UN Warns Individualistic Conservatives Threaten the Planet

"Save the world from free speech. Before it’s too late"

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD

SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2022/03/un-warns-individualistic-conservatives-threaten-daniel-greenfield/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

If you blinked you might have missed the momentous occasion of the release of the second part of the UN IPCC’s sixth assessment report of how we're all going to die unless we all board jets and attend global warming conferences. Or give lots of money to those officials who do it for us.

Since no one reads these things anyway, by the time the fourteenth chapter of the second part of the sixth assessment rolled around, everyone was drunk and decided to take shots at conservatives.

Chapter 14 was on North America and warned of the threat posed by "individualistic" conservatives who refuse to accept "collective responsibility" for driving pickup trucks.

Once upon a time, we agreed to disagree about things. Those were the good days.

The liberalism of, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it", has long since been replaced by, "You're spreading misinformation and I'm going to tell on you to Mark Zuckerberg."

The IPCC, or Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which changes its predictions of the incoming apocalypse more often than a phone psychic, is very upset about misinformation.

Misinformation contradicts the science and under the IPCC’s current chair, Hoesung Lee, who has a Ph.D. in Economics from Rutgers, and was, according to the IPCC, named one of TIME’s 100 Most Influential People in the World, the UN body is all about the science.

Even though economics is as much of a science as the chicken entrails of global warming.

But say what you will about Lee, who used to work for ExxonMobil, he still has better credentials than the former chair, railroad engineer, and sexual harasser Rajendra Pachauri. As a Nature obituary put it, Pachauri, who shared a Nobel Peace Prize and sexual misconduct allegations with Al Gore, died "following a prolonged battle with multiple heart ailments and charges of sexual harassment."

Forget climate change, it’s the sexual harassment allegations that will really kill you.

“If there's no action before 2012, that's too late,” Rajendra Pachauri said in 2007. In 2009, he claimed, “we have just about 6 years left in which we will have to bring about the peaking of emission.” It’s 2022, Pachauri is dead, and the planet is very much alive. Sadly, so is the IPCC.

With a past history like this, you can understand why the IPCC is sensitive about misinformation.

If there were a Nobel prize for misinformation, the IPCC would win it hands down. And that’s the only Nobel prize that it deserves. Unless there were another Nobel for blowing the most hot air.

A year after Pachauri was ousted over his personal contribution to global warming, Hoesung Lee took over and began warning that it's not too late to save the planet from cheap energy and a decent standard of living.

Six years later he's still at it.

IPCC WGII 6, the latest alphabet soup report that no one read, directs the blame for the imminent destruction of the planet at “resistance from individuals with conservative political ideologies” and “individualistic worldviews” who oppose “regulation”.

Save the world from free speech. Before it’s too late.

The IPCC’s preferred solution to the conservative problem (at least the one that it’s willing to put in print) is more media censorship. The report complains about the "journalistic norm of balance” that give "equal weight to climate scientists and contrarians" and are "unevenly amplifying certain messages that are not supported by science".

I don’t know which planet the IPCC is reporting from, where the media provides equal weight to both the establishment and its critics, but it isn’t this one. But the one thing we know about the IPCC from all its reports on the state of the planet is that it doesn’t know much about Earth.

The media is already saturated with the IPCC’s chicken little propaganda. Big Tech companies actively censor those who dissent from the notion that only high taxes can change the weather. To say nothing of the even more outrageous suppression of any other point of view within the scientific community and Corporate America than the one making Big Green investors very rich.

Nevertheless, the IPCC report complains that “much online social media discussion of climate change takes place in ‘echo chambers’”. These echo chambers, unlike the ones operated by the IPCC and the establishment, are obviously a threat to all intelligent life on earth.

A category that no one involved in the IPCC and the media qualifies for anyway.

The censorship will continue until everyone comes to believe that the world is ending as many years from now as it takes to create a sense of crisis while still making it possible to cash in.

The UN solution to all of those “individualistic” and “conservative” Americans is for “the rest of the human collective” to adopt “collective conduct” from “indigenous” people. Unfortunately, the United States has no indigenous people, only immigrants from various eras, tribes traveling across a land bridge from Siberia, paddling canoes, and then Columbus and his three ships.

But the UN might want to check in on Africa and see how the “indigenous” people of that continent exercise their “sense of duty or responsibility toward human and other-than-human relations” by wiping out endangered species and killing entire tribes with equal gusto.

Or Hoesung Lee might want to look toward Manchuria where his distant ancestors came from and examine just how that region shows us that we can “(re)learn from Indigenous cultures to (re)consider our responsibility/ies to the land”.

The idea that a native population is less likely to pollute the earth and water, hunt animals to extinction, and treat their territory like a trash heap is more white nonsense, as Lee knows.

The noble savage is the romanticized invention of European fourth-generation colonists who condescendingly presume that their neighbor is less likely to want an SUV or a weekend at the shore because his ancestors had a lower technological level and less civilizational scope.

The native population consists of stone, iron, and bronze age colonists who wiped out whatever indigenous peoples there were and then got down to the business of killing each other until the Europeans showed up. Your average American and Canadian tree hugger has as much of a mystical relationship with the great outdoors as a California casino owner or the Hawaiian businessman whose many times great-grandfather killed and enslaved the natives he found living there after he finished making the long imperialist canoe journey to colonize the islands.

The lead authors of the North American chapter who urge us to learn magical indigenous skills of collectivism are largely the descendants of European immigrants. And they know a whole lot more about collectivism than North American Indians who were a good deal more independent, conservative, and individualistic than the hive mind of two dozen authors behind a UN report.

But if the UN really wants to model respect for the land, it should lead the way by demolishing its Manhattan headquarters and returning Turtle Bay back to the turtles.

The one mystical quality that the IPCC does have is magical thinking.

After failing to convince Americans that the planet will burn unless everyone gives environmental consultants more money to change the weather, the IPCC is convinced that suppressing political dissent will surely convince those individualistic conservatives.

As everyone knows, using your power to silence people wins the argument every time.

It’s not American individualism that threatens the planet. The environmental movement not only stole trillions and spent it on trips and worthless windmills and solar panels, it brought the planet closer to war by making the world dependent on Middle Eastern and Russian fuel. After generations of wars that could have been avoided with cheap nuclear energy and domestic drilling, there is yet another war that is being fought over energy resources in Ukraine.

Conservative individualism doesn’t threaten the planet, environmental collectivism does. 

THE IDIOT VICE-PRESIDENT ON DISPLAY: Watch Kamala Harris laughing during press conference in Poland; what happened

Judge Jeanine: Kamala Harris is an 'embarrassment' on the world stage

Judge Jeanine and Joe Concha react to the vice president appearing to be unprepared for questions from the press.

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/03/11/zelenskyys-former-press-secretary-savagely-blasts-kamala-harris-n1565750

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Kamala Harris’s diplomatic mission to Europe did not go as hoped. It was bad enough when she managed to embarrass the United States again, this time during a joint press conference with Polish President Andrzej Duda in Warsaw where she laughed in response to a question about the Ukrainian refugee crisis, but now she’s been brutally mocked by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s former Press Secretary Iuliia Mendel.

“It would be a tragedy if this woman won the presidency,” Mendel said while retweeting a video of Kamala Harris’s inappropriate laughter.

The tweet has since been deleted. Nevertheless, we can all agree that she is absolutely correct. Though, quite frankly, it’s a tragedy that she’s vice president right now.

Sen. Graham: Kamala's Poland appearance made things worse

U.S. Funds Ukrainian Former Bioweapons Facility Handling ‘Dangerous Materials… With Windows Wide Open’

SEE: http://dilyana.bg/the-pentagon-bio-weapons/

ALSO SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-03-11-russia-says-ukraine-littered-us-bioweapons-labs.html

Tulsi Gabbard: Labs need to be 'shut down immediately'

Former Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard tells Tucker there's a 'real certainty' one of these labs will be breached if war doesn't end tonight.

BY THE NATIONAL PULSE

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/u-s-funds-ukrainian-former-bioweapons-facility-handling-dangerous-materials-with-windows-wide-open/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A Ukrainian bio lab receiving funds from the U.S. government was formerly a bioweapons factory under the control of the Soviet Union, with experts recently reporting a “lack of modern biosafety equipment” as well as “lethal microbes that in the West would be locked away in high-containment laboratories,” the National Pulse can reveal.

