LABOR DAY, FREEDOM, & THE WRECK OF SOCIALISM

 Labor Day, freedom, and the wreck of Socialism
 LABOR DAY, FREEDOM, & THE WRECK OF SOCIALISM 
 Americans today enjoy higher standard of living 
than kings of yesteryear
BY WASHINGTON EXAMINER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes,
from: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/labor-day-freedom-and-the-wreck
-of-socialism/article/2633145 
 

Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, leaders of the ascendant
left wing of the Democratic Party, believe that socialism in some form
is crucial for America’s better future. Young people seem to be buying
the message. According to a May 2016 Gallup poll, 55 percent of
Americans under the age of 30 have a positive view of socialism.

So, this Labor Day, as leftists invite you to step along their
pathway to a workers’ utopia, let us consider what capitalism has
already achieved for this country, and especially for its wage earners.
First, the economy has created social mobility on a level the world has
known in no other time and in no other place. Not every member of the
public will become wealthy or even enter the middle class, but doing so
is a realistic aspiration for anyone. As the chart below indicates, 59.9
percent of this country’s citizens are in the middle class.

That’s just the start. Ordinary people in this country enjoy a
standard of living that the wealthy of yesteryear, even kings and
aristocrats, could not have dreamed of. This is largely thanks to the
innovation of other Americans.

Instant communications and endless entertainment are at every
worker’s fingertips. Drugs exist to treat and cure ailments (both those
that are deadly and those that are merely difficult and unpleasant) that
were once incurable. Jet engines can move you at an affordable price
from New York to Los Angeles or from Miami to Anchorage in a matter of
hours. Computer software instantly handles problems today that took
hours of toil in the past. America’s innovators shape humanity’s future.

Whether you want to measure American achievement by counting the
Nobel Prize winners there are among our scientists and inventors — at
353, we’re way ahead of anyone else — or by the tough effectiveness of
our soldiers, it is dazzlingly clear that American know-how leads the
world. Whether you want to measure it in the high rate of homeownership,
the widespread access to endless entertainment and affordable
vacations, the robust community spirit, or the relative freedom from
government interference, the average American’s ability to pursue
happiness is unparalleled.

This is no accident but the legacy of a political system that is
flexible enough to change and right historic wrongs, yet rigid and
scrupulous in its respect for freedom. The American way has achieved a
more comfortable and dignified life for workers than any other.

Let us look at the socialist alternative favored by Sanders and
Warren. The miseries, deprivations, and backwardness it has inflicted on
populations wherever and whenever it has been tried are boundless. They
amount to the biggest empirical data set of political and economic
failure in the history of humankind. In Venezuela, to take only the
latest unfortunate experiment, it has meant the world’s largest oil
reserves being wasted and stolen while children starve
on the streets. The historical legacy of Soviet socialism, National
Socialism, and Maoist Communism, to cite the most egregious versions of
this poisonous left-wing political ideology, is so well known that it
does not need to be rehearsed here.

Even
those countries that experienced the more gentle “democratic
socialism,” such as modern South Africa and Brazil, socialism has
allowed corrupt politicians to pilfer state industries while the poor
live and die young in slums. Even in the socialized utopias of Europe,
it has meant destructive youth unemployment rates, a dearth of innovation, and death panels in hospitals.

To the extent that these nations have succeeded, it is mostly because
they have come to imitate us. It is in spite of, not because of, their
sympathy for ideas that turned Cuba and North Korea into the world’s two
largest prisons.

America is not perfect. Its health care system is absurdly expensive
(although also the world’s most effective). Its extortionate higher
education system increasingly resembles a fraudulent pyramid scheme. Its
ballooning entitlement state robs the young and gives to the old, with such generosity that today’s Medicare recipients receive three times more in benefits than what they paid in. And far too many Americans are victims of crime, gangs, and collapsing families.

But every society has problems, and ours could be so much worse. Just
look at those run under the system that leading lights of the
Democratic Party regard as an ideal.

 
 

GEERT WILDERS SLAMS EUROPEAN UNION, MIGRANT INVASION, IN DEFIANT SPEECH AT GLOBALIST CONFERENCE

 http://www1.cbn.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_xl_640x480/public/media/standard/images/geertwilders_si.jpg?itok=kWDQ3zSL
 Geert Wilders – Europe’s Suicide in the Face of Islam

 GEERT WILDERS SLAMS EUROPEAN UNION, 

MIGRANT INVASION, IN DEFIANT SPEECH 
AT GLOBALIST CONFERENCE 
 The future belongs to a Europe of sovereign nations
BY DAN LYMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Geert Wilders, leader of the Netherlands’ second-most popular
political party, delivered a speech to a crowd of globalists and
technocrats in which he denounced the EU superstate and the on-going
Islamization of the European continent.

