NOT SO STRANGE!: HOW PRESIDENT TRUMP GOT FOOLED INTO ENDORSING LUTHER STRANGE FOR ALABAMA SENATOR~MOORE PAINTED AS A LOSER DESPITE HAVING 30% OF VOTES

 http://inkport.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Screen-Shot-2017-04-27-at-3.07.16-PM.png
HOW PRESIDENT TRUMP GOT FOOLED INTO ENDORSING LUTHER STRANGE FOR ALABAMA SENATOR
 Published on Aug 9, 2017

Roger
Stone joins Alex Jones live via Skype to explain how Donald Trump was
fooled into endorsing an establishment candidate in the ongoing Alabama
Senate race.

  CATHOLIC HATRED FOR BIBLE BELIEVERS???
 National Right to Life Endorses Luther Strange for U.S. Senate Over Roy Moore
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

WASHINGTON — National Right to Life has announced its endorsement for
Sen. Luther Strange for U.S. Senate over “Ten Commandments Judge” Roy
Moore.
“National Right to Life is pleased to endorse Senator Luther Strange,
whose position on life reflects the true values of Alabama’s voters,”
Karen Cross, the organization’s political director, said in a statement
on Thursday. “Senator Strange has a 100 percent pro-life voting record
in the 115th Congress, including votes to confirm Neil Gorsuch to be an
associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court.”
The group noted that Strange supports defunding Planned Parenthood, is a
sponsor of the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act, and plans to
co-sponsor the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which will ban
abortions after 20 weeks gestation.
“As a co-chair of the Senate Values Action Team, Senator Strange is a
leader in the fight for pro-life legislation in the United States
Senate,” Cross added.

However, the announcement has left some pro-life Americans scratching
their heads as to why the organization selected Strange over Moore, who
supports the complete abolition of abortion.
“I was disappointed to see that your group had endorsed Luther Strange
in Alabama’s Senate race,” one commenter wrote on the group’s Facebook
page. “There are men who better represent your goals, and are better men
in general than Mr. Strange—men who don’t so fully represent the
corruption that is U.S. and Alabama politics.”
Others took to their own personal pages to express concern.

“It’s not so Strange that Luther is also the choice of Senate
Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and the GOP dwellers of Washington, D.C.
swamp,” one remarked. “Maintaining the status quo is their only goal.
They don’t want someone who truly believes in saving babies lives…”
“And you know why [they endorsed Strange]? Because Judge #RoyMoore wants
to abolish abortion while #StrangeLuther wants to keep that old
pro-life wagon a-rolling along,” another opined.
As previously reported, Moore currently holds the lead in the Senate
race, garnering 30 percent of the vote, according to recent polls. Among
those supporting Moore include “Texas Ranger” actor and martial artist
Chuck Norris, who likewise endorsed Moore in his 2012 run for chief
justice of the Alabama Supreme Court.
“Judge Roy Moore is the real deal,” he said in a statement on Monday.
“He’s tough, tested, and has a spine of steel. … Judge Moore has never
backed down from standing for what is right, and that’s exactly what
he’ll do in the U.S Senate. That’s why the Washington establishment is
spending millions trying to defeat Judge Moore.”
Moore said that part of the reason he is ahead in the polls is that the people are tired of the establishment.
“It’s not just Democrats, it’s not just the other party, it’s the
establishment,” he told AL.com. “People in Washington are watching this
race very closely. It’s going to signal whether there is going to be
change.”
The primary is set for Aug. 15. Rep. Mo Brooks is currently in a dead
heat for second place in the polls with Strange. The election is to fill
the Senate seat left by Jeff Sessions, who was selected by President
Trump to serve as U.S. Attorney General.
Christian News Network reached out to National Right to Life to inquire
why the organization chose to endorse Strange rather than Moore, but no
further information was provided other than the existing statement.
________________________________________________________

 STRANGE’S ECUMENICAL, CATHOLIC ASSOCIATION WITH EWTN:

March 22, 2012 

 ALABAMA AG FILES MOTION TO INTERVENE
IN EWTN LAWSUIT CHALLENGING MANDATE FOR
CONTRACEPTION COVERAGE

(MONTGOMERY)– Alabama Attorney General
Luther Strange today filed a motion to intervene in a federal lawsuit
challenging the contraception coverage mandate imposed by the Obama
Administration under the healthcare law signed by the President two
years ago Friday. 
Today’s action—regarding a mandate
particularly for contraception coverage—comes as the U.S. Supreme Court
is set to hear the broader issue of whether the federal government may
mandate that individual citizens be required to purchase insurance
coverage. Attorney General Strange and other state Attorneys General are
challenging the individual mandate in the U.S. Supreme Court, which
will hear three days of argument March 26-28.  
The contraception mandate requires all
employers and insurance companies – including those with religious and
conscience-based objections – to provide coverage for all FDA-approved
contraceptive methods and sterilization procedures.  Among these items
are the abortifacients known as the “morning-after pill” and the
“week-after pill.”  The only religious exemption is a narrow one that
applies primarily to churches and other houses of worship.  Religious
non-profits, schools, universities, and other enterprises – including
those who offer critical social services to the needy – do not qualify
for the exemption.
The lawsuit that Alabama is seeking to
join was filed by Eternal Word Television Network, Inc. (EWTN) in the
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on February 9,
and is styled Eternal Word Television Network, Inc. v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al.
The Attorney General explained that the
mandate violates federal law and would require state officials to
regulate insurance in violation of Alabama law: “The freedom of
religion, and to believe as one sees fit, is our ‘first freedom’ under
the United States Constitution.  The people of Alabama have recognized
the importance of this freedom and have enshrined it in their
Constitution as well.  Alabama law does not allow anyone to be forced to
offer a product that is against his or her religious beliefs or
conscience.”
“The healthcare law signed by President
Obama two years ago is taking effect now, and the consequences are
dire.  The law forces the States to be used as instruments in carrying
out the federal government’s unconstitutional policies,” Strange said. 
“Under the law, States have no discretion.  States instead must
immediately begin regulating their insurance markets and enforcing
federal provisions such as the contraception mandate, without regard to
their citizens’ religious beliefs or conscientious objections.”
EWTN is the world’s largest Catholic
media network, and objects to the contraception mandate on religious
grounds.  Under the mandate, EWTN and other religious employers and
insurers are forced to provide health coverage for services and
procedures that violate their religious beliefs and consciences.  EWTN
is represented in this lawsuit by The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty,
a non-profit, public-interest legal and education institute that
protects the free expression of all faiths, headquartered in Washington,
D.C.
Attorney General Strange filed a motion
to intervene in the lawsuit on the grounds that the mandate requires
Alabama to regulate its health insurance market in a way that violates
the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, the federal Religious
Freedom Restoration Act, the Alabama Religious Freedom Amendment, and
other laws. Pursuant to the new healthcare law, known as the Affordable
Care Act (ACA), the Secretaries of the U.S. Departments of Health &
Human Services, Treasury, and Labor promulgated the contraception
mandate as an interim final rule on August 3, 2011 and as a final rule
on February 15, 2012.  As a final rule, the mandate is federal law that
must be immediately followed.
Since religious employers and insurers
cannot comply with the mandate on religious and conscience-based
grounds, the mandate forces them to choose among violating their
beliefs, incurring substantial fines, or exiting the health insurance
marketplace altogether.  Alabama explained in its court filings that
such an event will leave persons without insurance, forcing the State to
pick up the tab.  The State’s indigent care costs are likely to go up,
as are the State’s Medicaid rolls. 
In the wake of public outcry, The White
House had spoken of a compromise where insurers would pay for the
contraception coverage instead of the religious employers.  However, the
mandate has not been amended to reflect the Administration’s proposal. 
The proposal is not a solution in any event.  Based on the Departments’
statements, religious employers would still be required to provide
plans that cover services that violate their beliefs.  And the proposal
does nothing to address the concerns of religious insurers who would be
forced to cover the services.  While they work out the details of the
proposal, the Departments have stated that they will voluntarily choose
not to enforce the mandate for one year.
Attorney General Strange noted:  “The
so-called ‘compromise’ proposed by the Obama Administration isn’t a
compromise at all.  The mandate is final.  We only have the federal
government’s assurances that they will not enforce the mandate for a
short period of time while they work out the details of a compromise
rule that would still force religious insurers and employers to provide
coverage that violates their religious beliefs and consciences.  The
issue is simple:  Either Alabamians and Americans around the country
will be allowed to exercise their religious freedom to say ‘no’ to
something they disagree with, or they won’t. We hope the Obama
Administration will listen, and adopt a position that supports our first
freedom rather than undermines it.” 
_______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________

A Strange State Of Corruption

By  |  May 18, 2017, 04:30am  |  @treyedwardsal
SEE: http://theresurgent.com/a-strange-state-of-corruption/;  

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Luther Strange’s suspect ascension to the US Senate is just the
latest in a series of bizarre House of Cards-esque corruption scandals
that have shocked the state of Alabama.

If you’ve been paying any
kind of attention to the recent slew of corruption and sex scandals
originating from the Alabama state capital, you can’t help but wonder if
this isn’t all some kind of orchestrated dramatic prelude to Season 5
of House of Cards. Approximately one year ago, Speaker of the House Mike
Hubbard was convicted of 12 felony ethics violations. Then, Chief
Justice of the Supreme Court Roy Moore was removed from office by an
unelected Judicial Inquiry Commission for standing up to the federal
government and refusing to force Alabama judges to obey the
controversial Obergefell v. Hodges ruling that overruled various state
laws regarding gay marriage. And finally, Governor Robert Bentley just
recently resigned and pled guilty to multiple misdemeanor campaign
finance violations as part of a deal to avoid felony ethics charges and
impeachment relating to various abuses of power used to cover up his
illicit affair with a senior political advisor. In less than one year,
the heads of all three branches of government (Legislative, Executive,
and Judicial) were removed from office. However, this season of our
drama isn’t quite over yet.

Roy Moore (L), Mike Hubbard (M), Robert Bentley (R)

In the last episode of “House of Cards: Alabama”,
Bentley had just resigned from office and Lt. Governor Kay Ivey was
being sworn in as the first Republican female governor in state history.
Now, as black fades to a wide-angle view of the State Capitol building
on a sunny day, the narrator informs us that the state is on pins and
needles awaiting the decision of Governor Ivey regarding the US Senate
special election. But first, we need to flash back to a few episodes
earlier. “November 2016” appears on the bottom of the screen, and we are
greeted by an unusually tall figure sitting across a desk from a
shorter one. “The Bentley impeachment process had been moving forward
rapidly for months,” continues our narrator. “Now, however, Attorney
General Luther Strange has called a meeting with Mike Jones, the
Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. Rumors have been swirling
that Strange has been moving forward with a criminal investigation of
his own, and may be close to issuing an indictment.” The conversation
between our two figures begins. The tall one, quickly recognized as
Luther Strange, is asking Chairman Jones to temporarily suspend the
impeachment proceedings against the Governor. Why? “Related work,”
replies Strange. No details are given, but the implication is obvious:
he wants to be the one to take the Governor down. Faced with the
prospect of a lengthy, expensive, and very complicated legislative
process in order to impeach a sitting Governor for the first time in
over a century, Jones eagerly agrees. A criminal indictment instead of
an impeachment will not only ensure that the punishment fits the crime,
but will save the state significant amounts of money.

A few days later, Donald Trump wins the
Presidency. Cue dramatic footage of cheering crowds, waving flags, and
patriotic music. Fade to black. Commercial break.

As the latest unimaginative car
commercial ends, the next scene opens on dramatic footage of Alabama’s
junior US Senator, Jeff Sessions, being sworn in as Donald Trump’s
Attorney General in the Oval Office. Alabama voters are ecstatic. It has
been almost a decade since any conservative in Alabama held a cabinet
position in the Federal government. For the first time in a couple
years, Alabamians are cautiously optimistic about their political
future. But this does not last long. Across the screen, newspaper
headlines dramatically scroll past: “
Bentley Preparing to Interview Senate Candidates,” “Bentley Narrows US Senate Picks To Six,” “Robert Bentley Appoints Luther Strange To US Senate,” “Bentley Sets Senate Special Election,” “Steve Marshall Named Alabama Attorney General By Bentley,” “New AG Confirms Investigation Into Gov. Bentley,” “Attorney General Appoints A Special Prosecutor To Continue Bentley Investigation”Auditor To Sue Bentley, Strange Over Senate Appointment,” “Lawsuit Filed Over Bentley’s Senate Special Election Date,” “Gov. Bentley Wants To Toss Lawsuit On Delayed Senate Election,” “Bentley To Defend His Special Election Decision Next Month,” and so on and so forth.

Robert Bentley (left) and Luther Strange (right)

Governor Robert Bentley, now a convicted
criminal, had received an application from, interviewed, and appointed
Luther Strange to the US Senate. The same Luther Strange who had been
halting his impeachment proceedings for months with no explanation. When
questions arose during the interview process about a possible conflict
of interest, the then Attorney General said “We have never said in our
office that we are investigating the governor. It’s somewhat unfair to
him and unfair to the process.” Not quite an explicit denial, but an
obvious implication of one. Both the Governor and the Attorney General
insisted there was no conflict of interest, presumably because there was no investigation – despite the impeachment proceedings being suspended for his “related work.”
Enter Steve Marshall. It’s not quite
clear what Governor Bentley thought he had to gain by appointing Mr.
Marshall as the next Attorney General (which, in Alabama, he can do
unilaterally with no approval required). However, it’s obvious that it
did not work out in the Governor’s favor. Within 48 business hours of
being sworn in, Attorney General Marshall met with his staff and asked
them about any potential investigation into the Governor. Upon being
informed that there was indeed an ongoing criminal investigation and
potential impending indictment, he immediately and publicly recused
himself from the process and appointed a special prosecutor. In doing
so, he effectively implicated Senator Strange in an ethics violation –
by insisting he himself was legally required to recuse himself from the
investigation simply because he had been appointed by the Governor, he
in effect implied that Luther Strange had been legally required to do
the same when he was applying for the appointment to the Senate. Since
this time,
a bar complaint has been filed against Strange based in part on this sequence of events.

Don’t leave to make more popcorn yet. We’re just getting to the good part.

Now, under any normal circumstances, what
would you expect to happen next? Naturally, we (Alabama voters)
expected to see a special election for the Senate seat come up. We all
figured that the problem with Luther would be quickly resolved in a
rapid special election in which he’d spend all his time defending
himself from corruption allegations, have no ability to raise money, and
have none of the advantages traditionally associated with an incumbent.
But we weren’t confident long. Even though our scumbag of a Governor
had become fairly well known for being unpredictable, we were all still a
bit shocked when he announced that he was not, in fact, holding a
special election. The election for the Senate seat would be held in
2018, along with the normal election cycle. This would allow Luther
Strange over a year to build up incumbency and financial resources, and
would give him time to let the controversy subside before he’d be forced
to answer to the general public. Time is the greatest ally of every
politician. This proclamation was issued despite opinions written by
both the Legislative Reference Service and the Secretary of State that
clearly stated that doing so was in direct violation of state law.

