EUROPEAN UNION BEGINS COURT ACTION AGAINST POLAND, HUNGARY, CZECH REPUBLIC OVER MIGRANT QUOTAS~BULGARIA CRIMINALIZES RADICAL JIHADIST ISLAM & SHARIA
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
EU officials announced they have begun court action against Poland, Hungary
and the Czech Republic over their opposition to the bloc’s mandatory relocation
scheme. The EU has now turned over the three countries to the European Court of Justice (ECJ). Although the ECJ possesses powers to interpret provisions of
international refugee law, the current crisis — which has caused chaos and led to jihad
attacks, and which threatens the fabric of European culture and society — is
unprecedented. The EU’s relentless attack on the Visegrad group is a troubling, fascist-
like interference in the sovereignty of those nations. The publication Deutshe Welle indicated that Brussels is determined “to see this scheme carried out,” despite the
strong resistance of those countries. Poland’s
Deputy Foreign Minister Konrad Szymanski said that his nation “is ready to defend its
position in the Court,” and declared: “No one will lift the duty of providing public safety
from the Polish government.”
It is the duty of every sovereign free nation to protect the citizens
of its country. Anything less is an evasion of responsibility at best,
treason at worst.
“EU chiefs refer Poland, Hungary and Czech Republic to ECJ over migrant quotas”, by Nick Gutteridge, Express, December 7, 2017:
EU officials announced they have begun court action
against Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic over their opposition to
the bloc’s mandatory relocation scheme.The decision is likely to provoke a furious response from the leaders
of the three states, which have all argued that the programme presents a
security threat to their citizens.It risks once more plunging Brussels into a bitter and acrimonious
battle with three of its newest member states, at a time when the bloc
is trying to uphold its remarkable unity of Brexit.In September Hungary and Slovakia lost an appeal to the ECJ against
the legality of the scheme after arguing that it should have been taken
by a unanimous decision of the member state.After that case eurocrats wrote to all four states not honouring
quotas, with Slovakia subsequently dropping their opposition, ordering
them to immediately start taking in migrants.In a statement the Commission said: “The replies received were again
found not satisfactory and three countries have given no indication that
they will contribute to the implementation of the relocation decision.“This is why, the Commission has decided to move to the next stage of
the infringement procedure and refer the three Member States to the
Court of Justice of the EU.”EU Commission first vice-president Frans Timmermans blasted: “There
can be no free riders in serious crises. We must be able to depend on
every single member state.”He added that “there is no sea wide enough, no fence wide enough to
stop people coming” and Europe must learn to adapt to modern migration
patterns.Hungary and Poland, which have right-wing populist governments, have
previously vowed not to comply with any order from the EU to start
taking in migrants saying it transgresses their sovereignty.Both face heavy fines for failing to comply with any eventual ruling
by the Luxembourg-based ECJ but have said they will face the
consequences to carry out their voters wishes.Hungary was today separately referred to the ECJ over a separate
crackdown on foreign funded NGOs and educational establishment which is a
crude attack on billionaire financier George Soros.The EU set up the migrant quota scheme at the height of the 2015 with
the intention of distributing 160,000 refugees around the bloc to ease
the burden on Greece and Italy….
________________________________________________________
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The Bulgarian parliament has moved to criminalise the
promotion of radical Islam, including advocating a caliphate, religious
violence, and sharia law.
Kudos to Bulgaria for tackling political Islam head on and making the
important point that the “change in law was not aimed at targeting a
religion but a dangerous ideology.”
As stated by UP Member of Parliament Boris Yachev:
Radical Islam is a particularly aggressive and dangerous ideology that justifies violence and the murder of [infidels]
The article goes on to say that Yachev was “insisting it also excused ‘slavery and genocide’ as a ‘systemic policy.’”
Yachev’s words are not difficult to grasp, but many will refer to
such truths as “Islamophobic.” The only notable issue in the quote is
that Yachev is not “insisting” anything of his own accord. What he
describes is in plain black and white in the Quran and Sunnah. Of course
not all Muslims live in accordance with such texts, but those texts are
there, and adhered to by enough Muslims to require Western governments
to take action to protect their culture and citizens against those who
adhere to them.
Promoting any ideology of violence or one threatening the
law and constitution of the nation could be punishable with one to five
years in jail and a fine of around £2,000, the Bulgarian newspaper
Dnevnik reports.
Bulgaria should be congratulated, and should serve as a model nation
in its recognition of the Islamic ideology. That ideology is indeed
invoked by those committing jihad attacks, as well as by those
practicing female genital mutilation, sex slavery, the persecution of
infidels and apostates, the murder of gays and the like. Let’s also hope
that Bulgaria researches and take a further step to outlaw stealth
jihad groups that are found to have ties to recognized terrorist
organizations (such as unindicted co-conspirators to terrorism). For example, even the United Arab Emirates deemed the “unindicted co-conspirator” CAIR to be a terrorist entity.
These stealth organizations also shield jihadists by means of their
incessant victimology narrative and promotion of the word “Islamophobia”
to beat down legitimate criticism of Islam.
“The Bulgarian parliament has moved to criminalise the promotion of
radical Islam, including advocating a caliphate, religious violence, and
sharia law”, by Liam Deacon, Breitbart, December 7, 2017:
The Bulgarian parliament has moved to criminalise the
promotion of radical Islam, including advocating a caliphate, religious
violence, and sharia law.
The legislature adopted the amendments to the nation’s criminal code
aimed at tackling radical Islam on their first reading this Wednesday.
They were proposed by a nationalist electoral alliance called the United Patriots (UP).
Promoting any ideology of violence or one threatening the law and
constitution of the nation could be punishable with one to five years in
jail and a fine of around £2,000, the Bulgarian newspaper Dnevnik
reports.UP Member of Parliament Boris Yachev told the paper that the change
in law was not aimed at targeting a religion but a dangerous ideology.
“Radical Islam is a particularly aggressive and dangerous ideology
that justifies violence and the murder of [infidels],” he said,
insisting it also excused “slavery and genocide” as a “systemic policy”.His party proposed a legal definition of radical Islam, which,
according to the law’s parliamentary reading, includes “when a person is
agitating for the creation of an Islamic State [or caliphate]”.Other tenets are promoting religious law over secular law, the
“forcible application of religious principles”, advocating violence
including “sacred war against non-Muslims [jihad]”, and recruiting
people into Islamist terrorism.In June 2016, the Bulgarian parliament voted with a large majority to
become the third European nation to ban the Islamic full-face veil, or
burqa, finalising the law in September with a fine of around £90.As a legacy of almost 500 years of Ottoman Turkish rule, Bulgaria has
one of the biggest Muslim minorities in Europe at about 12 per cent of
its 7.1 million population, Reuters reports.Speaking in October of this year, Deputy Prime Minister Krasimir
Karakachanov said: “It turns out that problems [with radical Islam] we
see in a number of European countries already exist in Bulgaria.”He claimed that “extremely liberal” laws were allowing the spread of more radical strains of Islam in education and training.
“It is mostly the… financing by private structures of religious
communities that attempt to realise political influence in the
country,”….