TRUMP: “PALESTINIANS” UNWILLING TO TALK PEACE, SO “WHY SHOULD WE MAKE ANY OF THESE MASSIVE FUTURE PAYMENTS TO THEM?”

TRUMP: “PALESTINIANS” UNWILLING TO TALK PEACE, SO “WHY SHOULD WE MAKE ANY OF THESE MASSIVE FUTURE PAYMENTS TO THEM?”
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

For years the U.S. has been showering billions upon various entities,
hoping to buy their loyalty or at least compliance. We’ve been played
for easy marks by the sharpies of the world. President Trump is calling a
halt. He is the first President even to threaten to call a halt. This
is the first administration to show that intimidation and bullying are
no longer currency in the White House.


“Trump threatens stop to Palestinian aid over Jerusalem row,” BBC, January 3, 2018:

The US may stop aid payments to Palestinians who are “no longer willing to talk peace”, President Trump said.

On Twitter, Mr Trump said the United States received “no appreciation or respect” in return for its aid.

He also said his controversial recognition of the contested city of
Jerusalem as Israel’s capital took the hugely divisive issue “off the
table” for new peace talks.

Palestinians had said the move showed the US could not be a neutral broker.
Soon after Washington’s decision was announced in December, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said he would not accept any US peace plan for the Middle East.
The decision on Jerusalem was also overwhelmingly condemned at the
United Nations, where 128 countries voted against Mr Trump’s fulfilment
of a campaign promise.
The US president was following up earlier comments about aid payments
to Pakistan, in which he said the US had received only “lies and
deceit” in exchange for billions of dollars in aid.
Jerusalem is one of the world’s most contested sites.
Israel claims the whole of the city as its capital. The Palestinians
want East Jerusalem, occupied by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war, to
be the capital of a future Palestinian state.
Mr Trump, however, decided to formally recognise Jerusalem as
Israel’s capital, despite being warned it could cause unrest in the
region.
He also said he would move the US embassy there from Tel Aviv, where all other nations have their consulates.
For the Palestinians, Mr Abbas said: “The United States has proven to be a dishonest mediator in the peace process.”
He also called Jerusalem the “eternal capital of the state of Palestine”.

How did the Palestinians respond to Mr Trump’s threat to cut aid?

Angrily. A Twitter feed of the governing Palestine Liberation
Organisation accused Mr Trump of sabotaging their “search for peace”.

What kind of aid does the US send to Palestinians?

Mr Trump’s tweets followed remarks from Nikki Haley, the US envoy to
the United Nations, in which she said the US would stop contributing to
the UN’s relief agency for Palestinian refugees.
The agency runs education, health, and social programmes. The United
States is its largest governmental donor, handing over almost $370m
(£270m) in 2016.
Speaking at a news conference, Ms Haley said: “The president has
basically said that he doesn’t want to give any additional funding, or
stop funding, until the Palestinians are agreeing to come back to the
negotiation table.”…

_______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
https://www.jihadwatch.org/2018/01/while-complaining-that-palestinians-will-starve-because-of-trumps-cuts-pa-buys-abbas-50000000-private-jet 

LONDON UNDER ITS MUSLIM MAYOR: SHARP RISE IN KNIFE CRIME, GUN CRIME, BURGLARY, RAPE, HOMICIDE

 LIBERALISM & JIHAD 
A DEADLY COMBINATION
LONDON UNDER ITS MUSLIM MAYOR: SHARP RISE IN KNIFE CRIME, GUN CRIME, BURGLARY, RAPE, HOMICIDE 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Is London descending into chaos because Sadiq Khan is a Muslim? No,
London is descending into chaos because its voters put identity over
competence, and elected this man because he was a Muslim, to prove to
the world that they were not racist, not because he would make a capable
mayor.


“Sadiq’s London: Knife Crime, Gun Crime, Theft, Burglary, Rape, Homicide all MASSIVELY Up,” by Raheem Kassam, Breitbart, January 2, 2018:

Britain’s media celebrated in droves when London elected its first Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, in May 2016.

Now the cacophony caused by the “we’re not racist” backslapping has
ended, the true implications of a Khan mayoralty are being realised.


In Britain’s capital over the past year, Khan presided over rises in
knife crime, gun crime, theft, burglary, rape, homicide, and more. And
not just by a little bit, either.


Some in the media — by which I mean basically just me — predicted Khan might be a disaster for London, but the extent to which this is true was beyond even our worst nightmares.
Parking the anecdotal evidence of Khan giving preference to genital mutilation-linked groups, and using his platform to agitate against the U.S. President, the statistics reveal a terrifying incompetence in keeping London safe — one of the mayor’s core areas of responsibility.
Data from
the Mayor of London’s Police and Crime Office — led by former
lobbyist-turned-Deputy Mayor Sophie Linden — reveals a sharp uptick in
violent crime in Khan’s first year.
From the years 2015/16 to 2016/17, homicides in London rose by 27.1
per cent. Youth homicide jumped 70 per cent. Serious youth violence was
up 19 per cent. Robbery was up 33.4 per cent, while home burglaries rose
by 18.7 per cent.


