FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR: MUELLER’S COMMENTS ARE ABSOLUTELY REPREHENSIBLE

MORE BAIT FOR THE DEMOCRATS;
DISTURBING THE HORNETS’ NEST
FORMER FEDERAL PROSECUTOR: 
MUELLER’S COMMENTS ARE ABSOLUTELY REPREHENSIBLE
FOX BUSINESS REPORTS
MUELLER’S CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS

Mueller’s evidence ‘remarkably similar’ to 

Nixon, Clinton charges: Napolitano


Giuliani slams Mueller’s ‘ethics’ over public 

Russia probe remarks

“IF HE WAS CONSTRAINED BY A JUSTICE DEPT. RULE (AGAINST CHARGING/INDICTING A SITTING PRESIDENT), 
WHY DID HE DO THE INVESTIGATION AT ALL?”:

Special Counsel Robert Mueller, in his first public appearance since being appointed to lead the Russia investigation, broke his silence Wednesday in saying his team did not have the “option” to charge President Trump with a crime because of Department of Justice policy, adding his report “would have said so” if they had “confidence” the president did not commit a crime.

Mueller, speaking from the Justice Department Wednesday morning, detailed the findings of the Russia investigation, underscoring the contention in his report that there “was not sufficient evidence to charge a conspiracy” over whether members of the Trump campaign coordinated with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential election.



Mueller explained longstanding Justice Department policy, which states that a sitting president cannot be charged with a crime.



But Mueller did not mince words on the special counsel’s inquiry into whether the president obstructed justice.



“If we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so,” Mueller said. “We did not determine whether the president did commit a crime.”


“The Constitution requires a process other than the criminal justice system to formally accuse the president of wrongdoing,” Mueller said Wednesday, echoing his report which states that Congress “may apply obstruction laws to the President’s corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law.”


“Charging the president with a crime was not an option we could consider,” Mueller explained, adding that “it would be unfair to accuse someone of a crime when there could be no court resolution of the charge.”

“We concluded that we would not reach a determination one way or the other about whether the president committed a crime,” Mueller added. “That is the office’s final position.”

The Justice Department announced Mueller would make a statement on Wednesday morning–his first in the more than two years since he was appointed as special counsel. A senior White House official told Fox News that the White House was advised on Tuesday night of Mueller’s plans.

Mueller also announced Wednesday that the special counsel’s office was officially closed and that he would be resigning from the Justice Department as special counsel to return to private life.

“I am speaking out today because our investigation is complete,” Mueller said. “The attorney general has made the report on our investigation largely public. We are formally closing the special counsel’s office. And as well, I’m resigning from the Department of Justice to return to private life.”

Meanwhile, multiple sources familiar with the situation told Fox News that Attorney General Bill Barr was aware of Mueller’s plans to deliver a statement Wednesday. One source told Fox News that Barr has also been made aware of the contents of Mueller’s statement. The attorney general, though, will not be at the Justice Department for Mueller’s appearance, and is, instead, traveling to Alaska to meet with law enforcement #Mueller #MuellerReport

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders told reporters Wednesday morning that President Trump was “aware” Mueller’s remarks were coming but had no comment when asked whether the White House had advanced knowledge of the substance of Mueller’s remarks. Sanders also had no comment on whether the president would make a public statement after Mueller speaks.
_______________________________________________________

Mueller Speaks The Democrats Freak! But Here’s The Truth…

Report by Douglas Ducote, Veteran
34 Other People Charged, But None Have Connections to “Russian” Spies, and/or Alleged Trump/Russian Connections
A Whole Bunch of Liberal Democrats Should Be Prosecuted Instead for Treason, Lies, False Accusations
Calls for Immediate Impeachment Already Starting
DR. STEVE TURLEY:

The SWAMP Strikes Back: 

Mueller Fuels Impeachment Calls against Trump!!!

