Your tax dollars at work: Biden’s Pentagon spending precious tax dollars to create new ‘gender’ office to transition force into an LGBTQ nightmare

Image: Your tax dollars at work: Biden’s Pentagon spending precious tax dollars to create new ‘gender’ office to transition force into an LGBTQ nightmare



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) There is no American institution that the left-wing extremist Democratic Party won’t tear down and politicize in furtherance of their own power and drive to change our nation and our culture into something our founders wouldn’t recognize, and that includes the U.S. military.

The new National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) is massive in the amount of money it spends, but what’s worse is that a sizeable portion of the spending is going towards turning the force into a “woke” shell of itself, far removed from what it was when The Greatest Generation won World War II.

One provision of the NDAA calls for “PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF THE GENDER ADVISOR WORKFORCE” under Section 539J in what is a blatant attempt to turn both the civilian defense support sector and as much of the military side as possible, into a nightmare of LGBTQ madness.

According to the section:

(a) Plan Required.–The Secretary of Defense shall develop and implement a plan to institutionalize the gender advisor workforce of the Department of Defense responsible for supporting the implementation of the Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2017 (Public Law 115-68; 131 Stat. 1202). (b) Elements.–The plan under subsection (a) shall include:

(1) Plans for the development and management of the gender advisor workforce, including plans for the training, certification, assignments, and career development of the personnel of such workforce. (2) The actions the Secretary of Defense will carry out to elevate, develop, define, and standardize the gender advisor workforce in accordance with recommendation 3.4(a) of the report of the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military titled “Hard Truths and the Duty to Change: Recommendations from the Independent Review Commission on Sexual Assault in the Military” and dated July 2, 2021. (3) Development of or modifications to guidance, policy, professional military education, and doctrine to define and standardize the gender advisor program with a focus on incorporating the principles outlined in the plan of the Department of Defense titled “Women, Peace, and Security Strategic Framework and Implementation Plan” and dated June 2020, or any successor plan. (4) Identification of training and education requirements for members of the Armed Forces and civilian employees of the Department of Defense, including general and flag officers and members of the senior executive service, on the role of the gender advisor workforce and the principles outlined in plan referred to in paragraph (3), or any successor plan.

This insanity comes at a time when Russia is building hypersonic missiles that can defeat all current U.S. missile defenses — ditto for China. Also, Beijing is building a new drone swarm network for space that can be launched from ‘motherships’ and is controlled by artificial intelligence with the objective of disrupting or destroying ‘enemy’ satellites.

Others have begun to notice how ‘woke’ the Pentagon is becoming under the far-left policies of Barack Obama, who is really running Biden’s administration.

246 years after the U.S. Army was established, today’s Department of Defense appears to be distracted from its national defense mission. Media commentators and service members alike have lamented the military’s drift toward becoming a testing ground for social policy experimentation,” Mike Berry, general counsel at First Liberty Institute and a former active duty U.S. Marine Corps officer, wrote recently.

He added: “As perhaps the only conservative participant on the Pentagon’s newly formed Countering Extremism Working Group, I can confirm the Pentagon’s full embrace of ‘wokeism.'”

Mind you, ‘extremism’ wasn’t a problem in the U.S. military prior to Joe Biden’s ‘victory.’ But suddenly, not only is the military ‘rife’ with such members, the Pentagon is spending precious tax dollars not on building a better missile defense but on an “Office of Countering Extremism” and, of course, transgender priorities.

This is worse than madness, this is completely intentional: The Biden regime is trying to rid the conservative-leaning, patriotic members of today’s military (a.k.a. “extremists”) and replace them with propagandized left-wing drones who will crush political dissent on behalf of the regime.

Sources include:

Deep State power grab: Leading Democrat adds provision to annual Pentagon spending bill that removes congressional oversight of domestic military operations

Image: Deep State power grab: Leading Democrat adds provision to annual Pentagon spending bill that removes congressional oversight of domestic military operations



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) The longer they remain in control of our government, the closer Democrats move our country toward a full-blown dictatorship, as evidenced by a provision added to the annual Pentagon spending bill by a top Democrat.

The provision, offered by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), head of the House Intelligence Committee, and approved by the Democrat majority, effectively removes all congressional oversight of many U.S. military operations on American soil.

According to USSA News, the amendment was first offered in 2020 after then-President Donald Trump threatened to deploy active-duty U.S. troops throughout the country to quell Black Lives Matter violence and rioting. While the House passed the amendment, it was eliminated during House-Senate reconciliation negotiations regarding the 2021 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

But now, Republicans claim that Schiff wants the measure added to the current NDAA so as to prevent proper congressional oversight of military operations on U.S. soil they are certain will be directed mostly at their conservative, Trump-supporting voters, under the false guise of “combatting domestic terrorism.”

USSA News further speculates:

If signed into law, the amendment could impact the resolution of the Jan. 6th hearings and Republicans’ planned investigation into the Biden Administration’s mishandling of the migrant crisis at the southern border. 

“This un-American amendment will fundamentally and irreparably erode Congress’ constitutional oversight responsibility,” Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) argued. “Democrats led by Adam Schiff are attempting to cover up for the national security crises of the weakest commander in chief in U.S. history.”

“I’m very concerned about it, and Republicans need to fight back against it in the House and Senate to make sure it doesn’t pass,” noted Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.).“Democrats know we are going to take back the majority and are already trying to tie our hands when we do.”

But Lauren French, a spokeswoman for Schiff, claimed that Republicans were mischaracterizing the amendment, but given that Schiff is one of the most prolific liars in Congress — having pushed the falsehood that Trump is a Moscow stooge who ‘stole’ the 2016 election — her words are practically meaningless.

“The measure prevents presidents, of any party, from unlawfully using our nation’s armed forces in a domestic law enforcement capacity against Americans exercising their constitutionally protected rights,” said French. “This is something both parties should support…This amendment deters violations of the law by prohibiting the use of unlawfully obtained evidence by the government in a court or other legal proceeding.”

Schiff’s amendment also gained support from the Brennan Center for Justice, which said it would “establish clear consequences to deter the government” from unlawfully deploying the U.S. military during certain domestic situations while also preventing the suppression of evidence during such incidents, USSA News noted further.

The outlet adds an assessment of its own regarding the amendment.

“This is an irrational development. Congressional oversight is an integral part of the checks and balances system that keeps a government balanced. Reducing oversight means that presidential power could go unchecked,” the site’s analysis said. “And while we certainly do not want to encourage military deployment during law enforcement situations, removing oversight is just plain stupid.”

In reality, deploying the military domestically is only constitutional under very limited circumstances. The president is the commander-in-chief and has the authority to order such deployments — again, under very limited circumstances including instances of invasion and rebellion — and would still retain control over those forces. But congressional oversight is also key to ensuring that presidents do not engage in Executive Branch overreach, and frankly, with Barack Obama essentially running the Biden regime in a third term, the last thing any American should want is a far-left potential dictator with unfettered power to go after political opponents using the full force of the U.S. military.

Schiff can’t be trusted. Republicans are exactly right to be wary.

Sources include:

DR. Mercola: Drug industry is trying to use Congress to take over supplements and regulate them out of existence

Image: Mercola: Drug industry is trying to use Congress to take over supplements and regulate them out of existence



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Health freedom is under attack in a new way. Illinois Senator Richard Durbin (D) is the sponsor of a new regulatory proposal -the Dietary Supplement Listing Act of 2022. This regulatory nightmare would give the pharmaceutical industry (FDA) more control over nutritional supplements, allowing the Food and Drug Administration to regulate many out of existence.

Under the new legislation, nutritional, food-based, and herbal supplements would be required to undergo the same pre-market approval process as drugs – limiting access and driving up the cost of some of the most basic nutrients and superfoods.

Drug industry seeks to destroy NAC, B6, CBD and much more

Dr. Joseph Mercola warns that the Dietary Supplement Listing Act of 2022 would allow the drug industry to take over supplements and regulate them out of existence. In the past, he said, “the drug industry and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have tried to ban certain supplements, including vitamin B6 and N-acetylcysteine (NAC), by reclassifying them as new drugs.” The latest hostile takeover of supplements would ensure that millions of Americans are unable to take care of their health in the most basic, fundamental ways.

This legislation would allow the FDA to reclassify certain supplements as “new drugs.” Supplement companies will not be able to afford millions of dollars in new regulatory fees that will be required to get their products approved by the FDA. If passed, this will drive small supplement manufacturers out of business, allowing the drug companies to continue buying them up. Right now, fourteen mega corporations – including the likes of Pfizer, Nestle, and Bayer – control more than one hundred of the most popular supplements on the market. For example, Nestle Health Science has bought up Garden of Life, Vital Proteins, Wobenzym, Persona Nutrition, Nuun, Orthica, Pure Encapsulations, Douglas Laboratories, Genestra, Minami, AOV, Klean Athlete, Bountiful, and its smaller brands Solgar, Osteo Bi-Flex, Puritan’s Pride, Ester-C, and Sundown. Once the drug companies control these products, the formulas are often adulterated and manufactured with fillers and synthetic chemicals.

The Dietary Supplement Listing Act of 2022 has already been introduced to the US Senate and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. It is expected to become a part of the FDA’s Safety Landmark Advancements Act. Daniel Fabricant, Ph.D. president and CEO of the Natural Products Association, warned, “Last time I checked, dietary supplements are not drugs, biologics or medical devices, so why Congress or anyone supporting nongermane legislation that will only add costs to consumers who are doing all they can to stay healthy is extremely troubling.”

Big Pharma trying to control, distort, eliminate the very God-given substances that help the body heal

The FDA has been writing warning letters to supplement companies, telling them not to market N-Acetyl-Cysteine (NAC) for any health issues. NAC has been used as a remedy to help the body synthesize glutathione, strengthening the immune system. The FDA threatened Amazon to stop selling NAC products after learning about the public’s interest in NAC for combating infections.

This is just the tip of the spear. In 2007, Medicure Pharma manufactured a synthetic version of vitamin B6, for which they owned a drug patent. Medicure Pharma called the vitamin MC-1 and used it to treat inadequate blood flow.

That year, Medicure Pharma called on the FDA to target any dietary supplement manufacturer that used vitamin B6 in their formula. Medicure Pharma argued that any product that contained pyridoxal 5?-phosphate was guilty of selling an “adulterated” product under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, article 402(f). The drug company had already entered MC-1 into the drug bank and believed they had exclusive rights to manufacture the synthetic B6 vitamin – no competition allowed. However, various whole food vitamin manufacturers used the natural form of vitamin B6 (pyroxidine) and refused to acquiesce to the Medicure Pharma and the drug industry. When a pharmaceutical company turns a vitamin into a synthetic drug, they are able to jack up the price and market it as theirs.

Under the new regulatory proposal, drug companies would be able to legally get away with this fraud with just about any natural vitamin or phytochemical. This will inevitably destroy health food stores and push basic food-based supplements into the pharmacy, where drug companies can control the price and limit access.

The Natural Products Association urges everyone to contact their representatives to oppose this threat to our health and freedom.

Sources include:

Celebrating World Ivermectin Day

Celebrating World Ivermectin Day



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) group and the World Council for Health (WCH) will be holding the Second World Ivermectin Day on Saturday, July 23. Established one year ago, the event is dedicated to sharing the evidence-based message that the safe and easily accessible drug ivermectin is highly effective when used early against Covid-19 and could put the pandemic behind us. 

“We have an incredibly positive and uplifting message to share; Ivermectin treats and prevents Covid and it is the key to unlocking the never-ending cycle of pandemic peaks and personal restrictions and will help restart economies,” said Dr. Tess Lawrie, U.K.-based founder of World Ivermectin Day, when establishing the event.

Besides the BIRD and the WCH, the coalition of medical professionals, journalists, and artists raising public awareness of the benefits of ivermectin includes such well-known organizations as Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), Trial Site News, Children’s Health Defense Europe, World Doctors Alliance, Coalition for Informed Consent, Doctors for Covid Ethics, Canadian Covid Care Alliance, French Association BonSens, and numerous other national and international groups.

Ivermectin is a decades-old antiparasitic and antiviral drug. It was first approved for human use in 1987. In 2015, scientists William Campbell and Satoshi Mura were awarded the Nobel Prize for their discovery of ivermectin, which has significantly reduced deaths from tropical infections.

After being administered a couple of million times to vulnerable populations, including children and pregnant women, the drug took center stage in April 2020, when Australian researchers from Monash University found that just a single dose could stop SARS-CoV-2 from growing in cell culture.

“We found that even a single dose could essentially remove all viral RNA by 48 hours and that even at 24 hours there was a really significant reduction in it,” Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute’s Dr. Kylie Wagstaff revealed.

All subsequent real-world and clinical studies showed the drug’s outstanding efficacy against Covid.

In his book The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, attorney, activist, and Children’s Health Defense founder Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. noted,

Since March 1, 2020, some front-line ICU and ER doctors began using Ivermectin in combination with HCQ in early treatment protocols…. More than 20 randomized clinical trials (RCT) have confirmed its miraculous efficacy against COVID for both inpatient and outpatient treatment. Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs completed in 2021 found notable reduction in COVID-19 mortality.

The favorable medical data on ivermectin as a Covid early treatment keeps on coming.

According to WCH, to date, there are 174 ivermectin Covid-19 studies, of which 121 are peer-reviewed, and 88 compare treatment and control groups.

According to the meta-analysis of the ivermectin studies, the results speak for themselves:

Statistically significant improvements are seen for mortality, ventilation, ICU admission, hospitalization, recovery, cases, and viral clearance. All remain significant after exclusions. 56 studies from 51 independent teams in 22 different countries show statistically significant improvements in isolation (38 primary outcome, 36 most serious outcome).

“The evidence supporting ivermectin for COVID-19 far exceeds the typical amount of evidence used for the approval of treatments,” note the scientists. That means that typically, regulatory bodies accept far lower efficacy rates for new drugs to sign off on their approval and recommendation. (Think Covid vaccines for children.)  

What makes ivermectin so effective against Covid?

Owing to its mechanism of action, ivermectin stops viral replication, meaning the virus can not reproduce and thus hurt the host. Besides that, it performs other important functions, including the following:

  • Stops the virus from entering the cells;
  • May stop viral protein traveling in and out of the cell nucleus;
  • Reduces inflammation;
  • Prevents blood clotting;
  • Helps protect the heart;
  • May help to repopulate the microbiome responsible for fighting off infections.

Despite the drug having a stellar safety profile and more promising efficacy characteristics against Covid, U.S. medical authorities advise against using it as a Covid treatment. That recommendation likely interfered with physicians’ ability to practice medicine from a patient-based perspective by directing them, their patients, and the public not to use ivermectin, according to the latest lawsuit against the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The FDA led a deceptive smear campaign against ivermectin, depicting it as a “horse dewormer” not suitable for humans.

“You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,” the agency tweeted on August 21, 2021.

On its website, America’s top regulatory agency strongly warns against using ivermectin, falsely claiming there’s no evidence that it works or that it is effective:

The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 in people or animals. Ivermectin has not been shown to be safe or effective for these indications.

In the best traditions of pandemic fear-porn-style messaging, the agency adds that those overdosing on ivermectin may experience a wide range of side effects, from nausea and vomiting, to “seizures, coma, and even death.” 

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) seems to be less dramatic in its assessment of ivermectin.

While admitting the drug is “generally safe and well tolerated” if used as prescribed, the CDC recommends against using it as Covid treatment. Interestingly, the agency advises all foreign refugees to take ivermectin for at least five days before coming to America, without specifying the purpose.

Speaking with The New American on several occasions, the president and co-founder of FLCCC, Dr. Pierre Kory (see here and here) described how the ongoing war against ivermectin and other early treatments has caused and continues to cause large numbers of unnecessary deaths. The core issue is that the federal government is acting under regulatory capture and serving Big Pharma. Until the agencies are restructured, the advice that they produce will not be in the interests of the patients, said Kory.

Speaking recently with The New American, Dr. Tess Lawrie suggested people take more responsibility for their own health and well-being.

The online streaming of the World Ivermectin Day starts on Friday at 7:00 PM Eastern Time.

“You can help us spread critical awareness about Ivermectin this July 23 by joining or hosting an event and sharing information on social media,” note the organizers. 

Please click here to watch it.

Would-Be Assassin of NEW YORK REPUBLICAN Congressman Zeldin Already a Free Man in Soft-on-Crime New York

David Jakubonis, left, brandished the sharp object at Zeldin, right, during a speech in upstate New York.

MOMENT of U.S. Rep. Lee Zeldin attacked at campaign rally for New York governor

WeaponTek™ Cat Keychain Self-Defense Metal Knuckle Weapon


The My Kitty self-defense key chain retails for $9.99.



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

On Thursday, Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.), who is running for governor of the Empire State, was attacked on stage during a campaign stop by a man with a sharp object. The assassination failed due to the quick actions of Zeldin and others present, who subdued the suspect.

“Thank you to everyone who reached out following tonight’s attack in Fairport,” Zeldin said in a statement. “Someone tried to stab me on stage during this evening’s rally, but fortunately, I was able to grab his wrist and stop him for a few moments until others tackled him. I’m ok, and Alison Esposito and all other attendees are safe.”

Zeldin also expressed gratitude for those who stepped up to subdue the attacker and for law enforcement for their quick response. “I’m as resolute as ever to do my part to make New York safe again,” Zeldin said. “This suspect will likely be right back out on the street immediately.”

He was right.

According to a statement released by the Monroe County Sheriff’s Department Thursday evening, the suspect, 43-year-old David Jakubonis, was charged with “Attempted Assault in the Second Degree (E-Felony)” and then “released on his own recognizance.”

This was a failed assassination attempt, and the suspect is already back on the streets.

This is New York. These are left-wing soft-on-crime policies at work. Zeldin has long been an advocate for repealing New York’s cashless bail system due to the spike in crime statewide that it created. “From New York City to Buffalo, New Yorkers have witnessed firsthand the deadly consequences of cashless bail, but Governor Kathy Hochul and those controlling the state legislature continue to put criminals over the safety of everyday citizens,” Zeldin said back in December. “In the midst of skyrocketing crime across our state, we must ensure that our brave men and women in law enforcement have the resources they need to keep our communities safe, and the ability to keep dangerous criminals behind bars is paramount. New York’s cashless bail law handcuffs justice, and its repeal is long overdue.”

But there’s another twist. Zeldin is a sitting member of Congress, and per 18 U.S. Code § 351, it is a federal crime to assault a member of Congress.

Section 351 of Title 18, United States Code, makes it a Federal offense to kill or kidnap a Member of Congress, a Member-of-Congress elect, certain specified executive branch officials, a major Presidential or Vice Presidential candidate, a Justice of the Supreme Court or a person nominated to be a Justice. Attempts and conspiracies to commit such offenses or to assault any such individual are also made criminal by this section

While New York’s actions aren’t surprising, the Department of Justice should have immediately stepped in, and  Jakubonis should face federal charges.

Given Attorney General Merrick Garland’s inaction on protests outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes, does anyone really think that Jakubonis will face charges?


Did Hochul Inspire Zeldin's Attacker? Some Say Yes.