. No arrests. No convictions. As far anyone can tell, no nothing.

This is Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Orange, Duval, Pinellas, Polk, St. Lucie, and Alachua. The big boys. In Hillsborough County—Tampa—the Soros-funded county election supervisor said he has a policy never to refer election crimes to prosecutors.

When you don’t prosecute election crimes, you get more election crimes.

Recommended: Care About Election Integrity? Let Me Introduce You to ERIC.

For a long time, the Heritage Foundation has been filling a database with election crime convictions and penalties. If there are only a few thousand voter fraud convictions—convictions you can peruse by state here at the Heritage Foundation voter fraud database—vote fraud-deniers like Robert Reich will claim voter fraud isn’t really a problem. Of course, we know all cases of theft aren’t caught, much less reduced to a conviction in court.

Imagine if we learned county prosecutors were failing to prosecute theft cases referred by the police.

The data matter also because Governor Ron DeSantis has proposed a solution to this government malfeasance, at least in Florida.

Establishment media, however, have sprung into action to stymie DeSantis. The Tampa Bay Times, after first rejecting an op-ed from this author describing the non-prosecution data in Safe Harbor, published a piece by vote fraud-denier Daniel Ruth: “What will Florida’s voter fraud agents do with all that free time?

The Washington Post was even more disingenuous. Reporter Beth Reinhard was aware of all the data from the Safe Harbor report showing non-prosecution of election crimes by county prosecutors in Florida. She ignored the data in her story and instead asked for the IRS 990 forms of the organization that produced the report.

Priorities.

This same malfeasance has affected the United States Justice Department for the last 14 years. More on that in a moment.

Naturally, the vote fraud-deniers will argue that the cases were probably all too flimsy to prosecute, so the data mean nothing.

Go with that. But anyone with common sense knows better.

I’ve heard all the excuses on the inside and out of government.

In my time at the Voting Section at the United States Department of Justice, I encountered a profound hostility among the rank and file to doing anything about voter fraud. Indeed, I appeared on Fox News numerous times calling for the head of the Election Crimes Branch, Richard Pilger, to be fired because of his role in blocking numerous election crime investigations.

To much fanfare, Pilger resigned in a fury right after the November 2020 election, was lionized on MSNBC, and then we found out he really didn’t resign. He just went on an extended coffee break but is back standing in the way of any federal voter fraud investigations.

Since Obama took office, there have essentially been two federal prosecutions of voter fraud, both because Trump-appointed U.S. Attorneys blasted by Pilger’s blocks. Both were for non-citizens voting in Texas and North Carolina.

Fourteen years. Two federal efforts.

It isn’t as if there aren’t other opportunities. For years, the FBI and U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of Florida (Miami) were provided with rock-solid information about people voting in Florida and in other states for the same federal election. Snowbird double voters, you might call them.

Instead of doing anything, federal employees with a duty to enforce the law made excuses for the potential criminals. “It might not be the same person.”  Or, “how do we know they voted for the same federal office?” Or better yet, “What if someone was just impersonating them?”

Indeed, impersonation would be a federal crime also. One way to answer the FBI’s questions is for the FBI to ask them in the field. It doesn’t look like that happened.

When you don’t prosecute election crimes, you get more election crimes.

Some county prosecutors might be forgiven for their failure to enforce the law. It’s likely that nobody in their prosecutor’s office knows what a federal form is or how a voter history file is created or what UOCAVA, NCOA, MOVE, ERIC, or NVRA mean. The election process is complicated, but that’s all the more reason states should have specially trained investigators and prosecutors.

Some county prosecutors might be chicken. They’ve seen how the left browbeats anyone who prosecutes voter fraud. Criminals get turned into heroes for violating election laws. Melowese Richardson—a criminal who admitted she voted for at least five other people for Obama in Cincinnati—was hugged at a rally by Al Sharpton when she was released from jail.

Foreigners voting in Texas are treated like Rosa Parks. It’s an upside-down world.

That’s why something needs to change. If Florida adopts Governor DeSantis’ plan to have the state investigate and prosecute election crimes, they can start with the hundreds of snowbird double voters and other criminals that Florida prosecutors and the FBI have been ignoring for over a decade.

RED STATES CREATING ELECTION POLICE FORCE!!!

