Founder of Oath Keepers arrested by FBI, expected to be charged with sedition

Fox News' David Spunt reports on the charges against Stewart Rhodes for his involvement in the attack on the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

2011: Stewart Rhodes (

Supreme Court Rules 6 to3 on osha Vaccine Mandate



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

On Thursday afternoon, the Supreme Court weighed in on Joe Biden’s vaccine mandate for companies with more than 100 employees. The Court ruled with a 6-3 margin to strike down the OSHA mandate for businesses with more than 100 employees, but it did allow the mandate for federally funded healthcare agencies with a 5-4 vote.

The Associated Press reports:

The court’s conservative majority concluded the administration overstepped its authority by seeking to impose the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s vaccine-or-test rule on U.S. businesses with at least 100 employees. More than 80 million people would have been affected.

“OSHA has never before imposed such a mandate. Nor has Congress. Indeed, although Congress has enacted significant legislation addressing the COVID–19 pandemic, it has declined to enact any measure similar to what OSHA has promulgated here,” the conservatives wrote in an unsigned opinion.

The conclusion on the per curium brief in favor of striking down the mandate concluded that OSHA’s powers are limited to regulating the workplace, yet COVID-19 affects more than just the workplace, which means that the pandemic falls outside of OSHA’s purview.

Read the full text of the Court’s per curium here.

In November, Biden ordered federal contractors, employers with 100 or more employees, and healthcare workers to force their employees to either show proof of vaccination or be tested weekly and wear masks to work. Since then, employers have been scrambling to figure out how to proceed as the deadline loomed for compliance while the issue was tied up in the courts. On Monday, the mandate officially went into effect, with no guidance from the Supreme Court on how they should proceed. Many companies felt they had no choice but to begin enforcement of the policy.

The Biden administration’s Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) cited a provision in OSHA regulations that it said gave broad authority to the federal government to protect employees at private companies from workplace hazards. Detractors said the language in the regulations was never intended to be used to mandate widespread vaccinations.

States immediately began filing lawsuits claiming the mandate was unconstitutional. A Louisiana federal court swiftly blocked the mandate. But in December, a three-judge panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that the lower court only had the authority to block the mandate in the states that had filed suit. A federal court in Texas then issued a preliminary injunction halting enforcement of the mandate for the states that filed lawsuits.

A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reinstated the vaccine mandate in mid-December, prompting a flurry of petitions to the Supreme Court for relief. The Biden administration petitioned the Supreme Court demanding a nationwide stay of the injunctions, pending a full review by the lower courts. This past Friday, the Court held an emergency hearing on the mandate for private employers as well as the one for healthcare workers.

As more details and analysis come down the line, we’ll share more with you. But in the meantime, breathe a sigh of relief that the vaccine mandate is effectively dead.

Special thanks to Paula Bolyard for her background work on this story.


Dark Thoughts from the Wife of Dr. Doom

The NIH bioethics boss, a specialist in “human subjects” research, explains it all for you.



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

“This book was written by the author in her private capacity. Opinions expressed are her own. No official support or endorsement by the NINR [National Institute of Nursing Research] the NIH [National Institutes of Health] or other agencies is intended or should be inferred regarding the views presented here.”

Those are the first words a reader encounters in The Search for an AIDS Vaccine: Ethical Issues in the Development and Testing of a Preventative HIV Vaccine, by Christine Grady, from Indiana University Press back in 1995. In the acknowledgments, doubts begin to rise.

The author thanks “my mentor,” Georgetown professor Leroy Walters, along with several academics and medical doctors. Also mentioned are two officials at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), a division of the NIH, and Mary Ropka and others at the Clinical Therapeutics Laboratory at the NINR.

On the book’s final page, readers learn that “Christine Grady is Acting Clinical Director and Research Associate at the National Institute of Nursing Research, the National Institutes of Health,” the very agency that supposedly offers no support or endorsement for Grady’s book, which is “dedicated to my family.”

How strange, then, that the author includes no acknowledgment for her husband, Dr. Anthony Fauci, whom she married ten years earlier in 1985. Dr. Fauci shows up on page 55, his only named appearance, as the “director of NIAID,” conveniently enough, “the branch of the NIH primarily responsible for vaccine development.” His wife finds limited success in the development of vaccines against retroviral infections and sexually transmitted diseases, and acknowledges that “HIV is an STD.”

