DAILY CALLER: KHIZR KHAN WROTE EXTENSIVELY IN FAVOR OF SHARIA OVER U.S. CONSTITUTION~KHAN PULLS HIS LAW FIRM WEBSITE AFTER EXPLOITING HIS SON’S DEATH

A FAUX PATRIOTIC POSE & EXPLOITATION OF SON’S DEATH, AFTER WRITTEN CLAIMS THAT SHARIA LAW SHOULD HAVE PRECEDENCE OVER AMERICAN CONSTITUTION
36db70d1ae016430caf80a2f15083cac
BY BREITBART NEWS:
SEE: http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/08/02/daily-caller-khizr-khan-wrote-extensively-favor-sharia/; republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:

Khizr Khan wrote that any writings on judicial matters “must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”

Khizr Khan, the Muslim father of a slain American soldier, is an attorney who has previously written in a law journal about Islamic law. He specifically wrote about the purity of the Quran and the Sunnah over all other texts and interpretations.
Khan rose to fame after speaking at the Democratic National Convention Thursday and pulling out a pocket U.S. Constitution imploring if Donald Trump had even read it.
Khan wrote “Juristic Classification Of Islamic Law” in the Houston Journal of International Law in 1983. In it he breaks down different levels of Islamic law. Khan writes that the Quran and the Sunnah which were both directly created by the Muslim prophet Muhammad were the only sources in Muhammad’s lifetime that “were recognized as binding.”
“The Shari’ah-was completed during the lifetime of Prophet Muhammed, in the Quran and Sunnah. This brings up an important fact which is generally overlooked, that the invariable and basic rules of Islamic Law are only those prescribed in the Shari’ah (Quran and Sunnah), which are few and limited,” Khan continues to write. “All other juridical works which have been written during more than thirteen centuries are very rich and indispensable, but they must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”

Read the rest of the story here.
_______________________________________________________
SEE ALSO:
EXCERPT: “Notwithstanding his war-hero son’s genuinely patriotic example, Khizr M. Khan has published papers supporting the supremacy of Islamic law over “man-made” Western law — including the very Constitution he championed in his Democratic National Convention speech attacking GOP presidential nod Donald Trump.”

“In 1983, for example, Khan wrote a glowing review of a book compiled from a seminar held in Kuwait called “Human Rights In Islam” in which he singles out for praise the keynote address of fellow Pakistani Allah K. Brohi, a pro-jihad Islamic jurist who was one of the closest advisers to late Pakistani dictator Gen. Zia ul-Haq, the father of the Taliban movement.”
________________________________________________________
AND:

Khizr Khan specializes in visa programs accused of selling U.S. citizenship


Robert Spencer in FrontPage: Khizr Khan’s Saudi Ties

EXCERPTS:
“Intelius records that Khizr Khan has worked at Hogan Lovells Llp. According to the Washington Free Beacon, “Hogan Lovells LLP, another U.S. firm hired by the Saudis, isregistered to work for the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia through 2016, disclosures show. Robert Kyle, a lobbyist from the firm, has bundled $50,850 for Clinton’s campaign.”
The Free Beacon added that the Saudi government has “supplied the Clinton Foundation with millions. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has given between $10 and $25 million to the foundation while Friends of Saudi Arabia has contributed between $1 and $5 million.””

Roger Stone: Everything You Need to Know About Donald Trump and Khizr Khan

EXCERPTS:
“The military service of the Khans’ son does not give the Khans immunity from fact checking about statements they made in their partisan support of Hillary Clinton. Specifically: Mr. Khan asked about Mr. Trump’s “sacrifice” without posing a similar question about Secretary Hillary Clinton — where was HER sacrifice? Despite his reverence for the U.S. Constitution, Mr. Khan  has not questioned the constitutionality of the Iraq War — which Hillary supported and his son died in. By using Mr. Khan as surrogate, Hillary Clinton has attempted to hide behind her own abysmal record as both Secretary of State and a U.S. Senator.  Not only has Hillary Clinton not made the sacrifices that Mr. Khan has talked about, but she has actually profited from her public service. It’s shameful to Capt. Kahn’s memory.”
_______________________________________________________
KHIZR KHAN EXPLOITS HIS SON’S DEATH TO ATTACK TRUMP
republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes:



By Kelleigh Nelson
August 3, 2016
NewsWithViews.com



Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them. There are two forms:





Taqiyya - Saying something that isn't true as it relates to the Muslim identity.



