MUSLIMS RIOT, ATTACK ISRAELI POLICE AT TEMPLE MOUNT; AT LEAST 56 WOUNDED

AFTER ISRAEL REMOVED METAL DETECTORS AT THE DEMAND OF THE MUSLIMS:
MUSLIMS RIOT, ATTACK ISRAELI POLICE 
AT TEMPLE MOUNT; AT LEAST 56 WOUNDED
BY ROBERT SPENCER
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 They got what they wanted: all the new security measures were removed. 
But they’re still rioting. Why? Because the Israeli concessions show 
that violence is the way to get what they want. So now they’re pressing 
for more concessions.
 Video by Jerusalem Online

“BREAKING: Arabs Attack Israeli Police on Temple Mount,” by Andrew Friedman, Tazpit News Agency, July 27, 2017:

Arabs attacked Israeli police on the Temple Mount
Thursday as Muslim worshipers returned to the holy site after a 10-day
boycott to protest Israeli security measures.

Livestreamed footage taken from the Mount of Olives, overlooking the
Temple mount, showed thousands of people milling around the site, with
the sounds of gunshots and ambulance sirens clearly heard.

The clashes took place hours after Islamic authorities who are
responsible for maintenance at the Dome of the Rock and Al-Aqsa Mosque
agreed to call off the boycott after Israeli authorities dismantled
security cameras and metal detectors at entrances to the Mount.

The security measures were introduced following the murder of two
police officers near the Lion’s Gate area of the compound by three
Israeli-Arabs who emerged from the Al Aqsa mosque within the Temple
Mount on July 14.

Late Thursday afternoon new protests began in the Bab Hutta
neighborhood, in the Muslim Quarter of the Old City, when a gate leading
from the neighborhood to the Mount was closed; the gate was later
opened, allowing hundreds of Muslims to pour through and into the
compound.

18:55 At least 56 people have been injured in the attacks against
Israeli police, and the subsequent response by security personnel on the
Temple Mount.

18:24 The most recent count is 46 people wounded in the clashes, according to local sources….

________________________________________________________

 Islamic Violence Erupts at the Temple Mount
 Muslim protestors riot and burn throughout Jerusalem 
 Published on Jul 22, 2017
Jerusalem,
Israel (Ynetnews) — Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Friday
declared a freeze on all relations with Israel in response to the Temple
Mount crisis. “Relations with Israel will be frozen at all levels until
Israel commits itself to canceling all its steps against the
Palestinian people as a whole and against the city of Jerusalem and the
Al-Aqsa Mosque in particular, and to committing itself to preserving the
historical and legal situation in Al-Aqsa,” he said in his statement.

“We
reject to magnetometers, as they are political moves presented in the
guise of security measures, whose sole goal is to take over the Al-Aqsa
Mosque and escape the peace process, turn the conflict from a political
one to a religious one and break up the mosque based on time and place.

In
a dramatic move, Palestinian Pres. announces PA ‘freezing of contacts
at all levels in light of the steps in Jerusalem by placing
magnetometers’; Hamas calls move ‘a meaningless announcement.’

Read more here: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,73…

Jihad terrorism works: Israel removes all security apparatus from al-Aqsa Mosque after violent protests
BY ROBERT SPENCER
 
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

The Israeli government no doubt believes that by caving in, they have
pacified an increasingly volatile situation. That is true in the short
run. But in the long run, they have only reinforced the proposition that
when “Palestinians” don’t get things their way, all they have to do is
riot and kill some innocent Israeli civilians, and the Israelis will
give them whatever they want. This will only lead to more, not less,
jihad terrorism in the future.


Now that Muslims can carry weapons to the Temple Mount with impunity, how many more Israelis will be murdered?

“Israel removes all security apparatus from al-Aqsa Mosque after unrest,” Reuters, July 26, 2017:

Israel overnight removed all security infrastructure it
had put in place this month at Muslim entrances to the Aqsa mosque
compound in Jerusalem’s Old City, stepping up its efforts to diffuse
political and religious tension.


The government had already dismantled metal detectors it installed in
the area after the killing of two Israeli policemen on July 14, hoping
the move would calm 10 days of often-violent protests that have put the
city on edge.