DEMOCRATS DEMAND TRUMP IMPEACHMENT AFTER MUELLER SAYS NO COLLUSION IN SPEECH

Democrats planned to impeach president regardless of Special Counsel findings

BY JAMIE WHITE
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/democrats-demand-trump-impeachment-after-mueller-says-no-collusion-in-speech/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Congressional Democrats are determined to impeach President Trump despite Special Counsel Mueller’s rare public statement reaffirming no collusion with the Russian government.
All the usual suspects who have been calling for Trump’s impeachment since his swearing-in, including Rep. Maxine Waters (Calif.) and even many 2020 presidential candidates, have doubled down, citing Mueller’s remark that only Congress could indict a sitting president.
Rep. Al Green (D-Texas), who twice had introduced articles of impeachment that later failed, didn’t even wait to hear Mueller’s remarks — he made up his mind years ago.
Notably absent from these impeachment calls are the Democrat leadership, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (N.Y.), and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, likely because they understand that pursuing impeachment would be political suicide for their party.
Pelosi in particular has been trying to tamp down her caucus’s yearning for impeachment after Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and other 2020 presidential candidates have pushed for it over the last few months.
The House Speaker even went as far to say that Trump was “goading” her caucus into impeaching him so he’d win the 2020 presidential election.
“Trump — I use his name — Trump is goading us to impeach him,” she said earlier this month. “That’s what he’s doing. Every single day, he’s just like taunting, taunting, taunting.”
Trump responded to Mueller’s latest public statement, saying the “case is closed!”




NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL HOSTS “PRIDE & LIBERATION” EVENT FEATURING PERFORMANCES BY DRAG QUEENS

NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL HOSTS 
“PRIDE & LIBERATION” EVENT FEATURING PERFORMANCES BY DRAG QUEENS
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
DURHAM, N.C. — A charter school in North Carolina recently hosted a “Pride & Liberation” event for students that included performances by two drag queens.
According to reports, two eighth grade teachers at Central Park School for Children in Durham — Taylor Schmidt and Schara Brooks — wanted to address the bullying of  homosexual and “transgender” students at the school and decided to put on a drag show.
“If we’re going to be a school that’s focused on equity and justice, and if we’re going to be a school that believes in the act of liberation, we need to be creative with our approach,” Schmidt told the Greensboro News & Observer.
The event featured two drag performers that go by the names Vivica C. Coxx and Stormie Daie, who spoke to the students and performed songs such as “Big, Blonde and Beautiful” from “Hairspray,” as well as Beyonce and Nicki Minaj tunes.
The outlet reports that Daie wore a layered rainbow skirt, and “[c]heers erupted when [he] pulled the skirt off to reveal a gold jumpsuit and knee-high gold boots.”
The Central Park School for Children step team also put on a performance, and a discussion panel was presented that included the two drag queens, openly homosexual Durham City Council member Vernetta Alston, and Helena Cragg, the executive director of the LGBTQ Center of Durham.
The event was held at the end of a week educating students on historical homosexual and transgender figures. Students from kindergarten through the fourth grade could also voluntarily attend a drag queen story time with Daie.
“You hope that the children listen to this,” Daie told CNN, “so that they know we didn’t have this when we were growing up. We weren’t seeing people like us being celebrated.”
As previously reported, a high school in Pennsylvania also presented a drag show for students last week as several students dressed as the opposite sex and danced on stage for their peers.
The Philadelphia Enquirer and the College Fix report that the “Gay-Straight Alliance” at Penn Wood High School in Lansdowne organized a day-long event entitled “Coming Home: A Place for Everyone to Feel Safe.”
Morning sessions held at the school library centered on “Being an Ally,” “Navigating the World: College and Beyond” and “LGBTQ+ Health Issues.” In the afternoon, students could attend “singing and runway performances” in the auditorium, as well as a video on the Stonewall riots and a presentation on “the history of drag.”
Students reportedly could choose to go to class or attend one or more of the events. The drag show included three male students who dressed as females and danced to songs such as “Killing Me Softly” and “Level Up.”
As previously reported, the Bible teaches that all men are born with the Adamic sin nature, having various inherent inclinations that are contrary to the law of God and being utterly incapable of changing by themselves. It is why Jesus outlined in John 3:5-7 that men must be regenerated by the second birth and be transformed from being in Adam to being in Christ, or they cannot see the kingdom of Heaven.
“Jesus answered and said unto him, ‘Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.’
Nicodemus saith unto him, ‘How can a man be born when he is old? Can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb and be born?’
Jesus answered, ‘Verily, verily, I say unto thee, except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit. Marvel not that I said unto thee, ‘Ye must be born again.’”
Jesus also outlined in John 8:34-35, “Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. … If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.”
_____________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
AND:
Stormie Daie performs at the school event.
A panel discussion was part of the Pride and Liberation Event.
Vivica C. Coxx performs at the event.

