The Real Reason Joe Biden Pardoned Hunter | 12/2/24

Hunter Biden's Pardon is a Golden Opportunity for Trump to DO THIS...

President Biden has issued a pardon for his son Hunter that covers any crimes committed over the past 10 years. That would include any possible fraudulent dealings with the Ukrainian energy company Burisma or the Chinese Communist Party. So, is Biden just trying to protect himself? Glenn breaks it all down and also explains how Donald Trump can still bring criminals to justice: Biden only pardoned Hunter and, by extension, himself. But anyone else who was involved in the Biden family’s shady business dealings is still fair game, especially if Trump’s pick for FBI Director, Kash Patel, declassifies everything...

Biden's Hypocritical Pardon of Hunter is Even Worse When You Read the Fine Print, w/ Cooke and Lowry

Greg Kelly: Joe Biden has lied since day one

'Gaslight of the century': Rob Schmitt reacts to Biden's pardon of Hunter

Joe Biden Lands in Angola, Africa Shortly After Pardoning Hunter Biden

How China Built its Industrial Infrastructure on Top of U.S. Debt.: Economist Jeffrey Tucker

This interview was first released on Epoch TV on Aug 8, 2024. Jeffrey Tucker is the senior economics columnist at The Epoch Times and the founder and president of the Brownstone Institute. “Once we start accurately measuring inflation, and I won’t speculate on the exact number, but we know it’s at least 127 percent over four years.” This episode dives into what’s really going on with the U.S. economy. Are we in a recession? Are prices and unemployment rising or falling? What about domestic manufacturing and imports? And can economic data be trusted? “Debt is the leading export of the U.S. and a leading product that we make. This is not sustainable; it’s just not going to work.” “We need to stop creating more debt. Just stop it. Stop printing money and reduce the budget. We need to prevent Congress from making reckless decisions. It can be fixed. But if we want to save American manufacturing, we need to start there.” “How is it possible that a country known for its expertise in apparel, textiles, toys, shoes, watches, pianos, steel, consumer electronics, machinery, and so much more suddenly doesn’t produce any of those things anymore? We had the knowledge, the resources, the markets, and the supply chains. Is it right that we let all of that go to waste?” “Economies are resilient and robust, and they respond rapidly. When people believe they will be rewarded for their work, when they see the government living within its means, when they feel trust is being rebuilt and the truth is being told, they become motivated. They engage in enterprising activities, invest, and help in the swift rebuilding of the country. I genuinely believe that the rebuilding process could take place relatively quickly. It’s not a hopeless situation.”

96.9% of Americans Charged with Hunter Biden’s Gun Crimes Get Jail Time

Lies Lie Detector Liar Concept of lies Lie detector Adobe Stock 76207749
Lies Lie Detector Liar Concept of lies Lie detector Adobe Stock 76207749

In the run-up to the 2024 Presidential election, President Joe Biden vowed not to use his presidential authority to pardon his son, Hunter Biden. He has doubled down multiple times through states and his press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, but now he has backtracked and pardoned his son, who was convicted of lying on an ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) Form 4473 and was accused of tax evasion.

Hunter Biden was arrested and successfully prosecuted for lying on an ATF Form 4473 that he filled out when he purchased a revolver from a Delaware gun shop. The firearm was recovered from a dumpster after his lover and dead brother’s wife disposed of it. When Hunter purchased the handgun, he was an addicted user of crack cocaine. Hunter would mark that he was not an unlawful user of drugs on the form.

After being charged, the younger Biden was offered a sweetheart deal not in line with those provided to others accused of lying on the government form. The judge rejected that deal, sending the case to a jury trial. He would be convicted on all charges and was waiting for sentencing. Even after the felony conviction, his father would maintain that there was no chance that he would pardon his son.

Hunter Biden was also facing charges of tax evasion. He allegedly hid large sums of money from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Hunter has always blamed his tax issues on his addictions. There have also been accusations of Hunter selling access to his father when Joe Biden was Vice President. Critics claim that the President’s son made millions from the scheme, leading some on the Republican side of the aisle to refer to the family as the “Biden Crime Family.”