But separate security measures, including closed-circuit cameras and
low metal gates, were left in place, angering Palestinian leaders and
the population, who have threatened a “day of rage” on Friday. Most
Muslims have avoided entering the compound in the past two weeks,
praying instead in the streets.

The stand-off at the holy site – the Haram al-Sharif compound, or the
Noble Sanctuary of Jerusalem – has provoked some of the worst bloodshed
in Jerusalem for years, with peace efforts having stagnated since
2014….

Amateur video shot overnight showed Israeli contractors dismantling
gantries put up to hold security cameras and using forklift trucks to
take away metal barriers from the marbled Lion’s Gate entrance to the
mosque compound.

Witnesses said all the security devices had been removed and crowds
of Palestinians gathered in the early hours to celebrate. Police
spokeswoman Luba Samri confirmed the removal. “Everything that was
installed after the attack (the killing of the two police officers) was
taken down overnight,” she said….

________________________________________________________

 Temple Mount Flashpoint: Clashes Erupt as Muslim Worshipers Return to Site, 125 Injured
 
Published on Jul 27, 2017
Thousands
of Muslim worshipers entered the Temple Mount on Thursday for the first
time in nearly two weeks, many shouting in delight as they did so, and
violent clashes erupted between Palestinians and Israeli security forces
at the compound.

A police officer was injured after a rock was thrown at his head, police said.

Channel 2 reported that 10 police officers were injured in the ensuing clashes.

Some
115 Palestinians were treated for injuries both inside the compound and
in the surrounding area, according to the Palestinian Red Crescent. A
spokesperson said the injuries were mainly caused by rubber bullets,
burns and bruises. Fifteen people were hospitalized, it said.

Police said worshipers began hurling rocks at security forces upon their reentry to the compound.

Some stones fell at the Western Wall plaza below, causing no injuries, a police spokesperson said.

The police responded to the stone-throwing with riot dispersal methods and vowed to forcefully combat any violence.

Extra
police and troops deployed to Jerusalem and West Bank after rollback of
security measures at sacred compound failed to calm tensions.

Israeli
forces prepared for possible violent protests in Jerusalem and the West
Bank Friday, as flaring tensions surrounding the Temple Mount persisted
even as Muslim leaders ended their protest over Israeli security
arrangements at the flashpoint holy site.

Extra police and border
guard gendarmes were ordered deployed to Jerusalem hotspots, and the
military was beefing up its presence in the West Bank amid expectations
of possible violent protests following midday prayers Friday, a week
after heavy clashes in the capital and West Bank left five Palestinians
dead.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ordered police
reinforcements in Jerusalem following the latest unrest, and police were
weighing limiting entry of younger men in anticipation of mass protests
for Friday prayers — the highlight of the Muslim religious week.

Israeli troops in the West Bank were put on high alert and prepared for more violence Friday, a military official said.

Israeli
officials had been hoping a planned “day of rage” by both the Fatah and
Hamas Palestinian factions would be called off after the security
measures were removed, but said they were prepared for protests.

Links:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/clashes-…

Israeli forces gird for Friday protests as Temple Mount unrest persists
http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-…

 

COSTA RICAN CHRISTIANS REJECT INCLUSION OF GENDER IDEOLOGY IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

 
COSTA RICAN CHRISTIANS REJECT INCLUSION OF GENDER IDEOLOGY IN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 (Evangelical Focus) — Pastors, evangelical leaders 
and Christian politicians gathered last weekend in San Jose, the capital
 of Costa Rica, to publicly express their rejection of the inclusion of 
gender ideology in the sex education classes that the Ministry of 
Education wants to put into effect.

With the motto #aMisHijosLosEducoYo (I educate my children),
thousands of believers participated in a demonstration in the center of
the Costa Rican capital.

Endorsed by the Evangelical Alliance, the concentration was full of speeches and prayer for the family.
 Continue reading this story >>

Pastors, evangelical
leaders and Christian politicians gathered last weekend in San Jose, the
capital of Costa Rica, to publicly express their rejection of the
inclusion of gender ideology in the sex education classes that the
Ministry of Education wants to put into effect.