HIV is also “associated with social deviance,” but no reference to works such as How to Have Sex in an Epidemic, from 1983, or And the Band Played On: Politics, People and the AIDS Epidemic, by Randy Shilts and first published in 1987. Both works outline bathhouse culture and the widespread use of amyl and butyl nitrites, also known as “poppers” and their destructive effects on health. Grady also ignores The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS, by Michael Fumento, first published in 1990.

Grady does recall how the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT-UP) and other activists were “taking matters into their own hands.” In July of 1990, Dr. Anthony Fauci announced that such activists would have representation on all committees and in all activities of NIAID’s AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG).

“The regulations governing the conduct for clinical trials for vaccines in the U.S.,” Grady explains, “are the same as those for clinical trials of drugs.” The drug of choice for NIAID was  AZT, azidothymidine, marketed as Zidovudine, and Retrovir.

As UC Berkeley molecular biologist Peter Duesberg noted in 1990, AZT is a DNA chain terminator designed for the treatment of leukemia but never accepted for cancer therapy. AZT is cytotoxic, lethal to body cells, and there was no evidence that AZT would cure or prevent AIDS. Professor Duesberg wrote the foreword to John Lauritsen’s Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story, published in 1992 and endorsed by, among others, UC Berkeley molecular biologist Harry Rubin, a pioneer in the field of retroviruses.

In his book, Lauritsen noted “Effects of Continuous Intravenous Infusion of Zidovudine (AZT) in Children with Symptomatic HIV Infection,” by Phillip Rizzo et al, published in the New England Journal of Medicine on October 6, 1988. Five of the 21 children in the trial died but Christine Grady, a mother of three daughters, makes no reference to Poison by Prescription and touts “the availability and effectiveness of AZT” as a boon to research.

The AIDS activists demanded the drug as their right and advanced a curious view of those participating in the clinical trials. As Grady notes, the exclusion of vulnerable groups such as children or women of childbearing age, “was called discriminatory.” Instead of being harmful, exploitative, and unjust, “participation in clinical trials was seen as a benefit, so those denied access were being harmed. Some perceived participation not only as a benefit but as a right.”

The rules for clinical drug tests and vaccine development are the same, and Grady explains that children “should not be one of the first groups to bear the burdens of efficacy testing of preventive vaccines.” (emphasis added) So the bioethicist does not rule out the use of children to “bear the burdens” of drug trials. Indeed, as she wrote on page 6, “the ideal HIV vaccine should be safe enough to administer to large numbers of healthy adults and children.”

In 1992, Dr. Fauci’s NAIAD approved secretive trials of AZT and other dangerous drugs with foster children in New York, nearly all of them African American. Those trials escape detailed analysis in Grady’s narrative, which advances a new ethos for vaccine research and application. For example, on page 72:

Protection of the rights, interests, and well-being of the individual as the main consideration in ethical guidance concerning the conduct of clinical research has been criticized by international scientists, representatives of developing countries, epidemiologists, and others. Some have argued stridently for a better balance between individual interests and societies’ interests. Some critics have claimed that the research codes’ emphasis on individualism and protection of individual rights (based on a Western political liberal philosophy) is incompatible with less individualistic cultural and moral perspectives in which persons define themselves in relation to their community, and in which conflict between the interests of the individual and the community would be hard to imagine.

On page 73, Grady cites an epidemiologist who contends:

A person-dominated medical ethic that focuses primarily on individual rights and duties and does not see individuals as part of a wider social order and community is insufficient for the task of setting moral and human rights boundaries around the conduct of research populations.

Grady repeats such contentions several times, and she is pretty much on board with it. 

“The primary participant and beneficiary of vaccine research is the community,” concludes Grady, who recommends research “in which the client and principal beneficiary is the community.” That was where she was going with it, and 27 years later, Christine Grady is the head of bioethics at the National Institutes of Health, responsible for “human subjects.”

The Search for an AIDS Vaccine was essentially ventriloquism for Dr. Fauci, chief medical advisor to Joe Biden, who jokes that Dr. Fauci is the real president of the United States. Like his wife Christine, “individualism and protection of individual rights” mean little if anything to the NIAID boss, a government bureaucrat since 1968.

“There comes a time when you do have to give up what you consider your individual right of making your own decision, for the greater good of society,” said Dr. Fauci last October. Dr. Fauci’s bio shows no advanced degrees in molecular biology or biochemistry and his prediction that AIDS would ravage vast swaths of the population was hopelessly wrong. Dr. Fauci has reversed himself many times but now claims “I represent science.” That claim gives parents plenty to ponder. 

