TRUMP PLANS TO NOMINATE KNOWN GUN-GRABBER TO HEAD ATF

TRUMP PLANS TO NOMINATE KNOWN GUN-GRABBER 
TO HEAD ATF

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
President Donald Trump announced his intent to nominate as the head of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) a man with a record of supporting restrictions on the right to keep and bear arms.
As posted on the White House website, President Trump, according to his authority under Article II, Section 2 of the United States Constitution, has tapped Charles Canterbury, Jr. to be the ATF Director. Canterbury’s credentials were then listed:
Mr. Canterbury currently serves as President of the National Fraternal Order of Police, a position he has held since 2003. He earned the rank of Major in the Horry County Police Department in Conway, South Carolina, after 26 years in the Patrol Division, Criminal Division, and Training Division. He has served on the Executive Board of the National Fraternal Order of Police for more than two decades. His distinguished career earned him an induction into the South Carolina Law Enforcement Hall of Fame. Mr. Canterbury is a graduate of Coastal Carolina University.
While the president may be pleased with his potential appointee, Second Amendment advocates are less sanguine about the prospect of Charles Canterbury leading the federal agency tasked with regulating firearms.
In a press released published by the Gun Owners of America (GOA), Canterbury’s contrariety to the prohibition on the infringement of the right to keep and bear arms is set forth for all to read:
His name is Chuck Canterbury, and he is the president of the anti-gun Fraternal Order of Police. Sadly, Canterbury has a long track record that should concern gun owners:
He’s testified before Congress to support anti-gunners like Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Attorney General Eric Holder.
Under his watch, the FOP backed Congressional measures to expand the unconstitutional and failing NICS system — which is the same system where 95% of the initial denials are false positives.
And on the state level, the FOP under his watch has supported Universal Background Checks and opposed Constitutional Carry.
As for the FOP’s record of opposing the Second Amendment, consider the following from a list of legislation opposed by the FOP:
“‘Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act,’ which would allow any civilian concealed carry permit holder to travel to any other State issuing concealed carry permits without any training or safety requirements;”
“Legislation or amendments that would have the effect of weakening P.L. 106-185, the ‘Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000’”
Canterbury, in testimony mentioned above, expressly announced his agreement with the FOP’s attempt to prevent the people from the free, unrestricted exercise of their natural right to be armed, as protected by the Second Amendment.
Finally, with regard to the concern constitutionalists should have over President Trump’s intent to nominate Charles Canterbury, a man known to support unconstitutional restrictions on gun ownership, to be the director of the ATF, an agency whose very existence violates the Constitution, consider the following letter penned by Canterbury and sent to the U.S. Senate in support of a proposed expansion of the restrictions on gun ownership, use, and purchase:
I am writing on behalf of the Fraternal Order of Police, the oldest and largest law enforcement organization in the United States, to strongly recommend that several measures, all absolutely critical elements of addressing gun violence, be included in legislation moving forward as a result of your deliberations:
These measures are:
Expansion of background checks on firearm purchasers;
Reinvigoration of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to ensure that it has the tools and resources necessary to its mission;
Improved law enforcement access to mental health records in the context of firearms acquisition; and
Funding to put more state and local law enforcement officers on the street.
A couple of paragraphs later, in promoting a more powerful ATF, Canterbury claims that liberty must be sacrificed so that we might save the children, in language that sounds more like something Barack Obama would say rather than Donald Trump: “For too long we have denied AFT the proper resources and our nation and our children have paid the price.”
Later in the same letter, Canterbury calls on Congress to use doctors as informants, to keep guns out of the “wrong hands.” Canterbury writes, “Along with comprehensive background checks, better access to mental health records is critical to keeping guns out of the wrong hands.”
There is no need to continue the catalog of Canterbury’s opposition to the Second Amendment and to its purpose of protecting — from government — the right of the people to keep and bear arms.
The U.S. Senate returns from its Memorial Day recess on Monday, June 3. Americans committed to the Constitution and to the preservation of one of our most basic rights — the right to keep and bear arms — should contact their U.S. Senators and urge them to oppose President Trump’s nomination of Charles Canterbury, a man on record petitioning the Senate to shrink the size of the Second Amendment and to increase the strength and size of the ATF, to head that very agency.
_____________________________________________________________
SOME HAVE A DIFFERENT VIEW:
https://www.ammoland.com/2019/06/atf-director-nominee-on-record-for-
protecting-second-amendment-rights/

ILLINOIS PASTOR’S PRAYER BEFORE HOUSE ASKS GOD TO JUDGE STATE FOR “SANCTIONED DESTRUCTION OF INNOCENT UNBORN”