(Photo by Mario Tama/Getty Images)

Angered at this turn of events, and especially at the clear implication that they’d been misled by Luther Strange for months, legislators began calling for the impeachment process
to resume immediately. The process quickly picked back up, and within a
month, the first hearings were being held. Governor Bentley did
everything in his power to postpone the process and maintain his
innocence, but finally caved right before the evidence was due to be
presented, and negotiated a deal with AG Marshall and the rest of the
law enforcement agencies involved. In exchange for no jail time, he
immediately resigned, pled guilty to multiple campaign finance
violations, agreed to community service and significant fines, and
promised to never run for office again.

Now, we can pick back up where we left
off. Kay Ivey is being sworn in as the second female governor in the
history of Alabama. She promises transparency and pledges to restore the
public’s faith in their government. She immediately fires multiple
senior staffers that were known to be involved in the various scandals,
including the husband of the Governor’s mistress, who ironically was in
charge of Governor Bentley’s faith-based initiatives. Then, the other
shoe drops: she announces that the Senate seat would immediately see a
special election.  Rejoice! Now, we can finally clean this state’s slate
of corruption. Remove the last vestige of the embarrassment that was
Dr. Governor Robert Julian Bentley.

Not so fast.

Mitch McConnell – AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

There were two factors that nobody had
considered. One: Very few people remembered what Luther Strange did for a
living before he was Attorney General. What was that? He was a
lobbyist. A DC lobbyist, to be specific. He knew how the system worked.
He’d been building relationships with the swamp creatures in the Capital
for decades, not months. And, two: Mitch McConnell needs a win. Not
just McConnell, but the entire GOP establishment. Their ability to
defend their own members against attacks from within their own party has
been severely diminished over the past few years, starting with the
unexpected downfall of Eric Cantor and the rise of the House Freedom
Caucus. This significantly impacts the ability of these partisan leaders
to whip votes and reassure their caucus members whenever they need them
to vote on an issue that is wildly unpopular with their constituents.
Now, here’s Luther Strange:
a loyal foot soldier and reliable caucus vote on whatever issue Mitch McConnell deems important at the time.
They need to prove that loyalty is rewarded with re-election, even in
difficult times. So, they’ve placed all their eggs in Luther’s basket.
Despite Luther never being elected to the Senate, they are treating him
like an invaluable long-term incumbent, devoting unlimited resources to
ensure his ascension.

Mitch McConnell is the real-life
equivalent of President Underwood on a mad rampage. Over the past few
weeks, and even now, he and his operatives at the NRSC are doing
everything in their power to not only build Luther Strange up, but to
unceremoniously destroy any attempt at opposition to him. They forced
numerous consults to resign from opposing campaigns by threatening them
and telling them that they’d be blackballed from any future work with
the GOP if they dared work against them. They’ve bought off unprincipled
Republicans – Luther is personally calling even mid-level operatives
himself and offering them large sums of money for their allegiance, many
times asking them to switch sides and betray a candidate they are
currently supporting. I have personal friends that have received such
calls, receiving offers of over $20,000. For every one one of those that
refused to auction off their integrity, I shudder to imagine how many
accepted such offers and have yet to admit to it.

Despite scaring off numerous legitimate
and well-funded candidates and co-opting Donald Trump’s campaign
speeches to attack principled conservatives, the NRSC is still boring
full-steam ahead in their war against those who refuse to toe the line
and bow the knee to party leadership. Just this past week, they
placed a $2.6 Million television ad buy with out-of-state funds,
saying that it is a “fraction” of what they plan on spending. Buoyed by
these out-of-state funds, establishment backing from deep within the
swamp, and a total lack of any kind of conscience that would prohibit
him from
blatantly lying in his campaign ads, Luther is poised to potentially win this seat and escape punishment for his corruption.

However, all hope is not lost.

Given the circumstances, it is no
surprise that the field for the Senate seat has quickly become quite
crowded. Ed Henry, the state legislator that led the impeachment process
against Robert Bentley, was the first to jump in – followed by former
Chief Justice Roy Moore, activist Randy Brinson, and Congressman Mo
Brooks, a member of the Freedom Caucus, as well as numerous less
well-known individuals on both sides of the aisle. The diversity of
candidates in this case is actually helpful, as Alabama uses a partisan
primary runoff system. Dividing the anti-Luther vote among several
candidates does not guarantee his success. In fact, it can only hurt it,
as each candidate that jumps in will pull of a small part of Luther’s
voters just through personal relationships and connections. The fewer
votes Luther has, the higher the chances of a runoff occurring, assuming
Luther survives that long. Once in a runoff, as long as all candidates
unite behind whoever is opposing Luther, we’ll be in good shape. But we
may not even get to that point.