GILLETTE: “THE BEST A MAN CAN GET” VIDEO SHOWS FATHER COACHING DAUGHTER WHO IDENTIFIES AS A MAN DURING “FIRST SHAVE”

GILLETTE NOW A “SOCIAL JUSTICE FACTORY” PROMOTING THE TRANS QUEER PERVERSE LIFESTYLE
“YOUR FIRST SHAVE IS SPECIAL” 
EVEN WHEN IT’S JUST FEMININE FUZZ 
ON A “WOULD BE MAN”

GILLETTE: “THE BEST A MAN CAN GET” VIDEO SHOWS FATHER COACHING DAUGHTER WHO IDENTIFIES 
AS A MAN DURING “FIRST SHAVE”
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The popular razor brand Gillette, known for its motto “The Best a Man Can Get,” released a video to social media on Thursday that shows a father encouraging his daughter — who identifies as a man — as she shaves her face for the first time.
“Growing up, I was always trying to figure out what kind of man I wanted to become and I’m still trying to figure out what kind of man I want to become,” the young woman, who now goes by the name Samson, says in the advertisement.
“I always knew that I was different. I didn’t know that there was a term for the type of person that I was,” she states. “I went into my transition just wanting to be happy. I’m glad I’m at the point where I’m able to shave.”
Samson then practices her strokes and her father affirms the motions. The two then go into the bathroom, where Samson has lathered up.
“Don’t be scared,” Samson’s father coaches as the two stand over the sink. “Shaving’s about being confident.”
“You are doing fine,” he encourages.
“I’m at the point in my manhood where I’m actually happy,” Samson tells viewers. “It’s not just myself transitioning. It’s everybody around me transitioning.”
The advertisement ends with Samson smiling as the motto for Gillette appears on the screen: “The Best a Man Can Get.”
Gillette, which is owned by Procter & Gamble, stated on its Facebook page that the brand is “taking steps to be more inclusive with how gender is represented in our marketing.” It also responded to one commenter, “As a brand committed to helping men look, feel, and act their best, we think it’s important to embrace inclusivity in how we portray masculinity.”
While a number of viewers praised Gillette for being “inclusive,” others expressed disappointment and vowed to never buy the brand again.
“As the Mama Bear to an amazing young man who happens to be trans, I thank you from the bottom of my heart. The tears flowed watching this. Thank you for representing the trans community. This is so wonderful,” one commenter wrote.
“Thank you, Gillette, for including all men in your advertising, and thank you Samson for sharing your story and helping me feel represented!” another stated.
“As a trans woman who still has to shave her face frequently, I am happy to see Gillette representing the trans community. Btw Gillette, can I be your trans female spokesperson?” a third asked.
“Why haven’t you learned from your other ads and over-the-top wokeness?” one opposing commenter wrote. “Just be a razor company and stop trying to force this down people’s throats.”
“Just threw all my Gillette products away,” another advised. “This is ridiculous! They are razors, not political props!”
“Gillette [is] really utilizing the crumbling morality of America to be in the spotlight,” a third lamented.
As previously reported, the Bible teaches that there is “nothing new under the sun,” as all men are born with the Adamic sin nature, having various inherent inclinations that are contrary to the law of God and being utterly incapable of changing by themselves. Jesus taught that “out of the abundance of the heart, the mouth speaks,” and that men must be supernaturally regenerated by the second birth, and be transformed from being in Adam to being in Christ, or they cannot see the kingdom of Heaven.
“If any man walk in the day, he stumbleth not because he seeth the light of this world. But if a man walk in the night, he stumbleth, because there is no light in him,” he said in John 11:9-10.
In John 8:12, Jesus declared, “I am the light of the world; He that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.”
____________________________________________________________
THE REACTION:
PARODY: WHY RISK USING A RAZOR 
WHEN YOU CAN USE AN ELECTRIC SHAVER?