PASTOR COREY MUSGRAVE’S IMPRECATORY PRAYER 
IN DEFIANCE OF “REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACT”
ILLINOIS PASTOR’S PRAYER BEFORE HOUSE 
ASKS GOD TO JUDGE STATE FOR 
“SANCTIONED DESTRUCTION OF INNOCENT UNBORN”
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. — A pastor in Illinois who opened the state House of Representatives in prayer on Friday asked Heaven’s court to judge the state for sanctioning the “destruction of the unborn” through the passage of the so-called Reproductive Health Act.
Corey Musgrave, who leads New Beginnings Church in Fairfield, began by thanking God for his blessings upon the state, including its natural resources, and noted the responsibility of Illinois’ lawmakers.
“God, we thank you for the ability to choose our own direction, even though those choices have consequences,” he said. “All throughout Your word, it is clear You have given us a choice. God, You even said, ‘Today, I give you the choice between life and death, blessings and curses. Now, I call upon Heaven to witness the choice you make. O that you would choose life so that you and your descendants might live.’”
“So God, I confess here today that I have not always made the right choice, and I thank you for being a merciful God who forgives and restores when we turn back to You,” Musgrave continued.
He then lamented that “this state has decided to go its own way apart from You,” and specifically in regard to the murder of the unborn.
“God, none of our evil actions have been hidden from You. You see everything,” Musgrave noted. “Lord, You have told us those things which You hate, and among them are hands that shed innocent blood.”
“I stand here in this House, in this high place in Illinois, and ask You, O God, creator of Heaven and Earth, if there is anything more innocent than a baby that is being created in the womb,” he prayed.
Musgrave quoted from Psalm 139 in noting that the unborn are not hidden from God’s sight.
“The Psalmist exclaimed, ‘You made all the delicate parts of my body and knit me together in my mother’s womb. Thank You for making me so wonderfully complex. Your workmanship is marvelous; how well I know it. You watched me as I was being formed in utter seclusion as I was woven together in the dark of the womb. You saw me before I was born.’”
He then lamented that despite those who have pleaded for lawmakers to protect those in the womb — referring to calls for the rejection of the Reproductive Health Act — legislators rather decided to pass the bill.
“God, we have made our appeals to the leaders of Illinois this week on behalf of those innocent babies who do not yet have a voice. We have been a voice for those who cannot speak for themselves as You have commanded us,” Musgrave stated. “Those appeals were denied, but we have one final appeal left and that is to the courts of Heaven.”
“God Almighty, I make an appeal to Heaven today, to You the perfect judge, the One who presides over Heaven’s court. I ask you to rise up, O God, and judge Illinois for the sanctioned destruction of the innocent unborn,” he said. “For when Your judgments are in this state, the inhabitants of Illinois learn righteousness.”
He asked God for mercy in the midst of judgment as he concluded his prayer.
“In this House I pray for justice to roll down like water and righteousness like a mighty river. In Your judgment, I pray that You would remember mercy, for we know that You, O God, do not want anyone to be destroyed,” Musgrave said.
“I ask this in the name of Your Son, the One who died for a sinner like me, the One who was appointed to judge the living and the dead. In the name of Jesus Christ I pray. Amen.”
As previously reported, The Reproductive Health Act, presented by Rep. Kelly Cassidy, D-Chicago, declares that women have a “fundamental right” to abortion and that a “fetus does not have independent rights” apart from his or her mother.
“Every individual who becomes pregnant has a fundamental right to continue the pregnancy and give birth or to have an abortion, and to make autonomous decisions about how to exercise that right,” it reads.
“A fertilized egg, embryo, or fetus does not have independent rights under the laws of this state,” the bill states.
It proclaims that the State may not “deny, restrict, interfere with, or discriminate against an individual’s exercise of the fundamental rights set forth in this Act.”
Some interpret the statute as allowing abortion up until birth for any reason as it does not contain language pertaining to limitations, and eliminates language from the current law that prohibits abortion past the point of viability unless “in the medical judgment of the attending or referring physician, based on the particular facts of the case before him, it is necessary to preserve the life or health of the mother.”
The bill passed the Illinois Senate 34-20 on Friday after clearing the House 65-40 on Tuesday. It now heads to the desk of Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker, who has vowed to sign the legislation into law.
“In Illinois, we trust women to make the most personal and fundamental decisions of their lives — and now, that will be the law of the land, even as it’s under threat in other states,” he said.
Psalm 119:136 says, “Rivers of waters run down mine eyes because they keep not Thy law.”

ZAKIR NAIK’S CRIMINAL ISLAMIC EMPIRE

ZAKIR NAIK’S CRIMINAL ISLAMIC EMPIRE
Dr. Zakir Naik, whose preaching is banned in India, Bangladesh, Canada, and the United Kingdom, is the Founder and President of the Islamic Research Foundation (IRF). Naik has been accused of inciting terrorism and religious hatred, and he was recently charged with money laundering and of acquiring $28 million in criminal assets (2019). His channel, Peace TV, is banned in India, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. How can a man who is considered by millions to be Islam’s greatest apologist be the source of so much violence and criminal activity?
David Wood of Acts 17 Apologetics discusses the issue.

UK: JEWS IN FEAR AFTER PRO-PALESTINIAN GROUP SUPPORTED BY JEREMY CORBYN FORCES JEWISH SHOPS CLOSED

UK: JEWS IN FEAR AFTER PRO-PALESTINIAN GROUP SUPPORTED BY JEREMY CORBYN 
FORCES JEWISH SHOPS CLOSED
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

“British Jews have spoken of their fear after a pro-Palestine group supported by Jeremy Corbyn forced Jewish-owned shops to close by staging aggressive rallies outside them.”

Corbyn also was recently ‘saluted’ by Hamas who thanked him for his support of a pro-Palestinian march. And three months ago, Corbyn stood up to block efforts by the UK Home Office to ban his “friends” Hizballah from the UK.
How any freedom-loving, human rights supporting, Israel recognizing individual could possibly support the jihadist Palestinian cause given its infamous history is mind blasting. Now, at the expense of Jews who suffer increasing violent Islamic anti-semitism, the chickens are coming home to roost in the UK and elsewhere in Western nations (via open door immigration). The intolerance and violence that is now escalating in Western countries that is ‘normal’ in the Palestinian territories and elsewhere across Islamic States is gaining more traction, thanks to those Leftists who are are enabling Islamic supremacism and willfully ignoring its gross misdeeds; yet they continue to escape accountability. These enablers are in fact being funded by taxpayers through Leftist government officials and bogus programs that claim to advocate for human rights, but yet ignore the worst human rights violations in the world today, perpetrated by Islamic supremacists against innocents, and committed in the name of Islam.
“EXCLUSIVE: British Jews in fear after pro-Palestine group supported by Corbyn forces Jewish shops to close with ‘campaign of intimidation'”By Jake Wallis Simons, Daily Mail, May 31, 2019:
British Jews have spoken of their fear after a pro-Palestine group supported by Jeremy Corbyn forced Jewish-owned shops to close by staging aggressive rallies outside them.
The Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC), of which Mr Corbyn is patron, targeted shops selling Israeli products in Brighton, London and Manchester, forcing two businesses to fold.
Earlier this month, it organised a rally in London which saw ‘open anti-Semitism from attendees’, according to the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism. A statement from the Labour leader was read out to the crowd.
It comes as Labour became the only party after the BNP to be formally investigated for racism by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).
A new film, Hounded, has been released today by anti-racism campaigners to draw attention to the harassment of Jews who sell goods from Israel, highlighting a ‘campaign of intimidation’ that has been going on for years.
It focuses on the case of a British Jewish businessman who fled the country with his family after he was hounded for five years by the Scottish PSC and the Republican Network for Unity, neither of which are officially endorsed by Mr Corbyn.
Nissan Ayalon, 33, relocated three times to escape the activists but each time they found him, attacking his shop with paint bombs because he sold Israeli cosmetics.
The revelations about the PSC will increase the pressure on the Labour leader – who was officially saluted by Hamas last week – as he struggles to contain his party’s anti-Semitism crisis…..
______________________________________________________________

