TEACHER FIRED FOR ASKING TRUMP TO DEPORT ILLEGALS VIA TWITTER

Teacher Fired For Asking Trump to Deport Illegals Via Twitter
TEACHER FIRED FOR ASKING TRUMP TO 
DEPORT ILLEGALS VIA TWITTER

Another person loses their job over opinions posted to social media

BY KELEN MCBREEN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A high school teacher in Texas was fired Tuesday over some tweets she sent to President Trump, asking him to do something about the illegal immigrants in her school district.
The Fort Worth Independent School District Board of Trustees voted on Tuesday to terminate the contract of English language arts teacher Georgia Clark, who has worked for the district since 1998.
The Carter-Riverside High School teacher tweeted what she thought were private messages directed at President Trump last month, but the comments were public and sparked a huge controversy in the Fort Worth community.
“Mr. President, Fort Worth Independent School District is loaded with illegal students from Mexico. Carter-Riverside High School has been taken over by them. Drug dealers are on our campus and nothing was done to them,” one tweet read.
She continued, “I really do need a contact here in FW who should be actively investigating & removing illegals that are in the public school system.”
Clark also claimed school districts across the state are removing photos of illegal students to stop them from being identified by law enforcement.
The teacher says she “contacted the feds,” the Texas Education Agency and her teacher organization, but the calls for help were left unanswered.
A controversial 1982 Supreme Court ruling allows illegal immigrants to attend public schools under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution.
See the now-deleted tweets below:
According to state law, Clark has 15 days to appeal the decision and will be paid while the process takes place.
The reaction from parents and students has been mixed, but the media is only focusing on those who are upset with the tweets.
A parent named Penny Clanton said, “Her comments were hurtful, irresponsible, misleading, and disrespectful to the students she is supposed to protect and educate.”
Another teacher in the district chimed in, saying, “Let’s get one thing straight, ma’am, no human is illegal.”
Parents said the comments were “threatening,” “hurtful,” “dangerous and harmful to the students,” and much more.
The following videos are mainstream media news reports on the story:

ROBERT ZAJAC, M.D.: UNVACCINATED KIDS ARE HEALTHIER THAN VACCINATED KIDS

ROBERT ZAJAC, M.D.: UNVACCINATED KIDS ARE HEALTHIER THAN VACCINATED KIDS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
As you know, medical doctors don’t have a lot training in vaccines. We don’t have a lot of 
training in anything in detail unless you become a specialist. I’ve been reading about 
vaccines since 2009, about an hour a day. I started reading about vaccines when I saw my 
patients getting hurt, and that was really hard for me. I didn’t want to believe it. … 
In the […] two years [after I began my practice], I noticed that there was a separation in 
my patient population. There were patients who were seeing the local chiropractor who 
were healthier than my other patients, and they were doing some other things for their 
health other than just taking medication for whatever condition they might have. They also 
had a lower vaccine uptake and they were healthy. And that was really hard for me to 
recognize.