1983 Good News Razor from Gillette "two blades jingle" 

TV Commercial

CANADIAN REVIEW

Gillette CEO Says Backlash to 

‘Toxic Masculinity’ 

Ad a “Price Worth Paying” 

Despite $8 Billion Writedown

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
PAUL JOSEPH WATSON EXPOSES THE CORPORATE ATTACK
ON WHITE NORMAL MALES & MASCULINITY
Gillette CEO Gary Coombe said the backlash to the company’s infamous ‘toxic masculinity’ ad was a “price worth paying” despite Procter & Gamble taking $8 billion writedown on its Gillette shaving business.
As we previously reported, despite performing well in other areas, Procter & Gamble reported a net loss of $5.24 billion thanks to the $8 billion Gillette writedown.
This led many to assert that the company was being punished by consumers for an ad earlier this year that took on ‘toxic masculinity’ by pandering to the #MeToo movement and suggested men need to be taught to not sexually harass women.
However, Coombe is not fazed by the backlash, telling Marketing Week that the commercial was a justifiable effort to capture a declining market share from millennials thanks to competition from Harry’s and Dollar Shave Club.
“It was pretty stark: we were losing share, we were losing awareness and penetration, and something had to be done,” he said, adding the company decided to “take a chance in an emotionally-charged way.”
Coombe said that the intensity of the backlash surprised him but that it was still a “price worth paying.”
“I don’t enjoy that some people were offended by the film and upset at the brand as a consequence,” said Coombe. “That’s not nice and goes against every ounce of training I’ve had in this industry over a third of a century. But I am absolutely of the view now that for the majority of people to fall more deeply in love with today’s brands you have to risk upsetting a small minority and that’s what we’ve done.”
One wonders how small this “minority” was given the $8 billion writedown.

CHURCH OF ENGLAND SCHOOL GOVERNOR RESIGNS OVER CONCERNS CHILDREN “SACRIFICED ON ALTAR OF TRANSGENDER IDEOLOGY”