Children are low risk for COVID-19 but Dr. Fauci wants to vaccinate them, starting in the first grade. Remember, according to his wife, the rules for vaccine development are the same as for drug trials. Children should not be “one of the first groups to bear the burdens of efficacy testing of preventive vaccines,” but for Grady, it’s okay to use the children to bear such burdens.

As parents might note, Pfizer wants 75 years before revealing the data on its vaccine, and harmful side effects are already turning up with others. In The Search for an AIDS Vaccine, Grady hinted at what could possibly go wrong with medical research on human subjects.

“Nazi Germany brought the difficult issues in research with human subjects to the attention of the public and medical/scientific communities,” Grady writes. “In the name of ‘experimentation,’ human torture and atrocities were performed on thousands of Jews and justified as medical research.”

Dr. Josef Mengele is not mentioned but “Dr. Klaus Karl Schilling infected more than 1,000 prisoners at Dachau with malaria without their consent.” The experiments exposed at the Nuremberg trials “forced an examination of human research,” and “the medical profession was aware that serious breaches of ethics had occurred in the past.” For someone concerned with ethics, that is not exactly a strong condemnation.

The drug Thalidomide, designed to treat nausea in pregnant women, was “thought to be exceptionally safe,” Grady writes but left “thousands of children with severe and unusual deformities” such as hands attached to shoulders, feet attached to hips, and so forth. “The harm done was the result of inadequate research,” says the wife of Dr. Anthony Fauci, who avoids some dark history about this drug once thought to be exceptionally safe. 

“Some babies had no arms or legs. Others had no ears or malformed kidney,” writes Katie Thomas of the New York Times. Thalidomide was the product of the German company

Chemie Grünenthal, “whose head of research, Dr. Heinrich Mückter, was a Nazi war criminal.” If nurse-bioethicist Grady encountered that information in any of her studies, it does not emerge in The Search for an AIDS Vaccine, published two years after she earned a Ph.D. in philosophy from Georgetown University.

The Tuskegee syphilis study, conducted by the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) never offered the effective therapy of penicillin to “poor black males,” some tracked for more than 40 years. Christine Grady cites an opinion that the Tuskegee program had “not provided informed consent, lacked a written protocol and was questionably designed.”

Others believed the study was “racist,” but no word from the bioethicist about violation of the black males’ individual rights, including their right to live. Grady advocates “justice as a principle requiring equitable selection of subject,” but does not invoke justice in the Tuskegee case.

Christine Grady wants to research in which “the client and principal beneficiary is the community,” not the individual. Her husband, Dr. Anthony Fauci is on record that individuals must give up “what they consider” to be their right to make their own decision. Whatever decision Dr. Anthony Fauci makes, it’s a safe bet that chief NIH bioethicist Christine Grady has signed off on it. Dr. Fauci lied about funding gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, so if Christine told him lying was ethically wrong he must have ignored her.

This casuist and her megalomaniac husband now wield executive-level power in America. It is as though Richard Nixon’s wife Pat headed the Federal Election Commission and found no ethical objection to the Watergate operation. Unlike Nixon and all other presidents, Dr. Fauci has never faced a vote of the people.

His forced lockdowns caused untold suffering and loss, but statements of sympathy from Dr. Fauci and his wife are hard to find. Their “human subjects” are now the entire populace, right down to those first-grade students, also known as children. Being a “subject” is different than being a citizen, with rights the government is bound by law to respect and preserve.

Dr. Anthony Fauci and his wife Christine Grady are the embodiment of white coat supremacy, rule over the people by unelected medical bureaucrats. Whitecoat supremacy is incompatible with American democracy, and if embattled Americans believed it is also bad for their health and safety it would be hard to blame them.

A Phone Call to Pfizer And a haunting conversation.


In this new video/audio published by Rabbi Chananya Weissman's Rumble Channel, we hear a recording of a certain individual's phone call to Pfizer about their vaccine. The conversation is highly disturbing. Make sure to listen:

Brighteon: PREMEDITATED MASS MURDER? Reiner Fuellmich’s Upcoming Legal Battle Against Gates, Fauci & Tedros

Reiner Fuellmich is a high-profile German-American lawyer with a long career in which he has conducted controversial criminal lawsuits against Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank and won. He has lately focused on investigating the facts surrounding the pandemic. Fuellmich's public interviews on social media are just informal chats in which both interviewer and interviewee give a free expression of their ideas, opinions, speculations, and conclusions based on what they know. Acting under the aegis of thousands of lawyers worldwide, he has conducted a large number of investigations that have brought him to the point where he and his team can determine that they have the true facts, the evidence of which will be presented more formally in an appropriate court of law in due course. Social media 'fact-checkers' are not the arbiters of truth, fact or opinion and have no business trying to suppress free speech. Viewers/listeners/readers should be allowed to do their own research, make up their own minds and draw their own conclusions based on what is presented, without interference. For the full interview go to: or

Audition with Dr Reiner Füellmich for international lawsuit Nuremberg

Reiner Fuellmich on social media censorship of free speech



‘We Will Likely See an Alarming Increase in Several Major Neurodegenerative Diseases’ Caused by COVID Vax: MIT Research Scientist



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Covid-19 vaccines “have been rushed to market with grossly inadequate evaluation and aggressively promoted to an uninformed public, with the potential for huge, irreversible, negative consequences.”

  • Senior Research Scientist at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Stephanie Seneff published a peer-reviewed paper in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (IJVTPR), discussing the technology behind the mRNA vaccines and their many potentially unknown consequences to health.
  • Seneff’s paper showed “several mechanisms by which these vaccines could lead to severe disease, including autoimmune disease, neurodegenerative diseases, vascular disorders (hemorrhaging and blood clots) and possibly reproductive issues,” according to the MIT researcher, who explained her paper’s findings in a piece for The Epoch Times.
  • The paper also highlighted the “risk that the vaccines will accelerate the emergence of new strains of the virus that are no longer sensitive to the antibodies produced by the vaccines.”
  • Seneff characterized the administration of Covid-19 vaccines as being “based on novel biotech gene-editing techniques that are brand new,” making them “a massive experiment unleashed on a huge unsuspecting population, with unknown consequences.”
  • The senior research scientist warns that “Even experts don’t really understand the mechanism as of now.”

“One potential consequence is to exhaust the finite supply of progenitor B cells in the bone marrow early in life, causing an inability to mount new antibodies to infectious agents,” writes Seneff. “An even more worrisome possibility is that these vaccines, both the mRNA vaccines and the DNA vector vaccines, may be a pathway to crippling disease sometime in the future. Through the prion-like action of the spike protein, we will likely see an alarming increase in several major neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s disease, CKD, ALS and Alzheimer’s, and these diseases will show up with increasing prevalence among younger and younger populations, in years to come.”

“Unfortunately, we won’t know whether the vaccines caused this increase, because there will usually be a long time separation between the vaccination event and the disease diagnosis,” Seneff went on to say, “Very convenient for the vaccine manufacturers, who stand to make huge profits off of our misfortunes — both from the sale of the vaccines themselves and from the large medical cost of treating all these debilitating diseases.”

  1. The Spike Protein is Toxic: Seneff explains in the Epoch Times piece how Covid-19 vaccines are all based on “supplying genetic code to produce the spike protein that is the main constituent of the SARS-CoV-2 protein cage that encloses its RNA contents,” as both “the DNA vector and the RNA vaccines induce the vaccine-infected cell to manufacture many copies of the spike protein according to the code.” Experimentation has proved “that the spike protein is toxic even when introduced all by itself,” writes Seneff.
  2. Bell’s Palsy: Seneff points out that as of May 21, 2021, “over 2500 reports of Bell’s palsy following COVID-19 vaccines had appeared in VAERS.”
  3. Prion Diseases: Covid-19 vaccines “might cause prion diseases” like MADCOW disease, because the spike protein that the vaccine forces the body to produce has an amino acid sequence similar to sequences involved with prion disease.
  4. Tracing the Vaccine Trail to the Spleen: After an injection, the “vaccine is picked up by antigen-presenting cells at the injection site and carried to the spleen via the lymph system,” says Seneff. “The carrier cells then hang out in the spleen for a long time. And this is where the danger lies in terms of the potential to cause prion disease.”
  5. Parkinson’s Disease: Seneff also explains how “mRNA vaccines set up perfect conditions in the spleen for the formation and distribution of conglomerates made up of misfolded α-synuclein, PrP and spike protein,” which is a problem because “α-synuclein, the prion-like protein linked to Parkinson’s disease.”
  6. Impaired Immune Response due to Over-vaccination: “Today’s children are by far the most vaccinated generation in the history of humankind,” says Seneff. “If we decide in the near future to deliver a booster COVID-19 shot to them every year, as seems possible given the current climate of enthusiasm for these vaccines, are we inviting disaster for them in years to come? Will their immune system “age” much faster than that of previous generations, due to the exhaustion of the pool of progenitor B cells by all these vaccines? Will they succumb to Parkinson’s disease or other debilitating prion-based neurodegenerative diseases much sooner and in much greater numbers than previous generations? This is an experiment that I hope we finally decide not to carry out.”
  • “Since December 2020, when several novel unprecedented vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 began to be approved for emergency use, there has been a worldwide effort to get these vaccines into the arms of as many people as possible as fast as possible,” writes Seneff.
  • “These vaccines have been developed ‘at warp speed,’ given the urgency of the situation with the COVID-19 pandemic. Most governments have embraced the notion that these vaccines are the only path towards resolution of this pandemic, which is crippling the economies of many countries,” she goes on.
  • “People don’t realize that these vaccines are vastly different from the many childhood vaccines we are now used to getting early in life. I find it shocking that the vaccine developers and the government officials across the globe are wrecklessly pushing these vaccines on an unsuspecting population.”

Colonel punished for encouraging parents to research vaccines

Rumble — A commandant of a Marine leadership academy may lose his job after encouraging parents to look into possible side effects of COVID-19 vaccines before giving them to their children. OAN's Christina Bobb sat down with him to discuss the situation.

Freaky Fauci spent $205,000 stolen from American taxpayers to create transgender monkeys

Image: Freaky Fauci spent $205K stolen from American taxpayers to create transgender monkeys



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Back in December, Tony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) sent $205,562 to Scripps Research to convert innocent monkeys into transgenders.

The alleged purpose of the research was to identify why transgender “women” experience high rates of HIV, which is something that Fauci knows a lot about as a longtime AIDS proponent.

For their Fauci-funded study, researchers abused male monkeys by subjecting them to feminizing hormone “therapy.” The stated goal was to identify the impact of female hormones on the immune system of male monkeys.

Since Fauci took over the NIAID back in 1984, this is the kind of horrific medical experimentation he has been funding and overseeing. Not just monkeys but also beagles have been subjected to extreme abuse as part of Fauci’s abusive mad scientist experiments.

“It was revealed in November that the NIAID funded a study that infected beagles with heart-worm larvae and euthanized them after experimentations,” reported The Washington Free Beacon.

“As part of another study, researchers infected beagles with mutated bacteria from ticks.”

Fauci loves to abuse animals and seems to have an obsession with gender-bending

Fauci also subjected monkeys to HIV as part of “vaccine” tests he oversaw. Every year, as many as 600 rhesus monkeys are captured and hauled off to an island off the coast of South Carolina where Charles River Laboratories abuses and tortures them for “research” purposes.

Charles River Laboratories, by the way, currently has a $27.5 million contract with the NIAID.

Dr. Katherine Roe, a neuroscientist with PETA, says that Fauci’s latest study involving the “transitioning” of monkeys into transgenders is “yet another pointless, wasteful monkey torture experiment.”

“It’s just bad science to suggest that dosing monkeys with feminizing medication make them good stand-ins for humans,” Roe told the Beacon. “This study will not help to prevent or treat HIV and will not help transgender women.”

Roe added that the study is ineffective if for no other reason than the fact that monkeys cannot even contract HIV. They contract something milder but similar called the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus or SIV.

Roe blames the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for spending billions of dollars on this pointless research even though primates are also unable to contract AIDS.

In a statement, a spokeswoman from Scripps Florid claimed that testing these “sub-populations” of monkeys can help to develop effective treatments for fatal diseases.

“The research you reference concerns a sub-population of people at greater risk of HIV infection, and factors that may or may not affect their response to a treatment/preventative approach in development,” the spokeswoman said.

“It is through these types of targeted research studies that substantive progress against HIV, cancer, ALS, dementia – indeed most diseases and conditions – will be made.”

It turns out that the NIAID has funded all kinds of transgender research involving HIV, almost like Fauci has some kind of obsession with gender-bending – and using American tax dollars to do it.

At one point, Fauci gave $155,000 to the University of Alabama to research the effects of giving testosterone to women.

He also sent $230,000 over to researchers at Emory University to study how immune cells in the rectums of transgender people affect their HIV risk.

Fauci has had a sick obsession with HIV and AIDS since the 1980s, which is important to emphasize. Something is very wrong with the guy.

“I’m thinking his fear experiments on monkeys were a prelude to the covid fearmongering now being imposed on people,” wrote a Natural News reader. “What a monster. He shouldn’t be allowed to walk free.”

The latest news about Fauci can be found at

Sources for this article include:

Brighteon: Vaccines and boosters destroy the immune system

Conspiracy theory, no longer. Vaccines and boosters destroy the immune system.

From immune deficiency to prion disease. The “experts” were simply repeating a talking point that was given to them by the health authorities who had absolutely no data on the information they were spewing within their position. This was exemplified by the propaganda media in order to promote a herd mentality and discourage free thought. Now we are beginning to learn the truth but unfortunately, it may be too late. The damage has been done. We’re beginning to see the tip of the iceberg from the fog of censorship and malfeasance given to us by those in authority.

DOJ to Form New Domestic Terrorism Unit Specializing in “Home Grown Terror Threats”

DOJ to Form New Domestic Terrorism Unit Specializing in “Home Grown Terror Threats”

Tulsi Gabbard at CPAC, 2022: Words they'll call you when you don't "shut up, fall in line"



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

On Tuesday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it will be forming a new unit that will focus specifically on domestic terror threats. Matthew Olsen, the assistant attorney general for national security, made the announcement in his opening remarks to the Senate Judiciary Committee.

According to Olsen, the number of domestic terrorism cases that the FBI is currently investigating has more than doubled since March of 2020.

“The threat posed by domestic terrorism is on the rise,” Olsen noted, bringing up the 2015 mass shooting at a Charleston, South Carolina, church; the 2017 shooting of Congressman Steve Scalise (R-La.) and four others in Alexandria, Virginia; the 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting; and the 2019 shooting at an El Paso Walmart.

Olsen then signaled the true reason that he and the DOJ believe a new domestic terrorism unit is necessary.

“Last week we marked the one-year anniversary of the attack on the Capitol on January 6. In the wake of that attack, the Department of Justice has undertaken an effort unprecedented in scope and complexity, to hold accountable all of those who engaged in criminal acts,” Olsen said.

“The attacks in recent years underscore the threat that domestic terrorism continues to pose to our citizens, to law enforcement officers, to public officials, and to our democratic institutions.”

Despite already having a group of attorneys specializing in both domestic and international terrorism, Olsen apparently decided unilaterally to create a new unit specializing in only domestic threats.

“I decided to establish a domestic terrorism unit to augment our existing approach,” Olsen said. “This group of dedicated attorneys will focus on the domestic terrorism threat, helping to ensure that these cases are handled properly and effectively coordinated across the Department of Justice and across the country.”

In his opening remarks, Olsen completely left out the anarchical summer of 2020 when neo-Marxist groups led by Antifa and Black Lives Matter took over a portion of the city of Seattle and literally burned parts of Minneapolis, Kenosha, and other cities to vent their left-wing, anti-police rage.

Also testifying before the Judiciary Committee was FBI National Security Branch Executive Assistant Director Jill Sanborn, who warned of the danger of small groups or lone-wolf terrorists.

“The greatest terrorism threat facing the United States today remains that posed by lone actors or small cells, who are typically radicalized online and look to use easily accessible weapons to attack soft targets,” Sanborn said.

The beginning of the hearing was marked by a battle of two videos, with committee chairman Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) showing a video of the January 6 unrest at the Capitol. Durbin attacked Republicans saying, “They are normalizing the use of violence to achieve political goals.”

The committee’s top Republican, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, countered with a video showing segments of the nearly 600 violent riots in the summer of 2020, complete with out-of-control fires, the attacking of police officers, and the use of explosive devices.

“These anti-police riots rocked our nation for seven full months, just like the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol rocked the nation,” Grassley said.

“Rocked the nation” even more than January 6 did, one might point out.

Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas) angrily denounced both Olsen and Sanborn for their unwillingness to answer whether any of the misdeeds of January 6 were actually fomented or even caused by FBI agents acting undercover.

“Your answer to every damn question is ‘I don’t know, I don’t know, I don’t know,’” Cruz complained to Olsen.

Cruz asked Sanborn directly about the federal government’s possible involvement in the events of January 6.

“Ms. Sanborn, a lot of Americans are concerned that the federal government deliberately encouraged illegal violent conduct on Jan. 6,” Cruz said, before asking if those allegations were true.

“Not to my knowledge, sir,” Sanborn answered.

Olsen’s omission of the onerous deeds of Black Lives Matter and Antifa in his rundown of recent instances of domestic terrorism is troublesome. It signals that “domestic terrorism” to him is a matter of opinion instead of an objective fact. If those instances of burning, looting, and pillaging don’t qualify as politically motivated domestic terrorism to Olsen, he shouldn’t be in charge of such investigations.