Biden’s New Nuclear Official Championed Underage Gay Prostitution



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Biden Collective’s deeply controversial new nuclear waste official once penned an op-ed in defense of an online escort service that was busted for facilitating underage gay prostitution. may or may not have broken the law. I don’t know. But I do know, from the frantic emails filling my inbox, that the raid on its headquarters has thrown many gay, bisexual, and transgender young adults into turmoil as their main source of income has been ripped away due to irresponsible and archaic views of sex work.”

Those are the words of Samuel Brinton, America’s new Deputy Assistant Secretary of Spent (nuclear) Fuel and Waste Disposition, in an op-ed published in the LGBTQ+ magazine The Advocate.

If you need a quick primer on who Brinton is, my PJ Media colleague Robert Spencer wrote about him when he started his new job a week ago, and also when his appointment was announced last February. Brinton is first and foremost a sexual radical who promotes as much queerness and kink as he can. One wonders whether he’ll be able to focus on federal storage and disposal of highly volatile nuclear waste.

It’s official. As of June 19th, I now serve my nation as the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Spent Fuel and Waste Disposition in the Office of Nuclear Energy in the Department of Energy.

— Sam Brinton (@sbrinton) June 29, 2022

Sam Brinton, Biden’s new hire to the Dept of Energy, in an interview about “pup play” and sex:

— Keri Smith 🌱Deprogrammed (@RealKeriSmith) February 10, 2022

For our VIPs: ‘Rachel Levine Is a 4-Star Admiral’ Is Our ‘Caligula’s Horse Is a Senator’ Moment

If you’re hungry for more, The National Pulse has additional background in its piece breaking the story about Brinton’s op-ed in support of underage gay prostitution. Brinton wrote the defense in response to a 2015 federal raid of the New York offices of, an online “escort service” that facilitated the trafficking and abuse of boys around the world. The National Pulse examines the case:

“In one case, after an escort agency failed to provide photo identification for an escort, a RENTBOY.COM employee advised the escort agency that he had deleted photographs with the face of the subject escort, but left the advertisement online and left photographs that showed only the escort’s body,” explained the indictment.

“In another case, after a different escort agency refused to provide identification for several escorts who appeared underage, the same RENTBOY.COM employee “suggested to [him] to crop the faces of those super young escorts,” continued the indictment, which also noted that the company never reported the cases to law enforcement agencies.

Concerning posts in Asia, Rentboy “failed to comply with its own standards requiring age verification,” even ignoring “employees [who] complained to RENTBOY.COM management about the quantity of underage escort advertisements.”

“In another email, another RENTBOY.COM employee speaking about the Asia-market ads said “Christ … talk about copyrighted and underage pies! TONS in that area … ALWAYS,” detailed the indictment, which also revealed that company executives never acted on these concerns.

Instead, “RENTBOY.COM employees reviewing Asia advertisements were also told by the defendant JEFFREY HURANT and other RENTBOY.COM managers to apply lesser standards in doing age verification of Asia-market advertisements.”

“As was summarized in one email, “In Asia ok to approve them … unless you see a baby … : ),” continued the indictment.

But Brinton thinks these practices are actually positive and supportive for gay boys. He wrote:

Why do they care? The same reason I do. Because sex work disproportionately affects the LGBT community. Transgender people engage in sex work at a rate 10 times that of cisgender (nontrans) women. And many LGBT youth engage in sex work just to survive. A 2013 Center for American Progress report suggests that LGBT youth are more than three times as likely to have engaged in survival sex.

I am not a person using sex work to survive. I am, however, overwhelmed with messages from GBT young men who are afraid of having to return to their families, where they face mistreatment, and even worse, because the main and most secure connection they had to income through escorting is now gone.”

They are reaching out to me because of my passion for ending conversion therapy, a set of the dangerous and discredited practices linked to severe depression, substance abuse, and even suicide. The connection is horrifying: Many of the young men were forced into conversion therapy by their families — the families to which they may now have to return without a steady income. This makes it my issue.

One of the young men who messaged me said, “I was never harming anyone with the work that I was doing. As cheesy as it sounds, most of the people just wanted a human connection with someone who they could relate to on some basic human level.” Another young man added, “It feels like we had a chance to act with dignity and authenticity for the first time and it was taken away from us.”

They are right. The rent boys weren’t harming anyone. But now these young men might have to return to communities and homes which have rejected who they are. And that’s when the real danger begins.

Brinton believes that the degradation and dangers of underage prostitution are superior to a teen being forced to live with his family who doesn’t approve of his lifestyle. The horror! Imagine that: a teenager might have to rein in his behavior for a few years until he’s able to support himself in a manner other than servicing men for cash (an option that never even seems to cross the depraved Deputy Assistant Secretary’s mind).

I have no doubt Brinton will comport himself in his new role with every bit as much professionalism and competence as the Biden Collective’s other tokenist appointments.




Pro-abortion Jewish organizations agree with Satanic Temple claim that “abortion ritual” represents “religious freedom”

Image: Pro-abortion Jewish organizations agree with Satanic Temple claim that “abortion ritual” represents “religious freedom”



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) More than 140 Jewish organizations, along with the Satanic Temple of New York City, are now claiming that getting an abortion is a form of “religious freedom” that is constitutionally protected and cannot be overruled by legislators or the courts.

On May 17, an event sponsored by “Jewish Rally for Abortion Justice” and supported by the Anti-Defamation League, publicly affirmed that “abortion access is a Jewish value” and that “banning abortions is a religious freedom issue.”

In early June, a south Florida synagogue filed a lawsuit claiming that the state’s new 15-week abortion ban violates the “religious freedom” of Jewish people. This is the same position held by the Satanic Temple of New York City, which claims that the “abortion ritual” is a form of “religious expression.”

According to Satanists, “birthing people” – meaning women – who belong to the religion should be allowed to freely murder their unborn children whenever they feel like it because this is a form of worship to their god. The Jewish groups agree.

“How have we not dismantled the government?” the Satanic Temple asked after the Supreme Court’s overruling of Roe v. Wade, calling the decision “illegitimate” and promising to “defy” it.

In 2015, the Satanic Temple filed a federal lawsuit in Missouri claiming that the state’s restrictive abortion laws violate their “free exercise” of Satanism. Five years later, Satanists launched a campaign called “Satanic Abortions Are Protected by Religious Liberty Laws,” and have since reiterated their position that Satanism is “the leading beacon of light in the battle for abortion access.”

“With Roe v. Wade overturned, a religious exemption will be the only available challenge to many restrictions to access,” tweeted the Satanic Temple’s official Twitter account on June, 24.

Ending someone else’s life does not qualify as religious expression

Frank Pavone, the national director of Priests for Life, stated in a recent interview that since abortion involves the killing of someone else’s life, it does not qualify under a religious exemption.

“Killing [of] an innocent human life … the government can, in fact, restrict [this act], even if someone is going to say, ‘My religious freedom requires me, requires me, in certain circumstances to abort,” he is quoted as saying.

Sincerely held religious beliefs that do not involve murder still qualify, but this is something entirely different.

“Nevertheless, the government can restrict someone’s religious freedom precisely out of an interest to protect others,” he added.

Pointing to several legal cases involving this issue, Pavone further explained how the government does, in some cases, have a compelling interest to interfere with or halt certain religious activities if they put the lives of others at risk.

“Based on the words in the Gospel that ‘they will handle poisonous snakes and not be harmed,’ some of these churches had snake handling going on in their services,” he explained how poisonous snake handling in the South had to be addressed by the government.

“For the protection of the lives of the congregation, the state came in [with legislation] and said, ‘You can’t do this.'”

Several churches challenged these laws at the time, but the courts upheld the government’s restrictions, recognizing that while all Americans have religious freedom, there is a “compelling interest and when there’s no other way to advance that interest, [they can use] the least restrictive means [to do so].”

“In this case,” Pavone added, “the state [of Florida] is asserting … its compelling interest, and it’s an interest in protecting human life.”

“A ‘religion’ with a baby-killing ritual is not a religion that belongs in a civilized society, let alone a Christian one,” wrote a commenter at LifeSiteNews.

More related news coverage about the abortion war can be found at

Sources for this article include:

Lunatic Amazon employees demand company cease all business operations in “red” states that prohibit baby butchery

Image: Lunatic Amazon employees demand company cease all business operations in “red” states that prohibit baby butchery



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Hundreds of slave laborers at Amazon’s sweatshop facilities have signed an open letter calling on the e-commerce behemoth to immediately cease all business operations in pro-life states so people will have “time to grieve.”

The letter calls on the tech giant to take “immediate and decisive action against the threat to basic human rights with the overturning of Roe v. Wade,” which apparently includes closing up shop in every “red” state.

“As part of Amazon’s wide-reaching efforts toward a more inclusive and diverse workforce, we believe that Amazon cannot let this recent decision go unanswered,” the letter reads.

“We ask Amazon, the world’s best employer, to actively defend against this assault on our liberty.”

Even though many of the proposals made admittedly “bear a larger business risk than others,” Amazon’s disgruntled employees say these are “unprecedented times” since many women are no longer able to murder their unborn children unless they want to travel to another state.

Just like what happened with the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), pro-abortion Amazon employees “of all genders” suddenly now need “space and time to grieve, express their frustrations, and protest against this assault on our rights,” the letter explains.

They also want Amazon to donate and match donations “to bail funds and assistance groups working to expand abortion access for women and pregnant people impacted in states” (Related: Many of these same Amazon employees are also calling for a book burning of all materials they do not like).

Since Amazon is going full “woke,” will it finally go broke?

Amazon also currently sells books and other materials that discuss abortion-related issues from a pro-life perspective, which these disgruntled employees are demanding be removed from the Amazon e-commerce platform immediately.

The letter demands that Amazon “[a]udit and remove product offerings that misrepresent the facts on abortion or encourage hate speech or violence toward abortion seekers.”

It also demands an audit of every political donation made by the company so that anything opposing abortion can be immediately removed from the future donations pool of financial disbursements.

The employees also want Amazon to enact company-wide policy changes to ensure that not a single penny ever again goes towards anything that attempts to preserve unborn human life rather than destroy it.

The most ridiculous demand in the letter from a business perspective is the one calling on Amazon to immediately halt all operations in states that enact laws “that threaten the lives and liberty of abortion seekers, either by denying healthcare in life-threatening circumstances or by criminalizing abortion seekers and providers.”

Like many other corporations in recent days, Amazon has already caved to demands that it pay for its promiscuous female employees to travel to other states, if need be, in order to get an abortion.

“Amazon became the latest corporation to cover employees’ travel costs to seek abortion care,” CNN reported back in May. “The company told staff it would pay up to $4,000 in travel expenses annually for medical treatments including abortions, according to a message seen by Reuters.”

Other companies that have decided to do much the same thing include Dick’s Sporting Goods, Citigroup, Uber, Yelp, Lyft, Match Group, Bumble, and Salesforce.

“I would fire the workers responsible for this disruptive behavior and remind everyone else that we are here to work and to please keep the activism on your own time and your open letters off my network,” wrote someone at Breitbart News in response to the Amazon letter.

“Exactly,” responded another. “If you want to celebrate killing babies, you do it on your own time.”

The latest news about Amazon’s insanity can be found at

Sources include:

Biden Admin Strikes $3.2B Deal with Pfizer to Include Unapproved Covid Shots



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Absent regulatory approval, the Biden administration struck a $3.2 billion deal last week with Pfizer and its partner BioNTech for 105 million doses of experimental genetic therapeutics for Covid (aka “vaccine”), which could be delivered as soon as later this summer and continue into the fourth quarter of the year.

According to the June 29 announcement on Pfizer’s website, the doses will come in 3, 10, and 30 milligrams, which suggests that they will cover all “eligible” demographics for the shot, including toddlers as young as six-month-old. The shipment will likely include the adult dose, which will be designed to tackle the Omicron strain of Covid.