With the motto #aMisHijosLosEducoYo (I educate my children), thousands
of believers participated in a demonstration in the center of the Costa
Rican capital.

Endorsed by the Evangelical Alliance, the concentration was full of
speeches and prayer for the family.

The Evangelical Church is struggling in different areas, because the
Ministry of Education is including a series of subjects for high school
students which promote ethical, family, and sexual views and values
contrary to the biblical vision.

Christian deputies are also fighting to prevent the progress of this and
other projects which aim to promote gender ideology in the schools.

“CLAIM THE RIGHT TO EDUCATE YOUR CHILDREN”

“I encourage you to educate and instruct your children,
See more: http://evangelicalfocus.com/family/2752/Costa_Rican_Christians_reject_the_inclusion_of_gender_ideology_in_the_educational_programs

 
 
Thousands of believers
participated in a demonstration in the center of the Costa Rican capital
under the motto #aMisHijosLosEducoYo (I educate my children).
See more: http://evangelicalfocus.com/family/2752/Costa_Rican_Christians_reject_the_inclusion_of_gender_ideology_in_the_educational_programs
Thousands of believers
participated in a demonstration in the center of the Costa Rican capital
under the motto #aMisHijosLosEducoYo (I educate my children).
See more: http://evangelicalfocus.com/family/2752/Costa_Rican_Christians_reject_the_inclusion_of_gender_ideology_in_the_educational_programs
Thousands of believers
participated in a demonstration in the center of the Costa Rican capital
under the motto #aMisHijosLosEducoYo (I educate my children).
See more: http://evangelicalfocus.com/family/2752/Costa_Rican_Christians_reject_the_inclusion_of_gender_ideology_in_the_educational_programs

SCARAMUCCI: WHITE HOUSE LEAKERS WOULD HAVE BEEN HANGED IN THE PAST

 Scaramucci: White House Leakers Would Have Been Hanged In Past
SCARAMUCCI: WHITE HOUSE LEAKERS WOULD HAVE BEEN HANGED IN THE PAST 
 “So treasonous.”
BY STEVE WATSON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

In a 30 minute interview that is being poured over this
morning, White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci told CNN
that the ‘treasonous’ leakers he is going after would have been hanged
at one time.

“The White House leaks are small potatoes
relative with things going on about leaking things about Syria or North
Korea or Iraq.” Scaramucci said.
“Those are the types of leaks
that are so treasonous that 150 years ago people would have been hung
for those type of leaks,” Scaramucci added.

As the interview the host Chris Cuomo progressed, Scaramucci outlined his goal as far as the leaks are concerned.
“Now
all of the cynics around here and the tweets and all these other
nonsense saying the leaks are never to going to stop. And I say to those
people, you are correct. I know the leaks will never stop, but if I can
dial back the leaks in the department that I am representing and the
department that I am running, then I will feel that I’ve accomplished
something on behalf of our president.” Scaramucci noted.
The newly appointed comms man said that the President personally authorized this morning’s call to CNN:

Scaramucci revealed that he and the President know who the senior White House leakers are, and are moving to deal with them.
“It’s
absolutely completely and totally reprehensible.” He said, adding “As
you know from the Italian expression, the fish stinks from the head
down, but I can tell you two fish that don’t stink, and that’s me and
the president. I don’t like the activity going on in the White House. I
don’t like what they’re doing to my friend.”
Scaramucci also
commented on his relationship with Reince Priebus, who he seemed to
implicate as one of the leakers in a now deleted tweet, saying he only
posted it to make a point about how its Priebus’ responsibility to help
him uncover the leakers.
“When the journalists who know who the
leakers are like Ryan Lizza, these guys know who the leakers are.
Jonathan Swan at Axios, these guys know who the leakers are. I respect
him for not telling me because I understand journalistic integrity.
However, when I put out a tweet, I put Reince’s name in a tweet, they
make the assumption it’s him because journalists know who the leakers
are. So, if Reince wants to explain he’s not a leaker, let him tell you
about himself.” Scaramucci said.

Scaramucci said last week that he and Priebus are like brothers, but today added that ‘some brothers are like Cain and Abel.’

Scaramucci stated that he doesn’t know “if the relationship with Reince is reparable,” adding “that’s up to the President.”

