CALIFORNIA COUPLE ARRESTED AFTER TEEN DAUGHTER ESCAPES TO REPORT 12 SIBLINGS BEING HELD CAPTIVE, SOME CHAINED~HOMESCHOOLING BLAMED BY LIBERALS

 https://heavyeditorial.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/turpin11-e1516057149845.jpg?quality=65&strip=all&w=549
CALIFORNIA COUPLE ARRESTED AFTER TEEN DAUGHTER ESCAPES TO REPORT 12 SIBLINGS BEING HELD CAPTIVE, SOME CHAINED 
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 PERRIS, Calif. — A California couple has been arrested and is being held on 
$9 million dollars bail each after their 17-year old daughter was able to escape 
their home and call 911 to report that she and her 12 siblings were being held 
captive, some being bound with chains.

David Turpin, 57, and Louise Turpin, 49, are now facing nine counts
of torture and 10 counts of child endangerment after police came to the
home and found the situation just as the girl had described.
“Further investigation revealed several children shackled to their
beds with chains and padlocks in dark and foul-smelling surroundings,
but the parents were unable to immediately provide a logical reason why
their children were restrained in that manner,” the Riverside County
Sheriff’s Department reported on Monday night.
It explained that officers thought all of the siblings were children
due to their size and condition from malnourishment, but were shocked
to learn that seven of them were actually adults, ages 18 to 29.

Capt. Greg Fellows said that the 17-year-old who called 911 from a
deactivated cell phone after escaping through a window looked like a
10-year-old.
“If you can imagine being 17 years old and appearing to be a
10-year-old, being chained to a bed, malnourished and the injuries
associated with that,” he remarked during a press conference on Tuesday.
“I would call that torture.”
All 13 siblings were interviewed and transported to Corona Regional Medical Center, where they were examined and fed.

“It’s hard to think of them as adults when you first see them because
they’re small, and it’s clear they’re malnutritioned,” CEO Mark
Uffer agreed during a press conference on Tuesday.
Dr. Sophia Grant, who runs the child abuse unit for the hospital
system, said that it is more than just food that the children require.
“The long-term needs of these kids are going to be the psychological
and psychiatric needs due to the prolonged starvation and maltreatment,”
she outlined.
The Turpins’ Facebook page was last utilized in 2016, when they
posted photographs of their children at a ceremony where the couple
renewed their vows. The children were dressed in matching outfits and
appeared to be happy—smiling and jumping up and down. It has not yet
been reported as to how long the children were mistreated by their
parents.
“I can’t get into the specific details of the conversation, but it
seemed that the mother was perplexed as to why we were at that
residence,” Fellows said.
ABC News reached out to the parents of David Turpin, James and Betty
Turpin of Virginia, who explained that they hadn’t seen the children in
several years. They outlined that the Turpins homeschooled their
children, who memorized passages from the Bible. The family did not
attend a church.
Neighbors told reporters that if any of the children were seen
outside, they appeared to be skinny and pale, and were non-social.
Kimberly Milligan said that she complimented three of the children once
as she saw them outside setting up a nativity scene, but they “froze”
and did not respond.
“They still did not say a word,” Milligan told the Washington Post.
“They were like children whose only defense was to be invisible.”
 ______________________________________________________

 Parents charged in torture allegedly held 13 siblings ‘captive’
 David Allen Turpin, 57, and Louise Anna Turpin, 49, were charged with
torture and child endangerment in Perris, California, officials said.
  Turpins renew their vows at Elvis chapel 
on 30th anniversary
 
Homeschooling Blamed For 13 Kids Held Captive
 Bizarre, strange, unprecedented — but it didn’t take long for the media
to blame homeschooling for abuse of 13 children at the hands of their
parents.

POLICE STATE OF NEW JERSEY: DEMOCRATS INTRODUCE BILL TO BAN YOUR CURRENTLY OWNED RIFLES, ETC., AS “ASSAULT WEAPONS”

  http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-obJtaA3EXM8/T75BFqRcy3I/AAAAAAAAAlA/lQhLatli-Fk/s1600/GunControlWorks+%281%29.jpg
 https://i.pinimg.com/736x/19/d8/00/19d8001bb10dfccb157480a7984315ae--gun-rights-gun-control.jpg
POLICE STATE
NEW JERSEY DEMOCRATS INTRODUCE BILL TO BAN YOUR CURRENTLY OWNED RIFLES, ETC., AS “ASSAULT WEAPONS” 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

New Jersey –(Ammoland.com)-
With the take over of the New Jersey Governors office by rabid gun
banning Democrat, Phil Murphy, the first attack on NJ gun owners rights
and property, of what will be many, has been launched.  The proposed
bill would ban most all the rifles and shotguns you currently own and
legally bought under the current NJ laws.

Sponsored by state senator Senator Nia H. Gill this bill would “strengthen” the State’s current assault weapons ban by revising the definition of an “assault weapon
to include: rifles with detachable magazines and one military style
feature; semi-automatic shotguns with one military style feature; and
semi-automatic pistols with one military style feature.

You can read the bill here:
The
current definition of an assault weapon sets forth a list of prohibited
firearms and specifically includes any firearm that is “substantially
identical” to any of the enumerated firearms. Under State regulations, a
semi-automatic firearm is to be considered substantially identical to
an enumerated firearm if it meets certain criteria. This bill codifies
these regulations while expanding the number of firearms that would be
considered assault weapons by adding criteria and reducing the number of
criteria that must be met from two to one. For example, under current
regulations, a semi-automatic rifle that has the ability to accept a
detachable magazine and has at least two listed criteria would be
considered an assault weapon.
These criteria include:

  • a folding telescoping stock,
  • a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon;
  • a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor;
  • and a grenade launcher.

Under
the bill, additional criteria are added including a thumbhole stock and
a second handgrip or a protruding grip that can be held by the
non-trigger hand. The bill also requires that only one criteria be met,
rather than the currently required two.
Now is the time to start calling. Ask them for a no vote once in committee. Law and public safety committee members.

  • Senator
    Linda R. Greenstein (D) (Assistant Majority Leader) DISTRICT OFFICE
    ADDRESS: 1249 South River Rd. Suite 105 Cranbury, NJ 08512 PHONE NUMBER:
    (609) 395-9911 FAX NUMBER: (609) 395-9032
  • Senator Patrick J.
    Diegnan Jr. (D) DISTRICT OFFICE ADDRESS: 908 Oak Tree Ave. Unit P South
    Plainfield, NJ 07080 PHONE NUMBER: (908) 757-1677
  • Senator
    Christopher “Kip” Bateman (R) DISTRICT OFFICE ADDRESS: 36 East Main St.
    Somerville, NJ 08876 PHONE NUMBER: (908) 526-3600
  • Senator Joseph
    P. Cryan (D) DISTRICT OFFICE ADDRESSES: 985 Stuyvesant Ave. Union, NJ
    07083 1120 East Jersey St. Elizabeth, NJ 07201 PHONE NUMBERS: (908)
    624-0880 (Union) (908) 327-9119 (Elizabeth)
  • Senator Declan J.
    O’Scanlon Jr. (R) DISTRICT OFFICE ADDRESS: (Temporary) 32 Monmouth St.
    3rd Floor Red Bank, NJ 07701 PHONE NUMBER: (732) 933-1591
  • Senator Nicholas J. Sacco (D) DISTRICT OFFICE ADDRESS: 9060 Palisade Ave. North Bergen, NJ 07047 PHONE NUMBER: (201) 295-0200

New Jersey Oath KeepersNew Jersey Oath KeepersAbout New Jersey Oath Keepers
NJ
Oath Keepers is a Constitution Education Outreach, Public Safety, Civil
Rights and Anti-Terrorist Group that is composed of Current and former
Military Members, Police, Reservists, Sheriffs Officers, Firefighters,
First Responders and concerned citizens that have sworn an oath to
defend and uphold the Constitution of the United States. www.njoathkeepers.org

“THE MORE OF US CHOOSE TO STAY SILENT, THE MORE DANGEROUS IT BECOMES FOR THE FEW WHO CONTINUE SPEAKING OUT”

“THE MORE OF US CHOOSE TO STAY SILENT, 
THE MORE DANGEROUS IT BECOMES FOR 
THE FEW WHO CONTINUE SPEAKING OUT”
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Gathered in Copenhagen “for a conference of terror attack
 survivors, artists and journalists vowed to continue fighting for free 
speech, despite a wave of violence targeting critical voices.”
Last January, one of Charlie Hebdo’s most outspoken journalists quit her job because “it has gone soft on Islamist extremism. Zineb El Rhazoui accused the weekly of bowing to Islamist extremists and no longer daring to draw the Prophet Mohammed.” Then she was threatened by Islamic State supporters  who called for her murder by “lone wolves.”

Now the 35-year-old El Rhazoui remains a staunch human rights
campaigner and warns that the more Westerners are silenced, the more
dangerous it becomes for those who speak out. She is right, but it will
not stop there. Jihadists will continue to expand their activities until
no one can escape them. Sharia requires that every infidel submit and
bow to it.
Westerners are losing freedoms, slowly slipping into the shadows of
dhimmitude. Already, Islamic supremacists have managed to force their
values upon infidels through their “Islamophobia” drives.
All religions
can be criticized, but not Islam; human beings can be violated and
murdered in accordance with Islamic religious edicts, while infidels
must “shut up for the good of diversity.”

Western politicians and leaders are also running scared,
surrendering the banner of freedoms and hard-earned Judeo-Christian
principles to Islamic supremacists.

“The Terror Attack Survivors Who Refuse To Be Silenced”, Agence France-Presse, January 14, 2018:

COPENHAGEN: Gathered in the Danish capital for a
conference of terror attack survivors, artists and journalists vowed to
continue fighting for free speech, despite a wave of violence targeting
critical voices.

“We are all targeted, indiscriminately, and the more of us choose to
stay silent, the more dangerous it becomes for the few who continue
speaking out, like me,” said Zineb El Rhazoui, a 35-year-old journalist
from French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo.

She was on holiday on January 7, 2015, when jihadists broke into the
Paris offices of the magazine, massacring 12 people in an attack that
shook France and the world.

The assault sparked mass protests and a wave of solidarity, with
people across the world adopting the slogan “Je suis Charlie” (I am
Charlie).

“The more of us speak out, defend our freedom and refuse to give up
on our liberties, the less the danger will be … focused on certain
people,” El Rhazoui told AFP on the sidelines of a conference hosted by
the Danish parliament on Saturday.

Her commitment to her beliefs has not come without a cost; everywhere she goes, she is accompanied by security guards.

Swedish cartoonist Lars Vilks, who in 2007 sparked controversy with
his drawings of Muslim Prophet Mohammad, said nothing would change if he
stopped working.

“If you stop, the things going on will not stop,” Vilks said.

He has also been the target of several attempted assaults, the latest
in Copenhagen in February 2015, during a conference dubbed “Art,
blasphemy and freedom”.

‘That was it’

Like El Rhazoui, Vilks leads a complicated life. Under constant
surveillance, he must coordinate with his security guards in order to
plan his day.

“If I have forgotten to buy some milk, I cannot actually go out and
buy the milk, and I cannot in practice call the bodyguards and say ‘I
want to buy some milk’,” he said.

“As a film … you have to plan your days in a certain way,” the 71-year-old added.

But after surviving an attack, some people choose to move away from activism.

Patrick Piscot was just 18 years old when he survived the July 2011
bomb and gun massacre by Norwegian neo-Nazi Anders Behring Breivik that
left 77 people dead.

Breivik was sentenced in 2012 to 21 years behind bars.

“If you survive something I believe that it is your responsibility to
get over it in your own way, you have the key to how you want to change
your life,” said Piscot, who decided to ended his political activism
soon after the attack.

“I continued to participate in AUF (the Workers’ Youth League in
Norway) for three weeks or months after the massacre, but that was it…..

RAYMOND IBRAHIM ON ISLAMIC “DHIMMITUDE”: WHY PROFESSING CHRIST IS BECOMING A “HATE CRIME” IN THE WEST

RAYMOND IBRAHIM: WHY PROFESSING CHRIST IS BECOMING A “HATE CRIME” IN THE WEST
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

What is the source of dhimmitude — which in many ways paralyzes responses to Islam — in the West?

First a definition: “dhimmitude,” which was coined by the late
Christian president of Lebanon, Bashir Gemayel, and popularized by
writer Bat Ye’or, is a neologism based on the Arabic word, dhimmi
that is, a non-Muslim (generally a Christian or Jew) who falls under
Islamic rule and, as a price for maintaining his religion, accepts an
inferior social standing. Simply put, the dhimmi must know his or her
place and never rock the boat, including by seeking equal rights with
Muslims.

While this is the classic and original manifestation of dhimmitude, a
new and unprecedented form has arisen in the West: in the Muslim world,
where might naturally makes right, Muslim majorities impose an
inferior status onto non-Muslim minorities; but in the West, it is the
West itself — or at least homegrown elements — that in certain fields
impose an inferior status on a non-Muslim majority.

The question becomes, Why? Why would a stronger civilization impose
the unjust and supremacist stipulations of a weaker, hostile
civilization, onto itself, and thereby paralyze itself against that same
hostile civilization?

The answer is evident in the words of an ancient strategy: “The enemy
of my enemy is my friend.” The Western elements that are forever
protecting and empowering Islam, and which operate under various names —
“Liberals,” “Leftists,” “Marxists,” “Progressives,” “Social Justice
Warriors,” etc. — ultimately care little about Islam; rather, Islam is
for them a tool to combat their real and much closer enemy: Christianity, and the mores and civilization borne of it and culminating in the West.

This is evident everywhere and in a myriad of forms. Most recently,
the British government “refused to say whether telling people about the
Christian faith could be a hate crime.”
Lord Pearson of Rannoch, a UKIP
peer, asked the House of Lords if they would “confirm unequivocally
that a Christian who says that Jesus is the only son of the one true God
cannot be arrested for hate crime or any other offence, however much it
may offend a Muslim or anyone of any other religion?” Government
spokesperson Baroness Vere of Norbiton responded by equivocating, saying
that the legal definition of “hate crime” has been the same for the
past 10 years.

But as Pearson explained in a later interview, the current definition
of “hate crime” is subjective and revolves around whether the “victim”
feels offended — thus leaving the door wide open to charging those who
proclaim Christ and the Trinity of committing a hate crime, especially
vis-à-vis Muslims, who adamantly object to the claim, as Pearson himself
acknowledged: “Certainly the stricter Muslims do feel offended by
Christianity and our belief in Jesus being the only Son of the one true
God.”

Pearson also pointed to a double standard in how “hate crimes” are
applied: “You can say what you like about the Virgin Birth, the miracles
and the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, but as soon as you say ‘come on,
is Islam really the religion of peace that it claims to be,’ all hell
breaks loose.”

Indeed, and there is a reason for that: unlike Islam — which many
Western elite feel no (direct) connection to and thus no threat
therefrom — Christianity is the faith of their forefathers; it is ever
present in their societies, judging them — and they hate it for it. But
rather than seek to suppress it openly, they operate indirectly,
including by propping up always angry and easily “offended” Muslims
against it, while they play the role of “impartial” secularist or
progressive — people who will make themselves (meaning others, notably
Christians) walk on eggshells lest the “feelings” of the “other” are
hurt.

From here one understands why liberals and progressives who forever
whine against any vestige of traditional (“oppressive”) Christianity
habitually make common cause with Islam — despite the latter’s truly
oppressive qualities. Feminists denounce the Christian “patriarchy” —
but say little against the Muslim treatment of women as chattel;
homosexuals denounce Christian bakeries — but say little against the
Muslim execution of homosexuals; multiculturalists denounce Christians
who refuse to suppress their faith, including by banning Christmas
phrases and images, to accommodate the religious sensibilities of Muslim
minorities — but say little against the entrenched and open Muslim
persecution of Christians.

From here one understands the ultimate reason why domineering Western
elements are imposing the unjust and stifling effects of dhimmitude on
and thus making the West weak and vulnerable:  “The enemy [Islam] of my
enemy [Christianity] is my friend.” As this most recent example from the
UK shows, Muslims are now even being used to make the central claim of
Christianity — which the progressive elite especially despise hearing as
it convicts their godless lifestyle — a “hate crime.”

AUSTRIAN JIHAD BRINGS FORCED SUBMISSION: MUSLIM MIGRANTS, INCLUDING BEARDED “12 YEAR OLD”, SEXUALLY ASSAULT 13 YEAR OLD GIRL AT ICE RINK

AUSTRIAN JIHAD BRINGS FORCED SUBMISSION: MUSLIM MIGRANTS, INCLUDING BEARDED 
“12 YEAR OLD”, SEXUALLY ASSAULT 
13 YEAR OLD GIRL AT ICE RINK
BY ROBERT SPENCER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The Qur’an teaches that Infidel women can be lawfully taken for
sexual use (cf. its allowance for a man to take “captives of the right
hand,” 4:3, 4:24, 23:1-6, 33:50, 70:30). The Qur’an says: “O Prophet,
tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to
bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more
suitable that they will be known and not be abused. And ever is Allah
Forgiving and Merciful.” (33:59) The implication there is that if women
do not cover themselves adequately with their outer garments, they may
be abused, and that such abuse would be justified.


Meanwhile, the bearded twelve-year-old adds an additional
grotesquerie to a story that is already full of them. Western
authorities have been outrageously credulous in accepting the age claims
of refugees who are not refugees, claiming to be boys when they are
men. It seems as if even the slightest skepticism would have been
“Islamophobic.” And so now we have bearded Muslim preteens preying on
Infidel girls in Austria. Our diversity is our strength!

“Linz ice disco: 13-year-old sexually assaulted by four Afghans!,”
translated from “Linzer Eisdisco: 13-Jährige von vier Afghanen sexuell
attackiert!,” Wochenblick, January 8, 2018:

Last Saturday, as every year, the ice disco took place in
the Linz Donaupark ice rink. A 13-year-old Austrian was sexually
assaulted by four migrants and is now in shock.

As the “Wochenblick” learned directly from police circles, the perpetrators are four Afghan asylum seekers.

They rushed to the helpless girl and groped her in the genital area.
More details about the act are still unclear, but still follow.

After the sex attack, the completely distraught girl turned to the security staff, who immediately alerted the police.

The officials were able to quickly locate the Afghan perpetrators, they have all been arrested.

However, as already known in advance, the main culprit is apparently only 12 years old – but already wears a beard!

If it turns out that his age is true, the Afghan would be liable for punishment.

A courageous security worker who apparently belongs to the staff of
the ice rink, however, launched a Facebook call. He also encourages
other girls to contact the police in case of such attacks!…

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WITHHOLDS $65 MILLION FROM “PALESTINIANS”

TRUMP ADMINISTRATION WITHHOLDS 
$65 MILLION FROM “PALESTINIANS”
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Bravo. Money is fungible. This is $65 million that the “Palestinians” won’t have to give to jihad terrorists.