Theft went up by over 10,000 incidents in a year, up 33.9 per cent,
and there were more than 4,000 additional knife crime incidents under
Khan than under his predecessor, a rise of 31.3 per cent.


Rape in the capital rose by 18.3 per cent, while there were 2,551
incidents of gun crime, representing a rise of 16.3 per cent on the
previous year.

The Mayor has continuously blamed central government “police cuts”
for the problems faced, but statistics reveal London only lost around
1,000 police officers (3 per cent) in the past year, reducing the
workforce from 31,343 to 30,379.
The report compares November to October data from the years 2015/16 and 2016/17.
Earlier this year London overtook New York City as one of the most dangerous capital cities in the Western world. The House of Commons recently revealed the UK capital has more acid attacks per capita than any other city in the world.
The Guido Fawkes blog notes:
“In the years before Khan became mayor the numbers had fallen
significantly – the Tories had got the numbers down to between 10 and 15
deaths of young people per year from over 30” and asks: “Why isn’t Sadiq facing more pressure on this? It should really be a much bigger story…”…

RAND PAUL: PAKISTAN BURNS OUR FLAG & IMPRISONS CHRISTIANS

 Rand Paul: Pakistan Burns Our Flag And Imprisons Christians
RAND PAUL: PAKISTAN BURNS OUR FLAG & IMPRISONS CHRISTIANS 
 Senator repeats Trump’s call to end aid
BY STEVE WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Senator Rand Paul repeated a call by the President this week
to end aid to Pakistan, saying that Trump is right because Pakistan
provides a safe haven for terrorists, incarcerates Christians, and hates
the US.

Appearing on Fox News Channel’s “Your World,” Paul said that aid
should not be given to countries who deny human rights and openly oppose
US principles.

“I think most Americans would support the president on this. Why
don’t we like to see our money going to countries that burn our flag?”
Paul said.


“In Pakistan, they incarcerate Christians.” he added, explaining that
“There is a Christian Asia Bibi that’s been on death row for five
years.”


“They put a Dr. Shakil Afridi in jail for 33 years. He’s the guy that
helps us get bin Laden.” Paul added, noting that “They looked the other
way that bin Laden was there over a decade.”


“So yes there should be conditions to it. We shouldn’t give money to
countries that have mass protests burning our flag and put Christians in
jail for gossip.” Paul exclaimed.


“There’s no reason in the world we should give them one penny when
they put Christians in jail or put people in jail that helped to get us
bin Laden. That shows to me to—makes me think that they don’t care about
being our ally.” he added.

“At the very least, if you give people money, they ought to be your
friend and they ought to be your ally. There’s some question whether
Pakistani intelligence cooperates with the network that kills our
soldiers across the border in Afghanistan.” Paul continued.

“Yeah, Americans agree with the president. We ought to quit sending good money after bad.” The Senator urged.

Paul added that he has discussed with Trump how to put the money to better use.

“And what I discussed with the president, I have an idea for using
some of that money at home. We have bridges, roads that need repair.
Keep that money at home and put it to rebuilding our infrastructure here
at home.” he stated.

Trump tweeted a promise Tuesday to put a halt to Pakistan receiving
billions of dollars from the US government every year for the last
decade and a half.

The President said that no more will he tolerate the Pakistani
authorities ‘lies and deceit’, and ‘thinking of our leaders as fools’.

Paul responded to give a whole hearted thumbs up to Trump’s
sentiment, noting that he himself has advocated ending aid to Pakistan
for years.

It was reported last week that the administration is
considering withholding $225 million in aid to Pakistan over frustration
with its handling of terror networks.

Pakistan’s defense minister responded to Trump Monday, saying that
the US has acted with “nothing but invective and mistrust” toward
Pakistan for years.

“[Pakistan] as anti-terror ally has given free to US: land & air
communication, military bases & intel cooperation that decimated
Al-Qaeda over last 16yrs, but they have given us nothing but invective
& mistrust,” Khurram Dastgir-Khan tweeted.

The US ambassador to Pakistan, David Hale, was reportedly summoned to the Pakistani foreign ministry to explain Trump’s comments.

 

WHY IS INFORMED CONSENT TO VACCINATION A HUMAN RIGHT?

