WILL JOEL OSTEEN OFFER HELP TO HOUSTON FLOOD VICTIMS OR KEEP HIS LAKEWOOD MEGA-CHURCH DOORS SHUT?

 FALSE PREACHER SHOWS NO MERCY!
WILL JOEL OSTEEN OFFER HELP TO HOUSTON FLOOD VICTIMS OR KEEP HIS CHURCH DOORS SHUT? 
 Published on Aug 28, 2017

Joel Osteen in lieu of opening to doors to his church to help those in need, he took to Twitter.

 Megachurch Pastor Responds To Criticism For Not Opening Doors To Harvey Victims
Published on Aug 29, 2017

Joel
Osteen, the owner of a Houston megachurch, has responded to an
onslaught of criticism after the pastor allegedly refused to open his
massive Lakewood Church to those seeking shelter from Hurricane Harvey.
Late Monday, Osteen said in a statement that he never shut his doors to
those in need. He also shared pictures that appear to show that the
church’s parking garage and surrounding area had experienced flooding,
in an attempt to back up claims that the church was “inaccessible.”
However, several videos posted on Twitter seem to show the location,
which seats thousands, unscathed by flooding.

 PROOF LAKEWOOD CHURCH NOT FLOODED:
Lakewood church rests on the highest elevation in the city so I don’t buy the lie that it was flooded.
 HURRICANE HARVEY : Joel Osteen Won’t Open Mega Church To Help Flood Victims in Houston, Texas! 
Published on Aug 29, 2017

One
of the most well known, and wealthiest church leaders in the world,
Joel Osteen, is not openning his Houston, Texas based Mega Church,
LakeWood Church, towards helping displaced flood victims in Hurricane
Harvey.

Update: They are getting ready to finally taking people in. YAY Internet and putting pressure on places where it belongs!

 

WHY DID DEMOCRAT MAYOR ORDER HOUSTON, TEXAS STAND DOWN DURING HURRICANE CATASTROPHE, DEFYING TRUMP & GOVERNOR ABBOTT?

 Why Did Democrat Mayor Order Houston Stand Down During Hurricane Catastrophe?
 http://ww4.hdnux.com/photos/47/52/05/10396023/3/premium_landscape.jpg
 Americans Are Dying After Trump Hating Houston Mayor Defies President’s Hurricane Warnings 
 Published on Aug 28, 2017

Americans Are Dying After Trump-Hating Houston Mayor Defies President’s Hurricane Warnings

Houston
Mayor Sylvester Turner is under heavy fire after he decided to use
Hurricane Harvey as a political weapon to make President Donald Trump
look bad. Turner, a hardcore liberal Democrat, reacted to the
president’s dire hurricane warnings, telling Southeast Texans to
evacuate, by making his own hurricane statement, and now, Americans are
dying. You’ll be completely shocked by what this idiot mayor told the
citizens of Houston, proving Democrats can never agree with Trump, even
if lives are on the line.
Houston Mayor Sam Turner hates
President Donald Trump so much he threw caution to the wind and tweeted
out statements about Hurricane Harvey to downplay what the president had
previously advised. On August 25th, it was quite evident that what
faced Southeast Texas was a wall of water of biblical proportions,
coming straight for them.

Trump immediately engaged his
administration to start emergency procedures. The president tweeted at
8:46 am on August 25th, “I have spoken w/ @GovAbbott of Texas and
@LouisianaGov Edwards. Closely monitoring #HurricaneHarvey developments & here to assist as needed,” followed by this tweet, “I encourage everyone in the path of #HurricaneHarvey to heed the advice & orders of their local and state officials.”

The
GOP Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, was crystal clear in his message on
August 25th, “I would urge everybody who has the possibility to
consider evacuating as soon as possible.” Seeing the “Republican
response” by Trump and Abbott, Mayor Turner played Russian roulette with
the citizens of Houston, tweeting, “Ignore unfounded, unsourced weather
predictions that are frightening Houstonians, Get info from trusted
outlets.”
At that point, everyone who had listened to the news knew a
hurricane worse than Katrina was headed straight for Houston, but it
mattered little to Turner, who found an opportunity to bash the
president more important than the safety of his citizens. Unfortunately,
that’s not all.

