1 Timothy Lesson 18: Eleven Evil Characteristics of False Teachers

What are false teachers? How can you recognize them? What are we to do regarding false teachers? These are all good questions that demand answers. Join Susan as she examines what God's Word declares our responses should be. YOUR SUPPORT OF THIS MINISTRY We are so thankful to the Lord for the opportunity to serve Him and to give of our time to help women via books, CDs, DVDs, counseling, radio ministry and YouTube. If you would like to support this ministry, we would welcome that. The monies go towards shipping of books, work that has to be done for the ministry like counseling and office work, and editing of Susan's books. (With the Master Ministries is under the umbrella and direction of the elders at Grace Community Church.) You may DONATE ONLINE through Grace Community Church's https://tithe.ly/give_new/www/#/tithe... online giving by selecting "other" and notating in the memo that it is for Susan Heck -- With the Master Ministries. This gift is tax deductible. RECOMMENDED RESOURCES STUDY BIBLE https://www.gty.org/store/bibles/44NK... Susan J. Heck speaking schedule and Susan’s BOOKS (can be ordered by phone) http://www.withthemaster.org Susan J. Heck (BOOKS ordered through Amazon) https://www.amazon.com/s?k=susan+heck... SUSAN RECOMMENDED YouTube Pam Take Two https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjDe... Grace to You https://www.youtube.com/user/JohnMacA... #SusanHeck #1Timothy #BibleStudy

China sends largest air incursion into Taiwan; Lawmakers worldwide condemn attack on HONG KONG EPOCH TIMES free press; PRINTING MACHINES DESTROYED WITH SLEDGE HAMMERS

American and European politicians condemn attacks against The Epoch Times printing house in Hong Kong. This after masked men smashed computers and printing machinery. Beijing is boosting pressure on Taiwan. It sent a record number of warplanes flying near the island, the largest incursion to date. A bold photo message from the U.S. to communist China, warning the country's Navy not to step out of line. It was taken in the South China sea. Chinese authorities make over $800 in three minutes. And it's all thanks to a traffic camera and the regime's administrative power. And Australia’s new Defense Minister is taking a hard line against Beijing. He’s calling out the regime for cyberattacks against Australia.

STARTS AROUND THE 3:30 MINUTE MARK: 

IT'S HAPPENED BEFORE: ARSON ATTACK IN 2019: 

UK: Convicted jihad terrorist had friendly chat with woman at deradicalization event, then stabbed her in the neck

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/04/uk-convicted-jihad-terrorist-had-friendly-chat-with-woman-at-deradicalization-event-then-stabbed-her-in-the-neck;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

“When you meet the unbelievers, strike the necks…” (Qur’an 47:4)

The obvious lessons regarding deradicalization and subjecting unsuspecting members of the public to unnecessary danger will not be drawn.

“Jihadi terrorist Usman Khan sat beside prisoner rehab volunteer, 23, moments before fatally stabbing her in the neck in Fishmonger’s Hall attack, inquest hears,” by Arthur Martin and Jack Wright, Daily Mail, April 13, 2021:

A convicted terrorist calmly chatted to a Cambridge graduate at a prisoner rehabilitation conference before stabbing her in the neck, an inquest heard yesterday.

Jihadi Usman Khan was photographed sitting one seat away from Saskia Jones, 23, in the banqueting hall at Fishmongers’ Hall in central London in November 2019.

Video footage showed Khan enjoying brunch and mingling with delegates in conference rooms which are lined with royal crests and a portrait of the Queen.

Staff and guests were unaware that the terrorist was wearing a fake suicide vest under his jacket and had three knives in his bag.

During the lunch break, Khan went to the men’s toilets and taped an eight-inch kitchen knife to each hand.

When he opened the door he saw 25-year-old Jack Merritt – another Cambridge University graduate who was helping to run the Learning Together rehabilitation programme – and stabbed him 12 times.

Police later found Khan’s prayer book and a third knife inside a bag in the toilet. He had inscribed the knives with the symbol of Allah.

Khan then moved towards the cloakroom where Miss Jones was standing and plunged a knife into her neck. Both victims died of their wounds minutes later.

