Day: July 5, 2018
POLISH LAWMAKER: “WE WILL NOT RECEIVE EVEN ONE MUSLIM….THIS IS WHY POLAND IS SO SAFE”
Polish lawmaker Dominik Tarczyński has stuck to his guns following a frank interview on the migrant crisis with Cathy Newman, insisting his government will not take a single illegal migrant because that is what his party promised before the elections.The Channel 4 presenter, who became infamous online following her viral interviewwith Canadian scholar Jordan Peterson, had demanded to know how many “refugees” Poland had taken, to which the Law and Justice Party (PiS) politician replied: “Zero.”“And you’re proud of that?” Newman demanded.“If you are asking me about Muslim illegal immigrants, none, not even one, will come to Poland,” Tarczyński repeated.“We took over two million Ukrainians — who are working, who are peaceful — in Poland. We will not receive even one Muslim, because this is what we promised… this is why our government was elected; this is why Poland is so safe, this is why we have not had even one terror attack,” he said.“We can be called ‘populists’, ‘nationalists’, ‘racists’, I don’t care — I care about my family, and about my country.”Breitbart London contacted the Polish lawmaker for his thoughts on the explosive interview, asking if he still felt confident that it was Poland’s strategy on the migrant crisis which had spared his country from the radical Islamic terror attacks which have plagued countries such as Germany, Sweden, and Spain.Mr Tarczyński insisted that “strategy” did not come into it and that the Law and Justice government’s decision to refuse migrants from the Middle East and North Africa came down to something much more simple.“It hasn’t been about strategy for us, but simply keeping our promises to the Polish people,” he explained.“We promised to say no to illegal immigrants in Poland before the elections in 2015, and we have kept our promises to the voters who elected us because that’s what they expected,” he said.“It’s incredible that these people in the European media and the European Commission — who are unelected, by the way — can’t understand this. We made a promise to the people, and we have a democratic responsibility to keep it.”Mr Tarczyński described how he had visited genuine refugees in the Lebanese camps neighbouring Syria several times — “unlike many of Poland’s critics” — and that they made it clear to them that genuinely needy refugees simply could not afford to pay people-smugglers to make the long journey through the Near East and South-Eastern Europe to the welfare states of North-West Europe.He added that, as the migrant crisis expanded to take in sub-Saharan Africans as well as the Middle-Easterners, open borders were simply not a viable solution to the problem.“There are a billion people in Africa,” he said matter of factly. “In the European Union, we have what, 500 million? How many Africans can we take?” he asked.“Don’t misunderstand me, we want to help the people who are suffering, but we need to help them where they are, at home. It’s not about being racist, nationalist — it’s about adopting a logical, rational system….
_______________________________________________________
Polish Official: “We Will Not Receive Even One Muslim” in Poland
HUNGARY’S FOREIGN MINISTER CHIDES “UNBALANCED, ONE-SIDED” BBC ANCHOR FOR PRO-EUROPEAN UNION, PRO-MIGRATION RANT
Hungarian foreign minister Péter Szijjártó had to chide BBC anchor Emily Maitlis for “unbalanced, one-sided” journalism after she lost her temper and launched into a rant about the EU standing for “tolerance, diversity, and human rights”.Speaking to Szijjártó on the publicly-funded broadcaster’s flagship BBC Newsnightprogramme, Maitlis took umbrage with the Hungarian statesman’s claim that “the current migration policy of the European Union can be very easily translated as an invitation” to illegal migrants.“On World Refugee Day this week, you passed a new law which makes it illegal to help migrants. It criminalises helping undocumented immigrants, and that includes asylum seekers. Why would you do that?” she asked.Szijjártó attempted to correct the presenter, saying that the anti-illegal immigration package — dubbed ‘Stop Soros’ — was aimed only at those organisations which “help people to ask for asylum even if they have no legal basis for that… and promoting [immigration] opportunities with no legal basis”.Maitlis appeared not to take heed of Szijjártó’s explanation, however, jabbing her finger at the foreign minister and doubling down on her previous claims.