Reportedly, the average price per dose in the new deal has increased from the $19.50 per dose the government paid in its initial contract with Pfizer, and reached more than $30.47 per dose.

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Pfizer Albert Bourla said that the shots “may provide protection against current and future variants,” adding that “Vaccines have been and will remain critical to protecting people of all ages against COVID-19.”

That is certainly not the case. Since the very beginning of the pandemic, it has become clear that the virus poses a real threat to the very elderly and those with frail health. Even the advent of the new Covid strains that evolved to be more transmittable did not make the virus more deadly see here and here). Finally, the availability of truly safe and effective Covid early treatments such as hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin reduces the risks of severe Covid outcomes to a minimum.

Bourla also praised “the ongoing impact of vaccination efforts in the U.S. and around the world,” even though the high vaccination coverage around the world is associated with higher Covid rates.

The administration has the option to purchase up to 195 million additional doses, bringing the total number of potential doses to 300 million.

The shots were acquired by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in collaboration with the Department of Defense.

According to the official statement, the administration “was forced” to reallocate $10 billion in existing funding, pulling billions of dollars from COVID-19 response efforts to secure the deal in the absence of additional funding from Congress.

HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra stressed that the shots would remain “free and widely available” for all Americans.

HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) Dawn O’Connell added that the department has procured and delivered more than 750 million doses of Covid shots nationwide in the past 18 months. Thanks to this effort, as many as two-thirds of Americans are not considered “fully vaccinated,” i.e., have gotten two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna, or a single dose of the Johnson & Johnson Covid shot. The lion’s share of the distributed doses, or 450 million, were produced by Pfizer-BioNTech, according to data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The move follows the endorsement of the Omicron-specific boosters by the vaccine advisory panel to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on June 25. The FDA is expected to grant an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the shot.

It is unclear how effective the additional dose will be since the companies have begun working on the shot for Omicron in late November 2021. Since then, the “original” Omicron (B.1.1.529 lineage) with its dozens of mutations compared to the Wuhan strain from 2019, in turn, evolved into two subvariants, BA.4 and BA.5, which are currently dominating the United States.

In early December, the company claimed that three doses of its shot were effective in neutralizing the Omicron. In January, Bourla underlined the importance of the third dose in protecting one from severe Covid, saying that just the initial two doses are not “good enough.”

Since then, the federal healthcare agencies have gradually expanded the recommendations of additional doses to include more age groups, such as children aged five to 11.

The question of the efficacy of the additional doses was raised during the FDA’s vaccine panel discussion. Remarkably, two distinguished members of the panel — Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and professor of pediatrics in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and Dr. Hank Bernstein, professor of pediatrics at the Zucker School of Medicine — voted against the authorization. The members quoted the lack of increased efficacy of the shots in protecting against “serious illness.”  

According to the leftist outlet The Daily Beast, the pandemic has “yielded outsize benefits for one company — Pfizer — making it both highly influential and hugely profitable as covid-19 continues to infect tens of thousands of people and kill hundreds each day.”

Despite the fact that people continue getting infected and sick with Covid, and die of it, the outlet called the company’s vaccines and Covid treatments a “success” that granted the company an “unusual weight in determining U.S. health policy.”

This state of affairs is likely to continue. Per the report, 

“Because the virus keeps mutating and will be around for a long time, the market for Pfizer’s products won’t go away. In wealthier countries, the public is likely to keep coming back for more, like diners at an all-you-can-eat restaurant, sated but never entirely satisfied.”

Many non-establishment experts believe that mass vaccination with vaccines that don’t prevent infection and transmission is the key factor that provides a competitive advantage to the most infectious — and potentially lethal — strains of the virus. Among them is the Belgian world-class virologist and vaccinologist Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who explained to The New American the mechanism of this action.

Therefore, the continuous mass intake of “leaky” vaccines only facilitates virus’ mutations. Those new variants will “require” new vaccine formulations. Forever and ever.