Victor Davis Hanson: Gov. Janet Mills Doesn’t Know It Yet, But She’s an ‘Insurrectionist’

Is Gov. Janet Mills of Maine an ‘Neo-Confederate’? Yes, and “she is taking states’ rights to the extreme,” argues Victor Davis Hanson in today’s edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” After refusing to comply with a Trump administration order banning men from competing in women’s high school sports, the Department of Justice launched a civil lawsuit against the Maine Department of Education for failing to protect women in women’s sports, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Wednesday. “Janet Mills may not know it, but she's an insurrectionist. She's a neo-Confederate. She is taking states' rights to the extreme. Rather than saying, ‘I oppose the federal government. I will go to court to stop you. If I lose, I will comply because the states are subordinate to the federal’ —she's not doing that. She's right in the spirit of the old Confederacy… “I can cite you chapter and verse from the poems of Catullus to the novels of ‘Satyricon,’ of Petronius, ‘The Satyricon,’ of men who dress up like women. Both as transvestites who are still, I guess you'd say, heterosexual, but they have a fetish to wear women's clothes or those who really want to be women. In the case of a poem or two, they castrate themselves. It's found in ancient history. “And statistically, if you go back before this controversy happened, it was a very small number of the population. About less than 1% identified as transgendered or transsexual. Then it became, in the last decade, the next civil rights frontier. And all of a sudden, we have universities where students are being polled at 10% or 20% or 30%, thinking they might want to transition. It almost became a cult following.”

Victor Davis Hanson: Europe, You Can’t Sit on the Sidelines Anymore

Which side will Europe take in a China-U.S. trade war? Of all the scenarios facing Europe right now vis-à-vis their relationship United States and China, their best option would be to side with the U.S., argues Victor Davis Hanson on today’s “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” “The third scenario is what I would suggest for the Europeans. They should say the following: “‘Despite our disagreements with the Trump administration, the United States is an ally. We know that we have been as victimized by Chinese mercantilism, high tariffs, cheating on patents, copyrights, dumping, and financial currency manipulation—all the things the United States complains about, we do too. In fact, we as Europeans as a whole have about the same deficit with China as the United States does. So, we are kindred spirits. So what we will do is, even though we have disagreements on our surplus with the United States and their efforts to reduce it, we will ally with the United States.’ “And that would represent about two-thirds of China's total trade action or monetary value.

Carl Higbie: Dems love to play pretend with gender

Victor Davis Hanson: Critics Slam Trump’s Economic Plan—but Offer No Alternative

The Left has no plan for the economy—but they complain like they do. In this edition of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words,” Hanson highlights the silence of the Left when it comes to proposing good economic policy. “We haven’t had balanced trade in 50 years. No one is giving any alternatives. No one is saying in any way that they have an antithetical or better plan than Donald Trump. “The success or failure of Donald Trump will hinge on the status of the economy." If you can’t get enough of Victor Davis Hanson from The Daily Signal, subscribe to his official YouTube channel: / @victordavishanson7273   He’s also the host of “The Victor Davis Hanson Show,” available wherever you prefer to watch or listen. Links to the show and exclusive content are available on his website: https://victorhanson.com/

Pam Bondi fined $100,000 for wearing a cross, but her response leaves the judge looking ridiculous

Attorney Fined $100,000 for Wearing Cross: How Pam Bondi Stood Up to Judge Prescott and Won | Inspiring Legal Drama The Incredible True Story of Religious Freedom in the Courtroom Watch this riveting courtroom drama unfold as renowned attorney Pam Bondi faces an unprecedented $100,000 fine for wearing a simple cross necklace in Judge Prescott's courtroom. What began as a routine hearing quickly transformed into an epic legal battle over First Amendment rights and religious freedom that captivated the nation. This inspiring story follows Pam Bondi as she refuses to back down when Judge Prescott attempts to silence her religious expression. Witness the shocking moment when the judge issues the massive fine, and experience the tension as Pam methodically dismantles his legal argument in front of everyone, exposing his hypocrisy and selective enforcement. The dramatic confrontation highlights critical issues of judicial overreach, constitutional rights, and the courage it takes to stand up for your beliefs in the face of intimidation. You'll be on the edge of your seat as this attorney fights back against injustice within the justice system itself. This trending story in English showcases a real courtroom showdown between a determined lawyer and a powerful judge, culminating in a victory that strengthened religious rights protections for all Americans. The Pam Bondi court case demonstrates how one person's principled stand can create lasting change in our legal system. From the initial shocking fine to the dramatic final vindication, this interesting story of courage and conviction reminds us all of the importance of defending our constitutional freedoms. Whether you're interested in legal drama, inspiring stories of standing up to authority, or the ongoing battle for religious expression, this powerful account of Pam Bondi's victory against Judge Prescott will leave you moved and motivated.