At the request of the Governor of Texas, I have
signed the Disaster Proclamation, which unleashes the full force of
government help!
While Trump was signing a national disaster
proclamation, Turner doubled down and tweeted, “Please think twice
before trying to leave Houston en masse. No evacuation orders have been
issued for the city. #Harvey.”
Turner himself was responsible for issuing the order of evacuation for
Houston, but instead of doing that, he tweeted out a politicized
message, and you guessed it, he never ordered evacuations. By the time
Harvey hit Houston, it was too late.
Thanks to Turner’s political
game playing, American citizens who could have gotten out remained
trapped. This includes the most vulnerable; namely, the disabled, the
elderly, and the kids. Even the local media could not ignore what Turner
did, or rather, what he refused to do. In a Texas Tribune article
titled, “Ahead of Hurricane Harvey, officials send Texans mixed messages
on evacuations,” they report, “Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner told
people living in the state’s largest city not to leave, citing ‘chaotic’
traffic from the 2005 evacuations ahead of Hurricane Rita.”

So,
the question becomes, was Turner’s blatant politicized reaction to
Hurricane Harvey something he did on his own or was this a larger
narrative that the leftists are plotting against Trump? There’s no doubt
Turner got his marching orders from the Democrats, who are hoping to
blame American deaths from a natural disaster on Trump. They’re hoping
for mass casualties like Hurricane Katrina, and they will then build a
bogus narrative to make it appear like Trump caused the whole thing.

So
far, the New York Times is reporting five are dead in Houston. That
number will only grow. There were adequate warnings to mobilize
emergency efforts to evacuate those most at risk, and Turner decided to
ignore them. Since Hurricane Katrina, emergency services have trained
for such a disaster as Harvey. But, when Democrats are more concerned
with politicizing events in a “gotcha game” with Trump, American lives
are expendable. This is how the globalists roll, but they are in for a
big surprise. Americans won’t be fooled by this game playing. We demand
answers from Turner and his Democratic masters. Blood is on their hands.
They must be held accountable for their crimes.

 WHY DID DEMOCRAT MAYOR ORDER HOUSTON, TEXAS STAND DOWN DURING HURRICANE CATASTROPHE?
 Despite governor’s recommendations, 
Democrat officials ignored him
BY ADAN SALAZAR
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Democrat Houston Mayor Sylvester Turner refused to issue
evacuation orders for the city’s 2.3 million residents, even after
Governor Greg Abbott had advised Texans to do so.

Despite Governor Abbott issuing a state of disaster
declaration last Wednesday for Harris and 29 other Texas counties,
Mayor Turner did not warn, inform or urge citizens to leave the area,
parts of which have now been catastrophically devastated by over 30
inches of rain.

On Friday, Governor Greg Abbott advised,
“Even if an evacuation order hasn’t been issued by your local official,
if you’re in an area between Corpus Christi and Houston, you need to
strongly consider evacuating.”
“If I were living in the Houston region, as I once did, I would decide to head to areas north of there,” he added.

On the other hand, “Mr. Turner, a Democrat, and other local officials
urged residents to stay in their homes as Hurricane Harvey, which has
since downgraded to a tropical storm, approached Houston on Friday,”
reported The Wall Street Journal.
On Friday afternoon, Mayor Turner reiterated that no evacuation order had been issued for Houston.

Photos
from Houston, the fourth most populous U.S. city, show the destructive
aftermath of days of rain, daring water rescues, entire highways
underwater and flooded out neighborhood streets.