At the time of the attack, Khan was on licence and was wearing an electronic tag.

He had been released the previous year after serving eight years for terror offences, including plotting to attack the London Stock Exchange in 2010.

Khan later stabbed criminology graduate Stephanie Szczotko in the arm before maiming fellow staff member Isobel Rowbotham….

‘[At 11.56pm] he appears to be talking to Saskia Jones,’ Jonathan Hough QC, counsel to the inquest, said. ‘We see him talking quite animatedly.’

DCI Brown replied: ‘Yes, we don’t know what the content of that conversation was.’

Khan scratched a symbol meaning ‘Allah’ into the blades he used to kill the victims, the inquest heard….

During the hearing today, statements and pen portraits were read aloud on behalf of the victims’ loved ones.

Jurors heard that Mr Merritt had worked at The Punter Pub in Cambridge for a short time where his boss believed he was ‘destined to do great things’ and remembered him for his ‘swagger.’…

Friends from Manchester University, where Mr Merritt studied at undergraduate level and achieved a First, said: ‘It was clear that Jack was intelligent, but when we started to study miscarriages of justice in further detail, it became clear how strongly Jack felt about criminal justice.’…

‘But Jack was also angry, frustrated, selfless and stubborn. He was angry because he saw our society failing those most in need….

Yes, but not in the way he thought.

Germany: Muslim mother kills her four-year-old son to keep him from being raised as a Christian

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2021/04/germany-muslim-mother-kills-her-four-year-old-son-to-keep-him-from-being-raised-as-a-christian;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

In the Qur’an, a mysterious figure, known as Khidr in Islamic tradition, kills a boy in an apparently random and gratuitous attack. He then explains: “And as for the boy, his parents were believers, and we feared that he would overburden them by transgression and disbelief. So we intended that their Lord should substitute for them one better than him in purity and nearer to mercy.” (18:80-81)

The mother in this case was likewise afraid that her son would grow up in “transgression and disbelief,” and she acted as Khidr did.

“4-year-old drowned in Rotenburg: accused mother collapses,” translated from “4-Jähriger in Rotenburg ertrunken: Angeklagte Mutter bricht zusammen,” Buten un Binnen, April 13, 2021 (thanks to Medforth):

How often does it happen that an entire courtroom suffers with the defendant? The 40-year-old woman with a silk headscarf wants to testify, but she is intimidated and upset, weeps silently and can barely utter a word. The mother is said to have killed her four-year-old son: she deliberately threw him from a bridge in Rotenburg into the Wümme, said public prosecutor Pia Geisler on Tuesday at the start of the trial in the Verden district court. The child drowned in the river. The charge is manslaughter (Az. Ks 101/21).

The defendant “killed a person without being a murderer,” said Geisler. Paragraph 212.1 of the Criminal Code provides for imprisonment between five years and life imprisonment. The boy came to the children’s clinic in Rotenburg on November 2, 2020 with severe burns. He had to be operated on three times. The mother, who is Turkish, said that she accidentally scalded him with hot water while washing, the prosecutor said.

Hospital employees wanted to notify the youth welfare office

The employees in the hospital found the injuries suspicious, they wanted to call in the youth welfare office. The mother then took her child out of the clinic. “The defendant feared that her custody would be withdrawn,” said Geisler. In the woman’s mind, this also meant that the boy would grow up not as a Muslim, but as a Christian. That’s why she threw her son over the railing of the bridge into the water to kill him.

She then wanted to commit suicide, but did not succeed. Hours later, the police in Rotenburg picked up the distraught woman. The body of the drowned child was found in a nightly search. The mother was first placed in a psychiatric hospital and later in custody.

Judge breaks off the trial

When the woman tried to testify through an interpreter, but could not, the presiding judge Volker Stronczyk broke off the questioning and adjourned the hearing. “Everyone in the room could see that the situation is very stressful for you,” he reassured the defendant as she apologized for her breakdown. “We negotiate the whole thing calmly and patiently.” The judge ordered defense attorney Daniela Post to summarize her client’s testimony in writing for the next meeting on April 30th.

