Cracking the Ivermectin Code: COVID-19 Associated Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation

The Chloroquine Wars Part XXXVII

BY MATTHEW CRAWFORD

SEE: https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/cracking-the-ivermectin-code-covid;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Since sometime last summer, I've paid (increasing) attention to much of the rapidly growing body of evidence that ivermectin (IVM) effectively treats SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19. While I decided some months ago that I believe IVM almost surely works as a treatment and could effectively end the pandemic, the strange consistency of IVM results as prophylaxis, early (like antiviral), late, and as a long haul treatment baffled me. Could it really be true that IVM works in so many different ways that it manages all these results?!

While IVM has immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties, so too does hydroxychloroquine, but the evidence on HCQ efficacy quite clearly favors prophylaxis/early usage over late treatment, indicating that antiviral action is the most important tool in HCQ's Swiss Army Knife array of mechanisms.

What could IVM be doing differently? Or is there just noise in the smaller body of research results (relative to HCQ's) that masks a time-dependence for the use of IVM that will be revealed in further research? An answer may have presented itself...

Recently, at least two papers have come out (Chen et al; and Solomay et al) reporting that SARS-CoV-2 infections are associated with reactivation of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). A few days later, another paper (Gold et al) demonstrated the relationship between EBV and Long COVID. EBV is a herpes virus often called "the kissing disease" that affects 95% of the human population (most everyone who ever sucked face). In many people, it causes no immediate problems, but upon infecting a host it can cause fever, headaches, skin rashes, mononucleosis, and some autoimmune disorders. After infection, EBV remains latent in the host but can be reactivated by an array of stimuli, some of which may be epigenetic stress responses. Perhaps this story is a nod to terrain theory.

One particularly interesting aspect of the observation that SARS-CoV-2 seems to reactivate EBV is that ivermectin has been noted to have antiviral properties that treat EBV (not to mention numerous other viruses). This may be why ivermectin seems not only to work as a prophylaxis and in early treatment of COVID-19 patients, but also with late patients and even with long haul COVID-19 sufferers!

Even better, since EBV is linked to the development of several cancers, that means that ivermectin's antiviral properties may provide a unique form of cancer protection!

And now your moment of zen, brought to you by Dr. Pierre Kory, evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein, and podcast deity Joe Rogan:

 

U.S. Judge Blocks Biden’s Federal Employee COVID Vax Mandate

BY AMERICAN FAITH

SEE: https://americanfaith.com/u-s-judge-blocks-bidens-federal-employee-covid-vax-mandate/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Texas judge blocks U.S. government from disciplining employees who failed to comply.

QUICK FACTS:
  • U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown ruled on Friday that Joe Biden can’t require federal employees to be vaccinated against the coronavirus, Reuters reports.
  • Judge Brown said the question was whether Biden could “require millions of federal employees to undergo a medical procedure as a condition of their employment,” concluding that “under the current state of the law as just recently expressed by the Supreme Court, is a bridge too far.”
  • Brown also said the government could protect public health with less invasive measures, such as masking and social distancing.
  • He worried that the government was going to begin disciplining non-compliant employees imminently, arguing the mandate amounted to a “Hobson’s choice” between their “jobs and their jabs.”
  • Judge Brown wrote in a 20-page injunction that the executive order “amounts to a presidential mandate that all federal employees consent to vaccination against COVID-19 or lose their jobs.” “Because the President’s authority is not that broad, the court will enjoin the second order’s enforcement,” he went on to say.
  • “Regardless of what the conventional wisdom may be concerning vaccination, no legal remedy adequately protects the liberty interests of employees who must choose between violating a mandate of doubtful validity or consenting to an unwanted medical procedure that cannot be undone,” the judge said.
  • “The government has not shown that an injunction, in this case, will have any serious detrimental effect on its fight to stop COVID-19,” he added. “Moreover, any harm to the public interest by allowing federal employees to remain unvaccinated must be balanced against the harm sure to come by terminating unvaccinated workers who provide vital services to the nation.”
WHAT ELSE THE JUDGE SAID:

The case is about “whether the President can, with the stroke of a pen and without the input of Congress, require millions of federal employees to undergo a medical procedure as a condition of their employment,” Brown wrote, according to The Hill.