An article published by the Washington Post on August 30th, 2005 – “U.S. to Aid Ukraine in Countering Bioweapons” – reveals a lab now receiving U.S. government funds formerly “supplied highly lethal pathogens to Soviet bioweapons factories”:

“One lab to receive funding is the I.I. Mechnikov Antiplague Scientific and Research Institute, in the Black Sea port city of Odessa. The institute was part of a Cold War network of “antiplague” stations that supplied highly lethal pathogens to Soviet bioweapons factories.”

In 2008, researchers from the James Martin Center for Non-Proliferation Studies in Monterey California noted of the Mechnikov facility:

“…its management claimed in 2003 that it knew nothing about either the Soviet offensive or defensive [bioweapons] program. We question the second since it was in effect a closed facility until the late 1980s and worked on highly dangerous Group II pathogens and, probably, at least at time on some Group I pathogens since at least 1965. It would make sense if at least one of its laboratories worked on Problem 5 projects.

“Problem 5” was the codename given to the Soviet bioweapons program.

Another report by the James Martin Center revealed disturbing practices at the U.S.-funded facility (emphases added):

The lack of modern biosafety equipment is also raising concern among U.S. officials about the potential for an accidental release of deadly bacteria and viruses. In Odessa, where 44 scientists and about 140 support staff carry out research in the I.I. Mechnikov Anti-plague Scientific and Research Institute, scientists wearing cotton smocks and surgical masks work with lethal microbes that in the West would be locked away in high-containment laboratories and handled only by scientists in spacesuits. The lab’s scientists said their training in handling dangerous materials allowed them to work safely with pathogens without Western-style safety equipment—which they viewed as unnecessary and which in any case they cannot afford. “Many of the institutes are located in downtown areas and some work with pathogens with windows wide open,” said Sonia Ben Ouagrham, who coauthored the Monterey study with Zilinskas and Alexander Melikishvili.

The news follows Biden State Department official Victoria Nuland telling the U.S. Senate that the American government is concerned about biological research facilities falling into Russian hands as a result of the ongoing conflict in Eastern Europe, despite the department appearing to correct her testimony the following day.

The unearthed article also confirms a previous National Pulse report revealing how former President Barack Obama spearheaded negotiations leading to the lab eventually receiving U.S. government funds as part of a memorandum of understanding with the U.S. Department of Defense.

“The agreement, the result of more than a year of negotiations, was announced by Sens. Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.) and Barack Obama (D-Ill.) during a visit to the Ukrainian capital, Kiev,” notes The Washington Post.

A separate article from The Irish Times – “Odessa Labs Host Deadly Legacy” – explains the Odessa-based laboratory’s former connections to the Soviet Union’s biological weapons programs.

Dubbed a “repository of knowledge, equipment and lethal pathogens that could be useful to bioterrorists,” the lab Obama negotiated to receive U.S. funds was highlighted for its inadequate safety precautions.

“The institutes were not officially part of the Soviet bioweapons complex, so they have been ineligible for the tens of millions of dollars given each year by western governments to keep former weapons scientists from selling their expertise. These governments are just beginning to look for ways to help the institutes, and not only because of the bioterrorism threat. In a two-year study of Russia’s biotech industry, a panel of the US National Academy of Sciences recently urged former Soviet republics to modernize the anti-plague labs and integrate them with other global networks working to prevent pandemics,” added the article.

“They often have culture collections of pathogens that lack biosecurity, and they employ people who are well-versed in investigating and handling deadly pathogens,” said Raymond Zilinskas, a bioweapons expert and co-author of a draft report by scholars from the Centre for Nonproliferation Studies at the Monterey Institute of International Studies on the role of Ukrainian labs in Soviet bioweapon efforts

“Some are located at sites accessible to terrorist groups and criminal groups,” he added.

The unearthed bio lab facility follows intense scrutiny over the U.S. government’s decision to fund risky, “gain-of-function” research in Wuhan at a Chinese Communist Partyrun lab with military ties.

Biden’s ‘science advisor’ trashes Christians, dismisses individual rights, says government can force vaccine

Francis Collins and Russell Moore: Evil Revealed In Leaked Audio

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://robertspencer.org/2022/03/bidens-science-advisor-trashes-christians-dismisses-individual-rights-says-government-can-force-vaccine;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

America’s future as a free society is in serious peril because there are so many authoritarians in positions of power and influence who have contempt for the American people and their values.

“LEAKED: Audio Shows Former NIH Director Trashing Christians at Event Hosted by Christianity Today,” RedState, March 8, 2022:

Dr. Francis Collins, former NIH Director and current “science advisor” to Joe Biden, has long proclaimed himself and Dr. Anthony Fauci as “not political figures.” But newly leaked audio, obtained by The Daily Wire’s Meg Basham, tells a far different story.

The audio was taken on October 26th, 2021 at an event hosted by Christianity Today in conjunction with the Institute of Politics (a leftwing organization founded by David Axelrod). Russell Moore, a favorite among socially left-leaning “evangelicals” like David French and Beth Moore, conducted the interview portion that included Collins.

What followed was the mocking of Christians, the dismissal of individual rights, and false assertions about the legalities involved with vaccine mandates. But rest assured, none of this was political per Collins’ self-description.

“The US government does have the authority to mandate vaccinations if there is an outbreak that is threatening people, because it’s not just about you, it’s about the people you’re going to infect,” Collins claimed, even though science journals were already reporting by that point that vaccinated people were just as likely to spread the then-dominant Delta variant as those who were unvaccinated.

Collins went on to ask rhetorically, “Do [mandates] convince people who otherwise wouldn’t get them?” He answered himself, “Oh yeah, especially if it means losing your job.”

Perhaps Collins should opine less on legal issues because that turned out to be objectively false. As most are aware, the Supreme Court ended up striking down the Biden administration’s federal vaccine mandate. Collins tried to cite Jacobson vs. Massachusetts, a 1905 case that involved state-level mandates, in the interview, again showing his lack of knowledge of the topic. The lack of empathy shown to those losing their jobs over a mandate that was scientifically pointless (everyone spreads COVID) is also striking.

Later, Collins would go on to outright mock Christians who value personal freedom from the government.

Collins said evangelicals, in particular, over-emphasize notions of personal liberty when it comes to mandates, saying they have so “wrapped themselves in the flag and wrapped themselves in this concept of personal freedom, that public health just grates on them.”

“[Evangelicals] have forgotten many times that freedom is not just about rights,” Collins contended. He then employed a mocking caricature of a Southern accent, asking the students, “How many times have you heard, ‘Muh freedom means I got rights’? Well, okay, you also have that other R-word: responsibilities. That’s what freedom is supposed to incorporate.”

I’m not sure what planet this man lives on, but freedom is actually about rights. There can be no freedom without rights, and anything that violates those rights is logically not freedom. The nod to “responsibilities” is a weak, commonly used excuse by government apparatchiks to force their agenda on others. Even tackling Collins’ claim on the merits, what responsibility to others does someone have to get vaccinated if the vaccine does not stop the spread of COVID?…

Arguably the most politically pointed portion of Collins’ remarks came when Moore asked him about the political opinions of his fellow Christians. Collins answered by referencing an Atlantic article by anti-Trump pundit Peter Wehner, another member of his and Moore’s book club, that argued evangelicals have “embraced the worst aspects of our culture and our politics” and that “churches [have] become repositories not of grace but of grievances, places where tribal identities are reinforced, where fears are nurtured, and where aggression and nastiness are sacralized.”

One-on-One with Financial Expert David McAlvany on oil & gas prices~Rep. Mike Turner Torches Biden on Energy Crisis, Response to Ukraine

As the war in Ukraine rages on, the U.S. and Europe are placing harsh sanctions on Russia. This comes at a time when the U.S. economy is still trying to recover from the pandemic and inflation is at a 40 year high. One of the biggest economic stressors for Americans right now is skyrocketing oil and gas prices. The average price for a gallon of gas just hit a record $4.25. David McAlvany, CEO of the David McAlvany Financial Group, joined OAN's Alicia Summers to discuss.

Pfizer’s own documents prove THEY KNEW their covid vaccines were not “safe and effective”; and they knew mRNA nanoparticles circulated throughout the body

BY LANCE D. JOHNSON

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-03-10-pfizers-own-documents-prove-they-knew-covid-vaccines-not-safe-mrna-nanoparticles.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) In late 2021, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman ordered Pfizer to release all relevant data on their “covid-19 vaccine.” The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tried to protect Pfizer, suggesting that the data be kept classified for the next twenty years. However, the courts ordered the speedy release of the information, demanding transparency for a product that has been used arrogantly and tyrannically to destroy people’s livelihoods and health.

As the documents are released to the public at the rate of 55,000 pages per month, researchers are documenting the truth about the covid-19 vaccines. For one, these injections use RNA replication technology to exploit the innate immune system, to mass-produce a variant of the spike protein bioweapon. This has led to widespread immune depletion and enhanced disease, causing higher caseloads, hospitalizations, and deaths. Furthermore, Pfizer’s own documents prove THEY KNEW their covid vaccines were not “safe and effective.” Pfizer also knew the mRNA nano-particles circulated throughout the body, causing damage to organs. The FDA granted emergency use authorization (EUA) anyway, lying to the public about the “safety” and “efficacy” of the vaccine.

Criminal negligence or criminal conspiracy: unraveling Pfizer and FDA deception about covid-19 vaccines

There are only two explanations for the FDA’s behavior in this historic matter of medical malpractice: criminal negligence or criminal conspiracy. Either the FDA negligently disregarded the data in these documents, or they actively participated in a criminal conspiracy to commit fraud and cause harm to the population. Why would the FDA blindly trust a company (Pfizer) that previously promoted pharmaceutical products illegally, leading to the largest health care fraud settlement in the history of the Justice Department? With the Pfizer documents being made public, both Pfizer and the FDA should be charged. They should be charged for not only promoting pharmaceutical products illegally but also for using deception and coercion to force harmful products on the population.

The Pfizer documents raise serious public health issues. At least 50,000 pages have been released thus far. In the documents, Pfizer reassured the FDA repeatedly that their vaccine would “prevent” covid-19, even though the study design utilized fraudulent diagnostic standards to manipulate endpoints, while ignoring absolute risk reduction. Pfizer understood that vaccinated individuals can still test positive for covid-19, and may still get the same respiratory symptoms, even after suffering from the side effects of the vaccine. Yet, Pfizer repeatedly claimed that their vaccine would “prevent” covid-19 – lying to the FDA about its effectiveness.

In the documents, Pfizer indicated that the vaccine be used for “active immunization to prevent COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 in individuals? 16 years of age.” However, Pfizer and the FDA also had data showing that the “efficacy” of the vaccine waned quickly. The data shows that the effects of the vaccine wane in just one month, even after two doses are administered. However, the FDA did not warn the public that vaccinated individuals would need monthly boosters to make the vaccine work.

Pfizer and FDA had clear evidence that vaccine causes widespread damage

Pfizer also had overwhelming data on the adverse events of the vaccine. The drug company knew that the adverse events increased with each additional booster shot, yet the FDA approved a two-shot protocol from the start and even approved a third booster, despite evidence of mounting health risks. In a series of documents, Pfizer wrote on page 24 about the dose-dependent nature of adverse events, which included severe grades of edema and erythema along with muscle necrosis, fibrosis, and increased spleen size and weight. “The incidence and severity of the reactions were higher after the second or third injections compared with the first injection,” Pfizer wrote.

Pfizer also had proof that the mRNA nano-particles migrated from the injection site, yet the government and the media repeatedly lied about the mRNA degrading and the whole process staying in the deltoid muscles. The vaccine ingredients migrated predominantly to the ovaries, liver, and spleen, but also proliferated the adrenal glands, bladder, bone, bone marrow, eyes, large intestine, lymph nodes, pancreas, salivary glands, skin, small intestine, testes, thymus, thyroid, and the uterus.

Pfizer and the FDA had clear data showing more systemic adverse events occurring in the vaccinated group over the placebo group, yet they both lied to the public, claiming that the vaccinated had mild disease and the unvaccinated were a “public health threat.” Pfizer knew that the vaccinated were two to twenty-five times more likely to experience negative health impacts from the vaccine.

In the documents, Pfizer adamantly preferred a passive adverse event surveillance system that relied on unsubstantiated reports that could be readily dismissed. Pfizer did not want to take on the added cost of accurately recording vaccine injuries, nor did they want to compensate families injured by their vaccines. Clearly, neither Pfizer, the FDA nor the CDC gave proper informed consent for these vaccines, harming countless people for life, while lying to the public with disinformation and damaging the public’s trust.

Sources include:

SteveKirsch.substack.com

NaturalNews.com

PHMPT.org

Justice.gov

NaturalNews.com

PHMPT.org [PDF]

Big Pharma admits mRNA injections are gene therapies, but no one seems to care

BY NOLAN BARTON

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-03-09-big-pharma-admits-mrna-vaccines-gene-therapies.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural NewsInfoWars host Owen Shroyer scoffed at the arrogance of people behind the experimental Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) injections.

“We were reporting, and other outlets were reporting, that this was an mRNA technology. And they said, ‘No, it’s not, there’s no mRNA shot, there’s no mRNA, there’s no mRNA in these shots.’ Now they just promoted it as mRNA. It’s like they expect us to not have a memory or something,” said Shroyer during a recent episode of “The Alex Jones Show.”

Shroyer actually meant to say gene therapy instead of mRNA, but you get the point. Big Pharma is making a fool out of everyone.

Filling in for regular host Alex Jones, Shroyer played a video clip in which a Bayer executive essentially admitted that Big Pharma deceived people into taking the mRNA injections. (Related: Bayer executive admits mRNA vaccines are “an example of gene therapy.”)

In the video, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Division President Stefan Oelrich said were it not for the pandemic, the experimental injection may have seen an extremely high rejection rate.

Oelrich made the statement at the opening of the World Health Summit 2021 last November. “Ultimately, the mRNA vaccines are an example of that cell and gene therapy,” Oelrich said at the time.

He also admitted that 95 percent of people would probably refuse gene therapy under normal circumstances. “I think this pandemic has opened many people’s eyes to innovation,” he said.

But even after Oelrich’s statement, some media outlets maintained their stance that the mRNA injections are not gene therapies.

On January 4, Forbes published an article titled “Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines are not gene therapies.”

Poynter.org even published a fact-check claiming that the Bayer executive did not actually say that the mRNA vaccines are cell and gene therapies.

“Oelrich did not say that mRNA vaccines against the COVID-19 are a gene or cell therapy. What he did point out is that mRNA-based vaccines are an example of technological innovation, just as the gene and cell therapy proposed by Bayer are an example of technological innovation,” it said.

Biden, Harris don’t support COVID vaccines before 2020 election

It’s not really surprising, Shroyer said, because the biggest supporters of the mRNA injections are also a bunch of phonies. He pointed out that both Kamala Harris and Joe Biden said they’re never going to take the vaccine when Donald Trump was the president. (Related: TWISTED: Trump goes full pro-vaccine as Biden and Kamala say they won’t trust any vaccine promoted by Trump.)

When CNN asked Harris before the 2020 election if she would take the vaccine once it’s approved, she refused to provide a clear answer. “Well, I think that’s going to be an issue for all of us. I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump,” she said on September 6, 2020.

Biden, on the other hand, suggested on July 28, 2020, that the coronavirus vaccine won’t be “real” and may not be “safe.” On August 6, 2020, Biden said the vaccine is “not likely to go through all the tests and trials that are needed to be done.” Finally, on September 7, 2020, Biden said he would take the coronavirus vaccine “only if we knew all of what went into it.”

“But then when Biden became president, they loved it. The vaccine didn’t change; the ingredients didn’t change. And it’s just amazing. I mean, we have caught these crooks red-handed – they’ve been caught. It’s so pathetic,” Shroyer said.

“It’s so pathetic that nobody wants to stop this crime. Nobody wants to hold the big pharmaceutical companies accountable. It’s like nobody knows, and it makes you wonder really who is in charge? Are our officials in charge? Or is it entities like Big Pharma that are actually the ones that are in charge?”

More related stories:

Dr. David Martin tells Clay Clark: mRNA vaccines are gene therapy designed to harm and enslave humanity – Brighteon.TV.

Richard Pan says Americans who refuse experimental coronavirus gene therapy injections are “domestic terrorists.”

mRNA-pimping Bayer executive GLOATS over pushing global acceptance of gene therapy injections disguised as vaccines.

Biden’s WAR on America: Target the nation’s “human infrastructure” with mandatory, deadly gene therapy injections to mass murder all those who keep the country running.

Watch the video below as Owen Shroyer talks about the arrogance displayed by Big Pharma in admitting that the mRNA vaccines are actually gene therapies.

This video is from the InfoWars channel on Brighteon.com.

Follow Vaccines.news for more news related to COVID-19 vaccines.

Sources include:

Brighteon.com

Presidency.UCSB.edu

Congress to Pass $1.5 Trillion Spending Bill Packed with Far-left Policies

BY PETER RYKOWSKI

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/congress-to-pass-1-5-trillion-spending-bill-packed-with-far-left-policies/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Democrats and Republicans in Congress have teamed up to push a radical leftist, $1.5 trillion “omnibus” spending bill — accelerating the federal government’s reckless spending while implementing multiple far-left, Marxist policies.

On Tuesday, March 8, negotiators of both parties announced a “bipartisan” agreement on the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, numbered H.R. 2471. This 2,741-page bill authorizes a total of $1.5 trillion in spending on various government programs for Fiscal Year 2022.

On Wednesday, March 9, the House passed H.R. 2471. The vote was delayed for hours over a dispute among Democrats regarding $15 billion in COVID-19 spending. Originally, the spending would have been offset by removing already-passed Covid aid for states, but House Democrat leadership ultimately removed the funding altogether while promising to pass it separately next week.

H.R. 2471 was voted on in two pieces, a method chosen by establishment leadership to ensure its passage. The provisions related to the military and homeland security passed by a 361-69 vote, while the domestic-spending provisions passed by a 260-171 vote. The bill now goes to the Senate for consideration; a vote will most likely occur between Friday evening and Sunday.

H.R. 2471 continues and accelerates the federal government’s reckless overspending that will result in economic catastrophe. Not only does the bill authorize $1.5 trillion in spending in just one year, but, according to Senate Democrats, it “includes a 6.7 percent increase for non-defense discretionary spending, the largest increase in non-defense programs in four years.” Meanwhile, neocon Senate Republicans are lauding a massive increase in defense spending plus nearly $14 billion in “emergency funding” for Ukraine.

Additionally, H.R. 2471’s provisions are blatantly unconstitutional and implement far-left, Marxist policies. One of the worst of the provisions snuck into the bill is the misleadingly titled “Violence Against Women Act” (VAWA). This radical provision would:
  • enact tyrannical gun-control policies, particularly empowering the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) to deputize local law enforcement to act as ATF agents, and to launch criminal investigations into law-abiding citizens who are mistakenly denied by the NICS background check system;
  • impose Marxist “gender identity” protections that would require women’s shelters to accept gender-confused men if they wish to participate in VAWA grant programs. The bill doesn’t include any religious exemptions;
  • insert Critical Race Theory into federal government policy by mandating “improving equity and reducing disparities”;
  • allow Indian tribal courts to exercise jurisdiction over non-Indians in direct violation of Articles II and III of the U.S. Constitution; and
  • fund a grant program that promotes the notion that it is “reproductive coercion” and domestic violence for fathers to dissuade their wives or girlfriends to not commit an abortion.

VAWA is one of the most extreme programs snuck into H.R. 2471, but it is not the only one. The omnibus bill also:

  • unconstitutionally spends over $33 billion on government education, something the federal government has absolutely no business doing;
  • spends over $100 billion on leftist “Green New Deal” programs, further implementing a radical climate-change agenda and rigging the economy in favor of “green” energy;
  • includes over 4,000 wasteful “pork” earmarks (totaling billions of dollars) for the first time since 2011;
  • as mentioned above, spends $13.6 billion in aid for Ukraine, further entangling the United States in foreign conflicts;
  • spends $0 on border security or other programs that would end mass migration into the United States, despite spending hundreds of millions of dollars on border security in foreign countries;
  • expands Marxist “diversity, equality, and inclusion” at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence;
  • spends billions of dollars on multiple wasteful welfare programs, government subsidies, and grants; and
  • continues the federal government’s COVID-19 “national emergency.”

H.R. 2471 includes many other wasteful and radical provisions, but what is mentioned above is sufficient to show the danger it poses to the Constitution and American liberty. The U.S. Senate would be wise to reject H.R. 2471 and instead only pass legislation that upholds the Constitution and individual liberty.

To urge your U.S. senators to oppose H.R. 2471, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, visit The John Birch Society’s legislative alert here.