CAIR: The First Amendment For Me, But Not For Thee

Hamas-Linked CAIR Enraged by Minneapolis Curfew, Demands Ramadan Exemption

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/robert-spencer/2021/04/12/hamas-linked-cair-enraged-by-minneapolis-curfew-demands-ramadan-exemption-n1439445;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

A curfew has been imposed in riot-torn Minneapolis-St. Paul, and the Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) is enraged. You see, it’s the first night of Ramadan, and city leaders put the curfew in place, according to a CAIR press release, “without consulting Muslim community leaders.” Now CAIR is calling on city officials to add an exception for religious purposes. And for the first time in its nearly thirty-year history, CAIR is right: let the Muslims go to mosque, let the Christians go to church, let the Jews go to synagogue, and so on, and stop the endless totalitarian overreach. But in one of the biggest jokes of these unhappy days, CAIR is suddenly manifesting newfound respect for the First Amendment, which it has been trying to render a dead letter for years.

Yes, there is rioting in Minneapolis. The curfew, however, is yet another in an ever-lengthening series of examples of American public officials penalizing law-abiding citizens for their own abject incompetence. Yes, it’s risky to go out when there is rioting going on. But Minneapolis police forces (such as they are after the left got its way and actually defunded the department, only to reverse course after the inevitable crime wave began), should be directing their energies toward arresting the rioters, not ordinary people who happen to be out after the designated beginning of the curfew. If people want to assume the risk of being out in the city while the riots continue, they should not be prevented from doing so, and if they are attacked, those who attack them should be prosecuted.

CAIR, meanwhile, is arguing for its religious exemption on religious freedom grounds. CAIR-Minnesota Executive Director Jaylani Hussein said in a press release: “By imposing a city-wide curfew on the very first night of Ramadan without consulting Minneapolis Muslim leaders, our leaders have undermined the community’s trust and violated the Constitution. Public officials must amend the curfew in order to respect freedom of religion, including the right to gather and worship during Ramadan.”

Amend “public safety” rules to respect the freedom of religion? Great idea. While you’re at it, amend the “public health” rules also, for the same reason.

CAIR wouldn’t be CAIR, of course, if it didn’t claim victim status, imply solidarity with the rioters, and do its bit to further the left’s narrative that America is a racist hellhole in which minorities are routinely harassed, discriminated against, and persecuted. CAIR-Minnesota Deputy Director Mohamed Ibrahim said in the statement: “On the eve of Ramadan, our community has been traumatized by the trial of Derik [sic] Chauvin and now the murder of Dante [sic] Wright. Nothing can bring solace and hope tonight better than gathering with our fellow Muslim community members in prayer. Denying Minnesota Muslims this right violates our First Amendment rights. The order must be amended.”

We must protect First Amendment rights, eh? Great idea, Mohamed! Interesting that CAIR made no mention of the First Amendment when it demanded in March that the Baltimore County School system remove what it claimed was an “Islamophobic” image from its curriculum, or when it praised the censure of a New Jersey school board member for criticizing Islam, or when the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) funneled $325,000 through CAIR to Georgetown University to support restrictions on the freedom of speech and the criminalization of criticism of Islam.

Nor did CAIR seem all that concerned about the First Amendment last February, when it demanded that CPAC cancel one of its featured speakers, Scott Presler, for supposedly being “anti-Muslim” (which usually means opposing jihad violence and Sharia oppression of women, gays, and others). The First Amendment appears to be the farthest thing from the Hamas-linked minds of CAIR officials in their ongoing persecution of Nicholas Damask, the Arizona professor who dared to observe in his classes that Islamic jihadis justify their actions by reference to Islamic texts and teachings. CAIR sued, lost on First Amendment grounds, and is appealing.

CAIR wasn’t nearly as interested in upholding the First Amendment as it is now back in December when it applauded Congressman Debbie Dingell for demanding that Facebook remove “anti-Muslim content.” This wouldn’t be simply the removal of hateful material; for years, CAIR and its allies have insisted that any and all honest analysis of the motivating ideology behind jihad violence is “anti-Muslim,” and must therefore be silenced. This became newly clear just days ago when a CAIR ally, Muslim Advocates, sued Facebook for its “anti-Muslim content,” including sites that simply oppose jihad terror.