TRUMP BANS “TRANSGENDERS” FROM MILITARY

 http://straightfromthea.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Donald-Trump-Ban-Transgender-Military-.jpg
TRUMP BANS “TRANSGENDERS” FROM MILITARY
BY DAVE BOHON
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 

Reversing a move made by President Obama late in his administration,
President Donald Trump said July 26 that “transgender” individuals —
those who identify with and behave according to the opposite sex — will
be banned from serving in the U.S. military.


“After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be
advised that the United States government will not accept or allow
transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. military,”
the president communicated in a series of Twitter posts. “Our military
must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be
burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that
transgender in the military would entail.”

While an Obama administration order had enabled transgender individuals to serve in the armed forces, earlier this month
the Defense Department had put a six-month moratorium on further
transgender enlistment, even as military branches moved forward with
training for how rank-and-file military personnel should treat
transgender personnel.

While the move bans further enlistment of transgender individuals, it
remains unclear what will happen to the approximately 250 transgender
military personnel currently serving.
A Pentagon spokesman referred all
questions about Trump’s statements to the White House. “We will continue
to work closely with the White House to address the new guidance
provided by the Commander in Chief on transgender individuals serving
the military,” said Navy Capt. Jeff Davis. “We will provide revised
guidance to the Department in the near future.”
Addressing the likely medical costs that would result from
transgenders in the military, the New York Times reported that Trump had
“elected to announce the ban in order to resolve a quietly brewing
fight on Capitol Hill over whether taxpayer money should pay for gender
transition and hormone therapy for transgender service members. The
dispute had threatened to kill a $790 billion defense and security
spending package scheduled for a vote this week.”
Among the first to criticize the president’s decision was the
American Civil Liberties Union, which called it “outrageous and
desperate,” vowing to fight the ban. “Let us be clear,” said ACLU staff
attorney Joshua Block. “This has been studied extensively, and the
consensus is clear: There are no cost or military readiness drawbacks
associated with allowing trans people to fight for their country. The
president is trying to score cheap political points on the backs of
military personnel who have put their lives on the line for their
country.”
Similarly, U.S. Representative Dan Kildee (D-Mich.) vice chair of the
congressional LGBT caucus, said the decision amounted to a “slap in the
face to the thousands of transgender Americans already serving in the
military,” and said it “undermines our military’s readiness.” Kildee
added that “anyone who is willing to put on the uniform of the United
States and risk their life in service to our country should be
celebrated as patriots, regardless of their gender identity. This
short-sighted and discriminatory policy will make America less safe.”
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called Trump’s decision
a “cruel and arbitrary decision,” and recalled that “on this very day
in 1948, President Harry Truman signed the executive order desegregating
the U.S. military. Sixty-nine years later, President Trump has chosen
this day to unleash a vile and hateful agenda that will blindside
thousands of patriotic Americans already serving with honor and
bravery.”
Even Senator John McCain, a celebrated Vietnam POW and chairman of
the Senate Armed Services Committee, added his own criticism concerning
the announcement, insisting that all Americans should be allowed to
serve in the military. “There is no reason to force service members who
are able to fight, train, and deploy to leave the military — regardless
of their gender identity,” he said.
But Representative Vicky Hartzler (R-Mo.), who had introduced a
failed amendment to the defense budget that would have banned
transgenders from the military, said that “President Trump’s decision
today to rescind Obama’s transgender military policy has the best
interests of the military in mind, and I thank him for taking this
decisive action.”
Marine Corps veteran Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council
(FRC), which has been a leading voice against allowing transgenders in
the military, applauded the president “for keeping his promise to return
to military priorities, and not continue the social experimentation of
the Obama era that has crippled our nation’s military. The military can
now focus its efforts on preparing to fight and win wars rather than
being used to advance the Obama social agenda.”
Similarly, Lt. Col. Robert Maginnis (U.S. Army, Ret.), the FRC’s
senior fellow for national security, speculated that “the president
obviously has been consulting with the top leaders in the Pentagon, who
are grounded in common sense, and they made recommendations to end it.
So the president has decided to not go down that path that the Obama
administration paved regarding political correctness.”
Looking at the issue in relation to long-held military requirements
for recruits, the ban was logical. The military has long sought
Americans who fit a “military mold,” so to speak, who won’t cause
needless disruptions or cause needless money to be spent. For instance,
the U.S. military excludes those without at least a high-school
equivalency degree, those with tatoos on the fingers, neck, or face or
“ear gauges,” those Americans on ADHD medication or insulin, those who
have a felony conviction, and those who are overweight. Many Americans
who are specifically excluded could, as senator John McCain said,
“fight, train, and deploy.” Transgenders are just one of many groups that
aren’t deemed good military material.
______________________________________________________

