SEE: https://christianacare.org/people/kenneth-l-silverstein-m-d/
SEE: https://doctors.christianacare.org/provider/Frederic+Todd+Harad/845122
BY: Esteban Parra and Karl Baker, Delaware News Journal
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes:Hospital officials said it would be a rare instance for this to occur and families can still immediately appeal the decision.
“Consistent with the above referenced ChristianaCare policy, an attending physician is not obligated to offer or to provide CPR if resuscitative treatment would be medically non-beneficial, even at the request of a patient or legally authorized representative,” according to the document.
Labeled Guidance Regarding Code Status Determination during the COVID-19 Pandemic, the document was signed by two of the hospital provider’s top physicians: Dr. Kenneth Silverstein, executive vice president and chief physician executive, and Dr. F. Todd Harad, chief, vascular surgery and associate director, Center for Heart and Vascular Health.
The hospital changed the guidance because risks to doctors and nurses have increased amid the pandemic, while the likelihood of a recovery for a resuscitated patient with “severe” coronavirus symptoms is low, said John Goodill, director of Supportive and Palliative Care Education and Outreach at ChristianaCare.
When “you have progressive life-sustaining measures instituted and you’re getting worse despite that, you’re not going to survive,” he said. “So resuscitating you when you die would not provide any benefit.”
Asked if the rule change was designed to preserve ventilators and other hospital equipment, Goodill said it is not “about a scarce allocation of resources.”
Though he said the hospital system is “hoping to not get into a situation that New York is” where health care institutions are operating at overcapacity as coronavirus patients flood emergency rooms.
“We have enough resources, right now,” Goodill said.
Before the coronavirus pandemic, an attending physician who put in place a DNR without consulting a hospital ethics committee risked a lawsuit from the patient’s family, Goodill said.
With the guidance, the attendant can impose the measure with the support from the hospital as an institution, he said. Even with the change, patients or families still can appeal the decision, he added.
“This new guideline simply puts a little more institutional support around on the side of the providers to put in place a DNR, he said, “even when the family doesn’t agree with it.”
We are providing this content free as a public service to readers during the coronavirus outbreak. Please support the work we’re doing by subscribing to Delaware Online.
Hospitals across the country are examining guidelines that allow doctors to override the wishes of COVID-19 patients, as they may pose a risk to staff.
R. Alta Charo, a University of Wisconsin-Madison bioethicist, told the Washington Post that while the idea of withholding treatment may be unsettling, especially in a country as wealthy as ours, it is pragmatic.
“It doesn’t help anybody if our doctors and nurses are felled by this virus and not able to care for us,” she said.
‘WHO LIVES AND WHO DIES:’ In a worst-case scenario, ethics guide choices on who gets care
According to ChristianaCare’s document, the state’s largest health care provider drafted its “Do Not Resuscitate / Allow Natural Death / Treatment Limitations” policy in 1993 and then updated it in 2018.
That policy is still in place.
While that policy outlines certain principles, the April 3 document provides additional guiding considerations around code status determinations during the coronavirus pandemic, which as of Monday had killed more than 22,000 Americans – 33 of them in Delaware.
The guiding considerations include the possibility that CPR would not benefit certain COVID-19 patients, particularly those with:
Another guide a doctor must consider is the probability that performing CPR on patients with coronavirus will increase transmission to health care workers, threatening their well-being and reducing their availability to treat future patients.
“Patient or representative assent should be sought but is not required,” the document states. “The attending physician should document in the record the basis for the decision and, if applicable, the agreement of the other physician.”
Physicians who decide not to offer CPR should inform the patient or their representative of the decision and the reason why and assure them that the patient will continue to receive all other forms of care.
An appeal of the do-not-resuscitate order may be initiated by asking for an expedited ethics consultant, the document said.
Other Delaware hospitals were asked about their do-not-resuscitate guidances. Only Saint Frances responded:
“At Saint Francis Healthcare, we are committed to faithful care for our patients and their families and we provide support in making end of life choices,” Ann D’Antonio, a spokeswoman for Saint Francis’ parent company Trinity Health Mid-Atlantic, said in a statement.
D’Antonio said they ask patients if they have an advance health care directive or living will, indicating their health care wishes.
“If these documents do not exist, we hold discussions with the patients and their families to determine their wishes, including their wishes for end of life care,” she said. “We continue to follow this process during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
The Delaware Healthcare Association issued a statement Friday on behalf of hospitals that did not respond. The statement said they regularly communicate with colleagues in other states and are aware of the “hot spot” locations where health care providers have been forced to make difficult decisions regarding resource allocation, due to an extreme surge of COVID-19 patients that outpaces the ability to meet patient need.
The best way to ensure there are enough hospital beds, ventilators, health care providers and personal protective equipment to care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients in Delaware is for Delawareans to stay at home and practice social distancing to continue to help “flatten the curve” and slow the spread of coronavirus disease, Smith said.
Loading…Contact Esteban Parra at (302) 324-2299, eparra@delawareonline.com or Twitter @eparra3.
This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: ChristianaCare: Doctors may overrule coronavirus patients’ end-of-life treatment wishes
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
FROM: DELAWARE FAMILY POLICY COUNCIL-https://www.delawarefamilies.org/learn-as
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational & research purposes: Assisted Suicide And COVID19 It goes without saying that our world has changed drastically in the last month or so due to the threat and fear of COVID19. Multiple areas of life are affected by not just the virus, but by how officials are choosing to handle it. ChristianaCare has provided that ‘physicians may overrule the objections of patients and issue the DNR’. In this way, they have effectively implemented euthanasia without so much as a vote from Delawareans! This time of great vulnerability has literally been weaponized against in their greatest moment of need. Overriding a person’s wishes in order to not resuscitate them is dangerous and morally wrong. It goes even farther than a person who desires to die and is state sanctioned murder! Even though we are currently living in unprecedented times, the issues with assisted suicide have not changed. It still fails to honor the value and dignity of human life and is a dangerous policy to consider. Suicide is not a part of medical care and should not be treated as such. Assisted Suicide Is Not Medical Care Or Treatment For Suffering!Governor Ron DeSantis speaks from Wauchula on Wednesday with Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer…
Anger, violence and confusion on the campus of UCLA Tuesday night as protesters clashed. Law…
Police were noticeably absent when violence erupted on the campus of the University of California…