So CAIR, a longtime foe of First Amendment rights, has suddenly become a strict constructionist when it comes to Ramadan in Minneapolis-St. Paul. And they’re right: let people make their own decisions. Risk is unavoidable in life. But those who are targeted by CAIR in the future for exercising their First Amendment rights should remember this day when this self-proclaimed “civil rights” group’s sinister hypocrisy became obvious to the world.

Vaccine death wave now unstoppable… 122 million Americans at risk

Vaccine death wave now unstoppable... 122 million Americans at risk

According to the CDC Covid Data Tracker page, over 122 million Americans have already received at least one dose of a covid vaccine. That's over one-third of the population, and it's increasing by nearly 2 million people per day in the United States.

As Americans are being killed by vaccines, globalists are replacing the American electorate by bringing in massive waves of illegal aliens, many of whom are pregnant women ready to give birth to anchor babies. The criminal Marxists who stole the 2020 election are continuing their plan to mass murder real Americans (with vaccines and bioweapons) and replace them with compliant, low-skilled illegals who will vote for socialist handouts and freedom-killing Democrat policies.

Today's Situation Update tells the full story on what's really happening with the vaccine depopulation weapon and why literally millions of Americans will likely die from this vaccine over the next few years.

Listen to the full podcast here.

Republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Situation Update, April 14th, 2021 - Vaccine DEATH WAVE now unstoppable... 122 million Americans join fatal medical experiment

FORMER Trump Official: Biden policies making government complicit in human trafficking

Rumble — As the Biden White House continues to avoid addressing the border crisis, another tragic trend is rearing its head. One America’s Chief White House Correspondent Chanel Rion has more from Washington.

Biden Courts Big Business as Wall Street Opposes Election Integrity

Biden Courts Big Business as Wall Street Opposes Election Integrity

BY LUIS MIGUEL

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/biden-courts-big-business-as-wall-street-opposes-election-integrity/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

As the Democrat Party has moved further left, so has Big Business, making for an unholy new alliance that poses a powerful threat to American freedoms.

President Joe Biden is reportedly aware of the falling out between the Republican Party and corporate America and is ready to work together with Wall Street to push socialist policies on the public both through government and the private sector.

“What President Biden realizes is that business is now ready to engage and they are an important voice at the table,” Valerie Jarrett, a former advisor to President Obama, told Politico. “Big business isn’t simply relying on Republicans to look out for their interests. They’re looking out for their own interests and getting more involved.”

Over recent years, the business community has increasingly become more politically active — and the bent of that activity has tended to sway left.

For example, PayPal canceled plans to build an operations center in North Carolina in 2016 owing to a state law prohibiting “transgender” individuals from using public restrooms opposite their biological sex. In 2018, Walmart and Dick’s Sporting Goods raised the age requirement for gun sales in response to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Many Americans are also concerned about left-wing bias at Big Tech corporations, which has led to the censoring, banning, demonetizing, and suppressing of predominantly conservative accounts.

Moreover, major companies have recently condemned efforts by Georgia and other states to make their election processes more secure, suggesting Republican lawmakers are simply reacting poorly to Biden’s defeat of Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election.

In fact, hundreds of corporations on Wednesday signed a letter denouncing legislation that restricts “any eligible voter from having an equal and fair opportunity to cast a ballot.”

The signatories of the letter include General Motors, Netflix, Starbucks, Amazon, BlackRock, Google, and Berkshire Hathaway CEO Warren Buffett.

The statement itself was facilitated by former American Express CEO Kenneth Chenault and Merck CEO Kenneth Frazier, and came after companies such as Delta Air Lines, Coca-Cola, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, and Google had already spoken out against Georgia’s election-reform bill.

As Politico notes, the infamous Rothschild banking dynasty is involved in the effort to merge the Democrat Party’s socialism with Big Business’ financial power:

Last weekend, more than 100 business leaders held a rare online meeting to discuss what action they should take in the wake of similar voting bills being considered in states across the country. Lynn Forester de Rothschild, founder of the Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism and one of the three people who helped coordinate the meeting, urged Biden to be more vocal about his desire to work with business leaders.