Jewish leaders say Corbyn has failed to act against Labour anti-Semitism


Corbyn attacks Trump for 'spreading hate’ 

during his state visit

RASHIDA TLAIB & THAT “SAFE HAVEN” FOR JEWS CREATED BY THE PALESTINIANS

Rep. Tlaib says the Holocaust gives 

her a “Calming Feeling”!

This anti-Semitic congresswoman says the Holocaust giver her a calming feeling because her ancestors, Palestinians, “created a safe haven for Jews”. Little does she know, indigenous Palestinians waged war on Jews and collaborated with Nazis to wipe Jews off the planet…
She needs to go!


RASHIDA TLAIB & THAT “SAFE HAVEN” FOR JEWS CREATED BY THE PALESTINIANS
BY HUGH FITZGERALD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Appearing as a guest on the Yahoo News podcast “Skullduggery” in early May, Rashida Tlaib offered her own fantastical version of Israeli, and “Palestinian” history: 
There’s always kind of a calming feeling, I tell folks, when I think of the Holocaust, and the tragedy of the Holocaust, and the fact that it was my ancestors — Palestinians — who lost their land and some lost their lives, their livelihood, their human dignity, their existence in many ways, have been wiped out, and some people’s [sic] passports,” Tlaib said on the podcast’s most recent episode, published Friday [May 11]. “And, just all of it was in the name of trying to create a safe haven for Jews, post-the Holocaust, post-the tragedy and the horrific persecution of Jews across the world at that time. And, I love the fact that it was my ancestors that provided that, right,[sic] in many ways, but they did it in a way that took their human dignity away and it  was forced on them.”
What kind of person, what kind of moral idiot, says that when she “thinks of the Holocaust” there “is always kind of a calming feeling”? We could stop right there, for that ought to be enough to permanently earn her universal scorn.  But let’s continue.
What she claims, in her confused and tortured English, is this:
Israel came into being to provide a “safe haven for Jews” after the Holocaust; it was the local population, the “Palestinians,” who “provided that safe haven” but in so doing, they lost “their land and some lost their lives, their livelihood, their human dignity, their existence in many ways.” You see, they were made to suffer for the crimes against the Jews committed by others, while being themselves guiltless.
Tlaib implies that Israel came into being as a reaction to the Holocaust. It did not. The Jewish state, as an idea and an ideal, long preceded the Holocaust. Eretz Israel was in the minds of exiled Jews for nearly two millennia. Modern Zionism, which called for Jews to rebuild a Jewish state in their ancestral homeland, began not — as Tlaib seems to think — post-World War II, as a belated attempt to create a “safe haven” after the Holocaust, but with Theodor Herzl, who made public at the First Zionist Congress in 1897 the goal of resurrecting a Jewish state.
Even under Ottoman rule, Jews had begun to return to Eretz Israel, buying land from local Arab owners and from absentee landlords in Amman, Beirut, and Istanbul, often at exorbitant prices. Jews continued to resettle in the Land of Israel during the period of the British mandate. They did not  despoil any local Arabs; these Jews paid handsomely for every last dunam they acquired. It was only after the 1948–49 war, in which the armies of five Arab countries attempted to snuff out the young life of the nascent Jewish state, that some land, from which the Arab owners had fled, was expropriated.
Rashida Tlaib appears not to know this history. And she describes the “Palestinians” (who came into existence, as a “people”– invented for propaganda purposes — only after the Six-Day War) as having had to sacrifice so much, in order that the Jews might have a “safe haven.” In fact, the local Arabs (Tlaib’s “Palestinians”) fought the Jews and opposed their return to Zion any way they could. Arabs were attacking Jewish settlers as early as 1920, at Tel Hai, where they killed Jewish farmers and burned their settlement to the ground; the same year, Arabs attacked Jews during the Nebi Musa riots in Jerusalem. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s local Arabs continued to attack Jews in farms, towns and cities.
The “Arab Revolt” in 1936-39 was, however, mainly directed at the British, who were seen as being too favorable toward the Jews (which was definitely not the case). The leader of the Palestinian Muslims, Haj Amin al-Husseini, went into exile during that revolt. Al-Husseini continued to promote violence against the Jews of ‘Palestine’, from his foreign eyries, first in Lebanon, then in Iraq. After a short stay in Fascist Italy, he ended up in Nazi Germany. From there Al-Husseini broadcast pro-Nazi propaganda to Arab and Muslim audiences; he found Bosnian Muslim volunteers for the Waffen-SS; he met with Hitler to express his enthusiasm for how the Fuehrer was dealing with European Jews; he may even have visited Auschwitz. He made propaganda broadcasts for the Nazis. He collaborated with the Germans in sabotage campaigns in Iraq, Transjordan, and ‘Palestine’. Husseini intervened on 13 May 1943, before the meeting with Himmler when he was informed of the Holocaust, with the German Foreign Office to block possible transfers of Jews from Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania to ‘Palestine’, after reports reached him that 4,000 Jewish children accompanied by 500 adults had managed to reach ‘Palestine’. He asked the Foreign Minister “to do his utmost” to block all such proposals, and this request was complied with. In June 1943 the Mufti recommended to the Hungarian minister that it would be better to send Jews in Hungary to concentration camps in Poland rather than let them find asylum in ‘Palestine’.
A year later, on 25 July 1944 he wrote to the Hungarian foreign minister to register his objection to the release of certificates for 900 Jewish children and 100 adults for transfer from Hungary, fearing they might end up in Palestine. He did everything he could to prevent European Jews from reaching Palestine.  He knew from Himmler himself what fate awaited them if they remained; that Final Solution was exactly what he wanted. This was the man who, even in exile, remained the undisputed leader of the Palestinian Arabs from the 1920s until after the first Arab-Israeli war.
Rashida Tlaib apparently knows none of this. Her history begins after World War II, with entirely innocent “Palestinians” being made to pay the price for the Holocaust. But those innocent “Palestinians” had been attacking and murdering Jews, whose only crime was to  have bought land in ‘Palestine’, since the 1920s. Their leader Al-Husseini eagerly collaborated with the Nazis and made every effort to persuade governments in Europe to prevent Jews from escaping to ‘Palestine’. And it was the desire to placate the “Palestinians,” in order to avoid a repeat of the violence of the “Arab Revolt,”  that caused the British government to severely limit the numbers of Jews who could enter Mandatory Palestine.
By the White Paper of 1939, only 15,000 Jews would be allowed into ‘Palestine’ each year, for five years; at the end of that period, any further Jewish immigration would be subject to veto by the Arabs, which meant it would end. The Arab pressure on the British thus led to a policy that prevented hundreds of thousands of desperate Jews from finding refuge just before, and during, World War II, in Mandatory Palestine. Instead, they were forced to remain in Europe, where they were murdered. The “Palestinians” had ensured that the gates to ‘Palestine’, for Jews, would remain shut.
Rashida Tlaib might want to look into the long history of how the local Arabs — her “Palestinians” — did everything they could to make sure that Jews would not find a “safe haven” in ‘Palestine’. They attacked Jews wherever they were — Jewish farmers and Jews living in towns, Jews living in Jerusalem and in the three other “holy cities” of Judaism, Hebron, Safed, and Tiberias, and Jews living in the brand-new city of Tel Aviv. These attacks by local Arabs started during World War I, continued during the mandate period, and are still ongoing, as we all know, right up to the present day. That’s some “safe haven” the “Palestinians” provided the Jews. Will Rashida Tlaib dare to admit that her potted history is dead wrong? Will she recognize the role of her “ancestors,” not in helping Jews to find refuge, but in making sure that they did not?
Tlaib apparently does not know that the 1948-49 Arab-Israeli war began when five Arab armies — those of Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Iraq — invaded the newly-declared state of Israel. The Secretary-General of the Arab League, Azzam Pasha, promised a “momentous massacre” of a kind that had not been seen since the days of the Mongols. Some “Palestinians” fled in the months prior to the Arab attack, so as to get out of the way of those armies; they had been assured that the Jews would be quickly crushed, and that they could then safely return to their homes. Those who chose to remain were neither dispossessed of their land, nor killed by the Israelis. Contrary to Rashida Tlaib’s preposterous assertion, they lost neither their lives, nor their livelihoods, nor their dignity.
Israel did indeed become a “safe haven” for Jews, but that was solely through the efforts of the Jews themselves, and despite the determination of the “Palestinians” to destroy the Jews already in ‘Palestine’, and to ensure that as few as possible would arrive, fleeing the Nazis, from Europe. The fable Rashida Tlaib tells, of “Palestinians:” being made to answer for the crimes of the Nazis, ignores decades of Arab attacks on Jewish settlers, of successful Arab efforts to persuade the British to severely limit Jewish immigration to ‘Palestine’, and to insist that European countries not allow any Jews to escape to the one place where they might have found refuge.
Rashida Tlaib’s string of self-pitying counter-factuals about the supposed role of the “Palestinians” in providing a “safe haven” for Jews, and about how they, so blameless, have been made to suffer for it, both astonishes and disgusts. She should be urged to study, for a start, the life and works of Haj Amin al-Husseini.  But I doubt if she would have the decency to do it. One thing about Rashida Tlaib is certain. History is not her strong suit.
________________________________________________________________
THE BACKLASH:

TLAIB'S TALL TALE: 

UNDENIABLE HISTORICAL PROOF PALESTINIANS NEVER PROVIDED SAFE HAVEN FOR JEWS!!!

She is no better than Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels. This Jew Hating Terrorist B-tch is a danger to Israel, America, and all Jews.
Former Top Dem Bucks Pelosi: Tlaib's Wrong About Origins of Israel One-time Democratic vice presidential candidate and former Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut said on Monday that Rep. Rashida Tlaib had her history wrong when she suggested the Palestinians permitted a “safe haven” for the Jewish people following the Holocaust. Both House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer defended Tlaib’s comments about Israel. The speaker tweeted on Monday that House Republicans and President Donald Trump owe the freshman representative an apology for trying to “smear” her by labeling her remarks anti-Semitic and anti-Israel. In contrast to Pelosi and Hoyer, Lieberman, former Vice President Al Gore’s running mate in the 2000 presidential election, responded to Tlaib’s comments Monday on Fox News’ “Cavuto Live,” saying that of all the statements he ever heard about the Holocaust, he’s “never heard one like that.” “It’s obvious she’s angry about what happened to the Palestinians as a result of the creation of the state of Israel,” Lieberman said. “The implication, although she didn’t say it, is that the Palestinians voluntarily provided that safe haven. Obviously not. “During the Second World War, the mufti of Jerusalem, the Palestinian leader, openly allied with Hitler,” Lieberman said. Also Monday, CNN’s John King pointed out that Tlaib was wrong about her history concerning the creation of Israel. Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948, as the British governing mandate came to an end.

BUTTIGIEG’S CHRISTIAN BROTHER-IN-LAW SPEAKS OUT AGAINST MAYOR PETE’S MANUFACTURING OF PARTNER CHASTEN’S POOR, “RAGS TO RICHES” UPBRINGING

FALSE VICTIMOLOGY SIMILAR TO HOW MUSLIMS EMPLOY IT TO GET THEIR WAY
TWO MODES OF LIBERAL PHOBIAS EMPLOYED BY DEMOCRATS:
HOMOPHOBIA & ISLAMOPHOBIA

Pete Buttigieg's brother-in-law Rhyan Glezman did a Fox News interview where he accused his brother-in-law Pete Buttigieg of trying to score 'political points' and said he had been shunned by family after becoming a born-again Christian

BUTTIGIEG’S CHRISTIAN BROTHER-IN-LAW 
SPEAKS OUT AGAINST MAYOR PETE’S 
MANUFACTURING OF PARTNER’S POOR UPBRINGING 
“RAGS TO RICHES” FICTIONAL STORY MEANT TO 
ELICIT SYMPATHY FROM VOTERS
“Glezman said his brother, who attends campaign events with Buttigieg (r) and has developed his own Twitter following, had invented a ‘rags-to-riches’ tale for ‘political gain'”
  • A series of profiles have examined Buttigieg husband Chasten’s childhood and struggles coming out as gay
  • One recent article quoted brother in law Rhyan Glezman, 34, saying: ‘I just don’t support the gay lifestyle’
  • The small-town Michigan preacher says his views have been distorted
  • He said the family wasn’t poor and that Chasten, 29, wasn’t shunned
  • ‘He was struggling for a time. But there was nothing on the family end that said he had to leave,’ he said 
  • Glezman took his campaign to Laura Ingraham’s show on Fox 
  • The born-again Christian minister said he is the one who was shunned by the family for his views 
  • He declared himself voting for ‘Trump 2020’ and  said Buttigieg’s role as mayor of South Bend wasn’t the right platform to be president
  • He says they last spoke at his grandmother’s funeral and refused Ingraham’s entreaties to patch things up 

_______________________________________________________________

SEE: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7091625/Now-Pete-Buttigiegs-born-brother-law-says-one-shunned-family.html

Rhyan Glezman (l) is a pastor in Clio, Michigan and married to (right) wife Erin. The couple took part in a protest against Planned Parenthood; in contrast his brother-in-law Pete Buttigieg has spoken in favor of pro-choice policies
Rhyan Glezman (l) is a pastor in Clio, Michigan and married to (right) wife Erin. The couple took part in a protest against Planned Parenthood; in contrast his brother-in-law Pete Buttigieg has spoken in favor of pro-choice policies
Glezman was quoted saying he loves his brother but doesn't approve of the 'gay lifestyle.' He and his wife Erin worship at the church he runs in Clio, Michigan
Glezman was quoted saying he loves his brother but doesn’t approve of the ‘gay lifestyle.’ He and his wife Erin worship at the church he runs in Clio, Michigan
Family: In contrast to their son Rhyan, Chasten's mother Sherri and father Terry are close to him and Pete Buttigieg, attending a Notre Dame football game together. Chasten's parents gave him away at his Episcopal church wedding to Buttigieg
Family: In contrast to their son Rhyan, Chasten’s mother Sherri and father Terry are close to him and Pete Buttigieg, attending a Notre Dame football game together. Chasten’s parents gave him away at his Episcopal church wedding to Buttigieg

________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLES OF MUSLIM VICTIMOLOGY 
MIRRORING HOMOPHOBIA:
JAMIE GLAZOV ON ILHAN OMAR:

Jamie Glazov Moment: 

The Left’s “You Hate Muslims” Charade

Christine Williams Moment: How the Victimology Subterfuge is Killing the West



After MUSLIMS beheaded a British soldier in the streets of London, all Muslims can whine about is not feeling safe in the streets of London anymore. And the media (CNN) water carriers fall right into line with them.



OBAMA BLASTS SECOND AMENDMENT IN SPEECH TO BRAZIL AUDIENCE: ‘OUR GUN LAWS IN THE US DON’T MAKE SENSE’

OBAMA BLASTS SECOND AMENDMENT IN SPEECH 
TO BRAZIL AUDIENCE: 
‘OUR GUN LAWS IN THE US DON’T MAKE SENSE’

Former US president says gun laws in America allow anyone to get a gun anytime

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In a speech at the VTEX Day digital conference in Sao Paulo, Brazil, Thursday, the 44th president lamented the Sandy Hook tragedy before attacking the Second Amendment.
“The most difficult day that I’ve had, was the day where there was a shooting at a school. Uh, where, 20 small children were shot, as well as some teachers,” he stated. “I had to go and comfort the parents.”
Obama goes on to say anyone can purchase any type of gun with little to no regulation, and claimed “machine guns” can be bought over the internet.
“Some of you may be aware our gun laws in the United States don’t make much sense,” Obama said, “Anybody can buy any weapon any time — without much if any regulation, they can buy it over the Internet, they can buy machine guns.”
He went on to claim he was sad he’d been unable to change gun laws following the school shooting.
“For me, having to speak to parents who have lost a child, just two days, or a day, after it happened, uh, and not being able to assure them that, um, that would change, that we would fix this,” he continued. “I couldn’t bring the children back, but I couldn’t even, uh, promise them that we would change the laws so that this wouldn’t happen to somebody else’s children.”

MAKE SODOM GREAT AGAIN? TRUMP’S “CELEBRATE PRIDE MONTH” TWEETS URGE NATIONS TO JOIN IN EFFORT TO LEGALIZE HOMOSEXUALITY

MAKE SODOM GREAT AGAIN? 
TRUMP’S “CELEBRATE PRIDE MONTH” TWEETS URGE NATIONS TO JOIN IN EFFORT TO LEGALIZE HOMOSEXUALITY
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
WASHINGTON — President Trump posted two tweets on Friday in recognition of homosexual and transgender “Pride Month,” asking Americans to “stand in solidarity” with homosexuals who live in countries where such sexual practices are illegal, as well as for nations to join his administration’s campaign to decriminalize homosexuality worldwide.
“As we celebrate LGBT Pride Month and recognize the outstanding contributions LGBT people have made to our great nation, let us also stand in solidarity with the many LGBT people who live in dozens of countries worldwide that punish, imprison, or even execute individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation,” he wrote.
“My administration has launched a global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality and invite all nations to join us in this effort!” Trump urged.
As of press time, the initial tweet has 65K likes and more than 15K retweets.
In February, NBC News reported that U.S. Ambassador to Germany Mike Grenell would be leading the effort to decriminalize homosexuality worldwide.
It noted that “[t]he U.S. embassy is flying in LGBT activists from across Europe for a strategy dinner to plan to push for decriminalization in places that still outlaw homosexuality — mostly concentrated in the Middle East, Africa and the Caribbean.”
Grenell, an open homosexual, told Fox News last month that Vice President Mike Pence was on board with the effort.
“I … want to just point out the fact that the vice president, Mike Pence, is fully on board with my push to decriminalize homosexuality around the world,” he said, as he sought to push back against assertions from Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg that Pence is “anti-gay.”
The ambassador noted that homosexuality is illegal in 71 countries, and in some nations, it can result in prison time or the death penalty.
“Mike Pence is on board with decriminalizing homosexuality around the world,” Grenell repeated. “I think that speaks volumes.”
Earlier this month, Trump told Steve Hilton of Fox’s “The Next Revolution” that he thinks “it’s great” that Buttigieg is campaigning with his “husband.”
“Putting aside policy disagreements, don’t you think that it’s just great to see the guy there on the stage with his husband, and it’s normal?” Hilton asked.
“I think it’s absolutely fine. I do,” Trump replied. “I think it’s absolutely fine.”
“Isn’t it a sign of great progress in the country?” Hilton inquired, continuing to prompt the president to concur that the development is positive.
“Yeah, I think it’s great,” Trump answered unflinchingly. “I think that’s something that perhaps some people will have a problem with, [but] I have no problem with it whatsoever. I think it’s good.”
Trump has similarly made a number of supportive remarks or positive gestures toward homosexual-identifying Americans in recent years, stating while running for office in 2016, “So you tell me, who’s better for the gay community, and who’s better for women than Donald Trump? Believe me!”
During his RNC acceptance speech, he stated that “[a]s president, I will do everything in my power to protect LGBTQ citizens from the violence and oppression of a hateful foreign ideology.”
His campaign website additionally made available for purchase “LGBTQ for Trump” t-shirts and pins, and at one point, he held up an “LGBT for Trump” rainbow flag that was handed to him during a campaign stop in Colorado.
After being elected, he decided to keep intact Barack Obama’s 2014 order banning federal contractors from engaging in “discrimination” in employment matters against homosexual and transgendered persons.
“President Trump continues to be respectful and supportive of LGBTQ rights, just as he was throughout the election,” the White House said in a statement at that time. “The president is proud to have been the first ever GOP nominee to mention the LGBTQ community in his nomination acceptance speech, pledging then to protect the community from violence and oppression.”
In 2018, Trump staffers sent a letter of congratulations for the 40th anniversary of the homosexual group Log Cabin Republicans, with the signed correspondence stating in part, “No matter the color of our skin or our sexual orientation, we all live under the same laws, salute the same great American flag, and are made in the image of the same Almighty God.”
The Bible teaches in Genesis 19 that the city of Sodom was full of various wickedness, including homosexuality. It states that as the men of Sodom saw angels enter into Lot’s home, “both old and young” surrounded the house and called out, “Where are the men which came into thee this night? Bring them out unto us, that we may know them.”
“I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly,” Lot replied.
The angels then “smote the men that were at the door of the house with blindness” so that they could not enter, and advised Lot, “[W]e will destroy this place, because the cry of them is waxen great before the face of the Lord, and the Lord hath sent us to destroy it.”
In the New Testament, Jude, the earthly brother of Jesus, pointed to the sorrowful fate of Sodom, writing, “Sodom and Gomorrah, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.”
He later encouraged Christians in light of the rampant sin of the last days to “have compassion [on souls], making a difference, and others save with fear.”
“[Y]e, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost, keep yourselves in the love of God, looking for the mercy of our Lord Jesus Christ unto eternal life,” Jude urged.

TRUMP TARIFFS ON MEXICO COULD HIT 25 PERCENT; ASYLUM RULES TO CHANGE

The Rise of Economic Nationalism: Trump Imposes 
Post-Globalist Tariffs on Mexico!
Dr. Steve Turley Reports:

TRUMP TARIFFS ON MEXICO COULD HIT 25 PERCENT; ASYLUM RULES TO CHANGE 

BY R. CORT KIRKWOOD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
President Trump will impose tariffs of up to 25 percent on Mexican imports if the kleptocracy south of the border doesn’t stop the flow of illegal immigrants traversing its territory to get to the United States.
Trump announced the trade penalties in a tweet late Thursday afternoon just after he posted videoof more than 1,000 illegals surging across the border in the El Paso sector in the wee hours Wednesday. It was the largest group ever apprehended.
And Trump also announced that the administration will rewrite asylum rules as another means to discourage the invasion.
The Tariff “On June 10th, the United States will impose a 5% Tariff on all goods coming into our Country from Mexico, until such time as illegal migrants coming through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP,” the president tweeted.
“The Tariff will gradually increase until the Illegal Immigration problem is remedied ... at which time the Tariffs will be removed. Details from the White House to follow.”
Those details are in a statement at the White House website, which opened with a candid assessment of the border crisis and Mexico’s role in helping foment it.
“For decades,” the president said, “the United States has suffered the severe and dangerous consequences of illegal immigration. Sadly, Mexico has allowed this situation to go on for many years, growing only worse with the passage of time.”
The situation is “from a safety, national security, military, economic, and humanitarian standpoint” a “grave disaster.” And the American taxpayer, the president said, “bears the extraordinary financial cost imposed by large-scale illegal migration.”
Now he said, “Mexico must step up and help solve this problem.”
Invoking the Emergency Economic Powers Act, which many would argue is an unconstitutional grant of power from Congress to the executive, Trump imposed a multi-tiered tariff:
If the illegal migration crisis is alleviated through effective actions taken by Mexico, to be determined in our sole discretion and judgment, the Tariffs will be removed. If the crisis persists, however, the Tariffs will be raised to 10 percent on July 1, 2019. Similarly, if Mexico still has not taken action to dramatically reduce or eliminate the number of illegal aliens crossing its territory into the United States, Tariffs will be increased to 15 percent on August 1, 2019, to 20 percent on September 1, 2019, and to 25 percent on October 1, 2019. Tariffs will permanently remain at the 25 percent level unless and until Mexico substantially stops the illegal inflow of aliens coming through its territory. Workers who come to our country through the legal admissions process, including those working on farms, ranches, and in other businesses, will be allowed easy passage.
If Mexico fails to act, Tariffs will remain at the high level, and companies located in Mexico may start moving back to the United States to make their products and goods. Companies that relocate to the United States will not pay the Tariffs or be affected in any way.
Trump said Mexico has enriched itself in its dealing with the United States, not least with jobs moving south across the border, and so if Mexico doesn’t cooperate, “the sustained imposition of Tariffs will produce a massive return of jobs back to American cities and towns. Remember, our great country has been the ‘piggy bank’ from which everybody wants only to TAKE.”
Asylum Rules Politico reported yesterday that Trump will also adjust the rules that govern applications for asylum. The new rules would block applications from illegals who live in another country other than their own before they arrive here.
Thus, migrants traveling through Mexico would not be permitted to apply. “U.S. law allows refugees to request asylum when they arrive on U.S. soil, but has long included an exemption for those who have already emigrated to a safe country,” Politico noted.
Free-traders and open-borders advocates are aghast, of course, and will most likely immediately file suit to stop the asylum change if not the tariff. Leftist subversives persuaded the federal courts, backed by the U.S. Supreme Court, to block Trump’s last effort to adjust asylum policy.
The policy is “extreme,” one told Politico, because it would block all Central Americans from applying for asylum.
Wrote Mexican president Andrés Manuel López Obrador, “How did a country of fraternity for all the migrants in the world become, from night to dawn, a ghetto, a closed space.” After all, he added, “the Statue of Liberty is not an empty symbol.”
AMLO, as he is known, did offer to help pay for the care, feeding, and other costs of the more than half-million illegals, almost all Central Americans, he permitted to cross Mexico to get to the United States.

ARMED CARTEL MEMBERS THREATEN BORDER WALL CONSTRUCTION CREW

$23,286,863 of $1.0B goal

Raised by 276,209 people in 5 months

About Brian Kolfage & 

We Build the Wall, Inc.

My name is Brian Kolfage, I have a verified blue check facebook page as a public figure and I’m a Purple Heart Recipient triple amputee veteran. Like a majority of those American citizens who voted to elect President Donald J Trump, we voted for him to Make America Great Again. President Trump’s main campaign promise was to BUILD THE WALL. And as he’s followed through on just about every promise so far, this wall project needs to be completed still. As a veteran who has given so much, 3 limbs, I feel deeply invested to this nation to ensure future generations have everything we have today. Too many Americans have been murdered by illegal aliens and too many illegals are taking advantage of the United States taxpayers with no means of ever contributing to our society. I have grandparents who immigrated to America legally, they did it the correct way and it’s time we uphold our laws, and get this wall BUILT! It’s up to Americans to help out and pitch in to get this project rolling. “If the 63 million people who voted for Trump each pledge $80, we can build the wall.” That equates to roughly 5Billion Dollars, even if we get half, that’s half the wall. We can do this. Democrats are going to stall this project by every means possible and play political games to ensure President Trump doesn’t get his victor. They’d rather see President Trump fail, than see America succeed. However, if we can fund a large portion of this wall, it will jumpstart things and will be less money Trump has to secure from our politicians. This won’t be easy, but it’s our duty as citizens. This needs to be shared every single day by each of you on social media. We can do it, and we can help President Trump make America safe again!
Report: Armed Cartel Members Threaten Border Wall Construction Crew

Mexican Cartels FURIOUS After PRO-AMERICAN Group SHUTS DOWN Key Smuggling Corridor in 

One Weekend



ARMED CARTEL MEMBERS THREATEN BORDER WALL CONSTRUCTION CREW

President of private border wall construction company made claim on Twitter

BY KELEN MCBREEN

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The president of the “We Build the Wall” project, Brian Kolfage, claims 15 armed cartel members wearing camouflage approached the border wall near El Paso, Texas and threatened construction crews working on the project Thursday night.
Kolfage, a triple-amputee Air Force veteran and Purple Heart recipient, started a GoFundMe campaign last December to raise money for private border wall construction that reached $22 million.
Last weekend, the group announced a half-mile stretch of border wall had been completed, deflating the mainstream media narrative that Kolfage was ripping off conservative donors.
Infowars has reported on armed men approaching the southern border, and sometimes entering the United States, multiple times over the past few years.
In April, Border Patrol cameras observed several men armed with rifles escorting illegals across the border.
In September of 2018, thousands of camouflaged men armed with assault rifles were filmed crossing the border and entering Arizona.
Meanwhile, the Democrats continue to claim there is no crisis at America’s southern border.
_______________________________________________________
THE TEAM
35400806_1555546304440677_r.jpeg
OANN EXCLUSIVE: ‘We Build the Wall’ erects border wall in surprise operation
We build the wall video
Fundraising for a Border Wall
Steve Bannon Shares Why He Joined 
'We Build The Wall' Team 
KRIS KOBACH INTERVIEW
ANGEL FAMILIES INTERVIEW
Privately Funded Border Wall Constructed in Texas and New Mexico!!! -
"We Build the Wall" founder's Purple Heart seals completed border wall

CATHOLICS SHOULD BELIEVE THEIR FIRST “POPE”

CATHOLICS SHOULD BELIEVE THEIR FIRST “POPE”
BY MIKE GENDRON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Roman Catholics believe Peter was their first pope, but to their peril, they do not believe what he taught. Peter did play a prominent role in the early church, but he always knew the church had only One Head (Eph. 5:23). That exalted position was reserved for the Lord Jesus Christ, who promised to build His church after He purchased it with His own blood (Mat. 16:18; Acts 20:28). 
Soon after Peter abandoned his career as a fisherman to follow Christ, he became a fisher of men. Several of his sermons were recorded in the Book of Acts, and his doctrinal teachings were recorded in his two epistles. For the purpose of challenging Roman Catholics to examine their faith, I have asked Peter some questions. All of his answers come from his writings and sermons. It is my prayer that Catholics will believe what Peter taught regarding theology, ecclesiology, and soteriology and repent from any of their religious teachings and traditions that oppose the infallible Word of God. 
Peter, were you the first pope and supreme head of the church? "As your fellow elder", I exhort you to "shepherd the flock of God among you, exercising oversight not under compulsion, but voluntarily, according to the will of God; and not for sordid gain, but with eagerness; nor yet as lording it over those allotted to your charge, but proving to be examples to the flock" (1 Peter 5:1-3). Were you infallible? The Lord Jesus rebuked me as a mouthpiece of Satan because I had not set my mind on the interests of God (Mat. 16:23). Paul opposed me to my face, saying I stood condemned, because I was not straightforward about the truth of the Gospel (Galatians 2:11-14). As a man, I was fallible, however, my two epistles contain the infallible Word of God because they were divinely inspired (2 Tim. 3:16). Should we confess our sins to priests? I instructed Simon the Sorcerer to repent of his wickedness and pray to God that his sins may be forgiven (Acts 8:22). Should we pray to Mary and the saints? I said to pray to God (Acts 8:22). When I was in danger I prayed to God, "Lord save me" (Mat. 14:30). Can anyone be saved apart from Jesus Christ? "There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved" (Acts 4:12). What would you say to Pope Francis, who teaches that atheists can follow their conscience into heaven? "There will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies, even denying the Master who bought them, bringing upon themselves swift destruction" (2 Pet. 2:1).
Is Mary another sinless mediator? Peter said, "The ignorant and unstable twist Paul's letters to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures" (2 Peter 3:16). Catholic who believe Mary is another mediator have twisted Paul's irrefutable declaration that Christ is only one mediator between God and man (1 Tim. 2:5). Can anyone have assurance of eternal life? God has caused believers to be born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ to obtain an inheritance which is imperishable and undefiled and will not fade away, reserved in heaven and protected by the power of God through faith (1 Pet. 1:3-5). Can indulgences be purchased for the remission of sins? God redeems us "not with perishable things such as silver or gold, but with the precious blood of Christ" (1 Pet. 1:18-19). Can anyone be born again through water baptism? "You have been born again not of seed which is perishable but imperishable, that is, through the living and enduring word of God" (1 Pet. 1:23). Water baptism is for those who have already received the Holy Spirit (Acts 10:47). Should Jesus Christ be made a sin offering every day during the sacrifice of the Mass? Christ died "for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, so that He might bring us to God" (1 Pet. 3:18). Is the Catholic priesthood necessary to offer sacrifices to God? Every believer has been called out of darkness into Christ's marvelous light to be part of the royal priesthood for the purpose of proclaiming His excellencies (1 Pet. 2:9).
Are you the rock upon which Jesus would build His church?  My confession of faith in Jesus as the Christ and the Son of God is how the the Lord's church is built (Mat. 16:18). All believers, who have the same God-given faith, are living stones that make up the church. The Lord Jesus is "the chief cornerstone" and "a rock of offense" (1 Peter 2:4-8). The foundation of any building is anchored by the cornerstone. Should Jesus be portrayed as a dead man hanging on a cross or a baby in Mary's arms? The resurrected Christ has ascended into heaven and is at the right hand of God (1 Pet. 3:21-22). What should we do in these days of great deception? Take care that you are not carried away with the error of lawless people and lose your own stability. But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ (2 Pet 3:17-18).
There is a profound contrast between the teachings of Peter and the opinions of Pope Francis. The enormous disparitybetween the teachings of these two men is a strong indictment of how far the Roman Catholic Church has departed from the faith of the apostles into apostasy. Just as Catholics must choose between trusting Christ and His Word or the teachings and traditions of their religion, they must also choose between trusting the teachings of Peter and the teachings of Francis. It is impossible to believe two opposing authorities. 
1 4 5 6