THE ENDLESS PREVARICATIONS OF REP. ILHAN OMAR

THE ENDLESS PREVARICATIONS OF REP. ILHAN OMAR
BY HUGH FITZGERALD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Ilhan Omar often blames America and Israel for the world’s problems. In early May, Omar denounced US sanctions against Venezuela intended to force out its socialist dictator after she was asked about the problems in the country.
“People like Elliott Abrams, neocons and warmongers, you know, for so long pushed for policies that are now — we can see, not only in Central America, but in many parts of the world, the kind of devastations that they’ve [not] seen for decades,” Omar said on Democracy Now. “Many of the sanctions we impose ultimately lead to devastations — and we are seeing it now in Venezuela.”
Just as in the case of her tweet about “Black Hawk Down,” Omar makes America out to be the bad guy, and ignores the greater context. In this case, she turns a blind eye to the repression and impoverishment that has been brought about by the corruption of Maduro’s regime and his predecessor, Hugo Chavez.
Furthermore, Omar also blamed Israel after Hamas and PIJ launched 700 rockets toward Israeli cities last week. Omar tweeted….
“How many more protesters must be shot, rockets must be fired, and little kids must be killed until the endless cycle of violence ends? The status quo of occupation and humanitarian crisis in Gaza is unsustainable. Only real justice can bring about security and lasting peace,”
Comment:“How many more protesters must be shot…” The people Omar calls “protesters” are not mere “protesters” at all; “protesters” do not throw Molotov cocktails and other explosives including grenades, or even, from time time, fire guns. Ordinary ‘protesters” do not throw into the air incendiary kites, as these people do. Organized and directed by Hamas, those who have taken part over more than a year in the so-called Great March of Return are attempting to breach Israel’s security fence, in the hope of then attacking Israeli soldiers and civilians.These are not “peaceful protesters” as Omar would have you believe.
Israel tries every non-lethal way it can to stop them, using tear gas and rubber bullets. Only when the marchers come very close to, or are just at, the security fence, attempting to cut through the barbed wire, throwing Molotov cocktails and other explosives, including grenades, or sending incendiary kites aloft to set fire to Israeli farmland (thousands of acres have been destroyed that way) do the Israelis use live fire. They almost always aim for the lower legs. Only in the most extreme and threatening of cases do they shoot to kill. Of course there would not have been a single Arab wounded or killed had Hamas not chosen to organize these attempts to breach Israeli security. And Israel has a right and a duty to defend itself; that is all Israel is doing.
“How many rockets must be fired…”
Omar appears to have forgotten it is not Israel that has been firing rockets, but Hamas. It is Hamas that has fired 690 rockets at Israeli cities and towns. That there was not enormous civilian loss of life in Israel is only because so many of those Hamas rockets either landed harmlessly on uninhabited land, or were intercepted by Israel’s Iron Dome defense. Omar needs to keep straight, too, who started the latest flare-up in Gaza: it was Islamic Jihad, firing on and wounding Israeli soldiers, that began the conflict. Israel retaliated, then Hamas massively escalated the conflict by firing several hundred rockets at Israel. Israel again retaliated, Hamas then fired hundreds more. In the end Hamas fired 690 rockets, while Israel destroyed 350 Hamas sites in Gaza. At any point Hamas could have stopped the fighting simply by ceasing to fire those rockets at Israel.
“[How many] little kids must be killed”
Indeed. Omar should be asking: Why does Hamas deliberately put children (“little kids”) in the front of the marchers, actually hoping they will be injured or killed, in order to stoke anti-Israel propaganda? The only reason to include children is the cruel calculation that some will be wounded or even killed, providing Hamas with a great propaganda victory. Israel makes enormous efforts not to harm children, but the problems with visibility — smoke from burning tires and the tear gas — and the general chaos of  thousands of people, running here and there, flinging their explosives toward the Israeli soldiers, makes it impossible to completely avoid wounding children.
“The status quo of occupation must be ended [in Gaza]..”
What can Ilhan Omar be thinking? There is no “occupation” of Gaza. There are no Israelis occupying any part of the Gaza Strip. The 9,000 Israelis who had been living in settlements in Gaza had all been removed by August 16, 2005. Since then Gaza has been ruled, first by the Palestine Authority, and then by Hamas. The Israelis handed over intact 3,000 greenhouses to the Palestinians, in the hopes that they would continue, and expand, the business Israelis had started. Instead, Palestinians vandalized and destroyed the greenhouses. Since coming to power in Gaza, Hamas has made a choice to invest hundreds of millions in weaponry of all kinds; in building its weapons warehouses, attack tunnels, offices, cyberattack headquarters. The money all of this cost could have been spent on bettering the lives of the Gazan Arabs but Hamas chose not to do so. Ilhan Omar wants you to think Israel’s “occupation” that ended 14 years ago is to blame.
The wretched  “status quo” in Gaza  has nothing to do with a non-existent “occupation” but with the choices made by Hamas leaders. They prefer spending money on war-making than on building the civilian economy. Furthermore, the catastrophic levels of corruption have impeded economic growth.  During the last decade more than $5 billion in aid money has been siphoned off by just two Hamas leaders, Moussa Abu Marzook and Khaled Meshaal, for themselves. There are estimated to be another 600 Hamas millionaires in Gaza. Does Ilhan Omar think this corruption is Israel’s fault?