“You will be making it illegal to help refugees fill in form,” she alleged, leaning forward aggressively.“You will make it punishable by jail to organise or distribute information that could help migrants.“Now, you accept that this legislation flouts not only human rights, but it also breaks an international treaty you have signed,” she asserted, laughing incredulously.“The content of the law is not what you have listed,” replied the Hungarian, perplexed.“The content of the law is that if you promote illegal possibilities to come to Hungary–” he began to explain, before Maitlis interrupted him.“No, I want to talk about this question of ‘illegal’, right, because anyone who lands in your country who calls themself an asylum seeker has the right to have their papers and their situation examined,” she insisted.Szijjártó attempted to explain that Hungary, which lies in Central Europe, is surrounded by peaceful countries, and that there is “no point of reference in any piece of international regulations why you should be allowed or helped or assisted to violate the border between two peaceful countries”.Maitlis did not address this point, but turned openly scornful, sneering: “You do know you don’t have an immigrant problem in Hungary? You do know that your own official data says you have 3,600 asylum seekers in a country of ten million? You do know that there were 300 asylum claims only this year? You don’t have an immigrant problem in your country!”Szijjártó explained that illegal migration into Hungary — which was running at 3,000 a day at the height of the migrant crisis, as Maitlis herself reported at the time — has only been brought under control because of the tough stance adopted by the Hungarian government, and that the country remains on the frontline as the situation in the Balkans looks set to boil over again….
ROBERT SPENCER: INDEPENDENCE DAY~WHY WE FIGHT
“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed…” — Declaration of Independence
Non-Muslims have “absolutely no right to seize the reins of power in any part of God’s earth nor to direct the collective affairs of human beings according to their own misconceived doctrines.” If they do, “the believers would be under an obligation to do their utmost to dislodge them from political power and to make them live in subservience to the Islamic way of life.” — Syed Abul Ala Maududi, founder of the Pakistani political party Jamaat-e-Islami
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” — Declaration of Independence
“The indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man. The indemnity paid for a Jew or Christian is one-third the indemnity paid for a Muslim. The indemnity paid for a Zoroastrian is one-fifteenth that of a Muslim.” — Reliance of the Traveller, a classic manual of Islamic sacred law (o4.9)“Thus if [a] Muslim commits adultery his punishment is 100 lashes, the shaving of his head, and one year of banishment. But if the man is not a Muslim and commits adultery with a Muslim woman his penalty is execution. … Similarly if a Muslim deliberately murders another Muslim he falls under the law of retaliation and must by law be put to death by the next of kin. But if a non-Muslim who dies at the hand of a Muslim has by lifelong habit been a non-Muslim, the penalty of death is not valid. Instead the Muslim murderer must pay a fine and be punished with the lash. … Since Islam regards non-Muslims as on a lower level of belief and conviction, if a Muslim kills a non-Muslim, then his punishment must not be the retaliatory death, since the faith and conviction he possesses is loftier than that of the man slain…Again, the penalties of a non-Muslim guilty of fornication with a Muslim woman are augmented because, in addition to the crime against morality, social duty and religion, he has committed sacrilege, in that he has disgraced a Muslim and thereby cast scorn upon the Muslims in general, and so must be executed. … Islam and its peoples must be above the infidels, and never permit non-Muslims to acquire lordship over them.” — Sultanhussein Tabandeh, A Muslim Commentary on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
“Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…” — First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
