MARVEL STUDIOS BOSS PROMISES “LGBT” CHARACTERS IN FUTURE FILMS

MARVEL STUDIOS BOSS PROMISES 
“LGBT” CHARACTERS IN FUTURE FILMS 
BY SELWYN DUKE
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/29409-marvel-studios-boss-promises-lgbt-characters-in-future-filmsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
We don’t know if they’ll have a “gay ray” or be able to close down a Christian bakery in a single bound, but Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) films may soon feature two “LGBT” superheroes. Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige made this promise in a recent interview, because, as we all know, portraying anomalous sexuality all the time, everywhere, is a modern American imperative. As Bustle reports:
Now that the MCU has completed its first three phases and released 19 superhero movies, it’s time for a change. The lack of LGBTQ heroes has long been criticized, and the Disney-owned Marvel Studios has heeded those critiques. In an interview with The Playlist, Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige revealed that at least two LGBT characters will join the MCU. The always hush-hush studio didn’t quite name who those heroes would be, but Feige did reveal that the LGBT heroes won’t all necessarily be added to the MCU as new characters. When asked who the LGBT characters would be, Feige said, “Both [characters] you’ve seen and ones you haven’t seen.”
Of course, this is remarkably narrow open-mindedness. What about polygamous and zoophile (relating to bestiality) characters and those with various paraphilias (strange sexual desires, such as fetishes)? What about the “species dysphoria” people who identify as animals? It’s a big world out there. Why exclude anyone?
The point is that virtually everyone here gets things backward without even realizing it. The sexual devolutionaries condemn their opponents for singling out, let’s say, homosexuality. But it is they who single it out — for special treatment. They do not take up the cudgels for most sexual behaviors.
Consider that when Christians refuse to rubber-stamp homosexuality, it’s merely part of a paradigm for man’s sexuality that also forbids fornication, adultery, self-gratification, polygamy, viewing pornography, and often even impure thoughts. And a Christian baker would balk at being party to an event celebrating any of those things. Yet we don’t see adulterers, fornicators, or polygamists trying to shut down Christian businesses. Nor are Christians condemned as “fornicaphobes,” “adulterophobes,” or “polygaphobes.”
But the tune changes when the issue is a certain narrow range of anomalous sexual behaviors. Let’s be clear, however: What the sexual devolutionaries are actually upset about is that Christians and certain others won’t offer the same special dispensation for those behaviors and discriminate as they do.
Of course, they have their particular agenda and are very effective at advancing it, and media and entertainment are the main vehicles through which this is accomplished. This process was explained well by sexual devolutionaries Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen (a marketing man by trade) in their 1989 book After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90’s. The authors called for a desensitization of Americans to homosexuality through a “continuous flood of gay-related advertising,” a “conversion of the average American’s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media.”
Entertainment’s power in this regard is unparalleled, and the tactic is simple: Create a likable character people will bond with and define him, in part, with a behavior you want accepted. Since people have trouble loving the sinner but hating the sin and too often either accept or reject both, they’ll start to accept that with which this beloved character is associated.
Some say, however, that Feige may be all talk and no action. As LifeSite reported yesterday, in “2015 he told Collider that audiences could expect to see a homosexual, bisexual, or transgender character sometime within the next decade.”
“However, whether Feige’s words signal a sincere desire to add LGBT messages to the movies, or are merely meant to appease disgruntled LGBT activists, remains unknown,” LifeSite continued. “‘Never EVER believe anything that #KevinFeige says,’ entertainment journalist Grace Randolph said Monday…. ‘He says yes to everything he’s ever asked because he doesn’t want any negative coverage.’”
Moreover, there may be a reason why oh-so progressive Hollywood has been reluctant to promote homosexuality as overtly on the silver screen as it does on TV. Putting pocketbook before principle, it may be wary of alienating the Chinese, who boast a huge market and may ban films with sexual-devolutionary content.
Unbeknownst to most Americans, the Chinese wield tremendous power over Hollywood and already control much of what you see on screen, as The New American has reported in the past.
Yet the home front could be an issue, too, as “domestic audiences may be increasingly wary of ‘representation’ in their entertainment,” LifeSite also informs. The news organ continues:
In March, GLAAD found that America’s LGBT acceptance has actually begun to decrease, which conservatives attribute to the LGBT lobby’s transition from “live and let live” arguments to attacks on other Americans’ religious, conscience, and privacy rights.
Parent company Marvel Entertainment, which is owned by Disney, has taken a beating on the political front in recent years, as well, raising further questions as to whether it really wants to risk altering the formula that has brought it success across nineteen [MCU] films so far.
Marvel Comics canceled all three of its comic book series that won GLAAD awards in 2017, citing poor sales. Last year, comic retailers excoriated the publisher for hurting their business with books that alienated readers by emphasizing political and “social justice” themes.
Philosopher C.S. Lewis once noted that sex “is not messed up because it was put in the closet; it was put in the closet because it was messed up.” Perhaps some Americans are tired of going to a theater to be entertained and seeing the inside of Hollywood’s closet instead.

SHOCK COMPILATION: DEMOCRATS, CELEBRITIES & MAINSTREAM MEDIA PUSH VIOLENCE AGAINST PRO-TRUMPERS

SHOCK COMPILATION: DEMOCRATS, CELEBRITIES & MAINSTREAM MEDIA PUSH VIOLENCE AGAINST PRO-TRUMPERS

Establishment collaborates to dehumanize conservatives ahead of violent uprising

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/shock-compilation-dems-celebrities-mainstream-media-push-violence-against-pro-trumpers/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
A video put together by The Daily Caller shows how the mainstream media, entertainment figures and establishment politicians are all urging Democrat party voters to wage a violent revolution against people who support President Donald Trump.
Also, check out Alex Jones’ and Owen Shroyer’s report: “Breaking! Leftists Surround Mitch McConnell’s Family, Confront His Wife”

‘REPUBLICANS ARE FORBIDDEN’: NAZI-STYLE DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA FLOODS LA

'Republicans Are Forbidden': Nazi-Style Democrat Propaganda Floods LA
‘REPUBLICANS ARE FORBIDDEN’: NAZI-STYLE DEMOCRAT PROPAGANDA FLOODS LA

Street art fights back against #resistance attacks on conservatives

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/republicans-are-forbidden-nazi-style-democrat-propaganda-floods-la/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Street artist Sabo and his Unsavory Agents placed Nazi-style propaganda posters around Los Angeles this week in an effort to bring attention to growing anti-conservative rhetoric being promoted by the left.
One poster declares “Republicans Are Forbidden,” in both German and English and another orders Dems to “Buy Only At Democrat Shops.”
Sabo gave a statement to Daily Wire Wednesday, saying the project was inspired by the Red Hen restaurant’s treatment of Sarah Sanders last week and admitting “it sent a chill” through him.
“It seems the Democrat owners don’t welcome the patronage of Republicans,” he said.
“Recently while visiting Austin, Texas me and my party were asked to leave no less than three bars because one of us dared wear a MAGA hat.”
Sabo continued, “We were told that our kind weren’t welcomed there. What the hell ‘kind’ is that I wondered. Patriots, Republicans, Americans? It really freaked me out.”
The prolific street artist says he created the signs to remind people that this has happened before and that we should learn from the past.
See photos of the Democrat-Nazi propaganda posters below:
Watch Sabo and Ben Garrison discuss the culture war with Alex Jones.