On Friday ahead of the heavy rains, Harris County Judge Ed Emmett said, “The safest thing is to stay where you are and ride out the storm… We don’t anticipate any kind of massive evacuation.”
Emmett,
a Republican top emergency official, later called criticism of the
decision not to evacuate “outrageous,” and claimed residents would have
laughed if they’d have issued the order.
“To suggest we should
have evacuated two million people is an outrageous statement,” Emmett
said. “What we’re facing now is an effort to respond to a tragedy… We’ve
never seen water like this before.”
The judge went on to say an evacuation would have been “totally nonsensical.”
“If
we had gone out three days before and said, ‘we want four million
people to leave Harris County,’ that would have been a totally
nonsensical thing to do,” he stated.
Hurricane
Harvey has now been blamed for five deaths in the Houston area, and is
the most major test the Trump administration has faced.
On Monday, city officials finally ordered mandatory and voluntary evacuations from certain areas.
Considering
the Democrat playbook admittedly calls for “not letting a serious
crisis go to waste,” some speculate Houstonians were sacrificed to make
Trump look bad.

Was the mayor just negligent, or was this a stunt designed to embarrass Trump?

 

NETANYAHU TELLS UN TOP DOG THAT IRAN IS BUILDING MISSILE SITES IN SYRIA, LEBANON TO STRIKE ISRAEL

NETANYAHU TELLS UN TOP DOG THAT IRAN IS BUILDING MISSILE SITES IN SYRIA, LEBANON 
TO STRIKE ISRAEL
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Given the UN’s track record regarding Israel, upon hearing this news, Guterres could probably scarcely contain his glee.

“Netanyahu tells UN chief Iran building missile production sites in Syria, Lebanon,” by Itamar Eichner, Ynet News, August 28, 2017:

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told United Nations
Secretary-General António Guterres Monday that Iran is building sites to produce precision-guided missiles in Syria and Lebanon, with the aim of
using them against Israel.

At the start of a meeting in Jerusalem, Netanyahu accused Iran of
turning Syria into a “base of military entrenchment as part of its
declared goal to eradicate Israel.”

“It is also building sites to produce precision-guided missiles
towards that end, in both Syria and in Lebanon. This is something Israel
cannot accept. This is something the UN should not accept,” Netanyahu
said as the two spoke during a joint press conference.

Iran, Israel’s arch-enemy, has been Syrian President Bashar
al-Assad’s staunchest backer and has provided militia fighters and
terror groups such as Hezbollah to help him in Syria’s civil war.

The prime minister lamented its “troubled relationship” with the UN,
decrying what he described as an “absurd obsession with Israel,” which
uses “flagrantly discriminatory tactics. You don’t have to be the
Israeli prime minister to understand that, and I think people of good
faith and common sense understand that.”

Netanyahu criticized the UN, saying that it fails to check
Palestinian hate speech, “absurdly denies” Jewish connections to
Jerusalem and has not stopped arms from reaching Hezbollah in Lebanon.

He was referring to a recent UN cultural agency resolution about
Jerusalem that angered Israel after it failed to acknowledge Jewish ties
with the city and recently denied Israeli sovereignty over the city.

Israel also criticized the UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon, or
UNIFIL, for being too soft on Iranian-backed Hezbollah forces in the
border area. The US recently backed Israel in its claims and suggested
that more responsibilities be demanded of the group to curb Hezbollah’s
activities….

AFTER CHARLOTTESVILLE, UN DEMANDS U.S. QUASH FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION

 http://bptnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/first2.jpg
AFTER CHARLOTTESVILLE, UN DEMANDS U.S. QUASH FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION
BY ALEX NEWMAN
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

While some of its leading member regimes behead Christians and chop body organs out of political prisoners,
the United Nations issued an “early warning” to the United States and
demanded illegal restrictions on free speech. As part of its decision,
the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), a
body that includes communists and Islamists, lambasted the United States
and President Donald Trump without actually mentioning his name. But
critics were quick to ridicule the UN outfit amid growing calls for the
U.S. government to withdraw from the widely criticized “dictators club.”
   