“Haley wanted a complete cutoff in U.S. money until the Palestinians
resumed peace talks with Israel that have been frozen for years. But
Tillerson, Mattis and others argued that ending all assistance would
exacerbate instability in the Mideast, notably in Jordan…”


Haley is right. Everything we do to oppose the jihad will “exacerbate
instability in the Mideast.” This veiled threat has guided U.S. policy
in the region for far too long. Essentially it amounts to bowing to
violent intimidation, which only encourages more violent intimidation.

“US withholds $65 million from Palestinian aid programs,” by Matthew Lee, Associated Press, January 16, 2018:

WASHINGTON — The Trump administration on Tuesday cut tens
of millions of dollars in money for Palestinian refugees, demanding
that the U.N. agency responsible for the programs undertake a
“fundamental re-examination,” the State Department said.

In a letter, the State Department notified the U.N. Relief and Works
Agency that the U.S. is withholding $65 million of a planned $125
million funding installment to the body. The letter also makes clear
that additional U.S. donations will be contingent on major changes by
UNRWA, which has been heavily criticized by Israel.

“We would like to see some reforms be made,” said State Department
spokeswoman Heather Nauert, adding that changes are needed both to the
way the agency operates and is funded. “This is not aimed at punishing
anyone.”

The State Department said it was releasing the rest of the
installment — $60 million — to prevent the agency from running out of
cash by the end of the month and closing down.

The U.S. is UNWRA’s largest donor, supplying nearly 30 percent of its
budget. The agency focuses on providing health care, education and
social services to Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Jordan,
Syria and Lebanon.

Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians either fled or were forced from
their homes during the war that led to Israel’s establishment in 1948.
Today, there are an estimated 5 million refugees and their descendants,
mostly scattered across the region.

The U.S. donated $355 million to UNWRA in 2016 and was set to make a
similar contribution in this year; the first installment was to have
sent this month. But after a highly critical Jan. 2 tweet from Trump on
aid to the Palestinians, the State Department opted to wait for a formal
policy decision before sending its first installment.

Trump’s tweet expressed frustration over the lack of progress in his
attempts to broker peace between Israel and the Palestinians, and he
pointed the finger at the Palestinians. “We pay the Palestinians
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS a year and get no appreciation or
respect,” he said. “But with the Palestinians no longer willing to talk
peace, why should we make any of these massive future payments to them?”

Israelis accuse the U.N. agency of contributing to Palestinian
militancy and allowing its facilities to be used by militants. They also
complain that some of UNRWA’s staff are biased against Israel….

The U.S. plan to withhold some, but not all, of the money was backed
by Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and Defense Secretary James Mattis,
who offered it as a compromise to demands for more drastic measures by
U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, officials said.

Haley wanted a complete cutoff in U.S. money until the Palestinians
resumed peace talks with Israel that have been frozen for years. But
Tillerson, Mattis and others argued that ending all assistance would
exacerbate instability in the Mideast, notably in Jordan, a host to
hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees and a crucial U.S.
strategic partner….

HIDDEN CAMERAS CAPTURE HUNDREDS OF TWITTER EMPLOYEES SPYING ON EVERYTHING WE DO~CHINA & OTHER FOREIGN COUNTRIES PRESSURE TWITTER TO BAN “CERTAIN PEOPLE”

HIDDEN CAMERAS CAPTURE HUNDREDS 
OF TWITTER EMPLOYEES SPYING ON EVERYTHING WE DO
 Twitter employees routinely read sex messages of users
BY PROJECT VERITAS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Project Veritas has released undercover footage of Twitter
Engineers and employees admitting that Twitter employees view all of
your private messages on their servers and analyze it to create a
“virtual profile” of you which they sell to advertisers.

The footage features four current Twitter software engineers–Conrado
Miranda, Clay Haynes, Pranay Singh, and Mihai Alexandru Florea.

Haynes, who was featured in part one of
the Twitter exposé, admitted in a January 6, 2018 meeting that Twitter
has hired hundreds employees with the express purpose of looking at
these “d*ck pics,” stating:
“There’s teams dedicated to it. I mean, we’re talking, we’re
talking three or four… at least, three or four hundred people… Yes,
they’re paid to look at d*ck pics.”

Haynes continues to elaborate that even he himself has seen these “d*ck pics”

“I’ve seen way more penises than I’ve ever wanted to see in my life.”

“That’s, yeah… You know, actually… This sounds horrible, but I’m actually glad and fortunate it’s just dicks, it’s just blow job pictures, it’s just that type of stuff.”

Pranay Singh, a Direct Messaging Engineer for Twitter
corroborated Haynes claims in a meeting with a Project Veritas
journalist on January 5, 2018:

“Everything you send is stored on my server… So all your sex messages and you, like, d*ck pics are on my server now…”

“All your illegitimate wives and, like, all the girls you’ve
been f*cking around with, they’re are on my server now… I’m going to
send it to your wife, she’s going use it in your divorce.”


“So, what happens is like, you like, write something or post
pictures on line, they never go away… Because even after you send them,
people are like analyzing them, to see what you are interested in, to
see what you are talking about. And they sell that data.”


According to Twitter software expert Mihai Florea, “To actually
charge the advertisers the money we have to prove it was you, and that’s
why using email address, or like a cookie or something that can track
you.” Florea continues, saying, “You’re paying for the right to use our
website with your data basically.”

Even those without Twitter accounts have their data stored in
their databases, according to Conrado Miranda: “You leak way more
information than you think. Like, we have information from people–Like,
if you go to Twitter for the first time, we have information about you.”

When asked how to protect people if that power fell into the wrong hands, Miranda responded “You don’t… There is no way.”

Clay Haynes also expressed his discomfort for Twitter’s policy in a December 29, 2017 meeting:

“It is a creepy Big Brother. It’s like a level… I don’t want to say it freaks me out, but it disturbs me.”

When Haynes was asked if this type of private information could leak from Twitter, he had this to say:

“Oh yeah, and it’s a genie out of the bottle kind of thing
after that point. You know? Sure, I can fire them. Heck, I could
probably even sue them, in some cases. But, the genie’s already out of
the bottle. Like, how do actually recoup costs… you can’t calculate the
cost or the damage of that.”


“Twitter is aggressively harvesting your personal information and
tracking your every movement, selling your virtual dossier to the
highest bidder ” says Project Veritas Founder James O’Keefe. “Even more
alarming is that these Twitter employees don’t seem to think that they
are the ‘biggest brother’ out there… We have more to come – stay tuned.”

Mr. O’Keefe has just completed a book about
this series entitled “AMERICAN PRAVDA: My fight for Truth in the Era of
Fake News.” The book will be released by St. Martin’s Press on January
16, 2018.

 
James O’Keefe’s Hidden Cameras Capture Hundreds Of Twitter Employees Spying On Everything We Do
  
BREAKING: Twitter Bans Political Dissidents 
for Foreign Governments;
“We Do That a Lot for China”
 Another Project Veritas undercover investigation has revealed a former
Twitter software engineer admitting that Twitter acts under the whims
and pressures of foreign governments–notably China–by silencing and
banning users at their request.

In an undercover Project Veritas journalist asks Miranda if foreign
governments pressure Twitter to ban certain people in their countries.
Miranda initially tells the PV journalist that he “cannot disclose that
information.”

Another Project Veritas journalist met with Miranda on January 1, 2018.
In this meeting, Miranda opened up and admitted that Twitter does in
fact ban people at the whims of foreign governments. He also reveals
some of the pressures that China in particular puts on Twitter if they
do not comply.

DELAWARE PARENT ALERT!: CHILDREN’S GENDER INDENTITY BILL “SB 65” PUTS GOVERNMENT BETWEEN YOU & YOUR CHILD AGAIN!

DELAWARE PARENT ALERT!: CHILDREN’S GENDER INDENTITY BILL “SB 65” PUTS GOVERNMENT BETWEEN YOU & YOUR CHILD AGAIN!
 
Final Vote Could be This Week!  
 Regulation
225 allows your child to be taught that his gender and race is whatever
he thinks and feels it should be AND that being transgender is normal.

Senate Bill 65 (SB 65) is a proposed law in Delaware that says if your child develops confusion about his/her identity, the ONLY licensed professional counseling your child can get is that which promotes a homosexual or transgender identity and helps him or her transition to the opposite gender (lines 117-119). 

Once again, the state is stepping in between parents, their child, and a qualified licensed therapist to say “WE KNOW BEST.” 

There’s more.

If a teen has sexual feelings towards a pre-pubescent child of the same
sex (pedopheliac feelings), SB 65 would prohibit a therapist from
working with the teen to reduce or eliminate those feelings (line 116).

ANY discussion (even a conversation) between a licensed professional and
your child that affirms your child’s biological reality and helps him
or her align with his or her faith and moral beliefs WILL BE BANNED (line 114).

ANY licensed professional who helps a minor child in this way or refers a
family for help outside of the state would have their professional
license revoked (line 139).

As many as 98% of gender confused boys and 88% of gender confused girls eventually accept their biological sex after naturally passing through puberty

Instead of supporting a child’s biological sex through natural puberty, the only help the State of Delaware will allow is sending a gender-confused child down the path of chemical castration with puberty blockers followed
by adding cross-sex hormones, which permanently sterilizes them and
puts them at risk for heart disease, strokes, diabetes, and cancers and leads to minors making the decision to amputate healthy body parts (lines 83-93, 117-119).

This is ABUSE, not support!

The language of this bill and its sponsors make PARENTS and licensed professional therapists out to be abusers, THE ENEMY! 

Parents, have you had enough of activist legislators forcing this radical gender ideology on your family?

PUSH BACK – take 2 minutes right now to email and ask your Representative to VOTE NO on SB 65, and forward this email to at least 10 others who you know will also take action.

Ask Your Representative to VOTE NO on SB65!

The legislature is back in session as of
last week, and the House could vote on SB 65 at any time. If it passes
the House, it will become law. Take a minute right now to send your Representative an email opposing SB 65.

Stand Firm,

Nicole Theis
President, Delaware Family Policy Council
(Eph 6:13)

P.S. SB 65 has already passed the State Senate (see how your Senator voted).
It has since then been voted out of the House Hearing Committee, so SB
65 can be called up for a vote at any moment. If it gets enough “yes”
votes in the House, it becomes law. Make sure ask your Representative to vote NO on SB 65!

Additional Resources: 

___________________________________________________

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
 DELAWARE SHORT
REPRIEVE: PARENTS MOBILIZE TO HALT GOVERNOR’S RULE 225 ALLOWING K-12
CHILDREN TO “SELF-IDENTIFY” GENDER & RACE
AND:
 DELAWARE: PROPOSED GOVERNOR’S REGULATION 225 ALLOWS CHILDREN TO SELF-IDENTIFY GENDER & RACE WITHOUT PARENTAL CONSENT

BIOLA UNIVERSITY: GOING, GOING, GONE AS PRESIDENT TAKES SABBATICAL AT CATHOLIC CONTEMPLATIVE MONASTERY

http://www.glastonburyabbey.org/images/phocagallery/abbeysign.jpg
  Our Lady of Glastonbury Abbey is a community of Benedictine monks who
live in Hingham, Massachusetts. They follow the Rule of Saint Benedict,
dedicating themselves to a life of prayer, service and hospitality.
All are welcome to enjoy the monastery grounds and join the monks in
daily Mass and prayer services. Glastonbury celebrates its 60th
anniversary in 2014. For more info, www.GlastonbutyAbbey.org.
SEE:
EXCERPT:
 A few
minutes after five o’clock, the bells began to ring from the abbey’s
chapel, reminding us that it was time for the afternoon vespers.
Acapella in that simple space, we sang psalms with words like, “Hear the
voice of my pleading as I call for help, as I lift up my hands in a
prayer to your holy place.” With the monks, I began to sing words sung
for thousands of years by the people of God. After the benediction, the
Benedictines headed for supper and I followed. The evening meal was
silent, save for the opening prayer and the memories read of monks long
gone.”
 https://i.ytimg.com/vi/RlfdFQx-9Jk/maxresdefault.jpg
BIOLA UNIVERSITY: GOING, GOING, GONE 
AS PRESIDENT TAKES SABBATICAL 
AT CATHOLIC CONTEMPLATIVE MONASTERY 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

For many years, Lighthouse Trails has written about the slide that
Biola University in Southern California has taken into contemplative
spirituality. Our first indication that the school was heading that way
was in February of 2006 when we learned that Biola was actively participating in a publication called Conversations Journal,
a magazine whose primary purpose is to bring contemplative
spirituality to the church, and editorial involvement includes names
such as Richard Foster, Basil Pennington (a Catholic mystic), Tilden
Edwards (co-founder of the panentheistic Shalem Institute), and others
of the contemplative viewpoint. Since then, we have watched as Biola
has gotten whole-heartedly on the contemplative band wagon with its
own Institute for Spiritual Formation through Biola’s Talbot School of Theology.

Fast forward nearly twelve years to the
fall of 2017 when the longstanding president of Biola, Dr. Barry
Corey, took a month-long sabbatical leave starting with a week at the Glastonbury Abbey in Massachusetts
(a Benedictine monastery) then wrote about his time of contemplative
silence at the Abbey for the students of Biola in an article titled “The Abbey Makes Space for the Soul” in the school’s student-run newspaper Chimes.

Of course, it makes sense to us that the
president of a strongly contemplative university would spend time in
silence at a Catholic mystical retreat center. We have been explaining
for many years now that contemplative prayer came to the evangelical
church from the Catholic monasteries (e.g. Thomas Merton at
the Abbey of Gethsemani in Kentucky). So naturally, a contemplative
proponent such as Corey would be drawn to a Catholic contemplative
retreat center. It’s like going back to the roots of what has become
the foundation of Biola’s “faith.” And with the president himself
boasting of his time at the Glastonbury Abbey, no doubt, many students
will wish to follow suit. Most of them probably won’t have the money
to take a week off and fly across the country to Massachusetts
(college students are generally strapped for funds – Biola’s yearly
tuition runs over $40,000 a year). But with President Corey’s glowing
report of his time at Glastonbury, students can at least order a few
books from Glastonbury’s online bookstore.

Here are some titles Biola students might purchase from the Glastonbury bookstore: Becoming the Presence of God (Contemplative Ministry for Everyone) by Michael Ford, Finding Our Sacred Center by Henri Nouwen, Divine Dance: The Trinity and Your Transformation by Richard Rohr, Christ in All Things: Exploring Spirituality with Pierre Teilhard De Chardin, Guidelines for Mystical Prayer, What the Mystics Know: Seven Pathways to Your Deeper Self
by Rohr, and a multitude of other similar books. The majority of the
books in Glastonbury’s bookstore radiates with the contemplative message
that God is in everyone. For those who are new to
understanding contemplative spirituality, THAT is the foundation of
contemplative prayer (i.e., Spiritual Formation)
– God in everyone, which of course, if was true, then Christ died for
us in vain as man would not need a Savior separate from himself. This
is why we have given our lives up to warn the church about the
infiltration of this panentheistic spirituality that now affects over
90% of the Christian colleges, universities, and seminaries. If
contemplative spirituality (as promoted at Biola) is legitimate, then
the Gospel is not needed, and those of us who believe in it are the
worst of fools.


Some reading this may be thinking, well,
just because Dr. Corey visited a contemplative monastery doesn’t mean
that Biola itself is promoting or teaching contemplative prayer. On
that matter, we could give one example after the next (see links to
some of our former research below). But let’s look at just a few
recent things from Biola’s website:


First, in Biola’s Journal of Spiritual Formation & Soul Care,
in the Fall 2017 issue is an abstract from an article titled
“Evangelical Spiritual Disciplines: Practices for Knowing God” written
by Dr. Tom Schwanda (Associate Professor of Christian Formation &
Spirituality at Wheaton College). It reads:

Evangelicals are not known for their awareness of or appreciation for their own history. . . . “evangelicals . . . have never been introduced to the richness of their own spirituality. Many evangelicals, and more broadly Protestants, were unaware of spiritual disciplines until Richard Foster’s groundbreaking publication Celebration of Discipline first released in 1978. While Foster wrote as an evangelical he was recovering the classic spiritual disciplines
that have been shaped by 2,000 years of the Christian church. As
important as this was there is also both historical and practical value
for evangelicals to recognize the rich spiritual treasures within their stream of Christian spirituality. This article seeks to redress this weakness in one limited way by examining the origin of evangelical spiritual disciplines and their development over the past three centuries. (source; emphasis added)

What Dr. Schwanda means is that
evangelicals have been missing out on “classic spiritual disciplines”
(primarily contemplative prayer), that is until Richard Foster brought
them to us. He’s also saying that Christians don’t have to look for
these disciplines from other religions or belief systems because we
already have a heritage of Christian mysticism in our own backyard
(i.e., a long line of Catholic mystics). Ray Yungen tried to explain
this in his book, A Time of Departing. Read the section below, which should provide some insight:

In [Thomas] Merton’s efforts to become a
mystic, he found guidance from a Hindu swami, whom Merton referred to
as Dr. Bramachari. Bramachari played a pivotal role in Merton’s future
spiritual outlook. [Henri] Nouwen divulged this when he said:
“Thus he [Merton] was more impressed when
this Hindu monk pointed him to the Christian mystical tradition. . . .
It seems providential indeed that this Hindu monk relativized [sic]
Merton’s youthful curiosity for the East and made him sensitive to the
richness of Western mysticism.”
Why would a Hindu monk advocate the
Christian mystical tradition? The answer is simple: they are one in
the same. Even though the repetitive words used may differ (e.g.
Christian words: Abba, Father, etc. rather than Hindu words), the end
result is the same. And the Hindu monk knew this to be true.
Bramachari understood that Merton didn’t need to switch to Hinduism to
get the same enlightenment that he himself experienced through the
Hindu mystical tradition. In essence, Bramachari backed up what I am
trying to get across in A Time of Departing, that all the world’s
mystical traditions basically come from the same source and teach the
same precepts . . . and that source is not the God of the Old and New
Testaments. The biblical God is not interspiritual!
Evangelical Christianity is now being
invited, perhaps even catapulted, into seeing God with these new eyes
of contemplative prayer. And so the question must be asked, is Thomas
Merton’s silence, Henri Nouwen’s space, and Richard Foster’s
contemplative prayer the way in which we can know and be close to God?
Or is this actually a spiritual belief system that is contrary to the
true message that the Bible so absolutely defines—that there is only
one way to God and that is through His only begotten Son, Jesus
Christ, whose sacrifice on the Cross obtained our full salvation? ( A Time of Departing, 2nd ed., p. 199)

Second, to show that Biola is promoting contemplative spirituality, if you examine the editorial staff for the Journal of Spiritual Formation & Soul Care,
you will see numerous contemplative and/or emergent names (Ruth Haley
Barton, Klaus Issler, Kyle Strobel, Larry Crabb, Bruce Demarest to name
a few); there is no way that the Journal is not going to be promoting contemplative spirituality.
One more example, in Biola’s class SEED570
Introduction to Spiritual Formation, one of the textbooks being used
is Adele Ahlberg Calhoun’s book, Spiritual Disciplines Handbook. In a Lighthouse Trails review of this book, we quote Calhoun from her book where she states:

I would be remiss not to mention the spiritual tutors that I know only through books: Dorothy Bass, Eugene Peterson, Gerald May, M. Basil Pennington, Dallas Willard, Phyllis Tickle, Fredrick Buechner, Richard Foster, Henri Nouwen, Richard Rohr, Jonathan Edwards [not a contemplative], Francis de Sales, Teresa of Avila, John of the Cross, Ignatius Loyola, St. Benedict, Julian of Norwich
and many more. Their ideas, voices and examples have shaped my own
words and experience of the disciplines. (Acknowledgment’s page)

If you are not familiar with these names,
please take some time to study them. They are all mystical advocates.
Calhoun’s book does not belong in any school that calls itself
Christian. You can see on the Biola website
that Calhoun spoke at the school in 2013 as well. In our review of
Calhoun, we showed how she advocates the spirituality of Catholic
panentheists Thomas Keating and Basil Pennington.
If there is a Biola student reading this
article, we beseech you to weigh this matter out in light of
Scripture. Your president is pointing you to a spiritual outlook that
negates the Gospel of Jesus Christ. It is as New Age, panentheistic,
and universalistic as it gets. Henri Nouwen, whom you have most likely
heard about in some of your classes at Biola, said this statement
near the end of his life after spending years practicing contemplative
prayer:

Today I personally believe that while
Jesus came to open the door to God’s house, all human beings can walk
through that door, whether they know about Jesus or not. Today I see
it as my call to help every person claim his or her own way to
God.”—From Sabbatical Journey, Henri Nouwen’s last book, page 51, 1998 Hardcover Edition

Nouwen came to this conclusion after
immersing himself in the very same contemplative silence that
Glasonbury Abbey lives by. If the above statement by Nouwen were true,
then everyone (even Hitler) will be saved, and it really doesn’t
matter what belief a person holds to because every way, every path (be
it Buddhism, Hinduism, even atheism) will be a path to God.
Biola University has been introducing
students to the beliefs of Henri Nouwen, Thomas Merton, and many other
mystics for a long time. Forty thousand dollars a year is a lot of
money to pay for an education like that!