TURKEY ELECTION: ERDOGAN DECLARES A WIN FOR “DEMOCRACY” DESPITE CORRUPTION, FRAUD, ARRESTS


TURKEY ELECTION: ERDOGAN DECLARES A WIN FOR “DEMOCRACY” DESPITE CORRUPTION, FRAUD, ARRESTS 
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan celebrated his election victory Sunday, 
declaring that “the sufferers of our region and all oppressed in the world” won the 
election as opposition leaders and international observers decry widespread arrests, 
ballot irregularities, and censorship.
This coming from a man who declared jihad on the Kurds and dispatched thousands of soldiers to “decimate them.” On January 20 and 21, 90,000 mosques in Turkey prayed Quranic conquest prayers, calling on Muslims to be ruthless to unbelievers.
Like all jihadists and Islamic supremacists, Erdogan is a liar who will say and do anything he can get away with to further his vision of a revived Ottoman Empire. He has already accused Europe twice of starting a war between the cross and the crescent, and has been at the forefront of pushing the idea that “Islamophobia” is a “crime against humanity.” Even with his disgraceful reputation as a violent jihadist despot, Erdogan has sent a “human rights” committee to visit Europe to probe “Islamophobia.”
One can expect that there was corruption at the deepest levels in the Turkish election.
“Erdogan Declares ‘Democracy Wins’ as Arrests, Fraud Claims Mar Turkish Election,” by Frances Martel, Breitbart, June 25, 2018:
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan celebrated his election victory Sunday, declaring that “the sufferers of our region and all oppressed in the world” won the election as opposition leaders and international observers decry widespread arrests, ballot irregularities, and censorship.
Despite most opposition candidates being effectively banned from television after Erdoğan shut down over one hundred media outlets in 2016 – and one presidential candidate facing 183 years in prison for criticizing Erdoğan’s policy on Kurdish Turkey – Erdoğan barely secured a simple majority on Sunday. According to the Turkish state-run Anadolu News Agency, Erdoğan received 52.56 percent of the vote.
Primary opposition candidate Muharrem İnce of the Republican People’s Party (CHP) received 30.64 percent of the vote; imprisoned Kurdish candidate Selahattin Demirtaş received 8.4 percent, and Meral Akşener, representing the debut of the nationalist Iyi (Good) Party, received 7.29 percent of the vote.
A map detailing how the vote broke down finds that Erdoğan dominated most of heartland rural Turkey, İnce did best with the urban vote, and Demirtaş locked down most states in the Kurdish-populated southwest. Edirne, the northeast city where Demirtaş is being held without a trial, went for İnce.
In the parliamentary election, Erdoğan’s Islamist Justice and Development Party (AKP) retained the plurality with 42.56 percent of the vote. They will govern in a coalition with the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), a traditional ally of the AKP. Demirtaş’ secularist, left-wing People’s Democratic Party (HDP) received 11.7 percent of the vote, increasing its voting block in parliament and avoiding dropping below the ten percent threshold necessary to be represented in the legislature….
____________________________________________________________________
ISLAMIC CALIPHATE, ONE MAN RULE,
A DICTATORSHIP WITH INCREASED POWERS

WOMEN FOR TRUMP CO-FOUNDER HIT WITH DEATH THREATS~CNN’S APRIL RYAN TWEETS THAT AMY KREMER IS A HATER & LIAR RIGHT AFTER INTERVIEW

INTIMIDATION BY LEFTISTS
WOMEN FOR TRUMP CO-FOUNDER 
HIT WITH DEATH THREATS
Amy Kremer receives hateful calls and emails after appearing
on CNN to debate immigration.
CNN’S APRIL RYAN TWEETS THAT KREMER
IS A HATER & LIAR
 HOW ABOUT YOUR CHILDREN – Amy Kremer vs April Ryan over families separated at Border
Women for Trump Founder Amy Kremer and CNN April Ryan engages in a heated debate over families separation at Border

PEDIATRICIANS ON TRANSGENDERISM: A MENTAL ILLNESS IS NOT A CIVIL RIGHT~”TRANSGENDER MEDICINE” A TERRIBLE FRAUD

TRANSGENDERISM: 
A MENTAL ILLNESS IS NOT A CIVIL RIGHT 
DR. MICHELLE CRETELLA
TFP Student Action interviews Dr. Michelle Cretella, M.D., president of the American College of Pediatricians. She debunks the lies behind transgender ideology with sound science and denounces the new wave of child abuse caused by the transgender movement.

Read the transcript of the entire interview: https://www.tfpstudentaction.org/blog…

The terrible fraud of 
‘transgender medicine’
At the Teens4Truth Conference, Ft. Worth, TX, Nov. 18, 2017. A physician who was in the Johns Hopkins Univ. Hospital group where “transgender medicine” was developed describes the lies, bad medicine, and fraud behind that movement. Quentin Van Meter, MD, FCP is a pediatric endocrinologist. He is a Fellow of the American College of Pediatricians and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

Understanding gender ideology — the propaganda of the sexual revolution

From the Teens4Truth Conference by Texas MassResistance in Ft. Worth, TX on Nov. 18, 2017. Dr. Jennifer Roback Morse of the Ruth Institute. How feminism, sexuality, homosexuality, transgenderism, and more are being told to and forced on the public.


JOHN MCCAIN’S SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF DIRECTOR URGED IRS TO TARGET CONSERVATIVE GROUPS

“audit so many that it becomes financially ruinous.” 
JOHN MCCAIN’S SUBCOMMITTEE STAFF DIRECTOR URGED IRS TO TARGET CONSERVATIVE GROUPS 
BY TOM FITTON
SEE: http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/06/25/mccains-subcommittee-staff-director-urged-irs-to-target-conservative-groups/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:

Little is as unnerving as trouble with the IRS, especially if you haven’t done anything wrong. That happened repeatedly during President Barack Obama’s administration, as his IRS enthusiastically targeted conservative groups.

We’re now understanding why the Congress didn’t do much of anything about it.
Judicial Watch released internal IRS documents revealing that Sen. John McCain’s former staff director and chief counsel on the Senate Homeland Security Permanent Subcommittee, Henry Kerner, urged top IRS officials, including then-director of exempt organizations, Lois Lerner, to “audit so many that it becomes financially ruinous.” President Trump, presumably unaware of these new facts, appointed Kerner as Special Counsel for the United States Office of Special Counsel.
The explosive exchange was contained in notes taken by IRS employees at an April 30, 2013, meeting between Kerner, Lerner, and other high-ranking IRS officials. Just ten days following the meeting, Lois Lerner admitted that the IRS had a policy of improperly and deliberately delaying applications for tax-exempt status from conservative non-profit groups.
Lerner and other IRS officials met with select top staffers from the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee in a “marathon” meeting to discuss concerns raised by both Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) that the IRS was not reining in political advocacy groups in response to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. Senator McCain had been the chief sponsor of the McCain-Feingold Act and called the Citizens United decision, which overturned portions of the Act, one of the “worst decisions I have ever seen.”
In the full notes of an April 30 meeting, McCain’s high-ranking staffer Kerner recommends harassing non-profit groups until they are unable to continue operating. Kerner tells Lerner, Steve Miller, Nikole Flax, then chief of staff to IRS commissioner, and other IRS officials, “Maybe the solution is to audit so many that it is financially ruinous.” In response, Lerner responded that “it is her job to oversee it all:”
Henry Kerner asked how to get to the abuse of organizations claiming section 501 (c)(4) but designed to be primarily political. Lois Lerner said the system works, but not in real time. Henry Kerner noted that these organizations don’t disclose donors. Lois Lerner said that if they don’t meet the requirements, we can come in and revoke, but it doesn’t happen in a timely manner. Nan Marks said if the concern is that organizations engaging in this activity don’t disclose donors, then the system doesn’t work. Henry Kerner said that maybe the solution is to audit so many that it is financially ruinous. Nikole noted that we have budget constraints. Elise Bean suggested using the list of organizations that made independent expenditures. Lois Lerner said that it is her job to oversee it all, not just political campaign activity.
Judicial Watch previously reported on the 2013 meeting. Senator McCain then issued a statement decrying “false reports claiming that his office was somehow involved in IRS targeting of conservative groups.” The IRS previously blacked out the notes of the meeting, but we found the notes among subsequent documents released by the agency.

Judicial Watch separately uncovered that Lerner was under significant pressure from both Democrats in Congress and the Obama DOJ and FBI to prosecute and jail the groups the IRS was already improperly targeting. In discussing pressure from Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) to prosecute these “political groups,” Lerner admitted, “it is ALL about 501(c)(4) orgs and political activity.”

The April 30, 2013 meeting came just under two weeks prior to Lerner’s admission during an American Bar Association meeting that the IRS had “inappropriately” targeted conservative groups. In her May 2013 answer to a planted question, in which she admitted to the “absolutely incorrect, insensitive, and inappropriate” targeting of Tea Party and conservative groups, Lerner suggested the IRS targeting occurred due to an “uptick” in 501 (c)(4) applications to the IRS but in actuality, there had been a decrease in such applications in 2010.
On May 14, 2013, a report by Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration revealed: “Early in Calendar Year 2010, the IRS began using inappropriate criteria to identify organizations applying for tax-exempt status” (e.g., lists of past and future donors). The illegal IRS reviews continued “for more than 18 months” and “delayed processing of targeted groups’ applications” in advance of the 2012 presidential election.
All these documents were forced out of the IRS as a result of an October 2013 Judicial Watch Freedom of Information (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the IRS after it failed to respond adequately to four FOIA requests sent in May 2013 (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Internal Revenue Service (No. 1:13-cv-01559)). Judicial Watch is seeking:
  • All records related to the number of applications received or related to communications between the IRS and members of the U.S. House of Representatives or the U.S. Senate regarding the review process for organizations applying for tax exempt status under 501(c)(4);
  • All records concerning communications between the IRS and the Executive Branch or any other government agency regarding the review process for organizations applying for tax exempt status under 501(c)(4);
  • Copies of any questionnaires and all records related to the preparation of questionnaires sent to organizations applying for 501(c)(4) tax exempt status and;
  • All records related to Lois Lerner’s communication with other IRS employees, as well as government or private entity outside the IRS regarding the review and approval process for 501 (c)(4) applicant organizations.
The Obama IRS scandal is bipartisan – McCain and Democrats who wanted to regulate political speech lost at the Supreme Court, so they sought to use the IRS to harass innocent Americans. The Obama IRS scandal is not over. Judicial Watch continues to uncover smoking gun documents that raise questions about how the Obama administration weaponized the IRS, the FEC, FBI, and DOJ to target the First Amendment Rights of Americans.
Tom Fitton is President of Judicial Watch.

