EAST CLEVELAND, OHIO: OBAMA SPEAKS TO WHITE LIBERALS, DESPERATE FOR THE BLACK VOTE

EAST CLEVELAND, OHIO: 
OBAMA SPEAKS TO WHITE LIBERALS, DESPERATE FOR THE BLACK VOTE 
Millie Weaver scouts out an Obama rally in East Cleveland, Ohio to get an idea of how the Democrats are going to perform in the midterms. Upon observation, Weaver finds the rally demographic turnout was predominantly white middle class attendees that don’t appear to be East Cleveland residents.

East Cleveland is a historically poor area consisting of a 90% African American population. Many articles cite the residents’ frustration with their government representatives neglecting the crisis of condemned buildings, crime, and poverty that inflict the city.

It appears that the Democrats intentionally planned Obama’s speaking event in this city in a desperate attempt to reel in black voters this midterm election that the Democrats failed to capture in the 2016 presidential election. Citing video footage of Obama’s rally attendees, Weaver concurs that the Democrats may still be unsuccessful in capturing the black vote this midterm election.

BOSCH FAWSTIN: WHY I DRAW MUHAMMAD

 BOSCH FAWSTIN: WHY I DRAW MUHAMMAD
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
I’ve drawn all of my life, but I never drew Muhammad, even though I was raised Muslim and was told he was a great man. And then, in 2005, Muslims threatened Danish cartoonists with death for drawing Muhammad. Like 9/11/01, the event was a flashpoint in my life. Free Speech was under attack by the same enemy who flew planes into our towers and who continued to wage a global jihad on civilization because a weak West refuses to defeat them. And in the face of this attack on Free Speech, many in the West refused to publish the Danish Muhammad cartoons, purportedly out of “respect for Islam,” but in reality, because they’re self-loathing gutless people who have no principles. Many in the West became de facto Muslims and submitted to Islam. And the enemy watched, pleased.
That’s when I decided to draw Muhammad. Not to “taunt” Muslims, as I’m accused of doing, as if “taunting” should lead to death threats and death, but to draw what the Islamic enemy doesn’t want me to draw. Defying evil is not “taunting.” I draw Muhammad not because I’m “suicidal,” as I’m ironically told by those who also claim that “Islam means peace,” but because I have the right to draw anything I want to. I first drew Muhammad in support of those who drew him and had their lives threatened over it. I drew Muhammad in support of those who were character assassinated by those without character. Those who draw Muhammad are condemned for “disrespecting Islam,” a religion that respects nothing outside of it, and tells its followers to “kill the infidels wherever you find them.” The greatest crime in Islam is not any actual crime; it’s disbelief in Islam. And the “crime” of drawing Muhammad is essentially Muslims flexing their muscles against a weak West, to keep us in check, as Muslims have drawn Muhammad over the centuries, particularly Shiite Muslims. It’s all about an enemy trying to intimidate a West who has shown that it’s willing to submit to its demands. I drew Muhammad, and I continue to draw Muhammad, because I’m free. Because I love Free Speech, and I want to live in a world where Free Speech is alive and well. All one needs to do is look at the parts of the world where there is no Free Speech, to fully appreciate how monumentally important it is.
I draw Muhammad because if I don’t — and many have stopped drawing him — then we will more closely resemble the Islamic world, which is a world where the bad guy won. I will continue to do my individual part to make sure that our world is never going to be that world, one Muhammad cartoon at a time. I have over 130 of my Muhammad cartoons in this volume, and I’ve drawn him over 200 times, so I expect to have more volumes.
I was asked in an interview once if I will ever stop drawing Muhammad, and I answered, “No. While it’s not a joy to draw something that brings death threats, it’s the death threats that will have to stop before I ever stop drawing Muhammad.” And so I continue to draw Muhammad, despite death threats. Despite the fact that most publishers will never give me work because of it. The enemy goes undefeated, and they continue to threaten us with more attacks, and personally threaten me for drawing Muhammad cartoons. I’m asked, “Aren’t you afraid to draw Muhammad?,” and I answer that I’m afraid not to. I can’t imagine letting savages dictate what I draw. Savages who murder human beings over cartoons. That’s intolerable, and they must be fought on all fronts, and I fight them by drawing Muhammad.
Order my book here, and here is a link to my video preview of my book.

‘DEEPLY RELIGIOUS’ CHELSEA CLINTON SAYS ENDING LEGAL ABORTION ‘UNCHRISTIAN’

'Deeply Religious' Chelsea Clinton Says Ending Legal Abortion 'Unchristian'

‘DEEPLY RELIGIOUS’ CHELSEA CLINTON SAYS ENDING LEGAL ABORTION ‘UNCHRISTIAN’

Democrat protege pushes globalist depopulation agenda

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/deeply-religious-chelsea-clinton-says-ending-legal-abortion-unchristian/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
During a SiriusXM Town Hall, Chelsea Clinton argued access to abortion is fundamental for women’s rights and said returning to a pre-Roe v. Wade America is “unchristian.”
“And when I think about all of the statistics — that are painful — of what women are confronting today in our country, and what even more women confronted pre-Roe and how many women died and how many more women were maimed because of unsafe abortion practices, we just can’t go back to that,” Clinton argued.
She continued, “That’s unconscionable to me… and also I’m sure that this will unleash another wave of hate in my direction, but as a deeply religious person it’s also unchristian to me.”
“I’ve had the temerity, as the Supreme Court did in 1992 in Planned Parenthood V. Casey, to point out that our ability to participate fully in our society, including economically, hinges on our ability to be able to make choices for our bodies and our families,” Chelsea concluded.