OFFICIALS AGREE:
  • Marcus Thornton, foreign State Department service officer and president of Feds for Medical Freedom, said their “fight is far from over” and his group will pursue “every lawful avenue available” to strike down the mandate, Government Executive reports.
  • The group is expecting thousands of its members to join a march in Washington on Jan 23.
  • “Today’s decision by Judge Brown is a victory for the thousands of men and women who want to serve their government without sacrificing their individual rights,” Thornton stated. “The 6,000-plus members of Feds for Medical Freedom want nothing more than to continue their service to this country without being subjected to unconstitutional mandates.”
PSAKI DISAGREES:

White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said 98% of federal workers are vaccinated or have sought medical or religious exemptions, claiming “We are confident in our legal authority,” in response to the judge’s ruling.

BACKGROUND:
  • Judge Brown is based in Galveston, Texas, and was appointed by President Donald Trump.
  • The Biden administration has already filed an appeal on the injunction, according to reports.
  • Biden issued the mandate by executive order in September, but the Supreme Court last week struck down a Biden order that would have forced private sector employers with over 100 workers, along with the U.S. Postal Service, to test or vaccinate their employees for Covid-19.
  • The federal employee case was brought by Feds for Medical Freedom, which filed three different lawsuits against the mandate, as well as an American Federation of Government Employees council that represents workers in the Homeland Security Department’s Federal Protective Service. 

Trump Reveals What’s Really Going on Between Him and Desantis

BY MATT MARGOLIS

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/matt-margolis/2022/01/21/trump-reveals-whats-really-going-on-between-him-and-desantis-n1551564;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

According to some recent reports in the media, Donald Trump is privately trashing Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.). These reports have been very distressing to many, as such a rift could have terrible implications for the Republican Party in 2024, as Trump and DeSantis are the top picks for president among Republican voters.

However, Trump denied any rift between the two in an interview with Sean Hannity on Thursday.

Hannity told Trump that DeSantis had denied there was any conflict between them, and asked him to confirm it.

“Is he right?” Hannity asked.

“Well, he is right,” Trump replied. “I get along great with Ron.”

“Ron has been very good,” Trump said. “He’s been a friend of mine for a long time. It’s totally fake news.”

“I have a very good relationship with Ron and intend to have it for a long time,” Trump added.

So there you have it. Both DeSantis and Trump have denied the reports. This wouldn’t be the first time the media has tried to manufacture a rift between them. Last year, Vanity Fair claimed the two were “on a collision course.”

These fake stories seem to only prove one thing: Trump and DeSantis represent the biggest threats to the Democratic Party in 2024.

Will These People Be Charged With Genocide?

BY DR. JOSEPH MERCOLA

SEE: https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/01/22/genocide.aspx;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Seven applicants, on behalf of the British population, have filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing 16 individuals of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression
  • The 16 defendants include Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Peter Daszak, Bill and Melinda Gates, the CEOs of Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson along with several other British authorities, as well as the presidents of the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum
  • According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53 of the Rome Statute
  • The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects
  • The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S. It can step in when a member state fails to take appropriate action to bring a criminal to justice. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court

According to The Desert Review, a slew of high-power figures in the COVID-19 pandemic and the push to mandate experimental COVID jabs have been accused of several crimes, including crimes against humanity, war crimes, and crimes of aggression in the U.K.:1

“In a stunning 46-page legal filing2 to the International Criminal Court on December 6 [2021], an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.”

The Dirty 16

In all, the 16 defendants named in the legal filing are:

  1. Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID
  2. Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance
  3. Bill Gates
  4. Melinda Gates
  5. Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
  6. Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
  7. Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca
  8. Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson & Johnson
  9. Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO
  10. Boris Johnson, U.K. prime minister
  11. Christopher Whitty, U.K. chief medical adviser
  12. Matthew Hancock, former U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
  13. Medicines and Healthcare, current U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
  14. June Raine, U.K. chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
  15. Dr. Rajiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation
  16. Klaus Schwab, president of the World Economic Forum

The victims, on behalf of whom the complaint was filed, are “the peoples of the United Kingdom.” One of the seven applicants is Dr. Michael Yeadon, a former vice president and chief scientist of allergy and respiratory research at Pfizer.

At the end of 2020, he expressed deep concerns about the COVID jabs becoming mandatory, as he could find no medical rationale for their use. In 2021, as we all know, mandates were rolled out around the world. In April 2021, Yeadon went public with concerns that the shots were part of a depopulation agenda.

“I believe [COVID-19 booster shots] are going to be used to damage your health and possibly kill you. I can see no sensible interpretation other than a serious attempt at mass depopulation,” he said in a “Planet Lockdown” interview published in late April 2021.3

What Is the International Criminal Court?

The International Criminal Court4,5 (ICC) is an intergovernmental organization and international tribunal located in The Hague, Netherlands. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S.

The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community, such as claims of genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes of aggression. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court, but that doesn’t always happen.

If warranted, the court can prosecute and try individuals charged with these types of crimes, but it will typically only do so if the member state fails to take the appropriate legal actions against the perpetrator, which can happen if a government tries to shield the individual in question from criminal responsibility. As noted in the complaint:6

“We have tried to raise this case through the local English police and the English Court system without success, we have been unable to even get the case registered either with the police or with the court after several attempts.

The statute for the ICC declares that ‘The ICC is intended to complement, not to replace, national criminal systems; it prosecutes cases only when a State is unwilling or unable genuinely to carry out the investigation or prosecution (Article 17(1)(a)). This is such a case which is why we are addressing the ICC directly.”

Still, the ICC relies on the states’ national law enforcement to arrest individuals, so a member state can still restrict the court’s ability to bring a criminal to justice. The ICC does not have its own police force to carry out warrants or arrests. In this case, defendants are scattered across several countries. According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and four articles of the Rome Statute.

Violation 1 — The Nuremberg Code

The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects.7

Foremost among these codes of ethics is the necessity of informed consent to participate in medical experimentation. The Nuremberg Code has also been the basis for other medical ethics guidance and laws, including the Helsinki Declaration of 1965, which binds practicing physicians to “act in the patient’s best interest when providing medical care.”

While not binding law, the complaint argues that the Nuremberg Code qualifies as a source of international law by way of Article 21(1)(b) of the Rome Statute, which recognizes international law, international treaties, international custom, and principles of law recognized by civilized nations as being of equal value.

Violation 2 — Genocide

Article 6 of the Rome Statute refers to acts of genocide, i.e., acts intended to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. Here, the group in question is the British population in its entirety, and by extension the world, starting with the elderly, chronically ill, and disabled. Genocide can include the acts of:

  • Killing
  • Causing serious bodily or mental harm
  • Imposing measures intended to reduce fertility
  • Deliberately inflicting conditions of life, calculated to bring about whole or partial destruction

All of these definitions apply in this case, and details are provided to support each charge. For example, with regard to “conditions of life calculated to bring about destruction,” this includes both the destruction of businesses and transfer of wealth through imposed lockdowns and damaging people’s immune systems through the refusal to offer early treatment, mask mandates and coercing people to take the COVID jab.

Violation 3 — Crimes Against Humanity

Article 7 of the Rome Statute covers crimes against humanity, which includes:

Murder Extermination
Imprisonment or severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law Torture
Enforced sterilizations Persecution of any identifiable group
Apartheid and other inhumane acts

The specific charges under each are detailed in the complaint, with data to support them.

Violation 4 — War Crimes

War crimes are covered in Article 8 of the Rome Statute. The complaint argues that “a covert war has been waged against the people of the United Kingdom (and the world) through the release of the biological weapon SARS-Cov-2 and the additional bioweapon, m-RNA gene therapy ‘vaccines.” They also include a charge of Mens Rea, meaning the intent to commit a crime, stating that:

“... the members of the UK government and world international leaders against which we have brought this complaint, are knowingly working on behalf of this global agenda for depopulation through the biological weapons known as SARS-Cov-2 and the m-RNA ‘vaccines.’

We submit therefore that the members of the UK government and world leaders against which we have brought this complaint have both knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes.”

War crimes listed in the complaint include:

Willful killing by way of the experimental COVID jabs, the use of lethal doses of midazolam in nursing home patients diagnosed with COVID, and the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in the shots.

Not only are they asking for a full investigation into the inclusion of graphene hydroxide in some of the COVID shots, but they also want a full investigation into the suspected assassination of Dr. Andreas Noack, a German chemist, and a top graphene expert. Noack’s doctoral thesis described the conversion of graphene oxide into graphene hydroxide. According to the complaint:

“Professor Dr. Pablo Campra comes from the university of Almeria, and alongside Dr. Andreas Noack he examined the covid ‘vaccines’ for the presence of graphene oxide with the Micro-Raman Spectroscopy, the study of frequencies. According to both doctors, the vaccines don’t contain graphene oxide but do contain graphene hydroxide.

On November 23, 2021, Dr. Andreas Noack released a video explaining what graphene hydroxide is and how the nano structures injected into the human body act as ‘razor blades’ inside the veins of ‘vaccine’ recipients ...

On 18th November 2020 Dr. Andreas Noack was on a ‘livestream’ on YouTube discussing the dangers of the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ when he was arrested on camera by armed German police (Appendix 41). On 26th November 2021, just hours after publishing his latest video about graphene oxide and graphene hydroxide (Appendix 42) he was attacked and murdered.

We request a full investigation be done into the inclusion of Graphene hydroxide in theCovid-19 ‘vaccines’ and into the assassination of Dr. Andreas Noack.”

Torture by way of forced mask-wearing, the use of test swabs containing carcinogenic chemicals, and the release of a manmade bioweapon.
Willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health — Examples include the forced use of masks, the closing of doctors’ offices, the COVID jab mandates, the use of psychological warfare, the use of economic warfare, the use of biological warfare, denial of effective medicines, suppression of alternative treatments, use of ventilators despite evidence of harm, and euthanizing elderly COVID patients with midazolam.
Extensive destruction and appropriation of property, not justified by military necessity and carried out unlawfully and wantonly.
Intentionally directing attacks against civilians, including those not taking direct part in any hostilities.
Intentionally launching an attack, knowing it will cause loss of life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian objects, and/or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment.

Violation 5 — Crimes of Aggression

The last violation is crimes of aggression against the British population, covered under Article 8 bis3 of the Rome Statute. According to the complaint:

“This is a global criminal conspiracy, which has been planned for several decades. It is now obvious that ‘the plan’ involves the ultrarich and leaders of most nation states, with a few exceptions.

It is also clear that powerful think-tanks including WEF [World Economic Forum] in Davos as well as the Club of Rome, and other NGOs like WHO and GAVI among others, are at the centre of this draconian criminal conspiracy. Under the official slogan; ‘BUILD BACK BETTER,’ used by the President of WHO, the President of USA, as well as the President of WEF, the Prime Minister of the UK as well as countless other world leaders.

The goal of this activity is to create a new world order, through the UN ‘s Agenda 2030, by dismantling all the Democratic Nation States, step by step, controlled by an un-elected elite and to destroy the freedoms and basic human rights of the peoples of the Earth.

In addition to this, the aim is to destroy small and medium sized businesses, moving the market shares to the largest corporations, owned by the Global Elite. The fulfilment of this goal will most likely lead to full enslavement of mankind.

This is being done by means of the threat from both a dangerous biological weapon, the virus, the vaccines, the testing test pins, the mask mandates and all other measures. All of which constitute not only a breach of National laws, but also a fundamental breach of the Charter of the United Nations and the Treaty of Rome and our Fundamental Human rights.

It is of the utmost urgency that ICC take immediate action, taking all of this into account, to stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare mentioned herein currently being waged against the people of the United Kingdom by way of a court injunction.”

New Findings Will ‘Dismantle the Entire Vaccine Industry’

In a January 1, 2022, video announcement (featured at the top of this article), Dr. Reiner Fuellmich8 — a U.S.-German consumer protection trial lawyer and co-founder of the German Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (Außerparlamentarischer Corona Untersuchungsausschuss)9,10,11 launched July 10, 2020 — announced the data they now have in their possession is “enough to dismantle the entire vaccine industry.”

Fuellmich is heading up the committee’s corona crisis tort case. Initially, the committee focused on exposing the PCR test fraud, but now they also have evidence that the vaccine makers were using different lot numbers to carry out an experiment within an experiment, unbeknownst to the public.

According to Fuellmich, it looks like an experiment to determine the dosage needed to kill and/or maim people. In other words, people have not been getting identical products. Different lots or batches contain different dosages and even different ingredients.

According to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, former chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee, they have “hard evidence” of this. He points to an investigation published in late 2021 showing only 5% of the lots were responsible for 100% of the rapid deaths.12

In the video, Wodarg also shows a graph of 9,500 different Pfizer jab batches, with some having toxicity, as evidenced by deaths, that is 3,000 times above the baseline. Others have toxicity that is 2,500 times higher than baseline. Between them are batches with no deaths attributed to them.

Wodarg also claims to have data showing that the vaccine makers appear to have coordinated and synchronized their experimentation so that only one of them is releasing a potentially deadly batch at a time. But they’re all doing this. They’re all experimenting with dosages and ingredients, Wodarg insists, and the reason they’re able to do this is that there are no review boards overseeing any of them.

There’s now an interesting site where you can search the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data based on your lot number, to see if you got one of the more dangerous batches. You can find that dashboard here.13 The video below explains how to use the dashboard.

“There is inescapable evidence, in my view as a lawyer, of there being premeditation,” Fuellmich says. And if premeditation can be proven, then there is no legal immunity for anyone anymore. They can all be held liable for injuries and deaths.

Without a doubt, the legal battles will be incredibly difficult to pursue, as there are so many powerful people working together on this, protecting each other. But that doesn’t mean we don’t try. On the contrary, we must do everything in our power to bring the criminals behind this global takeover to justice, and hold them accountable for everything that has been done to our economies, our livelihoods, our families, our health, and our children’s futures.