Hunter Biden Plea Deal Falls Apart

Hunter Biden (2nd L), son of US President Joe Biden, arrives at the J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building in Wilmington, Delaware, on July 26, 2023, to attend a change of plea hearing.

Hunter Biden (2nd L), son of US President Joe Biden, arrives at the J. Caleb Boggs Federal Building in Wilmington, Delaware, on July 26, 2023, to attend a change of plea hearing. Hunter Biden faces two misdemeanor charges for failure to pay taxes. The hearing is also expected to address an agreement between federal prosecutors and Biden to avoid prosecution for a felony charge of illegally possessing a firearm. (Photo by RYAN COLLERD / AFP) / ALTERNATIVE CROP (Photo by RYAN COLLERD/AFP via Getty Images)

BY ROY FRANCIS

SEE: https://www.oann.com/newsroom/hunter-biden-plea-deal-falls-apart/;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

Hunter Biden’s plea deal fell apart in court on Wednesday, and prosecutors say that there is no deal.

🚨 #BREAKING: HUNTER BIDEN'S PLEA DEAL FALLS APART IN COURT

Hunter Biden arrived in a Delaware court today prepared to enter a guilty plea on two tax misdemeanors, but the judge KILLED the deal after expressing concerns about the terms of the agreement. pic.twitter.com/O1DyxThLLa

Earlier on Wednesday, Hunter and his lawyer said that they would not accept the deal if no guarantee is given by the prosecution that no further charges would be brought against Hunter in the future. Prosecutors, however, said that there was still a possibility that the first son would be charged with other offenses, which include failing to register as a foreign agent.

The presiding judge, U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika, expressed concerns about the deal itself and the disagreement between the two parties in regard to the possibility of future charges against Hunter Biden. The deal was then struck down.

The turn of events came more than 90 minutes after the hearing began at the federal courthouse in Wilmington, Delaware.

Hunter Biden was set to plead guilty to two misdemeanors for not paying federal taxes on Time in 2017 and 2018. He was also set to enter into a deal that would resolve his felony gun charges.

Federal prosecutors said that the President’s son had failed to pay between $1.1. million and $1.5 million in federal taxes before the legal deadlines. He had also lied about his use of a controlled substance on a federal firearm purchase form in 2018.

As part of the plea agreement, prosecutors were expected to recommend a sentence of probation for the president’s son. Under the previous agreement, Hunter also had to remain sober and submit to drug testing for two years.

This is a developing story.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

 

‘INTEGRITY’ AT RISK: Hunter Biden’s legal team allegedly threatened with sanctions~Lawyer and former New York Police Department inspector Paul Mauro detail court records which imply that Hunter Biden’s legal team reportedly lied in court.

‘EGREGIOUS’: Hunter lawyers should be disbarred, says former FBI assistant director

Former FBI assistant director Chris Swecker responds to Hunter Biden’s lawyers allegedly misrepresenting themselves in a call to judge's court on the eve of his plea deal.

GOP rep. warns of 'rot' in the Biden administration

State Department spokesman pleads with Taliban not to allow Afghanistan to become ‘safe haven’ for terrorists

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2023/07/state-department-spokesman-pleads-with-taliban-not-to-allow-afghanistan-to-become-safe-haven-for-terrorists;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

What planet does Matthew Miller live on? State Department planet, which has no connection to Earth. Does he really think that the Taliban will heed any appeals from the United States government? Does he really think that the Taliban in Afghanistan will refrain from aiding its fellow jihad group, Tehreek-e-Taliban-e-Pakistan (TTP)? The ridiculous assumptions of the State Department stem from its unchanging refusal to understand the ideology and mindset of the people with whom they are dealing.

“US Urges Taliban to Prevent Afghanistan from Becoming ‘Safe Haven’ for Terrorists,” by Fidel Rahmati, Khaama Press News Agency, July 18, 2023:

The United States on Tuesday asked the Afghan Taliban to prevent their country from becoming a “safe haven” for terrorist attacks.

