republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By NWV Senior Political News Writer, Jim Kouri
Legislating From The Bench and putting America in danger
President Trump responded to Judge Robart in a tweet
stating”What is our country coming to when a judge can halt a Homeland
Security travel ban and anyone, even with bad intentions, can come into
U.S.?” The DHS has stopped flagging travelers. And direct flights have
resumed from the previously banned countries to the United States.
After
the DOJ quickly appealled Judge Robart’s decision a Federal 9th Circuit
Appeals Court declined to reinstate the Travel Ban. We are now playing
Russian roulette with our National Security. Set into motion by a
Federal judge basing his decision on political opinion rooted in the
subversion of George Soros’ Open Society initiatives.
Judge
Robart’s name won’t fade into mainstream media history. Because when the
next inevitable terror attack occurs on U.S. soil, we’ll know exactly
who to hold accountable for this dangerous subversion of U.S. National
Security. Jon Bowne reports.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
The showdown over President Trump’s executive order on immigration
continues. District Senior Judge James Robart of Seattle has issued “a
nationwide restraining order” to block Trump’s order, which restricts
immigration from seven Muslim countries – countries selected by the
Obama administration — suspends refugee admission for 120 days, and ban
Syrian refugees indefinitely.
Lee Gelernt, the lawyer who successfully argued for a restraining
order against Trump’s so-called “ban” in federal court in Brooklyn, New
York, stated:
The courts have and will continue to recognize that this
executive order favors Christians and disfavors Muslims and that is
antithetical to American values and flatly inconsistent with the United
States Constitution.
This erroneous comparison between Christians and Muslims aims to stir
up division and once again reveals the myopia of leftists and the the
anti-Trump camp. The reason for the Trump immigration policy is solely
national security. How many Christians have been infiltrating
the refugee stream for the purpose of murdering Westerners? How many
Christians have been raping and sexually assaulting non-Christian
Western women and girls all across Europe? How many Christian migrants
have been committing crimes and wreaking havoc to the tune of the 46
billion dollars that German and European taxpayers now have to fork over to fix?
There is no discriminatory intent about the Trump order. At worst, it
can be described as a drastic measure in a crisis. This obvious point
was addressed by White House press secretary Sean Spicer, who said in a
statement:
The president’s order is intended to protect the homeland
and he has the constitutional authority and responsibility to protect
the American people.
“White House: DOJ plans to defend Trump’s immigration ban”, by Melanie Eversley, USA Today, February 3, 2017:
U.S. District Senior Judge James Robart of Seattle on
Friday issued a nationwide restraining order blocking the travel ban put
in place by President Trump last week.
Trump’s ban, created through an executive order, sought to block
people from seven majority-Muslim countries from entering the United
States.
In issuing his decision, Robart was siding with Washington Attorney
General Bob Ferguson, who filed a suit to block key provisions of the
president’s executive order, which also bars Syrian refugees from
entering the country.
White House press secretary Sean Spicer released a statement Friday
night saying the Department of Justice would seek an emergency stay of
this “outrageous order.”
“The president’s order is intended to protect the homeland and he has
the constitutional authority and responsibility to protect the American
people,” Spicer said in the statement.
Statement by the Press Secretary:
At the earliest possible time, the Department of Justice intends to file
an emergency stay of this order and defend the executive order of the
President, which we believe is lawful and appropriate. The president’s
order is intended to protect the homeland and he has the constitutional
authority and responsibility to protect the American people.
As the law states, “Whenever the President finds that the entry of
any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be
detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by
proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend
the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or
non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may
deem to be appropriate.”
Washington state Gov. Jay Inslee, a Democrat, hailed Ferguson and applauded the decision.
“We should feel heartened by today’s victory and more resolute than
ever that we are fighting on the right side of history,” the governor
said in a statement. “Thank you to (Attorney General Bob Ferguson) and
his team for making the case that no person – not even the president –
is above the law.”
Amnesty International also applauded the development.
“This decision is a short-term relief for thousands of people whose
lives have been upended, but Congress must step in and block this
unlawful ban for good,” organization spokesman Eric Ferrero said in a
statement. “Trump’s Muslim ban is in humane, unlawful, and
discriminatory, which is why the courts and the public want it to be
stopped.”
Ferguson said his team has been working around-the-clock for the last week on reversing the executive order.
“It’s obviously an historic decision and an important one for the
rule of law and for the people of the state of Washington and the people
of our country. I have said from the beginning: it is not the loudest
voice that prevails in the courtroom, it is the Constitution, and that’s
what we heard from Judge Robart today.”
The decision is effective immediately nationwide, Ferguson said.
A lawyer with the national office of the American Civil Liberties Union said the decision was significant.
“The decision in Washington reaffirms that the courts will stand up
to the president,” said Lee Gelernt, the lawyer who successfully argued
for a restraining order against Trump’s ban in federal court in
Brooklyn, N.Y.
“The courts have and will continue to recognize that this executive
order favors Christians and disfavors Muslims and that is antithetical
to American values and flatly inconsistent with the United States
Constitution.”….
May 15, 2024 9:30 am By Christine Douglass-Williams; SEE: https://www.jihadwatch.org/2024/05/islamic-preachers-disseminate-hateful-messages-about-israel-and-jews-driving-further-antisemitism-surge; republished below in full, unedited,…
One long string of 'quid-pro-quos' that have led to international wars and terrorism. May 17,…
Will anyone ask Blinken to explain himself? May 17, 2024 by Robert Spencer SEE: https://www.frontpagemag.com/hamas-top-dog-antony-blinken-sends-a-stern-demand-to-israel;…