“Omar also retweeted a post by journalist Mehdi Hassan blaming Israel for a missile strike that killed a pregnant woman and child in Gaza. That retweet remained active — and Omar was silent — following the revelation that a PIJ rocket was responsible for the deaths, not an Israeli airstrike as pro-Hamas propaganda claimed.”
The revelation came directly in a communication by Islamic Jihad, confimring what Hamas had posted for its members on-line (and then quickly then down for fear the Israelis might see it). Here is the story:
“TPS (Jewish News Agency) has learned that the [Palestinian” baby was killed when Islamic Jihad terrorists launched a rocket towards Israel from within a populated area in the east of Gaza City, but the rocket misfired and landed short, exploding in a nearby house and killing the baby.
“The baby’s mother was not killed, but she did have a miscarriage.
“Mahmoud H., a local resident, told TPS about a massive pit he saw inside the house after the rocket’s explosion.
“The rocket was locally produced and may have malfunctioned or exploded prematurely because of the low-grade explosives.
“The Hamas-controlled Gazan Ministry of Health initially announced that Saba’s mother was killed, but then claimed that another woman named Falastin Abu ‘Arar was killed in the explosion. She may be Saba’s aunt.
“A source in Gaza told TPS that Islamic Jihad representatives met with the Abu ‘Arar family on Sunday morning and offered them full compensation and a registry of the baby as a “Shahid” entitled to long-term support in exchange for their silence.
“Arab journalists in Gaza are aware of the facts, but have refrained from reporting on them due to the sensitivity of the situation.
“TPS was successful in capturing Hamas’ report on the Islamic Jihad’s culpability.
“Hamas’ al-Risala News published a news item on the issue in its Telegram account on Sunday afternoon, but removed it shortly after. The item then appeared on another Hamas-lined Telegram channel and quickly disappeared.
The item says: “A leak from the heroes of the [Islamic Jihad’s] Sarayat al-Quds (Jerusalem Brigades) on the circumstances of the death of the baby Saba Abu ‘Arar indicates that a rocket of the resistance exploded inside the family’s home due to a technical failure, and prematurely exploded. There is a claim that the technical failure was caused by low-grade explosives in the rocket.”
“There is no doubt that the baby’s death has nothing to do with the enemy’s (Israel’s) planes,” the report added.
“The IDF stated Sunday afternoon that “Palestinian weapons caused the tragic death of a mother in Gaza and her baby.”
Yet more than a week has gone by since Hamas reported that the death of the pregnant woman and of the baby had nothing to do with Israel, but were the result of a technical failure leading to the premature explosion of an Islamic Jihad rocket. Ilhan Omar certainly knows of this admission by IJ reported by Hamas, but has left up her retweeting of a post by Mehdi Hassan blaming Israel for the killing of the baby and her mother. She should not only have removed that retweet, but also straightforwardly admitted that both Hamas and Islamic Jihad have told their own members the truth: a malfunctioning IJ rocket, not Israel, was responsible. Being Ilhan Omar means never having to apologize or explain. She has repeatedly stated falsehoods, refused to retract them, and then ridden out the political storm. When she insisted that CAIR was formed in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, as a response to fears of “islamophobia,’ and then learned that CAIR was actually formed in 1994, she  never admitted, much less apologized for, her gross error. Her teflon is remarkable.
Omar should be asked the following by some intrepid reporter:
1. Why do you describe Gaza as under “occupation” when Israelis had been pulled out by August 16, 2005?
2. Why did the Palestinians in Gaza destroy the $14 million dollars worth of greenhouses that Israel had turned over to them at that time, hoping that the residents of Gaza would take over the turnkey operations and thrive?
3. When you speak of “little kids” being endangered, who is doing the endangering? It is a fact that Hamas has put children toward the front of its weekly Great March of Return, hoping that they will be wounded or killed, so that Hamas will win a propaganda victory. Do you think it is right for Hamas to include these “little kids” in these marches, given the violence the marchers deliberately engender?
4. Do you think the condition of the people of Gaza has been at all improved by the vast sums spent on the manufacture, storage, and use, of very expensive weapons, on attack tunnels, and on cyberwarfare? Couldn’t those hundreds of millions of dollars be spent on building up the economy, so as to relieve the financial misery of Gazans, who must  endure high levels of unemployment and a pitiful infrastructure? How many water purification plants, or irrigation projects, might have been built with the money spent on the 690 rockets that were just fired at Israel by Hamas?
5. Are you aware of the enormous corruption at the highest levels of Palestinian leadership, and especially of Hamas? Did you know that two of its leaders, Moussa Abu Marzouk and Khaled Meshaal, each has a fortune of $2.5 billion? What could have been done with that $5 billion to improve the lot of the people of Gaza? Do you care about real people in Gaza, or only about scoring points against Israel? And there is much more corruption below that top level —  there are now  600 Hamas millionaires in Gaza. And in the PA there’s the same kind of corruption,.  Do you know about the $400 million that Mahmoud Abbas and his two sons have acquired as their business empire? Or the millions his cronies in Ramallah have been taking as their share? And all of this is money taken from the foreign aid meant to improve the lot of the people.  Why have you, Ilhan Omar, never spoken out, not once, about the corruption among the Palestinian leaders? Don’t you care?
Questions for study and discussion, if only Ilhan Omar would dare to study, would dare to discuss. She will, alas, do neither.
But let’s at least scratch off as much of that teflon as we can.