Note: Any Biola student, professor, or staff member who would be willing to read A Time of Departing,
the book we publish that explains contemplative spirituality, we will
be happy to send a free copy. Please just email us at
editors@lighthousetrails.com. Your name will be kept confidential.

Some of our other coverage on Biola University since 2006:
2017 – Biola University Brings in Emergent Speaker for Students, as Pathway to Apostasy Continues
2017 – Evangelical
Universities & Seminaries Offering Master of Arts in Spiritual
Formation – Going into the Deeper Waters of Contemplative Spirituality

2016 – Erwin
McManus, Moody, Liberty, Cedarville, and Biola Help Pave the
Emergent/Social Justice/Progressive Future with Barefoot Tribe

2016 – Mindfulness! Heard of It? What Does it Mean, and Where is it Showing Up in Christian Circles?
2014 – Letter to the Editor: Rick Warren, the Road to Rome, and More Trouble at Biola University
2013 – Biola Conference Welcomes Ruth Haley Barton as it Continues Heartily Down Contemplative Path
2008 – Lee Strobel’s Son – Founder of Contemplative Ministry – Biola Named as “Partner,” Lee Strobel as “Supporter”
2008 – Biola Magazine Managing Editor Admits Biola Promotes Contemplative Spirituality
2008 – Biola University Student Reports on Contemplative Chapel Services – Warns Parents to Avoid Biola
2006 – The Shape of Things to Come: Biola University Embraces Contemplative Spirituality
2006 – Biola University … and Emerging Spirituality

MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE’S ENROLLMENT PLUMMETS DUE TO LEADERSHIP’S MORAL FAILINGS & LIBERAL LEANINGS

 http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5215/5387791158_f7d8a50418_z.jpg
MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE’S ENROLLMENT PLUMMETS DUE TO LEADERSHIP’S MORAL FAILINGS & LIBERAL LEANINGS 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

LTRP Note: Lighthouse Trails has been reporting on
and challenging Moody Bible Institute for several years because they
have been progressively promoting and turning to contemplative
spirituality via Spiritual Formation programs. And yet, in our dealings
with them, they have always denied doing this. As we have pointed out
so many times, once a school begins going down that path, liberalism
(or what we call emergent) and a twisted view on the Gospel and the
Bible are the byproducts. Perhaps Moody leadership thought they would
increase enrollment by becoming trendy, culturally relevant, emerging,
contemplative, and liberal. They forgot one thing – God doesn’t bless
the mixing of truth and error – in fact, He judges it.

The following article was posted in November of 2017. On January 10th, the Broken Twig blog posted a new article titled Moody just accepted resignations of President Paul Nyquist, Provost Junias Venugopal & COO Steve Mogck.”
While replacing Moody’s leadership may solve some of their problems, if
the school doesn’t acknowledge their embracing of the contemplative
prayer movement, they will not climb out of this hole but will continue
falling further into it.

By The Broken Twig blog

“We’re in a storm.” That’s the reason President
Nyquist recently gave for a nearly 30 percent drop in enrollment at
Moody the past four years, which has caused the institute to close its
Spokane campus and cut more than 20 faculty in Chicago. Nyquist took no
responsibility for this dramatic drop in enrollment, which occurred
on his watch, but attributed it to a nationwide trend – a “college
bubble” that is bursting. He also pointed to a changing culture that
rejects Christ and His Word and fails to raise children interested in a
Bible education.

While it’s true that many have predicted that the
future pool of college applicants is shrinking, bursting a bubble that’s
prevailed for decades, it doesn’t explain Moody’s dramatic downturn
in such a short amount of time. In fact, total fall enrollment in
post-secondary institutions from 2013-2015 decreased only two percent nationwide. During that same time period, applications at Moody plummeted from 1,300 to 1,040 – a 20 percent drop!  . . .

Enrollment at Moody was steady until 2013 when it
began to plummet.  In September of that year, Moody changed its
longstanding policies regarding alcohol, smoking and gambling. In fact,
the policy position was so startling, even the New York Times wrote a piece documenting the change. Click here to continue reading.

Related Reading:

Erwin
McManus, Moody, Liberty, Cedarville, and Biola Help Pave the
Emergent/Social Justice/Progressive Future with Barefoot Tribe

Letter to the Editor: There is No Doubt That Moody Has Gone Contemplative – This Year’s Radio Programs Proves It.

Embracing Contemplative Shows Ill Effects at Moody Bible Institute in Ecumenical “Road to Rome” Event

Moody’s Pastors’ Conference Teaching Lectio Divina This Week – And Seven Years of Warning by Lighthouse Trails Go Unheeded 
_______________________________________________________

 What Would D. L. Moody Say Today to Moody Bible Institute About Mingling Truth and Error? 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

By Dwight L. Moody

I do not see how any Christian, most of all
a Christian minister, can go into these secret lodges with
unbelievers. They say they can have more influence for good, but I say
that they can have more influence for good by staying out of them and
reproving their evil deeds.

You can never reform anything by unequally
yoking yourself to ungodly men. True reformers separate themselves
from the world. But, some say to me, if you talk that way you will
drive all the members of secret societies out of your meetings and out
of your churches. But what if I did? Better men will take their
places. Give them the truth anyway, and if they would rather leave
their churches than their lodges, the sooner they get out of their
churches the better.

I would rather have ten members who are separated from the world than a thousand such members! Come out from the lodge.

Better one with God than a thousand without
Him! We must walk with God, and if only one or two go with us, it is
all right. Do not let down the standard to suit men who love their
secret lodges or have some darling sin they will not give up!
(source: https://www.thebereancall.org/content/dwight-l-moody-masonry).


THE SOCIAL GOSPEL OF MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.-INFLUENCED BY GANDHI’S HINDU, PASSIVE, NON RESISTANCE & COMMUNISM~HIS PERSONAL MORAL FAILURE

 “A BROADER DISTRIBUTION OF WEALTH” TO CURE POVERTY 
IS COMMUNISM
 https://i.pinimg.com/736x/69/e9/ba/69e9bae26cac2b531d6b02e740d7b20d.jpg
 http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-pFvhBoFeyJE/UhgBXWpWFdI/AAAAAAAAIos/DJlfwxkVC8s/s1600/king_cap.jpg
 https://bobbiblogger.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/capitalism.jpg
DOUBTS SINCE 1963 ABOUT KING 
AS A MODEL TO THE U.S. OF PATRIOTISM & MORALITY
MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.-
INFLUENCED BY GANDHI’S HINDU PASSIVE, 
NON RESISTANCE AND COMMUNISM~
HIS PERSONAL MORAL FAILURE ON TWO LEVELS
 False Prophet Martin Luther King Jr. Exposed! Full Documentary
 Martin Luther King, Jr., is a man that is universally praised as one of
the greatest heroes of the 20th century. Every year on the 3rd Monday in
January, a national holiday is celebrated in his honor. The truth is
that Martin Luther King, Jr., was a wicked false prophet, a sexual
pervert, and a communist tool. This film is not about race. God has made
all nations of the earth of one blood. This film will judge MLK, not by
the color of his skin, but by the content of his character.
HERETICAL BELIEFS MASKED BY 
“BAPTIST” PREACHER:
 INFLUENCE OF GANDHI ON “M.L.K.”:
 https://assets.rappler.com/612F469A6EA84F6BAE882D2B94A4B421/img/B652CE18426B45678EE3B0B2FEF3B677/gandhi-martin-luther-king-jr-20170218.jpg
ECUMENICAL, UNIVERSALIST, APOSTATE “SYNTHESIS” OF BELIEFS
 https://peopleint.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/martin-luther-king-on-mahatma-gandhi.png
Short film for use in a social studies classroom, including original
footage of Martin Luther King describing the influence that Gandhi had
on his philosophy of non-violence and its application within the Civil
Rights Movement.
  Robert E Lee or Martin Luther King
BY DAVID CLOUD
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
January 21, 1998
David Cloud, Way of Life Literature, P.O. Box 610368, Port Huron, MI 48061
866-295-4143,
fbns@wayoflife.org
INTRODUCTION BY BROTHER CLOUD

The
following is excerpted from an article by Carmeron L. Horne, a member
of Hillsdale Baptist Church, Tampa, Florida. As my readers know, I
rarely print anything dealing with politics or American government. One
reason is that many of our readers do not live in America. Another is
that I believe the root cause of a nation’s problems are spiritual, and
as a preacher I can do more to help my nation by focusing on things
related to strengthening churches than I can by addressing
political/social evils. The following article, though, so skillfully
exposes the lies promoted constantly by the mainstream humanistic media
and the public education system that I want to share it with our
readers. It is refreshing to hear some truth amidst the deceptive
revisionist history one hears on every side today.

As for Horne’s implication that the American Civil War was not
fought over slavery, I only agree in part. While slavery was not the
only issue over which the Civil War was fought, it was certainly one of
the issues and it was an important one. Other prominent issues in the
war were state’s rights and the power of the federal government, but had
there not been slavery, the Civil War would not have been fought.
Slavery was an ugly blight upon a great nation founded upon the concept
of human liberty, and it was a practice that was supported by many
professing Christians. Further, we cannot forget the wretched racism
that accompanied the practice of slavery. I refer to the idea that the
black man is less of a man or a different kind of a man than the white
man, and, in some cases, the idea that he was not a real man. The Ku
Klux Klan and many similar organizations and movements were a real
phenomenon that grew after the Civil War in the fertile soil of Southern
racism. I say this as a Southern boy who descends from a long line of
racists. As a high sheriff in Georgia, my great grandfather killed seven
black men (and repented of it before God before he died); many of my
relatives were members of the KKK; my grandmother’s pastor was the head
of a KKK chapter; my own father took up petitions to send the “black man
back to Africa where he belongs.” I refuse to ignore or whitewash this
aspect of the Civil War. To acknowledge that white racism is only one
type of racism that is alive and well in this fallen world and that
black racism and many other types of racism are just as real and just as
ugly, does not make white racism any less wrong. This is not to say
that all Southerners were racists or that every person who believes that
races should remain separate are racists; but the racial hatred that
produced a John Wilkes Booth was a hatred that was far reaching, and it
certainly played its role in the Civil War. And I denounce it in no
uncertain terms.

HAPPY ROBERT E. LEE’S BIRTHDAY
By Cameron L. Horne

Did
you know that a famous Confederate general was born on this date in
1807? Yes, you heard right – General Robert Edward Lee was born in
Stratford Virginia on January 19th, 1807!

While our media is
busy honoring a civil rights figure of dubious political, ethical, and
moral character, they are ignoring a truly great American hero!

For
those who still persist in thinking that the American war of 1861-1865
was a “civil” war fought over slavery and the preservation of the union,
General Lee stands as a shining example of the truth. Robert E. Lee was
an emancipationist who freed his own slaves long before the war began.
In fact, before the war he said that he would free every slave in the
South if it would prevent war. He knew however that it would not have.
For him, and every other Southern lady and gentleman it was not a civil
war, but a war for Southern independence!

Contrast him with
William T. Sherman, the general who marched through Atlanta leaving a
trail of civilian death and destruction, who wrote on July 10, 1860:
“Two such races [white and black] cannot live in harmony save as master
and slave.” I doubt you ever read that in your public school history
textbooks.

There is a great deal of American history that has remained buried and hidden from the awareness of the general public. …

Robert
E. Lee understood that anything granted by a government can be
withdrawn by that same government, but anything given to us by our
Creator cannot be taken by government because it precedes and supersedes
government. Please don’t forget that the purpose of our Constitution
was not to grant rights, but to identify and guarantee them. Lee and
many others in the South recognized that the Northern States were
violating the Constitution. …

General Lee did not want
secession, but when he realized that no other option was left, he said:
“I will still follow my native state with my sword, and if need be with
my life… These are my principles, and I must follow them.” When Lee
resigned his commission in the United States Army to join the
Confederacy, he said: “I cannot take up arms against my own state. A
union that can only be maintained by swords and bayonets … has no
charm for me.”

General Lee was a true role model; the likes of
which is rarely seen today. He was imbued with wisdom, high moral
character, an unfailing sense of duty, true manhood and a heroic
nobleness that inspired steadfast loyalty among the troops of the Army
of Northern Virginia. During the war, he ate what his troops ate, and
often slept on the cold ground even when a house and bed was available.
When his officers complained, he said: “Why should a general live better
than a soldier in the ranks?”

Even in defeat, his faith never
wavered. In a letter to his wife after the battle of Gettysburg, he
wrote: “I trust that a merciful God, our only hope and refuge, will not
desert us in this hour of need, and will deliver us by His almighty
hand, that the whole world may recognize His power and all hearts be
lifted up in adoration and praise of His unbounded loving-kindness. We
must, however, submit to His almighty will, whatever that may be.” Such
was the character and conviction of General Robert E. Lee.

Contrast
this man with the plastic icon that our society has chosen for January
19th. Today is the day that Congress has set aside as a national holiday
to celebrate the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. – a thoroughly
despicable hypocrite, a violent and immoral degenerate, a worthless
charlatan, and a Marxist.

Lest anyone attempt to level the
charge of RACISM against me, let me point out that the preceding
description contained no reference to race. That is because it wasn’t
his race that made him despicable, it was his behavior.

I also
did not include the title of “Dr.” because he plagiarized his way
through Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary.
This
documented and verifiable fact was revealed by none other than those who
were closest to him. David J. Garrow (a leftist academic who was
sympathetic to King) said that King’s wife, Coretta Scott King, who also
served as his secretary, was an accomplice in King’s repeated cheating.
The four senior editors of “The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr.” (an
official publication of the M.L. King Center for Nonviolent Social
Change Inc.) stated that King’s writings at both the university and the
seminary were: “Tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism.”
Most of King’s papers, speeches, and “sermons” were copied word for word
from the works of Dr. Jack Boozer, Edgar S. Brightman, and Paul
Tillich.

The good “Reverend” King was also a dedicated Marxist
and Communist.
King was intimately involved in several Communist front
groups including the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee
founded by Myles Horton and Don West: both members of the Communist
Party U.S.A. The agenda of many of these meetings was to plan tours of
the Southern states to initiate demonstrations and riots. 

 https://qph.ec.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-bfca19c2203bf904a23a6751b2d6a76b


King
went on to found the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC).
This organization was staffed and funded by other Communist individuals
and front groups. According to the FBI, many of Kings “nonviolent”
marches were in reality carefully crafted public image appearances that
were usually accompanied by the violent demonstrations of his followers.
The FBI also uncovered King’s habit of using SCLC money to hire
prostitutes to keep him entertained during the civil rights tours.
According to witnesses working in local hospitals, many of these
prostitutes would end up in the emergency room after being physically
abused by King.

J. Edgar Hoover tried to warn the President and
Congress by making all files available to them. The FBI files were also
made available to all the major electronic and print media. The rest is
history. A federal judge sealed the files until the year 2027, the
President and the media said nothing, and the charade continued.

The
last night Martin Luther King spent on earth was at the Lorraine Motel
in Memphis having sex with two prostitutes and physically beating a
third.

Retired FBI Assistant Director William C. Sullivan
describes himself as a liberal and said that he was initially “One
hundred percent for King…” until he learned the truth during the
investigation. After having “seen it all” during his 30 years with the
FBI, Sullivan said that King was one of only seven people he had ever
encountered who was such a total degenerate. 

__________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
 IT’S TIME TO STOP BEATIFYING MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.: JFK FILES EXPOSE LEADER 
AS SEXUAL PERVERT, MARXIST 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Anyone vaguely familiar with Martin Luther King, Jr. has known this for 
some time,  but the newly released JFK files expose MLK as a sexual 
pervert with actual documentation. It’s time for The Social Gospel 
Coalition, Russell Moore, and other evangelicals to stop beatifying this
 man as an evangelical leader to be admired. The Social Gospel Coalition
 has named its upcoming 2018 Cultural Marxism conference after the civil rights 
activist, in spite of the fact that King questioned the resurrection,
 doubted the Bible’s miracles, and held to what anyone might rightly 
call theological liberalism. Regardless of being strongly partnered with
 Communists and preaching the false gospel of Rauschenbuschism
the Evangelical Intelligentsia regularly invokes his name as a saint in that great 
cloud of witnesses.
 

President Donald Trump ordered the release of documents relating to
President John F. Kennedy from the National Archives, and those
documents contain a dossier on King. What they reveal, according to Fox News and
other sources, is that King had multiple extramarital affairs, likely
sired an out-of-wedlock child with his mistress, and had a penchant for
orgies. Please note that these have all been common knowledge about
King, but these documents provide hard evidence of the claims.
The Washington Examiner claims that a 20-page document details a
“two-day drunken sex orgy in Washington D.C.” attended by King, in which
he took part in the festivities. The primary source document may be
read here.
The document reveals that the orgy contained both heterosexual and
homosexual behavior (it’s long been known that King engaged in bi-sexual
behavior). Claims that this document is an attempt by J. Edgar Hoover
to slander King are entirely foolish, considering that this was an
internal report that was sealed from the public.

The document also details MLK’s communist sentiments, quoting a “Gus
Hall,” who was the General Secretary of CPUSA (the Communist Party), as
saying, “King is a whole-hearted Marxist who has studied it, believes in
it, and agrees with it, but because of his being a minister of
religion, does not dare to espouse it publicly.”

Furthermore, the document cites attendees at several of his events
who testify to “behind the scenes drinking, fornication, and
homosexuality that went on at the conference,” and provided testimony of
prostitutes being brought in for King and his associates. Along with
this the document also reveals that King was carrying on ongoing affairs
with at least three women, including a prominent folk singer. The
document states, “It is a fact that King not only regularly indulges in
adulterous acts but enjoys the abnormal by engaging in group sex
orgies.”
The lineup at MLK50 is like a roster for New Calvinism, including DA
Carson, Matt Chandler, and Russell Moore. Steve Gaines, the President of
the Southern Baptist Convention, seems to have been invited as the
token Arminian.


You can read the document for yourself here.

____________________________________________________
SEE HERESY OF “RAUSCHENBUSCHISM” (SOCIAL GOSPEL) HERE:
http://polemicsreport.com/2016/08/31/heresies-rauschenbuschism-social-gospel/ 
____________________________________________________
CONTINUING THE MYTH:

 President Trump Signs a Proclamation to Honor Dr.Martin Luther King, Jr Day Jan 12,2018
 OTHERS HAVE SEEN THROUGH THE PROPAGANDA:
 The Truth About Martin Luther King, Jr.
BY 
Stefan Molyneux

 

VATICAN JESUIT DECRIES “OBSESSION WITH BORDERS & NATIONAL SECURITY” AS A DETRIMENT TO REFUGEES’ “RIGHTS & DIGNITIES”~THE VATICAN’S MESSAGE TO THE U.S. ABOUT MIGRATION & REFUGEES

 CATHOLIC CHURCH TAKES AIM AT TRUMP:
VATICAN JESUIT DECRIES “OBSESSION 
WITH BORDERS & NATIONAL SECURITY” 
AS A DETRIMENT TO REFUGEES’ 
“RIGHTS & DIGNITIES”
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The Catholic Church, which makes millions of dollars annually on
refugee resettlement
, is now saying that those who oppose the Muslim
migrant influx are morally deficient. If you don’t want your land
invaded by tens or hundreds of thousands of people with vastly different
values, which they consider superior to yours, you are simply not a
good Christian.

Yet there is real cause for concern. Are Catholics to turn a blind eye to the fact that all of the jihadis
who murdered 130 people in Paris in November 2015 had just entered
Europe as refugees? Is it racism and xenophobia to recall that in
February 2015, the Islamic State boasted it would soon flood Europe with
as many as 500,000 refugees? Or that the Lebanese Education Minister said in September 2015 that there were 20,000 jihadis among the refugees in camps in his country?

Meanwhile, 80% of migrants
who have come to Europe claiming to be fleeing the war in Syria aren’t
really from Syria at all. So why are they claiming to be Syrian and
streaming into Europe, and now the U.S. as well? An Islamic State operative
gave the answer when he boasted in September 2015, shortly after the
migrant influx began, that among the flood of refugees, 4,000 Islamic
State jihadis had already entered Europe. He explained their purpose:
“It’s our dream that there should be a caliphate not only in Syria but
in all the world, and we will have it soon, inshallah.” These Muslims
were going to Europe in the service of that caliphate: “They are going
like refugees,” he said, but they were going with the plan of sowing
blood and mayhem on European streets. As he told this to journalists, he
smiled and said, “Just wait.”

On May 10, 2016, Patrick Calvar, the head of France’s DGSI internal intelligence agency, said that the Islamic State was using migrant routes through the Balkans to get jihadis into Europe.

“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)

“Vatican Official Decries ‘Obsession’ with National Security, Border Control,” by Thomas D. Williams, Breitbart, January 12, 2018:

A Vatican official has come out swinging in defense of
Pope Francis’ insistence on the topic of immigration, accusing the
Pope’s critics of being “obsessed” with national security and border
control.


Asked in an interview
with Italian media whether the Pope isn’t “obsessed” with the
immigration question, Jesuit Father Michael Czerny, undersecretary for
the Vatican’s office of Migrants and Refugees, responded that it isn’t
Pope Francis who is obsessive, but rather his critics.

Many would say that the modern “obsession with borders and national
security to the detriment of the rights and dignity of refugees and
refugees” is excessive, the priest declared. And for many others, “the
media predilection for sensational stories that feed xenophobia and
isolationism is also excessive,” he added.

For many people, “the way in which politicians create or exaggerate a
sense of crisis to obtain short-term advantages is decidedly
excessive,” he said.

Anybody who thinks the Pope’s focus on migrants is obsessive “should
give the current situation a thoughtful look,” Father Czerny said. If
anything is excessive, “it is the slowness with which the ‘developed’
world responds to such obvious and pressing needs,” many would say.

Citing the Secretary General of the United Nations, António Guterres,
the priest said that “the rise of nationalism and xenophobia must be
counted among the new dangers for global peace and stability.”

“Far from criticizing the Pope’s attention,” he said, “many good
people—and I think they are the overwhelming majority—are indeed deeply
grateful for his moral guidance and good example.”

“And I agree with him when he says: ‘Those who fuel fear towards
migrants, perhaps for political ends, instead of building peace, sow
violence, racial discrimination and xenophobia,’” he said.

The official added that true leaders “show that the common good can
and must be pursued and that there is no ‘common good’ based on fear,
defense and marginalization.”

The Vatican office for Migrants and Refugees working for “the
expansion of safe, legal channels for all migrants through the granting
of humanitarian visas” as well as promoting “programs of community
sponsorship” for migrants and refugees.

Last fall, the Vatican announced the roll-out of a two-year campaign called “Share the Journey” aimed at provoking a “shift in thinking” on immigration.

The campaign is being spearheaded by the global Catholic charities network Caritas Internationalis, and was launched as a response to Pope Francis’ frequent summons for a “culture of encounter.”

Our world “faces not a migration crisis, but a crisis of global solidarity,” Caritas
says on its website. “Be part of a worldwide campaign to reach out to
migrants, change perceptions, open hearts and minds, and strengthen the
bonds that unite us all.”….

______________________________________________________

THE VATICAN’S MESSAGE TO THE U.S. 
ABOUT MIGRATION & REFUGEES
EWTN (CATHOLIC NEWS): Fr. Michael Czerny S.J. (Jesuit), Undersecretary to the Section for Refugees and
Migrants, in the Vatican’s Department for the Promotion of Integral
Human Development joins Lauren Ashburn.
 Fr. Michael Czerny, SJ, on the Migrants 
and Refugees Section
 

OVER 200 MILLION CHRISTIANS WORLDWIDE FACING SEVERE PERSECUTION

OVER 200 MILLION CHRISTIANS WORLDWIDE FACING SEVERE PERSECUTION 
BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
  215 million Christians faced the most severe 
persecution in 2017, resulting in 3,066 deaths 
and 1,020 rapes mainly targeting women

While North Korea tops the list of the world’s worst persecuting
countries, in second place and occupying every place down to number 14
are majority-Muslim countries, with the single exception of Eritrea.


In order after North Korea: 2. Somalia 3. Afghanistan 4. Pakistan 5.
Sudan 6. Syria 7. Iraq 8. Iran 9. Yemen 10. Eritrea 11. Libya 12.
Nigeria 13. Maldives 14. Saudi Arabia.


The world has grown accustomed to this intolerable abuse against
Christians, and whenever the ubiquitous and systemic Islamic abuses of
Christians are pointed out, apologists are quick to divert attention
away by pointing out other abuses elsewhere.


“Study: Over 200 Million Christians Worldwide Facing Severe Persecution”, by Edwin Mora, Breitbart, January 11, 2018:

WASHINGTON, DC — North Korea stands at the top of a list
of 50 countries where at least 215 million Christians faced the most
severe persecution in 2017, resulting in 3,066 deaths and 1,020 rapes
mainly targeting women, revealed Open Doors, an organization that
monitors ill-treated Christians worldwide.
At the National Press Club on Wednesday, David Curry, the president
and CEO of Open Doors, unveiled the 2018 World Wide List (WWL) of the
top 50 “most dangerous” countries to worship Jesus. Referring to North
Korea, he declared:
Imagine in your mind a leader that thinks he’s god but acts like an
animal — devouring his own people with his teeth where people are forced
to worship at the statute of Kim Jung Un and bow down and lay flowers
at his feet as if he was a god.
Yet, [Kim] sets up controls mechanisms, neighborhood watches that
surround communities rewarding citizens for spying on each other giving
them more food if they find somebody who has a Bible and who purports to
a be a Christian and that makes Christians the number one enemy of the
state in North Korea and that’s why it is the number one on the world’s
watchlist.
Open Doors pointed out that thousands of Christians are facing death
worldwide for practicing their faith, particularly in North Korea.
According to the monitor group’s 2018 World Watch List (WWL), “215
million Christians experience high levels of persecution in the [50]
countries on the World Watch List,” with the majority of them in North
Korea, considered “the worst place for Christians” for 16 consecutive
years since 2002.
Open Doors reported:
The primary driver of persecution in North Korea is the state. For
three generations, everything in the country focused on idolizing the
leading [Kim Jung Un] family. Christians are seen as hostile elements in
society that have to be eradicated.
Due to the constant indoctrination permeating the whole country,
neighbors and even family members are highly watchful and report any
suspicious religious activity to the authorities…The situation for
Christians is vulnerable and precarious. They face persecution from
state authorities and their non-Christian family, friends and neighbors.
Pray for their protection.
There are many Christians languishing, starving, and enduring hard
labor in North Korea prisons for merely owning a Bible and having faith
in Jesus Christ.
Since the U.S.-led war that started in Afghanistan soon after
September 11, 2001, the United States has spent at least $877 billion on
the war-devastated country, including on the promotion of religious
freedoms.
Nevertheless, Afghanistan came in second place in the list of the top
50 worst countries in terms of persecution — where the cost of being a
Christian can quickly turn into a nightmare and the last breath one ever
takes.
During the 2017 reporting period covered by the latest World Watch
List, persecutors killed 3,066 Christians, kidnapped 1,252, raped 1,020,
and attacked 793 churches, noted Open Doors.
Of the top ten countries, eight are tormented by “Islamic
Oppression,” which mainly refers to hostility against Christians.
Eritrea and North Korea are the exceptions.
Meanwhile, persecution against Christians at the hands of “Hindu
extremists” in India is on the rise, resulting in deaths and rape of
Christian women.
“A shocking trend in the world watchlist I want to highlight for you
today is the increase in persecution of Christian women,” stated Curry.
“The data seems to prove that Christian women are the most vulnerable
population today with sexual harassment and rape and forced marriage
being prime tactics from extremists against the world against
Christians.”
Pakistan, India’s regional enemy, has accused Hindu extremists of
persecuting Christians and Muslims and forcing them to convert to their
religion….

Every day, Christian women reportedly face sexual harassment, rape,
and forced marriage, all common in India, which is ranked 11 on the
persecution list.
The justice for Christians in India is “poor,” determined Curry,
noting that 635 Jesus followers were held and detained in the nation
without trial last year alone, often called one of the largest
democracies in the world.
Of the 50 nations on the Open Doors World Watch list, at least two
Western Hemisphere countries made the cut joining the very few
predominantly Christian nations on the list — Latin America’s Mexico
(39th place) and Colombia (49th) where persecution is reportedly driven
by “organized crime and corruption.”
The monitor group identifies North Korea’s communist and
post-communist oppression as the primary source of persecution against
Christians, which make up a little over 1 percent (300,000) of the 25.4
million population…..

PAULA WHITE REPS. SCRUB WEB PAGE OF LANGUAGE URGING “FIRST FRUITS” OFFERING OF WAGES, “CONSEQUENCES” FOR NOT GIVING

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/7cVLpIcpkeo/hqdefault.jpg

 “Remember, I believe in sowing a month’s, week’s, or day’s pay. By
honoring God and obeying His Word IT SHIFTS SOMETHING SUPERNATURALLY!
It’s about doing YOUR VERY BEST! Honoring God with the principle of
First Fruits with your seed is all about Him- GOD IS WORTH IT! Let me
hear from you right away and make your “promise to come” a reality!”

 “When you don’t honor it, whether through ignorance or direct disobedience there are consequences.”

 

SEE OUR PREVIOUS POST:
PAULA WHITE REPS. SCRUB WEB PAGE OF LANGUAGE URGING “FIRST FRUITS” OFFERING OF WAGES, “CONSEQUENCES” FOR NOT GIVING
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 APOPKA, Fla. — Following media reports and public backlash over the matter, 
representatives for false teacher Paula White, who also serves as the chair of 
President Trump’s Evangelical Advisory Board, have scrubbed a page on White’s 
website of any mention that she had urged followers to give a “first fruits” 
offering of a day, week, or month’s wages—and that there are “consequences” 
for those who don’t give God their first fruits out of “ignorance or direct 
disobedience.”

As previously reported, Leonardo Blair of the Christian Post had first reported on White’s pitch, in which she declared via the web page (which includes a recorded video), “When we apply the Principle of First Fruits, we see that all firsts should be given to the Lord: the first of the day, week (Sabbath), month, and the first of our harvest—be it the wages for the first day, week, or the month.”
She asserted that “2018 is a year of life and deliverance from struggle [and] it begins right now with first fruits.” White noted that part of the Hebrew word for 18 means “alive” or “living.”
“We are demanding life to your purpose,” White declared. “And with obedience to this first fruits instruction, which is putting God first now, your purpose, your year, your prosperity, and your power will have life and be resurrected!”

She said that she personally gives one month’s wages every year, and noted that others “sow a month’s pay, a week’s pay, [or] a day’s pay,”—whatever is their best.
“Each January, I put God first and honor Him with the first of our substance by sowing a first fruits offering of one month’s pay. That is a big sacrifice, but it is a seed for the harvest I am believing for in the coming year,” White outlined.
“When you apply this, everything comes in divine alignment for His plan and promises for you. When you don’t honor it, whether through ignorance or direct disobedience, there are consequences,” she also warned.

White urged followers, both in the video and article, to click on a donate button to give their first fruits offering to her ministry. Depending on the amount donated, she offered a book, devotional and/or wall calendar, repeating several times that one should give God “their best.”
“Many people can do more! Remember, I believe in sowing a month’s, week’s, or day’s pay,” White reiterated. “By honoring God and obeying His Word it shifts something supernaturally! It’s about doing your very best! Honoring God with the principle of first fruits with your seed is all about Him—God is worth it! Let me hear from you right away and make your ‘promise to come’ a reality!”

Original paragraph on White’s website, since deleted. Click to enlarge.However, following media reports about the matter, as of Jan. 9, any language referencing a “day, week or month’s” wages or “consequences” or “demanding life to your purpose”—or any of the above quotes, with the exception of the book/devotional/calendar offer and references to giving your best—was absent from the web page. An edited version remains, which still asks followers via a donate button to “give your first fruits offering today.” The link leads to a donation page, which likewise discusses first fruits.
Christian News Network utilized the Wayback Machine to compare both versions of the web page. Click here for the original post by White and/or her staff and here for the edited post.
A spokesperson for White also claimed to the Christian Post in a statement that White’s remarks weren’t reported in their “full context” in Blair’s article and that White was only referring to herself giving of a month’s wages—and that she wasn’t suggesting that her followers must donate a month’s salary to her ministry or suffer the consequences.
“Pastor Paula White’s comments were originally reported out of their full context. She was actually speaking of her personal, longtime commitment to ‘put God first at the beginning of a new year,’ and as part of that commitment she has often donated her entire January salary to charity in gratitude to God for His blessings,” the statement said.
“She encouraged others to also be generous, but she does not—and did not—suggest that other people must donate a month’s salary to her or her church or face divine punishment,” the spokesperson added. “Charity is at the heart of Christianity as it is at the heart of every religious tradition in the world, and anyone who has listened to White’s teaching within its proper context should come to this conclusion as well.”
Text still remains in White’s video uploaded to YouTube, which reads in all capital letters, “Bring God the whole of the first — 1st day — 1st week — 1st month’s wages!” Below the urging reads, “Honor God with your first fruits offering — Click the donate button!” (as seen above in main photo)
“I want you to click on that button, and I want you to honor God with His first fruits offering,” White also states in the video.
As previously reported, White considers herself a life coach, authoring books such as “The Ten Commandments of Health and Wellness,” “Simple Suggestions for a Sensational Life,” “I Don’t Get Wholeness, That’s the Problem—Making Relationships Work” and “He Loves Me, He Loves Me Not.”
She has been married three times. Her first marriage was to Dean Knight, who she married as a teenager. The two have a son together, named Bradley. In 2007, White divorced her second husband, Randy White, and in 2015, she married Journey rocker Jonathan Cain, who has likewise been married three times.