“My inclination is to trust him to not be in the pockets of corporations at the expense of people and planet but he definitely wants to have a vibrant business community that takes care of our society,” she said in an interview.

Joining in the fight against Republican election-integrity bills are Wall Street firms and attorneys at some of the nation’s top law offices.

The New York Times reports that these firms are working with the Brennan Center for Justice, which is heavily funded by billionaire George Soros.

In 2019, the Brennan Center for Justice not only took money from Soros’s Open Society Foundations but from the Ford Foundation; Bank of America; the Tides Foundation; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP; PayPal; JPMorgan Chase; Microsoft; PepsiCo; and Comcast NBCUniversal.

The center’s effort involves targeting state legislators in Georgia, Texas, New Hampshire, Florida, Michigan, and Arizona to stop “voter suppressive bills,” which includes legislation mandating ID to vote.

“I do think he has an appreciation of the role that corporate America can play in addressing what we would define as social, political and cultural issues — not the least because he understands consumer-facing businesses have an imperative to understand their market,” a Biden advisor said.

The GOP has traditionally been considered to be the party of Big Business, but this dynamic has changed, as Republican voters feel ever more disenchanted with the companies using their power to assault conservative principles.

Republicans are increasingly open to restrictions on corporations, especially on Silicon Valley firms.

Concerns about the power of such corporations have prompted proposals from some Republicans, such as Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who this week introduced his Trust-Busting for the Twenty-First Century Act to further empower federal regulators to break the monopolistic practices of Big Tech firms.

It appears that the GOP is no longer the party of Big Business. And corporate America is no longer a place for constitutionalists.

PBS Falsely Dubs CONSERVATIVE Pro-America John Birch Society “Anti-government”

PBS Falsely Dubs Pro-America John Birch Society “Anti-government”

BY PAUL DRAGU

SEE: https://thenewamerican.com/pbs-falsely-dubs-pro-america-john-birch-society-anti-government/;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

PBS falsely labeled The John Birch Society “anti-government” in a recent report.   

The falsity was published April 3 in a PBS NewsHour Weekend segment titled “Crackdown on online hate speech pushes extremists to other platforms” by Simon Ostrovsky. 

PBS either does not agree with or understand the meaning of “anti” — to be opposed to something. Or the reporter intentionally lied. Whatever the case, there’s no way to tell because PBS did not respond to multiple requests from the JBS, the parent company of this magazine, on the matter.   

The JBS grounds its activism on the supreme law of the land, the U.S. Constitution. JBS is anti-government where government is anti-freedom, which in ways makes JBS more pro-government than the government, since the point of American government is to uphold laws that safeguard freedom and civility. 2020 is a perfect example of government gone off the rails. 

Over the last few years, it’s become apparent that major media is filled with activists posing as journalists. Many of them lie, others unknowingly parrot misinformation — all actions that perpetuate the overall Deep State-controlled national narrative.  

Fresh on many Americans’ minds is CBS’ 60 Minutes hatchet job on Florida Governor Ron DeSantis when it published the false story that he used the Publix grocery chain to distribute COVID-19 vaccines because the company donated to his campaign, alleging a pay-to-play scheme. Publix is the most accessible grocery chain in Florida and the recommendations to utilize its stores were suggested to DeSantis, not proposed by him. Even some Florida Democrats pointed that out, before and after the report. Regardless, 60 Minutes told a different story

A month ago, the Washington Post issued a major retraction in which it revealed that it wrongfully reported that then-president Donald Trump said to a top Georgia voting official in December during the election melee to “find the fraud.” Available audio proves that didn’t happen. Instead, Trump told the official that she had the most important job in the country and should review signatures going back several years. Regrettably, many other publications used as a basis for their own reporting the Post’s false story, and the damage was perpetuated.  

There are also the litany of allegations and rumors published during the Trump presidency (Russia Collusion?), as well as an obviously concerted effort to tell only one angle of the vast COVID-19 story, which has resulted in the silencing of a mountain of reports and expert voices. Fortunately, publications such as this magazine have told the stories major media hasn’t.