WHY IS INFORMED CONSENT TO VACCINATION 
A HUMAN RIGHT? 
 Civil liberties. They include the legal right to exercise freedom of
thought, speech, conscience, and religious belief. Autonomy. Protection
of autonomy and bodily integrity includes the human right to exercise
informed consent to medical risk taking. What is informed consent?
Informed consent means you have the legal right to be fully and
accurately informed about the benefits and risks of a medical
intervention, including a pharmaceutical product, and be free to make a
voluntary decision about whether to accept the risk for yourself or your
minor child without being coerced or punished for the decision you
make. Informed consent has guided the ethical practice of medicine since
the doctors’ trial at Nuremberg after World War II.

COMMUNIST CHINA VOWS TO “RESOLUTELY UPHOLD AUTHORITY OF U.N.”

 https://www.hongkongfp.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/POWERPNT_2017-04-14_12-52-33.jpg
COMMUNIST CHINA VOWS TO 
“RESOLUTELY UPHOLD AUTHORITY OF U.N.”
BY ALEX NEWMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
As the American people and the Trump administration work to rein
in the international dictators club, the mass-murdering dictator ruling
mainland China vowed in his New Year’s address
to “resolutely uphold the authority and status of the United Nations.”
Pledging to “chart the future” for all of “humanity,”  Chinese Communist
Party boss Xi Jinping (shown) also claimed his regime would serve as
“keeper of international order.” The controversial statements sparked
concerns among analysts worried about an increasingly belligerent
dictatorship in China that now has its agents in leadership roles across
the “global governance” system. In short, freedom is being threatened,
worldwide.


In his New Year’s address, delivered on December 31 of 2017, Xi
repeatedly emphasized the notion that the Communist Chinese regime was a
“responsible” and “major” player in the world. “China will resolutely
uphold the authority and status of the United Nations, actively fulfill
China’s international obligations and duties, remain firmly committed to
China’s pledges to tackle climate change, actively push for the Belt
and Road Initiative, and always be a builder of world peace, contributor
of global development and keeper of international order,” Xi declared
in his speech. “The Chinese people are ready to chart out a more
prosperous, peaceful future for humanity, with people from other
countries.”

Breaking down those comments, and considering them in light of recent
developments, it becomes clear that the international system of “global
governance,” as globalists refer to it, is increasingly under the sway
of the most murderous regime in recorded human history. In fact, as The New American warned years ago,
the globalist-backed Communist regime in China is being positioned by
the internationalist establishment as a leading force in what both
globalists and Chinese Communists often refer to as the “New World
Order.” The UN and its affiliates will be the key players, if the
establishment gets its way.

Examining Xi’s New Year statements, which were no doubt thoroughly
considered before being made publicly, yields significant clues as to
Beijing’s vision for the world. In the United States, the American
people and their elected representatives in both parties are becoming
increasingly weary of the UN. Indeed, the bid for a complete U.S.
withdrawal from the UN has become a mainstream position shared by grassroots Americans and even political leaders. Even globalist-minded leaders from both parties have spoken of defunding the UN. Trump, too, has vowed to rein in the UN, even announcing an American exit from various UN agencies and agreements.
And so, it is very significant that the Communist Chinese regime vowed
to “resolutely uphold the authority and status of the United Nations.”

But what that means, exactly, is not clear. For instance, would
Communist China take action if Congress were to challenge UN “authority”
and pass the American Sovereignty Restoration Act (H.R. 193),
which would end U.S. involvement in the UN? The UN routinely condemns
America for alleged “violations” of what it calls “international law” —
everything from
gun rights and spankings for children, to free speech and federalism,
to limited government and repealing ObamaCare, have been declared
violations of global “law” by UN officials
. The Communist Chinese regime has declared Americans’ gun rights to be a “human rights” violation, too.
What, if anything, does the regime in China intend to do to enforce
these illegitimate UN decrees as part of upholding the alleged
“authority” of the UN? Xi did not say.

The dictator’s claim that Beijing will “fulfill China’s international
obligations and duties” is less surprising. While the communist regime
routinely violates the God-given rights of its subjects — forced
abortions, torture, murder of dissidents, harvesting organs from
religious minorities, mass censorship, ethnic cleansing, cultural
genocide in Tibet, and more
— that appears to be compatible with its
so-called “international obligations.” Indeed, Article 29 of the UN
Universal Declaration of Human Rights makes clear that there are no real rights, as they can all be limited “by law,” and that even your privileges can
“never be used contrary to the purposes and principles of the United
Nations.” Still, when UN kangaroo courts rule against Beijing, it tends
to ignore the “ruling.”

On alleged man-made “climate change,” the Chinese regime vowed to
“remain firmly committed to China’s pledges to tackle climate change.”
That, too, is no surprise. In fact, China’s totalitarian rulers have been laughing all the way to the bank since 2015, when Obama pretended to commit the United States to the UN “Paris Agreement” mandating economic suicide for the West and mass subsidies for China and Third World kleptocrats. Under the UN “climate” regime, which Trump has vowed to exit, the Chinese pledged to continue emitting more and more CO2 (the gas of life) for years to come, while the Obama administration promised to use illegal executive decrees to radically slash U.S. energy production and prosperity to accomplish literally nothing for the environment.