THE SCHIZOPHRENIC MUSLIM MIND

THE SCHIZOPHRENIC MUSLIM MIND
BY MATEEN ELASS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Muslims are torn by two competing realities. The first is the illusion of supremacy upon which they have been suckled all their lives by the Mother of all books (the Qur’an). The second is the real world in which they have to live.
Talk with an average Muslim and sooner rather than later you will hear him/her boast — theirs is the best religion (“Today I have perfected for you your religion” — Quran 5.3); they have the best prophet (Muhammad is the seal of the prophets, i.e., the final prophet with Allah’s most complete revelation for mankind); they have the best book (the Qur’an is the literal, inimitable, unchangeable words of Allah); the best people (“You are the best of peoples ever raised up for mankind” — 3.110); theirs is the best language (the language of Arabic is the language of heaven, and certainly the language of revelation); they have the best law (Shari’a is divine law, and all the world should be governed by it); they have the best “blood” (i.e., according to divine law the shedding of a Muslim’s blood is a capital crime, while the shedding of the blood of a kafir is halal (permitted), in some cases requiring a payment of restitution to the victim’s family, in other cases stirring promises of heavenly rewards for dispatching a disbeliever properly to hellfire.
Indoctrinated to believe in Islam’s paramountcy, and therefore in their supremacy over everything non-Islamic, Muslims mindlessly roar “Allahu akbar” in unison whenever the
imperative “takbir” is shouted. Often wrongly translated in the West as “Allah is great,” what this means more precisely is “Allah is greater!” It is a claim to superiority, to the supremacy of Allah’s name over any rival which the non-Muslim world might offer in competition.
As Allah’s followers, Muslims believe it is mandatory that they rule over non-Muslims. Slaves are permitted because infidels lack the dignity and value of Muslims. Islamic law forbids that non-Muslims ever hold positions of authority over Muslims, especially in government. The Cairo Declaration on Human Rights (the Islamic world’s 1990 response to the 1948 United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which Muslim governments refused to acknowledge) openly states:
“The right to hold public office can only be exercised in accordance with the Shari’a, which forbids Muslims to submit to the rule of non-Muslims.”
Moreover, Muslims who rule can only do so in accordance with Islamic law — they are not permitted to innovate. Because Islam is perfect and supreme, according to its leaders, critical inquiry is not allowed. Any thinking which might question the received faith is initially discouraged, and if pursued, finally punished. According to the Quran (33:36):
It is not fitting for a Believer, man or woman, when a matter has been decided by Allah and His Messenger to have any option about their decision: if anyone disobeys Allah and His Messenger, he is indeed on a clearly wrong Path.
The most chilling extension of this suppression is, of course, the penalty of apostasy, which all the schools of Shari’a (both Sunni and Shi’ite) label a capital crime, with execution typically by beheading.
So Muslims are raised to believe in the supremacy of Islam over all else, and they toe the line well under the shadow of the sword of judgment. But here is where real life begins to interfere with fantasy.
If Islam indeed is the best religion, why does it need a law to compel people to remain within its confines?
If it is the perfection of revealed truth, why is critical inquiry not encouraged? After all, an honest search for truth should lead toward what is ultimately true, and not away from it. Truth stands up under scrutiny. So, why not encourage scholars to study the early manuscript evidence of the Qur’an and reveal to their lay audiences the facts that there is no original text of the Qur’an in existence, and that the various early manuscripts which do exist contain discrepancies from one another.
If the Qur’an is only truly the revealed words of Allah when read and understood in classical Arabic, why did Allah not cause all humanity to speak Arabic, so that the world could truly grasp his revelation? Why today does less than one quarter of the world’s Muslim population speak or read Arabic, and even fewer among that elite group understand the ancient and complex classical Arabic of the Qur’an? Why do Muslim scholars not openly admit that due to the mists of history and evolution of language, roughly one out of every five sentences in the Qur’an is unintelligible, and we are left with the best guesses of linguists?
Why is the eternal, perfect revelation of Allah concerned about squabbles in Muhammad’s harem, or with whether he can marry the divorced wife of his adopted son? Why should the timeless word give detailed instructions about caravan raids and battles with neighbors? Would not one hope that God’s best revelation to the human race should contain things more lofty than the prosaic concerns of a desert warrior?
