Vax Court Sees 400% Increase 
in Vaccine Injury Payouts
 Flu Shot Wins Top Honors for Biggest Payout
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Vaccine injury cases are on the rise people, so if you’ve got your 
head in the sand and you haven’t been paying attention, it’s time to 
wake up.
Here’s a little background for those of you just getting started.

Ronnie Reagan… almost 30 years ago to the day, the 40th president of the United States signed away the rights
of Americans to sue vaccine makers, replacing them with a law that
forces families who have suffered vaccine injury or death to sue the
U.S. government instead of a pharmaceutical company.
As a result, special masters from the United States Special Claims Court, also
known for our purposes as the vaccine court, are given full authority
as judge with no jury to decide the fate of Americans who have had the
unfortunate ‘luck’ to be stricken by a vaccine injury — which can range
from chronic, mild symptoms to death.
Once a year, this non-traditional court provides the public with a glimpse into its inner workings, by issuing an annual report on its website
a ritual that happens every January.  The report is sent to the
President of Congress, otherwise known as the Vice President of the
United States, where it is intended to serve as a bell weather
monitoring reactions the American public may be having to vaccinations
that are increasingly becoming forced by government mandates around the
Great, right?  Accountability in action?
The report, which is consistently ignored by mainstream media/politicians/health officials and the CDC, lies dormant on the reports page of the U.S. Special Claims Court website.
No headlines, no press release, no analysis, no alert the media, no nothing.
No surprise, given that most people in America don’t even know that vaccines were ruled to be unavoidably unsafe by the U.S. Supreme Court in 2011. 
Also no surprise, that mainstream, co-opted, globalist elite media
constantly ignore this report, along with sane arguments made by health
freedom advocates about the dangers and risks of vaccine injury (‘look! a
unicorn!’), instead using terms like ‘the science is in,’ and vaccine
risk has been ‘debunked,’ to deter rational discussion pertaining to
evidence that is hiding in plain sight.
Also no surprise that the U.S. Special Claims Court offers up an
ineffective, low tech, archaic version of the report every year. 
Instead of a nice, sort-able spread sheet, the court posts a scanned PDF
document — a format which requires labor-intensive activities to
conduct any sort of concrete analysis.  One must either re-data-entry
all 220+ pages which would take weeks, or conduct an extensive,
hand-written breakdown by vaccine of each case, combined with extensive
tallying and organization efforts in order to identify statistical
relevance and trends emerging from the vaccine court.
Is this by design?  Perhaps.  Most definitely it is at the very least
a deterrent from having anybody actually sit down and try to analyze
the damn thing.
Which is exactly why we do it, every year since 2014.  Not to be
deterred, it took us 10 months to finally finish our analysis of this
year’s report.  But once we did, the trends we found were shocking — not
just because of what they revealed about the continual increase in
vaccine injury, but also because of the deafening silence present among
the halls of mainstream media, as vaccine injury continues to be a
subject that journalists and media outlets ignore — chalking it up to
yet another conspiracy theory from yet another fake news site.
Well pull up a chair and hold on to your hats, because guess what we discovered:

  1. Vaccine court settlement payouts increased in total $91.2 million in 2015, up from $22.8 million in 2014 to $114 million in 2015 — a 400% increase.
  2. Vaccine court settlement payments for flu shots
    increased the most, from $4.9 million in 2014 to $61 million in 2015 — 
    an increase of more than 1000%, despite autumnal onslaughts every year
    of media/pr/advertising campaigns urging Americans to ‘get your flu
    shot,’ with total abandon for the statistical facts coming out of the
    vaccine court.
  3. Varicella (chicken pox) had the third biggest increase — from $0 in 2014 to $5.8
    million in 2015.  (No surprise shingles is on the rise among the
    elderly population, as recently vaccinated grandchildren continuously
    shed live virus to their unsuspecting elders.)
  4. Hepatitis B was the fourth largest increase in vaccine
    court settlements, increasing 321% in 2015 to more than $8 million in
    2015 from $1.9 million in 2014.
  5. TDap/DTP/DPT and D/T shots were the fifth largest increase, leaping 75% in 2014 from $5.5 million to $9.8.

The rest of the settlements not pictured here are: Tetanus,
$4 million; HPV $3.4 million, up from almost nothing in 2014 (one to
watch in January when the 2016 report is issued); MMR, which actually
decreased from the number one position last year to under $1 m — an 88%+
decrease in payouts; pertussis, $1.7 million; thimerisol $1.5
million; HIB, $345k, menginococal $500k, HEP A $408k, DPT & Polio,
$210k & rotovirus $76k. 

You may have noticed we omitted the second place winner, ‘other.’  Here’s why.
‘Other’ illustrates perfectly the dodgy nature of the vaccine court
report, and its lack of transparency in the vaccine court process. 
Instead of identifying which combination of vaccines are being charged
with injury or death and labeling the case accordingly, a special master
can decide to label a vaccine case ‘other,’ thereby diluting its affect
on the overall numbers in the final analysis.
In 2015, the ‘other’ category was the second largest
increase in vaccine settlement payments, totaling $21.5 million in
payouts, up 388% from $4.4 million in payouts the year before.