 
 

UNDER DAN BOONE, TREVECCA NAZARENE UNIVERSITY COMPROMISES WITH RADICAL ISLAM, CATHOLIC MYSTICISM; PROMOTES LGBT “RIGHTS”, EVOLUTION; REPUDIATES FUNDAMENTALISM

 https://sfnazarene.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/drboone.jpg
 “…I am deepening in the mystical forms of prayer.” (Dr. Dan Boone)
Under Dan Boone’s Leadership, a Christian University Compromises with Radical Islam
BY MANNY SILVA
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

“…I am deepening in the mystical forms of prayer.” (Dr. Dan Boone)
The above statement is a reflection of the paganistic ideas that guide Dr. Dan Boone’s theology. Dr. Boone is eventually going to run two Christian colleges into the ground. It’s just a matter of time, and perhaps that is what needs to happen. Trevecca Nazarene University has been going downhill spiritually thanks to his leadership. Let’s look at his latest decision, or non-decision, which demonstrates his lack of courage to stand against political correctness and radical Islam. It seems he wants to be their friend, even as he has a history of talking ugly against “fundamental Bible-believers.”  The Church of the Nazarene needs some real leadership that is sorely lacking.
Here, see for yourselves:
http://tennesseestar.com/2018/01/10/trevecca-university-caves-to-radical-muslims-at-cair-cancels-mae-beavers-event/
In summary, Dr. Boone has allowed Trevecca to cave to one of the most radical Islamic groups in the world. CAIR, which operates here in the United States, claims to be a moderate group interested in peace, but it is far from what it claims. Several years ago, CAIR was identified as a major financial contributor to the Holy Land Foundation, which funneled major money to Hamas, a terrorist group dedicated to the destruction of Israel. CAIR was named as an un-indicted co-conspirator. CAIR is a radical wolf in sheep’s clothing, and Dan Boone has kissed their ring finger.
So what happened in Kentucky? A Homeland Security Summit scheduled for Jan. 25 at Trevecca Nazarene University was suddenly cancelled. It was sponsored by Republican gubernatorial candidate and former State Senator Mae Beavers. Dr. Boone explained that it was cancelled because of complaints from “alumni.”

Here is Dr. Boone’s excuse:
“Throughout our history, Trevecca has consistently offered political candidates of both parties the opportunity to use our campus for events. We strongly believe that our students benefit from proximity to the voting process, and that freedom of speech is a foundation of American democracy.
However, a recent event tentatively scheduled to be held on our campus appears to have an agenda beyond a political campaign. This event would distract from our commitment to community building, education, and support of a diverse enrollment. Our agenda of Christian education in the heart of Nashville requires that we serve the best interests of this mission. For this reason, the planned event will not be held on Trevecca’s campus.”
Here is CAIR’s standard reaction to anyone who opposes their radicalism:
“It’s kind of a who’s who of Islamophobes. The themes are always the same – Muslims are about to take over the country and install sharia in place of the Constitution, and mosques are hotbeds of extremism.” ( CAIR spokesman Ibrahim Hooper)
This is part of Mae Beaver’s response:
“Today Trevecca has abandoned the Biblical principles that they preach in order to embrace political correctness and promote the interests of those who deny Christ and stand opposed to everything the University has represented in the past.”

Dr. Boone And The Real Radicals
Dr. Boone has a history of harsh criticism of Bible-believers, and clearly continues to exhibit a pattern of cow-towing to the politically correct world and radical Islam. He wants to be their friend. He wants to show how “loving” and “tolerant” and “understanding” he can be. He demonstrates, as Mae Beaver pointed out, that he is a supporter of Christ-deniers, and has little concern for Christians.
A few years ago, Dr. Boone made a curious decision to welcome a group on campus that was fundamentally opposed to the biblical view of homosexuality. But for the sake of some kind of compassionate dialogue, Dr. Boone allowed the radical homosexual group SoulForce to come onto campus and spout their un-Christian views. There was no problem for Dr. Boone in allowing promoters of sexual sin to invade the Trevecca campus. Here is the link to the article I wrote:
https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/a-response-to-dan-boones-report-on-soulforce/
Yet he sees a great concern with folks coming to campus to talk about the security of our nation and what to do about radical Islam. Dr. Boone is either a friend of radical Islam, or he does not have the moral courage to stand up to it. That is why he will run Trevecca as well as Eastern Nazarene College into the ground of moral relativism.

Dr. Boone Is The Real Radical
Dr. Boone has compared Bible-Believing Christians to Islamic fundamentalists. He says that our appetites have been whetted “by religious blood in the water.” (https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/dan-boone-goes-after-bible-believers-again/)
If you were to ever have a conversation with him about the Scriptures, you may just see him become a bit uncomfortable if you express your belief in the infallible, inerrant word of God. If you talk long enough about your complete trust in God’s word, and in your belief in the creation account, he may just very well turn beet-red! You see, he was one of the prime writers of the now-defunct Nazarenes Exploring Evolution, whose website has ignominiously disappeared along with their ungodly articles espousing evolution.
Dr. Boone is also into mysticism and Roman Catholic rituals like “practicing the silence”. Dr. Boone once said on his profile at Nazarene Theological Seminary (it is now gone) that “…I am deepening in the mystical forms of prayer.”
His affinity for contemplative spirituality is demonstrated by the prayer labyrinths he popularized at Trevecca for years. When I posted a few articles on the labyrinth at Trevecca, he started calling them prayer paths or prayer walks.
He has long promoted yearly trips for students to the Gethsemani Monastery in Kentucky, a site that was the spiritual home of the Roman Catholic mystic, Thomas Merton. Here at this retreat, students have the opportunity to “practice the silence”, which is nothing more than Catholic mysticism that has no roots in biblical teaching. The “spiritual discipline” of silence is a doctrine of demons.
Dr. Boone is just another in a long line of Nazarenes rushing to hold hands with the Roman Catholic Church.
Dr. Boone promotes one of the leading teachers of contemplative mysticism, false teacher Richard Foster. As an example, Foster makes the amazing claim that non-believers can also practice the Christian spiritual disciplines: “We need not be well advanced in matters of theology to practice the Disciplines. Recent converts–for that matter people who have yet to turn their lives over to Jesus Christ–can and should practice them” (Celebration of Discipline, 1978, p. 2).
Dr. Boone has called Thomas Merton and Ignatius of Loyola spiritual giants.
Merton was not a spiritual giant- he was a monk who said that he was “deeply impregnated with Sufism” because he believed that Eastern mysticism was compatible with and could be incorporated into Christianity.  He placed Mary high on a level equal to Jesus, he prayed to many Catholic saints.  He was influenced by Aldous Huxley, who found enlightenment through hallucinogenic drugs.
Ignatius of Loyola was no wiser, and as the founder of the Jesuits he brutally persecuted Christians and swore complete submission to the pope.  As most Roman Catholics do, he venerated Mary.  He practiced extreme asceticism, living in a cave for a year and never bathing.  He also promoted and taught visualization prayers, breath prayers, and other unbiblical practices (Source: David Cloud, Way of Life).  Yet, Dan Boone calls him a spiritual giant.
In a letter to Nazarene pastors he wrote in 2009, Dr. Boone not only erroneously claimed that the Roman Catholic church was the only church for 1500 years after Christ, but he also exposed more error along with his ecumenical get along with everyone philosophy.  How is it that we can “be one” with the Roman Catholic Church?
“While Nazarenes are different from Catholics in very significant ways, we believe that we will share eternity with them in the presence of the Christ who prayed that we might be one.” (Dan Boone)
His philosophy seems to be that anyone who claims the name of Jesus, no matter their belief otherwise, will spend eternity with Christ. This is contrary to Jesus’s teaching, and indicates Dr. Boone’s dangerous and ignorant thinking as he misleads others.
Dr. Boone may become a General Superintendent one day, and it will be no surprise. He knows how to play the game well. He is a friend to the LGBTQ agenda, and has demonstrated his support for them. He fought hard at the General Assembly in 2013 to water down the statement on human sexuality. He would be welcomed eagerly by Love Wins: LGBT, Andy McGee, as well as the leadership of the Dutch Nazarene district and other districts and churches that are slowly inching towards the normalization of homosexuality. It’s just a matter of time.
Such a man is what it will take to further go down the road of biblical compromise in the church. It is a road to further heresy and the destruction of a holiness denomination. And we still hear nothing from the General Superintendents about anything- all is well.

Additional Documentation Related To Dan Boone:

Dan Boone’s Involvement with Promoting Evolution
https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/2014/07/13/nazarene-scholars-continue-to-undermine-belief-in-gods-word-with-evolutions-lie/
Dan Boone’s Dislike of Bible Believers
https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/dan-boone-goes-after-bible-believers-again/
Dan Boone’s Involvement with SoulForce (LGBT advocates)
https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/2012/03/26/a-response-to-dan-boones-report-on-soulforce/
My Conversation with Dan Boone:
https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/conversation-with-a-university-president/
A Charitable Discourse?
https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/2011/08/30/a-charitable-discourse-or-compromise/
Labyrinths and Prayer Stations
https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/emergent-church-what-is-it/trevecca-labyrinth/
https://reformednazarene.wordpress.com/labyrinths-prayer-stations-yoga-in-the-nazarene-church/
_______________________________________________________

SEE ALSO: 
 https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Sen-Mae-Beavers.jpg?cd5d93
ABOVE: CONSERVATIVE MAE BEAVERS FOR GOVERNOR OF TENNESSEE
AND:

http://tennesseestar.com/2018/01/10/trevecca-university-caves-to-radical-muslims-at-cair-cancels-mae-beavers-event/;
EXCERPTS:
 ““The best indication that the Homeland Security Summit we were hosting is both necessary and important is the fact that CAIR doesn’t like it,” Beavers noted.
“CAIR consistently opposes efforts to improve our security and protect our communities from the terror attacks that are the weapon of choice of radical political Islam. Being the target of criticism from CAIR is a badge of honor, particularly when they never find any basis to criticize any other Republican candidates for Governor who all apparently meet with the approval of CAIR,” Beavers said.
“Nevertheless, I am very disappointed that with all the other liberal-oriented political events held on the Trevecca campus that they would cancel our Summit based on complaints from CAIR,” Beavers continued, adding:

CAIR seeks to silence any and all voices that do not bow
to their claim that Islam is “peaceful and tolerant.” Sadly, the Yazidi
women and children in Iraq who were targets of ISIS, the Coptic
Christians in Egypt, the 300 killed by Al-Shabbab in Somalia in October,
the dozens of victims at the Pulse nightclub in Orlando, the 14
murdered at a Christmas party in San Bernardino, the five service
members murdered by Mohammed Abdulazeez in CHATTANOOGA, and the
thousands who are killed each year throughout the world at the hands of
radical Islamists might disagree with CAIR’s propaganda campaign. CAIR
and the Southern Poverty Law Center are much more focused on designating
and silencing any speech they disagree with as “hate speech” rather
than confronting and condemning the truly evil and hateful ACTIONS that
are produced by political Islam that they condone.”

“I grew up practically on the campus of Trevecca Nazarene University,” Beavers noted.
“I went to elementary school there. I graduated from college there. My husband attended college there. My dad and uncle brought the lumber from my granddaddy’s sawmill in Alabama to build the McClurkan Building,” Beavers pointed out.

Despite the eleventh-hour cancellation by Trevecca, the Homeland Security Summit’s Eventbrite page is still up and active as organizers scramble to relocate the event.
In addition to Mae Beavers, headlining the Summit are nationally recognized subject matter experts on Islam and the imperative of jihad, Dr. Bill Warner, Cathy Hinners, and John Guandolo:”
_______________________________________________________

 Beavers condemn’s Trevecca’s caving to 
Islamic pressure
___________________________________________________ 
THIS WAS 2014, BUT NOT NOW:
https://s3.amazonaws.com/trevecca.edu/Homecoming-0558.jpg
 BOONE SOFT ON LGBT:
SOULFORCE MOTTO:
“SABOTAGE CHRISTIAN SUPREMACY”
 SEE: http://www.soulforce.org/
 VIDEO:



 Zachar Pullin's portrait

ABOVE:
Zachary Pullin, 28, sits at his office in downtown Seattle, Wash. Pullin identifies as Native American and queer. Photo by Imana Gunawan.
SEE ALSO:
https://trevechoesonline.com/2012/03/15/soulforce-equality-ride-visits-trevecca/
EXCERPT:
 “Trevecca marked the 83rd school the Soulforce equality ride visited in the past five years, said Zachary Pullin, an equality rider.
According to Soulforce’s website, the equality ride’s mission is “to visit the hundreds of schools in the United States that openly discriminate against Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer individuals and their Allies (LGBTQA) through their policies and practices.””

THEN: 
https://trevechoesonline.com/2012/03/15/trevecca-president-dan-boones-written-response-to-the-soulforce-visit/ 
EXCERPT:
 This past Monday we hosted a visit from an activist group called SoulForce. Quoting from their letter, “Groups of young adults have brought the Equality Ride bus to more than 70 campuses over the last four years with the heartfelt mission of creating dialogue about the inclusion and community climate of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ) people.” The group was respectful, congenial, and informed. They came in a spirit of friendship and left in the same spirit. We were able to converse with each other in a manner befitting respect and charity. They spoke on behalf of a hurting minority in the church and on the campus whose gender orientation makes life challenging for them. They left us with 3 requests:

1)  that we change the wording of our behavioral policies to more equally treat gay, lesbian, and queer persons (their preferred titles),
2)  that we specifically name our opposition to bullying on the basis of gender orientation by naming the LGBTQ in our policy, and
3)  that we create a LGBTQ Club on the campus as a safe place for students to discuss their sexual orientation.
_________________________________________________________ 

Tennessee’s Trevecca Nazarene University drops Homeland Security Summit after complaints from Hamas-linked CAIR
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

This egregious USA Today article is full of the usual nonsense: it’s
“anti-Muslim” to oppose jihad terror, Hamas-linked CAIR is presented as
if it were the civil rights organization it claims to be, without any
indication of the fact that CAIR officials have refused to denounce Hamas and Hizballah as terrorist groups. CAIR is an unindicted co-conspirator in a Hamas terror funding case —
so named by the Justice Department. Several former CAIR officials have
been convicted of various crimes related to jihad terror. CAIR’s
cofounder and longtime Board chairman (Omar Ahmad), as well as its chief
spokesman (Ibrahim Hooper), have made Islamic supremacist statements
about how Islamic law should be imposed in the U.S. (Ahmad denies this,
but the original reporter stands by her story.) CAIR chapters frequently distribute pamphlets
telling Muslims not to cooperate with law enforcement. CAIR has opposed
virtually every anti-terror measure that has been proposed or
implemented and has been declared a terror organization by the United
Arab Emirates. A CAIR operative recently called for the overthrow of the U.S. government.


An unsavory Hamas-linked group and a hard-Left smear group, the
Southern Poverty Law Center, should not be allowed to control who speaks
about security issues and who doesn’t, much less to control the public
discourse to the extent that only its point of view is represented in a
major newspaper. But that is the world we live in today.

“Trevecca Nazarene University blocks Mae Beavers event criticized as anti-Islam,” by Natalie Allison, USA Today, January 10, 2018:

Amid criticism, Trevecca Nazarene University has
withdrawn as a venue this month for a controversial event organized by
Republican gubernatorial candidate Mae Beavers.

The Jan. 25 “Homeland Security Summit” will feature three speakers
known by critics for espousing anti-Muslim views, including Bill French —
listed on promotional materials under his pen name “Bill Warner” —
Cathy Hinners and John Guandolo.

“It’s kind of a who’s who of Islamaphobes,” said Ibrahim Hooper,
communications director for the Council on American-Islamic Relations,
known as CAIR.

“The themes are always the same: Muslims are about to take over the
country and install sharia in place of the Constitution, and mosques are
hotbeds of extremism.”

Beavers released a statement on Wednesday describing Trevecca’s
decision as “caving to Islamic pressure” and said the university had
“abandoned Biblical principles in order embrace [sic] political
correctness and promote the interests of those who deny Christ.”

In a statement to USA TODAY NETWORK – Tennessee on Wednesday, the
university said the event would distract from Trevecca’s mission.

“Throughout our history, Trevecca has consistently offered political
candidates of both parties the opportunity to use our campus for
events,” according to the statement from spokeswoman Mandy Crow. “We
strongly believe that our students benefit from proximity to the voting
process, and that freedom of speech is a foundation of American
democracy.

“However, a recent event tentatively scheduled to be held on our
campus appears to have an agenda beyond a political campaign. This event
would distract from our commitment to community building, education,
and support of a diverse enrollment. Our agenda of Christian education
in the heart of Nashville requires that we serve the best interests of
this mission. For this reason, the planned event will not be held on
Trevecca’s campus.”

Trevecca President Dan Boone said in a statement on Tuesday the
university shared concerns expressed by alumni who had contacted the
school after learning of the event.

Beavers, 70, is an alumna of the university.

Crow said Tuesday that Boone’s office had received complaints about
the event and school officials began researching the speakers.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee confirmed it distributed
a letter to roughly 3,000 people over the weekend who had previously
signed its Nashville Unites resolution in an effort to inform them about
the controversial summit being planned.

It wasn’t immediately clear whether the event will go on at another venue.

CAIR issued a statement on Wednesday announcing that it “welcomes” the university’s decision to drop the event.
Following criticism, Beavers points finger at critics

In response to CAIR’s initial criticism of the event’s speakers,
Beavers noted that the Muslim advocacy group had been designated a
terrorist group by the United Arab Emirates and alleged the organization
was involved in “terrorism in the Holy Land.”

The U.S. government does not deem CAIR a terror group.

In an interview about the summit, Beavers said she decided to
organize the event because she is concerned about illegal immigration,
and that Americans and Tennesseans “don’t know who is coming here.”

Though Beavers said the event is on “homeland security” in general,
all the speakers featured in the summit express a clear focus on Islam.

“I think Islam is a threat to our country,” Beavers said in response
to whether she was against the religion, before adding that she believes
“Islam is a political agenda.”

She disagreed that the summit could be classified as an anti-Islam event.

Beavers described herself as “the only gubernatorial candidate who
has been talking about homeland security,” and told the USA TODAY
NETWORK – Tennessee she was forming an “advisory committee on homeland
security.”

When asked about homeland security risks facing Tennessee, Beavers
noted “the crime and the gangs that have come here because of illegal
immigration.”
Event speakers long-criticized by civil rights groups

Guandolo, a former FBI agent who runs the website and training group
“Understanding The Threat,” was accused by a Minnesota sheriff last year
of assaulting him at a national law enforcement conference.

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, Guandolo is an
“anti-Muslim extremist” who has been barred by multiple law enforcement
agencies from continuing to conduct training workshops due to his
conspiracy theories about Muslims.

Multiple events being led by Guandolo and his Understanding The
Threat associate Chris Gaubatz have been canceled, including as recently
as Tuesday in Amherst County, Virginia.

French runs the Nashville-based Center for the Study of Political
Islam, which the SPLC has also labeled a hate group, and was a leader in
opposing plans in 2010 for a new mosque in Murfreesboro.

He formerly worked as a physics professor at Tennessee State University.

Hinners, who lives in the Nashville area, is a retired Albany, N.Y.,
police officer who now runs the blog Daily Roll Call, where she claims
to expose “the Islamists and their organizations throughout the country,
with an emphasis on the State of Tennessee,” according to her LinkedIn
profile….

________________________________________________________

 ISLAM EXPOSED:
  THE REAL TRUTH TELLERS BILL (FRENCH) WARNER, CATHY HINNERS, JOHN GUANDOLO:
 Bill Warner, PhD: Jihad vs Crusades
 http://www.islamandkiwis.com/uploads/7/4/3/4/74345079/2067429_orig.jpg
  BILL WARNER: “I, ISLAMOPHOBE?”:
  THE CHURCHES’ DOCTRINE OF COWARDS; SPECIFICALLY NASHVILLE, TN:
“WILLING IGNORANCE” 
“PIETY, LACKING COURAGE”
 Which was worse? Watch the data and you decide. This video is part of
Bill Warner’s astounding lecture: “Why we are afraid. A 1400 years
secret”: part of a must watch playlist: bit.ly/1C5oxnc” 
548 JIHAD BATTLES AGAINST CIVILIZATION;
BATTLE MAP SHOWS THE PROGRESSION:
  ______________________________________________________
CATHY HINNERS
 
 EXCERPTED IN FULL FROM WEB PAGE BELOW, UNEDITED:
“Cathy Hinners is a decorated, retired police officer of 20
years. While active, she developed a course on Middle Eastern Crime,
Culture and Community and delivered it to thousands of law enforcement
officers across the country. Hinners was also a contract instructor with
the U. S. Department of Homeland Security’s Center for Domestic
Preparedness, delivering training to the National Guard, New York Police
Dept. and other law enforcement agencies on Weapons of Mass Destruction
and bomb recognition. In June of 2015, Cathy was named by the Southern
Poverty Law Center, along with 11 other women, who speak out against the
implementation of Sharia law in the United States. Cathy is the founder
of
dailyrollcall.com”
 ISLAMIC JIHAD: THE THREAT IN OUR BACKYARD:
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

As vast numbers of Muslims claim to be American, just as many are
responsible for the downfall of our society as we know it by demanding
change and accommodations which only behoove Islamists. Looking back at a
year when divisiveness and hatred were at an all time high, look deeper
and you will see exactly what was the cause. 


Islamists have attacked three things Americans hold dear, our faith,
our children, and our security.
All have been undermined by an ideology
that is disguised as a religion called Islam. So how is this creating a
divisive United States? Let’s start with the security. Islamists have
pushed, and sued, for Muslim refugees and immigrants to be able to enter
the U.S, despite travel bans and stricter vetting policies. As if that
wasn’t enough, Muslims have also jumped on the “sanctuary city” issue,
promoting their social justice and civil rights agenda, which doe not
take into account the safety or security of Americans at all.

It’s all about their caliphate, or the desire to create a world where
Islam reigns supreme, and sharia  (Islamic law) is the only law
allowed. In order to do this, the population of Muslims must expand
greatly, at which time their voices become louder, and they have
influence in positions of power. This year, 2018, we are seeing scores
of Muslims running for public offices, from Governors to local state
representatives. Keep in mind, sharia law is completely antithetical to
the Constitution of the United States, with many having already been
sworn in with one hand on the Quran.

Several front groups, like the Council on American Islamic Relations
(CAIR) and their executives, openly encourage members of the Muslim
community to refuse to talk to law enforcement if questioned, and demand
mosques not be surveilled, even if there is radicalization occurring.

While Muslims have opened and operate large numbers of Islamic
schools for their children, they continue to press issues in America’s
public schools, demanding accommodations, and tolerance, even in schools
run by and attended by Christians and Jews. One of the more dangerous
trends is the disproportionate, inaccurate education of children on
Islam in schools across the country. Glossing over the truth about who
the prophet Muhammad was, is especially alarming since he was a
murderous pedophile, but is depicted in textbooks as a good, pious man.
All this under the guise of “social studies” for 7th graders.

Finally the faith of millions of Americans is challenged with many
attending “interfaith” gatherings where they are told to believe all
gods are the same, including allah, which is only arabic for god. Using
the Quran as the basis for their lies, suras are recited in part, which
gives the appearance to many that Islam is  a peaceful, tolerant
religion. What is not discussed during these events, are the Sira ( the
prophet Muhammads biography) or the hadiths, his traditions. Even the
Reliance of the Traveller, which is the classic book of Islamic law, is
never mentioned, as all of these books reveal the truth about non
believers, and how inferior we are.

 In each case, anyone who questions the actions of Muslims as to
their true beliefs and intentions is seen as a bigot, hater or
Islamophobe. Muslims in America have portrayed themselves as victims
garnering the support of those who blindly believe what they are told
rather than questioning or researching for themselves. In this day and
age, where even the majority of  the main stream media does not
investigate or report the truth, it is easier to go with the flow and
not be labeled.

Muslims have chosen to use these labels which has cast a fear over
anyone that does speak out to fear losing their job, friends and family
members.

In the end, this creates a pitting of Americans against each other, just what enemies of a society do.

More to come..
________________________________________________________

JOHN GUANDOLO: 
 https://oneway2day.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/john-guandolo.jpg
 http://shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Culpeper-Guandolo-training1.jpg
 HATED BY THE LYING MUSLIM JIHADIST ORGANIZATION “CAIR”:
 https://www.cair.com/images/press_releases/John_Guandolo.jpg
 https://counterjihadnews.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/guandolo3.jpg?w=584&h=512
  Understanding The Threat July 4 Message 
to America
 Where is America’s sense of urgency about the Islamic Threat?
UTT’s President/Founder John Guandolo briefed hundreds of U.S. leaders
from 2006-Today, none of whom know or understand the threat in any real
measure. Americans must engage and reclaim their Independence Day.
 How Muslim Brotherhood Compromised the FBI & National Security by Former FBI Agent John Guandolo

Guandolo Moment: Facts That Point to Jihad in Las Vegas

 

TWITTER’S TECHNOLOGICAL TYRANNY: PROJECT VERITAS EXPOSES TWITTER’S ANTI-CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL AGENDA~TWITTER ENGINEERS TO “BAN A WAY OF TALKING” THROUGH “SHADOW BANNING”

 http://llcdn.listelist.com/listeliststatic/2016/11/03143335/jack-dorsey.jpg
  https://pics.onsizzle.com/fire-jack-dorsey-under-his-leadership-twitter-has-become-terrorist-6656843.png
 http://www.infiniteunknown.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Jack-Dorsey-Twitter-CEO-Big-Brother-485x288.jpg
SEE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Dorsey
TWITTER’S TECHNOLOGICAL TYRANNY: 
PROJECT VERITAS EXPOSES TWITTER’S 
ANTI-CONSERVATIVE POLITICAL AGENDA~
TWITTER ENGINEERS TO “BAN A WAY OF TALKING” THROUGH “SHADOW BANNING”
James O’Keefe: This Is The Biggest Story We Have Ever Broken, Shadow Ban #1 Trending 
On Twitter 
 James O’Keefe joins Alex Jones live via Skype to break down the latest
video from his organization Project Veritas that exposes Twitter’s
ability to arbitrarily silence, censor, and shadow ban users.
 Project Veritas Exposes Twitter’s Political Agenda
 A senior engineer describes his job as a “bouncer” for Twitter as he
describes the “big brotherish” tactics used at Twitter against those it
opposes politically.
TRUMP’S TWEETS FORWARDED BY TWITTER ENGINEER/CENSOR, CLAY HAYNES (& OTHERS)
  TO THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
 http://www.thedailysheeple.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/twitterveritas-e1515619293553.jpg
 
 Twitter Engineers To “Ban a Way of Talking” Through “Shadow Banning” 
 In the latest undercover Project Veritas video investigation, eight
current and former Twitter employees are on camera explaining steps the
social media giant is taking to censor political content that they don’t
like.

James O’Keefe has just completed a book about this series entitled
“AMERICAN PRAVDA: My fight for Truth in the Era of Fake News.” The book
will be released by St. Martin’s Press on January 16, 2018. 

Pre-order the book: http://www.americanpravdabook.com 
 
James O’Keefe – Project Veritas Busts 
Twitter Tyranny
 
Jack Dorsey Denies Twitter Censors Users
 
Twitter Engineers Create Algorithms 
To Censor Opposing Political Views
 Alex Jones exposes how Project Veritas has caught Twitter again, this
time admitting that their engineers create algorithms to censor
political views that oppose ‘the mainstream’ set at Twitter.

Project Veritas Video Exposes Twitter as Part of “American Pravda” 

BY C. MITCHELL SHAW

SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/27948-project-veritas-video-exposes-twitter-as-part-of-american-pravda; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Project Veritas is at it again — this time exposing Twitter as part
of the “American Pravda” of fake news designed to manipulate the way
people think by controlling their access to information and being “more
than happy” to violate users’ trust to help the government.

Project Veritas (veritas is Latin for truth) has already exposed major media — including CNN and the New York Times
— as part of its “American Pravda” series. Now, James O’Keefe — the man
behind Project Veritas — is turning his attention toward social media.
In an undercover video published Tuesday, O’Keefe shows that a Twitter
engineer says the company is “more than happy to help the Departmet of
Justice [DOJ] in their little investigation” by turning over all of
President Trump’s tweets and direct messages (Twitter’s version of
private messaging) to the DOJ — “even the ones he’s deleted.”

In the video, Senior Network Security Engineer Clay Haynes is shown
chatting with a young lady that he does not know is a Project Veritas
undercover journalist. He also does not know he is being recorded. That
recording happened on January 3. In answer to the young lady’s question,
“So you’re not a Trump lover?” Haynes says, “No.” He goes on to say,
“We’re more than happy to help the Department of Justice in their little
investigation.”

After the undercover journalist asks, “Okay, like how” and giggles
approvingly, Haynes elaborates. (As an aside, do these guys never
learn?) He answers her by saying, “Basically, giving them every single
tweet he’s posted — even the ones he’s deleted.” With the journalist
prompting him by saying, “Okay,” Haynes continues, “Any direct messages,
any mentions, oh yeah.”

He justifies his actions and those of his employer by saying, “I
don’t like being part of the machine that is contributing to America’s
downfall,” obviously referring to the fact that President Trump uses
Twitter for its intended purpose: mass communication. It seems that
since Haynes and his coworkers don’t like the message, they can
manipulate the system with a clear conscience.

While Twiiter has defended itself for not simply banning the president from its platform,
Haynes says the company has “had internal reviews about that.” Speaking
for himself, Haynes can be seen saying President Trump is “dangerous,”
adding, “don’t like him and he’s a terrible human being and I want to
get rid of him.” Twitter’s hypocrisy is evident: The social media giant
wants to be seen as tolerant and unbiased, while working against those
self-proclaimed values behind the scenes.

Another part of the video — filmed last week — shows Haynes talking
to an undercover and disguised James O’Keefe, who asks him about Twitter
“helping the Department of Justice in their little investigation.”
Haynes, was not willing to comment. James O’Keefe, you see — even in
disguise — is not a young lady.

But his previous statements paint a pretty damning picture. “So, what
we can do on our side is actually very terrifying,” he told the female
undercover journalist, going on to explain, “We have full access to
every single person’s account, every single direct message, deleted
direct message, deleted tweets — I can tell you who exactly logged in
from where, what username and password, when they changed their
password.” He also said that one reason Twitter keeps those logs is that
“it helps us detect a pattern of history.”

Haynes described the practice as “very, very dangerous,” and “very, very creepy Big Brother-ish.” No doubt.

And while many conservatives — including ostensibly President Trump —
use Twitter on a daily basis, Haynes made it clear that there is no
room for the conservative mindset at the company. “I’m a bleeding-heart
liberal,” he said, adding, “I think it comes with the territory.”

In the “internal reviews” held at Twitter about banning President
Trump’s account, Haynes said he “wasn’t the only one that basically said
that if we let this maniac — something along the lines of, if we let
this maniac continue, we would have a hard time finding another job.”

While the left-leaning philosophy of Twitter is not breaking news,
the degree to which the company would be “more than happy to help the
Department of Justice with their little investigation” is chilling.
Especially considering that a senior engineer at the company realizes
that the methods for doing that are “very, very dangerous,” and “very,
very creepy Big Brother-ish.”

O’Keefe ends the video by pointing out that while it is not known
whether Twitter has been subpoenaed for that information, it shouldn’t
really matter. After all, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey tweeted Twitter’s
support of Apple last year when Apple refused to comply with an order to
break into the iPhone of San Bernardino terrorist Syed Farook because
of the privacy implications involved. That tweet said, “We stand with
@tim_cook [Apple’s CEO] and Apple (and thank him for his
leadership)!”and carried a link to Tim Cook’s open letter explaining his
company’s decision. Apparently that was then and this is now.

Also, that was a terrorist and this is President Trump. And while Apple was right to stand its ground
and Twitter was right to support Apple, right appears to have nothing
to do with Twitter being “more than happy” about violating a user’s
trust if that user is @realDonaldTrump. Because this isn’t about right;
it’s about the Left.

This is a developing story and The New American will keep our readers updated.
_______________________________________________________

 Project Veritas Hidden Video: 
Twitter Employees Admit to Political Censorship
BY C. MITCHELL SHAW
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Former and current Twitter employees are caught on camera
admitting they censor political views they disagree with — without the
censored users even realizing it.

In the second undercover video in three days, Project Veritas has
continued to expose Twitter as part of the “American Pravda.” While the
first video showed a senior engineer at Twitter saying that the company
is “more than happy to help the Department of Justice with their little
investigation” into President Trump, this video helps explain why that
may be.

The new hidden camera video — published Thursday — features “nine
current and former Twitter employees” admitting to “steps the social
media giant is taking to censor political content that they don’t like,”
according to Project Veritas.

The video opens with a montage of damning quotes before showing those
quotes in context. Far from being less daming when seen in context,
they are more so. The video — showing current and former Twitter
employees admitting to the practice — focuses on something called
“shadow banning.” Imagine if Twitter wanted to silence you. If they ban
you outright — suspend or delete your account — it would be obvious and
you may take to another platform to denounce the company for censorship.
But what if they simply press the digital “mute button” on your tweets?
Your account is still “active” and you can still post, but no one
except you will ever see it.

Shadow banning and outright banning seem to be the tools of choice
for silencing conservative voices — especially those that support
President Trump and his policies.

Olinda Hassan is a policy manager in Twitter’s Trust and Safety
department, which she describes as “controversial.” Her team makes the
rules and regulations for the platform’s millions of users. They are the
gatekeepers. As Hassan explained, Twitter is “working on” a way to
silence certain people and ideas on the platform. “Yeah, it’s something
we’re working on — where we’re trying to get the shi**y people not to
show up,” she told the undercover journalist, adding, “It’s a product
thing we’re working on.”

To narrow down exactly who those “shi**y people” are that Twitter is
trying to keep from “showing up” in your timeline, the Project Veritas
video shows Mo Norai, a former content review agent at Twitter, saying,
“Let’s say if was a pro-Trump thing and I’m anti-Trump, I was like, ‘I
banned his whole account.’ It goes to you, and then it’s at your
discretion. And if you’re anti-Trump, you’re like, ‘Oh, you know what?
Mo was right, f*** it, let it go.’”

Norai went on to say that “discretion” — which he described as “I
guess how you felt about a particular matter,” plays a huge role in what
content gets banned at Twitter. As an example, Norai said, “If they [a
user] said, ‘This is pro-Trump, I don’t want it because it offends me,’”
the next step would be, “I say, ‘I banned this whole thing’ and it goes
over here and you’re like, “Oh, you know what? I don’t like it, too.
You know what? Mo’s right. Let it go.’”

So, based on a Twitter employee not liking something because it’s
pro-Trump, an entire account can be banned. How’s that inclusive
environment working out for you, Twitter?

Because Norai said that during his time at Twitter, left-leaning
posts that were tagged as possibly offensive were allowed to remain. “It
would come through checked and then I would be like, ‘You know what?
This is okay. Let it go.’”

Twitter has a “lot of unwritten rules,” Norai said. Those rules
largely dealt with what content was acceptable and what content was not.
Here is a clue: Conservative content was removed while liberal content
was allowed to stay.

Pranay Singh is a Direct Messaging engineer at Twitter. He said that
the suspension of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange’s Twitter account may
have been because of “the U.S. government pressuring” Twitter. He said,
“They do that.” In fact, he said it happens “all the f***ing time.” In
Assange’s case, he said the U.S. government doesn’t like “people messing
with their politics, and [Assange] has sh*t on a lot of people.”

As for the tactic of shadow banning a user, Abhinav Vadrevu, a former
software engineer at Twitter, said, “One strategy is to shadow ban so
that you have ultimate control.” He added, “The idea of a shadow ban is
that you ban someone, but they don’t know they’ve been banned because
they keep posting, but no one sees their content.” On the psychological
side of the equation, this creates a situation where the users just
think their posts — their ideas — aren’t appealing to anyone. “So they
just think no one is engaging with their content when in reality, no one
is seeing it,” Vadrevu said.

Vadrevu admitted that the practice “is risky” because “people will
figure that sh** out.” He also said that it would cause “bad press” and
that “it’s like, unethical in some way, you know? So, I don’t know.”
Clearly.

Another former Twitter engineer, Conrado Miranda, told an undercover
journalist that shadow banning as a way of political censorship is “a
thing.” It happens at Twitter. As he explained the process, “we have a
bunch of filters removing some tweets” and “kicking out some of them.”

Singh helped explain the types of tweets that are likely not to make
the cut. “Just go to a random (Trump) tweet and just look at the
followers,” he said. Those followers will “all be like guns, God,
’Merica, like and with the American flag and like, the cross.” He said
the way to get rid of those users — all of whom he assumes are bots, not
real users, because, “Like who says that? Who talks like that?” — is to
“just delete them.” But since “there are hundreds of thousands of them”
and that volume can’t be handled by people, “you got to, like, write
algorithms to do it for you.”

So, Twitter’s response to posts and users it doesn’t agree with is to
assume they are not real and turn a few lines of computer code loose to
delete them without any human verification process. It appears that
posts that are anti-gun, anti-God, anti-America, with rainbow flags and
pentagrams would escape that vetting process, even if they were posted
by bots. Smooth, Twitter, smooth.

Perhaps most shocking is the statement by Steven Pierre, a software
engineer at Twitter. Speaking on hidden camera, he said that Twitter is
developing a way to automate the whole process of what gets seen and
what doesn’t. “Every single conversation is going to be rated by a
machine” that will decide whether the conversation is “positive” or
“negative.” If it’s negative, “They may have a point, but it will just,
like, vanish,” he said. When asked whether this would “ban certain
mindsets,” he said no. “It’s going to ban, like, a way of talking.”
Twitter, where never is heard a discouraging word — or an honest word.

If that isn’t Pravda, nothing is. Between filtering,
banning, shadow banning, and manipulating what users see, Twitter is
dangerously close to a thought-control platform. In its first video
on Twitter, released Tuesday, Project Veritas showed Clay Haynes, a
senior network security engineer at Twitter, saying, “I don’t like being
part of the machine that is contributing to America’s downfall,”
obviously referring to the fact that President Trump uses Twitter for
its intended purpose: mass communication. If he meant that, he should
quit his job, because Twitter is clearly part of that machine.

 

PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY PAID JIHAD TERRORISTS & THEIR FAMILIES NEARLY $350 MILLION IN 2017

 http://www.thetruthaboutisrael.org.il/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Screenshot_20170829-221303.png
 PEACE ACCORD AND/OR “TWO STATE SOLUTION” WITH THESE ANIMALS?
 http://www.israelislamandendtimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Report-UK-Taxpayers-Pay-Millions-to-Brutal-Palestinian-Terrorists.jpg
PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY PAID JIHAD TERRORISTS & THEIR FAMILIES NEARLY 
$350 MILLION IN 2017
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

But deep down, they really, really want peace!

Yes, of course, I’m being sarcastic. But there are respected policy
analysts in Washington at this very moment who actually believe that.


“Palestinian Authority Paid Terrorists and Their Families Nearly $350 Million in 2017,” by Deborah Danan, Breitbart, January 10, 2018:

TEL AVIV – In accordance with its “pay-for-slay” law, the
Palestinian Authority last year paid terrorists and their families over
$347 million, Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman said Tuesday.


Citing the PA’s own data, terrorists with three to five year prison
sentences receive $580 dollars a month – equivalent to the average
Palestinian income, Liberman told a session of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee on Tuesday.


Terrorists sentenced to 20 years or more – usually for the murder of
Israeli civilians – receive more than $2,900 per month for their entire
lives, five times the amount of a “small time” terrorist.


On top of the PA salary, Arab terrorists who hold Israeli citizenship
receive a $145 bonus, more than the average Israeli income of around
$2,700.


In addition, there are additional stipends for wives and children.

Defense Minister Avigdor Liberman said, “The PA pays over a billion
shekels a year to terrorists and their families, thus encouraging and
perpetuating terrorism.”

“The minute the amount of the payment is decided according to the
severity of the crime and the length of the sentence – in other words,
whoever murders and is sentenced to life in prison gets much more – that
is funding terrorist attacks against Israeli citizens. There is nothing
that better illustrates the PA’s support for terrorism. We must stop
this,” he added.
Liberman also presented his bill proposing to deduct the amount paid
by the Palestinian Authority to terrorists and their families from
monies owed by Israel in taxes.
The PA has paid out NIS 4 billion ($1.12
billion) over the past four years towards terrorist salaries, as per PA
law.
According to Brig.-Gen. (res.) Yossi Kuperwasser, who served as
the director general of the Ministry of Strategic Affairs, the
longer a Palestinian security prisoner is jailed, “the higher the
salary. … Anyone who has sat in prison for more than 30 years gets NIS
12,000 ($3,360) per month.”…
In August, Breitbart Jerusalem reported
that PA President Mahmoud Abbas told President Donald Trump’s senior
adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner that he wouldn’t stop payments to
convicted terrorists until his “dying day.”


After his meeting with Kushner, Abbas issued a statement on
Facebook in which he vowed again: “I will never stop [paying] the
allowances to the families of the prisoners and released prisoners, even
if this costs me my position and my presidency.”


“I will pay them until my dying day,” he added.

______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/01/woman-stabbed-13-times-by-palestinian-jihadis-asks-is-the-uk-funding-the-terrorists-who-tried-to-murder-me 
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/01/while-complaining-that-palestinians-will-starve-because-of-trumps-cuts-pa-buys-abbas-50000000-private-jet 

CALIFORNIA JUST MANDATED LGBT INDOCTRINATION OF ALL CHILDREN IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS~AND PARENTS HAVE NO CHOICE TO OPT OUT

 https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/lgbt-preschool-pride-indoctrinating-children-tp-be-gay-queer-400x258.jpg
CALIFORNIA JUST MANDATED LGBT INDOCTRINATION OF ALL CHILDREN IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS~AND PARENTS HAVE NO CHOICE 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Editor’s Note: Gentle Readers, it is way past time to pull your children out of public schools.
(Natural News) Several hundred new laws have come into effect in California as of the first of the year, and one of them shamelessly
strips parents of elementary-age children of their right to opt out of
brand new LGBT-promoting curriculum that’s now being taught throughout
the state’s public schools.


Reports indicate that LGBT-inclusive textbooks are now being mandated
for use at public elementary schools throughout the Golden State, where
children as young and four or five will now be subjected to propaganda
that promotes homosexuality, transgenderism, and whatever other sexual
perversions (bestiality? pedophilia?) that liberalism might suddenly
decide is normal for humans.

Based on the law’s verbiage, students will be subjected to
LGBT-promoting curriculum in order to brainwash them into accepting any
flavor of the sexual rainbow that a person might choose to adopt. By
indoctrinating these little ones into total sexual acceptance, public
school administrators will achieve the law’s goal of requiring “fair,
accurate, inclusive, and respectful” treatment of LGBT-identifying
people, a.k.a. absolute acceptance of every type of sexuality.
Not only that, but the curriculum’s authors further took it upon
themselves to assign gay and lesbian labels to various historical
figures who never married, for instance, or who lived with someone of
the same sex. In other words, every historical figure who didn’t overtly
have a spouse of the opposite sex is assumed to be LGBT, and this is what California elementary school students will now be taught with no option for an exemption.
“We’re not trying to make anybody gay; we’re not saying there’s an
agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people;
what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face
certain prejudices,” insists Mark Jarrett, one of the publishers of the
new curriculum who portrays historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily
Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and President James Buchanan as LGBT,
even though there is no concrete historical evidence to suggest that any
of these individuals self-identified as such.

LGBT mafia rewriting history as it corrupts the minds of young students

While Jarrett adamantly denies that he’s in any way trying to push
revisionist LGBT history on young, impressionable minds, he’s doing
precisely that with his textbooks. For instance, eighth graders will now
be taught that legendary stagecoach driver Charlie Parkhurst “was a
woman who identified as a man.” The textbooks also state that George
Washington’s chief of staff, Baron Von Steuben, “may have been gay.”


Even famous poet Walt Whitman is maligned in Jarrett’s curriculum,
with text stating that Whitman “was drawn to young men … but denied his
same sex preferences in public.”

None of this is in any way historically accurate, of course. Back in
the old days before terms like gay and lesbian even existed as an
“identity,” many men and women alike fostered deep relationships with
people of the same sex that were not necessarily sexual in nature, but
that were still meaningful.
It was a unique type of love that’s rare today, and that transcends
anything that the deranged minds of today’s LGBT mafia could ever
possibly understand. And it is precisely because people like Jarrett
fail to recognize anything other than perverse sexual lust that they are
now taking it upon themselves to completely rewrite history in order to
fit their own seared perspectives.
Not only is California actively promoting this pro-LGBT narrative in
public schools using taxpayer dollars – and forcing parents to accept it
for their children – but it is also actively rejecting all curriculum that doesn’t promote LGBTism as healthy and normal. It’s not much different from California’s authoritarian policy on “mandatory” vaccinations, which no longer allows parents to exempt their children for reasons other than those of a medical nature.

 

PRO CHOICE? PREGNANT WOMAN FIRED FOR REFUSING FLU VACCINE~WHY WON’T PLANNED PARENTHOOD & LIBERALS ASSERT HER “RIGHT” TO CHOICE NOW?

 BOYCOTT THIS HOSPITAL 
IN MINEOLA, LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK:
 http://a.mktgcdn.com/p/_tfShH_kgFOGKbBvXqFDYygRbBAU3JiwgHtxdyX21iM/488x488.png
PRO CHOICE? PREGNANT WOMAN FIRED FOR REFUSING FLU VACCINE~WHY WON’T PLANNED PARENTHOOD & LIBERALS ASSERT 
HER “RIGHT” TO CHOICE NOW?
 Where is Planned Parenthood when a pregnant woman’s choice is violated
and her health is threatened by an employer demanding a flu vaccine? 
They’re only interested if an abortion is the choice.
SEE ALSO: 
EXCERPT: 
 

“In a statement, hospital officials told News 12:

“NYU
Winthrop Hospital maintains the highest standards to protect the health
and well-being of not only our patients but our employees. When we
established the mandatory influenza vaccination program many months ago,
every employee was notified and given the opportunity to apply for a
valid medical or religious exemption. Every exemption request was
evaluated on a case-by-case basis by a panel of clinical experts and
senior HR executives. It was determined that pregnancy alone was not a
valid basis for an exemption. In fact, the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) continues to recommend that all
women receive the influenza vaccine, including pregnant women, who are
at increased risk of serious illness and mortality due to influenza.
This recommendation is applicable in any trimester. Moreover, as the
ACOG states, ‘Maternal vaccination is the most effective strategy to
protect newborns because the vaccine is not approved for use in infants
younger than six months.’
“While we cannot comment on specific
instances due to privacy issues, we can say that, absent other
extenuating facts, an exemption request for pregnancy would not be
granted. NYU Winthrop Hospital believes that, as healthcare workers,
every one of our employees has a moral obligation to protect the health
and safety of our patients and our fellow employees. Mandatory flu
vaccination is a commitment to that responsibility.” – John Collins,
President and CEO, NYU Winthrop University Hospital”

_______________________________________________________

IRANIAN DISSIDENT CALLS PAMELA GELLER & ROBERT SPENCER “TRUE FRIENDS OF FREEDOM” FOR STANDING WITH IRANIAN PEOPLE

Islam was not for me – Amil Imani (Free Iran) 

 

Whistleblower reveals Islamist movement to subvert America & Israel, facilitated by Obama

 IRANIAN DISSIDENT CALLS PAMELA GELLER & ROBERT SPENCER “TRUE FRIENDS OF FREEDOM” FOR STANDING WITH IRANIAN PEOPLE
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Thank you, Amil. I’m humbled by and grateful for your words. As the
foes of freedom become more ruthless and relentless everywhere,
certainly Benjamin Franklin’s quip is truer than ever: we have to hang
together now, or we will all hang separately.

“Saluting Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer,” by Amil Imani, Capitol Hill Outsider, January 9, 2018:

…People such as Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, have
set themselves apart from the shameful gang of self-serving loudmouths
who find themselves suddenly tongue-tied when speaking up does not serve
their myopic and parochial agenda. If President Trump is for it, they
are against it, no matter what.

I am certain that I speak for millions of severely tormented
Iranians, where women in particular are subjected to unbelievable
atrocities, in thanking you. You are true friends of freedom. You are
standing with the people of Iran in their life and death struggle. We
thank you for your support.

In my opinion, the liberty-loving people of America and the world owe
a debt of gratitude to Pamela and Robert, for valiantly exposing the
racist and supremacist nature of the barbarity of Islam, for fearlessly
braving where others dare not tread, and for passionately defending
freedom of speech, rights of the individual and oppressed people of the
world.

Both Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer have been sounding this alarm
from the very beginning about the true nature of radical Islam and
jihadists’ imminent deadly threats to our way of life and American
values. While America is the last haven of hope where liberty can reign,
Islamic jihadists draw heavily from their treasury flush with oil
extortion money to bribe politicians and hire mercenaries to further
their evil objectives.

In my opinion, both Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer are true heroes.
They stand for all that is dear to free people. They are in stark
contrast to the masses of the politically correct, the apathetic, and
the hired Islamic apologists.

It is noteworthy that their work not only serves what is right, it
also serves the best interests of America and all of humanity. It proves
to the world that these two-liberty loving cherish and support freedom
and the rights of all people to speak freely.

“Where are the champions of … what did they call it? Oh
yes, the “Arab Spring” — that great euphemism for the oppressive Islamic
supremacist movement that sought to overthrow secular rule for the
vicious and brutal and sharia. Here, now, when a genuine movement for
freedom takes hold in a viciously oppressive Muslim country, the left
stands with the murderers and oppressors. The media, aligned with the
jihad force, will never report fairly or even remotely accurately on
these matters, as they are the tip of the spear of the anti-freedom,
anti-American fifth column in this country.” Pamela Geller

“Today, as the Iranian people courageously stand for freedom, it is
most fitting that the removal of the hijab has become the symbol of this
movement. We can only hope that the protesters will succeed in
overthrowing or at least drastically weakening the Islamic Republic,
such that the rights of women, and of all people, can flower. Iranian
women deserve better than the Islamic Republic. The Iranian people
deserve better than the Islamic Republic. The protesters deserve the
wholehearted support of all free people.” Robert Spencer

Sadly, during these times of great peril, truth is sacrificed by the
politically correct, the myopic self-serving in the liberally dominated
media, and the ruling class.  Against this backdrop, two people of great
courage and integrity labor tirelessly in speaking the truth and in the
defense of liberty.

As US Ambassador to the UN, Nikki Haley, said it beautifully: “We
must not be silent. The people are crying out for freedom. All freedom
loving people must stand with their cause. The international community
made the mistake of failing to do that in 2009. We must not make that
mistake again.”

On behalf of all freedom loving Iranians, I want to say: Thank you.
Thank you for reporting the Truth while the MSM blocked the accurate
flow of news from reaching the public. Thank you for standing with the
valiant Iranian people.

Both Robert Spencer and Pamela Geller are champions of freedom,
liberty and human rights. They rightfully deserve to be nominated for
the Nobel Peace Prize. I am honored to call them my friends.

_______________________________________________________

 Rush Limbaugh on Amil Imani
ISLAM’S USEFUL IDIOTS
 

OBAMA LEFT A BACKLOG OF MORE THAN A HALF MILLION ILLEGAL ALIENS

 https://downtrend.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/illegal-immigration-pic.jpg
 https://da-2.imgix.net/2016/03/5-DA-Infographics-11millionUndocumentedAmericans.png?ixlib=php-1.1.0&q=95&s=ca096017f565e5db0978e6c50ac117d3
OBAMA LEFT A BACKLOG OF MORE THAN 
A HALF MILLION ILLEGAL ALIENS 
BY STEVE BYAS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

“For a large part of the last four or five years we’ve been unable to take enforcement action against those individuals,” the Washington Examiner quoted ICE official Matthew Albence as saying earlier this week in explaining why U.S. immigration officials have a backlog of 550,000 illegal aliens. Albence is executive associate director for enforcement and removal operations.

Two reasons are given for this exceptionally large backlog. One,
former President Barack Obama handed many of them temporary amnesty, and
two, others were allowed to stay by judges sympathetic to illegal
immigration.

Obama began delaying deportation actions in large numbers in 2014.
Albence explained that even if officers of the Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE) found an illegal alien in jail, they were discouraged
from taking him into custody. “Our officers had to turn their heads or
walk the other way. So that’s a large part of that problem, the fact
that we couldn’t enforce the law.”
Even some illegals sought for murder were protected.
Acting ICE Director Thomas Homan also asserted, “We need to hold
judges accountable.” Another problem he cited was the hundreds of
sanctuary cities which have not allowed ICE officers to take illegal
aliens into custody, even if they are in their jails. ICE under the
Trump administration intends to fight those cities and other obstacles,
Homan added. He believes this will send a message to those here
illegally that they are still subject to deportation, even if they have
been in the country for a decade.
“There has to be a consequence and a deterrence to illegal activity
or the illegal activity won’t stop,” Homan pointed out. “We’ve made a
lot of headway this year — more than I’ve seen in a long time — and
we’ve got to keep going down this road. We’ve got to keep momentum
going.”

It is quite clear that the Obama administration, up to and including
the president, favored the influx of illegal aliens. What would be the
motivation?
Certainly, a long-range goal was increasing the number of voters
expected to cast their ballots for Democrat candidates. In the meantime,
the Obama administration probably assumed that, by taking such a
lenient approach to removing persons inside the country here illegally,
he would garner increased political participation from ethnic groups
with large numbers of immigrants. While many often think of Hispanics
when they hear of “illegal aliens,” ICE also has had problems in dealing
with a large Iraqi population in the Detroit area.
The problem, of course, did not originate with Obama. In 1965, the
Hart-Celler Act radically changed American immigration laws, abolishing
the quota system. The law replaced the quotas with preferences based on
family relationships. In 1988, Democratic consultant Patrick Reddy
praised the Kennedys for this change, declaring, “The 1965 Immigration
Reform Act promoted by President Kennedy, drafted by Attorney General
Robert Kennedy, and pushed through the Senate by Ted Kennedy has
resulted in a wave of immigration from the Third World that should shift
the nation in a more liberal direction within a generation. It will go
down as the Kennedy family’s greatest gift to the Democratic Party.”
Historian Tom Woods commented on the effect of this surge in
immigration, legal and illegal, asking whether we will “be more or less
free after even two more generations of immigration the size and
composition of recent decades. That immigrants and the American
bureaucracy that serves them will become yet another pressure group,
clamoring for privileges and benefits in Washington, can scarcely be
doubted.”
He continued, zeroing in on the problem we now face. “In order to
destroy the cultural and ethnic cohesion that acts as a bulwark against
its expansion, the state has a history of engaging in deliberate
scrambling. When this forced integration inevitably produces animosity,
the state is all too eager to impose order on a chaos of its own
creation.”
Woods concluded, “A facile advocacy of open borders gives the central
state exactly what it wants: the chance to supersede the preferences of
property owners, and to provide the pretext for further encroachments
on local and individual liberty.”
So, it is not too surprising that President Obama and his allies favored the coddling of illegal aliens.
Hopefully, simply enforcing present federal laws against illegal
immigration will be one of the legacies of the Trump presidency.

LIBERAL COLLECTIVIST COMMUNE: TRUMP ADMINISTRATION DELAYS OBAMA DECREE TO “DIVERSIFY” YOUR COMMUNITY

 LIBERAL “FAIR” COLLECTIVIST COMMUNE
 https://cached-assets.patriotpost.us/images/2015-07-09-fcdbda97_large.jpg
 
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION DELAYS OBAMA DECREE TO “DIVERSIFY” YOUR COMMUNITY
BY ALEX NEWMAN
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
The Trump administration has decided to delay — but not yet scrap — a draconian
and widely condemned “regulation” from the Obama administration known
as the “Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing” (AFFH) rule
. The
scheme, which became a lighting rod of controversy, aims to gather
massive amounts of demographic data on every community in America, then
use the awesome powers of the federal government to redistribute people
based on race and income. It’s all to advance some nebulous notion of
“diversity” and “fairness,” advocates say. On both sides of the debate,
though, there is an expectation that the recently unveiled delay could
be a stop-gap measure while the rule is totally abolished.

Officially,
the rule was “delayed” because local governments were having trouble
understanding — not to mention complying — with the byzantine mandates.
About one third of the initial local government plans for compliance
submitted to the feds were rejected, sparking concerns, according to
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development officials.
Multiple
local bureaucrats from big liberal cities and the Obama administration
were quoted downplaying the confusion and celebrating the rule as if it
were some great invention or innovation. Unsurprisingly, establishment
mouthpieces such as the New York Times did not quote a single critic, despite quoting liberally from tax-funded supporters with a clear conflict of interest.

  
The rule itself is confusing. Under the guise of making communities
more “diverse” and ending “segregation,” the Housing and Urban
Development Department (HUD) scheme would radically reshape your
neighborhood.
Not enough federally subsidized low-income apartments in
your upper- or middle-class suburb of single-family homes? The AFFH
would change that by plopping more welfare recipients and Section
8-subsidized apartments there. Not enough whites, Latinos, black people,
Muslims, or Asians in your community? The AFFH would seek to
redistribute people, too, until the feds’ vision of racial, religious,
and income levels being harmonized is realized across America.
In addition to the gnashing of teeth by the establishment’s leading
propaganda organs, a coalition of establishment AstroTurf groups on the
left-wing fringe also whined about the delay in enforcing the rule.
Basically, the alliance claimed
that poverty and poor education are a result of a federal government
that has not been active enough in redistributing people based on their
demographics and socioeconomic status. However, federal studies that
have been done show
that redistributing poor or minority people into wealthier communities
did not actually improve wellbeing, resulted in more food stamp use, and
brought crime into safer neighborhoods.
Outraged by the delay, the coalition, which includes everything from
transgender groups and the ACLU to a range of front groups for
billionaire extremist George Soros, demanded that HUD begin vigorously
enforcing the decree. Ironically, they claimed not allowing D.C.
bureaucrats to immediately reshape communities across America was
“giving local residents less voice in important decisions about their
communities.” Seriously. 
But if the hysterics are correct, the delay may just be a temporary
measure as the scheme is tossed into the trash heap of regulations being
dismantled by the Trump administration. The current HUD secretary, Ben
Carson, was actually a fierce critic of the scheme prior to joining
Trump’s cabinet. In a stinging rebuke of the power grab, Carson said
that the Obama agency’s rules relied on a “tortured reading” of the
relevant federal statutes.
“The new rule would not only condition the grant of HUD funds to
municipalities on building affordable housing as is the case today, but
would require that such affordable housing be built primarily in
wealthier neighborhoods with few current minority residents and that the
new housing be aggressively marketed to minorities,” warned Carson in a
column while he was running for the GOP nomination.
As intended, the Obama rule would fundamentally transform many
communities — especially wealthier suburbs. “In practice, the rule would
fundamentally change the nature of some communities from primarily
single-family to largely apartment-based areas by encouraging
municipalities to strike down housing ordinances that have no overtly
(or even intended) discriminatory purpose — including race-neutral
zoning restrictions on lot sizes and limits on multi-unit dwellings, all
in the name of promoting diversity,” added Carson, a widely respected
pediatric neurosurgeon once labeled an “extremist” by the fringe
left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center.
However, as with other socialist schemes that have backfired
everywhere they have been tried, Carson predicted that the AFFH would
end up becoming yet another government-mandated boondoggle. “These
government-engineered attempts to legislate racial equality create
consequences that often make matters worse,” he concluded, offering
examples such as the failed “busing” experiments with school children.
“There are reasonable ways to use housing policy to enhance the
opportunities available to lower-income citizens, but based on the
history of failed socialist experiments in this country, entrusting the
government to get it right can prove downright dangerous.”
However, after becoming HUD boss, Carson has softened his tone, and
vowed to “reinterpret” the rule rather than scrap it altogether,
alarming those who supported him for the post due to his opposition to
AFFH. “Do I believe in fair housing? Of course, I believe in fair
housing,” Carson was quoted as saying by the Washington Examiner,
adding that he did not believe in “extra manipulation and cost.” “So we
just have to reinterpret it, that’s all,” Carson said, without
elaborating on how he might reinterpret it to be less costly and
manipulative. Of course, lawless Supreme Court decrees notwithstanding,
no amount of manipulation outside a constitutional amendment could make
the rule constitutional, since the feds have no constitutional authority
over housing policy, period.
In an e-mail to The New American, American Policy Center
chief Tom DeWeese said much more was needed to rein in an out-of-control
federal government — but that the delay could be a good first step.
“I’m glad to see Carson is finally taking some steps,” said DeWeese,
author of the new book exposing “sustainable development” titled Sustainable! The War on Free Enterprise, Private Property and Individuals.
“Is it enough? Time will tell. He is under tremendous pressure by the
non-governmental organizations [NGOs] to not touch this sacred cow. But
if we are to restore American freedoms and property rights, this must be
the first target.”
An entire chapter in his new book is actually dedicated to exposing
the dangers of Obama’s AFFH scheme. “The main points are that the
enforcement of AFFH, without a clear definition of what it really is —
forcing local communities to strip search every neighborhood for
´equality,’ ‘balance,’ and other specific measures dictated by HUD —has
created specific guidelines dictating specific numbers of each for a
proper “balance,” DeWeese warned. “They have to do this every five
years. If HUD finds the neighborhood ‘out of balance’ then the community
needs to bring it in balance — perhaps by advertising to find the
ethnic or racial groups, etc, to bring in HUD-dictated balance. It is
social engineering and most specifically destroys local rule.”
Trump has cut 22 federal regulations for every new one added,
sparking nationwide celebrations and a dramatic economic boost that has
seen the stock market soar to record highs. The AFFH, though, is more
than just another burdensome Obama-era regulation that is dragging down
productivity and wasting money. Instead, it represents one of the
subversive tactics used by Obama and the establishment behind him to
“fundamentally transform the United States of America,” as Obama
infamously put it. Indeed, it is an attempt to centrally plan local
communities by an all-powerful government that, unless it is restrained,
will continue to devour every last freedom until at last it kills its
own host — the American people.
Not only is this AFFH regulation unconstitutional, it is dangerous:
It undermines freedom of association, the right to self government, the
rule of law, private property rights, local governance, states’ rights,
and much more. Trump and Carson should make good on yet another pledge
by killing the rule once and for all. Then, if they want to truly show
respect for their oath of office, they can work to shut down the entire
unconstitutional and unnecessary “housing” bureaucracy. In the meantime,
though, communities can and must protect themselves from this federally
mandated social engineering by refusing to accept “grants” from HUD —
and by firmly rejecting the strings that come attached to them. 

Related articles:
Bill Would Nullify Obama Plot to “Diversify” Your Neighborhood
Trump’s Regulatory Rollback: Not 2 to 1, but 22 to 1!
Battle Rages as GOP Saves Obama Plot to Diversify Neighborhoods
Obama Seeks to Reshape Neighborhoods With Housing “Diversity”
UN’s “New Urban Agenda” to Assault Liberty in a City Near You
Private Property Ownership — the First American Right To Die Under Barack Obama’s Tyranny
CFR Globalist: End U.S. States, Build China-style Regional Gov’t
President’s New Housing Plan: Another Racist Policy
A New Symbol Has Been Cast: People • Property • Liberty
HUD Seeks to Address “Inequality” in Wealthy Neighborhoods Through Regulations
“Smart Cities” to Spy on You in Ways Orwell Never Imagined
Communist Chinese Regime Forcing Rural Population Into Cities
________________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS:
https://ratherexposethem.org/2017/04/bill-would-nullify-obama-plot-to.html 
https://ratherexposethem.org/2016/11/feds-usurp-housing-authority-to-fight.html 
https://ratherexposethem.org/2016/07/listen-this-time-or-grant-money-from.html 
https://ratherexposethem.org/2016/06/obamas-new-version-of-desegregation.html 
VIDEOS:

 Tom DeWeese: HUD’s AFFH Will Destroy 
Your Neighborhood
 AFFH MUST BE STOPPED
 AFFH will allow the Federal Government to rewrite local zoning laws and
build low income housing – GHETTOS – in white upper middle class
neighborhoods. Rapes, robberies, burglaries and black mob violence
against whites will cause race wars that will rip our country apart.
Obama is a maniac working for the psychopaths that run the Federal
Reserve.
 Is AFFH Really Fair?
 Last week HUD released a rule so radical, you’d think Marx wrote it. In
an expansion of AHF, the government created a rule intended to decrease
residential segregation. So how does a government that can’t manage a
post office reengineer our neighborhoods? Is this even the role of the
government?
 OBAMA’S FUNDAMENTAL TRANSFORMATION: AFFH ALLOWS HUD TO CHOOSE 
YOUR NEIGHBORS
 AFFH is a program that will allows the FEDS to come into your town and
do a demographic study. They want to know what race of people lives
where. If you take their grant money (HUD) they will then get to dictate
to you whether or not your city is a “racist/segregated” city.

 
 

CONGRESSIONAL PROBE FINDS EVIDENCE OF FBI PROTECTING HILLARY CLINTON IN E-MAIL INVESTIGATION

 https://whatyouthoughtiwentaway.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/fbi-hillary-email-plot-678x381.jpg
CONGRESSIONAL PROBE FINDS EVIDENCE 
OF FBI PROTECTING HILLARY CLINTON 
IN E-MAIL INVESTIGATION
BY C. MITCHELL SHAW
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Congressional investigators have turned up new information indicating
that high-level FBI officials including ousted director James Comey
decided ahead of time to exonerate Hillary Clinton (shown) of doing
anything illegal in her use of an unsecured, unauthorized, private
e-mail server to send and receive classified e-mails during her tenure
as secretary of state. Not only that, but evidence indicates that the
FBI buried facts regrading Clinton wrongdoing.

In the myriad investigations now swirling around Hillary Clinton, it
is reasonable to ponder which one she should be most concerned about.
Yet it would be difficult to imagine one that could do more to damage
her than the investigations connected to her use of a private server.
After all, not being indicted (yet!) is not the same thing as being
found not guilty. Clinton could presumably still be charged, tried, and
convicted for the multiplicity of crimes she committed by sending and
receiving at least 2,079 classified e-mails over her private server and
account. With congressional investigators looking into the matter, it is
not beyond the realm of possibility that she may yet have to face
charges for her actions.

As The Hill reported
last week, a panel made up of “Republicans on three House committees
and the Senate Judiciary Committee” have newly uncovered irregularities
and contradictions inside the FBI’s probe of Hillary Clinton’s email
server.” As that report stated:

For the first time, investigators say
they have secured written evidence that the FBI believed there was
evidence that some laws were broken when the former secretary of State
and her top aides transmitted classified information through her
insecure private email server, lawmakers and investigators told The Hill.

That flies in the face of ousted FBI Director James Comey’s statement
when he publicly declined to recommend indicting Clinton because “our
judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case” since
the FBI did not find evidence of “intentional misconduct or indications
of disloyalty to the United States or efforts to obstruct justice.”
Because sending and receiving at least 2,079 classified e-mails, initially refusing to turn over her server, and then only turning the server over to investigators after having it wiped, and claiming that she had turned over “all work-related” e-mails while actually deleting half as many as she turned over are all apparently, in Comey’s mind, the actions of someone who did not intend to break the law. Right.

Fortunately for the American people and the cause of justice (and
unfortunately for Clinton), congressional investigators don’t buy that.
And Comey — already summarily dismissed from his position (and none too
soon) — may have to answer for his role in protecting Clinton.

As to whether Clinton intended to break the law, two important facts
should not be missed: First, her intent is irrelevant; second, she
certainly knew she was breaking the law and did so with full intent.

Her intent is irrelevant because the applicable statutes do not allow
for ignorance as an excuse; nor should they — national security demands
that those responsible for guarding it are held to a very high
standard: 18 USC Sec. 1924 criminalizes the unauthorized removal and
storage of classified information. Penalties can include fines and
imprisonment for up to one year. And while Clinton claimed early on that
many of the classified e-mails should not have been classified, she
lacked the authority to make that call.

In 2009, President Obama signed Executive Order 13526, which spells
out — in uncharacteristically clear language — the process for
declassifying intelligence and who has the authority to do so. One part
of the order says, “Information shall be declassified or downgraded by
… the official who authorized the original classification … [or] the
originator’s current successor.” Since other agencies (such as the CIA) classified the intelligence in those e-mails, Clinton could not simply decide it didn’t count.

Furthermore, 18 US Code 793 — which is part of the Espionage Act — says:

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or
having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book,
signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint,
plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating
to the national defense,
(1) through gross negligence permits the
same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to
anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or
destroyed, or
(2) having knowledge that the same has
been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to
anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or
destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft,
abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer —
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

“Gross negligence” does not require intent. Clinton broke a slate of
laws designed to protect national security from actions exactly like
those she directed and performed. Intent is not the germane issue here.

And — just to put in the for-what-it’s-worth column — Clinton
certainly was aware of her responsibilities and the salient fact that
her actions were contrary to those responsibilities. In short, the
evidence is indisputable that Clinton knew she was breaking the law, and
she did so deliberately.

First, there are the two non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) that
Clinton signed as part of her employment as secretary of state. As this
writer said when the first of those NDAs came to light in November 2015:

The NDA signed by Mrs. Clinton on her
second day as secretary of state spells out — in language so clear that
the meaning of the word “is” is quite unambiguous — her responsibility
in handling the sensitive information to which she would have access in
her new job. One part reads, “I have been advised that the unauthorized
disclosure, unauthorized retention, or negligent handling of SCI
[Sensitive Compartmented Information] by me could cause irreparable
injury to the United States or be used to advantage by a foreign
nation.” The agreement goes on to address how Secretary Clinton could be
sure she was abiding by the letter and the spirit of the agreement. “I
understand that it is my responsibility to consult with appropriate
management authorities in the Department … in order to ensure that I
know whether information or material within my knowledge or control …
might be SCI,” the NDA says.
And yet, while the ink of her signature
was still wet, Hillary made the decision to re-purpose Bill’s old e-mail
server into her own server to be used for official government business.
She and her campaign have made much of the fact that she was permitted,
by State policy, to operate a private server. Par for the course,
though, the fact is conveniently left out that her server was not
authorized to contain, store, transmit, or receive classified
information.

Besides the NDAs showing that Clinton was well aware of her responsibilities under the law, there is the also fact that an e-mail exchange,
dated June 22, 2015 and published by WikiLeaks in October 2016, shows
that Clinton’s inner circle didn’t even buy into her claim of ignorance
where the e-mail server was concerned. As this writer reported
at the time, the e-mail was written by Erika Rottenberg, an attorney
with tremendous experience in matters related to the intersection of
technology and law. Given her résumé, Rottenberg can safely be assumed
to know a thing or two about the law as it relates to the mishandling of
information over an unsecured, unauthorized, private e-mail account.
The e-mail (addressed to Stephanie Hannon — who is the the chief
technical officer of the Clinton Campaign — and Ann O’Leary — who serves
as a senior policy advisor for the campaign) addresses the “twisted
truth” of the way Clinton claimed she “only used one device” (a
BlackBerry) “when 2 weeks earlier, it was an iphone, BB [BlackBerry] and
ipad.” But the most damning part of the e-mail is when Rottenberg says:

I know when I talk to my friends who are
attorneys we are all struggling with what happened to the emails and
aren’t satisfied with answers to date. While we all know of the
occasional use of personal email addresses for business, none of my
friends circle can understand how it was viewed as ok/secure/appropriate
to use a private server for secure documents AND why further Hillary
took it upon herself to review them and delete documents without
providing anyone outside her circle a chance to weigh in. It smacks of
acting above the law and it smacks of the type of thing I’ve either
gotten discovery sanctions for, fired people for, etc.

Phrases like “secure documents,” “took it upon herself,” “above the
law,” and “discovery sanctions” — coming from a lawyer with so much
experience in matters of the law where technology is concerned — speak
volumes about Clinton’s intent.

Furthermore, if Clinton had no intent to break the law, her
deliberate actions — and those of her associates (read: accomplices) —
aimed at hiding her use of that private server, would make no sense: one
who is unaware she is breaking the law does not attempt to hide the
fact that she is breaking the law. But in February 2016, records
disclosed by Department of State as part of a Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) lawsuit reveal that Hillary Clinton — and senior officials
within the State Department — acted to set up a hidden computer network
to allow her to access her private e-mail server without going through
the secured — and archived — government network.

As this writer reported at the time:

The revelation came to light Monday when Judicial Watch made public the records
received as the result of a court order in its FOIA lawsuit about the
private e-mail server and account Mrs. Clinton used during her time as
secretary of state. According to a release by Judicial Watch, the
records included an e-mail thread detailing plans to “set up a
stand-alone PC in the Secretary’s office, connected to the internet (but
not through [the government] system) to enable her to check her emails
from her desk.”

The e-mail thread — covering a two-day period right after Mrs.
Clinton was sworn in as secretary of state — destroys any doubt that
Mrs. Clinton and her accomplices were aware that they were keeping her
e-mails “off the grid.” It discusses — in clear language — the plan to
allow “email be accessed remotely through the web using a non-DOS
[Department of State] computer” and to set up another office unconnected
to the government network “for HRC so she can go across hall regularly
to check her email.”

Given all of this, it is no wonder that congressional investigators
have found “irregularities” in the FBI investigation that claimed
Clinton did not intend to break the law.

Those investigators have also discovered more evidence that Comey’s
FBI had already decided to exonerate Clinton even before the
investigation was complete. The Hill reported:

Some
Republicans on the committee say the findings and revelations have left
them more convinced than ever that FBI leadership rigged the outcome to
clear Clinton.

Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) — who serves on the House Judiciary Committee —
said, “This was an effort to pre-bake the cake, pre-bake the outcome.”
His comment was prompted by revelations that Comey had already begun
drafting his report recommending against indictment before FBI
investigators had interviewed more than a dozen key witnesses including
Clinton herself and the computer firm employee who used the open-source
program (Bleachbit) to permanently wipe the private server before
Clinton turned it over to investigators. Gaetz’s analogy of pre-baking a
cake is spot on; in this case, the cake was taken out of the oven and
served before all of the ingredients were even assembled.

Senate Judiciary Committee Charles (Chuck) Grassley (R-Iowa) is equally critical of the FBI’s handling of the case. The Hill quoted Grassley as saying:

Making a conclusion before you interview
key fact witnesses and the subject herself violates the very premise of
good investigation. You don’t lock into a theory until you have the
facts. Here the evidence that isn’t public yet shows they locked into
the theory and then edited out the facts that contradicted it.

While the investigation continues, the
Justice Department inspector general “is expected to release initial
findings” in the case in the first quarter of 2018, according to The Hill.
That probe has also been looking into “whether agents and supervisors
had political connections, ethical conflicts or biases that affected
their work.”

Any way you slice it, the Clinton e-mail scandal is not going away
any time soon. And before it is over Clinton and those who helped and
protected her may have to face the music.

1 2 3 4 5