Victor Davis Hanson: Keep Your Enemies Close…But NOT In Your Groupchats

Did Jeffery Goldberg really have access to top secret “war plans”? When National Security Adviser Mike Flynn allegedly added Jeffrey Goldberg, editor of The Atlantic, to an encrypted groupchat with other senior Trump administration members, Goldberg remained silent for over a week, listening in on discussions before publishing a bombshell exposé on March 24th. Victor Davis Hanson reviews this debacle on today’s episode of “Victor Davis Hanson: In His Own Words.” “ He is one of the most hard-left critics of the Trump administration imaginable. But he was there. He listened to these conversations, apparently, for about 10 days. And then, when he was waiting and—he never notified anybody that they had mistakenly put his name on the inclusion list for this confidential information. “ Bottom line, if you're in the Trump administration, do not, do not under any circumstances think you can be friends with people who despise you. And that’s a lesson that I hope Mike Waltz learns.” Don’t miss out on Victor’s latest videos by subscribing to The Daily Signal today. You’ll be notified every time a new piece of content drops: https://www.youtube.com/dailysignal?s...

Baby Dies an Hour After Getting Seven Vaccines—But You Can’t Question the Shots?

Baby Dies an Hour After Getting Seven Vaccines—But You Can’t Question the Shots?

Imagine taking your perfectly healthy baby to the pediatrician for a “well-baby visit.” You allow the doctor to give your baby all the scheduled vaccines and, within an hour, your healthy baby is dead. Considering that your baby was administered 7-8 vaccines—one right after the other, you naturally assume the vaccines may have had something to do with your child’s death. The medical staff, however, assures you that the death could not possibly have been caused by the vaccines because they had observed the baby for 20 minutes post-vaccination and there were no apparent problems. Besides, they say, other babies have been given the same vaccines and they did fine.

This story, along with the questionable medical logic, has been repeated many times in the United States and around the world for decades. Most often, they are not publicized, and so the general public assumes such cases are rare. But they’re not that rare, particularly in India, where the pentavalent (5 vaccines in one shot) vaccine is given to infants, along with several other vaccines during the first year of life.

The vaccines infants in India routinely receive include the BCG (Bacillus Calmette–Guérin) vaccine; IPV (injectable or “inactivated” polio vaccine); OPV (oral polio vaccine); PCV (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine), and rotavirus vaccine (RVV). The pentavalent vaccine contains one dose each of diphtheria vaccine, pertussis vaccine, tetanus vaccine, hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine, and Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) vaccine.1 2

Just last week, The Times of India published an article about a 45-day-old baby girl in Rajanna Sircilla, India who was administered the pentavalent, HepB, and IPV shots. Since the HepB vaccine is already in the pentavalent vaccine, the reporter likely meant either the OPV, PCV, or RVV—or a total of seven vaccines. The parents of the child took her to a primary health center to receive the required vaccinations on Feb. 5, 2025.3 According to the article:

After receiving the shots, the parents stayed at the hospital for 30 minutes before returning home. About 30 minutes later, they noticed the baby was unresponsive and rushed her to a private hospital, where she was declared dead.3

The family of the child protested and alleged negligence on the part of the hospital staff as the cause of death. The staff said that they had observed the baby for 20 minutes after she was vaccinated and she appeared fine, and that another baby was vaccinated at about the same time and responded well to the shots. The local medical officer confirmed that the baby’s death was not caused by any complications related to the vaccines but rather by milk aspiration—”a condition where milk enters the lungs instead of the stomach.”3

Deaths of Babies Soon After Vaccination Usually Attributed to Something Else

Death by aspiration following the death of a baby shortly after a series of vaccinations seems to be a common refrain in India. In the case of one-month-old Aradhika Tripath, who died within two hours of being given seven vaccines, including pentavalent, Indian health officials alleged the child may have died from inhaling food or liquid into the trachea and lungs and accused the family of negligence when feeding her.4

In another case reported by The Times of India last September, a six-week-old infant in Chhattisgarh, India died after developing breathing difficulties soon after the baby was administered nine vaccines, including the pentavalent, IPV, OPV, PCV, and RVV shots. The article noted it was the third case of a baby dying in Chhattisgarh shortly after receiving the vaccinations that week.5

Vaccine Reaction has reported on at least a dozen cases of babies in India dying within hours after getting the pentavalent and other vaccines at the same time. Obviously, this is not remotely close to a complete list of such cases in this country where infants die shortly after receiving multiple vaccines. What is interesting is that in none of these cases were the deaths of the children attributed to the vaccinations just given, and there always seems to be a perfunctory rationale for dismissing a possible connection.