Credit: twitter.com/algop

Yesterday, Representative Ed Henry held a
press conference at the Alabama Republican Party headquarters – right
as the qualifying period was ending. He shocked the assembled crowd by
dramatically tearing his qualifying papers in half and announcing that
he had NOT, in fact, qualified to run as a candidate for the Senate
seat. In order to maintain his credibility in calling out Luther Strange
on his corruption, he has chosen to put ambition aside and do what’s
best for the state – fight from outside the race. He talked about the
bar complaint against Luther and is actively supporting a ballot access
challenge filed by Madison County resident Tom Scovill with the state
GOP steering committee. This will hopefully force the 21-member steering
committee to vote up or down on whether or not Luther Strange will be
allowed ballot access as a Republican candidate. This is a procedural
move that has the potential to actually work, given the mountain of
evidence compiled by Mr. Scovill to support his challenge. You can
download the challenge paperwork
here, here, here, and here,
and if you want to encourage the Alabama Republican Party to hear the
challenge and vote on it, you can call their office from 8am to 5pm at
(205) 212-5900. They will be voting tonight (Thursday, May 18) on
whether or not to hear the challenge. If it passes that hurdle, they’ll
then hold hearings on the evidence presented.

Actual footage of Ed Henry tearing his qualifying papers in half.

It’s anybody’s guess how this Senate race
will turn out. There is too much money being pumped into the race and
the field is too wide open for anybody to predict with any kind of
certainty a specific outcome. All we can hope is that justice will
prevail and the Strange slate of state corruption in Alabama will be
wiped clean.

Stay tuned for the next dramatic episode of “House of Cards: Alabama.”

If you found this article informative, please share it on Facebook and on Twitter using the hashtag #alpolitics.

About the author: Trey Edwards is an Alabama Republican political
consultant, and anti-tax/anti-corruption activist. He does not currently
work for any candidate or any party/group involved in the US Senate
race

_______________________________________________________
 
 Alabama Ethics Commission Delays Hearing On Luther Strange Finance Violations
By  |  July 28, 2017, 11:49am  |  @treyedwardsal
SEE: http://theresurgent.com/alabama-ethics-commission-delays-hearing-on-luther-strange-finance-violations/

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Over the past few months, we here at The Resurgent have been covering the corruption
surrounding newly appointed US Senator Luther Strange in great detail.
Now, The Resurgent has learned that the hearing on multiple alleged
campaign finance violations committed by Luther Strange have been
mysteriously delayed until the day after the special election primary in
which he is running to keep the seat he was appointed to by former
Governor Robert Bentley, who pled guilty to multiple crimes earlier this
year. This hearing was scheduled to occur on August 2nd, but has been
quietly postponed until August 16th, the day immediately following the
election on the 15th.

Luther Strange & Robert Bentley

Luther Strange is the former Alabama Attorney General, and was appointed
to be a US Senator after the man who previously held that spot, Jeff
Sessions, was appointed by Trump as the nation’s Attorney General.
Strange was appointed to the Senate by now-convicted criminal and former
Governor Robert Bentley, after Strange actively sought to halt the
impeachment proceedings against the Governor for more than six months.
Since then, scandal after scandal has come out surrounding the unelected
Senator, all while he is fighting for his political survival in a
special election that was called by the new Governor, Kay Ivey. Ivey
called a special election because former Governor Bentley had refused to
hold one, in violation of state law. By refusing to hold the special
election on schedule, Bentley gave Senator Strange months to raise
millions and cozy up to Mitch McConnell, who is now spending more than
$2.4 Million of NRSC money to protect him in a heated primary against 10
Republican opponents.
Approximately 90 days ago, there was a new development in the case
against Luther Strange that went largely under the radar: the Alabama
Secretary of State’s office filed a report with the Alabama Ethics
Commission stating that two expenses filed by Luther Strange’s campaign
were both outside the window in which expenses are permissible, and were
also over the maximum limit for those kinds of expenses. At the time,
Secretary of State John Merrill, also a Republican, told ALReporter,

“That is not a permissible expense and it exceeds the amount that could
be given even if it were within the correct time frame. There are two
violations there.”

These violations are both felonies according to Alabama law.

According to Strange’s campaign, these expenses have to do with Luther
Strange transferring the domain names for his website from his state
account to his federal account. However, this claim is suspicious, as
the amount of the transaction is over $1,400. Annual domain fees
generally vary in the $10-40 range. Normally, it would be assumed that
he was buying a batch of domain names similar to his website address,
but a statement from his attorneys in a Yellowhammer News article specifically says it was the purchase of “two web domains at fair market value.” These attorneys, – Megan Sowards Newton and Benjamin L. Ginsberg of
the high powered DC law firm Jones Day, have a history of working for
establishment GOP Congressmen and Senators. Megan Sowards Newton is the
former General Counsel for the NSRC, Mitch McConnell’s organization that
is spending millions of Republican dollars to protect the unelected
Luther Strange – in a primary, in a solid Republican state. Not only
that, but the NSRC has been actively intimidating and threatening
any consultants or campaign contractors that have gone to work for any
of the other Republican candidates running. It is uncertain exactly how
Mitch McConnell’s high powered lawyer friends were unable to achieve a
delay in this ethics hearing for his friend Luther Strange, and it is
unlikely that we will ever know, as the proceedings have been shrouded
from the public eye. In fact, the announcement that the meeting was
rescheduled was not widely broadcast, but simply quietly posted up on
their website. Below is a screenshot, just in case it mysteriously disappears in the near future:

Now, officially, we do not know for certain that the hearing on this
particular case was on the agenda for the August 2nd meeting of the
Alabama Ethics Commission, as that agenda has not been publicized.
However, The Resurgent did reach out to the Secretary of State’s office
and verify the facts:

  1. A report was filed with the Alabama Ethics Commission approximately 90 days before the August 2nd meeting was scheduled.
  2. There has been no hearing on the report yet.
  3. The rescheduling of this meeting of the Alabama Ethics Commission to
    August 16th guarantees that the matter will not be heard before the
    election on August 15th.