VIDEO:
CHURCH OF ENGLAND SCHOOL GOVERNOR RESIGNS OVER CONCERNS CHILDREN 
“SACRIFICED ON ALTAR OF TRANSGENDER IDEOLOGY”
BY HEATHER CLARK
SEE: https://christiannews.net/2019/05/28/church-of-england-school-governor-resigns-over-concerns-children-sacrificed-on-altar-of-trans-ideology/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes: 
LONDON — A vicar with the Church of England (CofE) who also serves as a governor at a CofE school has quit both of his jobs over concerns about the evident capitulation to “transgender” ideology.
“[W]e’re being coerced to think and speak a particular way,” lamented John Rogers in a video released by Christian Concern/The Christian Legal Centre. “[W]e’re being told we must go down a particular route.”
According to the organization, earlier this year, leadership at the school — which has not been identified — agreed to allow a child under 12 announce to his class that he would be “transitioning” to a girl. The head teacher allegedly told the school’s governors that the child’s parent was insistent that other parents should not be advised until the day of the announcement.
Therefore, the boy made the announcement unbeknownst to parents and “governors were informed by the head teacher that this was de-facto policy and the change would be done that way.” Children were also read the books “Big Bob, Little Bob,” a story about about a boy who dresses as a girl, and “Red: A Crayon’s Story,” in which the red crayon prefers to be blue.
Several governors, however, voiced their concern about the development, as well as other ramifications that they were left in the dark about, such as restroom use, changing room use, and lodging during trips away. They state that their complaints were ignored and they were told that the school was required under the UK’s equality laws to follow the policy.
The head teacher also brought in the transgender advocacy group Mermaids to conduct a training session with staff at the recommendation of the Department of Education. Audio snippets from the session were included in a video released by the Christian Legal Centre.
“Unless specifically stated by this family, everyone else just gets told, ‘The pupil you knew who had this name and this pronoun from this day will be this name and this pronoun,” the speaker said. “And that’s just staff who interact with the children. Governors just get told, ‘We have a pupil who is socially transitioning,’ and that is it.”
He said that there wasn’t any room for disagreement about the issue.
“Is it okay if I could share some different viewpoints that staff could take away … ?” Parker asked during the sessions, as captured by the audio recording.
“No, I don’t think so John,” the Mermaid member replied. “I’m sorry. It’s training today. It’s not time to share your viewpoint.”
As leadership likewise would not listen, Parker consequently left the school, seeing that it was “no longer a Christian place.” His resignation letter remarked that children are being “sacrificed on the altar of trans ideology.”
“The governors were simply told by the head teacher that a child born male now wished to be regarded as female, that parents were not to be informed by the school ahead of the transition, and that a controversial organization was being brought in to provide awareness and training to staff,” Parker said in a statement.
“Given the Christian ethos of the school, and the fact that a certain percentage of parents have sent their children to a CofE School because they sought for their children a Christian education in line with their own beliefs, the issue needed to be handled with those sensitivities in mind, and it has not been,” he mourned.
Andrea Williams, who leads the Christian Legal Centre, similarly expressed concern over the development and called for action and reformation.
“This is not an isolated case, and we are going to see more and more like it if nothing is done. Parents have a right to know if and when this ideological movement is in their schools and being taught as fact,” she said in a statement.
“The Church of England has one million children in its care. This is a serious God-given duty which the Church is failing at,” Williams lamented. “It has invited the new state ideology into the classroom and it has lost confidence in its own message of what it means to be human. The Church needs to act before it is too late.”

RADICAL LEFT VISION FOR AMERICA MARKS NATION’S DEMISE, NOT ITS SALVATION

RADICAL LEFT VISION FOR AMERICA MARKS 
NATION’S DEMISE, NOT ITS SALVATION
BY ROGER KATZ
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Opinion “The self-deceived person may even think he is able to console others who became victims of perfidious deception, but what insanity when someone who himself has lost the eternal wants to heal the person who is extremely sick unto death!” ~Søren Kierkegaard, from Works of Love (1847)
Human Rights LawsuitRadical Left Vision For America Marks Nation’s Demise, Not Its Salvation

New York – -(AmmoLand.com)- Radical Left politicians, along with a compliant Press, carry the message of the Collectivist vision—a vision that overrides concern for the health, safety, and well-being of the Nation and the Nation’s citizenry.
Like the crass hypocrites they are, radical Leftists love to go on about how they respect the rule of law but ignore it when they find it convenient to do so to support their radical agenda.

Lacking all visible restraint and common decency, they flagrantly, even exuberantly, attack our Constitution, our institutions, our history, our culture, our ethos, our Nation’s Judeo-Christian ethical underpinnings and belief in the Divine Creator.

