US STATE DEPARTMENT PUTS $700,000 INTO HUNGARIAN MEDIA, DEMANDS “PROGRAMMING” AGAINST VIKTOR ORBAN & PATRIOTS

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

The U.S. State Department has courted controversy by
announcing it will plough $700,000 into Hungarian media, angering the
country’s anti-globalist, conservative government

This shocking report makes no sense given the commonalities between
President Trump in “making America great again” and Victor Orban’s
similar stance.

Orban has proved to be a rare strong figure in standing against
unvetted mass Muslim migration that has seen Europe spiral into chaos.
He has also opposed EU quotas in the face of threats of sanctions. In
July, Orban stated that migrants were “poison” and “not needed.” Orban
has also praised the victory of Donald Trump in putting America first,
and declared 2017 “the year of rebellion” for Hungary.

Orban also upholds the cornerstone of democracy: free speech, which
every brand of fascism has vehemently opposed. In a ground-breaking
speech, Orban declared
that “freedom begins with speaking the truth” and that “we must
therefore drag the ancient virtue of courage out from under the silt of
oblivion. First of all we must put steel in our spines.”
A message to take from the US State Department’s hostile move against
Orban is that Trump still does not have control of the departments
working under him. The many calls to “drain the swamp” still have not
been heeded. As the article below points out:

The obvious subtext to all of this is that the State
Department funding effort is intended to bolster anti-government and
opposition media. This suggests it is still pursuing Obama era,
anti-conservative policy objectives

It also suggests an undermining of the Trump Presidency. If not
addressed, this will invite more such anti-Trump, anti-conservative
initiatives which will have a negative impact upon Trump’s support base.
A month ago, Hungarian MP István Hollik expressed fears
that “George Soros would use his organisation, now the second largest
political activist charity in the world, to influence Hungary’s 2018
general election” and “remove Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz party
from power, tear down the border fence, and implement the ‘Soros Plan’
to flood Europe with one million third-world migrants annually.”
Given the catastrophe that Europe has faced with its Hijra invasion,
the move to undermine Victor Orban’s government demands immediate
attention and intervention by Trump, as questions mount: who is really
controlling America?
“U.S. State Dept Puts $700,000 into Hungarian Media, Demands ‘Programming’ Against Orban, Patriots,” by Jack Montgomery Breitbart, November 22, 2017 (thanks to Inexion):

The U.S. State Department has courted controversy by
announcing it will plough $700,000 into Hungarian media, angering the
country’s anti-globalist, conservative government.

The funding was announced by U.S. Chargé d‘Affaires David
Kostelancik, who has previously appeared to openly criticise the Trump
administration by alluding to “apparent inconsistencies in [U.S.]
foreign policy” and remarking that “not every criticism of the
government is ‘fake news’.”
Breitbart London spoke to a State Department official who confirmed
it supports what it calls “democracy and human rights programming” in
many countries, and that its intentions in Hungary — a NATO ally — are
to “support media outlets operating outside the capital … to produce
fact-based reporting and increase their audience and economic
sustainability”.
The State Department also echoed Kostelancik’s claim that too many
Hungarian news outlets are sympathetic to Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s
popular conservative government — which has earned powerful enemies by
opposing the European Union on mass migration, building a highly
effective border wall, and exposing the network of European politicians
deemed “reliable allies” by billionaire open borders campaigner George
Soros.
The obvious subtext to all of this is that the State Department
funding effort is intended to bolster anti-government and opposition
media. This suggests it is still pursuing Obama era, anti-conservative
policy objectives internationally in defiance of President Trump, who
has praised Prime Minister Orbán — the first European leader to back him
— as “strong and brave”.
The Hungarian leader has maintained a position of strong opposition
to “globalist elites, the bureaucrats who serve them, the politicians in
their pay, and the agents of the Soros-type networks that embody their
interests” despite fierce opposition from Brussels, pro-mass immigration
NGOs, and left-liberal U.S. media, believing he is standing up for a
“silent majority” of hard-pressed families across the West, who wish to
preserve their Christian heritage and national identity.
For its part, the Hungarian government has denounced the State
Department for what it regards as blatant interference in its internal
affairs ahead of national elections in Spring 2018.
“What is this if not an intervention in the election campaign and the
domestic politics of Hungary? Which Washington office can judge the
applications of media organisations from a Hungarian county and what
kind of balanced service they would like to offer?” asked Foreign
Minister Péter Szijjártó, who said it was shocking that American
taxpayers’ money was being used to — to quote the State Department —
“educate journalists on how to practice their trade” in an allied
democracy.
“The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade has summoned the U.S.
Chargé d‘Affaires, asking for an explanation, and told him that we
consider this a political intervention by the U.S. Department of State
ahead of the elections,” a spokesman added.
The Hungarians have also robustly rejected the State Department’s accusations that there is no press freedom in their country.
For example, Prime Minister Orbán’s Secretary of State for Public
Diplomacy, Dr. Zoltán Kovács, has highlighted the following exchange
between journalists at Hungarian outlets 168óra and RTL Klub — neither
of which “would ever be described as linked to the Orbán Government”, in
his estimation:
168óra: Is there press freedom in Hungary?
Péter Kolosi: There is. If there weren’t, then there wouldn’t be an RTL Klub either.
Dr. Kovács then questioned whether Kostelancik — who is not the U.S.
ambassador to Hungary, but only fulfilling that role temporarily while
the Obama appointee he formerly served is in the process of being
replaced — has any mandate to be attacking Hungary’s media landscape in
the first place.
He also took the Chargé d‘Affaires to task for praising journalists
of the “Communist old guard” who attended his speech for supposedly
“striving to speak the truth” — a scene the Hungarian described as
“stomach-turning”, given their history of collaboration with the
Soviet-backed dictatorship.
Prime Minister Orbán, who opposed the Leftist regime at some personal
risk as a younger man, has often chided Western leaders — and the
European Union in particular — of “making excuses for the crimes of
Communism”, and worked to make sure its victims are given due attention
since his election.
Dr Kovács went on the publish a more extensive response to
Kostelancik and the State Department, in which he lamented their actions
as “astonishing and disappointing coming from an ally”.
Beyond the “clear interference in the domestic affairs of an ally”,
he noted that “the media in the U.S. has its own issues. Criticisms
related to concentration of media ownership, commercial relationships,
and mainstream media bias – Harvey Weinstein, anyone? — are now the
stuff of everyday in the U.S.”
He concluded by observing that one of Geroge Soros’s many so-called
civil society organisations launched a media training operation in
Hungary around the same time as Kostalencik announced the State
Department funding scheme — leaving some suspicious as to who the
“partner” the State Department intends to select to deliver its
programme might turn out to be.
Hungary is in the midst of a fierce struggle with Soros and his EU
backers over its opposition to his plan for the migrant crisis.
Hungary believes that the EU is implementing this plan on behalf of
the convicted insider trader through the compulsory redistribution of
migrants by a system quotas, among other measures, and is currently
conducting a national consultation on it to demonstrate that its
opposition to the plan has widespread public support…..