Former Governor Robert Bentley’s Mugshot

Legally, the Alabama Ethics Commission has up to one year before hearing
a complaint filed against a public official. However, there is a recent
precedent for holding the hearing before the election. Earlier
this year, after Secretary of State John Merrill filed a similar report
regarding Governor Robert Bentley’s campaign finances on Feb 3rd,
a hearing was held by the Alabama Ethics Commission within 90 days – on
April 10th, right as the impeachment proceedings against the Governor
were beginning. The evidence was nearly identical to the case against
Luther Strange, as is the language used by Secretary of State Merrill,
who at the time called Governor Bentley’s violations “not a permissible
expenditure.” These violations were turned over to the District Attorney
for prosecution, who immediately negotiated a plea deal with Bentley in
which he pled guilty to both campaign finance violations, stepped down
from office, and agreed to significant fines and community service. The
impeachment proceedings were abandoned, Kay Ivey was sworn into office,
and the state was finally able to move forward. The Ethics Commission’s
quick and decisive action in that case saved the taxpayers a significant
amount of time and money. Now, however, they have abandoned the
precedent they themselves set, and appear to be allowing this election
to move forward with no resolution on the highly pertinent ethics
complaints filed by the Secretary of State’s office. This is a violation
of the due process rights of the victims of this crime – in this case,
each and every individual voter in the state of Alabama. The general
public has a constitutional right to a speedy trial, and deserves to
know whether or not the sitting US Senator has violated the law before
heading to the polls on the 15th.

US Senate Candidate Randy Brinson

To make matters worse, all of this is going on while Luther Strange is
having to answer questions about yet another alleged scandal. He was
recently implicated in a conspiracy by some of the biggest corporate
political donors in the state to bribe legislators and public officials
to oppose an EPA Superfund project. After State Representative Oliver Robinson recently struck a deal and
pled guilty to taking a six-figure bribe, fellow State Representative
John Rogers told US Senate candidate Randy Brinson on the record that
he, too, was offered a bribe – and that Luther Strange was present at
the time. In fact, in an 18-month period while Luther Strange was using
his position as Attorney General to actively campaign against the
proposed EPA Superfund project, he received a total of $75,000 in
campaign contributions from the people who Oliver Robinson pled guilty
to taking a bribe from. After promising to hold a press conference to
that effect alongside Randy Brinson, Rogers backed out at the last
minute and started telling reporters that he’d never said such a thing –
apparently unaware that multiple additional people were listening to
the phone call. It really makes you wonder who got to him, and what he
was threatened with. Reports from political operatives close to the
situation tell The Resurgent that Rogers was visibly shaken after being
contacted by the people he previously claimed had attempted to bribe
him. These sources tell The Resurgent that he has since disappeared
completely from the public eye and refused to speak to anyone about the
matter. You can read the news articles about this event as it unfolded here, here, here, and here.
Please share and tweet this article on your favorite social media
network! Tag us on Twitter @Resurgent with your thoughts and use
#alpolitics and #alsen to join the conversation surrounding the Alabama
Senate race.

Also, please subscribe to our newsletter on the top of this page and like our Facebook Page to continue to receive the latest on the this developing story.


 

NEW YORK CITY GOVERNMENT TRAUMATIZES GUN OWNERS-BY JOHN STOSSEL

NEW YORK CITY GOVERNMENT TRAUMATIZES GUN OWNERS-BY JOHN STOSSEL
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 New York – -(Ammoland.com)- Why are law-abiding, licensed gun owners who 
follow laws and procedures being jailed in New York?

Reason
TV’s John Stossel finds that every week gun owners, legally licensed by
other states, are being arrested in New York airports despite correctly
following the procedures of the TSA and airlines.
One such
traveler, Avi Wolf, was charged for having an empty, plastic magazine in
his bag. He didn’t have the gun or bullets — just the magazine, which
he had forewarned the TSA about.

“I’m telling them … I
have a magazine here. It’s empty, no bullets,” Wolf said. “Next thing I
know they’re pulling me over to the side, they’re like, ‘Do you know
what you have in your bag?!’ I know what I have in my bag, I told you
what I have in my bag.”

Wolf spent a day in jail and $15,000 in legal fees, which resulted in plea bargaining a felony charge down to “public disorder.”

You can find the full video here:

SHERIFF ARPAIO: WHY IS OBAMA STILL RUNNING THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT?

 Sheriff Arpaio: Why is Obama still running the Justice Dept?

 SHERIFF ARPAIO: WHY IS OBAMA STILL RUNNING 

THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT? 
 DOJ denied Arpaio his right to a jury trial
BY JEROME CORSI
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – After being convicted of criminal
misdemeanor contempt, former Maricopa Co. Sheriff Joe Arpaio continues
to attack the Obama holdovers in the Trump Justice Department who
seeking to imprison him for enforcing the very immigration laws
President Trump has sworn to enforce.