Wouldn’t we hope for a restatement or clarification of the Ten Commandments or the Sermon on the Mount from the Mother of All Books? And yet we find in the Qur’an no clear teaching of a universal morality woven into the fabric of creation by its Monarch. Indeed, if the Qur’an and Shari’a are any indication, what is “moral” or “righteous” before Allah is that which advances the cause of Islam (whatever it takes), and what is “wrong” is whatever impedes that advance:
O believers, whosoever of you turns from his religion, God will assuredly bring a people He loves, and who love Him, humble towards the believers, disdainful towards the unbelievers, men who struggle in the path of God, not fearing the reproach of any reproacher. That is God’s bounty; He gives it unto whom He will; and God is All-embracing, All-knowing (5:54).
Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah, and those who reject Faith Fight in the cause of Evil: So fight ye against the friends of Satan: feeble indeed is the cunning of Satan (4:76).
Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves (48.29).
This is what leads to the summary doctrine of Islam known as al-Walaa’ w’al-Baraa’ (Loyalty and Disavowal). A Muslim is to devote himself to everything that pleases Allah and to oppose whatever displeases Allah. Morality is defined by what pleases Allah (what advances his supremacy within creation), and immorality becomes whatever stands between Allah and recognition of his supremacy. Oppression, murder, slavery, rape, deception, hatred of the infidel, all become sanctified tools of Allah if they serve to extend his kingdom on earth (i.e., the Muslim conquest of non-Muslims).
Muslims who are troubled by such partisan morality cast their eyes around the world to other cultures and see more elevated, even universal, versions of moral order. They see in the West the stand for universal rights and freedoms, and the aspiration that all human beings should be treated equally. Then they look back at the 57 Muslim-majority nations in the world, and note the number of dictatorships, the endemic nepotism within their leadership, and the rank corruption of their political and religious leaders.
They see that according to international studies, Muslim countries steadily rank at or near the bottom when it comes to personal freedoms, economic opportunities, standard of living, education, and equal rights. They see that human slavery has been eradicated over most of the non-Muslim world, but that it continues to thrive in the heart of the Islamic ummah.
They recognize that all of the blockbuster scientific discoveries and mind-bending technological breakthroughs, all the impetus for invention and innovation, come from the non-Muslim world. Not least among these achievements are the continuous military upgrades which make the West far superior in might than even the best equipped Muslim coalition could conceivably muster.
These realities are what lead to the schizophrenic Muslim mind. While yelling “Allahu akbar,” active Muslim supremacists are forced to scatter for cover whenever US drones are overhead. Knowing they are militarily inferior to infidel forces, jihadis are compelled to use the tactics of asymmetrical warfare: hit and run thrusts, lone wolf suicide bombers, terror attacks against soft targets. They turn as well to non-military tactics, making use of immigration and refugee policies in the West which allow them to infiltrate in large numbers, live as parasite on government welfare, and out-reproduce the native populations so as to increase their size and influence in the decades to come.
Just a few years ago, the Islamic State (ISIS), inebriated with its success in Iraq and Syria, boasted that soon the black flag of Muhammad and his followers would fly over the White House. They boasted ad nauseum that nothing could stop their advance, Allah willing. Apparently, Allah was not willing, because when the Trump administration took charge in the White House and decided to act decisively against ISIS in Syria, it was expunged in short order. The roars of Allahu akbar receded into the silence of impotence.
All these tactics and setbacks are an implicit admission that Islam is not superior to the non-Muslim, Western world — even with all our moral weaknesses, the West still outshines the Islamic world in terms of human rights and privileges; our quest for truth in the scientific and technological realms dwarfs that of the Muslim nations; our military strength leads to their saber-rattling and shaky knees, but no offensive engagements.
How can it be that the subjects of Islam, to whom Allah has promised supremacy over all the world, should find themselves inferior to the non-Muslim societies of the West and East? How can it be that there is no Caliphate since the fall of the Ottoman Empire in 1922 which sits as King of the hill, forcing infidel lands into submission before Allah? Why has Allah allowed disbelievers to effectively overrule the Muslim agenda and advance their own instead?…..Continue reading at the Mateen Elass site.
Mateen Elass (PhD) was raised in Saudi Arabia. After completing a B.A. at Stanford University he graduated from Fuller Seminary, earning M.Div. and M.A. degrees in Biblical Studies and Theology. After several years of pastoral work he returned to school earning a Ph.D. in New Testament Studies from Durham University in England, studying under the world-renowned NT scholar James D. G. Dunn.