These Dead Souls, these transgressors of the Creator’s sacred Commandments, attack all our citizenry holds most dear, and these extremists do so with increasing frequency and ferocity. Everything about them bespeaks ill-will, anger, hatred, resentment, intemperance, rage. They don’t seek to preserve our Nation; rather, they seek to destroy it. Both in their words and actions, they intend to rend everything, both tangible and intangible, that represents and constitutes the very soul-memory of our Nation and its people.
These Dead Souls ignore, out-of-hand, fundamental rights like, the Second Amendment, etched in the Bill of Rights, but show no reluctance in creating out of whole cloth other “rights” that cohere with their Collectivist precepts. They claim as fundamental rights: the right to attend college; the right to abortion on demand; the right of non-citizens to reside here under a general prescription of seeking asylum; and the right to be free from so-called “hate speech” and hurtful speech in the public space.
But such purported “rights” exist nowhere, tacitly or expressly, in the Bill of Rights or, for that matter, anywhere else in the Nation’s Constitution. Indeed, one presumed fundamental right cataloged by the Radical Left—the claim of a fundamental right to abortion on demand, abjectly unnatural, is transparently contradicted by Federal Statute and Supreme Court precedent, as is the right to be free from such vague notions as “hate speech” and hurtful speech.
Yet, as these Dead Souls don’t profess a belief in the concept of natural rights preexistent in the citizenry, such new panoply of “rights,” that are permitted to exist at all, shall consist only of those that Government deigns to grant to the polity, whether to a few members of the polity or to several of its members; whether to most members of the polity or to all its members—but with the understanding that such set of rights and liberties may be amended, ignored, or abrogated as Government needs and goals change, or as Government simply wishes.
And Government—as Government is conceived by these Radical Leftists, these Dead Souls—may at will, amend ignore or abrogate any such rights and liberties; doing so if for no other reason than to make the point that all lawful power, authority, and control emanates from and proceeds through Government to the Governed, the people, and not to Government through the consent of the Governed, the people.
Thus, the Radical Left seeks to turn the very political framework of our Nation on its head, commencing with the dissolution of the Second Amendment because an armed citizenry is altogether inconsistent with the tenets of Collectivism.
The Radical Left uses the mantras of “public safety” and “gun violence” to make its goal of de facto repeal of the Second Amendment, deceptively, “disarmingly” plausible and palatable to the citizenry so that it acquiesces, blindly, willingly; surrendering its firearms; ceding its Birthright to the Radical Left. Thus, the total disarming of the American citizenry proceeds, without a whimper; or, so the Radical Left believes and hopes. And, for those Americans who are not so easily duped, who do not wish to acquiesce, the Radical Left is not reluctant to use threats.