Xi also promised to “actively push for the Belt and Road Initiative.” As documented by The New American and many other sources, this scheme, despite being marketed as a “win-win” way to boost trade, is much more than that. With
help from the UN, the regime in Beijing intends to dominate —
economically and politically — the Eurasian landmass, with its power
reaching into Africa and Europe. The UN is fully onboard
. “While the
Belt and Road Initiative and the 2030 Agenda are different in their
nature and scope, both have sustainable development as the overarching
objective,” explained Socialist UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres,
with “sustainable development” a phrase used to describe a totalitarian UN-backed ideology seeking to centralize and expand coercive controls over humanity. 

The Chinese dictator’s pledge to serve as “keeper of international
order” is highly significant. The official narrative on world order, as pushed in the globalist establishment’s leading propaganda organs,
is that Trump is retreating from international leadership, putting what
they call the “liberal world order” at risk. Also part of this bogus
narrative is that the mass-murdering regime in China is valiantly and
somewhat reluctantly stepping into the void to protect and preserve
globalism, multilateralism, global governance, and more from a rogue
president in the White House. However, as this magazine has documented,
the globalist show is being engineered for public consumption — and the end result will be international tyranny if the agenda is not stopped.

Perhaps most alarming, Xi said in his speech that globalist Western
leaders and elites were fully onboard with his vision of a Communist
Chinese-led world order. At the G20 Summit and the World Economic Forum
in Davos, a premier gathering of globalists where Xi gave a keynote speech,
the dictator said he had “in-depth” exchanges of views with “concerted
parties,” as Beijing’s propaganda and espionage service Xinhua put it.
“They are all in favor of the joint building of a community with a
shared future for humanity,” Xi said, promising that the global order
they all seek would “benefit people across the world.” He did not say
whether Trump, who attended the G20 but not the WEF, agreed with the
vision.

The bizarre remarks by Chinese Communist Party boss Xi Jinping come
just weeks after UN General Assembly President Miroslav Lajcak, also an
unrepentant Communist Party operative, praised Beijing’s growing role in “global affairs.”
“I am also heartened by China’s pledge to join the new UN Peacekeeping
Capability Readiness System (PCRS) and take the lead in setting up a
permanent peacekeeping police squad and building a peacekeeping standby
force of 8,000 troops,” Lajcak was quoted as saying by Xinhua, a
propaganda organ and espionage front for the Chinese Communist Party.

On the domestic front, Xi vowed to continue oppressing the Chinese
people under the guise of ensuring their “well-being,” as defined by the
Communist Party. “That is why we should strengthen our sense of
responsibility, and do a good job of ensuring the people’s well-being,”
Xi said. “The well-being of our people is the Party and the government’s
greatest political achievement. Our cadres should put the people’s
state of living at the heart, and help them live a better life.”
Following a recent trip to China by Barack Obama after Trump’s trip,
Chinese propaganda organs referred to Obama as a “veteran cadre,” too, a term normally reserved for leading communists.

The fact that the brutal dictator of China is now so bold and brazen
in openly proclaiming the global ambitions of his murderous autocracy
should be cause for alarm to freedom-loving peoples everywhere. However,
despite the sense of confidence expressed by globalists and communists
united in common cause, the battle for freedom and self-government is by
no means over yet. In fact, with the American people waking up to the
dangers of globalism and statism in record numbers, the establishment’s
best laid plans may be facing the greatest challenge to date.

Related articles:

China: Staking Claim in the New World Order

In Davos, Globalists Hail Leadership of Communist Chinese Tyrant

GOP Sends Delegate to Communist Chinese Political Party Meeting

California Joins Forces With Communist Regime Against U.S.

Communist China Opens “Global Governance” School

Trump’s China Entourage: Heavy With Goldman Sachs, Rothschild, CFR Globalists

“Death By China” Film Exposes Suicidal U.S. Policy

Chinese Tyranny 2.0

UN Joins Beijing to Advance Globalism With “One Belt, One Road”

Chinese Mega-bank Partners With World Bank for New World Order

Remembering the Mass-murderer Mao

Why Is the UN Protecting Child Rapists?

U.S. Independence Attacked as Never Before by UN Interdependence

United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.