In a press release
blasting the United States for its alleged “failure to unequivocally
reject racist violent events,” the UN CERD provided concrete evidence
that it has either been watching too much “fake news,” or that it is
willing to lie in order to advance its fanatical anti-American,
anti-freedom agenda. Not that it should matter to the UN, which has a
charter specifically prohibiting involvement in nations’ domestic
affairs, but President Trump repeatedly condemned the Ku Klux Klan,
neo-Nazis, white supremacists, racists, and others, along with the
violent and terroristic communist forces that reportedly clashed with
them in Virginia this month.

“Racism is evil,” Trump declared after the violence in
Charlottesville. “And those who cause violence in its name are criminals
and thugs, including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other
hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans.”
Trump also denounced the violent “Antifa” extremists on the other side
of the confrontation who, ironically, share much in common with their totalitarian-minded National Socialist nemeses.

Perhaps the UN never got the memo about Trump, though. “We are
alarmed by the racist demonstrations, with overtly racist slogans,
chants and salutes by white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and the Ku Klux
Klan, promoting white supremacy and inciting racial discrimination and
hatred,” complained radical left-wing activist Anastasia Crickley, the
chairperson of UN CERD, in a widely publicized statement. “We call on
the U.S. Government to investigate thoroughly the phenomenon of racial
discrimination targeting, in particular, people of African descent,
ethnic or ethno-religious minorities, and migrants.”

Beyond simply condemning speech, the UN also believes the U.S.
government must wage a propaganda campaign to promote “tolerance” and
“diversity,” two terms that globalists and leftists have weaponized to
undermine liberty and promote open borders, globalism, perversion, and
hate. According to the UN document, U.S. authorities must not only 
“unequivocally and unconditionally reject and condemn racist hate speech
and racist crimes in Charlottesville and throughout the country,” they
must also “actively contribute to the promotion of understanding,
tolerance, and diversity between ethnic groups, and acknowledge their
contribution to the history and diversity of the United States of
America.”

Perhaps even more alarming than the dictators club’s brazen meddling
in U.S. affairs, though, was the UN’s hostile assault on the
constitutionally protected, God-given rights of free speech, free
expression, freedom of thought, and freedom of assembly. In multiple
statements plastered across the UN’s websites, the global outfit —
dominated by unfree regimes and even mass-murdering tyrants — attacked
the First Amendment head on. The statements demanded that the U.S.
government restrict free speech and association, saying it called on
authorities “to provide the necessary guarantees so that such rights are
not misused to promote racist hate speech.”

As the UN knows, or should know, the U.S. Constitution that
authorizes the U.S. government to exist in the first place specifically
prohibits any compliance with the UN’s outrageous demand. The First
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;
or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Government for a redress of grievances.” In other words, the UN is
calling on U.S. authorities to violate the supreme law of the land to
enforce an illegitimate and unconstitutional UN “convention.”  

Even the increasingly rogue U.S. Supreme Court has consistently
ruled, including as recently as this summer, that even the most vile
forms of speech are protected under the Constitution. “Speech that
demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age,
disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest
boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to
express the thought that we hate,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito in Matal v. Tam, a case dealing with the Washington Redskins, another target of UN hatred and illegal meddling by a coalition including numerous mass murderers and tyrants.  

Free speech is so universally accepted in America that even rogue
radicals on the high court who pay virtually no attention to the
Constitution have concluded the same thing. “A law found to discriminate
based on viewpoint is an egregious form of content discrimination,
which is presumptively unconstitutional,” wrote Justice Anthony Kennedy,
the same official who helped invent a “right” to a “homosexual
marriage” without any basis in law. “The First Amendment does not
entrust that power to the government’s benevolence. Instead, our
reliance must be on the substantial safeguards of free and open
discussion in a democratic society.”

Ironically, while the UN council demands the shredding of the U.S.
Constitution that has protected the God-given rights of Americans
relatively well for more than two centuries, the members of the UN CERD
mostly come from poor, unfree nations where corruption, crime, violence,
hatred, racism, intolerance, oppression, tyranny, and other social ills
are endemic and always have been. For instance, the kangaroo committee purporting to sit in judgment over the United States
consists of, among others, Communists and Islamists, along with a
Soviet-trained Russian agent as its “rapporteur.” Seriously. That such
forces would seek to undermine American freedom is no surprise.

