A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
PUNISHED For His Faith: Bishop Juhana Pohjola on Federalist Radio Hour
Paul Coleman Relays Legal Cases of Hate Speech Charges for Teaching Biblical Sexuality
Paul Coleman, Executive Director of ADF International, joins Tony Perkins to discuss the cases of Päivi Räsänen, Finland's former Interior Minister and leader of the Christian Democrats, and Rev Dr. Juhana Pohjola, Bishop-Elect of the Evangelical Lutheran Mission Diocese of Finland. They have both been criminally charged under a Finnish hate speech law for sharing what the Bible teaches about human sexuality.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Religious liberties are in danger.
Religious liberties are in danger in Finland, and Christianity has a giant target on its back.
In a court case with monumental implications, a pastor and a member of the Finnish Parliament are on trial for their faith. Juhana Pohjola, 49, faces criminal charges for teaching the Christian word that has been established for thousands of years.
Pohjola has ministered to small delegations of only dozens and has worked a lifetime building a tight-knit network of churches across Finland. Many of the humble churches started as a handful of people gathering for Bible study, singing hymns, prayer, and communion.
Many of the humble churches started as a handful of people gathering for Bible study, singing hymns, prayer, and communion.
But Pohjola’s life work faces a harrowing test of persecution when he and Finnish MP Päivi Räsänen go to trial on January 24th.
In Case With Global Implications, Finland Puts Christians On Trial For Their Faith https://t.co/w4Wsw3vdWL
What’s the accusation against Pohjola and Räsänen?
Hate speech!
The Federalist wrote:
Rasanen’s alleged crimes in a country that claims to guarantee freedom of speech and religion include tweeting a picture of a Bible verse. Potential penalties if they are convicted include fines and up to two years in prison.
Finnish Authorities: The Bible Is Hate Speech
Rasanen and Pohjola are being charged with “hate speech” for respectively writing and publishing a 24-page 2004 booklet that explains basic Christian theology about sex and marriage, which reserves sex exclusively for within marriage, which can only consist of one man and one woman, for life. The Finnish prosecutor claims centuries-old Christian teachings about sex “incite hatred” and violate legal preferences for government-privileged identity groups.
For a country that supposedly believes in free speech and religion, this prosecution is nothing more than a witch hunt.
The American Conservative noted:
Päivi Räsänen is a member of the Finnish Parliament from the Christian Democratic Party, and a practicing Lutheran. She is also facing hate speech investigations for having questioned publicly her own church leaders’ decision to affirm LGBT pride. Now, the Finnish police have expanded the investigation to consider charges against her over a 2004 pamphlet she wrote defending the Lutheran Church’s traditional teaching about marriage (which entails denying that same-sex marriage is a real marriage). It’s worth noting that Räsänen wrote that pamphlet seven years before LGBT was added to the national hate-speech law as a protected class. She was investigated once before for the pamphlet, and cleared — but now she’s going to undergo another interrogation.
Below is a screenshot of the tweet that started the persecution:
The world will be watching the trial of Päivi Räsänen. One thing is certain: violations of religious freedom must be condemned wherever they occur. Tweeting a Bible Verse Should Never Result in Jail Time: @FRCdchttps://t.co/oQp6LrofqE
FINLAND: The trial against the Christian parliamentarian charged with “ethnic agitation” against homosexuals will start in January. https://t.co/mkS5Dkm5Pf
Pohjola and Räsänen have faced relentless interrogation from police about their theology, and Finnish authorities admit their interpretation of Finland’s law makes publishing the Bible a hate crime.
The case is expected to have major international implications for freedom of speech and religious liberty in Western society.
The Federalist explained:
“Although all European countries have these hate speech laws, and these hate speech laws are increasingly being used against citizens for things that they say, this is the first time we’ve really seen Christians face criminal prosecution for explaining their biblical views,” Coleman said. “…It’s unprecedented. We’ve not seen attacks on free speech on this level in Europe, and that’s why they are extremely important cases, not just for the people of Finland and Paivi Rasanen and the bishop themselves, but for all of Europe. If this is upheld in one jurisdiction, we will no doubt see it in other jurisdictions as well.”
Such “hate speech” laws exist in every European country and Western countries such as Canada and Australia, and descend from Soviet influence. Coleman called them “sleeper laws,” saying that in other countries “they could be used any time just like they are in Finland. People need to mobilize against these laws and overturn them.”
ADF International is providing legal support for the cases and noted the grave dangers to freedom of speech:
“Freedom of speech is one of the cornerstones of democracy. The Finnish Prosecutor General’s decision to bring these charges against Dr. Räsänen creates a culture of fear and censorship. If committed civil servants like Päivi Räsänen are criminally charged for voicing their deeply held beliefs, it creates a chilling effect for everyone’s right to speak freely, ”said Paul Coleman, Executive Director of ADF International and author of “Censored“.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
A Nov. 17 lawsuit filed by two public-interest law firms is just the latest in a series of cases where schools are accused of initiating social gender transitions of children behind the backs of their parents.
An attorney involved in the litigation told the Daily Caller News Foundation that the policies are in place in school districts across the country.
‘[T]his sort of thing is metastasizing like a cancer underneath the surface around the country,’ Vernadette Broyles, president and general counsel of the Child and Parent Rights Campaign (CPRC) told the DCNF.
The lawsuit filed Nov. 17 by two public-interest law firms against the Kettle Moraine School District in Wisconsin over the clandestine social transition of a 12-year-old girl marks the latest in a series of cases where school officials allegedly initiated social gender transitions without parental consent.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty (WILL), one of the public-interest firms suing the Waukesha-area school district, is also involved in litigation against the Madison Metropolitan School District (MMSD). But one attorney involved in the litigation tells the Daily Caller News Foundation that policies and guidelines that are prompting schools to carry out clandestine transitions are in place across the country.
“[T]his sort of thing is metastasizing like a cancer underneath the surface around the country,” Vernadette Broyles, president and general counsel of the Child and Parent Rights Campaign (CPRC), told the Daily Caller News Foundation.
‘Mom, I Had A Meeting Today’
Broyles represents Jeff and January Littlejohn in a suit which alleges that Leon County Schools began helping their daughter transition without their consent after their daughter experienced gender dysphoria during the spring and summer of 2020. Mrs. Littlejohn told the DCNF she emailed her daughter’s math teacher, explaining that they “weren’t affirming at home” but that they “didn’t feel like we could stop our daughter from using a nickname.”
However, weeks later, Mrs. Littlejohn told the DCNF that her daughter made a shocking revelation while being picked up from school, saying, “Mom. I had a meeting today about my name and they asked me which restroom I wanted to use.”
“I immediately was very upset, I was confused. I asked her to elaborate. What are you talking about, I don’t know anything about a meeting. And so I immediately emailed the guidance counselor and I was called back with the assistant principal, which I thought, that’s also odd,” Mrs. Littlejohn told the DCNF. “And they then told me my daughter was now protected by law under a non-discrimination law, and they could not give me any information, because my daughter, who was 13 at the time, had to be the one to authorize my notification or attendance at the meeting,” she went on to say, adding that when she initially called the school, they would not even confirm such a meeting had taken place.
A guide for employees of Leon County Schools in addressing LGBTQ students shared with the DCNF by CPRC includes the question, “A student has exhibited behavior in school leading administrators or teachers to believe the student is LGBTQ+. Should the parents or legal guardians be notified?”
“No. Outing a student, especially to parents, can be very dangerous to the students' health and well-being. Some students are not able to be out at home because their parents are unaccepting of LGBTQ+ people out,” the “LCS Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Gender Nonconforming and Questioning Support Guide” states. “As many as 40% of homeless youth are LGBTQ+, many of whom have been rejected by their families for being LGBTQ+. Outing students to their parents can literally make them homeless.”
After weeks of communications that failed to resolve the situation, the Littlejohns, backed by CPRC, filed suit in federal court on Oct 18. Leon County Schools did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.
Screenshot from the “LCS Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Gender Nonconforming and Questioning Support Guide” provided to the DCNF
‘Even Over Her Parents’ Objection’
In Wisconsin, parents faced a similar situation in the Kettle Moraine School District, located near Milwaukee. After the parents told a guidance counselor and the principal at Kettle Moraine Middle School of their daughter’s struggle with gender dysphoria, the principal’s response on Jan. 20 left no room for doubt that their wishes would not be respected, according to legal documents.
The principal told them “when their daughter returned to school, school staff would refer to her using whatever name and pronouns she wanted while at school, even over her parents’ objection,” according to a complaint filed by WILL and the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).
“[Her parents] had no choice but to withdraw her from school, which they did immediately and kept her out of school for a few weeks. And during that time, she changed her mind. She realized her parents were right to take that cautious approach, and that she’d actually been confused,” WILL’s Luke Berg told the DCNF in an interview. The daughter now attends another school district.
The Kettle Moraine School District did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.
Screenshot of the complaint in B.F. v. Kettle Moraine School District
‘Not Adopted In A Transparent Manner’
WILL is also involved in a lawsuit against the MMSD over a similar policy, which it filed in February 2020, representing eight families, two of which involve single mothers.
“The District’s Policy was not adopted in a transparent manner with a full opportunity for all parents to provide feedback and with a public vote by the School Board,” the complaint said. “Instead, the Policy was developed internally within the Madison School District staff working with preferred groups that agreed with the direction being pursued by the staff.”
Berg told the DCNF that one of the preliminary motions, in this case, has already reached the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which is being asked to decide if the plaintiffs can remain anonymous. It is also being asked to rule on a preliminary injunction against the Madison Municipal School District.
“The trial court said the policy is enjoined to the extent that it requires staff or allows staff to deceive parents or to lie to parents if they ask about what’s happening at school,” Berg explained to the DCNF. “So that injunction is still in place, so parents can affirmatively ask their school district, ‘Hey what name and pronouns are you calling my child at school?’ and the staff has to answer truthfully.”
Tim LeMonds, the executive director for communications and public affairs for MMSD, told the DCNF he was “not able to provide comment on pending litigation.”
Screenshot from complaint in Doe v. Madison Metropolitan School District
‘Allowed To Keep Parents Out Of The Loop’
Cases alleging clandestine transitions are cropping up elsewhere across the country. In Montgomery County, Maryland, parents are suing their school district over a policy like those in Florida and Wisconsin.
“The judge is busy working on his opinion, I suppose, for six months or more now,” Rick Claybrook, an attorney working with the National Legal Foundation on the case, told the DCNF.
Claybrook told the DCNF that the suit, while filed in a Maryland state court, has been moved to a federal court over some of the issues raised.
“We’re not challenging the entire policy, but we’re challenging those parts of the policy that say you are allowed to keep parents out of the loop,” he explained.
A spokesman for Montgomery County Public Schools asked the DCNF for additional details about the litigation but did not provide comment as of this writing.
Screenshot of the complaint filed in Parents v. Montgomery County Board of Education
Fired For Telling Parents
A situation in Ludlow, Massachusetts shows just how serious some school districts are about keeping information from parents, according to a fired teacher’s lawyer.
Bonnie Manchester, a social studies teacher at Paul R. Baird Middle School, informed the parents of two students who had begun to socially transition at school. Manchester had done so at the request of one of the students, and the parents had been grateful for being told, according to her attorney, Frank McNamara.
However, in an April 16 letter, Principal Stacy Monette informed Manchester of her intent to terminate her employment.
“You shared sensitive confidential information about a student’s expressed gender identity,” Monette wrote, adding, “If you believed that it was necessary to inform the parents, the appropriate means to express your belief would have been through the so-called Mariners team and/or Guidance Counselor.”
“Thanks to the actions of Ms. Manchester, a child’s life may have been saved,” McNamara wrote in a May 17 letter to the district.
Two days later, Monette wrote to Manchester, announcing the decision to fire her.
“I have decided to terminate your employment with the Ludlow Public Schools due to conduct unbecoming of a teacher,” the May 19 termination letter said, going on to claim that by telling the parents, Manchester showed “a complete lack of concern for the student’s well-being.”
“You violated state law and regulations regard student records/privacy as well as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) by releasing student information to individuals who did not have the right to view the information,” Monette added.
McNamara told the DCNF he intends to file a civil complaint regarding the termination of Manchester. A Lowell Public Schools respond to the DCNF’s request for comment with a terse “No comment.”
The lawyers who filed the lawsuits against the school districts told the DCNF more legal action could be forthcoming.
“We’re speaking for parents around the country,” Broyles told the DCNF. “We’re actively working with parents in another state and considering yet another.”
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The Biden administration has published a new “strategy” to fight against COVID this winter that would include more unconstitutional and pseudo-medical measures.
The administration’s “new actions” published on Thursday are aimed to “get Americans boosted for even greater protection against the Delta and Omicron variants, keep schools and businesses open, and help quickly respond to surges if needed during the colder months.”
The administration claimed that it is “more prepared than ever” to push back against COVID. The plan details “additional protections” while “keeping our economy growing.”
The plan includes the following:
1. “Boosters for All Adults.” The CDC currently recommends all fully vaccinated Americans to get a booster shot of one of the “safe and effective” vaccines. Those who got Pfizer or Moderna should return for a third doseat least six months after completing the vaccination series. Those who got J&J may get boosted after two months.
Both president’s top medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci and CDC Director Rochelle Walensky have recently noted that the definition of “fully vaccinated” is likely to change “in the future” to include a third dose of the vaccine. That future seems to be much closer than one might expect.
2. “Vaccinations to Protect Our Kids and Keep Our Schools Open.”This, despite the fact that the FDA admitted “We’re never going to learn about how safe the vaccine [for children aged 5-11] is until we start giving it” and the world’s top medics argue the benefits of vaccinations for children do not outweigh the risks, and therefore they should be excluded from the measure.
The administration boasted that “The U.S. leads the world in vaccinating children in this age group,” and announced additional measures to continue the “progress,” such as launching additional vaccination sites at schools. The schools will also be recommended to implement additional “prevention policies” such as quarantining unvaccinated children if they’ve been in close contact with a person who tested positive.
3. “Expanding Free At-Home Testing for Americans.” The administration plans to issue guidance that would make private insurance companies cover the costs of at-home COVID diagnostic tests for more than 150 million Americans.
4. “Stronger Public Health Protocols for Safe International Travel.” The administration has already imposed a ban on international travelers from eight southern African countries but is set to further tighten testing requirements on all other international travelers entering the country, including American citizens. Starting early next week, all inbound international travelers must test for COVID within one day of departure globally, “regardless of nationality or vaccination status.” That rule, of course, does not apply to the illegal immigrants pouring into the country across the southern border, as Dr. Fauci has recently mentioned. All visitors but illegals are already required to be fully vaccinated.
5. “Protections in Workplaces to Keep Our Economy Open.”Referring to the OSHA vaccination/testing mandate for companies with 100 or more employees, the administration said, “The Department of Labor has provided a clear roadmap to help businesses keep workers safe and their doors open.” The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals reaffirmed its “stay” order against OSHA, citing its “grave statutory and constitutional issues” on November 12. The administration called on businesses to defy the ruling.
6. “Rapid Response Teams to Help Battle Rising Cases.” The administration has already “deployed thousands of federal personnel to help 27 states and two territories” during the summer and fall months in a bid to push back against the Delta variant. The effort is to be extended.
7. “Supplying Treatment Pills to Help Prevent Hospitalizations and Death.” The administration is set to secure 13 million doses of antiviral courses with a particular focus on “underserved” communities (i.e., run by Democrats), “which are often at highest risk from the virus.”
8. “Continued Commitment to Global Vaccination Efforts.” Per the plan: “To date, the U.S. has committed to donate 1.2 billion doses to the world. For every one shot the Biden Administration has administered in the U.S., we are donating about three doses to people around the world.” Two-hundred million doses are planned to be delivered to “countries in need” in the next 100 days.
The administration will also continue “to invest in companies that have experience manufacturing mRNA vaccines [Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna] to help them expand capacity by an additional 1 billion doses per year.”
9. “Steps to Ensure We Are Prepared for All Scenarios.” According to the plan, while the establishment experts “believe” that the vaccines “provide at least some protection against the Omicron variant and that boosters strengthen that protection significantly,” if it turns out that they don’t, “the Administration is taking steps now to be able to quickly act if updated vaccinations or boosters are needed to respond to the Omicron variant.” Meaning, Americans may need to take “updated vaccines and boosters” which are currently under “accelerated development.” And if they are, and the pharmaceutical companies have already invested in that, then it is very likely they will be “recommended” by the government.
On Monday, President Biden called the Omicron variant a “cause for concern, not cause for panic” as he urged Americans to get vaccinated and boosted. Dr. Fauci said Americans will have to “rev up” existing pandemic measures and “do everything and anything” against the new variant.
The president is announcing the details of the plan in early afternoon.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
Leave it to a no-nonsense Texan like Rep. Chip Roy to lay out the basic issue confronting Congress — and especially Republican members of the Senate and House of Representatives — as they decide whether to fund President Joe Biden’s multiple vaccine mandates.
In a must-watch video, Roy explains to Fox News’ Shannon Bream what is at stake in the debate that is likely to be the most important decision made this week on Capitol Hill (and, given everything that is up for grabs at the moment, that is saying something).
I have been contending for decades that Republicans in Washington, sooner or later, must make up their minds: Are they going to walk the walk of limited government, individual freedom, and constitutional republicanism with their votes on the floor of Congress, or are they just going to talk it in fundraising appeals and on Fox News, Newsmax, and OAN?
Here’s just a sample of Roy’s observations:
Should Republicans, should any member of Congress, vote to fund a government, fund the executive branch, and fund the very bureaucrats who are going after American citizens and telling them they are going to have to lose their jobs, lose their livelihoods, if they don’t take a mandatory vaccine under the mandates that President Biden has issued?
The question really becomes: why would we fund bureaucrats to go after our constituents?
It ought to be up to [the American people] and their doctors, not the president, not bureaucrats in Washington. So, why would we fund that?
Dr. Fauci isn’t telling the truth when he said that some of the folks [at the border] are being tested… The truth is, [migrants] are being captured inland on ranches. They’re then put together, often shoved into vehicles, and they’re only tested if they’ve got symptoms. The fact is we don’t have any real testing operation going on at the border.
This is about the government exercising control over the people, and that’s not necessary here. I don’t think we should fund the government in doing that. This is a test for Republicans. Will they stand up and fight for the American people or roll over?
Roy’s challenge to his GOP colleagues comes as three more federal judges declare Biden’s mandates to be unconstitutional, even as private-sector employees are losing their jobs and members of the U.S. military are being discharged, all because they prefer not to “take the jab,” the vaccination against the coronavirus.
Just this week, these judges slammed the brakes on the Biden mandates, citing constitutional grounds for doing so.
In his ruling, for example, U.S. District Court Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove stated, “The question presented here is narrow. Can the President use congressionally delegated authority to manage the federal procurement of goods and services to impose vaccines on the employees of federal contractors and subcontractors? In all likelihood, the answer to that question is no.”
Similarly, U.S. District Court Judge Terry Doughty declared:
If the executive branch is allowed to usurp the power of the legislative branch to make laws, two of the three powers conferred by our Constitution would be in the same hands. If human nature and history teach anything, it is that civil liberties face grave risks when governments proclaim indefinite states of emergency…During a pandemic such as this one, it is even more important to safeguard the separation of powers set forth in our Constitution to avoid erosion of our liberties.
And U.S District Court Judge Matthew Schelp opined that “Congress did not clearly authorize CMS [the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid] to enact this politically and economically vast, federalism-altering, and boundary-pushing mandate.”
As Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver, who has been at the forefront of legal challenges to the mandates issued against federal civilian workers, members of the military and private-sector corporations, explained:
It is promising that these federal judges are acknowledging that Biden has no authority to issue unlawful shot mandates to any person in America. It’s a matter of time before more courts rule against this administration’s agenda to force people to choose between their livelihood and religious beliefs and injecting an experimental drug into their bodies.
So, as Rep. Roy might say, why the devil would any Republican — or honest Democrat not paralyzed by ideology, woke threats, or fears of presidential retaliation — not vote to defund enforcement of the Biden mandates?
How many congressional careers will be wrecked by votes cast this week on this issue?
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) There is a massive coverup taking place with regard to the substantial spike in heart disease that is now occurring ever since Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” were introduced under Operation Warp Speed.
Dr. Aseem Malhotra appeared on GB News (U.K.) to discuss the findings of a new abstract published in the journal Circulation, which basically found that cardiovascular events are skyrocketing now that hundreds of millions of people have gotten injected (watch below).
'They aren't going to publish their findings, they are concerned about losing research money'
Dr Aseem Malhotra reveals a cardiology researcher found similar results to a new report showing an increase in risk of heart attack following the mRNA COVID vaccine. pic.twitter.com/63evorQwlJ
What used to be an 11 percent risk of heart attack over five years among those with some form of underlying heart disease has soared to 25 percent. The inflammatory markers associated with heart disease progression are basically now off the charts, and the only thing that has noticeably changed was the introduction of the jabs.
Since one study is typically not enough to prove something like this, Dr. Malhotra also referenced additional research at a prestigious British research institution that he says a whistleblower told him is being suppressed due to fear that the pharmaceutical industry will stop supplying grant money.
Researchers in the department of that facility that deals with this kind of thing identified a direct link between inflammation around the coronary arteries and the injections they are calling covid “vaccines.”
“We know since July there have been almost 10,000 excess non-covid deaths,” Dr. Malhotra told the host. “And most of those, or a significant proportion of those, have been driven by circulatory disease, in other words, heart attack and stroke.”
“There’s been a 30 percent increase in people dying at home, and often these are because of cardiac arrest.”
Dr. Malhotra’s own father is part of these statistics as he died of cardiac arrest at his home on July 26.
Plandemic tyranny needs to end otherwise mass genocide will continue unabated
Another contributing factor to this sudden and dramatic rise in cardiac events is the lockdowns, which have driven many people to adopt very unhealthy lifestyles marked by sedentary behavior and junk food binge eating.
“People’s diets got worse in general over lockdown and there was pandemic stress,” Dr. Malhotra further explained. “Chronic psychological stress is a significant risk factor.”
Since very few people are taking any of this seriously, probably because of the political ramifications, Dr. Malhotra is calling for an investigation, particularly by the Joint Committee of Vaccines and Immunisation (JCVI).
“I personally think this needs investigating, so I think the Joint Committee of Vaccines and Immunisation should absolutely investigate this,” he said.
“I think that the researchers need to take a look in the mirror and realize that they should publish this stuff because their duty primarily is to patients, not the interests of the drug industry,” he further added.
Policymakers also need to stop tyrannizing people with lockdowns, mask mandates, and other forms of medical fascism and terrorism. These “cures” for an alleged virus are worse than the supposed disease itself.
“It’s high time that policymakers around the world put an end to the mandates,” Dr. Malhotra says. “History will not be on their side and the public will not forgive them for it” if they do not, he added.
According to a commenter on Twitter, Prof. Norman Fenton from the Queen Mary University of London actually had his work censored by the U.K. government and the Office for National Statistics (ONS).
“His paper querying the statistics U.K. government / ONS were using was refused from being published,” this person wrote in a plea. “Please interview him. Something unethical is going on. We are being manipulated.”
Chinese Virus injections are killing thousands. To keep up with the latest, visit Genocide.news.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) U.S. District Judge Gregory Van Tatenhove struck down Biden’s intrusive covid-19 vaccine mandate that threatened the body autonomy rights of individuals who work as federal contractors. On September 9, 2021, Joe Biden signed an executive order forcing all federal contractors to ensure that their workers are “fully vaccinated” with experimental covid-19 jabs. If a contractor did not comply with the vaccine order by December 8, 2021, the Biden regime threatened to cut them off, discontinuing all business relations with the contractor and severing any future opportunities with them. Workers were scheduled to be terminated en masse, but now they are standing on legal high ground, as Biden’s vaccine mandates crumble all around him.
Judge restores equal opportunity, body autonomy rights for all federal contractors and their employees
Judge Tatenhove ruled that the Biden administration lacks the legal authority to force people to get vaccinated in order to contract with the federal government and freely engage in commerce. Biden’s vaccine mandate violates the medical privacy rights of all individuals involved while ignoring all evidence of natural immunity in the population and the growing evidence of vaccine failure. (There is no scientific evidence that covid vaccines have saved a single life.)
For now, the preliminary injunction applies to three states — Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee. If the Constitution is enforced, then the ruling will soon be made permanent, restoring equal opportunity for all federal contractors across the United States. A preliminary injunction has already been filed against the Biden regime’s vaccine mandate targeting private businesses and health care workers. Every person who is currently being pressured to take the jabs must continue to stand firm in their faith and bodily integrity because these communists will continue to lose in the courts.
“The question presented here is narrow. Can the president use congressionally delegated authority to manage the federal procurement of goods and services to impose vaccines on the employees of federal contractors and subcontractors? In all likelihood, the answer to that question is no,” Judge Tatenhove affirmed in a 29-page order. It should be noted that Judge Tatenhove pandered to the defendants and argued that the vaccines “are effective” and that governments “in some circumstances, can require citizens to obtain vaccines.”
It doesn’t take a law professor to understand that vaccine mandates are unconstitutional and violate natural law
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost stated, “This is not about vaccines, it’s about the mandates. The judge’s opinion clearly states that and it has been our position all along that the president cannot impose these mandates on the people.”
Biden’s lawyers argued that the federal government does have authority to control the private medical decisions of everyone who does businesses with the government because the President can pursue “efficient and economic” procurement under the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act.
Judge Tatenhove ruled in favor of the states and the people, citing the Tenth Amendment of the Constitution. He also ruled against Biden’s legal justification, saying that Biden failed to produce a single instance where the Services Act was used “to promulgate such a wide and sweeping public health regulation as mandatory vaccination for all federal contractors and subcontractors.”
The states that fought the vaccine mandate found it to be not only illegal and unconstitutional but also very burdensome to the labor force and the supply chain, with negative economic impacts to States and private citizens. The attorneys general argued that there are people with natural immunity, too, and the current risks of COVID-19 are not being considered with the biased, discriminatory vaccine mandate.
With the definition of “fully vaccinated” changing every six months — contractors, healthcare workers, and private companies across the United States would become permanently enslaved to a fascist medical dictatorship if the mandate is allowed to stand. Not only would they be subjugated into forever compliance, but they would also have to become a forever medical police force, threatening people to do things to their body under duress, against their own will. A vaccine mandate uses discrimination, segregation, and bribery to violate an individual’s privacy, faith, conscientious beliefs, health, and body autonomy. If a vaccine mandate is allowed to persist through any form of legal precedent, a dangerous threshold will have been breached, and it will take determined, righteous acts of courage to restore the Constitutional order and the respect for natural law. But for now, the rule of law is prevailing, and the communists are taking serious blows from the patriots who are fighting to protect the country.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) Thanks to the efforts of a group called Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, we now have smoking gun confidential documents that show Pfizer and the FDA knew in early 2021 that pfizer’s mRNA vaccines were killing thousands of people and causing spontaneous abortions while damaging three times more women than men.
One confidential document, in particular, was part of a court-ordered release of FDA files that the FDA fought by claiming the agency should have 55 years to release this information. A court judge disagreed and ordered the release of 500 documents per month, and the very first batch of documents contained this bombshell entitled, “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.”
The document reveals that within just 90 days after the EUA release of Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine, the company was already aware of voluntary adverse reaction reports that revealed 1,223 deaths and over 42,000 adverse reports describing a total of 158,893 adverse reactions. The reports originated from numerous countries, including the United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, France, Portugal, Spain and other nations.
Aside from “general disorders,” the No. 1 most frequently reported category of mRNA vaccine adverse reactions was Nervous system disorders, clocking in at 25,957 reports.
Pfizer has withheld the total number of doses released across the world, citing corporate trade secrets. This is indicated by “(b) (4)” in the document, where specific numbers and facts are redacted.
Even these numbers — already quite shocking, given the FDA’s insistence that mRNA vaccines are “safe and effective” — barely scratch the surface of the damage and deaths caused by these vaccines. “Reports are submitted voluntarily, and the magnitude of underreporting is unknown,” says Pfizer on page 5.
Three times as many women damaged, compared to men
Shockingly, the document reveals that more than three times as many women were damaged by the Pfizer vaccine, compared to men. There were 29,914 adverse events recorded in women, with just 9,182 recorded in men. It is not known whether the same number of men and women took the vaccine, but this number exposes the very real possibility of a gender-specific vaccine damage risk that the FDA went to great lengths to cover up.
Anecdotally, most of the neurological damage we’ve seen in people who have been damaged by the vaccine — convulsions, numbness, pain, etc. — has been depicted in women, not men. It looks like the FDA knows the mRNA vaccine exhibits a disproportionate, gender-specific damage profile that also affects women in terms of spontaneous abortions (also covered in the report).
Pfizer told the FDA its mRNA covid vaccines can cause “enhanced disease” by making covid worse
Also to the shock of many observers who are just now digging into this smoking gun document, Pfizer told the FDA under “Safety concerns” (section 3.1.2) that its mRNA injection could cause, “Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), including Vaccine-associated Enhanced Respiratory Disease (VAERD).”
This means the FDA knew the vaccine could sicken and kill patients who were later infected with covid.
Under the label of “missing information,” Pfizer also told the FDA that it has no information about “Use in Pregnancy and lactation” nor covering “Use in Paediatric Individuals < 12 Years of Age.”
“Vaccine Effectiveness” was also listed as “Missing information” by Pfizer.
In other words, Pfizer told the FDA its vaccines could kill people and that it had no information about vaccine effectiveness, yet the FDA fraudulently pushed the vaccine as “safe and effective” anyway. Pfizer even told the FDA that it had no safety information about use in pregnant women, yet the FDA (and Fauci, the CDC, etc.) all pushed the vaccine for pregnant women, despite the utter lack of safety information.
Based on this document, it appears that the FDA itself has been neck-deep in a criminal conspiracy to hide the truth about vaccine injuries and deaths while granting usage approvals to the very same corporations that openly told the FDA its products were killing people.
Note, too, that the entire corporate media complex has lied from day one, falsely claiming the vaccine has killed no one. They are, of course, complicit in this vaccine holocaust.
Spontaneous abortions, neonatal death, and other effects on pregnant women
In the section labeled, “Use in Pregnancy and lactation,” the report discusses reports of the mRNA vaccine being linked to:
spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each).
Notice that “spontaneous abortion” represents by far the highest number in these reports. In other words, the FDA knew this vaccine would kill unborn babies, but they pushed it on pregnant women anyway.
All mRNA vaccines must be immediately halted, and FDA bureaucrats must be indicted and arrested
This confidential document — just the first of thousands yet to be released — reveals two critical things:
1) The FDA committed criminal fraud and misrepresentation in approving mRNA vaccines as “safe and effective.” This means top FDA decision-makers must now face arrest and criminal prosecution.
2) The mRNA vaccine was known by Pfizer to be deadly even in its first three months of emergency use. This means Pfizer is also complicit in the continued deaths of innocent victims, as Pfizer itself should have pulled its deadly vaccine and halted all sales and distribution.
Find even more details in today’s Situation Update podcast which also covers Alex Baldwin’s magic gun, left-wing abortion pill gobblers protesting SCOTUS, Dr. Oz. running for the US Senate, Australia’s covid death camps, and much more:
