A WordPress Blog-THE CHURCH MILITANT Ephesians 5:11-"And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather expose them". This Christian News Blog maintains a one stop resource of current news and reports of its own related to church, moral, spiritual, and related political issues, plus articles, and postings from other online discernment ministries, and media which share the aims to obey the biblical commands to shed light on and refute error, heresy, apostasy, cults, and spiritual abuse. ALL CONTENT FROM HTTPS://RATHEREXPOSETHEM.BLOGSPOT.COM MOVED TO THIS NEW BLOG, MAY 2020
Donald Trump is laying out delivered a long list of things he would do if elected president.
During an appearance in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, he vows to act on them in the first 100 days in office.
“On November Eighth, Americans will be voting for this 100-day plan to restore prosperity to our country, secure our communities, and honesty to our government,” Trump says.
“This is my pledge to you and if we follow these steps we will once more have a government of, by and for the people and importantly we will make America great again. Believe me.”
Here is the list of the “Contract with the American Voter” policies detailed by Trump:
Propose a Constitutional Amendment to impose term limits on all members of Congress
Institute a hiring freeze on all federal employees to reduce federal workforce through attrition (exempting military, public safety, and public health)
Require for every new federal regulation, two existing regulations must be eliminated.
Institute a five year-ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists after they leave government service
Create a lifetime ban on White House officials lobbying on behalf of a foreign government.
Institute a complete ban on foreign lobbyists raising money for American elections.
Announce intention to renegotiate NAFTA or withdraw from the deal under Article 2205.
Announce withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership.
Direct Secretary of the Treasury to label China a currency manipulator.
Direct the Secretary of Commerce and U.S. Trade Representative to identify all foreign trading abuses that unfairly impact American workers and direct them to use every tool under American and international law to end those abuses immediately.
Lift the restrictions on the production of $50 trillion dollars’ worth of job-producing American energy reserves, including shale, oil, natural gas and clean coal.
Lift the Obama-Clinton roadblocks and allow vital energy infrastructure projects, like the Keystone Pipeline, to move forward.
Cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate change programs and use the money to fix America’s water and environmental infrastructure.
Cancel every unconstitutional executive action, memorandum and order issued by President Obama.
Begin the process of selecting a replacement for Justice Scalia from one of the 20 judges on my list, who will uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. [and protect the Second Amendment]
Cancel all federal funding to Sanctuary Cities.
Begin removing the more than 2 million criminal illegal immigrants from the country and cancel visas to foreign countries that won’t take them back.
Suspend immigration from terror-prone regions where vetting cannot safely occur. All vetting of people coming into our country will be considered extreme vetting.
Work with Congress on a Middle Class Tax Relief And Simplification Act. An economic plan designed to grow the economy 4% per year and create at least 25 million new jobs through massive tax reduction and simplification, in combination with trade reform, regulatory relief, and lifting the restrictions on American energy. The largest tax reductions are for the middle class. A middle-class family with 2 children will get a 35% tax cut. The current number of brackets will be reduced from 7 to 3, and tax forms will likewise be greatly simplified. The business rate will be lowered from 35 to 15 percent, and the trillions of dollars of American corporate money overseas can now be brought back at a 10 percent rate.
Work with Congress on a End The Offshoring Act. Establishes tariffs to discourage companies from laying off their workers in order to relocate in other countries and ship their products back to the U.S. tax-free.
Work with Congress on a American Energy & Infrastructure Act. Leverages public-private partnerships, and private investments through tax incentives, to spur $1 trillion in infrastructure investment over 10 years. It is revenue neutral.
Work with Congress on a School Choice And Education Opportunity Act. Redirects education dollars to gives parents the right to send their kid to the public, private, charter, magnet, religious or home school of their choice. Ends common core, brings education supervision to local communities. It expands vocational and technical education, and make 2 and 4-year college more affordable.
Work with Congress on a Repeal and Replace Obamacare Act. Fully repeals Obamacare and replaces it with Health Savings Accounts, the ability to purchase health insurance across state lines, and lets states manage Medicaid funds. Reforms will also include cutting the red tape at the FDA: there are over 4,000 drugs awaiting approval, and we especially want to speed the approval of life-saving medications.
Work with Congress on a Affordable Childcare and Eldercare Act. .Allows Americans to deduct childcare and elder care from their taxes, incentivizes employers to provide on-side childcare services, and creates tax-free Dependent Care Savings Accounts for both young and elderly dependents, with matching contributions for low-income families.
Work with Congress on an End Illegal Immigration Act. Fully-funds the construction of a wall on our southern border with the full understanding that the country Mexico will be reimbursing the United States for the full cost of such wall; establishes a 2-year mandatory minimum federal prison sentence for illegally re-entering the U.S. after a previous deportation, and a 5-year mandatory minimum for illegally re-entering for those with felony convictions, multiple misdemeanor convictions or two or more prior deportations; also reforms visa rules to enhance penalties for overstaying and to ensure open jobs are offered to American workers first.
Work with Congress on a Restoring Community Safety Act.Reduces surging crime, drugs and violence by creating a Task Force On Violent Crime and increasing funding for programs that train and assist local police; increases resources for federal law enforcement agencies and federal prosecutors to dismantle criminal gangs and put violent offenders behind bars.
Work with Congress on a Restoring National Security Act. Rebuilds our military by eliminating the defense sequester and expanding military investment; provides Veterans with the ability to receive public VA treatment or attend the private doctor of their choice; protects our vital infrastructure from cyber-attack; establishes new screening procedures for immigration to ensure those who are admitted to our country support our people and our values
Work with Congress on a Clean up Corruption in Washington Act..Enacts new ethics reforms to Drain the Swamp and reduce the corrupting influence of special interests on our politics.
“Of all of the undercover investigations I’ve conducted, this was by far the easiest. They were willing to pass out fraudulently obtained ballots like it was Halloween candy,” said James O’Keefe. “With almost three-quarters-of-a-million inactive voters and no Voter ID law in place, we could have turned the election results for most major candidates in the state. What we uncovered in this video illustrates how easy it would be for a well-orchestrated campaign with no regard for the law to change the outcome of a major election. Voter laws across the country need to be changed immediately to prevent this sort of potential voter fraud.”
News about the new 18-page plan was first reported by Reuters on October 19. It represents the first time the administration’s “policy for preventing violent extremism” has been updated, the establishment-controlled media organ reported. “The policy aims to prevent conversions to all violent ideologies,” Reuters reporter Julia Edwards added, citing the document, which still does not appear to have been released publicly. It was not immediately clear what constitutional or statutory authority the White House imagines it possesses to police people’s ideologies, or to hijack local governments to interfere in people’s personal beliefs.
According to Reuters, the White House “strategy” will be to unleash so-called “intervention teams” led by “mental health professionals,” faith-based groups, educators, and others “as a resource for people who find themselves in such circumstances.” These draconian “intervention teams” will then work to “divert a person” away from supposedly violent ideologies before they actually commit any violent acts or even any crimes. It is sort of like “pre-crime,” just more Orwellian and totalitarian.
If targets of Obama’s “community-based intervention teams” do not abandon the prohibited ideology through “mental health” and other interventions, “law enforcement” will be brought in to use more coercive measures. And if a person is believed to “pose a threat” or be “capable of committing a crime,” law-enforcement action will be taken, the policy states. In other words, “law-enforcement” action begins before a crime has even been committed — even before a target plots or conspires to commit a crime, which is of course already a crime in and of itself. Literally everyone is “capable” of committing a crime. The implications of the developments should be triggering alarm bells nationwide.
The increasingly politicized and lawless Justice Department and “Homeland Security” Department also have a big role to play in the new plan, according to media reports. Among other schemes, they will be super-charging their ideological propaganda campaigns, using taxpayer funding to illegally promote Obama’s ideology under the guise of countering ideologies Obama and the establishment disagree with and paint as violent.
The two bureaucracies will “enhance their social media campaigns to counter people being drawn to violence,” Reuters claimed matter-of-factly, without adding any details on how federal propaganda efforts — prohibited under federal law — would prevent anyone from being drawn to unapproved ideologies. The scheme may be related to a new “behavioral science” program Obama unleashed that aims to “nudge” and manipulate Americans to support everything from the man-made global-warming ideology and vaccines to Big Government and globalism.
As The New American reported last year, in the interest of defeating allegedly extreme ideologies with “better ideas,” Obama touted some of his administration’s policies at a UN summit announcing a global jihad against ideologies such as what the UN described as “anti-Muslim bigotry” in a press release. Among other schemes, he pointed to “efforts to discredit ISIL’s propaganda, especially online,” an apparent reference to his recently unveiled “Center for Strategic Counterterrorism Communications,” a federal propaganda machine led by Muslim Brotherhood-linked Islamist Rashad Hussain.
Under the new policy, federal prosecutors working for the increasingly radical DOJ will also put together “after-school programs” to shape children’s ideologies. Other recently unveiled Obama “extremism” plans also call for conscripting school teachers to seek out students with unapproved ideologies and report them to Big Brother for further scrutiny. The warning signs the FBI told teachers to look for included non-approval of homosexuality, Islam, and more. The leaked FBI document also decried what it referred to as “violent propaganda,” suggesting an increasingly unhinged federal government now literally equates speech with violence.
In other words, it appears that the federal government is now officially and openly waging all-out war on the God-given freedoms protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. These include free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and more — some of the most fundamental liberties; indeed, freedoms that the government was actually created to protect.
Unsurprisingly, Reuters and the administration both implied that the latest scheme was aimed at groups like the Islamic State, or ISIS. Yet, in reality, official Pentagon documents confirm that Obama knew al-Qaeda was leading the revolution in Syria, supported it with weapons and money anyway, and outlined as a deliberate policy goal the establishment of an Islamist “principality” in eastern Syria — an Islamic State today known better as ISIS or Daesh. Meanwhile, the administration has been importing Muslims into the United States as fast as politically possible, and both ISIS and the U.S. government acknowledge that ISIS terrorists are among them.
Thrown in among the myriad reported Islamic terror attacks purporting to justify the new White House scheme — San Bernardino, California; Orlando, Florida; and New York and New Jersey in 2015 and 2016 — was the brutal terrorist attack on Christians in South Carolina. In that case, a drug-abusing National Socialist (Nazi) named Dylan Roof reportedly massacred church-goers in Charleston. Incredibly, the Obama administration and the radical left have tried to paint the anti-Christian socialist-minded collectivist druggie as a conservative right-wing activist.
Also unsurprisingly, Reuters dutifully played its role as propagandist for the establishment, outlining only establishment-approved “criticism” of the extremist White House plan. Instead of pointing out that the scheme is unconstitutional, dangerous, Orwellian, and ridiculous, for instance, Reuters quoted an alleged “expert” who complained only that the ideology program would be too focused on Islamists. Of course, with Muslim Brotherhood operatives across the Obama “security apparatus,” there is little risk of that happening.
“What are violent ideologies and who gets to determine that? Who gets to define what is a violent ideology?” asked Limbaugh, whose weekly audience is estimated at almost 15 million listeners. “We know what this is…. Now, you might think, ‘Wait a minute, Rush, some of that, San Bernardino, that’s Islamic extremism.’ Yeah, but Obama’s not worried about that. ‘Orlando, that’s the guy that blew up the gay bar, again, another Islamic —’ No, no. Obama doesn’t care about that.”
“We know that the Department of Homeland Security in Obama’s first term released internal documents warning of the dangers posed by violent right-wing groups,” the talk-radio giant continued, highlighting a widely ridiculed official document from Obama’s “Homeland Security” bureaucracy telling local police that veterans, conservatives, constitutionalists, and other mainstream Americans are the nation’s top terror threat. “So you say, ‘Well, yeah, but Obama’s leaving.’ It doesn’t matter. The left runs everything in Washington no matter who the president is, and this work will continue.”
Concluding, Limbaugh pointed out that the real target of Obama’s extreme plan is basically everyone to the right of Obama and his radical allies. “I think that there’s no question that an ongoing effort to stamp out or intimidate anybody who happens to lean in any direction to the right is going to be undertaken, and I just wanted to mention this here at the top while everybody’s attention is focused,” he explained.
Indeed, there is no need to speculate on what is going on here. Obama’s actions and words have already made his agenda perfectly clear. In essence, the massive might of the federal government is being aimed squarely at voices that dissent from the increasingly dangerous extremism emanating from Washington, D.C. Americans of goodwill from across the political spectrum should unite to demand an immediate end to Obama’s unconstitutional ideological warfare.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”
How is this not treason?
“Iran to Add U.S.-Made Aircraft to Its War Fleet: Obama admin paves way for Tehran to rebuild its air force,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, October 24, 2016:
The Obama administration is forging a pathway for Iran to purchase American-made airliners that are likely to be converted for use in the Islamic Republic’s military, drawing concerns on Capitol Hill amid a flurry of recent attacks by Iranian-backed forces on U.S. military assets in the Middle East, according to conversations with lawmakers and fleet information obtained by the Washington Free Beacon.
Iran recently announced that it had struck deals with the U.S. Boeing airline manufacturer and France’s AirBus that would permit the companies to transfer technology and provide training to help the Islamic Republic produce equipment that would strengthen its aging fleet of American-made planes.
Iran currently uses at least six Boeing aircraft as part of its air force fleet. These planes were put on display last week when Iran launched a series of war drills aimed at deterring Western attacks.
As Iran angles to purchase 80 new jets from Boeing, which has lobbied heavily in favor of these sales, the Obama administration is being accused of helping to pave the way for Iran to transfer these commercial liners for use in its war fleet, according to lawmakers and sources familiar with Iran’s military buildup.
Iran has a history of transferring commercial jets purchased from America to its air force for use in military operations and the transfer of weapons and other illicit material abroad.
Lawmakers worry that the White House’s efforts to facilitate new airliner sales to Iran Air, the country’s national airline, will help Tehran bolster its war fleet at a time when it is threatening military action against Western forces in the region.
“We should not be surprised to see Iran’s latest military demonstrations feature Boeing 747s,” Rep. Peter Roskam (R., Ill.) told the Free Beacon. “It is incredibly irresponsible for any American company to sell products to the Islamic Republic that can easily be used for military purposes.”
“This is not hypothetical,” Roskam said. “We know the military has requisitioned Boeing planes from Iran Air in the past. Boeing is literally enhancing the military capabilities of the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism.”
The Free Beacon has learned that Iran converted several Boeing planes sold to its commercial outlet Iran Air for use in its air force fleet.
One Boeing 747, for instance, was sold to Iran in the mid-1970s after being used by the now-defunct TWA airlines. After being used by Iran Air, the plane was transferred to Iran’s Air Force, which still operates the plane, according to fleet information.
Several otherrefurbished planes were also converted for use first by Iran Air and then transferred for use in the country’s air force, according to open source information.
Iran’s use of these U.S.-made planes in its war fleet has raised renewed concerns from U.S. officials on the heels of reports that Boeing and AirBus will train Iranian engineers to repair these planes on their own.
This would enable Iran to reverse engineer key technology for use in its military and potentially skirt any new international sanctions that may be placed on the program, according to sources familiar with Iran’s military activities.
Iran also has inked a deal with Russia to co-produce Su-30 fighter jets, which are similar to American strike force planes such as the F-15E.
“It seems the Airbus and Boeing deal includes technology transfer, education, and participation in producing aircraft parts and equipment,” Maghsood Asadi Samani, the secretary of Iran’s airline companies organization, was recently quoted as telling Iran’s state-controlled press.
Iran has made it a priority in recent months to rebuild its aging air force and other military assets.
One senior congressional source involved in efforts to prevent these sales told the Free Beacon that the Obama administration is effectively helping Iran rebuild its war fleet with American-made planes.
“This is insane–an American company is rebuilding the Ayatollah’s Air Force right before our eyes,” the source said. “They’re not just selling aircraft either–they are cutting the Iranians into the production process, building supply lines within the Islamic Republic so the regime can insulate itself from any future attempts to impose sanctions. This is basically the equivalent of setting up a factory to build Sherman tanks in Munich in 1938.”
Sources told the Free Beacon that Boeing has been lobbying heavily on Capitol Hill to ensure these new deals with Iran are not blocked….
Robert “Bob” Creamer, one of the Democrat operatives caught on tape by Project Veritas orchestrating disruptions at Donald Trump rallies, has met with President Obama 47 times since he’s been in office, and visited the White House 342 times since 2009. Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.
BREAKING: DNC Caught Rigging Election Red Handed!
Rigging the Election – Video IV:
$20K Wire Transfer From Belize Returned
Published on Oct 26, 2016
This new video by Project Veritas and James Okeefe exposes massive fraud and corruption going on within the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democrat party as a whole.
In the effort to prove the credibility of the undercover donor featured in the videos and to keep the investigation going, Project Veritas Action made the decision to donate twenty thousand dollars to Robert Creamer’s effort. Project Veritas Action had determined that the benefit of this investigation outweighed the cost. And it did. In an unexpected twist, AUFC president Brad Woodhouse, the recipient of the $20,000, heard that Project Veritas Action was releasing undercover videos exposing AUFC’s activities. He told a journalist that AUFC was going to return the twenty thousand dollars. He said it was because they were concerned that it might have been an illegal foreign donation. Project Veritas Action was pleased but wondered why that hadn’t been a problem for the month that they had the money.
Just recently on Friday, October 21st at 2:30 pm false apostolic teacher C. Peter Wagner passed into eternity. One of Wagner’s best friends, “apostle” Chuck Pierce, confirmed Wagner’s death on his Facebook page Friday. In honor of Wagner’s death, longtime friend Ed Stetzer wrote an article at Christianity Today entitled “C. Peter Wagner (1930-2016), Some Thoughts on His Life and Passing” highlighting their friendship. While death can be a sad occasion for those here on earth as they face the lose a close friend, family member or leader. It is an even more woeful thought that the one who died, C. Peter Wagner, is spending eternity in hell. Even more disheartening is that a prominent face in evangelicalism, Ed Stetzer is leading many astray and right into the welcoming arms of the debaucherous neo-evangelical movement by honoring Wagner’s death. Stetzer is essentially aiding in leading people to the same false christ that Wagner worshiped by paying tribute to Wagner’s death. The death of Wagner should not be celebrated, but be used as a lesson to show where false teaching leads — to hell.
Is it harsh or judgmental to say that C. Peter Wagner has not passed into glory as Charisma News,and others would lead us to believe? No, it is not judgmental or insensitive to speak the truth. Many may criticize me or Pulpit & Pen for striking while the proverbial iron is still hot, but there is no better time in which to speak truth. Truth is not a respecter of time, emotions, people’s states of mind or what the public deems as proper etiquette. Truth only knows one thing–that it must be proclaimed. As Christians, apologists of the faith once delivered, and polemicists, we must be ready always to speak the truth; no matter the minute, the hour, or the day the truth must go forth. From where do we gather our truth? We receive our final authority, our truth, on all matters from the sufficiency of the closed canon of Scripture — God’s Word.
The biblical truth is that C. Peter Wagner is not in “Glory” today, unless he repented last moment of his false teachings and heresy, putting his faith in the Christ of the Bible and not the one of his choosing. Yes, that is correct. Wagner worshiped a different Jesus, not the one of the Bible. Wagner praised the “christ” of the NAR, the “christ” of extrabiblical revelation, the “christ” of modern day Montanism–a different “christ” altogether.
Wagner is often referred to as the grandfather of NAR movement. It was Wagner that invented the term “New Apostolic Reformation” and then charged himself as God’s appointed leader of this new extrabiblical organization. It is through Wagner and his promotion of the heresy of Modern Montanism that the Charismatic window of heresy was slid open, mainstreaming it into today’s neo-evangelical landscape. Wagner had far-reaching influence on outer fringe sub-Christian sects that support such false teachings Dominionism; The 7 Mountain Mandate; Third Wave Revivalism. Wagner’s teachings had power over groups like The Latter Rain Movement; Joel’s Army; IHOP; Bill Johnson’s Bethel Church, The Hillsong Media Empire. In Wagner’s later years he became the patriarch of the heretical Church Growth Movement. It is due in large part to Wagner that many of these outliers and skeptical groups are now part mainstream Christianity which form this quasi-evangelical movement we see today.
If you are reading this and happen to follow any of the teachers or listen to any of the teachings from these unorthodox groups, you need to repent of your sins against a holy thrice God and put your faith in the biblical Christ. As for those who claim the title of “Evangelical leadership” or to be a” missiologist” such as Ed Stetzer, you need to repent and stop promoting false teachers like C. Peter Wagner as a biblical viable Christian option to those in Christianity under your authority. It is these attempts to legitimatize heretics such as C. Peter Wagner that not only bring shame to the body of true believers but also will bring God’s holy wrath on those who promote them. For it is through the Gospel that God has provided a way of salvation for men. Through the gift of His son to the world, by repentance of sin and faith in the Christ of the Bible that one will enter into the Glorious eternity with the Father. It is not through the promotion of sub-Christian chicanery like that of the teachings of C. Peter Wager one enters eternity with a Holy and Righteous God.
C. Peter Wagner, one of the most influential leaders in the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR),died Friday at age 86. Many people who are part of the global NAR movement have been deeply influenced by Wagner without knowing it. In short, he did the heavy lifting theologically for the movement.
Wagner was a professor of church growth at Fuller Theological Seminary, where he taught for 30 years (1971 to 2001). He first coined the term “New Apostolic Reformation” to refer to the growing number of churches in the 1990s that started to accept the idea of present-day apostles. He wrote six books on the topic of apostles. He was the presiding leader over the International Coalition of Apostolic Leaders during its formative years, from 2001 to 2010.
Not all NAR leaders worked directly with Wagner or even agreed with all his teachings. Even so, there is significant overlap between the teachings of many NARleaders and those of Wagner. To understand NAR, one must understand Wagner’s views.
Though Wagner is gone, his influence on the NAR movement is lasting as the baton of NAR teachings is carried on by others, including Bill Johnson, senior pastor of Bethel Church in Redding, California., and Mike Bickle, founder of the International House of Prayer in Kansas City, Missouri. _________________________________________________________
“APOSTLE”C. PETER WAGNER DIES (Friday Church News Notes, November 4, 2016, www.wayoflife.org, fbns@wayoflife.org, 866-295-4143) – SEE: http://www.wayoflife.org/friday_church_news/17_44.php; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
C. Peter Wagner, a church growth guru who accepted the mantle of an apostle in the last decades of his life, passed away on October 21. Wagner was a missionary to Bolivia for 16 years and a professor at Fuller Theological Seminary from 1971-1999. While at Fuller, Wagner moved into the charismatic movement under the influence of John Wimber and became increasingly deceived to the end of his life. They jointly taught an influential course in the early 1980s called “Signs, Wonders and Church Growth,” promoting the use of “miracles” to make evangelism effectual. Wagner coined the term “Third Wave” to describe evangelicals who accept charismatic sign gifts and phenomena but do want to be known as charismatics. (The first wave was classical Pentecostalism, and the second was the charismatic movement.) Wagner said, “A key part of my own spiritual pilgrimage was my close friendship with John Wimber, which began in the mid-1970’s” (The Third Wave of the Holy Spirit, p. 27). He claimed that Bible-style prophesy was being restored. In a message at Indianapolis ’90, Wagner said, “In 1980, God began speaking to the churches about the resurgence of biblical prophecy. … I’m talking about Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Isaiah kind of prophecy, where God speaks to the churches. … all these signs, all that the Spirit is saying to the churches, are pointing to the great revival, the capital ‘R’ revival … children are prophesying, children are laying hands on the sick and they’re getting healed” (from notes taken at the conference by D. Cloud). Wagner claimed that he was healed of frequent headaches after John Wimber told him it was a “demon of headache” and that he had to “treat it like a cat on the back porch! yell at it and tell it to go away” (Ibid., p. 69). This is the type of nonsense that has so often passed for healing through all “waves” of Pentecostalism. Their sign gifts are nonexistent; their apostles are ridiculous; their tongues are gibberish; and their prophesies are a lie. In the 1990s, Wagner became a leader in the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR), believing that Christ’s return will be preceded by the restoration of apostles and a great revival of apostolic signs. The “prophetess” Cindy Jacobs proclaimed Wagner an apostle and said the Lord showed her that Wagner was “going to change the face of Christianity … like what Martin Luther did” (“Mobilizing the Prophetic Office,” National School of the Prophets, May 11, 2000). Wagner wrote many books on these subjects and had a vast heretical influence. We don’t know where Peter Wagner is today, but we do know that he now understands that he is no apostle. I heard Wagner, Wimber, and many other Pentecostal, charismatic, and “Third Wave” heretics speak at conferences in New Orleans ’87, Indianapolis ’90, St. Louis 2000, and elsewhere. For a report on these see Charismatic Confusion, available in print and as a free eBook from www.wayoflife.org. For an extensive report on John Wimber, see The Directory of Contemporary Worship Musicians, also available as a free eBook from Way of Life. And for much more on this subject see The Pentecostal Charismatic Movements, also available from Way of Life.
“It also seems that it is high time that the activists of the global ‘human rights community’ condemned or at least publicly discussed this ‘culture of hate’ in Muslim communities — and particularly the Christianophobia. But apparently because the victims are Christian, these ‘human rights activists’ could not care less.”
Indeed. And the Catholic Church, obsessed with a spurious and self-defeating “Muslim-Christian dialogue,” couldn’t care less about the plight of these Christians, either; in fact, the Catholic hierarchy actively moves to silence those Catholics who speak out about what is happening.
“Turkey Targets Christians,” by Robert Jones, Gatestone Institute, October 23, 2016:
American pastors in Turkey are being arrested hand over fist.
American Pastor Andrew Brunson, of the Resurrection Protestant Church, was arrested in Izmir (Smyrna)on October 7 alongside his wife, Norine Lyn Brunson, for “threatening the national security of Turkey.” Brunson is expected to be deported in 15 days. The couple is still being held in detention.
Turkish authorities also seized the residence permit of Ryan D. Keating, an American student pursuing a PhD in the philosophy of religion at Ankara University. Keating is a Christian who heads the Ankara Refugee Ministry for the Kurtulus Church. While he was leaving Turkey for work purposes, he was told at the airport that his residence permit in Turkey had been cancelled in September for “national security”, meaning that he will not be able to reenter the country. His wife and children are still in Ankara.
Yet another American Protestant pastor, Patrick Jansen, was not allowed to reenter Gaziantep, where he served. And still another American Protestant was ordered to leave Turkey upon landing at the airport.
They are not the first. In the last four years, more than 100 Christian pastors and other religious officials have been deported from Turkey — the visas of some of them were not renewed or were completely cancelled. They have been banned from reentering.
Pastor Brunson had also been exposed to an armed attack in front of the church in 2011, by a Turkish Muslim from the city of Manisa who shouted: “Al-Qaeda will bring you to account”, called members of the congregation “traitors” and threatened them with “bombing the church in Manisa.”
In the meantime, the Protestant Life Bridge Church, in the southern city of Antakya (Antioch), has been closed and sealed upon a complaint of the National Education Directorate and the order of the governor’s office for “giving education illegally.” The church, officials of which are also American citizens, was giving Bible lessons to its members.
The congregation has started looking for a new place to hold their Sunday services, the Turkish Christian news channel SAT-7 TURK reported on October 8.
The Protestant community in Turkey has been exposed to discrimination and persecution for a long time.