★★★ YOUR PATRIOT PATH TO FREEDOM! ★★★

Red states are actively creating election police forces! In this video, we’re going to look at three states in particular that are considering establishing law enforcement offices to police election integrity, we’re going to see how the mainstream media is absolutely panicking over such efforts, and stick with me to the very end of this video when I’ll reveal why the media only has themselves to blame for it all! You are NOT going to want to miss this!

DR. STEVE TURLEY REPORTS:

Trump Reveals What’s Really Going on Between Him and Desantis

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/01/21/trump-reveals-whats-really-going-on-between-him-and-desantis-n1551564;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

According to some recent reports in the media, Donald Trump is privately trashing Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.). These reports have been very distressing to many, as such a rift could have terrible implications for the Republican Party in 2024, as Trump and DeSantis are the top picks for president among Republican voters.

However, Trump denied any rift between the two in an interview with Sean Hannity on Thursday.

Hannity told Trump that DeSantis had denied there was any conflict between them, and asked him to confirm it.

“Is he right?” Hannity asked.

“Well, he is right,” Trump replied. “I get along great with Ron.”

“Ron has been very good,” Trump said. “He’s been a friend of mine for a long time. It’s totally fake news.”

“I have a very good relationship with Ron and intend to have it for a long time,” Trump added.

So there you have it. Both DeSantis and Trump have denied the reports. This wouldn’t be the first time the media has tried to manufacture a rift between them. Last year, Vanity Fair claimed the two were “on a collision course.”

These fake stories seem to only prove one thing: Trump and DeSantis represent the biggest threats to the Democratic Party in 2024.

Unearthed Video: Biden Judicial Pick Dale Ho – Voter ID ‘Essentially is a Poll Tax’

BY RENEE NAL

SEE: https://rairfoundation.com/unearthed-video-biden-judicial-pick-dale-ho-voter-id-essentially-is-a-poll-tax/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Dale Ho is a political partisan who would be better suited for an Antifa / Black Lives Matter looting spree than as a federal judge on the United States District Court.

Biden Judicial nominee Dale Ho is receiving media attention for denigrating the Electoral College, the founders’ vision of Checks and Balances and the U.S. Senate during remarks he made in 2018 at the Andrew Goodman Foundation.

But there are many, many videos of Dale Ho, who would serve as federal district judge for Southern New York if confirmed, that are easily accessible if one takes the time to look. In one video titled “Lewis Black Says F#%! Voter Suppression” with “comedian” Lewis Black, Dale Ho claims that Voter ID “essentially is a poll tax“.

The video is typical leftist propaganda. For example, Ho shows Lewis a photo of a long line of people voting as evidence that voting times need to be expanded. But there is no further context for the photo. The viewer is to just accept the narrative without question.

Watch:

In 2017, Dale Ho was featured in a video titled “Voting Rights Restrictions and White Supremacy” sponsored by MoveOn.org. Ho made outrageous remarks attributing voter integrity laws to a supposed “surge of white nationalism”. “The backlash that we’re seeing, these fake allegations of fraud,” Ho said, “are a direct response to the election of the first African-American president.”

Ho, who previously worked for the NAACP, also referenced a North Carolina voting law in which the Fourth Circuit Appeals Court claimed was meant to “target African-Americans with almost surgical precision.”  U.S. District Judge Thomas Schroeder, however, heartily disagreed with that assessment. He wrote in part:

North Carolina has provided legitimate state interests for its voter ID requirement and electoral system that provides registration all year long up to twenty-five days before an election, absentee voting for up to sixty days before an election, ten days of early voting at extended hours convenient for workers that includes one Sunday and two Saturdays, and Election Day voting.

Watch the short clip:

The video largely circulating today was during a 2018 speech at the Andrew Goodman Foundation. According to their website, the organization “supports youth leadership development, voting accessibility, and social justice initiatives on campuses across the country…”

Ho was speaking in his capacity as the Director of the ACLU’s Voting Rights Project. He was speaking alongside such luminaries as radical left activist Shaun King and co-chair of the Poor People’s Campaign Liz Theoharis. It appears that the goal was, as always, to get university students to vote for democrats.

“We had obviously lots of practices that are anti-democratic, that entrench in some ways minority rule in this country,” Ho said to the students. “And I’m talking about things like, you know, the Senate, the Electoral College, and the maldistribution of political power that results from those institutions,” he continued.

As pointed out by commentator Becket Adams:

Federal judges are required to take an oath to uphold the Constitution. The Constitution establishes both the Electoral College and the U.S. Senate. If Ho believes these institutions are anti-democratic, wouldn’t it follow, then, that he believes the Constitution, which he would be sworn to uphold, is likewise anti-democratic?

Dale Ho also mentions “Felon Disenfranchisement”, or his belief that convicted criminals should have the right to vote. Historically, criminals lose their right to vote once they committed a crime, just as violent felons lose their right to own firearms, for example.

Watch his statement here:

Dale Ho is a political partisan who would be better suited for an Antifa / Black Lives Matter looting spree than as a federal judge on the United States District Court. It is a vile insult that people like Ho are taken seriously at all.

Read Selected Articles at RAIR Foundation USA:

House Dems Pass Radical Federal Elections Takeover Via NASA Bill

Rumble — Congresswoman Kat Cammack (R-Fl.) explains to The New American’s Christian Gomez, how on Thursday, January 13, by a vote 220 Yeas to 203 Nays, House Democrats passed H.R. 5746, the “NASA Enhanced Use Leasing Extension Act of 2021,” gutting it of its original NASA language and replacing it with the merged text of various progressive “voting rights” bills. The merged bills (now in H.R. 5746) amount to an almost total federal takeover of elections. Rep. Cammack says, “We did not vote to give Martians the right to vote,” instead the bill was the Democrat’s partisan attempt to codify the many dubious emergency regulations put in place in 2020 under the guise of the COVID-19 pandemic. She urges those watching to contact both of their state’s U.S. Senators and pressure them to vote against this new elections bill H.R. 5746. In gutting and replacing the text, H.R. 5746 has been renamed from being the “NASA Enhanced Use Leasing Extension Act of 2021” to the ‘‘Freedom to Vote: John R. Lewis Act’’ (similar in name as H.R. 4/S. 4, the “John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act,” which was one of the various election bills that was merged into H.R. 5746).

'I Was Casting A Hell No Ballot': Kat Cammack Decries Democrats' 'Dangerous' Voting Reform Bill

NYC Legislation Allowing 800,000 Noncitizens to Vote Becomes Law

NYC Legislation Allowing 800K Noncitizens to Vote Becomes Law

BY LUIS MIGUEL

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/nyc-legislation-allowing-800k-noncitizens-to-vote-becomes-law/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

New York Mayor Eric Adams on Sunday allowed legislation that will allow over 800,000 noncitizens to vote in municipal elections to automatically become law.

Opponents of the law, which was passed by the City Council, have already vowed to challenge it. Unless a judge ultimately stops the legislation from being implemented, New York will be the biggest city in the nation to give the vote to non-citizens, although 15 municipalities across the country currently allow it.

Under the new law, the Board of Elections must now begin drawing an implementation plan by July. That includes voter registration rules and provisions for the creation of separate ballots for municipal races in order to prevent noncitizens from voting in state and federal races.

The legislation allows noncitizens to vote who have been lawful permanent residents of the city for at least 30 days, along with “Dreamers” and all those authorized to work in the U.S., to participate in elections for mayor, city council members, borough presidents, comptroller and public advocate.

Noncitizens will have the chance to vote for the first time in 2023.

“We build a stronger democracy when we include the voices of immigrants,” said former City Councilmember Ydanis Rodriguez, a leading advocate for the legislation.

Rodriguez has now been appointed by Adams as Transportation Commissioner.

Adams had previously cast uncertainty over the legislation’s fate when he voiced concern about the month-long residency standard but later affirmed that those concerns did not mean he would veto.

Because Adams failed to take action within his 30-day time limit, it automatically became law at midnight Sunday.

“I believe that New Yorkers should have a say in their government, which is why I have and will continue to support this important legislation,” the Democrat mayor said in a statement Saturday night, adding that dialogue with colleagues dispelled his earlier concerns.

Former Mayor Bill de Blasio expressed similar concerns before leaving office but did not move to veto the bill.

Some states, including Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, and Florida, have enacted rules to preemptively prohibit laws like the one passed in New York City.

New York Republicans have blasted the law.

Chair of the New York State Republican Committee Nick Langworthy called the bill “perhaps the worst idea out of New York City Democrats ever.”

“This radical legislation is unconstitutional, un-American, and downright dangerous. This not only will undermine the credibility of local city elections but will undoubtedly interfere with the integrity of state and national elections across New York State. Democrats do not get to create their own brand of citizenship to manipulate elections,” Langworthy stated, pledging to “use every single legal method to stop it.”

Minority Leader Joe Borelli joined Langworthy in condemning the legislation, noting that the New York Democrats will be granting a right to vote to people who are citizens of other countries and have a right to vote there. “If they want to vote here, they should go through the process of becoming citizens, because that is how you show a real commitment to being a part of this city and this country,” he added.

Democrats also want to radically reshape voting at the federal level. Their proposed “For the People Act” would force states to eliminate safeguards against electoral fraud with the ostensible aim of promoting democracy, but which critics say would weaken election integrity and result in the federalization of elections.

According to a summary of the proposal, the bill “expands voter registration and voting access” by requiring automatic and same-day registration while limiting states’ and localities’ ability to purge voter rolls. It would also mandate nationwide universal mail-in voting and put an end to voter ID requirements.

The challenges of passing a bill as ambitious as the For the People Act have led Democrats to release updated versions of “election reform” in the hopes of finding better success within their slim congressional majority. They are expected to soon bring the Freedom to Vote Act, which died in the Senate in October, back for reconsideration.

Provisions found in the Freedom to Vote Act that aren’t in the For the People Act include allowing certain election officials to sue if they are undeservedly removed from office, increasing protections against intimidating election workers, and allowing voters to sue if their vote is not counted.

Democrats simultaneously want to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which is intended to stop “discrimination” against nonwhite voters.

Trump endorses Hungary’s Orban for reelection, praises him for stopping illegal immigration

BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2022/01/trump-endorses-hungarys-orban-for-reelection-praises-him-for-stopping-illegal-immigration;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Donald Trump has come out in full support of Viktor Orban in Hungary’s upcoming spring election. The two share the priority of putting their country’s citizens and laws first and strengthening national security and the economy.

Last summer, during a Tucker Carlson interview, Orban referenced Trump as “a great friend of Hungary” and praised his "America first" foreign policy.”

The two are frequently bashed by globalists for taking national security seriously and protecting the cultures of their nations. Hungary spends tens of millions to rebuild churches and Christian communities destroyed by jihadis in the Middle East, yet has been referenced by globalists in derogatory terms such as “racist” and “xenophobic.”

While Western globalists swing their doors open to unvetted Muslim migrants, Christians are nowhere adequately aided by globalist-led countries.

Hungarian Foreign Affairs Minister Peter Szijjarto has rightly stated:

While Muslim leaders speak enthusiastically about the plight of their mistreated people, Christians shy away from highlighting the persecution of Christians. “The international community is absolutely not sensitive” to Christian persecution, and prefers to address issues of “religious minorities.”

Orban has remained unapologetically steadfast in protecting the country’s Christian character from an unvetted Muslim migrant invasion, unlike Britain and EU globalist-governed countries. The EU has resisted Orban at every turn, trying to impose Muslim migrant quotas on Hungary and other EU countries which are trying to protect their culture and identity. Trump was widely condemned for temporarily halting immigration from a handful of Muslim countries that were actually selected by the Obama Administration as being unable or unwilling to provide adequate information about those trying to enter the US.

“Donald Trump Endorses Hungary’s PM Viktor Orbán for Reelection,” by Jacob Bliss, Breitbart, January 3, 2022:

Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orbán received a reelection endorsement Monday from former President Donald Trump.

“Viktor Orbán of Hungary truly loves his Country and wants safety for his people,” Trump said in a statement from his Save America PAC, before laying out the reasons for his support in detail.

“He has done a powerful and wonderful job in protecting Hungary, stopping illegal immigration, creating jobs, trade, and should be allowed to continue to do so in the upcoming Election.”

“He is a strong leader and respected by all. He has my Complete support and Endorsement for reelection as Prime Minister,” Trump said about Orbán, who is running for reelection.

Orbán was first prime minister from 1998 till 2002 when his party — Fidesz — was forced into the opposition for eight years before he came been back in power in 2010 and won reelection in 2014 and 2018.

While he is Hungary’s longest-serving prime minister, he will go up against a largely unified opposition this spring when he attempts to secure a fourth consecutive term in office.

Breitbart London reported last year that “Orbán drew battle lines against the Hungarian left, their international backers in the European Union and foreign press, and Big Tech in a passionate, wide-ranging speech commemorating the 1956 uprising against the country’s then-communist puppet government.”