Matthew Miller, a spokesman for the US State Department, made the statement a day after the Pakistan Army blamed Kabul for the rise in militancy, saying that “safe havens and liberty of action” provided by Kabul, along with the most recent weapons available to militants from Afghanistan, allowed them to conduct attacks inside Pakistan, Dawn reported.

Islamabad has expressed concern over extremists using Afghanistan territory for cross-border terrorism on several occasions. The military has said that it expects the Taliban authorities to take action against militants and follow the Doha agreement.

The Pakistani military reported that nine officers were killed after militants attacked an army installation in Balochistan province, and three others died in the exchange of fire last week.

The Pakistani army said it had “serious concerns on the safe havens and liberty of action available to TTP in Afghanistan.”…

ATF Intimidating Another Home-Based Gun Dealer to Surrender FFL

ATF Intimidating Another Home-Based Gun Dealer to Surrender FFL

BY LEE WILLIAMS

SEE: https://www.ammoland.com/2023/07/atf-intimidating-another-home-based-gun-dealer-to-surrender-ffl/;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

U.S.A. — Tom Harris has been selling guns from his Lewisville, Texas home for 30 years. He is so respected and beloved by his customers that one gave him a kidney – literally – which saved his life.

Dialysis wasn’t working well for Harris, owner of Sporting Arms Company, which he operates from a dedicated space in his home. He had only months to live until a 39-year-old retired Marine offered to help.

“I heard you might need a kidney. I’ll get tested,” Harris recalls the man saying in 2019. “I told him that he and his wife should pray about it first. He said, ‘We already have.’ He was a perfect match – a 7 out of 7. Now, even if I lose my business, it has allowed me to live.”

In what has become standard operating procedure since Joe Biden took office, the ATF is trying to intimidate Harris – and other home-based gun dealers – into surrendering his Federal Firearm License. If he refuses to comply – and he most likely will – Harris will face what ATF calls “adverse actions.”

ATF dug up procedural errors from as far back as 2007 to make their current “case” against Harris, but the ATF had already told Harris he was cleared of these 16-year-old clerical errors, as well as newer ones. He has letters attesting to this. Unfortunately, none of this mattered to the ATF inspectors who recently began persecuting the 61-year-old disabled father of five only to satisfy their supervisors’ newfound zeal for FFL revocations.

“They threw the kitchen sink at me after they cleared me because their bosses weren’t happy with it,” Harris told the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project last week. “They are trying to intimidate me into surrendering my FFL.”

History

Harris has an industrial engineering degree and a master’s degree in management. He worked as a senior director of North American operations for a large tech company while selling guns, often putting in 100-hour weeks. He employed several off-duty local law enforcement officers to help with sales.

“I started selling guns right when the Bill Clinton administration started,” he said. “I’ve always appreciated guns from an engineering viewpoint.”

The business was slow until he received a bit of divine intervention. “A pastor prayed over my business, and it took off,” Harris said.

He describes his gun shop as “general purpose.” Since he has been in business so long, he can buy direct from Colt, Smith & Wesson, and he’s a master Kimber dealer. Harris estimates around 40% of his transfers are “wholesale” to newer dealers.

“Most are gun show guys,” he said. “I did a few gun shows in the early 2000s but got tired and quit.”

Today, he is one of the largest home-based gun dealers in North Texas. He has more than 10,000 customers across the country and has sold more than 184,000 firearms. His 30-plus Google reviews are extremely positive.

Harris has never had any serious discrepancies during ATF audits other than for his penmanship. Harris now qualifies as legally blind, but when his wife quit her job and began helping with the paperwork full-time, this problem was quickly solved.

Unlike some home-based dealers, gun sales are not a hobby for Harris. They’re his sole source of income.

