Senior Army Doctor: COVID Jabs Pose Greater Threat to Soldiers’ Health and Military Readiness than COVID

Long continued by saying she believed the American soldiers were a “national treasure” that should not be treated as “lab rats,” and deserved “the best medical care.”



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Lieutenant Colonel Theresa Long, a senior U.S. Army aerospace medicine specialist who has treated soldiers injured by COVID vaccines, said that those shots pose a greater danger to the health of American servicemen and military readiness than COVID itself and condemned the Biden administration for treating men and women in uniform as “lab rats.”

Long testified at an expert panel on vaccine mandates and COVID vaccine adverse reactions organized by U.S. Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin on November 2 in Washington, D.C. Her statement was made as protected communication under the Military Whistleblower Protection Act (10 U.S.C. § 1034).

Long began by denouncing the Biden administration’s treatment of American soldiers who were forced to take the COVID vaccine or face a discharge, which Long said was equivalent to losing them on the battlefield:

Over 200,000 U.S. members have rejected the vaccine, yet the military is pressing forward without regard to damage to morale and readiness. We have never lost 200,000 soldiers on the battlefield in a few months. Taking soldiers out of uniforms has the same impact on readiness as losing them on the battlefield.

Long further described how she expressed her concern to the senior leadership over the rushed manner in which the vaccines were trialed and then imposed on the nation’s military during the U.S. Army’s Senior Preventive Medicine Leadership Course held this past May. She inquired:

So we skipped two years of phase two trials and three years of phase three trials, we only lost 12 active-duty soldiers to COVID, yet we’re going to risk the health of the entire fighting force on a vaccine we only had two months of safety data on? 

The answer was:

You’re damn right, Colonel, and you’re going to get every soldier you can to take the vaccine so I can get enough data points to determine if the vaccine is safe.

Long continued by saying she believed the American soldiers were a “national treasure” that should not be treated as “lab rats,” and deserved “the best medical care.”

When Long first encountered a case of severe adverse reaction to the vaccine developed by a military colleague at the beginning of the vaccine rollout, she decided to take a closer look at the possible side effects and turned to the Vaccine Adverse Effect Recording System (VAERS).

“What I found horrified me,” said the doctor, “I found that the VAERS, in only a few months into the vaccination campaign, already had more deaths than in any year for all vaccines combined in each of the 10 years previously.”

Long told the committee how she got testimonies from the soldiers deployed at Fort Benning, a U.S. army base located near Columbus, Georgia, describing the “threats, coercion and intimidation to get the vaccines that were at that time still under EUA (Emergency Use Authorization).” That type of treatment, Long said, violated medical ethics, and specifically the Nuremberg Code, a 10-point statement delimiting permissible medical experimentation on humans.

When Long contacted the Army Public Health Command to inquire about the adverse events following the vaccination, she learned that the command was not tracking, tracing, or monitoring such cases.

At the same time, the Department of Defense was engaged in a marketing campaign to encourage military healthcare professionals such as Long to get vaccinated and then post about it on social media:

I received an email encouraging military healthcare providers and professionals to get vaccinated: “put a sticker on your uniform, post it to social media with the hashtag “the vaccine is safe,” or hashtag “get vaccinated!”

Long added that the army medical staff was simply used as a “marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies,” which was in fact a violation of DOD regulation that prohibits endorsement of a civilian product.

Long specifically underlined the threats that the vaccines pose to female health. She recalled a dramatic story of a young woman who trained at Rangers’ school and initially resisted the vaccine and experienced constant harassment for being unvaccinated. The woman later caved to the pressure and took the vaccine, which caused her such severe health complications that she had to drop the course.

Long said:

One of the things that this female’s story highlighted the most for me was that women had unique considerations than men and postmenopausal women.

Women who are in their childbearing potential have all the eggs they’ll ever have from conception until menopause. Their exposure to various chemicals, toxins, drugs and x-rays can not only affect their health, but that of their children and their ability to have children.

The army doctor added that historically, eight out of 10 drugs that initially “went through standard clinical trials,” but later pulled off the market disproportionately affected women, which developed cancers and transgenerational infertility. Consistently with Long’s observations, the World Health Organization data on COVID vaccines’ adverse reactions shows that almost 70 percent of all such cases so far have occurred in women.

Finally, Long discussed the issue of young men being at risk of developing myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, following the vaccination against COVID. Even despite the fact that the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) was discussing the issue in June, the military did not pause the vaccination effort.

When Long grounded three out of three pilots who developed severe reactions to the jabs that prevented them from executing their duties, her leadership “canceled” her as a physician who treated patients with acute conditions.

In the conclusion of her speech, Long warned against the dangers of “groupthink” in medicine. The architects behind the universal vaccination campaign, including Dr. Anthony Fauci and members of the Food and Drug Administration and the National Institute of Health, only allow for one narrative: “The vaccines are safe and effective.” But “neither is true,” the army doctor said.

Currently, the Biden administration is facing multiple legal challenges to the vaccine mandate for the military, as The New American has reported.

Brighteon: Stew Peters & Clay Clark Exposing Faith Leaders Pushing the “COVID-19 / Great Reset” Narrative

Stew Peters & Clay Clark Exposing Faith Leaders Pushing the "COVID-19 / Great Reset" Narrative

Discover the TRUTH About the Pastors Who Are Prostituting Their Pulpits to Push the "The Great Reset Agenda"



Endorsing the Creation of the "One World Religion" Center?

Chrislam Abrahamic Family House Animation


Rumble — PAPAL DECREE: “One World Religion” Center Plans Unveiled In NY, To Break Ground Soon

Learn More About The Next News Network At:

Learn More About the Religious Fraud Helping to Aid the Implementation of Klaus Schwab's Great Reset:

Read Klaus Schwab's Book:

Learn More About the 4th Industrial Revolution At:
Learn More About the Stew Peters Show:

The Fourth Industrial Revolution and genetically modified humans -

Prophecy rolling off the pages

Pope's New World Order of Iron and Clay, Mark of the Beast & Transhumanism

Rick Warren: Francis Collins, Klaus Schwab, And I Became Friends At The Davos World Economic Forum

Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback Church, lauds Francis Collins, then the Director of the National Institutes Of Health (NIH), during this November 2020 online chat for the HHS Partnership Center.

Congress Enacts $1.2 Trillion “Infrastructure” Bill With Radical Provisions

Congress Enacts $1.2 Trillion “Infrastructure” Bill With Radical Provisions



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In a major step toward implementing Joe Biden’s socialist “Build Back Better” agenda, Congress enacted a $1.2 trillion bipartisan “infrastructure” bill that Biden had been pushing.

On Friday, the House voted 228-206 to pass H.R. 3684. Having already been passed by the Senate in August, the bill now heads to President Biden for his signature.

H.R. 3684 was supposed to fail; six far-left Democrats voted against it as they demanded a simultaneous vote on the even more radical “Build Back Better Act.” Having a narrow three-vote majority in the House, House Democratic leadership was unable to pass the bill without these members’ support. However, 13 House Republicans saved H.R. 3684 by voting for it. They include Don Bacon (R-Neb.), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.), Anthony Gonzalez (R-Ohio), John Katko (R-N.Y.), Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.), David McKinley (R-W.Va.), Chris Smith (R-N.J.), Tom Reed (R-N.Y.), Fred Upton (R-Mich.), Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.), and Don Young (R-Alaska).

The far-left House Democrats voting against include Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), Cori Bush (D-Mo.), Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.).

At more than 2,700 pages long, H.R. 3684 would spend $1.2 trillion. However, only nine percent of that would actually go toward infrastructure, with the remainder going toward leftist programs and the pet projects of lawmakers. Specifically, H.R. 3684 includes the following radical provisions:
  • unconstitutionally mandates that states create carbon reduction programs, with the federal government choosing which plans to accept or reject;
  • creates a pilot program for a mileage tax, which tracks how many miles individuals drive, something that would infringe on Americans’ privacy, penalize drivers in low-density areas, and make driving too costly for some Americans;
  • requires car companies to equip all vehicles with “advanced alcohol monitoring systems“;
  • allows the federal government to bypass “Buy American” rules, promoting outsourcing to countries such as Communist China;
  • enables mass migration by funding border crossings and migrant “welcome centers” while including $0 for border wall construction;
  • defines “gender identity” as a protected class and uses the word “equity” 64 times;
  • enacts racial quotas for broadband spending;
  • rewards states that support and facilitate illegal migration to the United States, also for broadband spending;
  • ends Amtrak’s policies/goals of creating a profit and seeking to minimize costs;
  • includes multiple radical climate-change provisions, including over $50 billion to protect against “climate change” and $21 billion for “environmental remediation.” Additionally, H.R. 3684 will “modernize” the power grid to accommodate “green” energy; and
  • among other provisions, H.R. 3684 includes $39 billion for public transportation, $15 billion altogether for electric transportation, $65 billion for broadband, a $30 billion cryptocurrency tax.

One of the strongest voices speaking out against H.R. 3684 was former President Donald Trump. Stating it was “Very sad that the RINOs in the House and Senate gave Biden and Democrats a victory on the ‘Non-Infrastructure’ Bill,” Trump noted that Democrats had already set their eyes upon a second “infrastructure” bill.

This second bill is H.R. 5376, titled the “Build Back Better Act” after an Orwellian UN program, and it contains even more extreme provisions than H.R. 3684. At 1,684 pages, Democrats claim H.R. 5376 costs $1.85 trillion (down from the original $3.5 trillion they had pushed for). However, according to a Wharton study, the bill would actually cost $2.42 trillion. Furthermore, it includes $1.48 trillion in tax increases.

Among its other provisions, the Build Back Better Act would promote mass migration, spend up to $555 billion on “climate change” measures, override state pro-life laws while funding abortions in the United States, including radical pro-labor union provisions, and impose $700,000 fines on employers who violate the administration’s vaccine mandate.

The 13 House Republicans’ vote in favor of H.R. 3684 reveals much about their fidelity to the Constitution. It is up to the American people, through education and informed action, to put an end to these radical spending schemes.

To urge your U.S. representative and senators to reject the “Build Back Better Act” (H.R. 5376), visit The John Birch Society’s legislative alert here.

Biden threatens businesses with govt vaccine Gestapo that will go door to door, enforcing his mandate



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) For anyone who seriously believed that Donald Trump’s presidency was one filled with authoritarianism, you obviously are not familiar with the term, for the real tyranny emanating from the White House has come in the months after his reelection was stolen from him.

Joe Biden isn’t in charge of his administration, we all know that; the man can’t speak half the time and the other half, he can’t remember what he is saying or what he has said. When he’s not whispering into microphones in that creepy manner he’s now made infamous, he’s actually looking at cheat sheets to figure out which reporter to call on first. And these aren’t ‘new’ issues; he had them all throughout his campaign last year, so if you voted for him anyway, shame on you.

No, Biden’s not running things; it’s Barack Obama behind the scenes through surrogates like Susan Rice; he is implementing some of the same tyrannical schemes he used during his tenure when he 1) ran guns into Mexico; 2) sicced the IRS on his political opponents; 3) issued blatantly unconstitutional edicts like his DACA immigration plan; and 4) signed an unconstitutional health care bill into law.

Since taking over Biden’s regime, he has now overseen a complete collapse of the southwest border, a supply change crisis, rising inflation, skyrocketing energy prices and an illegal vaccine mandate which he, through Biden, is now threatening to enforce using the power of the very corrupt federal law enforcement system and government bureaucracies.

In early September, Biden issued a COVID-19 vaccine mandate to private businesses with 100 or more employees; we’re not sure how ‘he’ decided that businesses with 100 or more employees were more at risk of the virus than those with 99 or fewer employees, but nothing this regime does makes sense.

The rule finally dropped late last month; OSHA claimed some obscure emergency authority to issue the mandate. And since then, Biden has threatened to use the full force of the government, Gestapo-liketo enforce this unconstitutional intrusion into the private sector, as Breitbart News reports:

President Joe Biden’s administration warned Thursday there would be “planned inspections” and heavy fines to ensure businesses comply with a new coronavirus vaccine mandate set for a Jan. 4th deadline.

A senior Biden official spoke to reporters about their planned enforcement measures prior to leveling an Occupational Safety and Public Health requirement for businesses with over 100 employees to get them vaccinated for the coronavirus or test unvaccinated employees weekly and require them to wear masks.

“We also will be having some programmed or planned inspections where we do go to workplaces to check to make certain that the workplace is in compliance with the rule,” the official said, adding that most of the enforcement efforts would be aimed at companies where employee complaints were the highest.

Snitches, in other words.

“Employers face a standard penalty of $14,000 per violation, which could escalate if they refuse to be compliant. Willful or repeated violations of the rule could cost as much as $136,532,” the news outlet noted.

“For example, if we identify that an employer is willfully violating a standard, then that penalty is significantly higher than a workplace that is not willfully doing so,” the official said.

“Termination would really only occur if, after providing a facility with an opportunity to make corrections and come into compliance, they chose not to do so,” said the official, regarding what enforcement actions the government would take against healthcare facilities receiving federal Medicare and/or Medicaid funding.

“The bottom line is: Vaccination requirements work,” the official concluded. “And the actions we’re taking tomorrow will lead to millions of Americans getting vaccinated, protecting workers, saving lives, strengthening our economy, and helping it to accelerate our path out of this pandemic.”

No, the ‘bottom line’ is that this is America, and we have a Constitution and a 10th Amendment that does not give the federal government this kind of power over states. Enough already.

Sources include:


Florida Governor DeSantis Announces Bills to Stop Biden Employer Vaccine Mandate

DeSantis Announces Bills to Stop Biden Employer Vaccine Mandate



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R) on Monday unveiled several bills intended to neutralize the White House’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for employers.

During a news conference at Zephyrhills construction company, DeSantis announced his four bills, which would also call on the governor’s office to look into ways to create Florida’s own version of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), as well as eliminate existing language in Florida law that empowers the surgeon general to call for a vaccine mandate.

“No cop, no firefighter, and no nurse should be losing their jobs because of these jabs,” said DeSantis. “We have got to stand up for people and protect their jobs and protect their livelihoods.”

The bills, introduced Monday in the Florida House and Senate, will be considered during a special session called by the governor that is set to begin on November 15. The legislation aims to resist a set of rules published by OSHA last week that requires private employers with over 100 employees to implement vaccine mandates by January 4.

“We’ve got to stop bossing people around. We’ve got to stop the coercion. We’ve got to stop browbeating people,” the governor said. 

The Sunshine State is already suing the federal government over a separate rule that includes a vaccine requirement for federal contractors.

The bills presented by Florida’s Republican governor would create various exemptions that employees can use to get out of the federally enforced employer mandates, including an expected pregnancy, religious concerns, and health safety concerns backed with a doctor’s note. In addition, the legislation would create an exemption for those who have already been infected with COVID-19, as well as an opt-out for employees who promise to wear face masks or other employer-provided protective gear.

Politico notes:

Another provision would ban local governments and school districts from enacting vaccine requirements. The bills would also beef up a rule made by the state Department of Health in September that banned public schools from requiring student masks without parent permission and quarantining students who were exposed to the virus.

Businesses that refuse to follow the state law would be subject to an investigation by state Attorney General Ashley Moody. Employers found in violation of the law could face a fine of up to $50,000.

The bills would also block public release of any records detailing the circumstances behind an employee’s claimed exemption.

DeSantis’ announcement came on the same day he officially launched his reelection bid and on the heels of a weekend ruling by a federal appeals court that temporarily froze Biden’s vaccine mandate.

The ruling from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals came after a number of Republican-led states filed a legal challenge against the rule, which is to take effect on January 4. If implemented, Biden’s order will impact 100 million employees — about two-thirds of America’s workforce.

Last week, a Florida judge tossed out a lawsuit from several school districts that challenged the state’s ban on school mask mandates.

In his decision, the judge said the six counties failed to prove the ban was “an invalid exercise of delegated legislative authority.”

The Florida Department of Health chalked up the ruling as “yet another victory for parent’s rights.”

“At this point, the courts have been entirely clear: All school districts must come into compliance with the law and honor parental rights to make decisions for their children,” a statement from the department read.

Under the mask mandate ban, signed by DeSantis, over $525,000 has been withheld from Broward County Public Schools, and more than $190,000 has been withheld from Alachua County due to their mask mandates.

Under Biden, the federal government has heavily been pushing the vaccine. The United States reopened its doors on Monday to international travelers — but only those who have been fully vaccinated.

The White House is even deploying First Lady Jill Biden on a nationwide tour to encourage schools to open on-campus vaccination sites for children ages 5-11, just days after federal regulators recommended the COVID-19 shot for that age group.

Presently, the armed forces are cracking down on troops who refuse to get the COVID-19 vaccine. The Air Force has thus far discharged 40 service members who failed to get a coronavirus vaccination before the November 1 deadline officials imposed.

“Now that the deadline has passed, there’s a clear line to begin holding people accountable,” Air Force spokeswoman Ann Stefanek said.

French Poll: Two-Thirds Believe Christians ‘Threatened with Extinction’ by Mass Muslim Migration

French Poll: Two-Thirds Believe Christians ‘Threatened with Extinction’ by Mass Muslim Migration

But the problems connected with this migration can’t even be discussed; that would be “Islamophobic.”



republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The UK’s Daily Mail reported the shocking news Wednesday: “Two-thirds of French people think white, European, Christian populations are being ‘threatened with extinction’ by immigration from Muslim and African countries. Sixty percent of French people said such a scenario will ‘definitely’ or ‘probably’ play out in the country when asked by pollsters, who published the results last week.”

The poll, according to the Mail, “was conducted to test belief in the idea of a ‘Grand Replacement’, a concept touted by Eric Zemmour - a right-wing pundit who could face off against Macron in next year’s election.” The more common term is “the Great Replacement,” the idea that the political elites are bringing massive numbers of migrants into the free societies of the West in order to subvert them and create a population that is used to authoritarianism and more easily controlled. It’s also an idea that will get you denounced as a conspiracy theorist and hatemonger by our self-anointed moral superiors. Evidently they’re now going to have to write off two-thirds of France’s population as “racist” and “Islamophobic.”

Yet while the British media, and the establishment media all over the world, universally cast the problem in racial terms, the root problem here is not racial at all, but ideological. Oussama Cherribi, a member of the Dutch Parliament, quoted an imam in Holland: “The sharia (Islamic law) does not have to adapt to the modern world because these are divine laws. People have to bend to the sharia.”

According to the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Izmir, Turkey, Giuseppe Bernardini, in Europe, “the ‘dominion’ has already begun.” He notes that Saudi “petro-dollars” have been used “not to create work in the poor North African or Middle Eastern countries, but to build mosques and cultural centers in Christian countries with Islamic immigration, including Rome, the center of Christianity....How can we ignore in all this a program of expansion and re-conquest?”

Bernardini recounted a conversation he had with a Muslim leader who said to him: “Thanks to your democratic laws, we will invade you. Thanks to our religious laws, we will dominate you.”

French authorities have been reluctant to antagonize their growing and restive Muslim minority, despite the fact that many imams in France have said essentially the same thing.

Late in September 2019, French politician Marion Maréchal described France’s “first major challenge, the most vital,” as “the Great Replacement, this demographic countdown, which already makes us realize the possibility of becoming a minority on the land of our ancestors.” A multicultural society in France, she said, would be “fractured and violent,” and she noted that France in many ways had already changed beyond recognition: “After 40 years of mass migration, Islamic lobbies, and political correctness, France is in the process of passing from the eldest daughter of the Catholic Church to becoming the little niece of Islam. Terrorism is only the tip of the iceberg — this is not the France that our grandparents fought for.”

Maréchal had a point. Special accommodation of Muslim sensibilities has become the cultural norm in France and all over Western Europe. The accommodation is a one-way street. In October 2020, a Muslim migrant named Abdulakh Anzorov murdered a French schoolteacher, Samuel Paty, for the crime of showing a cartoon of Muhammad to his class. Abdulakh Anzorov’s father, Abouyezid Anzorov, stated proudly: “I educated him to love Allah more than his parents.” At a French school, the Lycée Gustave-Jaume in Pierrelatte, last week, graffiti was found scrawled on a wall in the boy’s restroom: “F*** the Islamophobes,” “To all teachers, I’ll behead you.”

Earlier this month, a French court sentenced another Muslim migrant to four years (that’s all) in prison for attempting to murder his own sister. Her crime? She was “too Westernised.”

There are so many stories like these, published on virtually a daily basis in the French alternative media, that it is impossible to keep track of them all. They vividly illustrate the fact that France has welcomed a large and growing population of people among whom are many who have absolute contempt for French law and no intention of obeying it, and who believe that they have a responsibility before Allah to replace that French law with Islamic law as soon as it becomes possible to do so. After all, the Muslims are the “best of people, enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong (Qur’an 3:110), while the non-Muslims are “the most vile of created beings” (Qur’an 98:6).

Those vile beings have every reason to be concerned. But they’ll be denounced and vilified as “Islamophobes” anyway.

Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is the author of 23 books including many bestsellers, such as The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades)The Truth About Muhammad, and The History of Jihad. His latest book is The Critical Qur’an. Follow him on Twitter here. Like him on Facebook here.