This is a short list — very short — of recent media misconduct. The good news is that the cat is out of the bag. Today, more Americans know the truth about major media, thanks partly to the Internet helping to loosen its longstanding information stranglehold. 

The John Birch Society has known the depths of media dishonesty for decades, as the fiercely patriotic organization, for which this author works, has withstood round after round of lies and misinformation. Interestingly, the first hit piece against the JBS was published in 1961 by, of all publications, People’s World, the newspaper of the Communist Party USA. After that, Time also published a hit piece, parroting many of the same points made by the Communist paper. You can’t make this stuff up.  

More newspapers followed the pattern set by People’s World and Time until major media’s de facto antagonistic position on the JBS was established. For years, newspapers and magazines reported the JBS was racist, anti-Semitic, and even communist. They did so casually and despite the facts. They did so because the JBS had exposed the concerted effort by a small group of megalomaniacs to destroy America and usher in tyrannical world government to be ruled by them.  

At best, major media reporters justified their reporting based on faulty interpretations of the organization’s fiercely pro-freedom stances on policy and issues. Nevertheless, it got so bad the founder of the JBS, Robert Welch, asked for an investigation into his organization, just a couple of years into the Society’s young yet effective existence, to set the record straight. In the early 1960s, a California fact-finding subcommittee did investigate, and found the attacks against the JBS baseless. It reiterated what was plain to anyone in the organization, whether white, black, brown, or Jewish: The Society was neither racist nor anti-Semitic. The investigation even reported that some JBS chapters were integrated, and others were even made up only of minorities.  

Nevertheless, the untruths about the JBS persist to this day, almost on a weekly basis.  

And sometimes they veer outside the aforementioned smear template. 

The crux of the latest PBS report is that since being banned from Facebook, “extremists” are flocking to other platforms. A small portion of the eight-minute segment mentions the JBS. The segment shows footage of a virtual meeting with the reporter’s voiceover saying, “Moderating it all is Karladine Graves, an unassuming Kansas City family doctor and self-professed member of the anti-government John Birch Society, who first started organizing these ‘standing strong together’ conferences as Joe Biden emerged as winner of the 2020 race.” Another clip shows Graves on the show Anarchy and USA, hosted by JBS’ Christian Gomez. 

It is certainly news to members that the Society is anti-government. Perhaps someone should tell JBS members who serve in local governments across the country to stop what they’re doing because their organization is anti-government. Or maybe the JBS’ motto should also be changed from “Less government, more responsibility — and with God’s help — a better world, to “No government, everyone’s a victim — and with God’s help — maybe we can survive.”  

And why does an anti-government organization have a Support Your Local Police action project? Police are the enforcement arm of local government. Police are government. The JBS has been admonishing Americans for decades to build relationships with their local police officers and support them.  

The essence of the JBS is to educate citizens on how to work within the confines of the true law of the land in the effort to restore individual freedom, national sovereignty, and prosperity. The organization goes to great lengths to make that happen, including by creating and constantly pushing a six-part video series called The Constitution is the Solution.

The other problem with the PBS smear job is the fact that JBS is being mentioned in a report that includes in the headline the words “hate speech.” Continuing its pattern of fictional reporting at its finest, the PBS report doesn’t specify what JBS actions or views fall into that category. Its justification is probably as logically and factually sound as its grounds for the “anti-government” label.  

JBS e-mailed PBS with many of the aforementioned points and asked them to remove any mention of the organization from the report and issue a correction. PBS did not respond. Nor has it issued a clarification, correction, or at the very least a note saying JBS objects to its characterization. 

What this all comes down to is that Americans must read and rely on news outlets that tell the truth. Americans need to rely on news outlets that have a basic understanding of what is really happening in the country and publish news that isn’t socialist propaganda. Without a true understanding of what is happening, Americans have no basis for effective corrective actions.  

Americans have been duped by the Deep State-controlled media for a long time, the result of which can be seen in the chaos and demoralization running rampant in the country. 

It’s time to stop taking major media seriously.  

The good news is that, today, it’s easy to tap into alternative media sources that aren’t controlled by the Deep State. The Internet makes many pro-American news sites available, including — cue the shameless plug — The New American and JBS.org.