The Truth About The Military Trans Ban

Wounded Warrior Defends Trump Transgender Ban

Iraq war amputee says stress of war ‘tests every ounce of your being’

 Wounded Warrior Defends Trump Transgender Ban

SEE: https://www.infowars.com/wounded-warrior-defends-trump-transgender-ban/

_________________________________________________

 https://lifesite-cache.s3.amazonaws.com/images/made/images/remote/https_s3.amazonaws.com/lifesite/paul-f.-zukunft_(1)_810_500_55_s_c1.jpg

 Coast Guard Commandant Defies Trump Ban on Transgenders in Military

by DAVE BOHON

SEE: https://www.thenewamerican.com/culture/item/26623-coast-guard-commandant-defies-trump-ban-on-transgenders-in-military; 

republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
 
Days after President Trump announced
that “transgender” individuals would be banned from serving in the
military, Admiral Paul Zukunft, commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard, said
that he would defy the decision of his commander in chief rather than
“break faith” with cross-dressing members of his service branch.
Noting that he had personally called one of 13 Coast Guard
members who had “come out” as transgender, Zukunft indicated that the
Coast Guard’s “investment” in its handful of transgender members was
more important that following orders from the president.
The call, Zukunft recounted in comments he made during a
talk at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, was to Lt.
Taylor Miller, who used to be a man, and whose supposed transition to
the opposite sex was covered recently in the Washington Post.
“If you read that story,” said Zukunft, “Taylor’s family has disowned
her. Her family is the United States Coast Guard. And I told Taylor, ‘I
will not turn my back. We have made an investment in you, and you have
made an investment in the Coast Guard, and I will not break faith.’”
Zukunft said that after the call to Miller, he contacted
retired General John Kelly, who at the time was director of Homeland
Security (under which the Coast Guard operates), who in turn relayed the
news to Defense Secretary Jim Mattis. Zukunft said that he has also
engaged officers from the Judge Advocate General’s Corps to navigate
what will likely become a major military sideshow as transgender
soldiers and sailors, emboldened by Zukunft’s defiance, step forward to
challenge President Trump’s order.
That order came in a series of Twitter posts on July 26,
as President Trump reversed an earlier move by the Obama administration,
announcing that “the United States Government will not accept or allow
transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military.
Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and
cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that
transgenders in the military would entail.”
Following that announcement, the pro-homosexual Palm
Center, based in San Francisco, released a letter signed by over 50
retired generals and admirals who supposedly oppose the ban.
“Transgender troops have been serving honorably and openly for the past
year, and have been widely praised by commanders,” the letter stated.
“Eighteen foreign nations, including the UK and Israel, allow
transgender troops to serve, and none has reported any detriment to
readiness.”
By contrast the conservative and Christian Family Research
Council’s Tony Perkins, a Marine Corps veteran, expressed the support
for the ban given by a majority of both retired and active military
personnel. “As our nation faces serious national security threats,” said
Perkins, “… our troops shouldn’t be forced to endure hours of
transgender ‘sensitivity’ classes and politically-correct distractions
like this one.”
As for now, it appears to be business as usual for
transgenders presently serving in the military. Following President
Trump’s announcement, General Joseph F. Dunford Jr., chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, issued a memo to military commanders indicating
that there would be no changes to policy without further orders from
above. “There will be no modifications to the current policy,” read the
memo, “until the president’s direction has been received by the
secretary of defense and the secretary has issued implementation
guidance.”
______________________________________________________

 Limbaugh Defends Trump’s Trans Military Ban: “US Military Is NOT An Experimentation Laboratory”