IF NOT ANIMAL CRUELTY, THEN CHILD CRUELTY
OAN: Stephanie Hamill w/ D.C. Draino
PETA CALLS FOR FIRING OF FAUCI FROM NIH
OAN: Animal Cruelty Scandal with Anthony Bellotti
Rumble — Anthony Bellotti, founder, and president of White Coast Waste Project gives The Real Story on Anthony Fauci’s animal cruelty labs.
BY ETHAN HUFF
SEE: https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-10-28-fda-biological-war-children-final-sacrifice-innocent.html;
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
(Natural News) In a unanimous vote of 17-0, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) vaccine advisory panel has recommended that the agency officially authorize the “emergency” use of Pfizer-BioNTech’s Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” in children ages five through 11.
The FDA does not have to abide by this recommendation, but chances are that it will because there really has never been a chemical injection that the agency has not wanted to stab into people’s arms, no matter how dangerous.
In fact, the FDA works overtime to get dangerous and ineffective vaccines approved. When they injure and kill children, the FDA covers it all up and pretends as though nothing is wrong.
If or when the FDA approves the Pfizer-BioNTech injection for children as young as five, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will then issue an opinion of its own about the matter.
According to reports, children between five and 11 years of age would receive a modified injection that contains only one-third the amount of vaccine per dose. Children 12 years of age and older will continue to receive the full doses.
FDA voting member says he had to vote in favor of covid vaccination for little kids in order to find out what it does to them
When asked why he voted in favor of the recommendation, one of the FDA advisory members revealed that “we’re never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it.”
In other words, nobody really knows what these things are going to do to society’s youngest members, and the only way to find out is to start experimentally injecting them with mRNA spike protein vials.
This is a similar rationale to the one once given by political dinosaur Nancy Pelosi when asked why she voted in favor of passing Obamacare. Since nobody actually read the legislation, Pelosi infamously stated that Congress had to pass it in order to find out what was in it.
By recommending that young children get jabbed with experimental Big Pharma chemicals that will permanently alter their DNA and leave them with damaged immunity, the FDA vaccine advisory panel is waging a biological war against our nation’s youth.
It would seem as though this could be the American government’s last abominable move before God Almighty himself intervenes to protect his innocent creation from being genetically butchered by Tony Fauci and his fellow death worshippers who would love for nothing more than to inject every last human soul with their chemical poisons.
This whole thing really does seem like some kind of ritual child sacrifice to the Branch Covidian god, who appears to demand the blood of innocents in order to quell his fury. The more children whose parents agree to get them jabbed, the happier their god is, which means fewer other “covid” restrictions such as lockdowns and mask mandates.
“All 17 board members who voted to approve this need to hang,” wrote one commenter at Zero Hedge, noting that the “study” they used to justify their yes votes was only two months long and proved absolutely nothing based on how it was constructed.
“This is meaningless statistical noise, also known as lying with statistics,” this same commenter added.
“The study isn’t large enough to detect any extremely rare side effects, such as the heart inflammation that occasionally occurs after the second dose, mostly in young men and teen boys,” the study itself further revealed its major shortcomings.
The government wants Chinese Virus injections to be repeatedly stabbed into everyone’s arms probably until the end of time. To keep up with the latest, visit ChemicalViolence.com.
Sources for this article include:
ZeroHedge.com
NaturalNews.com
__________________________________________________________________
FDA: "We're Never Going to Learn About How Safe the Vaccine for Children Is Until We Start Giving It"
BY VERONIKA KYRYLENKO
SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/fda-were-never-going-to-learn-about-how-safe-the-vaccine-for-children-is-until-we-start-giving-it/;
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:
The Food and Drug Administration’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee met on Tuesday to discuss Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for children five through 11 years of age (full recording is available here).
While the committee endorsed the shot in a 17-0 vote, one FDA panelist, Dr. Eric Rubin, made some unsettling remarks in regard to vaccines’ safety, saying, verbatim, “We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s the way it goes.”