The JBS network has been researching and publishing crucial information about what is really happening in America since 1958. Between the organization’s bookseducational videos, pamphlets, brochures, and this magazine, there’s no excuse for being ignorant of the who, what, where, how, and why of policy blunders and America’s enemies within and without.  

The JBS has warned repeatedly that forces behind the scenes are fervently working to tear down America. Those forces have feverishly utilized their propaganda machine — major media — to dupe Americans into accepting their own subjugation. 

The best way to combat the propaganda is with true news. The New American and JBS are among those sources.  

If you’d like to get involved in a grassroots patriot organization that has stood the test of time and is organized all across the country, consider joining The John Birch Society. Learn more about us at JBS.org. If you don’t have one already, get a subscription to TNA’s bi-weekly news magazine, which provides in-depth, investigative reports on the who, what, where, how, and why of the forces trying to destroy America. 

Paul Dragu

Paul Dragu

Paul Dragu is the Communications Director for The John Birch Society. He is an award-winning investigative journalist and former editor-in-chief of the Havre Herald. He is also the collaborative writer of Defector: A True Story of Tyranny, Liberty and Purpose. You can Email Paul at [email protected]

Cheer at How Israel Crippled the Iranian nuke Program

BY RICK MORAN

SEE: https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/rick-moran/2021/04/14/you-will-cheer-when-you-learn-how-israel-crippled-irans-nuclear-program-n1439831;

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:

Israel’s alleged attack on the Iranian nuclear facility at Natanz hit an electrical substation about 150 feet underground, severely damaging not only the power distribution system but also a power cable that led to the centrifuges.

An Iranian official said that such an attack would have taken years of planning, adding that “the design of the enemy was very beautiful.”

The Jerusalem Post has learned that “the attack took out both the primary and backup electrical systems.” With the power suddenly cut, there was no orderly and careful shutdown of the centrifuges leading to a cascade failure with spectacular results. The Iranians are admitting that thousands of centrifuges were destroyed.

The Iranians are saying it was an inside job.

Ali Rabiei, the spokesperson for the Iranian government, stated on Tuesday that the attack was “not an external attack” and that a “traitor” has been identified, adding that “the necessary measures are being taken.”

An informed official in the Iranian Intelligence Ministry told the IRGC-affiliated Tasnim News Agency on Monday that the identity of the disruption’s cause had been found and that “necessary measures are being taken to arrest the main cause of the disruption in the electricity system of the Natanz complex.”

Experts familiar with Mossad and the way it operates are worried about the leaks coming from the government on details of the operation.

A number of former Israeli security officials expressed concern at the leaks being shared about the attack, with former Mossad chief Danny Yatom warning, in an interview with Army Radio on Monday, that it could impact Israel’s operational capability. “If indeed this thing is the result of an operation involving Israel, this leak is very serious,” said Yatom. “It is detrimental to the Israeli interest and the fight against Iranian attempts to acquire nuclear weapons. There are actions that must remain in the dark.”

“Once Israeli officials are quoted, it forces the Iranians to take revenge,” warned Yatom. “If the Iranians start investigating with the publication hovering over their heads that the people behind the attack are the Israelis or the Americans, they will leave no stone unturned. This has an impact on our operational capability.”

Israeli media — many of whom are tight with Mossad leadership — originally reported that it was a cyberattack that had caused the damage. That would have been consistent with Mossad’s operational procedures — misdirection and denial. They may have been trying to protect their assets in Iran, giving them a chance to escape.

But almost immediately, there were leaks from the government about an explosive device doing the damage. That’s highly unusual for a Mossad operation and it’s no wonder they’re worried.

What will Iran do in response?

An analysis published in the Iranian Kayhan newspaper, which is tied to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, called for the government to withdraw from the talks on the nuclear deal in Vienna and to punish Israel as a “decisive and deterrent response to the enemy’s sinister plan.”

Israel would hardly be “punished” if Iran pulled out of talks to revive the nuclear deal. It’s exactly what Israel wants. Removing sanctions from Tehran would unleash a wave of terror and violence across the Middle East that would threaten Israel.

This, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu will not allow.