HEAD OF CHILD ABUSE CHARITY ARRESTED FOR ATTEMPTING TO RAPE TWO YEAR OLD CHILDREN~WAS A CLINTON CAMPAIGN OFFICIAL

CLINTON CAMPAIGN OFFICIAL &
HEAD OF CHILD ABUSE CHARITY ARRESTED FOR ATTEMPTING TO RAPE 
TWO YEAR OLD CHILDREN 

CHILD ABUSE CHARITY HEAD ARRESTED FOR ATTEMPTED CHILD RAPE

Also arrested on child pornography charges

BY DAILY MAIL
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/child-abuse-charity-head-arrested-for-attempted-child-rape/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The head of a charity that campaigns against sexual violence has been arrested in New York for child pornography and allegedly trying to meet with children as young as two for sex. 
Joel Davis, 22, is accused of trying to set up sexual encounters between himself and young children, as well as soliciting an undercover FBI agent to send sexually explicit videos of minors.
The New Yorker was arrested on Tuesday on child sex abuse and child pornography charges.
Davis is the chairman of the International Campaign to Stop Rape and Gender Violence in Conflict – an organization devoted to ending sexual violence.
Also watch the following:

RADICAL MUSLIM LINDA SARSOUR OF BAY RIDGE, BROOKLYN, N.Y.: “ALEXANDRA OCASIO-CORTEZ IS THE HOPE WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR”

Linda Sarsour: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Is the Hope We Have Been Waiting For

https://democracynow.org – Tuesday was a big day for progressive Democrats. In New York, former Bernie Sanders organizer Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defeated Rep. Joe Crowley. In Maryland, former NAACP chair Benjamin Jealous won the Democratic gubernatorial primary. We speak to Linda Sarsour of MPower Change about what the victories mean for the Democratic Party.

REPORTER FILES ASSAULT CHARGES AGAINST MAXINE WATERS FOLLOWING ENCOUNTER

Reporter Files Assault Charges Against Maxine Waters Following Encounter

REPORTER FILES ASSAULT CHARGES AGAINST MAXINE WATERS FOLLOWING ENCOUNTER

‘Yesterday when I confronted her on Capitol Hill, she ASSAULTED me,’ says Laura Loomer

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/reporter-files-assault-charges-against-maxine-waters-following-encounter/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Investigative reporter Laura Loomer filed a police report Tuesday accusing Democrat congresswoman Maxine Waters of assaulting her.
Loomer announced on Twitter she had filed charges against Waters with the Capitol Police, claiming, “Yesterday when I confronted her on Capitol Hill, she ASSAULTED me. She hit my hand, then she swatted me in the face twice w/ her papers.”
Loomer confronted the California House rep on camera in Washington DC earlier that day, following up on recent comments encouraging Democrats to publicly confront Trump supporters and admin officials.
Laura Loomer Confronts Maxine Waters

Play Video

In the video, Waters rejected Loomer’s questions asking what places Trump supporters can go without fear of being harassed, as she proceeds to bat Loomer’s camera away while telling her to schedule an appointment.

REACHING PUBERTY, GOP’S BALLS JUST DROPPED: REPUBLICANS RELEASE AD SAVAGING “UNHINGED” (INSANE) DEMOCRAT PARTY

Alex Jones presents a new AD released by the GOP that targets the violent, ‘unhinged’ democrats that are becoming normalized by the mainstream media’s support for political intimidation.

GOP’S BALLS JUST DROPPED: 

REPUBLICANS RELEASE AD SAVAGING “UNHINGED” (INSANE) DEMOCRAT PARTY 
BY CHRIS MENAHAN-INFORMATION LIBERATION
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The GOP released a savage ad on Tuesday showing how the Democrats have become completely “unhinged” radical extremists.
The well produced ad opens with Senator Bernie Sanders saying, “a few years ago, ideas that we talked about were thought to be fringe ideas, radical ideas, extremist ideas — those ideas are now mainstream,” over footage of graffiti that reads “revolution or death” and Kathy Griffin holding President Trump’s severed head.
It goes on to feature the bullying of White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders, Johnny Depp talking about assassinating the president, and Madonna talking about blowing up the White House.
The ad, which does not mention any specific GOP candidates, is sharp, shocking, and absolutely what the GOP needs to invigorate their base and bring in rational independents who are sick of the insanity.
This is Trump’s Republican Party now.
If Jeb or Romney were in the White House right now Karl Rove would be producing ads for the GOP touting illegal immigration as an “act of love” and apologizing for not passing DACA or some other stupid s**t.
They’d blather on about “our values” and tax cuts.
Instead, the whole GOP is becoming uncucked thanks to Trump’s alpha-stylings and waging total war.
The main criticism in the comments is the video isn’t radical enough.
“Should have closed with news footage of the Steve Scalise shooting,” reads the top comment on YouTube from The Next News Network.
Slicing in footage of Trump supporters being attacked would be good too.
I’m assuming they didn’t want to go too hard for the sake of civility. I’m not going to fault them as this is a big deal for the GOP to go this hard. Anyone can make an ad like this and I’m sure Super-Elite PACs are going to go even harder.
This article was posted: Wednesday, June 27, 2018 at 6:22 am

NEW YORK: 28 YEAR OLD SOCIALIST ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ UPSETS 10 TERM REP. JOSEPH CROWLEY IN U.S. CONGRESS

COMMUNIST, CATHOLIC PUPPET OF 
“NO BORDERS” POPE FRANCIS 
DEFEATS INCUMBENT
ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ:
“MOREOVER, NOT ONLY IS THIS ABOUT GENDER & RACE, THIS IS ABOUT CLASS”
NEW YORK:
28 YEAR OLD SOCIALIST ALEXANDRIA OCASIO-CORTEZ UPSETS 10 TERM REP. 
JOSEPH CROWLEY 
Michelle Malkin sounds off on the dangers of the newcomer’s agenda.
Dem Candidate Who Beat Crowley: 
DHS Operates Border ‘Black Sites’ 
QUOTES FROM WIKIPEDIA: 
She worked as an organizer for Bernie Sanders in his 2016 presidential campaign.
Ocasio-Cortez is a democratic socialist who supports ending the privatization of prisons and enacting gun control policies. Ocasio-Cortez has criticized Israel‘s foreign policy, calling the killing of Palestinian protesters on the Gaza border on May 14, 2018, a “massacre”. She supports abolishing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and has said that ICE is running “black sites“.
Ocasio-Cortez campaigned on a platform of Medicare for all, a federal jobs guarantee, tuition-free public college, and the abolition of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. A member of Democratic Socialists of America, she was endorsed by MoveOn, Justice DemocratsBrand New CongressBlack Lives Matter, and Democracy for America. Two days before the primary election, she attended a protest at an ICE child detention center in Tornillo, Texas.
While a student at Boston University, she interned in the immigration office of U.S. Senator Ted Kennedy.
RECENT DEBATE BETWEEN A “PROGRESSIVE” LIBERAL AND A “RADICAL GLOBALIST/SOCIALIST”

Admitted Communist Wins New York Primary, 

Putting America On The Path To Complete Corporate Control

Alex Jones breaks down how Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a self described socialist, won a primary race in New York, proving that liberal America is headed toward complete communist control.

Socialist Queen of Queens & Bronx Beats 

Democrat Establishment

A socialist millennial community organizer whose sole experience is working in the Bernie Sanders campaign, beat the 4th ranking Democrat in the House. The surprise victor owes it all to Hillary. Here’s why….

NRATV:

Socialists Have A New Millennial Ringleader

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old Democrat from New York ousted a career politician and has her sights set on cementing socialism in American politics.
SUPPORTED BY RADICAL MUSLIM LINDA SARSOUR & BERNIE SANDERS

Radical Muslim Linda Sarsour of Bay Ridge, Brooklyn: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Is the 

Hope We Have Been Waiting For

https://democracynow.org – Tuesday was a big day for progressive Democrats. In New York, former Bernie Sanders organizer Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez defeated Rep. Joe Crowley. In Maryland, former NAACP chair Benjamin Jealous won the Democratic gubernatorial primary. We speak to Linda Sarsour of MPower Change about what the victories mean for the Democratic Party.