The 18-member UN committee even includes a Yemhelhe Mohamed from
Mauritania, an Islamist African country where mostly blacks were (and
still are) openly enslaved mostly by Muslim Arabs and Berbers — a
practice that was not even criminalized until a mere 10 years ago. Other
nations represented include Communist China, where the brutal
dictatorship has murdered more people than any other in human history,
and where the ongoing cultural genocide of Tibet is well underway. Also
on the list: Algeria, Burkina-Faso, Togo, Pakistan, Turkey, Brazil,
Mauritius, and Guatemala. 

According to the UN’s bombastic statements condemning and warning the
United States, the UN outfit was acting under what is known as the
“early warning and urgent action procedure.” Citing the largely
engineered violence in Charlottesville, the UN outfit claimed its
warning was “aimed at preventing existing situations escalating into
conflicts and urgent procedures to respond to problems requiring
immediate attention to prevent or limit the scale or number of serious
violations of the Convention.”

Other nations scolded under the mechanism in recent years include
war-ravaged Burundi, Iraq, Nigeria, and Sudan. Also on the list was the
Ivory Coast, where
jihadists backed by UN military power overthrew the elected Christian
president, butchered thousands of Christians with machetes, and
installed a globalist Muslim central banker in the presidency
.
Neither Russia nor China, where ethnic minorities often face fierce
government persecution, were on the UN’s list. Nor were the Sunni Arab
regimes that consider converting to Christianity a capital offense.
Nothing has been said by the panel about UN schools caught brainwashing Muslim children to wage violent jihad against Jews, either; or on the escalating crisis of UN troops raping mostly black children around the world with total impunity.

The latest UN screed demonizing the United States and demanding
unconstitutional attacks on constitutionally guaranteed human rights is
merely one example among many. During the Obama administration, the
dictators club became increasingly bold, loudly demanding everything from the nationalization of police and propaganda in school textbooks to unconstitutional “robust gun control” and even a federal ban on spanking children. More recently, the UN even claimed repealing ObamaCare was a violation of “international law.” Of course, all of the UN’s demands represent flagrant violations of the U.S. Constitution.

Much of the UN’s extremism in attacking the United States and its
constitutionally limited form of government has been justified by citing
various UN schemes and agreements that globalists like to refer to as
“international law.” Especially prominent is the UN “Universal
Declaration of Human Rights,” a list of revocable privileges that is essentially the opposite of the God-given rights enshrined in America’s founding documents.
For perspective, simply consider Article 29 of the UDHR, which states,
among other ludicrous claims, that the UN-approved “rights and freedoms”
may “in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of
the United Nations.”

It is becoming increasingly clear to Americans that the dictators club has a totalitarian agenda for humanity, and that it must be stopped.
Trump has proposed drastic cuts to the UN’s budget. But unfortunately,
that will not be nearly enough. As prominent conservative pundit Glenn
Beck declared this week on his program, “it’s time to shutter the United Nations, close it up … stop paying for it.” Numerous other prominent Americans have made similar calls. And with the dictators club viciously maligning Trump and the nation that elected him to the presidency, critics of the UN hope the time has finally come to get the United States out of the UN, and the UN out of the United States.

Legislation to do just that, the American Sovereignty Restoration
Act, or H.R. 193, has already been introduced in Congress. It is
currently sitting in the House Foreign Affairs Committee. All that is
needed to destroy the dictators club and its lawless attacks against
America is sufficient public pressure on the American people’s elected
representatives. If there is one thing virtually all Americans remain
united on, it is the cherished value of free speech. Perhaps the UN’s
shameful attack on this fundamental human right will be enough to get
Congress and Trump to finally act against the lawless dictators club.

Related articles:

United Nations Exploits Pseudo-“Human Rights” to Attack U.S.