Consider the case of a five-month-old baby boy who died on Feb. 12-13, 2020 within hours of receiving the pentavalent vaccine. The medical officer who read a copy of the child’s post-mortem attributed the death to respiratory distress.4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 The rationale? The medical officer stated:

The same batch of vaccines were given to several hundred children. In the same [public health center], the nurse has given the vaccine to eight other infants. There were no adverse reports.6

The same rationale was reportedly given following the four-and-a-half-month-old girl shortly after a pentavalent vaccination…

The health officers said that the other children who were vaccinated did not show any adverse symptoms.15

Even in cases where a baby in India died hours after receiving the pentavalent vaccine and many other babies given the same vaccine at the same health center developed a fever and became seriously ill, health officials have been reluctant to entertain the possibility of a link to the vaccinations. In 2019, two babies, aged six and eight weeks, died within 24 hours of getting the pentavalent vaccine at a primary health center in Hyderabad. Another 32 children who received the vaccine came down with fever and at least four of them developed “serious complications.” Health officials concluded the deaths and adverse reactions were caused by doctors having given the babies the analgesic opioid drug Tramadol by mistake. In other words, “medical error.”12

Perhaps the most common explanation for Indian babies dying hours after getting half a dozen or more vaccines at one time is, “It was a coincidence.”

While reports abound of many other infant deaths occurring after vaccination in India, health officials in that country continue to express doubt as to whether the deaths are truly attributable to vaccination. As one Indian health official noted:

Infant deaths after immunization are usually coincidental. These deaths have other co-factors linked to them, other than vaccination. … Such incidental deaths during vaccination are extremely unfortunate.15

Widespread Reluctance of Health Care Pros in India to Blame Vaccines for Any Sudden Death of a Healthy Child

There have been countless cases in India and around the world of babies and older children dying within hours or days of getting a vaccine or two. The reluctance of doctors and health officials to blame the shot in these cases has been consistent. This reluctance does not appear to be affected by the number of vaccines administered. In India, giving babies 7-8 vaccines, including the “5-in-1” pentavalent, is considered safe, despite reports of deaths soon after their administration.

You would think that, at some point, doctors and health officials would intuitively sense that an unknown number of babies and children cannot tolerate multiple vaccines administered simultaneously. But, for the most part, this does not appear to be happening.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) assures parents that “getting multiple vaccines at the same time has been shown to be safe” and that the “scientific data show that getting several vaccines at the same time does not cause any chronic health problems.” This belief is promoted by many doctors and other health care professionals.16

“Theoretically, there’s no maximum number of vaccines you can get at the same time if you’re willing to have sore arms. You can get four or five together,” said Sten Vermund, MD, PhD, a professor of public health, an infectious disease epidemiologist, and a pediatrician at the Yale School of Public Health in New Haven, Connecticut. “We have no reservations from a medical standpoint. There’s no upper limit to how many you can get at one time,” says Ana Weill, MD, MPH, a researcher and infectious disease specialist with University of Washington Medicine in Seattle.17

Then, of course, there’s my personal favorite from pediatrician Paul Offit, MD, a vaccine developer and patent holder at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia… ”

“A more practical way to determine the diversity of the immune response would be to estimate the number of vaccines to which a child could respond at one time…  Infants have the “theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at any one time.”18

With this kind of thinking, it’s no wonder that so many doctors and other health care professionals remain stuck in this “denial at all costs” mindset. After all, if the “experts” believe that giving children dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of vaccines at one time is safe, then giving just a few at a time must certainly be safe. Consequently, any death temporally associated with recently administered vaccines must unquestionably be caused by something else.

If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.


If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.

Click here to view References:

1 Indian Academy of Pediatrics. Polio Vaccines.
2 Team Acko. Newborn Baby Vaccination Chart – India 2025Acko Jan. 23, 2025.
3 TNN. Vaccines not to blame for baby’s death, say officials. The Times of India, Feb. 7, 2025.
4 La Vigne P. Indian Girls Die Following VaccinationsVaccine Reaction Dec. 12, 2017.
5 TNN. Infant dies after vaccine shots, 3rd case in CT in a wk. The Times of India, Sept. 6, 2024.
6 TVR Staff. Infant Boy in India Dies Within Hours of Receiving Pentavalent VaccineThe Vaccine Reaction Apr. 11, 2020.
7 TVR Staff. Infant Boy in India Dies After Getting Pentavalent VaccineVaccine Reaction Mar. 10, 2020.
8 TVR Staff. Infant Boy in India Dies a Day After Receiving Pentavalent VaccineThe Vaccine Reaction Feb. 27, 2020.
9 TVR Staff. Infant Girl in India Dies a Day After Receiving Oral Polio and Pentavalent VaccinesThe Vaccine Reaction Sept. 11, 2019.
10 TVR Staff. Baby Girl in India Dies a Day After Getting the Pentavalent Vaccine. The Vaccine Reaction July 3, 2019.
11 TVR Staff. Infant Boy in India Falls Unconscious and Dies After VaccinationThe Vaccine Reaction June 27, 2019.
12 TVR Staff. Babies Die in India After Getting “5-in-1” VaccineThe Vaccine Reaction Apr. 3, 2019.
13 TVR Staff. Two Infants and a Toddler in India Die Shortly After VaccinationsThe Vaccine Reaction July 9, 2018.
14 TVR Staff. Two Infants in India Die Following Pentavalent VaccinationVaccine Reaction Mar. 15, 2018.
15 Isalkar U. Pentavalent vaccine alert after suspicious deathThe Times of India, Jan. 5, 2016.
16 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Multiple Vaccines at Once. Dec. 20, 2024.
.17 Upham, B. Is It Safe to Get Multiple Vaccines at the Same Time? Everyday Health, Sept. 12, 2024.
18 Cáceres‎ M. Dr. Offit Quotes: Top 10 ListVaccine Reaction Mar. 26, 2017.

Biden FLOODED the Government With DEI, But Trump Has ONE Way to Win

With just weeks left in office, President Biden (or whoever’s calling the shots) has decided to hire 1,200 DEI officials. Is this part of a plot to undermine Donald Trump’s plans and make it harder for him to rid the government of woke Deep State bureaucrats? Glenn and fellow BlazeTV host ‪@lizwheeler‬ discuss how other Democrats have recently proposed things like this, including a UK-style “shadow cabinet” that would oppose Trump. Liz also gives her advice to Trump on how to deal with these new DEI officials, who will be paid hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to focus on things like “health equity” …

Manhattan DA Bragg Agrees To Postpone Trump’s Sentencing, But ‘Not Dropping’ Case

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 13: U.S. President-elect Donald Trump arrives at a House Republicans Conference meeting at the Hyatt Regency on Capitol Hill on November 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. As is tradition with incoming presidents, Trump is traveling to Washington, DC to meet with U.S. President Joe Biden at the White House as well as meet with Republican congressmen on Capitol Hill. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)
U.S. President-elect Donald Trump arrives at a House Republicans Conference meeting at the Hyatt Regency on Capitol Hill on November 13, 2024 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Andrew Harnik/Getty Images)

OAN Staff Abril Elfi
11:34 AM – Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Manhattan district attorney Alvin Bragg has agreed to postpone President-elect Donald Trump’s sentencing in his so-called “hush money” case. However, he has not dropped the case and maintains that he doesn’t plan to.

On Tuesday, Bragg stated in a letter to Judge Juan Merchan that Trump is not likely to be sentenced “until after the end of [the] Defendant’s upcoming presidential term.” However, he did assert that the felony conviction should stand, in his opinion.

“No current law establishes that a president’s temporary immunity from prosecution requires dismissal of a post-trial criminal proceeding that was initiated at a time when the defendant was not immune from criminal prosecution and that is based on official conduct for which the defendant is also not immune,” the district attorney’s office wrote.

A New York court found Trump guilty of 34 felonies related to allegedly manipulating business records pertaining to a $130,000 payment made by his former attorney, Michael Cohen, to porn star Stormy Daniels prior to the 2016 election. Trump has pleaded not guilty in the case and maintains that he never had sexual relations with Daniels.

Trump had been scheduled to be sentenced on November 26th, but last week, Merchan put all proceedings in the case on pause at the request of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office.

“Merchan can move to either delay Trump’s sentencing until after he leaves the White House, could dismiss the conviction outright, or could grant a sentence of unconditional discharge, which would leave the conviction intact but free Trump from any prison time, fines, or probation,” Fox News reported.

Prosecutors had asked for more time to consider the next steps in the case, citing the need to balance the “competing interests” between having the criminal case go forward and protecting the office of the incoming president-elect.

Meanwhile, Trump’s defense lawyers have urged the judge to dismiss the case due to the “unconstitutional impediments” to his ability to govern. 