“My 84-year-old mother is now living with us, and three of the five kids are still ‘on the till’ in college,” he said.

The Troubles  

After an audit last year, two ATF special agents asked some pointed questions about multiple firearms Harris sold to an individual.

“They put the squeeze on me, but I answered all their questions and gave them whatever they wanted,” he said.

One of the ATF officials – Special Agent Aaron Loving – told Harris’ attorney he was cleared of any wrongdoing. Harris’s attorney documented this conversation in a letter.

“Agent Loving has informed me that you are no longer the target of any criminal investigation, and there will not be any criminal prosecutions forthcoming,” the letter states.

And then the ATF changed its mind.

A few months later, Special Agent Loving recontacted Harris’ attorney, stating, “We need Tom to give up his license voluntarily. The bosses up the chain want him to turn in his license or face adverse actions,” Harris recalls his attorney saying.

“We thought this was all over,” Harris said.

Last month, Special Agent Loving and his partner personally served a Notice of Revocation to Harris.

Allegations

Harris’ Notice of Revocation contains two violations:

  1. “On 10 occasions, Licensee willfully aided and abetted a non-licensee in dealing firearms without a license as required by the GCA…”
  2. “On 46 occasions, Licensee willfully made a false statement or representation with respect to information required by the GCA …”

Harris has since learned that the individual to whom he sold the firearms is now under investigation by the ATF.

“This individual was a customer of several FFLs,” Harris said. “The ATF had cleared me of any wrongdoing. They alleged I aided and abetted on ten forms, but at the time, the individual was actively being approved for his FFL. All of this was originally approved by the ATF, who said on multiple occasions I followed all the regs.”

ATF Response

Krissy Y. Carlson, ATF’s Director of Industry Operations (DIO) for its Dallas Field Office, signed Harris’ Notice of Revocation. She did not respond to calls or emails seeking her comments for this story.

ATF Special Agent Aaron Loving said, “I can’t – I’m not gonna speak on any active investigations.”

Agent Loving was specifically asked if he told Harris’ attorney that he was no longer the subject of any criminal investigation.

“I cannot speak to any active investigation,” Loving said again.

Instead, Loving offered the name and number of Sara Abel, the PIO for ATF’s Dallas Field Office, but the number he gave did not work.

Takeaways

Like other home-based FFLs, Harris was told nothing would happen if he surrendered his FFL voluntarily. Like other home-based FFLs, ATF wanted more than just compliance and his license.

“They were taking pictures left and right, which I knew was inappropriate,” Harris said. “They used a scanning app on their phones to photograph 4473s. At the end of one session, an inspector demanded a copy of my entire electronic database.”

Harris never handed over the database. He intends to fight.

“On a Monday last January, the ATF called and demanded that I get rid of all my guns by Friday and surrender my license,” Harris said. “They said they’d be here that Friday to sign the paperwork. I knew it wasn’t ATF’s administrative procedure. I knew it was abnormal. I told them I declined to voluntarily surrender my license.”

Said Harris: “I will not be intimidated into surrendering my license.”

One of Harris’ longtime customers has created a GiveSendGo account to help him raise funds for his legal defense.

This story is presented by the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project and wouldn’t be possible without you. Please click here to make a tax-deductible donation to support more pro-gun stories like this.


About Lee Williams

Lee Williams, who is also known as “The Gun Writer,” is the chief editor of the Second Amendment Foundation’s Investigative Journalism Project. Until recently, he was also an editor for a daily newspaper in Florida. Before becoming an editor, Lee was an investigative reporter at newspapers in three states and a U.S. Territory. Before becoming a journalist, he worked as a police officer. Before becoming a cop, Lee served in the Army. He’s earned more than a dozen national journalism awards as a reporter, and three medals of valor as a cop. Lee is an avid tactical shooter.

Lee Williams

 

Federal Judge Blocks Biden Asylum Policy

Venezuelan and Nicaraguan migrants are transferred by agents of the Border Patrol after crossing the Rio Grande river from Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua state, Mexico to El Paso, Texas, US to ask for political asylum on December 27, 2022. - The US government's two-year-old policy of invoking Covid-19 precautions to turn away hundreds of thousands of migrants at the Mexican border will remain in place for now, the Supreme Court ruled Tuesday. The decision to uphold the controversial rule known as Title 42 stemmed off a looming political crisis for President Joe Biden, as thousands waited at the southern border in expectation the policy was about to end. (Photo by Herika Martinez / AFP) (Photo by HERIKA MARTINEZ/AFP via Getty Images)

BY ROY FRANCIS

SEE: https://www.oann.com/newsroom/federal-judge-blocks-biden-asylum-policy/;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

A federal judge has blocked the Biden administration’s policy for asylum seekers that went into effect after Title 42 was lifted.

BREAKING REPORT: Federal judge BLOCKS Biden's new asylum policy.

District Judge Jon Tigar in Oakland, Calif., found the rules unlawful because they impose conditions on asylum-seekers that Congress did not intend.

United States District Judge Jon Tigar who resides in Oakland California, ruled that the policy is unlawful due to the conditions that have been imposed on asylum seekers.

Under the new rule, which went into effect in May, migrants would have difficulty receiving asylum if they cross the border illegally if they had already passed through any other country south of the border without seeking protection there first. The policy, had imposed limitations on migrants seeking asylum, but offer plenty of exceptions and do not apply to children that are traveling alone.

The immigrant rights group, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), sued the administration arguing that it is a violation of U.S. law, which protects the right to asylum no matter how the migrants enter the country. The rights groups said that the Biden administration rules force migrants to look for protection in countries that don’t have the same asylum system and human rights protections that the United States has.

The ACLU also argued that the CBP One app, that the administration has been utilizing at the border in order to process migrants faster and to book appointments over the internet, is not feasible. They said that the app does not have enough appointment slots, and that it is not available in enough languages.

The judge agreed and said that it is not feasible for migrants to seek protection in a transit country and that migrants face violence as they travel, particularly in Mexico.

“The Rule — which has been in effect for two months — cannot remain in place,” Tigar wrote in his order. “While they wait for an adjudication, applicants for asylum must remain in Mexico, where migrants are generally at heightened risk of violence by both state and non-state actors.”

Tigar also said that the rule is illegal because it brands those who cross at any place in between legal border crossings ineligible for asylum. He explained that Congress has specifically said that the crossing point should not affect whether someone is eligible for asylum.

The judge had blocked a similar policy during the Trump administration. Immigrant advocates had been pushing him to also block the current policy.

Last week, a Justice Department lawyer argued that the current policy is different from the Trump-era policy because it is paired with new pathways for migrants who are seeking protection, including, and primarily, the CBP One app.

The Biden policies have also been challenged by Republican led states, although Republicans argued the opposite point of judge Tigar, saying that immigration authorities have been releasing too many migrants into the country.

The ACLU applauded the decision by Tigar. Katrina Eiland, the deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, who had argued the case, said that the decision is a victory because the promise of America is “to serve as a beacon of freedom and hope.”

“The ruling is a victory, but each day the Biden administration prolongs the fight over its illegal ban, many people fleeing persecution and seeking safe harbor for their families are instead left in grave danger,” Eiland said. “The promise of America is to serve as a beacon of freedom and hope, and the administration can and should do better to fulfill this promise, rather than perpetuate cruel and ineffective policies that betray it.”

The block on the policy will go into effect in two weeks, giving the Biden administration time to file an appeal.

Stay informed! Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts

Florida Democrats Scurry to Rebuild Mail-in Voter Rolls After New Law Wipes Them Clean

Florida Democrats Scurry to Rebuild Mail-in Voter Rolls After New Law Wipes Them Clean

BY ATHENA THORNE

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/athena-thorne/2023/07/24/florida-democrats-scurry-to-rebuild-mail-in-voter-rolls-after-new-law-wipes-them-clean-n1713195;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

Under its hard-right legislature and magnificent governor, Ron DeSantis, Florida has delighted conservatives by batting down Democrat demoralization and power-grab initiatives with fierce alacrity. We’ve all thrilled at the spectacle of Heavy D crushing school groomers and busing asylum scammers to the blue sanctuaries that claim to love them so. At the same time, Florida’s fight to preserve and strengthen election integrity is also reaping benefits, and I wanted to make sure PJ Media readers didn’t miss out on the fun.

Florida’s wide-ranging new voting law, SB 90, is chock-full of rules that button up election integrity. Among its many actions is this one: “limiting the duration of requests for vote-by-mail ballots to all elections through the end of the calendar year of the next regularly scheduled general election.” It’s part of Florida’s move of mail-in voting from a four-year to a two-year registration window. This is a smart way to keep the rolls of voters registered to have mail-in ballots automatically sent to them from going stale and accumulating invalid names and addresses.

For engaged voters, this simply means logging onto the state website every two years instead of four to renew their requests for mail-in ballots. It’s as easy and convenient as clicking here and answering the questions. And of course, being eligible to vote in Florida.

But as any Democrat official will tell you (in so many words), Democrat voters are too stupid to participate in their own society by doing things like having a valid ID or using a computer. So naturally, party officials are simmering with outrage at the harsh new law. Here’s some not-biased-at-all reporting from NBC News:

Florida Democrats say they’re spending and organizing to chase down people who vote by mail after election officials across the state canceled all standing mail ballot requests this year.

The mass cancellations were to comply with a 2021 election law that added new restrictions to mail-in voting. The legislation — which was celebrated by Gov. Ron DeSantis and slammed by voting rights advocates as discriminatory — cut the duration of mail-in ballot requests in half from four years to two. It also required that existing requests for mail ballots be canceled at the end of 2022, forcing election workers to cancel millions of requests and start their lists of vote-by-mail voters from scratch.

In practice, that means that voters who requested mail-in ballots in 2021 or 2022 will have to make such requests again to vote in local races and the 2024 primary and general elections. In previous years, voters would not have had to request a ballot again for four years.

Since the COVIDification of elections, Democrats seem to come up with uncommonly large voter turnouts in state-wide and general elections. Part of their formula for accomplishing this is to first flood the zone with as many mail-in ballots as possible in the weeks leading up to Election Day. When Florida does things like tighten up the rolls of people and addresses to which ballots will be mailed, it makes it harder for Democrats to harvest enough of those ballots come counting time.

Related: The Rise of the Democrat Vote Machine (and How to Beat It)

The wailing and gnashing of teeth is music to honest citizens’ ears. “Instead of focusing our money, resources, and time on other endeavors and talking to voters, we’re having to spend resources to get people back on the rolls,” lamented Florida Democratic Party chair Nikki Fried — as if Republicans didn’t have exactly the same challenge. So why carry on like it’s just a Democrat problem? Why is it so important to them to have so many mail-in ballots sent out into the ether?

Some of us have no intention of ever moving somewhere as hot as Texas or Florida, but we are comforted by knowing they exist. It’s crucial that there are still states that resist being undermined by election shenanigans, child indoctrination, or hordes of illegal immigrants — in other words, that are determined to remain free and American. It’s good to know that, if the U.S. ever slips too far down the socialist-fascist slope, there will still be somewhere to defect to.

Who’s Buying Up All That Land Around Travis Air Force Base?

Who's Buying Up All That Land Around California's Travis Air Force Base?

BY VICTORIA TAFT

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2023/07/25/whos-buying-up-all-that-land-around-californias-travis-air-force-base-n1713338;

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, & research purposes.