UN “Human Rights” Council Now Officially Controlled by Dictators

After Equating Trump With ISIS, UN Freaks Out Over His Victory

Bill to Get U.S. Out of UN Introduced in New Congress

After Charlottesville, Globalist Rice Smears Patriots as Racists

UN Demands “Robust Gun Control” After Orlando Terror

UN: Jail Parents Who Spank Their Children

UN Announces Support for Obama’s Nationalization of Police

After Dallas Cop Killings, UN Touts “Black Lives Matter”

After Garner Death, UN Fomenting Racial Strife in America

UN-backed Forces Slaughter Christians in Ivory Coast

UN Speaks Out Against School Textbooks in America

UN LGBT Czar on Indoctrinating Children: “The Younger the Better”

UN Human Rights Council: Is Washington “Redskins” Appropriate?

U.S. Independence Attacked as Never Before by UN Interdependence

PRAISE GOD!: SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR CUTS ALL FUNDING OF STATE ABORTION CLINICS

 https://www.fitsnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/henry-mcmaster.jpg
 http://img.theepochtimes.com/n3/eet-content/uploads/2017/08/25/2017-08-25T203753Z_1_LYNXNPED7O1NR_RTROPTP_4_SOUTH-CAROLINA-ABORTION.jpg
 https://www.stripes.com/polopoly_fs/1.450901.1485423738!/image/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_900/image.jpg
SOUTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR CUTS ALL FUNDING 
OF STATE ABORTION CLINICS
BY DAVE BOHON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster (shown) issued an executive order
August 25 directing state agencies to cut off all funding to abortion
clinics in the state. The order directs the agencies to cease providing
both state and federal dollars via grants, contracts, state-administered
federal funds, or “any other form,” to all clinics performing the
murderous procedure.


Additionally, McMaster directed South Carolina’s Department of Health
and Human Services to seek waivers from the federal government allowing
the state to exclude abortion clinics from its Medicaid provider
network.


“There are a variety of agencies, clinics, and medical entities in
South Carolina that receive taxpayer funding to offer important women’s
health and family planning services without performing abortions,” Gov.
McMaster said in a statement. “Taxpayer dollars must not directly or
indirectly subsidize abortion providers like Planned Parenthood.”

Charleston, South Carolina’s Post and Courier newspaper
reported that three clinics in the state “offer elective abortions in
South Carolina, but only one of them is a Planned Parenthood clinic, in
Columbia.” The newspaper added that “federal law already prohibits
Medicaid money from being used to pay for abortions, with exceptions for
cases of rape, incest or when the mother’s life is in danger.”

Planned Parenthood responded to the directive with postured outrage.
“Today’s executive order issued by Governor McMaster hurts South
Carolinians in the name of politics,” said Jenny Black, a spokesperson
for Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, which administers the abortion
giant’s South Carolina franchise. “While he throws women under the bus
to score political points, Planned Parenthood South Atlantic will
continue
to focus on providing the wide-range of accessible, affordable
health care services that our patients, and his constituents, rely on.
We will not stop fighting to protect our patients’ access to health
care.”

Similarly, Ann Warner of Columbia, South Carolina’s Women’s Rights
and Empowerment Network issued a statement declaring that “we cannot sit
quietly and allow this to happen.
We need to speak out. We need to look
beyond political debates and remember that real people in our
communities are going to get hurt if this executive order is allowed to
stand.”

On the pro-life side, Marjorie Dannenfelser of the Susan B. Anthony
List thanked Gov. McMaster “for acting to ensure taxpayers fund
comprehensive primary and preventative care for women and families, not
abortion businesses like Planned Parenthood.”