Dr. Rubin noted,
This is a much tougher one, I think, than we had expected coming into it. The data show that this vaccine works and it’s pretty safe.… And yet, we’re worried about a side effect that we can’t measure yet, but it’s probably real. And we see a benefit that isn’t the same as it is in older patients.
Dr. Rubin further stated:
It’s a very, sort of, personal choice. If I had a child who was a transplant recipient, I would really want to be able to use a vaccine. And there are certain kids who probably should be vaccinated. The question of how broadly to use I think is a substantial one. And I know it’s not a question, and I know we’re kind of punting that to ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the CDC].
But I do think that it’s a relatively close call…. It really is going to be a question of what the prevailing conditions are. But we’re never going to learn about how safe this vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes. That’s how we found out about rare complications of other vaccines like coronavirus vaccine. And I do think we should vote to approve it.
Dr. Rubin did not argue that the committee should issue a limited endorsement for the jab, and recommend it only to immunocompromised children or those having known co-morbidities to COVID, such as obesity or diabetes. While admitting that the benefits of vaccination for young children are not as great compared to those in older people and that the long-term safety will only be learned after the vaccination begins, he still fully endorsed it.
The mainstream media was quick to try to sugar-coat Rubin’s statement.
Aaron Blake of the Washington Post wrote that Dr. Rubin’s comment was “significant and noteworthy,” but, at the same time, it was “basically tailor-made for vaccine skeptics such as Tucker Carlson and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.).”
The outlet “explained” that the parents should not worry, because they are not being “forced” to inoculate their children with experimental jab yet.
“What the FDA is considering here, after all, is not forcing any children ages 5 to 11 to take the vaccine; rather, it’s about giving parents the option,” the article reads. The parents must understand that in the situation of a “public health emergency … difficult decisions need to be made without the kind of extensive studies everyone would prefer were done.”
In other words, while the long-term side effects in children are not yet fully studied, and there is no knowledge of the “rare” side effects, the parents should “trust the science” and at this time decide for themselves whether they want their kids jabbed. Blake, while seemingly seeing no problem with the idea of forcing people to take a drug against their will, added that no “forcing” will even begin “until we get the more extensive data.”
This type of “reassurance” is troubling since we have already seen that the FDA and the CDC are uninterested in analyzing their own data on possible side effects associated with COVID vaccines in adults. VAERS, an admittedly “passive” system that only reflects a “tiny fraction” of all adverse reactions, has already recorded some 16,310 deaths (with 5,326 of those deaths occurring within two days following the vaccination), and 778,685 total adverse events to COVID jabs, yet the top regulatory and health agencies continue to insist the vaccines are “safe.” Moreover, the Biden administration is employing increasingly coercive tactics to get people inoculated.
Dr. Rubin was not the only speaker who conveyed some troubling messages.
Dr. Fiona Havers of the CDC admitted there are no studies on the long-term outcomes of the vaccine in children (1:03:22), as there is no information available on the vaccinated children’s chances of reinfection (1:05:44).
Dr. Matthew Oster, a pediatric cardiologist, commenting on the data available on vaccinated adolescents, outlined the higher chances of young male vaccine recipients having higher chances of developing heart inflammation than their unvaccinated peers (1:11:26). In females, the risk of developing myocarditis following vaccination was lower than in males, yet still exceeded the “background incidence.” At the same time, the chances of adolescents developing myocarditis due to COVID were significantly lower compared to them developing the condition due to vaccination (1:20:13).
As of October 21, COVID-19 death rate in children ages 5-11 represented 0.03 percent of all COVID-19 deaths in the United States, 0.008 percent of total COVID-19 cases, and 0.0005 percent of deaths among the entire U.S. population. The age group of 0-17 years made up for 0.0000002 percent deaths by total COVID-19 cases, according to the CDC data that was presented during the discussion (4:43:49).
The safety data on the Pfizer shot for children, based on “at least two months of follow-ups,” showed, according to the FDA (2:20:01), that no recipients developed any of the “adverse events of special interest,” including myocarditis/pericarditis, anaphylaxis, Bell’s palsy, and appendicitis.
