Day: December 2, 2021

RT USA News: New BLM fundraiser asks for $5 million FOR DARRELL BROOKS’ BAIL, after previous one is taken down

New BLM fundraiser asks for $5 million after previous one is taken down

SEE: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/exclusive-louisville-riot-u-haul-driver-arrested-according-leaked-internal-documents/

SEE: https://www.rt.com/usa/541567-gofundme-darrell-brooks-bail/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

28 Nov, 2021 16:43 / Updated 3 days ago
Get short URL
New BLM fundraiser asks for $5 million after previous one is taken down
Darrell Brooks appears in Waukesha County Court in Waukesha, Wisconsin ©  Mark Hoffman/Pool via REUTERS
A Milwaukee Black Lives Matter GoFundMe page claims to be raising $5 million for a nonprofit bail organization. It comes days after GoFundMe shut down a BLM fundraiser for Darrell Brooks, the suspect in a Waukesha car attack.
READ MORE

BLM’s Christmas message? ‘Boycott white businesses’BLM’s Christmas message? ‘Boycott white businesses’

A previous GoFundMe page that was raising funds specifically for Brooks’ bail was taken down for violating the platform’s terms of service. The new fundraising page, set up two days ago, is trying to raise the exact same amount, but is much more generic in its language and does not mention Brooks.

The page, started by Holly Zoller, says it’s raising money for the Bail Project, a nonprofit organization that works to raise funds for people’s bails. The group bailed out numerous people arrested last year during Black Lives Matter protests.

Zoller says she is raising money to “help make an impact,” though she does not say where the money will go after it is given to the Bail Project.

Brooks is accused of driving a vehicle into a Christmas parade in Waukesha, Wisconsin, injuring dozens and killing six. At the time, he was out on bail of just $1,000. The organizer of the previous GoFundMe page described Brooks, a convicted sex offender, as “our dear friend” and insinuated that Brooks’ arrest was a result of systematic racism.

While the new project doesn’t specify that it will help Brooks, many have accused the page of using a loophole in the system to continue violating the platform’s terms of service, which prevent fundraising for someone accused of violent crimes.

Zoller is listed on the Bail Project’s website as a ‘bail disrupter’ in Louisville, Kentucky. A ‘bail disrupter’ is described by the group as “community members” dedicated to “racial and economic justice.” Her activism in the past included a viral video showing a U-Haul truck, reportedly rented by her, that handed out supplies, such as shields.

Update. RT has received an email signed by The Bail Project press manager Joseph Pate, who said his charity has no connection to the fundraiser campaign and was not raising funds for Darrell Brooks. The GoFundMe page has since been deleted.

_____________________________________________________________

SEE ALSO: https://trutelli.com/2020/09/24/like-clock-work-a-u-haul-filled-with-signs-shields-and-weapons-are-passed-out-to-louisville-rioters/

New Twitter CEO Has Some Disturbing Opinions About Free Speech

New Twitter CEO Has Some Disturbing Opinions About Free Speech

James O'Keefe Responds to New Twitter Policy

BY JAMES MURPHY

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/new-twitter-ceo-has-some-disturbing-opinions-about-free-speech/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Parag Agrawal

On Monday, longtime Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey unexpectedly resigned from the social-media giant and a new CEO, Parag Agrawal, was named to lead the company.

In a statement announcing his resignation, Dorsey, who co-founded Twitter in 2006, said that Agrawal was his personal choice to head the company going forward “given how deeply he understands the company and its needs.”

Dorsey will remain with Twitter as a member of the board of directors during the transition to the new leadership.

Agrawal said he was “honored and humbled” by his selection to be CEO. In his own statement, he said of the company: “Our purpose has never been more important. Our people and our culture are unlike anything in the world. There is no limit to what we can do together.”

But Agrawal, a software engineer and the company’s chief technology officer since 2017, has a history of making some disturbing comments about how he views free speech.

“Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment, but our role is to serve a healthy public conversation and our moves are reflective of things that we believe lead to a healthier public conversation,” Agrawal said in 2020. “The kinds of things that we do about this is, focus less on thinking about free speech, but thinking about how the times have changed.”

Certainly, as a multinational company, Twitter is not bound by the uniquely American First Amendment. However, most of us in the United States take the idea of free speech rather seriously. We don’t necessarily want a “healthy public conversation,” whatever that means. We want to say what we think without fear of censorship.

Twitter has long been accused of expurgating thought and speech that the far-left woke mob finds offensive. Agrawal’s comments don’t offer much comfort that such censorship will lessen under his leadership.

When asked to define “misinformation” in a 2020 interview with MIT Technology Review, Agrawal focused on any “potential for harm” of the “misinformation” being shared instead of whether it was true or not.

“I think that’s the existential question of our times. Defining misinformation is really, really hard. As we learn through time, our understanding of truth also evolves,” Agrawal said. “So, we focused way less on what’s true and what’s false. We focus way more on potential for harm as a result of certain content being amplified on the platform without appropriate context.”

Twitter has routinely described itself as a “global town square” where ideas and points of view can be discussed freely. It’s simply not its role to police “potential harm” of ideas.

Despite being Twitter’s new CEO for less than three full days, controversy surrounding past tweets from Agrawal has already emerged. A 2010 tweet from Agrawal quickly emerged in which he quoted comedian Asif Mandvi saying, “If they are not gonna make a distinction between Muslims and extremists, then why should I distinguish between white people and racists.”

Starting in 2019, Agrawal headed Twitter’s Project Bluesky, which was designed to create a “decentralized standard for social media that would help better control abusive and misleading information on its platform.”

Then in 2020, Twitter chose to censor the completely accurate New York Post story about Hunter Biden’s laptop — a story which, had it been fairly covered by mainstream media, may have swayed the 2020 election in Donald Trump’s favor.

In one of his first moves as CEO, Agrawal and Twitter updated its policy on the sharing of private information “expanding its scope to include ‘private media.’” The new rule bans the sharing of “media of private individuals without the permission of the person(s) depicted.”

However, “This policy is not applicable to media featuring public figures or individuals when media and accompanying Tweet text are shared in the public interest or add value to public discourse.”

Exactly who decides who is a “private individual” and a “public figure?” Who decides what is in the “public interest” and what exactly might “add value to public discourse?”

Even Agrawal’s first move as CEO seems to be a free-speech quelling measure.

It’s easy to just dismiss Twitter’s authoritarian speech-policing ways, join Gab or Telegram or another platform that doesn’t yet dogmatically censor free speech, and call it a day. But Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and all the rest still need to be called out on their censorship. Like it or not, Twitter is still influential in society and the censorship it inflicts on people is wrong and extremely un-American.

Growing Numbers on the Right Calling For a Government Shutdown

Growing Numbers on the Right Calling For a Government Shutdown to Block Vaccine Mandates

BY RICK MORAN

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2021/12/01/growing-numbers-on-the-right-calling-for-a-government-shutdown-to-block-vaccine-mandates-n1537993;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A growing number of conservative voices — most of them outside of government — are calling for Republicans in Congress to refuse to fund the government until Joe Biden’s vaccine mandates are scrapped.

If there were going to be a shutdown, the timing couldn’t be better. The government will begin to run out of money this weekend, necessitating another continuing resolution to fund the government into 2022. And before the end of the month, the nation’s debt limit will have been reached, forcing the government not to spend more than it takes in and to default on at least part of its debt.

The calls are mostly coming from GOP congressional candidates, although several high-profile conservatives in the House are also calling for a shutdown.

Washington Examiner:

“Between now and Christmas, the debt limit will be reached and all appropriations for federal spending will expire,” Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, tweeted. “It takes 60 votes in the Senate to fund Biden’s agenda which includes FIVE different vaccine mandates. There are only 50 Democrats in the Senate.”

Rep. Chip Roy followed Massie’s declaration with a more explicit challenge for House and Senate Republicans, although with the GOP a minority in both chambers of Congress, only Senate Republicans are positioned to pull the trigger on a government shutdown. “Will they fund government that forces vax mandates … Or will they fight?” the Texas Republican tweeted. “The choice will draw lines for 2022.”

What would be the advantage of shutting down the government over vaccine mandates? Well, for one thing, it would prove that House and Senate Republicans have some balls, after all, right? And that’s really, really important — more important than funding the military and some other stuff the government does.

But aside from shutting down the government and getting a lot of people upset at Republicans because they might not think the mandates are worth blowing up government funding over, what else would a shutdown accomplish?

In essence, those calling for a shutdown are snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Biden’s mandate is losing in the courts and it’s losing popularity fast. He’s also failed spectacularly to convince more than a slight majority that the mandates are necessary.

Related: MANDATE CAVE: White House Suspends Vaccine Mandate for Fed Employees

Is this really the hill the right wants to die on? Ohio Senate candidate J.D. Vance thinks so. “Instead of giving [Democrats] a bipartisan flag to wave, we should shut down the government until the vaccine mandate ends,” he said at a recent candidate’s forum.

Of course, channeling the desires of the Republican base is a win-win for Vance in the crowded and competitive Ohio GOP Senate primary: Grassroots conservatives will give him credit for proposing the fight, and anything that goes wrong politically if Republican leaders follow his advice will redound not to Vance and candidates like him but to incumbent GOP lawmakers in Washington.

If the past is a prologue, that would be the most likely outcome. In 1995-1996, a majority-Republican Congress tried it against President Bill Clinton — and lost. In 2013, a majority-Republican House tried it against President Barack Obama — and lost. In 2018, a minority caucus of Senate Democrats tried it against former President Donald Trump — and lost. But GOP strategists from the party’s Trump wing still believe Senate Republicans would benefit from giving it a try.

Using government shutdowns as a political weapon is always more popular among those who aren’t responsible for living with the consequences of them. With the mandate in serious legal jeopardy, a shutdown may not even be necessary to accomplish the goal of ending Biden’s vaccine mandates.

Republican strategists think that prudence has a better chance of succeeding.

Nothing productive can come, they insist, from engaging in a politically damaging fight for the sake of catharsis. “It’s a clever gimmick but unlikely to change the minds of Democrats who run Washington,” said a Republican strategist who advises GOP senators.

“Do it because the base will feel better if we do” is hardly an argument for intelligent governance.

THE REAL AGENDA: Leading doctor says covid “vaccines” are intentionally designed to reduce world population

BY ETHAN HUFF

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-11-30-doctor-covid-vaccines-designed-reduce-world-population.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Dr. Shankara Chetty, a South African family doctor who is credited with improving early treatment for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19), says that the goal of the mass “vaccination” program is to “control and kill off a large proportion of our population without anyone suspecting that we were poisoned.”

In a recent statement, Dr. Chetty explained that the dying process provoked by the injections was designed in such a way as to be untraceable. People will start to get sick from this or that, and the symptoms will be so wide-ranging that it will be difficult to definitively peg them on the shots.

“The deaths that are meant to follow the vaccinations will never be able to be pinned on the poison,” he said. “They will be too diverse, there will be too many, and they will be in too broad a timeframe for us to understand that we have been poisoned.”

Dr. Chetty claims to have successfully treated more than 7,000 Chinese Virus patients “without a single hospitalization or death.” He is also keenly aware of the government’s censorship campaign against the early treatment protocols he provides to his patients.

“I think the perspective around what is happening is vitally important,” Dr. Chetty explained during a Zoom conference call. “We need to understand what the aim is. Everyone knows that there are inconsistencies, that there’s coercion, but we need to understand why. Why is it there?”

Jab spike protein is the “pathogen … causing all the death in covid illness”

In Dr. Chetty’s view, there is one thing that appears to be causing all of the deaths attributed to covid, and that thing is the spike protein.

This “pathogen,” as he describes it, is either found in (Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca) or produced by (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna) the so-called “vaccines.” And it is this pathogen that will eventually kill off millions, if not billions, of people.

“What looks like transpired here [is] they’ve engineered a virus and put this weapons-grade package onto it called ‘spike protein,'” Dr. Chetty further explained.

Only a small number of people experience an immediate “allergic reaction” to the “most elaborately engineered toxin,” he says, usually within the first eight days after the onset of symptoms. The injections, however, extend that allergic reaction “for a longer period.”

“We begin to see the endothelial [blood vessel lining] injuries that this vaccine causes with its spike protein, with its influence on its ACE2 receptors,” Dr. Chetty warns. “Those are the deaths that are meant to follow. And they will never be pinned onto the spike protein, a very well-engineered toxin.”

“Now spike protein is also a membrane protein. So, the mRNA will distribute this throughout our body. It will be made in various tissues around our body. It will be incorporated into those membranes around our body, and those specific tissues.”

Because these spike proteins are recognized by the body as foreign invaders, the immune system overreacts in an autoimmune way – meaning it attacks itself. This is where the slow-death process begins.

“Now this toxin in the long term is going to get people with pre-existing illness to have those illnesses exasperated,” he warns.

What is worse, these toxins include “bits of HIV protein,” which clearly shows that they were genetically engineered, Dr. Chetty says. People with cancer “are going to have their cancers flare up, and they will say they died of cancer.”

“People with vessel injuries or predisposition like our diabetics and [those with] hypertension are going to have strokes and heart attacks and the rest at varying times, and we’ll attribute those to their preexisting conditions,” he added.

“People are going to develop, over time, autoimmune conditions, the diversity of which will never be addressed by any pharmaceutical intervention because they’re far too targeted.”

The latest news about covid shot injuries and deaths can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

GreatGameIndia.com

NaturalNews.com

STILLBIRTHS GALORE: The infant death wave has begun as pregnant women continue getting jabbed for “covid”

BY ETHAN HUFF

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-12-01-infant-death-wave-pregnant-women-jabbed-covid.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Officials in Scotland are reporting an “abnormal increase” in deaths among newborn babies, which has prompted an investigation.

In the month of September, 21 babies died within 28 days of birth, according to the official numbers. This is a significant spike and outlier that experts say cannot be attributed simply to chance.

“While infant deaths rates vary widely from month to month, the increase was larger than expected from chance alone,” reported Newspunch.

“Public Health Scotland (PHS) and other agencies are now looking into whether the Covid pandemic or other factors could be behind the increase.”

It turns out that stillborn babies also increased during the month of September, which Herald Scotland says is not normal.

“Control and warning limits are designed to flag up to public health teams when neonatal, stillbirth or other infant deaths are occurring at unexpectedly high or low levels which may not be due to chance,” the paper reported.

The conventional explanation is that “covid” must be to blame. Almost nobody is even mentioning the word vaccine, even though the jabs are the most obvious culprit.

A big reason why it is safe to blame the injections is because this is the first time since the beginning of the plandemic that neonatal deaths have been so abnormally above average that even public health authorities are making mention of it.

“Although the rate fluctuates month to month, the figure for September – at 4.9 per 1000 live births – is on a par with levels that were last typically seen in the late 1980s,” Newspunch further reported.

We are now witnessing a plandemic of the fully vaccinated

PHS is one of the government bodies currently investigating the spike in deaths among babies. The agency admitted that the fact that the upper control limit has now been exceeded “indicates there is a higher likelihood that there are factors beyond random variation that may have contributed to the number of deaths that occurred.”

PHS is also working with the Scottish National Neonatal Network, the Maternity and Children Quality Improvement Collaborative, and the Scottish government “to understand any possible contributing factors to the most recent infant mortality patterns, and to incorporate findings into existing prevention and improvement work.”

This latest data out of Scotland directly corresponds with similar data out of Germany, where excess mortality is skyrocketing.

It turns out that in the least vaccinated areas of Germany, excess mortality is not as noticeable. The areas of highest jab compliance, however, are seeing deaths soar.

“The correlation is + .31, is amazingly high and especially in an unexpected direction,” reads a rough English translation of that data.

What this all suggests, of course, is that the real plandemic is occurring among the “fully vaccinated.” If the jabs had never been released under Operation Warp Speed, the first plandemic would already be long over.

Since people are basically being injected with the latest “variants,” however, the plandemic is just going to keep on going and going probably forever – unless We the People finally wake up en masse and put a stop to all the medical fascism.

“I’ll bet all the mothers got the clot shot,” wrote one Newspunch commenter about why many Scottish babies are now dying.

“Gee, what have you recently forced on pregnant mothers? We need an investigation,” joked another sarcastically.

“They’re not really investigating,” responded another. “This is a stall tactic to make it look like they’re looking into it.”

“Be careful,” joked yet another. “You might get flagged for spreading ‘misinformation.'”

More of the latest news about the Chinese Virus injection plandemic can be found at ChemicalViolence.com.

Sources for this article include:

Newspunch.com

NaturalNews.com