Speaking about the Cold War-era rebellion, where roughly 3,000 were killed, and over 700 fatalities were caused to the Soviet Communist forces in the country, Orbán said, “There are moments in the lives of nations when suddenly everyone feels ‘Enough is enough, things can’t go on like this any longer.’ We have to decide, and our decision shows who we really are.”

“The worth of an entire nation is revealed: it remains silent or protests; it acquiesces or rebels…..

Biden, Harris Spew Toxic Lies About Mostly Peaceful Protest on January 6, 2021. GOP Wants to “Suppress” Vote, “Subvert Elections”

Biden, Harris Spew Toxic Lies About Mostly Peaceful Protest on January 6, 2021. GOP Wants to “Suppress” Vote, “Subvert Elections”

BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/biden-harris-spew-toxic-lies-about-mostly-peaceful-protest-on-january-6-2021-gop-wants-to-suppress-vote-subvert-elections/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In two speeches that were a toxic mix of hysteria, downright lies, and ridiculous exaggerations, dementia-addled President Biden and his India-first sidekick, Vice President Kamala Harris, told the world that the mostly peaceful protest at the U.S. Capitol a year ago today threatened the very existence of the country.

The mostly peaceful protesters assaulted the Constitution, Biden said.

They assaulted the “will of the people.”

They held the American people at knifepoint … at the “throat.”

More egregiously, former President Trump and the GOP want to “suppress the vote.”

The mostly peaceful protest on January 6 last year was the gravest threat to the nation’s safety and security since the sneak attack on Pearl Harbor, Harris said. It was akin to the 9/11 terror attacks.

The question isn’t whether Biden and Harris lied, but whether any two politicians have lied with such impunity.

Biden’s Bilge

“Democracy was attacked — simply attacked,” Biden said:

The will of the people was under assault. The Constitution — our Constitution — faced the gravest of threats.

Outnumbered and in the face of a brutal attack, the Capitol Police, the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, the National Guard, and other brave law enforcement officials saved the rule of law.

Our democracy held. We the people endured. And we the people prevailed.

For the first time in our history, a president had not just lost an election, he tried to prevent the peaceful transfer of power as a violent mob breached the Capitol.

President Trump did no such thing, but demonizing Trump and his supporters was the order of the day.

After a few words about Abraham Lincoln and Clio, the Greek muse of history, Biden cited the Bible’s admonition that “the truth will make us free.”

The Bible also says “thou shalt not murder,” an injunction the pro-abortion president has apparently missed in all his scripture studies. But leave that aside. Biden regaled listeners with his rendition of what happened on January 6, 2021.

Biden called what he described “God’s truth,” then detailed the acts of the few violent protesters, some of them leftist agitators.

“This wasn’t a group of tourists,” Biden continued. “This was an armed insurrection.”

In fact, the FBI did not recover any firearms from the mostly peaceful protesters or the few who turned violent, as the words “armed insurrection” suggest.

But “we must be absolutely clear about what is true and what is a lie,” Biden continued:

And here is the truth: The former president of the United States of America has created and spread a web of lies about the 2020 election. He’s done so because he values power over principle, because he sees his own interests as more important than his country’s interests and America’s interests, and because his bruised ego matters more to him than our democracy or our Constitution.

He can’t accept he lost, even though that’s what 93 United States senators, his own Attorney General, his own Vice President, governors and state officials in every battleground state have all said: He lost.

That’s what 81 million of you did as you voted for a new way forward.

He has done what no president in American history — the history of this country — has ever, ever done: He refused to accept the results of an election and the will of the American people.

And so, at this moment, we must decide: What kind of nation are we going to be?

Are we going to be a nation that accepts political violence as a norm?

Five years ago, Biden wasn’t worried about “political violence” or those who “refused to accept the results of an election and the will of the American people.” On January 20, 2017, communist rioters rampaged through Washington, D.C., burning and pillaging. Congressmen challenged Trump’s victory over Hillary Clinton.

Nor were Biden and Harris worried when enraged protesters swarmed into the Hart Senate Office building during the confirmation proceedings of U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh. They were unmoved when those protesters pounded on the doors of the Supreme Court building and disrupted his confirmation hearings and vote on the Senate floor.

Those facts aside, the upshot of the speech was that a few violent cranks — again, partly instigated by leftist provocateurs — actually threatened to overthrow the government, a patently ridiculous claim.

“Those who stormed this Capitol and those who instigated and incited and those who called on them to do so held a dagger at the throat of America — at American democracy,” Biden said:

They didn’t come here out of patriotism or principle. They came here in rage — not in service of America, but rather in service of one man.

Those who incited the mob — the real plotters — who were desperate to deny the certification of the election and defy the will of the voters.

Having denounced the “Big Lies” from Trump and his supporters, Biden blatantly lied about GOP efforts to ensure ballot security with Voter ID.

“Right now, in state after state, new laws are being written — not to protect the vote, but to deny it; not only to suppress the vote, but to subvert it; not to strengthen or protect our democracy, but because the former president lost,” Biden said:

Instead of looking at the election results from 2020 and saying they need new ideas or better ideas to win more votes, the former president and his supporters have decided the only way for them to win is to suppress your vote and subvert our elections. 

It’s wrong. It’s undemocratic. And frankly, it’s un-American.

Harris Harangue

The brief introductory from Harris, who will likely go down as the most insignificant vice president in history, will be remembered for one thing. A mostly peaceful protest that got out of hand, she claimed, reminded one of the events in which thousands were killed or murdered.

“Certain dates echo throughout history, including dates that instantly remind all who have lived through them — where they were and what they were doing when our democracy came under assault,” Harris said. “Dates that occupy not only a place on our calendars but a place in our collective memory. December 7th, 1941. September 11th, 2001. And January 6th, 2021.”

For the record:

Harris called Biden a “public servant with the character and fortitude to meet this moment, a leader whose life’s work has been moving our nation toward that more perfect union.”

For the record:

When Harris ran against Biden for the Democrat nomination, she all but called him a racist. She also said she believed that he sexually assaulted former Senate aide Tara Read.

Republicans move to ban federal funds to states, cities that allow non-citizens to vote

BY JUST THE NEWS

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/republicans-move-to-ban-federal-funds-to-states-cities-that-allow-non-citizens-to-vote/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Several liberal municipalities from San Francisco to New York have moved to allow non-citizens to cast ballots in local elections.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., is leading a coalition of Republicans in Congress to sponsor legislation that would ban federal funding to states or localities that allow foreigners to vote in U.S. elections.

The new legislation, dubbed the Protecting Our Democracy by Preventing Foreign Citizens from Voting Act, was introduced after many liberal municipalities from San Francisco to New York had moved in 2021 to allow non-citizens to cast ballots in local elections.

“It’s ridiculous that states are allowing foreign citizens to vote,” Rubio said. “However, if states and localities do let those who are not U.S. citizens to vote in elections, they shouldn’t get U.S. citizen taxpayer money.”

The measure is being cosponsored by GOP Sens. Steve Daines of Montana, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, John Kennedy, of Louisiana, Rick Scott of Florida, and James Lankford, R-Oklahoma.

Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C., plans to introduce companion legislation in the House. 
  
“Voting in this country is a right that should solely be limited to American citizens. Allowing non-citizens or illegal immigrants to vote, even if only in state or local elections, gives foreign nationals influence on some of the most important decisions impacting our families, our rights, and our representation in government,” Duncan said. 

Daines said he was concerned that “far-left states and cities have moved to disenfranchise Americans by allowing non-citizens to participate in our elections.”

Kennedy said the move toward non-citizen voting makes a mockery of U.S. citizenship.”

The proposed federal law comes a few months after Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger proposed an amendment to his state’s constitution banning non-citizen voting in his state.

“From New York City to San Francisco, more and more extreme liberal jurisdictions are extending voting to non-citizens,” he told Just the News. “Citizens-only voting has overwhelming bipartisan support.”

Rubio’s new bill would prohibit federal funds from going to any state or local government that allows foreign citizens to vote in any federal, state, or local election and require all state or local governments to certify they do not allow foreign citizens to vote when applying for federal funding.

The issue of non-citizen voting first came to a boil at the end of the 2018 Georgia governor’s race, when Democrat Stacey Abrams suggested the “blue wave” of voters she hoped would put in her office included the “documented and undocumented,” the latter a liberal preferred term for illegal aliens.

Republicans from eventual winner Brian Kemp to President Donald Trump alleged she was calling for foreigners to vote. Abrams denied it, saying she only meant that illegal aliens are part of the constituency she planned to represent and was not seeking ineligible voters to cast ballots.

But within two years, several liberal communities have begun the process of allowing non-citizens to vote in local elections. A 1994 congressionally-passed law prohibits non-citizens from voting in elections for federal officeholders.

In Vermont, the cities of Montpelier and Winooski, both with populations under 8,000, have approved allowing non-citizens to cast ballots in municipal elections for mayor, city council, and school board.

San Francisco, nine cities in Maryland, and two communities in Massachusetts have all approved noncitizen voting, although the latter are still awaiting state legislative approval. And Chicago, New York City, and Los Angeles are also moving forward with plans to allow foreign citizens to vote in local U.S. elections.

New York’s City Council voted earlier this month to allow 800,000 non-citizens lawfully residing in the city to vote in municipal elections. 

Trump Holding Press Conference on Jan 6 Anniversary to Discuss Election Fraud & Fake Republicans

BY JON FLEETWOOD

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/trump-holding-press-conference-on-jan-6-anniversary-to-discuss-election-fraud-fake-republicans/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

“In many ways, a RINO is worse than a Radical Left Democrat, because you don’t know where they are coming from and you have no idea how bad they really are for our Country,” Trump said in a statement.

QUICK FACTS:
  • President Donald Trump plans to hold a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Jan 6, seeking to examine the “rigged” 2020 presidential election and confront “RINOs” (Republicans in name only).
  • Trump will make the case that the “insurrection” did not take place on Jan 6 but on Election Day, referring to what happened at the Capitol as a “completely unarmed protest of the rigged election.”
  • “[R]emember, the insurrection took place on November 3rd, it was the completely unarmed protest of the rigged election that took place on January 6th,” Trump wrote in a statement, pointing to evidence of voter fraud in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
  • “I will be having a news conference on 6 January [2022] at Mar-a-Lago to discuss all of these points, and more,” Trump went on to say.
  • President Trump condemned “weak” Republican Republicans across the country for refusing to investigate voter fraud which he said would prove he actually won the 2020 election.
  • “In many ways, a RINO is worse than a Radical Left Democrat, because you don’t know where they are coming from and you have no idea how bad they really are for our Country,” Trump wrote. “The good news is there are fewer and fewer RINOs left as we elect strong Patriots who love America.”
TRUMP’S FULL STATEMENT:

“Why isn’t the Unselect Committee of highly partisan political hacks
investigating the CAUSE of the January 6th protest, which was the rigged
Presidential Election of 2020? Does anybody notice that they want to stay as
far away from that topic as possible, the numbers don’t work for them, or even
come close. The only thing they can do is not talk about it. Look at what is
going on now in Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, and, to a lesser
extent, Michigan where the numbers are horrendously corrupt in Detroit, but
the weak Republican RINOs in the Michigan House and Senate don’t want to
touch the subject. In many ways a RINO is worse than a Radical Left Democrat,
because you don’t know where they are coming from and you have no idea
how bad they really are for our Country. The good news is there are fewer and
fewer RINOs left as we elect strong Patriots who love America. I will be having
a news conference on January 6th at Mar-a-Lago to discuss all of these points,
and more. Until then, remember, the insurrection took place on November 3rd,
it was the completely unarmed protest of the rigged election that took place on
January 6th.”

BACKGROUND:
  • Trump’s Mar-a-Lago event will contrast events planned by Joe Biden and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who are marking the anniversary of the Jan 6 Capitol protests with a “solemn observance,” The Washington Post reports.
  • “Already, preparations are underway for a full program of events, including a discussion among historians about the narrative of that day; an opportunity for Members to share their experiences and reflections from that day; and a prayerful vigil in the evening,” Pelosi wrote.
  • “Why isn’t the Unselect Committee of highly partisan political hacks investigating the CAUSE of the January 6th protest, which was the rigged Presidential Election of 2020?” Trump said in his Tuesday statement.

Jon Fleetwood is Managing Editor for American Faith and author of “An American Revival: Why American Christianity Is Failing & How to Fix It.”

John Fund: U.S. Far Behind Mexico, Canada, and Europe in Election Safeguards

Election security expert John Fund explains how the election system in the US is far more insecure and wrought for fraud than the systems found in Canada, Mexico, and many European countries. He explains the security flaws posed by the prevalence of mail-in-ballots and absentee ballots and says that prevention must be the focus because it is incredibly hard to find evidence after fraud occurs.

1 10 11 12 13 14 25