Late Sunday night, President Joe Biden would break his promise not to use his presidential power to pardon his son. He claimed that the Democrat-run Department of Justice (DOJ) targeted his son for political reasons. He claimed his son did nothing wrong when lying on the 4473 because there wasn’t a victim. President Biden said almost no one is charged with lying on a 4473. Quick research shows that several hundred people each year are charged with lying on the ATF gun purchase form.

The President wrote: “Today, I signed a pardon for my son Hunter. From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department’s decision-making, and I kept my word even as I have watched my son being selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted. Without aggravating factors like use in a crime, multiple purchases, or buying a weapon as a straw purchaser, people are almost never brought to trial on felony charges solely for how they filled out a gun form. Those who were late paying their taxes because of serious addictions, but paid them back subsequently with interest and penalties, are typically given non-criminal resolutions. It is clear that Hunter was treated differently.”

The DOJ issued a press release in January of last year stating that it is “aggressively pursuing those who lie in connection with firearms transactions.” The ATF and the DOJ are taking a hard line on those who lie when purchasing a firearm. The press release included examples of Americans charged and convicted of the same crime as Hunter Biden. Many wonder if President Biden will pardon these Americans as well.

United States Attorney Robert J. “Bob” Troester wrote: “Federal law prohibits knowingly making any false statement in connection with purchasing, or attempting to purchase, a firearm. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) requires prospective firearm buyers to complete ATF Form 4473. This Form requires buyers to answer several questions, including those about the buyer’s competency, criminal history, drug use, immigration status, and history with domestic violence. Applicants who knowingly make false statements may also face criminal prosecution for a felony and up to 10 years in federal prison.”

The ATF even had an operation that included going after people lying on a 4473. “Project Safe Neighborhoods” was a nationwide effort to catch and prosecute those lying on a 4473. The ATF and the DOJ disagree with the President’s accusation that lying on a 4473 isn’t a big deal. According to both agencies, the crimes are serious, and the government should be pursuing the violators with all available resources.

“Keeping guns out of the hands of those who shouldn’t have them is of paramount concern,” said U.S. Attorney Robert J. Troester. “We will use the tools available to us to pursue those who use a straw purchaser or lie when trying to buy a gun. We will continue to work closely with ATF and our law enforcement partners to prevent guns from falling into the wrong hands by holding accountable those who lie to get them.”

President Biden also insists that his son’s alleged tax evasion should be forgiven because of his addiction to crack cocaine at the time the crime was committed. Many will point out that the U.S. prison system is full of people who commit crimes because of their addictions. This contradiction causes many to think that President Biden is acting hypocritical by pardoning his son, not just for going back on his promise but for his push to prosecute aggressively those citizens who commit similar crimes. Others claim this is an example of a two-tiered justice system where the rich and powerful can commit crimes with impunity, even though Biden has stated many times in the past that “no one is above the law.”

Hunter Biden issued a statement on the pardon after it was made public by the White House. He blamed politics for his convictions. Hunter said he would dedicate his life to helping people who are “sick and suffering.” He thanked his family for supporting him through his trials.

Hunter Biden’s Statement: “I have admitted and taken responsibility for my mistakes during the darkest days of my addiction — mistakes that have been exploited to publicly humiliate and shame me and my family for political sport. Despite all of this, I have maintained my sobriety for more than five years because of my deep faith and the unwavering love and support of my family and friends. In the throes of addiction, I squandered many opportunities and advantages. In recovery we can be given the opportunity to make amends where possible and rebuild our lives if we never take for granted the mercy that we have been afforded. I will never take the clemency I have been given today for granted and will devote the life I have rebuilt to helping those who are still sick and suffering.”

Hunter Biden’s legal team has filed motions with the courts in both cases to have them dismissed because of the pardon.


About John Crump

Mr. Crump is an NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. John has written about firearms, interviewed people from all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons, follow him on X at @crumpyss, or at www.crumpy.com.

Trump’s National Concealed Carry Reciprocity: What You Need to Know ~ VIDEO

VIDEO: https://youtu.be/2yXmPqwujr4

The debate over national handgun reciprocity has reignited, fueled by Donald Trump’s recent statement that he would sign such handgun carry reciprocity legislation into law.