Wilders was an unlikely guest at the exclusive Ambrosetti Forum, hosted in Italy by the European House, a highly influential think tank.
The
Dutch populist, known for his strong opposition to globalism and Islam,
held nothing back in a powerful address titled “The Europe We Want.”

“I applaud the fact that you invite someone who does not share your
enthusiasm for the European Union. Or your European dream as Euro
commissioner Frans Timmermans just called it. To be honest: his dream is
my nightmare,” Wilders began. “I believe in a positive future for
Europe as a community of independent, sovereign and democratic nations –
working together without a supranational political union – a Europe
without the European Union.”

Wilders extolled the virtues of the
nation state and professed the critical importance of national
sovereignty in the protection of a society, its culture, and its people –
contrasted with the bullying tactics and reckless policies of
unelected, internationalist dictators in Brussels.
“Another
extremely important thing the Dutch have achieved over the past
centuries were clear and defined borders. Borders are important. Because
they protect us and define who and what we are,” Wilders said. “Thanks
to our governments who gave away sovereignty we are now no longer in
charge of our immigration policy and even our own borders, and the
result is devastating.”
“The Dutch have their own identity. And so do the other nations of Europe. But there is NO single European identity.”
“The
EU is characterized by cultural relativism and enmity towards
patriotism. But patriotism is not a dangerous threat, it is something to
be proud of,” he continued. “It means defending a nation’s sovereignty
and independence, and not selling it out in shabby compromises to the EU
and its bureaucrats.”

Wilders
went on to place the lion’s share of the blame for the on-going migrant
crisis on German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s shoulders, saying her “Wir schaffen das – We can do it” rhetoric has been a invitation for disaster, as millions of mostly-Muslim Third World “asylum seekers” pour onto the European land mass, desperate to become one of “Mama Merkel’s” esteemed “guests” – but who refuse to assimilate or work, and aren’t expected to do so.

Referring
to the growing list of Islamic terrorist attacks being carried out
across Europe, he declared, “Brussels together with the pro-EU leaders
in the national capitals created the conditions which made these
horrible events and attacks possible by allowing millions of immigrants
to enter Europe – often unchecked, by making no assimilation demands
whatsoever, by refusing to impose a leitkultur, a dominant culture, by
being politically correct and because of a total lack of leadership.”

Wilders concluded with a barrage of anti-globalism proclamations that likely set the room on fire.
“But,
despite all the bad news, as I said at the beginning, I am an optimist.
All over Europe, ever more people are becoming proud patriots, and know
that the patriots will win. And so will the nation state,” he said. “We
can also work together to fight terrorism. But all on a voluntary
basis, as sovereign nations.”
“And without a political union. Without the EU. The future belongs to the Europe of sovereign nations.”
Read Wilders’ full speech HERE.

TWITTER SUSPENDS SHAZIA HOBBS, FORMER MUSLIM, ANTI FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION CAMPAIGNER

  

http://www.shaziahobbs.com/ 

 Former Muslim, anti-FGM campaigner Shazia Hobbs suspended from Twitter

BY ROBERT SPENCER

SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2017/09/former-muslim-anti-fgm-campaigner-shazia-hobbs-suspended-from-twitter; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Twitter is evil. It lets stand open death threats against me. It censors content to suit Iran’s Islamic authorities. It has flagged as “hateful” tweets stating the fact that Islam is not a religion of peace and reporting accurately about anti-Semitic statements by an imam. It has let Islamic State accounts stand while banning those of people who report terrorists. It has shadowbanned my account, preventing thousands of readers from seeing Jihad Watch posts.

Twitter, like the other social media giants, should be broken up
using anti-trust laws. It is an increasingly fascist platform that
ruthlessly clamps down on voices that dare to dissent from the Leftist
agenda.

“Former Muslim, Anti-FGM Campaigner Shazia Hobbs Suspended from Twitter,” by Oliver JJ Lane, Breitbart, September 4, 2017:

A Muslim apostate and high profile campaigner against
both female genital mutilation (FGM) and forced marriage has been
suspended from micro-blogging platform Twitter, amidst a wider crackdown
on right wing voices on the website, and other online platforms like
Facebook.

Twitter users noticed the prolific writer and campaigner had vanished from the platform Friday. Hobbs had previously spoken
at the Unite Against Hate ‘Gays Against Sharia’ march in
Manchester, where she spoke out against Muslim rape gangs preying on
young white girls.


Hobbs turned away from Islam after escaping an arranged marriage with
a physically abusive husband she had been forced into aged 18.


Speaking to Breitbart London, Ms. Hobbs confirmed she has been suspended indefinitely.

“It’s absolutely disgusting,” she told the website. “There was no
reason given. Twitter would not tell me what tweets were in violation of
their rules. They said it was because of ‘harassment’.

“All I tweet about is the rape of Pakistani children by Pakistani men,” she said.

She appealed directly to Twitter which has so far rejected her
petition, and condemned the platform for shutting down a voice raising
awareness of child sexual abuse in Pakistani British communities.

“No one speaks out against the rape of Pakistani children,” she said.

Suspended for so-called harassment, Ms. Hobbs told Breitbart London
that she is frequently called “racist” and accused of being “full of
hate” for calling for the jailing of parents who subject their daughters
to genital mutilation.

“I get the biggest amount of hate from Pakistani men and ‘feminazis’ who tell me I’m ‘fueling the far right’.

“I’m trying to put a stop to these harmful practices. I’ve had more
love and acceptance from the so-called ‘far right’ than from the
Pakistani community,” she asserted….

_______________________________________________________


 
 

BRUSSELS: NINE MEN THROWN OFF FLIGHT FOR SCREAMING “ALLAHU AKBAR” AND CLAIMING TO CARRY BOMBS

 
BRUSSELS: NINE MEN THROWN OFF FLIGHT FOR SCREAMING “ALLAHU AKBAR” AND CLAIMING TO CARRY BOMBS 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 Ryanair may now be denounced as “Islamophobic” for thinking that screams
 of “Allahu akbar” were any cause for alarm. Nowadays, one must deny 
reality in order to avoid charges of “bigotry.”
 

“9 men thrown off Ryanair flight for shouting ‘Allahu Akbar,’” RT, September 2, 2017:

Nine men have been thrown off a Ryanair flight for
allegedly shouting “Allahu Akbar” and claiming to carry bombs, which
they later said was a “joke.”

The group was removed from the Madrid-bound flight before it took off from Zaventem Airport, Brussels early Saturday.

Following the disruptive passengers’ removal, the Boeing 737-800 was
briefly evacuated and searched before departing with a two-hour delay
around 9:15am local time.

Spokesperson for the Belgian federal police, Peter De Waele, confirmed the incident to RT.com, and said one man was arrested.

“The flight commander refused to take these nine people (a group of
friends) after the incident. One of them was a foolish joker and called
‘Allahu Akbar’ (‘God is great’),” said De Waele.

A spokesperson for Ryanair told RT.com that the flight crew requested
police assistance “after a number of passenger became disruptive prior
to departure.”…

 
 

INDIANA: TAXPAYER FUNDED BALL STATE UNIVERSITY GIVES ACADEMIC CREDIT TO STUDENTS FOR MEETING MUSLIMS

 
INDIANA: TAXPAYER FUNDED BALL STATE UNIVERSITY GIVES ACADEMIC CREDIT TO STUDENTS 
FOR MEETING MUSLIMS 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

This is based on the oft-repeated claim of the establishment media
and Islamic apologists that “Islamophobia” stems from people simply not
knowing any Muslims personally, and if these racist, redneck yahoos
would simply meet some of these charming, wise, noble people, they would
no longer be greasy Islamophobes, but would morph immediately into
metrosexual, horn-rimmed-glasses-wearing donors to the Southern Poverty
Law Center.

This absurd notion is based on the false assumption that distrust of
Islam stems from “Islamophobic” propaganda, and not from the actions of
Muslims such as Osama bin Laden, Anwar al-Awlaki, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi,
Nidal Malik Hasan, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, Syed Rizwan Farook,
Tashfeen Malik, and other bloodthirsty jihadis.

“Taxpayer-Funded University Gives Academic Credit To Students For Meeting Local Muslims,” by Eric Owens, Daily Caller, August 31, 2017:

Ball State University in Muncie, Indiana will offer a
course which gives actual academic credit to students for meeting
Muslims, hanging out at a Muncie mosque, and making a documentary film
about Muslims who reside in the local area.

The taxpayer-funded course at Ball State is a seminar titled “Muslims
In Muncie,” according to an informational email obtained by The Daily
Caller.

The course is scheduled for the spring semester.

A flyer promoting the “Muslims In Muncie” course explains that
enrolled students will “learn about the history and diversity of Muslims
in America” by participating “in the social and ritual life of the
Muncie Islamic Center.” Students will also meet Muslim leaders and
collect oral histories from Muslims for a documentary film.

At the end of the course, students will “host a public showcase in May 2018” — presumably in relation to the film.

The for-credit seminar will help students become “empowered as critically engaged, globally aware citizens.”

Students who sign up for Ball State’s for-credit Muslim
meet-and-greet course will receive credit through the honors college or
for graduation requirements related to humanities, social science, fine
arts or religious studies….