“In confronting the Danish cartoons and the Dutch film ‘Fitna’, we sent a clear message to the West regarding the red lines that should not be crossed. As we speak, the official West and its public opinion are all now well-aware of the sensitivities of these issues. They have also started to look seriously into the question of freedom of expression from the perspective of its inherent responsibility, which should not be overlooked.” — Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, secretary general of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation“Pakistan will ask the European Union countries to amend laws regarding freedom of expression in order to prevent offensive incidents such as the printing of blasphemous caricatures of Prophet Muhammad (Peace Be Upon Him) and the production of an anti-Islam film by a Dutch legislator…” — Daily Times of Pakistan“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” — Barack Hussein Obama“We also understand that, for 235 years, freedom of expression has been a universal right at the core of our democracy. So we are focused on…us[ing] some old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.” — Hillary Clinton“We are going to have the filmmaker arrested.” — Hillary Clinton, referring to the filmmaker whose YouTube video about Muhammad she blamed for the Benghazi jihad massacre
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” — First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” — Hamas-linked CAIR co-founder and longtime board chairman Omar Ahmad (he denies saying it, but the original reporter stands by her story)“I wouldn’t want to create the impression that I wouldn’t like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future.” — Hamas-linked CAIR’s Ibrahim HooperThe Muslim Brotherhood “must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” — Mohamed Akram, “An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America”
A PAULA WHITE PICK FOR SUPREME COURT?~AMY CONEY BARRETT: ALL THE RIGHT PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS~BUT QUESTIONABLE CATHOLIC, CHARISMATIC, ECUMENICAL, DOMINIONIST BELIEFS & ASSOCIATIONS
2 CORINTHIANS 6:
ECUMENICAL RELIGIOUS CULT MEMBER WHO LACKS BIBLICAL DISCERNMENT & VIEWS ALL “CHRISTIAN” DENOMINATIONS AS “EQUAL”,
NONE APOSTATE?
ANOTHER BRAINWASHED PUPPET OF
POPE FRANCIS, LEADING “LOST BRETHREN” PROTESTANTS BACK TO
“HOLY MOTHER CHURCH” IN ROME?
DOESN’T SHE REALIZE THAT CATHOLICISM IS A CULT, AS WELL AS “PEOPLE OF PRAISE”?
SEE: https://peopleofpraise.org/
ALSO SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST ON CHURCH “COVENANTS”:
https://ratherexposethem.org/2014/10/church-membership-covenants-unbiblical.html
QUOTE FROM: https://slate.com/human-interest/2018/07/amy-coney-barretts-alleged-religious-group-people-of-praise-what-is-it.html :
“Law professor and Senate candidate Richard Painter tweeted the old Times story this weekend and said People of Praise “looks like a cult”; another prominent critic one-upped Painter by calling it a “secretive religious cult.””
A PAULA WHITE PICK FOR SUPREME COURT?
Amy Coney Barrett & “People of Praise”:
5 Fast Facts | Heavy.com
Trump has now revealed that he’s narrowed the field to replace Kennedy down to five people, two of whom are women.
AMY CONEY BARRETT: ALL THE RIGHT PROFESSIONAL CREDENTIALS~BUT QUESTIONABLE CATHOLIC, CHARISMATIC, ECUMENICAL, DOMINIONIST BELIEFS & ASSOCIATIONS
Amy Coney Barrett
Amy Coney Barrett | |
---|---|
Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit | |
Assumed office November 2, 2017 |
|
Appointed by | Donald Trump |
Preceded by | John Daniel Tinder |
Personal details | |
Born | Amy Vivian Coney New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S. |
Spouse(s) | Jesse Barrett |
Children | 7 |
Education | |
Academic work | |
Discipline | Jurisprudence |
Institutions | University of Notre Dame |
Website | Notre Dame Law Biography |
Contents
[hide]
Education and career
Federal judicial service
Personal life
People of Praise
Abbreviation | POP |
---|---|
Formation | 1971 |
Type | Ecumenical Christian organization |
Headquarters | South Bend, Indiana |
Membership
|
about 3,000[1] |
Website | peopleofpraise.org |
Contents
[hide]
History[edit]
Description[edit]
Covenant[edit]
Leadership and spiritual direction[edit]
Gender roles[edit]
Divisions and affiliated organizations[edit]
Campus Division[edit]
Action Division[edit]
Christians in Commerce[edit]
Trinity Schools[edit]
- Greenlawn, in South Bend, Indiana
- Meadow View, in Falls Church, Virginia
- River Ridge, in Eagan, Minnesota
Brotherhood of the People of Praise[edit]
Reception[edit]
See also[edit]https://trinityschools.org/
_______________________________________________________