Democratic Socialist who upset NY Rep. Joe Crowley falsely claimed Israel committed “massacre” in Gaza

“THE SHACK” AUTHOR CLAIMS UNSAVED CAN STILL BE RECONCILED TO GOD AFTER DEATH: “I DON’T THINK DEATH IS OUR DAMNATION”~BUT HELL IS, FOR SURE

1 John 5:11-12 And this is the testimony: God has given us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. The one who has the Son has this eternal life; the one who does not have the Son of God does not have this eternal life.
Romans 6:23-For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO HAVE FAITH IN JESUS CHRIST & REPENT AFTER DEATH? THE BIBLE MAKES NO ALLOWANCE FOR SUCH. THE GRACE OF SALVATION IS A FREE GIFT WHILE WE ARE ALIVE ONLY
“THE SHACK” AUTHOR CLAIMS UNSAVED CAN STILL BE RECONCILED TO GOD AFTER DEATH: “I DON’T THINK DEATH IS OUR DAMNATION”~
BUT HELL IS, FOR SURE
BY HEATHER CLARK

William P. Young, the author of the best-selling novel “The Shack,” which was made into a major motion picture and decried by some as containing blasphemous and false doctrine, outlined in a recent interview that he believes people are still given chances to receive Christ’s sacrifice after death, remarking, “I don’t think the story is over just because you die.” An acquaintance of Young’s, who has long expressed concern about the popular author, says that he is saddened that some are so willing to accept such false teaching from Young.
Eternity News published an article about Young on Wednesday, sharing content of an interview that it conducted with the writer as it discussed his part in the new documentary “The Heart of Man,” as well as his beliefs about what the consequences are in this life and upon death if the prodigal son does not return to the Father.
“You’re putting a ‘[if you] don’t return’ as if death is the final arbiter,” Young replied.
Young, who also published a controversial book last year entitled “Lies We Believe About God,” said that he holds a different view than most, as he believes that when the Scriptures state that “neither death nor life … shall be able to separate us from the love of God,” it means all men, and not just Christians.
“[E]very time the New Testament talks about the issue of judgment, it talks about krisis—the Greek word for judgment—and it’s a crisis. You’re going to enter a crisis, and I don’t think the story is over; I don’t think death is our damnation,” Young claimed.
He stated that while he believes Jesus is both savior and judge, and that men receive the ramifications of their choices, they can still potentially change their mind as God continues to pursue them.
“I think that Jesus is both our salvation and rightful judge, but that judgment is intended for our good, not our harm,” Young said. “So, what does it mean? Well, you get to experience the losses of your choices, and that’s no fun. I mean it’s devastating.”
When asked if he meant only in this life or for eternity, he said that it depends on whether the person continues to hold to their choice after death.
“[The consequences are] potentially for eternity, if you keep holding on to it. But I don’t think the story is over just because you die,” Young stated. “I think there is an ongoing relational confrontation between the One who knows you best and loves you best. Potentially forever and, potentially, you could say ‘no’ forever. How someone could do that I don’t know, but definitely that tension is held in Scripture for sure.”

DeYoung

However, James B. DeYoung, author of “Burning Down the Shack: How the ‘Christian’ Bestseller is Deceiving Millions” and an acquaintance of Young, told Christian News Network that he has long known that Young espoused this belief and tried to warn Christians about it when “The Shack” novel and movie craze were taking place.
“He strongly asserted it first in a paper he delivered in 2004 to a Christian think tank that he and I started in 1997. Then, last year in his non-fiction book, ‘Lies We Believe about God’ (2017) he devoted a whole chapter (#21) to assert that death is not more powerful than God, that God can reach people after death and bring them to Himself,” DeYoung explained. “He rejects [the] evangelical belief that asserts that death is final.”
“Interestingly, most people don’t realize that the corollary to this teaching is the belief that Hell will eventually be emptied—that everyone there, including the devil and fallen angels, will repent. [That] the fires of Hell are corrective and restorative, and all will go out and enter Heaven,” he warned.
DeYoung said that this belief is not supported by Scripture, which teaches that judgment is final and none can cross from Hell into Heaven.
“Hebrews 9:27 [notes] this limited course of events: ‘It is appointed for people once to die, and after this comes judgment.’ Again, in Jesus’ parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16), the major declaration is that the separate location of the wicked and the righteous is unchangeable and fixed,” he outlined.
“Further, Jesus, at the end of his parable of the sheep and the goats (Matthew 25), speaks of ‘eternal torment’ for the wicked, and ‘eternal life’ for the righteous. These words assume clearly that destinies are fixed (since they are ‘eternal’),” DeYoung continued. “Finally, the rest of Jesus’ teaching about the afterlife assumes a fixed destiny; there is not even a hint that a destiny either way can be altered after death.”
DeYoung has written three books to counter Young’s teachings, including the aforementioned “Burning Down the Shack,” as well as “Lies Paul Young Believes About God” and “Exposing Universalism,” which also cites the beliefs of Brian McLaren and Rob Bell.
“For fourteen years I have been asserting that Paul Young advocates universal reconciliation (also known as universal salvation) in all his novels, including ‘Crossroads’ [2010] and ‘Eve’ [2015]) and the movie ‘The Shack.’ My views were generally rejected. Now the ‘genie is out of the bottle,’” he said.
DeYoung further noted that in Young’s “Lies We Believe About God” book, the 28 so-called lies cited include the beliefs that “sin separates people from God,” “you need to get saved,” “God is in control” and “the cross was God’s idea.”
“In light of his non-fiction book, I’m surprised that people are so uninformed regarding his stated beliefs; and I’m saddened that so many find no fault with them—beliefs that the Christian Church has labeled for almost two thousand years as heresy,” he lamented.

________________________________

THE SHACK AUTHOR PREACHES UNIVERSALISM 



(FridayChurch News Notes, June 29, 2018www.wayoflife.org,[email protected], 866-295-4143) – republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
William Paul Young, author of the popular and influential novel The Shack, said in a recent interview that those who die without faith in Jesus Christ will have further opportunities for salvation. He says, “Romans itself says that death can’t separate you from the love of God. … I don’t think death is our damnation. I think that Jesus is both our salvation and rightful judge but that judgment is intended for our good, not our harm” (“The Shack author on God the Father, sexual sin and the afterlife,”EternityNews.com, Australia, Jun. 20, 2018). Young is a false teacher who is saying what many people want to hear. He is one of those “heaps of teachers” described in the prophecy of 2 Timothy 4:3-4 who scratch the ears of those who want a kind of Christianity that allows them to live according to their lusts. William Young abuses and twists Scripture terribly, ignoring context which is the most fundamental rule of interpretation, and taking promises that refer to a believer in Jesus Christ and wrongly applying them to the unbeliever. Jesus Christ Himself left no doubt about the destiny of the unbeliever. “He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him” (John 3:36). Fundamentally, The Shack is about redefining God. Young has said that the book is for those with “a longing that God is as kind and loving as we wish he was” (interview with Sherman Hu, Dec. 4, 2007). He is referring to the desire on the part of the natural man for a God who loves “unconditionally,” does not require repentance, does not judge sin, and does not make men feel guilty for what they do. The Shack depicts a false god, yet it has been endorsed by Pat Robertson’s 700 Club, CCM artist Michael W. Smith, sports star Tim Tebow, Gayle Erwin of Calvary Chapel, James Ryle of the Vineyard churches, Gloria Gaither (who hosted a reading of The Shack as reported in the New York Times), Mark Lowry (former singer with the Gaithers), Eugene Peterson, author of The Message, Wade Burleson, pastor of Southern Baptist Emmanuel Baptist Church of Enid, Oklahoma, and many others. In October 2017, the Gospel Music Association’s Dove awards selected The Shack movie as the “inspiration film of the year.” William Young was one of the speakers at the February 2009 National Pastor’s Convention in San Diego, sponsored by Zondervan and InterVarsity Fellowship. “Evangelical” Christianity is well on its way to total apostasy. (For more about William Paul Young and The Shack, see “The Shack’s Cool God,” www.wayoflife.org/database/shackscoolgod.html)

GLOBALIST, SOCIALIST AIR BNB “PROFOUNDLY DISAPPOINTED” IN SUPREME COURT’S FAVORABLE DECISION ON TRUMP’S TRAVEL BAN~FAILS TO UNDERSTAND ITS NOT A MATTER OF DISCRIMINATION BUT RATHER NATIONAL SECURITY

Jun.26, 2018 — Chris Lehane, Airbnb head of global policy and communications, discusses the Supreme Court ruling on the travel ban and how it impacts Airbnb’s business. He speaks with Bloomberg’s Emily Chang on “Bloomberg Technology.”
DON’T LIKE TRUMP’S BORDER WALL EITHER

GLOBALIST, SOCIALIST AIR BNB 

“PROFOUNDLY DISAPPOINTED” 
IN SUPREME COURT’S FAVORABLE DECISION ON TRUMP’S TRAVEL BAN~
FAILS TO UNDERSTAND ITS NOT A MATTER OF DISCRIMINATION BUT RATHER 
NATIONAL SECURITY
PUBLIC RELEASE: republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
“The US Supreme Court decided to uphold the travel ban. We are profoundly disappointed by the Court’s decision. The travel ban is a policy that goes against our mission and values — to restrict travel based on a person’s nationality or religion is wrong. 

And while this news is a setback, we will continue the fight with organizations that are helping those impacted. Airbnb will be matching donations to the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) up to a total of $150,000 through September 30, 2018 to support their work advocating for systemic change and legal pathways for those affected by the travel ban. If you’d like to join us, you can donate here

We believe that travel is a transformative and powerful experience and that building bridges between cultures and communities creates a more innovative, collaborative and inspired world. At Airbnb, we are so grateful to our community who will continue to open doors around the world so that together, we can travel forward.”

Brian Chesky, Joe Gebbia and Nathan Blecharczyk



SUPREME COURT: MULTIPLE VICTORIES FOR CONSERVATIVES ON PREGNANCY CENTERS, FLORISTS & CAKE SHOPS FORCED TO VIOLATE THEIR CHRISTIAN CONSCIENCES & BELIEFS


President Donald Trump IMPORTANT Press Conference after VICTORY at the Supreme Court 
TRAVEL BAN REMAINS ON COUNTRIES WITH A HISTORY OF TERRORISM

Winning! Supreme Court Gives Trump His Full Immigration Ban!!!

Supreme Court Sides With Calif. Pregnancy Centers Challenging Law Requiring Provision of Info on Govt. Abortion Programs

BY HEATHER CLARK
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in a 5-4 decision that a California law requiring pro-life pregnancy centers to provide information to clients regarding how they can take part in government programs that would allow them to obtain an abortion at little or no cost “likely violates the First Amendment.”
The court ruled that the State of California has ample avenues to disseminate its desired message without having to force pro-life pregnancy centers to essentially advertise for abortion services against their convictions.
“California could inform low-income women about its services ‘without burdening a speaker with unwanted speech,’” wrote Justice Clarence Thomas on behalf of the majority. “Most obviously, it could inform the women itself with a public information campaign. California could even post the information on public property near crisis pregnancy centers.”
“California argues that it has already tried an advertising campaign, and that many women who are eligible for publicly-funded healthcare have not enrolled. But California has identified no evidence to that effect. And regardless, a ‘tepid response’ does not prove that an advertising campaign is not a sufficient alternative,” he said. “… [I]ndividuals might not have enrolled in California’s services because they do not want them, or because California spent insufficient resources on the advertising campaign.”
Thomas said that whatever the case may be, “California cannot co-opt the licensed facilities to deliver its message for it. ‘[T]he First Amendment does not permit the State to sacrifice speech for efficiency.’”
A separate concurring opinion written by Justice Anthony Kennedy condemned California’s Reproductive FACT Act requirements even more sternly.
“It does appear that viewpoint discrimination is inherent in the design and structure of this Act. This law is a paradigmatic example of the serious threat presented when government seeks to impose its own message in the place of individual speech, thought, and expression,” he wrote.
“For here the State requires primarily pro-life pregnancy centers to promote the State’s own preferred message advertising abortions. This compels individuals to contradict their most deeply held beliefs, beliefs grounded in basic philosophical, ethical, or religious precepts, or all of these,” Kennedy declared.
“… Governments must not be allowed to force persons to express a message contrary to their deepest convictions. Freedom of speech secures freedom of thought and belief. This law imperils those liberties.”
The court sent the case, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. Becerra, back to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s conclusion.
Read the ruling in full here. In addition to Thomas and Kennedy, Roberts, Alito and Gorsuch sided with the pregnancy centers. Justices Breyer, Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan comprised the dissent.
As previously reported, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the Reproductive FACT Act into law in Oct. 2015, a measure that was dubbed the “bully bill” by pro-life groups in the state. The bill was authored by Democratic Assemblyman David Chiu, who outlined in the measure that he takes issue with pregnancy centers that don’t provide abortion referrals to women.
“The author contends that, unfortunately, there are nearly 200 licensed and unlicensed clinics known as crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) in California whose goal is to interfere with women’s ability to be fully informed and exercise their reproductive rights, and that CPCs pose as full-service women’s health clinics, but aim to discourage and prevent women from seeking abortions,” it read.
The legislation therefore required that licensed pregnancy care centers provide the following message to clients in print, whether posted on the wall or distributed in a flyer: “California has public programs that provide immediate free or low-cost access to comprehensive family planning services (including all FDA-approved methods of contraception), prenatal care, and abortion, for eligible women. To determine whether you qualify, contact the county social services office at (telephone number).”
Violators could be fined $500 for the first offense and $1,000 for each infringement afterward.
Unlicensed pregnancy care centers were similarly required to post a notice advising that they have not been licensed by the State to provide medical services. As stated above, there are both licensed and unlicensed pro-life pregnancy centers in California, depending on what services are offered.
According to reports, NARAL Pro-Choice California was a major sponsor of the law, as it contended that pregnancy centers “mislead” mothers in trying to dissuade them from killing their unborn children. Abortion “rights” groups characterize pregnancy centers as “fake clinics,” although they provide free ultrasounds and pregnancy tests, and are often staffed with nurses and ultrasound techs, in addition to other volunteers.
“There has been an explosion of these fake health clinics that mislead women in ways that are very troubling and in some cases dangerous to their health,” claimed Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, to NPR. “If these fake medical centers had on their front doors, ‘We’re pro-life centers. We’re here to help you decide to continue your pregnancy,’ there’s nothing wrong with that, and that’s fine. But what they’re trying to do instead is lure women in on false pretenses.”
NIFLA disagrees that licensed locations cannot be considered clinics, nor do they believe that the facilities are being deceptive as they do not suggest that they perform abortion procedures. See the ruling out of Maryland surrounding Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc.
“Pregnancy centers that provide ultrasound services (and other medical services such as STI testing and treatment) under the supervision and direction of a licensed physician are, in fact, medical clinics and should be acknowledged as such,” NIFLA explained in an article on its website in 2013.
“… In addition to the medical director, they also utilize the services of RNs, physicians assistants, registered diagnostic medical sonographers (RDMS) and other licensed health care providers.”
Several faith-based pregnancy centers filed suit to challenge the Reproductive FACT Act following its passage, including the aforementioned National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, the Pregnancy Care Clinic and the Fallbrook Pregnancy Resource Center. However, both the federal district court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals declined to grant an injunction, finding that the requirement served a significant government interest.
“California has a substantial interest in the health of its citizens, including ensuring that its citizens have access to and adequate information about constitutionally-protected medical services like abortion,” wrote Judge Dorothy Nelson, appointed to the bench by then President Jimmy Carter, for the Ninth Circuit last October. Nelson identifies as an adherent to the Baha’i religion.
“And given that many of the choices facing pregnant women are time sensitive, such as a woman’s right to have an abortion before viability, we find convincing the AG’s argument that because the licensed notice is disseminated directly to patients whenever they enter a clinic, it is an effective means of informing women about publicly-funded pregnancy services,” she said.
The centers then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which agreed in November to hear the case. Numerous amicus briefs were filed in support of the pregnancy centers, including a coalition of 22 states, 41 family policy organizations, 23 legal scholars, and numerous pregnancy centers and pro-life groups nationwide.
“No one should be forced by the government to express a message that violates their convictions, especially on deeply divisive subjects such as abortion,” ADF President Michael Farris, who argued on behalf of NIFLA before the Supreme Court earlier this year, said in a statement on Tuesday. “In this case, the government used its power to force pro-life pregnancy centers to provide free advertising for abortion. The Supreme Court said that the government can’t do that, and that it must respect pro-life beliefs.”

______________________________________________________

US Supreme Court Asks Washington Supreme Court to Revisit Florist Judgment in Light of 

Masterpiece Cakeshop Ruling

BY HEATHER CLARK
WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court has asked the Washington State Supreme Court to revisit a ruling against a florist who was found guilty of discrimination for providing referrals to a regular customer who wanted her to furnish his same-sex ceremony, directing the court to review the matter in light of the high court’s Masterpiece Cakeshop decision, which found that hostility toward religion unfairly influenced the legal judgment.
The Washington Supreme Court will now need to examine whether or not Barronelle Stutzman of Arlene’s Flowers received a fair trial by the state courts. The U.S. Supreme Court had ruled earlier this month in the Masterpiece Cakeshop case that decision-makers must be neutral toward religion in contemplating whether or not a violation of the law was committed, not being prejudiced against it.
“As the record shows, some of the commissioners at the Commission’s formal, public hearings endorsed the view that religious beliefs cannot legitimately be carried into the public sphere or commercial domain, disparaged Phillips’ faith as despicable and characterized it as merely rhetorical, and compared his invocation of his sincerely held religious beliefs to defenses of slavery and the Holocaust,” wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy on behalf of the 7-2 majority on June 4.
“The Commission’s hostility was inconsistent with the First Amendment’s guarantee that our laws be applied in a manner that is neutral toward religion. Phillips was entitled to a neutral decision-maker who would give full and fair consideration to his religious objection as he sought to assert it in all of the circumstances in which this case was presented, considered, and decided,” he said.
The court did not reach, however, whether or not business owners may decline to fulfill orders surrounding same-sex events, but said, “The outcome of cases like this in other circumstances must await further elaboration in the courts, all in the context of recognizing that these disputes must be resolved with tolerance, without undue disrespect to sincere religious beliefs, and without subjecting gay persons to indignities when they seek goods and services in an open market.”
The ruling was therefore characterized as “narrow,” which confused some Americans who thought the outcome was a great victory, being 7-2. “Narrow” referred to the scope of the ruling—that the justices did not provide answers to a number of questions surrounding the matter—but only remarked that hostility toward religion can’t cloud legal decisions, and that the issue would have to play out more in the courts.
As previously reported, the Arlene’s Florist case began in 2012 when Washington Attorney General Bob Ferguson leveled Stutzman with a lawsuit as he claimed that she violated the law by not fulfilling an order for a same-sex event.
Stutzman had been approached by one of her faithful customers, Robert Ingersoll, a homosexual, as he wanted her to supply the floral arrangements for his upcoming ceremony with his partner, Curt Freed.
“We had gone to Arlene’s for many years and enjoyed her service. She did a great job for us, so it was just natural for us to go there to have her do our flowers,” Freed told KUOW radio.
Stutzman stated that she politely explained that she would not be able to help in regard to the event, but referred him to three other florists that could be of assistance.
“I just took his hands and said, ‘I’m sorry. I cannot do your wedding because of my relationship with Jesus Christ,’” Stutzman told reporters.
But after Ingersoll decided to post on Facebook about the matter, controversy arose on both sides of the issue—both for and against Stutzman. The florist said that she received a number of threatening and angry comments.
“It blew way out of proportion,” Stutzman explained. “I’ve had hate mail. I’ve had people that want to burn my building. I’ve had people that will never shop here again and [vow to] tell all their friends.”
Weeks later, Attorney General Bob Ferguson issued Stutzman a letter advising that she must accommodate homosexual ceremonies or be subject to a lawsuit and heavy fines. He included with his letter a form that offered Stutzman the opportunity to recant and agree to comply with the law. She refused, and was subsequently met with a discrimination suit.
But the Christian legal organization Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) contended that Ferguson’s actions were inappropriate since he never received a complaint, but rather filed on his own volition. It also filed a motion asking that Ferguson and the ACLU—which filed a separate suit—be prohibited from attacking Stutzman on a personal level.
In January 2015, Benton County Superior Court Judge Alex Eckstrom—while throwing out a charge that accused Stutzman of directing her business to violate the state’s anti-discrimination laws—ruled that the florist may be held personally responsible for the incident.
A month later, Eckstrom granted summary judgment to Stutzman’s opponents, agreeing that she had committed an act of discrimination. The court also ordered Stutzman to provide full service to same-sex ceremonies, which includes not only accepting the order, but also delivering to the homosexual celebration, and assisting with the specific arrangements and decoration on-site.
She appealed to the Washington Supreme Court, which unanimously upheld the lower court ruling in February 2017. Stutzman consequently appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
“The U.S. Supreme Court has rightfully asked the Washington Supreme Court to reconsider Barronelle’s case in light of the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision,” Kristen Waggoner with ADF remarked in a statement on Monday. “In that ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court denounced government hostility toward the religious beliefs about marriage held by creative professionals like Jack and Barronelle. The state of Washington, acting through its attorney general, has shown similar hostility here.”
“Barronelle, like Jack, serves all customers but declines to create custom art that expresses messages or celebrates events in conflict with her deeply held religious beliefs. The Washington attorney general’s efforts to punish her because he dislikes her beliefs about marriage are as impermissible as Colorado’s attempt to punish Jack,” she said.
Stutzman also reiterated both in a statement and in video form that Ingersoll was her friend, and she has served him many times—including on Valentine’s Day, Mother’s Day and for birthdays and anniversaries—and would serve him again.
“Rob was my customer and friend for over nine years,” she said. “I knew he was gay, and it was never an issue. I serve everyone. He enjoyed my custom floral designs, and I loved creating them for him. I would gladly serve Rob if he were to come back to my shop today. The attorney general has always ignored that part of my case, choosing to vilify me and my faith instead of respecting my religious beliefs about marriage.”

STARBUCKS EXPANDS BENEFITS TO COVER ALL TRANSGENDER SURGERIES~CLOSING 150 STORES, BUT ABLE TO PAY FOR PERVERSIONS


CLOSING 150 STORES, BUT ABLE TO PAY FOR PERVERSIONS

STARBUCKS EXPANDS BENEFITS TO COVER ALL TRANSGENDER SURGERIES

Previously only gender reassignment surgery covered

BY ADAN SALAZAR
SEE: https://www.infowars.com/starbucks-expands-benefits-to-cover-all-transgender-surgeries/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Coffee giant Starbucks has announced they will fully fund an employees’ gender transitions, from reassignment surgery to hair transplants and other cosmetic procedures.
On Monday, the company announced a change to its health benefits package which will now cover cosmetic surgeries for transgenders – that is men who feel like becoming women and vice versa.
“Starbucks health insurance plans include not only gender reassignment surgery (which had been covered since 2012), but now also a host of procedures for transgender partners that were previously considered cosmetic, and therefore not covered, such as breast reduction or augmentation surgery, facial feminization, hair transplants and more,” the company wrote in a news release.
Benefits Vice President Ron Crawford said it was “the right thing to do” because transgenders feel the procedures are essential.
“The approach was driven not just by the company’s desire to provide truly inclusive coverage, and by powerful conversations with transgender partners about how those benefits would allow them to truly be who they are,” Crawford said.
Additionally, the company will cover hair grafts and voice therapy, and “there is no lifetime cap for the services.”
News of the new benefits come as the company fights off allegations of racism after two black men were kicked out of one of their stores while waiting for a friend. After the incident, the company shuttered stores nationwide for employees to undergo “racial-bias education.”
Last week Starbucks also announced they are in the process of closing 150 stores in the U.S., a majority of which are located in blue states, due to poor sales.
No word yet on any additional benefits for cisgender employees.
BREAST AUGMENTATIONS/REDUCTIONS, FACIAL FEMINIZATION, HAIR REMOVAL, TRANSPLANTS INCLUDED

FACEBOOK PERMANENTLY BANS YOUNG ANTI-MIGRATION “IDENTITARIAN” MOVEMENT

FACEBOOK PERMANENTLY BANS YOUNG ANTI-MIGRATION “IDENTITARIAN” MOVEMENT 
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/06/facebook-permanently-bans-young-anti-migration-identitarian-movementrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The anti-mass migration Generation Identity movement has been banned permanently from Facebook…Facebook confirmed that the group had been permanently banned from the platform, “citing their policies against extremist content and organised hate groups.”
Over the last few years, Westerners have been conditioned to accept madness. Calling out human rights abuses and trying to save Western countries from becoming mirror images of Islamic states is not “extremist,” and does not constitute “hate.” The young “identitarian” movement has been expanding to defend against Islamization.
Across Europe from Ireland to Slovenia, groups of young people are mobilizing against migration. A growing “identitarian” movement, led by mostly smart and tech-savvy young men, is attracting attention in its efforts to “stop and reverse” the flow of migrants from the South.
It is difficult to argue against the mission of the identitarian movement as it is stated on their website:
Generation Identity (in some countries, ‘Identitarian Movement’) is a Europe-wide patriotic youth movement that promotes the values of homeland, freedom and tradition through peaceful activism, political education, and community & cultural activities. We want to create an awareness for a metapolitical patriotic value base
Yet elected globalist leaders who continue to betray their countries have allied themselves with Islamic supremacists, and are slowly dismantling the freedoms of their societies. Members of this alliance continue to lie about, condemn and smear anyone who stands against their socialist-left and Islamic supremacist agendas. The cornerstone of any free society is free speech, dialogue and debate, which Generation Identity also promotes:
We are a non-violent youth movement that highlights the need for open and honest public debate about immigration policies, identity and the future of our nations and of Europe.
While Facebook shuts down free expression and voices of reasoned concern about the Islamization of Western countries, it has been accused of sloppily and “inadvertently” helping thousands of jihadists “connect and recruit new members” through its suggested friends feature.
Over the last several weeks the group [Generation Identity] has seen page after page disappear from the social media giant’s platform with little or no explanation.
In May, Jihad Watch reported that the far-Left hate group Hope Not Hate was responsible for getting Generation Identity UK co-leader Tom Dupré fired from his banking job for his anti-Islamization views. Hope Not Hate tweeted out proudly that “far-right group Generation Identity – a movement which has a long history of racism and extreme anti-Muslim prejudice – have been BANNED from Facebook.”
“Censorship: Entire European Identitarian Movement Permanently Banned From Facebook”, by Chris Tomlinson, Breitbart, June 24, 2018:
The anti-mass migration Generation Identity movement has been banned permanently from Facebook, after all of their official pages were deleted due to “extremist content.”
Over the last several weeks the group has seen page after page disappear from the social media giant’s platform with little or no explanation, but a new report claims that Facebook has permanently banned the hipster-right identitarians, accusing them of posting “extremist content”.
According to the paper, Facebook confirmed that the group had been permanently banned from the platform, “citing their policies against extremist content and organised hate groups.”
The ban impacts all branches of the identitarian movement, including in Britain, Austria, Italy, Germany, Denmark, Hungary, and France, where the original Generation Identitaire group was founded.
The French wing of the movement put out a press release when censorship of their pages began earlier this year, saying: “By depriving Generation Identitaire of any representation on its platform, Facebook tries to gag a political movement that has accumulated hundreds of thousands of subscribers throughout Europe.”….

DEMOCRATS OPENLY CALLING FOR MOBS TO HARASS & ATTACK TRUMP SUPPORTERS~VIOLENCE NEXT?~REP. MAXINE WATERS CONFRONTED BY PRO TRUMP JOURNALIST; CALLS FOR HER RESIGNATION, CENSURE


DEMOCRATS OPENLY CALLING FOR MOBS TO HARASS & ATTACK TRUMP SUPPORTERS 
MSNBC talking head Rob Reiner was allowed more time to share his Trump derangement, bringing on his own wife and declaring that Trump is like Hitler, and all Trump supporters are ‘hardcore racists’.

Breaking! Leftists Surround Mitch McConnell’s Family, Confront His Wife

The War On Trump: From Confrontation 

to Harassment to Violence?

BY BOB ADELMANN
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/item/29388-the-war-on-trump-from-confrontation-to-harassment-to-violencerepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
After The New American reported on the harassment of White House spokeswoman Sarah Huckabee Sanders at the Red Hen in Lexington, Virginia, on Friday night, her father told talk show host Laura Ingraham what happened next:
Once Sarah and her family left … [they] just went home. They had sort of had enough. But the rest of the family went across the street to a different restaurant. The owner of the Red Hen … then followed them across the street, called people, and organized a protest, yelling and screaming at them from outside the other restaurant and creating this scene.
And then Huckabee added: “This is what the left has been reduced to. It’s really tragic. And it’s dangerous.”
Dangerous, indeed. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich weighed in on Twitter: “Nastiness reflects desperation, not strength. They can’t win the argument, so they use nastiness. Sad and dangerous.”
Black journalist Derrick Hollie, writing for The Daily Signal, took special umbrage at the escalation of the attacks: “To me, a black man who has lived in the South most of my life, this strategy sounds more like that of the segregationists than those of our civil rights heroes…. So the question must be asked of anyone: Where does this sort of rhetoric lead?”
Representative Maxine Waters, the revolutionary from California with ties to communists and socialists going back decades, provided part of the answer: “We’re going to win this battle!” For Maxine and others taking up the cudgel of outrage against President Trump and members of his administration, it’s a war that has just escalated beyond simple confrontation and harassment.
Remember that left-wing Bernie Sanders supporter James Hodgkinson took his marching orders seriously in June, 2017, by shooting and nearly killing Steve Scalise, the Republican House Majority Whip from Louisiana, along with three others participating in baseball practice. The previous month Hodgkinson wrote that “Trump is a Traitor. Trump has Destroyed Our Democracy. It’s Time to Destroy Trump & Co.”
And there’s the incident concerning Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, who was heckled and booed at a Mexican restaurant and then hassled by a mob outside her home three days later. And White House aide Steven Miller, who was called a “fascist” while dining out in D.C. And Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi who was driven from a movie theater.
There’s Robert De Niro’s obscenity, and Peter Fonda’s suggestion that Trump’s son Barron should be locked up with pedophiles, and so-called comedienne Kathy Griffin holding a representation of the president’s decapitated head.
How much worse is it likely to get? Hamilton Nolan, also a Sanders supporter and blogger at the left-wing SplinterNews.com, gave his answer:
Do you think that being asked to leave a restaurant, or having your meal interrupted, or being called [out] by the public is bad? My fascism-enabling friends, this is only the beginning…. This is going to get more extreme. And it should. We are living in extreme times…. The day will come, sooner than you all think, when Trump administration officials will look back fondly on the time when all they had to worry about was getting hollered at at a Mexican restaurant.
It’s a war and the Left has ordered its escalation.
__________________________________________

WATCH: MAXINE WATERS CONFRONTED – ‘WHERE ARE TRUMP SUPPORTERS ALLOWED?’

Rep refuses to answer questions regarding comments about harassing Trump supporters

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/watch-maxine-waters-confronted-where-are-trump-supporters-allowed/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Rep. Maxine Waters freaked out when pro-Trump investigative journalist Laura Loomer inquired about recent comments encouraging Democrats to confront Trump supporters.
Video of the incident appeared at BigLeaguePolitics.com:

Laura Loomer Confronts Maxine Waters

Play Video

Waters repeatedly refused to answer Loomer’s questions asking where Trump supporters can go without being harassed, as the two approach an elevator where other people block Loomer from entering.

Did @RepMaxineWaters stick her tongue out at @LauraLoomer 😳 Aside from looking creepy AF she was sticking her tongue out 😳 Has she lost her damn mind

“IT’S A MEMBERS ONLY ELEVATOR! MEMBERS HAVE TO VOTE!”

NO TRUMP SUPPORTERS ALLOWED IN MAXINE WATERS’S ELEVATOR!!!!!!

OKAY?!?

MUST WATCH VIDEO:

Today I confronted @RepMaxineWaters on Capitol Hill. She recently encouraged Leftists to harass @realDonaldTrump administration officials & supporters in public.

“Are we supposed to sit at the back of the bus?” @PressSec @bigleaguepol https://bigleaguepolitics.com/watch-laura-loomer-confronts-maxine-waters/ 

The California House rep has been at the center of controversy since Saturday, when she called on liberals to harass Trump administration officials in public after a restaurant refused to serve White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
“And so, let’s stay the course. Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up and if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” Waters ordered.
On Monday, President Trump blasted Waters for endangering his aides and supporters, calling her an “extraordinarily low IQ person.”

Congresswoman Maxine Waters, an extraordinarily low IQ person, has become, together with Nancy Pelosi, the Face of the Democrat Party. She has just called for harm to supporters, of which there are many, of the Make America Great Again movement. Be careful what you wish for Max!

________________________________

SEE ALSO: https://www.infowars.com/gop-lawmakers-demand-maxine-waters-resign-over-calls-to-harass-trump-officials/


Maxine Waters Is The Most Deranged Politician In History

Maxine Waters and the Dying 

Democratic Party!!!


______________________________________________________

SHOCK VIDEO! LEFTISTS CALL FOR TRUMP SUPPORTERS TO BE GUNNED DOWN IN RESTAURANTS

Deranged leftists crazed enough to want shooting war?

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/shock-video-leftists-call-for-trump-supporters-to-be-gunned-down-in-restaurants/republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The lunatic left it seems is getting dangerously more belligerent by the day.

Also watch Alex’s special report: Breaking: Enemy Armies Now Attacking The US / Trump Strikes Back With Rex 84

MEXICO, THE ENEMY SOUTH: NEXT MEXICAN PRESIDENT SAYS INVADING U.S. IS A “HUMAN RIGHT”~FOLLOWING THE ORDERS OF POPE FRANCIS

THE ENEMY SOUTH: NEXT MEXICAN PRESIDENT SAYS INVADING U.S. IS A “HUMAN RIGHT”
BY SELWYN DUKE
SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/north-america/item/29360-the-enemy-south-next-mexican-president-says-invading-us-is-a-human-rightrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
Should Mexico be declared an enemy nation? This question is more valid than ever now that our southern neighbor’s presumptive next president has declared that invading the United States — i.e., mass, uncontrolled migration — is a “human right.”
As the Daily Caller reported Friday:
Mexican presidential candidate Andrés Manuel López Obrador (AMLO) declared mass immigration to the United States a “human right” for all North Americans during a speech Tuesday.
“And soon, very soon — after the victory of our movement — we will defend all the migrants in the American continent and all the migrants in the world,” Obrador said, adding that immigrants “must leave their towns and find a life in the United States.”
He then declared migration “a human right we will defend,” eluniversal.com reports.
While the election is not until July 1, Obrador is by far the frontrunner.
While this may be the most brazen invasion-USA pronouncement by a Mexican politician to date, Mexico already has a track record of encouraging border jumping. As National Review wrote last March, “In December 2004, the Mexican government distributed 1.5 million copies of a pamphlet titled ‘Guide for the Mexican Migrant,’ unabashedly advising its citizens on ways to illegally migrate to the United States…. The literature went as far as recommending what type of clothes to wear when crossing a river, and explaining how to stay hydrated when crossing a desert.”
“Now, Mexico’s ministry of foreign affairs has published ‘Recommendations in Case of Immigration Detention,’ an infographic video advising illegal immigrants in the United States on ways to avoid deportation when approached by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents,” the magazine continued.
Of course, hypocritical Mexico doesn’t apply this open-borders standard to itself. Not only is its immigration law strict, but under the Mexican constitution, a naturalized citizen can never enjoy the full rights of citizenship — they’re reserved for the native-born.
Unfortunately, Obrador (shown) and the rest of America’s enemies, including our own immigrationists, are thus far winning this battle. Owing to the latest propaganda involving “separating families” (something most migrants do themselves when leaving their families to come here), a monkey wrench has been thrown into border enforcement. As Politico writes:
President Donald Trump may not admit it but, practically speaking, his administration’s “zero-tolerance” border strategy is dead.
Top officials at the Department of Homeland Security acknowledged that reality at a meeting Thursday afternoon, according to a former department official with knowledge of the meeting.
“It’s going to be ‘catch and release’ because they don’t have the detention beds for them,” the former official said.
That same message was delivered by Brandon Judd, president of a union for Border Patrol agents, who told CNN Thursday that the executive order Trump signed Wednesday requiring families caught at the border to be detained together simply left his agency no choice.
“We’re going to have to release them,” he said.
Chalk up another one for the swamp.
It’s said that Obrador has encouraged the invasion partially as a protest against the Trump administration, and in this border battle he has a distinct advantage: a fifth column within the United States comprising a whole major political party, part of another, big-money business interests, and a good percentage of the population.
These entities all have common cause. What’s Mexico’s motivation? Obrador has admitted that his nation’s economy is dependent on remittances sent to Mexico from the United States. And as Fox News pundit Tucker Carlson put it in segment last Thursday (video below), Mexico sends “their poorest people here because it’s cheaper than taking care of them there. America is now Mexico’s social safety net, and that’s a very good deal for the Mexican ruling class.” It’s also a good deal for our business class, which wants cheap labor. This is why the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is pro-migration and why the Republicans it donates to are wobbly on the issue.
Then there’s the big motivation: Since the 1965 immigration act took effect in ’68, 85 to 90 percent of our immigrants have come from the Third World and Asia, and 70 to 90 percent of them support Democrats upon being naturalized. Knowing this, the Democrats want to import as many future voters as possible as quickly as possible, by hook or by crook.
Add to this how a large segment of America has been brainwashed with diversity-über-alles dogma, and it’s a perfect storm of treasonous spirit: money over country, ideology over country, party over country.
Meanwhile, as Obrador preaches to us, his dysfunctional nation is coming apart at the seams. Eighteen mayoral candidates have been assassinated in the run-up to its July 1 elections, two alone in a recent 24-hour period. Despite this, in the past he has proposed pardoning those who likely murdered them, the drug cartels.
Of course, if we won’t even secure our borders — especially with what’s clearly an enemy nation — how much less dysfunctional are we?

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD LINKED & FORMER DNC CHAIR, REP. ELLISON, SAYS MUSLIMS MAY PREPARE PORK FOR HELL BOUND INFIDELS

http://www.yaf.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Screen-Shot-2018-01-04-at-10.35.43-AM.png
https://www.westernjournalism.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Keith_Ellison_Bernie_Sanders-1.jpg
https://static01.nyt.com/images/2008/06/24/us/24muslim1.650.jpg
MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD LINKED & FORMER DNC CHAIR, REP. ELLISON, SAYS MUSLIMS MAY PREPARE PORK FOR HELL BOUND INFIDELS 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/06/muslim-brotherhood-linked-rep-ellison-says-muslims-may-prepare-pork-for-hell-bound-infidelsrepublished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
The sharp dichotomy in Islam between believers and unbelievers, and the deeply ingrained lack of charity toward the latter, is seldom remarked upon in the establishment media, but it seems that Muslim Brotherhood-linked Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) recently let the mask slip.
“Muhammad is the apostle of Allah. Those who follow him are merciful to one another, ruthless to unbelievers” (Qur’an 48:29).
In 2008, Ellison accepted $13,350 from the Muslim American Society (MAS) to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca. The Muslim American Society is a Muslim Brotherhood organization: “In recent years, the U.S. Brotherhood operated under the name Muslim American Society, according to documents and interviews. One of the nation’s major Islamic groups, it was incorporated in Illinois in 1993 after a contentious debate among Brotherhood members.” That’s from the Chicago Tribune in 2004, in an article that is now carried on the Muslim Brotherhood’s English-language website, Ikhwanweb.
“Iowa GOP Rep. King says Ellison Helped him with Muslim Questions,” KSTP, June 22, 2018 (thanks to The Religion of Peace):
Republican Rep. Steve King says he asked Minnesota Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison — a Muslim — about Muslims working in Iowa pork processing plants.
In an interview posted Friday by Breitbart News radio, King says he didn’t know whether Muslims would handle pork, so he “talked with Keith Ellison about that, who would be the lead Muslim in Congress.”
King says he learned an imam would need to grant someone a “special dispensation.”
He adds that it would be OK because “as long as they’re preparing this pork for infidels, they’ll send them to hell and it must make Allah happy.”…

_____________________________________________________
SEE ALL OUR PREVIOUS POSTS ABOUT ELLISON:
https://ratherexposethem.blogspot.com/search?q=KEITH+ELLISON&max-results=20&by-date=true 
_______________________________________________
UPDATE:

Keith Ellison attacks Gorsuch after Supreme Court upholds Trump’s travel ban: 

He obeys his ‘paymasters’


REVOICE CONFERENCE BANS PRO-CHRISTIAN ACTIVIST FROM ATTENDING, REFUNDS REGISTRATION FEES


REVOICE CONFERENCE BANS PRO-CHRISTIAN ACTIVIST FROM ATTENDING, 
REFUNDS REGISTRATION FEES 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational and research purposes:
In case you’ve yet to hear, the Revoice Conference is an event designed to celebrate “Queer Culture” within the Christian Church, to “de-sin” Same Sex Attraction (SSA), and to move American evangelicals to abandon a traditional, historic and orthodox understanding of human sexuality. Although a conference like this is standard fare among mainline liberal denominations like the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA), the Presbyterian Church USA, or the United Methodist Church, embracing and celebrating celibate homosexuality is not typical among more conservative denominations like the Presbyterian Church of America (PCA) or the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC). The Revoice Conference, however, will be hosted by the PCA, is being promoted by Southern Baptists affiliated with the SBC entity, the ERLC (Matt Chandler, Karen Swallow Prior, and many more), is being organized by a Southern Baptist Theological Seminary graduate and former faculty member (Nate Collins) and is even being promoted by a Master’s Seminary graduate (Preston Sprinkle). The conference is seen as a bellwether   for the direction of conservative evangelicalism, or at least the remnant of it that still exists. Members of the Evangelical Intelligentsia who aren’t promoting the conference explicitly are (laughably) claiming they’re unaware of it (as Russell Moore claimed at the annual meeting of the SBC, even though his ERLC research fellows are helping to promote the conference, and its infamy has been reported widely in the media). As Revoice is aiming to make the evangelical church more inclusive to the LGBTQXYZLMNOP lobby, its organizer, Nate Collins, has rejected the registration of conservative Christian advocate, Peter LaBarbera, excluding him from the event.
LaBarbera is the founder of Americans for the Truth About Homosexuality (AFTAH). AFTAH was founded in 2006 and educates the public regarding homosexuality and argues that homosexuality is not inborn or innate, but a decision made by the homosexual and is in part created by the environment rather than genetic variables. LaBarbera was once the editor for the highly esteemed Family Research Council (FRC), and has a long track record of social conservatism, particularly on the issue of human sexuality. Prior to serving the FRC, LaBarbera was a reporter for the Washington Times. He first came to wide acclaim for his 1994 video, The Gay Agenda, which was promoted by the Christian Coalition. That documentary is seen in the eyes of many as being nearly prophetic in its accuracy of the homosexual goals and their fulfillment in America. LaBarbera has promoted traditional marriage and the Sanctity of Life in both the United States and Canada and is a well-known opponent of the normalization of sodomy as a valid lifestyle choice or identity group.
LaBarbera tweeted out that Nate Collins, the former SBTS faculty member and Revoice organizer, contacted him to return his registration fees and inform him he could not attend. The following is from his Twitter feed
It is certainly odd that Revoice is actively researching its attendees – even from publicly available information. This seems to be of the same neighborhood of odd behavior that led to ERLC employee, Brent Leatherwood, to make a false report against a media member at the SBC annual convention and having him forcibly removed from the convention hall for doing nothing but asking Russell Moore a question about the upcoming Queer Culture-celebrating Revoice Conference. Like with The Gospel Coalition’s meeting that excluded all white women, inclusion seems to be only a one-way street for leftists and progressives.
The message of Revoice seems clear…conservatives need not attend.
It’s exceedingly odd that a conference that is ostensibly designed to increase dialogue and understanding would shut out someone with an opposing point-of-view.
[Editor’s Note: LaBarbera has not returned a request for comment sent to his Twitter account, by the time of publication]
________________________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
1 2 3 6