We’re not accusing anybody of anything.  But, 388% increase is a
lot.  What combination of vaccines is causing such an increase?  Doesn’t
the public have a right to know?  If the court decided, for example,
that there were too many flu shot settlements mounting for the year,
couldn’t it simply skew the data by categorizing certain cases as
‘other,’ which would artificially deflate the flu category?
Did we mention that these results are ONLY for the judgements — cases
that are found in favor of the plaintiff.  It does NOT include the
EXTENSIVE legal fees for both sides, which are paid for by the U.S.
government whether the lawyer wins or loses the case?  Those are
categorized as costs.  And instead of submitting them in the report
along with any judgments that are awarded, often they are entered as
separate entries, making the exercise of linking them with their
judgement payouts that much harder, requiring yet another step in the
arduous, analysis of data.
The total dollar payout of legal fees for the vaccine court in 2015 is $42 million.
Also, a hand full of settlements in the payout are based on annuities
— that means that the payouts (many of which total more than $1
million) reoccur annually.  That’s because life as they knew it for some
plaintiffs disappeared after their vaccine injury occurred, and the
costs to care for them in perpetuity for the life of the plaintiff
requires an annual sum that is often extensive.
Share far and wide people, it’s time to turn the tide.

 Shocking Report: 1100% Increase In 
Flu Shot Injury Payouts
 The Federal Government Has Paid Out 
$3.7 Billion Dollars For Vaccine Injury
Victim Of Gardasil Vaccine Speaks Out
Do Mandatory Vaccinations Violate 
The Constitution?
The Truth About Vaccinations With Lori Gregory
 Lori Gregory of the Mom Street Journal joins to convey her research into the dangerous, deadly mandatory vaccine industry.
Lori Martin Gregory Doctors For Accountability 
In Medicine D.C.
 Lori Martin Gregory’s speech at the Doctors For Accountability In
Medicine PRESS CONFERENCE in D.C. on March 31, 2017. Camera, sound and
editing by Joshua Coleman.
See The Evidence That Vaccines Are 
Unsafe And Ineffective
 The MSM would have you believe that anyone who opposes vaccines is not
only crazy but a danger to society, however the evidence to the contrary
continues to pile up.


“GracePointe was no exception: a 2015 article from the Nashville Scene reported significant departures: both members of the church’s Board of Elders and half of the congregation’s 2,200-person membership quickly decamped following the LGBT announcement.
 Changes ultimately were not limited to teachings on sexuality. In August, the Nashville Star reported that GracePointe would share space with another progressive congregation, now describing itself as “unapologetically interfaith”.
 GracePointe has listed the 12,000-square-foot modernist chapel and 22 acre property where the church has met since 2009. The property, initially listed in February at $7.5 million, was dropped to $5.7 million in March and $4.9 million in April according to real estate records. The property is now under contract according to the Franklin Patch, and the sale could finalize by year’s end.”

 GracePointe Church

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 (Friday Church News Notes, 
December 1, 2017,, [email protected], 866-295-4143) -
 We reported in February 2015 that GracePointe Church near Nashville had
 changed its stance on “gay Christianity.” After country music star 
Carrie Underwood spoke in favor of “gay marriage” in 2012, the pastor 
led the church in a three-year process of “listening on the topic of 
sexual orientation and identity.” Though the matter has been settled in 
Scripture for thousands of years and Bible-believing churches since the 
apostles have universally treated homosexuality as a sin to be repented 
of, the very modern senior pastor Stan Mitchell led GracePointe to 
accept homosexuals into “the full privileges of membership,” including 
“being able to serve in leadership.” Two years later, Out & About Nashville
 reports that GracePointe is a shadow of its former self. Attendance has
 fallen by more than two thirds, from 700-800 to 250, and the church is 
selling its multi-million dollar property. Mitchell told reporter Julie 
Chase, “We need to get being LGBGQI off the sin list, because it’s 
killing kids” (“Stan Mitchell and GracePointe,” O&AN, Sep. 8, 2017).
 No amount of “listening” and cunning exegesis can change the Bible’s 
simple and clear teaching that marriage is limited to one man and one 
woman and that any sexual relationship apart from sacred marriage is sin
 before God. “Marriage is
 honourable in all, and the bed undefiled: but whoremongers and 
adulterers God will judge” (Hebrews 13:4). Mitchell frames the issue in 
terms of “love.” If we love the homosexual, we are supposed to 
sympathize with his condition rather than sit in judgment on him. In 
fact, the issue is
 love, but the first direction of our love must be toward God, as per 
His first law (Deuteronomy 6:5), and toward His infallible Word which 
cuts against the grain of this proud generation. Further, the call for 
sinners to repent is the truest definition of love, for this makes it 
possible for them to have a right relationship with God. Mitchell also 
frames the issue in terms of inclusion. He says that “inclusion means 
that we can live together in agreement and disagreement.” That is not 
what Paul taught. “Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord 
Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be 
IN THE SAME MIND and in the same judgment” (1 Cor. 1:10). 
There is no unity in diversity here.
 Interview: Evangelical Church Begins 
Accepting LGBT
 GracePointe Church announces 
"full membership" to LGBT members

February 4, 2015 Dialogue – The Church & Full Sacramental LGBT Inclusion from GracePointe Church on Vimeo.