THE MCMASTER CABAL: LEAD OPERATIVES IN THE DEEP STATE COUP EFFORT TO OUST TRUMP

 https://hw.infowars.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/110917mcmaster.jpg
THE MCMASTER CABAL: LEAD OPERATIVES IN THE DEEP STATE COUP EFFORT TO OUST TRUMP
BY WILLIAM F. JASPER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Are top-level members of the Trump administration colluding on
ways to oust President Trump? Are members of Trump’s Cabinet and
National Security Council plotting a coup? Is National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster among those whom former Trump political adviser Roger Stone alleges (see here and here)
have been having “conversations” about removing Trump from office?
There is ample reason for seriously considering the stunning
allegations. And there is good reason to believe that General McMaster
(shown) would figure prominently in any such effort.

Ever since his election, there has been speculation that the “Deep State”
(or the “establishment”), the globalists who operate as the “permanent
government” of the United States — through both Democratic and
Republican administrations would attempt to remove President Trump from
office — by one means or another. This is not tinfoil hat conspiracy
theory; it has been obvious from Day One in office (actually, even
before his inauguration) that this president is being subjected to
unprecedented, coordinated attacks from within and without, including
most especially from the internationalist political operatives who
control our intelligence agencies, the State Department, the National
Security Council, and numerous other agencies in the federal
bureaucracy. These operatives have engaged in a steady beat of
critically timed leaks to their Deep State allies at the New York Times, Washington Post, Politico,
CNN and other organs of the virulently anti-Trump “mainstream” media
thought cartel. The leaks — many of which carry criminal penalties for
releasing classified national security information — all aim at
crippling and damaging President Trump politically.

Together with the non-stop attacks accusing him of racism, misogyny,
sexual harassment, Islamophobia, xenophobia, etc., the Deep State
opponents hope to bludgeon President Trump until he is sufficiently
damaged, to the point that he can be removed by impeachment, or invoking
the 25th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. If those efforts fail,
there is always resort to the more extreme option — Plan C. The “25th
Amendment solution,” has been pushed for months now by The Atlantic, the National Constitution Center, CNN, the New York Times, Washington Post,
and the other usual suspects. Under this controversial application of
the constitutional provision for presidential succession, a majority of
the Cabinet, together with the vice president (Mike Pence) would declare
President Trump unfit for office due to “inability to discharge the
powers or duties of his office.” Since President Trump is not physically
incapacitated, the self-appointed removers have relentlessly attacked
him on supposed mental and psychological infirmities. Since President
Trump would not likely concede to such a “soft coup,” the matter would
then go to Congress, which would need to support the removal by a
two-thirds vote margin in both the House and Senate.

CFR’s Max Boot: “Cri du Coeur From Inside the Deep State”

Where does Herbert Raymond McMaster fit in all of this? He is, most
likely, one of the top Deep State actors orchestrating the moves to
undermine President Trump. As we reported on December 29 (Deep State Boasts: We’re Sabotaging Trump From the Inside),
McMaster has been repeatedly singled out for praise by the anti-Trump
globalists, especially those associated with the Deep State’s premier
Brain Trust, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Most recently, the CFR has congratulated McMaster (a CFR member) and Nadia Schadlow (also CFR)
for sabotaging President Trump’s first National Security Strategy (NSS)
report, for cleverly (and subversively) replacing “Trumpian” notions —
such as defending national sovereignty and promoting America First —
with the internationalist, pro-UN, pro-world government positions that
have become “traditional” in the higher levels of the
Democrat-Republican duopoly that has run the country for much of the
past century. CFR Senior Fellow Max Boot, a “Republican” who endorsed
Hillary Clinton for president, approvingly described the
McMaster-Schadlow contributions to the Trump NSS as a “cri du coeur [cry
of the heart] from inside the Deep State signaling to the outside world
that Trumpian thinking has not entirely taken over the U.S.
government.” Yes, and it was also signaling to other Deep State
operatives that anti-Trump opponents within the highest levels of the
administration believe they are ascendant and have such power and
influence that they can get away with thumbing their noses at their
boss. Moreover, it would appear to be one of many signals emanating from
the Deep State’s network that the time may be soon approaching to make
the Big Play. As we reported, Max Boot’s essay is accompanied on the CFR
website by similar praise for Mc Master’s NSS subversion from CFR
President Richard Haass and the CFR’s Senior Fellow for Global
Governance Stewart Patrick.

Boosting McMaster, Trashing Trump

Another of the many important recent signals in that respect is the sneak preview of the NSS provided by Kate Brannen in The Atlantic, one of the media attack dogs most relentlessly baying at Trump, snapping at his heels, and lunging for his throat. Her piece, “Trump’s National Security Strategy is Decidedly Non-Trumpian,”
carried this subtitle: “An exclusive preview of the White House’s plan
highlights the wide gulf between what the president says and what he
does.”

The Atlantic’s “exclusive preview” — 10 days before the
White House released the document — was made possible, Ms. Brannen
informs the reader, thanks to “a Trump administration staffer who
reviewed a draft of the document — and shared key excerpts with me.” The
fact that a source high enough up in the administration (in the White
House, the NSC, or the Cabinet) would leak the document, especially to a
hostile reporter at a hostile publication, should confirm to any
sentient being that President Trump has backstabbers close to the
throne.

“A few classically Trumpian themes are there — the wall, concern over
trade imbalances — but much of the document reflects the values and
priorities of the president’s predecessors,” Brannen notes, regarding
the NSS. Pre-empting the CFR’s Max Boot,
she credits this continuity — which contradicts the president’s stated
policies — to McMaster and Schadlow. “The draft document,” she says,
“was spearheaded by Nadia Schadlow, senior director for strategy on the
National Security Council (NSC). Schadlow is regarded as a conservative
foreign-policy expert based on her experience in the establishment
think-tank world, including stints at the Council on Foreign Relations
and the Smith Richardson Foundation. She joined the NSC at Lieutenant
General H.R. McMaster’s request after he took over as national security
adviser following retired Lieutenant General Michael Flynn’s resignation
in February.”

As we noted in our previous article, the pundits and media-cited
experts invariably try to misdirect readers/viewers and bolster
Schadlow’s credibility by describing her as “conservative,” implying, of
course, that her globalist ties and views should not be viewed with
suspicion. And, naturally, Brannen has no trouble finding academic
“experts” to weigh in in favor of the McMaster/Schadlow team and against
Trump. “The NSS drafters did an admirable job of trying to square the
president’s views with longstanding American principles and interests,
but the variance with the president’s own behavior is so wide as to make
the document incredible,” former NSC and State Department staffer Kori
Schake told her. Besides being a CFR member (which Brannen doesn’t
mention), Schake is a fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution
and co-editor of the book Warriors and Citizens with Trump’s
Defense Secretary James Mattis. Mattis and Secretary of State Rex
Tillerson are two of the other top-level administration members that
receive generally positive reviews from the establishment Swamp
Creatures and their media compadres. Like McMaster, Mattis and Tillerson
are presented as being “moderating” influences on an otherwise
dangerous and out-of-control president.

Brannen also quotes former Obama NSC official Joshua Geltzer (CFR),
now a professor at Georgetown Law School. “Whatever value the language
of an NSS has, that value depends on the credibility of the deeds and
other words that might back it up,” Joshua Geltzer said. “Sadly, there’s
been too much in the past year designed to stoke fear and sow schisms
to make credible language of unity, however much I do crave such unity.”

Among the many alleged sins that Brannen accuses President Trump of
is that “He has undermined the rule of law repeatedly, personally
attacking specific judges, the federal judiciary more broadly, as well
as the FBI, the Justice Department and their leaders, some of whom he
picked.” That is rich, coming from a rabidly partisan “journalist” who
assists and praises those who violate our laws and jeopardize our
national security, and whose publication has ceaselessly attacked the
president.

The Atlantic, by the way, is one of the many establishment media organs that endorsed Hillary Clinton. The Atlantic’s
publisher, David G. Bradley, is a member of the CFR, as is veteran
leftwing correspondent James Fallows. Bradley sold the majority share in
the company to the Emerson Collective, a leftwing outfit led by Laurene
Powell Jobs (CFR), the billionaire widow of Apple Inc. co-founder Steve
Jobs, but has stayed on to continue building the Washington, D.C.-based
media empire’s influence among the Swamp supporters. Bradley, Jobs, and
the folks at The Atlantic are so venomously anti-Trump that when Politico
fired reporter Julia Ioffe for an extremely crude F-bomb tweet
suggesting an incestuous relationship between President Trump and his
daughter Ivanka, The Atlantic immediately hired Ioffe to cover politics and national security.

The Atlantic’s Kate Brannen also writes for Foreign Policy,
a publication launched in 1970 by the globalist Carnegie Endowment for
International Peace, but purchased in 2013 by the CFR-dominated
Washington Post Co. (now rebranded as Graham Holdings Company). Writers
for Foreign Policy tilt heavily to the Democratic portside and many are prominent Swamp denizens. Like the CFR’s own in-house journal, Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy depends heavily on CFR “experts,” but takes a more openly “progressive” stance on most issues.

McMaster’s Night of the Long Knives: Purging Trump Loyalists

On May 9, 2017, Brannen rushed to McMaster’s defense with a Foreign Policy
article titled, “The Knives Are Out for Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster.” “In
the White House ‘Game of Thrones for morons,’” Brannen wrote, “Steve
Bannon is trying to turn the president against his national security
advisor.” Brannen’s Foreign Policy piece was playing off of a similar piece written the day before by Eli Lake for Bloomberg News
titled, “Washington Loves General McMaster, But Trump Doesn’t.”
(Michael Bloomberg, of course, is a member of the CFR and his company is
a CFR “President’s Circle” corporate member.) Lake and Brannen paint a
picture of the noble, duty-bound, “brilliant” McMaster besieged by
ideological cretins and “morons.”

Brannen’s colleague at The Atlantic, Rosie Gray, penned a
similar piece titled, “The War Against H.R. McMaster,” in which she
warned that “the national-security adviser’s job is on the line, and the
pro-Trump media have launched an all-out assault against him.” The
“pro-Trump Media” to which she referred — Breitbart News, The Daily Caller, The Free Beacon, Infowars,
and others —   had indeed been going after McMaster, and for good
reason; McMaster is seen (correctly, in this writer’s opinion) as
leading a slow-motion coup, gradually replacing Trump loyalists with CFR
globalists.

McMaster is not the mastermind of this operation; he is merely the
point man for the Deep State. The takedown of General Flynn was
orchestrated by operatives above McMaster’s pay grade to clear the way
for his ascendancy. The same operatives, no doubt, maneuvered to make
sure that Trump would not replace Flynn with Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, an
early Trump loyalist who still remains as Executive Secretary and Chief
of Staff of the NSC. Over the past several months, McMaster and his Deep
State enablers have whittled away the Trump loyalists to the point
where the president has become essentially surrounded by CFR globalists
and their minions. If Bannon & Company had the knives out for
McMaster, it appears McMaster & Company had the longer knives — and
more of them — and were a step or two ahead of the Trumpsters.

Here is a short list of some of the significant casualties among the
Trump loyalists whom McMaster is credited with giving the axe since
General Flynn’s departure:

Steve Bannon — NSC member and chief White House Adviser
Richard Higgins — NSC Director for Strategic Planning
Colonel Derek Harvey — NSC Middle East Advisor
Ezra Cohen-Watnick — NSC Senior Director for Intelligence Programs
Tera Dahl — NSC Deputy Chief of Staff
Adam Lovinger — NSC Senior Director for Strategic Assessment
Sebastian Gorka — Deputy Assistant to the President

Thus, McMaster — who is widely recognized as being at odds with key planks of President Trump’s agenda, and has, reportedly, openly mocked the president at a dinner,
calling him a “dope,” and an “idiot,” with the intelligence of a
“kindergartner” — has gained strategic high ground in the Trump
administration. While purging Trump loyalists, he also kept on board
(and in some cases promoted) Obama holdovers and CFR globalists. Key
players among McMaster’s Minions include: Nadia Schadlow (CFR); Dina
Habib Powell (CFR and Trilateral Commission), although she has indicated
she will be leaving sometime early in 2018; Victoria Coates (who cites
Donald Rumsfeld and K.T. McFarland, both CFR members, as her mentors).

Among the more notorious Obama NSC holdovers whom McMaster protected
are: Abigail Grace, Fernando Cutz , Merry Lin, and Andrea Hall (who is
reported to be the source of critical leaks from the Trump NSC). In
addition, McMaster campaigned (unsuccessfully) to bring Obama CIA
operative Linda Weissgold in to replace Trump loyalist Cohen-Watnick.
She’s the one who drafted the infamous “Benghazi talking points” memo to
deceive Congress and exonerate Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and
President Barack Obama from responsibility in the deadly attack. Trump
nixed that appointment. However, McMaster did succeed in bringing Kris
Bauman, a radical Hamas-PLO apologist, to be NSC point man on Israel.

Having made many unwise appointments, President Trump is now finding
himself increasingly surrounded by avowed enemies and smiling
backstabbers. The McMaster appointment could prove to be one of the most
disastrous choices, since the NSC chief and his minions already are
playing a crucial role in what are obviously Deep State efforts to
remove President Trump. Whether that ultimately comes down to Plan A, Plan B, or Plan C,
McMaster will be a key establishment agent in issuing critical orders
to carry it out, most especially if it comes to Plan C — removing the
president by assassination.

These are, obviously, very, very serious charges, and we would not be
entertaining the possibility that such heinous, criminal schemes could
actually be in the offing except for the fact that steadily mounting
evidence points inescapably to that conclusion. The methodical setting
up of pieces and removing of others, together with the coordinated,
relentless Fake News campaign, shows a chess board in play in which the
enemies of freedom are moving toward checkmate.

President Trump still has a window of opportunity to forestall a
coup, but his time may be running out. McMaster is the swamp creature
who, arguably, now presents the greatest internal threat not only to the
president’s agenda, but to his life. President Trump should listen to
his loyal base, which has been urging him to fire McMaster for the past
several months. If he fails to do so, he puts not only himself but the
entire nation at risk; a political coup (whether by Plan A, B, or C)
would throw the republic into a constitutional crisis, one which would
likely prove fatal for freedom. McMaster should go — Now!


Related articles:

Deep State “Plan C” Is to Kill Trump, Advisor Roger Stone Warns

Deep State Boasts: We’re Sabotaging Trump From the Inside

Greenies, Globalists Decry Trump Reversal of Obama Policy on Climate “Security Threat”

Globalist McMaster Purges Trump Loyalists, Protects Obamaites

Trump Picks CFR Member for New National Security Advisor

Deep State Secret Societies: Skull & Bones, Bohemians, Illuminati

Deep State Behind the Deep State: CFR, Trilaterals, Bilderberg

Deep State “Intelligence” Threatens Trump, Self-Government
_______________________________________________________
SEE OUR PREVIOUS POSTS HERE, IN THIS CONDENSED STORY:
https://ratherexposethem.org/2017/12/hr-mcmasters-willful-ignorance-andor.html 

PLANNED PARENTHOOD’S ANNUAL REPORT: 321,384 ABORTIONS PERFORMED IN 2016-2017

PLANNED PARENTHOOD’S ANNUAL REPORT: 321,384 ABORTIONS PERFORMED IN 2016-2017 
BY HEATHER CLARK
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

WASHINGTON — The abortion and contraception giant
Planned Parenthood has released its annual report, which shows that
while the number of abortions it performed last year are the lowest in a
decade, still over 321,000 babies were murdered in their mother’s womb
during the 2016-2017 fiscal year.

“As we enter our 101st year, providing access to expert health care
and education remains at the center of what we do. We continue to
drive innovations in health care delivery by leveraging new technology
to get patients the care and information they need to live healthy lives
and build the futures they want,” the organization wrote in its report, which outlines the services provided over the past year, most centering on sexual activity.

Planned Parenthood reported 321,384 abortions for the year, down from
the 328,348 performed abortions during the 2015-2016 fiscal year—or
6,964 fewer murdered children. However, the number still equates to over
800 abortions a day.

While some might assume that the number of abortions decreased due to
the provision of contraception, the figures show that the distribution
of birth control continues to decline at Planned Parenthood with each
passing year. Over 2.7 million people were provided with contraceptives
in the 2016-2017 fiscal year—from temporary to permanent, including over
730 thousand emergency contraception kits.

The figure is one million less than what was reported five years
ago, as 3.7 million contraceptives were provided in 2012. 3.5 million
were distributed in 2013, 2.9 million in 2014, and 2.8 million in 2015.

The number of Americans receiving testing for sexually transmitted
diseases (STD’s), however, increased. Over 4.4 million people were
tested or treated for an STD, up from 4.2 million the year prior. Over
222,000 were found to have a sexual disease, up from 209,900 in the
2015-2016 fiscal year. 706,903 patients were tested for HIV, up from
654,218 the year prior.

Only 7,762 women obtained prenatal care during the 2016-2017 fiscal
year as many Planned Parenthood locations do not offer the service, down
from 9,419 the previous year. Just 1,182 mothers obtained miscarriage
care, as opposed to the 2,073 who were served in 2015. 3,389 adoption
referrals were provided compared to the 321,384 abortions performed.

Government funding was the largest source of revenue for the
organization, as it received over $543 million in the year alone, down
slightly from $554 million in 2015-2016. $532 million came from private
contributions and grants. With all the sources of income combined,
Planned Parenthood generated over $1.45 billion in revenue throughout
the fiscal year.

And despite its expenditures, which included $75 million to
“strengthen and secure Planned Parenthood,” $47 million for sexual
education, and $40 million on public policy, the abortion giant still
garnered a $98.5 million dollar profit, labeled as “excess of revenue,”
up from $77 million the year prior and $58 million in 2014.

Read the report in full here.

As previously reported, in an introductory lecture to his course on
obstetrics in 1854, Philadelphia doctor Hugh Lennox Hodge lamented that
even the mothers of his day were lacking of natural affection toward
their own children and sought out means to kill them.

“They seem not to realize that the being within them is indeed
animate, that is, in verity, a human being—body and spirit—that it is of
importance, that its value is inestimable, having reference to this
world and the next,” he said. “They act with as much indifference as if
the living, intelligent, immortal existence lodged within their organs
were of no more value than the bread eaten, or the common excretions of
the system.”

“We can bear testimony that in some instances, the woman who has been
well educated, who occupies high stations in society, whose influence
over others is great, and whose character has not been impugned, will
deliberately resort to any and every measure which may effectively
destroy her unborn offspring,” Hodge sorrowed.

“[S]he recklessly and boldly adopts measures, however severe and
dangerous, for the accomplishment of her unnatural, her guilty purpose …
that she may be delivered of [a child] for which she has no desire, and
whose birth and appearance she dreads.”