According to a global report by the organization Open Doors,
“Persecution of Christians is more than just physical violence. It is a complex, multifaceted phenomenon that involves many aspects such as various forms of cultural marginalization, government discrimination, hindrances on conversion, interferences on participation in public affairs and restrictions on church life.”
According to the 2015 Human Rights Violations Report by the Association of Protestant Churches, Protestants in Turkey are continually exposed to hate crimes, and physical and verbal assaults.
For example, on September 10, 2015, a man went to the Ankara Batıkent Bereket Church, shouted profanities and insults, and struck the church leader. Security forces arrived and took the man to the local police station, where he was released with no action taken.
The man threatened the church leader again, demanding he shut down the church. When the police were notified again, no one came. And when the pastor closed the church and went to the precinct to explain, again no official action was taken.
The Protestant community in Turkey is not recognized as a legal entity, and hence, has no legal right to organize in officially-recognized churches.
The Association of Protestant Churches reported:
The Protestant community has generally tried to solve this issue to setting up associations or becoming a representative of an already existing association. As of 2015, members of the Protestant community have 1 foundation, 35 church associations and 18 representative offices connected to these associations. This association forming process continues. Associations are not accepted as a “church” or a “place of worship.” The problem of a religious congregation becoming a legal entity has not been completely solved. The present legal path does not allow for a congregation to obtain a legal personality as a “congregation.” … Thus, small congregations continue to be helpless…
The Protestant Community does not have the right to share its religion freely or to train religious leaders.
Another source of discrimination against Christians in Turkey is the obligatory declaration of faith: “The section for religious affiliation on the identity cards forces people to declare their faith and increases the risk of facing discrimination in every arena of life,” according to the Association of Protestant Churches.
There are also problems in education and the compulsory “Religious Culture and Moral Knowledge” class, textbooks of which are dominated by the tenets of Islam and Islamic practices.
Currently, all school children in primary and secondary schools in Turkey must attend the class.
According to the 2015 report by the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, on the compulsory religious education in Turkey in textbooks, “The characterizations of both Jewish and Christian beliefs, sacred texts, and prophets are done through Islamic beliefs rather than through what Jews and Christians believe themselves.”
Teaching the Bible is considered “illegal” by the Turkish authorities, so what are Turkish children are taught about Christianity at school? A brief section in a Turkish textbook describes Christianity as follows:
“When Jesus reached 30 years of age, Allah gave him the duty of being a prophet. He then began inviting people to believe in Allah. At the start, only 12 people believed in his call. They are called the ‘disciples.’ The holy book of Christianity is Incil [the Gospels]. The four Incils written by and known with the names of their writers as Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are the most famous… Christians accept prophethood of other prophets besides Prophet Muhammad… Christians believe all human beings are born sinners, thus all children are washed with holy water to cleanse from their sins. This is called baptism.”
As the report of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom stresses, according to Christian theology, this description is completely false:
The view of Jesus as a prophet is not what Christians believe, but what Muslims believe. Similarly, the holy book of Christians is not only Incil, but the Kutsal Kitap or Kitabı Mukaddes, the Holy Bible, with the Old and New Testaments as the two main parts. Students are not told where the four Gospels, which are part of the New Testament, fit into the Christian Bible. The expression “the most famous” is also confusing, as they are the only ones in the canon of the New Testament; it most likely alludes to the idea that there were Gospels which prophesied Prophet Muhammad but were changed or destroyed by Christians. Similarly, it is not clear what the text means in describing Christians as believing in other prophets besides Muhammad. Also, there is no unanimity in Christianity on the baptism of children, or its meaning regarding salvation from sins.
“In principle, students can be exempted by a simple written request by their guardians to the school authorities, however, in practice this is not always adhered to,” added the report.
Religious minorities have reported that some schools refuse exemptions on the premise that there is no other class students can take, and they offer no similar alternative electives specific to the traditions of such children. Instead, religious minority students are faced with the option of taking the class or sitting alone somewhere else on the school premises during the classes, thus separating them from their peers and singling out their religious differences.
For school-age children, such experiences can be traumatic. Thus, many parents of religious minority children continue to let their children take compulsory religious education rather than putting them through such an ordeal at a young age.
The sources of Christian persecution in Turkey are “Islamic extremism and religious nationalism,” reported Open Doors. “Islam has become a key feature of Turkish nationalism. Pressure on believers from Muslim backgrounds is especially acute due to the Islamic social environment.”
“Christians still face many difficulties as they attempt to be accepted in their own society even though Turkey boasts as being the most pluralistic culture in the Middle East.
“The land of Asia Minor is the historical setting of the first expressions of the Christian faith, widely recorded throughout the New Testament. Today, this land continues to host some of the most ancient churches. However, the Christian presence has shrunk dramatically in the last century due to many adverse circumstances.
Today, only less than 0.2% of Turkey’s population is Christian. But even this tiny, dwindling minority is still routinely exposed to discrimination on many levels. The historical and current situation of Christians in Turkey and the wider region makes one wonder: Is there no end to Christian-hatred in the Muslim world?
Is there also no end to the Jew-hatred, Alevi-hatred, Yazidi-hatred, atheist-hatred and basically hatred of all non-Muslim groups? Is there no end to the bloodshed between the Sunni Muslims and Shia Muslims? It seems that Islamic jihad and Islamic supremacism has created a deeply anti-humanitarian culture in the Muslim world, which has caused the extermination or repression of millions of people.
It also seems that it is high time that the activists of the global “human rights community” condemned or at least publicly discussed this “culture of hate” in Muslim communities — and particularly the Christianophobia. But apparently because the victims are Christian, these “human rights activists” could not care less.
Whether the U.S. administration will speak out for the American Christians whose rights and religious liberty have been violated in Turkey remains to be seen.
CHICAGO – The largest Catholic university in the U.S. prevented an on-campus organization from displaying a pro-life poster, suggesting that the message was “provocative” and “hurtful.”
DePaul University is a private university in Chicago, founded in 1898. Although the university celebrates its “Catholic character” in its mission statement and seeks to foster the Catholic faith on campus, the school is being criticized for refusing to allow an organization to display a pro-life poster.
Earlier this month, the DePaul College Republicans requested permission to display on campus a poster bearing the phrase “Unborn Lives Matter.” Campus officials declined their request, saying the pro-life sign would have to be redesigned before it could be displayed.
The university’s president, Dennis Holtschneider, explained their reasoning in an online letter.
“DePaul is a private Catholic institution, and … we are committed to developing arguments and exploring important issues that can be steeped in controversy and, oftentimes, emotion,” he wrote. “Yet there will be times when some forms of speech challenge our grounding in Catholic and Vincentian values. When that happens, you will see us refuse to allow members of our community to be subjected to bigotry that occurs under the cover of free speech.”
Holtschneider then cited the College Republicans’ proposed poster, saying it was banned because the message “provokes the Black Lives Matter movement.” Therefore, unless the poster is redesigned, it will not be allowed on campus.
“Certainly, everyone is allowed to have their opinions on these topics,” he added. “I simply ask when you are expressing your opinion that you respect the difference between a reasoned discussion and words whose primary purpose is to wound.”
DePaul College Republicans said they were appalled by the university’s pronouncement.
“We, the DePaul College Republicans, are appalled by the university’s decision to censor pro-life messaging and give the Black Lives Matter movement some sort of protected status,” said Jorin Burkhart, an executive board member of the Republican club, in a statement to “The College Fix.”
Burkhart said the poster “was in no way meant to ‘mock’ BLM.”
“Frankly, DePaul University seems intent on trashing the very Catholic and American values it claims to be grounded in,” he said.
The Roman Catholic Church’s catechisms condemn abortion in no uncertain terms, describing it as a “moral evil” that is “gravely contrary to the moral law.” But the vice president of the DePaul College Republicans, John Minster, told “The Daily Wire” that the university “has shown its true colors” in disapproving their group’s message.
“Rather than standing up for the pro-life and free speech ethics this ‘Catholic’ University claims to uphold, administration has bent the knee to radical leftists, banning more speech despite the pro-life message,” Minster stated. “These habitual violations of students’ rights are why organizations like the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) have claimed DePaul University may be the worst school for free speech in the nation. Sadly, administration is proving FIRE correct.”
How awkward it will be when the Muslim refugee president throws the queer vice president off the top of a tall building. More from the authoritarian Leftist fantasy world that prevails on most American campuses today:
“Corcoran School of the Arts and Design Partners with Creative Time Summit,” by Willona M. Sloan, GW Today, October 17, 2016 (thanks to Campus Reform):
Just three weeks away from the end of one of the most contentious presidential campaigns in U.S. history, artists, activists and educators converged in Washington, D.C., to talk, listen and share ideas about how art can influence social justice. The gathering was the three-day conference Creative Time Summit: Occupy the Future.
The summit, which ended Sunday evening, featured more than 50 speakers addressing themes of democracy, social change and art. Speakers included Alicia Garza, organizer, writer and co-creator of #BlackLivesMatter; Hans Ulrich Obrist, artistic director of Serpentine Galleries; and Ian MacKaye, co-founder of Dischord Records and musician with bands including Fugazi and the Evens.