He also argued that the conviction should be vacated and the charges dismissed because of the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in July that presidents cannot be prosecuted over their official acts, and that evidence of their official acts cannot be used in trials over personal behavior.

In a statement responding to Bragg’s decision, Trump spokesman Steven Cheung called the filing “a total and definitive victory for President Trump.”

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Vanessa Guillén’s Sister Condemns The Atlantic for Claiming Trump Disparaged Soldier: ‘He Showed Nothing but Respect’

Candles and flowers decorate a makeshift memorial for US Army Specialist Vanessa Guillen at Power House Gym on August 14, 2020, in Houston, Texas. - Guillen's murder the subsequent suicide of the chief suspect, US Army specialist Aaron Robinson, has put a spotlight on sexual harassment in the US military. Guillen, a 20-year-old US Army specialist at Fort Hood in Texas, went missing more than two months ago. After a weeks-long search, a lawyer for the Guillen family confirmed that human remains found on June 30 near her former base were those of the missing soldier. (Photo by Mark Felix / AFP) (Photo by MARK FELIX/AFP /AFP via Getty Images)
Candles and flowers decorate a makeshift memorial for U.S. Army Specialist Vanessa Guillen at Power House Gym on August 14, 2020, in Houston, Texas. (Photo by MARK FELIX/AFP /AFP via Getty Images)

OAN Staff Blake Wolf
4:20 PM – Wednesday, October 23, 2024

SEE: https://www.oann.com/newsroom/vanessa-guillens-sister-slams-the-atlantic-for-claiming-trump-disparaged-the-murdered-soldier-trump-did-nothing-but-show-respect/; republished below in full, unedited, for informational, educational, & research purposes:

The sister and family attorney of Vanessa Guillén, a U.S. soldier who was murdered in 2020, slammed a report by The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief who claimed that Donald Trump refused to pay for Guillén’s funeral after previously agreeing to. He also claimed that the former president made racist remarks towards her ethnicity.

The article, written by Jeffrey Goldberg, claimed that Trump was extremely upset after receiving a $60,000 funeral bill during a 2020 meeting in the Oval Office. Goldberg claims Trump stated “It doesn’t cost $60,000 bucks to bury a f–king Mexican.”

Goldberg also claimed that Trump demanded his former chief of staff, Mark Meadows, not pay the bill, stating “Don’t pay it!”

Vanessa Guillén was 20-years-old at the time of her death. She was murdered in 2020 by Aaron Robinson, a soldier who was stationed at the same base in Texas.

Robinson, along with his then-girlfriend, Cecily Aguilar, dismembered Guillén’s body after the murder and hid it in the woods. Robinson ended up committing suicide after a confrontation with police. Aguilar pleaded guilty for aiding Robinson’s crimes, which resulted in a 30 year prison sentence.

The release of the article sparked backlash from Vanessa’s sister, Mayra Guillén, as well as the family's attorney, stating that Trump has done “nothing but show[n] respect to my family.”

“Wow. I don’t appreciate how you are exploiting my sister’s death for politics-hurtful & disrespectful to the important changes she made for service members, “ Mayra stated on X. “President Donald Trump did nothing but show respect to my family & Vanessa. In fact, I voted for President Trump today.”

Natalie Khawam, the Guillén family attorney, also released a statement accusing Goldberg of exploiting the tragic death of Guillén for political gain ahead of the election.

“After having dealt with hundreds of reporters in my legal career, this is unfortunately the first time I have had to go on record and call out Jeffery Goldberg@the Atlantic: not only did he misrepresent our conversation but he outright LIED in HIS sensational story,” she wrote on X.

“More importantly, he used and exploited my clients, and Vannesa Guillenss murder… for cheap political gain. I would also like to also point out that the timing of this “story” is quite suspicious, as this supposed conversation that Trump had would have occurred over 4 years ago! Why a story about it now?!” she continued, questioning Goldberg’s intentions.

“As everyone knows, not only did Trump support our military, he also invited my client to the Oval Office and supported the I Am Vanessa Guillen bill too,” she added.

Meadows also spoke out against Goldberg’s accusations, stating that “Any suggestion that President Trump disparaged Ms. Guillen or refused to pay for her funeral expenses is absolutely false,” he wrote in an X post. “He was nothing but kind, gracious, and wanted to make sure that the military and the U.S. government did right by Vanessa Guillén and her family.”

Additionally, the Trump campaign responded to the claims, stating that Goldberg’s report was “absolutely false.”

“President Donald Trump has spent his life caring for America’s military heroes…,” stated Alex Pfeiffer, a Trump campaign advisor. “There has been no greater advocate for our brave military men and women than Donald J. Trump.”

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts