Democrats Mull $100 Monthly ‘Biden Bucks’ Gas Stimulus Checks to Buy Your Vote

BY RICK MORAN

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2022/03/23/democrats-mull-100-monthly-biden-bucks-gas-stimulus-checks-to-buy-your-vote-n1583510;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Democrats have hit upon a simple way to end inflation. Why not give every American a $100 check every month to offset the inflation that their policies caused in the first place?

Better yet, Congress could give kids another $100 a month so that a family of three or four would be eligible for up to $300 a month in “Biden Bucks.”

Of course, what all that deficit spending will do to the inflation rate can only be guessed at. But when you have the power to print cash, it doesn’t matter, does it? If inflation gets too bad, you can always print up more “Biden Bucks.”

Eventually, they’d have to denude the Enchanted Forest of trees to print all that cash, but there are plenty more where those came from.

CBSNews:

American consumers could see increased costs of $2,000 this year due to the recent surge in gas prices — and that’s on top of an extra $1,000 in grocery store costs due to the steepest rise in inflation since 1982. Already, consumers are reporting they are cutting back on spending or driving less, with most blaming sticker shock at the pump.

The gas stimulus would “provide middle-class Americans with monthly payments to ease the financial burden of this global crisis,” Thompson said in a statement about the proposal, referring to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which has pushed gas prices higher.

Currently, millions of Americans would qualify for the payments based on current gas prices, which averaged $4.24 a gallon on March 22, according to AAA.

Called the Gas Rebate Act, the bill is being proposed by Democratic Reps. Mike Thompson of California, John Larson of Connecticut, and Lauren Underwood of Illinois. No word on how the Biden Bucks would be paid for, but if history is any guide — and when it comes to federal spending, it usually is — Congress will sorta, kinda, mostly forget that little detail when it comes to passing the bill.

A second proposal from Rep. Ro Khanna, a Democrat from California, and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat from Rhode Island, would provide a quarterly rebate to consumers based on a tax levied on oil and gas companies.

The Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax would charge a per barrel tax equal to 50% of the difference between the current price of a barrel of oil and its pre-pandemic average price between 2015 to 2019, according to a statement from the lawmakers.

The two lawmakers calculated that if the per barrel price sits at $120, the tax would raise about $45 billion a year — providing single filers with $240 annually and joint filers with $360 each year.

In 1980, Congress tried another “Windfall Profits Tax.” It defined “windfall profit” as the “excess of the removal price of a barrel of crude oil (amount for which barrel is sold) over the sum of the base price adjusted for inflation and the amount of the severance tax adjustment. Specifies that the windfall profit on any barrel of crude oil may not exceed 90 percent of the net income attributable to such barrel.”

The complexity of the oil industry — a complexity that no Democratic politician understands — can’t be reduced to gibbering bureaucratic blather in order to find a unique way of taxing profits.

If anyone thinks a “Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax” would bring in $45 billion, I have a fine, beautiful, bridge over the Chicago River I’d like to sell you.

It won’t be necessary, after all. Biden Bucks will be spent on something else in the government that will be equally wasteful, equally stupid, and equally expensive.

Soviet-Style Surveillance at a Connecticut University When every faculty member is an informer.

BY JAY BERGMAN

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/03/new-stasi-central-connecticut-state-university-jay-bergman/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Last month, in a statement issued by its Office of Equity and Inclusion, Central Connecticut State University established a new policy designating faculty, administrators, and nearly all other employees as "mandated reporters.” In that capacity, they are required to report to this office any information they come across pertaining to "gender-based discrimination."  Infractions indicative of such discrimination range from "sexual misconduct" – a capacious concept that at other universities has included jokes told within earshot of persons who consider them sexist – to “dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking.”  And to ensure that every instance of discrimination is rooted out, persons reporting it can do so anonymously.

The statement establishing this policy raises more questions than it answers.  First, and most obviously, it fails to include any definition of "gender-based discrimination," or any indication of its limits.  Can such discrimination manifest itself in speech as well as in action?  If it did, could any punishment by the university be reconciled with its stated commitment to academic freedom, and to the right to free expression guaranteed in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, and in Article I, Section 5 of the Connecticut State Constitution?

Other aspects of this new policy are no less problematic.

Who at the university decides whether a charge of gender-based discrimination is valid?  What are the penalties for its commission?  Would those accused of it enjoy the rights afforded defendants in legal proceedings, such as the right to counsel, to confront one’s accuser, and to have access to all relevant evidence?  And would "information learned from third parties" -- which is included in the statement among the kinds of evidence the university considers worthy of investigation -- be subject to the rules in the criminal justice system on the admissibility of hearsay evidence?

One wonders on what authority the university will adjudicate allegations of conduct that is clearly criminal, such as rape.  Should not such allegations be forwarded directly to the criminal justice system?  And by what authority does the university involve itself in domestic violence, which by definition involves family members and is clearly beyond its jurisdiction?

Finally, and perhaps most critically, since reporting gender-based discrimination is mandatory, are there penalties for not reporting it?

Defined as a denial of a social good or benefit to which an individual would otherwise be entitled, discrimination based on sex and gender is wrong. Imposing punishment for its commission in proceedings that observe due process is appropriate.

Nevertheless, as a historian of the Soviet Union and international communism, I find CCSU's policy of mandatory reportage profoundly disturbing.  It is reminiscent, in substance if not in scale, of the requirement of Soviet citizens, when millions were starving to death in the 1930s, that they unmask peasants hoarding grain by reporting them to the NKVD (the acronym of the political police); failure to do so was deemed evidence of treason and punishable by execution or by confinement in a labor camp.  To save themselves or to settle scores, husbands denounced wives, wives denounced husbands, and children denounced parents.

Another instance of such reportage concerns the Stasi, the East German political police during the Cold War, who employed 174,000 informers, or roughly 2.5% of the population -- a percentage even higher than that of its Soviet equivalent.

By comparison, under its new policy, every faculty member and administrator at CCSU is an informer.

As one who has taught CCSU students and served the university for more than three decades, I fear that the policy it has instituted will inevitably have a chilling effect on the free exchange of ideas and opinions, not just on issues pertaining to sex and gender, but on everything in the university's curriculum that is debatable and on which reasonable people may disagree.  Such exchanges are the very reason universities exist.  Without them, universities are mere instruments of indoctrination, enforcing a stifling orthodoxy its faculty are too intimidated and fearful to challenge.

-------------

Jay Bergman is a Professor of History at CCSU and serves on the Board of Directors of the National Association of Scholars.

___________________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO: https://www.ccsu.edu/diversity/

JUDGE Ketanji Brown Jackson’s hearing before the senate

JACKSON: "EVERY JUDGE HAS A PERSONAL, HIDDEN AGENDA"

REFUSES TO ANSWER A QUESTION AS TO WHETHER SHE'S IN FAVOR OF PACKING THE SUPREME COURT

PLEASE READ OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT JUDGE JACKSON AT: https://ratherexposethem.org/?s=JACKSON

Real America's Dan Ball With Dr. Carol Swain On Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson (3/21/22)

Senator Marsha Blackburn: Americans Deserves Answers From Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson

"WHAT IS YOUR SECRET AGENDA?" - Smart GOP Senator SILENCE Ketanji Brown during Heated Questioning

HANNITY: Ted Cruz reveals Ketanji Brown Jackson's 'disturbing' rulings

Ted Cruz: ‘Our Democratic Colleagues Want the Supreme Court To Be Anti-Democratic’

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz questions Jackson in Supreme Court confirmation hearings

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz presses Ketanji Jackson Brown on critical race theory

WATCH: Sen. Ted Cruz questions Ketanji Brown Jackson on sentencing for child pornography cases

Sen. Cornyn Discusses the Judiciary Committee’s Hearings on Judge Jackson’s Supreme Court Nomination

Lindsey Graham clashes with Ketanji Brown Jackson on the third day of hearings

SCHWEIZER: Laptop Not Just a Hunter Biden Story, President Biden is Compromised; “New World Order” promoter too

The 'Red Handed' author, who was among the first to go through Hunter Biden's laptop, argues it reveals the president's son received funds from 'powerful individuals' in countries including Russia and China and that his father benefited from those funds.

The most BRUTAL 60 seconds on TV for the Biden Crime Family!!!

Biden Promises a ‘New World Order’ (Video)

BY JON FLEETWOOD

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/biden-promises-a-new-world-order-video/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Joe Biden promised a “new world order” at a Business Roundtable CEO Quarterly Meeting on Monday.

QUICK FACTS:
  • Joe Biden on Monday discussed a “new world order” at a Business Roundtable CEO Quarterly Meeting, according to The White House.
  • “And now is a time when things are shifting,” Biden said, referring to the world economy and the tens of millions who died amid the wars of the first half of the 20th century. “We’re going to—there’s going to be a new world order out there, and we’ve got to lead it. And we’ve got to unite the rest of the free world in doing it.”
  • Wikipedia calls theories about a “secretly emerging totalitarian world government” attempting to establish a New World Order a “conspiracy theory.”
  • According to The Independent, the New World Order conspiracy theory “dates back decades, and holds that a nefarious elite led by the United Nations and other shadowy forces is planning to install a single transnational global government via the use of force—possibly with the involvement of US agencies including the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which some believe is preparing to put Americans in concentration camps.”
  • Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colorado) wrote on Twitter Tuesday, “No, Joe Biden, there is no new world order coming on my watch.”
  • Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Georgia) tweeted the same day, “We’re on the verge of WW3 and globalists want the new world order.”
WATCH THE FULL SPEECH:
BIDEN’S STATEMENT IN CONTEXT:

“You know we are in an inflection point, I believe, in the world economy,” Biden said. “Not just the economy, the world. It occurs every three or four generations. As one of the top military people said to me in a secure meeting the other day, 60 million people died between 1900 and 1946 and since then we established a liberal world order and that hadn’t happened in a long while. Lot of people dying [now], but nowhere near the chaos. And now’s the time when things are shifting. There’s gonna be a new world order out there, and we’ve gotta lead it. And we’ve gotta unite the rest of the world in doing it.”

BACKGROUND:
  • Biden has been defending the concept of a New World Order since the early ’90s. Then-Senator Biden wrote an op-ed titled “How I Learned to Love the New World Order,” confirmed by Snopes to have been published by The Wall Street Journal on April 23, 1992.
  • In 2013, at the annual Export-Import Bank conference, then-Vice President Biden said, “The affirmative task we have now is to create a new world order.” “We have to update the global rules of the road and we have to do it in a way that maximizes benefits for everyone because obviously, it is overwhelmingly in our interest. This isn’t a zero-sum game, it is overwhelmingly in our interests that China prospers,” Biden went on to say. “We want everybody to have a little money.”
  • The New World Order phrase was famously invoked by former President George H.W. Bush during the Persian Gulf crisis in 1990, The Daily Mail notes. “Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective—a new world order—can emerge,” Bush said. “A new era—freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice, and more secure in the quest for peace.”
Image from Snopes, which claims to have found a copy of Biden’s WSJ op-ed in the New York Public Library archives

Zelensky ‘Consolidates’ All Channels Into Government Propaganda, Bans 11 Political Parties

AUTHORITARIAN POWER GRAB

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD

SEE: https://robertspencer.org/2022/03/zelensky-consolidates-all-channels-into-government-propaganda-bans-11-political-parties;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Tell me more about Ukraine’s western liberal values, please.

In an address to his nation delivered Sunday, Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky announced an order “combining all national TV channels, the program content of which consists mainly of information and/or information-analytical programs, [into] a single information platform of strategic communication” to be called “United News.”

The move means the end, at least temporarily, of privately owned Ukrainian media outlets in that country. Zelensky claimed the measure is needed to combat alleged Russian misinformation and “tell the truth about the war.”

Along with the media consolidation, he banned “any activity” by 11 political parties.

The emergency actions were taken under rules for martial law. Zelensky claimed he was trying to institute a “unified information policy.”

Those are all euphemisms for a totalitarian system.

Now, mind you, this kind of thing is standard in much of the world, including Russia, where there’s no meaningful political opposition on the air, and media outlets toe the party line. But the whole argument for Ukraine was that it was supposed to be better than Putin’s Russia.

It’s also hard to see what the point of such a move would be if Ukraine is truly unified. You only need to resort to totalitarian measures when the country isn’t.

Ukrainian biolabs linked to EcoHealth Alliance, which helped create and unleash COVID-19

Image: Ukrainian biolabs linked to EcoHealth Alliance, which helped create and unleash COVID-19

BY ETHAN HUFF

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-03-22-ukrainian-biolabs-linked-to-ecohealth-alliance.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) The web of lies surrounding the Pentagon-run biological weapons laboratories in Ukraine and elsewhere continues to unravel with new evidence showing that Peter Daszak’s EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) is also involved.

Along with Metabiota, EHA is a longtime partner of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which has been funding its bioweapons operations in Africa and elsewhere.

In 2009, USAID launched an early warning system for new and emerging diseases in 21 countries that was led by the University of California Davis‘ One Health Institute. One of the core partners on this project was EHA, along with Metabiota, the Wildlife Conservation Society, and the Smithsonian Institute.

According to the Daily Exposé, PREDICT partnered with EHA to carry out a nine-year effort to catalog hundreds of thousands of biological samples, “including over 10,000 bats.”

A 2015 study funded by PREDICT looked at a “diversity of coronaviruses in bats.” The publishing of this study in 2017 preceded the unveiling of the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) plandemic, which began in 2019, in just two years.

Entitled “Global patterns in coronavirus diversity” and published in the journal Virus Evolution, that paper explained how PCR assays were used to detect both known and novel coronaviruses.

“Results of a five-year study in 20 countries on three continents have found that bats harbor a large diversity of coronaviruses (CoV), the family of viruses that cause Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS) and the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS),” wrote Columbia University‘s Mailman School of Public Health about the research.

One of the study’s 16 authors was, of course, Daszak, whom we know has serious conflicts of interest pertaining to the COVID plandemic. At that time, however, Daszak falsely declared no conflicts of interest.

EHA Executive Vice President William Karesh was also listed as an author. Daszak and Karesh’s company, we now know, is a longtime partner of the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), which is where the Fauci Flu is believed to have “escaped.”

“Notably, the relationship between the WIV and the American Biodefense establishment was advanced by EHA policy advisor, David R. Franz, former commander at US bioweapons lab at Fort Detrick,” further explained the Exposé.

WIV’s Dr. Shi Zhengli, a.k.a. “Batwoman,” had also worked with EHA’s Daszak on bat-related studies. As far back as 2005, Daszak and Zhengli were conducting research on SARS-like coronaviruses in bats. Several PREDICT-funded studies on SARS-like coronaviruses and Swine Flu count with both Zhengli’s and Daszak’s contributions. Perhaps the most noteworthy of these is a 2015 PREDICT and NIH-funded study she co-authored entitled: “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence.”

EHA whistleblower says he believes Peter Daszak is a CIA “double agent, EcoHealth is a CIA front organization

Andrew Huff, a former vice president at EHA turned whistleblower, came forward to reveal that highly dangerous gain-of-function research was being conducted, and the funding managed, by his former employer.

EHA partners with and accepts cash from a variety of sources, Huff further revealed, including not just the National Institutes of Health (Francis Collins) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Tony Fauci), but also a slew of other government agencies, private corporations, and foundations such as Google, Wellcome Trust, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The Department of Defense (DoD) also funded EHA, according to an image tweeted by Huff on February 15 showing a list of contributions over the years.

“Rumor is that the DoD has been lying to Congress about funding EHA,” Huff wrote in the caption.

Huff believes that Daszak works directly with, or even for, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Huff stated that Daszak could be “a double agent working on behalf of the Chinese government,” and that EcoHealth is basically just “a CIA front organization.”

In a January 23 Twitter thread, Huff broke this all down, even more, explaining that “not only is EcoHealth Alliance a CIA front organization, but the United States of America is primarily responsible for COVID, not China. COVID was a U.S. scientific R&D program where COVID was transferred to China.”

In other words, it might be better to call this thing the American Virus as opposed to the Chinese Virus. Or better yet, how about we call it the Pentagon Virus or even the NATO Virus?

Whatever the case may be, this rabbit hole clearly goes a whole lot deeper than even the “conspiracy theorists” thought it did.

“The start of the COVID-19 bioweapon was at the UNC lab with Baric and Shi,” wrote someone at the Exposé, UNC referring to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and the others referring to Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli.

“It would appear that the first COVID-19 bioweapon version was completed in 2015 in a joint effort by the U.S. and China,” this same commenter added after putting a few other pieces together.

More related news can be found at Corruption.news.

Sources include:

DailyExpose.uk

NaturalNews.com

Disney “pervs out” to help turn America communist, keeps lesbian make-out scene in new Toy Story “Lightyear” movie to brainwash kindergarteners

Image: Disney “pervs out” to help turn America communist, keeps lesbian make-out scene in new Toy Story “Lightyear” movie to brainwash kindergarteners

BY S.D. WELLS

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-03-22-disney-helps-turn-america-communist-brainwash-kindergarteners.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Part of the deconstruction of America by the communists in Washington DC involves the breaking down of human character, values, morals, religion, and feelings of self-worth. This leads to heavy reliance on big government to “rescue” everyone from their problems of poverty, drug addictions, alcoholism, pornography addiction, sexually transmitted diseases, and poor health in general.

It’s a “rabbit hole” that also often leads to reliance on the government for money (loans, grants, and handouts) for school, food, rent, abortions, etc. It runs even deeper. It’s all a distraction so the children will grow up to vote for free money and more government tyranny. Sexual brainwashing is key to this insidious plan, and it begins very early on, believe it or not.

Hollywood and Disney play a huge role in how children perceive the real world, even though it’s just movies and shows. Just recently, Disney is pushing the lesbianism for children theme quite hard in the new Toy Story movie called “Lightyear,” and they’re catching a lot of flack for it. This is communism in the brewing, starting as early as possible, at the movies, schools, daycare centers, social media, and streaming television.

Gender fluid indoctrination part of communist takeover of America

This “gender fluid” indoctrination of children worldwide is a pedophile push to justify pushing adult sexual thinking and expressions onto the kids, and with children as young as they can possibly get away with it. Let’s face it, straight folks aren’t infiltrating schools to teach the kids how to tuck their package or saw off breasts to switch roles for sexual interests.

Straight folks aren’t literally trying to change the curriculum in elementary schools to eliminate “he” and “she” so everyone can use the same bathroom, along with the twisted adults who identify as teens or kids, and the children who are allowed to identify as cats or dogs. That’s just the tip of the iceberg, and now Disney Corporation has weaved in an overtly gay lesbian kissing scene in Pixar’s new Buzz Lightyear movie, and this thing is “not yet rated.” No wonder why.

This is Disney’s “revenge” for the Florida bill (Florida’s Parental Rights in Education Bill) that keeps identifying humans by their gender, instead of everyone being somewhere on the spectrum of fluid gay (a.k.a. the schooling of ‘gender orientation’ for children between kindergarten and third grade).

LGBTQ-Trans-Everything is the most important topic for all children of all ages, according to communists and perverts

There is substantial LGBTQ “representation” in the new movie, not just a French kiss scene between two women. Yet, Disney Corporation has previously issued a memo saying they were not going to be including LGBTQ themes in their movies, but so much for that. Disney executives say they always review gay content in Pixar films, and in retaliation for supposedly being “barred from creating it,” Disney will keep this in the kid’s film.

The Florida bill prohibits EXPOSING KIDS under ten to radical sexual practices and ideologies in school. There is NO mention of the word “gay,” in the legislation, as the radical gay activists and LGBTQ+ Disney executives just created their own scarecrow to burn for more attention. Now they’re screaming they were made a target in order to defend “educating” little kids about sexual preferences starting in kindergarten.

Again, the communist aggression is digging roots and injecting perversions in the elementary schools, kids’ movies, and through social media. Keep in mind Disney has made BILLIONS from communist China.

Maybe Disney should change Mickey and Minnie Mouse to Maggie and Minnie? Is Donald Duck actually a girl? Is little Bo Peep really a 58-year-old man in drag? Should Buzz Lightyear be wearing high heels and a thong (while tucking his shlong and his waxed balls) the whole movie, that way kids can better cope with stuff like that when they figure out what daily-changing gender they want to be? Is this where it’s all heading folks?

Remember, it’s all about distracting and perverting everybody so we won’t be able to defend our human rights and Bill of Rights, and so the elitists can eliminate the middle class. Just follow the bouncing ball. Ask yourself, should kindergarteners be educated about asking themselves what gender they are and which gender they would want to have sex with later? Only radical sex freaks seem to want that, oh, and most communists.

Click your mouse on Gender.news for updates on hot topics that affect proper education and moral values in school.

Sources include:

WesternJournal.com

NaturalNews.com

_______________________________________________________________________

SEE OUR RELATED POST:

Portland Children’s Hospital Gives Kids Tips on ‘Tucking’ and Sex Shops

Teaching Boys to "Tuck"!? This Is Horrifying

BY VICTORIA TAFT

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/victoria-taft/2022/03/21/portland-childrens-hospital-gives-kids-tips-on-tucking-and-sex-shops-n1568304;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

When captains of industry and the biggest names in sports and tech signed on to support Oregon’s beloved Doernbecher (pronounced DORN-becker) Children’s Hospital, they probably didn’t think they were underwriting efforts to give minor children advice on sneaking into adult sex shops.

Though sex shops are as plentiful in Oregon as Starbucks and 7-Eleven stores due to Oregon’s elastic free speech law that puts live sex acts on par with political debates, it’s assumed that giving children access to sex shops was not part of the Doernbecher deal when it first took effect.

And yet, here we are.

Comes now the news that Doernbecher has been giving sex pointers to kids who are sexually confused. Seldom do you find a small child who thinks often about sex or finds him or herself confused about it, but doggone it, Doernbecher is here to help.

Doernbecher, an institution that one assumes believes in science, states its only stance on gender questions is to “affirm” the sexuality of a child we’ve been told is inherently “confused” about sexuality.

“As part of its mission to ensure the health and well-being of all patients, Oregon Health & Science University proudly offers gender-affirming health care to patients of all ages, including children and adolescents,” the hospital’s parent organization said to TND in a statement. “Providers follow established, evidence-based medical standards, and employ a thoughtful, multidisciplinary process that involves both patients and their support systems.

The hospital that treats children with dire medical needs like cancer treatments now supplies the full gamut of sex-change surgeries and medical interventions, including puberty blockers, hormone therapies, and gender-affirming surgeries “that involves both patients and their support systems” (emphasis added). Parents aren’t mentioned.

The hospital offers a way for underaged, “confused,” and easily suggestible children to get dress-up clothes for aspiring drag queens … at an adult sex store.

“In the Portland area … is a sex-positive shop … . They sell gender-affirming clothing items as well as sex toys, videos, and more. The shop is for people age 18 and older, but they offer appointments before or after hours for younger shoppers. You can schedule an appointment by calling them or emailing.” Emphasis added.

Is sexualizing children now part of the Doernbecher portfolio? If so, they might want to mention it on their IRS 990 forms or their website, so all those unsuspecting doyennes who might be thinking of leaving their fortunes to the hospital know that it will go toward encouraging inappropriate sexual behavior for children without their parents’ knowledge. Just a thought.

And then there’s the Doernbecher how-to guide for children on “tucking” male genitalia to make the child look more like a girl when in drag.

The children’s hospital also provides tips on “taping the penis and scrotum,” “putting your testicles inside your body,” and “where to buy tucking clothing,” and recommends an Etsy shop that sells tucking attire for “children.”

Any way you tuck it, it sounds painful.

The tips go on: “Press gently on your testicles … you should not feel faint or nauseated or have extreme pain. If you do, take a break and try again later.” And the following tip is included: “If you find yourself getting aroused, take a break and try again later. An erection will make it impossible to tuck.”

Gee, thanks for the tip.

Sinclair Broadcasting’s TND received a comment from the hospital, and officials said they were very proud of its “gender-affirming health care to patients of all ages, including children and adolescents.” The statement continued that it’s all based on science-y science in “a thoughtful, multidisciplinary process that involves both patients and their support systems.”

It also said that “medical interventions are not provided for children,” but considering that the children’s hospital’s previous statements said the advice was for children, it’s unclear what their definition of “children” is.

According to the hospital’s Form 990, it has received about $90 million in state support since 2014. Now, that’s a lot of taxpayer money.

____________________________________________________________________

SEE OUR RELATED POST: https://ratherexposethem.org/2022/03/23/disney-pervs-out-to-help-turn-america-communist-keeps-lesbian-make-out-scene-in-new-toy-story-lightyear-movie-to-brainwash-kindergarteners

Stop the Russian Invasion of America

Biden wants to protect every border except our own.

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/03/stop-russian-invasion-america-daniel-greenfield/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

While the Biden administration is focused on protecting the borders of Ukraine from Russia, some 8,600 Russians have shown up at our border with Mexico since last August.

Not to be left too far behind, 5,534 Ukrainians have also arrived since October.

Last December, two cars carrying 18 Russian migrants tried to barrel their way through at the San Ysidro Port of Entry. A CBP officer opened fire on a Mercedes driven by the invaders.

YouTube is full of guides for Russians looking to get into the United States through Mexico.

In one video, a man with Asiatic features wearing a Russian Army shirt directs his video to all Russians, describes how he made it to San Diego after a previous failed attempt in which they discussed trying to evade CBP and race to the border crossing and advises that if you don't leave Russia with a "commanda", close friends, relatives, "like in the army", it won't work well.

He suggested that in immigration detention around 70% were Russian speakers, "Ukrainians, Belarusians, Russians, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz.”

"Make a decision and make a run for it, in a fraction of a second," he advises. "And it'll be what will be. Even if they catch you, nothing will happen to you."

That ought to be the motto of the Biden Administration’s open borders immigration policy.

That’s why there are encampments of Russians and Ukrainians in Mexico demanding asylum.

Did Putin invade Tijuana while no one was looking? If he tried, a heroic resistance of cartel members with machine guns mounted on Toyota pickup trucks would have sent Russian troops, already suffering from dysentery, alcohol poisoning, and six different kinds of STDs, packing.

How exactly did a town worth of Russians and Ukrainians pop up in Mexico? They flew there. And they didn’t do it to buy hundred peso Rolexes made in China but because they know that if they come up with a timely sob story about fleeing the latest crisis, we’ll let them in.

And it’s working.

According to the AP, of the 8,600 Russians who invaded America, "all but 23 were processed under laws that allow them to seek asylum." When Russians invade Ukraine, we send in the Javelin missiles. When Russians invade America, we throw a parade to welcome them in.

Only four of the Ukrainians who showed up since September were asked to leave.

Every Russian who shows up now claims to hate Putin. But if loving Putin were grounds for asylum, they’d all come dressed in Putin t-shirts. The Ukrainians, regardless of where they live, including one who came from Uganda, claim to be fleeing the Russians. And they’re all fleeing each other to Mexico and demanding that we save them from each other. Right now.

The Trump administration's Remain in Mexico policy was supposed to stop this kind of migrant tourism under which migrants from every single country in the world would fly to Mexico and show up at the border, demanding asylum.

Asylum from what? Mexican sunsets?

Despite the Biden administration's open borders plot, state lawsuits and court rulings led the policy to remain in force. Russians and Ukrainians flying halfway around the world to show up at our land border don’t have a credible fear of persecution in Mexico. They’re gaming the system.

“While Moscow to Cancún is the most common route, some Russians fly from Amsterdam or Paris to Mexico City and then go to Tijuana,” an expert relates. Is there a reason these folks can’t apply for asylum in Amsterdam or Paris? Having reached Paris, aren’t they now safe?

Despite Gov. Ron DeSantis suggesting, 'If (Putin) went into France, do you think they'd do anything to put up a fight? Probably not”, Paris hasn’t actually fallen again. Yet. It’s safe from Putin (albeit not so much from Algerian or Moroccan Jihadists shouting, “Allahu Akbar.”)

The United States does not share a border with either Ukraine or Russia. Despite that, we’re being invaded anyway because the one border we aren’t allowed to protect is our own.

If Putin wanted to invade America, all he would have to do is fly his forces into Tijuana International Airport (if we don't steal your luggage, it's because your clothes aren't good enough) and have all 150,000 conscripts apply for political asylum. Two days later they’d all be on buses heading around the country courtesy of the Lutheran Immigration Services, the Conference of Catholic Bishops, HIAS, and the beleaguered American taxpayer.

He wouldn’t even need to bring any tanks. We’ve already surrendered our border and nation.

The AP informs us that one Russian "narrated his trip from Moscow’s Red Square to a San Diego hotel room, with layovers in Cancún and Mexico City. His YouTube video shows him confessing to nerves after buying a used car in Tijuana, but he says later in San Diego that everything went smoothly – despite two days in US custody – and that others considering the journey shouldn’t be afraid." Maybe they should be afraid. At least just a little.

A few days ago, Biden announced another $800 million in security assistance to Ukraine.

Imagine what $800 million could do on our border. There still isn’t any money to build a border wall. Texas is shouldering the costs of deploying the National Guard to the border. Border personnel are still deprived of the resources they need to deal with the invasion of America.

The Ukrainians are entitled to secure their border. But why don’t Americans have that right?

Anyone who has a legitimate fear of persecution and requires political asylum can file their requests for asylum. The vast majority of arrivals however are economic migrants. The Southern land border now sees a vast horde of international migrants from India, China, Russia, and every other part of the world who fly into Mexico, rent cars and drive up for asylum.

Open borders mean that we share a border with the entire world. And the world is showing up.

Maybe after spending billions securing Ukraine’s border, the Biden administration and some of its Republican open borders allies can give a thought to securing the border of a beleaguered nation being invaded by the Russians and by everyone else. A country called America.