The final day of the summit was held at the Corcoran School of the Arts and Design at the George Washington University and featured breakout sessions that covered topics such as mural making, unionization in art schools, gender equality in the arts and building alliances in the undocumented youth movement. Carmen Montoya, assistant professor of sculpture, led a session called “Rethinking Democratic Decision-Making.”
Corcoran School Director Sanjit Sethi co-hosted Art School/Field School: Democratizing Arts Education through Locational and Community Practices with Richard Saxton, director of M12 Studio and associate professor at the University of Colorado, Boulder.
The round table discussion was designed to be a true conversation. “We want to extract knowledge and recognize the expertise in the room,” Mr. Sethi said.
There is no doubt that it was a “true conversation” in which only one perspective was allowed to be heard.
The summit’s closing event was the collective reading of the co-authored text “I want a president…“ in front of the White House on Sunday evening.
The original “I want a president…” text by artist and activist Zoe Leonard was created in 1992, listing demands for a new U.S. president. The new text was developed collectively through a series of community writing workshops that were co-organized by curators Natalie Campbell and Saisha Grayson and held at the Corcoran School, MLK Library, Bread for the City and other organizations in D.C. and New York City. Earlier this month, participants came to the Corcoran School for the final editing of the document that was to be performed.
Dozens of summit attendees came together to read both the 1992 and 2016 texts in unison, repeatedly for an hour. As tourists and passersby stopped to listen, they were encouraged to join the performance. The atmosphere was jovial as people joined their voices together and the reading created an inclusive space for an engaging conversation about our country’s future.
Here is one excerpt from the 2016 “I want a president…” text:
I want a Native American for president. I want a Muslim refugee for president, and I want a queer for vice president, and I want someone who walked hundreds of miles across a desert and swam across a river to be here….
It’s a common and recurring tendency among conservative Catholics to be complacent regarding the jihad threat because of a desire to see Muslims as allies in a culture war against all-encroaching and authoritarian secularism. This idea is based on ignorance of or indifference to the fact that, with its polygamy, divorce at a word, sexual slavery of Infidel women, allowance for wife-beating, tolerance for early abortion, and more, Islamic sexual morality is hardly akin to Catholic sexual morality. There is also a tendency, which is also found all over the West outside the Catholic Church, to assume that various concepts, and acts designed to express them, mean the same thing in an Islamic context that they do in a non-Muslim context. That false assumption is what we see here from Archbishop Chaput with regard to modesty.
Archbishop Chaput says: “The hijab and the burqa say two important things in a morally confused culture: ‘I’m not sexually available;’ and ‘I belong to a community different and separate from you and your obsessions.’” In reality, that is what a Western woman might be intending to convey, but in an Islamic context the message is slightly different, and that slight difference is all-important. Yes, the hijab and burqa certainly say, ‘I’m not sexually available” and “I belong to a community different and separate from you and your obsessions.” But there is more. The Qur’an says: “O Prophet, tell your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers to bring down over themselves of their outer garments. That is more suitable that they will be known and not be abused.” (33:59) This is the foundation of the prevailing assumption in Islamic culture that if a woman is raped or sexually abused, it is her fault for exciting men, who can’t be expected to control themselves. This is the assumption underlying honor killing, and the reason why it is so common in the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and other Muslim countries for women to be imprisoned after they were raped: the rape is their fault.
So the hijab and burqa are really saying: “I am assuming the responsibility — willingly or not — for the possibility that I might be raped or sexually abused.” It is a visible sign of the subjugation of women.
And that “willingly or not” clause is all-important as well. Archbishop Chaput says: “I admire the integrity of those Muslim women” who wear the hijab and the burqa. He assumes that they are wearing it freely, as they would be in the West. And to be sure, many Muslim women, especially in the West, are indeed wearing it of their own volition. What does Archbishop Chaput think of the integrity of Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it? How does he feel about the integrity of Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab? And of the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; and of Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; and of Amira Osman Hamid, who faces whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; and of the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; and of the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; and of the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paint balls because they weren’t wearing hijab; and of the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; and of the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; and of the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; and of the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; and of the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; and of the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; and of the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents, and all the other women and girls who have been killed or threatened, or who live in fear for daring not to wear the hijab?
What about their integrity? Those who taunt or brutalize hijab-wearing women are louts and creeps, and should be prosecuted if they commit any acts of violence. At the same time, the women who don’t wear hijab in Muslim countries are far more likely to be victims of violence than hijabis in the West. Who speaks for them?
And while Archbishop Chaput is admiring the integrity of Muslim women who wear the hijab and the burqa, has he considered the possibility that some of them face lives of misery and brutalization if they dare not to wear it, especially in light of the Qur’an’s mandate to beat women “from whom you fear disobedience” (4:34)?
The conservative Catholic complacency regarding Islam, and particularly Islamic morality, is based on ignorance, as you can see here from my debate with the Catholic apologist Peter Kreeft. It is compounded by the outright falsehoods that Pope Francis continues to spread, most notoriously his outrageously false claim that “authentic Islam and the proper reading of the Koran are opposed to every form of violence.” The Pope has created tremendous confusion among Roman Catholics who imbibe the prevailing idolatry of the papacy, treating every word from the Pope as a divine oracle and even reading out of the Church those who dare to stand up and say that he has said something false when he obviously has. Meanwhile, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops is increasingly authoritarian, ruthlessly suppressing any dissent from the Pope’s complacent and false claim that Islam is a religion of peace with a dispatch it has never shown in teaching or defending the actual tenets of the Catholic Faith. In pursuing this line, however, the papal idolators are digging themselves into a rather large hole, as they’re attaching the Church’s dogmatic and moral authority to a falsehood, which challenges any claim to such authority in the first place. In other words, if one cannot be a Catholic and believe that Islam is not a religion of peace, then Catholicism is false, and the Church not worth staying in anyway. Thus either the Church will reject this suicidal position, and do it soon, or else collapse upon its own self-contradiction.
“Leave them; they are blind guides. And if a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.” (Matthew 15:14)
“The message behind the burqa,” by Phil Lawler, Catholic Culture, October 20, 2016 (thanks to Judith):
In hisexcellent speech at Notre Dame(about which more anon), Archbishop Charles Chaput makes an interesting point about Muslim women who wear thehijaborburqa:
Some of my friends are annoyed by that kind of “in your face” Islam. But I understand it. Thehijaband theburqasay two important things in a morally confused culture: “I’m not sexually available;” and “I belong to a community different and separate from you and your obsessions.”
There are problems with Islam, especially in its more assertive forms, and the archbishop says as much in passing. But those two messages are messages that our culture needs to hear….
In Philadelphia I’m struck by how many women I now see on the street wearing the hijab or even the burqa. Some of my friends are annoyed by that kind of “in your face” Islam. But I understand it. The hijab and the burqa say two important things in a morally confused culture: “I’m not sexually available;” and “I belong to a community different and separate from you and your obsessions.”
I have a long list of concerns with the content of Islam. But I admire the integrity of those Muslim women. And we need to help Catholics recover their own sense of distinction from the surrounding secular meltdown. The Church and American democracy are very different kinds of societies with very different structures and goals. They can never be fully integrated without eviscerating the Christian faith. An appropriate “separateness” for Catholics is already there in the New Testament. We’ve too often ignored it because Western civilization has such deep Christian roots. But we need to reclaim it, starting now.
INCIRLIK AIR BASE, Turkey —An activist that often works to separate God from the military is seeking the punishment of an Air Force commander who responded to a recent interview question that Jesus is his guide and influences his decisions.
The Incirlik Air Base in Turkey published the interview last month on its website, which recently decided to feature new faces to the base as an introduction to others.
On Sept. 15, the focus was on U.S. Air Force Lt. Col. Michael Kersten, who serves with the 39th Medical Support Squadron. The unit provides “preventative and clinical health and wellness services for U.S. and coalition forces.”
“Is there a leader from your career that influenced you the most?” he was asked during the interview. “If so, who, and how did they affect the way you lead?”
“There’s no ONE in particular, Kersten responded. “As a Christian, my example is to be like Christ. He is my guide and affects all of my decisions. He teaches to do all things as unto the Lord and I believe this is synonymous with integrity first and excellence in all we do.”
But Mikey Weinstein of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) took issue with Kersten’s response and wrote to his superiors to demand that he be punished.
“[A] number of Turkish military personnel and related Turkish nationals, the majority of whom are practitioners of the Islamic faith, also assigned at Incirlik were, like their fellow American/USAF MRFF allies, extremely offended,” he wrote.
Weinstein asserted that Kersten had violated military rules with his reply, and said that it caused him to wonder if Kersten would be biased against those of other faiths.
“Lt. Col. Kersten willfully and definitively violated AFI 1-1 with his sectarian Christian proselytizing statement. He has proclaimed to the entire Incirlik Air Base community that ALL of his decisions are based upon his Christian faith,” he wrote. “Moreover, and perhaps even more outrageously, he claims that his exclusivist Christian faith is synonymous with two of the three Air Force official core values.”
“He has essentially stated that Christianity (or his particular interpretation/denomination of same) is the guiding policy of HIS command,” Weinstein said. “He has VERY publicly endorsed his singular view of Christian faith supremacy and it is not unreasonable or irrational to think that this widespread endorsement in an official Air Force internet publication could and/or would lead to preferential treatment of those subordinates who share his views.”
He therefore demanded that Kertsen be both rebuked and punished.
“MRFF demands that you (1) expeditiously and publicly rebuke Lt. Col. Kersten’s official statement—as contrasted with his private Christian faith belief which is not MRFF’s concern—(2) appropriately and visibly punish Lt. Col. Kersten for his unconstitutional and UCMJ-violating behavior; (3) apologize to your airmen and our Turkish allies, and; (4) reaffirm an inclusive 39th Air Base Wing command climate…” Weinstein wrote.
Col. John Walker soon replied, thanking Weinstein for his correspondence, but advising that the Air Force protects service members’ rights to practice their religion.
“The Air Force places the highest value on the rights of its personnel in matters of religion by its members,” he wrote. “Our Airmen are sworn to protect our rights and liberties as Americans, including the right of all Airmen to practice their religious faith of to practice no faith at all.”
Now, MRFF has submitted a second letter, expressing dissatisfaction with Walker’s response, which it characterized as a “signed glamour shot sent by a celebrity to everyone who writes to them.”
“Perhaps you misunderstood our position concerning Lt. Col. Kersten’s statements and our demand for appropriate and visible consequences,” Legal Affairs Coordinator Tobanna Barker wrote on Friday. “While Lt. Col. Kersten certainly has the right to share his religious beliefs, he is not entitled to publicly declare that all of his decisions are based his personal faith, rather than upon his oath of office and allegiance to the U.S. Constitution.”
Barker then threatened to take action if the organization’s demand was not satisfied.
“If you will not take appropriate action, we must take appropriate action on behalf of our clients,” she wrote. “Therefore, we must insist, sir, on a real response from you that states unambiguously whether you will take any action concerning our demand.”
The HMS Richmond has reported the Russian fleet is heading south towards the Dover strait while several NATO vessels are being deployed to keep the flotilla under surveillance. Meanwhile Vladimir Putin has recalled two corvettes from the Mediterranean to divide the Royal Navy’s response to his aircraft carrier provocatively sailing down the British coastline
WATCH OUT RUSSIANS!
A fire breathing HMS Dragon is coming to get you! State-of-the-art Royal Navy destroyer is on its way to make sure Putin’s attack fleet leave English Channel
HMS Dragon was seen leaving Portsmouth Harbour to keep an eye on the Russian vessels
The Admiral Kuznetsov passed the Dover Strait shortly before lunch on its way to attack jihadis in Syria
The powerful Russian fleet was ordered to travel though the English Channel’s shipping lanes in single file
The Royal Navy and Nato allies are keeping the Russian carrier fleet under close observation
Putin has recalled two corvettes from the Mediterranean to divide the Royal Navy’s response to his fleet
Russians have mocked Royal Navy as ‘weak’ and claimed Britain ‘overreacted’ by deploying warships
Royal Navy’s HMS Duncan (centre) is seen here observing a Russian Kirov Class Battle cruiser (left) and Russian aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov
The Type 45 HMS Dragon and a number of other Royal Navy ships are taking part in the man-marking exercise. Pictured, HMS Dragon (right) accompanying the Russian destroyer
The Admiral Kuznetsov, pictured, passed by the White Cliffs of Dover, left, shortly after 11am on its way to the Mediterranean
The Norwegian Air Force shadowed the Admiral Kuznetsov heading south earlier this week on their way to Syria
An armed guard stood by a pair of SU-33 fighters, equipped with air-to-air missiles on the carrier’s flight deck
The Russian fleet, including the guided missile battle cruiser Peter the Great, which passed by Dover earlier today
Among the Russian fleet which passed in single file was the destroyer the Vice-Admiral Kulakov
________________________________________________
Russian Battle Group Enters The Mediterranean/Humanity Under Globalist Attack
Published on Oct 21, 2016
The world moves closer and closer to world war 3 as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton continue to antagonize Vladimir Putin.
West Now At War With Russia: Top British General
Published on Oct 21, 2016
James Wesley Rawles talks with Alex Jones about how the West is positioning itself in a provocative manner to antagonize Russia.
Will Russia’s NATO Advance Mean War?
Published on Oct 22, 2016
In a hawkish article for CNN, Shirreff asserts that the west faces the biggest threat from Russia since the Cold War and that Vladmir Putin plans to “re-establish Russia’s status as one of the world’s great powers” by marching into the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.
Under Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, an attack on one NATO member country represents an attack on all member countries, meaning the United States would be at war with Russia if Russian troops set foot in Baltic countries.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and
research purposes:
Senior British army officer and former deputy supreme allied commander Europe Gen. Sir Richard Shirreff warns that NATO faces “nuclear war with Russia in Europe,” and that America is already technically at war with Russia.
In a hawkish article for CNN, Shirreff asserts that the west faces the biggest threat from Russia since the Cold War and that Vladmir Putin plans to “re-establish Russia’s status as one of the world’s great powers” by marching into the Baltic states of Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia.
Comparing the west’s policy towards Putin to the appeasement of Hitler, Shirreff claims that Moscow, “may have already lit the fuse that could lead to the unthinkable: nuclear war with Russia in Europe.”
Under Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, an attack on one NATO member country represents an attack on all member countries, meaning the United States would be at war with Russia if Russian troops set foot in Baltic countries.
“A Russian attack on the Baltic states puts America at war with Russia — meaning nuclear war, because Russia integrates nuclear weapons into every aspect of its military doctrine,” writes Shirreff.
He also states that “Russia is at war with America already,” recycling the claim, which remains unproven, that Russia is behind the email hacks that led to Wikileaks’ publicizing of Clinton campaign emails.
“And don’t think Russia would limit itself to the use of tactical nuclear weapons in Europe. Any form of nuclear release by the Russians would almost certainly precipitate nuclear retaliation by the United States, and the dreadful reality of mutually assured destruction and the end of life as we know it would follow,” adds Shirreff.
Shirreff’s article is timely given that a fleet of Russian warships passed through the English Channel earlier today, closely monitored by the Royal Navy.
As we reported earlier this week, Kremlin insider Sergei Markov warned that war between the United States and Russia could break out “even before the November elections in the U.S.,” urging citizens to stockpile food.
State-owned television stations are urging citizens to find out where their nearest nuclear bomb shelter is located, while 40 million Russians from all levels of the military and government took part in a massive emergency evacuation drill earlier this month.
“Millwee alleged that Clinton assaulted her in that tiny editing room, that he would come up behind her while she was sitting in a chair and rub her shoulders, moving his hands toward her breasts. When she asked him to stop after the first time, he laughed at her. The second and third time Clinton assaulted Millwee, he rubbed his genitalia against her until he climaxed, Millwee claimed.”
“Millwee alleged that after the third time Clinton assault her, he showed up at her apartment. She said he knocked on the door for about five minutes, but she refused to let him inside. She left her job at the station after Clinton showed up at her door.”
NEW ACCUSER STEPS FORWARD,
MAKES GRAPHIC NEW CLINTON CLAIM
The Conservative Tribune reports, In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News, a new accuser has come forth and detailed how former President Bill Clinton sexually assaulted her in the 1980s.
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | FOX 59 reported via Jim Hoft at the Gateway Pundit reports: The Delaware County Republican Party said vandals struck at their office last week. Someone threw two landscaping bricks through a window on Oct. 8. Signs for Donald Trump and Todd Young were hanging on the window at the time, according to the group’s Facebook page.
VIDEOS:
VANDALIZED EVERY PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN MUNCY, INDIANA
NRA Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer Wayne LaPierre looks at what eight years of a Barack Obama presidency has done to our once-great nation. And he warns what will happen if Hillary Clinton is elected. “She will launch an all-out war on the Second Amendment,” declares LaPierre. “There is no red line President Hillary Clinton will not cross when it comes to attacking your rights and forcibly taking your guns.”LaPierre states the only thing that can stop Clinton is the five million members of the National Rifle Association. History’s most committed, most elite defenders of freedom are the special forces that swing elections, he notes. The NRA chief calls for members to stand shoulder-to-shoulder on November 8 and fight for a shared dream that America can—and will—be great again.
Violence is one thing, and violence against innocent people is always to be condemned, but that doesn’t need a Miami Commission resolution. “Hate speech” is another matter altogether. It’s a subjective classification, and that’s why this is so dangerous. By “hate speech” Islamic groups, such as Nezar Hamze’s Hamas-linked Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), all too often mean any honest discussion of how Islamic jihadists use the texts and teachings of Islam to justify violence and hatred and supremacism. The Miami Commission doesn’t realize how it is being played: it is opening the door to criminalization of all criticism of Islam, as per Sharia blasphemy laws; and that would effectively shut down any opposition to the advancing jihad.
The Miami Commission also seems to have forgotten about the First Amendment, which protects speech that others may dislike or oppose. But the First Amendment will not defend itself against attacks, and under the guise of condemnations of “hate speech,” it is being effectively chipped away and reduced to empty words.
“Miami passes resolution condemning hate speech, violence against Muslims,” by Paradise Afshar, ABC Local 10 News, October 20, 2016:
MIAMI – Nezar Hamze stood in front of the Miami Commission last week, holding back tears before thanking officials for placing a resolution condemning hate speech and violence against Muslims on the agenda.
“Wanted to thank you for your courage commissioner,” Hamze, operations director with the Council of American-Islamic Relations, and Broward Sheriff’s Office deputy. “As a father I appreciate your courage. It’s hard raising children when politicians attack your faith and for you to have the courage, the political courage, which is often absent, is tremendous.”
On Oct. 13, the commission passed a resolution condemning hate speech and violence directed at Muslims. The item was intended to show “solidarity with Muslims and those targeted for their ethnicity, race, or religion.”
The item was sponsored by Vice Chair Ken Russell and passed unanimously by the commission.
Russell said there are thousands of Muslim residents in Miami who have “needed a voice to speak for them.”
“And it’s not about courage as a politician, it’s simply heartfelt empathy for someone’s freedom to express their religion and not be persecuted for it,” Russell said. “And to recognize it as a religion of love. Not to judge a group of people by the minority few within their population that commit bad crimes.”
There are about 27 Islamic centers in Miami-Dade County and about 60 in the tri-county area, with close to 120,000 to 140,000 Muslims living in the tri-county area, according to Wilfredo Ruiz, communications director with CAIR Florida.
Ruiz supported the item and spoke at the meeting, thanking the commission for the resolution during the meeting.
He said that there has been an increase in Islamophobia that has been “raised by some politicians on all levels, local, state and national levels.” Ruiz said there has been a 500 percent increase in hate crimes against Muslims in Florida in the past year.
“Resolutions like this really help foster a better environment, where the contributions of this many Muslims that have served and keep on serving our nation are protected, and we are embraced as another part of the American fabric,” Ruiz said.
Shabbir Motorwala, of the Council of South Florida Muslim Organizations, also spoke in its favor.
“It’s a very strong message the city will be sending to the people preaching about the hate, not against Muslims, but against anybody,” he said. “The Muslim community is really pleased with this resolution, and I hope this will send a strong message to hate-mongers around the country.”…
Muslim persecution of Christians is accelerating with ferocious and horrifying tenacity around the world — with a Muslim mob demanding the execution of a Christian teen accused of “insulting Islam” and Muslims threatening riots if Asia Bibi is released from prison being two recent manifestations of this terror.
In response to this Islamic barbarism against Christians, and our government’s and media’s shameful silence about it, the Glazov Gang is running one of its most popular episodes: a program joined by Louis Lionheart, a Christian preacher who engages in open-air debates, dialogues and evangelism on 3rd. Street Promenade in Santa Monica, California.
Louis came on the show to discuss Muslim Woman Attacks Christian Preacher, sharing the incident that occurred with him on 3rd St. when he dared to tell the truth about Mohammed and Aisha. (The video clip of the assault is played at the 4:25 mark of the program).
Don’t miss it!
And make sure to watch Shillman Fellow Raymond Ibrahim discuss Islamic Hate for the Christian Cross, unveiling what really lies behind Muslim hatred of the Crucifix: CLICK HERE.
Establishment Panics: Trump Refuses to Accept Rigged Election
Obama Says Trump is Dangerous For Talking About Rigged System
Published on Oct 22, 2016
During a speech to Hillary Clinton supporters, at which Hillary was not present, President Obama declared that GOP nominee Donald Trump is ‘dangerous’ for talking about a rigged political system.
Republican Presidential nominee Donald Trump told a rally in Newark, Ohio on Thursday “I will totally accept the results of this great and historic presidential election — if I win.” He continued, “Of course I would accept a clear election result, but I would also reserve my right to contest or file a legal challenge in the case of a questionable result.”
SHOCKING Report Documents Massive Election Theft by the Democrats
Published on Oct 21, 2016
In this special report Alex Jones breaks down the admitted plan to steal the election from Donald Trump.
JAMES O’KEEFE IN DANGER
Published on Oct 21, 2016
The leader of Project Veritas, James Okeefe has evidence so damning that his life may be in danger.
Project Veritas Under Attack…Developing
Published on Oct 21, 2016
The most recent story uncovered by Project Veritas and James Okeefe is so dangerous that it may be putting their lives in danger.
Brexit campaign leader Nigel Farage breaks down the dire importance of America’s upcoming presidential election, and warns that if the U.S. doesn’t act now we could be facing a collapse like we’ve never seen before.
Nigel Farage: Trump To Destroy Hillary in Final Debate
Published on Oct 19, 2016
Nigel Farage breaks down Donald Trumps plan for the final debate and predicts that Trump will deliver the, “knock out blow” to Hillary Clinton.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
NEW YORK —During Thursday night’s Al Smith charity dinner in New York City, which featured speeches from both presidential candidates, Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton told those gathered that she shares a belief with Roman Catholics that to “achieve salvation,” a person must have “both faith and good works.”
“I am not Catholic. I’m a Methodist. But one of the things we share is a belief that in order to achieve salvation, we need both faith and good works,” Clinton told those gathered.
She made her remarks while speaking about the legacy of the late Al Smith, a former Democratic governor of New York who was believed to be the nation’s first Roman Catholic nominee for president. He was defeated in the 1928 election by Republican Herbert Hoover after being opposed by some for his Catholicism.
“When I think about what Al Smith went through, it is important to just reflect how groundbreaking it was for him, a Catholic, to be my party’s nominee for president,” Clinton said.
“Don’t forget, school boards sent home letters with children saying that if Al Smith is elected president, you will not be allowed to have or read a Bible. Voters were told that he would annul Protestant marriages,” she continued. “And I saw a story recently that said people even claimed the Holland Tunnel was a secret passageway to connect Rome and America to help the pope rule our country.”
Clinton opined that such statements only cause division and hostility among the people.
“Those appeals to fear and division can cause us to treat each other as the other. Rhetoric like that makes it harder for us to see each other, to respect each other, to listen to each other, and certainly a lot harder to love our neighbor as ourselves,” she said. “I believe the way we treat other is the highest expression of faith and of service.”
The Democratic nominee then stated that while she is not Catholic herself, she shares the Roman Catholic belief “that in order to achieve salvation, we need both faith and good works.”
“And you certainly don’t need to be Catholic to be inspired by the humility and heart of the holy father, Pope Francis,” Clinton said, drawing applause. “Or to embrace his message about rejecting a mindset of hostility, his calls to reduce inequality, his warnings about climate change, [and] his appeal that we build bridges, not walls.”
While dissent from the view exists among Roman Catholics, some teach that both faith and works are needed for salvation. According to the Catechism of the Catholic Church, Article 2, paragraph 2010, “Since the initiative belongs to God in the order of grace, no one can merit the initial grace of forgiveness and justification, at the beginning of conversion. Moved by the Holy Spirit and by charity, we can then merit for ourselves and for others the graces needed for our sanctification, for the increase of grace and charity, and for the attainment of eternal life.”
It also repeats at paragraph 2027, “No one can merit the initial grace which is at the origin of conversion. Moved by the Holy Spirit, we can merit for ourselves and for others all the graces needed to attain eternal life, as well as necessary temporal goods.”
Christians, however, believe that one’s works are not a part of salvation, but rather the evidence of it.
Ephesians 2: 8-9 reads,”For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God, not of works, lest any man should boast.”
James 2:18 also states, “Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.”
The Al Smith dinner, hosted by the Archbishop of New York, is an annual gathering of elitists for Catholic charities supporting needy children held at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel in New York on the third Thursday of October. The event honors former New York Governor Al Smith, the first Catholic presidential candidate.
It is ceremonially the last event at which the two U.S. presidential candidates share a stage before the election. In the past, the event has been an occasion for American power brokers to rub elbows with their political pawns.
But this Election year being one of the strangest on record presented yet another opportunity for Donald Trump to hold no quarter.
Of course the media will spin this with the intent of containing Trump’s populist message while simultaneously falling on their own sword. Truth be told, this is only the beginning. Whatever the outcome of the Presidential election. The Clinton Crime family will ultimately have to answer to the veracity growing within the American consciousness.
It is well documented that in 1953, Nazi mind control experimentation under order by CIA Director Allen Dulles and headed by Sidney Gottlieb was integrated into the backrooms of CIA offices, College Psychiatric Departments, prisons and Mental Institutions. Following World War 2 after Operation Paperclip morphed into Operation Bluebird then into Operation Artichoke and Operation Midnight Climax finally becoming MK Ultra mind control as it is known today.
In 1953 the CIA research budget allotted roughly 10 million dollars to be dedicated to human experimentation involving hypnosis and amnesia, utilizing the effects of heroin, morphine, barbiturates, amphetamine, LSD, BZ, scopolamine, and other hallucination causing compounds.
In 1977, a FOIA request unearthed 20,000 documents related to MK Ultra after Frank Church and the Ford Administration began investigating the CIA in 1975.As the US Supreme Court later noted, MK ULTRA was: concerned with “the research and development of chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine operations to control human behavior.” The program consisted of some 149 sub projects which the Agency contracted out to various universities, research foundations, and similar institutions. At least 80 institutions and 185 private researchers participated. Because the Agency funded MK Ultra indirectly, many of the participating individuals were unaware that they were dealing with the Agency.
Fast forward to today. MK Ultra victims number in the tens of thousands. Hollywood culture celebrates MK Ultra as Illuminati symbolism, whether most people realize it or not. A dark web of sleeper assassins lie dormant due to ongoing MK Ultra experimentation. And sex slaves, their free will broken under extreme stress from MK Ultra experimentation, exist among the highest seats of power submitting to their handler’s bidding. That is why Cathy O’ Brien’s story, as inconceivable as it maybe to the average American, is important today.
As detestable as Trump’s indiscretions may appear to the average American through the lens of a monopolized and propagandized media that Goebbells would be proud of. Trump’s supposed war on women pales in comparison to the claims of rape, drug trafficking, and full blown racketeering made against the CIA backed Clinton crime family.
Conflicts of interests and blurry ethical lines mark nearly everything the Clintons have ever touched. The more that is known about Hillary’s e-mail scandal, the more obvious it becomes that corruption is something of a family trait. The dog-and-pony show which was sold to the American people as an investigation into Hillary’s e-mail may not have resulted in any real action against anyone of Team Clinton, but recently released transcripts of FBI interviews conducted during the investigation shed new light on just how deep the rabbit hole goes.
One transcript (though redacted in such a way as to leave more questions than answers) shows that Bryan Pagliano was not the only government employee moonlighting to work on Hillary’s unsecured, unauthorized, private e-mail server. A Secret Service agent assigned to protect former President Bill Clinton was also doing work on the server.
The agent (who’s name and dates of service on Bill’s security detail are redacted) told investigators that he worked on the server to provide “network assessments” and other troubleshooting tech support. He also told investigators that he performed similar work for the Clinton Foundation. The transcript says he “assisted the Clinton Foundation in a case related to theft of information on the Clinton Foundation Information systems.”
The transcript for the May 25, 2016 interview with the Secret Service agent says that he
was assigned to the protective detail of WILLIAM CLINTON from [redacted] to [redacted]. Because of [redacted] information technology (IT) skills, he was asked to do network assessments and troubleshoot IT issues at the Clinton Foundation. From [redacted] to [redacted] assisted the Clinton Foundation in a case related to the theft of information on the Clinton Foundation information systems.
That statement, of course, goes against the mantra of Team Clinton that they had no reason to be concerned about the security of Hillary’s server. If the systems at the Clinton Foundation had been breached, it is a short step to the breaching of the e-mail server housed in the Clinton bathroom. After all, hackers routinely penetrate one system to gain information related to other systems operated by the same people or organizations. Once hackers were able to access the Clinton Foundation’s systems, reaching out to Hillary’s private e-mail server would have been the obvious next step.
Of course, this all also supports a reasonable conclusion that there was no clear line of demarcation between the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton State Department or any other entity under the control of the Clintons. Bill and Hillary seem to be missing the basic decency to realize the impropriety of having government employees assigned to them also working for them in other (secret) ways.
Besides showing those blurry lines, the transcript makes it obvious that something is not quite right with the Secret Service agent’s statement. The transcript says the Secret Service agent
was contacted by JUSTIN COOPER in January 2011 to assist with the security of an email server at the Clinton residence in Chappaqua, New York. [redacted] did not physically or remotely access the server in the residence at Chappaqua. [redacted] was not aware of the hardware components of the server or software installed on the server. [redacted] conducted open source research relating to the security of email servers and contacted BRYAN PAGLIANO to recommend adding outbound IP filtering to the server. [redacted] received PAGLIANO’S name and contact information from COOPER. [redacted] was aware of no information pertaining to the email server located in Chappaqua.
Anyone with any understanding of computer problems and solutions sees that there is something wrong here. For the rest of you, perhaps it would be easier to spot by way of comparison. Let us imagine that this transcript was about a Secret Service agent performing automotive mechanical work for the Clinton Foundation’s cars. Then, in 2011 that agent is asked to do research for a problem with one of the Clinton’s personal cars. But — and here is where this begins to come loose — he doesn’t know what kind of car it is, what fuel (gas, diesel, electric) it uses, or how it is driven. He simply does research on how to improve the fuel efficiency of cars and then sends that information along to the guy who has actually seen the car. Make sense? I don’t think so either. Not only would such research be worthless, it is obvious that Pagliano could have easily done the same online search himself, since he had access to the server and could limit the search to the components and software actually being used.
Trying to make sense of almost anything the Clintons have been involved in is like trying to unscramble an egg. And in almost every case, the egg is rotten.
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:
By Frosty Wooldridge
October 21, 2016
NewsWithViews.com
If Hillary Clinton reaches the White House, you face a president who will fundamentally and drastically change America.
If she reaches the highest office in our land, it will give her mandates to increase Muslim refugee immigration. She will dissolve our borders by not enforcing our immigration laws in accordance with Barack Obama’s mandates for the past eight years. She will present amnesty for 20 to 30 million illegal aliens. She will increase America’s $19.5 trillion national debt to a point of financial collapse to pay for legal and illegal immigrants. She will continue free trade deficits that will create more foreign debt and loss of American jobs to China, India and Mexico. Worst of all, she will smash every American’s Second Amendment rights to own a weapon for self-defense.
First of all, she promises to import 110,000 Syrian Muslim refugees into America in 2017 to continue Obama’s Islamic immigration legacy. Vetting them to weed out terrorists must be the grandest and most profane farce in history. But we citizens will become the victims, i.e., 9/11, Boston Marathon, Orlando, San Bernardino, Fort Hood, Chattanooga, St. Cloud and more to come.
ABC anchor David Muir, Wednesday, September 14, 2016, reported that Barack Obama successfully imported 11,000 Syrian refugees into America this year. He expects to import a total of 110,000 in 2017 with Hillary's election to the White House.
This fact remains: you cannot 'vet' the mind of a Muslim. Such a mind feeds on the terrorist handbook: the Quran. That book compels its followers to "convert or kill all non-believers." That's the prime directive of Islam.
Once that ‘flow’ of refugees streams into our country, like Germany’s 1.5 million Syrian refugees, we face endless millions cultural conflicts, rapes and Islamic violence. Muslim immigrants destroy every country they inhabit! One look at Europe’s countries being invaded gives you our fate at Hillary’s hand. Muslims do not integrate or assimilate into any country:
"Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any faith, but to become dominant. The Qur’an should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” Omar Ahmed, director of Council on American Islamic Relations.
The more Muslims we import, the faster we face sociological disintegration of our laws, culture, language and ethos. We face parallel societies exploding all over America. If you think “Black Lives Matter” violence hits our cities today, just watch when Islam’s followers demonstrate and riot with “Muslim Lives Matter.” We face a sociological breakdown.
“Diversity within a nation destroys unity and leads to civil wars,” said social scientist Garret Hardin. “Immigration, a benefit during the youth of a nation, can act as a disease in its mature state. Too much internal diversity in large nations has led to violence and disintegration. We are now in the process of destabilizing our own country. The magic words of de-stabilizers are ‘diversity’ and ‘multiculturalism’.”
Hillary will follow Obama Immigration’s Policy Timeline Wrecking Ball: [YouTube Video Link]
As Hillary degrades our laws and enforcement, millions of refugees will line up on the Mexican border. Without borders, we become a “destination” not a country.
Unfortunately, the more Muslims we import, the more terror events. It's the nature of the religion. It's not going to change, because, as their numbers grow, so does their push for Sharia Law. There's no way to soften their prime directive: "Convert or kill all non-believers." One look at Europe shows you our future. Journalist Daniel Greenfield wrote, “When you turn on the evening news and see a running death toll, it’s happening more and more often. The new brand of Islamic terror only needs one thing… Muslims. Lone wolf terrorism operates off the existing Muslim population in a particular country. The bigger the Muslim population, the bigger the risk. The FBI or other law enforcement agencies cannot monitor even a fraction of the Islamic settler population sympathetic to terror. As the Muslim settler population in the country increases, the number of cases will grow.” (Source: Right Side News, Stop Lone Wolf Terrorism by Ending Muslim Immigration, August 2, 2016)
According to Dr. Steven Camarota, Center for Immigration Studies, in Washington, DC, www.cis.org, illegal alien flows average 500,000 annually since 2014, 2015 and in 2016. They bring their anchor babies that tap into our welfare systems at billions of dollars in costs, annually.
All of this immigration flow adds up to over 100,000,000 (million) immigrants, their children and chain-migrated relatives within 30 years. Look at what it will become in this short video:
Understand this reality: by importing millions of immigrants, we load up our country with unskilled labor, welfare and mouths to feed. We overshoot our water, food and resources. Essentially, we drive our country toward becoming a third world country—fighting for survival. They come here for a better life, but where do we go for a better life once our country cannot function?
With her mandate as president, she will attack our 2nd Amendment rights to own weapons for self-defense. Once the government takes our guns, it can dictate to us what we will do, how we will act and what we can say. We will deform from citizens to ‘subjects’ of the state. Hillary moves toward becoming a monarch by election.
All in all, Hillary Clinton will inject Islam’s terrorists into our communities. Their greater numbers will create horrific chaos across our nation. She will force us to pay for them even in the face of our $20 trillion debt that ultimately will collapse our system. She cannot and will not create jobs for millions of immigrants, but they will undercut our jobs for all our minorities, middle class and teens. She will force our educational systems into incompatible cultures, linguistic chaos and racial-ethnic tension that will grow with their sheer numbers.
Once she gets into the White House, you will be the recipient of a whirlwind of tragedies while she sits on her throne.
