UPDATE: Canada’s “Most Persecuted Pastor” Released From Jail but Still Held Under Strict House Arrest: “My Body Is Here but My Mind Is Still in the Cell”

Cleveland Clinic Denies Boy Kidney Transplant Because He Didn’t Get COVID Shot

For the past nine years, the Donaldsons have dedicated their lives to creating the best possible outcome for the health and well-being of their little boy Tanner. Jenn Donaldson his mother, quit her job to care for Tanner so she can meet the frequency of his medical needs. Their little boy suffers from Posterior Urethral Valves (PUV) which are obstructive membranes that develop in the urethra, which functions by draining urine from the bladder. These valves can obstruct or block the outflow of urine, which leads the ureters and kidneys to become progressively dilated, resulting in damage. PUV cannot be prevented. It begins in the early stages of fetal development and abnormally affects male infants. Reports of the incidence of PUV vary as widely as 1 in 2,000 to as much as 1 in 25,000. Article Link | https://trialsitenews.com/cleveland-c...

 

BY CAROLYN HENDLER, JD

SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/04/cleveland-clinic-denies-boy-kidney-transplant-because-he-didnt-get-covid-shot/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

As of October 2021, the Cleveland Clinic will not permit patients who have not gotten COVID-19 vaccine to undergo lifesaving organ transplants, either as a recipient or as living donors. The clinic’s reasoning is that the recipient, who receives immunosuppressant drugs post-transplant, could be at high risk of contracting SARS-Cov-2. The unvaccinated will not be accepted as living organ donors due to the possibility that the virus could be transmitted to the transplant recipient during the operation.1

According to the clinic:

Living donation for organ transplantation has been a life-saving treatment, but it is not without risks to the donor. For the living donor, preventing COVID-19 infection around the time of their surgery and recovery is crucial.2

Cleveland Clinic officials point to a John Hopkins University study that found that kidney transplant patients who received a COVID vaccine after the transplant procedure did not mount a sufficient immune response to vaccination.  The study showed that less than one out of every five kidney transplant patients amounted a strong response to the vaccine. However, a subsequent Johns Hopkins study showed that transplant recipients who received a COVID booster did amount to a sufficient antibody response.3

Cleveland Clinic Denies Transplant to Unvaccinated Nine-Year-Old with Only One Failing Kidney

Nine-year-old Tanner Donaldson is being denied a kidney transplant because of Cleveland Clinic’s rigid COVID vaccine restrictions on organ transplant procedures. Tanner, who was born with only one kidney currently functioning at between 18-20 percent, will need a transplant soon. Fortunately, his father, Dane Donaldson, is a perfect match and a willing donor. Although Tanner has been under the care of the Clinic since his birth, he is unable to receive an organ transplant due to recent changes to the clinic’s transplant policy.4

Dane Donaldson was found to be a kidney transplant match for his son in 2018. The family decided to wait a few years for Tanner to have the surgery as a kidney from a live donor is only expected to last about 20 years and Tanner is so young. However, because the Donaldsons are not vaccinated due to their personal and religious beliefs, the Cleveland Clinic refuses to perform the life-saving operation it had previously agreed to perform.5

Both of Tanner's parents along with Tanner and his older sibling survived a bout with COVID and have natural immunity from the virus but the clinic has not changed its policy and has not responded to the family’s lawyer’s requests for a religious exemption.6 7

Kidneys from Unvaccinated Dead Donors are Used But Unvaccinated Live Kidney Donors are Turned Away

In an article in The Epoch Times, the Donaldsons pointed out that the hospital’s policy allows the kidneys of unvaccinated deceased donors to be used for kidney transplants but turns away unvaccinated live kidney donors.

Commenting on the contradiction, Dane Donaldson  said:

A live donor is the best donor for kidneys, but they’ll take a kidney from a deceased person not vaccinated, it makes no sense.8

Despite the Donaldson’s offer to sign a liability waiver protecting the clinic should he or Tanner come down with COVID post-transplant, the clinic continues to refuse to perform the procedure for Tanner, maintaining that:

We continually strive to minimize risk to our living donors, and vaccination is an important component to ensure the safest approach and optimal outcomes for donors.9

The Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sent a letter to the Cleveland Clinic listing a number of studies showing that it is rare for a person to be reinfected with COVID after recovering from the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which included a study published by the clinic itself. In that study looking at 52,238 vaccinated and unvaccinated healthcare workers, not one of the previously infected unvaccinated healthcare workers were reinfected with the virus over a five-month period.10

In an ABC-TV report, Dane Donaldson said about the Cleveland Clinic and his young son…

I don’t know what we do today. You know, I gotta think somewhere out there, that cooler heads would prevail and we could, you know, I’d love it still to be at the Clinic and us come around and have some type of dialogue and say, ‘Okay, you know, let’s look at your case,’” said Donaldson. “We’re trying to put plan B in place. The number one thing I can do is keep him as healthy as possible and I can remain and keep my health the best I can. But it’s stressful. There’s no doubt about it. You know, it just is.11

The Donaldsons are trying to find another facility that will perform the kidney transplant for Tanner.

Moderna Recalls 764,900 Doses of Spikevax Due to Contamination Problem

BY MARCO CACERES

SEE: https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/04/moderna-recalls-764900-doses-of-its-covid-shot-due-to-contamination-concerns/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Moderna, Inc., developer of the experimental messenger RNA (mRNA) mRNA-1273, or “Spikevax,” biologic, has recalled 764,900 doses in lot #000190A of the product from the European market. On Apr. 8, 2022, the company said that the doses, manufactured under contract to Moderna by Spanish pharmaceutical company ROVI Pharma Industrial Services, SAU, are being pulled out of “an abundance of caution” due to the discovery of a “foreign substance” in a vial in Málaga, Spain.1 2 3 4 5

Lot #000190A was distributed in Norway, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden during Jan. 13-14. In a press release, Moderna said it did not believe that the contamination “poses a risk to other vials in the lot” and does not believe that it “affects the significant benefit/risk profile of the vaccine.”1 2 3 4 5

While Moderna did not reveal the exact nature of the contamination, it said that the tainted vial has been submitted for “forensic assessment and investigation” and that it was “committed to working transparently and expeditiously with regulators to address any potential concerns.”1 2 3 4 5

Stainless Steel Particles Found in Spikevax

This is not the first time Moderna has experienced a contamination problem involving Spikevax. In August 2021, the company confirmed that it had received several complaints of “particulate matter” in doses of the shot in Japan. On Sept. 1, the Takeda recalled 1.63 million doses (in 163,000 vials) of the product after three lots, produced by ROVI, were found to be contaminated with 316L stainless steel particles. The company said that the steel particle contamination was caused by “friction between two pieces of metal installed in the stoppering module of the production line due to an incorrect set-up.”1 6 7 8 9

Both Moderna and the distributor of Spikevax in Japan, Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., assured the public that they did not believe the contamination of its product posed a safety problem.6 7 8 9 In a joint statement to the public, Moderna and Takeda said:

The rare presence of stainless steel particles in the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine does not pose an undue risk to patient safety and it does not adversely affect the benefit/risk profile of the product… Metallic particles of this size injected into a muscle may result in a local reaction, but are unlikely to result in other adverse reactions beyond the local site of the injection.6

Three Men Die Days After Getting Second Dose of Spikevax

Later in September 2021, however, there were media reports of three individuals in Japan who had died shortly after receiving Spikevax, including a 49-year-old man who died the day after getting a second shot on Aug. 11. Two other men, 38 and 30 years old, also died in August within days after getting second doses of Spikevax.10 11 12 In another joint statement, Moderna and Takeda said:

There is no indication that any of the deaths following administration of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine were in any way related to administration of the vaccine. Tthere is also no reason to believe the vaccine poses any health hazard or undue safety risk. This is a tragic event, and the loss of life is something that we take very seriously. We offer our sincerest condolences to their loved ones.10 11 12

In an investigative report made public on Oct. 1, 2021, Moderna and Takeda concluded that “human error” was responsible for the incorrect assembly of the stopper module. The error was “specific to visually misjudging the precise 1 mm gap between the star-wheel and the stopper.”9 13

Despite the recent production problem with Spikevax in Europe, the product continues to be distributed and used in the United States. The latest recall applies only in Europe.14

Click here to view References:

1 Kansteiner F. Moderna recalls vaccine batch after foreign substance found in CDMO-made vial—againFierce Pharma Apr. 11, 2022.
2 Mitra A. Moderna recalls over 760K COVID-19 vaccine doses in EuropeSeeking Alpha Apr. 8, 2022.
3 Moderna. Moderna Recall Notification of Lot #000190A.
4 Reuters. Moderna recalls thousands of COVID vaccine doses in Europe. Apr. 8, 2022.
5 Rovi Pharma Industrial Services. Moderna and ROVI Pharma Industrial Services, S.A.U. today announced a recall of one lot (lot #000190A) of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (Spikevax®). Apr. 8, 2022.
6 GlobalData Healthcare. Japan: 1.6 million Moderna vaccine doses recalled; Novavax replacement deal signedPharmaceutical Technology Sept. 30, 2021.
7 Inada M. Moderna Says Covid-19 Vaccine Contaminant in Japan Was Stainless Steel, Sees No Safety IssueThe Wall Street Journal Sept. 2, 2021.
8 Reuters. Moderna to recall COVID-19 doses in Japan over stainless steel contaminantsThe Japan Times Sept. 2, 2021.
9 Dunleavy K. Moderna report says ‘human error’ to blame for contamination found in 3 vaccine lots from Rovi plantFierce Pharma Oct. 1, 2021.
10 Blair G. Third person dies in Japan after taking contaminated Moderna coronavirus vaccineThe Guardian Sept. 7, 2021.
11 Cole B. Third Person Dies After Receiving Contaminated Moderna VaccineNewsweek Sept. 7, 2021.
12   Sharma S. Japan says a third man has died after taking the contaminated Moderna vaccineIndependent Sept. 8, 2021.
13 Takeda.com. Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine Recall Investigation Report – October 2021
14 Loe M. No, the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine wasn’t recalled in the US11 Alive Apr. 13, 2022.

Brighteon: Democrats Weaponization of Education Must Stop, Says Terry Namkung

The Democrat-led weaponization of the public education system is getting more and more extreme, and it must stop, U.S. congressional candidate and Air Force veteran Terry Namkung tells The New American magazine's Alex Newman in this interview on Conversations That Matter. Namkung's Democrat opponent in the race, Rep. Bobby Scott, chairs the House Education Committee and has been a leading proponent of the radical sexualization and LGBT agenda, as evidenced by his support of the Equality Act (H.R. 5) to unleash federal persecution of Christians and others who support traditional values when it comes to sexuality and morality. Scott and other Democrats have also been pushing Critical Race Theory to divide Americans and demonize conservatives as racists using lies.

It’s On: Groomer School in Massachusetts Sued for Hiding ‘Gender Identity’ From Parents

BY MEGAN FOX

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/megan-fox/2022/04/18/let-the-lawsuits-begin-groomer-school-in-massachusetts-sued-for-hiding-gender-identity-from-parents-n1590250;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The fight against gender cult grooming is raging across the country and in Massachusetts, two sets of parents have filed a lawsuit alleging violations of religious freedom, privacy, and parental rights against public school officials who attempted to drive a wedge between them and their children using extreme gender ideology. The Massachusetts Family Institute put out a press release about the lawsuit.

Massachusetts Family Institute (MFI), in conjunction with the Child & Parental Rights Campaign, Inc. (CPRC), filed a lawsuit on behalf of two Ludlow, MA families against Ludlow public school officials. The families are suing for violations of their parental rights stemming from a district policy prohibiting school staff from sharing information with parents about a student’s discordant gender identity and efforts to promote that identity in school. In the case of one of the families named in the suit, school officials were actively transitioning their 11-year-old daughter and 12-year-old son without their parents’ knowledge and against their wishes.

The first parents say they asked school officials not to speak to their children about gender identity issues or mental health concerns and the school ignored them.

School officials, however, dismissed the parents’ instructions and not only continued having such conversations with their daughter, but began addressing her in school by an alternative name and pronouns.  School staff also made a point of only using the girl’s given name in communication with her parents, intentionally concealing their affirmation of her gender transition at school.  School officials justified their deception by citing guidance handed down by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
https://www.doe.mass.edu/sfs/lgbtq/genderidentity.html ), which does not authorize their actions.

The same family discovered that the school officials were not only counseling their daughter in gender theology against their wishes but their son as well, giving him female pronouns and a female name without consulting the parents.

Vernadette Broyles, CEO and General Counsel of CPRC stated that “we are seeing this type of concerted effort by school officials across the country. School officials are making decisions about the lives of children that they are not qualified or authorized to make and doing it without telling, and often deceiving, parents. This is a clear violation of the parents’ rights to control the education, health, and upbringing of their children.” 

Related: Freak of the Week: Another Woke Teacher Abandons Education to Talk to 5th-Graders About Being Gay

The other family named in the lawsuit is suing the school district for violating their free exercise of religion by infringing on their sincerely held religious beliefs, which include respect for parental authority, honesty, and adherence to church teaching that human beings are created male or female.

This lawsuit is about protecting the right of parents to raise their children without the interference of government officials,” explained Andrew Beckwith, President of MFI and local counsel for the parents.  “By deliberately circumventing the authority of parents over the mental health and religious beliefs of their children, activists at the Ludlow schools are violating time-honored rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution and the Massachusetts Constitution. The school officials’ behavior sends the message that parents do not have the best interest of their children in mind. It assumes that children need to be protected FROM their parents, instead of BY their parents.”

The two families are asking the school to publicly rescind the district policy at the center of the controversy so that parents will be notified when their child raises concerns to school staff about their mental health, including concerns about their gender identity. They are asking that school officials stop counseling students on matters of gender discordance without parental knowledge and consent and to stop deceiving parents by using alternate names and pronouns for students in school but not in communication with parents. They’re also seeking an injunction, damages and attorneys’ fees.

I have long argued that the instruction of gender theology in schools is a direct violation of students of faith and their First Amendment rights to freely exercise their religion. The lawsuit lays out causes of action involving the fundamental right to parent children, familial privacy under the 14th Amendment, and the First Amendment right to practice religion. I don’t know what the defense is for any of these things that are enshrined in the Constitution as civil rights, but this court case should be epic.

Brighteon: Dr. Ardis: Venom From Snakes and Snails Found in Covid Patients & new pharmaceutical drugs

The FDA has approved SIX prescription drugs that are made from snake venom

SEE: 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-04-15-fda-approved-six-prescription-drugs-snake-venom.html

These 16 pharmaceutical drugs are made from animal venom

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-04-17-pharmaceutical-drugs-made-animal-venom.html

 

 

Human Microchip Implants and the Internet of Bodies

BY DR. JOSEPH MERCOLA

SEE: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/04/19/internet-of-bodies.aspx;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Implantable microchips are marketed as the ultimate in convenience, but the goal is to create the Internet of Bodies (IoB), described by the World Economic Forum (WEF) as an ecosystem of “an unprecedented number of sensors,” including emotional sensors, “attached to, implanted within, or ingested into human bodies to monitor, analyze and even modify human bodies and behavior”
  • Sweden is one of the earliest adopters of implantable microchips. The chip is implanted just beneath the skin on the hand, and operates using either near-field communication (NFC) — the same technology used in smartphones — or radio-frequency identification (RFID), which is used in contactless credit cards
  • Implanted payment chips are an extension of the internet of things; they’re a way of connecting and exchanging data, and the benefits must be weighed against the potential risks
  • Countries around the world are now working on a system for a central bank digital currency (CBDC), a fiat currency in digital form that is programmable so that you can only spend your money on certain things or in specific places, as desired by the issuer
  • In the end, everything will be connected to a single implantable device that will hold your digital identity, health data, and programmable CBDCs. Your digital identity, in turn, will include everything that can be known about you through surveillance via implanted biosensors, your computer, smartphone, GPS, social media, online searches, purchases, and spending habits. Algorithms will then decide what you can and cannot do based on who you are

While implantable microchips are marketed as the ultimate in convenience, the goal of this trend goes far beyond allowing you to open doors without keys and buy things without your wallet.

The goal is to create what’s known as the Internet of Bodies (IoB), described by the World Economic Forum (WEF) as an ecosystem of “an unprecedented number of sensors,” including emotional sensors, “attached to, implanted within, or ingested into human bodies to monitor, analyze and even modify human bodies and behavior.”1

Keywords in that sentence that the PR machine skips right over is the stated goal to “modify human bodies and behavior.” And who will be in charge of those modifications? They don’t say, but we can safely assume that it will be those who have something to gain from the modification of your actions and behaviors.

Sweden Paves the Way for Microchipping

As noted in the featured NBC News segment, Sweden is one of the earliest adopters of implantable microchips. The chip, about the size of a grain of rice, is implanted just beneath the skin on the hand, and operates using either near-field communication (NFC) — the same technology used in smartphones — or radio-frequency identification (RFID), which is used in contactless credit cards.

Already, Sweden has become more or less a cashless society. Now, this tiny implant will replace the need for debit and credit cards altogether, as well as identification and keys. To pay for an item, all you have to do is place your left hand near the contactless card reader, and the payment is registered.

An estimated 5,000 to 10,000 Swedes have been chipped so far, although Swedish authorities claim they don’t know the exact number, as there’s no central registry.

At present, it’s claimed that the chips cannot be tracked, but that doesn’t mean they’ll remain untrackable in the future. And, while these early microchips contain only limited amounts of information, we know the WEF dreams of implementing a global digital identification system that would include everything imaginable about you, from your online search history and medical information to your personal banking data, social credit score, and more.

Humans Are Becoming Hackable

As noted by financial technology expert Theodora Lau, implanted payment chips are "an extension of the internet of things;” they’re a way of connecting and exchanging data, and the benefits must be weighed against the potential risks.2

This is particularly true if and when more personal information begins to be migrated into them, leaving you vulnerable to hackers and surveillance. She told BBC News:3

"How much are we willing to pay, for the sake of convenience? Where do we draw the line when it comes to privacy and security? Who will be protecting the critical infrastructure, and the humans that are part of it?"

A PBS NewsHour segment from 20194 also reviews some of the concerns surrounding implantable microchips (see video above). Importantly, just about any smartphone can read the chip with the proper scanner installed, and “anybody would be able to hack it,” according to Dr. Geoff Watson, a consultant anesthetist5 who has teamed up with the chip’s inventor “to ensure the implant procedure is carried out to a medical standard.”

While many say they have no privacy fears around the current microchips, it’s reasonable to suspect that privacy concerns will rise in tandem with the amount of personal information held on the chips, and with the number of people who have the implants.

Credit card theft was rare in the beginning and typically involved physical loss of the card. Today, you can’t seem to keep a credit card for more than a handful of years before it’s somehow stolen even though the card is still in your possession.

Identity theft is also rampant, and getting worse by the day, as millions of illegals in need of new identities flood across the southern border of the United States.

As noted by the Center for Immigration Studies, illegal immigrants are not “undocumented,” as most will obtain fraudulent documents through identity theft.6 In other words, they’re stealing the legal identities of Americans. In 2020, the total cost for identity theft and identity fraud was $56 billion — the highest in recorded history — and affected 39 million Americans.7

There’s no reason to believe theft and fraud won’t happen as microchipping becomes more commonplace. And that risk is in addition to the risks involved with government spying on and controlling both your behavior and spending once the microchips are connected to your personal finances and programmable digital currencies.

In a November 2019 interview with CNN,8 history professor and adviser to WEF founder Klaus Schwab, Yuval Noah Harari, warned that “humans are now hackable animals,” meaning, the technology exists by which a company or government can know you better than you know yourself, and that can be very dangerous if misused.

He predicted that algorithms will increasingly be used to make decisions that historically have been made by humans, either yourself or someone else, including whether or not you’ll be hired for a particular job, whether you’ll be granted a loan, what scholastic curriculum you will follow and even who you will marry.

The Plan to Control the ‘Useless Masses’

gigi sims tweet

In another interview, Harari discussed what Schwab refers to as The Fourth Industrial Revolution (read: transhumanism), noting that we’re now learning to “produce bodies and minds” (meaning augmented bodies, and cloud and artificial intelligence-connected minds) and that one of the greatest challenges we face will be what to do with all the people that have become obsolete in the process.

How will unaugmented people find meaning in life when they’re basically “useless, meaningless”? How will they spend their time when there’s no work, no opportunity to move up in some kind of profession? His guess is that the answer will be “a combination of drugs and computer games.” I’ll let you decide if that’s a vision of utopia or hell on earth.

Nothing Will Be Private — Not Even Your Bodily Functions

The WEF’s plan for the IoB even includes biosensors that measure and monitor your biological functioning and emotional states. Already, the U.S. Pentagon and Profusa Inc. have collaborated on the development of a tiny implantable biosensor that detects disease by tracking chemical reactions inside your body.9

For example, it would be able to determine whether you’ve been infected with a virus-like SARS-CoV-2 or influenza long before any symptoms emerge. As explained by Defense One, the biosensor consists of two parts:10

“One is a 3mm string of hydrogel, a material whose network of polymer chains is used in some contact lenses and other implants. Inserted under the skin with a syringe, the string includes a specially engineered molecule that sends a fluorescent signal outside of the body when the body begins to fight an infection.

The other part is an electronic component attached to the skin. It sends light through the skin, detects the fluorescent signal and generates another signal that the wearer can send to a doctor, website, etc. It’s like a blood lab on the skin that can pick up the body’s response to illness before the presence of other symptoms, like coughing.”

Now, the sensor allows a person's biology to be examined at a distance via smartphone connectivity, and Profusa is backed by Google, the largest data mining company in the world.

Knowing that, it’s hard to imagine that your biological data won’t be used to boost Google’s profits and increase government control. While Profusa was expecting to receive approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2021, it doesn’t appear to have been approved yet.

Other Monitoring and Tracking Devices in the Pipeline

Another invention that stands poised to track your health is biocompatible near-infrared quantum dot microneedle arrays. As explained in a 2019 Science Translational Medicine article,11 this novel vaccine delivery system is able to “deliver patterns of near-infrared light-emitting microparticles to the skin” that can then be “imaged using modified smartphones.” In short, it would serve as an invisible tattoo of your vaccination record.

Bill Gates has also funded the development of a birth control microchip that can be turned on and off by remote control. The National Post writes:12

“The birth control microchip ... would hold nearly two decades worth of a hormone commonly used in contraceptives and dispense 30 micrograms a day ... The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation has given more than $4.5 million to MicroCHIPS, Inc., to ‘develop personal system that enables women to regulate their fertility’ ...”

In November 2019, Daré Bioscience, a San Diego-based biopharma company, announced13 that it had reached an agreement to acquire MicroCHIPS Biotech and would be adding the birth control microchip to its portfolio. Interestingly, back in 2014, MicroCHIPS appeared confident it would be able to get the product to market in 2018, but as of 2022, it’s still in development.

Programmable Digital Currencies Are Next

Countries around the world are now working on a system for a central bank digital currency (CBDC), a fiat currency in digital form that is programmable so that you can only spend your money on certain things or in specific places, as desired by the issuer.

In the video above, WhatsHerFace comments on Canada’s 2021 announcement of its plan for a CBDC that will be universally accessible, even if you don’t have a bank account or a cell phone. What kind of device might fulfill that? An implanted microchip, of course, that has your digital identity and digital wallet on it.

In 2007, American businessman and film producer Aaron Russo told “Infowars” that the goal of the New World Order was to create “a one-world government, where everybody has an RFID chip implanted in them, and all money is to be in those chips.”

“There will be no more cash, and this [information] was given to me straight from Rockefeller himself,” Russo said. “So, they can take out any money they want, any time they want. They say, ‘You owe us this much in taxes,’ and they just take it out of your chip. Total control. And ... if you’re protesting against what they’re doing, they’ll turn off your chip and you have nothing ... It’s total control of the people.”

Fast-forward to April 2022, and Canada is now permanently enshrining its government-imposed sanctions against protesters in its new budget.14 As you may recall, the Canadian government shut down the bank accounts of participants in the trucker protest against vaccine mandates, and even those who donated as little as $25 to the protest.

Crowdfunding platforms will now be more tightly regulated, and the government is also launching a legislative review of cryptocurrencies. Just imagine the control the Canadian government would have had with a programmable CBDC. They could have prevented the donations from occurring at all, and shut down the account of anyone who even tried to give a few dollars to the freedom movement.

A Carefully Crafted Plan for World Domination

All of this is happening at the same time that the World Health Organization, another deep state technocrat stronghold, is building a global vaccine passport system.15 Once CBDCs and a global vaccine passport system are up and running, it won’t be long before they’re combined into one — likely in the form of an implantable microchip.

We can predict this because they’ve told us that this is the plan. Just look through the WEF’s website descriptions of The Great Reset16 and Fourth Industrial Revolution.17

Read the Rockefeller Foundation’s April 2020 white paper,18 “National COVID-19 Testing Action Plan — Strategic Steps to Reopen Our Workplaces and Our Communities,” which spells out the direction of social control through the implementation of permanent COVID-19 tracking and tracing measures.

Look into the ID2020 Alliance,19 a public-private partnership founded by Bill Gates’ GAVI, The Vaccine Alliance, The Rockefeller Foundation, Microsoft, Accenture, and Ideo.org.20 Members in the alliance include the Learning Economy Foundation,21 founded by the United Nations in 2018,22 Facebook, Mastercard, ShareRing, Simprints and others.23

ID2020 began as a digital identity program for Bangladesh, and has since expanded to include “the implementation of digital technologies which tie with the [Learning Economy] Foundation’s vision of a world in which learners can map their educational progress to achieve their academic, employment, and life goals.”24

In the end, everything will be connected to a single implantable device. Right now, it’s a tossup as to whether a vaccine passport or a digital identity platform will be the foundation for what’s to come, but what is certain is that whatever it’s called, it will include your digital identity, vaccination status, and other health data, and programmable CBDCs.

Your digital identity, in turn, will include everything else that can be known about you through surveillance via implanted biosensors, your computer, smartphone, GPS, social media, online searches, purchases, and spending habits. Imagine having an AI listening, watching, and scoring every move you make and every heartbeat, and algorithms deciding what you can and cannot do based on your behavior, expression, social contacts, and personal views.

Add to that technologies that can modify your behavior and emotional state with or without your knowledge, which is what the WEF’s 2020 briefing document on the IoB describes.25 It may sound like science fiction, but this is what they intend to do. Every new technology, every new surveillance opportunity they bring forward is to further this aim.

For decades, we’ve embraced technologies with our mindset on convenience and/or safety. That’s always how they rope us in. But we will lose everything worth living for if we continue down this path without foolproof privacy safeguards and personal autonomy rights in place.