The Armed Attorneys, Richard Hayes, and Emily Taylor unpack the topic in their latest YouTube video, exploring its potential impact, legal foundations, and the challenges ahead. Here’s a breakdown of the key points and why this topic is a hot button for gun owners and anti-gun advocates alike.

What Is National Reciprocity?

At its core, national reciprocity would ensure that concealed carry permits issued by one state are recognized across all states—much like a driver’s license. Currently, states have varying agreements on recognizing other states’ carry permits, with some (AKA Maryland, New Jersey, and New York) outright refusing to honor permits issued elsewhere. National reciprocity aims to standardize this patchwork system, providing permit holders with clarity and protection.

For example, a Texan traveling to Maryland—a state with strict (some say unconstitutional) gun laws—could legally carry their firearm under a national reciprocity law, provided they follow Maryland’s rules.

However, the specifics of each state’s firearm laws would still apply.

Why Is This Issue Contentious?

National reciprocity is polarizing for those that are scared of too much freedom for several reasons:

  1. State Sovereignty: Critics argue it infringes on states’ rights, forcing them to adopt policies their citizens may disagree with.
  2. Public Safety Concerns: Opponents claim it could undermine their efforts to regulate firearms within their borders. The Sky is falling.
  3. Constitutional Debate: Supporters point to the Full Faith and Credit Clause (Article IV, Section 1 of the Constitution), which requires states to honor each other’s laws and judgments. They argue this should apply to concealed carry permits, especially since the Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms.

The Legal and Political Landscape

President Trump’s promise to sign a national reciprocity bill could be an “easy win” politically, especially with a Republican majority in the House. However, it would face immediate legal challenges. States like California and New York, known for their strict gun control laws, would likely sue the federal government, arguing that such legislation violates states’ rights and public policy.

The courts would then need to address complex questions:

  • Does the Full Faith and Credit Clause mandate recognition of carry permits across state lines?
  • How does the Second Amendment intersect with states’ rights to regulate firearms?

Potential Pitfalls & Minefields of Laws

While national reciprocity could simplify travel for gun owners, there are important caveats:

  • State-Specific Laws: Even with reciprocity, gun owners must follow the laws of the state they are visiting. For example, a Texan carrying in Florida cannot open carry, as Florida prohibits it.
  • Feature Bans and Magazine Limits: Restrictions on certain firearm features or magazine capacities would still apply unless successfully challenged in court.
  • Legal Risks: Until these issues are litigated and resolved, gun owners could find themselves in legal trouble if they mistakenly believe their home state’s laws apply everywhere.

What’s Next?

If national reciprocity passes, expect immediate lawsuits and a drawn-out court battle. The outcome could set a precedent for how the Second Amendment is applied across state lines. In the meantime, gun owners should stay informed and cautious when traveling.

Join the Conversation; let us know what you think below.

The road to national reciprocity is fraught with legal and political hurdles, but it represents a significant step forward for Second Amendment advocates. What do you think? Should concealed carry permits work like driver’s licenses, or does this infringe on states’ rights? Share your thoughts below and help us keep the conversation alive.

Stay tuned to the Armed Attorneys for updates on this and other key Second Amendment issues. Together, we can fight the anti-2A narrative and protect our rights.

President Trump Promises Concealed Carry Reciprocity When Reelected

“I will protect the right of self-defense everywhere it is under siege, and I will sign concealed carry reciprocity,” President Trump said. “Your Second Amendment does not end at the state line.”

Delaware Confiscates $100 Billion of Musk’s Wealth

elon musk gestures while speaking
Elon Musk (Getty Images)

By Newsmax Wires    |   Monday, 02 December 2024 10:42 PM EST

A Delaware judge moved Monday to confirm its confiscation of Elon Musk's wealth that he created at Tesla — denying him a compensation package that would be worth over $100 billion in value today.

Musk has paid a heavy price for countering woke politics, making X a neutral platform, and backing Donald Trump for president.

Delaware Chancellor Judge Kathaleen McCormick on Monday ruled to confirm her January ruling that found Musk was not eligible for a 2018 compensation package then valued at $56 billion.