SWEDEN: BISHOP OF STOCKHOLM SAYS SHE HAS MORE IN COMMON WITH MUSLIMS THAN “RIGHT WING CHRISTIANS”

SWEDEN: BISHOP OF STOCKHOLM SAYS SHE HAS 
MORE IN COMMON WITH MUSLIMS THAN 
“RIGHT WING CHRISTIANS”
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Openly gay “Bishop of Stockholm Eva Brunne revealed that she not only has a distaste for right-wing Christians, but claims to have more in common with Muslims.”
Brunne is so nearsighted and egocentric that she cannot see beyond the end of her own nose. She is only capable of judging others and holding a world view in accordance with whatever negative experience she may have had with “right-wing Christians” in her own personal life; and she condemns others in the public square based on this experience as a bishop–a position that she is unfit for.
Brunne needs a lesson in Islamic doctrine to establish how much more she has in common with Muslims than “right wing Christians”. She can start by visiting Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Pakistan, Somalia, Afghanistan (uncovered), declare her lesbianism and speak her mind openly there. She’ll find out rather speedily about the rights of women and gays in Islam. Afterward, she can then compare it to “right wing Christians”. Unfortunately, she’d be murdered under the sharia and so, she will not be able to publicly correct her absurd commentary against “right-wing Christians”.
She also goes on to lambaste Christians for historic wrongs while ignoring the 1400 year history of jihad; the current Christian and minority persecution, murder of gays and apostates and black slavery in Algeria, Sudan, and Mauritania.
The mere fact that wretched ‘leaders’ like Brunne exist in the Church is a contributing factor to the ‘tolerance’ of Islamization of the West.
“Bishop Has More in Common with Muslims than Right-Wing Christians”, by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, June 5, 2019:
Controversial Bishop of Stockholm Eva Brunne revealed that she not only has a distaste for right-wing Christians, but claims to have more in common with Muslims. The Church of Sweden bishop made her comments this week on the People and Faith programme broadcast on Sveriges Radio, stating that she believes that the subject of Christian values has been largely taken over by right-wing populists.
“We all have to think about which people we are and who we are living with. And in fact, we all have the same value. Although we do not speak the same language or pray to God in the same way or look the same, we have the same value, and we shall live in a country together and have the same rights,” she said, in comments reported by Nyheter Idag. “I say that I sometimes have more in common with Muslims, those I meet, than with the right-wing Christians,” she said and went on to add that Christians have their own extremists, mentioning the Crusades and the witch burnings that took place hundreds of years ago.
“We hear a lot about terrorism and think that it is Muslims who practice this, which it is, but it is nevertheless a small, small minority of all the Muslims we know,” she added.
The first openly lesbian bishop in Sweden, Brunne has caused controversy in the past when she allocated Muslim prayer spaces in Swedish churches in 2015, demanding that crosses and other Christian symbols be removed as well. Brunne defended her decision comparing the spaces to multi-faith prayer rooms found in airports or hospitals. The Stockholm bishop is not the only member of the church of Sweden to have expressed a fondness for Islam. Last year, Muslims in the city of Växjö lobbied the local government to allow for the public broadcast of the Islamic call to prayer.
While many rejected the idea, Bishop Fredrik Modeus announced his support for it saying: “I welcome the application and look forward to hearing both church bells and prayer announcements in our city.”….
___________________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
CALLING GOD "SHE"?~CHURCH OF SWEDEN PROMOTES GENDER NEUTRAL BLASPHEMY
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/2017/12/calling-god-shechurch-of-
sweden.html 
EXCERPT:
Bishop Eva Brunne has pushed for Muslim prayers rooms and removal of crosses in Swedish churches.
Rather than stand for Biblical truth, many churches like the Church of Sweden have gone after the praise and adoration of the world. The Church of Sweden’s continued descent into apostasy and one world religion is also seen in their effort to raise funds for “God’s House” a construction project which will add a mosque to an already-existing Church of Sweden building. The goal is to physically connect the church, mosque and a Catholic chapel via a glass-walled courtyard and promote “…peace and coexistence between religions.”