Kitman - Lying by omission. An example would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if anyone kills "it shall be as if he had killed all mankind") while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate murder in undefined cases of "corruption" and "mischief."



Tawriya - Intentionally creating a false impression.



Muruna - 'Blending in' by setting aside some practices of Islam or Sharia in order to advance others.





Know When to Hold Them, Know When to Fold Them



I have been blessed to get inside the Trump Organization and speak to a great number of Trump’s people. I absolutely believe this man will do everything he can to straighten out our country and bring her back to a semblance of decency. I also love Mr. Trump, because I’ve done so much research on him. Having said that, he needs to know when to hold them, and know when to fold them, a la Kenny Rogers. He needs to know when to counterpunch and when to leave it alone. He should have told Mr. Khan, “I’m sorry your son died. I was against this middle east war, and had I been president, your son would still be alive today.”



The commie democrats and neo-con republicans don’t care about us or the Muslims infiltrating this country, they care only about power and money. The interests of the American citizens are not even in their scripted lies and propaganda to the American people! They don’t even mention it!



Hillary Hires Khan to Attack Trump



Khizr Khan caused a sensation the last night of the DNC convention when he and his wife took the stage (a stage with a wall around it), and challenged Donald J. Trump’s proposed ban on Muslim immigration. He even asked Mr. Trump if he had ever read the Constitution, and then stated that Mr. Trump had never sacrificed anything or anyone.



He said that Trump has a black soul. Well, Mr. Khan, Trump’s soul is probably the purest and most Godly soul we’ve seen in a Presidential candidate in decades. I wouldn’t even venture what kind of soul belongs to Hillary Clinton or Islamic terrorists. Actions speak so much louder than words, Mr. Khan!

Trump took sharp offense, saying that, "While I feel deeply for the loss of his son, Mr. Khan who has never met me, has no right to stand in front of millions of people and claim I have never read the Constitution, (which is false) and say many other inaccurate things."



In previous remarks, Trump has acknowledged the positive contributions of most Muslims, while focusing on the need to fight radical Islamic terror.



Of course Mr. Khan never made any mention of radical Islam or terrorists who for hundreds of years have attacked and brutally murdered innocent men, women and children and even animals. According to a recent Breitbart article, Khan claimed that terrorists have nothing to do with Islam. I have to wonder if Mr. Khan has ever read the Hadith or Quran.



He also falsely claimed that the Constitution does not allow a ban on Muslim immigration, and walls on our borders are unconstitutional.



The audience immediately reacted with applause. However, Khan apparently chose to disregard the American legal system which operates under the Constitution. The president actually does have the authority to implement such an immigration ban. Democrat Jimmy Carter used it when he banned Iranians from entering our country in 1980. (Not to mention Theodore Roosevelt and Dwight D. Eisenhower)



Title 8, Section 1182(f) specifically states:





Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.









The 1952 McCarren-Walter Act, motivated by concerns over communist subversion also allows for restrictions. This law was written by two Democrats and required immigrants to be of good moral character, to honor and uphold the principles of the Constitution, and to assimilate into American society. Only those who were willing to accept these conditions were allowed into the country.



Gold Star Mothers



Mrs. Khan, is a Gold Star mother, and as such she is off limits for any comments. I find it sad that after 12 years she couldn’t have said something about her son while she was on the stage with her husband. All Gold Star mothers are highly respected by veterans as well as they should be by all Americans.



Humayun S. M. Khan, posthumously awarded the Purple Heart and Bronze Star, was just 27 years old when he was killed in Operation Iraqi Freedom on June 8th, 2004 by a taxi car bomb that exploded in his base. According to the Department of Defense Captain Khan was an exemplary soldier, and served the US military with distinction. He saved the lives of those around him telling them to “hit the dirt” moving toward the speeding vehicle to intercept it.



Hillary on Sean Smith’s Mother, Patricia



When Hillary called Patricia Smith a liar after her speech at the RNC convention, where Mrs. Smith stated that Hillary lied to her, the media and DNC colluded to besmirch Mrs. Smith. She lost her son, Sean, because Hillary Clinton and the administration refused to send much needed help to Benghazi. It is just fine for the media to attack one mother who has lost a child because of the incompetence and disregard for human life of this administration and Hillary Clinton in particular. 

However, because Mr. Trump intimated that Mrs. Khan didn’t speak because she’s a good Muslim wife, his statement created a whirlwind of controversy, as though he’d attacked a Gold Star mother, which is not what he was doing or saying at all. He knows full well that in Islam, women are second-class citizens, and that is what he was referring to with only her husband speaking at the convention.



The double-standard is glaring and so very obvious. Hillary, whose negligence contributed to Sean Smith’s death, essentially called Patricia Smith a liar on national TV, and few in the media objected. Some, in fact, joined Clinton’s attack. And what was done to Sean Smith’s mother when she lost her son because of Hillary’s incompetence, is far worse than anything Mr. Trump has said. 

Just Who is Khizr Khan?




Breitbart’s article, “Clinton Cash: Khizr Khan’s Deep Legal, Financial Connections to Saudi Arabia, Hillary’s Clinton Foundation Tie Terror, Immigration, Email Scandals Together,” states that Khizr Khan has deep ties to the government of Saudi Arabia, and to international Islamist investors through his own law firm. His website was deleted because it clearly stated Khan has ties to controversial immigration programs that wealthy foreigners can use to essentially buy their way into the United States, and he has deep ties to the “Clinton Cash” narrative through the Clinton Foundation. One of his specific areas of practice, according to the deleted website, is “E2 Treaty Investors, EB5 Investments & Related Immigration Services.” He specializes in Visa programs accused of selling US citizenship.



Remember that Hillary Clinton has received $25 million plus from the Saudi’s through the Clinton Foundation.



Khan, according to Intelius as also reported by Walid Shoebat, used to work at the law firm Hogan Lovells, LLP, a major D.C. law firm that has been on retainer as the law firm representing the government of Saudi Arabia in the United States for years, which the Washington Free Beacon exposed weeks ago.



This same firm handles Hillary Clinton’s taxes and has since 2004, and is also connected to the email scandal. They think they’re fooling us…no way.




The article states that Khan is a promoter of Islamic Sharia Law in the U.S. He was a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (Islamic Sharia). Khan’s fascination with Islamic Sharia stems from his life in Saudi Arabia. During the eighties, Khan wrote a paper titled Juristic Classification of Islamic [Sharia] Law. In it he elucidated on the system of Sharia law expressing his reverence for “The Sunnah [the works of Muhammad] — authentic tradition of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him).”



According to Theodore Shoebat and Walid Shoebat, Mr. Khizr Khan is a promoter of Islamic sharia law and a co-founder of the Journal of Contemporary Issues in Muslim Law (sharia). In fact, in the past, Khirz Khan has shown "his appreciation for an icon of the Muslim Brotherhood" by the name of Said Ramadan, who "wrote material for the Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia, an organization that has been promoting Islamic revivalism and indoctrination to recruit young people in Malaysia to jihadism." Mr. Said Ramadan was the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood including Ahmad Bahefzallah, “the boss of Huma Abedin (Hillary Clinton's aide)."



Khizr Khan wrote that any writings on judicial matters “must always be subordinated to the Shari’ah and open to reconsideration by all Muslims.”



Should this connection give us pause? Absolutely, it should!!!!!!



Despite what David Barton or Khan may believe, Sharia Law and the Constitution are not compatible.



Conclusion



In an effort toward clarification, Donald Trump released a statement:





“Captain Humayun Khan was a hero to our country, and we should honor all who have made the ultimate sacrifice to keep our country safe. The real problems here are the radical Islamic terrorists who killed him, and the efforts of these radicals to enter our country to do us further harm. Given the state of the world today, we have to know everything about those looking to enter our country, and given the state of chaos in some of these countries, that is impossible.”



 Moreover, Trump reiterated that "Captain Khan, killed 12 years ago, was a hero, but this is about RADICAL ISLAMIC TERROR and the weakness of our 'leaders' to eradicate it!"



A Blue Star mother wrote a letter to Mr. Khan that was brutal in its response. Here is that letter, and it needs to be read by every American who loves freedom and liberty. Please let me know that you’ve read it!



Mr. Trump is again right, and righteous! He holds us all to a higher standard for the citizens of our country.



_________________________________________________________



TEXT OF LETTER REFERRED TO ABOVE:



"To the Muslim Gold Star father that spoke at the DNC…..I have some thoughts on your comments. I am a Blue Star mother. My deepest condolences on the loss of your son. No family should have to endure such a loss. That being said….while your son is a hero, you Sir, are NOT. My son has served three tours of combat in the countries you and your family came from. Iraq and Afghanistan were his introduction to adulthood and service to something bigger than our individual selves. He was blown up by an IED set by your countrymen. His Purple Heart is a testament to his love of America and our freedoms. I have suffered through his multiple combat tours in Iraq and Afghanistan….never knowing from moment to moment if he would return home in a flag draped coffin. It is torture when a mother wakes up to this day after day and sees the atrocities happening over there on the news and being helpless to change a thing. My comments to you will probably offend you. I do not apologize. These things need to be said. Unlike you, I could NEVER use my son’s death as a pawn piece in support of a woman that left “America’s treasure” (Hillarys words) to die unaided in Benghazi. The same woman that says vile things to her military details there to protect her. You, Sir, are supposed to be a witness to your son’s bravery and sacrifice. Instead you stood on a stage and promoted the woman that upholds the very people that killed your son. You became a political PAWN that promotes pandering to our enemy. You desecrated your son’s memory by your words. You did not utter one word of outrage at anyone but Donald Trump. Are you forgetting that Trump did not kill your son. He had nothing whatsoever to do with these wars. His memory should mean more to you than five minutes of fame on the stage of the party that voted to send your son to war. The same party that for eight years has denied and cheated our veterans out of their deserved medical care. Who for the last three years has cut our veterans pay. Of note…your wife stood SILENT. She stood with her head covered, never uttering a word about her loss. She submitted to you being her voice in front of the country. She abdicated her free voice to you…..as would any good Sharia wife and mother. Let me say, this was not lost on the other American military moms….myself included. Had it been my son being “used” as a political PROP, no one could have silenced me. I would be voicing my grief, my pride, my love of him to the world. A man cannot speak to a mothers loss. No man knows her heart at the loss of a child. She did her heroic son a disservice by her silence. She should have uncovered her head and her heart to be the American mother you claim. And last if all….you dared to flash your pocket Constitution and ask if Trump has read it. I dare to ask you, Sir….HAVE YOU READ IT? If you say yes, then I dare ask you HOW you could represent that party? HOW can you support this woman? How can you affiliate your family with a party and candidate that cannot even call the radicals that killed your son what they are? How can you support a current administration that diminishes your son’s death by denying he had an enemy? And if you have read our Constitution, how could you cover your soulmate in colorful submissive sheets and have the audacity to speak FOR her? Your son died for that Constitution you so carelessly waved around on national TV in support of the very party that exists to destroy it. As a soldier’s mother….NO ONE could ever speak for me. I find your outrage artificial. I find your party affiliation offensive. I find your wife’s silence atrocious and offensive. I find YOU a political FOOL. I find your son to have been your greatest accomplishment, and you, Sir, have dishonored him. I hope you memorize that pocket constitution so you will understand what it means to be a REAL American and hero. You are not one. You were USED. Your son WOULD NOT be proud of you. My only hope is that when MY son goes a fourth time to combat radical Islamic terrorist’s, ( and he WILL) he will know that his mother never stood submissively SILENT about an American hero. Yes, your son was a hero that could not be manipulated but, you, Sir, are a weak minded FOOL. I would love to hear your thoughts this morning about the 1500 American soldiers on the air base in Turkey being held as basic hostages as I type. Not a word from this president or party you adore…or the media that so thoroughly manipulated and used you and your wife. So…what say you Sir??? What will you say to a Blue and Gold Star family if these heroes die? In my opinion, you will say NOTHING."