“Why is Barack
Obama is still running the Trump Justice Department?” Arpaio asked
Infowars.com in an exclusive interview.  “Ironically, this is a ‘revenge
prosecution’ in which Obama-holdovers in the Justice Department are
seeking to enforce a court order that socialist LaRaza lawyer Tom Perez
imposed on me because I refused to make Maricopa County into a sanctuary
for illegal immigrants.”
The irony of the case is that the
criminal misdemeanor contempt charge is being pressed against Arpaio by
the Public Integrity Section (PIN) of the Criminal Division of the U.S.
Department of Justice – the section within the Justice Department that
holds exclusive jurisdiction over the prosecution of alleged criminal
official misconduct, as well as over the prosecution of alleged judicial
misconduct — a relevant fact in that the actions of District Court
Judge Murray Snow have been called into question by Arpaio’s legal team.

“How can the Public Integrity Section of the Justice Department
prosecute me when all I did was to honestly enforce the immigration laws
currently on the books?” Arpaio asked Infowars.com in an exclusive
telephone interview.
“The Public Integrity prosecutors who are
still after me are all Obama hold-overs who went so far as to charge me
under the wrong statute so they could deny me a jury trial, refusing to
drop their open-borders amnesty agenda,” he argued.
“How is it
that Attorney General Sessions ignored a letter Sheriff Arpaio’s
attorneys had hand-delivered to his office, when all Sheriff Arpaio
requested was that the Justice Department consider insisting the Public
Integrity Section would allow hi my right as a U.S. citizen to a trial
before a jury of my peers?” Arpaio asked.
“It’s ironic that I’m
being persecuted by Obama hold-overs Justice Department Public Integrity
Section that thinks denying me a jury trial by erroneously using an
inappropriate statute, even after being made aware of this by my
attorneys, somehow doesn’t implicate them in official misconduct and the
potential to be criminally prosecuted themselves,” Arpaio insisted.
“A revenge prosecution”
Infowars.com has previously reported
the case against Arpaio began with the 2007 traffic stop that resulted
in the arrest of Ortega Melendres, a Mexican tourist who was a passenger
in an automobile stopped in Cave Creek, Maricopa County.
Melendres charged
the Maricopa County sheriff’s officers were “fundamentally stopping
brown-skinned people with the pretext of looking for criminals.”
The
case developed into a class action lawsuit that caught the attention of
Eric Holder and Tom Perez, then in the Civil Rights division of the
Obama Justice Department.
Arpaio, a target of the Obama
administration for years because of his determination to enforce
strictly existing immigration laws, was seen by Perez, acting under the
orders of Eric Holder, as implementing in the Maricopa County Sheriff’s
Office (MCSO) a “systematic policy” that set law enforcement rules and
procedures to be intentionally discriminatory to the rights of
Hispanics.
Perez began his legal career as a LaRaza attorney in
Maryland. He currently is Chair of the Democratic National Committee, a
major force in moving the Democratic Party in a hard-left direction.
Now
at 85-years-old, after a distinguished career that includes service in
the U.S. Army from 1950-1953, service as a police officer in Washington,
D.C., and Las Vegas, Nevada, as well as working as a top federal drug
enforcement officer in foreign countries and the United States. Arpaio, a
former DEA narcotics agent and  head of the U.S. Drug Enforcement
Administration, U.S. Department of Justice, for Arizona, faces criminal
charges that could see him convicted to six-months in jail if found
guilty.
Arpaio’s plea to Attorney General Jeff Sessions ignored
Arpaio’s
attorney, Mark Goldman, Goldman & Zillinger PLLC in Scottsdale, AZ,
sent to Attorney General Sessions a letter dated June 22, 2017, that
was requesting the Department of Justice to consider various pleas
before the start of the bench trial then scheduled to begin on Monday,
June 26, 2017, before U.S. District Judge Susan R. Bolton, in Phoenix,
Arizona.
Infowars.com has confirmed that several efforts
were made to contact Attorney General Sessions directly and through
trusted intermediaries in an effort to get Justice Department attention
to Goldman’s letter.

 Infowars.com
can also confirm that Attorney General Sessions was insolated within
the Justice Department so that all attempts to communicate with him
failed.

Ultimately, Goldman’s letter was ignored, and
with the Justice Department’s failure to intervene in the case, Judge
Bolton began the bench trial against Arpaio as originally scheduled.
“The
criminal contempt allegations stem from an alleged failure of the
Maricopa County Sheriff’s Offices (MCSO) to comply with an Order of the
Court (preliminary injunction) dated December 23, 2011,” Goldman’s
letter read.
“This charge relates back to the prior Obama
administration and a time when the Sheriff’s practices were in direct
opposition to the Obama administration in regards to immigration
policy,” Goldman’s letter continued. “The Sheriff was enforcing the law.
The Obama administration appears to have been interested in doing the
opposite for apparent political reasons.”
In the letter, Goldman
argued the Obama Justice Department allowed Arpaio to be charged with
criminal contempt misdemeanor charges under the wrong statute, precisely
because the statute of limitations on the correct statute had run out,
and the incorrect statute allowed Judge Bolton to deny Arpaio the right
to a jury trial.
Here is what Goldman wrote:

  • “In
    regards to other aspects of the prosecution, we request that you
    reconsider the DOJ’s prosecution of this matter because it was
    incorrectly brought under 18 U.S.C. Section 401. Section 401 relates to a
    simple criminal contempt of a lawful order. The matter should have been
    brought under 18 U.S.C. Section 402. Section 402 applies to
    contumacious conduct that is also a separate crime as more particularly
    described in the attached Petition. The allegations in this matter
    compel it to be prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. Section 402 that entitles the
    offender to a jury trial in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 3691.
    Additionally, Section 402 offenses come with a one year statute of
    limitations.
  • “Given that the matter was not charged under the
    correct statute, and consequently the Department of Justice has deprived
    Sheriff Arpaio of his jury trial right and the applicable statute of
    limitations, in the interest of justice we request that you move the
    Court to dismiss the criminal contempt proceedings or, at the very
    least, move the Court to stay the trial pending a full review of this
    matter by your office.
  • “Time is of the essence for the reason that this matter.”

Goldman
also argued the Obama Justice Department had timed various announcement
coincident with Arizona voting deadlines in 2016, so as to influence
voters to defeat Arpaio’s bid for re-election – an effort that is in
direct conflict with DOJ policies instituted by Eric Holder.
“The
announcements had an undeniable effect upon Sheriff Arpaio’s campaign to
be elected to a seventh term in office,” Goldman wrote. “The impact on
Sheriff Arpaio’s re-election campaign is clear.  He is no longer
Sheriff.”
Obama and Lynch plan to oust Arpaio from office
Largely
as a result of the adverse publicity from facing criminal contempt
charges, Arpaio lost on Nov. 8, 2016, his seventh bid to be elected
Maricopa County Sheriff.
The challenger, Paul Penzone, a Democrat and a former Phoenix police sergeant who lost to Arpaio in 2012, won
the sheriff’s election in 2016 only after the Justice Department under
Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced criminal charges would be
brought against Arpaio. This, combined with George Soros backing
Penzone’s campaign positioned to Arizona’s growing Hispanic population.
Throughout the entire case, the Obama DOJ pursued Arpaio with a vengeance.
On
Jan. 5, 2012, when the Department of Justice dropped the initial
criminal case against Arpaio in favor of pursuing the civil case, the
Department of Justice sent
the author an email, explaining, “If MCSO wants to debate the facts
rather than fixing the problems stated in our findings, we will do so by
way of litigation.”
According to information provided the author
by a credible whistleblower, while the Department of Justice was
prosecuting Arpaio from 2008 to 2010, the National Security Agency
conducted electronic surveillance of the various Arizona-based federal
judges on the case, as well as on Arpaio, and on the Maricopa County
Sheriff’s Office.
At the same time, Department of Justice attorneys under the direction of Attorney General Eric Holder maintained an on-going telephone back-channel discussion with the federal judge assigned to handle the case.
That the Department of Justice conspired to defeat Arpaio is suggested by the timing of his criminal indictment.
In mid-October 2016, with the election approximately three weeks away, the Justice Department announced
that lawyers were preparing to file criminal contempt of court charges
against Arpaio for his alleged violation of Judge Stone’s orders in the
Melendres case.
Then, on Nov. 4, 2016, four days before the election, Politico reported Soros had contributed over $3 million to a Soros-funded PAC, Maricopa Strong, to defeat Arpaio.
Obama holdovers in DOJ seek prison time for Arpaio
On July 31, Judge Bolton found that Arpaio was guilty of misdemeanor criminal contempt.
As Infowars.com has previously reported,
Arpaio’s attorney Mark Goldman explained to Infowars.com in an
exclusive telephone interview and follow-up email that the judge in the
case, U.S. District Susan R. Bolton, was so biased against Arpaio that
she could have written her opinion before the trial even started,
stating her prejudice from the start that Arpaio was guilty of
misdemeanor civil contempt guilty conviction.
Arpaio’s attorneys
are in the process of appealing the misdemeanor criminal court
conviction that has the possibility of forcing him to serve jail time,
depending upon the sentencing order Judge Snow is expected to order on
Oct. 5, 2017, after the DOJ probation department prepares its
presentence investigation report.
Arpaio still has a petition for a
writ of mandamus before the Supreme Court, asking the Supreme Court to
intervene directly in the case with a ruling that Arpaio’s request for a
jury trial should have been granted.
For more information click here.

 

CDC DESTROYED EVIDENCE THAT SOME VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM

CDC DESTROYED EVIDENCE THAT SOME VACCINES CAUSE AUTISM
 Published on Aug 10, 2017

The
government agency known as the Center for Disease Control has been
exposed as having destroyed evidence that suggests that the MMR Vaccine
can increase the chances of a child developing autism.

 Producer Of Anti Vaccine Movie Banned From Australia
 Published on Aug 10, 2017

Countries are now banning people just for the simple action of challenging the status quo.