SOCIALIST ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ WEARS $3,500 OUTFIT FOR PHOTO-OP WITH CONSTRUCTION WORKERS

FRAUD
“Back in July it was revealed that despite Ocasio-Cortez claiming to be a rough and ready working class girl from the Bronx, she mostly grew up in wealthy Westchester County.”

QUOTES FROM: 
“Ocasio-Cortez was 2 years old when her father, Sergio Ocasio-Roman, bought a modest home on Longvue Street in Yorktown for $150,000. The family lived in the Parkchester section of the Bronx at the time and moved to the house in Yorktown a few years later.”

“Exterior of a house on Longvue Street in Yorktown Heights, the home that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s family owned from 1991 until 2016. (Photo: Albert Conte/The Journal News)
Ocasio-Cortez graduated from Yorktown High School in 2007.
Her father died in September 2008, just as she was starting her sophomore year at Boston University. The house was deeded to her mother, the executor of her father’s will, in 2012.

Westchester County land records show that Ocasio-Cortez was living there with her mother and brother in 2016 when they sold the home for $355,000.”
SOCIALIST ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ WEARS $3,500 OUTFIT FOR PHOTO-OP WITH CONSTRUCTION WORKERS

That wealth could have been redistributed better

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s working class credentials are under scrutiny again after she was pictured wearing a $3,500 outfit for a photo-op with construction workers.
Ocasio-Cortez wore a $1990 Gabriela Hearst blazer, $890 Gabriela Hearst pants and $625 Monolo Blahnik shoes.
The outlay on such an expensive outfit left some wondering if such wealth could have been redistributed better.
null
“This so pisses me off,” responded one Reddit user. “Bugs the shit out of me that she wants to raise taxes, pretending to champion the poor….in a $3k outfit.”
“I’ve never met a socialist who had the faintest idea of redistributing a penny of their own money. They’re all about taking all the time,” added another.
“As a barmaid she took all $500 of the tips after a holiday night at the bar, stiffing the waitresses with only $50,” responded another user. “She is only a socialist if she can take as much as she wants and leave the scraps for everyone else.”
null
She’s wearing more than what he earns in a month.
Back in July it was revealed that despite Ocasio-Cortez claiming to be a rough and ready working class girl from the Bronx, she mostly grew up in wealthy Westchester County.
Numerous mainstream media biographies of Ocasio-Cortez omit the fact that she basically grew up middle class, with her architect father able to send her to Boston University to study economics and international relations.
One wonders how disconnected Ocasio-Cortez is now to ordinary Americans given that she is swanning around in $3,500 outfits while claiming to be a working class hero.
Infowars has been banned by Facebook. Please help by sharing this article on your own Facebook page.
SUBSCRIBE on YouTube:
Follow on Twitter: 
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor at large of Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com.

STATE RUN SWEDISH KINDERGARTEN BANS WORDS “HE,” “SHE,” MAKES BOYS WEAR DRESSES

EDUCATION=INDOCTRINATION 
STATE RUN SWEDISH KINDERGARTEN BANS WORDS “HE,” “SHE,” MAKES BOYS WEAR DRESSES

Asks children as young as two to talk about ‘boys falling in love with boys and girls falling in love with girls’

BY PAUL JOSEPH WATSON
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/state-run-swedish-kindergarten-bans-words-he-she-makes-boys-wear-dresses/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A whistleblower working at a state-run kindergarten in Sweden has revealed how officials told her never refer to children as “he” or “she,” to encourage boys to wear dresses, and to initiate conversations with children as young as two about “boys falling in love with boys and girls falling in love with girls.”
In an interview with Världen idag, “Anna,” who has been working in the kindergarten for two years, said she was quickly informed that telling children something they were wearing was “nice” was forbidden and that the pre-schoolers should not be assigned genders.
When Anna read books to the children, she noticed that all mentions of “he” or “she” had been covered with Tipp-Ex and replaced with the gender neutral pronoun “hen”.
She later discovered that the popular “Emil and Pippi” books had been thrown away because they didn’t feature any gender neutral characters and the bookshelves had “been filled with children’s books with subjects such as transsexuality and homosexuality.”
Anna also asserted that children as young as one and two were partaking in group discussions where they were told by teachers “that a girl could fall in love with a girl and boy in a boy.” The toddlers were then asked “Who are you in love with?”
A confused little boy responded, “My Lego.”
Dolls, cars and trains have also been banned at the pre-school because they are gender-normative, while a boy who dressed up in a fireman’s outfit was told by a teacher to take it off and wear a dress instead even though he didn’t want to.
“I do not want a dress, I want this,” the boy said, to which the teacher responded, “But you know you’ll have a dress?”
Anna reveals how even some of the parents are on board with the indoctrination. When a mother came to pick up her son, Anna said to the boy, “Your mom is here,” to which the mother responded, “I’m not their mother, I’m a parent.”
Officials also told Anna not to say “Mom” and “Dad” because “a child can have two custodians of the same gender.”
Anna says that a 3-year-old girl who once proclaimed “I’m a boy today!” later asked her, “Am I a boy or girl?” to which Anna firmly responded, “You are a girl.”
“I cannot follow those rules. I just cannot. They are against everything I know,” concluded Anna.
The kindergarten in question was not named by the newspaper because they didn’t want to expose their source.
Since 1998, the Swedish government’s guidelines on schooling have “forbidden enforcing gender stereotypes, and government funded gender neutral kindergartens with gender aware teachers has made it possible for families to raise their children without a set gender identity,” according to a VICE report.
The populist Sweden Democrats just increased their presence in parliament after the country’s latest election, but given stories like this, in addition to Sweden’s rampant problem with crime, rape and mass immigration, one wonders whether it’s too late.
Infowars has been banned by Facebook. Please help by sharing this article on your own Facebook page.