___________________________________________________

 Governor’s order says funds won’t go to 
abortion providers
 

“THEY DON’T SPEAK ENGLISH”: FIVE YEAR OLD CHRISTIAN GIRL IN UK PLACED IN FOSTER CARE WITH NIQAB WEARING MUSLIMS~FORCED TO SPEAK ARABIC, OBSERVE MUSLIM DIET RESTRICTIONS, SHAMED ABOUT CHRISTIAN BELIEFS

“THEY DON’T SPEAK ENGLISH”: FIVE YEAR OLD CHRISTIAN GIRL IN UK PLACED IN FOSTER CARE 
WITH NIQAB WEARING MUSLIMS 
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

“And more recently the girl told her that ‘Christmas and Easter are
stupid’ and that ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’…the child was
‘very distressed’ and claimed the foster carer had removed her
Christian cross and encouraged her to learn Arabic.”

Imagine what the outcry would be if a Muslim child were placed in a
Christian family that denigrated her Muslim beliefs. And that would
never happen in Britain or anywhere else in the West. But this incident
is all in a day’s work in shattered, staggering, dhimmi Britain, in
which the May government is so bent on appeasing Islamic supremacists
and jihadis that it is willingly sacrificing non-Muslim children to the
chimera of a harmonious multicultural future, a vision that will
dissolve in blood.

“Christian girl, 5, is forced into foster care with Burka-wearing
Muslim carers who ‘took away her crucifix and stopped her eating
bacon,’” by Fiona Parker and Martin Robinson, Mailonline, August 28, 2017 (thanks to Blah):

A white five-year-old girl was forced to live in Muslim
foster homes where nobody spoke English and her carers took away her
Christian cross and encouraged her to learn Arabic, it emerged today.

The child, who is a native English speaker, spent the past six months
in two Muslim households after being placed into foster care in Tower
Hamlets, east London.

Local authority reports describe how the little girl sobbed and
begged not to be returned to her niqab-wearing carer’s home, telling a
social worker: ‘They don’t speak English.’

Her mother offered to send her back from a home visit with her
favourite meal – spaghetti carbonara – but the girl said it was banned
because it contained bacon – which Muslims do not eat.

And more recently the girl told her that ‘Christmas and Easter are
stupid’ and that ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’, according to
The Times.

The reports detail how the child was ‘very distressed’ and claimed
the foster carer had removed her Christian cross and encouraged her to
learn Arabic.

The two placements were made by the scandal-hit Tower Hamlets borough council against the wishes of the girl’s family.

Local authorities are required to give due consideration to a child’s
religion, racial origin and cultural and linguistic background’ when
placing them into a foster home.

The girl’s mother is said to be horrified by the circumstances her daughter has been placed in.

A friend told the newspaper: ‘This is a five-year-old white girl. She
was born in this country, speaks English as her first language, loves
football, holds a British passport and was christened in a church.

‘She’s already suffered the huge trauma of being forcibly separated
from her family. She needs surroundings in which she’ll feel secure.
Instead, she’s trapped in a world where everything feels foreign and
unfamiliar. That’s really scary for a young child.’

The girl lived with her first carer, who is believed to have worn a
niqab outside the family home, for four months. Her current carer wears a
burka, which covers her face entirely, when she is out in public with
the child….

_______________________________________________________

 Christian Child Forced Into Muslim Foster Care
 Published on Aug 28, 2017

Christian
children in the UK are now being forced into Muslim foster care homes
under the guise of “diversity” with the true intent being destruction of
the West and free society.

 MPs’ anger as Christian girl is forced into Muslim foster care: Demands for inquiry over five-year old girl
Published on Aug 28, 2017