Pray for Sweden

Swedish One World Religion | Prophesied Falling away in the church Chrislam
Church of Sweden Archbishop Antje Jackelén has led the push to stop referring to God as “He.”
In a sign of the growing apostasy in the historic state churches across the world, the Church of Sweden has decided to adopt “gender neutral” language when referencing God and their leader even referred to the Holy Spirit as a “she.”
End time Bible prophecy falling away apostasy in the church | Church of Sweden promotes gender inclusive LGBTQ agenda

TRUMP TAKEN TO TASK FOR CONGRATULATORY “LGBT PRIDE” STATEMENT

TRUMP TAKEN TO TASK FOR CONGRATULATORY 
“LGBT PRIDE” STATEMENT 
BY DAVE BOHON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
President Trump is being criticized for his congratulatory statement acknowledging June as “LGBT Pride” month — the first Republican president to do so.
On June 1 the White House released the following short presidential statement via Twitter: “As we celebrate LGBT Pride Month and recognize the outstanding contributions that LGBT people have made to our great Nation, let us also stand in solidarity with the many LGBT people who live in dozens of countries worldwide that punish, imprison, or even execute individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation. My Administration has launched a global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality and invites all nations to join us in this effort!”
While most conservative Christian individuals and groups gave the president a pass on the ill-advised greeting, Tim Wildmon of the American Family Association advised that “homosexuality is not something the president should celebrate. It’s unnatural, unhealthy, and immoral behavior.”
Wildmon added that he hoped the president would “continue to stand firm against the so-called Equality Act (H.R. 5) and any legislation that threatens religious freedom. Such legislation will use the full force of the federal government to punish Americans who don't embrace the LGBT political agenda.”
Of course, this is not to suggest that conservative Christian individuals and groups believe that LGBT people should be imprisoned or executed for their behavior, but they do believe that LGBT lifestyles should not be normalized or celebrated, and individuals should not be forced by law to condone or support LGBT lifestyles. Furthermore, the United States has no business attempting to change the cultures of other countries, just as we do not accept other countries telling us how to conduct our business.
Homosexual activists were also largely critical of the president’s statement, calling it hypocritical. In a Twitter post, Chad Griffin of the pro-homosexual Human Rights Campaign wrote, “You can’t celebrate Pride and constantly undermine our rights — including attacking #TransHealth, discharging #TransTroops, refusing to protect LGBTQ youth, and cozying up to dictators who brutalize & marginalize LGBTQ people. This is gross hypocrisy, with an emphasis on gross.”
The Democratic National Committee offered its own self-serving Tweet, charging the president: “You want to define transgender people out of existence. Your record speaks for itself, and a single tweet won’t change that.”
By contrast, Gregory T. Angelo, a former communications specialist with the pro-homosexual Log Cabin Republicans, tweeted: “Been waiting all my life for a Republican to show this kind of leadership. THANK YOU PRESIDENT TRUMP!”
And in an effort to give President Trump the benefit of the doubt, Dr. Michael Brown, who regularly writes in opposition to the LGBTQ agenda, said that his impression “is that Donald Trump wants gays to be treated fairly and, as stated in a Fox News interview, he has no personal issue with gay ‘marriage,’ but when he feels that LGBT activism infringes on the rights of others, especially conservative Christians, he will stand against that activism.”

COLORADO BECOMES 18TH STATE TO BAN “GAY CONVERSION THERAPY,” AN ATTACK UPON FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND SPEECH

COLORADO BECOMES 18TH STATE 
TO BAN “GAY CONVERSION THERAPY”, 
AN ATTACK UPON FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND SPEECH 
BY DAVID CLOUD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
(Friday Church News Notes, June 7, 2019, www.wayoflife.org [email protected], 
866-295-4143) - In a brazen attack upon the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of 
religion and freedom of speech, Colorado has become America’s 18th state to ban “gay 
conversion therapy.” It was signed into law by Gov. Jared Polis, the first openly homosexual 
governor in America’s history. This is another example of how that “homosexual rights” 
trump and thus destroy the freedoms guaranteed by the United States Constitution. 
The fact that these laws are not being quickly overturned by the judicial branch is evidence 
that the judges in question are unethical activists who are not upholding the Constitution 
they have sworn to uphold.