We know the name of the outfit buying up farmland all around and “up to the fence” of Travis Air Force Base in Solano County, Calif., but officials want to know who those “mysterious” people are and what their intentions are. The Air Force has been trying to figure out why Flannery Associates, LLC purchased 300 parcels comprising 52,000 acres of land and why it’s playing hardball in court to wrest control of the land from reluctant sellers. Now concerned politicians are asking questions.

Travis is home to three major air wings that supply and support U.S. military personnel around the globe, most recently bringing material to Ukraine following the Russian invasion. Travis Air Force Base hosts three of the Air Force’s largest “strategic airlift” Air Mobility Wing squadrons on its 6,455-acre reservation. The base, known as the “Gateway to the Pacific,” is home to 60th, 621st, and 349th Air Wings — a contingent of about 40 gigantic supply airships, the C-5M Super Galaxy and C-17 Globemaster III. The base’s approximately 30-jet fleet of KC-10 Extenders can refuel military planes in-flight around the world.

Anyone close to the base can tell if something is spinning up, which could be an important tell to our enemies. In short, the base is kind of a big deal, not least because my Dad served as a mechanic there and my sisters were born at the hospital on base.

Solano County officials, the Air Force, and congressional representatives are all asking questions. Is this similar to the Chinese company buying up a parcel of land abutting Grand Forks Air Base in North Dakota? They don’t know because the LLC is incorporated in Delaware, where there’s no requirement to reveal investor information. But Flannery Associates claims nearly all — 97% — “of its invested capital” comes from U.S. investors, according to the Wall Street Journal. The other three percent are based in the UK and Ireland.

Recommended: Democrat Reaction to MTG Splaying Hunter’s Dirty Laptop Pictures in Public Is Beyond Ironic

Congressman John Garamendi, (D, Calif.) a House Armed Services Committee member whose district covers Travis AFB, told the Journal, “The fact that they’re buying land purposefully right up to the fence at Travis raises significant questions.” He said, “We don’t know who Flannery is, and their extensive purchases do not make sense to anybody in the area.”

Travis Air Force Base. Image via Google Earth.

Though the land is between San Francisco and Sacramento, some don’t think the investment by the Folsom-based company makes much sense. County Supervisor Mitch Mashburn told the Journal that most of the land the investors bought for $800,000,000 is “dry farmland” and if they planned to develop it, they’d get in touch with local officials like him. But they haven’t. “I don’t see where that land can turn a profit to make it worth almost a billion dollars in investment,” he says.

The City of Rio Vista is now surrounded on all sides by Flannery Associates-owned property. Rio Vista City Councilwoman Sarah Donnelly says the mysterious deals have made her suspicious. She told KABC-TV News that, “Their intention isn’t to grow olive trees. It feels nefarious to need all of the land to the point where you’re going to sue them to intimidate to sell to you — those aren’t farmers.”

Flannery Associates attorneys have been spending a lot of time in court, accusing land owners of conspiring to raise prices and cheat the investment group. In May, Reuters reported the group is suing a group of land owners for $510 million in damages for conspiring to inflate “the price of real estate by hundreds of millions of dollars and overcharged the company in violation of U.S. antitrust law.” So, not only do they want to control a lot of the land around the Air Force base, but they are willing to use U.S. courts to help them.

The Air Force asked the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) to get involved, but in the nearly a year it has been investigating, it hasn’t been successful in learning who the investors are.

Keeping you in the dark is a mainstay of the Democrat Left. So always opt for transparency — like PJ Media. Arm yourself with information with our brand of opinion journalism, where satire, humor, and serious coverage collide. We don’t need to tell you that the Democrats in all facets of government, including the White House, have attempted to kill conservative journalism through censorship on social media. Just read our coverage of the Twitter Files and recent court battles if you doubt it. Keep truthful reporting alive — become a PJ Media VIP! Take advantage of our Summer Sale and use the code SAVEAMERICA to get 50% off your annual membership!