Ball State philosophy and religious studies professor Elizabeth Agnew is organizing the course.

Students “need to be selected to join the seminar,” according to the
email obtained by TheDC. “Dr. Agnew has already started to interview
students for this seminar.”…

“From 2012-2015, Professor Agnew participated with a team of Ball
State faculty in a U.S. State Department-funded partnership with
Quaid-i-Azam University in Islamabad, Pakistan to advance the American
Studies graduate program at QAU’s Area Study Center.”…

 

JUDGE ORDERS DAVID DALEIDEN & HIS ATTORNEYS TO PAY NEARLY $200K TO ABORTION FEDERATION FOR RELEASING UNDERCOVER VIDEO DESPITE COURT ORDER

 
 http://lifenews.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/JudgeWilliamOrrick.png
JUDGE ORDERS DAVID DALEIDEN & HIS ATTORNEYS TO PAY NEARLY $200K TO ABORTION FEDERATION 
FOR RELEASING UNDERCOVER VIDEO 
DESPITE COURT ORDER 
BY HEATHER CLARK
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 SAN FRANCISCO, Calif. — A federal judge hasordered pro-life activist David 
Daleiden, who is known for his undercover investigation into Planned 
Parenthood’s provision of aborted baby body parts to biomedical companies, 
along with his attorneys to pay nearly $200,000 to the National Abortion 
Federation (NAF) for releasing video footage from the organization’s annual 
conventions despite a court order.

On Thursday, U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick
leveled $195,359.04 in civil sanctions against Daleiden and his criminal
defense attorneys, Steve Cooley and Brentford Ferreira, for the
Federation’s security and personnel costs, as well as attorneys’ fees
surrounding efforts to have the undercover video removed.

“In setting this amount, I have considered the magnitude of
‘the harm threatened by continued contumacy, and the probable
effectiveness of any suggested sanction in bringing about the result
desired,’” he wrote. “CMP, Daleiden, Cooley, and Ferreria are jointly and severally liable for this amount to be paid to NAF.”

As previously reported, the NAF sued Daleiden in July 2015
to prevent footage recorded undercover at its 2014 and 2015 from being
made public, claiming that it could jeopardize the safety of its
members. Orrick sided with the organization, issuing a preliminary
injunction in February 2016 banning Daleiden from releasing any videos
recorded at the NAF’s annual conventions.

He noted that the Federation requires attendees to sign
confidentiality agreements, promising not to disclose the contents of
the event.

“Confidentiality agreements are common to protect trade
secrets and other sensitive information, and individuals who sign such
agreements are not free to ignore them because they think the public
would be interested in the protected information,” Orrick wrote.

Also opining that “the majority of the recordings lack much
public interest,” Orrick said that the Federation’s rights to privacy
and safety outweighed any public interest in the videos.

“Weighed against that public interest are NAF’s and its
members’ legitimate interests in their rights to privacy, security, and
association by maintaining the confidentiality of their presentations
and conversations at NAF Annual Meetings. The balance is strongly in
NAF’s favor,” he wrote.

However, in May 2017, Daleiden released a video that he
called a “preview” of a longer forthcoming investigation, which featured
clips of various Planned Parenthood officials and other abortion
advocates making nonchalant statements about
the abortion process, including that the baby’s eyeballs fell into
their lap or that they had to tear off a leg to avoid technically
performing a partial-birth abortion.

The recording was quickly removed by YouTube shortly after its publication.

In July, Orrick ruled that Daleiden violated the court’s injunction when he released the video. Orrick also found Daleiden’s criminal defense attorneys in contempt as well.

According to reports, the men believed the footage needed to
be released after California Attorney General Xavier Becerra charged
Daleiden with 14 counts of covertly recording confidential conversations
and one count of conspiracy to invade privacy.

Daleiden has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to lift Orrick’s order prohibiting him from releasing the videos.

“[W]hat is ultimately at stake here is whether those who
‘blow the whistle’ on illegal or inhumane misbehavior in any industry
may be silenced and even punished for telling the truth to the public at
large and to those charged with enforcing criminal and regulatory bans
on nefarious practices,” Tom Brejcha of the Thomas More Society, which
is representing Daleiden in the civil matter, said in a statement last
month.

“Whether America will remain an open or closed society hangs
in the balance,” he opined. We trust that the justices will stand by
our traditional disapproval of ‘prior restraints on free speech,’ hear
Daleiden’s appeal, vindicate his First Amendment rights, and reverse the
lower courts’ egregious mistakes.”

Orrick’s wife has reportedly posted statements online that
are favorable to Planned Parenthood, and Orrick had previously served on
the board of an organization that permitted a Planned Parenthood
facility to operate on its property.