Don't Nuke Me, Bro

Representative Swalwell's plan if gun owners refuse to turn in their property, use nukes on American citizens.Representative Swalwell's plan if gun owners refuse to turn in their property, use nukes on American citizens.
Recall the remarks of the “illustrious” Congressional Representative from the “Sanctuary” State of California, Eric Swalwell, who, in November 2018, brazenly, spouted that he would be ready “to nuke” gun owners who do not willingly surrender their “assault weapons.” Many Americans took offense at the remark and rightfully so. The liberal “fact-checker” website, Snopes, counters that Swalwell had never really meant what he said. Trying to cast a positive light on Swalwell’s remark, Snopes reports:
“What's True [about Swalwell’s remark]
In a tweet on 16 November, Swalwell responded to a gun rights enthusiast who said the Democrats' proposal to confiscate or buy semi-automatic rifles would result in “war” due to resistance from the gun owners, stating “it would be a short war” because “the government has nukes.”
“What's False [about Swalwell’s remark]
Swalwell quickly insisted that his reference to the government's possession of nuclear weapons was intended as no more than a joke and emphasized that he was not warning gun owners about such a response to their (hypothetical) resistance to gun confiscation.”
But, who is the joke really on? Obviously, the remark about the use of “nukes” was hyperbole. That much is obvious. But Swalwell’s sentiment wasn’t, and isn’t mere hyperbole. Swalwell is deadly serious.
Don't Nuke Me Bro Get Your TeeDon't Nuke Me, Bro! Get Your Tee
Eric Swalwell is one of a large bevy of Democratic Party candidates campaigning for his Party’s nomination for U.S. President in the upcoming 2020 election, and, while all of these Candidates are virulently anti-gun, Eric Swalwell, in particular, is running prominently on a strong anti-gun platform.
Lauding the Australian Government’s gun confiscation policy, Swalwell is openly critical of our own Nation’s Second Amendment right of the people to keep and bear arms, and he has made clear that he intends to confiscate all firearms Government defines as ‘assault weapons.'
What isn’t humorous about Swalwell’s remarks—not the least bit humorous—and isn’t meant to be a joke, is a point that Swalwell has stated and reiterated often, and it is a cornerstone of his anti-gun plank. Swalwell has made it abundantly clear and is deadly serious when he asserts his intention to confiscate all firearms that Government—his Administration—defines as ‘assault weapons.’ And, he has also made it crystal clear that any American citizen who fails to surrender those weapons will be arrested and prosecuted.
Consistent with the pronouncements of Obama and Hillary Clinton, Swalwell waxes poetic about Australia’s extraordinarily restrictive gun measures. But, keep in mind that Australia’s heavy-handed antigun stance and actions that Swalwell and that Obama and Clinton applaud, isn’t a Constitutional Republic in the vein of our own Nation. Australia is a Commonwealth Nation, presided over by a Governor General, who answers to the Queen of England. Moreover, Australia, unlike our Nation, never did recognize the right of the people of Australia to own and possess firearms, independent of Government say-so. Hell, Australia doesn’t even have a Bill of Rights, and its overseers have vigorously fought against the inclusion of one. Not surprisingly, then, the Australian Government can by, fiat, restrict gun ownership and possession, and Australians–less citizens than subjects of the realm–have no legal recourse. And, this is the Country that Swalwell, and Obama, and Clinton, and all of the other Leftist extremists emulate?
To say these Leftist extremists hold a vision of America different from that of the founders’ vision, indeed a vision opposed to that of our founders’, is a crass understatement. For the assertion fails to capture the sheer scale and scope of the Radical Left's horrific agenda–what it is the Radical Left wants to accomplish and what it intends to force upon Americans, all of us–in the event, it gains control of all three Branches of Government.
What these extremists, these Dead Souls, seek to accomplish is the creation of an entirely different kind of America; an America no longer conceived as a free Republic, no longer existing as an independent, Sovereign Nation State. What these Dead Souls have in mind for Americans and for the Nation is the Nation's dissolution and the subjugation of its citizens. They perceive the remains of what once existed as a free Republic and independent Sovereign Nation State subsumed into a new Governmental and societal construct entirely—indeed, completely consumed by a new international world order that, like a giant serpent, swallows Nation’s whole.
Thus, these Radical Leftists, these Dead Souls, seek to demolish the very existence of our Country as a Sovereign Nation State and free Republic; and, in so doing, they seek to undercut the very notion of a Bill of Rights that embraces fundamental, natural rights, preexistent in the Nation’s citizenry—rights, then, that, in the founders' vision, precede and transcend Government and rest well beyond the lawful power of Government to constrain.
The Radical Left’s objectives for this Nation are ruthlessly, remorselessly and frightfully diabolical; it's rhetoric, transparently duplicitous; its lack of concern for the Nation's citizenry, abjectly shameful; its methods, rapaciously mercenary.
Americans would do well to keep all this uppermost in mind when they go to the polls in 2020.
Arbalest Quarrel
About The Arbalest Quarrel:
Arbalest Group created `The Arbalest Quarrel' website for a special purpose. That purpose is to educate the American public about recent Federal and State firearms control legislation. No other website, to our knowledge, provides as deep an analysis or as thorough an analysis. Arbalest Group offers this information free.
For more information, visit www.arbalestquarrel.com.