MPs’ anger as Christian girl is forced into Muslim foster care: Demands for inquiry over five-year-old’s plight.
MPs
demanded an urgent review last night after it emerged a ‘distressed’
Christian five-year-old had been forced to live with Muslim foster
carers.
The Government was urged to examine the case, which has seen a
scandal-hit council place the girl in two Muslim households in the past
six months, against the wishes of her family.
Social workers said
the child sobbed and begged not to be returned to one foster mother –
who wore a face veil in public – as the household spoke no English.
She
also claimed her foster carer had said she should learn Arabic and had
taken away her Christian cross necklace, The Times reported.
The
child – who is white, was born in Britain and has a UK passport – was
allegedly not allowed to eat a spaghetti carbonara prepared by her birth
mother because it contained bacon.
She was said to have told her
biological mother ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’ and
‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’, prompting questions over cultural
attitudes in her foster homes.
Her current foster mother wears a
burka in public which completely hides her face. The placements were
arranged by Tower Hamlets council in east London, where children’s
services were criticised by Ofsted earlier this year.
Inspectors
rated the council’s children’s services ‘inadequate’ and said there was
an ‘entrenched culture of non-compliance with basic social work
standards’.
Last night, MPs said the five-year-old’s apparent
distress over her foster homes raised disturbing questions over the
council’s decision to place an English-speaking Christian child in
Muslim households.
Robert Halfon, chairman of the Commons education
committee, urged the Government to examine the case and establish
whether the issue was widespread within the foster care system.
He said the child should ‘have the right to be placed with people who reflect her heritage and background’.
Philip
Hollobone, Tory MP for Kettering, said: ‘What if it were a Muslim girl
being looked after by a Christian couple and they insisted she deny her
Muslim upbringing and become a Christian – how would the Muslim
community feel about that?
‘It seems to me the original heritage of
the child ought to be respected by the foster family, whatever their own
faith happens to be. The council needs to review this case urgently …
All religions should be treated equally and respected in the same way.’
Andrew
Bridgen, Tory MP for North West Leicestershire, added: ‘This just feels
wrong. This is the wrong decision for the long-term welfare of the
child.
‘My constituents will wonder what world they are living in, in
Tower Hamlets … Someone needs to take a look at this. Imagine the
outcry from the Muslim community if this had been a Muslim child adopted
by a white Christian family.’
Former justice minister Shailesh Vara,
Tory MP for North West Cambridgeshire, said the decision was
‘completely wrong’, adding: ‘The local authority should have ensured
that in placing the child in a foster home her religion and cultural
background would be totally respected.
Tower Hamlets council was
criticised only months ago by inspectors who found children were left in
‘situations of harm’ for too long.
Its children’s services
department was branded ‘inadequate’ by Ofsted in April. In their report,
inspectors warned there were ‘widespread and serious failures’ which
had left children in ‘neglectful and abusive situations’ for too long.
They
said chief executive Will Tuckley and the department director Debbie
Jones had ‘insufficient scrutiny’, meaning they ‘did not know about the
extent of the failures to protect children’. The watchdog’s findings
were so concerning that following its investigation in January,
immediate action was needed in many cases to ensure children were safe.
Inspectors were also forced to order an urgent review into a number of areas, including private fostering arrangements.
They found superficial assessments failed to consider whether children had been trafficked or abandoned, and basic safeguard

 
Christian 5 Year-Old Girl Forced into Muslim Foster Care Has Cross Removed, Told to Learn Arabic 
Published on Aug 29, 2017
The
child, who is a native English speaker, spent the past six months in
two Muslim households after being placed into foster care in Tower
Hamlets, east London. She was forced to live in Muslim foster
homes where nobody spoke English and her carers took away her Christian
cross and encouraged her to learn Arabic, according to The Times. Local
authority reports describe how the little girl sobbed and begged not to
be returned to her niqab-wearing carer’s home, telling a social worker:
‘They don’t speak English.’ The reports detail how
the child was ‘very distressed’ and claimed the foster carer had removed
her Christian cross and encouraged her to learn Arabic. The girl told
her mother Christmas and Easter are ‘stupid’ and European women are
alcoholics. The child, who is a native English speaker, also
refused to take back her favourite meal – spaghetti carbonara – because
it contained bacon – which Muslims do not eat. The girl’s mother is said to be horrified by the circumstances her daughter has been placed in. A
friend told the newspaper: ‘This is a five-year-old girl. She was born
in this country, speaks English as her first language, loves football,
holds a British passport and was christened in a church. ‘She’s
already suffered the huge trauma of being forcibly separated from her
family. She needs surroundings in which she’ll feel secure. Instead,
she’s trapped in a world where everything feels foreign and unfamiliar.
That’s really scary for a young child.’