McCormick complained the Tesla package for Musk was the "biggest compensation plan ever — an unfathomable sum."

After McCormick had initially ruled that Musk had not gotten proper approval from Tesla shareholders, Musk filed suit.

Musk said he properly received board approval and later hit financial targets to earn the compensation, including benchmarks based on stock value, profitability, and revenue.

At one point, visionary Musk had driven the value of Tesla to close a trillion dollars during the compensation period. Today, Tesla holds a market cap of over $1.1 trillion.

After the judge's January 2024 ruling, Tesla went back to its shareholders to approve the Musk compensation plan.

In June, Tesla shareholders again approved the original $56 billion compensation overwhelmingly — with 77% of stock owners backing Musk and the package.

After the shareholder vote, Tesla went back to the Delaware court to seek its approval, only to find its compensation plan rebuffed again.

"Even if a stockholder vote could have a ratifying effect, it could not do so here," McCormick said in her opinion Monday.

"Were the court to condone the practice of allowing defeated parties to create new facts for the purpose of revising judgments, lawsuits would become interminable," she wrote.

McCormick saw little contradiction, however, in penalizing Musk for the wealth he created, while granting the lawyers who sued him on behalf of shareholders an incredible $345 million in attorney fees for their legal filings.

Musk was not happy by today's ruling and took to X writing, "Shareholders should control company votes, not judges."

Musk reposted other X posts critical of the ruling.

One repost stated: "Things to do in Delaware: 1) Leave."

Musk also reported fund manager Cathie Wood's X post where she called McCormick an "activist judge at its worst."

Wood continued: "No judge has the right to determine CEO compensation. Shareholders voted twice, overwhelming each time, to ratify @elonmusk's 2018 performance-based pay package."

Since the court's first ruling, Musk has been on the warpath with Delaware.

This year he moved both Tesla and SpaceX's incorporation from Delaware to Texas. He also moved Neuralink to Nevada.

Musk has also urged other companies to quit Delaware as well.

On X, Musk has stated bluntly, "Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware."

The home state of President Joe Biden, Delaware has come under criticism for its close ties to the Biden family and its political agenda.

Last year, The Wall Street Journal published an article, co-authored by former Attorney General William Barr, lambasting Delaware for embracing far-left Environmental, Social, and Governance policies and attempting to push them on corporations.

And The Hill reported that major corporations are fleeing Delaware as a result of its highly politicized agenda.

Data suggests Delaware is seeing a drop-off of new incorporations. In 2022, the last year the state released data, Delaware saw a 6% fall in new incorporations.

Trump Announces Massad Boulos, Tiffany Trump’s Father-In-Law, As Senior Adviser On Arab And Middle East Affairs

ROCKY MOUNT, NORTH CAROLINA - OCTOBER 30: Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. President Donald Trump greets supporters during a campaign event at the Rocky Mount Event Center on October 30, 2024 in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. With less than a week until Election Day, Trump is campaigning for re-election in the battleground states of North Carolina and Wisconsin. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Republican presidential nominee, former U.S. President Donald Trump greets supporters during a campaign event at the Rocky Mount Event Center on October 30, 2024 in Rocky Mount, North Carolina. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

OAN Staff Abril Elfi
9:57 AM – Sunday, December 1, 2024

President-elect Donald Trump has announced Lebanese American businessman Massad Boulos will be serving as his senior adviser on Arab and Middle Eastern affairs.

On Sunday, Trump announced his pick in a post on Truth Social.

“Massad is an accomplished lawyer and a highly respected leader in the business world, with extensive experience on the International scene,” Trump said.

“He has been a longtime proponent of Republican and Conservative values, an asset to my Campaign, and was instrumental in building tremendous new coalitions with the Arab American Community,” he added.

Boulos, Tiffany Trump’s father-in-law, met with Arab American and Muslim leaders several times during the election campaign.

He will most likely collaborate with Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy for the Middle East, who was appointed last month.

This is the second time in recent days that Trump chose the father-in-law of one of his children to serve in his administration. On Saturday, Trump announced Charles Kushner, father of his son-in-law Jared Kushner, as his pick for Ambassador to France.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts