Day: October 30, 2021

DR. JOHN BERGMAN: Pharmaceutical Control of Your Lives

With the world becoming increasingly toxic and the incredible lack of knowledge regarding appropriate healthcare, it has never been more important to take charge of your health and your life. The Extreme Health Academy is a website that's full of information to help you learn exactly what you must do to survive and thrive in this world. Best of all this website is a community of people ready to help others on the road to optimal health with features like an online forum, live workshop, podcasts, monthly video courses a supporting community, and much more!

Republicans introduce bill to stop Jerusalem consulate for Palestinians

BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/10/republicans-introduce-bill-to-stop-jerusalem-consulate-for-palestinians;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In the face of the Biden administration’s lack of support for Israel — from its open rebuke of Israeli settlement policies in Judea and Samaria to establishing a Jerusalem consulate to Palestinians — some Republicans have introduced a bill to stop the latter, which is welcome news.

Although Biden has said he won’t reverse Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, he proceeded with a move that would in effect symbolically neutralize Trump’s gesture. Reopening the Palestinian consulate in Jerusalem is inappropriate, given the Palestinian goal to annihilate Israel. It provides a further opportunity for the Palestinians to target Israel and exacerbate divisions in Jerusalem. We can hope that Israel will block Biden’s plans.

Biden’s overall stance on Israel has far-reaching implications; he is encouraging jihad and antagonism against Israel. America’s stance will likely have an adverse impact in the next round of Palestinian jihadist rocket fire against Israel, which is inevitable, so that when Israel defends itself, pro-Palestinian protests, accompanied by antisemitic flareups, will likely gain even more momentum, as was already seen in May during Operation Guardian of the Walls.

Also, last month, the Squad “forced Iron Dome funding to be pulled from a bill to keep the United States government funded.” The Iron Dome intercepts incoming rockets on Israeli territory, thus saving many lives, while Palestinian leadership has no problem with using their own people as human shields.

“GOP bill seeks to stop Jerusalem consulate for Palestinians” by Lahav Harkov, Jerusalem Post, October 26, 2021:

US Senator Bill Hagerty of Tennessee, along with 33 other Republican senators, introduced a bill on Tuesday meant to block the Biden administration from opening a consulate serving Palestinians in Jerusalem.

The Upholding the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Law Act of 2021 is meant to ensure the full implementation of the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act and stop what Hagerty views as the Biden administration’s attempted subversion of that law.

US President Joe Biden has said he will not reverse former president Donald Trump’s recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital.

However, Biden promised in his election campaign that he would reopen the consulate to the Palestinians in Jerusalem, which was merged into the US Embassy to Israel in 2018, when Trump implemented the 1995 law and moved the embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken and other US officials have said they will reopen the consulate, which was historically in a building on Agron Street in downtown Jerusalem.

The US would need Israel’s approval to open a consulate, and the current Israeli government opposes the move.

Hagerty said: “It is regrettable that the Biden administration insists on making moves that divide the United States and Israel when our two nations should be laser-focused on stopping Iran’s terror-sponsoring regime from going nuclear, on countering growing threats from Hezbollah, Hamas, and other Iran-backed terrorist groups, and on strengthening and expanding the historic Abraham Accords that truly have increased peace in the Middle East.”

“The Trump administration kept its promise to move the US Embassy to Jerusalem, the eternal and indivisible capital of the Jewish State, and Congress must do everything in our power to strengthen our posture,” he added.

The new act quotes the 1995 law, which states, “Jerusalem should remain an undivided city,” and calls for it to be recognized as the capital of Israel and the relocation of the US Embassy.….

Chris Salcedo: “Taking out the trash” with anti-Trump Republicans

Chris Salcedo: Anti-conservative Republicans are making it increasingly clear that it's 'time to take out the trash.' - via The Chris Salcedo Show, weekdays at 5PM ET on Newsmax

Catalina Lauf: America has rid itself of a "RINO"

Illinois Congressional candidate Catalina Lauf reacts to the announcement that anti-Trump Republican Congressman Adam Kinzinger will not seek reelection

Impeach Kamala Harris for Afghanistan Betrayal

BY DANIEL GREENFIELD

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/10/impeach-kamala-harris-for-afghanistan-betrayal;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Impeachment ensures Kamala and her boss won’t get any more Americans killed.

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is an investigative journalist and writer focusing on the radical Left and Islamic terrorism.

“Were you the last person in the room?” CNN’s Dana Bash asked Kamala Harris.

“Yes,” Kamala Harris nodded.

“And you feel comfortable?”

“I do,” she replied.

The subject under discussion was Biden’s disastrous decision to pull out of Afghanistan, preceding a civilian withdrawal with a military pullout, failing to coordinate with allies, and ultimately creating the nation’s greatest hostage crisis while arming the Taliban terrorists.

Kamala had boasted of being the ’last person in the room’ when Biden makes big decisions. When Biden decided to betray Americans and aid the Taliban, it was no different. Afterward the ‘last person in the room’ was also the last person to want to answer questions about her role in the fateful decision that killed 13 American military personnel and revived Al Qaeda.

After the Taliban seized Kabul, leaving Americans stranded behind enemy lines, Kamala ducked questions and left the country. When a reporter tried to ask her about the Americans left behind in Afghanistan before her flight, she giggled and replied that they couldn’t be a “higher priority”.

And then she flew off to Singapore where she toured flower gardens and had an orchid named after her while Americans were being beaten by the Taliban in the streets of Kabul.

Kamala also took time out to meet with Halimah Yacob, Singapore’s first female Muslim president, selected in a rigged election with no opposing candidates in which only Malaysians could compete, and to show off another outfit by leftist Singaporean fashion designer Prabal Gurung who had falsely claimed that, “anti-blackness that is woven into the DNA of America”.

After having done her part to disgrace America in Singapore, Kamala tried to duck questions about what was happening to the Americans she had left behind as hostages in Afghanistan.

Despite Singapore penning up reporters in a separate room and forcing them to ask questions remotely, she still had to face questions about what was happening in Afghanistan. Kamala tried to avoid responsibility, arguing that, “there’s going to be plenty of time to analyze what has happened” and assured the press that “we are singularly focused on evacuating American citizens, Afghans who worked with us.” By the time the evacuation had concluded, many of the Americans and the vast majority of the Afghans had been left behind under Taliban rule.

While Kamala Harris was happy to take credit for Biden’s Afghanistan policy and to put her stamp of approval on it when it seemed like a good idea, she’s been running from it ever since. Whether it’s dodging reporters or flying off to Asia, she doesn’t want to be the last person in the room anymore. But it’s much too late for Kamala to pretend that she had nothing to do with it.

As the “last person in the room”, Kamala Harris had made a point of taking a prominent seat at nearly every intelligence and security briefing. And though she only holds down the second spot, she is in some ways more culpable for the disastrous moves in Afghanistan than Biden.

Kamala Harris visited Afghanistan more recently than Biden as part of a Senate Intelligence Committee oversight trip. As a Committee member during the years that Biden was out of office, she had access to classified information that he did not. While there were plenty of recent reports warning of an imminent collapse in Afghanistan, she would have been seeing reports for four years before Biden and had a clearer picture of recent developments in the country.

And, unlike Biden, she can’t plead dementia.

Nor was Kamala just deferring to her boss. During her visit to Afghanistan in 2018 and during her failed presidential primary campaign, she laid out essentially the same positions as Biden.

In 2019, Kamala Harris went on MSNBC’s leftist Rachel Maddow gabfest to attack President Trump’s withdrawal plan as irresponsible and fumed that a commander in chief has to “understand the seriousness and the severity of one`s decisions”.

There’s no apparent sign that Kamala understands the seriousness and severity of turning the Taliban into the heaviest armed Sunni Jihadist group on the planet or of betraying our allies.

“I was in Afghanistan days before he made that decision, and, Rachel, when I was there, I spoke with generals and I spoke with troops. There was an active conversation happening around negotiating what should be the future of Afghanistan. And then out of nowhere, the president makes his decision. It was irresponsible,” she whined on MSNBC.

Did any of the troops tell her to cut and run while leaving thousands of Americans behind?

Every promise that Kamala made, that the evacuations of Americans would be the “highest priority”, that she would bring American soldiers home “responsibly”, that she would “ensure that the country is on a path to stability, that we protect the gains that have been made for Afghan women and others, and that it never again becomes a safe haven for terrorists” were broken.

Even as the Taliban were forcing young girls to marry their terrorists, Kamala was telling reporters in Vietnam not to worry because she had spent her “entire career on the protection of women and children.”

Considering she had actually spent her career covering for the likes of Willie Brown, Bob “Filthy” Filner who got the Jeffrey Epstein special from her office, along with “one of her closest professional confidantes” who was accused of sexually harassing his assistant, not to mention Joe Biden, that’s almost as implausible as her claim that Afghanistan was her highest priority even while being named godmother to an orchid in Singapore.

When the Biden-Harris administration abandoned Americans in Afghanistan, the stranded included 8 San Diego families and 21 local students. A local school district went to work to help them. Kamala Harris ignored her former constituents as she had all the others trapped there.

In September, after Biden fled and left Americans behind, and Kamala claimed that she could be trusted because she had built her “entire career on the protection of women and children”,  a school liaison warned that, “we still have thousands of families, invisible families, who are still stuck in Afghanistan, who are U.S. passport holders, green card holders, SIV holders.”

The one politician working on the issue was a Republican congressman who declared, “The Biden administration left them behind and we didn’t rest until they were on their way home.”

A father who made it out with 5 kids thanked the Marines. He made no mention of Kamala.

Kamala Harris had spent her career betraying the people she claimed to be helping. Afghanistan is just one more chapter in her disgraceful biography. It deserves to be the last.

Biden claimed that Kamala Harris is “the last voice in the room and never fails to speak the truth.” What “truth” did Kamala speak when Biden made a series of disastrous decisions that cost the lives of American military personnel and the freedom of American civilians?

When Biden allowed the Taliban to take Kabul and screen those Americans and Afghans who were allowed to reach the airport through their checkpoints, what did Kamala have to offer?

When the Haqqani Network, allies of Al Qaeda, controlled Kabul, the checkpoints, and access to the airport for fleeing Americans, did Kamala utter a single word of protest to Joe Biden?

She was “comfortable” with it. And she still is.

Biden claimed that this would be the Biden-Harris administration. Kamala would be his partner in all things, handling calls with foreign leaders, leading diplomatic missions, and tackling crises.

As his partner, she deserves an equal share of the responsibility and the accountability.

“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” Article II, Section 4 of the United States Constitution states.

Kamala Harris violated the trust and duty of her office by engaging in behavior whose consequences were foreseeable to a former member of the Senate Intelligence Committee and the second highest elected official in the country with access to classified intelligence. The collapse of the Afghan government, the Taliban takeover of the country, and the fall of Kabul were not unexpected developments, but ones that plenty of people, the vast majority of whom had no access to intelligence briefings, predicted based on past and current events.

Kamala Harris attacked President Trump’s Afghanistan plan as irresponsible and claimed that she had a better plan. The entire world has seen the Biden-Harris withdrawal plan in action.

And is horrified by it.

America’s enemies are gloating and our allies are fearfully backing away. China is threatening Taiwan, Iran is accelerating its nuclear program, and Americans are being taken hostage in Haiti and Venezuela. America is in danger and the risk of war is growing because of Kamala.

A military setback is not itself an impeachable offense, but knowingly abandoning Americans and advanced military equipment to the Taliban are. When the Biden-Harris administration chose to put a military pullout ahead of a civilian one for political reasons, they turned a military retreat into the nation’s worst hostage crisis, destroyed our credibility, and disgraced our nation.

“There is going to be plenty of time to analyze what has happened and what has taken place in the context of the withdrawal from Afghanistan,” Kamala told reporters in Singapore.

The time is long since past. And the best way to begin is with an impeachment inquiry.

The Biden-Harris administration has made it clear that it will not cooperate with an ordinary investigation. The media, which was briefly critical when its reporters were under fire, has gone back to carrying the corrupt administration’s water. Impeachment hearings will remind the public of what happened and an inquiry will help make it clear who in the administration knew what.

And when they knew it.

Dead American military personnel and American civilians trapped behind enemy lines deserve the truth. And they deserve an accountability that begins with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Impeachment won’t bring back the dead, but it will ensure that Kamala and her boss don’t get any more Americans killed.

IT GETS WORSE: Fauci funded inhumane medical experimentation on minority AIDS orphans in NYC

Image: IT GETS WORSE: Fauci funded inhumane medical experimentation on minority AIDS orphans in NYC

BY ETHAN HUFF

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-10-28-fauci-funded-inhumane-medical-experimentation-aids-orphans.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) After it was revealed that Tony Fauci sent American taxpayer dollars to an animal abuse operation that tortured and murdered dogs, it has since come to light that Fauci did much the same thing to human AIDS orphans in New York City back in the early 2000s as well.

Circulating photos include one depicting a young black boy being experimented on at a NYC hospital. The boy shown was one of hundreds that Fauci exploited as part of a Tuskegee-style government-Big Pharma experiment that led to at least 25 minor deaths during the study, another 55 deaths after the fact in foster care, and hundreds more deaths after that.

“In 2005, the city of New York hired the VERA Institute to form a final report on the drug trials,” it was reported. “VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008.”

“They reported that twenty-five children died during the drug studies, that an additional fifty-five children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29% of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used).”

Nobody likes Fauci except the mainstream media

As always, no payment or compensation was given to any of the children who were used in the trials, nor to their parents. They were mere fodder for Fauci’s mad scientist “research,” which continues to this very day as no president has yet had the guts or gall to get rid of him.

Fortunately, there are brave souls not in government who are coming forward to tell all about what the National Institute of Health (NIH) has been doing for decades, committing serious crimes against humanity.

The following video features an Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC) interview between Liz Brown and Mimi Pascual that talks all about this in greater depth. It starts around the 24:30 mark where key points of the interview occur:

Numerous documents and interviews with children and childcare workers at ICC who participated in the Fauci-funded research are speaking out about the horrors they witnessed and contributed to, not realizing fully what they were doing until the damaging effects and deaths appeared after it was completed.

Fauci, of course, more than likely knew fully about the risks involved. To him, though, human life is meaningless. Its only worth is to be experimented on for “research” purposes.

Back then, only a few hundred children were affected by Fauci’s mad scientism. Today, the entire world is being injected with experimental poisons, the full effects of which have yet to fully manifest.

“Dr. Fauci is Dr. Frankenstein and Dr. Moreau into one,” joked one commenter at The Gateway Pundit.

“More like Dr. Mengele,” responded another.

“One might ask … ‘Why now? Why is Fauci being exposed and incriminated now?'” speculated another. “Could it be he is no longer a trusted and valuable tool for the cabal in power?”

“This … ‘man’ … has been scum since the introduction of HIV back in the ’80s. The disease was politicized back then … and oh! Lookie here … this ‘new’ ‘not-gain-of-function-disease’ … that he has had a direct hand in … has been … politicized, too …”

Another called out National Geographic for launching a ridiculous “documentary” portraying Fauci as some kind of hero for humanity rather than the demented monster that he truly is.

“This is all coming back to light because this is one of the reasons that black people in New York City refuse to take the jab,” noted another.

More of the latest news about Fauci can be found at Evil.news.

Sources for this article include:

NaturalNews.com

TheGatewayPundit.com

Children 5-11 do NOT need “unnecessary” covid vaccines, warn experts

Image: Children 5-11 do NOT need “unnecessary” covid vaccines, warn experts

BY ETHAN HUFF

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-10-29-children-do-not-need-unnecessary-covid-vaccines.html;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

(Natural News) Dr. Meryl Nass, a member of the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Scientific Advisory Panel, is warning that Pfizer lied about the safety and efficacy data for its Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” trial involving young children.

To make the case to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that children aged 5-11 need to get injected with spike protein poison, Pfizer excluded some of the children who participated in it from the final results.

“Three thousand children received Pfizer’s covid vaccine, but only 750 children were selectively included in the company’s safety analysis,” Nass revealed.

“Studies in the 5-11 age group are essentially the same as the 12-15 group – in other words, equally brief and unsatisfying, with inadequate safety data and efficacy data, with no strong support for why this type of immuno-bridging analysis is sufficient. All serious adverse events were considered unrelated to the vaccine.”

While meeting with the FDA, Pfizer argued that children as young as five need to get injected for the Deep State Virus, even though no attempt was made to even assess so-called “asymptomatic transmission,” which has long been used as an excuse to keep the tyranny going forever.

One of the advisory committee’s members, Dr. Ofer Levy, petitioned Pfizer for evidence showing that its injection prevents actual transmission of Chinese Germs. Pfizer was unable to present such evidence because it does not exist.

Dr. William Gruber, Pfizer’s senior vice president of clinical research and development, indicated that his company did not assess this at all. When pressed further about the issue, Gruber basically admitted that Pfizer is just making a baseless claim about this issue without evidence.

How did the FDA conduct a proper risk-benefit analysis of the Pfizer injection if it never even looked at the VAERS under-reporting factor?

Another thing that Steve Kirsch, founder of the COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund, wants to know is how the FDA advisory panel that recommended the Pfizer injection was able to do so when said panel never even conducted a proper risk-benefit analysis?

In order to do so, the FDA panel would have had to take a look at the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System’s (VAERS) under-reporting factor (URF), which it did not do.

“How can you do a risk-benefit of analysis of COVID vaccines if you don’t know the URF?” Kirsch asked poignantly.

“This is extremely, extremely important. You have been assuming it has been one. It is not one. Using a URF of 41, which is calculated using CDC methodology, we find over 300,000 excess deaths in VAERS. If the vaccine didn’t kill these people, what did?”

Kirsch also wants to know how many more Americans have to die before the FDA and other deep state players pull the plug on this mass deception operation? Or was that the point of it all along: to kill as many people as possible with these injections?

“There is no emergency and Covid-19 is exceedingly treatable,” Dr. Jessica Rose, a viral immunologist and biologist, stated plainly to the panel.

Rose co-authored a peer-reviewed study which found that myocarditis rates were significantly higher in people aged 13 to 23 within the eight weeks after the injections were first rolled out.

“In an act of censorship, this paper has been temporarily removed and it has now been killed without criticism of the work,” Rose further explained.

She added that tens of thousands of reports have been submitted to VAERS, even for newborn children. At least 60 children died from the jabs, and 23 of them were less than two years old.

The latest news coverage about the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) can be found at Pandemic.news.

Sources for this article include:

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

NaturalNews.com

Biden to Give Illegal-alien “Families” $1M Each Over Trump “Separations”

Biden to Give Illegal-alien “Families” $1M Each Over Trump “Separations”

BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/biden-to-give-illegal-alien-families-1m-each-over-trump-separations/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Biden Regime plans to pay illegal-alien “families” that were “separated” at the border during the Trump administration $1 million each as compensation for the “trauma” they suffered, the Wall Street Journal disclosed yesterday.

The payouts, pursuant to lawsuits from the usual open-borders subversives, will average about $450,000 per person. Price tag for the bucks-at-the-border bonanza: $1 billion.

Worse still, the leftist lawyers who represent the “families” demand permanent residence. That will mean citizenship — and new Democrat voters only all too willing to thank the party for making them rich.

The message from the Biden Regime to the world’s penniless masses is clear: Jump the border, break the law, file lawsuits, get rich. 

Final Numbers Not Set

The regime is working “to resolve lawsuits filed on behalf of parents and children who say the government subjected them to lasting psychological trauma,” the newspaper reported:

The U.S. Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and Health and Human Services are considering payments that could amount to close to $1 million a family, though the final numbers could shift, the people familiar with the matter said. Most of the families that crossed the border illegally from Mexico to seek asylum in the U.S. included one parent and one child, the people said. Many families would likely get smaller payouts, depending on their circumstances, the people said.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which represents families in one of the lawsuits, has identified about 5,500 children separated at the border over the course of the Trump administration, citing figures provided to it by the government. The number of families eligible under the potential settlement is expected to be smaller, the people said, as government officials aren’t sure how many will come forward. Around 940 claims have so far been filed by the families, the people said.

The total potential payout could be $1 billion or more.

At issue is the so-called family separation policy that border agents enforced during the Trump administration. 

“In some cases families were forcefully broken up with no provisions to track and later reunite them, government investigations found,” the Journal reported:

The lawsuits allege some of the children suffered from a range of ailments, including heat exhaustion and malnutrition, and were kept in freezing cold rooms and provided little medical attention.

The lawsuits claim the children suffered “lasting” mental issues, including “anxiety, a fear of strangers and nightmares.”

The open-borders subversives who represent the families demand $3.4 million each.

“President Biden has agreed that the family separation policy is a historic moral stain on our nation that must be fully remedied,” Lee Gelernt of the American Civil Liberties Union told the Journal. “That remedy must include not only meaningful monetary compensation, but a pathway to remain in the country.”

Some cases settled during the Trump administration.

What About Obama Separations?

The settlements arranged because of POTUS 45’s policy raise the question of damages for those families separated during the Obama Regime when Biden was vice president.

When the hysteria over separation peaked in 2019, McClatchy Newspapers reported the truth that Trump did not conceive the policy even if he vigorously enforced it.

“President Barack Obama separated parents from their children at the border,” McClatchy reported:

Obama prosecuted mothers for coming to the United States illegally. He fast tracked deportations. And yes, he housed unaccompanied children in tent cities. For much of the country — and President Donald Trump — the prevailing belief is that Obama was the president who went easier on immigrants.…

Obama’s policy helped create the road map of enforcement that Trump has been following — and building on.

At the time, Trump officials resented being blamed for “creating policies that were already in action,” McClatchy continued.

A deputy assistant attorney general in the Obama Regime, Leon Fresco, explained that “families” were separated because it was safer for the children. Some fathers, for instance, were drug smugglers.

“ICE could not devise a safe way where men and children could be in detention together in one facility,” Fresco told McClatchy. “It was deemed too much of a security risk.”

All that aside, border authorities have found that as many as 25 percent of so-called families are fakes. Ninety percent of asylum claims are bogus.

PA State Senator Pushes for Expansion of State’s FIREARMS Castle Doctrine

Pennsylvania State Senator Pushes for Expansion of State’s Castle Doctrine

BY JAMES MURPHY

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/pennsylvania-state-senator-pushes-for-expansion-of-states-castle-doctrine/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Pennsylvania State Senator Pat Stefano, a Republican, introduced new legislation on Thursday that would expand castle doctrine in the state.

Castle doctrine is a concept stating that it is acceptable to use lethal force in order to defend yourself from attack in your own home, or “castle.” Castle doctrine is similar to the concept of “stand your ground,” except that it’s typically limited to a citizen’s dwelling, automobile, and, in some states, workplaces.

The law was last updated in Pennsylvania in 2011 to extend the right of self-defense to places where a citizen has the right to be if they believe themselves to be in danger of being murdered, kidnapped, severely injured or raped.

Stefano’s expansion of the Pennsylvania law would make it acceptable for a citizen to use lethal force to quell an attack beyond the dwelling to the property line.

“Forcing law-abiding Pennsylvanians to wait to defend their loved ones until a criminal enters their home could result in the unnecessary loss of innocent life — a tragedy made worse because it could have been prevented,” Stefano said. “The right to defend oneself should not be limited, as it is in the current weaker standard, based on whether individuals are inside their dwelling or on their property.”

According to Stefano, the new update to the law would give citizens the ability to “better protect themselves, their family, and their property.”

Kim Stolfer, the president of Firearms Owners Against Violent Crime, told KDKA in Pittsburgh that the revision of the law was “absolutely essential” to give Pennsylvanians options in case of violent attack.

“You see what’s happening around us in society and you see how police are basically being defunded and thrown to the wayside,” Stolfer said. “The collateral damage in all of this, nobody is really taking into account … the law-abiding citizens are going to be left defenseless or put in harm’s way because of it.”

“It’s so very important to have clarity in the law so that when these dynamic, critical incidents happen and unfold, the people who are involved in them — who are trying to protect themselves — can do it with certainty,” Stolfer said.

Anti-gun activists, of course, disagreed.

“Whether your property line is 10 feet from your front door or half a mile away, you would be allowed to shoot and kill someone. If you were worried about your safety, rather than taking the reasonable stance of locking your door and calling the police, which will much more likely protect your life and save other people’s lives,” said Adam Garber, the executive director of CEASEFIRE, PA, an anti-gun group.

Garber and his group believe that the expansion of the new law would lead to more aggressive behavior from citizens who are being attacked.

“But what this does is extend the scope so significantly and that it encourages aggressive behavior and leads to more violence which we’ve seen in other communities with expanded stand your ground laws.”

Certainly, 911 should be called in the event of a home (or property) intrusion, if feasible. But once called, does Garber and his ilk believe that it’s the homeowner’s responsibility to simply hide and wait for the cavalry?

The very need for “stand your ground” and “castle doctrine” laws is anathema to common sense. That state governments have found the necessity to codify the principle that a citizen has a right to defend himself is a product of a society obsessed with the rights of criminals — not the rights of the individual.

In this case, Stefano’s expansion of Pennsylvania’s Castle Doctrine is probably necessary, but it’s really only a little extra common sense added to a law that shouldn’t have to exist.

Ten Afghan Refugees Are National Security Risks, More Coming

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2021/10/29/just-the-beginning-ten-afghan-evacuees-detained-as-national-security-risks-n1527904;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

The Biden administration is giving America gifts that will keep on giving for generations to come, and one of the foremost of these gifts is the newly-arrived group of Afghan evacuees: 70,000 are now in the U.S., and the total number is expected to exceed 124,000 before long. One of Biden’s handlers, unnamed in a Wednesday Wall Street Journal report, has admitted that ten of these evacuees have already been detained as risks to national security. Only ten out of 70,000 isn’t bad, right? Sure. But Biden’s handlers’ catastrophic mishandling of the withdrawal from Afghanistan makes it virtually certain that there will be many more.

The reasons for this are clear. Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas noted in late September that 60,000 Afghans had been brought to the United States by that time, including nearly 8,000 who were American citizens or residents of the country, and 1,800 had Special Immigrant Visas (SIV) issued to them for aiding the U.S. military in Afghanistan.

What about the rest? Mayorkas explained:

Of the over 60,000 individuals who have been brought into the United States [from Afghanistan]—and I will give you approximate figures and I will verify them, approximately 7 percent have been United States citizens. Approximately 6 percent have been lawful permanent residents. Approximately 3 percent have been individuals who are in receipt of the Special Immigrant Visas. The balance of that population are individuals whose applications have not yet been processed for approval who may qualify as SIVs and have not yet applied, who qualify or would qualify—I should say—as P-1 or P-2 refugees who have been employed by the United States government in Afghanistan and are otherwise vulnerable Afghan nationals, such as journalists, human rights advocates, et cetera.

The upshot of this is that over eighty percent of the Afghan evacuees were neither American citizens nor SIV holders. So who are they? No one knows. Certainly, Biden’s handlers don’t. Congressman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) recently discovered that 12,000 of the Afghans who were sent to Camp As Sayliyah in Qatar and then went on to the U.S. were not just “individuals whose applications have not yet been processed for approval,” as Mayorkas put it, but had no identification at all. Issa stated: “They came with nothing. No Afghan I.D., no I.D. of any sort. Those people were all forwarded on to the U.S., and that’s quite an admission. So many people had no I.D. whatsoever and yet find themselves in the United States today based on what they said.”

This is no reason to be concerned, say Biden’s handlers. Another (or maybe the same one quoted before) unnamed “senior official” in the Biden administration assured the Wall Street Journal that “the use of biometric and biographic data was a robust screening strategy, as the U.S. had decades to build up databases of information related to national security threats and crime. The official said it was sufficient to address the lack of paperwork or other identifying information.” The official downplayed any risk: “In the case of Afghanistan, we had quite a lot [of data] because we’ve spent almost 20 years in the country. It was actually a particularly rich set of information in those various databases.”

National Security Council spokesperson Emily Horne added: “The fact that some have been flagged by our counterterrorism, intelligence, or law enforcement professionals for additional screening shows our system is working. Many of the same people criticizing us for bringing in Afghans were on TV calling for us to evacuate as many Afghans as possible in August.”

Related: As Trump Warns of Terrorism From Afghan Refugees, Some in GOP Look for Ways to Welcome Them

There are, as you no doubt already realize, not a few flies in this ointment. The Journal also noted that “federal officials interviewed at U.S. bases overseas stated to Republican aides that they didn’t have any training in identifying fraudulent Afghan documents, raising concerns about the validity of documents that were used.” As a result, several Afghans were able to board a flight in Mazar-e-Sharif with fraudulent documents. They were caught, but how many others weren’t? “There were several people who were traveling with fake passports,” the Biden wonk admitted. However, relax: “They did not have Taliban affiliation.”

Great. But the number of evacuees who have already aroused suspicion is greater than the ten who have been flagged as national security risks. The Washington Post reported on September 10 that “the Department of Homeland Security flagged 44 Afghan evacuees as potential national security risks during the past two weeks as the government screened tens of thousands for resettlement in the United States.”

Not only is the potential for deception virtually limitless when dealing with people who have absolutely no identification; it also must be borne in mind that these people have come from a jihadi hotspot and that ISIS, which has a significant presence in Afghanistan, has repeatedly told its operatives in the West to affect Western clothing and a secular outward appearance in order to fool gullible security officials. And Biden’s security apparatus is so very eager to be fooled, it even denies the ideological and theological basis of Islamic jihad terrorism. How, then, can it vet for it? It can’t. And that means that these ten evacuees who have been detained are only the beginning.

Iran’s Atrocious Human Rights Record Must Be Addressed Before New Nuclear Talks :: The Investigative Project on Terrorism

BY ABIGAIL R. ESMAN

SEE: https://www.investigativeproject.org/9050/iran-atrocious-human-rights-record-must-be;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

There were days in a cramped, dark room. There were days and nights at Evin prison, with bright lights and interrogations and little or no sleep. And then there was the injection, a mysterious drug his prison guards shot into Payam Derafshan's veins, triggering convulsions and seizures that caused him to bite off half his tongue. According to one report, after doctors treated Derafshan, an Iranian human rights attorney, at a nearby hospital, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps brought him to a mental institution. According to his lawyers, he was there "subjected to electric shocks, seriously damaging his neurological system and causing him to lose consciousness."

Records of Derafshan's torture emerged earlier this month, the latest in a seemingly endless line of stories of lawyers, journalists, and human rights activists jailed, tortured, even killed by Iranian state security forces. Worse, most of these savageries were committed with the approval – if not at the command – of the man who is now Iran's new president, Ebrahim Raisi – the country's former chief of the judiciary. According to the New York-based Center for Iran Human Rights in Iran, it was Raisi who oversaw "ongoing executions of juvenile offenders ... and the detainment of dual and foreign nationals to use as political bargaining chips in with other countries."

Consequently, a group of Iranian exiles filed a claim against Raisi earlier this month in Scotland, calling for him to be held accountable for human rights abuses, including his role in the 1988 massacre of nearly 30,000 political prisoners. The complaint, filed with the Scottish police, sought Raisi's arrest if he attended the UN Climate Change conference in Glasgow on Oct. 31. (He has since declined to make the trip.) The moves follow a similar call by Center for Human Rights In Iran founder and director Hadi Ghaemi, that President Biden recognizes the ongoing human rights abuses in future policies and relations with Iran.

Now, with Iran agreeing to reenter talks in November aimed at curbing its nuclear ambitions, that call is more urgent than ever.

Because it isn't only Iranian human rights activists and journalists – people like Farzaneh Zilabi, sentenced to a year in prison in September for "gathering and collusion" and "insulting the leadership"; or Narges Mohammadi, sentenced in May to 80 lashes and 30 months imprisonment for her involvement with a peaceful sit-in at Evin prison, and for publishing statements against the death penalty. It is also foreign and dual-nationals who are at risk – people like Iranian-American journalist and anti-hijab activist Masih Alinejad, the recent target of a state-sponsored kidnapping plot allegedly orchestrated by then-president Hassan Rouhani; Iranian-American businessman Emad Sharghi, sentenced in January to serve 10 years in prison on charges of spying and espionage; British and German dual-nationals, sentenced to more than ten years in August for "propaganda against the regime"; and various Dutch-Iranians in the Netherlands assassinated in recent years.

"Arguably the most notable difference today on the ground, in contrast to when the nuclear deal was signed in 2015, is the severe deterioration in Iran's dismal human-rights record," Ghaemi writes.

This is a reality the Biden administration should know. In March, the State Department issued its 2020 report on human rights in the Islamic Republic. It noted "numerous reports of unlawful or arbitrary killings; ... forced disappearance and torture by government agents, as well as systematic use of arbitrary detention and imprisonment; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; ... severe restrictions on free expression, the press, and the internet, including violence, threats of violence, and unjustified arrests and prosecutions against journalists ... severe restrictions on religious freedom; ... lack of meaningful investigation of and accountability for violence against women; unlawful recruitment of child soldiers by government actors to support the Assad regime in Syria; trafficking in persons; violence against ethnic minorities; crimes involving violence or threats of violence targeting lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex persons; criminalization of consensual same-sex sexual conduct; significant restrictions on workers' freedom of association; and the worst forms of child labor."

Those concerns must be addressed, and demands of justice made if any further negotiations are to take place with Iran in efforts to contain its nuclear program. As Ghaemi also notes, "the state of civil and political liberties in a country is intricately related to its foreign policies" – and research has also shown that civil and political liberties are equally related to a country's militancy, likelihood to engage in war and the stability of its society and government. There can be no stability in the Middle East, no end to the violence in the region, and no certainty of nuclear containment, unless and until Iran ends its barbaric human rights abuses.

The Biden administration must make this a condition to any negotiations in November.

IPT Senior Fellow Abigail R. Esman is a freelance writer based in New York and the Netherlands. Her new book, Rage: Narcissism, Patriarchy, and the Culture of Terrorism, was published by Potomac Books in October 2020. Follow her at @abigailesman.

Dr. Paul Cottrell explains in this eye-opening video below, mRNA vaccine makers deliberately add chemicals to their vaccines to erase immune function in order to protect the mRNA strands from a normal immune response that would destroy them.

THE VACCINE-CANCER ATROCITY: Like clockwork, most vaccinated Americans will lose immune function by Christmas and start growing accelerated CANCER tumors that will kill them over the next ten years

BY MIKE ADAMS

SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-10-29-the-vaccine-cancer-atrocity-like-clockwork-most-vaccinated-americans-will-lose-immune-function-by-christmas-and-start-growing-accelerated-cancer-tumors-that-will-kill-them-over-the-next-ten-years.html

EXCERPT: "Put another way, a normal, healthy immune system would destroy the mRNA strands before they could breach the cell walls and enter cell ribosomes that synthesize proteins. Thus, suppressing the immune system is a critical strategy in the delivery of mRNA to the body’s cells."

Brighteon.com/4c2922ea-7239-478d-8780-6fb80d4df3f4